Factorization of measures and applications to the weak Goldfeld conjecture
Abstract.
Extending Gross’s result, we prove that a certain factorizaton of measures holds for all and any finite even Dirichlet character of any conductor, rather than only for split and with conductor a power of . Using this generalization, we find lower bounds on the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields for which (under certain assumptions on the elliptic curve) a chosen quadratic twist of an elliptic curve over has rank . We also find lower and upper bounds for the proportion of quadratic twists with rank when we vary , the factor we twist by, under the assumption that (the prime factor counting function) is sufficiently close to a Gaussian distribution, as described by Erdös-Kac. We apply similar methods to cubic twists, and then derive analogous lower bounds for the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields for which a sextic twist has rank . Lastly, for elliptic curves over satisfying certain assumptions, we find positive lower bounds on the proportion of quadratic twists (over ) which have rank and rank , which yields examples of elliptic curves satisfying the weak Goldfeld conjecture.
1. Introduction
1.1. Algebraic and analytic rank
Let be an elliptic curve over . The -points of form an abelian group ) called the Mordell-Weil group. Mordell’s theorem states that is finitely generated, and thus the rank of is a well-defined, nonnegative integer. We call the rank of the algebraic rank of , and denote it as .
However, the algebraic rank is rather difficult to handle. Instead, we may attach the following -function to the elliptic curve :
where
and is the trace of the Frobenius element associated to . (In the multiplicative reduction case, the type of reduction determines the sign of the plus/minus.) This -function satisfies a functional equation relating its values at and , and thus its order of vanishing at is of interest. We call the order of vanishing of at the analytic rank of , and denote it as .
Although the notions of analytic and algebraic rank may seem unrelated, they are not. The famous Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture [6] posits that they are in fact equal.
Conjecture 1.1 (Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer).
The algebraic rank is the same as the analytic rank: .
The BSD conjecture is still wide open, although significant advances have been made. Some of the strongest known results are due to [25], [27], [2], [13], [15], and [16], and they relate the algebraic and analytic ranks in low rank cases.
Theorem 1.2.
If , then .
However, it’s still unproven as to whether implies that .
1.2. Goldfeld’s conjecture
Elliptic curves can be ordered by a property called height. This property is useful when studying statistics of elliptic curves, since it allows us to formalize the notion of an average: to measure the average of a quantity over all elliptic curves, we can calculate the average over the finitely many elliptic curves with height at most , and then take a limit as . The analytic rank of an elliptic curve is one particularly important property that can be studied in this way. Originating from [11] and [18], it is widely believed that among all elliptic curves over , the elliptic curves with analytic rank or should each have density , while elliptic curves with analytic rank greater than should have density . Recent developments by [5], [7], [4], and others have placed increasingly tighter bounds on the average, putting it closer and closer to the conjectured value of ; for example, the average rank is bounded below by and bounded above by .
Understanding the average rank over all elliptic curves is rather difficult. We can instead look at one particular family of elliptic curves: the quadratic twists of a fixed elliptic curve . In [11], Goldfeld postulated that the average rank of a family of quadratic twists should behave in the same way as the set of elliptic curves over .
Conjecture 1.3 (Goldfeld).
Let be an elliptic curve and let be the family of quadratic twists of as varies over the set of fundamental domains. Then of the have analytic rank , have analytic rank , and have analytic rank greater than .
However, Goldfeld’s conjecture is still very open. There is no elliptic curve which has been shown to satisfy Goldfeld’s conjecture. We will instead study the following weaker version of Goldfeld’s conjecture (see, for example, [14, Conjecture 1.2]).
Conjecture 1.4 (Weak Goldfeld).
As in Conjecture 1.3, fix and let be the family of quadratic twists of . A positive proportion of the have rank and a positive proportion of the have rank .
In the last section of this paper, we will prove a result which, given certain conditions on the elliptic curve, guarantee that a positive proportion of its quadratic twists will have rank and ; in addition, we give lower bounds for these proportions.
1.3. Measures on profinite groups
We follow the exposition in [12, §1]. Let be a prime, the ring of -adic integers, the field of -adic numbers, and the algebraic closure of . Now let be the ring of integral elements in . For a commutative profinite group , we consider its completed group algebra over , . The elements of are called measures on . We also define , the total ring of fractions of , as the ring whose elements are for and is not a zero-divisor.
We define a bilinear pairing between continuous functions and measures in by approximating by locally constant functions and taking a limit, as in [22]:
For , we extend this pairing by . This construction is well-defined since it does not depend on the representation of , and agrees with our previous definition for .
Let be an imaginary quadratic field. We will primarily consider the case where or where is complex conjugation, and is a (continuous) character from to .
1.4. Structure of the paper and main results
Let be a prime, an imaginary quadratic field where splits, and a continuous -adic character of which is trivial on complex conjugation. Let be the restriction of to , the quadratic character modulo , and the Teichmüller character. As in [12], define the measures by , , and . Motivated by the classical factorization of -series , Gross [12, Theorem 3.1] derives the factorization of measures
when is split in and is a finite even Dirichlet character whose conductor is a power of . In §2, we extend this result in Theorem 2.13 to all (not just split ) and any finite even Dirichlet character (with any conductor).
We then turn our attention to elliptic curves. In §3, we introduce assumptions on the elliptic curve which will hold for the remainder of the paper. We will assume that is residually reducible modulo (Assumption 3.1), and we will work with integers and imaginary quadratic fields satisfying various divisibility and congruence conditions relating , the conductor of , and the discriminant of (Assumptions 3.2 and 3.3).
In §4, we discuss general congruences of -series and Eisenstein series, especially those associated with quadratic characters. We obtain some auxiliary results concerning the congruence of certain modular forms with Eisenstein series, and calculate the Euler factor at after -depleting (see §4.3).
In §5.1, we use the factorization in Theorem 2.13 to arrive at the two key technical results, Theorem 5.6 and Theorem 5.7. Under Assumption 3.3 and the assumption that satisfies the nonvanishing of a certain class number modulo (for , we need and for , we need ), we find a lower bound on the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields for which has rank . In §5.2, we vary instead. Assuming that is sufficiently close to a Gaussian distribution, we find bounds on the proportion of such that has rank ; these are given in Theorem 5.11.
In §6, we address cubic and sextic twists. In §6.1, we obtain results similar to §4 but for cubic twists. Since sextic twists are a composition of a cubic twist and a quadratic twist, we apply our results from §5.1 to obtain similar results on sextic twists in §6.2. The results, paralleling Theorem 5.6 and Theorem 5.7, are given by Theorem 6.6 and Theorem 6.7.
Finally, in §7, we positive lower bounds on the proportion of for which has rank and , under similar assumptions. Given the assumptions before, plus the additional assumption that , in Theorem 7.1 we find that has rank for at least of all such , and rank for at least of all such . As an easy corollary, we conclude Conjecture 1.4 for certain elliptic curves.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Daniel Kriz for supervising this project, mentoring the author, and providing much needed guidance. The author also thanks Jonathan Love and Professor Andrew Sutherland for many helpful discussions and feedback.
2. Factorization of measures
We follow the notation in [12]. Let be a prime, an imaginary quadratic field where splits, a finite even Dirichlet character on , the restriction of to , and the composition of with some fixed injection . Let be the quadratic character modulo and the Teichmüller character. We define as in [12, p. 92], and obtain the formulas , , and , as in [12, p. 93].
2.1. Dirichlet characters with conductors a prime power
We start with the classical factorization and the functional equation for :
where is the gamma function, is the conductor of , is the Gauss sum, and if while if .
Proposition 2.1.
.
Proof.
By differentiating,
Setting yields
But since , we have
Notably, , which concludes the result. ∎
The explicit formulas of Dirichlet and Kronecker are as follows:
Proposition 2.2.
.
Proof.
By differentiating, we have
Since , we have . Setting yields
Note that the Laurent series of is which implies that
Furthermore, . Combining these, we find that three of the terms cancel, which yields ∎
Using the identity , and the fact that , we find that
Now, combining these with the fact that , we find that
or equivalently
Proposition 2.3.
The equation
holds for all .
Remark.
This is [12, (3.5)], but he only proves it for split .
Now recall that and are -units in the field . Let denote the group of all -units. It is a finitely generated subgroup of . Now consider the complex vector space . This is isomorphic to the regular representation of . Now note that for all , due to transport of structure, we have that
This implies that both and lie in the -eigenspace of , which is one-dimensional. Therefore
for some . Consider the map
defined by . This map is clearly -linear, so
Applying to both sides of yields that
In particular, note that . We can actually say that
Proposition 2.4.
As elements of , we have
Now take some . Applying to both sides, we find the following equality in :
Now consider the explicit formulas provided by [12, p. 93]:
Putting these together yields the -adic identity
Proposition 2.5.
Now, following [12, p. 93], there exist measures such that for any finite even Dirichlet character of conductor , we have
Now define a measure given by
Then we have the equality
for all finite even Dirichlet characters with conductor . Thus we have that
Theorem 2.6.
.
2.2. Generalization to conductor not a prime power
We will now work more generally and extend to the remaining cases. We fix to be some positive integer with at least two distinct prime divisors. We again start with the classical factorization and the functional equation for :
where is the gamma function, is the conductor of , is the Gauss sum, and if while if .
Proposition 2.7.
.
Proof.
By differentiating,
Setting yields
But since , we have
Since , which concludes the result. ∎
We have the following explicit formulas:
-
•
[12, p. 88],
-
•
[12, p. 88] (note that this is for general conductors ),
-
•
[24, p. 281], where is a ray class character modulo , is the number of roots of unity equivalent to mod , and is the conductor of .
Note that , but .
Proposition 2.8.
.
Proof.
First note that the classical factorization (with value ) yields
In particular, consider the left hand side’s power series expansion around : although vanishes at , has a pole of order . But since the residue of is , we have that
Now using Gross’s formula, we find that
∎
Proposition 2.9.
.
Proof.
Note that we have a quotient homomorphism between the ray class group modulo , isomorphic to , with . Furthermore, since is totally real. Then [24] gives the result
But note that
so we have
∎
Now, combining these with the fact that , we find that
or equivalently
Proposition 2.10.
The equation
holds for all .
Remark.
This is [12, (3.5)], but he only proves it for split and . Note that depends on .
Now note that and are units in the field . (In particular,
which holds whenever has at least two distinct prime divisors.) Let denote the group of all units. It is a finitely generated subgroup of of rank , by Dirichlet’s unit theorem. Now consider the complex vector space . This is isomorphic to the quotient of the regular representation of by the subspace spanned by . For all , due to transport of structure, we have that
This implies that both and lie in the -eigenspace of , which is one-dimensional since is abelian. Therefore
for some . Consider the map
defined by . This map is clearly -linear, so
Applying to both sides of yields that
In particular, note that . We can actually say that
Proposition 2.11.
As elements of , we have
Now take some . Applying to both sides, we find the following equality in :
Now consider the explicit formulas provided by [12, p. 93]:
Putting these together yields the -adic identity
Proposition 2.12.
Now, following [12, p. 93] there exist measures such that for any finite even Dirichlet character of conductor , we have
Now define a measure given by
Then we have the equality
for all finite even Dirichlet characters with conductor . Combining with Theorem 2.6, we have the following factorization:
Theorem 2.13.
For any finite even Dirichlet character , with , , and , we have that .
3. Assumptions and conventions
For the remainder of the article, we fix several assumptions. We will restate them throughout the article, but organize them here for convenience. We will let denote an imaginary quadratic field and the discriminant of . We will let denote an elliptic curve over a number field (usually either or ) with conductor . Let be the modular form associated to . We assume that will be residually reducible modulo :
Assumption 3.1 (Residually reducible).
All elliptic curves will be residually reducible modulo . In other words, the -adic Galois representation reduced modulo to is reducible.
We will also require that satisfies the Heegner hypothesis relative to in many situations, as found in [1, p. 8]:
Assumption 3.2 (Heegner hypothesis).
For every prime , then is a quadratic residue modulo .
We will focus a great deal of attention to quadratic twists of . Let be an elliptic curve given by . Then for such that , the quadratic twist of by is given by , and denoted with modular form . We will primarily focus on . We will later see that when is residually reducible, then for some Eisenstein series and integer , and therefore we will denote .
In a similar manner, we will denote the cubic twist of by , where the cubic twist is given by .
Finally, we will denote by Assumption 3.3 the following series of assumptions on .
Assumption 3.3.
We make the following assumptions:
-
•
For all primes , if , then ,
-
•
,
-
•
,
-
•
.
4. Congruences modulo
4.1. Congruences of -series and Eisenstein series
Let
be the modular form attached to an elliptic curve . Let the -adic Galois representation be ; we will assume that is always residually reducible modulo . Let
be an Eisenstein series, where
Proposition 4.1.
The Galois representation of is isomorphic up to semisimplification to where is the cyclotomic character.
Proof.
The Brauer-Nesbitt theorem implies that up to semisimplication, is determined by its characteristic polynomial, or equivalently, trace and determinant. Furthermore, the Cebotarev density function implies that the Frobenius elements are dense in the Galois group. Since is a continuous function, it suffices to check that trace and determinant match on the Frobenius elements for each prime. We have
which confirms that the trace function matches. The determinant yields
and both functions match. ∎
Proposition 4.2.
Suppose is residually reducible, i.e. the representation is isomorphic to up to semisimplification. Then , where is the Eisenstein series with a quadratic character, and and for the cyclotomic character. Furthermore, .
Proof.
Since , it follows that are quadratic characters. By Brauer-Nesbitt, it suffices to check that the trace and determinant functions agree on Frobenius elements, which are dense in the Galois group by the Cebotarev density theorem. Checking the determinant function, we have that
Thus
Letting for some quadratic character modulo , we have that
Now, the trace functions yield that
Since the coefficients of the two modular forms agree on prime indices, they agree on all nonconstant terms. Thus , where the left hand side is a modular form of weight , and thus the right hand side must also be a modular form of weight . By [20], , and we have that . ∎
4.2. Congruences of quadratic twists
Consider some arbitrary squarefree . We will study the quadratic twist of by and write it as , with the elliptic curve becoming . We will assume that is residually reducible. By Proposition 4.2, we have for some quadratic character . Since , it follows that . Since is again a quadratic character, we may write for some squarefree . Thus every quadratic twist of an elliptic curve whose Galois representation is residually reducible is congruent to modulo , where is some quadratic character. From now on, we will write the quadratic twist of the elliptic curve as and the associated modular form as , where .
4.3. Stabilizations
We follow [3] and describe the -depletions/stabilizations. Let be the modular form of an elliptic curve . Then the -depletion is given by
Suppose is a good prime; then , where and are given by [3, p. 1085].
Let be the conductor of . If a prime , then , hence there is no need to change the value through -depletion. If a prime with , then , so we may use instead of . In particular, suffices.
Proposition 4.3.
The Euler factor at of for some is .
Proof.
Corollary 4.3.1.
Assuming the Heegner hypothesis, the Euler factor at does not vanish modulo when .
Proof.
Since , it suffices to have . ∎
If and agree on all coefficients whenever for all where is a finite set of primes, then we may take the -depletions to force them to be equal. In particular,
where indicates the modular form after depletions for each .
5. Congruence of modular forms
5.1. Varying
We follow the discussion from section . For the remainder of this section, we set . Suppose we have an -series attached to an elliptic curve whose Fourier expansion is whose Galois representation modulo is residually reducible. Then proposition implies that , the Galois representation modulo of the Eisenstein series . Now consider the quadratic twist by , so that , where is the Kronecker character. It follows that where is some quadratic character. Now denote , and , so that we parametrize the twists by the corresponding Eisenstein series. In particular, for all , where . We thus have that and are congruent modulo everywhere except possibly at indices divisible by some bad prime .
Let . Assume . If , then . On the other hand, , so . We need only stabilize (-deplete) at primes such that . Due to Corollary 4.3.1, we will require all such to satisfy for the rest of the paper. This is noted in the section on assumptions. For each of these , we have , so is a good prime for . On the other hand, for , it immediately follows that so , and since , then . Hence there is no need to -deplete at such primes (it is already zero), and we only need to consider the primes for which .
Denote this set by . Then is a set of bad primes for , but good primes for . Take to be the product of .
Note that and , so by the -expansion principle, we have
Proposition 5.1.
For infinity types of type with , we have .
Setting and taking the limit of as gives, by continuity,
Proposition 5.2.
For the norm character of type , we have
In fact, more generally:
Proposition 5.3.
Suppose we have two modular forms and with Galois representations and such that . Then , where is such that whenever , and is type for . Furthermore, this is true for , the norm character of infinity type .
Proof.
The stabilization at yields , and thus after stabilizing at all , it follows that
and by hypothesis, they are already congruent modulo when . The -expansion principle then implies that
To see that this holds for , take of type as . Since is continuous in , it follows that the limit is and the congruence for holds. ∎
Define as in [17, Definition 8.8]; we’ll write as shorthand.
Proposition 5.4.
If , then has rank .
Proof.
We have and . From Proposition 5.2, . By [17, Theorem 9.10], , where is a Heegner point. Now suppose . By Corollary 4.3.1, due to the Heegner hypothesis, none of the Euler factors vanish, and thus . It follows that , and hence is not a torsion point, and it follows that has positive rank. A theorem due to Kolyvagin [15] (for example, see [9, Theorem 2.9]) implies that in fact has rank exactly . ∎
Adopting the notation from [17, Theorem 9.11], for we have that
By Theorem 2.13, this sum is equal to , where is the Katz -adic -function. By [26, Theorem 5.11], we have that
so we conclude that
Hence
For , this turns out to be . For , this turns out to be .
Proposition 5.5.
We now turn to calculating the proportion of such that ; we will address the other case shortly after.
We assume the Heegner hypothesis. This requires that is a quadratic residue modulo all primes dividing , except for . Letting and such that , then . Furthermore, (due to the conditions provided by Nakagawa-Horie in [19, p. 21] or [8, Lemma 2.2]). Recall that Assumption 3.3 denotes the follow conditions on :
-
•
For all primes , if , then ,
-
•
,
-
•
,
-
•
.
Theorem 5.6.
For fixed with satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of such that is at least .
Proof.
For each , the proportion of which are quadratic residues is . The number of such primes is , so the proportion of such is greater than . Of this set , [8, Lemma 2.2] implies that
Hence for a fixed , the proportion of which are quadratic residues modulo all and is at least . ∎
We have the immediate
Corollary 5.6.1.
For fixed and satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields which admit a quadratic twist of by the fixed is positive.
We also immediately obtain information about the rank of over .
Corollary 5.6.2.
For fixed with satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields such that has rank is at least .
Proof.
We also address the case. Once again, let and with , and .
Theorem 5.7.
For fixed with satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of such that is at least .
Proof.
For each , the proportion of which are quadratic residues is . The number of such primes is , so the proportion of such is greater than . This set is given by a system of congruence conditions, modulo all . Of this set , [8, Lemma 2.2] implies that
Hence for fixed , the proportion of which satisfy the Heegner hypothesis and is at least . ∎
Once again, we find two corollaries.
Corollary 5.7.1.
For fixed and satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields which admit a quadratic twist of by the fixed is positive.
Corollary 5.7.2.
For fixed with satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields such that has rank is at least .
5.2. Varying
In this paper we will usually fix and vary . Let us now fix and and vary . The first result we have is considering the proportion of which satisfy the Heegner hypothesis.
Theorem 5.8.
For fixed , the number of satisfying the Heegner hypothesis is asymptotic to .
Proof.
For each , we need to be a quadratic residue . Let where the are distinct odd primes and . We need
since the factor of is always a square. Quadratic reciprocity implies that for each . In particular, when is fixed, the sign depends only on , and is also fixed. Then is equivalent to the condition that an even number of the are , and thus in the product
it suffices to allow anything in the first indices, and the last index is determined in order to yield a product of . Note that if for any , then it is always a quadratic residue. Thus at most of have not a quadratic residue , and it follows that the proportion of with a quadratic residue is at least . Even stronger, is a quadratic residue whenever where or , and . It follows that can only be constructed from such primes.
From the Wiener-Ikehara Tauberian theorem [21, Theorem 2.4], we find that the proportion of such that is constructed from this set of primes is asymptotic to .
∎
Suppose we let vary and count the proportion of pairs (equivalently pairs ) such that has rank . Corollary 5.6.1 and Corollary 5.6.2 imply that the proportion of for fixed depends only on , and in particular, on the number of prime factors of . Thus it suffices to consider only positive , as the sign does not matter. Consider the interval . Then we seek to measure
By summing over values of instead, we have
The final proportion will be at least . We will now find asymptotic bounds for .
By Erdös-Kac [10], for , follows a Gaussian distribution with and . Therefore we may assume that for sufficiently large , may be approximated by a continuous distribution; we will assume that this continuous distribution is sufficiently accurate and measure
where . Since for large , it’s clear that the upper bound exceeds , we may take
Substituting , we transform the following integral, which is but extended from to :
Let . Then substituting , we have
where
We will now bound and (both of which are positive values, since the integrand is strictly positive).
Lemma 5.9.
.
Proof.
Take
Let . Then we can write
Now consider that
As a result, we have that , where . But can be solved using the well-known Poisson trick, which yields that , so we have that . ∎
With , we can calculate it almost exactly.
Lemma 5.10.
.
Proof.
We have
The exponent rearranges to
where
Using Poisson’s trick once again, we find
As a result, we conclude that
∎
Putting the above two lemmas together, we conclude that
which implies that
Theorem 5.11.
Assuming that is approximated by a (continuous) Gaussian distribution sufficiently well, in the set , the proportion of (for ) which yield a quadratic twist with rank over satisfies
where .
6. Higher twists
6.1. Cubic twists
Let be the modular form associated to , an elliptic curve over . We have that (of weight ) for some Hecke character of type , where
Let be the associated cubic twist character, where is a primitive third root of unity. Let be the modular form associated to , the cubic twist of by , such that
Proposition 6.1.
The modular forms and are equivalent modulo at all coefficients except those which are not relatively prime to .
Proof.
For all with , we have . As a result, for all coprime to , we have
and thus we have except at the coefficients of for . Since and , it follows that and for some with . Therefore , and hence
As a result, , and therefore except at coefficients of for not relatively prime to . ∎
Proposition 6.2.
The Galois representations of and are isomorphic.
Proof.
Let be the Galois representation of . Let be the Galois representation of , the cubic twist of by . Let be the conductor of , so that is the conductor of . Then Neron-Ogg-Shafarevich implies that and are unramified outside of and , respectively. As a result, the Galois representations factor through and , respectively, where is the maximal unramified extension of outside of . Now for all primes , the Artin map gives a Frobenius element such that and . The prior discussion shows that
Furthermore, the Frobenius elements always satisfy . The Brauer-Nesbitt theorem applied to implies that and are characterized (up to isomorphism) by their characteristic polynomials, and thus by the trace and determinant functions. We showed that and agree on the trace and determinant functions modulo for all Frobenius elements with . By the Cebotarev density function, the Frobenius elements have density in the Galois groups, and therefore all but finitely many of the Frobenius elements are dense in the Galois group. Since trace and determinant are continuous functions, this implies that and agree modulo on trace and determinant on the entire Galois group, and thus they agree modulo everywhere (by Brauer-Nesbitt). As a result, we find that . ∎
Proposition 6.3.
If , then has rank .
Proof.
We assume the Galois representation modulo is reducible. By Proposition 4.2, we have that up to semisimplification.
6.2. Sextic twists
Consider the family of elliptic curves over for up to isomorphism; denote this by . This family of elliptic curves has -invariant . The sextic twist by , , is the elliptic curve given by
where denotes that is isomorphic to over . Thus the sextic twist by is a function
The quadratic twist by on , denoted by , is the curve
so
The cubic twist by on , denoted by , is the curve
so
We easily check that .
As a result, we have that
and it’s clear that these functions commute.
Proposition 6.4.
The family of curves are exactly the elliptic curves which admit cubic twists.
Proof.
This family is precisely the family of elliptic curves with Weierstrass form with ; in particular, this is exactly the family of elliptic curves with -invariant , since , where (see [23, p. 45]).
On the other hand, an elliptic curve admits a cubic twist iff it has CM by . Since the underlying field has characteristic , by [23, cor. III.10.2], this is equivalent to . ∎
Due to this, the family are the only elliptic curves which interest us.
Proposition 6.5.
The Galois representation of any of the curves is residually reducible modulo .
Proof.
Since this family of curves admits cubic twists, they have CM by . The prime is ramified in , so let be the prime lying over . Then is a group of order . This group is defined over the Hilbert class field of , which is since the class number of is . Now, the group is generated by , the automorphism given by complex conjugation. Since , it follows that is defined over . As a result, is a subgroup preserved by , and thus is residually reducible modulo . ∎
Let and let be some positive integer satisfying Assumption 3.3.
Theorem 6.6.
For a fixed (and thus ) and satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields such that has rank is at least .
Proof.
We have for some nonnegative integer . Since , it follows that the set of primes dividing is a subset of the set of primes dividing . As a result, the subsequent cubic twist by yields an elliptic curve whose conductor does not have any new primes dividing it (compared to ), and therefore does not require any more -depletions.
As a result, any which admits a quadratic twist of by will also admit a cubic twist by . This occurs when is a quadratic residue modulo all primes , and by Theorem 5.6, occurs for at least of the . Now applying Proposition 5.4, we conclude that every such also satisfies the property that has rank . ∎
In particular, since every is isomorphic to the sextic twist of by (over a sufficient ), it is of particular interest to study . Thus specializing Theorem 6.6, we have
Corollary 6.6.1.
For fixed with and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields such that has rank is at least .
Proof.
By applying Theorem 6.6 with , the result follows. ∎
Addressing the case, we have the analogous results.
Theorem 6.7.
For a fixed (and thus ) and satisfying Assumption 3.3 and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields such that has rank is at least .
Proof.
We have for some nonnegative integer . Since , it follows that the set of primes dividing is a subset of the set of primes dividing . As a result, the subsequent cubic twist by yields an elliptic curve whose conductor does not have any new primes dividing it (compared to ), and therefore does not require any more -depletions.
As a result, any which admits a quadratic twist of by will also admit a cubic twist by . This occurs when is a quadratic residue modulo all primes , and by Theorem 5.7, occurs for at least of the . Now applying Proposition 5.4, we conclude that every such also satisfies the property that has rank . ∎
Once again specializing to , we have:
Corollary 6.7.1.
For fixed with and , the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields such that has rank is at least .
Proof.
By applying Theorem 6.7 with , the result follows. ∎
7. Ranks of twists over
For some suitable elliptic curve , we have discussed the proportion of imaginary quadratic fields with yielding elliptic curves of either rank or rank . We will now consider the ranks over instead.
We will need the concept of a root number. The root number of an elliptic curve is the value such that .
Theorem 7.1.
Fix with and satisfying . Then has rank for at least of all such , and rank for at least of all such .
Proof.
By [15], Heegner points in exist iff . Furthermore, if has rank , then has rank , and . It follows that if has rank , then has rank if .
For , Corollary 5.6.1 shows that when , there exists some imaginary quadratic field (in fact, a positive density) such that has rank , and thus it suffices to check when . Since is fixed, we check the proportion of such that in each case. We have which depends only on the residue of modulo . There are exactly quadratic residues and quadratic nonresidues, and thus the proportion of (assuming ) is exactly . Now [8, Lemma 2.2] implies that for every such that , then the proportion
Since this holds for every such , it follows that the proportion of such satisfying is at least .
For , Corollary 5.6.2 shows that when , there exists some imaginary quadratic field (in fact, a positive density) such that has rank , and thus it suffices to check when . Since is fixed, we check the proportion of such that in each case. We have which depends only on the residue of modulo . There are exactly quadratic residues and quadratic nonresidues, and thus the proportion of (assuming ) is exactly . Now [8, Lemma 2.2] implies that for every such that , then the proportion
Since this holds for every such , it follows that the proportion of such satisfying is at least .
We conclude that in either case, the proportion of with having rank is at least . Analogously, when , we find that has rank , and the same result holds. ∎
Noting that the assumptions hold for a fixed (positive) proportion of , we conclude that for elliptic curves satisfying the above assumptions, Conjecture 1.4 holds.
Corollary 7.1.1.
For such satisfying the assumptions of Theorem 7.1, the weak Goldfeld conjecture holds.
References
- BCD+ [14] Massimo Bertolini, Francesc Castella, Henri Darmon, Samit Dasgupta, Kartik Prasanna, and Victor Rotger. -adic L-functions and euler systems: a tale in two trilogies. Automorphic forms and Galois representations, 1:52–102, 2014.
- BCDT [01] Christophe Breuil, Brian Conrad, Fred Diamond, and Richard Taylor. On the modularity of elliptic curves over : wild 3-adic exercises. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, pages 843–939, 2001.
- BDP+ [13] Massimo Bertolini, Henri Darmon, Kartik Prasanna, et al. Generalized heegner cycles and -adic rankin L-series. Duke Mathematical Journal, 162(6):1033–1148, 2013.
- BS [13] Manjul Bhargava and Arul Shankar. The average size of the 5-selmer group of elliptic curves is 6, and the average rank is less than 1. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.7859, 2013.
- BS [15] Manjul Bhargava and Arul Shankar. Ternary cubic forms having bounded invariants, and the existence of a positive proportion of elliptic curves having rank 0. Annals of Mathematics, pages 587–621, 2015.
- BSD [65] Bryan John Birch and Henry Peter Francis Swinnerton-Dyer. Notes on elliptic curves. ii. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 1965.
- BSZ [14] Manjul Bhargava, Christopher Skinner, and Wei Zhang. A majority of elliptic curves over satisfy the birch and swinnerton-dyer conjecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.1826, 2014.
- Bye [04] Dongho Byeon. Class numbers of quadratic fields and . Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 132(11):3137–3140, 2004.
- Dar [06] Henri Darmon. Heegner points, stark-heegner points, and values of L-series. In International congress of mathematicians, volume 2, pages 313–345, 2006.
- EK [40] Paul Erdös and Mark Kac. The gaussian law of errors in the theory of additive number theoretic functions. American Journal of Mathematics, 62(1):738–742, 1940.
- Gol [79] Dorian Goldfeld. Conjectures on elliptic curves over quadratic fields. In Number Theory Carbondale 1979, pages 108–118. Springer, 1979.
- Gro [80] Benedict H Gross. On the factorization of -adic L-series. Inventiones mathematicae, 57(1):83–95, 1980.
- GZ [86] Benedict H Gross and Don B Zagier. Heegner points and derivatives of L-series. Inventiones mathematicae, 84(2):225–320, 1986.
- KL [19] Daniel Kriz and Chao Li. Goldfeld’s conjecture and congruences between heegner points. In Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, volume 7. Cambridge University Press, 2019.
- Kol [89] Viktor Alexandrovich Kolyvagin. Finiteness of E(Q) and (E,Q) for a subclass of weil curves. Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya, 32(3):523, 1989.
- Kol [07] VA Kolyvagin. Euler systems. In The Grothendieck Festschrift, pages 435–483. Springer, 2007.
- Kri [21] Daniel Kriz. Supersingular -adic L-functions, maass-shimura operators and waldspurger formulas. In Supersingular p-adic L-functions, Maass-Shimura Operators and Waldspurger Formulas. Princeton University Press, 2021.
- KS [99] Nicholas M Katz and Peter Sarnak. Random matrices, Frobenius eigenvalues, and monodromy, volume 45. American Mathematical Soc., 1999.
- NH [88] Jin Nakagawa and Kuniaki Horie. Elliptic curves with no rational points. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 104(1):20–24, 1988.
- Ser [73] Jean-Pierre Serre. Formes modulaires et fonctions zêta p-adiques. In Modular functions of one variable III, pages 191–268. Springer, 1973.
- Ser [74] Jean-Pierre Serre. Divisibilité de certaines fonctions arithmétiques. Séminaire Delange-Pisot-Poitou. Théorie des nombres, 16(1):1–28, 1974.
- Ser [78] Jean-Pierre Serre. Sur le résidu de la fonction zêta -adique d’un corps de nombres. CR Acad. Sci. Paris, 278:183–188, 1978.
- Sil [09] Joseph H Silverman. The arithmetic of elliptic curves, volume 106. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
- Sta [77] Harold M Stark. Class fields and modular forms of weight one. In Modular Functions of one Variable V, pages 277–287. Springer, 1977.
- TW [95] Richard Taylor and Andrew Wiles. Ring-theoretic properties of certain hecke algebras. Annals of Mathematics, 141(3):553–572, 1995.
- Was [97] Lawrence C Washington. Introduction to cyclotomic fields, volume 83. Springer Science & Business Media, 1997.
- Wil [95] Andrew Wiles. Modular elliptic curves and fermat’s last theorem. Annals of mathematics, pages 443–551, 1995.