Generation of Circularly-Polarised High-Harmonics with Identical Helicity in Two-Dimensional Materials
Abstract
Generation of circularly-polarized high-harmonics with the same helicity to all orders is indispensable for chiral-sensitive spectroscopy with attosecond temporal resolution. Solid-state samples have added a valuable asset in controlling the polarization of emitted harmonics. However, maintaining the identical helicity of the emitted harmonics to all orders is a daunting task. In this work, we demonstrate a robust recipe for efficient generation of circularly-polarized harmonics with the same helicity. For this purpose, a nontrivial tailored driving field, consisting of two co-rotating laser pulses with frequencies and , is utilized to generate harmonics from graphene. The Lissajous figure of the total driving pulse exhibits an absence of the rotational symmetry, which imposes no constraint on the helicity of the emitted harmonics. Our approach to generating circularly-polarized harmonics with the same helicity is robust against various perturbations in the setup, such as variation in the subcycle phase difference or the intensity ratio of the and pulses, as rotational symmetry of the total driving pulse remains absent. Our approach is expected to be equally applicable to other two-dimensional materials, among others, transition-metal dichalcogenides and hexagonal boron nitride as our approach is based on absence of the rotational symmetry of the driving pulse. Our work paves the way for establishing compact solid-state chiral-XUV sources, opening a new realm for chiral light-matter interaction on its intrinsic timescale.
I Introduction
In the last few decades, high-harmonic generation (HHG) has become an essential ingredient in attosecond science. HHG is a strong-field-driven highly nonlinear frequency up-conversion process. HHG provides a route not only to generate attosecond pulses in the extreme ultraviolet (XUV) energy regime [1] but also to interrogate electron dynamics on its natural timescale [2, 3, 4, 5]. Owing to the recollision mechanism of HHG in gases [6], the harmonic yield drops markedly as the polarization of the driving laser pulse changes from linear to circular. To circumvent this problem, a combination of two counter-rotating circularly-polarized laser pulses with frequencies and has been employed to generate circularly-polarized harmonics. The resultant harmonic spectrum displays doublets of circularly-polarized harmonics where and harmonics exhibit the polarization of - and -fields, respectively. However, harmonics do not conserve parity and thus they are forbidden [7, 8]. Different variants of the bichromatic counter-rotating schemes, such as varying the ratio of the ellipticities and/or of the intensities of the two driving pulses [9, 10], controlling the subcycle phase between the two pulses [11], introduction of an additional seed pulse with different polarization [12, 13], adding plasmonic field enhancement [14], and noncollinear geometry of the scheme [15, 16] are employed to control the polarization of the emitted harmonics. It is important to emphasis that the recognition of chiral molecules [17, 18], circular dichroism in magnetic materials [19], spin and magnetisation dynamics in solids at their natural timescales [20, 21], to name but a few, are examples of chiral-sensitive light-matter interaction phenomena where the desired control over the polarization of the emitted harmonics and resultant attosecond XUV pulses is quintessential.
The extension of HHG from gases to solids offers an attractive option for compact tabletop sources of coherent XUV attosecond pulses. Because of the periodic nature of solids with higher electron density in comparison with gases, HHG in solids seems a better option for higher yield of harmonics [22, 23]. Moreover, solid HHG has added a new dimension in attosecond spectroscopy to shed new light on various equilibrium and nonequilibrium aspects of solids [24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39].
In comparison with HHG from gases, HHG from solids exhibits different sensitivity toward circularly-polarized laser pulses [40, 41]. It has been shown that a high degree of control over the polarization of emitted harmonics can be achieved by the dynamic control of crystal symmetries and intertwined interband and intraband electronic dynamics [42]. Saito et al. have demonstrated the generation of harmonics with alternate helicity using a circularly-polarized laser pulse, owing to the selection rules derived from the symmetry [43]. Recently, bicircular counter-rotating laser pulses have been employed to generate circularly-polarized harmonics in solids, which has enabled one to preform symmetry-resolved chiral spectroscopy [44] and to probe valley-selective excitations in two-dimensional materials [45, 46, 47]. In all cases, the harmonic spectra of solids, similar to gases, are composed of pairs of circularly-polarized harmonics with opposite helicity owing to the threefold rotational symmetry of the bicircular counter-rotating pulses. Thus, the generation of circularly-polarized harmonics with the same helicity to all orders is missing – a major impediment in the realisation of a compact all-solid-state XUV source for chiral spectroscopy. The main focus of the present work is to address this major obstacle.
Our work provides a robust recipe to generate circularly-polarized harmonics with the same helicity to all orders. For that purpose, a nontrivial tailored driving field without any rotational symmetry is designed for HHG. The total electric field of the co-rotating bicircular pulses does not exhibit any symmetry, which is in contrast to the counter-rotating pulses with threefold symmetry. Thus, it is expected that the absence of any symmetry of the total driving field will impose no symmetry constraint on the helicity of the emitted harmonics. To test our idea, monolayer graphene is exposed to a combination of bicircular co-rotating laser pulses. It is worth mentioning that HHG from graphene and the underlying mechanism have been extensively explored in recent years [48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57]. Moreover, the anomalous ellipticity dependence of HHG from graphene has been explored experimentally [58, 54] as well as discussed theoretically [58, 54, 59, 60, 61, 53].
II Computational Details
Semiconductor Bloch equations in the Houston basis are solved to simulate the interaction of laser with graphene. The nearest-neighbor tight-binding approach is used to represent graphene as discussed in our previous work [62]. High-harmonic spectrum is simulated by performing the Fourier transform () of the time derivative of the total current as
(1) |
Here, is the current at any k-point in the Brillouin zone as a function of time.
III Results and Discussion
Before we discuss results obtained for bicircular co-rotating laser pulses, let us revisit the results for single-colour and bicircular counter-rotating laser pulses. The polarization-resolved high-harmonic spectrum of graphene driven by a single-colour left-handed circularly-polarized pulse is shown in Fig. 1(a). Owing to the six-fold rotational symmetry of graphene and conservation of spin angular momentum of the driving laser pulse, selection rules indicate the generation of (6 1)-order harmonics with . Moreover, the helicity of the 6+1 (6-1) harmonics is the same (opposite) helicity as the driving pulse [63]. Our results in Fig. 1(a) are in prefect agreement with the selection rules and with an earlier report [55]. Moreover, the low harmonic yield of the fifth and seventh harmonics with opposite helicity has been observed in an experiment [58]. It has been anticipated that the yield of harmonics can be improved by increasing the intensity of the driving field [55].
The total vector potential corresponding to circularly-polarized laser pulses is given as
(2) |
Here, is the amplitude of the vector potential, is the temporal envelope of the driving field, is the subcycle phase difference between and 2 pulses, and is the ratio of electric field strength of the two pulses. +(-) represents the co-rotating (counter-rotating) laser pulse configuration. In this work, fundamental pulse with a peak intensity of 0.3 TW/cm2 and a wavelength of 2 m is used for HHG from graphene. The fundamental driving pulse has eight cycles with sin-square envelope. Similar laser parameters have been employed to study coherent electron dynamics in graphene [64, 65].

Figure 1(b) presents the polarization-resolved harmonic spectrum of graphene driven by bicircular counter-rotating -2 laser pulses. The resultant vector potential exhibits a trefoil symmetry as shown in the inset. Following the threefold symmetry and conservation of spin angular momentum, with harmonics are allowed, whereas harmonics are symmetry forbidden [8]. is the number of photons of the pulse. Moreover, the allowed - and -order harmonics follow the helicity of the and pulses, respectively [19, 44, 45]. From the figure, our results are consistent with the selection rules and earlier report [46]. Note that the polarization of one of the driving pulses individually impacts the helicity of the emitted harmonics significantly.
Analysis of results in Figs 1(a) and 1(b) establishes that the generation of harmonics with circular polarization, using either a single colour circular pulse or bicircular counter-rotating -2 pulses, is possible. In both cases, the adjacent harmonics are of opposite helicity, which has a serious consequence for the helicity of the resultant attosecond pulses. If the intensities of adjacent harmonics with opposite helicity are the same then the generated attosecond pulse exhibits linearly polarization with a rotating axis of polarization. In such circumstances, one needs to induce an imbalance in the intensity of the adjacent harmonics to have a control over the helicity of the resultant attosecond pulses [10, 11, 12].
The total harmonic spectrum in polarization-resolved fashion for the bicircular co-rotating -2 laser pulses is presented in Fig. 1(c). As evident from the Lissajous figure in the inset, the total field does not exhibit any rotational symmetry. Thus, the conservation of spin angular momentum does not impose any constraint in the helicity of the generated harmonics and none of the harmonics are symmetry forbidden. As a result, all-order circularly-polarized harmonics are generated with the same helicity as that of the driving pulse. Analysis of the relative yield of the spectrum revels that the left-circularly-polarized harmonics are the leading harmonics.

After demonstrating the capability of the co-rotating -2 scheme to generate circularly-polarized harmonics with the same helicity, let us analysis the temporal evolution of the emitted harmonics in the time domain. For this purpose, Fig. 2 presents the time profiles of a few selected harmonics corresponding to Fig. 1(c). All the harmonics are left-handed circularly polarized as evident from the Lissajous figure and the and components of the harmonics in the time domain.

At this juncture it is natural to wonder how robust are the features of the spectrum shown in Fig. 1(c) with respect to the variations in the subcycle phase and the relative ratio . To avoid overlapping and have a better representation, we present the harmonics with left- and right-handed circular polarization in the left- and right-hand panels of Fig. 3, respectively. Figures 3(a) and 3(b) display the harmonic spectrum for different values of . From the figure, the polarization state of the emitted harmonics is insensitive with respect to variations in , and all the harmonics are left-handed circularly polarized in nature. To understand the insensitivity, let us look at the total electric field of the co-rotating -2 scheme for different values of as shown above the panels. As evident from the Lissajous figures of the total field, the variation in results in the rotation of the resultant field. However, the fields have no rotation symmetry. Thus, there are no significantly changes in the polarization and the intensity of the emitted harmonics [see Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)].

Now let us explore how the variation in the value affects the harmonic spectra. The peak intensity of the resultant field is maintained at 0.3 TW/cm2 while varying the value. As expected, an increase in the value results in an increase of the harmonic yield [see Figs. 3(c) and 3(d)]. However, the overall nature of the spectra does not change with respect to , i.e., harmonics are still circularly polarized in the direction of the driving field. The reason for that can be attributed to the similar Lissajous figures of the resultant field for different values as evident from the bottom panel. Thus, the investigation of Fig. 3 leads us to conclude that the generation of circularly-polarized harmonics with same helicity via the co-rotating -2 scheme does not require fine tuning of subcycle phase or intensity ratio between the pulses. Therefore, the co-rotating scheme is robust in generating circularly-polarized harmonics with the same helicity to all ordera.
Before making a summary, let us examine how the harmonic spectrum is sensitive to the dephasing time – a phenomenological term accounting for the decoherence between electrons and holes within the semiconductor-Bloch equations framework. Figure 4 presents how the different values of the dephasing time affect the harmonic spectrum corresponding to co-rotating -2 laser pulses. As evident from the figure, lower-order harmonics are insensitive to the dephasing time as they are dominated by the intraband current [62, 54, 66]. On the other hand, higher-order harmonics are dominated by the interband current as their intensities are boosted with an increase in the dephasing time. The interband channel is prone to the coherence between the excited electrons and their corresponding holes [54]. Also, longer electron-hole trajectories are sensitive to the decoherence time as the corresponding excursion time allows for more scattering events during HHG [66]. Thus, relatively smaller dephasing time means more scattering events for the same excursion time. Hence, the yield of higher harmonics will be suppressed for smaller dephasing time [66]. Note that the increase in the harmonic yield with increase of dephasing time does not alter the polarization properties of the emitted harmonics as evident from Fig. 4.
IV Conclusion
In summary, we explore the possibility of generating circularly-polarized high-harmonics with the same helicity in solids. To achieve this ambitious goal, we harness the no rotational symmetry of the tailored driving field consisting of two co-rotating circular pulses with frequencies and . The absence of rotational symmetry of the driving field enforces no constraint on the helicity of the emitted harmonics. It is observed that the spectrum of monolayer graphene, driven by the bicircular co-rotating pulses, consists of circularly-polarized harmonics with the same helicity to all orders as that of the fundamental pulse. The Lissajous figure of the total driving pulse exhibits no rotational symmetry for different subcycle phase differences between and pulses and different intensity ratios between the pulses. Moreover, dephasing time, associated with the decoherence between electrons and holes, does not alter the nature of the harmonic spectrum. Thus, our approach for generating circularly-polarized high-harmonics with the same helicity is robust against any imperfection in the driving pulses. Furthermore, we anticipate that our approach will be applicable to other hexagonal two-dimensional materials, such as hexagonal boron nitride and molybdenum disulfide, as our approach is based on the absence of rotational symmetry of the total system consisting of the total driving field and the two-dimensional material. However, unlike gapless graphene, the interplay of the interband and intraband currents is different in gapped graphene [67], and therefore the value of the dephasing time will play a crucial role in determining the helicity of the emitted harmonics in gapped graphene. Thus, laser parameters need to be optimised to obtain a desired control over the helicity of the emitted harmonics from gapped graphene. Also, based on the results presented in Ref. [44], our approach could be extended to bulk materials also. Present work offers an avenue for detailed chiral-sensitive light-matter interactions on natural timescales.
Acknowledgements
G. D. acknowledges support from Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB) India (Project No. MTR/2021/000138).
References
- Midorikawa [2022] K. Midorikawa, Progress on table-top isolated attosecond light sources, Nature Photonics 16, 267 (2022).
- Krausz and Ivanov [2009] F. Krausz and M. Ivanov, Attosecond physics, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 163 (2009).
- Bucksbaum [2007] P. H. Bucksbaum, The future of attosecond spectroscopy, Science 317, 766 (2007).
- Corkum and Krausz [2007] P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz, Attosecond science, Nature Physics 3, 381 (2007).
- Dixit et al. [2012] G. Dixit, O. Vendrell, and R. Santra, Imaging electronic quantum motion with light, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 11636 (2012).
- Corkum [1993] P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization, Physical Review Letters 71, 1994 (1993).
- Neufeld et al. [2019] O. Neufeld, D. Podolsky, and O. Cohen, Floquet group theory and its application to selection rules in harmonic generation, Nature Communications 10, 1 (2019).
- Fleischer et al. [2014] A. Fleischer, O. Kfir, T. Diskin, P. Sidorenko, and O. Cohen, Spin angular momentum and tunable polarization in high-harmonic generation, Nature Photonics 8, 543 (2014).
- Neufeld and Cohen [2018] O. Neufeld and O. Cohen, Optical chirality in nonlinear optics: Application to high harmonic generation, Physical Review Letters 120, 133206 (2018).
- Dorney et al. [2017] K. M. Dorney, J. L. Ellis, C. Hernández-García, D. D. Hickstein, C. A. Mancuso, N. Brooks, T. Fan, G. Fan, D. Zusin, C. Gentry, P. Grychtol, H. C. Kapteyn, and M. M. Murnane, Helicity-selective enhancement and polarization control of attosecond high harmonic waveforms driven by bichromatic circularly polarized laser fields, Physical Review Letters 119, 063201 (2017).
- Frolov et al. [2018] M. V. Frolov, N. L. Manakov, A. A. Minina, N. V. Vvedenskii, A. A. Silaev, M. Y. Ivanov, and A. F. Starace, Control of harmonic generation by the time delay between two-color, bicircular few-cycle mid-ir laser pulses, Physical Review Letters 120, 263203 (2018).
- Dixit et al. [2018] G. Dixit, Á. Jiménez-Galán, L. Medišauskas, and M. Ivanov, Control of the helicity of high-order harmonic radiation using bichromatic circularly polarized laser fields, Physical Review A 98, 053402 (2018).
- Rajpoot et al. [2021] R. Rajpoot, A. R. Holkundkar, and J. N. Bandyopadhyay, Polarization control of attosecond pulses using bi-chromatic elliptically polarized laser, Journal of Physics B 54, 225401 (2021).
- Ansari et al. [2021] I. N. Ansari, C. Hofmann, L. Medišauskas, M. Lewenstein, M. F. Ciappina, and G. Dixit, Controlling polarization of attosecond pulses with plasmonic-enhanced bichromatic counter-rotating circularly polarized fields, Physical Review A 103, 013104 (2021).
- Huang et al. [2018] P. C. Huang, C. Hernández-García, J. T. Huang, P. Y. Huang, C. H. Lu, L. Rego, D. D. Hickstein, J. L. Ellis, A. Jaron-Becker, A. Becker, et al., Polarization control of isolated high-harmonic pulses, Nature Photonics 12, 349 (2018).
- Hickstein et al. [2015] D. D. Hickstein, F. J. Dollar, P. Grychtol, J. L. Ellis, R. Knut, C. Hernández-García, D. Zusin, C. Gentry, J. M. Shaw, T. Fan, et al., Non-collinear generation of angularly isolated circularly polarized high harmonics, Nature Photonics 9, 743 (2015).
- Ferré et al. [2015] A. Ferré, C. Handschin, M. Dumergue, F. Burgy, A. Comby, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, G. A. Garcia, R. Géneaux, L. Merceron, E. Mevel, L. Nahon, S. Petit, B. Pons, D. Staedter, S. Weber, T. Ruchon, V. Blanchet, and Y. Mairesse, A table-top ultrashort light source in the extreme ultraviolet for circular dichroism experiments, Nature Photonics 9, 93 (2015).
- Cireasa et al. [2015] R. Cireasa, A. E. Boguslavskiy, B. Pons, M. C. H. Wong, D. Descamps, S. Petit, H. Ruf, N. Thiré, A. Ferré, J. Suarez, J. Higuet, B. E. Schmidt, A. F. Alharbi, F. Legare, V. Blanchet, B. Fabre, S. Patchkovskii, O. Smirnova, Y. Mairesse, , and V. R. Bhardwaj, Probing molecular chirality on a sub-femtosecond timescale, Nature Physics 11, 654 (2015).
- Kfir et al. [2015] O. Kfir, P. Grychtol, E. Turgut, R. Knut, D. Zusin, D. Popmintchev, T. Popmintchev, H. Nembach, J. M. Shaw, A. Fleischer, H. Kapteyn, M. Murnane, and O. Cohen, Generation of bright phase-matched circularly-polarized extreme ultraviolet high harmonics, Nature Photonics 9, 99 (2015).
- Boeglin et al. [2010] C. Boeglin, E. Beaurepaire, V. Halté, V. López-Flores, C. Stamm, N. Pontius, H. A. Dürr, and J. Y. Bigot, Distinguishing the ultrafast dynamics of spin and orbital moments in solids, Nature 465, 458 (2010).
- Radu et al. [2011] I. Radu, K. Vahaplar, C. Stamm, T. Kachel, N. Pontius, H. A. Dürr, T. A. Ostler, J. Barker, R. F. L. Evans, R. W. Chantrell, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, A. Kirilyuk, T. Rasing, and A. V. Kimel, Transient ferromagnetic-like state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins, Nature 472, 205 (2011).
- Goulielmakis and Brabec [2022] E. Goulielmakis and T. Brabec, High harmonic generation in condensed matter, Nature Photonics 16, 411 (2022).
- Ghimire and Reis [2019] S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from solids, Nature Physics 15, 10 (2019).
- Bharti et al. [2022] A. Bharti, M. Mrudul, and G. Dixit, High-harmonic spectroscopy of light-driven nonlinear anisotropic anomalous hall effect in a weyl semimetal, Physical Review B 105, 155140 (2022).
- Pattanayak et al. [2022] A. Pattanayak, S. Pujari, and G. Dixit, Role of majorana fermions in high-harmonic generation from kitaev chain, Scientific Reports 12, 1 (2022).
- Zaks et al. [2012] B. Zaks, R.-B. Liu, and M. S. Sherwin, Experimental observation of electron–hole recollisions, Nature 483, 580 (2012).
- Luu et al. [2015] T. T. Luu, M. Garg, S. Y. Kruchinin, A. Moulet, M. T. Hassan, and E. Goulielmakis, Extreme ultraviolet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature 521, 498 (2015).
- Schubert et al. [2014] O. Schubert, M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, B. Urbanek, C. Lange, U. Huttner, D. Golde, T. Meier, M. Kira, S. W. Koch, and R. Huber, Sub-cycle control of terahertz high-harmonic generation by dynamical bloch oscillations, Nature Photonics 8, 119 (2014).
- Hohenleutner et al. [2015] M. Hohenleutner, F. Langer, O. Schubert, M. Knorr, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Real-time observation of interfering crystal electrons in high-harmonic generation, Nature 523, 572 (2015).
- Pattanayak et al. [2020] A. Pattanayak, M. S. Mrudul, and G. Dixit, Influence of vacancy defects in solid high-order harmonic generation, Physical Review A 101, 013404 (2020).
- Vampa et al. [2015a] G. Vampa, T. J. Hammond, N. Thiré, B. E. Schmidt, F. Légaré, C. R. McDonald, T. Brabec, and P. B. Corkum, Linking high harmonics from gases and solids, Nature 522, 462 (2015a).
- Vampa et al. [2015b] G. Vampa, T. J. Hammond, N. Thiré, B. E. Schmidt, F. Légaré, C. R. McDonald, T. Brabec, D. D. Klug, and P. B. Corkum, All-optical reconstruction of crystal band structure, Physical Review Letters 115, 193603 (2015b).
- Langer et al. [2018] F. Langer, C. P. Schmid, S. Schlauderer, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, P. Nagler, C. Schüller, T. Korn, P. Hawkins, J. Steiner, et al., Lightwave valleytronics in a monolayer of tungsten diselenide, Nature 557, 76 (2018).
- Luu and Wörner [2018] T. T. Luu and H. J. Wörner, Measurement of the berry curvature of solids using high-harmonic spectroscopy, Nature Communications 9, 1 (2018).
- Banks et al. [2017] H. B. Banks, Q. Wu, D. C. Valovcin, S. Mack, A. C. Gossard, L. Pfeiffer, R.-B. Liu, and M. S. Sherwin, Dynamical birefringence: electron-hole recollisions as probes of berry curvature, Physical Review X 7, 041042 (2017).
- Mrudul et al. [2019] M. S. Mrudul, A. Pattanayak, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Direct numerical observation of real-space recollision in high-order harmonic generation from solids, Physical Review A 100, 043420 (2019).
- Imai et al. [2020] S. Imai, A. Ono, and S. Ishihara, High harmonic generation in a correlated electron system, Physical Review Letters 124, 157404 (2020).
- Borsch et al. [2020] M. Borsch, C. P. Schmid, L. Weigl, S. Schlauderer, N. Hofmann, C. Lange, J. T. Steiner, S. W. Koch, R. Huber, and M. Kira, Super-resolution lightwave tomography of electronic bands in quantum materials, Science 370, 1204 (2020).
- Rana et al. [2022] N. Rana, M. Mrudul, D. Kartashov, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, High-harmonic spectroscopy of coherent lattice dynamics in graphene, Physical Review B 106, 064303 (2022).
- Ghimire et al. [2011] S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high-order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature Physics 7, 138 (2011).
- Tancogne-Dejean et al. [2017] N. Tancogne-Dejean, O. D. Mücke, F. X. Kärtner, and A. Rubio, Ellipticity dependence of high-harmonic generation in solids originating from coupled intraband and interband dynamics, Nature Communications 8, 1 (2017).
- Klemke et al. [2019] N. Klemke, N. Tancogne-Dejean, G. M. Rossi, Y. Yang, F. Scheiba, R. Mainz, G. Di Sciacca, A. Rubio, F. Kärtner, and O. Mücke, Polarization-state-resolved high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature Communications 10, 1 (2019).
- Saito et al. [2017] N. Saito, P. Xia, F. Lu, T. Kanai, J. Itatani, and N. Ishii, Observation of selection rules for circularly polarized fields in high-harmonic generation from a crystalline solid, Optica 4, 1333 (2017).
- Heinrich et al. [2021] T. Heinrich, M. Taucer, O. Kfir, P. Corkum, A. Staudte, C. Ropers, and M. Sivis, Chiral high-harmonic generation and spectroscopy on solid surfaces using polarization-tailored strong fields, Nature Communications 12, 1 (2021).
- He et al. [2022] Y.-L. He, J. Guo, F.-Y. Gao, and X.-S. Liu, Dynamical symmetry and valley-selective circularly polarized high-harmonic generation in monolayer molybdenum disulfide, Physical Review B 105, 024305 (2022).
- Mrudul et al. [2021] M. Mrudul, Á. Jiménez-Galán, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Light-induced valleytronics in pristine graphene, Optica 8, 422 (2021).
- Mrudul and Dixit [2021a] M. S. Mrudul and G. Dixit, Controlling valley-polarisation in graphene via tailored light pulses, Journal of Physics B 54, 224001 (2021a).
- Hafez et al. [2018] H. A. Hafez, S. Kovalev, J. C. Deinert, Z. Mics, B. Green, N. Awari, M. Chen, S. Germanskiy, U. Lehnert, J. Teichert, et al., Extremely efficient terahertz high-harmonic generation in graphene by hot dirac fermions, Nature 561, 507 (2018).
- Avetissian and Mkrtchian [2018] H. K. Avetissian and G. F. Mkrtchian, Impact of electron-electron coulomb interaction on the high harmonic generation process in graphene, Physical Review B 97, 115454 (2018).
- Chizhova et al. [2017] L. A. Chizhova, F. Libisch, and J. Burgdörfer, High-harmonic generation in graphene: Interband response and the harmonic cutoff, Physical Review B 95, 085436 (2017).
- Al-Naib et al. [2014] I. Al-Naib, J. E. Sipe, and M. M. Dignam, High harmonic generation in undoped graphene: Interplay of inter-and intraband dynamics, Physical Review B 90, 245423 (2014).
- Zurrón et al. [2018] Ó. Zurrón, A. Picón, and L. Plaja, Theory of high-order harmonic generation for gapless graphene, New Journal of Physics 20, 053033 (2018).
- Zurrón-Cifuentes et al. [2019] Ó. Zurrón-Cifuentes, R. Boyero-García, C. Hernández-García, A. Picón, and L. Plaja, Optical anisotropy of non-perturbative high-order harmonic generation in gapless graphene, Optics Express 27, 7776 (2019).
- Taucer et al. [2017] M. Taucer, T. J. Hammond, P. B. Corkum, G. Vampa, C. Couture, N. Thiré, B. E. Schmidt, F. Légaré, H. Selvi, N. Unsuree, et al., Nonperturbative harmonic generation in graphene from intense midinfrared pulsed light, Physical Review B 96, 195420 (2017).
- Chen and Qin [2019] Z. Y. Chen and R. Qin, Circularly polarized extreme ultraviolet high harmonic generation in graphene, Optics Express 27, 3761 (2019).
- Sato et al. [2021] S. A. Sato, H. Hirori, Y. Sanari, Y. Kanemitsu, and A. Rubio, High-order harmonic generation in graphene: Nonlinear coupling of intraband and interband transitions, Physical Review B 103, L041408 (2021).
- Boyero-García et al. [2022] R. Boyero-García, A. García-Cabrera, O. Zurrón-Cifuentes, C. Hernández-García, and L. Plaja, Non-classical high harmonic generation in graphene driven by linearly-polarized laser pulses, Optics Express 30, 15546 (2022).
- Yoshikawa et al. [2017] N. Yoshikawa, T. Tamaya, and K. Tanaka, High-harmonic generation in graphene enhanced by elliptically polarized light excitation, Science 356, 736 (2017).
- Zhang et al. [2021] Y. Zhang, L. Li, J. Li, T. Huang, P. Lan, and P. Lu, Orientation dependence of high-order harmonic generation in graphene, Physical Review A 104, 033110 (2021).
- Liu et al. [2018] C. Liu, Y. Zheng, Z. Zeng, and R. Li, Driving-laser ellipticity dependence of high-order harmonic generation in graphene, Physical Review A 97, 063412 (2018).
- Dong et al. [2021] F. Dong, Q. Xia, and J. Liu, Ellipticity of the harmonic emission from graphene irradiated by a linearly polarized laser, Physical Review A 104, 033119 (2021).
- Mrudul and Dixit [2021b] M. Mrudul and G. Dixit, High-harmonic generation from monolayer and bilayer graphene, Physical Review B 103, 094308 (2021b).
- Alon et al. [1998] O. E. Alon, V. Averbukh, and N. Moiseyev, Selection rules for the high harmonic generation spectra, Physical Review Letters 80, 3743 (1998).
- Higuchi et al. [2017] T. Higuchi, C. Heide, K. Ullmann, H. B. Weber, and P. Hommelhoff, Light-field-driven currents in graphene, Nature 550, 224 (2017).
- Heide et al. [2018] C. Heide, T. Higuchi, H. B. Weber, and P. Hommelhoff, Coherent electron trajectory control in graphene, Physical Review Letters 121, 207401 (2018).
- Heide et al. [2022] C. Heide, Y. Kobayashi, A. C. Johnson, F. Liu, T. F. Heinz, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Probing electron-hole coherence in strongly driven 2d materials using high-harmonic generation, Optica 9, 512 (2022).
- Klemke et al. [2020] N. Klemke, O. Mücke, A. Rubio, F. X. Kärtner, and N. Tancogne-Dejean, Role of intraband dynamics in the generation of circularly polarized high harmonics from solids, Physical Review B 102, 104308 (2020).