This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Hawking radiation received at infinity in higher dimensional Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetimes

Kai Lin 1,2    Wei-Liang Qian2,3,4    Xilong Fan5    Bin Wang3    Elcio Abdalla6 1) Hubei Subsurface Multi-scale Imaging Key Laboratory, Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China 2) Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo, 12602-810, Lorena, SP, Brazil 3) Center for Gravitation and Cosmology, College of Physical Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China 4) Faculadade de Engenharia de Guaratinguetá, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Guaratinguetá, SP, Brazil 5) School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China 6) Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
(April 20th, 2021)
Abstract

In this work, we investigate the Hawking radiation in higher dimensional Reissner-Nordström black holes as received by an observer, resides at infinity. The frequency-dependent transmission rates, which deform the thermal radiation emitted in the vicinity of the black hole horizon, are evaluated numerically. Apart from the case of four-dimensional spacetime, the calculations are extended to higher dimensional Reissner-Nordström metrics, and the results are found to be somewhat sensitive to the spacetime dimension. In general, it is observed that the transmission coefficients practically vanishes when the frequency of the emitted particle approaches zero. It increases with increasing frequency and eventually saturates to some value. For four-dimensional spacetime, the above result is shown to be mostly independent of the metric’s parameter, neither of the orbital quantum number of the particle, once the location of the event horizon, rhr_{h}, and the product of the charges of the black hole and the particle qQqQ are given. For higher-dimensional cases, on the other hand, the convergence becomes more slowly. Moreover, the difference between states with different orbital quantum numbers is found to be more significant. As the magnitude of the product of charges qQqQ becomes more significant, the transmission coefficient exceeds one. In other words, the resultant spectral flux is amplified, which results in an accelerated process of black hole evaporation. The relation between the calculated outgoing transmission coefficient with existing results on the greybody factor is discussed.

pacs:
04.70.Dy, 04.62.+v, 11.30.-j

I Introduction

The four laws of black hole mechanics were initially proposed [1] as merely an analogy to the four laws of thermodynamics. The notion of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy [2, 3, 4] shed light on the microscopic degrees of freedom of the black hole. It plays an important role in the holographic principle [5, 6] and the AdS/CFT correspondence [7, 8]. From a different aspect, Hawking’s approach [9, 10] shows that the black hole emits radiation according to a thermal spectrum, which, in turn, demonstrates the consistency with Bekenstein’s results. Wilczek and coauthors [11, 12] have further considered the effect of self-interaction correction to the metric. By employing a semi-classical approximation [12], the related physical process is interpreted as a particle traversing the horizon from inside while moving inward. Mathematically, the interpretation is closely related to the fact that the relevant contribution only concerns a small interval bounded by the initial and final radii, in the immediate vicinity of the horizon [12]. As a result, the calculated tunneling rate is with respect to the position of the horizon.

The above semi-classical method introduced by Wilczek has incited many subsequential studies (see, for instance, Refs. [13, 14]). Furthermore, it has inspired other approaches [15, 16, 17, 18]. Angheben et al. has proposed [16] to evaluate the imaginary part of the action via the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, which is an extension from the approach by Srinivasan and Padmanabhan [15]. The method can be applied to static metrics, which might be singular at the horizon. Moreover, the proposed procedure is independent of any particular choice of spatial coordinates. However, the formal solution of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation partly relies on the symmetries of the specific metric. Moreover, as the particle’s self-gravitation is ignored, the resultant particle emission rate takes into account only the leading term linear in energy. The method has been examed in the context of a broader class of spacetimes, as well as different types of fields, where consistent results are obtained [17, 19, 20, 21].

The particle emission took place at the horizon of a black hole experience an effective potential during its course to the spatial infinity. In other words, the resultant spectral flux received by an observable at infinity is further deformed by a frequency-dependent transmission coefficient, γ(ω)\gamma(\omega). To be specific, for an observer resides at infinity, the expectation value for the number of a given particle species of frequency ω\omega reads

n(ω)=γωeβω±1,\displaystyle\langle n(\omega)\rangle=\frac{\gamma{\omega}}{e^{\beta\omega}\pm 1}\ , (1.1)

where β\beta is the inverse of Hawking temperature, the plus (minus) sign is for fermions (bosons). Here

γ(ω)=|𝒯|2\displaystyle\gamma(\omega)=\left|\frac{\mathcal{T}}{\mathcal{I}}\right|^{2} (1.2)

is the so-called greybody factor [22], where 𝒯\mathcal{T} and \mathcal{I} are the amplitudes of the transmission and incident waves. In the literature, however, the latter are usually defined in the context of an incoming wave from infinity with given frequency ω\omega, interpreted as the probability for it to reach the horizon of the black hole. Nonetheless, it can be shown [23] that the above probability coincides with that for an outgoing wave in the mode ω\omega to escape to infinity through the effective potential of the black hole. Therefore, regarding Wilczek’s viewpoint of Hawking radiation, it measures the tunneling probability for penetration of the barrier governed by the black hole metric. In asymptotically flat spacetimes, it is directly associated with the S-matrix element.

At small frequency, analytical results on the greybody factor can be obtained by perturbative approach [24]. On the other hand, for frequencies with large imaginary part, the monodromy method [25] has been utilized [26, 23]. Estimations on the bound of the greybody factor have also been carried out [27]. However, in general, as the forms of the effective potentials are rather complicated, the exact solution for a given metric is not straightforward. As a result, one usually resorts to numerical approaches.

The present study involves an attempt to numerically investigate the Hawking radiation as well as the frequency-dependent transmission coefficient in Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetime. The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we briefly review the Hawking radiation on the horizon of the black hole. The frequency-dependent transmission coefficient is obtained numerically for various types of fields in section III. Additional discussions and concluding remarks are given in the last section.

II Tunneling radiation by the semi-classical approach

In this section, we briefly review the Hawking radiation at the horizon of the Reissner-Nordström black hole, in terms of the Hamilton-Jacobi method [16]. The background nn dimensional metric and electromagnetic potential are given by

ds2\displaystyle ds^{2} =\displaystyle= f(r)dt2+dr2f(r)+r2dΩn2\displaystyle-f(r)dt^{2}+\frac{dr^{2}}{f(r)}+r^{2}d\Omega_{n-2}
dA\displaystyle dA =\displaystyle= At(r)dt\displaystyle A_{t}(r)dt (2.1)

where f=18Γ((n1)/2)M(n2)π(n3)/2rn3+4Γ((n1)/2)Q2r2(3n)(n2)(n3)π(n3)/2f=1-\frac{8\Gamma((n-1)/2)M}{(n-2)\pi^{(n-3)/2}r^{n-3}}+\frac{4\Gamma((n-1)/2)Q^{2}r^{2(3-n)}}{(n-2)(n-3)\pi^{(n-3)/2}} and At=Qr3n(3n)A_{t}=\frac{Qr^{3-n}}{(3-n)}. dΩn2d\Omega_{n-2} is a n2n-2 dimensional unit sphere. MM and QQ are the mass and charge of the black hole, respectively. The event horizon rhr_{h} and inner horizon ri=brhr_{i}=br_{h} satisfy the relation M=(n2)π(n3)/2(1+bn3)8Γ((n1)/2)rhn3M=\frac{(n-2)\pi^{(n-3)/2}(1+b^{n-3})}{8\Gamma((n-1)/2)}r_{h}^{n-3} and Q=bn3(n2)π(n3)/22Γ((n3)/2)rh2(n3)Q=\frac{b^{n-3}(n-2)\pi^{(n-3)/2}}{2\Gamma((n-3)/2)}r_{h}^{2(n-3)}.

As a semi-classical approximation, the dynamics of particles with various spin satisfy the Hamilton-Jacobi equation [15, 16, 19, 20, 21], namely,

gμν(SxμqAμ)(SxνqAν)+m2=0\displaystyle g^{\mu\nu}\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial x^{\mu}}-qA_{\mu}\right)\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial x^{\nu}}-qA_{\nu}\right)+m^{2}=0 (2.2)

where mm and qq are the mass and charge of particle. For a static four-dimensional metric, one may look for a solution in the form

S=ωt+R(r)+Y(θ,ϕ,).\displaystyle S=-\omega t+R(r)+Y(\theta,\phi,\cdot\cdot\cdot). (2.3)

By substituting the specific forms of the metric and electromagnetical potential into above equation, one finds the following radial equation after separating the variables

1f(ω+qAt)2+fR2+m2=λr2\displaystyle-\frac{1}{f}\left(\omega+qA_{t}\right)^{2}+fR^{\prime 2}+m^{2}=\frac{\lambda}{r^{2}} (2.4)

where λ\lambda is a constant. Therefore, near the event horizon, we have

R\displaystyle R =\displaystyle= 𝑑r(ωωh)2f(r)(m2λ/r2)f(r)\displaystyle\int dr\frac{\sqrt{(\omega-\omega_{h})^{2}-f(r)(m^{2}-\lambda/r^{2})}}{f(r)}
\displaystyle\to dσσ2(ωωh)2f(rh)(rrh)(m2λ/r2)f(rh)\displaystyle\int\frac{d\sigma}{\sigma}\frac{2\sqrt{(\omega-\omega_{h})^{2}-f^{\prime}(r_{h})(r-r_{h})(m^{2}-\lambda/r^{2})}}{f^{\prime}(r_{h})}

where ωh=qQ/rh\omega_{h}=-qQ/r_{h}. σ=drf=2rrhf(rh)\sigma=\int\frac{dr}{\sqrt{f}}=\frac{2\sqrt{r-r_{h}}}{\sqrt{f^{\prime}(r_{h})}} is the leading contribution of the invariant distance. The integral is carried out by deforming the contour to avoid the singularity at the horizon, which picks up half a residue:

S=R=2π(ωωh)f(rh).\displaystyle\Im S=\Im R=\frac{2\pi(\omega-\omega_{h})}{f^{\prime}(r_{h})}. (2.5)

It is noted that the result is invariant with respect to time recalibration and spatial diffeomorphism [16]. Subsequently, the quantum tunneling rate from horizon is given by

Γ=exp(2S)=exp(4πωωhf(rh))\displaystyle\Gamma=\exp\left(-2\Im S\right)=\exp\left(-4\pi\frac{\omega-\omega_{h}}{f^{\prime}(r_{h})}\right) (2.6)

and the Hawking temperature at horizon reads

Th=f(rh)4π.\displaystyle T_{h}=\frac{f^{\prime}(r_{h})}{4\pi}. (2.7)

At this point, the Hawking radiation is purely thermal.

In what follows, we proceed to evaluate the role of the effective potential on the resultant spectral flux, as the emitted particle further penetrates the barrier toward an observer at spatial infinity.

III The frequency-dependent transmission coefficient in Reissner-Nordström spacetime

Usually, for a non-rotating metric, the equation of motion of various fields can be simplified by using the method of separation of variables and the radial part of the resultant field equation reads

d2Ψdr2+((ω+qAt)2V(r))=0.\displaystyle\frac{d^{2}\Psi}{dr_{*}^{2}}+\left((\omega+qA_{t})^{2}-V(r)\right)=0. (3.1)

The above equation is Schrodinger-type, where r=𝑑r/fr_{*}=\int dr/f is tortoise coordinate and VV, the effective potential, is governed by the specific spacetime as well as particle state. For asymptotically flat spacetimes, V(rrh)=0V(r\rightarrow r_{h})=0 and V(r)=VV(r\rightarrow\infty)=V_{\infty}, so the solutions possess the following asymptotic forms at horizon and infinity [22]

ΨeikHr+eikHrrrh,𝒯eikr+𝒜eikrr.\displaystyle\Psi\sim\begin{array}[]{cc}\mathcal{R}e^{-ik_{H}r_{*}}+\mathcal{I}e^{ik_{H}r_{*}}&r\rightarrow r_{h},\\ \mathcal{T}e^{ik_{\infty}r_{*}}+\mathcal{A}e^{-ik_{\infty}r_{*}}&r\rightarrow\infty.\\ \end{array} (3.4)

The equation of motion implies that the Wronskians

W(rrh)=2ikh(||2||2),\displaystyle W(r\rightarrow r_{h})=-2ik_{h}(\left|\mathcal{R}\right|^{2}-\left|\mathcal{I}\right|^{2}),
W(r)=2ik(|𝒯|2||2).\displaystyle W(r\rightarrow\infty)=2ik_{\infty}(\left|\mathcal{T}\right|^{2}-\left|\mathcal{I}\right|^{2}).

are conserved so that one finds the following relation

|𝒯|2|𝒜|2=kHk(||2||2).\displaystyle\left|\mathcal{T}\right|^{2}-\left|\mathcal{A}\right|^{2}=-\frac{k_{H}}{k_{\infty}}(\left|\mathcal{R}\right|^{2}-\left|\mathcal{I}\right|^{2}). (3.6)

For the present scenario, the incident wave is propagates outward with amplitude \mathcal{I} and one also requires

𝒜0.\displaystyle\mathcal{A}\equiv 0. (3.7)

In the case of a massless scalar field, the relevant effective potential in Reissner-Nordström spacetime can be derived from the Klein Gordon equation, which reads

V=fr2[l(l+n1)+n22rf+(n4)(n2)4f],\displaystyle V=\frac{f}{r^{2}}\left[l(l+n-1)+\frac{n-2}{2}rf^{\prime}+\frac{(n-4)(n-2)}{4}f\right],

where ll is the orbital quantum number of the particle state.

At this point, the problem is reduced to that of the one-dimensional barrier penetration. To obtain the transmission coefficient, we resort to solve Eq. (3.1) numerically with the boundary conditions Eqs. (3.4) and (3.7).

For the present study, we make use of an approach based on numerical integration. We relegated to the appendix technical details of the numerical scheme, and present the results in Figs. 1-6.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: The calculated transmission coefficient |𝒯|2\left|\frac{\mathcal{T}}{\mathcal{I}}\right|^{2} for massless scsalar field as a function of the frequency ω\omega for different values of bb. The calculations are carried out with rh=1r_{h}=1, qQ=18qQ=\frac{1}{8}, and l=0l=0.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The same as Fig. 1, but for the low frequency region ωTh\omega\ll T_{h} and ωrh1\omega r_{h}\ll 1. The calculated results are compared with the low frequency limit obtained in Refs. [28, 23].
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The same as Fig. 1, for different values of ll. The calculations are carried out with rh=1r_{h}=1, qQ=18qQ=\frac{1}{8}, and b=14b=\frac{1}{4}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: The same as Fig. 1, for different values of bb and ll in (3+1) dimensional spacetime. The calculations are carried out with rh=1r_{h}=1 and qQ=0qQ=0. The calculated results (shown in solid curves) are compared with the low boundary (shown in dotted curves) obtained in Ref. [27].
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: The calculated transmission coefficient |𝒯|2\left|\frac{\mathcal{T}}{\mathcal{I}}\right|^{2} for massless scsalar field as a function of qQqQ for different values of bb. The calculations are carried out with rh=1r_{h}=1, ω=1\omega=1, and l=0l=0.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The calculated transmission coefficient |𝒯|2\left|\frac{\mathcal{T}}{\mathcal{I}}\right|^{2} for massless scsalar field as a function of qQqQ for different values of ll. The calculations are carried out with rh=1r_{h}=1, ω=1\omega=1, and b=14b=\frac{1}{4}.

In Figs. 14 we present the resultant transmission coefficient as a function of the frequcency, |𝒯|2\left|\frac{\mathcal{T}}{\mathcal{I}}\right|^{2} vs. ω\omega, for massless scsalar field. The calculations are carried out by varying the parameter of the metric bb and the orbital quantum number ll. It is observed that the transmission coefficient monotonically increases with increasing frequency. As shown in Fig. 2, they are in agreement with universal analytic results [28, 23] in the low frequency region ωTh\omega\ll T_{h} and ωrh1\omega r_{h}\ll 1, as it rises from zero where the frequency vanishes. The physical interpretation is that at very low frequency, the size of the wavelength is much significant than that of the black hole. Therefore an incident wave from infinity is virtually unaffected by the presence of the latter. On the other hand, the transmission coefficient eventually saturates to some value at the limit of high frequency. In Fig. 4, the obtained results are also compared against the lower bound estimated in Ref. [27]. From Figs. 1 and 3, at four dimension, it is found that resultant transmission coefficients all converge to the same curve, for given rhr_{h} and qQqQ and different values of bb and ll. However, as one goes to higher-dimensional cases, the convergence becomes more slowly. Moreover, the difference between states with different bb and ll becomes more significant.

In Figs. 5 and 6, we investigate the transmission coefficient as a function of the product of the charge of the particle and the black hole qQqQ. For all the cases, the transmission rate is found to be a monotonically decreasing function of qQqQ. The dependence is mostly linear for given bb and for l=0l=0. For larger ll, the curves show a twisted feature, and in the four-dimensional case, they are observed to converge together eventually. In particular, it is shown that for qQ<0qQ<0, as the magnitude becomes more significant, the transmission coefficient further increases and eventually exceeds one. In other words, the resultant spectral flux is amplified by the effective potential. This feature is reminiscent of the superradiance [29], which occurs when the frequency is less than a particular value related to the charge of the black hole. By comparing the results for different spacetime dimensions, it is found that the difference between states with different bb and ll becomes more pronounced for higher dimensional spacetimes. The slope of the monotonical dependence decreases as ll increases, and it becomes more evident as the dimension of spacetime increases. For example, for the cases of 5+15+1 and 6+16+1 metrics, the transmission coefficient of l=0l=0 increases mostly linearly with decreasing qQqQ, apart from that the slope in 5+15+1 is larger. However, the corresponding slopes for the cases with l=1,2,3l=1,2,3 are much less significant when compared to the former.

IV Concluding remarks

To summarize, the Hawking radiation in Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetime regarding an observer resides at infinity is studied. We evaluate the frequency-dependent transmission coefficient after discussing the thermal radiation emitted in the vicinity of the horizon. It is found that the transmission coefficients approaches zero as the frequency of the emitted particle vanishes. It is a monotonically increasing function of the frequency and saturates when the frequency is more significant. In four-dimensional spacetime, this feature is shown to be mostly independent of the parameters, for given rhr_{h} and qQqQ. For higher-dimensional spacetimes, the difference between states with different bb and ll becomes more pronounced. In particular, it is found that the transmission coefficient exceeds one when qQ<0qQ<0 and the magnitude becomes large enough. This indicates that the spectral flux is further amplified during the course of traversing the curved spacetime.

Acknowledgements.
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) under contract Nos. 11805166,11673008, and 11922303.

Appendix: An adapted method for numerical integration

This method was initially utilized for the calculation of superradiance [22]. For the present study, it can be readily adapted for the numerical calculations. The code is implemented in terms of Mathematica notebook. For the purpose of the present study, we introduce the following adaptations. First, we rewrite the radial equation by the coordinate transform x=1rhrx=1-\frac{r_{h}}{r}, so that x=1x=1 as rr\rightarrow\infty and x=0x=0 as r=rhr=r_{h}. By expanding the function at x=0x=0 and x=1x=1, one can numerically integrate the Schrodinger-type equation from the region near x=0x=0 to that near x=1x=1. The code’s efficiency lies in its significant accuracy of the numerical implementation for the integration in Mathematica.

References

  • [1] J. M. Bardeen, B. Carter, and S. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 31, 161 (1973).
  • [2] J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973).
  • [3] J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 9, 3292 (1974).
  • [4] J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D49, 1912 (1994), gr-qc/9307035.
  • [5] C. R. Stephens, G. ’t Hooft, and B. F. Whiting, Class. Quant. Grav. 11, 621 (1994), gr-qc/9310006.
  • [6] L. Susskind, J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377 (1995), hep-th/9409089.
  • [7] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 253 (1998), hep-th/9802150.
  • [8] J. M. Maldacena, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999), hep-th/9711200, [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2,231(1998)].
  • [9] S. W. Hawking, Nature 248, 30 (1974).
  • [10] S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975), [Erratum: Commun. Math. Phys.46,206(1976)].
  • [11] P. Kraus and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. B433, 403 (1995), gr-qc/9408003.
  • [12] M. K. Parikh and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5042 (2000), hep-th/9907001.
  • [13] Q.-Q. Jiang, S.-Q. Wu, and X. Cai, Phys. Rev. D73, 064003 (2006), hep-th/0512351, [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D73,069902(2006)].
  • [14] J. Zhang and Z. Zhao, Phys. Lett. B638, 110 (2006), gr-qc/0512153.
  • [15] K. Srinivasan and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D60, 024007 (1999), gr-qc/9812028.
  • [16] M. Angheben, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini, JHEP 05, 014 (2005), hep-th/0503081.
  • [17] R. Kerner and R. B. Mann, Phys. Rev. D73, 104010 (2006), gr-qc/0603019.
  • [18] R. Li, J.-R. Ren, and S.-W. Wei, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 125016 (2008), 0803.1410.
  • [19] K. Lin and S.-Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D79, 064035 (2009).
  • [20] K. Lin and S. Yang, Phys. Lett. B674, 127 (2009).
  • [21] K. Lin and S.-Z. Yang, Chin. Phys. B20, 110403 (2011).
  • [22] D. N. Page, Phys. Rev. D13, 198 (1976).
  • [23] T. Harmark, J. Natario, and R. Schiappa, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 14, 727 (2010), 0708.0017.
  • [24] W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D14, 3251 (1976).
  • [25] L. Motl and A. Neitzke, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, 307 (2003), hep-th/0301173.
  • [26] A. Neitzke, (2003), hep-th/0304080.
  • [27] T. Ngampitipan and P. Boonserm, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D22, 1350058 (2013), 1211.4070.
  • [28] S. R. Das, G. W. Gibbons, and S. D. Mathur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 417 (1997), hep-th/9609052.
  • [29] R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Lect. Notes Phys. 906, pp.1 (2015), 1501.06570.