Exponentially-growing Mode Instability on the Reissner–Nordström-Anti-de-Sitter black holes
Abstract
We construct growing mode solutions to the uncharged and charged Klein–Gordon equations on the sub-extremal Reissner–Nordström-anti-de-Sitter (AdS) spacetime under reflecting (Dirichlet or Neumann) boundary conditions. Our result applies to a range of Klein–Gordon masses above the so-called Breitenlohner–Freedman bound, notably including the conformal mass case. The mode instability of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime for some black hole parameters is in sharp contrast to the Schwarzschild-AdS spacetime, where the solution to the Klein–Gordon equation is known to decay in time. Contrary to other mode instability results on the Kerr and Kerr-AdS spacetimes, our growing mode solutions of the uncharged and weakly charged Klein–Gordon equation exist independently of the occurrence or absence of superradiance. We discover a novel mechanism leading to a growing mode solution, namely, a near-extremal instability for the Klein–Gordon equation. Our result seems to be the first rigorous mathematical realization of this instability.
1 Introduction
In this paper, we are interested in constructing growing mode solutions to the Klein–Gordon equation with parameters on a sub-extremal Reissner–Nordström-anti-de-Sitter background:
(1.1) |
where is the electromagnetic potential and the Reissner–Nordström-AdS metric takes the form of
(1.2) |
is the mass of the black hole, is the charge of the black hole, is the cosmological constant, is the charge of the scalar field, and is the negative Klein–Gordon mass. We will consider the charged scalar field case and the uncharged scalar field case . We will assume the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime is sub-extremal, i.e. admits two positive roots. Let be the largest root of corresponding to the area radius of the event horizon.
We will make a gauge choice for the electromagnetic potential of the following form
(1.3) |
In the case , equation is reduced to the well-known uncharged Klein–Gordon equation with the usual covariant derivative .
Due to the lack of global hyperbolicity of the asymptotically AdS spacetime, the natural formulation of the Klein–Gordon equation is the initial-boundary value problem; see [37, 35]. We also refer to Section 3.1 for a detailed introduction to the geometry and boundary conditions of the asymptotically AdS spacetime. The growing mode solutions we consider in this paper take the form of , where has a negative imaginary part and is a function regular at the event horizon.
In view of the fact that can be parametrized by or alternatively, we will call the sub-extremal parameters of if the corresponding are sub-extremal parameters. Then under these new parameters, corresponds to while the extremality corresponds to . For fixed , the admissible sub-extremal range of is . We refer to Section 3.2 for a detailed discussion of the parameters transform.
In the following, we will call parameters of the Klein–Gordon equation . Our main results are as follows:
Theorem 1.1.
[Rough version of the main result] For the Klein–Gordon equation , let for Dirichlet boundary conditions and for Neumann boundary conditions respectively. Imposing reflecting boundary condition (Dirichlet or Neumann) for (1.1), we have the following three results about growing mode solutions:
-
(1)
(Large charge case) Assume are given sub-extremal parameters with , is fixed, and is a fixed large charge (the size of depends on and ). Let be the set of all such that are admissible sub-extremal parameters and with parameters has a growing mode solution that is regular at the event horizon. Then is non-empty and open.
-
(2)
(General fixed charge case) For any fixed satisfying the conditions
(1.4) (1.5) where is the positive solution to the quadratic equation
(1.6) Let be the set of all such that are admissile sub-extremal parameters and with parameters has a growing mode solution that is regular at the event horizon. Then is non-empty and open.
- (3)
We make the following remarks.
Remark 1.2.
In the large charge case, above is a constant depending on the given sub-extremal parameters, and growing mode solutions are constructed for spacetimes away from the extremality (in the sense that ). For the general fixed charge case, however, there is no lower-bound requirement for and thus our result includes the uncharged case . Our general strategy in proving the large charge case and general fixed charge case is to construct growing mode solutions around a stationary solution and one should think is close to where a stationary solution to (1.1) exists. For the weakly charged case, we can further construct growing mode solutions not only near a stationary solution but for all close to . For the uncharged case, the conditions (1.4) and (1.5) are reduced to
(1.7) | |||
(1.8) |
which includes the conformal mass .
Remark 1.3.
The construction of growing mode solutions for the uncharged case crucially relies on the non-positivity of the energy on spacelike hypersurfaces . As will be discussed in detail in Section 1.2.2, the condition
(1.9) |
ensures that the energy remains positive and bounded on each constant time slice. Consequently, the boundedness of the solution to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation (1.1) can be established using standard arguments. Therefore, for growing mode solutions in the uncharged case, the parameters must satisfy the following necessary “bound-violating” condition:
(1.10) |
which can be interpreted as a largeness requirement for the black hole charge; see Section 1.2.2 for a detailed discussion.
Remark 1.4.
We also remark that the growing mode solutions constructed in this paper for the large charge case and the general fixed charge case are obtained by perturbing stationary solutions. It remains unclear to us whether growing mode solutions exist for the general fixed charge and the black hole being close to the extremality. However, by the computation in Section 1.2.2, we can show that if
(1.11) |
then there is no stationary solution to (1.1). Hence the necessary condition the existence of stationary solutions is
(1.12) |
The role of the black hole charge in the existence of growing mode solutions
It is important to note that, in direct contrast to the condition (1.10), the decay results in [39, 38] for Klein–Gordon equations on Schwarzschild-AdS and Kerr-AdS imply that for any parameters
In other words, it is impossible to construct the growing mode solutions if the black hole spacetime itself is uncharged () and spherically symmetric; see Section 1.1.4 for a detailed discussion.
The role of the scalar field charge in the existence of growing mode solutions
We now distinguish between the charged and uncharged cases. For the charged case, since the charge can be taken to be arbitrarily large, we have
The presence of a (large) scalar field charge allows the black hole away from the extremality and the black hole spacetime to be weakly charged. While for the general fixed charge case, by and the method in this paper, we can show
which can be interpreted as follows: for a fixed charge , there exist parameters
very close to the extremal parameters. The result in the weakly charged case implies that growing mode solutions exist for all close to the extremality.
Heuristically, the existence of growing mode solutions for large charge case in Theorem 1.1 can be explained in view of the fact that the charge plays a role in the so-called “effective mass” , i.e. the coefficient of zero order term of in . violates the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound in the compact region of when the charge is large while keeping satisfying the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound; see [26, 27, 28, 42] for the heuristical discussions. For the general fixed charge case and weakly charged case, the situation is more subtle since no large effective mass is available in general.
The Breitenlohner–Freedman bound and local well-posedness
The bound is called the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound, which is crucial for local well-posedness concerns of . is proved to be local well-posed under Dirichlet boundary conditions [34] for and under Neumann boundary conditions [55] for ; see also Section 1.1.1. The ranges of our in all three cases in Theorem 1.1 (condition ) fit within both local well-posedness regimes for the reflecting boundary conditions. Furthermore, we note is conjectured in [42] as the optimal masses range for the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation under which the growing mode solutions exist; see also Section 1.3. However, condition is new to the best of our knowledge.
A toy model for the linearized Einstein–Maxwell equations
The negative Klein–Gordon mass in the setting is motivated by considering the Einstein–Maxwell equations with :
where is the energy tensor given by the Maxwell field. Informally, can be viewed as a wave operator under wave harmonic coordinates. Hence a toy model for studying the (in)stability of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime is the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation with a negative mass . Furthermore, with the conformal mass can be viewed as a simplification of the analogous Teukolsky equations derived in the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime, which plays an important role in the study of linear stability of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime. One can refer to [22] for the analogous Teukolsky equations on the asymptotically flat Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime.
Construction of hairy black holes
In [39], Holzegel and Smulevici proved that any spherically symmetric solutions to the Einstein–Klein–Gordon equations with a negative cosmological constant in the vicinity of Schwarzschild-AdS converge exponentially to the Schwarzschild-AdS again. In particular, the scalar field decays exponentially in time. Their result shows that the only stationary spherical black hole solutions of the Einstein–Klein–Gordon equations with a negative cosmological constant are Schwarzschild-AdS spacetimes with vanishing scalar field . However, using the mode solution construction obtained in this paper, which essentially relies on the non-zero black hole charge , see Remark (1.3) and (1.10), we show the existence of stationary black hole with a non-trivial (charged or uncharged) scalar field under the reflecting boundary conditions for the Einstein–Maxwell–Klein–Gordon equations with a negative cosmological constant in our companion work [58].
Largely charged and weakly charged instability mechanism
In [51] and [19], growing mode solutions were constructed respectively to the Klein–Gordon equation on the Kerr and Kerr-AdS spacetimes violating the Hawking–Reall bound. The mechanism behind these instabilities is of a superradiant nature for spacetimes outside of spherical symmetric. In [5], growing mode solutions to the charged Klein–Gordon equation on Kerr–Newman-dS and Reissner–Nordström-dS have also been constructed, due to the strong coupling of the black hole charge and the scalar field charge. The mechanism behind this instability is also of a superradiant nature induced by the scalar field charge [2]; see Section 1.2.1 for a detailed discussion.
As mentioned above, the instability mechanism for our large charge case is due to the effective mass violating the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound. In view of (1.11), the coupling of the black hole charge and the scalar field charge is also strong in our large charge case, which is very similar to the case of growing mode solutions on Kerr–Newman-dS. This instability is indeed of superradiant nature [18] and is called tachyonic instability in physics literature [26, 27, 28, 42, 8]. However, since there is no superradiance for the uncharged scalar field in the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime, our growing mode solution is due to a new mechanism called near-extremal instability, as already discussed in [42]; see also Section 1.2.2 for a further discussion of this mechanism.
Outline of the rest of the introduction
In Section 1.1, we discuss some previous results regarding (in)stability on the asymptotically AdS spacetime and establish a connection between growing mode solutions we get in this paper and an instability conjecture of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime. In Section 1.2.1, we review previous works on constructing growing mode solutions to the Klein–Gordon equation on different spacetimes. We also give the brief introduction to the instability mechanism of these growing mode solutions there. In Section 1.2.2, we discuss the novel instability mechanism leading to the growing mode solutions of the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation on the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime. In Section 1.3, we discuss the physics motivation and heuristic argument.
1.1 Previous results on stability/instability of the asymptotically AdS spacetime and decay of the field
In the past decades, despite intensive research aimed at proving the stability of the Einstein vacuum equation in the asymptotically flat spacetimes, there have been only a few results regarding the (in)stability of the asymptotically AdS spacetime. Due to the presence of a conformal timelike boundary, the choice of boundary conditions plays a decisive role in the (in)stability issues. To address the nonlinear (in)stability problems in the asymptotically AdS spacetime, the first step is to understand the decay and boundedness properties of the linearized field equation, which will heuristically suggest the (in)stability of the spacetime. As mentioned above, a natural toy model for the Einstein equations (coupled with matter field) with a negative cosmological constant is the Klein–Gordon equation on a fixed asymptotically AdS spacetime with a negative conformal mass.
First, we give a brief definition of boundary conditions for the Klein–Gordon equation with a conformal mass here; see Section 3.3 for the definition for more general Klein–Gordon masses.
Definition 1.5.
For the Klein–Gordon equation on an asymptotically AdS spacetime, the solution satisfies the Dirichlet, Neumann, or dissipative boundary condition if the following holds:
-
(1)
Dirichlet boundary condition:
-
(2)
Neumann boundary condition:
-
(3)
Optimally dissipative boundary condition:
We define the reflecting boundary condition to be either the Dirichlet boundary condition or the Neumann boundary condition. Note it is also possible to consider inear combinations of the Dirichlet and the Neumann boundary conditions, which are called the Robin boundary conditions. We will not pursue results under Robin boundary conditions in this paper.
1.1.1 Local well-posedness results
The study of the Klein–Gordon equation on asymptotically AdS spacetimes has been initiated in a series of works [34, 35]. In [34], Holzegel proved the local well-posedness results for Klein–Gordon equations on general asymptotically AdS spacetimes under the Dirichlet boundary conditions with . For the Neumann boundary conditions, the local well-posedness results are still available [55] for . [21] establishes the local well-posedness under the dissipative boundary conditions for some certain range of . In [35], Holzegel and Smulevici proved the local well-posedness results for the spherically symmetric Einstein–Klein–Gordon equations with a negative cosmological constant under Dirichlet boundary conditions with .
1.1.2 Results and conjectures on the stability of the pure AdS spacetime with dissipative boundary conditions
The pure AdS spacetime takes the form of
In [36], the following conjecture was made for the pure AdS with optimally dissipative boundary conditions.
Conjecture 1.6 ([36]).
Anti-de Sitter spacetime is asymptotically stable for optimally dissipative boundary conditions.
1.1.3 Results and conjectures on the instability of the pure AdS spacetime with reflecting boundary conditions
In [11, 12], the following instability conjecture about the pure AdS spacetime with reflecting boundary conditions was made by Holzegel and Dafermos.
Conjecture 1.7 ([11, 12]).
Anti-de Sitter spacetime is non-linearly unstable for reflecting (Dirichlet or Neumann) boundary conditions.
The above conjecture relies on the expectation that, for any small perturbations to pure AdS initial data, the solutions to the Einstein vacuum equations with a negative cosmological constant will form a trapped surface region. In a series of works [47, 46, 48, 49], Moschidis proved the instability of AdS for the Einstein-null dust system and Einstein-massless Vlasov system with reflecting boundary conditions under the spherically symmetric setting.
1.1.4 Linear (in)stability of AdS black hole
In [38, 40], Holzegel and Smulevici showed a sharp inverse logarithmic decay rate for the Klein–Gordon equation on the Schwarzschild-AdS spacetime 111In fact, under the spherically symmetric assumption of , they can further show decays exponentially in time. under the Dirichlet boundary condition. Moreover, their sharp logarithmic decay result also holds for the Kerr-AdS spacetime satisfying the Hawking–Reall bound. One should note that the Hawing–Reall bound is crucial in obtaining the decay. In fact, Dold [19] constructed growing mode solutions of the Klein–Gordon equation on the Kerr-AdS spacetime violating the Hawking–Reall bound.
Once the decay result for the Klein–Gordon equation is obtained, the next step is to study the (in)stability of linearized gravity. For the Kerr spacetime, Teukolsky derived two decoupled equations for the linearized curvature components in [53]. Most recently, Graf and Holzegel proved mode stability for the analogous Teukolsky equations on the Kerr-AdS spacetime satisfying the Hawking–Reall bound in their work [23], thus ruling out the possibility of growing mode solutions.
However, the existence of growing mode solutions to the Klein–Gordon equation on the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime constructed in this paper leads to the expectation of mode instability of the analogous Teukolsky equations, in contrast to the cases of Schwarzschild-AdS and Kerr-AdS. We will come back to this problem in our future work.
1.1.5 Nonlinear (in)stability of the asymptotically AdS spacetime
Now we discuss nonlinear (in)stability results for asymptotically AdS spacetimes. In [39], Holzegel and Smulevici showed that, for any small spherical perturbation of the Schwarzschild-AdS initial data, under the Dirichlet boundary conditions, solutions of the Einstein–Klein–Gordon equations with a negative cosmological constant will converge to the Schwarzschild-AdS spacetime exponentially in time, demonstrating the spherical stability of the Schwarzschild-AdS spacetime.
Most recently, in a series of works [24, 25] establishing the linear stability of Schwarzschild-AdS, Holzegel and Graf showed that under Dirichlet-type boundary conditions, the solutions to the Teukolsky equations with perturbed Schwarzschild-AdS initial data converge to Kerr-AdS with an inverse logarithmic rate in time.
Despite decay results for the Klein–Gordon equations and the Teukolsky equations, this inverse logarithmic decay rate is believed to be too slow to ensure the nonlinear stability of the Kerr-AdS spacetime. Hence, in [38], Holzegel and Smulevici made the following conjecture:
Conjecture 1.8 ([38]).
The Kerr-AdS spacetimes are non-linearly unstable solutions to the initial-boundary value problem for the Einstein equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions.
In contrast, the growing mode solutions we construct in this paper show instability even at the linear level. We naturally expect the nonlinear instability of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetimes as solutions to the Einstein–Maxwell equations with a negative cosmological constant under reflecting boundary conditions.
1.2 Comparing mechanisms for growing mode solutions to the Klein–Gordon equation on different spacetimes
1.2.1 The known instability mechanism I: Superradiant instability
Growing mode solutions on the Kerr and Kerr-AdS spacetimes violating the Hawking–Reall bound have been constructed in [51, 19] respectively. Both spacetimes exhibit superradiance induced by rotation, namely, negative energy at the event horizon, which gives rise to the growing mode solutions222For the Klein–Gordon equation on Kerr, growing mode solutions are due to the combination of the superradiance and massive character of the equation. Heuristically, the Klein–Gordon mass serves as a reflecting mirror that would reflect the superradiance and result in a “black-hole bomb”; see [51, 15, 17, 59]. Note on the contrary, the massless wave equation on the Kerr spacetime does not admit exponentially growing mode solutions [52, 56]. Moreover, the solutions to the wave equation on Kerr are bounded and decay in time [13, 14, 1].. See [51, 19] for a detailed discussion of this superradiant instability. See also [50, 15, 17, 59] for some previous heuristic discussions.
While the rotation-induced superradiance phenomenon affects the Klein–Gordon equation on the Kerr/Kerr-AdS spacetimes, there is no such phenomenon on Reissner–Nordström/Reissner–Nordström-AdS since they are spherically symmetric. However, if one considers the charged Klein–Gordon equation on the charged spacetime, there is a charged analog of the superradiance induced by the coupling of the black hole charge and the scalar field charge ; see [18, 8, 16, 2] and references therein. Growing mode solutions on Kerr-Newman-dS and Reissner–Nordström-dS have been constructed in [5], for spacetimes where the product of the angular momentum and the Klein–Gordon mass is small compared to the product of the black hole charge and the scalar field charge , which is a rigourous mathematical realization of this charge-induced superradiant instability. However, if the coupling is not strong, namely, the product of the black hole charge and the scalar field charge is small, then the exponential decay of the local energy is obtained in [4] for the Klein–Gordon equation on Reissner–Nordström-dS.
The Breitenlohner–Freedman bound is crucial to provide a positive scalar field energy near the infinity. This is exploited to prove the local well-posedness of the asymptotically AdS spacetime; see [6] for the original physics argument and [35, 55] for a rigorous mathematics proof. The charged Klein–Gordon equation (1.1) takes the form of the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation with a effective mass
for which the relevant Breitenlohner–Freedman bound is satisfied when approaches infinity. Hence, we still have the local well-posedness result. However, for large charge , it is possible to violate the analogous condition of the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound
for a bounded value of . We exploit this fact in the proof of Lemma 6.2, which plays an important role in the construction. This superradiant mechanism has been identified as tachyonic instability in the context of physics literatures; see for instance [8, 29].
1.2.2 The new type of instability mechanism: Near-extremal instability
There is, however, no analogous superradiant mechanism for the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation on the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime. Instead, the existence of growing mode solutions results from the black hole being too close to the extremality, which is called the near-extremal instability [29].
We try to illustrate the mathematical meaning of this new type of instability by comparing the uncharged Klein–Gordon equations on Schwarzschild-AdS and Reissner–Nordström-AdS. Using the coordinates as in (1.2), let be the foliation of spacetimes. Putting the Dirichlet boundary conditions at timelike infinity, the standard energy estimate gives
where is the unique timelike Killing vector field on the spacetimes, is the normal vector field on , is the volume form of , and the energy momentum tensor for the Klein–Gordon equation is
(1.13) |
The boundedness of the solution follows from a standard argument if the energy on the spacelike slice is positive. The conservation of energy shows that the quantity
is independent of . However, since the Klein–Gordon mass in our setting is negative, the positivity of
is not guaranteed at first glance. On the Schwarzschild-AdS spacetime, the integral of the negative term can be absorbed by the integral of the derivative term using the Hardy inequality. The following Hardy inequality can indeed be obtained:
(1.14) |
Using the above Hardy inequality, for the Schwarzschild-AdS spacetime, we have
(1.15) | ||||
Moreover, for the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime, using the argument as above, one can in fact show that if
(1.16) |
the energy is still positive. Hence by the standard commuting vector field and redshift methods, one can still show the boundedness of the solutions. Combining (1.16) and (1.5), we can show that growing mode solutions to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation (1.1) can only exist if
(1.17) |
In the above computation, the integral of the negative term in the energy is controlled by the weighted norm of by the Hardy inequality . This weight in (1.14) decays quadratically like towards the event horizon, whereas the weight of the norm of in the original energy of the Schwarzschild-AdS spacetime decays at a linear rate with bounded away from . This fact is crucial in showing the absence of the negative energy. Hence, near the horizon, the integrand on the right-hand side of is positive, giving the hope to absorb the negative term in the whole black hole exterior region . However, on the extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime, decays exactly quadratically like . A simple computation shows that the analogous integrand on the right-hand side of might be negative near the event horizon. Hence, for the near-extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime, if the initial data is supported near the event horizon, the energy might be negative; see Section 6.2 for the proof of the existence of negative energy in near-extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetimes. This phenomenon is the key observation allowing us to construct the growing mode solution in our main theorem.
1.3 Hairy black holes and connection to the AdS/CFT correspondence
1.3.1 Connection between growing mode solutions, oscillating mode solutions, and hairy black holes
The well-known no-hair conjecture in General Relativity asserts that all stationary black hole solutions to the Einstein (coupled with reasonable matter fields) equations are uniquely determined by the mass, charge, and angular momentum; for instance see the review [33] and references therein.
In [51], Shlapentokh-Rothman constructed solutions of the form to the Klein–Gordon equation on the Kerr spacetime, which is interpreted as a “linear hair”, in violation to at least the spirit of the conjecture. He showed the existence of growing mode solutions ( has a negative imaginary part) and time-periodic solutions (). Later, with Chodosh [9], they further constructed one-parameter families of the stationary axisymmetric asymptotically flat solutions to the Einstein–Klein–Gordon equations bifurcating off the Kerr solution. Their work gives a counter-example to the no-hair conjecture.333In fact, their result violates the no-hair conjecture to the extend that the metric is stationary but the scalar field is time-periodic. See also [32, 30, 7, 3, 31, 10] for previous physics and numerics results in this direction.
In the works [54, 43], the mathematical study of the hairy black hole interiors has been initiated. Putting the characteristic initial data on the event horizon, corresponding to a stationary non-zero scalar field , Van de Moortel [54] investigated the interior of the stationary Einstein–Maxwell–Klein–Gordon hairy black holes and their singular structures, assuming the scalar field is uncharged. Later, Van de Moortel and Li studied the analogous problem with the charged scalar field [43]. However, the existence of a stationary black hole exterior corresponding to the solutions in [54, 43] was open; see Open Problem iv in [54]. We resolve this problem in the companion work [58], taking advantage of the method in this paper, which gives the affirmative answer to Open Problem iv and provides examples of asymptotically AdS hairy black holes whose interior is governed by the results of [54, 43].
1.3.2 AdS/CFT correspondence, holographic superconductor, and near-horizon geometry
Asymptotically AdS black holes have also emerged as an object of interest in the celebrated AdS/CFT correspondence [44, 45, 57]. Growing efforts have been spent in finding holographic analogs of superconductors, a problem for which hairy black holes appear as natural candidates. In fact, the existence of non-trivial stationary asymptotically AdS hairy black holes has been predicted in the paper [29], using heuristics relying on the so-called near-horizon geometry. Indeed, it is possible to “map” the near-extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime to by a limiting procedure. The heuristics of [29] argue that the -dimensional Breitenlohner–Freedman bound is relevant to the existence of growing mode solutions to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation on the extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime, specifically for in the range
Our result actually shows the growing mode solutions exist within this range for sub-extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS black holes. We also identify explicitly a sufficient condition (1.5) for the growing mode solutions to exist, which is not previously identified in [29]. While our method in principle also works to construct growing mode solutions on the extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime, we leave this question to future works.
Outline of the rest of the paper
In Section 3, we introduce the geometry of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime and discuss the near-horizon boundary conditions and near-infinity boundary conditions. In Section 4, we give precise statements of our main theorems and discuss the difficulties and new ideas. The construction of the stationary solutions of (1.1) is viewed as an important step toward the construction of the growing mode solutions. We construct the stationary solution with arbitratry boundary conditions in Section 5 and with reflecting boundary conditions in Section 6 and 7 respectively. Lastly, in section 8.1, we prove the existence of the desired growing mode solutions.
2 Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank his advisor, Maxime Van de Moortel, for his kind support, continuous encouragement, numerous inspiring discussions, and valuable suggestions for the manuscript. Additionally, the author expresses special thanks to Zheng-Chao Han for several very enlightening discussions.
3 Preliminary
3.1 Geometry of Reissner–Nordström-AdS space
The Reissner–Nordström-AdS metric in coordinates is given by
where here is the mass of the black hole, is the charge of the black hole, and is the negative cosmological constant. The Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime is uniquely determined by parameters . We refer to these parameters as sub-extremal if the function admits two distinct positive roots, denoted as . The region is known as the exterior of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS black hole and the hypersurface is called the event horizon. We can define the horizon temperature as:
(3.1) |
For sub-extremal parameters, since is the largest real root, we have . Parameters are called extremal if has two identical positive roots. For extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS, we have .
Note that the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime breaks down in the usual coordinates when . To extend the spacetime smoothly to the event horizon, let
we can see that
Then we can define the outgoing Eddington–Finkelstein (EF) coordinates by
The Reissner–Nordström-AdS metric in the outgoing EF coordinates becomes
As we can see from the asymptotic behavior of when approaches infinity, the affine length of the curve with constant is finite, contrary to the asymptotically flat Reissner–Nordström spacetime, where there approaches infinity. By letting , we can show that the boundary of with coordinates is timelike; see Figure 1 for the Penrose diagram of the Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime.
3.2 Parameters for the spherically symmetric Klein–Gordon equation
The spherically symmetric Klein–Gordon equation on the Reissner–Nordström-AdS background is
(3.2) |
If we further assume is stationary, then we can get the stationary Klein–Gordon equation:
(3.3) |
We call parameters of the Klein–Gordon equation and sub-extremal parameters if the corresponding are sub-extremal parameters for Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime. However, since the sub-extremal condition concerns the roots of , which are solutions of a quartic equation, it is hard to provide an algebraic criterion for when the parameters will satisfy the sub-extremal condition. Hence it may be inconvenient to use as parameters. In the following proposition, we prove that we can always use as parameters.
Proposition 3.1.
The parameters transformation is a regular transformation. The new parameters satisfy the sub-extremal condition if and only if
(3.4) | |||
(3.5) |
In other words, for fixed , the sub-extremal condition can be achieved by decreasing to be smaller than but larger than .
Proof.
By the form of , we have
It is easy to check the Jacobian of the map
is non-zero. Hence the transformation is regular. By condition , we have .
Calculating the horizon temperature , we can get
by condition (3.5). Since
by Vieta Theorem, we have
(3.6) | |||
(3.7) |
where , are the four roots of the polynomial .
Given that already has a positive root , either it has two real roots and along with two non-real conjugate roots and , or it has four real roots . For the first case, we have . Thus we have , by . Since by condition , is the largest root and are sub-extremal. If has four real roots, then by and , we have positive and negative. Since and , then is the largest root and parameters are sub-extremal. ∎
3.3 Boundary conditions
In this section, we give the precise definition of Dirichlet, Neumann, and Robin boundary conditions. Let .
Definition 3.2.
[55] We say a function on obeys Dirichlet, Neumann, or Robin boundary conditions if the following holds:
-
(1)
Dirichlet:
-
(2)
Neumann:
-
(3)
Robin:
where is a real constant.
3.4 Mode solutions
Assume is a mode solution of satisfying the Dirichlet boundary condition, we can get the equation for :
(3.8) |
To facilitate the discussion of solutions under Neumann boundary conditions, letting , we can rewrite the equation as:
(3.9) | ||||
From the asymptotic analysis, the behavior of near is given by Dirichlet, Neumann, or Robin conditions. Next, we derive the asymptotic behavior of when . Since the Reissner–Nordström-AdS metric can be extended to the event horizon in the outgoing EF coordinates, we require the solution of the Klein–Gordon equation can also be extended to the event horizon. We have
Hence to do the extension, we require that can extended to be a smooth function on . We have the following relation
(3.10) | ||||
(3.11) |
From , we have
(3.12) |
For growing mode solutions , we have the asymptotic decay behavior:
(3.13) |
We can prove the following result:
Proposition 3.3.
For any given sub-extremal parameters , the only real mode solution to the Klein-Gordon equation with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions which can be extended smoothly to the horizon is the static solution with .
Proof.
Multiplying and taking the imaginary part of the equation , we have
Hence if is real, we have
For satisfying the Dirichlet boundary condition, using and , we have
Hence . For satisfying the Neumann boundary condition, using the equation and reapplying the above argument, we can prove the same conclusion. ∎
Furthermore, for the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation, we have the following result about growing mode solutions.
Proposition 3.4.
All growing mode solutions to the uncharged equation (3.8) on the sub-extremal Reissner–Nordström-AdS spacetime have pure imaginary mode .
4 Main results and outline of the proof
4.1 Precise statements of main results
Now we are ready to state the main results we get.
Theorem 4.1.
For Klein–Gordon equation with negative mass , let for Dirichlet boundary conditions and for Neumann boundary conditions. Imposing reflecting boundary condition for (1.1), we have
-
(1)
(Large charge case) For any given sub-extremal parameters with and , there exists a , such that for any and sufficiently small, there exist real analytic functions and with on so that there exists a mode solution of with sub-extremal parameters . Moreover, can be continuously extended to the event horizon .
-
(2)
(General fixed charge case) For each fixed parameters satisfying
(4.1) (4.2) where is the positive solution to the quadratic equation (1.6). Then for any sufficiently small, there exist real analytic functions and with on , such that are sub-extremal parameters and there exists a mode solution of with parameters . Moreover, can be continuously extended to the event horizon and we have
(4.3) (4.4) - (3)
Remark 4.2.
In both the large charge case and the general fixed charge case, when , the solutions constructed in the theorem reduce to stationary solutions. One should think the growing mode solutions in these two cases are constructed by perturbing a stationary solution. However, in view of Proposition 3.4, one can treat the existence of growing mode solutions to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation (3.8) as an negative eigenvalue problem. This perspective allows us to construct growing mode solutions to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation for all without using perturbative approach. Additional, growing mode solutions for the weakly charged case can be obtained by perturbing the scalar field charge.
Remark 4.3.
The key step toward proving the existence of growing mode solutions is the construction of non-trivial bounded stationary solutions to with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions. Under the stationary assumption, is reduced to the ODE . Instead of solving ODE under given boundary conditions, we start with regular data at and solve the equation to . Considering the asymptotic behavior of the solution, we can prove the following proposition:
Proposition 4.4.
For any sub-extremal parameters satisfying the Breitenlohner–Freedman bound , we can construct the static spherically symmetric solution to the Klein–Gordon equation under fixed Reissner–Nordström AdS metric such that
(4.7) | |||
(4.8) |
is the local basis of the solution of equations , with the following asymptotic behaviors:
(4.9) | ||||
(4.10) |
In other words, is a function on satisfying the Dirichlet boundary condition and is a function on satisfying the Neumann boundary condition.
Remark 4.5.
In the later discussion, we use the notation to denote the asymptotic behavior and notation to denote the asymptotic behavior .
The above theorem holds for any sub-extremal parameters , highlighting the significance of the boundary conditions. For a given boundary condition, it’s highly non-trivial that one can prove the existence of a regular stationary solution on .
Furthermore, we can prove the following existence of non-trivial stationary solutions to with reflecting boundary conditions.
Theorem 4.6.
Imposing the reflecting boundary condition for the Klein–Gordon equation with a negative mass , we have
-
(1)
(Large charge scalar field) For any given sub-extremal parameters with and within the above range, there exists a , such that for any , there exists , such that a stationary solution to with parameters exists and can be extended continuously to the event horizon .
- (2)
4.2 Main difficulty and outline of the proof
In this section, we discuss the main difficulties in the proof and ideas we used by considering the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation with Dirichlet boundary conditions; see Section 7.1 for the discussion of Neumann boundary conditions. The ideas of doing the charged case are essentially the same. We mainly adopt the method outlined in [51]. The proof is divided into two main steps:
- •
-
•
Perturb the stationary solution and use the implicit function theorem to get growing mode solutions.
The main difficulty is the first step.To show the existence of a non-trivial stationary solution with Dirichlet boundary condition, we apply the variational method to find the minimizer of the energy functional of :
The asymptotic analysis of solution gives that is finite if and only if is bounded and satisfies the Dirichlet boundary condition. Furthermore, the energy identity of implies for the stationary solution .
To construct the desired solution, we apply the variational argument to within the function class with
By the constrained variational principle, the minimizer will be the solution of the following eigenvalue equation
For fixed neutral parameters , we denote the -dependence of by . To show can be zero for some , we start with such that are extremal parameters for the given and show that is negative. Then by exploiting the monotonicity and continuity of with respect to , we conclude the existence of such that .
However, several difficulties arise when attempting to apply the above framework.
-
1.
First, the energy functional is not even lower bounded at first glance, as the functions in our function class essentially have an norm equal to while contains the integral of .
-
2.
Second, even if is lower bounded in our function class, since degenerates at the event horizon, we could not get the boundedness of the minimizing sequence . Hence, to the best of our knowledge, no (weak) convergence result we can use.
-
3.
Third, the above framework requires us to start with , and the corresponding should have a negative minimum. However, as already shown in Section 1.2.2, for small black hole charge (1.16), one can prove the positivity of the energy functional, which means the existence of the energy functional with a negative minimun is subtle in our setting.
The second difficulty is the easiest one to overcome. We can directly use the method outlined in [51] by considering the perturbed energy functional , which has the same integrand but is integrated over . Then for each fixed , we can show that is lower bounded on , thereby we can prove the boundedness of the minimizing sequence of this perturbed energy functional. By the weak compactness of and Sobolev embedding, we can show the existence of the minimizer of ; See Proposition 6.6. To get rid of , our method is to take a step back by showing the local boundedness on any fixed compact set and then achieving local convergence for each . Nonetheless, the limit obtained from the local convergence argument might be trivial since the energy can concentrate outside of the compact set despite having . Therefore, we still need some coercivity results.
One of the main new ideas in this paper lie in the proof of the first difficulty and coercivity mentioned above, which uses the so-called twisted derivative obtained by replacing the usual derivative with ; see Section 6.1. The twisted derivative has been used to establish the local well-posedness of the Klein–Gordon equation on asymptotically AdS space with Neumann boundary conditions in [55]. This approach addresses the difficulty arising from the fact that the energy functional is infinite for functions with Neumann boundary conditions. The surprising aspect here is that, even for Dirichlet boundary conditions, we need to employ the twisted derivative. Writing the equation and energy functional in the twisted derivative form, the structure of will influence the potential term, enriching the sign structure of the potential. By a careful analysis of the potential and integrability of solutions in Proposition 6.10 and 6.9 we can get the lower boundedness and coercivity.
Dealing with the third difficulty of achieving a negative minimum for the uncharged is particularly challenging. To overcome this obstacle, we derive a sharp near-horizon version of the Hardy inequality in Lemma 6.3 and devise a test function with a compact support to demonstrate the existence of a negative minimum in Lemma 6.5.
The non-trivial stationary solution with Neumann boundary conditions can be constructed similarly, by using a different twist function in the twisted derivative.
Growing mode solutions can be obtained from the stationary solution through the application of the implicit function theorem; see Section 8.1.
5 Proof of Proposition 4.4
The proof of Proposition 4.4 is a standard application of the asymptotic analysis. We provide a proof in this section for completeness.
Proof.
By the local asymptotic analysis of equations , locally near we have
where and are analytic functions on and finite at . If we can show when , the solution can be extended to the whole domain , then by the asymptotic analysis at , we have
where and are the local solutions of at satisfying and respectively.
Note in , the term is defined everywhere on since
Multiplying on both sides of the equation , we have
(5.1) |
Integrating , we have
(5.2) |
Then by the Gronwall inequality, we have
which means and are finite on any interval . Hence by the extension principle of the ODE, we know the solution of exists on . ∎
We can aslo prove the following Wronskian estimate of .
Proposition 5.1.
For the local basis of solutions of the linear Klein–Gordon equation in Proposition 4.4, for large and small enough, we have the following bounds
(5.3) | |||
(5.4) |
Proof.
By the asymptotic behavior of and , follows trivially. Let
be the local basis of the solution of near . We have
Calculating the Wronskian, we have
(5.5) | ||||
Since and are linearly independent, then we have
Hence we can prove . ∎
6 Proof of Theorem 4.6 for Dirichlet boundary conditions
In this section, we will prove Theorem 4.6 under Dirichlet boundary conditions. We use the notation to emphasize the role of the parameter in the following argument.
6.1 Energy functional and the twisted energy functional
Recall that we can write the stationary Klein–Gordon equation as
(6.1) |
where takes the form of
The corresponding energy functional is:
(6.2) |
We call the term
defined in the above energy functional the potential term. One can see is always negative on . To overcome the difficulties mentioned in Section 4.2, we introduce the twisted derivative. Let be the twisted derivative
where function is called the twist function. The dual operator of this twisted derivative operator is . We can rewrite the equation with respect to the twisted derivative as
(6.3) |
where the twisted potential is
(6.4) |
We can also define the twisted energy functional by
(6.5) |
In the proof of Theorem 4.6 with Dirichlet boundary conditions, we choose . Let denote the potential function and denote the twisted energy functional when , then we have
(6.6) |
We can prove that the twisted energy functional is equivalent to the original energy functional.
Lemma 6.1.
If , then for any smooth function .
Proof.
This can be proved by direct computation. We have
The third identity is due to the integration by parts and the fact that is compactly supported. ∎
Since degenerates at the event horizon, we define the perturbed energy functional to be
(6.7) |
Similarly, we can define the perturbed twisted energy functional
(6.8) |
6.2 Negative energy bound state
Recall the temperature of the event horizon
(6.9) |
For fixed parameters , the horizon temperature is determined by the black hole mass .
We say has a negative energy bound state if there exists such that . Let
be the set of all admissible such that admits a negative energy bound state. Due to Lemma 6.1, if has a negative energy bound state, so does for any smooth function . If charge can be taken to be large, then the negative energy bound state follows trivially. We can prove the following lemma.
Lemma 6.2.
For any fixed sub-extremal parameters satisfying the bound , there exists a such that for any , we can find the negative energy bound state for the functional .
Proof.
Let on be a smooth function defined on with support on . Let
If we set , then for any , we have the negative energy bound state. ∎
For the second case in Theorem 4.6 where the sufficient largeness of is missing, the existence of a negative energy bound state becomes more subtle. The numerical method in physics literature [29] fails to find a negative energy bound state for when and . Next, by using a sharp Hardy-type inequality and continuity argument, we prove the existence of a negative energy bound state for the general fixed charge case, which paves the way to prove Theorem 4.6.
Lemma 6.3.
[Sharp Hardy-type Inequality] Assume , then we have
The constant in the inequality is sharp in the sense that for any small, we can find a such that
Proof.
By the integration by parts and Hölder inequality, we have
Thus we have
Next we prove the constant here is sharp. For and , let be
(6.10) |
where and . We have
and
Hence if we choose small and close to , we have
Note by the construction of , we know that is continuous on and smooth on . Hence . Then we can approximate by , we have such that
∎
Remark 6.4.
Note the inequality we got above is scaling invariant. So we can get the same result with the same sharp constant if we change the domain in the setting to be for any . In the later discussion, will be chosen to be a small number.
Now we are ready to prove the following lemma showing that for fixed and the parameters satisfying conditions (4.1) and (4.2), the set is non-empty.
Lemma 6.5.
For each fixed parameters satisfying
(6.11) | |||
(6.12) |
where is the positive root of (1.6), is non-empty.
Proof.
For fixed , if we can find the negative energy bound state for , then by continuity of with respect to for fixed , we can find the negative energy bound state for with in the neighborhood of .
Calculating with , we have
By Lemma 6.3, we can find with for any such that
Then we have the following estimate for :
Then by the conditions (4.1) and (4.2), we can choose and small such that the right hand side of the above inequality is negative.
Now we have . By the continuity, we can prove is non-empty. ∎
6.3 Minimizer of the energy functional
We consider the following function class :
We can define the perturbed function class by changing the domain in the above definition to be . Since is compactly supported, we still have , similar to Lemma 6.1.
At first glimpse one may suspect whether the minimum of can be attained in since contains the integral of while only makes the restriction on the norm of the function near infinity. However, we can prove the following proposition.
Proposition 6.6.
For , if has a negative energy bound state, then for any small enough, can attain its negative minimum in the function class .
Proof.
In this proof, we use to denote the constant independent of . By Lemma 6.1 and the continuity of with respect to , we know that for small enough, we can also find a negative energy bound state for . It remains to prove that can attain its minimum in . We have
Since has a negative energy bound state, the term
must have negative values. However, by considering the limit of this term when , we have
Hence there exists a such that is positive for .
Then we have
(6.13) | ||||
Since on
we have
Since , we have
(6.14) |
And since the right hand side of is positive, we have
Hence we have is lower bounded. Let be the minimizing sequence of . Without loss of generality, we can assume . Then since is bounded, by we know is integrable:
(6.15) |
For , we have
Hence we have
Then we have is bounded. By Rellich compactness theorem, we have weakly converges to in and strongly converges to in on any compact set . Next, we prove that also belongs to . By the strong convergence on a compact set , we have
Passing to the limit, we have
Assume , then for any , there exist infinite many such that
Then by , we have
which provides a contradiction if is large enough. Hence can attain its minimum in . ∎
Remark 6.7.
The key point in obtaining the minimizer in the above proof is that the twisted potential is strictly positive near the infinity. This property allows us to increase the integrability of the functions in the minimizing sequence and prove that . For the case, we have a more refined description of : is negative on and positive on . The presence of the charge complicates the sign of the term on .
By the constrained variational principle, we can get the Euler–Lagrange equation for
(6.16) |
where is the minimum of in .
Remark 6.8.
One can still have Lemma 6.6 and estimate without assuming the negative energy bound state. The proof follows line by line. However, the negative energy bound state condition allows us to derive the Euler-Lagrange equation with negative eigenvalue .
Applying the asymptotic analysis to the solution of , asymptotically we have since is bounded. Moreover, by using the energy estimate, we can get the following uniform bound for independent of .
Proposition 6.9.
Let be the solution of with sub-extremal parameters obtained above. Then is asymptotically when approaches infinity. Moreover, we have
(6.17) |
where is a constant independent of .
Proof.
By the asymptotic analysis of the equation at and boundedness of , we know
It remains to prove . Let
(6.18) |
where and are the local basis of the equation with the same sub-extremal parameters on , defined in Proposition 4.4. By the asymptotic behavior of near , we have
Substituting into , we have
Then we have
Using and , we have
Hence for , we have
(6.19) | ||||
where here is a constant independent of . Similarly, for and , we have
(6.20) |
Thus we only need to show that is uniformly bounded in . Note that
If we can find a sequence such that goes to infinity, then by , goes to infinity uniformly in for . Hence we have
which is a contradiction since and are uniformly bounded in . Therefore we obtain the uniform boundedness of . Hence we can prove . ∎
Next, we want to get rid of . We can prove the following proposition.
Proposition 6.10.
If has a negative energy bound state, then there exists a non-zero solution of the equation
(6.21) |
Moreover, satisfies the Dirichlet boundary condition and can be extended continuously to the event horizon.
Proof.
Let . By , we have
Thus we have the uniform boundedness for on
(6.22) |
Hence weakly converges to in and strongly converges to in up to a subsequence. By , we have
Then we have
(6.23) |
where is a positive constant which will be chosen very large later.
When , we have . Now for our fixed parameters , we can find large enough, such that . Then we have
Basic calculation shows that will have exactly one zero point . Hence there exists such that is positive on .
Considering the energy functional , we have
(6.24) | ||||
Since
where is bounded above due to the fact that has a negative energy bound state. Since the term on the left hand side of is bounded, we have
(6.25) |
Combining and , we have
(6.26) |
by choosing large enough.
Thus is non-zero. By the local convergence result, satisfies the equation
By the asymptotic analysis of the equation , we have
Since is locally convergent to on any compact set , we have
where is a constant independent of . Thus we conclude that and is the desired solution of . ∎
The immediate consequence of Proposition 6.10 is that, is a growing mode solution to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation (1.1) with the mode .
Remark 6.11.
By the asymptotic behavior of , we have
If we normalize such that
then we have
(6.27) |
Remark 6.12.
Note that in the above argument, to show is non-zero, we need the fact that is bounded away from to have the lower bound . This step relies on the existence of a negative energy bound state.
Now we are ready to prove Theorem 4.6.
Proof.
By Lemma 6.2, Lemma 6.5, and Proposition 6.6, we only need to find an such that . First, we derive the monotonicity of and in terms of . For any and , we have
Since for fixed and is a decreasing function of and is an increasing funciton of , we have
Passing to the limit, we have and are increasing functions of . By the same computation as above, we can further show that is a Lipschitz function of with Lipschitz constant uniform in :
where is a uniform constant independent of and . Passing to the limit we get is also an increasing uniformly Lipschitz function of . Let , where if one considers the large charge case and if one considers the general fixed charge case. Then we can continuously extend to by letting
If , then by remark 6.12 and all the construction above, we can find and such that is the solution of
Then implies we can find a negative energy bound state for , which means . Since is a contninuous function of , for where is a small positive number, we have . Then we can apply the above argument in Proposition 6.6 again to show that , which contradicts to the definition of . Therefore .
Last, we need to construct the corresponding function . We consider the solution of the equation
with and Dirichlet boundary condition. By the asymptotic analysis, we write as
where
Since for , we have by continuity. Then
is the non-zero solution of 3.3 with Dirichlet boundary condition and can be extended continuously to the event horizon. ∎
7 Proof of Theorem 4.6 for Neumann boundary conditions
In this section, we begin to prove Theorem 4.6 for Neumann boundary conditions. We will elaborate on the new ingredients in this different boundary condition case while omitting some proofs similar to those used in the Dirichlet boundary condition case.
7.1 Outline of the proof
In Section 4.2, we discussed the outline of the proof for Dirichlet boundary conditions. Based on the discussion there and the proofs we used in Section 6, we further discuss the new challenges we will face in the case of Neumann boundary conditions.
First, if we want to apply a similar variational method, the immediate difficulty we will face is that the energy functional is not even finite for functions with Neumann boundary conditions since functions with Neumann boundary conditions decay slower near the infinity. This can be overcome by using the appropriately designed twisted derivative, which was first raised by Breitenlohner and Freedman [6] and later was used in [55, 19, 41] to study the Klein–Gordon equations on asymptotic AdS spacetimes under Neumann boundary conditions.
Second, to achieve Neumann boundary conditions for the minimizer, we can no longer take in Lemma 6.1 to be compactly supported. Then Lemma 6.1 will fail in general since the boundary term generated from using the integration by parts in the proof of Lemma 6.1 is not finite. Recall that in the proof of Proposition 6.10, we need to use a different and in principle equivalent twisted energy functional to show that the limit is non-trivial. This step has not worked for the Neumann boundary conditions since the failure of Lemma 6.1 for generic twist functions. Hence we have to come up with a more robust method. We overcome this difficulty by constructing a nice twisted energy functional.
Third, as in the case of the Dirichlet boundary conditions, we can only expect local convergence while boundary conditions concern the behavior of at . For the Dirichlet boundary conditions, in the proof of Proposition 6.10, is finite if and only if solution satisfies the Dirichlet boundary condition. We can obtain the finiteness of the energy functional on any compact set and then pass to the limit to get the finiteness of . This strategy does not work for the Neumann boundary conditions, since the suitable twisted energy functional is finite for functions with Neumann or Dirichlet boundary conditions and we lose information at infinity when applying the local convergence argument. The boundary condition of is achieved by establishing the uniform bound of , analogously to Proposition 6.9
7.2 More general twisted derivatives
In this section we introduce a new function space and the twisted derivatives we will use.
First, to illustrate the idea of dealing with non-integrability of the energy function generated by slow decay nature of function with Neumann boundary conditions, we consider the following naive twisted energy functional.
Let . We can rewrite the equation by using the twisted derivative :
(7.1) | |||
(7.2) |
The twisted energy functional for this equation is
(7.3) |
which is finite for functions with Neumann boundary conditions. The secret in the above choice of the twisted derivative is that the leading order term in the potential is canceled. However, in this situation, the leading term of is comparable to the term , which means the positivity of the potential term near depends on the values of . In view of Remark 6.7, the method in the Dirichlet boundary condition case fails for Neumann boundary conditions. To make our method more robust and cover all ranges of possible where the negative energy bound state and local well-posedness hold, we define the following twist function , which can be viewed as a suitable modification of the twist function preserving its structure at infinity:
(7.4) |
where is a large constant which will be chosen later and is a smooth function that makes smooth on . When , we have
(7.5) | ||||
When , we have
(7.6) |
for large enough.
To define the new function space, let be a smooth function which is on and vanishes near infinity. Then we can define :
can be viewed as a function supported away from . The difference between and defined in Section 6 is that is no longer compactly supported. Consequently, Lemma 6.1 is not true generically since the non-vanishing boundary terms.
7.3 Negative energy bound state and the eigenvalue solution
Since to find the negative energy bound state, we only need to consider with compactly supported. Hence we can immediately get the existence of the negative energy bound state for . Specifically, we have the following two lemmas, the proofs of which follow line by line from the case of Dirichlet boundary conditions in Lemma 6.2 and Lemma 6.5.
Lemma 7.1.
For any fixed parameters satisfying the bound , and for any , there exists a such that for any , is non-empty.
Lemma 7.2.
Next, we prove the existence of a minimizer for the energy functional .
Proposition 7.3.
If has a negative energy bound state, then for any small enough, can attain its negative minimum in the function class . Moreover, satisfies the Neumann boundary condition.
Proof.
The proof here is almost the same as the proof of Proposition 6.6. Consider the twisted energy functional
By the limit , we have is positive and asymptotically when . By the limit , we have is positive near the event horizon. Let and be the smallest and largest root of respectively. We have
(7.9) | ||||
Hence is lower bounded in . Let be the minimizing sequence. Then we have
(7.10) |
Therefore is bounded. Then we have is weakly convergent to and strongly convergent to on any compact set . Then by , we have in fact
Hence by the same argument as in Proposition 6.6, we have
.
Remark 7.4.
One should note that, the Dirichlet boundary condition in the proof of Proposition 6.6 is obtained by looking at the finite energy. However, since functions in our function class no longer vanishes near infinity, the variational principle itself gives information about the boundary condition of .
We can get rid of in the following proposition:
Proposition 7.5.
If there exists a negative energy bound state of , then we can find a non-zero solution of the equation
(7.13) |
Moreover, satisfies the Neumann boundary condition and can be extended continuously to the event horizon .
Proof.
By using the same argument as in the proof of Proposition 6.10, we can show that is weakly convergent to in and strongly convergent to in . By , we have
Hence is non-trival and solves the equation
(7.14) |
which is equivalent to (7.13).
It remains to prove that still satisfies the Neumann boundary condition. This part does not follow trivially since is obtained by the local convergence and we may lose information near the infinity. For any compact set , by using the same argument as in Proposition 6.9, we have
(7.15) |
is uniformly bounded in and . Then by the weakly convergence results, we have
(7.16) |
However, if has the Dirichlet branch, then can not be uniformly bounded when is located near the infinity, which is a contradiction. ∎
8 Proof of growing mode solution
In this section, we finally close the proof of Theorem 4.1.
8.1 Growing mode solutions for the large charge case and the general fixed charge case under Dirichlet boundary condition
Theorem 8.1.
Let be the parameters where the stationary solutions defined in Theorem 4.6 exist. Then there exists such that there exist analytic functions and for with and such that mode solutions to the equation (1.1) with parameters exist under the Dirichlet boundary condition. Moreover, can be continuously extended to the event horizon and
(8.1) | |||
(8.2) |
We can write the solution of in the form of
(8.3) |
where is the local basis of solutions of with satisfying the Dirichlet boundary condition and satisfying the Neumann boundary condition. Furthermore, if is a real number while and are not real functions, then and are also two linearly independent solutions and satisfy the same boundary conditions. Hence we can always take and to be real if is real.
Proof.
Since is a stationary solution, we have . Let , , and , then by the implicit function theorem, to prove the existence of growing mode solutions under Dirichlet boundary conditions, we only need to show
(8.4) |
For real, multiplying and taking the imaginary part, we have
(8.5) |
By the near horizon and near infinity behaviors of in and , we have
Taking the and derivatives respectively and evaluating at , we have
(8.6) | ||||
Since , holds if and only if . Assume
(8.7) |
Then differentiating the equation at , we have
(8.8) |
We can multiply the above equation by and use the integration by parts. Since by our assumption , the boundary terms appear in the integration by parts vanish. Hence we have
(8.9) | ||||
Since is also the solution of , the left hand side of the above equation is . Since on for parameters , we have
which contradicts to the fact that is non-trivial. Hence and by the implicit function theorem, for small enough, there exist real analytic functions and on , such that for parameters , we have the growing mode solution satisfying the Dirichlet boundary condition.
To prove (8.1) and (8.2), differentiating the equation (3.8) with respect to at , we have
(8.10) |
By the boundary conditions (3.13) and (3.12) for at the event horizon, we have
(8.11) | |||
(8.12) |
Since satisfies the Dirichlet boundary condition, the boundary terms at the infinity vanish. For the equation (8.10), multiplying , taking the real and imaginary part respectively, and integrating by parts, we have
(8.13) | |||
(8.14) |
Hence we have
∎
8.2 Growing mode solutions for the weakly charged case under Dirichlet boundary condition
The existence of growing mode solutions to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation under Dirichlet boundary conditions, as stated in the weakly charged case of Theorem 4.1, follows from Proposition 6.10, Proposition 3.4, and the equation (3.8). It remains to show the existence of growing mode solutions near the extremality when is small. Let and for as in Theorem 4.6, we have the following result:
Theorem 8.2.
Let be the growing mode solution to the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation (1.1) with parameters under Dirichlet boundary. Then there exist a small positive number and real analytic functions and on with such that a growing mode solution of the form to (1.1) with parameters under the Dirichlet boundary condition exists.
Proof.
We can write the solution of in the form of
(8.15) |
as in Section 8.1. Assume that for parameters , the uncharged Klein–Gordon equation (1.1) admits a growing mode solution with mode under the Dirichlet boundary condition. The boundary conditions for at the event horizon are given by and . We can deduce that
(8.16) |
Differentiating the equation (3.8) with and respectively at and , taking the imaginary part, and integrating over , analogously to the computation in (8.9), we have
(8.17) | |||
(8.18) |
Analogously to the proof of Theorem 8.1, assuming , differentiating equation (3.8) with respect to , multiplying , and integrating by parts over , we can get a contradiction. Hence . Then by the implicit function theorem, we can finish the proof. ∎
8.3 Growing mode solution for Neumann boundary condition
References
- [1] Lars Andersson and Pieter Blue. Hidden symmetries and decay for the wave equation on the Kerr spacetime. Annals of Mathematics, pages 787–853, 2015.
- [2] Alain Bachelot. Superradiance and scattering of the charged klein–gordon field by a step-like electrostatic potential. Journal de mathématiques pures et appliquées, 83(10):1179–1239, 2004.
- [3] Carolina L Benone, Luís CB Crispino, Carlos Herdeiro, and Eugen Radu. Kerr-Newman scalar clouds. Physical Review D, 90(10):104024, 2014.
- [4] Nicolas Besset. Decay of the local energy for the charged klein–gordon equation in the exterior de sitter–reissner–nordström spacetime. In Annales Henri Poincaré, volume 21, pages 2433–2484. Springer, 2020.
- [5] Nicolas Besset and Dietrich Häfner. Existence of exponentially growing finite energy solutions for the charged klein–gordon equation on the de sitter–kerr–newman metric. Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations, 18(02):293–310, 2021.
- [6] Peter Breitenlohner and Daniel Z Freedman. Stability in gauged extended supergravity. Annals of physics, 144(2):249–281, 1982.
- [7] Yves Brihaye, Carlos Herdeiro, and Eugen Radu. Myers–Perry black holes with scalar hair and a mass gap. Physics Letters B, 739:1–7, 2014.
- [8] Richard Brito, Vitor Cardoso, Paolo Pani, et al. Superradiance, volume 10. Springer, 2020.
- [9] Otis Chodosh and Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman. Time-periodic Einstein–Klein–Gordon bifurcations of Kerr. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 356:1155–1250, 2017.
- [10] Pedro VP Cunha, Carlos AR Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Helgi F Rúnarsson. Shadows of Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Physical review letters, 115(21):211102, 2015.
- [11] Mihalis Dafermos and Gustav Holzegel. Dynamic instability of solitons in 4+ 1 dimensional gravity with negative cosmological constant. In Seminar at DAMTP. University of Cambridge Cambridge, 2006.
- [12] Mihalis Dafermos and Gustav Holzegel. On the nonlinear stability of higher dimensional triaxial Bianchi-IX black holes. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 10(4):503–523, 2006.
- [13] Mihalis Dafermos and Igor Rodnianski. Decay for solutions of the wave equation on Kerr exterior spacetimes i-ii: The cases— a—¡¡ m or axisymmetry. arXiv preprint arXiv:1010.5132, 2010.
- [14] Mihalis Dafermos, Igor Rodnianski, and Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman. Decay for solutions of the wave equation on Kerr exterior spacetimes III: The full subextremal case— a—¡ m. Annals of mathematics, pages 787–913, 2016.
- [15] Th Damour, N Deruelle, and R Ruffini. On quantum resonances in stationary geometries. Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985), 15:257–262, 1976.
- [16] G Denardo and R Ruffini. On the energetics of Reissner–Nordström geometries. Physics Letters B, 45(3):259–262, 1973.
- [17] Steven Detweiler. Klein-Gordon equation and rotating black holes. Physical Review D, 22(10):2323, 1980.
- [18] Laurent Di Menza and Jean-Philippe Nicolas. Superradiance on the Reissner–Nordstrøm metric. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32(14):145013, 2015.
- [19] Dominic Dold. Unstable mode solutions to the Klein–Gordon equation in Kerr-anti-de Sitter spacetimes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 350:639–697, 2017.
- [20] Lawrence C Evans. Partial differential equations, volume 19. American Mathematical Society, 2022.
- [21] Oran Gannot. Elliptic boundary value problems for Bessel operators, with applications to anti-de Sitter spacetimes. Comptes Rendus Mathematique, 356(10):988–1029, 2018.
- [22] Elena Giorgi. The linear stability of Reissner–Nordström spacetime: the full subextremal range— q—¡ m. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 380(3):1313–1360, 2020.
- [23] Olivier Graf and Gustav Holzegel. Mode stability results for the Teukolsky equations on Kerr–anti-de Sitter spacetimes. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 40(4):045003, 2023.
- [24] Olivier Graf and Gustav Holzegel. Linear stability of schwarzschild-anti-de sitter spacetimes i: The system of gravitational perturbations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02251, 2024.
- [25] Olivier Graf and Gustav Holzegel. Linear stability of schwarzschild-anti-de sitter spacetimes ii: Logarithmic decay of solutions to the teukolsky system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.02252, 2024.
- [26] Steven S Gubser. Phase transitions near black hole horizons. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 22(23):5121, 2005.
- [27] Steven S Gubser. Breaking an Abelian gauge symmetry near a black hole horizon. Physical Review D, 78(6):065034, 2008.
- [28] Sean A Hartnoll, Christopher P Herzog, and Gary T Horowitz. Building an AdS/CFT superconductor. arXiv preprint arXiv:0803.3295, 2008.
- [29] Sean A Hartnoll, Christopher P Herzog, and Gary T Horowitz. Holographic superconductors. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2008(12):015, 2008.
- [30] Carlos Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. Ergosurfaces for Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Physical Review D, 89(12):124018, 2014.
- [31] Carlos Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Helgi Rúnarsson. Non-linear Q-clouds around Kerr black holes. Physics Letters B, 739:302–307, 2014.
- [32] Carlos AR Herdeiro and Eugen Radu. Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Physical review letters, 112(22):221101, 2014.
- [33] Markus Heusler. Stationary black holes: Uniqueness and beyond. Living Reviews in Relativity, 1:1–57, 1998.
- [34] Gustav Holzegel. On the massive wave equation on slowly rotating Kerr-AdS spacetimes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 294(1):169–197, 2010.
- [35] Gustav Holzegel. Well-posedness for the massive wave equation on asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes. Journal of Hyperbolic Differential Equations, 9(02):239–261, 2012.
- [36] Gustav Holzegel, Jonathan Luk, Jacques Smulevici, and Claude Warnick. Asymptotic properties of linear field equations in anti-de Sitter space. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 374(2):1125–1178, 2020.
- [37] Gustav Holzegel and Jacques Smulevici. Self-gravitating Klein–Gordon fields in asymptotically anti-de-Sitter spacetimes. In Annales Henri Poincare, volume 13, pages 991–1038. Springer, 2012.
- [38] Gustav Holzegel and Jacques Smulevici. Decay properties of Klein-gordon fields on Kerr-AdS spacetimes. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 66(11):1751–1802, 2013.
- [39] Gustav Holzegel and Jacques Smulevici. Stability of Schwarzschild-ads for the spherically symmetric Einstein-Klein-Gordon system. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 317:205–251, 2013.
- [40] Gustav Holzegel and Jacques Smulevici. Quasimodes and a lower bound on the uniform energy decay rate for Kerr–AdS spacetimes. Analysis & PDE, 7(5):1057–1090, 2014.
- [41] Gustav H Holzegel and Claude M Warnick. Boundedness and growth for the massive wave equation on asymptotically anti-de Sitter black holes. Journal of Functional Analysis, 266(4):2436–2485, 2014.
- [42] Gary T Horowitz. Introduction to holographic superconductors. From Gravity to Thermal Gauge Theories: The AdS/CFT Correspondence: The AdS/CFT Correspondence, pages 313–347, 2011.
- [43] Warren Li and Maxime Van de Moortel. Kasner inversions and fluctuating collapse inside hairy black holes with charged matter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00046, 2023.
- [44] Juan Maldacena. The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. International journal of theoretical physics, 38(4):1113–1133, 1999.
- [45] Juan Maldacena. Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2003(04):021, 2003.
- [46] Georgios Moschidis. The Einstein–null dust system in spherical symmetry with an inner mirror: structure of the maximal development and Cauchy stability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.08685, 2017.
- [47] Georgios Moschidis. The characteristic initial-boundary value problem for the Einstein–massless Vlasov system in spherical symmetry. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04274, 2018.
- [48] Georgios Moschidis. A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein-null dust system with an inner mirror. Analysis & PDE, 13(6):1671–1754, 2020.
- [49] Georgios Moschidis. A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein-massless Vlasov system. Inventiones mathematicae, 231(2):467–672, 2023.
- [50] William H Press and Saul A Teukolsky. Floating orbits, superradiant scattering and the black-hole bomb. Nature, 238(5361):211–212, 1972.
- [51] Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman. Exponentially growing finite energy solutions for the Klein–Gordon equation on sub-extremal Kerr spacetimes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 329:859–891, 2014.
- [52] Yakov Shlapentokh-Rothman. Quantitative mode stability for the wave equation on the Kerr spacetime. In Annales Henri Poincaré, volume 16, pages 289–345. Springer, 2015.
- [53] Saul A Teukolsky. Rotating black holes: Separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations. Physical Review Letters, 29(16):1114, 1972.
- [54] Maxime Van de Moortel. Violent nonlinear collapse in the interior of charged hairy black holes. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 248(5):89, 2024.
- [55] Claude M Warnick. The massive wave equation in asymptotically AdS spacetimes. Communications in mathematical physics, 321(1):85–111, 2013.
- [56] Bernard F Whiting. Mode stability of the Kerr black hole. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 30(6):1301–1305, 1989.
- [57] Edward Witten. Anti de Sitter space and holography. arXiv preprint hep-th/9802150, 1998.
- [58] Weihao Zheng. Asymptotically anti-de sitter spherically symmetric hairy black holes. In preparation, 2024.
- [59] Theodoros JM Zouros and Douglas M Eardley. Instabilities of massive scalar perturbations of a rotating black hole. Annals of physics, 118(1):139–155, 1979.