This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

How earthquakes affect firms risk response: Evidence from Chinese public firms

Yujue WANG

1 Motivation

Sudden natural disasters introduce operational hazards into firms. Earthquakes are frequent natual disasters, strong and quick with clear event time. Rather than meteorological disasters like hurricanes and floods, earthquakes are more unexpected and would not last for a long period. Furthermore, destructive great earthquakes usual cause numerous assets lossof frms, bring threats to people and trigger panic in the whole economy.

Although the eathquakes are suddend events, the risk propagation on the economy is long-lasting through multiple channels. Earthquakes’s impact on firms’ stock price and total assests are not limited to a short-term, neither in the direct covered areas([valizadeh2017ripple]). From the ex-post perspective, firms with factories factories located in areas affected by natural disasters are much less profitable([hsu2018natural]). In another way, earthquake shock could also spur the rise of innovation ability ([rao2021]). To sum up, earthquakes do have comprehensive effects on firm operation and economy development.

2 Data

2.1 Earthquakes Frequency

According to data scraping from China Earthquake Administration(https://www.cea.gov.cn), from 2001 to 2021, there are 8115 earthquakes documented, mearsure by Richter magnitude scale. The data contais the information of earthquake time, location, magnitude, depth of each earthquake event. More information refers to table 1. Earthquakes larger than 4.5 magitude could be noticeable and felt by people, and larger than 6 called strong earthquakes would damage to a moderate number of structures in populated areas. After the Great Wenchuan Earthquake in 2008, China has been attemping to establish a more complete monitor system, therefore earthquakes statistics after 2008 sustain a stable scale.

Year Before1 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Total 99 281 714 510 402 471 767 717 585 549 529 561 664 577 689
M\geq4.5 94 131 85 61 45 49 90 47 33 40 39 46 49 42 60
M\geq6 15 15 4 3 2 3 3 5 1 5 3 0 2 3 4
  • 1

    Aggregate earthquakes from 2001-2007.

Table 1: Earthquakes Frequency in China

2.2 Public firms

This paper selects firm-level annual public information of firms listed in the Chinese stocks Market from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research(CSMAR) database. Data mainly contains register information and semester, and annnual balance sheet of each firm. The data ranges from 2008 to 2021. I choose 2004 as the starting point because earthquake statistics is stable at hundred-scale per year starting from 2008, and the balance sheet reguluation for public firms in China experienced a reform in 2007. Database describing the shareholding structure are merged to specify if the firm is controlled by government, the capital stock in circulation share of the total capital stock, and top 10 share holdings information. Stock symbol connects the above data. Particularlly, firms with primary business in finance field is dropped by industry code. Null values are removed during filtering. All continuous variables are winsorized at the 1st and 99th percentiles.

3 Identification and estimation

First, I want to illustrate that a single strong earthquake would result in operation distress on the firms. The Strong Lushan Earthquake in 2013 is chosen because it is almost the most severe earthquakes in the past two decades ranked only second to the Great Wenchuan Earthquake in 2008. The magitude of Lushan Earthquake is 7.0. The direct economic loss consulted in Sichuan Province exceeds 130 billian dollars. Wenchuan Earthquake and Lushan Earthquake both happened in Sichuan province, because Sichuan province and Chongqing are located on the eauthquake-prone areas, i.e. Longmenshan Fault. Thus, the treat group is listed firms in Sichuan and Chongqing because the two city is close geographically and similarly in economic structure. Considering the similarity in industry composition of public firms, Henan Province and Hebei Province are combined to serve as the control group. The control group firms are distributed mostly in manufacturing and production industry. Besides, Henan and Hebei are also located at Taihang earthquake zone, where happend the Strong Tangshan Earthquake (magnitude 7.8) in 1976. Thus, the model is constructed as below:

Special_items_i,t/Sales=α+X_i,tΓ+τpost_i,tTreat_i,t+θ_i+δ_t+ϵ_i,tSpecial\_items_{\_}{i,t}/Sales=\alpha+X^{\prime}_{\_}{i,t}\Gamma+\tau post_{\_}{i,t}*Treat_{\_}{i,t}+\theta_{\_}i+\delta_{\_}t+\epsilon_{\_}{i,t}

SpecialitemsSpecial\ items usually is a large, one-time expense or income that are not expected by firms. Since no such same term in Chinese balance sheet, I used some general terms which could be high correlated to the sudden fluctuations caused by earthquakes. Specifically, special_itemsspecial_{\_}items refers to cash flow of each public firm in each year. Sales is annual total sales. The controls X_stX_{\_}{st} include CFA,GROWCFA,GROW ,LRL,ROA,ROE,,LRL,ROA,ROE, eq_timeseq\_times in each year for each firm. CFACFA is the ratio of net cash flow and total assets. GROWGROW is the ratio of retaqined earnings and net assets. ROEROE is return on equity. ROAROA is return on assets, reflecting the profitability. LRLLRL is the ratio of net profits and sales, i.e. profit margin of primary business. eq_timeseq_{\_}times is the moderate and strong earthquake times (magitude is higehr than 4.5) of the city area where the firm’s office is located at, merged from the earthquake database established before by administrative code. ϵ\epsilon is a stochastic error. θ_i\theta_{\_}i is firm-level fixed effect, δ_t\delta_{\_}t is year fixed effect. post_i,tpost_{\_}{i,t} takes the value of 1 after the earthquakes happen, i.e. including 2013 and after. Parameter τ\tau captures the average impact of unexpected natural diasater. All statistics are annual.

4 Baseline results

4.1 DID on Yaan Earthquake with year data

See figure 1 and Table 2.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: preliminary Trend Examination
Table 2: Firm cash flow changes by the great earthquake
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Netcashflow_i,t/Sales_i,tNet\ cash\ flow_{\_}{i,t}/Sales_{\_}{i,t}
1.treat .024663** .024382***
(.009583) (.006441)
1.after .026359*** .020962***
(.0052) (.005575)
1.treat×\times1.after -.021528*** -.022039** -.022826*** -.022809***
(.008017) (.007846) (.008179) (.008196)
Firm FE No NO Yes Yes
Year FE No Yes No Yes
cfa 1.95547*** 2.006421*** 1.920219*** 1.922397***
(.063112) (.051698) (.066088) (.065637)
grow .00766*** .010013*** .006277** .006414**
(.002763) (.002808) (.00268) (.002755)
lrl .244232*** .406626*** .163708*** .165046***
(.042841) (.0395) (.038291) (.039)
roa -.670846*** -1.06518*** -.49411*** -.497076***
(.113242) (.107085) (.105939) (.107282)
roe -.028847* -.03778 -.023604 -.025326*
(.014802) (.021661) (.014791) (.014529)
lassets -.007016*** -.011007*** -.000535 -.002511
(.002519) (.001754) (.004493) (.005307)
gov .006273 .016679*** -.015471 -.013606
(.00801) (.004347) (.011544) (.011399)
cons .138*** .23941*** .024197 .080865
(.052011) (.03635) (.092842) (.112033)
Observations 2886 2886 2886 2858
R-squared .7090 .7175 .7139 .8477
  • Standard errors are in parentheses.
    p<.01,p<.05,p<.1{}^{***}p<.01,^{**}p<.05,^{*}p<.1

4.2 subsection name

5 Future work

Event study([dou2022competition]) on effect of strong earthquake happened at different time. Given the preliminary results, the effect of single earthquake on the firms is still ambiguous. Actually, I have been trying this part in both annual and semester level, altough the results is not satisfied. Risk propagation through ([hyun2019spillovers]),([chen2021regulating]). In addition to the traditional variables, the paper attempts to add variables such as node degree and network topology centrality.