This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Fluorite-type materials in the monolayer limit

Shota Ono [email protected] Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan    Ravinder Pawar Department of Chemistry, National Institute of Technology (NIT) Warangal, Warangal, Telangana, 506004, India
Abstract

The 2H, 1T, and their distorted structures are known as prototype structures of AB2AB_{2} monolayers. Here, we study a puckered structure that is truncated from the (110) surface of fluorite-type materials. 53 fluorite-type materials are investigated based on first-principles approach. The formation energy calculations indicate that seven systems form the puckered structure in the monolayer limit, while other systems form either 1T, 2H, or distorted 1T structures. The puckered structures of PbF2, PRh2, and Ga2Au exhibit negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR) in the out-of-plane direction. An analytical model for the NPR is derived. The surface energy calculations predict the appearance of NPR.

I Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenides have attracted attention due to their electronic, optical, and mechanical properties choi2017 . They are classed as AB2AB_{2} materials, where AA is a transition metal and BB is a chalcogen atom (S, Se, and Te), and exfoliated from 3D bulk due to their layered structure. They usually adopt either 2H or 1T structures and exhibit a structure-dependent property. For example, 2H MoS2 is a semiconductor with a direct band gap, whereas 1T MoS2 is a metal and shows a ferromagnetism under a tensile strain magneMoS22018 . Distorted 1T structures have been studied in several AB2AB_{2} monolayers. The 1T structure is a Peierls distorted phase, and 1T WTe2 shows a ferroelasticity that originates from the three equivalent directions of the distortion lili2016 . More complex geometries, such as 1T′′ and 1T′′′ structures, have also been investigated zhao2018 . By performing high-throughput density-functional theory (DFT) calculations and assuming these structures, several structure maps have been proposed for AB2AB_{2} monolayers fukuda2021 ; silva2022 ; kumar2022 .

It is of fundamental importance to explore other structures different from 1T and related-structures. Recently, 2D materials created from non-layered materials have also been synthesized experimentally ji2019 ; puthirath2021 ; balan2022 . In addition, a wide variety of 2D materials has been predicted by cutting surfaces of non-layered materials. Lucking et al. have predicted that an ultrathin layer truncated from the (111) surface of zincblend-type semiconductors relaxes to double-layered honeycomb structure, and exhibits topological electronic band structure 2Dtraditional . Friedrich et al. have studied electronic, optical, and magnetic properties of hematite and ilmenite in the monolayer limit friedrich2022 . The present authors have also studied structural and physical properties of 2D metallic systems ono2020 ; ono2020_Po ; sangolkar2022 . Many elemental metals have hexagonal structures that are truncated from the (111) surface of the face-centered cubic structure or the (0001) surface of the hexagonal close-packed structure.

Fluorite-type (CaF2-type) materials exhibit a cubic structure with a stoichiometry of AB2AB_{2}, where AA atoms form a face-centered cubic structure and BB atoms occupy the tetrahedral sites. Therefore, two monolayer structures are truncated from their surface with keeping the stoichiometry of bulk (see Fig. 1(a)). One is the 1T structure that is truncated from the (111) surface. The other monolayer is truncated from the (110) surface and exhibits a highly puckered (PCK) structure. Although the PCK structure has been investigated theoretically for Be2C naseri2019 and ZrS2 abutalib2019 , such a structure is not the ground state. In addition, physical properties intrinsic to the PCK structure have not been explored yet.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Crystal structure of fluorite-type material in the bulk form and the monolayer limit. 1T and puckered structures are truncated from the (111) and (110) surfaces, respectively. VESTA vesta is used to visualize crystal structures. (b) Schematic illustration of rectangular-shaped unit cell for 1T, 2H, 1T, and PCK structures. Blue and red shapes indicate AA and BB atoms, respectively. Upward (downward) triangle is located above (below) z=0z=0 plane, and a circle is located at z=0z=0.

In this paper, we investigate the structural and physical properties of 53 fluorite-type materials in the monolayer limit by using first-principles approach. Seven monolayers are identified to have the PCK structure, and among them, PbF2, Ga2Au, and PRh2 monolayers have an out-of-plane negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR), that is, their thickness increases when stretched. PbF2 and Ga2Au monolayers are dynamically and thermodynamically stable, but PRh2 monolayer is unstable at room temperature. By developing an analytical model, we demonstrate that the NPR is inherently present in the PCK structure. We also show that a linear relationship holds between the (111) and (110) surface energies, and PbF2, Ga2Au, and PRh2 exhibit an anomalously small (110) surface energy.

It is known that many puckered structures exhibit a negative Poisson’s ratio in the out-of-plane direction. For example, phosphorene (0.027-0.027) jiang2014 ; du2016 , arsenic (0.09-0.09) han2015 , GeS (0.14-0.14 within GGA-PBE and 0.19-0.19 with van der Waals correction) gomes2015 , SnSe (0.17-0.17) zhang2016 , TiN (0.102-0.102) zhou2017 , Ag2S (0.52-0.52) peng2019 , and SnS2 (1.79-1.79) wang2023 , where the value in a parenthesis indicates the Poisson’s ratio ν\nu at equilibrium condition. The Ga2Au (0.6-0.6) and PbF2 (0.4-0.4) monolayers studied in the present work also serve as 2D auxetic materials.

II Computational details

II.1 2D structures

By using Materials Project database materalsproject and pymatgen code pymatgen , we first extracted 94 fluorite-type materials (spacegroup of Fm3¯mFm\bar{3}m). These materials have been found in inorganic crystal structure database (ICSD). We excluded ff-electron systems (lanthanide and actinide compounds), some of hydrogen compounds (Li2NH, K2PtH4, Ca2RhH5.4, and Sr2RhH5), high-temperature phase materials (Cu2S, Cu2Se, and Al2O), and oxides (PbO2 and BiO2). H2S and H2Se were also excluded because of a large discrepancy between experimental and calculated lattice constants. Zirconia (ZrO2) and hafnia (HfO2) in the fluorite-type structure are known to be stable above 2650 K and 2870 K, respectively shin2018zirconia , but these are studied in the present work.

We study 53 fluorite-type materials that consist of AB2AB_{2} (19), A2BA_{2}B (14), and others (20), where AA is a metallic element and BB is H, F, Cl, O, S, Se, and Te. The AB2AB_{2}-type system includes hydrides (8), fluorides (7), chlorides (2), and oxides (2). The A2BA_{2}B materials consist of alkali metals A=A= Li (4), Na (4), K (3), and Rb (3) and chalcogen atoms B=B= O, S, Se, and Te. The other materials consist of alkali earth metals Be (2) and Mg (4) and other metallic elements Rh (2), Ir (2), Pt (4), Au (3), Ni (1), Co (1), and Pd (1).

We consider four crystal structures in the monolayer limit: 1T, 2H, 1T, and PCK structures. These are illustrated in Fig. 1(b). The 1T structure corresponds to a monolayer that is truncated from the (111) surfaces of 3D phase. The 1T and 2H structures have a hexagonal unit cell with lattice constant aa. The atoms are located at A(0,0,0)A(0,0,0), B(0,a/3,h)B(0,a/\sqrt{3},h), and B(a/2,a/(23),h)B(a/2,a/(2\sqrt{3}),-h) for 1T structure, and A(0,0,0)A(0,0,0), B(0,a/3,±h)B(0,a/\sqrt{3},\pm h) for 2H structure, where 2h2h is the thickness of the monolayer. For the case of A2BA_{2}B systems, AA and BB atoms should be interchanged. The 1T structure has a rectangular unit cell with lattice constants of aa and bb. This is regarded as a distorted 1T structure, as AA atoms are dimerized along yy direction and BB atoms follow the movement of AA atoms. The 1T structure may be buckled along the zz direction. The PCK structure is regarded as a monolayer truncated from the (110) surface. AA atom in the center of rectangular cell is displaced to zz direction, i.e., A(a/2,b/2,δ)A(a/2,b/2,\delta). Each AA atom is surrounded by four BB atoms in the same planes, z=0z=0 and δ\delta.

II.2 First-principles calculations

We used Quantum ESPRESSO (QE) code qe to perform density-functional theory (DFT) calculations. We used exchange-correlation energy functional within generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) parametrized by Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) pbe . The electron-ion interactions were treated by using ultrasoft pseudopotentials in pslibrary1.0.0 dalcorso . The energy cutoff for wavefunction was set to be Ecut=max(EA,EB)E_{\rm cut}=\max(E_{A},E_{B}) plus 20 Ry, where Ej(j=A,B)E_{j}(j=A,B) is the suggested value for atom jj, and the energy cutoff for charge density was set to be 10Ecut10E_{\rm cut}. Spin-polarized calculations were performed. A vacuum layer was set to be 15 Å for 2D systems. Convergence thresholds for the total energy in the self-consistent field calculations was set to be 101210^{-12} Ry, and those for the total energy and forces for structure optimization were set to be 10510^{-5} Ry and 10410^{-4} a.u., respectively.

We first optimized the crystal structure by using smearing parameter of 0.015 Ry smearingMP and kk-point distance Δk\Delta k smaller than 0.1 Å-1. The lattice constant of 0.95a3D/20.95a_{3D}/\sqrt{2} was assumed as an initial guess for 1T and 2H structures, where a3Da_{3D} is the lattice constant of the cubic phase and the factor of 0.950.95 accounts for the in-plane contraction due to the lack of atoms along the out-of-plane direction. For 1T structure, an initial structure was prepared by referring to the crystal structure of WTe2 monolayer. For PCK structure, b/a2b/a\simeq\sqrt{2} and δ=0.4a\delta=0.4a were assumed as an initial guess. Ferromagnetic phase was assumed in the initial spin configurations. For semiconducting systems, we optimized the structure again by using no smearing parameters and assuming Δk0.15\Delta k\leq 0.15 Å-1.

The stability of AnBmA_{n}B_{m} system is studied by calculating the formation energy

Eform(AnBm)=εα(AnBm)nε(A)mε(B)n+m,\displaystyle E_{\rm form}(A_{n}B_{m})=\frac{\varepsilon_{\alpha}(A_{n}B_{m})-n\varepsilon(A)-m\varepsilon(B)}{n+m}, (1)

where nn and mm are integers, εα(AnBm)\varepsilon_{\alpha}(A_{n}B_{m}) is the total energy of AnBmA_{n}B_{m} in the structure α\alpha, and ε(X)\varepsilon(X) with X=A,BX=A,B is the total energy of element XX. To obtain ε(X)\varepsilon(X), we extracted the ground state structure of XX from the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD) oqmd , as done in the construction of Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB) C2DB2021 . We optimized the structure and calculated ε(X)\varepsilon(X).

For the bulk and the 2D system having negative formation energy and the lowest energy among four structures (1T, 2H, 1T, and PCK), we calculate the phonon dispersions within density-functional perturbation theory dfpt . The long-range Coulomb correction is included in the force constant matrix for semiconductors. The Coulomb interaction in the zz direction is truncated for 2D systems iso2D . The 8×8×18\times 8\times 1 qq grid is used for the 1T and 2H structures, 6×4×16\times 4\times 1 for the 1T and PCK structures, while 4×4×44\times 4\times 4 for the 3D structure. The variable for the acoustic sum rule is set to be “crystal” qe .

For the systems having NPR, first-principles molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are performed by using QE qe . A 4×4×14\times 4\times 1 supercell is assumed, the volume of the unit cell is fixed, and the ionic temperature is kept to 300 K by adapting the velocity scaling. The Newton’s equation is integrated by using the Verlet algorithm with a time step of 1 fs.

To investigate the ionic character of 2D AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems, we estimate the Madelung constant MM of 1T and 2H structures. The MM is then characterized by h/ah/a only. The electrostatic energy is calculated by using pymatgen code pymatgen .

We calculate the surface energy γ\gamma for the (111) and (110) planes of fluorite-type materials. This is defined as

γ=EslabnEbulk2A,\displaystyle\gamma=\frac{E_{\rm slab}-nE_{\rm bulk}}{2A}, (2)

where EslabE_{\rm slab} is the total energy of the slab including nn unit cells, EbulkE_{\rm bulk} is the total energy of 3D bulk, and AA is the area of the surface. The factor of 1/21/2 accounts for the presence of two surfaces on top and bottom sides of the slab. For the (111) and (110) surfaces, 7 and 9 layer-thick slabs (21 and 27 atoms) including a vacuum layer of 15 Å are assumed and the atomic position of the middle (fourth and fifth) layer is fixed in the geometry optimization. The slab models are constructed by using atomic simulation environment (ASE) package ase .

III Results and Discussion

III.1 Stability trend

Before studying the 2D systems, we calculated phonon dispersions of 53 compounds in the fluorite structure to check whether the methodology used in the present work correctly predicts the dynamical stability of 3D counterparts. We have found that HgF2, PIr2, ZrO2, and HfO2 are unstable within PBE. When Perdew-Zunger pz and PBEsol pbesol functionals are used, HgF2 and PIr2 are dynamically stable.

Table 1, 2, and 3 lists the EformE_{\rm form} of AB2AB_{2}, A2BA_{2}B systems, and other ordered alloys, respectively, in the 1T, 2H, 1T, and PCK structures for 53 compounds. The EformE_{\rm form} of bulk is also tabulated in these Tables. For AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems except for ScH2, YH2, TiF2, PbF2, and Li2Te, 1T phase is the most stable 2D structure because 2H and PCK phases are higher in energy and 1T phase is relaxed to 1T structure, as listed in Table 1 and 2. The EformE_{\rm form} of the 1T phase is larger than of bulk by less than 0.2 eV, while hydrides tend to be less stable. These 1T phases are dynamically stable. However, some of them show imaginary frequencies around Γ\Gamma point in the Brillouin zone. This is attributed to an instability against the flexural (out-of-plane) vibrations. Phonon dispersions for the lowest energy phase are provided in Supplemental Materials SM .

The stability preference of ordered alloys is different from AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems. As listed in Table 3, the 1T or PCK phases are preferred rather than 1T phase. However, many of them have positive EformE_{\rm form}, while they have negative EformE_{\rm form} in the bulk. The systems having negative EformE_{\rm form} are X2X_{2}Pt (X=X= Al, Ga, In, and Sn) in the 1T structure, PRh2, Ga2Au, and CoSi2 in the PCK structure, and Al2Pd in the 2H structure. These structures are all dynamically stable except for Sn2Pt. The phonon dispersions are provided in Supplemental Materials SM .

Table 1: Formation energy (eV/atom) of 3D bulk, 1T, 2H, 1T, and Puckered (PCK) structures for 19 AB2AB_{2} systems. When 1T structure is not a ground state among 2D phases, the value is underlined for the most stable structure. A hyphen indicates that no scf convergence or relaxed geometry are obtained.
bulk 1T 2H 1T PCK
ScH2 0.67-0.67 0.27-0.27 0.20-0.20 0.27-0.27 0.29-0.29
YH2 0.71-0.71 0.25-0.25 0.19-0.19 0.25-0.25 0.29-0.29
TiH2 0.48-0.48 0.16-0.16 0.05-0.05 0.16-0.16 0.10-0.10
ZrH2 0.56-0.56 0.15-0.15 0.02-0.02 0.15-0.15 0.10-0.10
VH2 0.20-0.20 0.02 0.110.11 0.020.02 0.120.12
NbH2 0.24-0.24 0.090.09 0.190.19 0.090.09 0.190.19
TaH2 0.10-0.10 0.160.16 0.220.22 0.160.16 0.240.24
CrH2 0.060.06 0.170.17 0.250.25 0.170.17 -
CaF2 3.92-3.92 3.79-3.79 3.53-3.53 3.79-3.79 3.75-3.75
SrF2 3.93-3.93 3.75-3.75 3.52-3.52 3.75-3.75 3.73-3.73
BaF2 3.87-3.87 3.69-3.69 3.50-3.50 3.69-3.69 3.68-3.68
TiF2 2.72-2.72 2.62-2.62 2.84-2.84 2.80-2.80 -
CdF2 2.17-2.17 2.09-2.09 1.90-1.90 2.09-2.09 2.06-2.06
HgF2 1.38-1.38 1.33-1.33 1.18-1.18 1.33-1.33 1.31-1.31
PbF2 2.37-2.37 2.23-2.23 2.08-2.08 2.26-2.26 2.28-2.28
SrCl2 2.50-2.50 2.45-2.45 2.31-2.31 2.45-2.45 2.42-2.42
BaCl2 2.58-2.58 2.47-2.47 2.34-2.34 2.47-2.47 2.46-2.46
ZrO2 3.38-3.38 3.23-3.23 2.68-2.68 3.23-3.23 3.19-3.19
HfO2 3.58-3.58 3.46-3.46 2.86-2.86 3.46-3.46 3.40-3.40
Table 2: Same as Table 1 but for 14 A2BA_{2}B-type systems.
bulk 1T 2H 1T PCK
Li2O 1.86-1.86 1.69-1.69 1.38-1.38 1.69-1.69 1.65-1.65
Li2S 1.36-1.36 1.16-1.16 0.94-0.94 1.16-1.16 1.15-1.15
Li2Se 1.27-1.27 1.08-1.08 0.88-0.88 1.08-1.08 1.08-1.08
Li2Te 1.04-1.04 0.86-0.86 0.70-0.70 0.85-0.85 0.86-0.86
Na2O 1.22-1.22 1.08-1.08 0.86-0.86 1.08-1.08 1.04-1.04
Na2S 1.08-1.08 0.90-0.90 0.71-0.71 0.90-0.90 0.88-0.88
Na2Se 1.08-1.08 0.89-0.89 0.72-0.72 0.89-0.89 0.88-0.88
Na2Te 0.94-0.94 0.76-0.76 0.61-0.61 0.76-0.76 0.76-0.76
K2S 1.08-1.08 0.93-0.93 0.78-0.78 0.93-0.93 0.91-0.91
K2Se 1.11-1.11 0.96-0.96 0.82-0.82 0.96-0.96 0.94-0.94
K2Te 1.03-1.03 0.88-0.88 0.74-0.74 0.88-0.88 0.86-0.86
Rb2S 1.02-1.02 0.90-0.90 0.76-0.76 0.90-0.90 0.87-0.87
Rb2Se 1.07-1.07 0.94-0.94 0.81-0.81 0.94-0.94 0.91-0.91
Rb2Te 1.01-1.01 0.87-0.87 0.74-0.74 0.87-0.87 0.85-0.85
Table 3: Same as Table 1 but for 20 ordered alloys.
bulk 1T 2H 1T PCK
Be2C 0.24-0.24 0.210.21 0.820.82 0.560.56 0.210.21
Be2B 0.040.04 0.450.45 0.560.56 0.530.53 0.450.45
Mg2Si 0.16-0.16 0.300.30 0.340.34 0.280.28 0.270.27
Mg2Ge 0.27-0.27 0.170.17 0.200.20 0.190.19 0.130.13
Mg2Sn 0.20-0.20 0.210.21 0.490.49 0.150.15 0.160.16
Mg2Pb 0.07-0.07 0.320.32 0.550.55 0.250.25 0.240.24
AsRh2 0.42-0.42 0.440.44 0.400.40 0.290.29 0.250.25
PRh2 0.75-0.75 0.060.06 0.060.06 0.01-0.01 0.06-0.06
PIr2 0.37-0.37 0.750.75 0.460.46 0.400.40 0.450.45
Sn2Ir 0.25-0.25 0.220.22 0.230.23 0.060.06 0.210.21
Al2Pt 0.89-0.89 0.22-0.22 0.05-0.05 0.29-0.29 0.22-0.22
Ga2Pt 0.58-0.58 0.12-0.12 0.02-0.02 0.23-0.23 0.14-0.14
In2Pt 0.48-0.48 0.02-0.02 0.010.01 0.13-0.13 0.08-0.08
Sn2Pt 0.45-0.45 0.08-0.08 0.07-0.07 0.18-0.18 0.13-0.13
Al2Au 0.44-0.44 0.090.09 0.130.13 0.110.11 0.100.10
Ga2Au 0.24-0.24 0.100.10 0.060.06 0.040.04 0.01-0.01
In2Au 0.25-0.25 0.120.12 0.070.07 0.030.03 0.010.01
Si2Ni 0.36-0.36 0.210.21 0.150.15 0.130.13 0.010.01
CoSi2 0.53-0.53 0.180.18 0.150.15 0.080.08 0.06-0.06
Al2Pd 0.61-0.61 0.01-0.01 0.15-0.15 0.13-0.13 0.01-0.01

We next calculate the Madelung constant MM to study the ionic character of AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems. The hydrides are excluded due to the metallic band structure. We assume the oxidation states of BB^{-} for halogens (F and Cl) and and B2B^{2-} for chalcogens (O, S, Se, and Te). Figure 2 plots MM as a function of h/ah/a for AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems. The 1T structures have h/a[0.15,0.32]h/a\in[0.15,0.32] and M>2.3M>2.3, whereas the 2H structures have M<2.3M<2.3. Therefore, the ionic character of 1T structure is more significant than of 2H structure.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The Madelung constant MM of 1T (solid) and 2H (dashed) structures as a function of h/ah/a. The circles indicate MM of 25 systems listed in Table 1 and 2 except for hydrides. TiF2 has a large h/ah/a, and MM is small compared to the other compounds.

Note that TiF2 monolayer has a large value of h/a=0.48h/a=0.48 and prefers 2H structure. It is interesting that 2H TiF2 is more stable than the 3D bulk morita (see Table 1). The 2H structure has an indirect band gap of 1.3 eV (PBE) from K to Γ\Gamma in the Brillouin zone, while the 1T structure is metallic. This relationship between the crystal structure and electronic property is similar to that in MoS2 monolayer magneMoS22018 . Such a structure-property relationship reflects the electronic configuration of transition metals. For Ti atom [Ar](3d)2(4s)2(3d)^{2}(4s)^{2}, and a possible oxidation state is Ti2+. For Mo atom [Kr](4d)5(5s)1(4d)^{5}(5s)^{1}, and a possible oxidation state is Mo4+ by assuming S2-. The remaining two electrons in the Ti and Mo atoms should be occupied into dd energy levels. As the 2H structure has the D3h symmetry, dz2d_{z^{2}} state becomes the lowest energy state. By considering the spin degeneracy, the dz2d_{z^{2}} state is completely filled, while the other dd states are empty, resulting in a finite band gap. On the other hand, the 1T structure has the Oh symmetry, and dxyd_{xy}, dyzd_{yz}, and dzxd_{zx} states become stable in energy. These states are partially filled with two electrons, resulting in a metallic phase.

As we have obtained stable structures of fluorite-type materials in the monolayer limit, we next explore physical properties of PCK structures below.

III.2 Negative Poisson’s ratio

We study the elastic property of the PCK structures: ScH2, YH2, PbF2, Li2Te, PRh2, Ga2Au, and CoSi2. The PCK structure is stretched along the yy direction. We define the out-of-plane strain as εz=(dd0)/d0\varepsilon_{z}=(d-d_{0})/d_{0}, where dd and d0d_{0} are the thickness of the monolayer with and without the strain, respectively. Figure 3(a) shows εz\varepsilon_{z} as a function of εy\varepsilon_{y}. The atom position and the lattice constant aa are optimized, while the lattice constant bb is fixed. Interestingly, when εy\varepsilon_{y} is increased, εz\varepsilon_{z} also increases for Ga2Au, PbF2, and PRh2 monolayers. This indicates an NPR in the out-of-plane direction, ν=εz/εy<0\nu=-\partial\varepsilon_{z}/\partial\varepsilon_{y}<0. As shown in Fig. 3(b), ν\nu takes a minimum value of 0.8-0.8 at εy=0.02\varepsilon_{y}=0.02 in Ga2Au monolayer. First-principles MD simulations show that they are thermodynamically stable at 300 K except for PRh2, as shown in Fig. 3(c). For the case of 2D semiconductors (PbF2 and Li2Te), we plotted the potential energy and εz\varepsilon_{z} as functions of (aa0)/a0(a-a_{0})/a_{0} and (bb0)/b0(b-b_{0})/b_{0}, where a0a_{0} and b0b_{0} are the lattice constants in equilibrium. The NPR is observed only when the PbF2 monolayer is stretched along the yy direction. This is provided in the Supplemental Material SM .

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The εy\varepsilon_{y}-dependence of (a) the out-of-plane strain εz\varepsilon_{z} and (b) the Poisson’s ratio ν=εz/εy\nu=-\partial\varepsilon_{z}/\partial\varepsilon_{y} for the PCK structures. The third order polynomial is fitted to points (εy,εz\varepsilon_{y},\varepsilon_{z}), and ν\nu is obtained from the derivative of the polynomial with respect to εy\varepsilon_{y}. (c) MD runs at 300 K for Ga2Au, PbF2, and PRh2 monolayers in the PCK phase. A 4×4×14\times 4\times 1 supercell is assumed (96 atoms). PRh2 monolayer becomes unstable after 1 ps. (d) A1,A2,B1A_{1},A_{2},B_{1}, and B2B_{2} atoms for the PCK-structured AB2AB_{2} monolayer (see Sec. III.2.1).

We have investigated whether the NPR also appears for thicker PbF2 films. The PCK structure is constructed by stacking two PbF2 layers [see Fig. 1(a)]. Therefore, we have constructed three (9 atoms) and four (12 atom) PbF2 layers. The strain is increased from εy=0\varepsilon_{y}=0 to 0.06. However, no NPR is observed in these systems because the thickness monotonically decreases from 4.017 and 6.134 Å to 3.947 and 6.056 Å for three and four layers, respectively.

III.2.1 Analytical model

We discuss an origin of the NPR based on an analytical model. As shown in Fig. 3(d), the atomic positions of the PCK structure are denoted as A1(0,0,0)A_{1}(0,0,0), A2(a/2,b/2,zA)A_{2}(a/2,b/2,z_{A}), B1(0,b/4,zB)B_{1}(0,b/4,z_{B}), and B2(a/2,b/4,zAzB)B_{2}(a/2,b/4,z_{A}-z_{B}), where zAz_{A} and zBz_{B} are the zz coordinates of A2A_{2} and B1B_{1} atoms, respectively, and B2B_{2} atom has z=zAzBz=z_{A}-z_{B}. The thickness is given by d=2zBzAd=2z_{B}-z_{A} when zA<zBz_{A}<z_{B}. When the monolayer is elongated along the yy direction (εy>0\varepsilon_{y}>0), it will be contracted along the xx direction (εx<0\varepsilon_{x}<0), and the A2A_{2} and B1B_{1} atoms will approach the z=0z=0 plane (εzA<0\varepsilon_{z}^{A}<0 and εzB<0\varepsilon_{z}^{B}<0). Then, the zz coordinate of B2B_{2} atom becomes negatively large, which results in an increase in dd, i.e., the NPR.

To show this, we assume that the bond lengths, l(A1A2),l(A1B1)l(A_{1}A_{2}),l(A_{1}B_{1}), and l(A1B2)l(A_{1}B_{2}), are not changed under the strain. This is a good approximation for the PCK structures: For PbF2, l(A1A2)=4.024.06l(A_{1}A_{2})=4.02\rightarrow 4.06 Å, l(A1B1)=2.332.35l(A_{1}B_{1})=2.33\rightarrow 2.35 Å, and l(A1B2)=2.572.58l(A_{1}B_{2})=2.57\rightarrow 2.58 Å when εy=0.06\varepsilon_{y}=0.06 is applied. The structural parameters are changed from a,b,a,b, zAz_{A}, and zBz_{B} to a=a(1+εx)a^{\prime}=a(1+\varepsilon_{x}), b=b(1+εy)b^{\prime}=b(1+\varepsilon_{y}), zA=zA(1+εzA)z_{A}^{\prime}=z_{A}(1+\varepsilon_{z}^{A}), and zB=zB(1+εzB)z_{B}^{\prime}=z_{B}(1+\varepsilon_{z}^{B}), respectively. When l(A1A2)l(A_{1}A_{2}) is equal to l(A1A2)l^{\prime}(A_{1}A_{2}) under the strain, the following equation should be satisfied:

a2εx+b2εy+4zA2εzA=0,\displaystyle a^{2}\varepsilon_{x}+b^{2}\varepsilon_{y}+4z_{A}^{2}\varepsilon_{z}^{A}=0, (3)

where the first order of strains is considered. From the conditions l(A1B1)=l(A1B1)l(A_{1}B_{1})=l^{\prime}(A_{1}B_{1}) and l(A1B2)=l(A1B2)l(A_{1}B_{2})=l^{\prime}(A_{1}B_{2}), we obtain the relationships

b2εy+16zB2εzB=0\displaystyle b^{2}\varepsilon_{y}+16z_{B}^{2}\varepsilon_{z}^{B}=0 (4)

and

4a2εx+b2εy+16(zAzB)(zAεzAzBεzB)=0.\displaystyle 4a^{2}\varepsilon_{x}+b^{2}\varepsilon_{y}+16(z_{A}-z_{B})(z_{A}\varepsilon_{z}^{A}-z_{B}\varepsilon_{z}^{B})=0. (5)

Eq. (4) indicates that the zz coordinate of B1B_{1} atom decreases to zB(1+εzB)z_{B}(1+\varepsilon_{z}^{B}) because εzB<0\varepsilon_{z}^{B}<0 when εy>0\varepsilon_{y}>0. From Eqs. (3)-(5), we obtain

εzA=b216zAzB(4zAzB)εy.\displaystyle\varepsilon_{z}^{A}=-\frac{b^{2}}{16z_{A}z_{B}}\left(4-\frac{z_{A}}{z_{B}}\right)\varepsilon_{y}. (6)

This also predicts εzA<0\varepsilon_{z}^{A}<0 because zAzBz_{A}\simeq z_{B}. The εzA\varepsilon_{z}^{A} is negatively larger than εzB\varepsilon_{z}^{B} by a factor of three. Therefore, the thickness, expressed by

d=d0+b28zB(1zA2zB)εy\displaystyle d=d_{0}+\frac{b^{2}}{8z_{B}}\left(1-\frac{z_{A}}{2z_{B}}\right)\varepsilon_{y} (7)

with d0=2zBzAd_{0}=2z_{B}-z_{A}, increases with εy\varepsilon_{y}. This results in ν=(d/d0)/εy<0\nu=-\partial(d/d_{0})/\partial\varepsilon_{y}<0. For an unrelaxed PCK structure (b=2ab=\sqrt{2}a and d0=zA=zB=a/2d_{0}=z_{A}=z_{B}=a/2), ν\nu is exactly equal to 1/2-1/2.

In our model, ν<0\nu<0 always holds. In realistic systems, the bond lengths are changed within a few percent under the strains. In addition, B1B_{1} and B2B_{2} atoms have different yy coordinates. These affects the εy\varepsilon_{y}-dependence of ν\nu.

III.2.2 Relationship to the surface energy

Our analytical model suggests that the NPR is inherently present in the PCK structure. As the PCK structure is truncated from the (110) surface, it is interesting to study whether the monolayers having NPR are identified by surface energy calculations.

Figure 4 shows a correlation of the surface energies between the (111) and (110) surfaces. The γ\gamma for AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems is plotted in Fig. 4(a), while that for the other ordered alloys is plotted in Fig. 4(b). The calculated data for ZrO2, HfO2, Li2O, and Be2O are plotted in Fig. 4(b) due to the large γ\gamma. CrH2 is excluded because the scf calculation assuming ferromagnetic phase is not converged. For all systems, the (111) surface is more stable. This is consistent with previous calculations on CaF2, SrF2, and BaF2 bebelis2017 . As shown in Fig. 4(a), a linear relationship of γ(110)1.5γ(111)\gamma_{(110)}\simeq 1.5\gamma_{(111)} holds for AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems. For the other ordered alloys in the high energy regime (γ(111)0.4\gamma_{(111)}\gtrsim 0.4 J/m2), the relation γ(111)<γ(110)1.5γ(111)\gamma_{(111)}<\gamma_{(110)}\lesssim 1.5\gamma_{(111)} is satisfied, as shown in Fig. 4(b). It is noteworthy that PbF2, Ga2Au, and PRh2 having NPR exhibit a large deviation from the linear relationship of γ(110)1.5γ(111)\gamma_{(110)}\simeq 1.5\gamma_{(111)}.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Correlation between γ(111)\gamma_{(111)} and γ(110)\gamma_{(110)}. The dashed lines indicate γ(110)=γ(111)\gamma_{(110)}=\gamma_{(111)} (blue) and γ(110)=1.5γ(111)\gamma_{(110)}=1.5\gamma_{(111)} (orange).

IV Conclusion

We have studied 53 fluorite-type materials in the monolayer limit by performing first principles calculations. Most of AB2AB_{2} and A2BA_{2}B systems form the 1T structure. The puckered structure can exhibit a negative Poisson’s ratio (NPR) in the out-of-plane direction. An analytical model is developed to explain the NPR. The puckered structures having NPR (PbF2, Ga2Au, and PRh2) are identified by the energy difference between the (111) and (110) surfaces.

In the present work, we have focused on non-layered fluorite-type materials to explore novel 2D materials. The 1T and puckered structures are truncated from the (111) and (110) surfaces, respectively. A similar strategy, truncation from low-index surfaces of non-layered materials, will be useful to expand the family of 2D materials.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 21K04628). Calculations were done using the facilities of the Supercomputer Center, the Institute for Solid State Physics, the University of Tokyo, and the Supercomputer “MASAMUNE-IMR” at Center for Computational Materials Science, Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University.

References

  • (1) W. Choi, N. Choudhary, G. H. Han, J. Park, D. Akinwande, and Y. H. Lee, Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications, Mater. Today, 20, 116 (2017).
  • (2) W. Xu, S. Yan, and W. Qiao, Magnetism in monolayer 1T-MoS2 and 1T-MoS2H tuned by strain, RSC Adv. 8, 8435 (2018).
  • (3) W. Li and J. Li, Ferroelasticity and domain physics in two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers, Nat. Commun. 7, 10843 (2016).
  • (4) W. Zhao, J. Pan, Y. Fang, X. Che, D. Wang, K. Bu, and F. Huang, Metastable MoS2: Crystal Structure, Electronic Band Structure, Synthetic Approach and Intriguing Physical Properties, Chem. Eur. J. 24, 15942 (2018).
  • (5) M. Fukuda, J. Zhang, Y.-T. Lee, and T. Ozaki, A structure map for AB2 type 2D materials using high-throughput DFT calculations, Mater. Adv. 2, 4392 (2021).
  • (6) A. Silva, J. Cao, T. Polcar, and D. Kramer, Pettifor maps of complex ternary two-dimensional transition metal sulfides, Npj Comput. Mater. 8, 178 (2022).
  • (7) P. Kumar, V. Sharma, S. N. Shirodkar, and P. Dev, Predicting phase preferences of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides using machine learning, Phys. Rev. Materials 6, 094007 (2022).
  • (8) D. Ji, S. Cai, T. R. Paudel, H. Sun, C. Zhang, L. Han, Y. Wei, Y. Zang, M. Gu, Y. Zhang, W. Gao, H. Huyan, W. Guo, D. Wu, Z. Gu, E. Y. Tsymbal, P. Wang, Y. Nie, and X. Pan, Freestanding crystalline oxide perovskites down to the monolayer limit, Nature 570, 87 (2019).
  • (9) A. B. Puthirath, A. P. Balan, E. F. Oliveira, V. Sreepal, F. C. Robles Hernandez, G. Gao, N. Chakingal, L. M. Sassi, P. Thibeorchews, and G. Costin et al., Apparent gerromagnetism in exfoliated ultrathin pyrite sheets, J. Phys. Chem. C 125, 18927 (2021).
  • (10) A. P. Balan, A. B. Puthirath, S. Roy, G. Costin, E. F. Oliveira, M. A. S. R. Saadi, V. Sreepal, R. Friedrich, P. Serles, and A. Biswas et al., Non-van der Waals quasi-2D materials; Recent advances in synthesis, emergent properties and applications, Mater. Today 58, 164 (2022).
  • (11) M. C. Lucking, W. Xie, D.-H. Choe, D. West, T.-M. Lu, and S. B. Zhang, Traditional Semiconductors in the Two-Dimensional Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 086101 (2018).
  • (12) R. Friedrich, M. Ghorbani-Asl, S. Curtarolo, and A. V. Krasheninnikov, Data-Driven Quest for Two-Dimensional Non-van der Waals Materials, Nano Lett. 22, 989 (2022).
  • (13) S. Ono, Dynamical stability of two-dimensional metals in the periodic table, Phys. Rev. B 102, 165424 (2020).
  • (14) S. Ono, Two-dimensional square lattice polonium stabilized by the spin-orbit coupling, Sci. Rep. 10, 11810 (2020).
  • (15) A. A. Sangolkar, S. Jha, and R. Pawar, Density Functional Theory-Based Calculations for 2D Hexagonal Lanthanide Metals, Adv. Theory Simul. 5, 2200057 (2022).
  • (16) K. Momma and F. Izumi, VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272 (2011).
  • (17) M. Naseri, J. Jalilian, F. Parandin, and K. Salehi, A new stable polycrystalline Be2C monolayer: A direct semiconductor with hexa-coordinate carbons, 382. 2144 (2018).
  • (18) M. M. Abutalib, A DFT based prediction of a new 2D zirconium disulfide PmmmPmmm-ZrS2 monolayer: A quasi direct band gap semiconductor, Results Phys. 12, 903 (2019).
  • (19) J. W. Jiang and H. S. Park, Negative poisson’s ratio in single-layer black phosphorus, Nat. Commun. 5, 4727 (2014).
  • (20) Y. Du, J. Maassen, W. Wu, Z. Luo, X. Xu, and P. D. Ye, Auxetic black phosphorus: a 2D material with negative Poisson’s ratio, Nano Lett. 16, 6701 (2016).
  • (21) J. Han, J. Xie, Z. Zhang, D. Yang, M. Si, and D. Xue, Negative Poisson’s ratios in few-layer orthorhombic arsenic: First-principles calculations, Appl. Phys. Express 8, 041801 (2015).
  • (22) L. C. Gomes, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, Enhanced piezoelectricity and modified dielectric screening of two-dimensional group-IV monochalcogenides, Phy. Rev. B 92, 214103 (2015).
  • (23) L. C. Zhang, G. Qin, W. Z. Fang, H. J. Cui, Q. R. Zheng, Q. B. Yan, and G. Su, Tinselenidene: a Two-dimensional Auxetic Material with Ultralow Lattice Thermal Conductivity and Ultrahigh Hole Mobility, Sci. Rep. 6, 19830 (2016).
  • (24) L. Zhou, Z. Zhuo, L. Kou, A. Du, and S. Tretiak, Computational Dissection of Two-Dimensional Rectangular Titanium Mononitride TiN: Auxetics and Promises for Photocatalysis, Nano Lett. 17, 4466 (2017).
  • (25) R. Peng, Y. Ma, Z. He, B. Huang, L. Kou, and Y. Dai, Single-Layer Ag2S: A Two-Dimensional Bidirectional Auxetic Semiconductor, Nano Lett. 19, 1227 (2019).
  • (26) H. Wang, T. Li, Z. Chen, W. Zhu, W. Lin, H. Wang, X. Liu, and Z. Li, High out-of-plane negative Poisson’s ratios and strong light harvesting in two-dimensional SiS2 and its derivatives, Nanoscale 15, 16155 (2023).
  • (27) A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, W. Chen, W. D. Richards, S. Dacek, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, D. Skinner, G. Ceder, and K. A. Persson, The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).
  • (28) S. P. Ong, W. D. Richards, A. Jain, G. Hautier, M. Kocher, S. Cholia, D. Gunter, V. L. Chevrier, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis, Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314 (2013).
  • (29) H. Shin, A. Benali, Y. Luo, E. Crabb, A. L. Bezanilla, L. E. Ratcliff, A. M. Jokisaari, and O. Heinonen, Zirconia and hafnia polymorphs: Ground-state structural properties from diffusion Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. Materials 2, 075001 (2018).
  • (30) P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, and M. Cococcioni et al., Advanced capabilities for materials modeling with Quantum ESPRESSO, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017).
  • (31) J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  • (32) A. Dal Corso, Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu, Computational Material Science 95, 337 (2014).
  • (33) M. Methfessel and A. T. Paxton, High-precision sampling for Brillouin-zone integration in metals, Phys. Rev. B 40, 3616 (1989).
  • (34) S. Kirklin, J. E. Saal, B. Meredig, A. Thompson, J. W. Doak, M. Aykol, S. Rühl, and C. Wolverton, The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies, Npj Comput. Mater. 1, 15010 (2015).
  • (35) M. N. Gjerding, A. Taghizadeh, A. Rasmussen, S. Ali, F. Bertoldo, T. Deilmann, U. P. Holguin, N. R. Knøsgaard, M. Kruse, A. H. Larsen et al., Recent Progress of the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB), 2D Materials 8, 044002 (2021).
  • (36) S. Baroni, S. Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001).
  • (37) T. Sohier, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Density functional perturbation theory for gated two-dimensional heterostructures: Theoretical developments and application to flexural phonons in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 96, 075448 (2017).
  • (38) A. H. Larsen, J. J. Mortensen, J. Blomqvist, I. E. Castelli, R. Christensen, M. Dułak, J. Friis, M. N. Groves, B. Hammer, C. Hargus et al., The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).
  • (39) J. P. Perdew and A. Zunger, Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981).
  • (40) J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Restoring the Density-Gradient Expansion for Exchange in Solids and Surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).
  • (41) See Supplemental Material at (URL) for (a) phonon dispersions of 53 monolayers and (b) potential energy and εz\varepsilon_{z} as functions of in-plane lattice constants for PbF2 and Li2Te in the PCK structure.
  • (42) N. Morita, T. Endo, T. Sato, and M. Shimada, TiF2 with fluorite structure — a new compound, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 6, 859 (1987).
  • (43) S. Bebelis and P. Nikolopoulos, Temperature Dependence of the Surface Energy of the Low-index Planes of CaF2, BaF2 and SrF2, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 26, 1223 (2017).