This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

11institutetext: Physics Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China 22institutetext: Helmholtz Research Academy Hesse for FAIR (HFHF), GSI Helmholtz Center for Heavy Ion Physics, Campus Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany 33institutetext: Institut für Theoretische Physik, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität,Max-von-Laue-StraÃe 1, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Gluon decay into heavy quark pair under a strong magnetic field

\firstnameShile \lastnameChen\fnsep 11 [email protected]    \firstnameJiaxing \lastnameZhao 2233    \firstnamePengfei \lastnameZhuang 11
Abstract

Due to the extreme large magnetic field produced in the initial stage of non-central heavy-ion collision, the dynamical process of gluon decay into heavy quark pair will take place under an external field rather than in vacuum. Unlike in the vacuum case, where the process is forbidden by energy momentum conservation, under the external field, a process emerges considering the background energy which recovers the conservation. We calculate the gluon decay rate at leading order under a uniform magnetic field.

It is widely accepted that the strongest electromagnetic field in nature is generated in high energy nuclear collisions Kharzeev:2007jp ; Voronyuk:2011jd ; Deng:2012pc ; Tuchin:2013ie . The maximum of the magnetic field can reach 5mπ20.1GeV25m_{\pi}^{2}\sim 0.1\ \rm GeV^{2} in Au+Au collisions at top RHIC energy and almost 70mπ21GeV270m_{\pi}^{2}\sim 1\ \rm GeV^{2} in Pb+Pb collisions at LHC energy Deng:2012pc ; Tuchin:2013ie , where mπm_{\pi} is the pion mass. The strong magnetic field will cause many novel phenomena like chiral magnetic effect(CME) Kharzeev:2007jp , photoproduction of dileptons and quarkonia in peripheral and ultra-peripheral collisions ALICE:2015mzu , splitting of D0D^{0} and D¯0\bar{D}^{0} directed flows Das:2016cwd , and spin-polarized difference between Λ\Lambda and Λ¯\bar{\Lambda} Guo:2019joy .

In our previous study Chen:2024lmp , we calculate the heavy quark production with the elementary process ggQQ¯gg\to Q\bar{Q} under the extreme strong magnetic field and show the analytical results with the Lowest Landau Level approximation (LLL). Because of the dimension reduction in phase space, the cross section of this process has a divergence around the incoming energy threshold. Then the heavy quark pair production in nucleus-nucleus collisions will be extremely enhanced at low transverse momentum and suppressed at high transverse momentum. The existence of external magnetic field which breaks the rotational invariance and only the momentum along the magnetic field is conserved. The production process becomes anisotropic and strongly dependent on the direction of motion.

To verify the validity of this LLL approximation, we put our calculation a step forward, extending to the next Landau level. From the result, we could conclude that if the partons mainly distributed in the small x region and the heavy quark produced at low pTp_{T} region with external magnetic field 10GeV2\sim 10GeV^{2} then the process could be well described at LLL. In the calculation, we found that the cross section of such an elementary process will encounter a divergence for uu- and tt- channel if we set the final quarks up to n=1n=1 state. The inducement of this divergence is not from the threshold of the initial energy but the onshellon-shell of the internal quark, which means the Feynman diagram could be cut, and the sub-process is just the decay of the on shell gluon to quark anti-quark pair. In vacuum, the elementary process like Fig. 1 is forbidden due to the energy-momentum conservation because the massless gluon has no rest mass. However, with the background field, this process will no longer be forbidden any more because the strong magnetic field could compensate the energy. This process has been widely studied in the astro physics when they consider the QED processes on a magnetars. In heavy-ion collision, when considering the pre equilibrium stage with magnetic field, the gluon decay has barely contributed to the quark statistics. In this proceeding paper, we will calculate and discuss this process under LLL.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Elementary process of the gluon decay into quark anti-quark pair.

The Feynman rules associated with quarks are controlled by Dirac equation

[iγμ(μ+iqAμ)m]ψ=0,\left[i\gamma^{\mu}\left(\partial_{\mu}+iqA_{\mu}\right)-m\right]\psi=0, (1)

where mm is the quark mass, qq the quark electric charge, and AμA_{\mu} the electromagnetic potential. We consider an external magnetic field BB in the direction of zz-axis and choose the Landau gauge with A0=0A_{0}=0 and 𝑨=Bx𝒆y{\bm{A}}=Bx{\bm{e}}_{y}. In this case, the momentum along the xx-axis is not conserved. Taking into account the Landau energy levels for a fermion moving in an external magnetic field, the stationary solution of the Dirac spinor can be written as

ψn,σ(x,p)=eipxun,σ(𝒙,p),ψn,σ+(x,p)=eipxvn,σ(𝒙,p)\psi_{n,\sigma}^{-}(x,p)=e^{-ip\cdot x}u_{n,\sigma}({\bm{x}},p),\ \ \ \ \psi_{n,\sigma}^{+}(x,p)=e^{ip\cdot x}v_{n,\sigma}({\bm{x}},p) (2)

where the quantum number nn is Landau level, and the four-momentum is defined as pμ=(ϵ,0,py,pz)p_{\mu}=(\epsilon,0,p_{y},p_{z}) with py=aqBp_{y}=aqB controlled by the center of gyration aa.

With the stationary solution of fermion field above, we could obtain the S-matrix of the decay process gqq¯g\to q\bar{q} as

Sfi=igd4xψ¯(σ)(x)pz,0,aγμtcAcμ(x)ψ+(σ+)(x)pz+,0,a+S_{fi}=-ig\int d^{4}x\bar{\psi}_{-}^{(\sigma_{-})}(x)_{p_{z-},0,a_{-}}\gamma_{\mu}t^{c}A^{\mu}_{c}(x)\psi_{+}^{(\sigma_{+})}(x)_{p_{z+},0,a_{+}} (3)

when we proceed our calculation under LLL, we could obtain

Sfi\displaystyle S_{fi} =\displaystyle= tcg22ωL7/2ei4ωsinθ[4acosϕ+λB2ωsinθ(i+sin(2ϕ))]\displaystyle t^{c}\frac{g}{2\sqrt{2\omega}L^{7/2}}e^{-\frac{i}{4}\omega\sin\theta[4a_{-}\cos\phi+\lambda_{B}^{2}\omega\sin\theta(-i+\sin(2\phi))]} (4)
×\displaystyle\times ϵzpz(pz+ωcosθ)+(m+E)(m+E+)m(m+E)m(m+E+)(2π)3δfi3(E,py,pz)\displaystyle\epsilon_{z}\frac{p_{z-}(-p_{z-}+\omega\cos\theta)+(m+E_{-})(m+E_{+})}{\sqrt{m(m+E_{-})}\sqrt{m(m+E_{+})}}(2\pi)^{3}\delta_{fi}^{3}(E,p_{y},p_{z})

where ωk^=ω(1,sinθcosϕ,sinθsinϕ,cosθ)\omega\hat{k}=\omega(1,\sin\theta\cos\phi,\sin\theta\sin\phi,\cos\theta) is the momentum of the initial gluon and ϵz\epsilon_{z} is the z-component of its polarization vector.

The two independent polarization modes of gluon is 𝒪\mathcal{O} mode and \mathcal{E} mode, with ϵ𝒪=(cosθcosϕ,cosθsinϕ,sinθ)\epsilon_{\mathcal{O}}=(-\cos\theta\cos\phi,-\cos\theta\sin\phi,\sin\theta) and ϵ=(sinϕ,cosϕ,0)\epsilon_{\mathcal{E}}=(\sin\phi,-\cos\phi,0). Since the S-matrix is proportional to ϵz\epsilon_{z}, only 𝒪\mathcal{O}-mode remains. If here we set θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2, then ϵz=1\epsilon_{z}=1 and pz+=pz,E+=E=Ep_{z+}=-p_{z-},\ E_{+}=E_{-}=E, we could obtain a simplified formulation

Sfi=tcgmE2ωL7/2e14λB2ω2+iΦ(2π)3δfi3(E,py,pz)S_{fi}=t^{c}\frac{gm}{E\sqrt{2\omega}L^{7/2}}e^{-\frac{1}{4}\lambda_{B}^{2}\omega^{2}+i\Phi}(2\pi)^{3}\delta_{fi}^{3}(E,p_{y},p_{z}) (5)

where Φ\Phi is a phase term which will not contribute to the decay rate. And this S-matrix has the exact the same formula with  Kostenko:2018cgv ; Kostenko:2019was except the color factor. The decay rate of the process gQQ¯g\to Q\bar{Q}(θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2)

Γ\displaystyle\Gamma =\displaystyle= g2c1TLdpz+2πLdpz2πLda+2πλB2Lda2πλB2|Sfi|2\displaystyle g^{2}\sum_{c}\frac{1}{T}\int L\frac{dp_{z+}}{2\pi}\int L\frac{dp_{z-}}{2\pi}\int L\frac{da_{+}}{2\pi\lambda_{B}^{2}}\int L\frac{da_{-}}{2\pi\lambda_{B}^{2}}|S_{fi}|^{2} (6)
=\displaystyle= g24q2m212πE2ωλB2eλB2ω2/2daL𝑑pzδ(ωE+E)\displaystyle g^{2}\frac{4q^{2}m^{2}}{12\pi E^{2}\omega\lambda_{B}^{2}}e^{-\lambda_{B}^{2}\omega^{2}/2}\int\frac{da_{-}}{L}\int dp_{z-}\delta(\omega-E_{+}-E_{-})
=\displaystyle= g24qBm23πω2ω24m2eλB2ω2/2\displaystyle g^{2}\frac{4qBm^{2}}{3\pi\omega^{2}\sqrt{\omega^{2}-4m^{2}}}e^{-\lambda_{B}^{2}\omega^{2}/2}
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Left)The decay rate of gQQ¯g\to Q\bar{Q} with final quark mass m=1.5m=1.5GeV and θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2 changes with initial gluon energy. (Right) The decay rate changes with polarization angle at eB=1GeV2eB=1\leavevmode\nobreak\ \rm GeV^{2} and different lines represent ω=3.1GeV\omega=3.1\leavevmode\nobreak\ \rm GeV(Red), 3.5GeV3.5\leavevmode\nobreak\ \rm GeV(Blue) and 6.0GeV6.0\leavevmode\nobreak\ \rm GeV(Green) respectively. Dashed lines are the thresholds of angle window determined by the energy conservation condition.

From the numerical result, we could see that the decay rate decreasing with incoming energy has the same property with the scattering cross section ggQQ¯gg\to Q\bar{Q}, which has a threshold depending on the rest mass of final fermions and increasing with magnetic field. The difference appears when considering the polarization angle dependence. The energy conservation condition pz+2+m2+pz2+m2=ω\sqrt{p_{z+}^{2}+m^{2}}+\sqrt{p_{z-}^{2}+m^{2}}=\omega is satisfied only with polarization angle is around π/2\pi/2 which means the gluon is moving perpendicular to the magnetic field especially when the gluon energy approaches threshold. And when the energy grows, the angle window becomes larger and along with the exponential decrease of the magnitude of decay width. On the contrary, when the incoming gluon is moving along the magnetic field, it is obvious to see that the energy conservation is violated and this process is forbidden.

In summary, we derived the gluon decay rate under the external magnetic field in the strong field limit. This process is barely considered in the initial stage quark production since the magnetic field is believed to decay at a very fast speed when the system enters the QGP phase. From the result, we could conclude that the decay rate of gluon increases with the magnitude of magnetic field which means a stronger magnetic field can induce a faster decay of the gluon even if the gluon has no interaction with magnetic field. As our previous work mentioned, the LLL is more suitable for a lighter quark, and we believed that the light quark production will also be affected by this process.

Acknowledgement: The work is supported by the NSFC grants No. 12075129, the Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research No.2020B0301030008, the funding from the European Unionâs Horizon 2020 research, and the innovation program under grant agreement No. 824093 (STRONG-2020).

References

  • (1) D. E. Kharzeev, L. D. McLerran, and H. J. Warringa, The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’, Nucl. Phys. A 803 (2008) 227–253, [arXiv:0711.0950].
  • (2) V. Voronyuk, V. D. Toneev, W. Cassing, E. L. Bratkovskaya, V. P. Konchakovski, and S. A. Voloshin, (Electro-)Magnetic field evolution in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 054911, [arXiv:1103.4239].
  • (3) W.-T. Deng and X.-G. Huang, Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 044907, [arXiv:1201.5108].
  • (4) K. Tuchin, Particle production in strong electromagnetic fields in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2013 (2013) 490495, [arXiv:1301.0099].
  • (5) ALICE Collaboration, J. Adam et al., Measurement of an excess in the yield of J/ψJ/\psi at very low pTp_{\rm T} in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 2.76 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 222301, [arXiv:1509.08802].
  • (6) S. K. Das, S. Plumari, S. Chatterjee, J. Alam, F. Scardina, and V. Greco, Directed Flow of Charm Quarks as a Witness of the Initial Strong Magnetic Field in Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, Phys. Lett. B 768 (2017) 260–264, [arXiv:1608.02231].
  • (7) Y. Guo, S. Shi, S. Feng, and J. Liao, Magnetic Field Induced Polarization Difference between Hyperons and Anti-hyperons, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134929, [arXiv:1905.12613].
  • (8) S. Chen, J. Zhao and P. Zhuang, “Heavy flavor production under a strong magnetic field,” [arXiv:2401.17559 [hep-ph]].
  • (9) Z. Wang, J. Zhao, C. Greiner, Z. Xu, and P. Zhuang, Incomplete electromagnetic response of hot QCD matter, Phys. Rev. C 105 (2022) L041901, [arXiv:2110.14302].
  • (10) L. Yan and X.-G. Huang, Dynamical evolution of magnetic field in the pre-equilibrium quark-gluon plasma, arXiv:2104.00831.
  • (11) Y. Chen, X.-L. Sheng, and G.-L. Ma, Electromagnetic fields from the extended Kharzeev-McLerran-Warringa model in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Nucl. Phys. A 1011 (2021) 122199, [arXiv:2101.09845].
  • (12) A. Kostenko and C. Thompson, QED Phenomena in an Ultrastrong Magnetic Field. I. Electron–Photon Scattering, Pair Creation, and Annihilation, Astrophys. J. 869 (2018) 44, [arXiv:1904.03324].
  • (13) A. Kostenko and C. Thompson, QED Phenomena in an Ultrastrong Magnetic Field. II. Electron-Positron Scattering, e±e^{\pm}-Ion Scattering, and Relativistic Bremsstrahlung, Astrophys. J. 875 (2019) 23, [arXiv:1904.03325].