Holographic realization of constant roll inflation and dark energy: An unified scenario
Abstract
In the formalism of generalized holographic dark energy, the infrared cut-off is generalized to the form, , where and are the particle horizon and the future horizon, respectively (moreover, is the scale factor and is the Hubble parameter of the universe). Based on such formalism, we establish a holographic realization of constant roll inflation during the early universe, where the corresponding cut-off depends on the Hubble parameter and its derivatives (up to the second order). The viability of this holographic constant roll inflation with respect to the Planck data in turn puts a certain bound on the infrared cut-off at the time of horizon crossing. Such holographic correspondence of constant roll inflation is extended to the scenario where the infrared cut-off is corrected by the ultraviolet one, which may originate due to quantum effects. Besides the mere inflation, we further propose the holographic realization of an cosmic scenario from constant roll inflation (at the early time) to the dark energy era (at the late time) with an intermediate radiation dominated era followed by a Kamionkowski like reheating stage. In such a unified holographic scenario, the inflationary quantities (like the scalar spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio) and the dark energy quantities (like the dark energy EoS parameter and the present Hubble rate) prove to be simultaneously compatible with observable constraints for suitable ranges of the infrared cut-off and the other model parameters. Moreover the curvature perturbations at super-Hubble scale prove to be a constant (with time) during the entire cosmic era, which in turn ensures the stability of the model under consideration.
I Introduction
One of the most important puzzles in today’s cosmology is why the universe undergoes an accelerating phase at the two extreme curvature regimes, i.e., during the early time and during the late time. Several higher curvature gravity theories (like theory, the Gauss-Bonnet gravity theory, etc.) have been used to resolve this issue, and well, they earned quite a success in this direction (see Capozziello:2011et ; Nojiri:2010wj ; Nojiri:2017ncd for extensive reviews). In the higher curvature theories, the Einstein-Hilbert action is suitably generalized, which may originate from the diffeomorphism property of the gravitational action or from the string theory. One other arena of string theory is the holographic principle that particularly originates from black hole thermodynamics and string theory and establishes a connection of the infrared cutoff of a quantum field theory, which is related to the vacuum energy, with the largest distance of this theory tHooft:1993dmi ; Susskind:1994vu ; Witten:1998qj ; Bousso:2002ju . Such holographic consideration is currently running through its full pace in the field of cosmology. In particular, holographic dark energy (HDE), which is based on the holographic principle rather than adding some extra term in the Lagrangian of matter, proves to successfully describe the late time acceleration era of the universe Li:2004rb ; Li:2011sd ; Wang:2016och ; Pavon:2005yx ; Nojiri:2005pu ; Zhang:2005yz ; Elizalde:2005ju ; Gong:2004cb ; Malekjani:2012bw ; Khurshudyan:2016gmb ; Gao:2007ep ; Li:2008zq ; Anagnostopoulos:2020ctz ; Li:2009bn ; Feng:2007wn ; Sheykhi:2023woy ; Sheykhi:2022jqq ; Lu:2009iv ; Huang:2004wt ; Mukherjee:2017oom ; Nojiri:2017opc ; Saridakis:2020zol ; Barrow:2020kug ; Adhikary:2021xym ; Srivastava:2020cyk ; Nojiri:2022nmu ; Bhardwaj:2021chg ; Chakraborty:2020jsq . Note that generalized holographic dark energy introduced in Nojiri:2005pu gives all known HDEs as particular cases – this was explicitly proven in Nojiri:2021iko ; Nojiri:2021jxf . Besides dark energy, the holographic principle has also been used to realize inflation during the early phase of the universe, particularly the slow-roll inflation Nojiri:2019kkp (see also the subsequent papers Paul:2019hys ; Bargach:2019pst ; Elizalde:2019jmh ; Oliveros:2019rnq ; Chakraborty:2020tge ). Moreover, the holographic inflation with a suitable cut-off seems to be compatible with the recent Planck data. Actually, during the early universe the holographic energy density, which is inversely proportional to the squared infrared cut-off of the theory, becomes large and hence can drive inflation. Recently we proposed a unified cosmological scenario of slow-roll inflation and the dark energy era from a holographic point of view in a covariant way Nojiri:2020wmh . The holographic realization to describe the early universe is even extended to the bouncing cosmology, in which case, the holographic energy density violates the null energy condition and triggers a non-singular bouncing universe Nojiri:2019yzg ; Brevik:2019mah .
Regarding holographic inflation, as we have mentioned earlier that the holographic principle has been used particularly for slow-roll inflation Nojiri:2019kkp ; Paul:2019hys ; Bargach:2019pst ; Elizalde:2019jmh ; Oliveros:2019rnq ; Chakraborty:2020tge ; Nojiri:2020wmh . In the slow-roll regime, an almost flat scalar potential is generally considered that leads to a negligible acceleration of the scalar field under consideration. In particular, the term (where is the scalar field and an overdot denotes the derivative with respect to cosmic time) is negligible with respect to the Hubble friction and the restoring force. As a qualitatively different condition, people considered the constant roll inflation where the scalar field rolls at a constant rate, in particular, (with is an arbitrary constant and not necessarily that ) Motohashi:2014ppa . Clearly, in the regime of , the constant roll inflation reduces to the standard slow-roll one. A lot of successful attempts have been made to propose constant roll inflation during the early universe in the realm of various modified gravity models, which are also consistent with the observable data (for instance, see Kinney:2005vj ; Kumar:2015mfa ; Cook:2015hma ; Nojiri:2017qvx ; Gao:2017uja ; Odintsov:2017qpp ; Odintsov:2017hbk ; Cicciarella:2017nls ; Ito:2017bnn ; Mohammadi:2018oku ; Elizalde:2018now , but not limited to). Due to the considerable successes of constant roll inflation and the holographic principle, it becomes important to examine whether any connection exists between them, and we would like to mention that this still demands a proper investigation.
Coming back to the holographic dark energy (HDE), the corresponding holographic cut-off is generally taken as particle horizon or the future horizon . However the fundamental form of the cut-off is still a debatable topic, and along this direction, it deserves mentioning that the most general holographic cut-off was proposed in Nojiri:2005pu where the is generalized to the form (where is the scale factor and is the Hubble parameter of the universe), known as generalized HDE. Based on this formalism, the known entropic dark energy models proposed so far are shown to be equivalent to holographic dark energy, where the corresponding cut-off depends on either the particle horizon and its derivatives or the future horizon and its derivatives Nojiri:2021iko ; Nojiri:2021jxf . Along this line, very recently the idea of generalized entropy (that can generalize a wide class of known entropies like the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, the Tsallis entropy, the Renyi entropy, the Sharma-Mittal entropy, the Kaniadakis entropy, etc.) has been proposed Nojiri:2022aof ; Nojiri:2022dkr ; Odintsov:2022qnn (one may also go through Odintsov:2023qfj for a short review on generalized entropy), which also seems to have a generalized holographic correspondence and can successfully unify viable slow-roll inflation with a viable dark energy era Nojiri:2022dkr . These reveal the rich cosmological implications of the generalized holographic formalism.
Based on the above discussions, such generalized form of immediately leads to the following questions:
-
•
Does there exist suitable holographic cut-off(s) which can successfully drive constant roll inflation during the early universe? If so, then what about the observable viability of such “holographic constant roll inflation”?
-
•
Besides the mere inflation, does there exist any generalized that produces a unified cosmological scenario from constant roll inflation to the dark energy era of the universe from a holographic point of view?
We will intend to address these questions in the present paper. We should mention that the holographic constant roll inflation has been studied earlier in Mohammadi:2022vru , however, in a different context, the author of Mohammadi:2022vru considered the parameter (appears in the holographic energy density as ) to be time-dependent. On contrary, in our present analysis, we will consider the parameter to be a constant (more physical) and the infrared cut-off to be of the generalized form to establish the holographic realization of constant roll inflation. Besides inflation, we will also examine the holographic correspondence of the unification from constant roll inflation to the dark energy era. These make the present work essentially different than the earlier one.
The paper is organized as follows: After going through some basics of constant roll inflation in scalar-tensor theory in Sec. II, we will examine the holographic connection of constant roll inflation and the unification of constant roll inflation with the dark energy era in Sec. III and Sec. V, respectively. In Sec. IV between these two sections, we will consider a modified holographic constant roll inflation, where the infrared cut-off is corrected by the ultraviolet one. The paper ends with some conclusions in Sec. VI.
II A brief on constant roll inflation
In this section, we will revisit the main essence of constant roll inflation driven by a scalar field Motohashi:2014ppa , where the action is given by,
(1) |
Here (with being Newton’s gravitational constant) and is the scalar field under consideration with a potential . The flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metric fulfills our present purpose, in which case, the Friedmann equations and the scalar field equation are given by,
(2) | ||||
(3) | ||||
(4) |
respectively, where is the Hubble parameter and denotes the scale factor of the universe. In the case of slow-roll inflation, the acceleration of the scalar field is ignored in the flat regime of , owing to which, the first term in the right-hand side of Eq. (4) is neglected with respect to the other terms. However, the constant roll inflation deals in a different regime where is not negligible, rather is a constant. In particular, the constant roll condition is given by,
(5) |
where is a constant (known as the constant roll parameter). Clearly, for , the above condition can be thought of as equivalent to the standard slow-roll case.
Differentiating Eq. (3) (with respect to ) and applying the constant roll condition, one obtains,
(6) |
on integrating which, gives a first-order differential equation of the Hubble parameter as,
(7) |
Here is an integration constant considered to take positive values. Moreover Eq. (3) can be rewritten as,
(8) |
by plugging which into Eq. (2), yields the scalar field potential in terms of and :
(9) |
The above expression of will be useful at some stage. Having obtained the equations under constant roll conditions, we now move for the solutions of these field equations, and for this purpose, we will consider two different cases depending on whether or , respectively.
For , Eq. (7) indicates that the Hubble parameter remains less than (as should be negative), and hence the solution of Eq. (7) turns out to be,
(10) |
By using the solution of into and integrating twice (with respect to the cosmic time), one obtains the evolution of the scalar field as,
(11) |
The above helps to eliminate from Eq. (10) and results to the Hubble parameter in terms of as,
(12) |
which along with Eq. (9) immediately leads to the following form of corresponding to the aforementioned solutions:
(13) |
Eq. (10) depicts that the variable ‘’ ranges within to have a positive valued Hubble parameter (the positive Hubble parameter indicates an expanding universe where increases from to zero). Thus during the early universe, i.e., during , the Hubble parameter from Eq. (10) behaves as , which results in a de-Sitter inflationary stage. Furthermore, the first slow-roll parameter is calculated as,
(14) |
This demonstrates that is an increasing function with respect to the cosmic time, and therefore, must reach unity at some point in time depending on the value of . For example, if one takes , then reaches to unity at . The instance of indicates the end of inflation. Consequently, the beginning of inflation (when the CMB scale crosses the horizon) may be considered as 55 or 60 e-folds back from the instance of Motohashi:2014ppa . Thus as a whole, the model of action (1) with can drive a constant roll inflationary scenario, which has an exit after 55 or 60 e-fold numbers. Here it deserves mentioning that the other case, i.e., , leads to a power law inflation during the early universe, however, inflation is eternal and has no exit mechanism. Keeping this in mind, we will consider the case to establish the holographic equivalence of constant roll inflation.
III Holographic constant roll inflation
In the holographic principle, the holographic energy density is proportional to the inverse squared infrared cutoff , which could be related to the causality given by the cosmological horizon,
(15) |
Here is a free parameter. Identifying as the sole energy density, the Friedmann equation gives,
(16) |
Note that corresponds to the radius of the cosmological horizon, which may correspond to the infrared cutoff scale, as expected. As a candidate of the infrared cutoff , we may consider the particle horizon or the future event horizon , which are given as follows,
(17) |
Differentiating both sides of the above expressions lead to the Hubble parameter in terms of , or in terms of , as,
(18) |
In Nojiri:2005pu , a general form of the cutoff was proposed, which could be a function of both and and their derivatives, or additionally of the Hubble horizon and its derivatives as well as of the scale factor, namely,
(19) |
Based on this generalized formalism, we now establish that the constant roll inflation (discussed in the previous section) has an equivalent holographic correspondence with a suitable cut-off. In particular, by comparing Eq. (6) with Eq. (16), we may identify,
(20) |
or the comparison of Eq. (7) with Eq. (16) yields,
(21) |
Moreover it may be noted that Eq. (7) can be written as,
(22) |
on integrating which (with respect to the cosmic time), we obtain
(23) |
The above equation provides the general infrared cut-off, which resembles with the particle horizon or the future event horizon as,
(24) |
respectively. Therefore in the present case, the generalized holographic cut-off can be expressed by either of the following ways:
(25) |
Furthermore, due to Eq. (18), the above forms of and can also be expressed either in terms of particle horizon and its derivatives or in terms of the future horizon and its derivatives (see the Appendix, Sec. Appendix: Holographic cut-offs in terms of either particle horizon or future horizon).
The holographic Friedmann equation with the cut-off given by reproduces the cosmological field Eq. (6), or similarly, the cut-off , , or results to Eq. (7). Here we need to recall that Eq. (6) or Eq. (7) can lead to constant roll inflation as discussed in Sec. II. Thus we may argue that the infrared cut-offs of the form as well as of the form , , or are equally able to drive constant roll inflation, which we may call “holographic constant roll inflation”. This indeed establishes the holographic equivalence of the constant roll inflation in the present context. We may also write the general holographic cut-off corresponds to the constant roll inflation as follows:
(26) |
where the coefficients satisfy . The effective equation of state (EoS) parameter corresponding to the above is given by,
(27) |
Having the holographic model of Eq. (26) in hand, we now determine the evolution of the . With the explicit forms of (), Eq. (26) turns out to be,
(28) |
Using the holographic Friedmann equation along with the aforementioned constraint relation , the above equation yields the following solution of the :
(29) |
Here it deserves mentioning that the above solution of satisfies
(30) |
which is the constant roll condition in a holographic scenario. Therefore the solution of the holographic cut-off obtained in Eq. (29) indeed points to constant roll inflation. This solution of , in turn, helps to calculate the observable quantities, by which, we can investigate the viability of the holographic inflationary scenario. The slow-roll quantities in holographic inflation are given by,
(31) |
with . Consequently the scalar spectral index () and the tensor-to-scalar ratio () come as,
(32) |
respectively, where the suffix ‘’ symbolizes the horizon crossing instant of the CMB scale mode in which we are interested. Here we would like to mention that the above expressions of and are valid for slow-roll inflation. However, we will show that the present constant roll inflationary model obtains compatibility with the Planck data for ; thus we safely work with Eq. (32) even in the present context. The immediately leads to and as follows:
(33) |
Plugging the above expressions of the slow-roll parameters into Eq. (32) and after a little bit of simplification, we obtain the final forms of and as:
(34) |
It should be noticed that and depend on the dimensionless parameters and (where is the infrared cut-off at the time of horizon crossing of the CMB scale mode with being the horizon crossing instance). We can now directly confront the spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio with the Planck 2018 results Planck:2018jri , which constrain the observational indices to be:
(35) |

For the holographic model at hand, the and prove to be simultaneously compatible with the Planck constraints for the following narrow ranges of the parameters:
(36) |
This is depicted in FIG. 1. Thus as a whole, the holographic model of Eq. (28) triggers constant roll inflation which is indeed compatible with the Planck data provided the holographic cut-off at horizon crossing (i.e., ) and the constant roll parameter lie within the above-mentioned range.
IV More on holographic constant roll inflation
In this section, following Nojiri:2019kkp , we will consider an ultraviolet correction over the infrared one, and thus the holographic cut-off takes the following form,
(37) |
During the inflationary era, i.e., at high energy scales, the quantum gravity effects may become important, and hence the infrared cut-off acquires a correction by the ultraviolet one. In such modified holographic scenario, the comparison of with Eq. (6) or with Eq. (7) yields the infrared cut-off(s) corresponding to the constant roll inflation as follows,
(38) |
or,
(39) |
respectively. Due to the holographic Friedmann equation , the cut-off clearly reproduces Eq. (6), or similarly, the reproduces Eq. (7). Owing to this, we may argue that or , in the presence of ultraviolet cut-off, can drive constant roll inflation. We can also determine the evolution of such infrared cut-off(s), and is given by,
(40) |
Consequently, the scalar spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio in the present context turn out to be,
(41) |
The above theoretical expectations of and in such a modified holographic scenario turn out to be simultaneously consistent with the Planck 2018 constraints (see Eq. (35)) provided (i.e., the infrared cut-off at the instant of horizon crossing) and lie within the following ranges:
(42) |
It is clear by comparing Eq. (42) with Eq. (36) that in presence of the ultraviolet correction, the constraint on becomes different compared to the previous case where there is no ultraviolet correction, and moreover, for , the above constraint on resembles with that of in Eq. (36). Therefore in the present modified holographic scenario, the appearance of may give some extra freedom to some extent (one may go through Nojiri:2019kkp ).
V Unification from constant roll inflation to dark energy: Holographic view
The constant roll inflation in (10) well describes the inflation in the early epoch corresponding to , however, the Hubble rate during becomes negative and therefore it does not describe the expansion of the universe. In the spirit of this, we may consider the following simple modification of the Hubble parameter:
(43) |
for which, the associated scale factor of the universe is given by: where , , and are positive parameters (it may be mentioned that both and have mass dimension while is dimensionless). Here the constant roll parameter is replaced by (in place of ) to differentiate the present case from the previous ones. Eq. (43) clearly depicts that for , becomes a constant, in particular, , which results in a de-Sitter inflationary stage. On the other hand, when becomes a constant again at , which may correspond to the dark energy. Moreover the Hubble parameter in Eq. (43) satisfies,
(44) |
Thus the quantity tends to a positive constant value at the large negative time, which in turn ensures that the inflation is a constant roll in nature. Therefore by the modification in (43), we can describe both the constant roll inflation in the early universe and dark energy in the late universe in a unified manner. Because Eq. (43) is a shift by a constant from (10), Eq. (6) and Eq. (7) are modified as follows,
(45) |
Such a unified picture of constant roll inflation and dark energy may be described by some suitable higher curvature like gravity theory, for instance, see Odintsov:2017hbk where initially takes an corrected logarithmic form which drives constant roll inflation during the early phase, while at a late time, the is considered to be more-or-less of exponential form that ensures a viable dark energy era of the universe. In addition the standard cosmological evolution in-between the inflation and the dark energy era, and also the transition from the standard cosmology to the late time acceleration, have been successfully demonstrated in Odintsov:2017hbk . Or even a scalar-tensor theory may be also suitable to trigger of Eq. (43) – where the scalar field initially rolls at a constant rate to give the constant roll inflation and at a late time, the scalar field energy density acts like a bare cosmological constant which in turn leads to a late dark energy era. However, in the present context, our main concern is to establish the holographic equivalence of such a unified cosmological description, rather than finding suitably modified gravity theory(ies) corresponding to this evolution. For this purpose, let us individually compare the first and second equations of Eq. (V) with Eq. (16), which immediately identify,
(46) |
respectively. On the other hand, we may note that the second equation in Eq. (V) can be rewritten as
(47) |
on comparing which with Eq. (16) identifies the following cut-offs in more-or-less similar fashion of the particle horizon or the future event horizon :
(48) |
respectively. Therefore the generalized holographic cut-off, that results to an unification of constant roll inflation and dark energy era, can be expressed by either of the following ways:
(49) |
The holographic Friedmann equation with cut-off identified as reproduces the first equation of Eq. (V), or similarly, the holographic cut-offs like , , or reproduce the second equation of Eq. (V). This reveals that , , , or is equally capable to demonstrate the unified evolution of constant roll inflation and the dark energy era of the universe. We may also express the general holographic cut-off corresponding to the such unified description as follows:
(50) |
with . Due to along with the explicit forms of (), we determine the evolution of the cut-off as follows:
(51) |
becomes constant at asymptotic values of the cosmic time which, due to , points to the unification of two accelerating stages of the universe from the holographic point of view. In particular, for large negative and for large positive time, the becomes and , respectively, which depict holographic inflation during the early stage and holographic dark energy during the late time of the universe. Thus if we consider , then specifies the inflationary energy scale while is the Hubble scale during the dark energy stage. Moreover the of Eq. (51) obeys,
(52) |
This ensures that the holographic inflation occurring during the early universe is indeed a “constant roll” in nature. Thus we may argue that the holographic model of Eq. (50) can describe constant roll inflation and dark energy of the universe in a unified way. Having obtained such a cut-off, we now examine the observable viability of the model with respect to the recent Planck data. The first and second slow-roll parameters (defined in Eq. (31)) in this context turn out to be,
(53) |
respectively, where we use Eq. (51). Consequently, the scalar spectral index and the tensor-to-scalar ratio take the following forms,
(54) |
respectively, with being the horizon crossing instant of the CMB scale mode on which we are interested to evaluate the observable indices. It is evident that both and in the present holographic scenario depend on , and . It turns out that and are simultaneously compatible with the Planck 2018 data Planck:2018jri provided and the other parameters lie within the following ranges:
(55) |

This is revealed in Fig. 2. On the other hand, the effective EoS parameter corresponding to the cut-off in Eq. (50) (or in Eq. (51)) comes as,
(56) |
which tends to at i.e., during the dark energy era. This is, however, expected as the cut-off in Eq. (51) tends to a constant value, in particular, , during the large positive time. Thus we take the parameter to be equal to the present Hubble parameter of the universe, i.e., (where is the current Hubble parameter), which in turn makes the holographic cut-off at present time as . As a whole, the inflationary and the dark energy constraints in the present holographic scenario are given by,
(57) |
Having demonstrated the inflation and the dark energy era, we now like to describe the intermediate evolution of the universe (in-between the end of inflation and the dark energy era) in order to have an unified cosmology in the present holographic scenario. Regarding the end of inflation, we use the explicit evolution of from Eq. (51) to Eq. (53), and after a little bit of simplification, we obtain
(58) |
which has the behaviour as shown in Fig.[3]. The figure clearly depicts that is a monotonic increasing function with time and reaches to unity nearly at which, in turn, indicates the end of inflation ( represents the cosmic time when the inflation ends).

Therefore the beginning of inflation (when the CMB scale crosses the horizon) may be considered 50 to 65 e-folds back from the instance of (or equivalently ). The e-fold number is given by which, due to the Hubble parameter of Eq. (43), becomes
(59) |
Here is the instance of the beginning of inflation when . With and in order to have 50 to 65 e-folds of inflation, we find from the above expression that should lie within . Thus as a whole the inflation starts, i.e when the CMB scale crosses the horizon, at and gets an exit at , during which, the total e-fold number of the inflationary era becomes .
After the end of inflation, the universe needs to enter to a reheating phase or to the standard radiation dominated era in the case of instantaneous reheating. As we have demonstrated that the holographic energy density corresponding to the cut-off , i.e , triggers an inflation during the early universe and a dark energy era during the late time of the universe. Hence in order to have radiation energy in the present scenario, we introduce a new holographic energy density (corresponding to a cut-off ), beside the existing , and is given by,
(60) |
which is considered to have a coupling with the radiation, i.e around the end of reheating, will eventually decay to the normal radiation. Therefore the total holographic energy density turns out to be,
(61) |
and the effective cut-off () is given by,
(62) |
where is shown in Eq. (50). Similar to , the satisfies a conservation equation like
(63) |
where is the associated EoS parameter of (recall that is the EoS parameter corresponding to the , see Eq. (56)). Here we would like to mention that the decay rate from to the radiation energy becomes effective only around the end of reheating, and thus safely obeys the above conservation equation. As we will demonstrate below that during the inflation, remains suppressed compared to and thus the inflation is controlled entirely by . However after the inflation ends, decreases at a considerably faster rate and lands to the value of the present dark energy density, in particular . As a result, becomes larger over almost one e-fold after the end of inflation and thus dominates the universe’s evolution during the reheating stage which ends when the decay rate of becomes comparable to the Hubble rate. As a result, the holographic energy density decays to radiation around the end of reheating, which in turn sets the standard cosmological evolution of the universe. Eventually, the radiation energy density (that falls by ) becomes less than and then the universe again dominates by which triggers the late time acceleration of the universe. Thus as a whole, the early inflation and the late dark energy era are controlled by with two different energy scales respectively, while the intermediate phase of the universe from the end of inflation to the dark energy era is controlled by and the radiation energy produced from the decay of . For the demonstration of such evolution of the universe, we consider a variable EoS parameter corresponding to , in particular,
(64) |
where is a constant and recall that represents the total e-fold number of the inflationary era. According to the above expression, for and during (more-or-less, such behaviour of EoS parameter occurs in alpha attractor scalar-tensor theory with suitable exponent of the scalar potential). Thus the holographic energy density remains almost constant during the inflation, while after the inflation ends, seems to decay by with the expansion of the universe. In order to get the full evolution of , we use the expression of from Eq. (64) to the conservation Eq. (63), and by using , we obtain in terms of the e-fold variable as follows:
(65) |
where . Therefore the cut-off corresponding to turns out to be,
(66) |
The behaviour of is shown in the Fig. [4] where we take and . The figure clearly demonstrates that remains almost constant during the inflation (i.e during ), while after the inflation ends, seems to decay by with the e-fold variable. In the Fig. [4], we also take . The reason for taking such a value of is following: since the inflation is considered to be controlled by which acquires at the beginning of inflation (i.e at ) and at the end of inflation (i.e at ). Thus we take which remains almost constant during the inflation, so that during and the inflation gets controlled by .

We now compare the evolutions of and with the expansion of the universe, see Fig. [5] where the blue and red curves describe the logarithmic scale of and respectively (in particular, the blue curve represents and the red curve is for ). The left plot of Fig.[5] shows the two energy densities during the entire cosmological era, i.e from the beginning of inflation to the dark energy era, while the right plot is the zoomed-in version of the left one during the inflation. The figure clearly demonstrates that during the inflation and thus the inflation gets controlled by (corresponding to the cut-off ) which results to a Hubble parameter like Eq. (43). However after the inflation ends, decreases at a faster rate compared to , and eventually, dominates over within one e-fold after the end of inflation. Due to the fact that is described by a constant EoS parameter () during the post inflationary era (see Fig. [4]), the universe enters to a Kamionkowski like reheating phase during the same.


In this case, we may write the reheating e-fold number () and the reheating temperature () as follows Cook:2015vqa :
(67) |
where and are the Hubble parameter at and at respectively, is the present temperature of the universe, is the CMB scale and is the relativistic degrees of freedom. From Eq. (43), one can determine and , and by using these into Eq. [67], we finally obtain the reheating e-fold number in terms of — this is shown in Fig.[6]. The figure depicts that in order to be , the EoS parameter of during the reheating stage should be larger than , in particular . For instance, here we consider for which the reheating e-fold number comes as . Consequently, the reheating temperature becomes which is indeed safe from the BBN temperature .

Furthermore the holographic energy density at the end of reheating is given by
(68) |
which, due to , acquires the value as that is also evident in the Fig.[5] (or in the Fig.[4]). At the end of reheating, this amount of decays to radiation which in turn serves the initial energy density in the radiation dominated era. It is clear from Fig.[5] that the radiation coming from still dominates over after the end of reheating and thus sets the radiation dominated era (the standard cosmological evolution) of the universe. We may write the evolution of the radiation energy density (which is the dominating agent during the radiation dominated era) as,
(69) |
Owing to this decaying nature, eventually becomes comparable to the asymptotic which actually sets the present dark energy density of the universe. Eq. (69) immediately indicates that the condition happens nearly at (i.e almost 50 e-folds after the end of reheating) — this is consistent with the Fig.[5]. Thus in the present scenario where and the other parametric regimes are shown in Eq. (57) — the inflation occurs during , while the reheating and the radiation dominated era happen during and respectively. Going back to Fig.[5], it is clear that after (i.e after the radiation dominated era), becomes the dominating agent of the total energy contents. In effect, the universe undergoes through a late time acceleration controlled by a constant energy density . As a whole,
(70) |
As a result, the Hubble parameter during the inflation follows Eq. (43), while during the reheating and during the radiation stages, the Hubble parameter goes as
(71) |
respectively. Here is the Hubble parameter at the end of reheating, and is given by . Finally during the dark energy era, due to the form of in Eq. (51), the Hubble parameter becomes a constant . Due to the above expressions of , the dependence of e-fold variable on cosmic time during different epochs are obtained as,
(72) |
where , and represent the instance of the beginning of inflation, the end of inflation and the end of reheating respectively. Such dependence of at various cosmological stages have been used in obtaining the Fig. [5]. As we mentioned earlier that the dark energy starts to dominate the universe nearly at , and by using the third expression of Eq. (72), we determine the corresponding cosmic time as . With (that sets the inflationary energy scale), we get (the conversion may be useful), which suggests that the late acceleration of the universe indeed occurs near the present epoch.
Besides the background evolutions, the curvature perturbations in the super-Hubble scale are also worthwhile to address to examine the model’s stability. The Fourier mode of primordial curvature perturbation (, with being the momentum of the Fourier mode) starts from the Bunch-Davies vacuum in the deep sub-Hubble regime (where the perturbation modes of interest lie within the Hubble horizon), while in the super-Hubble scale, consists of a constant part and an evolving part as given by,
(73) |
where , are constant (with respect to the cosmic time) and . The scale factor during inflation behaves as , and moreover, and during the reheating and the radiation era respectively. As a result, the evolving part of at different cosmological epochs goes as,
(74) |
In Fig. [7], we give the plot of during inflation.

Therefore Fig. [7] along with Eq. (74) indicate that the evolving mode of monotonically decays with time (as ) in the super-Hubble regime from inflation to the radiation dominated era. Hence the curvature perturbation in the present unified scenario becomes constant at super-Hubble scale, i.e.,
(75) |
which in turn ensures the stability of the model.
Here we would like to mention that in the present unified scenario, the matter dominated era is absent in-between the radiation and the dark energy epochs. This is because we consider only one decay channel, particularly from to radiation energy, during the reheating stage. In order to introduce the matter dominated stage in the current context, the holographic energy density needs to decay via two channels during the reheating stage: one of these will produce the radiation energy, while the other channel will give the pressureless dust having EoS parameter to be zero. The matter dominated era has its own importance from the fact that the large scale modes re-enter the horizon around the transition of radiation to matter dominated era. Thus unlike to the situation in the radiation era, the large scale perturbation modes remain in the sub-Hubble regime and are not constant with time during the matter dominated epoch. We hope to address these issues (i.e the introduction of matter dominated era in an unified holographic cosmological model and its consequences) at some of our future work.
Therefore the holographic model with the cut-off given in Eq. (62) (where and are shown in Eq. (51) and Eq. (66) respectively) proves to unify the universe’s evolution from a constant roll inflation to the dark energy era with an intermediate radiation era followed by a Kamionkowski like reheating stage. The inflationary quantities (like the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio) and the present Hubble parameter during the dark energy era lies within the observable regime Planck:2018jri ; Planck:2018vyg provided , and satisfy the above-mentioned constraints.
VI Conclusions
The holographic principle has earned a lot of attention due to its rich cosmological implications for explaining the inflation and the dark energy of the universe. In the realm of holographic cosmology, the holographic energy density is inversely proportional to the squared infrared cut-off, in particular, . However, the fundamental form of the is still a debatable topic, and here it deserves mentioning that the most general holographic cut-off is proposed in Nojiri:2005pu where the is generalized to depend upon . Evidently, with such a generalized form of the , the holographic cosmology becomes phenomenologically richer.
Based on such generalized formalism, we propose a holographic realization of universe’s evolution from a constant roll inflation to the dark energy era with an intermediate radiation era followed by a Kamionkowski like reheating stage. The holographic cut-off corresponding to the constant roll inflation depends on the Hubble parameter and its derivatives (up to second order), and consequently, the cut-off satisfies the equivalent constant roll condition in the holographic scenario. To examine the viability of the model, we determine the observable quantities like the scalar spectral index () and the tensor-to-scalar ratio () in the present holographic inflation, and it turns out that the theoretical expectations of and become simultaneously compatible with the Planck data for a suitable value of the model parameter(s). In this regard, the simultaneous compatibility of and puts a bound on the holographic cut-off at the instant of horizon crossing. Such holographic correspondence of constant roll inflation is also extended to the case where the infrared cut-off is corrected by the ultraviolet one which, during the early universe, may originate from quantum gravity effects. Due to the appearance of the ultraviolet cut-off, the viable bounds on the infrared cut-off at the instant of horizon crossing modify compared to the previous case where the ultraviolet correction is absent. The presence of the ultraviolet correction provides some extra freedom to adjust the model parameters to have a viable holographic constant roll inflationary scenario. However, these holographic models (without or with ultraviolet correction) are unable to describe the cosmology after the inflation, in particular, the standard cosmological evolution and the dark energy era of the present universe. In the spirit of this, we propose a modified holographic cut-off which, due to the holographic Friedmann equation, results in a smoothly unified cosmological scenario from constant roll inflation at an early era to the dark energy era at the late time of the universe. In such unified holographic scenario, the holographic cut-off becomes constant and satisfies the constant roll condition at the early time leading to successful constant roll inflation, and the cut-off tends to be a different constant at the late time resulting in the dark energy era of the universe with a lower energy scale compared to that of the inflationary one. The inflation has a graceful exit at a finite time, after which, the universe enters to a Kamionkowski like reheating stage described by a constant EoS parameter of holographic energy density. It turns out that the EoS parameter corresponding to the holographic energy during the reheating stage must be larger than the value in order to have a viable reheating scenario, and moreover, the reheating temperature proves to be safe from the BBN temperature. Around the end of reheating, a portion of the effective holographic energy decays to radiation which in turn sets the standard radiation era of the universe. Regarding the other portion of the effective holographic energy — it decays at a considerably faster rate after the inflation ends and immediately lands to the present value of the dark energy density almost within 5 e-fold from the end of inflation (see the Fig.[5]), owing to which, it has no role during the radiation dominated era. However due to the fact that the radiation energy density redshifts by and the dark energy density remains almost constant, the universe eventually enters to the dark energy dominated era after a certain time. We have calculated the instance when the radiation energy density becomes comparable to the dark energy density in the present scenario, and it happens at around (i.e around the present epoch of the universe). The dark energy EoS parameter tends to the value at a late time, which is however expected because of the constancy of the late-time Hubble parameter. Consequently, the inflationary quantities (like the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio) and the present Hubble parameter during the dark energy, era prove to be consistent with the observable constraints for suitable ranges of the infrared cut-off (at the time of horizon crossing during the inflation), the constant roll parameter and the other model parameters. Regarding the evolution of perturbations, it turns out that the curvature perturbation in the present context remains constant (with time) at super-Hubble regime from inflation to the radiation dominated era. This in turn ensures the stability of the unified cosmic model under consideration.
In summary, the generalized holographic formalism proves to be very useful in describing constant roll inflation during the early universe as well as the unification of constant roll inflation with the late dark energy era of the universe. However, our understanding of the fundamental cut-off still demands a proper explanation. We hope that the present work of holographic description of the universe in a unified manner may help in a better understanding of the holographic principle.
Appendix: Holographic cut-offs in terms of either particle horizon or future horizon
Using Eq. (18) into Eq. (20), one may obtain the either in terms of particle horizon () and its derivatives or in terms of the future horizon () and its derivatives. They are given by:
(76) |
in terms of and its derivatives, or similarly,
(77) |
in terms of and its derivatives. Furthermore from Eq. (18) and Eq. (21), we obtain in terms of particle horizon and its derivatives as follows:
(78) |
and moreover,
(79) |
in terms of and its derivatives. Thus the above four equations provide our desired results for this section.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported in part by MICINN (Spain), project PID2019-104397GB-I00 and JSPS fellowship S23013 (SDO).
References
- (1) S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Phys. Rept. 509 (2011) 167 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 [arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]].
- (2) S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rept. 505 (2011) 59 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.04.001 [arXiv:1011.0544 [gr-qc]].
- (3) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rept. 692 (2017) 1 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.001 [arXiv:1705.11098 [gr-qc]].
- (4) G. ’t Hooft, Conf. Proc. C 930308 (1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026].
- (5) L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 doi:10.1063/1.531249 [hep-th/9409089].
- (6) E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 doi:10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a2 [hep-th/9802150].
- (7) R. Bousso, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 825 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.825 [hep-th/0203101].
- (8) M. Li, Phys. Lett. B 603 (2004) 1 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.10.014 [hep-th/0403127].
- (9) M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and Y. Wang, Commun. Theor. Phys. 56 (2011), 525-604 doi:10.1088/0253-6102/56/3/24 [arXiv:1103.5870 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (10) S. Wang, Y. Wang and M. Li, Phys. Rept. 696 (2017) 1 doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.003 [arXiv:1612.00345 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (11) D. Pavon and W. Zimdahl, Phys. Lett. B 628 (2005) 206 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.134 [gr-qc/0505020].
- (12) S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Gen. Rel. Grav. 38 (2006) 1285 doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0301-6 [hep-th/0506212].
- (13) X. Zhang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 14 (2005) 1597 doi:10.1142/S0218271805007243 [astro-ph/0504586].
- (14) E. Elizalde, S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and P. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 103504 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.71.103504 [hep-th/0502082].
- (15) Y. g. Gong, B. Wang and Y. Z. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 043510 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043510 [hep-th/0412218].
- (16) M. Malekjani, Astrophys. Space Sci. 347 (2013) 405 doi:10.1007/s10509-013-1522-2 [arXiv:1209.5512 [gr-qc]].
- (17) M. Khurshudyan, Astrophys. Space Sci. 361 (2016) no.12, 392 doi:10.1007/s10509-016-2981-z
- (18) C. Gao, F. Wu, X. Chen and Y. G. Shen, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 043511 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.043511 [arXiv:0712.1394 [astro-ph]].
- (19) M. Li, C. Lin and Y. Wang, JCAP 0805 (2008) 023 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/05/023 [arXiv:0801.1407 [astro-ph]].
- (20) F. K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis, [arXiv:2005.10302 [gr-qc]].
- (21) M. Li, X. D. Li, S. Wang and X. Zhang, JCAP 0906 (2009) 036 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/06/036 [arXiv:0904.0928 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (22) C. Feng, B. Wang, Y. Gong and R. K. Su, JCAP 0709 (2007) 005 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2007/09/005 [arXiv:0706.4033 [astro-ph]].
- (23) A. Sheykhi and S. Ghaffari, [arXiv:2304.03261 [gr-qc]].
- (24) A. Sheykhi, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) no.2, 023505 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023505 [arXiv:2210.12525 [gr-qc]].
- (25) J. Lu, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare and L. Xu, JCAP 1003 (2010) 031 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/03/031 [arXiv:0912.0923 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (26) Q. G. Huang and Y. G. Gong, JCAP 0408 (2004) 006 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2004/08/006 [astro-ph/0403590].
- (27) P. Mukherjee, A. Mukherjee, H. Jassal, A. Dasgupta and N. Banerjee, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134 (2019) no.4, 147 doi:10.1140/epjp/i2019-12504-7 [arXiv:1710.02417 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (28) S. Nojiri and S. Odintsov, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) no.8, 528 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5097-x [arXiv:1703.06372 [hep-th]].
- (29) E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) no.12, 123525 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123525 [arXiv:2005.04115 [gr-qc]].
- (30) J. D. Barrow, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Lett. B 815 (2021), 136134 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136134 [arXiv:2010.00986 [gr-qc]].
- (31) P. Adhikary, S. Das, S. Basilakos and E. N. Saridakis, [arXiv:2104.13118 [gr-qc]].
- (32) S. Srivastava and U. K. Sharma, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 18 (2021) no.01, 2150014 doi:10.1142/S0219887821500146 [arXiv:2010.09439 [physics.gen-ph]].
- (33) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, Phys. Lett. B 835 (2022), 137553 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137553 [arXiv:2211.02822 [gr-qc]].
- (34) V. K. Bhardwaj, A. Dixit and A. Pradhan, New Astron. 88 (2021), 101623 doi:10.1016/j.newast.2021.101623 [arXiv:2102.09946 [gr-qc]].
- (35) G. Chakraborty and S. Chattopadhyay, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) no.03, 2050024 doi:10.1142/S0218271820500248 [arXiv:2006.07142 [physics.gen-ph]].
- (36) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, Symmetry 13 (2021) no.6, 928 doi:10.3390/sym13060928 [arXiv:2105.08438 [gr-qc]].
- (37) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, Phys. Lett. B 825 (2022), 136844 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136844 [arXiv:2112.10159 [gr-qc]].
- (38) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019), 134829 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134829 [arXiv:1904.01345 [gr-qc]].
- (39) T. Paul, EPL 127 (2019) no.2, 20004 doi:10.1209/0295-5075/127/20004 [arXiv:1905.13033 [gr-qc]].
- (40) A. Bargach, F. Bargach, A. Errahmani and T. Ouali, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) no.02, 2050010 doi:10.1142/S0218271820500108 [arXiv:1904.06282 [hep-th]].
- (41) E. Elizalde and A. Timoshkin, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) no.9, 732 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7244-z [arXiv:1908.08712 [gr-qc]].
- (42) A. Oliveros and M. A. Acero, EPL 128 (2019) no.5, 59001 doi:10.1209/0295-5075/128/59001 [arXiv:1911.04482 [gr-qc]].
- (43) G. Chakraborty and S. Chattopadhyay, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 17 (2020) no.5, 2050066 doi:10.1142/S0219887820500668 [arXiv:2006.07143 [physics.gen-ph]].
- (44) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou and T. Paul, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) no.2, 023540 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023540 [arXiv:2007.06829 [gr-qc]].
- (45) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and E. N. Saridakis, Nucl. Phys. B 949 (2019), 114790 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.114790 [arXiv:1908.00389 [gr-qc]].
- (46) I. Brevik and A. Timoshkin, doi:10.1142/S0219887820500231 [arXiv:1911.09519 [gr-qc]].
- (47) H. Motohashi, A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, JCAP 09 (2015), 018 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/09/018 [arXiv:1411.5021 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (48) W. H. Kinney, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005), 023515 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.023515 [arXiv:gr-qc/0503017 [gr-qc]].
- (49) K. S. Kumar, J. Marto, P. Vargas Moniz and S. Das, JCAP 04 (2016), 005 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/005 [arXiv:1506.05366 [gr-qc]].
- (50) J. L. Cook and L. M. Krauss, JCAP 03 (2016), 028 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/03/028 [arXiv:1508.03647 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (51) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Class. Quant. Grav. 34 (2017) no.24, 245012 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa92a4 [arXiv:1704.05945 [gr-qc]].
- (52) Q. Gao and Y. Gong, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (2018) no.11, 491 doi:10.1140/epjp/i2018-12324-3 [arXiv:1703.02220 [gr-qc]].
- (53) S. D. Odintsov and V. K. Oikonomou, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.2, 024029 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024029 [arXiv:1704.02931 [gr-qc]].
- (54) S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou and L. Sebastiani, Nucl. Phys. B 923 (2017), 608-632 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.08.018 [arXiv:1708.08346 [gr-qc]].
- (55) F. Cicciarella, J. Mabillard and M. Pieroni, JCAP 01 (2018), 024 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/01/024 [arXiv:1709.03527 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (56) A. Ito and J. Soda, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) no.1, 55 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5534-5 [arXiv:1710.09701 [hep-th]].
- (57) A. Mohammadi, K. Saaidi and T. Golanbari, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) no.8, 083006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.083006 [arXiv:1801.03487 [hep-ph]].
- (58) E. Elizalde, S. D. Odintsov, V. K. Oikonomou and T. Paul, JCAP 02 (2019), 017 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/017 [arXiv:1810.07711 [gr-qc]].
- (59) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and V. Faraoni, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) no.4, 044042 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.044042 [arXiv:2201.02424 [gr-qc]].
- (60) S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, Phys. Lett. B 831 (2022), 137189 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137189 [arXiv:2205.08876 [gr-qc]].
- (61) S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, Phys. Dark Univ. 39 (2023), 101159 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101159 [arXiv:2212.05531 [gr-qc]].
- (62) S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, [arXiv:2301.01013 [gr-qc]].
- (63) A. Mohammadi, Phys. Dark Univ. 36 (2022), 101055 doi:10.1016/j.dark.2022.101055 [arXiv:2203.06643 [gr-qc]].
- (64) Y. Akrami et al. [Planck], Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020), A10 doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833887 [arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (65) N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020), A6 [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652 (2021), C4] doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 [arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]].
- (66) J. L. Cook, E. Dimastrogiovanni, D. A. Easson and L. M. Krauss, JCAP 04 (2015), 047 doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/04/047 [arXiv:1502.04673 [astro-ph.CO]].