This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Extraordinary-log surface phase transition in the three-dimensional XYXY model

Minghui Hu Department of Physics and Anhui Key Laboratory of Optoelectric Materials Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Functional Molecular Solids, Ministry of Education, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China    Youjin Deng [email protected] Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China MinJiang Collaborative Center for Theoretical Physics, College of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou 350108, China    Jian-Ping Lv [email protected] Department of Physics and Anhui Key Laboratory of Optoelectric Materials Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Functional Molecular Solids, Ministry of Education, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China
(November 29, 2024)
Abstract

Universality is a pillar of modern critical phenomena. The standard scenario is that the two-point correlation algebraically decreases with the distance rr as g(r)r2dηg(r)\sim r^{2-d-\eta}, with dd the spatial dimension and η\eta the anomalous dimension. Very recently, a logarithmic universality was proposed to describe the extraordinary surface transition of O(NN) system. In this logarithmic universality, g(r)g(r) decays in a power of logarithmic distance as g(r)(lnr)η^g(r)\sim({\rm ln}r)^{-\hat{\eta}}, dramatically different from the standard scenario. We explore the three-dimensional XYXY model by Monte Carlo simulations, and provide strong evidence for the emergence of logarithmic universality. Moreover, we propose that the finite-size scaling of g(r,L)g(r,L) has a two-distance behavior: simultaneously containing a large-distance plateau whose height decays logarithmically with LL as g(L)(lnL)η^g(L)\sim({\rm ln}L)^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}} as well as the rr-dependent term g(r)(lnr)η^g(r)\sim({\rm ln}r)^{-\hat{\eta}}, with η^η^1{\hat{\eta}^{\prime}}\approx{\hat{\eta}}-1. The critical exponent η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime}, characterizing the height of the plateau, obeys the scaling relation η^=(N1)/(2πα)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=(N-1)/(2\pi\alpha) with the RG parameter α\alpha of helicity modulus. Our picture can also explain the recent numerical results of a Heisenberg system. The advances on logarithmic universality significantly expand our understanding of critical universality.

surface critical behavior; extraordinary-log transition; O(NN) model; universality class

Continuous phase transitions are ubiquitous, from the magnetic and superconducting transitions in real materials to the cooling of early universe. Near a second-order transition, a diverging correlation length emerges, and several macroscopic properties become independent of microscopic details of the system Stanley (1999); Sachdev (2011); Fernández et al. (2013). Systems can be classified into few universality classes, depending on a small number of global features like symmetry, dimensionality and the range of interactions. Typically, physical quantities exhibit power-law behaviors governed by critical exponents characteristic of a universality class. In particular, at criticality, the two-point correlation function g(r)g(r) decays algebraically with the spatial distance rr as

g(r)r2dη,g(r)\sim r^{2-d-\eta}, (1)

where dd is the spatial dimension and η\eta is the anomalous dimension. Power-law universality has been extensively verified and recognized as the standard scenario of critical phenomena Sachdev (2011); Fernández et al. (2013); Goldman (2013); Svistunov et al. (2015). Very recently, a novel logarithmic universality of criticality, drastically different from that encoded in (1), was proposed in the context of surface critical behavior (SCB) Metlitski .

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Phase diagram of the XYXY model (3). The horizontal axis is for the surface coupling enhancement κ\kappa and the vertical axis relates to the bulk coupling KK by 1/K1/K. Phases are denoted by the abbreviations BD (bulk disorder), BO (bulk order), SD (surface disorder), SOq{\rm SO_{q}} (surface quasi-long-range order), and SO (surface order). The ordinary, the extraordinary-log, and the SD-SOq{\rm SO_{q}} critical lines meet together at the special critical point. The topology of the phase diagram is well known, but the nature of the extraordinary transition remains a puzzle Metlitski . Parameters denoted by red circles are used in this work to analyze the extraordinary-log universality class.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Results for the extraordinary-log transitions at κ=1,1.5,3\kappa=1,1.5,3, and 55. Statistical errors are much smaller than the size of symbols. (a) Log-log plot of the two-point correlation g(L/2)g(L/2) and the scaled susceptibility χ0L2\chi_{0}L^{-2} versus ln(L/l0){\rm ln}(L/l_{0}). The parameter l0l_{0} is κ\kappa-dependent and obtained from least-squares fits. Dashed lines have the slope 0.59-0.59 and denote the critical exponent η^=0.59(2)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.59(2). (b) Log-log plot of the scaled magnetic fluctuations χ1L2\chi_{1}L^{-2} versus ln(L/l0){\rm ln}(L/l_{0}). Dashed lines have the slope 1.59-1.59 and denote the exponent η^1.59\hat{\eta}\approx 1.59. (c) Scaled helicity modulus ΥL\Upsilon L versus LL. The horizontal axis is in a log scale. Dashed lines have the slope 0.540.54 and relate to the universal RG parameter α=0.27(2)\alpha=0.27(2) by 2α2\alpha.

SCB refers to the critical phenomenon occurring on the boundary of a critical bulk Binder and Hohenberg (1974); Ohno and Okabe (1984); Landau et al. (1989); Diehl (1997); Pleimling (2004); Deng et al. (2005); Deng (2006); Dubail et al. (2009); Zhang and Wang (2017); Ding et al. (2018); Weber et al. (2018); Metlitski ; Weber and Wessel (2021); Parisen Toldin (2021). Recent activities on SCB were partly triggered by the exotic surface effects of symmetry protected topological phases Grover and Vishwanath ; Parker et al. (2018). The O(NN) model exhibits rich SCBs including the special, ordinary, and extraordinary transitions, depending on NN and dd Binder and Hohenberg (1974); Ohno and Okabe (1984); Landau et al. (1989); Diehl (1997); Pleimling (2004); Deng et al. (2005); Deng (2006); Dubail et al. (2009); Zhang and Wang (2017); Ding et al. (2018); Weber et al. (2018); Metlitski ; Weber and Wessel (2021); Parisen Toldin (2021). The situations at d=3d=3 are extremely subtle and controversial Deng et al. (2005); Deng (2006); Metlitski ; Weber and Wessel (2021); Parisen Toldin (2021). Logarithmic universality of extraordinary transition was proposed for the three-dimensional O(NN) model with 2N<Nc2\leq N<N_{c} by means of renormalization group (RG) Metlitski , whereas NcN_{c} is not exactly known. It was predicted that the two-point correlation on surface decays logarithmically with rr as Metlitski

g(r)[ln(r/r0)]η^,g(r)\sim[{\rm ln}(r/r_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}}, (2)

where r0r_{0} is a non-universal constant. If NN is specified, the critical exponent η^\hat{\eta} is universal in extraordinary regime. The asymptotic form (2) obviously differs from the standard scenario (1). A quantum Monte Carlo study was performed for the SCB of a (2+1)-dimensional O(3) system Weber and Wessel (2021). However, both the logarithmic and the extraordinary-power behavior Metlitski were not completely confirmed. By contrast, compelling evidence for the logarithmic behavior was obtained from a classical O(3) ϕ4\phi^{4} model Parisen Toldin (2021).

In this work, we explore the extraordinary transition with N=2N=2, which is the lower-marginal candidate for the logarithmic universality. We consider an extensive domain of extraordinary critical line, in which the universality of logarithmic behavior is confirmed. Moreover, we give a two-distance scenario for the finite-size scaling (FSS) of g(r)g(r), where an rr-independent plateau emerges at large distance. The height of the plateau exhibits a logarithmic FSS with the exponent η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime}, which relates to the exponent η^\hat{\eta} of rr-dependent behavior by η^η^1\hat{\eta}^{\prime}\approx\hat{\eta}-1.

We study the XYXY model on simple-cubic lattices with the Hamiltonian Landau et al. (1989); Deng et al. (2005)

/(kBT)=𝐫𝐫K𝐫𝐫S𝐫S𝐫,{\cal H}/(k_{\rm B}T)=-{\sum_{\langle{\bf r}{\bf r^{\prime}}\rangle}}K_{{\bf r}{\bf r^{\prime}}}\vec{S}_{\bf r}\cdot\vec{S}_{\bf r^{\prime}}\;, (3)

where S𝐫\vec{S}_{\bf r} represents the XYXY spin on site 𝐫{\bf r} and K𝐫𝐫K_{{\bf r}{\bf r^{\prime}}} denotes the strength of nearest-neighbor ferromagnetic coupling. We impose open boundary conditions in one direction and periodic boundary conditions in other directions, hence a pair of open surfaces are specified. We set K𝐫𝐫=KK_{{\bf r}{\bf r^{\prime}}}=K^{\prime} if 𝐫{\bf r} and 𝐫{\bf r^{\prime}} are on the same surface and K𝐫𝐫=KK_{{\bf r}{\bf r^{\prime}}}=K otherwise. The surface coupling enhancement κ\kappa is defined by κ=(KK)/K\kappa=(K^{\prime}-K)/K.

Figure 1 shows the phase diagram of model (3), which contains a long-range-ordered surface phase in presence of ordered bulk, as well as disordered and critical quasi-long-range-ordered surface phases in presence of disordered bulk. The critical lines meet together at the special transition point. A characteristic feature for N=2N=2 is the existence of the quasi-long-range-ordered phase, which is absent in N=1N=1 and N3N\geq 3 situations.

Consider the quasi-long-range-ordered regime. As the bulk critical point KcK_{c} is approached, namely KKcK\rightarrow K_{c}^{-}, divergent bulk correlations emerge. A possible scenario is that the surface long-range order develops at KcK_{c} as a result of the effective interactions mediated by long-range bulk correlations. This scenario can not be precluded by the Mermin-Wagner theorem as the effective interactions could be long-ranged. A previous study revealed Deng et al. (2005) that the Monte Carlo data restricting to L95L\leq 95 (LL is linear size) are not sufficient to preclude either discontinuous or continuous surface transition across the extraordinary critical line; the former implies long-range surface order at KcK_{c}.

By Monte Carlo sampling of the surface two-point correlation function g(r)=S0Srg(r)=\langle\vec{S}_{0}\cdot\vec{S}_{r}\rangle, we confirm the emergence of logarithmic universality in model (3). As shown in Fig. 2(a), the LL dependence of g(L/2)g(L/2) obeys the scaling formula g(L/2)[ln(L/l0)]η^g(L/2)\sim[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}} with η^=0.59(2)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.59(2).

We analyze the surface magnetic fluctuations Γ(𝐤)=L2m(𝐤)2\Gamma({\bf k})=L^{2}\langle||\overset{\rightharpoonup\mkern-10.0mu\rightharpoonup}{m}({\bf k})||^{2}\rangle with m(𝐤)=(1/L2)𝐫S𝐫ei𝐤𝐫\overset{\rightharpoonup\mkern-10.0mu\rightharpoonup}{m}({\bf k})=(1/L^{2})\sum_{\bf r}\vec{S}_{\bf r}e^{i{\bf k}\cdot{\bf r}}, where the summation runs over sites on surface and 𝐤{\bf k} denotes a Fourier mode. As shown in Figs. 2(a) and (b), the magnetic fluctuations χ0=Γ(0,0)\chi_{0}=\Gamma(0,0) (susceptibility) and χ1=Γ(2π/L,0)\chi_{1}=\Gamma(2\pi/L,0) have the distinct FSS behaviors χ0L2[ln(L/l0)]η^\chi_{0}\sim L^{2}[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}} and χ1L2[ln(L/l0)]η^\chi_{1}\sim L^{2}[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}}, with η^η^+1{\hat{\eta}}\approx{\hat{\eta}^{\prime}}+1. Motivated by these observations as well as the two-distance scenarios in high-dimensional O(NN) critical systems Papathanakos (2006); Grimm et al. (2017); Zhou et al. (2018); Lv et al. (2021); Fang et al. and quantum deconfined criticality Shao et al. (2016), we conjecture that the FSS of critical two-point correlation behaves as

g(r){[ln(r/r0)]η^,lnr𝒪[(lnL)η^/η^],[ln(L/l0)]η^,lnr𝒪[(lnL)η^/η^],g(r)\sim\begin{cases}[{\rm ln}(r/r_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}},&{\rm ln}r\leq\mathcal{O}[({\rm ln}L)^{\hat{\eta}^{\prime}/\hat{\eta}}],\\ [{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}},&{\rm ln}r\geq\mathcal{O}[({\rm ln}L)^{\hat{\eta}^{\prime}/\hat{\eta}}],\end{cases} (4)

where r0r_{0} and l0l_{0} are non-universal constants. By (4), we point out two coexisting features: the rr-dependent behavior [ln(r/r0)]η^[{\rm ln}(r/r_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}} and the large-distance rr-independent plateau [ln(L/l0)]η^[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}}. Equation (4) is an explanation for our numerical results and compatible with the FSS of second-moment correlation length at the extraordinary transition of O(3) model Parisen Toldin (2021); Metlitski (2021). Recently, a two-distance scenario was used to describe the two-point correlation of O(nn) model at a marginal situation (the upper critical dimensionality) Lv et al. (2021) and confirmed by large-scale simulations on hyper-cubic lattices up to 7684768^{4} sites Fang et al. . The open surfaces of model (3) are at the lower critical dimensionality (ds=2d_{s}=2) and also belong to marginal situations.

We confirm the scaling relation between η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} and the RG parameter of helicity modulus. The helicity modulus Υ\Upsilon measures the response of a system to a twist in boundary conditions Fisher et al. (1973). The definition is given in the Supplementary Materials (SM). Figure 2(c) demonstrates that Υ\Upsilon scales as ΥL2αlnL\Upsilon L\sim 2\alpha{\rm ln}L with the RG parameter α=0.27(2)\alpha=0.27(2). Figure 3 simultaneously illustrates the universality of η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} and α\alpha in the extraordinary regime. Meanwhile, the scaling relation αη^=1/(2π)\alpha\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=1/(2\pi) is evidenced, conforming to the predicted form Metlitski

η^=N12πα.\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=\frac{N-1}{2\pi\alpha}. (5)

According to (4), the exponent η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} characterizes the FSS of the height of the plateau. Equation (5) is not exactly the original prediction in Ref. Metlitski , where the exponent η^\hat{\eta} for rr-dependent behavior obeys the relation η^=(N1)/(2πα)\hat{\eta}=(N-1)/(2\pi\alpha).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The critical exponent η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} estimated from g(L/2)g(L/2) and χ0\chi_{0}, the RG parameter α\alpha from Υ\Upsilon, and their product αη^\alpha\hat{\eta}^{\prime}. Error bars are plotted with symbols. The shadowed areas, whose heights represent two error bars, denote the ranges of our final estimates for η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} and α\alpha. The red dashed line denotes the predicted value αη^=1/(2π)\alpha\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=1/(2\pi) by RG.

To explore the SCB, we fix the bulk coupling strength at KcK_{c}. Previously, two of us and coworkers performed simulations utilizing the Prokof’ev-Svistunov worm algorithms Prokof’ev and Svistunov (2001, 2010) on periodic simple-cubic lattices with Lmax=512L_{\rm max}=512, and obtained 1/Kc=2.201 844 1(5)1/K_{c}=2.201\,844\,1(5) Xu et al. (2019). This estimate was confirmed by an independent Monte Carlo study Hasenbusch (2019). Here, we simulate model (3) at 1/Kc=2.201 844 11/K_{c}=2.201\,844\,1 using Wolff’s cluster algorithm Wolff (1989) on simple-cubic lattices with Lmax=256L_{\rm max}=256. The original procedure in Ref. Wolff (1989) is adapted to model (3). We analyze the extraordinary transitions at κ=1\kappa=1, 1.51.5, 33, and 55, and the special transition at κs=0.622 2\kappa_{s}=0.622\,2 Deng et al. (2005). For each κ\kappa, the number of Wolff updating steps is up to 1.2×1081.2\times 10^{8} for L32L\leq 32 and ranges from 1.7×1081.7\times 10^{8} to 6.1×1086.1\times 10^{8} for L48L\geq 48. See SM for details, which includes Refs. Janke (1990); Krauth (2006).

Our conclusions are based on FSS analyses performed by using least-squares fits. Following Refs. Hasenbusch (2019, 2020), the function curve_fit()curve\_fit() in Scipy_libraryScipy\_library is adopted. For caution, we compare the fits with the benchmarks from implementing Mathematica’s NonlinearModelFitNonlinearModelFit function as Ref. Salas (2020). The fits with the Chi squared per degree of freedom χ2/DF1\chi^{2}/{\rm DF}\sim 1 are preferred. We do not trust any single fit and final conclusions are drawn based on comparing the fits that are stable against varying LminL_{\rm min}, the minimum size incorporated.

Table 1: Estimates of the critical exponent η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} and the RG parameter α\alpha for the extraordinary-log transition at κ=1\kappa=1. η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} is estimated from the scaling formulae g(L/2)[ln(L/l0)]η^g(L/2)\sim[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}} and χ0L2[ln(L/l0)]η^\chi_{0}\sim L^{2}[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}}, and α\alpha is determined from ΥL=2αlnL+A+BL1\Upsilon L=2\alpha{\rm ln}L+A+BL^{-1}.
LminL_{\rm min} χ2\chi^{2}/DF η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} or α\alpha l0l_{0} or AA
g(L/2)g(L/2) 16 2.91/4 0.596(2) 0.94(1)
32 0.66/3 0.592(3) 0.97(2)
48 0.58/2 0.591(5) 0.98(4)
χ0\chi_{0} 32 3.46/3 0.603(2) 1.13(2)
48 0.08/2 0.598(4) 1.18(3)
64 0.02/1 0.597(5) 1.19(5)
Υ\Upsilon 8 5.46/4 0.255(3) 0.41(2)
16 3.33/3 0.265(7) 0.32(6)
32 2.51/2 0.25(2) 0.4(2)

Figure 4(a) demonstrates the two-point correlation function g(r)g(r) for the extraordinary transition at κ=1\kappa=1. The large-distance behavior can be monitored by the LL dependence of g(L/2)g(L/2). According to Eq. (4), we have a scaling formula g(L/2)[ln(L/l0)]η^g(L/2)\sim[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}}. We perform least-squares fits to this formula and obtain η^=0.596(2)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.596(2), l0=0.94(1)l_{0}=0.94(1), and χ2/DF0.73\chi^{2}/{\rm DF}\approx 0.73, with Lmin=16L_{\rm min}=16. As LminL_{\rm min} is varied, preferred fits are also obtained (Table 1). By comparing the fits, our final estimate of η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} for κ=1\kappa=1 is η^=0.59(1)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.59(1). In the SM, we present similar analyses for κ=1.5,3\kappa=1.5,3 and 55, for which the final estimates are η^=0.60(1)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.60(1) (κ=1.5\kappa=1.5), 0.58(1)0.58(1) (κ=3\kappa=3) and 0.58(2)0.58(2) (κ=5\kappa=5). It is therefore confirmed that g(L/2)g(L/2) obeys the logarithmic scaling g(L/2)[ln(L/l0)]η^g(L/2)\sim[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}}, with a universal exponent η^=0.59(2)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.59(2). As displayed in the SM, the fits by the conventional power-law ansatz (1) have poor qualities and give unstable results.

For a verification of Eq. (4), we analyze the FSS of surface magnetic fluctuations. In the Monte Carlo simulations, we sample χ2=Γ(2π/L,2π/L)\chi_{2}=\Gamma(2\pi/L,2\pi/L) as well as χ0\chi_{0} and χ1\chi_{1}.

According to (4), an rr-independent plateau emerges at large distance. This plateau contributes to the magnetic fluctuations at zero mode but not to those at non-zero modes. The ratio χ0/χ1\chi_{0}/\chi_{1} at extraordinary transitions is shown in Fig. 4(b). As LL\rightarrow\infty, the ratio keeps increasing, implying distinct FSS of χ0\chi_{0} and χ1\chi_{1}.

More precisely, χ0\chi_{0} is expected to scale as χ0L2[ln(L/l0)]η^\chi_{0}\sim L^{2}[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}^{\prime}}. The results of scaling analyses for κ=1\kappa=1 are illustrated in Table 1 and those for κ=1.5\kappa=1.5, 33, and 55 are given in SM. Comparing preferred fits, we obtain η^=0.60(1)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.60(1) (κ=1\kappa=1), 0.59(2)0.59(2) (κ=1.5\kappa=1.5), 0.58(2)0.58(2) (κ=3\kappa=3), and 0.58(1)0.58(1) (κ=5\kappa=5). These estimates of η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} agree well with those determined from the LL dependence of g(L/2)g(L/2), hence the final result η^=0.59(2)\hat{\eta}^{\prime}=0.59(2) is confirmed.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) The two-point correlation g(r)g(r) for the extraordinary-log transition at κ=1\kappa=1 with L=8,16,32,64,128L=8,16,32,64,128, and 256256. The dashed line denotes the logarithmic decaying [ln(L/l0)]0.59[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-0.59} in the large-distance limit. (b) The ratio χ0/χ1\chi_{0}/\chi_{1} of magnetic fluctuations versus LL for the extraordinary-log transitions at κ=1\kappa=1, 1.51.5, 33, and 55, and for the special transition at κs=0.622 2\kappa_{s}=0.622\,2. In both panels, statistical errors are much smaller than the sizes of the data points.

We analyze the magnetic fluctuations χ1\chi_{1} and χ2\chi_{2} at nonzero Fourier modes by performing fits to χ𝐤0L2[ln(L/l0)]η^\chi_{{\bf k}\neq 0}\sim L^{2}[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}}. We confirm the drastic decays of χ1L2\chi_{1}L^{-2} and χ2L2\chi_{2}L^{-2} upon increasing lnL{\rm ln}L. For reducing the uncertainties of fits, we fix l0l_{0} at those obtained from the scaling analyses of χ0\chi_{0}, and estimate η^1.7\hat{\eta}\approx 1.7 over κ=1,1.5,3\kappa=1,1.5,3, and 55. From the log-log plot of χ1L2\chi_{1}L^{-2} versus ln(L/l0){\rm ln}(L/l_{0}) in Fig. 2(b), it is seen that the data nearly scale as χ1L2[ln(L/l0)]η^\chi_{1}L^{-2}\sim[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}} with η^1.59\hat{\eta}\approx 1.59. Similar result is obtained for χ2L2\chi_{2}L^{-2} (SM). Hence, χ1\chi_{1} and χ2\chi_{2} obey the logarithmic FSS formula χ𝐤0L2[ln(L/l0)]η^\chi_{{\bf k}\neq 0}\sim L^{2}[{\rm ln}(L/l_{0})]^{-\hat{\eta}}, with η^1.6\hat{\eta}\approx 1.6.

Our results for the FSS of χ0\chi_{0} and χ1\chi_{1} are also compatible with the Monte Carlo data Parisen Toldin (2021); Metlitski (2021) of the second-moment correlation length ξ2nd\xi_{\rm 2nd}, which scales as (ξ2nd/L)2(χ0/χ11)lnL(\xi_{\rm 2nd}/L)^{2}\sim(\chi_{0}/\chi_{1}-1)\sim{\rm ln}L. The relation η^=η^+1\hat{\eta}=\hat{\eta}^{\prime}+1 is implied.

As η^\hat{\eta} is much larger than η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime}, the two-distance scenario (4) indicates that the rr-dependent contribution decays fast. It explains the profile of g(r)g(r) in Fig. 4(a), where the large-distance plateau dominates.

By contrast, the special transition at κs\kappa_{s} belongs to the standard scenario (1) of continuous transition. The rr-dependent behavior converges to the power law g(r)rηg(r)\sim r^{-\eta}, which is comparable with the contribution from g(L/2)Lηg(L/2)\sim L^{-\eta}. Moreover, the magnetic renormalization exponent yhy_{h} relates to the anomalous dimension η\eta by yh=(4η)/2y_{h}=(4-\eta)/2, and the magnetic fluctuations χ0\chi_{0}, χ1\chi_{1}, and χ2\chi_{2} all scale as L2yh2L^{2y_{h}-2}. As shown in Fig. 4(b), the ratio χ0/χ1\chi_{0}/\chi_{1} at κs\kappa_{s} converges fast to a constant upon increasing LL. More results for g(r)g(r), χ0\chi_{0}, χ1\chi_{1} and χ2\chi_{2} are given in SM.

It was predicted Metlitski ; Metlitski (2021) that the scaled helicity modulus ΥL\Upsilon L diverges logarithmically as ΥL2αlnL\Upsilon L\sim 2\alpha{\rm ln}L, with α\alpha a universal RG parameter. Further, the universal form (5) of scaling relation was established Metlitski . The form is supported by the Monte Carlo results of an O(3) ϕ4\phi^{4} model Parisen Toldin (2021).

We sample Υ\Upsilon of model (3) by Monte Carlo simulations. The dependence of ΥL\Upsilon L on lnL{\rm ln}L is shown in Fig. 2(c) for κ=1,1.5,3\kappa=1,1.5,3, and 55. For each κ\kappa, a nearly linear dependence is observed in large-LL regime. Further, we perform a FSS analysis of Υ\Upsilon according to ΥL=2αlnL+A+BL1\Upsilon L=2\alpha{\rm ln}L+A+BL^{-1}, where AA and BB are constants. We explore the situations with and without the correction term BL1BL^{-1} separately. Stable fits are achieved, with the final estimates of α\alpha being α=0.26(2)\alpha=0.26(2) (κ=1\kappa=1), 0.27(1)0.27(1) (κ=1.5\kappa=1.5), 0.28(1)0.28(1) (κ=3\kappa=3), and 0.27(1)0.27(1) (κ=5\kappa=5). Comparing these estimates, the universal value of α\alpha is determined to be α=0.27(2)\alpha=0.27(2).

As shown in Fig. 3, the scaling relation (5) between α\alpha and η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} is confirmed. According to (4), η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime} characterizes the logarithmic FSS for the height of plateau.

We provide strong evidence for the emergence of the extraordinary-log universality class Metlitski . We propose the two-distance scenario (4) for the FSS of two-point correlation function, where a large-distance plateau emerges. The height of the plateau decays logarithmically with LL by the exponent η^\hat{\eta}^{\prime}, which obeys the scaling relation (5) with the RG parameter of helicity modulus. The two-distance scenario is supported not only by the Monte Carlo data for N=2N=2 of this work, but also by the results for N=3N=3 in Ref. Parisen Toldin (2021).

A variety of open questions arise. First, it is shown essentially that a two-dimensional XYXY system with finely tuned long-range interactions exhibits logarithmic universality. Is it possible to formulate the interactions in a microscopic Hamiltonian? Second, is there a classical-quantum mapping for the two-distance scenario that holds at the O(NN) quantum critical points Ding et al. (2018); Weber et al. (2018); Weber and Wessel (2021)? Third, as shown in Ref. Fang et al. , the introduction of unwrapped distance is crucial for verifying the short-distance behavior in two-distance scenario. The behavior of unwrapped distance in the extraordinary-log universality remains unclear. Finally, we note that, as recently observed for the five-dimensional Ising model Fang et al. (2020), lattice sites can be decomposed into clusters, and interesting geometric phenomena associated with the two-distance scenario may arise Sun et al. .

Acknowledgements.
We thank Max Metlitski for useful comments and for sharing an unpublished note Metlitski (2021) with us. This work has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (under Grant Nos. 11774002, 11625522, and 11975024), the Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai (under grant No. 20DZ2210100), the National Key R&D Program of China (under Grant No. 2018YFA0306501), and the Education Department of Anhui.

References