Gauge invariance and amplitudes of two-photon processes
P. A. Krachkov
[email protected]Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
A. I. Milstein
[email protected]Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
A. G. Shamov
[email protected]Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics of SB RAS, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
Abstract
A method to derive the convenient representations for many two-photon amplitudes is suggested. It is based on the use of the gauge in which the photon propagator has only space components. The amplitudes obtained have no any strong numerical cancellations and, therefore, are very convenient for numerical evaluations. Our approach is illustrated by the consideration of the processes , , and . The method is extended on the case of polarized particles. The amplitudes obtained in this approach have been employed for extension
of the event generator developed by F.A. Berends, P.H. Daverveldt, and R. Kleiss.
pacs:
11.15.-q; 13.10.+q; 13.38.-b; 13.40.-f; 14.70.-e
I Introduction
Investigations of processes (two-photon processes),
where are pairs of leptons () or hadrons with C-parity give an important
experimental information on physics of collisions. Such investigations are the important parts of the physical programs of C- and B- factories.
Since the leptonic two-photon processes are completely described by QED, they provide firstly a possibility to test QED in higher orders of the perturbation theory and secondly are important for calibration of the experiments and suppression of backgrounds.
There are a few generators that simulate leptonic two-photon processes beyond the equivalent photon approximation BDK86 ; Schu98 ; Ver83 ; HKD93 ; BPP2001 . The most popular is a generator of F.A. Berends, P.H. Daverveldt, and R. Kleiss (DIAG36 or BDK generator ) BDK86 . It includes all Feynman diagrams and accounts for identity effect. It is worth noting that this effect is not taken into account in other two-photon event generators.
The BDK prediction of the identity effect in
process has been presented in Ref. KMRS2019 . The unexpected growth of the effect with
the cut on the invariant mass of produced pair motivated us to make calculations with
the BDK generator in which the alternative matrix elements expression were embedded.
The BDK prediction on the identity effect were confirmed at the increased accuracy of the
numerical calculations.
These alternative matrix element expressions are presented below. Unlike to those used
in BDK BDK85 , they contain only spatial components of the involved particle momenta which
ensure their numerical stability. Another advantage of them is an easiness of the modification for semi-leptonic final states. Simulation of the semi-leptonic processes such as became actual in context of BELLE analysis of with Mizuk2019 .
In this case two-photon processes are main sources of the background.
II Method of calculation
First of all, to obtain the explicit form of the matrix element, it is necessary to introduce some convenient basis for the Dirac spinors. Since the number of the Feynman diagrams is quite large, for numerical calculations it is important to have the most simple expression for the total amplitude. Then, the following circumstance must be taken into account. In the two-photon processes, the main contribution to the cross section is given by kinematics where a virtual photon is emitted almost along the initial electron momentum . In such kinematics the corresponding current has large components and , i.e., , where and ( is the electron mass, we set ). As a result, using the Feynman gauge leads to a huge numerical cancellation between and at high energies, which is a problem for numerical calculations with high accuracy. In our work we avoid this problem by means of the gauge in which the photon propagator contains only spatial components:
(1)
To calculate the amplitude of the process, we use the following explicit form of the positive-energy Dirac spinor and negative-energy Dirac spinor LL
(2)
Here are Pauli matrices, and are the electron momentum and energy, and are the positron momentum and energy, is the two-component spinor, denotes two possible polarizations, the same basis of spinors for all particles is used. We introduce three unit orthogonal vectors , , (so that ) and choose to be the eigenstate of the operator , i.e., . It is convenient to direct along the momentum of initial electron. Then we have
(3)
Using the quantities and , we obtain the matrices which are necessary for further calculations:
(4)
Here
(5)
All Feynman diagrams have a block structure and can be easily expressed via several quantities.
For one-photon emission (or absorption) and annihilation these quantities are
(6)
For two-photon emission (or absorption) and annihilation, the block terms are
(7)
By means of Eqs. (II)-(II), one can easily write the explicit expressions for the amplitudes of huge amount of processes. These expressions are rather simple and have no any strong numerical cancellations. Therefore, they are very convenient for numerical evaluations.
Consider, as an example, the process . Let be the momenta of initial electron and two final electrons, and be the momenta of the initial positron and two final positrons, respectively. Typical Feynman diagrams, which contribute to the amplitude of the process, are shown in Fig. 1.
The differential cross section, averaged over polarizations of the initial particles and summed up over polarizations of the final particles, reads
(8)
Here is the fine structure constant, is the contribution of the diagram shown in Fig. 1(a), is the contribution of the diagram shown in Fig. 1(b), is similar to but with the photon emission from positron line, corresponds to one-photon annihilation of initial pair with subsequent virtual photon decay into two pairs (Fig. 1(c)), and corresponds to two-photon annihilation of initial pair with subsequent decay of each virtual photon into pair (Fig. 1(d)).
Figure 1: Typical diagrams contributing to the amplitude of the process ; wavy lines correspond to photons and straight lines to electrons and positrons. (a) Additional pair is a result of annihilation of two virtual photons. (b) Emission of photon with its subsequent decay into pair. (c) One-photon annihilation of initial pair with subsequent virtual photon decay into two pairs. (d) Two-photon annihilation of initial pair with subsequent decay of each virtual photon into pair.
The amplitudes have the following form
(9)
We now consider the process .
Let and are the initial electron and positron momenta,
and are momenta of the final electron and positron, and are momenta of and . The cross section of the processes is given by Eq. (8) with the substitution , where is given by Eq. (II) with and .
It is easy to generalize our formulas to the case of polarized
particles, which is actual in context of the c-tau factory project CTAU .
Let electron and positron are described by the Dirac spinors
and ,
where and are unit vectors directed along the electron and positron spin, respectively. Then we note that the following relations hold
(10)
Therefore, using the Dirac equation we can make the following transformation
(11)
As a result, the cross section for the polarized initial electron and positron has the form
(12)
Then we use the relations
(13)
and the definition of and . We have
(14)
Here and are the average polarization vectors in the electron and positron beams, respectively, . Finally we obtain the explicit expression for the cross section with the polarized initial particles:
(15)
Another example is the differential cross section of the process . Let and be the momenta and , and are the momenta of and , and are the momenta of and . In this process, the main contribution to the amplitude is given by the two types of diagrams shown in Fig. 2. Other contributions are suppressed by the pion electromagnetic form factor with . As a result, the differential cross section reads
(16)
where a structure of the pion electromagnetic vertex has been taken into account.
Similarly, the cross section of the process
can easily be obtained. We do not present the corresponding result here because of its bulkiness.
Figure 2: Two types of diagrams giving the main contribution to the amplitude of the process . Wavy lines correspond to photons, thin straight lines correspond to electrons and positrons, double lines correspond to muons, and dotted lines correspond to pions.
III Conclusion
In the present work we have suggested a method to write the convenient representations for many two-photon amplitudes. Our approach is based on the use of the gauge in which the photon propagator has only space components (). The amplitudes obtained have no any strong numerical cancellations and, therefore, are very convenient for numerical evaluations. We have illustrated our approach on the examples of the processes , , and .
It is shown how the results can be extended on the case of polarized particles.
Basing on this approach the extension of BDK generator KMRS2019 was developed allowing for the simulation of processes at increased numerical precision and of processes with pair in the state Shamov . The contribution of narrow resonances are
accounted via the vacuum polarization effects.
References
(1) F.A. Berends, P.H. Daverveldt and R. Kleiss, Comput. Phys. Commun. 40, 286 (1986).
(2) G.A. Schuler, Comput. Phys. Commun. 108, 279 (1998).