High-Sensitive Microwave Electrometry with Enhanced Instantaneous Bandwidth
Abstract
Rydberg microwave (MW) sensors are superior to conventional antenna-based techniques because of their wide operating frequency range and outstanding potential sensitivity. Here, we demonstrate a Rydberg microwave receiver with a high sensitivity of and broad instantaneous bandwidth of up to . Such excellent performance was achieved by the amplification of one generated sideband wave induced by the strong coupling field in the six-wave mixing process of the Rydberg superheterodyne receiver, which was well predicted by our theory. Our system, which possesses a uniquely enhanced instantaneous bandwidth and high-sensitivity features that can be improved further, will promote the application of Rydberg microwave electrometry in radar and communication.
Atomic systems, which are excellent quantum platforms, have achieved tremendous developments in precision quantum metrology such as magnetometry [1, 2, 3] and atomic frequency standards [4, 5, 6]. Quantum sensing of MW electric fields has also gained considerable attention because of its potential applications in radar [7] and modern communication [8]. Rydberg atoms, which possess large dipole moments of MW transitions [9], are a major platform for providing highly sensitive microwave measurements[10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. The amplitude of the MW electric field has been detected using Autler-Townes (AT) splitting or ac Stark shifts induced by MW in the electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) spectrum, providing a direct International System of Units traceable measurement of MW [17, 20, 21]. In addition, the ability to measure the polarization [22, 23], phase [16, 24], and angle of arrival [25] of the MW field has been demonstrated.
High sensitivity and broad instantaneous bandwidth are two core parameters for high-performance practical MW electrometry. To achieve high sensitivity, a method called a superheterodyne receiver utilizing an extra local dressed MW has been demonstrated, achieving unprecedented highly sensitive MW measurements with a sensitivity of up to [16]; however, the instantaneous bandwidth is limited to a few hundred kilohertz. For the instantaneous bandwidth, although a response time of for MW pulses was demonstrated in [26], the bandwidth observed in most experiments on Rydberg communication receivers is below several megahertz [27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. The limitation of the transient atomic response to MW pulses results from dephasing mechanisms [32]. Recently, a large modulation bandwidth for MW communication in a Rydberg superheterodyne receiver was demonstrated with the discovery of an intrinsic six-wave mixing process [33]. However, there has been no reported Rydberg MW sensor that can satisfy the high sensitivity and broad bandwidth requirements for practical applications, such as radar.
In this letter, we demonstrate a Rydberg superheterodyne receiver with a sensitivity of and an instantaneous bandwidth of up to based on a new physical mechanism of enhanced atomic transient response, which was well predicted by our theoretical model. The physical mechanism for the enhancement of the atomic transient response is the increased emission efficiency of one generated sideband wave in the six-wave mixing process, which leads to a sensitive response of Rydberg systems to microwaves with a broad instantaneous bandwidth.
The experiment was performed on a -cm long cylindrical room-temperature rubidium vapor cell, as shown in Fig. 1(a). The beam for the probe field was derived from a 780 nm laser stabilized using modulation transfer spectroscopy, whereas the coupling field came from a 480 nm laser locked to a high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavity. The Gaussian beam radii of the probe and coupling light were and , respectively. The power of the coupling laser was varied in the experiment, whereas that of the probe laser was maintained at , which corresponded to a peak Rabi frequency of , because a lower probe Rabi frequency leads to a faster instantaneous response [32]. The generated optical signals and transmitted probe laser were recorded using an avalanche photodiode (APD) with a bandwidth of (Thorlasbs APD410A) and analyzed using a spectrum analyzer (Keysight N9020A MXA) to obtain signal amplitudes via a superheterodyne. The signal and local MWs were generated using two analog signal generators (Agilent E8257D), combined using a power combiner, and transmitted through a single horn antenna to free space. The local MW resonantly coupled Rydberg states at a frequency of . The reference clocks of the two MW sources and spectrum analyzer were synchronized with an active hydrogen clock to maintain frequency stability. The details of the Rabi frequency calibrations of the two MWs and lasers are presented in [34].

The energy levels for the six-wave mixing processes in the Rydberg superheterodyne receiver are shown in Figs. 1(b) and (c). The probe (), coupling (), and local MW () fields were the input fields. First, the and fields pumped atoms from ground state to Rydberg state . Then, as shown in Fig. 1(b), the field induced atoms emitted in state , and the signal MW field () excited atoms to and finally released a photon. This six-wave mixing process satisfied the condition . Thus, with , which is a positive sideband photon. Alternatively, as shown in Fig. 1(c), the input signal MW field () induced atoms emitted at state , and the strong field excited atoms to state and finally released a photon, which satisfied the condition . is a negative sideband photon. In these two processes, both intensities of generated and fields depended on the signal MW field; however, the field was stronger because the signal MW photon played different roles in these two processes. The signal MW photon acted as the seed of the stimulated emission process for the negative sideband generation and as linear absorption field for the positive sideband generation. Moreover, the wave vector mismatch , where and () are the wave vectors of the corresponding field shown in Fig. 1(a), had almost no effect on the efficiency of the six-wave-mixing process because ( was the length of the vapor cell) in our experiment geometry, which ensured wide input angle of the signal MW detection in principle.
In our system, the two generated sideband waves were mixed with a carrier wave (probe laser), forming a heterodyne detection. The frequency of the beat signal was , which was the frequency difference between the two sideband waves and the carrier wave. The amplitude of the oscillating beat signal corresponded to the amplitude of the two generated sidebands, which directly reflected the strength of the electric field of the signal MW. The enhanced instantaneous bandwidth in our system was achieved by amplifying the negative sideband wave in the six-wave mixing process.
To analyze dependence of the amplitude of beating signal on parameters of the frequency-mixing processes and reveal the physical mechanism of bandwidth enhancement, we began with a brief theoretical description of the atomic system response. In theory, for a weak probe and signal MW field, the beat signal amplitude oscillating at can be estimated as
(1) |
where the angular brackets denote the Doppler average, and are the harmonic atomic coherence components of (i.e., ), which are described as
(2) | |||||
(3) | |||||
where , , , , and are the spontaneous decay rates of the excited and Rydberg states, and is the additional dephasing rate of atomic coherence. It should be noted that we had , , and the maximum value in our system. The details of the coefficients and the theoretical model are presented in [34], including Refs. [35, 36, 37, 38, 39]. Eq. (1) was used to calculate the theoretical response curves. According to Eqs. (1–3), it is clear that the amplitude of the beat signal of the two frequency-mixing processes depends on the Rabi frequencies of the coupling laser and local MW.

In the experiment, we first optimized the local MW power for each coupling Rabi frequency to obtain the peak response of the system for the signal MW. Fig. 2(a) shows the measured EIT spectrum at different coupling Rabi frequencies, and Fig. 2(b) shows the corresponding amplitude of the beat signal (i.e., the response amplitude for a small signal MW) versus the local MW Rabi frequency for . It can be clearly observed that there was an optimized local MW power in which the response amplitude was maximum at a certain coupling Rabi frequency, and the peak response amplitude increased with the coupling Rabi frequency , indicating that the increase in the EIT signal exceeded the decrease caused by power broadening when was smaller than . We measured the sensitivity and bandwidth of the weak MW signal under peak response conditions.

Here we demonstrate the instantaneous bandwidth of the proposed system. The atomic transient response curves were measured by scanning the frequency difference of the two MWs from to . Fig. 3(a) shows the experimentally normalized atomic transient response curves for different coupling Rabi frequencies, and Fig. 3(b) shows the corresponding theoretical curves. In Fig. 3(a), the probe transmission signals were recorded using an APD with a bandwidth of ; hence, the measured frequency range was limited to . In addition, the actual instantaneous bandwidth of the system was estimated from the intersection point between the measured frequency response curve and line, considering the bandwidth of the detector. The attenuation caused by the APD response was approximated using a first-order low-pass filter with a bandwidth of . In Fig. 3(a), we observe a tendency toward an increased instantaneous bandwidth as the coupling Rabi frequency increases. Specifically, we observed a small gain peak in the atomic transient response curve at . In Fig. 3(c), we plotted the experimental results versus the coupling Rabi frequency. The experimental instantaneous bandwidth of the system was for , and increased to for , which was significantly larger than the limit (the total ground-state dephasing rate) predicted in Ref. [30]. The gain peak is crucial for enhancing the instantaneous bandwidth to overcome this limitation. The corresponding theoretical data are shown in Figs. 3(b) and (c). The theoretical predictions agree with the experimental data well, confirming the validity of the following analysis of the physical mechanism of bandwidth enhancement.
To further investigate the origin of the enhanced instantaneous bandwidth and gain peak, we studied the contributions of the two generated sideband waves to the amplitude response, as shown in Fig. 3(d). In the low-frequency regime (i.e., ), the contributions of the two generated sideband waves to the Rydberg receiver were almost identical. In addition, Fig. 3(d) clearly shows that in the high-frequency regime (i.e., ), the contribution of the positive sideband wave () started to decrease, whereas that of the negative sideband wave () exhibited a large gain peak induced by a strong coupling laser, resulting in an overall enhanced instantaneous bandwidth. The distinct behaviors of the two sideband waves can be attributed to the roles of the signal MW field in the two six-wave mixing processes, namely, the seed field for stimulated emission and population pumping.

Furthermore, based on our theoretical model, we analyzed the bandwidth range that the system could reach. In theory, the atomic transient response highly depends on the dephasing rate and the coupling Rabi frequencies. In Fig. 4(a), the theoretical frequency response curves at different dephasing rates clearly show the existence of a high-frequency response peak with an amplitude greater than and a low-frequency response valley with an amplitude less than , particularly at a low rate. Fig. 4(b) shows the theoretical frequency responses at different coupling Rabi frequencies . A response peak and valley appeared, and the frequency position of the peak increased with the coupling Rabi frequency. These two figures show that the dephasing rate played a dominant role in the low-frequency response, whereas the strong coupling laser produced a high-frequency response peak. A larger relaxation rate resulted in a flatter and broader bandwidth. In addition, it should also be noted that flat instantaneous bandwidths of up to several hundred megahertz could be easily obtained at the expense of sensitivity owing to the Doppler broadening effect in the copropagating experimental geometry of laser beams, as it effectively increased the relaxation rate . This study focused on simultaneously achieving both high sensitivity and broad instantaneous bandwidth. Under the premise of ensuring high sensitivity, our system achieved an experimental flat frequency range of up to 10.2 MHz, and theoretical analysis suggested that a high-frequency response of up to 50 MHz could be achieved using a large coupled Rabi frequency.

Next, we evaluated the sensitivity of our system by considering the noise level and signal response. Fig. 5(a) shows the measured amplitude of the beat signal as a function of the applied signal MW power. The sensor performance was measured at optimal , as shown in Fig. 2(b). The optical readout signal exhibited excellent linearity with the signal MW power. Subsequently, the electric field amplitude of the signal MW field was deduced from the experimental data of the calibrated MW Rabi frequencies [34]. Thus, we deduced the sensitivity of our system from the noise measurement, where signal-to-noise ratio equal to one. Fig. 5(b) shows the noise-limited sensitivity of the Rydberg superhet. It should be noted that we considered the frequency-response effect shown in Fig. 3(a) to accurately determine the sensitivity of this system. The best sensitivity of our setup was estimated to be at . The APD noise floor was lower than the optical noise floor, indicating that the current sensitivity was mainly limited by the system noise. Higher sensitivity may be achieved through homodyne detection to eliminate common-mode laser noise.
In summary, we demonstrated high-performance Rydberg MW electrometry, which has practical advantages: a high sensitivity of and a broad instantaneous bandwidth of up to . The observed frequency response, which exhibited an enhanced high-frequency gain in the strong-coupling case, was attributed to the amplification of one generated sideband wave in the six-wave mixing process of the Rydberg superheterodyne receiver. Our theoretical analysis showed that the detection of a superheterodyne signal at frequencies of up to can also be achieved with a large coupling Rabi frequency. For the first time, our results revealed an enhanced instantaneous response and realized broadband and high-sensitivity microwave measurements, promoting future practical applications.
Acknowledgements.
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 12174409 and No. 61835013).References
- Budker and Romalis [2007] D. Budker and M. Romalis, Optical magnetometry, Nature Physics 3, 227 (2007).
- Zhang et al. [2022a] S.-C. Zhang, H.-B. Lin, Y. Dong, B. Du, X.-D. Gao, C. Yu, Z.-H. Feng, X.-D. Chen, G.-C. Guo, and F.-W. Sun, High-sensitivity and wide-bandwidth fiber-coupled diamond magnetometer with surface coating, Photon. Res. 10, 2191 (2022a).
- Zhang et al. [2022b] S. Zhang, J. Lu, Y. Zhou, F. Lu, K. Yin, D. Zhan, Y. Zhai, and M. Ye, Zero field optically pumped magnetometer with independent dual-mode operation, Chin. Opt. Lett. 20, 081202 (2022b).
- Hinkley et al. [2013] N. Hinkley, J. A. Sherman, N. B. Phillips, M. Schioppo, N. D. Lemke, K. Beloy, M. Pizzocaro, C. W. Oates, and A. D. Ludlow, An atomic clock with instability, Science 341, 1215 (2013).
- Ludlow et al. [2015] A. D. Ludlow, M. M. Boyd, J. Ye, E. Peik, and P. O. Schmidt, Optical atomic clocks, Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 637 (2015).
- Yan et al. [2022] C. Yan, H. Shi, Y. Yao, H. Yu, Y. Jiang, and L. Ma, Automatic, long-term frequency-stabilized lasers with sub-hertz linewidth and frequency instability, Chin. Opt. Lett. 20, 070201 (2022).
- Richards et al. [2010] M. A. Richards, J. Scheer, W. A. Holm, and W. L. Melvin, Principles of modern radar, Vol. 1 (Citeseer, 2010).
- Pozar [2000] D. M. Pozar, Microwave and RF design of wireless systems (John Wiley & Sons, 2000).
- Gallagher [1988] T. F. Gallagher, Rydberg atoms, Reports on Progress in Physics 51, 143 (1988).
- Sedlacek et al. [2012] J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kübler, R. Löw, T. Pfau, and J. P. Shaffer, Microwave electrometry with Rydberg atoms in a vapour cell using bright atomic resonances, Nature Physics 8, 819 (2012).
- Simons et al. [2016] M. T. Simons, J. A. Gordon, C. L. Holloway, D. A. Anderson, S. A. Miller, and G. Raithel, Using frequency detuning to improve the sensitivity of electric field measurements via electromagnetically induced transparency and autler-townes splitting in Rydberg atoms, Applied Physics Letters 108, 10.1063/1.4947231 (2016).
- Kumar et al. [2017a] S. Kumar, H. Fan, H. Kubler, J. Sheng, and J. P. Shaffer, Atom-based sensing of weak radio frequency electric fields using homodyne readout, Sci Rep 7, 42981 (2017a).
- Kumar et al. [2017b] S. Kumar, H. Q. Fan, H. Kubler, A. J. Jahangiri, and J. P. Shaffer, Rydberg-atom based radio-frequency electrometry using frequency modulation spectroscopy in room temperature vapor cells, Optics Express 25, 8625 (2017b).
- Liao et al. [2020] K.-Y. Liao, H.-T. Tu, S.-Z. Yang, C.-J. Chen, X.-H. Liu, J. Liang, X.-D. Zhang, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Microwave electrometry via electromagnetically induced absorption in cold Rydberg atoms, Physical Review A 101, 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053432 (2020).
- Meyer et al. [2020] D. H. Meyer, Z. A. Castillo, K. C. Cox, and P. D. Kunz, Assessment of Rydberg atoms for wideband electric field sensing, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 53, 10.1088/1361-6455/ab6051 (2020).
- Jing et al. [2020] M. Jing, Y. Hu, J. Ma, H. Zhang, L. Zhang, L. Xiao, and S. Jia, Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed Rydberg spectroscopy, Nature Physics 16, 911 (2020).
- Anderson et al. [2021] D. A. Anderson, R. E. Sapiro, and G. Raithel, A self-calibrated SI-traceable Rydberg atom-based radio frequency electric field probe and measurement instrument, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 69, 5931 (2021).
- Meyer et al. [2021] D. H. Meyer, P. D. Kunz, and K. C. Cox, Waveguide-coupled Rydberg spectrum analyzer from 0 to 20 ghz, Physical Review Applied 15, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.014053 (2021).
- Simons et al. [2021] M. T. Simons, A. B. Artusio-Glimpse, C. L. Holloway, E. Imhof, S. R. Jefferts, R. Wyllie, B. C. Sawyer, and T. G. Walker, Continuous radio-frequency electric-field detection through adjacent Rydberg resonance tuning, Physical Review A 104, ARTN 032824 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.032824 (2021).
- You et al. [2022] S. H. You, M. H. Cai, S. S. Zhang, Z. S. Xu, and H. P. Liu, Microwave-field sensing via electromagnetically induced absorption of Rb irradiated by three-color infrared lasers, Optics Express 30, 10.1364/oe.454433 (2022).
- Holloway et al. [2017] C. L. Holloway, M. T. Simons, J. A. Gordon, A. Dienstfrey, D. A. Anderson, and G. Raithel, Electric field metrology for SI traceability: Systematic measurement uncertainties in electromagnetically induced transparency in atomic vapor, Journal of Applied Physics 121, 10.1063/1.4984201 (2017).
- Sedlacek et al. [2013] J. A. Sedlacek, A. Schwettmann, H. Kubler, and J. P. Shaffer, Atom-based vector microwave electrometry using rubidium Rydberg atoms in a vapor cell, Phys Rev Lett 111, 063001 (2013).
- Wang et al. [2023] Y. H. Wang, F. D. Jia, J. H. Hao, Y. Cui, F. Zhou, X. B. Liu, J. Mei, Y. H. Yu, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, F. Xie, and Z. P. Zhong, Precise measurement of microwave polarization using a Rydberg atom-based mixer, Optics Express 31, 10449 (2023).
- Simons et al. [2019] M. T. Simons, A. H. Haddab, J. A. Gordon, and C. L. Holloway, A Rydberg atom-based mixer: Measuring the phase of a radio frequency wave, Applied Physics Letters 114, 114101 (2019).
- Robinson et al. [2021] A. K. Robinson, N. Prajapati, D. Senic, M. T. Simons, and C. L. Holloway, Determining the angle-of-arrival of a radio-frequency source with a Rydberg atom-based sensor, Applied Physics Letters 118, 10.1063/5.0045601 (2021).
- Sapiro et al. [2020] R. E. Sapiro, G. Raithel, and D. A. Anderson, Time dependence of Rydberg EIT in pulsed optical and RF fields, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 53, 094003 (2020).
- Cox et al. [2018] K. C. Cox, D. H. Meyer, F. K. Fatemi, and P. D. Kunz, Quantum-limited atomic receiver in the electrically small regime, Physical Review Letters 121, 110502 (2018), pRL.
- Li et al. [2022] H. Li, J. Hu, J. Bai, M. Shi, Y. Jiao, J. Zhao, and S. Jia, Rydberg atom-based AM receiver with a weak continuous frequency carrier, Optics Express 30, 13522 (2022).
- Song et al. [2019] Z. Song, H. Liu, X. Liu, W. Zhang, H. Zou, J. Zhang, and J. Qu, Rydberg-atom-based digital communication using a continuously tunable radio-frequency carrier, Optics Express 27, 8848 (2019).
- Meyer et al. [2018] D. H. Meyer, K. C. Cox, F. K. Fatemi, and P. D. Kunz, Digital communication with Rydberg atoms and amplitude-modulated microwave fields, Applied Physics Letters 112, 10.1063/1.5028357 (2018).
- Yang et al. [2022] K. Yang, Z. Sun, R. Mao, Y. Lin, Y. Liu, Q. An, and Y. Fu, Wideband Rydberg atom-based receiver for amplitude modulation radio frequency communication, Chin. Opt. Lett. 20, 081203 (2022).
- Bohaichuk et al. [2022] S. M. Bohaichuk, D. Booth, K. Nickerson, H. Tai, and J. P. Shaffer, Origins of rydberg-atom electrometer transient response and its impact on radio-frequency pulse sensing, Phys. Rev. Appl. 18, 034030 (2022).
- Firdoshi et al. [2022] T. Firdoshi, S. Garain, S. Mondal, and A. K. Mohapatra, Six-wave mixing of optical and microwave fields using Rydberg excitations in thermal atomic vapor (2022), arXiv:2207.01835 [physics.atom-ph] .
- [34] See Supplemental Material at URL for details about the theoretical model and experimental parameters.
- Šibalić et al. [2017] N. Šibalić, J. D. Pritchard, C. S. Adams, and K. J. Weatherill, Arc: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali rydberg atoms, Computer Physics Communications 220, 319 (2017).
- Fleischhauer et al. [2005] M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Electromagnetically induced transparency: Optics in coherent media, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005).
- Casas et al. [2001] F. Casas, J. A. Oteo, and J. Ros, Floquet theory: exponential perturbative treatment, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34, 3379 (2001).
- [38] D. A. Steck, Rubidium 87 d line data, available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.2.1, 21 November 2019).
- Beterov et al. [2009] I. I. Beterov, I. I. Ryabtsev, D. B. Tretyakov, and V. M. Entin, Quasiclassical calculations of blackbody-radiation-induced depopulation rates and effective lifetimes of rydberg , , and alkali-metal atoms with , Phys. Rev. A 79, 052504 (2009).