High Fidelity Control of a Nitrogen-Vacancy Spin Qubit at Room Temperature using the SMART Protocol
Abstract
A practical implementation of a quantum computer requires robust qubits that are protected against their noisy environment. Dynamical decoupling techniques have been successfully used in the past to offer protected high-fidelity gate operations in negatively-charged Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV-) centres in diamond, albeit under specific conditions with the intrinsic nitrogen nuclear spin initialised. In this work, we show how the SMART protocol, an extension of the dressed-qubit concept, can be implemented for continuous protection to offer Clifford gate fidelities compatible with fault-tolerant schemes, whilst prolonging the coherence time of a single NV- qubit at room temperature. We show an improvement in the average Clifford gate fidelity from for the bare qubit to for the SMART qubit, with the nitrogen nuclear spin in a random orientation. We further show a 30 times improvement in the qubit coherence times compared to the bare qubit.
I Introduction
The negatively charged Nitrogen-Vacancy (NV-) centre in diamond [1] has long been proposed as a potential qubit platform for room-temperature quantum computing, owing to its long coherence times and compatibility with optically detected magnetic resonance techniques [2, 3, 4]. The longitudinal relaxation time and transverse relaxation time , together dictate how long a spin-qubit can remain in a prepared state. These metrics of coherence are of general importance for applications in quantum computing and memory nodes for quantum communication [5, 6, 7].
The overall coherence of an NV- spin qubit is typically limited by a relatively shorter coherence time, due to decoherence produced by a nuclear spin bath [8] in isotopically unpurified diamond. The nuclear spin bath, along with the host nuclear spin of the NV- , therefore negatively impact qubit gate operations, leading to lower gate fidelities [9].
Qubit gate operations with fidelities exceeding 0.99 are said to allow for error-correction strategies which are critical for qubit scalability [10, 11, 12]. To achieve this, dynamical decoupling techniques may be employed to protect the qubit [13, 9, 14, 15]. In addition, universal holonomic gates [16, 17] and composite pulse sequences [18] have also been demonstrated to exhibit high gate fidelities. However, in most cases a static magnetic field (B0) aligned with the NV- main symmetry axis is required to polarise the host nitrogen nuclear spin [19, 20], which in turn reduces the occurrence of detuned gate operations. While helpful for gate fidelities, initialisation of the nuclear spin presents an added layer of complexity towards scalability, requiring either RF delivery or careful alignment of the B0 field for multiple NV- spin qubits. If the host nuclear spin is of no interest, it will be useful to perform high-fidelity qubit gate operations on the electronic spin without nuclear spin initialisation.
Alternative control strategies include the implementation of microwave (MW) dressed states, which protect the qubit against magnetic field fluctuations by offering continuous dynamical decoupling [21, 22, 23, 24]. The always-on MW field redefines the quantization axis along the driving axis, and the quantization energy according to the driving strength. The latter opens up alternative two-axis control methods [25, 26]. Recently, the Sinusoidally Modulated, Always Rotating and Tailored (SMART) protocol as an extension to the dressed protocol, was employed to achieve high fidelity gates in a SiMOS quantum dot device at low temperatures [27, 28]. In this protocol the resonant MW drive is sinusoidally modulated to reduce the impact of MW detuning and amplitude fluctuations; in particular, the effect of detuned driving has a significant impact on idle qubits (identity gate operation). Some advantages of the SMART protocol over other methods, such as dynamical decoupling sequences, include simplicity in implementation, effective protection against decoherence even during gate operations and compatibility with global control of spin qubits [29, 30]. Similar alternating MW fields have also recently been employed to protect qubits in hBN from a nuclear spin bath [31], and to optically address NV- spins using universal holonomic gates in diamond [17] at room temperature.
In this work, we utilize the SMART protocol to demonstrate room temperature, high-fidelity, single qubit gates on the negatively charged Nitrogen-Vacancy (15NV-) electron spin, hosted within an electronic grade CVD diamond sample. We first measure the bare qubit coherence times and compare them to the extended coherence time using the SMART protocol. We then construct various single qubit gates in the bare, dressed, and SMART qubit bases and extract the average Clifford gate fidelities using randomized-benchmarking techniques [32]– thereby demonstrating high control fidelities compatible with fault-tolerant architectures and the advantage of the SMART protocol.
II Qubit Coherence

We first implement a bare spin qubit using the spin transition of a single NV- electron spin with a 15N isotope nuclear spin (). The chemical vapour deposition grown diamond sample used in this work contains etched nanopillars for improved photon collection efficiency and better isolation of single NV- defects with a non-resonant laser [33]. The Hamiltonian of the NV- spin is written in the laboratory frame as
(1) |
where is the zero-field splitting of GHz, {S, I} are operators for the electron and nuclear spins respectively, B0 is the static magnetic field, {, } are gyromagnetic ratios for the electron and 15N nuclear spins respectively, and {, } are hyperfine constants. The qubit spin state is correlated with the photoluminescence intensity of the NV- electronic spin, and is measured using suitable optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) techniques on a measurement setup similar to previous work [34, 35]. A measurement confirms a single NV- spin with as shown in Fig. 1(a). An ODMR sweep measurement shown in Fig. 1(b) reveals that the detected NV- centre is hyperfine coupled to a 15N host nuclear spin with a strength of 3.1 MHz, consistent with literature [36, 37].
Parameter | Value | Description |
---|---|---|
28 GHz/T | Electron gyromagnetic ratio | |
-4.316 MHz/T | Nuclear gyromagnetic ratio | |
3.1 MHz | Isotropic hyperfine | |
2.87 GHz | Zero-field splitting | |
1.85 mT | Static B field (simulated) |
II.1 Bare qubit
A permanent magnet is placed near the diamond sample to Zeeman-split the degenerate electronic energy levels. Simulation of the NV- Hamiltonian to match the Zeeman-splitting indicates a magnetic field of 1.8 mT. The hyperfine-coupled host nuclear spin is not initialised in our experiments. To overcome this, we coherently drive the electron spin equally detuned from both hyperfine-split ODMR frequencies with a strong field ( dBm delivered to a thin PCB antenna [34]). We measure Rabi oscillations of the bare qubit with frequency MHz and a coherence time µs, as shown in Fig. 1(c). Two-axis control of the bare qubit is implemented by making use of IQ modulation of the applied field.
We then measure the bare qubit coherence time using a Ramsey pulse sequence. The resulting data plotted in Fig. 1(d) shows an oscillating signal, fitted to a single decaying sinusoid with frequency 1.5 MHz approximately equal to the expected detuning, and a transverse free induction decay time of µs. When compared to the measured , this result already hints that the coherence time of a continuously driven spin qubit may be longer than that of an idle spin qubit.

II.2 Dressed and SMART qubit

The dressed qubit is implemented by applying an ‘always-on’ resonant MW field to continuously drive the spin; this establishes new eigenstates and . It is convenient to transform into the dressed basis (Hadamard transform), in which case the new eigenstates appear along the vertical axis of the Bloch sphere [26]. The dressed spin is initialised into the state using a -Y/2 gate pulse and projected for measurement using a +Y/2 gate pulse with respect to the bare spin.
Control of the dressed qubit can then be implemented by detuning pulses via frequency modulation (FM) [38], with the X and Y axis control signals being differentiated by a phase-shift. The gate lengths are then defined by the FM depth; thus Rabi oscillations in the dressed basis can be observed by sweeping the FM pulse lengths.
Similarly, to implement the SMART protocol, the always-on MW field is amplitude modulated with a sinusoid where the product of the amplitude and modulation period follows the relationship . Here, is the bare spin Rabi frequency, is the zeroth order Bessel function and is the amplitude modulation period [27].
In order to measure the coherence time of the SMART protocol, we perform a similar Ramsey experiment to that of the bare qubit but replace the free precession with continuous modulated driving. We also sweep the modulation period for increasing driving times (in multiples of ) while keeping the peak modulation amplitude fixed. The resulting Ramsey signal decay times are fit to the Bessel function, as shown in Fig. 2. The results indicate improved coherence times of 30 µs and 40 µs for optimum modulation periods ns and ns, corresponding to and , respectively. The results confirm that the optimal modulation period follows the Bessel function as expected and that the coherence time is improved by at least a factor of 30 compared to the bare qubit. We tabulate the measured and theoretically predicted times in Table 2. The small discrepancy between theoretically predicted and measured values for are attributed to slow MW power drifts and detuned Rabi oscillations.
We proceed to implement two-axis control at a sinusoidally modulated MW field with period ns and MHz. Two-axis control is realised by adding another modulation to an axis perpendicular to the always-on MW driving axis. Hence, with the MW axis applied along X, two-axis control is implemented by adding modulation along Y at frequency (y-gate) and 2 (z-gate) [27]. We therefore apply IQ modulation to implement the SMART qubit control. Two-axis Rabi oscillations of the dressed and SMART qubit are shown in in Fig. 3(a) and (b), respectively.
In Fig. 4, we extend the Rabi experiments to longer pulse lengths and find a significant factor of three improvement in the coherence time of the SMART qubit ( µs) when compared to the dressed qubit ( µs). Such an improvement in coherence time is beneficial for high-fidelity qubit gates, as a higher number of gates may be applied before the qubit experiences appreciable decoherence.

(MHz) | (theory) | (measured) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 2.405 | 9 | 267 ns | ns |
1 | 5.520 | 9 | 613 ns | ns |

III High Fidelity Clifford Gates
We perform randomized benchmarking on the bare, dressed and SMART qubits to compare their overall average Clifford gate fidelity , extracted from the fit function [32]. Here is the number of Clifford gates, is the spin probability as a function of applied Clifford gates, and variables , absorb the state preparation and measurement error [39]. Importantly the variable is fixed to an experimentally determined value, while and are left as free parameters for the fit. Additionally, we calculate the theoretical upper bound (UB) for using [40, 32], where is the measured Rabi quality factor.
We also simulate randomized benchmarking on the bare qubit using time-domain simulation of the NV- Hamiltonian shown in Eq. 1. For the measurements we average over the complete gate space constructed from primitive gates for repetitions, while for the simulations we average for repetitions to ensure convergence. Additionally, we repeat the measurements for both target output states in the bare spin basis and in the dressed spin basis, and combine the results to yield an average Clifford gate fidelity. The average Clifford gate fidelities for the bare, dressed and SMART qubits are compared in Fig. 5.
As seen in Fig. 5(a), a simulation of the randomized benchmarking for the bare qubit without decoherence modelling(black symbols) is able to accurately predict the measured average Clifford gate fidelity of (red symbols). The upper bound for the bare calculation is higher than this value ( 0.995) since is not affected by detuned driving. These results suggest that the main limiting factor for the bare qubit control fidelity is the detuning of 1.5 MHz due to the uninitialised nuclear spin. The dressed qubit with a 0.95 MHz Rabi frequency however offers a much better gate fidelity of ; the main limiting factor for the dressed qubit is attributed to spin decoherence. Higher dressed Rabi frequencies may be problematic due to breakdown of the rotating-wave approximation, unless the bare Rabi frequency is also increased [38]. For practical difficulties in increasing the MW power, we are limited to the bare Rabi frequency of 9 MHz.
For the SMART qubit, the gate lengths are restricted to a multiple of . Thus, with ns, we calibrate the SMART Rabi frequency to . The SMART protocol results in even higher average Clifford gate fidelity of , exceeding 0.99, for a similar Rabi frequency of MHz, and achieving results similar to [28]. This is expected as the SMART qubit exhibits an extended coherence time, as can be seen from inspection of Fig. 2 and Fig. 4. Although Fig. 2 shows a marginally better coherence improvement for the second operating setpoint of 588 ns, we expect that the reduction in the resulting Rabi frequency would not be of benefit for achieving higher gate fidelities. Future work in this direction may explore using multi-tone amplitude modulation instead to work around this limitation [28].
IV Conclusion
High fidelity control of qubits with gate fidelities exceeding 0.99 is critical for implementing various fault-tolerant quantum computing circuits. In this work we have shown that the SMART protocol enables high fidelity control of the electronic spin of an NV- spin qubit at room temperature, without needing to initialise the hyperfine-coupled host nuclear spin. We first demonstrate a factor of 30 improvement in the coherence time of the SMART qubit when compared to the bare qubit. We then measure an average Clifford gate fidelity of 0.9930.002 for the SMART qubit using randomized benchmarking techniques. We find that the SMART protocol achieves gate fidelities comparable to dynamical decoupling methods albeit with a simpler and environment-agnostic implementation, thereby simplifying experimental requirements and qubit operations, and providing a scalable path for multi-qubit operation.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the Australian Research Council (CE170100012). H.H.V. and I.H. acknowledge support from the Sydney Quantum Academy. H.H.V also acknowledges support from the Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship. C.A. and A.L. acknowledge support from the University of New South Wales Scientia program.
References
- Doherty et al. [2013] M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond, Physics Reports 528, 1 (2013).
- Wrachtrup and Jelezko [2006] J. Wrachtrup and F. Jelezko, Processing quantum information in diamond, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 18, 807 (2006).
- Balasubramanian et al. [2009] G. Balasubramanian, P. Neumann, D. Twitchen, M. Markham, R. Kolesov, N. Mizuochi, J. Isoya, J. Achard, J. Beck, J. Tissler, V. Jacques, P. R. Hemmer, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond, Nature Materials 8, 383 (2009).
- Zhang et al. [2018] H. Zhang, C. Belvin, W. Li, J. Wang, J. Wainwright, R. Berg, and J. Bridger, Little bits of diamond: Optically detected magnetic resonance of nitrogen-vacancy centers, American Journal of Physics 86, 225 (2018).
- DiVincenzo and Loss [1999] D. P. DiVincenzo and D. Loss, Quantum computers and quantum coherence, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 200, 202 (1999).
- Zhong et al. [2015] M. Zhong, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, J. G. Bartholomew, S. E. Beavan, S. M. Wittig, J. J. Longdell, and M. J. Sellars, Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time, Nature 517, 177 (2015).
- Bhaskar et al. [2020] M. K. Bhaskar, R. Riedinger, B. Machielse, D. S. Levonian, C. T. Nguyen, E. N. Knall, H. Park, D. Englund, M. Lončar, D. D. Sukachev, et al., Experimental demonstration of memory-enhanced quantum communication, Nature 580, 60 (2020).
- Childress et al. [2006] L. Childress, M. V. G. Dutt, J. M. Taylor, A. S. Zibrov, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, P. R. Hemmer, and M. D. Lukin, Coherent dynamics of coupled electron and nuclear spin qubits in diamond, Science 314, 281 (2006).
- Zhang et al. [2014] J. Zhang, A. M. Souza, F. D. Brandao, and D. Suter, Protected quantum computing: Interleaving gate operations with dynamical decoupling sequences, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 050502 (2014).
- Dobrovitski et al. [2013] V. Dobrovitski, G. Fuchs, A. Falk, C. Santori, and D. Awschalom, Quantum control over single spins in diamond, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 23 (2013).
- Knill [2005] E. Knill, Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices, Nature 434, 39 (2005).
- Fowler et al. [2012] A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012).
- De Lange et al. [2010] G. De Lange, Z.-H. Wang, D. Riste, V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson, Universal dynamical decoupling of a single solid-state spin from a spin bath, Science 330, 60 (2010).
- Van der Sar et al. [2012] T. Van der Sar, Z. Wang, M. Blok, H. Bernien, T. Taminiau, D. Toyli, D. Lidar, D. Awschalom, R. Hanson, and V. Dobrovitski, Decoherence-protected quantum gates for a hybrid solid-state spin register, Nature 484, 82 (2012).
- Chou et al. [2015] Y. Chou, S.-Y. Huang, and H.-S. Goan, Optimal control of fast and high-fidelity quantum gates with electron and nuclear spins of a nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond, Phys. Rev. A 91, 052315 (2015).
- Arroyo-Camejo et al. [2014] S. Arroyo-Camejo, A. Lazariev, S. W. Hell, and G. Balasubramanian, Room temperature high-fidelity holonomic single-qubit gate on a solid-state spin, Nature Communications 5, 4870 (2014).
- Sekiguchi et al. [2022] Y. Sekiguchi, K. Matsushita, Y. Kawasaki, and H. Kosaka, Optically addressable universal holonomic quantum gates on diamond spins, Nature Photonics 16, 662–666 (2022).
- Rong et al. [2015] X. Rong, J. Geng, F. Shi, Y. Liu, K. Xu, W. Ma, F. Kong, Z. Jiang, Y. Wu, and J. Du, Experimental fault-tolerant universal quantum gates with solid-state spins under ambient conditions, Nature Communications 6, 8748 (2015).
- Chakraborty et al. [2017] T. Chakraborty, J. Zhang, and D. Suter, Polarizing the electronic and nuclear spin of the NV-center in diamond in arbitrary magnetic fields: analysis of the optical pumping process, New Journal of Physics 19, 073030 (2017).
- Busaite et al. [2020] L. Busaite, R. Lazda, A. Berzins, M. Auzinsh, R. Ferber, and F. Gahbauer, Dynamic nuclear spin polarization in nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Phys. Rev. B 102, 224101 (2020).
- Golter et al. [2014] D. A. Golter, T. K. Baldwin, and H. Wang, Protecting a solid-state spin from decoherence using dressed spin states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 237601 (2014).
- Morishita et al. [2019] H. Morishita, T. Tashima, D. Mima, H. Kato, T. Makino, S. Yamasaki, M. Fujiwara, and N. Mizuochi, Extension of the Coherence Time by Generating MW Dressed States in a Single NV Centre in Diamond, Scientific Reports 9, 13318 (2019).
- Xu et al. [2012] X. Xu, Z. Wang, C. Duan, P. Huang, P. Wang, Y. Wang, N. Xu, X. Kong, F. Shi, X. Rong, and J. Du, Coherence-protected quantum gate by continuous dynamical decoupling in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 070502 (2012).
- Miao et al. [2020] K. C. Miao, J. P. Blanton, C. P. Anderson, A. Bourassa, A. L. Crook, G. Wolfowicz, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, and D. D. Awschalom, Universal coherence protection in a solid-state spin qubit, Science 369, 1493 (2020).
- Laucht et al. [2016a] A. Laucht, R. Kalra, S. Simmons, J. P. Dehollain, J. T. Muhonen, F. A. Mohiyaddin, S. Freer, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, D. N. Jamieson, J. C. McCallum, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Morello, A dressed spin qubit in silicon, Nature Nanotechnology 12, 61 (2016a).
- Seedhouse et al. [2021] A. E. Seedhouse, I. Hansen, A. Laucht, C. H. Yang, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Saraiva, Quantum computation protocol for dressed spins in a global field, Phys. Rev. B 104, 235411 (2021).
- Hansen et al. [2021a] I. Hansen, A. E. Seedhouse, A. Saraiva, A. Laucht, A. S. Dzurak, and C. H. Yang, Pulse engineering of a global field for robust and universal quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 104, 062415 (2021a).
- Hansen et al. [2021b] I. Hansen, A. E. Seedhouse, K. W. Chan, F. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, A. Laucht, A. Saraiva, C. H. Yang, and A. S. Dzurak, Implementation of the SMART protocol for global qubit control in silicon, arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.00836 (2021b).
- Vahapoglu et al. [2021a] E. Vahapoglu, J. P. Slack-Smith, R. C. Leon, W. H. Lim, F. E. Hudson, T. Day, T. Tanttu, C. H. Yang, A. Laucht, A. S. Dzurak, et al., Single-electron spin resonance in a nanoelectronic device using a global field, Science Advances 7, eabg9158 (2021a).
- Vahapoglu et al. [2021b] E. Vahapoglu, J. Slack-Smith, R. C. Leon, W. H. Lim, F. Hudson, T. Day, J. Cifuentes, T. Tanttu, C.-H. Yang, A. Saraiva, et al., Coherent control of electron spin qubits in silicon using a global field, arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14622 (2021b).
- Ramsay et al. [2022] A. J. Ramsay, R. Hekmati, C. J. Patrickson, S. Baber, D. R. Arvidsson-Shukur, A. J. Bennett, and I. J. Luxmoore, Room temperature coherent control of protected qubit in hexagonal boron nitride, arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.12747 (2022).
- Muhonen et al. [2015] J. Muhonen, A. Laucht, S. Simmons, J. Dehollain, R. Kalra, F. Hudson, S. Freer, K. M. Itoh, D. Jamieson, J. McCallum, et al., Quantifying the quantum gate fidelity of single-atom spin qubits in silicon by randomized benchmarking, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 27, 154205 (2015).
- Momenzadeh et al. [2015] S. A. Momenzadeh, R. J. Stöhr, F. F. de Oliveira, A. Brunner, A. Denisenko, S. Yang, F. Reinhard, and J. Wrachtrup, Nanoengineered diamond waveguide as a robust bright platform for nanomagnetometry using shallow nitrogen vacancy centers, Nano Letters 15, 165 (2015), pMID: 25438091.
- Sewani et al. [2020] V. K. Sewani, H. H. Vallabhapurapu, Y. Yang, H. R. Firgau, C. Adambukulam, B. C. Johnson, J. J. Pla, and A. Laucht, Coherent control of nv- centers in diamond in a quantum teaching lab, American Journal of Physics 88, 1156 (2020).
- Yang et al. [2022] Y. Yang, H. H. Vallabhapurapu, V. K. Sewani, M. Isarov, H. R. Firgau, C. Adambukulam, B. C. Johnson, J. J. Pla, and A. Laucht, Observing hyperfine interactions of nv- centers in diamond in an advanced quantum teaching lab, American Journal of Physics 90, 550 (2022).
- Groot-Berning et al. [2021] K. Groot-Berning, G. Jacob, C. Osterkamp, F. Jelezko, and F. Schmidt-Kaler, Fabrication of 15NV- centers in diamond using a deterministic single ion implanter, New Journal of Physics 23, 063067 (2021).
- van Dam et al. [2019] S. B. van Dam, M. Walsh, M. J. Degen, E. Bersin, S. L. Mouradian, A. Galiullin, M. Ruf, M. IJspeert, T. H. Taminiau, R. Hanson, and D. R. Englund, Optical coherence of diamond nitrogen-vacancy centers formed by ion implantation and annealing, Phys. Rev. B 99, 161203 (2019).
- Laucht et al. [2016b] A. Laucht, S. Simmons, R. Kalra, G. Tosi, J. P. Dehollain, J. T. Muhonen, S. Freer, F. E. Hudson, K. M. Itoh, D. N. Jamieson, J. C. McCallum, A. S. Dzurak, and A. Morello, Breaking the rotating wave approximation for a strongly driven dressed single-electron spin, Phys. Rev. B 94, 161302 (2016b).
- Magesan et al. [2011] E. Magesan, J. M. Gambetta, and J. Emerson, Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 180504 (2011).
- Stano and Loss [2022] P. Stano and D. Loss, Review of performance metrics of spin qubits in gated semiconducting nanostructures, Nature Reviews Physics , 1 (2022).