This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Experimental Search for Non-Newtonian Forces in the Nanometer Scale with Slow Neutrons

Y. Kamiya [email protected] International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Graduate School of Science, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan    R. Cubitt Institut Laue-Langevin, 71 avenue des Martyrs, CS 20156, 38042 Grenoble cedex 9, France    L. Porcar Institut Laue-Langevin, 71 avenue des Martyrs, CS 20156, 38042 Grenoble cedex 9, France    O. Zimmer Institut Laue-Langevin, 71 avenue des Martyrs, CS 20156, 38042 Grenoble cedex 9, France    G. N. Kim Department of Physics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 702-701, Republic of Korea    S. Komamiya International Center for Elementary Particle Physics and Graduate School of Science, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Abstract

Improved limits for new gravity-like short-range interactions, in which a scattering potential is modeled by the Yukawa-type parametrization, have been obtained by measuring the angular distribution of 6 Å neutrons scattering from atomic xenon gas. We have collected approximately 1.4×1081.4\times 10^{8} small-angle neutron scattering events. The data are interpreted as no evidence of new forces and show improved upper limits on the coupling strength in the interaction range of 0.30.3 nm to 99 nm. These improved constraints are also interpreted as new limits for a model, in which a charge of the new forces is expressed as a linear combination of the baryon number and the lepton number.

I Introduction

The standard model of particle physics has been developed for almost half a century and provides a solid basis for understanding nature from the view point of its fundamental constituents, matter and interactions. It has succeeded in describing various phenomena of particle physics observed in a wide energy range up to the electroweak scale. However, there are still some unnatural points left, such as the so-called fine-tuning problem in radiative corrections to the Higgs mass, or the metastability of the electroweak vacuum Espinosa (1995); Isidori, Ridolfi, and Strumia (2001); Giudice (2013). Those imply extensions to the standard model or new theoretical frameworks which may appear at an energy below the Grand Unified Theory’s (GUT’s) scale Georgi and Glashow (1974).

II Experimental Scheme

We focus particularly on searching for new bosons of gravity-like coupling fields, which are naturally involved in some beyond-the-standard-model theories based on supersymmetry or spatial extra dimensions Fayet (1996); Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, and Dvali (1998); Randall and Sundrum (1999). They are also predicted by scalar-tensor theories of gravitation that treat gravity as a field theory Brans and Dicke (1961); Khoury and Weltman (2004). In many cases, new fields would become manifest in additional gravity-like forces between test objects.

A sensitive method to search for these effects evaluates the neutron scattering processes with xenon atomic gas. The experiment has been performed using a monochromatic cold neutron beam on the D22 small-angle neutron scattering instrument at the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) Kamiya, Cubitt, and Zimmer (2016), and a momentum transfer dependence (qq-dependence) in the scattering processes has been analyzed. We have selected a slightly larger neutron wavelength than in a previous measurement Kamiya et al. (2015), allowing us to investigate a region of lower qq. In addition, we have collected around 1.4×1081.4\times 10^{8} scattering events. Along with this improvement of statistical error, systematic control on the xenon gas pressure has been carefully considered. We follow the evaluation scheme which was widely utilized in previously performed experiments Pokotilovski (2006); Haddock et al. (2018); Kamiya et al. (2015); Nesvizhevsky, Pignol, and Protasov (2008); Borkowski et al. (2019); Bordag, Mohideen, and Mostepanenko (2001). Therein, the Yukawa-type scattering potential in natural units,

Vnew(r)=14πg2Q1Q2eμrr,V_{new}(r)=-\frac{1}{4\pi}g^{2}Q_{1}Q_{2}\frac{e^{-\mu r}}{r}~{}, (1)

is used as a model of new physics, where g2g^{2} is a coupling strength, QiQ_{i} are coupling charges, and μ\mu is the mass of the boson mediating the new interaction. This additional potential causes a new qq-dependent term in neutron scattering distributions. The differential scattering cross-section can in total be written as

dσdΩ(q)bc2{1+2χem[1f(q)]+2χnewμ2q2+μ2},\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega}(q)\simeq b_{c}^{2}\left\{1+2\chi_{em}[1-f(q)]+2\chi_{new}\frac{\mu^{2}}{q^{2}+\mu^{2}}\right\}~{}, (2)

where the constant bcb_{c} (5\sim 5 fm) is the coherent scattering length. The dominating first term describes ordinary nuclear scattering. The second term represents the well-known qq-dependent electromagnetic interactions between the neutron and intra-atomic fields. Here, χem\chi_{em} is on the order of 10210^{-2}. f(q)f(q) is the atomic form factor, which is modeled as f(q)=[1+3(q/q0)2]0.5f(q)=[1+3(q/q_{0})^{2}]^{-0.5} with q0=6.86q_{0}=6.86 Å-1 for xenon gas within 10410^{-4} accuracy Sears (1986). The third term is due to the additional qq-dependent Yukawa-type scattering potential. Here χnewmng2Q1Q2/2πbcμ2\chi_{new}\equiv m_{n}g^{2}Q_{1}Q_{2}/2\pi b_{c}\mu^{2} where mnm_{n} is the neutron mass. Since χem\chi_{em} and χnew\chi_{new} are small enough, we neglect terms where products of the small amplitudes occur. We assume that the coupling charges are masses MiM_{i} to keep compatibility with discussions on the Cavendish type experiments Bordag, Mohideen, and Mostepanenko (2001); Chen et al. (2016); Geraci et al. (2008); Kapner et al. (2007); Tan et al. (2016); Yang et al. (2012), which verify the inverse-square law of Newtonian gravity using macroscopic test masses. Reviews of such experiments, and connections to results from the large hadron collider can be found in Ref. Murata and Tanaka (2015).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Time sequence of taken data categories. Category 2 contains scattering data taken when the chamber evacuated down to a level of 10410^{-4} Pa, representing measurements of the contribution due to the chamber, only. Category 4 contains scattering data taken with the chamber filled up with xenon gas of around 167 kPa, representing measurements of the contributions of the gas and the container. (b) Time variation of neutron transmission through the 250 mm xenon gas, which is evaluated using the cat.3 data. Data in stable condition of the period from #2 to #9 are used for the new-interaction search.

III Setups and Data Sets

The beam line consists of a neutron velocity selector, a neutron flux monitor, a collimation system, a scattering chamber which contains xenon atomic gas of 167 kPa pressure, and a 2 dimensional neutron detector with 1 m ×\times 1 m sensitive area. We use an unpolarized neutron beam supplied from the ILL research reactor of 58 MW power. A wavelength of 6 Å was selected with 10% FWHM fractional resolution. Circular neutron apertures of diameters 20 mm was located 2.80 m and 0.22 m upstream from the center of the xenon-filled chamber, defining the beam divergence to be around 8 mrad. The scattering chamber had a cylindrical shape of length 250 mm and diameter 130 mm. It was mounted on a leveling stage with a thermal insulating plate. The cylinder axis was aligned along the beam traveling line using a laser light. Outgas rate of the chamber had been measured before the beam time to be 0.50.5 Pa/h, which corresponds to contaminations of less than 75 ppm in our successive measurements. The chamber was connected to a getter-based gas purifier, a vacuum system, and a high-pressure xenon gas bottle. The vacuum system could evacuate the chamber volume down to at least 10410^{-4} Pa level. The main detector on the D22 beam line consists of 128 3He filled tube counters arranged vertically and horizontally spaced by 8 mm. The neutron position along the tube axis could be determined with 4 mm resolution. Therefore the detector enabled us to measure the 2 dimensional scattering distribution image of 8 mm (horizontal) times 4 mm (vertical) pixels. The detector was located 3005±33005\pm 3 mm downstream from the center of the scattering chamber.

Data sets are categorized to five: background data (cat.0), data of transmission through the evacuated chamber (cat.1), data of scattering from the evacuated chamber (cat.2), data of transmission through the xenon gas filled chamber (cat.3), and data of scattering from the xenon gas filled chamber (cat.4). The transmission data are taken with an attenuated direct beam, where a beam stopper is moved out of the beam axis. Total accumulation times are 20 minutes, 10 minutes, 16 hours, 50 minutes, and 24 hours for cat.0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The cat.3 and cat.4 data are taken alternately to monitor the stability of xenon gas pressure. Time sequence of the taken data is illustrated in the Fig 1(a). Figure 1(b) shows a variation of the neutron transmission through the xenon gas. The gas pressure varied during the first period of cat.4 (#1), so we use the data from cat.4 (#2) to (#8) for the new-force evaluations. The transmission is measured to be 0.921±0.0010.921\pm 0.001 during the stable period.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) Measured angular distributions for the cat.4 data (above) and for the cat.2 data (below). The cat.2 distribution is normalized using the transmission of xenon gas. The contribution from beam background of the cat.0 data, not shown in the figure, is a flat distribution and smaller than the scattering data by three orders of magnitude. (b) Extracted angular distribution due to the scattering off the xenon gas. The red dashed line shows a best fit (see text). (c) Residuals from the best fit function. (d) Obtained 95% CL limits in the Yukawa-type g2g^{2} - λ̄\lambdabar parameter space (λ̄1/μ\lambdabar\equiv 1/\mu). The upper dashed line represents a result using spectroscopy of weakly bound Yb2 molecule Borkowski et al. (2019). The lower dashed line shows the prospective precision of this new method. Theoretical predictions due to extra U(1) gauge bosons are shown as dashed lines for symmetry braking scales of ΛU(1)246\Lambda_{U(1)}\sim 246 GeV and 1\sim 1 TeV Fayet (1996). (e) Re-interpretation of our new limits for λ̄=1\lambdabar=1 nm (as an example) to the model in which a coupling charge QQ is expressed as a linear combination of the baryon and the lepton number, BB and LL, as a function of the mixing angle θ5\theta_{5}.

IV Measurements and New Limits

Figure 2(a) shows the measured scattering contributions with and without xenon gas. They have been normalized by the transmission and integrated counts on the neutron flux monitor for each data category. The difference between the two distributions, which is reflected by the qq-dependence of the neutron-xenon scattering processes, is shown in Fig. 2(b) with the best fit curve of the fitting function dσ~/dΩ(θ;β)=(1α)(1β)hc(θ)+α(1β)hem(θ)+βhnew(θ;μ){\rm d}\tilde{\sigma}/{\rm d}\Omega(\theta;\beta)=(1-\alpha^{*})(1-\beta)h_{c}(\theta)+\alpha^{*}(1-\beta)h_{em}(\theta)+\beta h_{new}(\theta;\mu) for 1/μ=1/\mu= 1 nm. Here, dσ~/dΩ(θ;β){\rm d}\tilde{\sigma}/{\rm d}\Omega(\theta;\beta) represents a smoothened differential cross-section evaluated by convoluting the Eq. (2) with the finite beam size, the length of the scattering target, neutron attenuation in xenon gas, and the thermal motion of xenon gas atoms at 293 K using the Monte Carlo method. The quantities hc(θ)h_{c}(\theta), hem(θ)h_{em}(\theta), and hnew(θ;μ)h_{new}(\theta;\mu) are convoluted distributions corresponding to the first, second, and the third term in the equation (2), respectively. The Monte Carlo estimation assumes isotropic thermal motion of Maxwellian distributed atoms. This thermal motion leads to a slight forward-backward asymmetry and hence inclination of the expected distribution. This effect mimics an additional qq-dependence in the scattering processes, which becomes notable for lighter targets, such as for argon gas. The measured distribution is normalized to S𝑑σ~/𝑑Ω(θ)𝑑θ=1\int_{S}d\tilde{\sigma}/d\Omega(\theta)d\theta=1 over the signal acceptance SS of 28 mrad <θ<<\theta< 150 mrad, providing a high sensitivity to ranges of a new interaction around the nanometer scale. In the fitting function, α\alpha^{*} is a constant calculated from measurements of the neutron mean-square charge radius Tanabashi (2018), and β\beta is a fitting parameter, which represents the strength of new forces g2g^{2}. Residuals from the best fit curve are shown in the Fig. 2(c). The best fit values of β\beta are, for example, (1.7±1.6)×103(-1.7\pm 1.6)\times 10^{-3} and (9.6±5.6)×104(-9.6\pm 5.6)\times 10^{-4} for new forces of 0.4 nm and of 1 nm range, respectively. Using the Feldman and Cousins interpretation for the estimation around the physics boundary Feldman and Cousins (1998), we set improved limits for new gravity-like interactions as shown in the Fig. 2(d). Estimations of systematic effects on beta are dominated by the uncertainties of the neutron transmission γ\gamma and the sample-to-detector distance. A shift by the one-sigma uncertainties of these quantities would shift the best fit value of beta for new forces of 1 nm range by around 4% and 6%, respectively. Other effects due to a non-Gaussian component of neutron wavelength distribution, temperature of the xenon gas, calibration factors for each pixel, and uncertainty of the atomic form factor are estimated to be much smaller.

The obtained limits are re-interpreted within a model in which a charge of new interaction is expressed as a linear combination of the baryon number BB and the lepton number LL. This assumption was discussed in references Fischbach et al. (1988); Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and Staudt (1995) and experimental constraints in a hundreds micron range on this picture are reported in Adelberger et al. (2007). Here we follow the notation of the charge of new interactions as in Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and Staudt (1995), Q=Bsinθ5+(B2L)cosθ5,Q=B\sin\theta_{5}+(B-2L)\cos\theta_{5}~{}, where the mixing angle θ5\theta_{5} expresses a preference of the new force to couple to baryons or leptons. The leptophilic forces would imply θ5=π/4\theta_{5}=-\pi/4.

V Conclusion

We measured a neutron-xenon scattering distribution and obtained improved limits for gravity-like non-Newtonian forces in the nanometer scale. The results were re-interpreted with a model with new charges which are expressed as a linear combination of the baryon and the lepton number.

Acknowledgements.
We appreciate Mark Jacques for technical supports on the instrumentation. This work is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant No. 17H05397, 18H01226, and 18H04343.

References

  • Espinosa (1995) J. R. Espinosa, Physics Letters B 353, 257 (1995).
  • Isidori, Ridolfi, and Strumia (2001) G. Isidori, G. Ridolfi,  and A. Strumia, Nuclear Physics B 609, 387 (2001).
  • Giudice (2013) G. F. Giudice, Proceedings of Science EPS-HEP, 163 (2013).
  • Georgi and Glashow (1974) H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Physical Review Letters 32, 438 (1974).
  • Fayet (1996) P. Fayet, Classical and Quantum Gravity 13, A19 (1996).
  • Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos, and Dvali (1998) N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos,  and G. Dvali, Physics Letters B 429, 263 (1998).
  • Randall and Sundrum (1999) L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Physical Review Letters 83, 4690 (1999).
  • Brans and Dicke (1961) C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Physical Review 124, 925 (1961).
  • Khoury and Weltman (2004) J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Physical Review Letters 93, 171104 (2004).
  • Kamiya, Cubitt, and Zimmer (2016) Y. Kamiya, R. Cubitt,  and O. Zimmer, Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL): Grenoble, 2016: DOI:10.5291/ILL–DATA.3–15–89  (2016).
  • Kamiya et al. (2015) Y. Kamiya, K. Itagaki, M. Tani, G. N. Kim,  and S. Komamiya, Physical Review Letters 114, 161101 (2015).
  • Pokotilovski (2006) Y. N. Pokotilovski, Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69, 924 (2006).
  • Haddock et al. (2018) C. C. Haddock, N. Oi, K. Hirota, T. Ino, M. Kitaguchi, S. Matsumoto, K. Mishima, T. Shima, H. M. Shimizu, W. M. Snow,  and T. Yoshioka, Physical Review D 97, 062002 (2018).
  • Nesvizhevsky, Pignol, and Protasov (2008) V. V. Nesvizhevsky, G. Pignol,  and K. V. Protasov, Physical Review D 77, 034020 (2008).
  • Borkowski et al. (2019) M. Borkowski, A. A. Buchachenko, R. Ciuryło, P. S. Julienne, H. Yamada, K. Yuu, K. Takahashi, Y. Takasu,  and Y. Takahashi, Scientific Reports 9, 14807 (2019).
  • Bordag, Mohideen, and Mostepanenko (2001) M. Bordag, U. Mohideen,  and V. M. Mostepanenko, Physics Reports 353, 1 (2001).
  • Sears (1986) V. F. Sears, Physics Reports 141, 281 (1986).
  • Chen et al. (2016) Y. J. Chen, W. K. Tham, D. E. Krause, D. López, E. Fischbach,  and R. S. Decca, Physical Review Letters 116, 221102 (2016).
  • Geraci et al. (2008) A. A. Geraci, S. J. Smullin, D. M. Weld, J. Chiaverini,  and A. Kapitulnik, Physical Review D 78, 022002 (2008).
  • Kapner et al. (2007) D. J. Kapner, T. S. Cook, E. G. Adelberger, J. H. Gundlach, B. R. Heckel, C. D. Hoyle,  and H. E. Swanson, Physical Review Letters 98, 021101 (2007).
  • Tan et al. (2016) W.-H. Tan, S.-Q. Yang, C.-G. Shao, J. Li, A.-B. Du, B.-F. Zhan, Q.-L. Wang, P.-S. Luo, L.-C. Tu,  and J. Luo, Physical Review Letters 116, 131101 (2016).
  • Yang et al. (2012) S.-Q. Yang, B.-F. Zhan, Q.-L. Wang, C.-G. Shao, L.-C. Tu, W.-H. Tan,  and J. Luo, Physical Review Letters 108, 081101 (2012).
  • Murata and Tanaka (2015) J. Murata and S. Tanaka, Class. Quantum Grav. 32, 033001 (2015).
  • Tanabashi (2018) M. Tanabashi (Particle Data Group), Physical Review D 98, 030001 (2018).
  • Feldman and Cousins (1998) G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins, Physical Review D 57, 3873 (1998).
  • Fischbach et al. (1988) E. Fischbach, D. Sudarsky, A. Szafer, C. Talmadge,  and S. H. Aronson, Annals of Physics 182, 1 (1988).
  • Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and Staudt (1995) H. A. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus and A. Staudt, "Non-accelerator Particle Physics", Institute of Physics Publishing , 432 (1995).
  • Adelberger et al. (2007) E. G. Adelberger, B. R. Heckel, S. Hoedl, C. D. Hoyle, D. J. Kapner,  and A. Upadhye, Physical Review Letters 98, 131104 (2007).