This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Galactic Clustering Under Power-law Modified Newtonian Potential

Abdul W. Khanday [email protected] Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Srinagar, Kashmir-190006, India Sudhaker Upadhyay [email protected]; [email protected] Department of Physics, K.L.S. College, Nawada, Bihar 805110, India Department of Physics, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, Bihar 824234, India Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA) Pune, Maharashtra 411007, India School of Physics, Damghan University, P. O. Box 3671641167, Damghan, Iran Prince A. Ganai [email protected] Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Srinagar, Kashmir-190006, India
Abstract

We estimate galaxy clustering under a modified gravitational potential. In particular, the modifications in gravitational potential energy occur due to a power-law and cosmological constant terms. We derive a canonical partition function for the system of galaxies interacting under such a modified gravitational potential. Moreover, we compute various thermodynamical equation of states for the system. We do comparative analysis in order to emphasize the effect of corrections on thermodynamics of the system. Interestingly, the modifications in thermodynamical quantities are embedded in clustering parameter only.

1 Introduction

Since last decade, the substantial progresses have been made in the understandings of galaxy clusters, from their internal structure and evolution to their place in the large scale structure of the universe. All these progresses are due to the stupendous improvements in the theoretical modeling and numerical simulation, viz-a-viz abundance of new information provided by multi-wavelength surveys of the universe. Various theories of cosmological many-body distribution function have been developed from the thermodynamic point of view. Benkestien [1], Hawking [2] and Unruh [3] originated the relation between relativity and thermodynamics. Later, Jacobson [4] introduced the Einstein equation as thermodynamic equation of state. In fact, the Einstein equation is derived from the proportionality of entropy and the horizon area together with the fundamental relation δQ=TdS\delta Q=TdS, where δQ\delta Q and TT are interpreted as the energy flux and Unruh temperature. Recently Verlinde [5] proposed an entropic origin of gravity and interpreted gravity as an entropic force. In this regard, it is argued that the central notion needed to derive gravity is information. Employing the holographic principle and equipartition law of energy, Newton’s law of gravitation, Poisson’s equation and Einstein’s field equations are successfully obtained. Verlinde had used area-entropy relation of black holes in Einstein’s gravity (i.e. S=A4lp2S=\frac{A}{4l_{p}^{2}}) to get the Newtons law, where S,AS,A and lPl_{P} refer the entropy of the black hole, the area of horizon and the Planck length, respectively.

The study of modified gravity on the cosmological scales is an active area of present research. Recently, the corrected gravitational potential plays a vital role in estimation of the total mass of a sample of 12 clusters of galaxies which provides a better fit to the mass of visible matter [6]. At large distances, the modification in Newtonian potential occurs due to the propagation of gravity into the bulk [7]. Recently, Sheykhi and Hendi studied the effect of power-law corrections in entropy to the Newton’s law [8]. These corrections appear due to entanglement of quantum field inside and outside of horizon [9]. It is also found that a viable source of black hole entropy is quantum entanglement of degrees of freedom inside and outside the horizon. Also, the black hole entropy is found directly proportional to the surface area of the sphere when the field is in the ground state. But when the field is in a superposition of ground and excited states, a correction term proportional to a fractional power of area appears. These corrections are negligible for large horizon areas. Another quantum correction to Newton’s law, a logarithmic correction, has also been studied which appears due to the result of thermal equilibrium fluctuations and the quantum fluctuations of loop quantum gravity [10, 11, 12]. Recently, the effect of this logarithmic correction on the galaxy clustering has also been studied  [13]. The clustering of galaxies has been studied under the modified gravity under various potentials [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21].

The power-law corrected entropy leads to modification in Newton’s gravitational potential by adopting the viewpoint of gravity as an entropic force. We consider a power-law corrected entropy of the following form  [9, 22]:

S=A4lp2[1KαA1α2],S=\dfrac{A}{4l_{p}^{2}}[1-K_{\alpha}A^{1-\frac{\alpha}{2}}], (1)

where α\alpha is a dimensionless constant whose value is not confirmed yet and the parameter KαK_{\alpha} that depends on the power α\alpha of the entropy correction as following:

Kα=α(4π)α21(4α)rc2α,K_{\alpha}=\frac{\alpha(4\pi)^{\frac{\alpha}{2}-1}}{(4-\alpha)r_{c}^{2-\alpha}},

here rcr_{c} denotes crossover scale. The Boltzmann constant is set unit here. The last term of equation (1) appears due to the superposition of ground state and excited state wave function of the field. Interestingly, Verlinde [5] proposed an entropic origin of gravity and interpreted gravity as an entropic force. The gravity derived here was from the notion of information associated with matter and its location measured in terms of entropy. The Newton’s law of gravitational force FF is related to the entropy SS of the system as [8]

F=4lp2GM2r2SA.\displaystyle F=-4l_{p}^{2}\frac{GM^{2}}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial S}{\partial A}. (2)

For the power-law corrected entropy given in (1), this relation leads to the following modified Newton’s force [8]:

F=GM2r2[1α2(rcr)α2],F=-\frac{GM^{2}}{r^{2}}\left[1-\frac{\alpha}{2}\left(\frac{r_{c}}{r}\right)^{\alpha-2}\right], (3)

which coincides with the original Newtons law when α\alpha is set to zero. Keeping in view the attractive nature of gravity, we should have F<0F<0. This requires,

α<2(rrc)α2.\alpha<2\left(\frac{r}{r_{c}}\right)^{\alpha-2}.

In this paper, we study the effect of power-law corrected Newtonian potential on the clustering of galaxies. We also consider the effect of dark matter on the formation of galaxy clusters via the incorporation of cosmological constant in the Newtonian potential. This is because of the role played by cosmological constant Λ\Lambda in the expansion of universe  [5]. In order to study the effects of all the corrections made in gravitational potential in galaxy clustering, we first derive the NN-body partition function by evaluating configuration integrals recursively. The resulting partition function is employed to calculate the various thermodynamic quantities viz the Helmholtz free energy, entropy, pressure, internal energy, and chemical potential which possess deviations from their original values due to the incorporation of corrections. Remarkably, a modified clustering parameter emerges naturally from the corrected equations of state. Furthermore, we derive the probability distribution function assuming that the system is in a quasi equilibrium state as described by the grand canonical ensemble. The expression of distribution function embeds modified clustering parameter. A comparative analysis is made with the original distribution function to study the deviation due to corrections.

The paper is organized as following. In section 2, we consider a power-law and cosmological constant modified gravitational potential to calculated partition function of the system of galaxies and galaxy clusters. With the help of resulting partition function, the various thermodynamical equation of states are calculated in section 3. The study the distribution of galaxies and galaxy’s clusters under the modified gravitational potential, we estimate distribution function in section 4. Finally, we draw concluding remarks in the last section.

2 Interaction of galaxy clusters under modified potential

In this section, we derive a modified Newtonian potential due to power-law corrected force and estimate the partition function.

2.1 A modified gravitation potential

Utilized standard definition Φ=F𝑑r\Phi=-\int Fdr, we calculate a power-law modified gravitational potential corresponding to power-law corrected Newton’s law (3) as

Φ=GM2[1r+α2(α+1)rcα2rα+1].\Phi=-GM^{2}\left[\frac{1}{r}+\frac{\alpha}{2\left(\alpha+1\right)}r_{c}^{\alpha-2}r^{\alpha+1}\right]. (4)

This potential can arise in modified gravity theories like f(R)f(R) gravity. In fact, the power-law entropy corrected Friedmann equation is derived using the first-law on the apparent horizon [8].

To get more realistic results, one can not ignore the cosmological constant term 16Λr-\frac{1}{6}\Lambda r [23] in potential at the cosmological scale as cosmological constant is responsible for the expansion of the Universe through a repulsive force. Therefore, the exact gravitation potential is given by

Φ=GM2[1r+α2(α+1)rcα2rα+1+16Λr2GM2].\Phi=-GM^{2}\left[\frac{1}{r}+\frac{\alpha}{2\left(\alpha+1\right)}r_{c}^{\alpha-2}r^{\alpha+1}+\frac{1}{6}\frac{\Lambda r^{2}}{GM^{2}}\right]. (5)

This is a final gravitational potential where second and third terms correspond to the power-law and cosmological constant correction terms respectively.

2.2 Generating functional of galaxies cluster under modified gravity

Next, we estimate the partition function for the system of galaxies under the modified gravitational potential. Here it is assumed that system of galaxies follows a statistically homogeneous distribution over large regions, which consists of an ensemble of cells with equal volume VV and equal average density. Let us begin by writing the general partition function for the system comprised with NN galaxies of equal mass MM, momenta PiP_{i} and average temperature TT as

ZN(T,V)=1λ3NN!d3NPd3Nrexp[1T(i=1NPi22M+Φ(r1,r2,rN))],Z_{N}\left(T,V\right)=\dfrac{1}{\lambda^{3N}N!}\int d^{3N}Pd^{3N}r\ \exp\left[-\frac{1}{T}\left(\sum_{i=1}^{N}\frac{P_{i}^{2}}{2M}+\Phi\left(r_{1},r_{2},...r_{N}\right)\right)\right], (6)

where N!N! appears due to distinguishable nature of galaxies and λ\lambda is a normalization constant for the phase space volume cell. Upon integration over momentum space, this further simplifies to

ZN(T,V)=1N!(2πMTλ2)3N/2QN(T,V),Z_{N}\left(T,V\right)=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi MT}{\lambda^{2}}\right)^{3N/2}Q_{N}\left(T,V\right), (7)

where the configuration integral, QN(T,V)Q_{N}\left(T,V\right), has the following form:

QN(T,V)=1i<jN(1+ΦT)d3Nr,Q_{N}\left(T,V\right)=\int...\int\prod_{1\leq i<j\leq N}\left(1+\frac{\Phi}{T}\right)d^{3N}r, (8)

Here we neglected the higher-order terms of potential as the system of galaxies is still clustering.

Here we note that for the point-mass galaxies (i.e., for r=0r=0), the potential energy and consequently partition function diverges. In order to remove this discrepancy, we assume galaxies of extended nature (i.e., galaxies with halos). For this we introduce a softening parameter ϵ\epsilon, which assures the finite size of galaxies. The value of this softening parameter ranges 0.01ϵ0.050.01\leq\epsilon\leq 0.05. In order to estimate partition function, the modified potential incorporates softening parameter appropriately as follows,

Φ(ϵ)=GM2[1(r2+ϵ2)12+αrcα22(1α)r1α+16Λr2GM2].\Phi\left(\epsilon\right)=-GM^{2}\left[\frac{1}{\left(r^{2}+\epsilon^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}+\frac{\alpha r_{c}^{\alpha-2}}{2\left(1-\alpha\right)}r^{1-\alpha}+\frac{1}{6}\frac{\Lambda r^{2}}{GM^{2}}\right]. (9)

The second and third terms do not require softening parameter to be introduces as corresponding potentials do not diverge.

Now, we estimate configuration integral QN(T,V)Q_{N}\left(T,V\right) iteratively. The configuration integral for a single (spherically) galaxy of radius RR is given by

Q1(T,V)=V.Q_{1}\left(T,V\right)=V. (10)

For system of two galaxies, the configuration integral is given by

Q2(T,V)=4πV𝑑RR2[1+GM2T(1(R2+ϵ2)12+αrcα22(1α)R1α+16ΛR2GM2)].Q_{2}\left(T,V\right)=4\pi V\int dR\ R^{2}\left[1+\frac{GM^{2}}{T}\left(\frac{1}{\left(R^{2}+\epsilon^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}}+\frac{\alpha r_{c}^{\alpha-2}}{2\left(1-\alpha\right)}R^{1-\alpha}+\frac{1}{6}\frac{\Lambda R^{2}}{GM^{2}}\right)\right]. (11)

Here, the double integral reduces to a single integral by fixing the position of one galaxy. This result can also be obtained by considering the fact that expansion of universe exactly cancels the effect of the long-range mean gravitational field on the particle motions [24]. Eq. (11) further simplifies to

Q2(T,V)\displaystyle Q_{2}\left(T,V\right) =\displaystyle= V2[1+32GM2RT(1+ϵ2R2+ϵ2R2lnϵ/R1+1+ϵ2R2\displaystyle V^{2}\left[1+\frac{3}{2}\frac{GM^{2}}{RT}\left(\sqrt{1+\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{R^{2}}}+\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{R^{2}}\ln\frac{{\epsilon}/{R}}{1+\sqrt{1+\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{R^{2}}}}\right.\right. (12)
+\displaystyle+ 3α2(1α)(4α)rcα2R1α+ΛR315GM2)].\displaystyle\left.\left.\frac{3\alpha}{2\left(1-\alpha\right)\left(4-\alpha\right)}r_{c}^{\alpha-2}R^{1-\alpha}+\frac{\Lambda R^{3}}{15GM^{2}}\right)\right].

More compactly, this can be written as

Q2(T,V)=V2[1+32(ζ+γ+β)GM2RT],Q_{2}\left(T,V\right)=V^{2}\left[1+\frac{3}{2}\left(\zeta+\gamma+\beta\right)\frac{GM^{2}}{RT}\right], (13)

where

ζ\displaystyle\zeta =1+ϵ2R2+ϵ2R2lnϵ/R1+1+ϵ2R2,\displaystyle=\sqrt{1+\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{R^{2}}}+\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{R^{2}}\ln\frac{{\epsilon}/{R}}{1+\sqrt{1+\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{R^{2}}}},
γ\displaystyle\gamma =3α2(1α)(4α)rcα2R1α,\displaystyle=\frac{3\alpha}{2\left(1-\alpha\right)\left(4-\alpha\right)}r_{c}^{\alpha-2}R^{1-\alpha},
β\displaystyle\beta =ΛR315GM2.\displaystyle=\frac{\Lambda R^{3}}{15GM^{2}}.

Here, we note that α\alpha in the γ\gamma takes the value 0.624<α<20.624<\alpha<2 because within this limit only a phantom accelerating universe can be derived which is compatible with the observations [25].

Next, we scale the temperature TT and radius RR as Tη1TT\rightarrow\eta^{-1}T and RηRR\rightarrow\eta R, which leads to the dimensionless factor GM2RT\frac{GM^{2}}{RT} scale invariant. Therefore, we can scale GM2RT(GM2RT)3=32(GM2T)3ρ¯:=x\frac{GM^{2}}{RT}\rightarrow\left(\frac{GM^{2}}{RT}\right)^{3}=\frac{3}{2}\left(\frac{GM^{2}}{T}\right)^{3}\bar{\rho}:=x [26]. Thus, Eq. (13) finally reduces to

Q2(T,V)=V2[1+(ζ+γ+β)x].Q_{2}\left(T,V\right)=V^{2}\left[1+\left(\zeta+\gamma+\beta\right)x\right]. (14)

Following this procedure iteratively, the configuration integral for NN galaxies is obtained as

QN(T,V)=VN[1+(ζ+γ+β)x]N1.Q_{N}\left(T,V\right)=V^{N}\left[1+\left(\zeta+\gamma+\beta\right)x\right]^{N-1}. (15)

By inserting this value of configuration integral of NN galaxies into the the partition function (7), we achieve the expression of partition function for NN galaxies gravitating under modified gravity as

ZN(T,V)=1N!(2πMTλ2)VN[1+(ζ+γ+β)x]N1.Z_{N}\left(T,V\right)=\frac{1}{N!}\left(\frac{2\pi MT}{\lambda^{2}}\right)V^{N}\left[1+\left(\zeta+\gamma+\beta\right)x\right]^{N-1}. (16)

3 Thermodynamical equations of state

In this section, we derive various more exact equations of states for the system of galaxies interacting under modified potential. More precisely, we derive the Helmholtz free energy, entropy, internal energy, pressure and chemical potential. We also emphasize the effect of corrections in Newton’s potential on these equation of states.

3.1 Helmholtz free energy

The Helmholtz free energy can be calculated from the partition function using following definition:

F=TlnZN(T,V).F=-T\ln Z_{N}(T,V). (17)

Therefore, the Helmholtz free energy for our system of galaxies is calculated by

F=NT(lnNVT3/2)NTNTln[1+(ζ+γ+β)x]32NTln(2πMλ2).\displaystyle F=NT\left(\ln\frac{N}{V}T^{-3/2}\right)-NT-NT\ln\left[1+\left(\zeta+\gamma+\beta\right)x\right]-\frac{3}{2}NT\ln\left(\frac{2\pi M}{\lambda^{2}}\right). (18)

Here we have made following assumption (N1)N(N-1)\approx N, since NN is very large. This equation can also be written as

F=NT(lnNVT3/2)NT+NTln[1(ζ+γ+β)x1+(ζ+γ+β)x]32NTln(2πMλ2).F=NT\left(\ln\frac{N}{V}T^{-3/2}\right)-NT+NT\ln\left[1-\frac{(\zeta+\gamma+\beta)x}{1+(\zeta+\gamma+\beta)x}\right]-\frac{3}{2}NT\ln\left(\frac{2\pi M}{\lambda^{2}}\right). (19)

Figure 1: Helmholtz free energy vs. number of galaxies. Left: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively, with ζx=1\zeta x=1, βx=0\beta x=0. Right: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively, with ζx=1\zeta x=1, βx=1\beta x=1. Rest of the parameters are unit here.

Figure 2: Behavior of Helmholtz free energy versus particle number for different values of MM. We set all the parameters along with ζx\zeta x, βx\beta x and γx\gamma x to unit. Here, red, blue, and green lines correspond to M=1M=1, M=5M=5 and M=10M=10, respectively.

In order to study the behavior of Helmholtz free energy with respect to particle number, we plot a graph 1 and 2. From the figure, we see that Helmholtz free energy is a decreasing function of NN. It means as long as number of galaxies increases the Helmholtz free energy decreases. It is also evident that the corrections due to power-law and cosmological constant terms make the free energy more negative. Also, the free energy decreases with increase in the mass of galaxies.

By comparing this equation of state to its original form given in Ref. [24], we conclude that the corrections in Newton’s potential are apparent in clustering parameter only. The new clustering parameter corresponding to power-law and cosmological constant corrections is obtained as

b=(ζ+γ+β)x1+(ζ+γ+β)x.b_{\star}=\frac{(\zeta+\gamma+\beta)x}{1+(\zeta+\gamma+\beta)x}. (20)

This modified clustering parameter can be expressed in terms of original clustering parameter bϵ=ζx1+ζxb_{\epsilon}=\frac{\zeta x}{1+\zeta x} [24] as follows

b=bϵ(1γxβx)+(γ+β)x1+(γ+β)xbϵ(γ+β)x.b_{\star}=\frac{b_{\epsilon}(1-\gamma x-\beta x)+(\gamma+\beta)x}{1+(\gamma+\beta)x-b_{\epsilon}(\gamma+\beta)x}. (21)

3.2 Entropy

Let us calculate entropy of the system which a very important thermodynamical quantity. For a given Helmholtz free energy (19), the entropy can easily be calculated as

S=Nln(NVT3/2)Nln[1b]3Nb+52N+32Nln2πMλ2.\displaystyle S=-N\ln\left(\frac{N}{V}T^{-3/2}\right)-N\ln[1-b_{\star}]-3Nb_{\star}+\frac{5}{2}N+\frac{3}{2}N\ln\frac{2\pi M}{\lambda^{2}}. (22)

Here we have utilized standard entropy definition S=(FT)N,VS=-\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial T}\right)_{N,V}. The specific entropy (entropy per galaxy) is given by

SN=ln(NVT3/2)ln[1b]3b+S0,\frac{S}{N}=-\ln\left(\frac{N}{V}T^{-3/2}\right)-\ln[1-b_{\star}]-3b_{\star}+S_{0}, (23)

where S0=52+32ln2πMλ2S_{0}=\frac{5}{2}+\frac{3}{2}\ln\frac{2\pi M}{\lambda^{2}} is a constant.

Figure 3: Specific entropy (S/NS/N) versus particle number (NN) with (right) and without (left) dark energy contributions. Left: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively, with ζx=1\zeta x=1 and βx=0\beta x=0. Right: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively with ζx=1\zeta x=1 and βx=1\beta x=1. Rest of the parameters are unit here.

Figure 4: Behavior of specific entropy (S/NS/N) versus particle number (NN) for different values of MM. We set all the parameters along with ζx\zeta x, βx\beta x and γx\gamma x to unit. Here, red, blue, and green lines correspond to M=1M=1, M=5M=5 and M=10M=10, respectively.

The behavior of specific entropy with respect to number of galaxies can be seen in Figs. 3 and 4. The specific entropy is also a positive valued decreasing function with number of galaxies. The power-law corrected term makes specific entropy smaller in absence of dark energy. However, the effect of power-law correction is not significant in the presence of dark energy but makes specific entropy bit positive. The specific entropy increases significantly along with increase in mass of galaxies.

3.3 Internal Energy

The internal energy of the system is defined as U=F+TSU=F+TS. For a given Helmholtz free energy (19) and entropy (22), the internal energy is calculated by

U=32NT[12(ζ+γ+β)x1+(ζ+γ+β)x]=32NT[12b].U=\frac{3}{2}NT\left[1-2\frac{\left(\zeta+\gamma+\beta\right)x}{1+\left(\zeta+\gamma+\beta\right)x}\right]=\frac{3}{2}NT\left[1-2b_{\star}\right]. (24)

Figure 5: Internal energy (UU) versus particle number (NN) with (right) and without (left) dark energy contributions. Left: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively, with ζx=2\zeta x=2 and βx=0\beta x=0. Right: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively with ζx=2\zeta x=2 and βx=1\beta x=1. Rest of the parameters are unit here.

From the figure 5, we observe that the internal energy of the system which is negative valued becomes more negative under the effect of correction in gravitational potential.

3.4 Pressure

The standard definition of pressure is given by P=(FV)N,T.P=-\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial V}\right)_{N,T}. Exploiting expression (19), the pressure for a gravitating system under modified gravity is given by

P=NTV[1b].P=\frac{NT}{V}\left[1-b_{\star}\right]. (25)

Figure 6: Pressure (PP) versus particle number (NN) with (right) and without (left) dark energy contributions. Left: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively, with ζx=2\zeta x=2 and βx=0\beta x=0. Right: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively with ζx=2\zeta x=2 and βx=1\beta x=1. Rest of the parameters are unit here.

The pressure is a linear function of number of the galaxies, which means that pressure increases as long as number of galaxies increases. It is obvious from the figure 6 that the presence of correction terms negate the pressure of the system.

3.5 Chemical Potential

The chemical potential which measure exchange of galaxies can be calculated from the formula μ=(FN)V,T\mu=-\left(\frac{\partial F}{\partial N}\right)_{V,T}. So, it is a matter of calculation to derive chemical potential for this system as

μ=T(lnNVT3/2)Tln[1+(ζ+γ+β)x]T(ζ+γ+β)x1+(ζ+γ+β)x32Tln(2πMλ2).\mu=T\left(\ln\frac{N}{V}T^{-3/2}\right)-T\ln\left[1+(\zeta+\gamma+\beta)x\right]-T\frac{(\zeta+\gamma+\beta)x}{1+(\zeta+\gamma+\beta)x}-\frac{3}{2}T\ln\left(\frac{2\pi M}{\lambda^{2}}\right). (26)

This further simplifies to

μ=T(lnNVT3/2)+Tln[1b]Tb32Tln(2πMλ2).\mu=T\left(\ln\frac{N}{V}T^{-3/2}\right)+T\ln\left[1-b_{\star}\right]-Tb_{\star}-\frac{3}{2}T\ln\left(\frac{2\pi M}{\lambda^{2}}\right). (27)

Figure 7: Chemical potential (μ(N)\mu(N)) versus particle number (NN) with (right) and without (left) dark energy contributions. Left: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively, with ζx=1\zeta x=1 and βx=0\beta x=0. Right: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively with ζx=1\zeta x=1 and βx=1\beta x=1. Rest of the parameters are unit here.

Figure 8: Behavior of chemical potential (μ(N)\mu(N)) versus particle number (NN) for different values of MM. We set all the parameters along with ζx\zeta x, βx\beta x and γx\gamma x to unit. Here, red, blue, and green lines correspond to M=1M=1, M=5M=5 and M=10M=10, respectively.

The behavior of chemical potential with respect to number of galaxies can be seen from figures 7 and 8. Interestingly, we observe that the chemical potential is negative valued for the system of galaxies with small number of galaxies. However, it becomes positive valued when number of galaxies increases to a specific value. The presence of correction terms in clustering parameter decreases the chemical potential of the system. The chemical potential decreases with increase of the mass of galaxies.

At the end of this section, we conclude that the modified Newton’s potential amounts changes to the clustering parameter bb_{\star} only, however the basic structures of the equations remain intact.

4 General distribution function

In order to find the probability distribution function F(N)F(N), which contains void distribution as well as statistics of counts of the number of galaxies in cells throughout the system. For the system of galaxies, wherein galaxies as well as energy can cross the cell boundary, one has to estimate the grand canonical partition function. The grand canonical partition function, a weighted sum of all canonical partition functions, is defined by

ZG(T,V,z)=N=0eNμTZN(T,V),Z_{G}(T,V,z)=\sum_{N=0}^{\infty}e^{\frac{N\mu}{T}}Z_{N}(T,V), (28)

where zz is the fugacity. The grand partition function for the system of galaxies is expressed in terms of thermodynamic variables as

lnZG=PVT=N(1b).\ln Z_{G}=\frac{PV}{T}=N(1-b_{\star}). (29)

The probability distribution function F(N)F(N) for finding NN galaxies in a cell of volume VV and energy U(N,V)U(N,V) is defined by

F(N)=ieNμTeUiTZG(T,V,z)=eNμTZN(V,T)ZG(T,V,z).F(N)=\frac{\sum_{i}e^{\frac{N\mu}{T}}e^{\frac{U_{i}}{T}}}{Z_{G}(T,V,z)}=\frac{e^{\frac{N\mu}{T}}Z_{N}(V,T)}{Z_{G}(T,V,z)}. (30)

Making use of Eqs. (16), (27) and (29), the distribution function for the extended mass galaxies under modified potential is estimated as

F(N)=N¯N!(1b)[N¯(1b)+Nb]N1eNbN¯(1b).F(N)=\frac{\bar{N}}{N!}(1-b_{\star})[\bar{N}(1-b_{\star})+Nb_{\star}]^{N-1}e^{-Nb_{\star}-\bar{N}(1-b_{\star})}. (31)

This distribution function is structurally similar to those derived originally by Saslaw and Hamilton  [27] from thermodynamic point of view and by Ahmad and Saslaw  [24] from statistical point of view. Also the distribution function derived from logarithmic and volume corrected Newtonian potential  [13] has the same general structure.

Figure 9: The distribution function F(N)F(N) versus NN for N¯=10\bar{N}=10 with (right) and without (left) cosmological constant contributions. Left: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively, with ζx=1\zeta x=1 and βx=0\beta x=0. Right: red, blue, and green lines correspond to γx=0,0.5\gamma x=0,0.5 and 11, respectively with ζx=1\zeta x=1 and βx=1\beta x=1.

The behavior of distribution function F(N)F(N) versus NN can be seen from the comparative analysis as given in Fig. 9. The presence of correction term decreases the peak value of distribution function which occurs for system of small number of galaxies. However, for the system of large number of galaxies the correction terms increase the distribution function.

5 Discussion and conclusions

We have presented a study of galaxy clustering under the modified Newton’s law. These modifications to Newton’s law incorporate a power-law entropic corrections along with the inclusion of cosmological constant Λ\Lambda term, in order to take into account the effect of quantum entanglement (a possible source of black hole entropy) and dark energy respectively. Utilizing the modified Newtonian potential, we have derived the corresponding canonical partition function for the system of extended mass galaxies with the assumption that the system is made of NN equal volume cells and average particle density ρ¯\bar{\rho}, which are statistically homogeneous over large regions. In this regard, we have used of softening parameter ϵ\epsilon in the first term of Hamiltonian to get rid of the divergence of the Hamiltonian when galaxies are considered as point like. This justifies that the extended nature (finite size) of galaxies (or galaxies with halos). From the resulting partition function, we have calculated various important thermodynamic equations of state. Namely, these are free energy, entropy, internal energy, pressure and chemical potential. The exact expressions of equations of state contain a corrected correlation (clustering) parameter which emerges naturally for the clusters of the galaxies with halos. The new clustering parameter bb_{\star} reduces to the original parameter bϵb_{\epsilon} when γ=0\gamma=0 and β=0\beta=0. Moreover, the distribution function is modified due to correction in potential but has the similar structure as the original one.

References

  • [1] J. D. Benkenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973)
  • [2] S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975)
  • [3] W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D 14, 870, (1976)
  • [4] T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260 (1995)
  • [5] E. P. Verlinde, J. High Energy Phys. 04, 029, (2011)
  • [6] S. Capozziello, E. De Filippis and V. Salzano, MNRAS 394, 947 (2009)
  • [7] E. G. Floratos and G. K. Leontaris, Phys. Lett. B 465, 95 (1999)
  • [8] A. Sheykhi and S. H. Hendi, Phys. Rev. D 84, 044023 (2011)
  • [9] S. Das, S. Shankaranaraynan and S. Sur, Phys. Rev. D 77, 064013 (2008)
  • [10] K. A. Meissner, Classical Quantum Gravity 21, 5245 (2004)
  • [11] A. Ghosh and P. Mitra, Phys. Rev. D 71, 027502 (2005)
  • [12] A. Chatterjee and Majumdar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 141301 (2004)
  • [13] S. Upadhyay, Phys. Rev. D 95, 043008 (2017)
  • [14] R. H. Sanders, MNRAS 342, 901 (2003)
  • [15] M. Milgrom and R. H. Sanders, Astroph. J. 599, L25 (2003)
  • [16] M. Hameeda, S. Upadhyay, M. Faizal and A. F. Ali, MNRAS 463, 3699 (2016)
  • [17] B. Pourhassan, S. Upadhyay, M. Hameeda and M. Faizal, MNRAS 468, 3166 (2017)
  • [18] S. Upadhyay, S. Capozziello and B. Pourhassan, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, 1950027 (2019)
  • [19] S. Capozziello, M. Faizal, M. Hameeda, B. Pourhassan, V. Salzano and S. Upadhyay, MNRAS 474, 2430 (2018)
  • [20] B. Pourhassan and S. Upadhyay, Phys. Dark Univ. 29, 100596 (2020)
  • [21] M. Hameeda, S. Upadhyay, M. Faizal, A. F. Ali and B. Pourhassan, Phys. Dark Univ. 19, 137 (2018)
  • [22] N. Radicella and D. Pavon, Phys. Lett. B 691, 121 (2010)
  • [23] W. Rindler and M. Ishak, Phys. Rev. D 76, 043006 (2007)
  • [24] F. Ahmad, W. C. Saslaw, and N. I. Bhat, Astrophysics J. 571, 576 (2002)
  • [25] K. Karami, A. Abdolmaleki, N. Sahraei and S. Ghaffari, JHEP 1108, 150 (2011)
  • [26] L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshtiz, Statistical Physics (Pergamon Oxford, 1980)
  • [27] W. C. Saslaw and A. J. Hamilton, Astrophysics J. 13, 276 (1984)