How magnetic activity alters what we learn from stellar spectra
Abstract
Magnetic fields and stellar spots can alter the equivalent widths of absorption lines in stellar spectra, varying during the activity cycle. This also influences the information that we derive through spectroscopic analysis. In this study we analyse high-resolution spectra of 211 Sun-like stars observed at different phases of their activity cycles, in order to investigate how stellar activity affects the spectroscopic determination of stellar parameters and chemical abundances. We observe that equivalent widths of lines can increase as a function of the activity index log R during the stellar cycle, which also produces an artificial growth of the stellar microturbulence and a decrease in effective temperature and metallicity. This effect is visible for stars with activity indexes log R5.0 (i.e., younger than 4-5 Gyr) and it is more significant at higher activity levels. These results have fundamental implications on several topics in astrophysics that are discussed in the paper, including stellar nucleosynthesis, chemical tagging, the study of Galactic chemical evolution, chemically anomalous stars, the structure of the Milky Way disk, stellar formation rates, photoevaporation of circumstellar disks, and planet hunting.
1 Introduction
How does chromospheric activity affect the way we interpret stellar spectra? In recent years, both observational and theoretical studies have addressed this fundamental question for stellar astrophysics. The spectroscopic analysis of the Sun-like star HD 45184 performed by Flores et al. (2016) revealed that the Fe II lines at 4924 , 5018 , and 5169 , formed in the upper photosphere, have their equivalent widths (EWs) modulate over the stellar activity cycle. More recently, Galarza et al. (2019) showed that the EWs of iron lines in the spectra of the young (400 Myr) solar twin HD 59967 increase as a function of chromospheric activity along the stellar cycle. They also demonstrated that the EW variations occur for quantities which depend on the mean line-centre optical depth of formation (). The direct consequence of this effect is an increase in atmospheric microturbulence () inferred from the relation between derived Fe abundances and reduced EW, which is proportional to stellar activity level. This effect also drove an artificial decrease of the stellar metallicity ([Fe/H]) and effective temperature (Teff) as a function of chromospheric activity. No variations were observed for surface gravity (log g).
The results from Flores et al. (2016) and Galarza et al. (2019) confirm and conclusively demonstrate the hypothesis advanced by other observational studies, that elemental abundances in stellar spectra can correlate with stellar activity (e.g., Morel et al. 2003, 2004; Reddy & Lambert 2017; Baratella et al. 2020).
These observations are also supported by theoretical works showing that the presence of a magnetic field can affect spectral lines, both directly through the Zeeman effect and indirectly, due to the magnetically induced changes on the thermodynamical structure of the atmosphere (e.g., Borrero 2008; Fabbian et al. 2010, 2012; Moore et al. 2015; Shchukina & Trujillo Bueno 2015; Shchukina et al. 2016). Since the strength of magnetic fields in the stellar atmosphere changes following the activity cycle (Babcock, 1959), this could explain the observed EW modulation as a function of the activity level. Finally, also the fraction of stellar surface covered by cool spots changes during the activity cycle (Schwabe, 1844), which may play a role in varying the EWs, especially those from lines with low excitation potentials.
In spite of that, magnetic fields and cool starspots are usually neglected in the analysis of stellar spectra, on the unproven assumption that their effects are of secondary importance compared to other sources of uncertainty. Therefore, studying the effects of magnetic activity on stellar spectra is clearly an important new step forward in the progress of techniques for spectroscopic analysis.
With the present study we aim at extending the experiment performed on a single star by Galarza et al. (2019) to 211 Sun-like stars observed 21,897 times by the high-resolution spectrograph HARPS at different phases along their activity cycle (see Section 2 for a detailed discussion on the spectroscopic analysis). Our final goal is to establish - over a large sample of stars covering a wide range of activity levels - how chromospheric activity can indirectly affect the absorption lines of stellar spectra and the information that we infer from spectroscopic analyses (see Section 3). Our results have fundamental implications for several topics in astrophysics that are discussed in Section 4 and include stellar nucleosynthesis, chemical tagging, the study of Galactic chemical evolution, chemically anomalous stars, the structure of the Milky Way disk, stellar formation rates, photoevaporation of circumstellar disks, and planet hunting. Finally, in Section 5 we summarise the outcomes of this experiment and we draw our conclusions.
2 Spectroscopic analysis
Our experiment is carried out over a sample of stellar spectra collected by the HARPS spectrograph (Mayor et al., 2003) and stored in the ESO Archive. The HARPS spectrograph is installed on the 3.6 m telescope at the ESO La Silla Observatory (Chile) and delivers a resolving power of 115,000 over the 383 - 690 nm wavelength range. The stars and spectra employed in our analysis are selected through the following criteria.
-
•
We select the stars observed by HARPS with parameters falling within the following intervals: T[5500, 6100] K, log g[4.0, 4.8] dex, and [Fe/H][-0.3, 0.3] dex. The stellar parameters are obtained by Casali et al. (submitted) through the analysis of the co-added HARPS spectrum of each target using the line-by-line differential technique relative to the Solar spectrum. This technique has been developed (e.g.,Langer et al. 1998; Gratton et al. 2001; Laws & Gonzalez 2001; Meléndez et al. 2009) to obtain precise differential abundances of similar stars, such as binary stars with similar components (e.g. Desidera et al. 2004; Ramírez et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2014; Biazzo et al. 2015; Teske et al. 2016; Nagar et al. 2019) and solar twin stars (e.g., Ramírez et al. 2009; Bedell et al. 2014; Nissen 2015; Spina et al. 2018a).
-
•
Stars with at least 10 HARPS spectra available from the ESO public archive with signal-to-noise ratio S/N 100 pixel-1 and acquired at airmass 1.6.
-
•
Stars with an intrinsic variation of chromospheric activity of log R 0.015 dex measured over the HARPS spectra111The log R index measures the stellar chromospheric flux emission from the photospheric emission in the core of Ca H and K lines (Noyes et al., 1984).. The log R values are obtained through Eq. 6, 7, and 8 in Lorenzo-Oliveira et al. (2018) and the measure on each exposure of the Ca II HK activity indices SHK are performed according to the methods of Lovis et al. (2011).
Our final sample includes 211 stars observed by HARPS 21,897 times in total. In Table 1 we list the ID of each spectrum, the corresponding star, the ESO project ID, the S/N measured on the 65th spectral order, the airmass, exposure time and the barycentric Julian date (BJD) of the observation. Before the analysis, all spectra are normalised and Doppler-shifted using IRAF’s continuum and dopcor tasks.
For the spectroscopic analysis, we employed a line list consisting of 78 Fe I lines, 17 Fe II lines and 146 lines of other elements (i.e., C, Na, Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Y, Zr, and Ba). The wavelengths, species and excitation potentials of the atomic transitions employed in our study are reported in Table 2. The last columns of the Table lists the EWs measured in the Solar spectrum by Casali et al. (submitted). This line list is based on the list employed in Meléndez et al. (2014), that was assembled specifically for the analysis of solar twin stars by selecting preferentially unsaturated lines with minimal blending in the Solar spectrum. Equivalent widths of the atomic transitions listed in Meléndez et al. (2014) are measured with Stellar diff222Stellar diff is Python code publicly available at https://github.com/andycasey/stellardiff.. This code allows the user to select one or more spectral windows for the continuum setting devoid of absorption features around each line of interest. We employ the same window settings to calculate continuum levels and fit the lines of interest with Gaussian profiles in all the exposures and the co-added spectrum of each star. The EW measurements are used by the qoyllur-quipu (q2) code (Ramírez et al., 2014) to determine the stellar parameters and chemical abundances for each exposure through the line-by-line differential analysis, using the co-added spectrum as a reference. The log R indexes, EWs, atmospheric parameters and differential abundances determined for each single exposure from our analysis are listed in Tables 3, 4, and 5. Note that the differential abundances reported in these tables are not relative to the Sun, but relative the co-added spectrum of the corresponding star.
Spectrum ID | Star | Project ID | S/N | Airmass | Exptime | BJD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[pxl-1] | [s] | |||||
HARPS.2005-04-20T08:37:39.998 | Cen A | 075.D-0800(A) | 397 | 1.40 | 3 | 2453480.86322119 |
HARPS.2005-04-20T09:29:10.270 | Cen A | 075.D-0800(A) | 258 | 1.56 | 3 | 2453480.89899796 |
HARPS.2005-04-19T03:21:40.666 | Cen A | 075.D-0800(A) | 370 | 1.28 | 5 | 2453479.64375465 |
HARPS.2005-04-23T07:46:50.894 | Cen A | 075.D-0800(A) | 339 | 1.31 | 2 | 2453483.82803507 |
HARPS.2005-04-21T03:57:14.304 | Cen A | 075.D-0800(A) | 385 | 1.22 | 4 | 2453481.66851639 |
… | … | … | … | … | … | … |
Wavelength | Specie | EWSun | |
---|---|---|---|
[eV] | |||
4365.896 | Fe I | 2.990 | 51.1 |
4445.471 | Fe I | 0.087 | 40.5 |
4602.001 | Fe I | 1.608 | 71.7 |
4779.439 | Fe I | 3.415 | 40.5 |
4788.757 | Fe I | 3.237 | 65.7 |
… | … | … |
Spectrum ID | Star | log R | 4365.9 | err 4365.9 | 4445.5 | err 4445.5 | 4602.0 | err 4602.0 | … |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[dex] | [m] | [m] | [m] | [m] | [m] | [m] | … | ||
HARPS.2005-04-20T08:37:39.998 | Cen A | 5.154 | 59.18 | 0.17 | 49.14 | 0.20 | 81.03 | 0.17 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-20T09:29:10.270 | Cen A | 5.160 | 59.31 | 0.17 | 49.29 | 0.22 | 80.12 | 0.17 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-19T03:21:40.666 | Cen A | 5.146 | 59.20 | 0.20 | 48.96 | 0.22 | 79.66 | 0.16 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-23T07:46:50.894 | Cen A | 5.151 | 59.70 | 0.20 | 49.94 | 0.24 | 80.57 | 0.20 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-21T03:57:14.304 | Cen A | 5.148 | 59.37 | 0.20 | 49.09 | 0.20 | 80.48 | 0.17 | … |
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
Spectrum ID | Star | log R | Teff | err Teff | log g | err log g | [Fe/H] | err [Fe/H] | err | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[dex] | [K] | [K] | [dex] | [dex] | [dex] | [dex] | [km s-1] | [km s-1] | ||
HARPS.2005-04-20T08:37:39.998 | Cen A | 5.154 | 5815 | 5 | 4.306 | 0.012 | 0.223 | 0.004 | 1.11 | 0.01 |
HARPS.2005-04-20T09:29:10.270 | Cen A | 5.160 | 5817 | 5 | 4.316 | 0.013 | 0.222 | 0.004 | 1.11 | 0.01 |
HARPS.2005-04-19T03:21:40.666 | Cen A | 5.146 | 5811 | 5 | 4.306 | 0.011 | 0.221 | 0.004 | 1.10 | 0.01 |
HARPS.2005-04-23T07:46:50.894 | Cen A | 5.151 | 5808 | 5 | 4.286 | 0.012 | 0.228 | 0.004 | 1.08 | 0.01 |
HARPS.2005-04-21T03:57:14.304 | Cen A | 5.148 | 5807 | 4 | 4.301 | 0.010 | 0.217 | 0.004 | 1.11 | 0.01 |
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
Spectrum ID | Star | log R | [C I/H] | err [C I/H] | [Na I/H] | err [Na I/H] | … |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[dex] | [dex] | [dex] | [dex] | [dex] | … | ||
HARPS.2005-04-20T08:37:39.998 | Cen A | 5.154 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.008 | 0.009 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-20T09:29:10.270 | Cen A | 5.160 | 0.015 | 0.007 | 0.02 | 0.02 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-19T03:21:40.666 | Cen A | 5.146 | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.007 | 0.007 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-23T07:46:50.894 | Cen A | 5.151 | 0.019 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | … |
HARPS.2005-04-21T03:57:14.304 | Cen A | 5.148 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.002 | 0.011 | … |
… | … | … | … | … | … | … | … |
-
•
Note. The differential abundances reported in this table are relative to the co-added spectrum of the corresponding star.
3 Results
In this Section we present our results and discuss how stellar activity affects the spectroscopic determination of atmospheric parameters and chemical abundances.
3.1 Stellar activity and equivalent widths
The study by Galarza et al. (2019) on the solar twin HD 59967 revealed that the EWs of iron lines can vary along the stellar activity cycle of quantities that depend on the mean line-centre optical depth . Namely, lines with log -1 do not show any significant variation along the cycle, but those that form in the external layers of the photosphere have EW values that change with chromospheric activity along the stellar cycle. This effect is also shown in Fig. 1-top where we plot the EW measurements of the Ba II line 5853 measured from the HD 59967 spectra at different phases of its activity cycle: at higher activity levels, the EW is clearly higher.
We perform a linear fit of the EWs-log R relation for this and other atomic lines in the HD 59967 spectra. The resulting slopes are plotted in Fig. 1-middle as a function of EW, the median EW of the line over all exposures. The EW value can be used as a proxy of the line optical depth , as stronger lines form higher above the optical surface of the stellar atmosphere (Gray, 1992). The red squares in Fig. 1-middle panel and the relative error bars represent the binned averaged slope values and standard deviations calculated at different EW intervals. From the plot we observe that lines with EW50 m have slopes that are typically positive, indicating that their EWs increase with the activity index. All the other lines have slopes that are typically consistent with zero, meaning that their EWs have not varied significantly during the stellar cycle.
These trends are likely caused by stellar magnetic fields and cool spots affecting the formation of absorption lines observed in stellar spectra. Magnetic fields can affect spectral lines both directly, through the Zeeman effect, and indirectly, due to magnetically induced changes the temperature and density of the atmospheric plasma in the line formation region. In the spectrum of a star permeated by magnetic fields of some 10mT or more, the Zeeman pattern of many absorption lines is considerably wider than the thermal Doppler profile resulting in artificially larger EWs (Babcock, 1949). The magnitude of magnetic intensification of the line depends on the strength of the magnetic field and on the of the single line: absorption features that form near the top of the stellar photosphere, where magnetic fields are stronger, undergo a stronger magnetic intensification than lines that form in lower layers. Following the study of Babcock (1949) on magnetic intensification of stellar absorption lines, many theorists have suggested the presence of magnetic fields to explain the observed phenomenologies of pre-main-sequence stars, such as chemical anomalies or the lithium spread in young clusters (e.g., Uchida & Shibata 1984; Leone & Catanzaro 2004; Leone 2007; Oksala et al. 2018).
On the other hand, the indirect effects of magnetic fields arise from the fact that stellar photospheres become more transparent near magnetic concentrations due to the lower density of the plasma. This allows one to probe into deeper and hotter layers of the stellar atmosphere. The hotter temperatures that the radiation “feels” in these regions weakens the absorption lines with higher potential energy (Fabbian et al., 2012). Since we do not observe weakening of lines as a function of the activity index, we consider that the magnetic intensification predicted by Babcock (1949) is a more likely explanation for the EW modulation than other indirect effects caused by magnetic fields. However, it is also possible that indirect effects due to the presence of strong magnetic fields in the vicinity of stellar spots and plage regions, have also affected the absorption lines creating a certain degree of scatter in the EW measurements, probably further modulated by the rotation of the star.
Finally, the same EW modulation can also be explained by the variation of the stellar surface covered by cold spots along the activity cycle. In fact, cold stellar spots can make the stellar photosphere appear cooler, increasing the EW of lines with low energy potential (Gray, 1992). Unfortunately, lines with low energy potentials tend to form at smaller , which means it is impossible to clearly determine if the main cause of the EW variation is the Zeeman broadening, cool stellar spots or a combination of the two. It is also possible that the relative importance of the direct and indirect effects of magnetic fields and stellar spots changes as the star ages, due to the drastic variation of spot filling factors, number of faculae, and strength of magnetic fields that stars undergo across the pre-main-sequence and early stages of the main sequence phases.


Our analysis confirms the conclusions given by Flores et al. (2016) and Galarza et al. (2019) for the solar twins HD59967 and HD45184, respectively. However, the goal of this paper is to pass from the analysis of single objects to the study of a larger number of stars of different ages and typical activity levels. To do so, we first perform a linear fit of the relation between the EW-log R slopes and EW for all the absorption features with EW50 m. The resulting linear function is represented in Fig. 1-middle as a red solid line. The slope of this linear function is another important parameter that hereafter we call . Similarly, we calculate for all the other stars in our sample. In Fig. 1-bottom we plot values along with their uncertainties as a function of log R for all stars in our sample, where log R is the median of the activity indexes measured at all epochs. The red squares represent the binned-averaged values and their standard deviations. The plot shows that the variation on EW during the activity cycle becomes significant for log R5.0 dex. Accordingly to the age-log R relation calibrated by Lorenzo-Oliveira et al. (2018) on solar twin stars, stars with log R5.0 dex are typically younger than 5 Gyr. The sensitivity of the EWs to the variation of chromospheric activity during the stellar cycle increases with the median stellar activity and, consequently, it is more significant for younger stars.
Another interesting outcome of this analysis is that the indirect effects of magnetic fields on stellar spectra are negligible in relation to the Zeeman broadening of atomic lines or the effect of cool stellar spots. This is a general behaviour of all the most active stars in our sample, regardless of other possible key factors, such as the morphology of magnetic fields, that can vary from star to star and that could determine the magnitude by which magnetic fields influence stellar spectra (Moore et al., 2015; Shchukina & Trujillo Bueno, 2015).
Finally, we test whether Voigt profiles measure changes in EWs along the stellar cycle that are different than those obtained with Gaussian profiles. In Fig. 2 we show the EWs of the Ba II line at 5853 measured with Voigt profiles in HD59967 spectra as a function of log R. These EWs are typically 8 m larger than those obtained with Gaussians (i.e., see Fig 1-top), because a Voigt profile can better capture the damping wings of stronger lines. However, the EW variation as a function of log R traced by Voigt profile is marginally consistent with that observed with Gaussians: while the first gave a EW-log R slope equal to 335 m, the use of Gaussians produced a slope of 434 m.
3.2 Stellar activity and stellar parameters
In Section 3.1 we have shown that the modulation in chromospheric activity during the stellar cycle can modify the EW of absorption features of a multiplicative factor that depends on EW. Stars with typical log R5.0 dex are affected by this phenomenon.
As a consequence, the stellar parameters inferred from the simultaneous search for three spectroscopic equilibria of iron lines (i.e., excitation equilibrium, ionization balance, and the relation between log NFeI and the reduced equivalent width EW/) can also be indirectly influenced by the stellar chromospheric activity. This is clearly visible in the four panels of Fig. 3. Each panel shows the sensitivity of the four atmospheric parameters (Teff, log g, [Fe/H], and ) to the variation in chromospheric activity. For example, Teff/log R as a function of log R for all stars in our sample. A negative Teff/log R means that the Teff value determined though our analysis for a particular star decreases as a function of chromospheric activity during the stellar cycle, while a Teff/log R consistent with zero indicates that the Teff value has not changed during the stellar cycle.
As shown before, chromospheric activity can induce an increment of lines with typically large EWs. Therefore, higher values are required to balance the relation between abundances and EW/. The effect becomes more prominent at larger log R. This explains why /log R increases with log R, as observed in the lower-right panel of Fig. 3. An increase of delays the saturation of the curve of growth of each absorption line and, as a consequence, decreases the inferred abundance of the corresponding element (Gray, 1992). This effect is clearly visible in the lower-left panel of Fig. 3, where [Fe/H]/log R decreases with the increase of the stellar log R. The effect described in Section 3.1 also impacts the spectroscopic determination of Teff (see upper-left panel of Fig. 3), but it does not significantly affect log g (see upper-right panel of Fig. 3).
A detailed inspection of Fig. 3 can provide insights on how the chromospheric activity of stars affects our ability to infer Teff, [Fe/H], and from stellar spectra. With this aim, we simultaneously model the Pi/log R - log R relations for the ith atmospheric parameters Pi through Markov-chain Monte Carlo simulations. For the procedure we adopt a model that switches between a null dependence from stellar activity at low log R values to a linear dependence Pi/log R from stellar activity at high log R values. The model is described as it follows:
(1) |
where xj is the log R value of the jth star and is the switchpoint of the ith parameter. The model assumes priors for ai and i that are Normal distributions (,), where is the mean and the standard deviation. Namely, the priors for a, a[Fe/H], and aξ are (5103 K, 10103 K), (0.0 dex, 3 dex), and (1 km s-1, 5 km s-1), respectively. The prior for is (5 dex, 1 dex). We also assume that data points have Gaussian uncertainties of variance s + , where sij is the uncertainty in Pi/log R for the j-star and is a parameter that accounts for the possibility that sij are underestimated and that HARPS observations have not homogeneously sampled the entire stellar cycles. The priors for is a half Cauchy function with parameter equal to 10 K, 1 dex, and 10 km s-1 for Teff, [Fe/H] and respectively. We ran the simulation with 10,000 sample, half of which are used for burn-in, and employing the No-U-Turn Sampler (Hoffman & Gelman, 2011). The script was written in Python using the pymc3 package (Salvatier et al., 2016).
The convergence of the simulations have been checked by inspecting the traces for each parameter and their autocorrelation plots. The 90 confidence intervals of the posteriors are listed in Table 6: they are well within the ranges allowed by the priors. The 90 confidence intervals of the models resulting from the inference are represented in Fig. 3 as blue areas.
Parameter | a | ||
---|---|---|---|
[5, 50, 95] | [5, 50, 95] | [5, 50, 95] | |
Teff [K] | 5056, 3510, 2109 | 4.58, 4.53, 4.48 | 40.4, 47.5, 55.0 |
Fe/H [dex] | 0.221, 0.172, 0.123 | 5.23, 5.15, 5.07 | 0.024, 0.029, 0.034 |
[km s-1] | 1.02, 1.30, 1.61 | 5.10, 5.05, 4.98 | 0.082, 0.100, 0.118 |
In our model, the spectroscopic determination of the Pi parameter is influenced by activity cycle only if the star has a log R . The switchpoint inferred for Teff occurs with the highest probability at 4.5 dex, which corresponds to solar twins of 1 Gyr (Lorenzo-Oliveira et al., 2018). While the switchpoint inferred for [Fe/H] and happens at 5.0, meaning that the determination of these parameters of solar twins younger than 4-5 Gyr is possibly affected by magnetic fields or stellar spots. However, it must be noted that these results are heavily dependent on the master list of absorption features employed in the spectroscopic analysis. In fact, a reduced use of absorption lines with EW50 m in the spectroscopic analysis would mitigate the impact of magnetic fields or spots on the determination of stellar parameters. However, in this case it would be more difficult to probe microturbulence due to a lack of strong lines.

Finally, we can predict how a star identical to the Sun (i.e., Teff=5770 K, [Fe/H]=0.0 dex, =1.0 km s-1) would look as a function of its chromospheric activity if analysed with the same linelist employed in this study. To do so, we assume that the variation of the ith parameter for the jth star Pij is equal to zero if the stellar activity index is smaller than the switchpoint (i.e., xj), while for larger activity indexes it is equal to the integral of Eq. 1. Our model also includes a second term that depends on and that accounts for the possibility that the measured uncertainty Pi/log R is underestimated. Therefore:
(2) |
The Pi probability distribution at each log R has been inferred from the ai, , and posteriors resulting from the MCMC simulation. In Fig. 4 we show the 90 confidence intervals of these distributions. The blue areas highlight the range in log R values covered by our dataset, while the red areas are an extrapolation at larger activity indexes of the model fitted to the observations. The maximum variations in stellar parameters traced by blue areas are around 100 K, 0.06 dex and 0.35 km s-1 for Teff, [Fe/H], and , respectively. These values are similar to the typical uncertainties in atmospheric parameters provided by large spectroscopic surveys observing at optical wavelengths, such as the Gaia-ESO and GALAH surveys (Smiljanic et al., 2014; Buder et al., 2018). However, these surveys targeted pre-main-sequence clusters and stars that are significantly more active than those analysed here. Thus, even if spectroscopic surveys use different methods of analysis and linelists than those employed in our study, it is possible that the magnetic fields or star spots have affected to a certain extent some scientific outcomes of these collaborations (see Section 4 for a discussion on the scientific implications of our result).

Since our dataset samples the artificial variation of stellar parameters up to activity indexes of log R4.3 dex, the red areas in Fig. 4 represent an extrapolation of this phenomenon at higher indexes, up to log R4.0 dex, values that are typically measured in star forming regions (Mamajek, 2008). Interestingly, values measured for members of these young associations are typically around 2 km s-1 (e.g., James et al. 2006; Santos et al. 2008), in agreement with the prediction in Fig. 4 - right panel. This indicates that magnetic fields and stellar spots play an important role in shaping atomic lines in stellar spectra also at the high activity regimes typical of pre-main-sequence stars. Also the prediction of a Teff variation of 600 K at log R4.0 dex is partially consistent with the results of other studies that compared spectroscopic and photometric Teff values for stars in pre-main-sequence stars (Morel et al., 2003; Baratella et al., 2020) finding differences up to 400 K. However, these studies are not able to probe the effect of stellar spots, which have a roughly similar quantitative effect on the temperatures derived from spectroscopic and photometric data (see Fekel et al. 1986; Morel et al. 2003). Thus, the question around the full effect of stellar activity on spectroscopic Teff of T Tauri stars is still open. For instance, it is possible that in extremely active stars (e.g., log R-4.0 dex) the Zeeman effect and the consequences of cold stellar spots are counteracted but not fully compensated by the indirect effects that magnetic fields have on the stellar photosphere, which allow stellar spectra to probe into deeper layers where temperatures are higher. This could be possible due to the significantly higher strength of magnetic fields on T Tauri stars compared to other objects older than a few 10 Myr.
3.3 Stellar activity and chemical abundances
The selective intensification of the strongest absorption lines in stellar spectra affects the determination of chemical abundances in two opposite ways. On one side, the EW intensification produces an increase of chemical abundances. On the other hand, the growth of has the effect of lowering the chemical abundances. Therefore, the net effect on abundances depends on the relative importance of these two reactions to stellar activity, which in turn depends on the linelist that is used for the analysis.
In Fig. 5 we show the dependence of elemental abundances from stellar activity [X/H]/log R as a function of log R. While each black dot represents one star of the sample, the red squares and their error bars correspond to the binned averaged [X/H]/log R value and its standard deviation at different log R intervals. These values are weighted by the [X/H]/log R uncertainties. The general behaviour traced by the red symbols shows that the growth in compensates the abundance increase for all the elements. Similarly to what we have observed for [Fe/H] (see Fig. 3), the variation of along the cycle of the most active stars is large enough to lower the abundances of Si, Sc, Ti, Mn, Ni, and Cu. This is not surprising, in fact, according to our linelist, these elements are mostly determined through the measurement of absorption lines that form deep into the stellar photosphere (i.e., 1) and that are not significantly intensified by the stellar magnetic fields or cold spots. Furthermore, most of these lines are medium-strong (e.g., EW40-70 m) and sensitive to . Therefore, for these elements the increase of line EWs is not enough to compensate for the growth in .
There is a second class of elements formed by C, Na, Al, S, V, Co, Y, and Zr for which the lines used are also formed deep in the atmosphere, but these lines are so weak that they are not sensitive to . Therefore, the change in the abundances of these elements as a function of log R is nearly zero.
Finally, we identify a third group of elements (i.e., Mg, Ca, Cr, and Ba) that are detected mostly through strong lines formed in the upper atmosphere. These lines are both sensitive to and intensified by the stellar magnetic fields or cold spots, in a way that one effect counterbalance the other. Therefore, their change in abundances is also nearly zero.

4 Scientific implications
In the previous section we have shown how chromospheric activity can affect the stellar parameters and elemental abundances derived from stellar spectra due to the magnetic broadening of the absorption lines and cold stellar spots with EW50 m. This result provides a definitive explanation to important open questions in the study of the chemical evolution of the Galaxy (e.g., the low metallicity of the local ISM, the metal content of Orion, and the Ba puzzle) as well as key implications for chemical tagging, planet hunting, and many other studies based on stellar parameters determined from spectra of young stars. Below we discuss the significance of our result to these topics.
4.1 The anaemia of the local ISM
The chemical analysis of young (100 Myr) stars is extremely important in the context of Galactic chemical evolution as it provides strong constraints to the models of stellar nucleosynthesis. In addition, young stars have not had time to disperse along the Galactic disk, therefore their chemical content is representative of the ISM’s composition at the location where they are observed today. In contrast to models of Galactic chemical evolution (e.g., Minchev et al. 2013; Sanders & Binney 2015; Frankel et al. 2018), independent studies have consistently found that the youngest stars in our Galaxy have a metal content lower than the Sun. For instance, the metal content measured in different star forming regions located within 500 pc from the Sun (i.e., Chamaeleon, Corona Australis, Lupus, Orion Nebula Cluster, Rho Ophiuchi, Taurus) is on average equal to [Fe/H]=0.070.03 dex (Cunha et al., 1998; Santos et al., 2008; D’Orazi et al., 2011; Biazzo et al., 2011a, 2012; Spina et al., 2014, 2017), which is 15 lower than the Solar metallicity. Interestingly, members of star forming regions are found to have values significantly higher than that of the Sun and typically within the range 2.0-2.5 km s-1 (e.g., James et al. 2006; Santos et al. 2008; Baratella et al. 2020). The typical log R index of these stars is 4.0 dex (Mamajek & Hillenbrand, 2008). The comparison of these values to the prediction in Fig. 4 suggests that the youngest stars of the solar vicinity appear to be artificially metal poor and with high as a consequence of their high activity levels (e.g., strong magnetic fields, high coverage of cold stellar spots) that have selectively intensified the strongest atomic lines. According to our predictions, these star forming regions should actually contain the same amount of metals of the Sun.
4.2 The metal content of Orion
The [Fe/H]-log R prediction in Fig. 4 also provides a convincing explanation for the metal content measured in the sub-clusters of the Orion association. Orion is one of the nearest regions (d350-450 pc) of ongoing star formation where both low and high mass stars are formed. It is a complex composed of different sub-clusters with different ages, as the stellar formation burst has spread across the association during the last 20 Myr, triggered by supernovae explosions (Bally, 2008). Since type II supernovae are sites of major nucleosynthesis, these explosions may also chemically enrich parts of the surrounding interstellar gas, and hence the newly formed next generation of stars (e.g., Reeves 1972; Cunha & Lambert 1992, 1994). Therefore, one would expect that the sequential star formation occurring in Orion should result in a peculiar chemical enrichment with the youngest regions being enhanced in metals relative to older ones. Instead, the Orion Nebula Cluster, which is the youngest region of the Orion association, has been found to be the metal-poorest (D’Orazi et al., 2009; Biazzo et al., 2011a, b). Our analysis suggests a revised analysis of Orion’s metal content that should properly take into account the effects of magnetic fields and cold spots on stellar spectra. Providing the first evidence of self-enrichment in a young stellar association would give fundamental insights into stellar nucleosynthesis and, most importantly, on the role that supernovae explosions have in the sequential collapse of molecular clouds, hence on the origin of stars and stellar clusters.
4.3 The barium puzzle
The so-called is still one of the most debated open questions around the production of -process elements in the Milky Way. It originated when D’Orazi & Randich (2009) measured [Ba/Fe] ratios in young (50 Myr) open clusters in the solar vicinity (500 pc) which showed to have 0.3 dex higher Ba than the value predicted by models of stellar nucleosynthesis (Travaglio et al., 1999; Busso et al., 2001). Further, in contrast to the anomalous Ba overabundance, the abundances of other -process elements such as Y, Zr, La and Ce relative to Fe was found to be Solar (D’Orazi et al., 2012). Interestingly, further studies in young open clusters have shown that additional channels of nucleosynthesis, such as the intermediate neutron-capture process (Cowan & Rose, 1977), cannot explain the Ba overabundance compared to other neutron-capture elements (Mishenina et al., 2015).
A new piece of this puzzle was provided by Reddy & Lambert (2015), who analysed five young (5-200 Myr) local associations and found that they cover an abnormally large range [Ba/Fe] ratios, from +0.07 to +0.32 dex. A further analysis of solar twin stars by Reddy & Lambert (2017) finally provided some clues to the solution of the . Namely, they showed a trend of increasing abundances from the Ba II 5853 line with stellar activity among coeval stars. Therefore, they speculated that the high Ba abundance measured in young associations is not nucleosynthetic in origin but associated with the level of stellar activity. Specifically, they argued that a value derived from Fe lines that form at much larger in the photosphere is not sufficient to represent the true broadening imposed by the turbulence of the upper photospheric layers where the Ba II lines form.
Our analysis proceeds in this framework, demonstrating that a relation exists between the EW of lines formed at small into the stellar atmosphere, such as the Ba II lines, and the stellar activity (see Fig. 1, top and middle panels). This dependence is visible in our data only for stars with log R-5.0 dex (Fig. 1, bottom panel).
However, in apparent contradiction to Fig. 1, Fig. 5 does not show any clear evidence of a systematic positive dependence of Ba abundances from stellar activity. This is not surprising because, as we pointed out in Section 3.3, the increase in as a function of stellar activity has the important consequence of lowering chemical abundances that are derived at high activity levels. Therefore, in our analysis, the increase in is large enough to counterbalance the effect that the Zeeman broadening and stellar spots would have on Ba abundances.
Since the increment in is highly dependent on the line list employed in the analysis and in particular to the number of lines with high EW/ that can trace the turbulence in the upper stellar layers, the use of different line lists can result in a different sensitivity of the parameter to stellar activity. Therefore, a different line list can also produce very different abundances of Ba, whose lines are extremely sensitive to . This explains the large spread in Ba abundances found in young nearby associations by different teams (D’Orazi & Randich, 2009; Reddy & Lambert, 2015, 2017). For instance, the applied by Reddy & Lambert (2017) for the calculation of Ba abundances was taken from Nissen (2015) and based on a list of weak Fe (EWs70 m) formed quite deep in the atmosphere. Therefore, they were using values that do not reflect the extra broadening of absorption lines in the upper layers of active stars, where Ba lines are formed. On the other hand, our line list includes Fe lines with formation depths similar to those of the Ba lines. This explains the apparent contradiction of the large Ba abundances obtained by Reddy & Lambert (2017) with the lack of Ba variation in Fig. 5. In a similar way, while our masterlist contains 78 Fe I lines, the one used by D’Orazi & Randich (2009) was probably too small (only 33 Fe I lines) to adequately probe the turbulence in the upper stellar layers. In fact, while KG-type stars younger than 50 Myr have that are typically greater than 1.5 km s-1 (see also D’Orazi et al. 2012), the values estimated in D’Orazi & Randich (2009) are within 0.7 and 1.2 km s-1 and very close to their first guess values. In conclusion, the Zeeman effect or stellar spots have intensified the lines used to determined the Ba abundance by D’Orazi & Randich (2009), but in their analysis this effect was not counteracted by any increase as in our analysis, leaving the Ba abundances anomalously high.
4.4 Chemical signatures of planet engulfment events
Do stars swallow their own planets? The major consequence of planet engulfment would be a chemical enhancement of the host star due to the pollution of rocky material. If the accreting star has a sufficiently thin convective zone, the planetary material is not too diluted and can produce a significant increase of the atmospheric metallicity, which can be reliably detected (Spina et al., 2015; Church et al., 2019). In fact, such dilution will not yield an indiscriminate abundance rise of all the metals, but likely will produce a characteristic chemical pattern that mirrors the composition observed in rocky objects with mostly refractory elements (i.e., those with higher condensation temperature) being overabundant relatively to volatiles (Chambers, 2010).
The chemical signatures of planet engulfment events have been found among members of binary systems (e.g., Ramírez et al. 2015; Teske et al. 2016; Oh et al. 2018; Tucci Maia et al. 2019a; Nagar et al. 2019) and open clusters (Spina et al., 2015, 2018b; D’Orazi et al., 2019). Members of the same stellar association are born at the same time and from the same gas, therefore they should be chemically identical. This indicates that the chemical anomalies found among members of the same association cannot be explained by processes of nucleosynthesis. However, this work poses the suspicion that these chemical anomalies are not actually due to planet engulfment events, but instead caused by different activity levels of the members of the same stellar association.

The red and blue symbols in Fig. 6 represent the average of the [X/H]/log R values for stars with log R[-4.7,-4.5] and log R[-4.5,-4.3], respectively, as a function of the condensation temperature Tcond of the X-element listed in Lodders (2003). From this plot it is evident that some elements are sensitive to the variation in chromospheric activity during the stellar cycle, while others are not. We also observe that there is no clear relation between the sensitivity of an element to the stellar activity and its condensation temperature. Therefore, from these data there is no evidence in support of the possibility that chromospheric activity could mimic signatures of planet engulfment events in the chemical composition of stars. Instead, there are elements suggesting that the chemical anomalies found so far are genuine and not related to stellar activity. For example, a number of chemically anomalous Sun-like stars are older than 5 Gyr (Ramírez et al., 2015; Ramirez et al., 2019; Tucci Maia et al., 2019b), therefore - according to our results - their activity levels are not high enough to produce the observed differences in elemental abundances, i,e., [Fe/H]0.05 dex. Furthermore, even when the anomaly has been found among members of young stellar associations, there is no relation between the Fe abundance of the stars and their value (Spina et al., 2015, 2018b; D’Orazi et al., 2019), as one would expect if the chemical anomaly was driven by an especially high (or low) activity level of the anomalous star compared to the other siblings.
4.5 Chemical tagging
Similar to a DNA profile, one could use the individual chemical patterns of stars that are not in clusters today to trace them back to a common site of origin (Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn, 2002). This approach - commonly called “chemical tagging” - is a powerful tool for Galactic archaeology, which aims at recovering the remnants of the ancient building blocks of the Milky Way (e.g., clusters, super-clusters, moving groups) that are now dispersed, reconstructing their star formation history and the migration rate of stars within the Milky Way (e.g., Bland-Hawthorn et al. 2010). In fact, the main motivation behind the large-scale spectroscopic surveys of the current decade (e.g., APOGEE, Gaia-ESO, GALAH; Holtzman et al. 2015; Gilmore et al. 2012; De Silva et al. 2015) has been the acquisition of large and homogeneous sets of spectroscopic data from different environments within the Galaxy to trace its history in space and time.
Regardless of the precision achievable in elemental abundances, the success of chemical tagging relies on the significance of critical factors, including the level of chemical homogeneity within members of open clusters and the chemical diversity between open clusters. Even if it is now established that processes of atomic diffusion (Dotter et al., 2017) and planet engulfment events (Laughlin & Adams, 1997) can imprint chemical inhomogeneities among members of the same stellar association, a growing number of studies based on high-precision analysis of solar twin stars are showing that most cluster members on the same evolutionary phase are chemically identical at the typical precision levels reached by large spectroscopic surveys (Liu et al., 2016b, a; Spina et al., 2018a; Nagar et al., 2019).
On the other hand, our analysis shows that magnetic fields or stellar spots can reduce the chemical diversity between stars of different ages, posing a serious challenge for chemical tagging. In fact, while younger stars in our Galaxy should be chemically richer, they also tend to appear poorer in metals than older stars due to the increasing levels of stellar activity (see Fig. 4 - middle panel). In fact, recent studies have shown how challenging is to reconstruct and reassemble the dissolved stellar associations in the Solar vicinity or identify the dispersed family of open clusters solely based on the chemical composition of stars (e.g., Blanco-Cuaresma & Fraix-Burnet 2018; Ness et al. 2018; Simpson et al. 2019; Casey et al. 2019). Therefore, new methods of spectroscopic analysis that could consider the effect of chromospheric activity in the stellar spectra (e.g., Baratella et al. 2020) would pave the way for chemical tagging in the Milky Way disk.
On the other hand, in the context of chemical tagging, it is also possible to use the effect line intensification on stellar spectra to our advantage. In fact, the evidence that equivalent widths of lines can vary during the stellar cycle of quantities which depend on , allows us to use abundance ratios from lines of the same element formed at different depths in the stellar atmosphere to identify young and active stars in the field or among candidate members of young associations.
4.6 Stellar ages
It is well known that a star, as it ages, evolves along a determined track in the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram that - to a first approximation - depends on the stellar mass and metallicity. Therefore, if the atmospheric parameters and the absolute magnitude MV of the star are known with enough precision, it will be possible to determine reasonable estimates of its age and mass (Vandenberg & Bell, 1985; Lachaume et al., 1999). In Fig. 4 we show that Sun-like stars with higher chromospheric activity tend to appear cooler and metal poorer than what they really are. As a consequence, their ages and masses determined though isochrones are systematically overestimated (see also Galarza et al. 2019). This has fundamental implications for all the studies that aim to trace the nucleosynthetic history of elements in the Galaxy through stellar [X/Fe]-age relations and chemical clocks (e.g., Nissen 2015, 2016; Spina et al. 2016b, a, 2018b; Feltzing et al. 2017; Tucci Maia et al. 2016; Bedell et al. 2018).
4.7 Interstellar extinction
In the recent years, spectroscopic and photometric Galactic surveys have enabled the computation of three-dimensional interstellar extinction maps thanks to accurate stellar atmospheric parameters and line-of-sight distances. This can be achieved by comparing the observed colours to those computed through the stellar parameters and a set of isochrones (e.g., Schultheis et al. 2015; Schlafly et al. 2017). This technique is extensively used also to infer interstellar extinction, which is particular important for young stars in star forming regions or pre-main-sequence clusters that are still partially embedded in the parental cloud. In fact, knowledge of the bolometric luminosities of stars in these young associations is vital for a broad variety of topics in stellar astrophysics. These include the studies of mass segregation, dynamical and structural properties of stellar associations before their dissolution, age spread in star forming regions, rate of star formation in giant molecular clouds and its dependence on time and stellar mass, the analysis of photoevaporation of circumstellar disks and its impact on planet formation (e.g., Luhman 2008; Sacco et al. 2017; Prisinzano et al. 2019).
Young stars are very active and their spectra are heavily affected by the strong magnetic fields. According to our analysis, the Teff of these stars is systematically underestimated due to the effect of chromospheric activity (Fig. 4 - left panel), which results in an underestimation of the stellar extinction, hence to an overestimation of the bolometric luminosity. Therefore, depending on the technique of spectroscopic analysis and the employed line list, stellar activity may have affected the results of observational studies of pre-main-sequence populations.
4.8 Planet hunting
The possibility to disentangle the effect of stellar activity and jitter from the radial velocity modulation of stars is of paramount importance for spectroscopic surveys that aim at planet detection. This can be achieved through different indicators, such as the bisectors of the spectral cross-correlation function (Queloz et al., 2001), H (Bonfils et al., 2007; Robertson et al., 2014) and log R (Noyes et al., 1984; Delisle et al., 2018). More recently, new approaches using these activity indicators and statistical techniques such as Gaussian Processes (e.g., Haywood et al. 2014; Rajpaul et al. 2015; Jones et al. 2017; Delisle et al. 2018) or Moving Average (e.g., Tuomi et al. 2013) have significantly improved our ability to mitigate the impact of stellar activity on the planetary signal. Recent works have searched for new activity indicators, showing how stellar activity affects spectral lines in different ways (Thompson et al., 2017; Davis et al., 2017; Wise et al., 2018; Zhao & Tinney, 2020), which opens up the possibility of using the wealth of information contained in high-resolution spectra to verify the authenticity of a planetary signal (e.g., Dumusque 2018).
Our analysis has shown that not all lines have the same sensitivity to stellar activity, but that only the strongest ones (i.e., those with EW50 m or with log -1 dex; see also Galarza et al. 2019) vary their EW during the activity cycle (see Fig. 1). Therefore, by masking all the lines for which no variation is expected along the stellar cycle and by detecting all the other lines, it is possible to further reduce the noise from stellar activity. This is a very promising possibility that could significantly increase the potential of high-resolution spectrographs in the hunt for planets around Sun-like stars. This is especially true for the spectrographs that do not observe the Ca lines, such as Veloce-Rosso (Gilbert et al., 2018) and Minerva-Australis (Addison et al., 2019).
5 Summary
In this study we analyse 21,897 HARPS spectra of 211 Sun-like stars. These stars are observed at high-resolution (R115,000) and high S/N (100 pixel-1) at different phases of their activity cycles. The main goal of this experiment is to provide a quantitative evaluation of the effect that chromospheric activity has on the atmospheric parameters and elemental abundances that we infer from stellar spectra. Our main results can be summarised as follows:
- •
-
•
This effect is visible for stars with log R5.0 and increases with the activity level of the star (Fig. 1-bottom). Using the log R-age relation calibrated by Lorenzo-Oliveira et al. (2018) on solar twin stars, we conclude that spectra of Sun-like stars younger than 4-5 Gyr are likely affected by this phenomenon.
-
•
The observed dependence of line EWs from chromospheric activity can be ascribed to the Zeeman broadening of absorption lines that form near the top of the stellar photosphere where magnetic fields are stronger or to the presence of cold stellar spots that can increase the EWs of lines at low energy potentials.
-
•
Stellar parameters inferred from the simultaneous search for three spectroscopic equilibria of iron lines (i.e., excitation equilibrium, ionisation balance, and the relation between log NFeI and the reduced EWs) are also influenced by the intensification of absorption lines due to stellar activity (Fig. 3 and 4). Namely, the EW increase of strong Fe I lines leads to higher values, which, as a consequence, lowers [Fe/H]. This effect is visible for stars with log R5.0 (i.e., stars younger than 4-5 Gyr) and increases for more active stars. We also observe a decrease of Teff with chromospheric activity, which is evident for stars with log R4.5 (i.e., younger than 1 Gyr). These effects are not negligible at the typical precision of large spectroscopic surveys. From our analysis, we have not observed any variation in log g.
-
•
The intensification of absorption line due to chromospheric activity and the consequent rise of has the effect of changing the abundances of specific elements. We have identified three classes of elements. The first class includes the species such as Si, Sc, Ti, Mn, Fe, Ni, and Cu, that are detected mostly through medium-strong lines (EW40-70 m) and that formed deep in the stellar photosphere (1). These lines are not significantly intensified by magnetic fields or stellar spots, but they are very sensitive to . Therefore, the growth of their EWs is not enough to compensate for the rise of . For this reason, the abundance of these elements decreases as a function of the stellar activity index. The second class of elements includes C, Na, Al, S, V, Co, Y, and Zr. The lines of these elements are very weak and formed deep in the atmosphere. They are nor affected by stellar activity, nor sensitive to . Therefore, the change of their abundance is nearly zero. Finally, the elements Mg, Ca, Cr, and Ba are detected through strong lines that formed in the upper atmosphere. These lines are both intensified by stellar activity and sensitive to , in a way that one effect counterbalance the other. Therefore the change in their abundances is also nearly zero. We stress again that these conclusions depend on the line list that is employed in the spectroscopic analysis.
-
•
The finding that stellar parameters and abundances can vary as a function of the stellar activity level has several fundamental implications on different topics in astrophysics. For example, studies of Galactic Chemical Evolution will have to consider that the effect described in this paper can artificially affect the chemical abundances obtained through spectroscopic analysis of quantities that depend on the stellar activity, which also scales with the stellar age. On the other hand, the modulation that stellar activity induces on the EWs of the strongest lines (such as the Ba line at 5853 , see Fig. 1) can be used to trace the phase of the activity cycle in addition to the Mt. Wilson S-index. This can result particularly useful for planet detection techniques.
With this work we aim at improving the current techniques of spectroscopic analysis by highlighting the limitations and inconsistencies caused by the simplistic assumption that stellar spectra are not affected by magnetic fields and stellar spots. It is central to our progress in different areas of astrophysics that we overcome this difficulty. Therefore, the next step of this research will necessarily be the identification of the main cause(s) of the phenomenon described above (e.g., magnetic fields and/or stellar spots) which will then allow us to find a definitive solution to these limitations (e.g., a new method of spectroscopic analysis and stellar models that incorporate the effects of magnetic fields and stellar spots).
However, the undesired effects of magnetic activity on the spectroscopic analysis can be already hindered by a strategic choice of absorption features in the master list (e.g., see Baratella et al. 2020). From our study it is clear that the sensitivity of the stellar parameters to the activity index is mainly due to the use of many medium and strong Fe lines formed in the upper layers of the stellar atmosphere. Namely, out of the 95 Fe I lines in our master list (Table 2), 11 have EWs measured in the Solar spectrum that are within 70-80 m, nine fall in the range of 80-90 m, and six have EWs 100 m. On the other hand, Galarza et al. (2019) showed that by choosing a list of weaker Fe lines non sensitive to variations to chromospheric activity they have been able to obtain smaller microturbulences and statistical errors in the spectroscopic analysis of the young solar twin HD 59976. Therefore, a partial solution to the activity problem would be to employ a list of weak Fe lines to determine the stellar parameters, such as the line list used by Nissen (2015) which includes only Fe lines weaker than 70 m. However, an indiscriminate choice of only the weakest Fe lines could also significantly reduce the number of lines at low excitation potential and high reduced EW, necessary to reach the excitation/ionisation equilibria. Alternatively, Baratella et al. (2020) proposed a new method based on titanium lines to derive the spectroscopic surface gravity, and most importantly, the microturbulence parameter, while a combination of Ti and Fe lines is used to obtain effective temperatures.
The use of weak lines can certainly improve the abundance determination of individual elements. However, the problem remains for those element, such as Ba, that are observed only through strong lines formed in the upper layers of the stellar atmosphere. In these cases, the only viable solution could come from magneto-hydrodynamical modelling of stellar atmospheres.
References
- Addison et al. (2019) Addison, B., Wright, D. J., Wittenmyer, R. A., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 115003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab03aa
- Babcock (1959) Babcock, H. D. 1959, ApJ, 130, 364, doi: 10.1086/146726
- Babcock (1949) Babcock, H. W. 1949, ApJ, 110, 126, doi: 10.1086/145192
- Bally (2008) Bally, J. 2008, Overview of the Orion Complex, ed. B. Reipurth, 459
- Baratella et al. (2020) Baratella, M., D’Orazi, V., Carraro, G., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937055
- Bedell et al. (2014) Bedell, M., Meléndez, J., Bean, J. L., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 23, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/23
- Bedell et al. (2018) Bedell, M., Bean, J. L., Meléndez, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 865, 68, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad908
- Biazzo et al. (2012) Biazzo, K., Alcalá, J. M., Covino, E., et al. 2012, A&A, 547, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219680
- Biazzo et al. (2011a) Biazzo, K., Randich, S., & Palla, F. 2011a, A&A, 525, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015489
- Biazzo et al. (2011b) Biazzo, K., Randich, S., Palla, F., & Briceño, C. 2011b, A&A, 530, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116621
- Biazzo et al. (2015) Biazzo, K., Gratton, R., Desidera, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526375
- Blanco-Cuaresma & Fraix-Burnet (2018) Blanco-Cuaresma, S., & Fraix-Burnet, D. 2018, A&A, 618, A65, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832815
- Bland-Hawthorn et al. (2010) Bland-Hawthorn, J., Krumholz, M. R., & Freeman, K. 2010, ApJ, 713, 166, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/166
- Bonfils et al. (2007) Bonfils, X., Mayor, M., Delfosse, X., et al. 2007, A&A, 474, 293, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077068
- Borrero (2008) Borrero, J. M. 2008, ApJ, 673, 470, doi: 10.1086/524099
- Buder et al. (2018) Buder, S., Asplund, M., Duong, L., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478, 4513, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1281
- Busso et al. (2001) Busso, M., Marengo, M., Travaglio, C., Corcione, L., & Silvestro, G. 2001, Mem. Soc. Astron. Italiana, 72, 309
- Casey et al. (2019) Casey, A. R., Lattanzio, J. C., Aleti, A., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1910.09811. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09811
- Chambers (2010) Chambers, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 724, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/92
- Church et al. (2019) Church, R. P., Mustill, A. J., & Liu, F. 2019, MNRAS, 2778, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3169
- Cowan & Rose (1977) Cowan, J. J., & Rose, W. K. 1977, ApJ, 212, 149, doi: 10.1086/155030
- Cunha & Lambert (1992) Cunha, K., & Lambert, D. L. 1992, ApJ, 399, 586, doi: 10.1086/171950
- Cunha & Lambert (1994) —. 1994, ApJ, 426, 170, doi: 10.1086/174053
- Cunha et al. (1998) Cunha, K., Smith, V. V., & Lambert, D. L. 1998, ApJ, 493, 195, doi: 10.1086/305118
- Davis et al. (2017) Davis, A. B., Cisewski, J., Dumusque, X., Fischer, D. A., & Ford, E. B. 2017, ApJ, 846, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8303
- De Silva et al. (2015) De Silva, G. M., Freeman, K. C., Bland-Hawthorn, J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2604, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv327
- Delisle et al. (2018) Delisle, J. B., Ségransan, D., Dumusque, X., et al. 2018, A&A, 614, A133, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732529
- Desidera et al. (2004) Desidera, S., Gratton, R. G., Scuderi, S., et al. 2004, A&A, 420, 683, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041242
- D’Orazi et al. (2012) D’Orazi, V., Biazzo, K., Desidera, S., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2789, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21088.x
- D’Orazi et al. (2011) D’Orazi, V., Biazzo, K., & Randich, S. 2011, A&A, 526, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015616
- D’Orazi & Randich (2009) D’Orazi, V., & Randich, S. 2009, A&A, 501, 553, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811587
- D’Orazi et al. (2009) D’Orazi, V., Randich, S., Flaccomio, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 501, 973, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200811241
- D’Orazi et al. (2019) D’Orazi, V., Oliva, E., Bragaglia, A., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1911.06337. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.06337
- Dotter et al. (2017) Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cargile, P., & Asplund, M. 2017, ApJ, 840, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d10
- Dumusque (2018) Dumusque, X. 2018, A&A, 620, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833795
- Fabbian et al. (2010) Fabbian, D., Khomenko, E., Moreno-Insertis, F., & Nordlund, Å. 2010, ApJ, 724, 1536, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/1536
- Fabbian et al. (2012) Fabbian, D., Moreno-Insertis, F., Khomenko, E., & Nordlund, Å. 2012, A&A, 548, A35, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219335
- Fekel et al. (1986) Fekel, F. C., Bopp, B. W., Africano, J. L., et al. 1986, AJ, 92, 1150, doi: 10.1086/114246
- Feltzing et al. (2017) Feltzing, S., Howes, L. M., McMillan, P. J., & Stonkutė, E. 2017, MNRAS, 465, L109, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw209
- Flores et al. (2016) Flores, M., González, J. F., Jaque Arancibia, M., Buccino, A., & Saffe, C. 2016, A&A, 589, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628145
- Frankel et al. (2018) Frankel, N., Rix, H.-W., Ting, Y.-S., Ness, M., & Hogg, D. W. 2018, ApJ, 865, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadba5
- Freeman & Bland-Hawthorn (2002) Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 487, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840
- Galarza et al. (2019) Galarza, J. Y., Meléndez, J., Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1910.01040. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.01040
- Gilbert et al. (2018) Gilbert, J., Bergmann, C., Bloxham, G., et al. 2018, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 10702, Proc. SPIE, 107020Y
- Gilmore et al. (2012) Gilmore, G., Randich, S., Asplund, M., et al. 2012, The Messenger, 147, 25
- Gratton et al. (2001) Gratton, R. G., Bonanno, G., Claudi, R. U., et al. 2001, A&A, 377, 123, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011066
- Gray (1992) Gray, D. F. 1992, Science, 257, 1978
- Haywood et al. (2014) Haywood, R. D., Collier Cameron, A., Queloz, D., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 2517, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1320
- Hoffman & Gelman (2011) Hoffman, M. D., & Gelman, A. 2011, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.4246
- Holtzman et al. (2015) Holtzman, J. A., Shetrone, M., Johnson, J. A., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 148, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/5/148
- James et al. (2006) James, D. J., Melo, C., Santos, N. C., & Bouvier, J. 2006, A&A, 446, 971, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053900
- Jones et al. (2017) Jones, D. E., Stenning, D. C., Ford, E. B., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1711.01318. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.01318
- Lachaume et al. (1999) Lachaume, R., Dominik, C., Lanz, T., & Habing, H. J. 1999, A&A, 348, 897
- Langer et al. (1998) Langer, G. E., Fischer, D., Sneden, C., & Bolte, M. 1998, AJ, 115, 685, doi: 10.1086/300228
- Laughlin & Adams (1997) Laughlin, G., & Adams, F. C. 1997, ApJ, 491, L51, doi: 10.1086/311056
- Laws & Gonzalez (2001) Laws, C., & Gonzalez, G. 2001, ApJ, 553, 405, doi: 10.1086/320669
- Leone (2007) Leone, F. 2007, ApJ, 667, L175, doi: 10.1086/522119
- Leone & Catanzaro (2004) Leone, F., & Catanzaro, G. 2004, A&A, 425, 271, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20047180
- Liu et al. (2014) Liu, F., Asplund, M., Ramirez, I., Yong, D., & Melendez, J. 2014, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, Volume 442, Issue 1, p.L51-L55, 442, L51, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu055
- Liu et al. (2016a) Liu, F., Asplund, M., Yong, D., et al. 2016a, MNRAS, 463, 696, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2045
- Liu et al. (2016b) Liu, F., Yong, D., Asplund, M., Ramírez, I., & Meléndez, J. 2016b, MNRAS, 457, 3934, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw247
- Lodders (2003) Lodders, K. 2003, ApJ, 591, 1220, doi: 10.1086/375492
- Lorenzo-Oliveira et al. (2018) Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., Freitas, F. C., Meléndez, J., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A73, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629294
- Lovis et al. (2011) Lovis, C., Dumusque, X., Santos, N. C., et al. 2011, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1107.5325. https://arxiv.org/abs/1107.5325
- Luhman (2008) Luhman, K. L. 2008, Chamaeleon, ed. B. Reipurth, Vol. 5, 169
- Mamajek (2008) Mamajek, E. E. 2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, 329, 10, doi: 10.1002/asna.200710827
- Mamajek & Hillenbrand (2008) Mamajek, E. E., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2008, ApJ, 687, 1264, doi: 10.1086/591785
- Mayor et al. (2003) Mayor, M., Pepe, F., Queloz, D., et al. 2003, The Messenger, 114, 20
- Meléndez et al. (2009) Meléndez, J., Asplund, M., Gustafsson, B., & Yong, D. 2009, ApJ, 704, L66, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/1/L66
- Meléndez et al. (2014) Meléndez, J., Ramírez, I., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2014, ApJ, 791, 14, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/14
- Minchev et al. (2013) Minchev, I., Chiappini, C., & Martig, M. 2013, A&A, 558, A9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220189
- Mishenina et al. (2015) Mishenina, T., Pignatari, M., Carraro, G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3651, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2337
- Moore et al. (2015) Moore, C. S., Uitenbroek, H., Rempel, M., Criscuoli, S., & Rast, M. P. 2015, ApJ, 799, 150, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/150
- Morel et al. (2004) Morel, T., Micela, G., Favata, F., & Katz, D. 2004, A&A, 426, 1007, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041047
- Morel et al. (2003) Morel, T., Micela, G., Favata, F., Katz, D., & Pillitteri, I. 2003, A&A, 412, 495, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031469
- Nagar et al. (2019) Nagar, T., Spina, L., & Karakas, A. I. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1911.09861. https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.09861
- Ness et al. (2018) Ness, M., Rix, H. W., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9d8e
- Nissen (2015) Nissen, P. E. 2015, A&A, 579, A52, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526269
- Nissen (2016) —. 2016, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08399
- Noyes et al. (1984) Noyes, R. W., Hartmann, L. W., Baliunas, S. L., Duncan, D. K., & Vaughan, A. H. 1984, ApJ, 279, 763, doi: 10.1086/161945
- Oh et al. (2018) Oh, S., Price-Whelan, A. M., Brewer, J. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaab4d
- Oksala et al. (2018) Oksala, M. E., Silvester, J., Kochukhov, O., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 3367, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2487
- Prisinzano et al. (2019) Prisinzano, L., Damiani, F., Kalari, V., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A159, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834870
- Queloz et al. (2001) Queloz, D., Henry, G. W., Sivan, J. P., et al. 2001, A&A, 379, 279, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011308
- Rajpaul et al. (2015) Rajpaul, V., Aigrain, S., Osborne, M. A., Reece, S., & Roberts, S. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2269, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1428
- Ramirez et al. (2019) Ramirez, I., Khanal, S., Lichon, S. J., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1909.07460. https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.07460
- Ramírez et al. (2009) Ramírez, I., Meléndez, J., & Asplund, M. 2009, A&A, 508, L17, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913038
- Ramírez et al. (2014) —. 2014, A&A, 561, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322558
- Ramírez et al. (2011) Ramírez, I., Meléndez, J., Cornejo, D., Roederer, I. U., & Fish, J. R. 2011, ApJ, 740, 76, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/76
- Ramírez et al. (2015) Ramírez, I., Khanal, S., Aleo, P., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/13
- Reddy & Lambert (2015) Reddy, A. B. S., & Lambert, D. L. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 1976, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1876
- Reddy & Lambert (2017) —. 2017, ApJ, 845, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81d6
- Reeves (1972) Reeves, H. 1972, A&A, 19, 215
- Robertson et al. (2014) Robertson, P., Mahadevan, S., Endl, M., & Roy, A. 2014, Science, 345, 440, doi: 10.1126/science.1253253
- Sacco et al. (2017) Sacco, G. G., Spina, L., Randich, S., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.03741
- Salvatier et al. (2016) Salvatier, J., Wieckiâ, T. V., & Fonnesbeck, C. 2016, PyMC3: Python probabilistic programming framework. http://ascl.net/1610.016
- Sanders & Binney (2015) Sanders, J. L., & Binney, J. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3479, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv578
- Santos et al. (2008) Santos, N. C., Melo, C., James, D. J., et al. 2008, A&A, 480, 889, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20079083
- Schlafly et al. (2017) Schlafly, E. F., Peek, J. E. G., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Green, G. M. 2017, ApJ, 838, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa619d
- Schultheis et al. (2015) Schultheis, M., Kordopatis, G., Recio-Blanco, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425333
- Schwabe (1844) Schwabe, H. 1844, Astronomische Nachrichten, 21, 233, doi: 10.1002/asna.18440211505
- Shchukina et al. (2016) Shchukina, N., Sukhorukov, A., & Trujillo Bueno, J. 2016, A&A, 586, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526452
- Shchukina & Trujillo Bueno (2015) Shchukina, N., & Trujillo Bueno, J. 2015, A&A, 579, A112, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425569
- Simpson et al. (2019) Simpson, J. D., Martell, S. L., Da Costa, G., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 5302, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3042
- Smiljanic et al. (2014) Smiljanic, R., Korn, A. J., Bergemann, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 570, A122, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423937
- Sneden (1973) Sneden, C. 1973, ApJ, 184, 839, doi: 10.1086/152374
- Spina et al. (2018a) Spina, L., Meléndez, J., Casey, A. R., Karakas, A. I., & Tucci-Maia, M. 2018a, ApJ, 863, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad190
- Spina et al. (2016a) Spina, L., Meléndez, J., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2016a, A&A, 593, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628557
- Spina et al. (2016b) Spina, L., Meléndez, J., & Ramírez, I. 2016b, A&A, 585, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527429
- Spina et al. (2014) Spina, L., Randich, S., Palla, F., et al. 2014, A&A, 568, A2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424135
- Spina et al. (2015) Spina, L., Palla, F., Randich, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, L6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526896
- Spina et al. (2017) Spina, L., Randich, S., Magrini, L., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630078
- Spina et al. (2018b) Spina, L., Meléndez, J., Karakas, A. I., et al. 2018b, MNRAS, 474, 2580, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2938
- Teske et al. (2016) Teske, J. K., Khanal, S., & Ramírez, I. 2016, ApJ, 819, 19, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/19
- Teske et al. (2016) Teske, J. K., Shectman, S. A., Vogt, S. S., et al. 2016, The Astronomical Journal, Volume 152, Issue 6, article id. 167, 20 pp. (2016)., 152, doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/167
- Thompson et al. (2017) Thompson, A. P. G., Watson, C. A., de Mooij, E. J. W., & Jess, D. B. 2017, MNRAS, 468, L16, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx018
- Travaglio et al. (1999) Travaglio, C., Galli, D., Gallino, R., et al. 1999, ApJ, 521, 691, doi: 10.1086/307571
- Tucci Maia et al. (2019a) Tucci Maia, M., Meléndez, J., Lorenzo-Oliveira, D., Spina, L., & Jofré, P. 2019a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.04195. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04195
- Tucci Maia et al. (2019b) —. 2019b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1906.04195. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04195
- Tucci Maia et al. (2016) Tucci Maia, M., Ramírez, I., Meléndez, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A32, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527848
- Tuomi et al. (2013) Tuomi, M., Anglada-Escudé, G., Gerlach, E., et al. 2013, A&A, 549, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201220268
- Uchida & Shibata (1984) Uchida, Y., & Shibata, K. 1984, PASJ, 36, 105
- Vandenberg & Bell (1985) Vandenberg, D. A., & Bell, R. A. 1985, ApJS, 58, 561, doi: 10.1086/191052
- Wise et al. (2018) Wise, A. W., Dodson-Robinson, S. E., Bevenour, K., & Provini, A. 2018, AJ, 156, 180, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aadd94
- Zhao & Tinney (2020) Zhao, J., & Tinney, C. G. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4131, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3254