Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope detections of two high-opacity Hi 21 cm absorbers at
Abstract
We report the discovery of two remarkable high-opacity Hi 21 cm absorbers against low-luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGNs), at towards J0229+0044 and at towards J0229+0053. The absorbers were detected in an unbiased Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope survey for Hi 21 cm absorption against radio sources in the DEEP2 survey fields, covering , and including sources without known redshifts. The velocity-integrated Hi 21 cm optical depths are km s-1 (J0229+0044) and km s-1 (J0229+0053), higher than that of any known redshifted Hi 21 cm absorber at , and implying high Hi column densities, cm-2. The emission redshift of J0229+0044 is consistent with the Hi 21 cm absorption redshift, while the strength and velocity spread of the absorption against J0229+0053 suggest that it too arises from gas in the AGN environment: both absorbers are thus likely to be “associated” systems. The two AGNs have low rest-frame 1.4 GHz radio and 1215 Å ultraviolet luminosities ( W Hz-1 and W Hz-1, respectively), both significantly lower than the typical luminosities of AGNs against which Hi 21 cm searches have hitherto been carried out at . The paucity of Hi 21 cm absorbers at may be due to a luminosity bias in high- AGN samples that have been searched for Hi 21 cm absorption, where the high AGN ultraviolet luminosity affects physical conditions in its environment, ionizing the neutral hydrogen.
1 Introduction
For radio-loud active galactic nuclei (AGNs), studies of “associated” Hi 21 cm absorption by neutral atomic hydrogen (Hi) in the AGN environment provide an interesting probe of physical conditions in the vicinity of AGNs (see Morganti & Oosterloo, 2018, for a recent review). For example, the strength of the Hi 21 cm absorption yields information on the Hi column density and the gas spin temperature , and how these are affected by proximity to the AGN. The Hi 21 cm absorption kinematics, relative to the AGN, can be used to determine whether the Hi is infalling (redshifted) or outflowing (blueshifted), and thus, to infer the importance of AGN fuelling and feedback at different cosmological epochs (e.g. van Gorkom et al., 1989; Vermeulen et al., 2003; Morganti et al., 2003, 2016). Very long baseline interferometric Hi 21 cm absorption studies can be used to track the influence of the AGN jets on the gas, and the driving of high-velocity outflows (e.g. Oosterloo et al., 2000; Morganti et al., 2013). The detection rates of Hi 21 cm absorption in different AGN types can provide information on the evolutionary history of AGNs, and on AGN unification schemes (e.g. Vermeulen et al., 2003). High-opacity Hi 21 cm absorbers are also good candidates for searches for radio molecular absorption (e.g. Wiklind & Combes, 1994; Kanekar et al., 2005; Allison et al., 2019), which can be used to probe fundamental constant evolution on cosmological timescales (e.g. Kanekar, 2011; Kanekar et al., 2018).
The detection of associated Hi 21 cm absorption at high redshifts, , would allow one to extend the above studies to the early Universe and track the cosmological evolution of Hi in AGN environments. Unfortunately, despite a number of searches (e.g. Curran et al., 2008; Aditya & Kanekar, 2018a, b; Grasha et al., 2019), this endeavour remains limited by the paucity of known high- associated Hi 21 cm absorbers. While more than a hundred such absorbers have been found at (e.g. Vermeulen et al., 2003; Geréb et al., 2015; Maccagni et al., 2017; Aditya, 2019), there are only 8 confirmed detections at (Uson et al., 1991; Moore et al., 1999; Ishwara-Chandra et al., 2003; Curran et al., 2013; Aditya et al., 2017; Aditya & Kanekar, 2018a; Dutta et al., 2020). Curran et al. (2008) argued that this apparent redshift evolution in the strength of the associated Hi 21 cm absorption might arise because higher-redshift AGNs searched for Hi 21 cm absorption typically have high ultraviolet (UV) and radio luminosities; however, their results were based on a heterogenous AGN sample. This issue was further examined in an Hi 21 cm absorption survey of a homogenous sample of flat-spectrum AGNs by Aditya & Kanekar (2018b), who found that associated Hi 21 cm absorption is significantly weaker in AGNs at high redshifts, but also in AGNs with high rest-frame radio or ultraviolet (UV) luminosities. Unfortunately, the luminosity bias in their target sample, with high-luminosity AGNs at high redshifts, meant that it was not possible to break the above degeneracy between redshift evolution and AGN luminosity. Searches for associated Hi 21 cm absorption in low-luminosity AGNs at high redshifts offer the best route to break this degeneracy.
Next, searches for associated Hi 21 cm absorption have so far mostly been carried out in AGNs with known redshifts. This introduces a bias against AGN environments with high Hi column densities, as such systems are likely to have high dust columns, which would obscure the AGN in the optical and UV wavebands, making it difficult to measure its redshift. Hi 21 cm or mm-wave absorption surveys that target all radio AGNs independent of redshift information ensure no bias against dusty sightlines (e.g. Wiklind & Combes, 1996; Kanekar et al., 2014a; Allison et al., 2015).
We have used the upgraded Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT; Gupta et al., 2017) to carry out such an unbiased search for Hi 21 cm absorption, covering the redshift range against a large sample of radio sources. In this Letter, we report the discovery of two remarkable high-opacity Hi 21 cm absorbers at , both identified against reddened AGNs, with low rest-frame radio and UV luminosities.
2 Observation, Data Analysis, and Results


The two new Hi 21 cm absorbers were discovered in our MHz survey of the DEEP2 Survey fields, using the Band-4 receivers of the upgraded GMRT. The DEEP2 Survey used the DEIMOS spectrograph on the Keck II Telescope to accurately measure the spectroscopic redshifts of 38,000 galaxies at , in four regions of the sky (Newman et al., 2013). Our GMRT survey used five pointings to cover two of the four DEEP2 field, with the main aim of measuring the average Hi mass of star-forming galaxies at , by stacking the Hi 21 cm emission spectra of galaxies with DEEP2 spectroscopic redshifts (Chowdhury et al., 2020). However, in addition to the primary science goal, the high spectral resolution of our survey ( km s-1) allowed us to carry out an unbiased search for Hi 21 cm absorption against all the () radio-continuum sources with flux densities mJy (without correcting for the shape of the primary beam) in the five target fields, including sources without a known redshift. Our search was sensitive to both associated and intervening Hi 21 cm absorption at . This search yielded the initial discovery of two high-opacity absorbers, at towards J0229+0044, and at towards J0229+0053, the focus of this Letter.
We followed up the two absorbers with GMRT Director’s Discretionary Time (DDT) in December 2019 (J0229+0044; proposal DDTC101) and February 2020 (J0229+0053; proposal DDTC121) to confirm the Hi 21 cm absorption, and accurately measure the Hi 21 cm optical depth. The total observing times were 10 hours (J0229+0044) and 12 hours (J0229+0053), using the GMRT Software Backend (GSB) and the GMRT Wideband Backend (GWB), respectively, as the primary correlator to cover the redshifted Hi 21 cm line. The choice of correlator and the correlator settings were based on the aim of simultaneously covering the redshifted Lambda-doubled OH 18 cm lines; however, local oscillator tuning issues in the observations of J0229+0044 led us to a different correlator setup for the observations of J0229+0053. For J0229+0044, the OH 18 cm line frequencies were covered using the GWB as the secondary correlator, with a bandwidth of 200 MHz, centered at 700 MHz and sub-divided into 16,384 channels. Conversely, for J0229+0053, a single GWB 200 MHz band with 16,384 channels was used to cover both the Hi 21 cm line and the OH 18 cm lines. The observational details (related to the Hi 21 cm line) for the two sources are provided in Table 1.
The data were analyzed in the Common Astronomy Software Package (casa version 5; McMullin et al., 2007), following standard procedures. The aoflagger package (Offringa et al., 2012) was additionally used for excision of data affected by radio frequency interference (RFI). After the initial data editing, and gain and bandpass calibration using observations of the compact source 0204+152, a standard self-calibration procedure was carried out for each target source, using line-free channels. The imaging was done with the task tclean, with the w-projection algorithm (Cornwell et al., 2008). In the case of J0229+0053, where the observing bandwidth was large, we additionally used the MT-MFS algorithm (second order expansion; Rau & Cornwell, 2011) to image the target field. The synthesized beams of the final continuum images have full widths at half maximum (FWHMs) of (J0229+0044) and (J0229+0053). Both sources were found to be unresolved in our continuum images, with flux densities of mJy (J0229+0044, at MHz) and mJy (J0229+0053, at MHz). The quoted errors include the error measured from a 2-dimensional Gaussian fit to a small region around each source and the typical error in the GMRT flux density scale, % at these frequencies.
The task uvsub was then used to subtract out all detected continuum emission from the self-calibrated visibilities of each field. For each source, a spectral cube was made from these continuum-subtracted visibilities in the barycentric frame, using natural weighting. The Hi 21 cm spectrum was extracted by taking a cut through the cube at the AGN location. The final spectrum for each source was then obtained by fitting a second-order polynomial to the line-free regions of each spectrum, and subtracting this out. We further smoothed the spectra by 7 channels (J0229+0044) and 2 channels (J0229+0053), to velocity resolutions of km s-1 and km s-1, respectively. The final optical depth RMS noise values are per 26.6 km s-1 (J0229+0044) and per 11.2 km s-1 (J0229+0053).
AGN | Coordinates | BW | S | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(J2000) | MHz | MHz | Jy/Bm | mJy | km s-1 | mJy | km s-1 | cm-2 | ||
J0229+0044 | 02h29m28.9s, | 4.17 | 640.80 | 100 | 3.8 | 0.87 | 1.2166 | |||
00d44′29.5′′ | ||||||||||
J0229+0053 | 02h29m47.2s, | 200 | 656.68 | 20 | 5.6 | 0.41 | 1.1630 | |||
00d53′08.9′′ |
Our final Hi 21 cm spectra towards J0229+0044 and J0229+0053 are shown in Figs. 1[A] and 1[B], respectively. The velocity-integrated Hi 21 cm optical depths are km s-1 (J0229+0044) and km s-1 (J0229+0053). Assuming K and a covering factor, , these integrated Hi 21 cm optical depths imply Hi column densities of cm-2 (J0229+0044) and cm-2 (J0229+0053). Note that these are conservative assumptions: a lower covering factor or a higher spin temperature would imply even higher Hi column densities. The observational results are summarized in Table 1.
Our correlator setup allowed us to carry out a simultaneous search for the redshifted OH 1665 MHz and 1667 MHz lines towards both sources (e.g. Kanekar & Chengalur, 2002; Kanekar et al., 2005). The spectral RMS noise values at the redshifted OH line frequencies were 0.9 mJy/Bm per 9.7 km s-1 channel (J0229+0044) and 0.36 mJy/Bm per 9.5 km s-1 channel (J0229+0053); this yields upper limits to the velocity-integrated OH 1667 MHz optical depth of km s-1 (J0229+0044) and km s-1 (J0229+0053), assuming a Gaussian line profile with a line FWHM of 10 km s-1.
3 The AGNs: J0229+0044 and J0229+0053
3.1 J0229+0044
The AGN J0229+0044 is spatially coincident with an object identified in the DEEP2 survey (DEEP2 42053345), with a spectroscopic redshift of from the Oii doublet111The object was targeted in the DEEP2 survey at two different epochs and the DEEP2 catalog reports two redshifts, and ; these measurements are consistent within the km s-1 redshift error for redshift quality Q objects (Newman et al., 2013). We have used the mean of these two measurements as the AGN redshift, and have assumed the mean estimate to have a uncertainty of km s-1.. The quasar has g from the Dark Energy Survey (DES; Abbott et al., 2018) and K from the ALHAMBRA survey (Moles et al., 2008), i.e. gK. The object is also detected by GALEX in the near-ultraviolet (NUV) band, with an NUV magnitude of (i.e. similar to the g-band magnitude); however, we note that the NUV-band emission may be contaminated by the Lyman- emission of the AGN. We estimate the rest-frame 1215 Å luminosity222We assume a flat -cold dark matter cosmology, with (, , km s-1 Mpc-1, to convert flux densities to luminosity densities at the Hi 21 cm absorption redshift. (LUV) of J0229+0044 by interpolating between the measured B-band (B; Willmer et al., 2006) and NUV magnitudes; this yields a 1215 Å luminosity of L W Hz-1 (this is formally an upper limit, due to the possibility that the GALEX NUV measurement may be affected by the AGN’s Lyman- emission).
J0229+0044 has a 641 MHz flux density of mJy in our GMRT continuum image; this implies a rest-frame 1.4 GHz radio luminosity of L W Hz-1. Further, the source has a flux density of mJy at 1.4 GHz (from the VLA FIRST survey; Becker et al., 1995) and mJy at 8.5 GHz (from our analysis of an archival VLA X-band data set, project AC274). Combining the three measurements, we find that J0229+0044 has a relatively flat radio spectrum, with a spectral index of between MHz and GHz (where is defined such that ).
The Hi 21 cm absorption towards J0229+0044, shown in Figure 1[A], consists of a single component, centered at . This is in excellent agreement with the spectroscopic redshift of the DEEP2 object, indicating that the Hi 21 cm absorption arises from gas in the AGN environment. A single-component Gaussian fit to the Hi 21 cm line profile yields a peak optical depth of and an FWHM of km s-1. We emphasize that the optical depth sensitivity of the current GMRT Hi 21 cm spectrum towards J0229+0044 is quite low, due to the low AGN flux density. We hence cannot rule out the presence of the wide associated Hi 21 cm absorption that is typically detected in AGNs with L W Hz-1 (Maccagni et al., 2017).
3.2 J0229+0053
The Hi 21 cm spectrum towards J0229+0053, shown in Fig. 1[B], has two distinct features: a strong component centred at and with a peak optical depth of , and a wide weak wing that extends to km s-1 with respect to the main component. Unfortunately, the AGN does not currently have a spectroscopic redshift; its photometric redshift is (Hsieh et al., 2005). The redshift of the main Hi 21 cm component is in broad agreement with the AGN’s photometric redshift, but the large uncertainty in the photometric redshift means that we cannot formally rule out the possibility that the AGN is a background source (i.e. that the absorption arises from an “intervening” galaxy; e.g. Kanekar et al., 2014b). However, the high velocity-integrated Hi 21 cm optical depth of the absorber suggests that it is likely to be an associated system; such high values have hitherto only been obtained from Hi 21 cm absorption in AGN environments (e.g. Geréb et al., 2015; Aditya & Kanekar, 2018b; Kanekar et al., 2014b). Further, the wide line profile, with km s-1 between the nulls, is significantly larger than those seen in intervening systems, where km s-1 (Kanekar et al., 2009). We hence conclude that the Hi 21 cm absorption in J0229+0053 is likely to arise from gas in the AGN environment, i.e. that the AGN redshift is approximately equal to the Hi 21 cm absorption redshift.
J0229+0053 is faint at ultraviolet and optical wavelengths, with V, B (Hsieh et al., 2005), g= (DES; Abbott et al., 2018), and a non-detection in the GALEX NUV band. The object is detected in the UKIDSS survey, with K (Lawrence et al., 2007). Interpolating between the B-band magnitude and the upper limit on the NUV magnitude yields the upper-limit L W Hz-1 on the 1215 Å luminosity, where we have assumed that the AGN redshift is the same as the Hi 21 cm absorption redshift.
The measured GMRT 657 MHz flux density of mJy implies that J0229+0053 has a rest-frame 1.4 GHz luminosity of L W Hz-1, again assuming that the AGN redshift is the same as the Hi 21 cm absorption redshift. The AGN has a flux density of mJy at 1.4 GHz (VLA FIRST survey; Becker et al., 1995), i.e. an inverted spectrum at low frequencies, with spectral index . The AGN spectral index above 1.4 GHz is uncertain, due to inconsistencies between multiple 4.8 GHz flux-density measurements, mJy in the 87GB survey (Gregory & Condon, 1991) and mJy in the MIT Green Bank 5 GHz survey (Bennett et al., 1986)333The discrepancy in the GHz flux-density measurements could be due to either intrinsic variability or uncertainties in the flux density scale of the two surveys.. These measurements yield spectral indices of or . Thus, the AGN either is a GPS source or has an inverted spectrum at frequencies GHz.
While the strength and width of the Hi 21 cm absorption towards J0229+0053 imply that the absorption is likely to arise from gas in the AGN environment, a detailed understanding of the system critically requires a measurement of the AGN redshift. For example, if the AGN redshift is the same as the redshift of the main Hi 21 cm absorption component, the wide and weak Hi 21 cm absorption is likely to trace a jet-driven outflow of cold gas (e.g. Oosterloo et al., 2000; Morganti et al., 2013). Conversely, if the strong Hi 21 cm absorption lies redward of the AGN redshift, the different Hi 21 cm absorption components may arise against distinct sub-arcsecond-scale radio continuum structures (e.g. Peck & Taylor, 2001; Struve et al., 2010).
4 Discussion

The two new Hi 21 cm absorbers presented here are remarkable due to both the faintness of the background sources, and the high velocity-integrated Hi 21 cm optical depths, larger than that of any known redshifted Hi 21 cm absorber at and nearly an order of magnitude higher than those at (e.g. Curran et al., 2013; Aditya & Kanekar, 2018a). Indeed, this is the first time that Hi 21 cm absorption has ever been detected against a source with an integrated flux density lower than mJy at the redshifted Hi 21 cm line frequency at any redshift (e.g. Geréb et al., 2015; Maccagni et al., 2017; Aditya & Kanekar, 2018b); J0229+0044 has a flux density of just mJy! In passing, we note that VLBI Hi 21 cm spectroscopy of low- AGNs has yielded detections of Hi 21 cm absorption against resolved source components with individual flux densities mJy (e.g. Józsa et al., 2009; Srianand et al., 2015), as well as similarly high Hi 21 cm optical depths again against individual source components ( km s-1; e.g. Morganti et al., 2004; Srianand et al., 2015).
Both AGNs show evidence for significant reddening, with gK (J0229+0044) and gK (J0229+0053). For comparison, only % of the 1,697 optically-selected QSOs at in the SDSS-UKIDSS matched catalog of Peth et al. (2011) have gK, with none having gK. The inferred Hi column density along the two sightlines is extremely high, cm-2. This indicates a high dust column along the sightline, which is likely to cause high obscuration, and hence, reddening of the AGN (e.g. Webster et al., 1995). Searches for associated Hi 21 cm absorption towards red quasars have shown higher detection rates, consistent with the hypothesis that the reddening is due to dust obscuration in the AGN environment (e.g. Carilli et al., 1998; Yan et al., 2016). However, it is possible that the apparent reddening might also arise due to the colour of the AGN host galaxy (e.g. Benn et al., 1998). Aditya & Kanekar (2018b) found no significant evidence of a dependence of the strength of Hi 21 cm absorption on the AGN color, also suggesting that AGN reddening might arise from other causes.
We emphasize that the absorber towards J0229+0053 would not have been detected if we had limited our search to radio sources with known spectroscopic redshifts. Indeed, the detection of strong Hi 21 cm absorption against J0229+0053, which is highly reddened and hence faint at optical and UV wavelengths, demonstrates the power of such unbiased searches in identifying high Hi 21 cm opacity sightlines that are excellent candidates for molecular absorption.
Aditya & Kanekar (2018a, b) used Hi 21 cm absorption surveys of GHz-peaked-spectrum (GPS) AGNs and flat-spectrum AGNs (the latter drawn from the Caltech-Jodrell Flat-spectrum (CJF) sample; e.g. Taylor et al., 1996), respectively, to find that associated Hi 21 cm absorption is significantly weaker in AGNs at both high redshifts, and high rest-frame radio or UV luminosities. These associated Hi 21 cm absorption studies are unique due to the homogeneity of the target AGN samples. Our two AGNs have flat or inverted low-frequency spectra, with radio spectral indices consistent with the spectral-index selection criterion () of the CJF sample444We note that the spectral index of J0229+0053 is uncertain due to the difference between the two measurements of its 4.8 GHz flux density; however, the two 4.8 GHz measurements yield spectral indices () consistent with the CJF selection criterion (see Section 3.2).. Fig. 2[A] shows the velocity-integrated Hi 21 cm optical depths of the 122 Hi 21 cm absorbers of the CJF and GPS samples of Aditya & Kanekar (2018a, b) plotted as a function of redshift (with detections shown in orange and non-detections in blue). The low Hi 21 cm absorption detection rate and the paucity of high-opacity absorbers at high redshifts are clear from the figure: there are only three confirmed Hi 21 cm absorbers at , all with integrated Hi 21 cm opacities km s-1. Figs. 2[B] and [C] illustrate the luminosity bias in the samples, with higher-redshift AGNs having higher radio and UV luminosities. The lower strength of associated Hi 21 cm absorption in high-redshift AGNs of the GPS and CJF samples can hence be explained by (1) redshift evolution of the Hi column density or gas spin temperature in AGN environments, (2) excitation of the upper hyperfine Hi level due to the high AGN 1.4 GHz luminosity, resulting in a high spin temperature, or (3) ionization of the Hi due to the high AGN UV luminosity, resulting in a low Hi column density.
Our two new Hi 21 cm absorbers are shown as red stars in each of the panels of Fig. 2. It is clear that they have far higher Hi 21 cm optical depths, by nearly an order of magnitude, than any Hi 21 cm absorber from the CJF or GPS samples at . Further, unlike all the CJF and GPS AGNs at , the two AGNs have relatively low luminosities in both the rest-frame 1.4 GHz and the UV wavebands, L W Hz-1 and L W Hz-1. Our discovery of two high- Hi 21 cm absorbers with high velocity-integrated optical depths, and low rest-frame radio and UV AGN luminosities suggests that ionization and/or excitation effects play an important role in determining the strength of associated Hi 21 cm absorption. It thus appears likely that the current paucity of Hi 21 cm absorbers at may be due to the luminosity bias in AGN samples that have so far been searched for associated Hi 21 cm absorption.
Of course, our results do not rule out the possibility of redshift evolution in AGN environments, in either the Hi column density or the spin temperature. However, it is clear that tests of putative redshift evolution must be carried out on AGN samples with similar distributions of UV and radio luminosities, across a range of redshifts.
Finally, we note that the rest-frame 1215 Å luminosities of both J0229+0044 and J0029+0053 are significantly lower than the threshold of L W Hz-1 suggested by Curran et al. (2008), above which UV photons from the AGN may ionize most of the Hi. Indeed, all the AGNs that show confirmed detections of associated Hi 21 cm absorption at have low rest-frame UV luminosities, L W Hz-1 (Curran et al., 2008; Aditya et al., 2017; Aditya & Kanekar, 2018a; Dutta et al., 2020), but show a wide dispersion in their rest-frame 1.4 GHz radio luminosities, L W Hz-1. This suggests that the rarity of associated Hi 21 cm absorbers at may arise mainly because of a decrease in the Hi column density in the AGN environment due to ionization of the Hi by UV photons, rather than an increase in the Hi spin temperature due to proximity to the bright radio AGN.
In summary, we have used an unbiased GMRT Hi 21 cm absorption survey at to discover two new Hi 21 cm absorbers at , both of which are likely to arise from Hi in the AGN environment. The two absorbers have the highest integrated Hi 21 cm optical depths of all known redshifted Hi 21 cm absorbers, with an inferred Hi column density of cm-2. Both AGNs are significantly reddened (gK ), consistent with dust obscuration at the above high Hi column densities. The two AGNs have lower rest-frame 1215 Å UV and 1.4 GHz radio luminosities than most high- AGNs that have hitherto been searched for Hi 21 cm absorption. Our results suggest that ionization effects at high AGN UV luminosities are likely to play an important role in determining the strength of associated Hi 21 cm absorption, and that the current dearth of Hi 21 cm absorbers at may be due to the luminosity bias in current high- AGN samples with searches for Hi 21 cm absorption. Unbiased Hi 21 cm absorption surveys should allow us to significantly increase the number of Hi 21 cm absorbers at high redshifts in the near future.
References
- Abbott et al. (2018) Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., et al. 2018, ApJS, 239, 18
- Aditya (2019) Aditya, J. N. H. S. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 5597
- Aditya & Kanekar (2018a) Aditya, J. N. H. S., & Kanekar, N. 2018a, MNRAS, 473, 59
- Aditya & Kanekar (2018b) —. 2018b, MNRAS, 481, 1578
- Aditya et al. (2016) Aditya, J. N. H. S., Kanekar, N., & Kurapati, S. 2016, MNRAS, 455, 4000
- Aditya et al. (2017) Aditya, J. N. H. S., Kanekar, N., Prochaska, J. X., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 465, 5011
- Allison et al. (2015) Allison, J. R., Sadler, E. M., Moss, V. A., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 1249
- Allison et al. (2019) Allison, J. R., Mahony, E. K., Moss, V. A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 482, 2934
- Becker et al. (1995) Becker, R. H., White, R. L., & Helfand, D. J. 1995, ApJ, 450, 559
- Benn et al. (1998) Benn, C. R., Vigotti, M., Carballo, R., Gonzalez-Serrano, J. I., & Sanchez, S. F. 1998, MNRAS, 295, 451
- Bennett et al. (1986) Bennett, C. L., Lawrence, C. R., Burke, B. F., Hewitt, J. N., & Mahoney, J. 1986, ApJS, 61, 1
- Carilli et al. (1998) Carilli, C. L., Menten, K. M., Reid, M. J., Rupen, M. P., & Yun, M. S. 1998, ApJ, 494, 175
- Chowdhury et al. (2020) Chowdhury, A., Kanekar, N., Chengalur, J. N., Sethi, S., & Dwarkhanath, K. S. 2020, Nature, Accepted
- Cornwell et al. (2008) Cornwell, T. J., Golap, K., & Bhatnagar, S. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2, 647
- Curran et al. (2013) Curran, S. J., Whiting, M. T., Tanna, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 3402
- Curran et al. (2008) Curran, S. J., Whiting, M. T., Wiklind, T., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 765
- Dutta et al. (2020) Dutta, R., Raghunathan, S., Gupta, N., & Joshi, R. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 838
- Geréb et al. (2015) Geréb, K., Maccagni, F. M., Morganti, R., & Oosterloo, T. A. 2015, A&A, 575, A44
- Grasha et al. (2019) Grasha, K., Darling, J., Bolatto, A., Leroy, A. K., & Stocke, J. T. 2019, ApJS, 245, 3
- Gregory & Condon (1991) Gregory, P. C., & Condon, J. J. 1991, ApJS, 75, 1011
- Gupta et al. (2017) Gupta, Y., Ajithkumar, B., Kale, H. S., et al. 2017, Current Science, 113, 707
- Hsieh et al. (2005) Hsieh, B. C., Yee, H. K. C., Lin, H., & Gladders, M. D. 2005, ApJS, 158, 161
- Ishwara-Chandra et al. (2003) Ishwara-Chandra, C. H., Dwarakanath, K. S., & Anantharamaiah, K. R. 2003, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 24, 37
- Józsa et al. (2009) Józsa, G. I. G., Garrett, M. A., Oosterloo, T. A., et al. 2009, A&A, 500, L33
- Kanekar (2011) Kanekar, N. 2011, ApJ, 728, L12
- Kanekar & Chengalur (2002) Kanekar, N., & Chengalur, J. N. 2002, A&A, 381, L73
- Kanekar et al. (2018) Kanekar, N., Ghosh, T., & Chengalur, J. N. 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 120, 061302
- Kanekar et al. (2014a) Kanekar, N., Gupta, A., Carilli, C. L., Stocke, J. T., & Willett, K. W. 2014a, ApJ, 782, 56
- Kanekar et al. (2009) Kanekar, N., Prochaska, J. X., Ellison, S. L., & Chengalur, J. N. 2009, MNRAS, 396, 385
- Kanekar et al. (2005) Kanekar, N., Carilli, C. L., Langston, G. I., et al. 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 261301
- Kanekar et al. (2014b) Kanekar, N., Prochaska, J. X., Smette, A., et al. 2014b, MNRAS, 438, 2131
- Lawrence et al. (2007) Lawrence, A., Warren, S. J., Almaini, O., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 379, 1599
- Maccagni et al. (2017) Maccagni, F. M., Morganti, R., Oosterloo, T. A., Geréb, K., & Maddox, N. 2017, A&A, 604, A43
- McMullin et al. (2007) McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. 2007, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, CASA Architecture and Applications, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127
- Moles et al. (2008) Moles, M., Benítez, N., Aguerri, J. A. L., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 1325
- Moore et al. (1999) Moore, C. B., Carilli, C. L., & Menten, K. M. 1999, ApJ, 510, L87
- Morganti et al. (2013) Morganti, R., Fogasy, J., Paragi, Z., Oosterloo, T., & Orienti, M. 2013, Science, 341, 1082
- Morganti & Oosterloo (2018) Morganti, R., & Oosterloo, T. 2018, A&A Rev., 26, 4
- Morganti et al. (2003) Morganti, R., Oosterloo, T. A., Emonts, B. H. C., van der Hulst, J. M., & Tadhunter, C. N. 2003, ApJ, 593, L69
- Morganti et al. (2004) Morganti, R., Oosterloo, T. A., Tadhunter, C. N., et al. 2004, A&A, 424, 119
- Morganti et al. (2016) Morganti, R., Veilleux, S., Oosterloo, T., Teng, S. H., & Rupke, D. 2016, A&A, 593, A30
- Newman et al. (2013) Newman, J. A., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 5
- Offringa et al. (2012) Offringa, A. R., van de Gronde, J. J., & Roerdink, J. B. T. M. 2012, A&A, 539, A95
- Oosterloo et al. (2000) Oosterloo, T. A., Morganti, R., Tzioumis, A., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 2085
- Peck & Taylor (2001) Peck, A. B., & Taylor, G. B. 2001, ApJ, 554, L147
- Peth et al. (2011) Peth, M. A., Ross, N. P., & Schneider, D. P. 2011, AJ, 141, 105
- Rau & Cornwell (2011) Rau, U., & Cornwell, T. J. 2011, A&A, 532, A71
- Srianand et al. (2015) Srianand, R., Gupta, N., Momjian, E., & Vivek, M. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 917
- Struve et al. (2010) Struve, C., Oosterloo, T. A., Morganti, R., & Saripalli, L. 2010, A&A, 515, A67
- Taylor et al. (1996) Taylor, G. B., Vermeulen, R. C., Readhead, A. C. S., et al. 1996, ApJS, 107, 37
- Uson et al. (1991) Uson, J. M., Bagri, D. S., & Cornwell, T. J. 1991, Phys. Rev. Lett., 67, 3328
- van Gorkom et al. (1989) van Gorkom, J. H., Knapp, G. R., Ekers, R. D., et al. 1989, AJ, 97, 708
- Vermeulen et al. (2003) Vermeulen, R. C., Pihlström, Y. M., Tschager, W., et al. 2003, A&A, 404, 861
- Webster et al. (1995) Webster, R. L., Francis, P. J., Petersont, B. A., Drinkwater, M. J., & Masci, F. J. 1995, Nature, 375, 469
- Wiklind & Combes (1994) Wiklind, T., & Combes, F. 1994, A&A, 286, L9
- Wiklind & Combes (1996) —. 1996, Nature, 379, 139
- Willmer et al. (2006) Willmer, C. N. A., Faber, S. M., Koo, D. C., et al. 2006, ApJ, 647, 853
- Yan et al. (2016) Yan, T., Stocke, J. T., Darling, J., et al. 2016, AJ, 151, 74