This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks:

] ] ]

Gravitational waves detection with exceptional points in micro cavities

Jian Liu [    Lei Chen [    Fei He [    Ka-Di Zhu [email protected] Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum Control (Ministry of Education), School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 DongChuan Road, Shanghai 200240, China, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing, China
Abstract

Here we propose a new gravitational waves(GWs) detector in broad frequency band, which is operated at exceptional points(EPs) in micro cavities. The detected signal is an eigenfrequency split of the mechanical modes caused by the spatial strain. Due to the complex square root topology near the EP, the splitting is greatly enhanced for sufficiently small perturbations. Compared to current strategies, it can be achieved at the room temperature and has advantages in micro device scale, wide frequency band and higher sensitivity.

Optomechanics, exceptional points, gravitational wave
pacs:
Valid PACS appear here
preprint: APS/123-QED

I INTRODUCTION

According to the quantum mechanical perturbation theory, a perturbation with strength of ε\varepsilon acting on a two fold-degenerate system will cause the energy shift or energy split in proportion to ε\varepsilon. Thus it is possible to probe variety of parameters in a system by the frequency spectrum and some sensors are based on this principle[1-4]. There is another type of degeneracy in the open system (exchanging energy with the surrounding environment), called exceptional point (EP). The EP is the spectrum singularity in the parameter space, where two or more eigenvalues and their corresponding eigenvectors coalesce simultaneously. One of the main differences between exception points and conventional degeneration is their sensitivity to perturbations[5-7]. Owing to the complex square-root topology near an EP, any perturbation ε\varepsilon lifts the degeneracy, leading to a frequency splitting that scales as ε\sqrt{\varepsilon}. Therefore, a smaller perturbation means that the improvement in sensitivity is more significant.

As well known from the general theory of relativity, gravitational waves(GWs) can cause a strain hh in space. Existing detection strategies are based on long-baseline optical interferometry [8]. The principle is to utilize the time-varying phase shifts caused by GWs in the optical path. Since the wavelengths or frequencies of radiated GWs are determined by the scales of the sources, it is necessary to observe the GWs with various frequency bands to understand the hierarchical structure of the universe. At present, laser interferometer detectors have been improved, and it is expected to directly detect GWs in the 0.1 to 1 kHz band through advanced LIGO technology[9]. Observations of low-frequency GWs have been tried through spaceborne experiments[10-12] and astrophysical observations[13].

In this Letter, we study how micro scale optical cavities can be used to detect gravitational wave radiations. We propose a new GW detection mechanism based on the optomechanical coupling change induced by spatial strain at the EP of the system. This scheme does not rely on a shot-noise limited displacement measurement of test mass mirrors, but rather depends on a precision frequency measurement of the nanomechanical resonators. The eigenfrequency splitting induced by GW can be read out in the high-resolution frequency spectrum. The proposed detector differs from known detectors in at least 4 points: (i) the scale of the device is not limited, here we use the micro cavities for example. (ii) can detect gravitational waves over a wider frequency range. (iii) due to the topological properties at the EP, the sensitivity is greatly improved. (iv) operate at room temperature.

II THEORY FRAMEWORK

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Generic setup. An open system consisted of coupled double resonators . The two resonators are coupled to each other, and each resonator is coupled to an optical cavity.The two cavities are driven by blue- and red-detuned laser, respectively.

Let us begin with the Hamiltonian of coupled mechanical resonators,

H=ω1a1+a1+ω2a2+a2+J(a1+a2+a1a2+).H=\hbar\omega_{1}a_{1}^{+}a_{1}+\hbar\omega_{2}a_{2}^{+}a_{2}+\hbar J(a_{1}^{+}a_{2}+a_{1}a_{2}^{+}). (1)

Here a1+(a1)a_{1}^{+}(a_{1}) and a2+(a2)a_{2}^{+}(a_{2}) are the creation (annihilation) operators of the mechanical modes, ω1\omega_{1} and ω2\omega_{2} are their mechanical frequencies, JJ denotes the coupling strength between them. The tunable coupling of two mechanical resonators can be achieved through the piezoelectric effect or the photothermal effect[14].

According to the Heisenberg equation of motion and the commutation relations [a1,a1+]=1[a_{1},a_{1}^{+}]=1, [a2,a2+]=1[a_{2},a_{2}^{+}]=1, From Eq.(1), we can get,

da1dt=i(ω1iΓ12)a1iJa2,\frac{da_{1}}{dt}=-i(\omega_{1}-i\frac{\Gamma_{1}}{2})a_{1}-iJa_{2}, (2)
da2dt=i(ω2iΓ22)a2iJa1,\frac{da_{2}}{dt}=-i(\omega_{2}-i\frac{\Gamma_{2}}{2})a_{2}-iJa_{1}, (3)

Here we phenomenologically introduce the mechanical damping rate Γj(j=1,2)\Gamma_{j}(j=1,2). The resulting equation of motion is

ddt(a1a2)=i(ω1iΓ12JJω2iΓ22)(a1a2),\frac{d}{dt}\binom{a_{1}}{a_{2}}=-i\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\omega_{1}-i\frac{\Gamma_{1}}{2}&J\\ J&\omega_{2}-i\frac{\Gamma_{2}}{2}\end{array}\right)\binom{a_{1}}{a_{2}}, (4)

Then we can introduce the gain and lose through the optomechanical method. The schematic of our setup is sketched in Fig.1, where two resonators are optomechanically coupled to two cavities respectively, and simultaneously coupled to each other. Now we can engineer mechanical gain (loss) by driving the cavity with a blue-detuned (red-detuned) laser. According to cavity optomechanics, the optomechanical damping rate is given by [15]

γj=g02ncav(j)Φ and Φ=[κj(κj/2)2+(Δjωj)2+κj(κj/2)2+(Δj+ωj)2].\begin{split}\gamma_{j}&=g_{0}^{2}n_{cav}^{(j)}\Phi\text{ and }\\ \Phi&=[\frac{-\kappa_{j}}{(\kappa_{j}/2)^{2}+(\Delta_{j}-\omega_{j})^{2}}+\frac{\kappa_{j}}{(\kappa_{j}/2)^{2}+(\Delta_{j}+\omega_{j})^{2}}].\end{split} (5)

where ncav(j)n_{cav}^{(j)} is the intracavity photon number which can be controlled by the optical drive signal, κj\kappa_{j} denote the cavity decay rate, Δj\Delta_{j} represent the laser detuning from the cavity resonance. The optical frequency shift per displacement is given as G=ωcav/xG=-\partial\omega_{cav}/\partial x. For a simple cavity of length LL, we have G=ωcav/LG=\omega_{cav}/L, where ωcav=π(c/L)\omega_{cav}=\pi(c/L) is the frequency of single optical mode, cc is the speed of light in vacuum. And g0=GxZPFg_{0}=Gx_{ZPF} is the vacuum optomechanical coupling strength, expressed as a frequency, here xZPF=/2mjωjx_{ZPF}=\sqrt{\hbar/2m_{j}\omega_{j}} is the zero-point fluctuation amplitude of the mechanical oscillator, and mjm_{j} is the effective masses of the resonators. Finally, we express g0g_{0} as a function of LL via

g0=πcL2xZPF.g_{0}=\frac{\pi c}{L^{2}}x_{ZPF}. (6)

This indicates that smaller cavities yield larger coupling strengths. Since γj\gamma_{j} can be both positive and negative, it can either increase or decrease the mechanical damping rate, causes extra damping or antidamping, corresponding mechanical loss or gain. Thus the total mechanical damping rates of the resonators can be expressed as the sum of natural mechanical damping rate γm\gamma_{m} and the optomechanical damping rate γj\gamma_{j}, hence we have Γj=γm+γj\Gamma_{j}=\gamma_{m}+\gamma_{j}. Then we consider the eigenvalues of the effective Hamiltonian in Eq.(4),

λ±=ω1+ω22i4(Γ1+Γ2)±α,with α=J2+14[(ω1ω2)+i(Γ22Γ12)]2.\begin{split}\lambda_{\pm}&=\frac{\omega_{1}+\omega_{2}}{2}-\frac{i}{4}(\Gamma_{1}+\Gamma_{2})\pm\alpha,\\ \text{with }\alpha&=\sqrt{J^{2}+\frac{1}{4}[(\omega_{1}-\omega_{2})+i(\frac{\Gamma_{2}}{2}-\frac{\Gamma_{1}}{2})]^{2}}.\end{split} (7)

With the simplification, we choose Γ1=Γ2=Γ=(γ2+γm)=γ1+γm\Gamma_{1}=-\Gamma_{2}=\Gamma=-(\gamma_{2}+\gamma_{m})=\gamma_{1}+\gamma_{m}, we use two identical optical cavities and resonators, that means ωj(j=1,2)=ωm\omega_{j}(j=1,2)=\omega_{m}, mj(j=1,2)=mm_{j}(j=1,2)=m and κj(j=1,2)=κ\kappa_{j}(j=1,2)=\kappa. We also use the driving lasers with the identical power to drive both micro cavities simultaneously, this indicates ncav(j)(j=1,2)=ncavn_{cav}^{(j)}(j=1,2)=n_{cav}. Thus Eq. (7) simplifies to

λ±=ωm±J2Γ2.\lambda_{\pm}=\omega_{m}\pm\sqrt{J^{2}-\Gamma^{2}}. (8)

Instead of the traditional vibrational mode, we now have new mechanical modes, which can be called as the supermodes. Their mechanical frequencies are ω±(S)=\omega_{\pm}^{(S)}=Re(λ±)(\lambda_{\pm}) and spectral linewidths are γ±(S)=\gamma_{\pm}^{(S)}= Im(λ±)(\lambda_{\pm}).

III MEASUREMENT MECHANISM

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Real(a) and imaginary(b) part of the mechanical eigenfrequencies as a function of ncavn_{cav}. The real part represents the mechanical supermode frequencies and the imaginary part represents the line widths of the supermodes.

Here we consider the mechanical resonators of Si beams for example, which possess the thickness of t=80nmt=80nm, mass m=5.3×103ngm=5.3\times 10^{-3}ng, the vibration frequency ωm/2π=1GHz\omega_{m}/2\pi=1GHz[16]. Their mechanical coupling strength is usually much less than their resonance frequencies[14], here we use practical device parameter J/2π=10MHzJ/2\pi=10MHz[17]. We use the cavities with length L=0.1mmL=0.1mm and decay rate κ/2π=0.1GHz\kappa/2\pi=0.1GHz. We then set the cavity-pump detunings Δ1=Δ2=ωm\Delta_{1}=-\Delta_{2}=\omega_{m}. From Fig.2 we can see that the parity-time(PT)-broken regime and the PT symmetric regime are separated by the exception point (ncav=n01.48×1012n_{cav}=n_{0}\simeq 1.48\times 10^{12}), where the eigenfrequencies coalesce. As ncavn_{cav} increases, the frequencies of the pair of supermodes approach to each other and coalesce, while the linewidth starts with zero and then branches, indicating that the PT symmetry is broken.

Gravitational wave is the propagation of curvature wave in space-time, which is emitted by accelerated masses. It causes a strain hh in space perpendicular to the direction in which it propagate. The length change is proportional to the original distance between two places, ΔL/L=h\Delta L/L=h. We shall see next the splitting of the supermodes can be used as a signal of the gravitational wave due to the length changes of cavities.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The eigenfrequency splitting as a function of the perturbation strength of the spatial strain. The frequencies and masses of resonators are ωm/2π=1GHz\omega_{m}/2\pi=1GHz and m=5.3×103ngm=5.3\times 10^{-3}ng, respectively. Their mechanical coupling strength J/2π=10MHzJ/2\pi=10MHz.

An important parameter in a PT symmetrical system is the difference between the eigenfrequencies, namely the eigenfrequency splitting which can be defined as D=ω+(S)ω(S)D=\omega_{+}^{(S)}-\omega_{-}^{(S)}. To evaluate the sensitivity of gravitational wave detection at EP, we need to know the effect of a perturbation on the supermode splitting near the EP. Any perturbation ΔL\Delta L of the cavity length induces a change in vacuum optomechanical coupling strength dgdg that affects the eigenvalues as

D=Re{2J2[(g0+dg)2n0Φ]2}.D=\text{Re}\left\{2\sqrt{J^{2}-[(g_{0}+dg)^{2}n_{0}\Phi]^{2}}\right\}. (9)

Here we consider γmγj\gamma_{m}\ll\gamma_{j} and Γγ2=γ1\Gamma\simeq-\gamma_{2}=\gamma_{1}. The relationship between the change of vacuum optomechanical coupling strength and the length of cavity ΔL\Delta L is given by

dg=g0LΔL=2g0LΔL=2g0h.dg=\frac{\partial g_{0}}{\partial L}\Delta L=-2\frac{g_{0}}{L}\Delta L=-2g_{0}h. (10)

The sensitivity can be defined as ΔD(h)=D(h)D(0)\Delta D(h)=D(h)-D(0). The system is at the EP when there is no gravitational wave, thus D(0)=0D(0)=0, so we have J=g0n02|Φ|J=g_{0}{}^{2}n_{0}\left|\Phi\right|. Considering dgg0dg\ll g_{0}, the result can be simplified as

ΔD=42Jh.\Delta D=4\sqrt{2}J\sqrt{h}. (11)

Fig.3 shows ΔD\Delta D as a function of the perturbation hh near the EP. We can see that the eigenfrequency splitting is proportional to the square root of the perturbation strength hh. At the EP, both eigenvalues and eigenvectors are coalesce. The perturbation of spatial strain can shift the exceptional point, and thereby the non-Hermitian degeneracy of the eigenfrequencies are released and cause the supermodes to split. Thus our scheme does not rely on a shot-noise limited displacement measurement of mirrors, but rather depends on a precision frequency measurement of the mechanical mode. The minimum measurable frequency difference is usually determined by the mechanical linewidth and noises. Here the linewidths of the mechanical modes are γ±(S)=\gamma_{\pm}^{(S)}=Im[ωm±J2[(g0+dg)2n0Φ]2][\omega_{m}\pm\sqrt{J^{2}-[(g_{0}+dg)^{2}n_{0}\Phi]^{2}}]. At the EP, dg=0dg=0, hence γ±(S)=0\gamma_{\pm}^{(S)}=0, as shown in Fig.2(b). Then we consider the perturbation h>0h>0, dg<0dg<0, thereby J2[(g0+dg)2n0Φ]2>0J^{2}-[(g_{0}+dg)^{2}n_{0}\Phi]^{2}>0, indicates γ±(S)=0\gamma_{\pm}^{(S)}=0, the linewidth of the supermodes is still coalesce and equal to 0, so the perturbation will not induce a linewidth increase.

However, various noise processes will cause the increasing of frequency uncertainty. For the nanomechanical resonators, the main noise source is the thermomechanical fluctuations[16]. In such a measurement, the resonator is driven at a constant mean square amplitude xcx_{c}, which can be roughly approximated as xc0.53tx_{c}\approx 0.53t. According to the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, the frequency fluctuation induced by thermal noise can be calculated by δω=kBT/2πτ(mωmxc2Q)\delta\omega=\sqrt{k_{B}T/2\pi\tau(m\omega_{m}\left\langle x_{c}^{2}\right\rangle Q)}. Here QQ is the mechanical quality factor, TT is the effective temperature and kBk_{B} is the Boltzmann constant. We can see that high mechanical quality and low temperature help reduce the thermal noise. In order to obtain the quantum-noise-limited sensitivity of the strain hh, we assume that the eigenfrequency split caused by GWs is exactly equal to the frequency stability determined by the thermal noise, this means δω=ΔD\delta\omega=\Delta D, then we get the limit under the sample time of τ=1s\tau=1s.

hmin=kBTeffxc2Q164πmωmJ2.h_{\min}=\frac{k_{B}T_{eff}}{\left\langle x_{c}^{2}\right\rangle Q}\frac{1}{64\pi m\omega_{m}J^{2}}. (12)

For the resonator with Q=105Q=10^{5}, the spatial strain resolution of hmin=8.9×1025h_{\min}=8.9\times 10^{-25} can be achieved at the room temperature (Teff=300KT_{eff}=300K). If the effective temperature of the vibrational modes can be reduced to 1K1K by using the laser cooling technologies[18,19], the sensitivity can be increased by more than 2 orders of magnitude to reach an unprecedented level of hmin=3.0×1027h_{\min}=3.0\times 10^{-27}. We can see from Eq.(12) that the sensitivity is independent of cavity length used in our scheme, but using a resonator with higher frequency and smaller mass can improve the detection sensitivity.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The sensitivity curve of the EP based optomechanical detector with the maximum observation time of 1h1h. The black solid and dashed lines indicate the theoretical prediction results at effective temperatures of 300K and 1K, respectively. The limit of the advanced LIGO interferometers and future detectors: LISA, DECIGO, BBO, Basic AGIS, are included for reference.

This EP-based optomechanical sensor measures the length changes of the micro cavities. The spectral splitting is proportional to the square root of the amplitude of the GW hh, regardless of the GW’s frequency. Therefore, the detector’s responses to gravitational waves of arbitrary frequency are consistent. However, considering that the distance changes induced by the ultra-low-frequency gravitational waves are very slow, we estimate the strain sensitivity with a maximum observation time of 11 hour, and compare it with other projects[9-12,20] in Fig.4. It can be clearly seen that the EP-based optomechanical sensor performs better. We hope that the proposed system can advance the search for gravitational wave by an enhanced sensitivity of several orders of magnitude compared with traditional methods in various frequency bands.

IV CONCLUSION

We propose an optomechanical gravitational wave detector based on the exceptional points. The system is a coupled optomechanical system, in which the gain and loss are applied by driving the cavities with a blue detuned and red detuned electromagnetic fields, respectively. When the gain and loss reach a balance, the system will show the degeneracy of exceptional points, and the perturbation of the length of micro cavity will cause an eigenfrequencies split which can be probed with the frequency spectrum, thus the readout noise caused by the beam amplitude can be avoided. Compared with the traditional detectors, the sensitivity is greatly enhanced due to the complex square root topology of EPs in wide frequency band.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.11274230 and 11574206), the Basic Research Program of the Committee of Science and Technology of Shanghai (No.14JC1491700).

References

  • (1) W. Yu, W. C. Jiang, Q. Lin, and T. Lu , Cavity optomechanical spring sensing of single molecules, Nat. Commun. 7, 12311 (2016).
  • (2) J. J. Li and K. D. Zhu, All-optical mass sensing with coupled mechanical resonator systems, Phys. Rep. 525, 223 (2013).
  • (3) J. Liu and K. D. Zhu, Nanogravity gradiometer based on a sharp optical nonlinearity in a levitated particle optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. D 95, 044014 (2017).
  • (4) L. He,Ş. K. Ö zdemir, J. Zhu, W. Kim, and L. Yang, Detecting single viruses and nanoparticles using whispering gallery microlasers, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 428 (2011).
  • (5) W. Chen,Ş. K. Ö zdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature 548, 192–196 (2017).
  • (6) J. Wiersig, Sensors operating at exceptional points: General theory, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033809 (2016).
  • (7) H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order exceptional points, Nature 548, 187–191(2017).
  • (8) R. X. Adhikari, Gravitational radiation detection with laser interferometry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 121 (2014).
  • (9) K. S. Thorne, Nobel Lecture: LIGO and gravitational waves III, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 040503 (2018).
  • (10) N. Tamanini and C. Danielski, The gravitational-wave detection of exoplanets orbiting white dwarf binaries using LISA, Nature Astronomy 3, 858 (2019).
  • (11) S. Sato, et al., DECIGO : The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 154, 012040 (2009).
  • (12) C. Cutler and D. E. Holz, Ultrahigh precision cosmology from gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 80, 104009(2009).
  • (13) P. D. Lasky, et al., Gravitational-Wave Cosmology across 29 Decades in Frequency, Phys. Rev. X 6, 011035 (2016).
  • (14) X. W. Xu, Y. Liu, C. P. Sun, and Y Li, Mechanical PT symmetry in coupled optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 92, 013852 (2015).
  • (15) M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  • (16) K. L. Ekincia, Y. T. Yang, and M. L. Roukesb, Ultimate limits to inertial mass sensing based upon nanoelectromechanical systems, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 2682 (2004).
  • (17) K. Fang, M. H. Matheny, X. Luan, and O. Painter, Optical transduction and rounting of microwave phonons in cavity optomechanical circuits, Nat. Photonics 10, 489 (2016).
  • (18) D. Kleckner and D. Bouwmeester, Sub-kelvin optical cooling of a micromechanical resonator, Nature 444, 75 (2006).
  • (19) M.R. Vanner, J. Hofer, G.D. Cole, and M. Aspelmeyer, Cooling-by-measurement and mechanical state tomography via pulsed optomechanics, Nat. Commun. 4, 2295 (2013).
  • (20) J. M. Hogan, D. M. S. Johnson, and S. Dickerson, et al., An atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor in low earth orbit (AGIS-LEO), Gen Relativ Gravit 43, 1953 (2011).