This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Fluid-fluid demixing and density anomaly in a ternary mixture of hard spheres

Nathann T. Rodrigues [email protected] Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil    Tiago J. Oliveira [email protected] Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 36570-900, Viçosa, MG, Brazil
Abstract

We report the grand-canonical solution of a ternary mixture of discrete hard spheres defined on a Husimi lattice built with cubes, which provides a mean-field approximation for this system on the cubic lattice. The mixture is composed by point-like particles (0NN) and particles which exclude up to their first (1NN) and second neighbors (2NN), with activities z0z_{0}, z1z_{1} and z2z_{2}, respectively. Our solution reveals a very rich thermodynamic behavior, with two solid phases associated with the ordering of 1NN (S1S1) or 2NN particles (S2S2), and two fluid phases, being one regular (RFRF) and the other characterized by a dominance of 0NN particles (F0F0 phase). However, in most part of the phase diagram these fluid (FF) phases are indistinguishable. Discontinuous transitions are observed between all the four phases, yielding several coexistence surfaces in the system, among which a fluid-fluid and a solid-solid demixing surface. The former one is limited by a line of critical points and a line of triple points (where the phases RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 coexist), both meeting at a special point, after which the fluid-fluid coexistence becomes metastable. Another line of triple points is found, connecting the FF-S1S1, FF-S2S2 and S1S1-S2S2 coexistence surfaces. A critical FF-S1S1 surface is also observed meeting the FF-S1S1 coexistence one at a line of tricritical points. Furthermore, a thermodynamic anomaly characterized by minima in isobaric curves of the total density of particles is found, yielding three surfaces of minimal density in the activity space, depending on which activity is kept fixed during its calculation.

I Introduction

In two recent works NT0NN2NN ; NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN , we have investigated three athermal binary mixtures of hard spheres placed on the cubic lattice, where they are approximated by kkNN particles, i.e., particles which exclude up their kkth neighbors. The mixtures considered were composed by pairs of the three smallest “spheres” (0NN-1NN, 0NN-2NN and 1NN-2NN) and grand-canonical phase diagrams for these systems were obtained through their solution on a Husimi lattice built with cubes NT0NN2NN ; NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN [see Fig. 1(a)]. Such mean-field solutions display very rich entropy-driven thermodynamic behaviors. In a brief, in the 0NN-1NN case, a fluid (FF) and a solid (S1S1) phase (associated with the ordering of 1NN particles) were found, separated by a continuous and a discontinuous transition line, both meeting at a tricritical point NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN . The same phases and behavior were observed in the 1NN-2NN mixture, but now another solid (S2S2) phase (associated with the ordering of 2NN particles) is present in the system and it is separated from the FF and S1S1 phases by coexistence lines, which meet the FF-S1S1 one at a triple point NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN . For the 0NN-2NN mixture, an even more interesting scenario was found, with two fluid phases, one regular (RFRF) and another characterized by a dominance of 0NN particles (F0F0), beyond the S2S2 phase. Its phase diagram displays a fluid-fluid demixing transition, characterized by a RFRF-F0F0 coexistence line, which ends in a critical point and also meet a RFRF-S2S2 and a F0F0-S2S2 coexistence line in a triple point NT0NN2NN . Another interesting feature observed in the 0NN-1NN and 0NN-2NN mixtures is a thermodynamic anomaly characterized by minima in isobaric curves of the total density of particles. These different behaviors in the binary systems — specially the absence of the density anomaly in the 1NN-2NN case and the existence of the fluid-fluid demixing only the 0NN-2NN mixture — lead us to inquiry how these things are connected in the more general and interesting case of the 0NN-1NN-2NN ternary mixture. In this paper we address this by tackling the challenging problem of building up the three-dimensional (3D) phase diagram for this ternary model, once again by solving it on a cubic Husimi lattice.

We remark that ternary mixtures are central in a vast number of systems. To name a few, we may cite ternary quasicrystals QCs , several chemical reactions involving three species (e.g., 2H2 + O2 \leftrightharpoons 2H2O), mixtures of cholesterol and lipids which play a key role in cell membranes Elliott ; Solanko , water-oil-surfactant mixtures Sager ; Abbott , and so on. Moreover, colloids and granular matter in general are usually modeled as hard spheres granular . In fact, (thermal) models of ternary mixtures have recently been used to investigate, e.g., critical Casimir forces among colloidal particles dispersed in a binary solvent Tasios ; Maciolek and the percolation of patchy colloids Seiferling ; Teixeira . Regarding the athermal case, ternary mixtures of hard spheres have been theoretically investigated using different approximation methods Gazzillo ; Fotouh ; Paschinger ; Konig and in several works such approaches were compared with both simulations Schaink ; Santos ; Santos2 ; Malijevsk ; Malijevsk2 ; Patra ; Yu and experiments Hoshino ; Fotouh2 ; Matsunaga ; Boned ; Anderson ; Yi .

Despite these works considering the hard spheres in the continuous space, as long as we know, ternary mixtures of them on the lattice (i.e., of kkNN particles) have never been investigated so far. Actually, even binary mixtures of kkNN particles on the cubic (or any other three-dimensional) lattice have never be studied before our recent works discussed above, based on the cubic Husimi lattice solution NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN ; NT0NN2NN . On the other hand, the 0NN-1NN mixture has been considered by several authors on the triangular frenkel0nn1nn ; Lekkerkerker ; Nienhuis and square lattice poland ; Jim01 ; tiago15 , beyond a mean-field solution on the Bethe lattice tiago11 . A central topic in these studies is the possibility of a fluid-fluid demixing transition in kkNN-binary mixtures. We remark that in nonadditive mixtures, as is the case in kkNN ones, the demixed phases fill the space more effectively than the mixed one, so that a demixing is expected; and it has indeed been observed in several systems Dijkstra ; Schmidt ; Brader ; Dickman95 ; Roiji ; Wensink ; Dubois ; Varga ; Mederos ; Schmidt02 ; Heras . In the kkNN systems, while van Duijneveldt and Lekkerkerker Lekkerkerker claimed to have found a fluid-fluid demixing in the 0NN-1NN mixture on the triangular lattice, strong evidence against this have been presented by other authors frenkel0nn1nn ; Nienhuis , who observed only fluid-solid transitions in this model, similarly to what is found for this mixture on the square poland ; Jim01 ; tiago15 and hierarchical lattices tiago11 ; NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN .

Therefore, it seems that among all kkNN-binary mixtures investigated so far the 0NN-2NN case on the cubic Husimi lattice is the single one presenting a stable fluid-fluid demixing NT0NN2NN . Hence, it is quite interesting to analyze what happens with this transition when 1NN particles are introduced in this system. As will be demonstrated below, the RFRF-F0F0 coexistence still exists for small densities of 1NN particles, giving rise to a fluid-fluid demixing surface in the 3D phase diagram of the 0NN-1NN-2NN mixture. Such phase diagram is also featured by several other coexistence surfaces, including a solid-solid demixing one, a critical FF-S1S1 surface and lines of critical, tricritical and triple points, giving rise to a very rich thermodynamic behavior.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II the model is defined and solved on the cubic Husimi lattice in terms of recursion relations, which are presented in the appendix. Its thermodynamic behavior is discussed in Sec. III. Our final discussions and concluding remarks are presented in Sec. IV.

II Model definition and solution on the Husimi lattice

The model considered here consists of a ternary mixture of hard spheres, with diameter λ\lambda, defined on — and centered at the vertices of — a cubic lattice. By assuming the lattice spacing being aa, the smallest (0NN) particles corresponds to spheres of diameter λ=a\lambda=a, so that they occupy a single lattice site and effectively do not interact with each other. The intermediate (1NN) and largest (2NN) particles are spheres of diameters λ=2a\lambda=\sqrt{2}a and λ=3a\lambda=\sqrt{3}a, respectively, which thus exclude up to their nearest and next-nearest neighbors of being occupied by other particles. Let us remark that in our previous works on binary mixtures NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN ; NT0NN2NN , we have wrongly stated that the 1NN and 2NN particles would correspond to cubes of lateral sizes λ=2a\lambda=\sqrt{2}a and λ=3a\lambda=\sqrt{3}a, respectively, instead of spheres. An activity zkz_{k} is associated with each kkNN particle (with k=0,1,2k=0,1,2) in our grand-canonical study of the model. It is worthy recalling that while the pure 0NN model can be exactly solved and it does not present any phase transition, the pure 1NN and 2NN models on the cubic lattice are known to undergo a continuous Gaunt ; Yamagata ; HB ; Panagiotopoulos and a discontinuous Panagiotopoulos phase transition, respectively, from disordered fluid to ordered solid phases.

The translational symmetry breaking of these solid phases display sublattice ordering, as illustrated in Figs. 1(b) and 1(c). In the ground state (the full occupancy limit) the solid phase for the pure 1NN system (the S1S1 phase) is characterized by particles occupying one of two sublattices: either sublattices with index 11 or 22 in Fig. 1(d). On the other hand, the solid related to the pure 2NN system (the S2S2 phase) is featured by particles occupying one among four sublattices [AiA_{i}, BiB_{i}, CiC_{i} or DiD_{i}, with i=1,2i=1,2, in Fig. 1(d)], so that its ground state is four-fold degenerated. Thereby, to correctly capture the symmetries of both solid phases in the 0NN-1NN-2NN mixture, we have to deal with eight sublattices, as defined in Fig.1(d).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Illustration of part of a Husimi lattice built with cubes. The ground states of the solid S1S1 and S2S2 phases, in the cubic lattice, are displayed in (b) and (c), respectively. (d) Definition of the sublattice structure in a elementary cube of the Husimi lattice. (e) Representation of the possible states (jj) for the root sites. They can be empty (j=j=\varnothing) or occupied by a 0NN (j=0j=0, open square), an 1NN (j=1j=1, full square) or a 2NN (j=2j=2, circle) particle.

Following our recent studies on the corresponding binary mixtures NT0NN2NN ; NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN , here we will investigate the ternary 0NN-1NN-2NN case by defining the model on a Husimi lattice built with cubes [see Fig. 1(a)]. It is important to remark that the Husimi lattice consists of an infinite Cayley tree where each vertice is replaced by a polygon or a polyhedron. So, since the dimension of such lattice is infinity, the critical transition behavior is lead by mean-field exponents. Despite this, solutions on the Husimi lattice carry some degree of correlation of the system on the relevant lattice (the cubic lattice here), usually giving better results than other mean-field methods gujrati . In fact, in some lattice gas systems, the Husimi solution even presents some quantitative agreement with simulation results on regular lattices Buzano ; Tiago10 .

To solve the ternary mixture on the Husimi lattice, we define a root site on an elementary cube [as shown in Fig. 1(a)] and partial partition functions (ppf’s) according to its state. For each sublattice, the root site (and any other lattice site as well) can be empty (j=j=\varnothing), occupied by a 0NN (j=0j=0), by an 1NN (j=1j=1) or by a 2NN particle (j=2j=2), totaling 44 states [see Fig. 1(e)]. Hence, since we have 88 sublattices, there are 3232 ppf’s for this system. One cube defines the 0-generation of the hierarchical lattice; so, by attaching the root sites of seven cubes to the vertices of such cube, with exception of its root site, one obtains a subtree with 11-generation. Then, by attaching seven of such subtrees to the vertices of a new cube with exception of its root site, a 2-generation subtree is built. By repeating this process, we can create a (M+1)(M+1)-generation subtree from seven ones with MM generations. Then, by summing over all possibilities of creating such subtree, by appropriately taking into account the particle exclusions, with its root site kept fixed in the state ss and sublattice gg, one obtains a recursion relation for the ppf gsg^{\prime}_{s} as function of all ppf’s in the previous generation gjg_{j}, with g=a1,a2,,d1,d2g=a_{1},a_{2},...,d_{1},d_{2} and s,j=,0,1,2s,j=\varnothing,0,1,2. Some details on such recursion relations (RRs) are presented in the appendix.

Since we are interested in infinite subtrees, and the RRs usually diverges in this thermodynamic limit, we will work with ratios of them, defined as

Gj=gjg,G_{j}=\frac{g_{j}}{g_{\varnothing}}, (1)

where Gj=A1,j,A2,j,,D1,j,D2,jG_{j}=A_{1,j},A_{2,j},...,D_{1,j},D_{2,j} and j=0,1,2j=0,1,2. Thereby, from the 3232 RRs for the ppf’s one obtains 2424 RRs for the ratios. The thermodynamic phases of the system are given by the stable and positive fixed points of these RRs. To analyze the stability of a given phase, we calculate the Jacobian matrix and its leading eigenvalue, Λ\Lambda, at the associated fixed point. The phase is stable in the regions of the parameter space (z0,z1,z2)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}) where Λ<1\Lambda<1, while Λ=1\Lambda=1 defines its spinodal.

Similarly to the ppf’s, we can obtain the partition function, YY, of the model on the tree by summing over all possibilities of attaching the root sites of eight subtrees to a central cube. It can be written in a compact form in terms of the ppf’s, e.g., as

Y\displaystyle Y =\displaystyle= a1,a1,+z0a1,0a1,0+z1a1,1a1,1+z2a1,2a1,2\displaystyle a_{1,\varnothing}a^{\prime}_{1,\varnothing}+z_{0}a_{1,0}a^{\prime}_{1,0}+z_{1}a_{1,1}a^{\prime}_{1,1}+z_{2}a_{1,2}a^{\prime}_{1,2}
=\displaystyle= a1,b1,c1,d1,a2,b2,c2,d2,y,\displaystyle a_{1,\varnothing}b_{1,\varnothing}c_{1,\varnothing}d_{1,\varnothing}a_{2,\varnothing}b_{2,\varnothing}c_{2,\varnothing}d_{2,\varnothing}y,

where yy is a function of the ratios (Eq. 1) and the activities z0z_{0}, z1z_{1} and z2z_{2}. Then, the density of kkNN particles in the sublattice A1A_{1} at the central cube is given by

ρk(A1)=A1,k8YYA1,k,\rho^{(A_{1})}_{k}=\frac{A_{1,k}}{8Y}\frac{\partial Y}{\partial A_{1,k}}, (3)

with k=0,1,2k=0,1,2. A similar equation holds for the other sublattices, by replacing A1A_{1} with A2,B1,A_{2},B_{1},\ldots, or D2D_{2}. Once we have the density of a kkNN particle in all sublattices, its total density is ρk=ρk(A1)+ρk(A2)++ρk(D1)+ρk(D2)\rho_{k}=\rho^{(A_{1})}_{k}+\rho^{(A_{2})}_{k}+...+\rho^{(D_{1})}_{k}+\rho^{(D_{2})}_{k}. From the partition function we can also calculate the bulk free energy per site. Following the ansatz proposed by Gujrati gujrati , and discussed in detail for a Husimi lattice build with cubes in NT0NN2NN , for the ternary mixture one has

ϕb=18ln[A1,B1,C1,D1,A2,B2,C2,D2,y6],\phi_{b}=-\frac{1}{8}\ln\left[\frac{A_{1,\varnothing}B_{1,\varnothing}C_{1,\varnothing}D_{1,\varnothing}A_{2,\varnothing}B_{2,\varnothing}C_{2,\varnothing}D_{2,\varnothing}}{y^{6}}\right], (4)

where

A1,a1,b1,c1,d1,a2,b2,c2,d2,,A_{1,\varnothing}\equiv\frac{a^{\prime}_{1,\varnothing}}{b_{1,\varnothing}c_{1,\varnothing}d_{1,\varnothing}a_{2,\varnothing}b_{2,\varnothing}c_{2,\varnothing}d_{2,\varnothing}}, (5)

and the other ratios can be obtained by the sublattice permutation scheme described in the appendix. The bulk free energy is handy to determine where a first-order transition takes place. In a region where two or more phases have Λ<1\Lambda<1, the equality of their bulk free energies determines the point, line or surface of coexistence among these phases.

III Thermodynamic behavior of the model

III.1 Summary of results for the binary mixtures

Once the binary mixtures 0NN-1NN (z2=0z_{2}=0), 0NN-2NN (z1=0z_{1}=0) and 1NN-2NN (z0=0z_{0}=0) are the boundary planes of the (z0,z1,z2(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}) space for the ternary case, it is interesting to start the presentation of results by discussing in detail the thermodynamic behavior of such planes NT0NN2NN ; NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN .

For the 0NN-1NN mixture — the plane (z0,z1,0)(z_{0},z_{1},0) — we have found two thermodynamic stable phases NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN : a disordered fluid (FF) phase, where the recursion relations (RRs) for the ratios assume a homogeneous solution A1,j=B1,j==C2,j=D2,jA_{1,j}=B_{1,j}=\ldots=C_{2,j}=D_{2,j} with j=0,1,2j=0,1,2, and the solid S1S1 phase, associated with the ordering of the 1NN particles, where the RRs take the form Ai,j=Bi,j=Ci,j=Di,j=ri,jA_{i,j}=B_{i,j}=C_{i,j}=D_{i,j}=r_{i,j}, with i=1,2i=1,2 and j=0,1,2j=0,1,2, and r1,j>r2,jr_{1,j}>r_{2,j} for j=0,1j=0,1, while r1,2<r2,2r_{1,2}<r_{2,2}, when the sublattices with index 11 are the ones more occupied. Namely, in this phase one has ρj(A1)==ρj(D1)>ρj(A2)==ρj(D2)\rho_{j}^{(A_{1})}=\cdots=\rho_{j}^{(D_{1})}>\rho_{j}^{(A_{2})}=\ldots=\rho_{j}^{(D_{2})}, for j=0,1j=0,1 and the opposite for j=2j=2. [Note that these fixed points and densities are for these phases in the ternary case; and obviously ρ2(X)=0\rho_{2}^{(X)}=0, \forall sublattice XX, in the 0NN-1NN mixture.] For small z0z_{0} there is a continuous FF-S1S1 transition, while for large z0z_{0} such transition becomes discontinuous. The critical and the coexistence FF-S1S1 lines meet at a tricritical point, located at (z0,z1,z2)TC=(0.5958,1.1277,0)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})_{TC}=(0.5958,1.1277,0) [see Fig. 2]. Interestingly, this mixture presents a thermodynamic anomaly, characterized by minima in isobaric curves of the total density of particles as function of one activity (z0z_{0} or z1z_{1}). A line of minimum density (LMD) exists within the fluid phase, starting at z00.20z_{0}\approx 0.20 for z10z_{1}\rightarrow 0 and ending close to the tricritical point in a region where the FF phase is metastable (see Fig. 2).

A similar anomaly has also been observed in the 0NN-2NN mixture — the plane (z0,0,z2)(z_{0},0,z_{2}). In this case, the LMD starts at z00.333z_{0}\approx 0.333 for z20z_{2}\rightarrow 0 and, as in the 0NN-1NN case, it ends inside the region where the fluid phase is metastable NT0NN2NN (see Fig. 2). Actually, beyond the regular fluid (RFRF) phase (whose RRs have the symmetry just mentioned for the FF phase), the 0NN-2NN mixture displays another stable disordered fluid phase characterized by a dominance of 0NN particles, reason for which it was baptized as the F0F0 phase in Ref. NT0NN2NN . The RRs are also featured by A1,j=B1,j==C2,j=D2,j=rjA_{1,j}=B_{1,j}=\ldots=C_{2,j}=D_{2,j}=r_{j} in the F0F0 case, but with r11r_{1}\approx 1, r20r_{2}\approx 0 and r30r_{3}\approx 0, while in RFRF case the values of rjr_{j} strongly depend on the activities. These very same symmetries apply for the particle densities: while in RFRF phase ρ0\rho_{0}, ρ1\rho_{1} and ρ2\rho_{2} considerably vary with z0z_{0}, z1z_{1} and z2z_{2}, in the stable region of the F0F0 phase one has ρ0ρ1\rho_{0}\gg\rho_{1} and ρ0ρ2\rho_{0}\gg\rho_{2}. Beyond these two fluid phases, the solid S2S2 phase is also present in the phase diagram, which is associated with the ordering of the 2NN particles and characterized by a fixed point with A1,j=A2,j>B1,j=C1,j==C2,j=D2,jA_{1,j}=A_{2,j}>B_{1,j}=C_{1,j}=\ldots=C_{2,j}=D_{2,j}, for j=0,1,2j=0,1,2, when the sublattices A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} are the more populated ones. This yields densities ρj(A1)=ρj(A2)>ρj(B1)==ρj(D2)\rho_{j}^{(A_{1})}=\rho_{j}^{(A_{2})}>\rho_{j}^{(B_{1})}=\ldots=\rho_{j}^{(D_{2})}, for j=0,1,2j=0,1,2. A stable fluid-fluid demixing is observed in this system, whose discontinuous RFRF-F0F0 transition line ends at a critical point (CP), located at (z0,z1,z2)CP=(0.6297,0,5.4243)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})_{CP}=(0.6297,0,5.4243), so that for z2<z2,CPz_{2}<z_{2,CP} the RFRF and F0F0 phases cannot be distinguished. Hereafter, whenever this happens we will refer to these phases simply as the fluid (FF) phase. The S2S2 phase is the most stable one for large z2z_{2} and it is separated from the two fluid phases by discontinuous transition lines. The three coexistence lines RFRF-F0F0, RFRF-S2S2 and F0F0-S2S2 meet at a triple point (TP) located at (z0,z1,z2)TP=(0.6774,0,6.5671)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})_{TP}=(0.6774,0,6.5671) [See Fig. 2].

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Phase diagrams for the binary mixtures in the (z0,z1,z2)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}) space. The solid and dashed lines are continuous and discontinuous transition lines between the indicated phases they are separating. The squares are triple points, the circles are tricritical points and the star is a critical point. The dotted lines are the LMDs.

Finally, in the 1NN-2NN mixture — the plane (0,z1,z2)(0,z_{1},z_{2}) —, we have found the fluid FF and the two solid S1S1 and S2S2 phases NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN . Similarly to the 0NN-1NN mixture, continuous and discontinuous FF-S1S1 transition lines are observed, which meet at a tricritical point, located at (z0,z1,z2)TC=(0,1.5273,2.5016)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})_{TC}=(0,1.5273,2.5016). The solid S1S1 and S2S2 phases are observed in the regions of large z1z_{1} and z2z_{2}, respectively, and are separated by a discontinuous transition line. Another coexistence line exists between the FF-S2S2 phases, which meet the FF-S1S1 and S1S1-S2S2 ones in a triple point, located at (z0,z1,z2)TP=(0,2.3102,7.8746)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})_{TP}=(0,2.3102,7.8746) [See Fig. 2]. In contrast with the previous binary mixtures, no density anomaly was found in the 1NN-2NN case.

The summary of the behavior for the binary mixtures, displayed in Fig. 2, indicates that the 3D phase diagram for the ternary case is quite complex and interesting. For instance, the presence of the two fluid-S2S2 discontinuous transition lines in the planes (0,z1,z2)(0,z_{1},z_{2}) and (z0,0,z2)(z_{0},0,z_{2}) strongly suggests the existence of a coexistence fluid-S2S2 surface in the 3D parameter space. Similarly, the FF-S1S1 transitions in the planes (z0,z1,0)(z_{0},z_{1},0) and (0,z1,z2)(0,z_{1},z_{2}) strongly indicates that a critical and a coexistence FF-S1S1 surface exist in the full phase diagram, both meeting at a line of tricritical points (a TC line). Besides these features, everything else is less clear. For example, it is unclear from the binary mixtures what can be expected for the LMD lines found in the planes (z0,z1,0)(z_{0},z_{1},0) and (z0,0,z2)(z_{0},0,z_{2}), since the values of z0z_{0} where they start in each plane do not coincide. So, this could indicate either a complex scenario with two (or more) surfaces of minimum density, or that one or both of such surfaces do not exist. In the same token, it is not possible to known at this point whether the fluid-fluid demixing is a particular feature of the case z0=0z_{0}=0, or if it extends for z0>0z_{0}>0, giving rise to a RFRF-F0F0 coexistence surface, as well as to a line of triple points (where the phases RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 coexist) and a critical line in the 3D phase diagram. In what follows, these points will be addressed in great detail.

III.2 The Fluid-Fluid transition

From all thermodynamic properties observed in the binary mixtures discussed above, the fluid-fluid demixing transition in the 0NN-2NN (z1=0z_{1}=0) system is the most surprising one, in face it is absence in other kkNN mixtures studied so far. For this reason, we will start the building up of the 3D phase diagram for the ternary mixture by analyzing the RFRF-F0F0 transition.

In order to do this, we investigate the phase behavior of slices of the 3D space for fixed values of z1z_{1}. Some relevant examples of such slices are shown in Fig. 3. For small z1z_{1}, specifically for z1<0.3177z_{1}<0.3177 [see Fig. 3(a) for the case z1=0.1z_{1}=0.1], the same thermodynamic behavior of the case z1=0z_{1}=0 is found, with the phases RFRF, F0F0 and S2S2 pairwise separated by discontinuous transition lines which meet at a triple point, while the fluid-fluid demixing transition ends in a critical point. This demonstrates that in the 3D phase diagram there exist coexistence surfaces separating the RFRF-F0F0, RFRF-S2S2 and F0F0-S2S2 phases, all of them meeting at a line of triple points (the RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 TP line). Moreover, there is a line of critical points (a CP line), where the RFRF-F0F0 coexistence surface ends. Substantially, this confirms that the fluid-fluid demixing transition is not restricted to the z1=0z_{1}=0 case, being a feature of the ternary mixture.

Quantitatively, we observe that while the (z0,z2)(z_{0},z_{2}) coordinates of the TP line mildly change with z1z_{1}, the z2z_{2} one for the CP line present a strong variation with z1z_{1}, leading the stable region of the RFRF-F0F0 coexistence to decrease as z1z_{1} increases. For instance, the RFRF-F0F0 coexistence line occurs in an interval Δz21.14\Delta z_{2}\approx 1.14 for z1=0z_{1}=0, but only Δz20.76\Delta z_{2}\approx 0.76 for z1=0.1z_{1}=0.1. In fact, by increasing z1z_{1} one observes that the CP line becomes closer to the TP line, and at the special point (z0,z1,z2)=(0.6987,0.3177,7.0280)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})^{*}=(0.6987,0.3177,7.0280) both lines meet, so that the stable fluid-fluid demixing transition disappears at this point. This gives rise to the phase diagram displayed in Fig. 3(b), for z1=z1z_{1}=z_{1}^{*}, with the (now completely metastable) RFRF-F0F0 coexistence line ending at the special point, so that the RFRF-S2S2 coexistence surface for z1<z1z_{1}<z_{1}^{*} now becomes a FF-S2S2 coexistence, which meets the F0F0-S2S2 coexistence line at the special point.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Phase diagrams for fixed (a) z1=0.10z_{1}=0.10, (b) z1=0.3177z_{1}=0.3177 and (c) z1=1.10z_{1}=1.10. In all panels, the dashed lines represent stable coexistence lines between the phases they are separating, while the dashed-dotted lines are the metastable RFRF-F0F0 coexistence lines. The solid line in (c) is the FF-S1S1 critical line. The square in (a) is the RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 TP, while the stars are the RFRF-F0F0 CP and the triangle in (b) represents the special point where the TP line ends.

For not so large values of z1>z1z_{1}>z_{1}^{*}, one still finds the RFRF-F0F0 coexistence ending at the CP line, as shows Fig. 3(c) for z1=1.1z_{1}=1.1, but now this line is also metastable, occurring inside the region where the S2S2 phase is the most stable one. Therefore, the more complex scenario observed for small z1z_{1} gives place to a simple FF-S2S2 discontinuous transition. Namely, for z1>z1z_{1}>z_{1}^{*} the fluid-fluid demixing transition becomes preempted by the fluid-solid transition. Hence, at the special point the CP line becomes metastable and the RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 TP line ends. A summary of these behaviors in the 3D space is presented in Fig. 4.

Although in general we will not be interested in discussing metastable transitions here, it is interesting to take a close look on this for the fluid-fluid demixing, to verify how further the RFRF-F0F0 coexistence surface goes as z1z_{1} increases. First, we notice that, regardless the value of z1z_{1}, the metastable part of this surface is always limited from above, i.e., it ends when it meets the spinodal of the RFRF phase, as shown in Figs. 5(a) and 5(b). Second, for large z1z_{1} the S1S1 phase also appears in the phase diagram in the region of small z0z_{0} and z2z_{2}, as seen in Fig. 3(c), and the fluid phase let to be stable in such region. This is clearly seen by comparing the phase diagram in Fig. 5(c) with the spinodals of the fluid phases in Fig. 5(b). Curiously, by increasing z1z_{1} the spinodal of the fluid phase develops a cusp, which approximates of the (metastable) CP line as z1z_{1} increases, see Fig. 5(a) for z1=2.3z_{1}=2.3. Such approximation occurs until z12.3731z_{1}\approx 2.3731, after which the cusp meets the RFRF and F0F0 spinodals (in the point where there was the CP line), changing completely the scenario of such spinodals. In fact, as demonstrated in Fig. 5(b), for z1=2.5z_{1}=2.5, the stability region of RFRF phase becomes now limited to a closed domain of the (z0,z2z_{0},z_{2}) phase diagram, and the (metastable) RFRF-F0F0 coexistence line ends at the point where the spinodal of the F0F0 phase crosses the one for the RFRF phase. Therefore, the CP line ends at z12.3731z_{1}\approx 2.3731, while the fluid-fluid demixing still exists for larger values of z1z_{1}. However, by increasing z1z_{1}, one observes that the domain of the RFRF stability shrinks, yielding a decreasing in the in RFRF-F0F0 coexistence line, which finally disappears at z1=5.7157z_{1}=5.7157.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Part of the 3D phase diagram for the ternary mixture in the activity space, highlighting the region around which the fluid-fluid demixing surface [the shaded (orange) one in the plot] takes place. All the surfaces presented here (separating the phases RFRF- or FF-S2S2, F0F0-S2S2 and RFRF-F0F0) are coexistence surfaces. The triangle is the special point, where the CP line meets the RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 TP line. The star and the square represent the CP and the TP point, respectively, in the (z0,0,z2)(z_{0},0,z_{2}) plane.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Spinodals of the disordered fluid phases (solid lines) and the metastable RFRF-F0F0 coexistence lines (dash-dotted lines) for fixed (a) z1=2.3z_{1}=2.3 and (b) z1=2.5z_{1}=2.5. The lines with triangles, circles and crosses are the RFRF, F0F0 and fluid (where RFRF and F0F0 phases cannot be distinguished) spinodals, respectively. The star in (a) is the metastable CP. For comparison, the phase diagram for z1=2.5z_{1}=2.5 is presented in (c), where the dashed lines represent coexistence lines between the indicated phases they are separating and the square is the TP. The phase diagram for z1=2.3z_{1}=2.3 is quite similar to this one.

III.3 The phase diagram for the ternary mixture

From the results in the previous subsection, one knows that for z1<z1z_{1}<z_{1}^{*} the 3D phase diagram presents three coexistence surfaces (RFRF-F0F0, RFRF-S2S2 and F0F0-S2S2), a RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 TP line and a CP line, which meet (and ends or becomes metastable) at the special point, as depicted in Fig. 4. Moreover, for z1>z1z_{1}>z_{1}^{*}, but not so large, this behavior gives place to a simple FF-S2S2 coexistence surface.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Phase diagrams for fixed (a) z0=0.20z_{0}=0.20 and (b) z0=1.20z_{0}=1.20. The solid and dashed lines represent critical and coexistence lines, respectively, between the indicated phases they are separating. The black squares and the circle denote the TP and the TC point, respectively.

As shows Fig. 3(c), a critical FF-S1S1 transition line is found in slices of the phase diagram for z1z_{1} fixed (and large enough), giving rise to a critical FF-S1S1 surface in the 3D space, as expected from the behavior of the binary mixtures. Such surface starts at z1=0.7284z_{1}=0.7284 — which turns out to be the point of minimum (in relation to z1z_{1}) of the FF-S1S1 critical line in the 0NN-1NN mixture [i.e., in the plane (z0,z1,0z_{0},z_{1},0)] NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN — and exists in a limited region of the parameter space. Namely, it gives place to a discontinuous FF-S1S1 transition surface for large z1z_{1}, as confirmed in Fig. 5(c). These features are better seen in slices of fixed and small z0z_{0}, as the one in Fig. 6(a) for z0=0.2z_{0}=0.2, where one finds a phase diagram similar to the one for z0=0z_{0}=0, with a continuous and a discontinuous FF-S1S1 transition line meeting at a TC point. This confirms not only the existence of a critical and a coexistence FF-S1S1 surface, but also the presence of a TC line where they meet in the 3D space. By analyzing several slices for fixed z0z_{0} or z2z_{2}, we have accurately determined the TC line, which connects the two tricritical points found in the planes (z0,z1,0)(z_{0},z_{1},0) and (0,z1,z2)(0,z_{1},z_{2}). Interestingly, it presents a complex non-monotonic behavior, attaining a maximum point, with respect to z1z_{1} and z2z_{2}, at (z0,z1,z2)TC,max=(0.6719,1.4216,4.6678)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})_{TC,max}=(0.6719,1.4216,4.6678). This line, as well as the critical and coexistence FF-S1S1 surfaces are depicted in Fig. 7, which shows this part of the 3D phase diagram in detail.

The z0z_{0}-slices, as those in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b), also confirm the presence of the discontinuous FF-S2S2 surface, as well as unveil the existence of a surface of solid-solid (S1S1-S2S2) demixing in the ternary mixture. Moreover, one always observes that the FF-S1S1, FF-S2S2 and S1S1-S2S2 coexistence surfaces meet in a line of triple points (the FF-S1S1-S2S2 TP line), as seen in Figs. 5(c) and 6. This line starts at the triple point of the 1NN-2NN mixture [i.e., in the (0,z1,z20,z_{1},z_{2}) plane] and extends to z0,z1,z2z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}\rightarrow\infty; its behavior is also shown in Fig. 7. It is important to notice that, since the TC line (and then the critical FF-S1S1 surface) ends at a finite value of z0z_{0}, for large values of this activity everything we find in this part of the 3D phase diagram are the FF-S1S1, FF-S2S2 and S1S1-S2S2 coexistence surfaces meeting at the TP line [see Fig. 6(b)].

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Part of the 3D phase diagram for the ternary mixture in the activity space, highlighting the region where the critical FF-S1S1 surface [the shaded (red) one in the plot] takes place. The the dashed lines indicate the FF-S1S1 coexistence surface, which meets the critical surface at the TC line and is limited from above by the FF-S1S1-S2S2 TP line. The circles and the square mark the location of the TC line and TP line, respectively, in the boundary planes.

The existence of the FF-S1S1-S2S2 TP line in the limit of z0,z1,z2z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}\rightarrow\infty can be justified by the existence of a F0F0-S1S1, a FF-S2S2 and a S1S1-S2S2 coexistence line in the binary mixtures, all of them extending to infinity NT0NN2NN ; NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN . Since the RRs assume simple forms in such limit, it is straightforward to determine the behavior of the TP line there. For instance, the fixed point for the RRs in the fluid phase has the form Ai,0=Bi,0=Ci,0=Di,0=1A_{i,0}=B_{i,0}=C_{i,0}=D_{i,0}=1 and Ai,j=Bi,j=Ci,j=Di,j=0A_{i,j}=B_{i,j}=C_{i,j}=D_{i,j}=0 for i=1,2i=1,2 and j=1,2j=1,2. For the S1S1 phase one finds A1,j=B1,j=C1,j=D1,j=1A_{1,j}=B_{1,j}=C_{1,j}=D_{1,j}=1 for j=0,1j=0,1, while all others RRs vanish, when the sublattices indexed by 11 are the more populated ones. In the S2S2 phase, if the sublattices A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} are the ones more populated, one has Ai,j=1A_{i,j}=1 and Bi,j=Ci,j=Di,j=0B_{i,j}=C_{i,j}=D_{i,j}=0, for i=1,2i=1,2 and j=0,1,2j=0,1,2. Using these solutions, it is simple to calculate the free energies in this limit, being ϕ(F)=(1+z0)8\phi^{(F)}=(1+z_{0})^{8}, ϕ(S1)=(1+z0+z1)4\phi^{(S1)}=(1+z_{0}+z_{1})^{4} and ϕ(S2)=(1+z0+z1+z2)2\phi^{(S2)}=(1+z_{0}+z_{1}+z_{2})^{2}. By making ϕ(F)=ϕ(S1)=ϕ(S2)\phi^{(F)}=\phi^{(S1)}=\phi^{(S2)} and solving in terms of z0z_{0}, one finds

z1=z02+z0z_{1}=z_{0}^{2}+z_{0} (6)

and

z2=z04+4z03+5z02+2z0.z_{2}=z_{0}^{4}+4z_{0}^{3}+5z_{0}^{2}+2z_{0}. (7)

Therefore, as z0z_{0}\rightarrow\infty this TP line behaves has z1z02z_{1}\approx z_{0}^{2} and z2z04z_{2}\approx z_{0}^{4}. This result can be understood as follows: at full occupancy an 1NN particle effectively occupies the volume of two 0NN ones, while a 2NN particle occupies the volume of four 0NN ones, in agreement with the exponents above. The calculated free energies also allow us to determine the behavior of the FF-S1S1, FF-S2S2 and S1S1-S2S2 coexistence surfaces in the limit of z0,z1,z2z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}\rightarrow\infty, where one finds z1z02z_{1}\approx z_{0}^{2} and z2z04z_{2}\approx z_{0}^{4} for the FF-S1S1 and FF-S2S2 cases, respectively. Therefore, in slices of the 3D phase diagram for very large and fixed z0z_{0}, these surfaces shall appear as straight lines at constant z1z_{1} and z2z_{2}, respectively. The S1S1-S2S2 coexistence surface, on the other hand, behaves as z2(z0+z1)2z_{2}\approx(z_{0}+z_{1})^{2}, being a quadratic function of z1z_{1} (z0z_{0}) for fixed z0z_{0} (z1z_{1}). In fact, these results are somewhat confirmed in Fig.6(b) for z0=1.2z_{0}=1.2, where we see that the FF-S1S1 and FF-S2S2 lines occur at almost constant values (specially the former one), while the S1S1-S2S2 line is not so straight, indicating the existence of a nonlinear dependence between z2z_{2} and z1z_{1}. Results [not shown] for slices for much larger values of z0z_{0} indeed confirm the correctness of the predicted surfaces.

Figure 8 presents the complete 3D phase diagram in the space of activities, summarizing all the features discussed so far. In face of its complexity — it has a fluid-fluid, a solid-solid and several fluid-solid coexistence surfaces, with three of them (FF-S1S1, FF-S2S2, and S1S1-S2S2) extending to z0,z1,z2z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}\rightarrow\infty, beyond a critical fluid-solid surface, a CP line, a TC line and two TP lines — it is a bit hard drawing this phase diagram in an intelligible way. Anyhow, it is important to let clear how the partial diagrams depicted in Figs. 4 and 7 connects, what are the sizes of the transition surfaces (at least the ones which exist in limited domains) and so on.

At this point, it is important to stress that we have carefully looked for new phases in the general case, but only the four phases already present in the binary mixtures were found.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Phase diagram for the ternary mixture in the activity space, indicating all phases and transition surfaces and lines, following the same scheme of symbols and colors from the previous figures.

III.4 The surfaces of minimum density

As discussed in subsection IIIA, two lines of minimum density (LMDs) were found in the binary mixtures inside the fluid phase, one in the 0NN-1NN (z2=0z_{2}=0) and other in the 0NN-2NN (z1=0z_{1}=0) case. In the former system, the LMD starts at z00.333z_{0}\approx 0.333 when z10z_{1}\rightarrow 0, while in the last one it starts at z00.20z_{0}\approx 0.20 when z20z_{2}\rightarrow 0, and in both cases they end at the spinodal of the fluid phase, inside regions where the corresponding solid phases are more stable than the fluid NT0NN1NN-1NN2NN ; NT0NN2NN . The difference between these starting points suggests a complex scenario for the ternary mixture with at least two surfaces of minimum density (SMDs). Before discussing them, however, it is important to remark that such starting points were calculated through a limiting process. For example, for the 0NN-1NN mixture, we located the (z0,z1z_{0},z_{1}) coordinate where the total density — defined as ρT=ρ0+2ρ1+4ρ2\rho_{T}=\rho_{0}+2\rho_{1}+4\rho_{2} — presents a minimum for a given pressure, PP 111In our grand-canonical formalism P=ϕ/a3P=-\phi/a^{3}., i.e., along an isobaric curve of ρT×z0\rho_{T}\times z_{0} (or z1z_{1}) (see, e.g., Fig. 5 in Ref. NT0NN2NN ). Then, by varying PP we can build up the LMD curve and determine it as close as we want of the z0z_{0} axis by making z10z_{1}\rightarrow 0. Exactly on the z0z_{0}-axis, however, one has ρT=z0/(1+z0)\rho_{T}=z_{0}/(1+z_{0}), so that no anomaly exists there.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Surfaces of minimum density in the activity space. The dash-dotted (green), continuous (black) and dashed (red) lines are the z0z_{0}-, z1z_{1}- and z2z_{2}-SMD, respectively. The doted (black) line is the LMD where all three SMDs seems to end. The shaded (blue) surface is part of the FF-S2S2 coexistence surface, above which the SMDs become metastable.

Then, if we take slices of fixed z2>0z_{2}>0, one still finds LMDs in the way just described, forming a SMD in the 3D space. Such z2z_{2}-SMD (since it is obtained for fixed values of z2z_{2}) starts at the LMD in the plane (z0,z1,0)(z_{0},z_{1},0) and varies smoothly in the space, ending at the spinodal of the fluid phase, deep inside the region where the fluid is metastable. Although this surface does not exist exactly in the plane (z0,0,z2)(z_{0},0,z_{2}), using the limiting process we can obtain it as close as we want of this plane, so that there exists a LMD for z10z_{1}\rightarrow 0 limiting this surface (see Fig. 9). Proceeding in the same way, but now considering slices of fixed z1z_{1}, a second SMD (the z1z_{1}-SMD) is obtained, which starts in the LMD on the plane (z0,0,z2)(z_{0},0,z_{2}) and also ends at the spinodal of the fluid phase in the metastable region. In this case, the SMD does not exist exactly in the plane (z0,z1,0)(z_{0},z_{1},0), but it can be determined in the limit of z20z_{2}\rightarrow 0. This z1z_{1}-SMD is also shown in Fig. 9. The existence of these two SMDs indicates, for sake of completeness, the existence of a third one for fixed z0z_{0}. As shown in Fig. 9, such z0z_{0}-SMD indeed exists in the 3D space and, albeit it cannot be observed exactly in the planes (z0,z1,0)(z_{0},z_{1},0) and (z0,0,z2)(z_{0},0,z_{2}), it can be obtained in the limits z20z_{2}\rightarrow 0 and z10z_{1}\rightarrow 0, respectively. In such limits, the starting point of the z0z_{0}-SMD is at z00.50z_{0}\approx 0.50 and, similarly to the other SMDs, it also ends in the spinodal of the fluid phase. As observed in Fig. 9, the three SMDs become quite close for large z2z_{2} and they seem to be limited from above by a single line. However, it is quite hard to assure this numerically and it may be the case that they end at different (but very close) lines, or become a single surface before this.

IV Conclusions

We have determined the thermodynamic behavior of a ternary mixture of hard spheres, defined on the cubic lattice, composed by point-like particles (0NN) and particles which exclude up to their first (1NN) and second (2NN) neighbors. We treat this model by solving it on a Husimi lattice built with cubes, where four phases were found in the phase diagram, being two fluid and two solid ones, separated by several coexistence surfaces and a critical surface, which end or meet in lines of critical, tricritical and triple points. One of the disordered phases is a regular fluid (RFRF), in the sense that the particle densities (ρ0\rho_{0}, ρ1\rho_{1} and ρ2\rho_{2}) strongly depends on the activities, while in the second disordered fluid (F0F0) phase one always has ρ0ρ1\rho_{0}\gg\rho_{1} and ρ0ρ2\rho_{0}\gg\rho_{2}. The solid S1S1 (S2S2) phase is featured by a sublattice ordering of 1NN (2NN) particles. We notice that columnar and smectic phases, observed for hard cubes on the cubic lattice Lafuente ; Rajesh , are absent in our solution. Although this can be due to the hierarchical structure of the Husimi lattice, we remark that these phases have never been found in previous studies of the pure 1NN and 2NN models on the cubic lattice Gaunt ; Yamagata ; HB ; Panagiotopoulos , strongly suggesting that they should indeed not appear in their mixture.

A fluid-fluid (RFRF-F0F0) demixing surface is observed in the system, which is limited from below [in the (z0,z1,z2z_{0},z_{1},z_{2}) space] by a line of critical points (CP), whose coordinate z2,cz_{2,c} increases fast with z1,cz_{1,c}, while the CP line and the whole RFRF-F0F0 coexistence surface exist in a narrow range of z0z_{0}. This shows that, by increasing ρ1\rho_{1}, a large ρ2\rho_{2} is need to yield the demixing, confirming that the fluid-fluid transition is not a feature restricted to the 0NN-2NN mixture, but the presence of the 1NN particles turns its appearance more difficult. In fact, although the demixing surface extends for a large portion of the phase diagram, it is stable only in a small area, when compared with the other transition surfaces. Such stable part is limited from above by the RFRF-F0F0-S2S2 triple point line, which ends when it meets the CP line at a special point [located at (z0,z1,z2)=(0.6987,0.3177,7.0280)(z_{0},z_{1},z_{2})^{*}=(0.6987,0.3177,7.0280)]. Therefore, the demixing surface becomes completely metastable (i.e., preempted by the FF-S2S2 transition) already for z1>z1z_{1}>z_{1}^{*}, corresponding to a very small density of 1NN particles: ρ1>ρ1=0.014\rho_{1}>\rho_{1}^{*}=0.014. This scenario lets clear why a fluid-fluid demixing has not been observed in the 0NN-1NN and 1NN-2NN binary mixtures. A possible explanation for this fact is that, although these are nonadditive mixtures, the particle sizes are not so dissimilar as in the 0NN-2NN case to yield a demixing. Further investigations of kkNN mixtures with larger kk’s are necessary to confirm this.

We have also observed an anomaly in isobaric curves of the total density of particles (versus ziz_{i}, with i=0,1,2i=0,1,2), inside the fluid phase, which increase after passing to a minimum. Three surfaces of minimum density (SMDs) were found in the 3D parameter space, each one defined for one of the activities kept fixed. These SMDs start at different lines when we approximate the planes (z0,0,z2z_{0},0,z_{2}) and (z0,z1,0z_{0},z_{1},0) by making z10z_{1}\rightarrow 0 and z20z_{2}\rightarrow 0, respectively, and ends at the spinodal surface of the fluid phase. For very large z2z_{2}, deep inside the metastable fluid region, these three surfaces either become quite close or collapse into a single surface. Although it is hard to decide this numerically, it is simple to figure out that this occurs because in this region one has ρ2ρ0\rho_{2}\gg\rho_{0} and ρ2ρ1\rho_{2}\gg\rho_{1}, so that ρT4ρ2\rho_{T}\approx 4\rho_{2} independently of the activity being fixed. We remark that density anomalies are typically found in complex polymorphic fluids, whose modeling is usually very elaborated (as is the case, e.g., in lattice gases with directional interactions) polymorphism . Therefore, the existence of this kind of anomaly in the simple athermal system analyzed here indicates that mixtures of hard spheres (and hard disks as well tiago15 ) might be useful as a starting point to understand anomalies in more complex fluids.

Acknowledgements.
We acknowledge support from CNPq, CAPES and FAPEMIG (Brazilian agencies).

Appendix A Recursion relations for the ternary mixture

The recursion relations (RRs) for the partial partition functions (ppf’s) of the 0NN-1NN-2NN mixture were obtained using the method described in Sec. II. For the root site in the sublattice A1A_{1}, they are given by

a1,\displaystyle a^{\prime}_{1,\varnothing} =\displaystyle= b1,c1,d1,a2,b2,c2,d2,{(1+z0B1,0)(1+z0C1,0)(1+z0D1,0)(1+z0A2,0)(1+z0B2,0)(1+z0C2,0)\displaystyle b_{1,\varnothing}c_{1,\varnothing}d_{1,\varnothing}a_{2,\varnothing}b_{2,\varnothing}c_{2,\varnothing}d_{2,\varnothing}\{(1+z_{0}B_{1,0})(1+z_{0}C_{1,0})(1+z_{0}D_{1,0})(1+z_{0}A_{2,0})(1+z_{0}B_{2,0})(1+z_{0}C_{2,0})
(1+z0D2,0)+z1(B1,1+C1,1+D1,1+A2,1+B2,1+C2,1+D2,1)\displaystyle(1+z_{0}D_{2,0})+z_{1}(B_{1,1}+C_{1,1}+D_{1,1}+A_{2,1}+B_{2,1}+C_{2,1}+D_{2,1})
+\displaystyle+ z12[B1,1(D1,1+A2,1+B2,1+C2,1)+C1,1(B2,1+C2,1+D2,1)+D1,1(A2,1+C2,1+D2,1)+A2,1C2,1+B2,1D2,1]\displaystyle z_{1}^{2}[B_{1,1}(D_{1,1}+A_{2,1}+B_{2,1}+C_{2,1})+C_{1,1}(B_{2,1}+C_{2,1}+D_{2,1})+D_{1,1}(A_{2,1}+C_{2,1}+D_{2,1})+A_{2,1}C_{2,1}+B_{2,1}D_{2,1}]
+\displaystyle+ z13[B1,1D1,1(A2,1+C2,1)+B1,1A2,1C2,1+C1,1B2,1D2,1+D1,1A2,1C2,1]\displaystyle z_{1}^{3}[B_{1,1}D_{1,1}(A_{2,1}+C_{2,1})+B_{1,1}A_{2,1}C_{2,1}+C_{1,1}B_{2,1}D_{2,1}+D_{1,1}A_{2,1}C_{2,1}]
+\displaystyle+ z14B1,1D1,1A2,1C2,1+z0z1[B1,1(D1,0+A2,0+B2,0+C2,0)+C1,1(B2,0+C2,0+D2,0)\displaystyle z_{1}^{4}B_{1,1}D_{1,1}A_{2,1}C_{2,1}+z_{0}z_{1}[B_{1,1}(D_{1,0}+A_{2,0}+B_{2,0}+C_{2,0})+C_{1,1}(B_{2,0}+C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})
+\displaystyle+ D1,1(B1,0+A2,0+C2,0+D2,0)+A2,1(B1,0+D1,0+C2,0)+B2,1(B1,0+C1,0+D2,0)\displaystyle D_{1,1}(B_{1,0}+A_{2,0}+C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+A_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+D_{1,0}+C_{2,0})+B_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+C_{1,0}+D_{2,0})
+\displaystyle+ C2,1(B1,0+C1,0+D1,0+A2,0)+D2,1(C1,0+D1,0+B2,0)]\displaystyle C_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+C_{1,0}+D_{1,0}+A_{2,0})+D_{2,1}(C_{1,0}+D_{1,0}+B_{2,0})]
+\displaystyle+ z02z1[B1,1D1,0(A2,0+B2,0+C2,0)+B1,1A2,0(B2,0+C2,0)+B1,1B2,0C2,0+C1,1B2,0(C2,0+D2,0)\displaystyle z_{0}^{2}z_{1}[B_{1,1}D_{1,0}(A_{2,0}+B_{2,0}+C_{2,0})+B_{1,1}A_{2,0}(B_{2,0}+C_{2,0})+B_{1,1}B_{2,0}C_{2,0}+C_{1,1}B_{2,0}(C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})
+\displaystyle+ C1,1C2,0D2,0+D1,1B1,0(A2,0+C2,0+D2,0)+D1,1A2,0(C2,0+D2,0)+D1,1C2,0D2,0\displaystyle C_{1,1}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}+D_{1,1}B_{1,0}(A_{2,0}+C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+D_{1,1}A_{2,0}(C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+D_{1,1}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}
+\displaystyle+ A2,1B1,0(D1,0+C2,0)+A2,1D1,0C2,0+B2,1B1,0(C1,0+D2,0)+B2,1C1,0D2,0\displaystyle A_{2,1}B_{1,0}(D_{1,0}+C_{2,0})+A_{2,1}D_{1,0}C_{2,0}+B_{2,1}B_{1,0}(C_{1,0}+D_{2,0})+B_{2,1}C_{1,0}D_{2,0}
+\displaystyle+ C2,1B1,0(C1,0+D1,0+A2,0)+C2,1C1,0(D1,0+A2,0)+C2,1D1,0A2,0+D2,1C1,0(D1,0+B2,0)+D2,1D1,0B2,0]\displaystyle C_{2,1}B_{1,0}(C_{1,0}+D_{1,0}+A_{2,0})+C_{2,1}C_{1,0}(D_{1,0}+A_{2,0})+C_{2,1}D_{1,0}A_{2,0}+D_{2,1}C_{1,0}(D_{1,0}+B_{2,0})+D_{2,1}D_{1,0}B_{2,0}]
+\displaystyle+ z03z1[B1,1D1,0A2,0(B2,0+C2,0)+B1,1D1,0B2,0C2,0+B1,1A2,0B2,0C2,0+C1,1B2,0C2,0D2,0\displaystyle z_{0}^{3}z_{1}[B_{1,1}D_{1,0}A_{2,0}(B_{2,0}+C_{2,0})+B_{1,1}D_{1,0}B_{2,0}C_{2,0}+B_{1,1}A_{2,0}B_{2,0}C_{2,0}+C_{1,1}B_{2,0}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}
+\displaystyle+ D1,1B1,0A2,0(C2,0+D2,0)+D1,1B1,0C2,0D2,0+D1,1A2,0C2,0D2,0+A2,1B1,0D1,0C2,0+B2,1B1,0C1,0D2,0\displaystyle D_{1,1}B_{1,0}A_{2,0}(C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+D_{1,1}B_{1,0}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}+D_{1,1}A_{2,0}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}+A_{2,1}B_{1,0}D_{1,0}C_{2,0}+B_{2,1}B_{1,0}C_{1,0}D_{2,0}
+\displaystyle+ C2,1B1,0C1,0(D1,0+A2,0)+C2,1B1,0D1,0A2,0+C2,1C1,0D1,0A2,0+D2,1C1,0D1,0B2,0]\displaystyle C_{2,1}B_{1,0}C_{1,0}(D_{1,0}+A_{2,0})+C_{2,1}B_{1,0}D_{1,0}A_{2,0}+C_{2,1}C_{1,0}D_{1,0}A_{2,0}+D_{2,1}C_{1,0}D_{1,0}B_{2,0}]
+\displaystyle+ z04z1(B1,1D1,0A2,0B2,0C2,0+D1,1B1,0A2,0C2,0D2,0+C2,1B1,0C1,0D1,0A2,0)\displaystyle z_{0}^{4}z_{1}(B_{1,1}D_{1,0}A_{2,0}B_{2,0}C_{2,0}+D_{1,1}B_{1,0}A_{2,0}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}+C_{2,1}B_{1,0}C_{1,0}D_{1,0}A_{2,0})
+\displaystyle+ z0z12[B1,1D1,1(A2,0+C2,0)+B1,1A2,1(D1,0+C2,0)+B1,1C2,1(D1,0+A2,0)+C1,1B2,1D2,0+C1,1D2,1B2,0\displaystyle z_{0}z_{1}^{2}[B_{1,1}D_{1,1}(A_{2,0}+C_{2,0})+B_{1,1}A_{2,1}(D_{1,0}+C_{2,0})+B_{1,1}C_{2,1}(D_{1,0}+A_{2,0})+C_{1,1}B_{2,1}D_{2,0}+C_{1,1}D_{2,1}B_{2,0}
+\displaystyle+ D1,1A2,1(B1,0+C2,0)+D1,1C2,1(B1,0+A2,0)+A2,1C2,1(B1,0+D1,0)+B2,1D2,1C1,0]\displaystyle D_{1,1}A_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+C_{2,0})+D_{1,1}C_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+A_{2,0})+A_{2,1}C_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+D_{1,0})+B_{2,1}D_{2,1}C_{1,0}]
+\displaystyle+ z02z12(B1,1D1,1A2,0C2,0+B1,1A2,1D1,0C2,0+B1,1C2,1D1,0A2,0+D1,1A2,1B1,0C2,0\displaystyle z_{0}^{2}z_{1}^{2}(B_{1,1}D_{1,1}A_{2,0}C_{2,0}+B_{1,1}A_{2,1}D_{1,0}C_{2,0}+B_{1,1}C_{2,1}D_{1,0}A_{2,0}+D_{1,1}A_{2,1}B_{1,0}C_{2,0}
+\displaystyle+ D1,1C2,1B1,0A2,0+A2,1C2,1B1,0D1,0)+z0z13(B1,1D1,1A2,1C2,0+B1,1D1,1C2,1A2,0+D1,1A2,1C2,1B1,0\displaystyle D_{1,1}C_{2,1}B_{1,0}A_{2,0}+A_{2,1}C_{2,1}B_{1,0}D_{1,0})+z_{0}z_{1}^{3}(B_{1,1}D_{1,1}A_{2,1}C_{2,0}+B_{1,1}D_{1,1}C_{2,1}A_{2,0}+D_{1,1}A_{2,1}C_{2,1}B_{1,0}
+\displaystyle+ B1,1A2,1C2,1D1,0)+z2(B1,2+C1,2+D1,2+A2,2+B2,2+C2,2+D2,2)\displaystyle B_{1,1}A_{2,1}C_{2,1}D_{1,0})+z_{2}(B_{1,2}+C_{1,2}+D_{1,2}+A_{2,2}+B_{2,2}+C_{2,2}+D_{2,2})
+\displaystyle+ z22(B1,2B2,2+C1,2C2,2+D1,2D2,2)+z0z2(B1,2B2,0+C1,2C2,0+D1,2D2,0+B2,2B1,0+C2,2C1,0+D2,2D1,0)\displaystyle z_{2}^{2}(B_{1,2}B_{2,2}+C_{1,2}C_{2,2}+D_{1,2}D_{2,2})+z_{0}z_{2}(B_{1,2}B_{2,0}+C_{1,2}C_{2,0}+D_{1,2}D_{2,0}+B_{2,2}B_{1,0}+C_{2,2}C_{1,0}+D_{2,2}D_{1,0})
+\displaystyle+ z1z2(B1,2B2,1+C1,2C2,1+D1,2D2,1+B2,2B1,1+C2,2C1,1+D2,2D1,1)}\displaystyle z_{1}z_{2}(B_{1,2}B_{2,1}+C_{1,2}C_{2,1}+D_{1,2}D_{2,1}+B_{2,2}B_{1,1}+C_{2,2}C_{1,1}+D_{2,2}D_{1,1})\}
a1,0\displaystyle a^{\prime}_{1,0} =\displaystyle= b1,c1,d1,a2,b2,c2,d2,{(1+z0B1,0)(1+z0C1,0)(1+z0D1,0)(1+z0A2,0)(1+z0B2,0)(1+z0C2,0)\displaystyle b_{1,\varnothing}c_{1,\varnothing}d_{1,\varnothing}a_{2,\varnothing}b_{2,\varnothing}c_{2,\varnothing}d_{2,\varnothing}\{(1+z_{0}B_{1,0})(1+z_{0}C_{1,0})(1+z_{0}D_{1,0})(1+z_{0}A_{2,0})(1+z_{0}B_{2,0})(1+z_{0}C_{2,0})
(1+z0D2,0)+z1(C1,1+A2,1+B2,1+D2,1)+z12(C1,1B2,1+C1,1D2,1+B2,1D2,1)+z13C1,1B2,1D2,1\displaystyle(1+z_{0}D_{2,0})+z_{1}(C_{1,1}+A_{2,1}+B_{2,1}+D_{2,1})+z_{1}^{2}(C_{1,1}B_{2,1}+C_{1,1}D_{2,1}+B_{2,1}D_{2,1})+z_{1}^{3}C_{1,1}B_{2,1}D_{2,1}
+\displaystyle+ z0z1[C1,1(B2,0+C2,0+D2,0)+A2,1(B1,0+D1,0+C2,0)+B2,1(B1,0+C1,0+D2,0)+D2,1(C1,0+D1,0+B2,0)]\displaystyle z_{0}z_{1}[C_{1,1}(B_{2,0}+C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+A_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+D_{1,0}+C_{2,0})+B_{2,1}(B_{1,0}+C_{1,0}+D_{2,0})+D_{2,1}(C_{1,0}+D_{1,0}+B_{2,0})]
+\displaystyle+ z02z1[C1,1B2,0(C2,0+D2,0)+C1,1C2,0D2,0+A2,1B1,0(D1,0+C2,0)+A2,1D1,0C2,0\displaystyle z_{0}^{2}z_{1}[C_{1,1}B_{2,0}(C_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+C_{1,1}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}+A_{2,1}B_{1,0}(D_{1,0}+C_{2,0})+A_{2,1}D_{1,0}C_{2,0}
+\displaystyle+ B2,1B1,0(C1,0+D2,0)+B2,1C1,0D2,0+D2,1C1,0(D1,0+B2,0)+D2,1D1,0B2,0]\displaystyle B_{2,1}B_{1,0}(C_{1,0}+D_{2,0})+B_{2,1}C_{1,0}D_{2,0}+D_{2,1}C_{1,0}(D_{1,0}+B_{2,0})+D_{2,1}D_{1,0}B_{2,0}]
+\displaystyle+ z03z1(C1,1B2,0C2,0D2,0+A2,1B1,0D1,0C2,0+B2,1B1,0C1,0D2,0+D2,1C1,0D1,0B2,0)\displaystyle z_{0}^{3}z_{1}(C_{1,1}B_{2,0}C_{2,0}D_{2,0}+A_{2,1}B_{1,0}D_{1,0}C_{2,0}+B_{2,1}B_{1,0}C_{1,0}D_{2,0}+D_{2,1}C_{1,0}D_{1,0}B_{2,0})
+\displaystyle+ z0z12(C1,1B2,1D2,0+C1,1D2,1B2,0+B2,1D2,1C1,0)+z2A2,2}\displaystyle z_{0}z_{1}^{2}(C_{1,1}B_{2,1}D_{2,0}+C_{1,1}D_{2,1}B_{2,0}+B_{2,1}D_{2,1}C_{1,0})+z_{2}A_{2,2}\}
a1,1\displaystyle a^{\prime}_{1,1} =\displaystyle= b1,c1,d1,a2,b2,c2,d2,{1+z0(C1,0+A2,0+B2,0+D2,0)+z02[C1,0(A2,0+B2,0+D2,0)\displaystyle b_{1,\varnothing}c_{1,\varnothing}d_{1,\varnothing}a_{2,\varnothing}b_{2,\varnothing}c_{2,\varnothing}d_{2,\varnothing}\{1+z_{0}(C_{1,0}+A_{2,0}+B_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+z_{0}^{2}[C_{1,0}(A_{2,0}+B_{2,0}+D_{2,0})
+\displaystyle+ A2,0(B2,0+D2,0)+B2,0D2,0]+z03[C1,0A2,0(B2,0+D2,0)+C1,0B2,0D2,0+A2,0B2,0D2,0]\displaystyle A_{2,0}(B_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+B_{2,0}D_{2,0}]+z_{0}^{3}[C_{1,0}A_{2,0}(B_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+C_{1,0}B_{2,0}D_{2,0}+A_{2,0}B_{2,0}D_{2,0}]
+\displaystyle+ z04C1,0A2,0B2,0D2,0+z1(C1,1+A2,1+B2,1+D2,1)+z12(C1,1(B2,1+D2,1)+B2,1D2,1)\displaystyle z_{0}^{4}C_{1,0}A_{2,0}B_{2,0}D_{2,0}+z_{1}(C_{1,1}+A_{2,1}+B_{2,1}+D_{2,1})+z_{1}^{2}(C_{1,1}(B_{2,1}+D_{2,1})+B_{2,1}D_{2,1})
+\displaystyle+ z13C1,1B2,1D2,1+z0z1[C1,1(B2,0+D2,0)+B2,1(C1,0+D2,0)+D2,1(C1,0+B2,0)]\displaystyle z_{1}^{3}C_{1,1}B_{2,1}D_{2,1}+z_{0}z_{1}[C_{1,1}(B_{2,0}+D_{2,0})+B_{2,1}(C_{1,0}+D_{2,0})+D_{2,1}(C_{1,0}+B_{2,0})]
+\displaystyle+ z02z1(C1,1B2,0D2,0+B2,1C1,0D2,0+D2,1C1,0B2,0)\displaystyle z_{0}^{2}z_{1}(C_{1,1}B_{2,0}D_{2,0}+B_{2,1}C_{1,0}D_{2,0}+D_{2,1}C_{1,0}B_{2,0})
+\displaystyle+ z0z12(C1,1B2,1D2,0+C1,1D2,1B2,0+B2,1D2,1C1,0)+z2A2,2}\displaystyle z_{0}z_{1}^{2}(C_{1,1}B_{2,1}D_{2,0}+C_{1,1}D_{2,1}B_{2,0}+B_{2,1}D_{2,1}C_{1,0})+z_{2}A_{2,2}\}
a1,2\displaystyle a^{\prime}_{1,2} =\displaystyle= b1,c1,d1,a2,b2,c2,d2,(1+z0A2,0+z1A2,1+z2A2,2)\displaystyle b_{1,\varnothing}c_{1,\varnothing}d_{1,\varnothing}a_{2,\varnothing}b_{2,\varnothing}c_{2,\varnothing}d_{2,\varnothing}\left(1+z_{0}A_{2,0}+z_{1}A_{2,1}+z_{2}A_{2,2}\right) (8d)

where Ai,jA_{i,j}, Bi,jB_{i,j}, Ci,jC_{i,j} and Di,jD_{i,j}, with i=1,2i=1,2 and j=0,1,2j=0,1,2, are the ratios defined in Eq. 1. The RRs for the other sublattices can be obtained from cyclic permutations of the sublattice labels: A1B2A_{1}\rightarrow B_{2}, B2C1B_{2}\rightarrow C_{1}, C1D2C_{1}\rightarrow D_{2}, D2A1D_{2}\rightarrow A_{1}, together with C2D1C_{2}\rightarrow D_{1}, D1A2D_{1}\rightarrow A_{2}, A2B1A_{2}\rightarrow B_{1}, B1C2B_{1}\rightarrow C_{2}. Following this order, we can find the RRs for the sublattices D2D_{2}, C1C_{1} and B2B_{2}. Those for sublattices A2A_{2}, B1B_{1}, C2C_{2} and D1D_{1} can be obtained from the ones for A1A_{1}, B2B_{2}, C1C_{1} and D2D_{2}, respectively, by exchanging all the sublattice indexes ii (121\leftrightarrow 2). Once we have the RRs for the ppf’s at hand, the ones for their ratios are obtained by simply dividing the corresponding equations, e.g., by dividing the equations 8b, 8c and 8d by 8a.

References

  • (1) N. T. Rodrigues and T. J. Oliveira, Phys. Rev. E 100, 032112 (2019).
  • (2) N. T. Rodrigues and T. J. Oliveira, J. Chem. Phys. 151, 024504 (2019).
  • (3) Quasicrystals: Structure and Physical Properties, edited by H.-R. Trebin (Willey, 2006).
  • (4) R. Elliott, I. Szleifer, and M. Schick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098101 (2006).
  • (5) D. Wüstner and K. Solanko, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1848, 1908 (2015).
  • (6) S. Abbott, Surfactant Science: Principles & Practice (Destech Publications, 2017).
  • (7) W. F. C. Sager. Microemulsion Templating. In: Nanostructured Soft Matter: Experiment, Theory, Simulation and Perspectives, edited by A. V. Zvelindovsky, Springer, 2007, p. 3-44.
  • (8) Granular Matter: An Interdisciplinary Approach, edited by A. Mehta (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994).
  • (9) N. Tasios and M. Dijkstra, J. Chem. Phys. 146 134903 (2017);
  • (10) A. Maciolek and S. Dietrich, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 045001 (2018).
  • (11) F. Seiferling, D. de las Heras, and M. M. Telo da Gama, J. Chem. Phys. 145, 074903 (2016).
  • (12) P.I.C.Teixeira and J.M.Tavares, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 16 (2017).
  • (13) D. Gazzillo, Mol. Phys. 84, 303 (1995).
  • (14) K. Fotouh and K. Shukla, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51 (1996).
  • (15) E. Paschinger, A. Reiner, and G. Kahl, Mol. Phys. 94, 743 (1998).
  • (16) A. König and N. W. Ashcroft, Phys. Rev. E 63, 041203 (2001).
  • (17) H. M. Schaink, Physica A 210, 113 (1994).
  • (18) S. B. Yuste, A. Santos, and M. López de Haro, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 3683 (1998).
  • (19) A. Santos, S. B. Yuste, and M. López de Haro, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 5785 (2002).
  • (20) A. Malijevský, A. Malijevský, S. B. Yuste, A. Santos, and M. López de Haro, Phy. Rev. E 66, 061203 (2002).
  • (21) A. Malijevský, S. Labík, and A. Malijevský, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 1742 (2004).
  • (22) C. N. Patra, and S. K. Ghosh, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 3668 (2003).
  • (23) Y.-X. Yu, J. Chem. Phys. 121, 1535 (2004).
  • (24) K. Hoshino, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 13, 1981 (1983).
  • (25) K. Fotouh and K. Shukla, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 4933 (1996).
  • (26) S. Matsunaga, S. Tamaki, and S. Takeda, Phys. Chem. Liq. 37, 395 (1999).
  • (27) A. Baylaucq, M. Moha-ouchane, and C. Boned, Phys. Chem. Liq., 38, 353 (2000).
  • (28) B. J. Anderson, V. Gopalakrishnan, S. Ramakrishnan, and C. F. Zukoski, Phys. Rev. E 73, 031407 (2006).
  • (29) L. Y. Yi, K. J. Dong, R. P. Zou, and A. B. Yu, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50, 8773 (2011); Powder Technology 224, 129 (2012); R. P. Zou, X. Bian, D. Pinson, R. Y. Yang, A. B. Yu, and P. Zulli, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 20, 335 (2003).
  • (30) D. Frenkel and A. A. Louis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3363 (1992).
  • (31) J. S. van Duijneveldt and H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4264 (1993); J. Stat. Phys. 77, 103 (1995).
  • (32) A. Verberkmoes and B. Nienhuis, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2501 (1999).
  • (33) D. Poland, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 2767 (1984).
  • (34) D.-J. Liu and J. W. Evans, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10977 (2001).
  • (35) T. J. Oliveira and J. F. Stilck, Phys. Rev. E 92, 032101 (2015).
  • (36) T. J. Oliveira and J. F. Stilck, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 184502 (2011).
  • (37) R. Dickman and G. Stell, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 8674 (1995).
  • (38) M. Dijkstra, Phys. Rev. E 58, 7523 (1998).
  • (39) M. Schmidt, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 16, L351 (2004).
  • (40) J. M. Brader and R. L. C. Vink, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 036101 (2007).
  • (41) R. van Roij, B. Mulder, and M. Dijkstra, Physica A 261, 374 (1998).
  • (42) H. H. Wensink, G. J. Vroege, and H. N. W. Lekkerkerker, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 7319 (2001).
  • (43) S. Dubois and A. Perera, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 6354 (2002).
  • (44) S. Varga, A. Galindo, and G. Jackson, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 7207 (2002).
  • (45) M. Schmidt and A. R. Denton, Phys. Rev. E 65, 021508 (2002).
  • (46) Y. Martínez-Ratón, E. Velasco and L. Mederos, Phys. Rev. E 72, 031703 (2005).
  • (47) D. de las Heras, Y. Martínez-Ratón, and E. Velasco, Phys. Rev. E 76, 031704 (2007).
  • (48) D. S. Gaunt, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 3237 (1967).
  • (49) A. Yamagata, Physica A 215, 511 (1994).
  • (50) J. R. Heringa and H. W. J. Blöte, Physica A 232, 369 (1996).
  • (51) A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, J. Chem. Phys. 123, 104504 (2005).
  • (52) P. D. Gujrati, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 809 (1995).
  • (53) C. Buzano, E. De Stefanis, and M. Pretti, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 024506 (2008).
  • (54) T. J. Oliveira, J. F. Stilck, and M. A. A. Barbosa, Phys. Rev. E 82, 051131 (2010).
  • (55) L. Lafuente and J. A. Cuesta, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 10832 (2003).
  • (56) N. Vigneshwar, D. Mandal, K. Damle, D. Dhar, and R. Rajesh, Phys. Rev. E 99, 052129 (2019).
  • (57) Liquid Polymorphism, Advances in Chemical Physics Vol. 152, edited by H. E. Stanley (Wiley, 2013).