This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: These authors contributed equally to this workthanks: These authors contributed equally to this work

Experimental quantum simulation of superradiant phase transition beyond no-go theorem via antisqueezing

Xi Chen Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China    Ze Wu Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China    Min Jiang Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China    Xin-You Lü [email protected] School of physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China    Xinhua Peng [email protected] Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China    Jiangfeng Du Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Abstract

Superradiant phase transition (SPT) in thermal equilibrium, as a fundamental concept bridging the statistical physics and electrodynamics, can offer the key resources for quantum information science. Notwithstanding its fundamental and practical significances, equilibrium SPT has never been observed in experiments since the first proposal in the 1970s. Furthermore, the existence of equilibrium SPT in the cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) systems is still subject of ongoing debates, due to the no-go theorem induced by the so-called A2A^{2} term. Based on the platform of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), here we experimentally demonstrate the occurrence of equilibrium SPT beyond no-go theorem by introducing the antisqueezing effect. The mechanism relies on the antisqueezing that recovers the singularity of the ground state via exponentially enhancing the zero point fluctuation (ZPF) of system. The strong entanglement and squeezed Schrödinger cat states of spins are achieved experimentally in the superradiant phase, which may play an important role in fundamental tests of quantum theory, implementing quantum metrology and high-efficient quantum information processing. Our experiment also shows the antisqueezing-enhanced signal-to-noise rate (SNR) of NMR spectrum, providing a general method for implementing high-precision NMR experiments.

Superradiant phase transition, driven by the singularity of quantum fluctuation at the critical point, has undergone tremendous developments in recent years [1]. It was proposed in the Dicke model, describing the collective interaction between NN two-level systems and a quantum field, in the thermodynamics limit NN\rightarrow\infty [2, 3]. When NN = 1, the Dicke model is reduced to a Rabi model, in which the SPT has also been predicted theoretically by replacing the thermodynamics limit with the classical oscillator limit Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty (Ω\Omega and ω\omega being the frequency of spin and field, respectively) [4]. Above the quantum critical point, the vacuum (ground state) of cavity field is macroscopically occupied, and becomes twofold degenerate, corresponding to a spontaneously 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} symmetry breaking. This leads to the appearance of important quantum effects in the supperradiant phase, including spin-field entanglement, distinguishable quantum superposition with large-amplitude, and so on [5].

Cavity (including circuit) QED systems [6, 7], allowing to manipulate the light-matter interaction at the quantum level, offer an important platform of implementing SPT. However the required critical parameter regime and ultralow-temperature ground state preparation are normally hard to be satisfied with current technologies of cavity QED. More importantly, the existence of the equilibrium SPT in the cavity QED systems is still challenged by the no-go theorem [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Specifically, for describing the dipole atom-field interactions in the cavity QED system, the standard Dicke and Rabi Hamiltonians have neglected the squared term of electromagnetic vector potential (i.e., A2A^{2} term), which will forbid the occurrence of equilibrium SPT. This is because the A2A^{2} term, via adding a coupling-dependent potential of the cavity field, makes the disappearance of the singularity of quantum fluctuation during the whole parameter space. Until now, the SPT has not been realized experimentally in thermal equilibrium, while the nonequilibrium SPT has been observed in the simulations of the DM with a Bose-Einstein condensate in an open cavity [14, 15, 16] or a trapped ion setup [17].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Theoretical model, phase diagram, physical system, and quantum circuit for implementing SPT. a, NN+1 spins are used to map the quantum Rabi model consisting of a two-level system coupled to a Boson field with 2N2^{N} harmonic levels with coupling strength λ\lambda. The red arrows and dashed potential indicate the antisqueezing effects. b, Phase transition property in the limit Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty, described by the lowest excitation energy and the order parameter Φ\Phi in the parameter regimes from I to IV defined by the values of ξ\xi and α\alpha. The occurrence and disappearance of SPT are indicated by tick and cross, respectively. The solid and dashed lines correspond to the NP and SP, respectively. c, Molecular structure of 13C-iodotriuroethylene and the relevant system parameters. The diagonal and off-diagonal elements represent chemical shifts and J-couplings, respectively. d, Quantum circuit for the adiabatic ground state preparation and the measurement of Φ\Phi with H^0(l)=[1s(l)]^0\hat{H}_{0}(l)=[1-s(l)]\hat{\mathds{H}}_{0}, H^1(l)=s(l)^s\hat{H}_{1}(l)=s(l)\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}, where l=0,1,2Ll=0,1,2\dots L, and s(l)s(l) slowly changes from 0 to 1.

Here we employ the quantum simulation technology [18, 19, 20] to experimentally demonstrate the realization of equilibrium SPT beyond no-go theorem induced by an added antisqueezing of field. We use liquid-state NMR molecules [21] to simulate the quantum Rabi model including the A2A^{2} and antisqueezing terms (approaching the classical oscillator limit Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty) by a well-defined spin-to-oscillator mapping scheme. Note that the unaccessible parameter conditions for SPT in the actual cavity QED system can be attained in the platform of NMR. Based on the excellent controllability, the NMR system has been successfully used to simulate topological orders [22] and Lee-Yang zeros [23].

Interestingly, we experimentally show that the antisqueezing effect not only makes the appearance of SPT in the case of including A2A^{2} term, but also makes the SPT to be reversed, i.e., transition from normal phase (NP) to superradiant phase (SP) along with decreasing spin-field coupling strength. This originally comes from the exponentially enhanced ZPF induced by the antisqueezing effect, that recovers the singularity of the ground state of system. The optimized parameter condition including the necessary antisqueezing strength for phase transition is identified by presenting experimentally the antisqueezing-dependent phase diagram of ground state. In the SP, we experimentally obtain the strong spin-oscillator entanglement and the squeezed Schrödinger cat states of spins exhibiting a negative Wigner distribution, large-amplitude separation of peaks, and distinct interference fringes. These states could be used to fault-tolerant quantum computation [24, 25] and quantum metrology [26] approaching Heisenberg limit with actual NMR systems, aside from providing fundamental insights into the nature of decoherence and the quantum–classical transition [27]. Moreover, we show good theory-experiment agreement due to the antisqueezing-enhanced SNR of NMR spectrum, which applies to the general NMR experiments. Our work also provides the important family of antisqueezing with a new type of applications, besides its widely applications in quantum precision measurement [28] and enhancing light-matter interaction [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36].

The Rabi model with Hamiltonian

H^R=\displaystyle\hat{H}_{\rm R}= Ω2σ^z+ωa^a^+λ(a^+a^)σ^x\displaystyle\frac{\Omega}{2}\hat{\sigma}_{z}+\omega\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}+\lambda(\hat{a}^{\dagger}+\hat{a})\hat{\sigma}_{x} (1)

describes a two-level system with frequency Ω\Omega interacting with an oscillator mode with frequency ω\omega, and λ\lambda denotes the coupling strength. Here a^\hat{a} (a^\hat{a}^{\dagger}) is the annihilation (creation) operator of the oscillator mode, and σ^z\hat{\sigma}_{z}, σ^x\hat{\sigma}_{x} are the Pauli operators for the two-level system. This model has the 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} (or parity) symmetry associating with a well-defined parity operator Π^=eiπ^\hat{\Pi}=e^{i\pi\hat{\mathbb{N}}}, where ^=a^a^+(1/2)(σ^z+1)\hat{\mathbb{N}}=\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}+(1/2)(\hat{\sigma}_{z}+1) is the total excitation number of the system. As shown in the regime I{\rm I} of FIG. 1b, the ground-state SPT is predicted theoretically in the classical oscillator limit Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty, characterized by a vanishing of the lowest excitation energy [4]. However, this SPT will disappear when the A2A^{2} term H^A=(αλ2/Ω)(a^+a^)2\hat{H}_{A}=(\alpha\lambda^{2}/\Omega)(\hat{a}+\hat{a}^{\dagger})^{2} (α1\alpha\geq 1 decided by the Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn sum rule) is included in the actual cavity QED systems, corresponding to the regime II{\rm II} of FIG. 1b. This is the no-go theorem of SPT [10], and the corresponding debate continues to today from 1970s. Here we will demonstrate experimentally the above no-go theorem can be broken through by introducing an antisqueezing effect, i.e., H^As=ξ(a^+a^)2\hat{H}_{\rm As}=-\xi(\hat{a}+\hat{a}^{\dagger})^{2} in the platform of NMR. The regime IV{\rm IV} of FIG. 1b theoretically shows the reappearance of SPT via the singularity of the excitation energy and the sudden change of the order parameter Φ=(ω/Ω)a^a^\Phi=(\omega/\Omega)\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\rangle at the critical point λ~=1+αλ~24ξ/ω\tilde{\lambda}=\sqrt{1+\alpha\tilde{\lambda}^{2}-4\xi/\omega} with λ~=2λ/Ωω\tilde{\lambda}=2\lambda/\sqrt{\Omega\omega}. Specifically, the rescaled ground-state occupation of oscillator Φ=(1/4)(λ~s2λ~s2)\Phi=(1/4)(\tilde{\lambda}_{s}^{2}-\tilde{\lambda}_{s}^{-2}) becomes non-zero from Φ=0\Phi=0 at the critical point [37]. The regime III{\rm III} of FIG. 1b demonstrates that the antisqueezing effects could dramatically reduce the critical point of SPT in the case of α=0\alpha=0.

To experimentally demonstrate the ground-state SPT in the platform of NMR, we simulate the Rabi model including the A2A^{2} and antisqueezing terms by using NN+1 spins, as shown in Fig. 1a. Based on the generators of SU(2), the mapping process is defined as

a^\displaystyle\hat{a} =A^Σ^z,a^=A^+Σ^z+𝟙N,\displaystyle=\hat{A}_{-}\sqrt{\hat{\Sigma}_{z}},\,\,\,\,\,\hat{a}^{\dagger}=\hat{A}_{+}\sqrt{\hat{\Sigma}_{z}+\mathds{1}^{\otimes N}}, (2)

where Σ^z=i=1N2i2σ^zi+(2N1)/2\hat{\Sigma}_{z}=-\sum^{N}_{i=1}2^{i-2}\hat{\sigma}^{i}_{z}+(2^{N}-1)/2, and 𝟙N=𝟙𝟙\mathds{1}^{\otimes N}=\mathds{1}\otimes\cdots\otimes\mathds{1} (with NN spin identity operator 𝟙\mathds{1}) is the identity matrix of 2N×2N2^{N}\times 2^{N} dimensions. Here the definitions of operators A^±\hat{A}_{\pm} and the well-defined spin-to-oscillator mapping process are shown in the Methods. This mapping process has some similarities to Holstein-Primakoff transformation, and it is exact in the limit of NN\rightarrow\infty. We employ 13C-iodotriuroethylene dissolved in d-chloroform as 4-qubits system and the experiments are conducted on Bruker Avance III 400 MHz spectrometer at room temperature. The molecule consists of one 13C and three 19F nuclear spins, as shown in FIG. 1c. Now the base vectors of 4-qubits span a 16 dimensional Hilbert space {|n}\{|n\rangle\} (n=0,1,2.15)\left(n=0,1,2....15\right), defined in the Methods. In the weak-coupling approximation, the natural Hamiltonian of the sample molecule is described as

H^NMR=i=14πωiσ^z(i)+1i<j4π2Jijσ^z(i)σ^z(j),\displaystyle\hat{H}_{\rm NMR}=\sum^{4}_{i=1}\pi\omega_{i}\hat{\sigma}_{z}^{(i)}+\sum_{1\leqslant i<j\leqslant 4}\frac{\pi}{2}J_{ij}\hat{\sigma}_{z}^{(i)}\hat{\sigma}_{z}^{(j)}, (3)

where ωi\omega_{i} represents the chemical shift of the ii-th spin, and JijJ_{ij} is the scalar coupling strength between two spins. The values of parameters ωi\omega_{i} and JijJ_{ij} are given in Fig. 1c. At the beginning, our system, initially at the thermal equilibrium state, is prepared to a pseudo-pure state (PPS) ρ^pps=[(1ε)/16]𝟙4+ε|00|\hat{\rho}_{\rm pps}=[(1-\varepsilon)/16]\mathds{1}^{\otimes 4}+\varepsilon\outerproduct{0}{0} by using the selective-transition approach [38]. Here ε105\varepsilon\approx 10^{-5} is the polarization, and the fidelity between the experimental initial state and the pure state |00||0\rangle\langle 0| is 0.991. The detail initialization process is shown in the Supplementary [37].

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Experimental demonstration of exponentially enhanced ZPF of the oscillator by the antisqueezing effects. The theoretical (dashed line) and experimental (red circles) ZPF versus the antisqueezing strength ξ\xi. The inset shows the dependence of the SNR of NMR spectrum on ξ\xi. The Wigner functions of two squeezed vacuum states are shown in the right side.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Experimental demonstration of the recovering of equilibrium SPT induced by the antisqueezing effects. a, b, The order parameter Φ\Phi versus the scaled spin-field coupling strength λ~\tilde{\lambda} in the cases of a ξ=0\xi=0 and b ξ/ω=0.26\xi/\omega=0.26. The subfigure of b shows the comparison between the cases of finite-parameter (Ω/ω=50\Omega/\omega=50) and the classical oscillator limit (Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty), where the SPT occurs exactly. The shading of b divides NP and SP, according to the exact critical point λ~=1+αλ~24ξ/ω\tilde{\lambda}=\sqrt{1+\alpha\tilde{\lambda}^{2}-4\xi/\omega}. The bar graph of b indicates two von Neumann entropies of system in SP (λ~=0.2\tilde{\lambda}=0.2) and NP (λ~=1\tilde{\lambda}=1) when Ω/ω=25\Omega/\omega=25. c, The corresponding Wigner functions of experimental ground states for λ~=0.2, 0.3\tilde{\lambda}=0.2,\,0.3 (SP) and λ~=1\tilde{\lambda}=1(NP) when Ω/ω=25\Omega/\omega=25. Here α=1.1\alpha=1.1 is chosen for all subfigures.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Antisqueezing modulated ground-state phase diagram. a, The order parameter Φ\Phi versus λ~\tilde{\lambda} and Ω/ω\Omega/\omega for ξ/ω=0.26\xi/\omega=0.26. The inset shows the experimental power-law scaling of Φ\Phi at the critical point, and the fitted finite-frequency scaling exponent is γ=0.676\gamma=-0.676. The white dashed line corresponds to the exact critical point in the limit Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty. b, The dependence of Φ\Phi on λ~\tilde{\lambda} and ξ/ω\xi/\omega for Ω/ω=20\Omega/\omega=20. The white (black) dashed line corresponds to the critical parameter distinguishing NP and SP (SP and UP). c, The reduced density matrix ρ^as=trσ(|GsG|)\hat{\rho}^{s}_{a}=\tr_{\sigma}(|G\rangle_{s}\langle G|) for Ω/ω=25\Omega/\omega=25, obtained by the experimentally reconstructed ground state of ^s\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}. The diagonal elements contribute to a^a^s\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\rangle_{s}, while the sub-sub diagonal elements contribute to a^2s\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}\rangle_{s} and a^2s\langle\hat{a}^{2}\rangle_{s}. The system parameters are same as FIG. 3.

Let us first experimentally demonstrate the antisqueezing-enhanced ZPF in our 4-spins system, which is the key of recovering ground-state SPT in the case of including the A2A^{2} term. It is also the nature of antisqueezing enhanced light-matter interaction explored in recent theoretical [29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35] and experimental [36] works. Theoretically, the antisqueezing term H^As\hat{H}_{\rm As} will make the ground state of an oscillator from a vacuum state |0|0\rangle to the squeezed vacuum state S^(r)|0\hat{S}(r)|0\rangle with S^(r)=exp[r(a^2a^2)/2]\hat{S}(r)=\exp[r(\hat{a}^{2}-\hat{a}^{\dagger 2})/2] and the squeezing parameter r=(1/4)ln(14ξ/ω)r=(1/4)\ln(1-4\xi/\omega). Then the ZPF, defined as ZPF=x^2x^2{\rm ZPF}=\sqrt{\langle\hat{x}^{2}\rangle-\langle\hat{x}\rangle^{2}} with nondimensional quadrature x^=(a^+a^)/2\hat{x}=(\hat{a}+\hat{a}^{\dagger})/2, will be exponentially enhanced with increasing the antisqueezing strength ξ\xi (see the dashed line of FIG. 2). In our experiment, the truncated squeezing operator in the Hilbert space {|n}\{|n\rangle\} is implemented with the gradient ascent pulse engineering (GRAPE) pulses with time 15ms [39]. The pulse sequences are sequentially applied into the PPS for preparing the squeezing vacuum state. Then, we implement two steps measurement to obtain the ZPF of the squeezing vacuum state from the readout spectra of NMR. (i) Apply four π/2\pi/2 readout pulses, i.e., R^y(i)(π/2)=exp(iπ/4σ^y(i))\hat{R}^{(i)}_{y}(\pi/2)=\exp(-i\pi/4\hat{\sigma}^{(i)}_{y}), to reconstruct the diagonal elements [40] of the squeezing vacuum density matrix, corresponding to the expectation a^a^\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\rangle. (ii) Apply identity operator and unitary operator U^1\hat{U}_{1} (or U^2\hat{U}_{2}) to the fourth (or third) spin, followed by measuring the NMR spectra of the fourth (or third) spin to obtain the expectation a^\langle\hat{a}\rangle (or a^2\langle\hat{a}^{2}\rangle). Here the operators U^1=n=014|nn+1|+|150|\hat{U}_{1}=\sum^{14}_{n=0}|n\rangle\langle n+1|+|15\rangle\langle 0| and U^2=n=013|nn+2|+|140|+|151|\hat{U}_{2}=\sum^{13}_{n=0}|{n}\rangle\langle{n+2}|+|14\rangle\langle{0}|+|15\rangle\langle{1}| are used to transfer the concerned parts of a^\langle\hat{a}\rangle and a^2\langle\hat{a}^{2}\rangle to the single quantum coherence terms, and they can be implemented by the quantum circuits shown in Fig. S4 of Supplementary [37] or the equivalent GRAPE pulse sequences. To clearly show the antisqueezing effects, we also present the Wigner functions of two experimentally reconstructed states by the state tomography [40]. The experimental data shown in FIG. 2 are in excellent agreement with the theoretical prediction, and the error bars, coming from the statistical fluctuation of the NMR spectra, become smaller along with increasing the antisqueezing effect. This originally comes from the antisqueezing-enhanced SNR of the NMR spectra, as shown in the inset of FIG. 2 and FIG. S5(a) of Supplementary [37]. Our work offers a general method to enhance the measurement precision in the NMR experiments, where the signal is encoded in the x^\hat{x} quadrature of the detector.

Next we experimentally show the equilibrium SPT modulated by the antisqueezing effects. The key point is the recovering of ground-state SPT of Rabi model including the A2A^{2} term due to the antisqueezing-enhanced ZPF shown above. With the exact squeezing transformation, the ground state of the total system Hamiltonian ^=H^R+H^A+H^As\hat{\mathds{H}}=\hat{H}_{R}+\hat{H}_{A}+\hat{H}_{As} is equivalent to apply a squeezing operation S^(r~)\hat{S}(\tilde{r}) on the ground state of the transformed Hamiltonian ^s=S^(r~)^S^(r~)=(Ω/2)σ^z+ωsa^a^+λs(a^+a^)σ^x\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}=\hat{S}^{\dagger}(\tilde{r})\hat{\mathds{H}}\hat{S}(\tilde{r})=(\Omega/2)\hat{\sigma}_{z}+\omega_{s}\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}+\lambda_{s}(\hat{a}^{\dagger}+\hat{a})\hat{\sigma}_{x} [37]. Here ωs=e2r~ω\omega_{s}=e^{2\tilde{r}}\omega, λs=er~λ\lambda_{s}=e^{-\tilde{r}}\lambda, r~=(1/4)ln(1+αλ~24ξ/ω)\tilde{r}=(1/4)\ln(1+\alpha\tilde{\lambda}^{2}-4\xi/\omega), and the constant term in Hamiltonian ^s\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s} has been ignored. Now the problem is transferred to experimentally preparing the ground state of ^s\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}. In our sample molecule, 13C spin is labeled as the two-level system, and three 19F nuclear spins are used to map the truncated boson mode a^\hat{a} with the defined mapping process Eq. (2). In the experiments, we employ the widely used adiabatic method [41] to prepare the ground state of ^s\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}. According to the quantum circuit shown in FIG. 1d, the 4-spins sample is firstly prepared into the ground state of Hamiltonian ^0=i=14σ^y(i)\hat{\mathds{H}}_{0}=\sum_{i=1}^{4}\hat{\sigma}^{(i)}_{y} by applying π/2\pi/2 pulses along yy axis on four spins simultaneously. Then the quantum system is controlled to adiabatically evolve under the instantaneous Hamiltonian ^(l)=[1s(l)]^0+s(l)^s\hat{\mathds{H}}(l)=[1-s(l)]\hat{\mathds{H}}_{0}+s(l)\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}, with l=1,2,Ll=1,2,...L and s(l)s\left(l\right) changing slowly from 0 to 1. The system will finally evolve to the ground state of ^s\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}, denoted by |Gs|G\rangle_{s}, after the above adiabatic evolution sequence. The experimental adiabatic evolution is implemented by the GRAPE pulse with time 26ms. Based on the prepared ground state |Gs|G\rangle_{s}, the order parameters of SPT, expressed as Φ=(ω/Ω)(cosh(2r~)a^a^s(1/2)sinh(2r~)(a^2s+a^2s)+sinh2r~)\Phi=(\omega/\Omega)(\cosh(2\tilde{r})\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\rangle_{s}-(1/2)\sinh(2\tilde{r})(\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}\rangle_{s}+\langle\hat{a}^{2}\rangle_{s})+\sinh^{2}\tilde{r}), can be obtained by measuring the corresponding expectations defined with |Gs|G\rangle_{s}. The detail measurement processes are shown in the Methods.

To show the realization of SPT, we present the dependence of the order parameter Φ\Phi (including the theoretical results and experimental data) on λ~\tilde{\lambda} for different frequency ratio Ω/ω\Omega/\omega in FIGs. 3a and 3b. It is shown from FIG. 3a that, without antisqueezing effects (ξ\xi = 0), the phase transition is forbidden by the A2A^{2} term, i.e., the no-go theorem. However, the SPT is recovered by introducing a fixed antisqueezing effect (ξ/ω=0.26\xi/\omega=0.26) in FIG. 3b. Specifically, the experimental order parameter Φ\Phi in FIG. 3b changes from almost zero to finite number at λ~0.63\tilde{\lambda}\approx 0.63 with decreasing λ~\tilde{\lambda}, which indicates a reversed SPT approximately. Along with increasing Ω/ω\Omega/\omega, this tendency approaches the case of Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty, where the reversed SPT occurs exactly at the critical point λ~=1+αλ~24ξ/ω\tilde{\lambda}=\sqrt{1+\alpha\tilde{\lambda}^{2}-4\xi/\omega} (see the inset of FIG. 3b[37]. Physically, the occurrence of SPT in our experiment originally comes from the recovering of the singularity of ground state fluctuations due to the antisqueezing-enhanced ZPF of system, as shown in Fig. S2 of the Supplementary [37]. Moreover, the comparison between FIGs. 3a and 3b shows that the experimental data agree highly with the theoretical results in the case of introducing the antisqueezing effects, which demonstrates again the property obtained from FIG. 2, i.e., the antisqueezing effects can significantly enhance the SNR of the NMR spectra.

Rich quantum resources can be obtained in the superradiant phase, such as the quantum entanglement and quantum superposition of coherent states, i.e., Schrödinger cat states. They are significant for quantum metrology and quantum computation, aside from their fundamental nature. For example, Schrödinger cat states can enhance the measurement precision by separating the two superposed coherent states with a large distance in phase space, which offers the complementary sensitivity to environmental influences. In the limit Ω/ω\Omega/\omega\rightarrow\infty, the ground state of our system (including the antisqueezing term) is theoretically predicted as a squeezed state |Gnp=S^(r~np)|0a||G\rangle_{\rm np}=\hat{S}(\tilde{r}_{\rm np})|0\rangle_{a}|\!\downarrow\rangle in the NP and a spin-oscillator entangled state |Gsp(1/2)S^(r~)[D^(β)|0a|++D^(β)|0a|]|G\rangle_{\rm sp}\approx(1/\sqrt{2})\hat{S}(\tilde{r})[\hat{D}(\beta)|0\rangle_{a}|\!\downarrow\rangle_{+}+\hat{D}(-\beta)|0\rangle_{a}|\!\downarrow\rangle_{-}] in the SP with a defined displaced operator D^(β)\hat{D}(\beta) [37]. By the state tomography, we experimentally reconstruct the ground states of system, when it is in the NP (λ~=1\tilde{\lambda}=1) and SP (λ~=0.2, 0.3\tilde{\lambda}=0.2,\,0.3). The bar graph in FIG. 3b clearly demonstrate that the strong spin entanglement is obtained in the SP via the von Neumann entropy S=tr(ρ^alog2ρ^a)S=-\tr(\hat{\rho}_{a}\log_{2}\hat{\rho}_{a}) (ρ^a\hat{\rho}_{a} is the reduced density matrix of oscillator). Moreover, in the SP, the entanglement state |Gsp|G\rangle_{\rm sp} becomes a squeezed cat state, when we measure the 13C spin in the (1/2)(|+±|)(1/\sqrt{2})(|\!\downarrow\rangle_{+}\pm|\!\downarrow\rangle_{-}) basis [37]. We plot the corresponding Wigner functions of three experimentally reconstructed ground states in FIG. 3c, which clearly demonstrate the appearance of squeezed cat states in the SP. They have a negative Wigner distribution with distinct interference fringes and large size for λ~=0.3\tilde{\lambda}=0.3 and 0.20.2, which are the key for implementing super-resolution metrology with high probability and fault-tolerant quantum computing. Note that, the Schrödinger cat state also can be experimentally prepared via the homodyne detection on the number state[42, 43], photon subtraction on the squeezed state[44, 45], and high-order nonlinear atom-field interaction[46]. Here the realization of quantum superposition state indicates a spontaneously 2\mathbb{Z}_{2} breaking, which is evidenced by the nonzero ground-state coherence a^sp\langle\hat{a}\rangle_{\rm sp} [37].

To fully demonstrate the rich equilibrium dynamics induced by the antisqueezing effect, in FIGs. 4a and 4b, we present the experimental ground-state phase diagram characterized by the rescaled ground-state excitation Φ\Phi. The realization of reversed SPT are shown again, and it also can be seen from the reduced density matrix ρ^as\hat{\rho}_{a}^{s} reconstructed experimentally by state tomography. As shown in FIG. 4c, the main contributions to Φ\Phi, i.e., a^a^s\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\rangle_{s} (diagonal elements) and a^2s\langle\hat{a}^{2}\rangle_{s} (sub-sub diagonal elements), approximately change from zero to finite value along with decreasing λ~\tilde{\lambda}. Figure 4a again shows that the dependence of Φ\Phi on λ~\tilde{\lambda} approaches to the case of exactly occurring SPT at the quantum critical point along with increasing Ω/ω\Omega/\omega. Furthermore, we measure a series of order parameters Φ\Phi at the critical point for different values of Ω/ω\Omega/\omega, showing the finite-frequency scaling for the observable Φ\Phi in the inset of FIG. 4a. The order parameter Φ\Phi vanishes with a power-law scaling, and the fitted finite-frequency scaling exponent γ=0.676\gamma=-0.676 is very close to the universal exponent 2/3-2/3 of the Rabi and Dicke model, which verifies the experimental realization of SPT in finite-frequency regime again. By fixing the value of Ω/ω\Omega/\omega, Figure 4b indicates that ξ/ω>1/4\xi/\omega>1/4 is required for the occurrence of phase transition, which is consistent with the analytical parameter condition λ~1+αλ~24ξ/ω\tilde{\lambda}\geqslant\sqrt{1+\alpha\tilde{\lambda}^{2}-4\xi/\omega} of SPT. However, too large antisqueezing strength will lead the system enter into the unstable phase (UP), when the rescaled ground-state excitation becomes an imaginary number. With increasing the spin-oscillator coupling λ~\tilde{\lambda}, the competition between the A2A^{2} and antisqueezing effects will push the system to enter into SP when λ~>1+αλ~24ξ/ω\tilde{\lambda}>\sqrt{1+\alpha\tilde{\lambda}^{2}-4\xi/\omega}, and then enter into NP when λ~<1+αλ~24ξ/ω\tilde{\lambda}<\sqrt{1+\alpha\tilde{\lambda}^{2}-4\xi/\omega}. Our experimental results are approximately agreement with the exact boundaries of different phases, and this consistency becomes better and better along with increasing Ω/ω\Omega/\omega (see FIG. S1 of the Supplementary [37]), which again predicts the occurring of exact SPT in the classical oscillator limit.

In summary, we have presented the first proof-in-principle experimental demonstration of equilibrium SPT beyond no-go theorem induced by the antisqueezing effects. To understand the reappearance of SPT, we experimentally shown the enhanced ZPF by antisqueezing, which ultimately recovers the singularity of the ground state of system. The antisqueezing modulated ground-state phase diagram are presented by experimentally preparing the ground state of system with the adiabatic method. Associating with the SPT, we also experimentally realize the strong entanglement and the squeezed cat state of spins, which provides the new possibilities both for quantum metrology and quantum information processing. Our work is fundamentally interesting in demonstrating that the A2A^{2} term is not the ultimate limit for experimental observation of equilibrium SPT in the cavity QED system.

Aside from the above results, the observed antisqueezing-enhanced SNR could be used to the general NMR experiments. The defined spin-to-oscillator mapping process is suitable not only for NMR systems, but will also works well in other spin systems, such as trapped ions [47] and NV centers [48]. They opens the new routes for experimentally exploring the novel quantum optical effects with the platform of NMR or other spin systems.

References

References

  • [1] Kirton, P., Roses, M. M., Keeling, J. & Dalla Torre, E. G. Introduction to the dicke model: From equilibrium to nonequilibrium, and vice versa. Adv. Quantum Technol. 2, 1800043 (2019).
  • [2] Hepp, K. & Lieb, E. H. On the superradiant phase transition for molecules in a quantized radiation field: the dicke maser model. Ann. Phys. 76, 360–404 (1973).
  • [3] Wang, Y. K. & Hioe, F. T. Phase transition in the dicke model of superradiance. Phys. Rev. A 7, 831–836 (1973).
  • [4] Hwang, M. J., Puebla, R. & Plenio, M. B. Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the rabi model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015).
  • [5] Lambert, N., Emary, C. & Brandes, T. Entanglement and the phase transition in single-mode superradiance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 073602 (2004).
  • [6] Raimond, J. M., Brune, M. & Haroche, S. Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565–582 (2001).
  • [7] You, J. Q. & Nori, F. Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits. Nature 474, 589–97 (2011).
  • [8] Rzażewski, K., Wódkiewicz, K. & Żakowicz, W. Phase transitions, two-level atoms, and thea2term. Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 432–434 (1975).
  • [9] Knight, J. M., Aharonov, Y. & Hsieh, G. T. C. Are super-radiant phase transitions possible? Phys. Rev. A 17, 1454–1462 (1978).
  • [10] Nataf, P. & Ciuti, C. No-go theorem for superradiant quantum phase transitions in cavity qed and counter-example in circuit qed. Nat. Commun. 1, 72 (2010).
  • [11] Viehmann, O., von Delft, J. & Marquardt, F. Superradiant phase transitions and the standard description of circuit qed. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011).
  • [12] Vukics, A., Grießer, T. & Domokos, P. Elimination of thea-square problem from cavity qed. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 073601 (2014).
  • [13] Jaako, T., Xiang, Z. L., Garcia-Ripoll, J. J. & Rabl, P. Ultrastrong-coupling phenomena beyond the dicke model. Phys. Rev. A 94, 033850 (2016).
  • [14] Baumann, K., Guerlin, C., Brennecke, F. & Esslinger, T. Dicke quantum phase transition with a superfluid gas in an optical cavity. Nature 464, 1301–6 (2010).
  • [15] Baden, M. P., Arnold, K. J., Grimsmo, A. L., Parkins, S. & Barrett, M. D. Realization of the dicke model using cavity-assisted raman transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020408 (2014).
  • [16] Klinder, J., Kessler, H., Wolke, M., Mathey, L. & Hemmerich, A. Dynamical phase transition in the open dicke model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 3290–5 (2015).
  • [17] Safavi-Naini, A. et al. Verification of a many-ion simulator of the dicke model through slow quenches across a phase transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 040503 (2018).
  • [18] Lloyd, S. Universal quantum simulators. Science 273, 1073–8 (1996).
  • [19] Buluta, I. & Nori, F. Quantum simulators. Science 326, 108–11 (2009).
  • [20] Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S. & Nori, F. Quantum simulation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153–185 (2014).
  • [21] Jones, J. A. et al. Magnetic field sensing beyond the standard quantum limit using 10-spin noon states. Science 324, 1166–8 (2009).
  • [22] Luo, Z. H. et al. Experimentally probing topological order and its breakdown through modular matrices. Nat. Phys. 14, 160–165 (2018).
  • [23] Peng, X. et al. Experimental observation of lee-yang zeros. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 010601 (2015).
  • [24] Lund, A. P., Ralph, T. C. & Haselgrove, H. L. Fault-tolerant linear optical quantum computing with small-amplitude coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 030503 (2008).
  • [25] Li, L. et al. Cat codes with optimal decoherence suppression for a lossy bosonic channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 030502 (2017).
  • [26] Joo, J., Munro, W. J. & Spiller, T. P. Quantum metrology with entangled coherent states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 083601 (2011).
  • [27] Jeong, H., Son, W., Kim, M. S., Ahn, D. & Brukner, C. Quantum nonlocality test for continuous-variable states with dichotomic observables. Phys. Rev. A 67, 012106 (2003).
  • [28] Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nat. Photonics 5, 222–229 (2011).
  • [29] Lü, X. Y. et al. Squeezed optomechanics with phase-matched amplification and dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093602 (2015).
  • [30] Zeytinoğlu, S., İmamoğlu, A. & Huber, S. Engineering matter interactions using squeezed vacuum. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021041 (2017).
  • [31] Leroux, C., Govia, L. C. G. & Clerk, A. A. Enhancing cavity quantum electrodynamics via antisqueezing: Synthetic ultrastrong coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 093602 (2018).
  • [32] Qin, W. et al. Exponentially enhanced light-matter interaction, cooperativities, and steady-state entanglement using parametric amplification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 093601 (2018).
  • [33] Ge, W. et al. Trapped ion quantum information processing with squeezed phonons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 030501 (2019).
  • [34] Li, P. B., Zhou, Y., Gao, W. B. & Nori, F. Enhancing spin-phonon and spin-spin interactions using linear resources in a hybrid quantum system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 153602 (2020).
  • [35] Chen, Y.-H., Qin, W., Wang, X., Miranowicz, A. & Nori, F. Shortcuts to adiabaticity for the quantum rabi model: Efficient generation of giant entangled cat states via parametric amplification. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.04078 (2020).
  • [36] Burd, S. C. et al. Quantum amplification of boson-mediated interactions. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14342 (2020).
  • [37] See the supplemental materials.
  • [38] Peng, X. H. et al. Preparation of pseudo-pure states by line-selective pulses in nuclear magnetic resonance. Chem. Phys. Lett. 340, 509–516 (2001).
  • [39] Khaneja, N., Reiss, T., Kehlet, C., Schulte-Herbruggen, T. & Glaser, S. J. Optimal control of coupled spin dynamics: design of nmr pulse sequences by gradient ascent algorithms. J. Magn. Reson. 172, 296–305 (2005).
  • [40] Lee, J. S. The quantum state tomography on an nmr system. Phys. Lett. A 305, 349–353 (2002).
  • [41] Steffen, M., van Dam, W., Hogg, T., Breyta, G. & Chuang, I. Experimental implementation of an adiabatic quantum optimization algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 067903 (2003).
  • [42] Ourjoumtsev, A., Jeong, H., Tualle-Brouri, R. & Grangier, P. Generation of optical ’schrodinger cats’ from photon number states. Nature 448, 784–6 (2007).
  • [43] Etesse, J., Bouillard, M., Kanseri, B. & Tualle-Brouri, R. Experimental generation of squeezed cat states with an operation allowing iterative growth. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 193602 (2015).
  • [44] Ourjoumtsev, A., Tualle-Brouri, R., Laurat, J. & Grangier, P. Generating optical schrodinger kittens for quantum information processing. Science 312, 83–6 (2006).
  • [45] Lo, H. Y. et al. Spin-motion entanglement and state diagnosis with squeezed oscillator wavepackets. Nature 521, 336–9 (2015).
  • [46] Vlastakis, B. et al. Deterministically encoding quantum information using 100-photon schrodinger cat states. Science 342, 607–10 (2013).
  • [47] Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C. & Wineland, D. Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 281–324 (2003).
  • [48] Doherty, M. W. et al. The nitrogen-vacancy colour centre in diamond. Phys. Rep. 528, 1–45 (2013).

Methods

Spin-to-oscillator mapping scheme. Generally, NN qubits can be used to simulate a boson mode with 2N2^{N} levels by arranging all spin states as the binary form of the corresponding excitation number

|0\displaystyle\ket{0} |NN110=|0000,\displaystyle\mapsto\ket{\uparrow_{N}\uparrow_{N-1}\cdots\uparrow_{1}\uparrow_{0}}=\ket{00\cdots 00}, (4)
|1\displaystyle\ket{1} |NN110=|0001,\displaystyle\mapsto\ket{\uparrow_{N}\uparrow_{N-1}\cdots\downarrow_{1}\uparrow_{0}}=\ket{00\cdots 01},
\displaystyle\vdots\qquad\vdots
|2N1\displaystyle\ket{{\rm 2^{N}-1}} |NN110=|1111.\displaystyle\mapsto\ket{\downarrow_{N}\downarrow_{N-1}\cdots\downarrow_{1}\downarrow_{0}}=\ket{11\cdots 11}.

This scheme makes sure the spin space is fully utilized and the spin matrices are exactly same as the mapped oscillator operators. The mathematical form of this mapping scheme has some similarities to Holstein-Primakoff transformation. We will firstly give the mapping representation of the truncated number operator

a^a^=i=1N2i2σ^z(i)+2N12,\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}=-\sum^{N}_{i=1}2^{i-2}\hat{\sigma}^{\left(i\right)}_{z}+\frac{2^{N}-1}{2}, (5)

where the superscript (i)\left(i\right) denotes the ii-th qubit. Eq. (5) can be proved by the mathematical induction.

Proof of Eq. (5): Obviously, the equation establishes when N=1N=1. Assume Eq. (5) is true for N=kN=k. Now for N=k+1N=k+1

diag{0,,2k+11}\displaystyle{\rm diag}\left\{0,\cdots,2^{k+1}-1\right\} (6)
=diag{0,,2k1}𝟙+2k𝟙k(𝟙σ^z(k+1)2)\displaystyle={\rm diag}\left\{0,\cdots,2^{k}-1\right\}\otimes\mathds{1}+2^{k}\mathds{1}^{\otimes k}\otimes\left(\frac{\mathds{1}-\hat{\sigma}_{z}^{\left(k+1\right)}}{2}\right)
=(2k12i=1k2i2σ^z(i))𝟙\displaystyle=\left(\frac{2^{k}-1}{2}-\sum^{k}_{i=1}2^{i-2}\hat{\sigma}^{\left(i\right)}_{z}\right)\otimes\mathds{1}
2k1(𝟙kσ^z(k+1)𝟙(k+1))\displaystyle\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad-2^{k-1}\left(\mathds{1}^{\otimes k}\otimes\hat{\sigma}_{z}^{\left(k+1\right)}-\mathds{1}^{\otimes\left(k+1\right)}\right)
=i=1k+12i2σ^z(i)+2k+112,\displaystyle=-\sum^{k+1}_{i=1}2^{i-2}\hat{\sigma}^{\left(i\right)}_{z}+\frac{2^{k+1}-1}{2},

where 𝟙k=𝟙𝟙\mathds{1}^{\otimes k}=\mathds{1}\otimes\cdots\otimes\mathds{1} is the identity matrix of 2k×2k2^{k}\times 2^{k} dimensions. Then the formula will be true for every natural number NN.

To obtain the representations of operators a^\hat{a} and a^\hat{a}^{\dagger}, let’s define Σ^za^a^\hat{\Sigma}_{z}\equiv\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a} with Σ^z|n=n|n\hat{\Sigma}_{z}\ket{n}=n\ket{n}, and the ‘increasing operator’ (‘decreasing operator’) A^+/\hat{A}_{+}/ (A^\hat{A}_{-}) as follow

A^+\displaystyle\hat{A}_{+} σ^+(1)+σ^+(2)σ^(1)++σ^+(N)σ^(N1)σ^(1),\displaystyle\equiv\hat{\sigma}^{\left(1\right)}_{+}+\hat{\sigma}^{\left(2\right)}_{+}\hat{\sigma}^{\left(1\right)}_{-}+\cdots+\hat{\sigma}^{\left(N\right)}_{+}\hat{\sigma}^{\left(N-1\right)}_{-}\cdots\hat{\sigma}^{\left(1\right)}_{-}, (7)
A^\displaystyle\hat{A}_{-} σ^(1)+σ^+(1)σ^(2)++σ^+(1)σ^+(2)σ^(N).\displaystyle\equiv\hat{\sigma}^{\left(1\right)}_{-}+\hat{\sigma}^{\left(1\right)}_{+}\hat{\sigma}^{\left(2\right)}_{-}+\cdots+\hat{\sigma}^{\left(1\right)}_{+}\hat{\sigma}^{\left(2\right)}_{+}\cdots\hat{\sigma}^{\left(N\right)}_{-}.

It is not difficult to find that A^+|n=|n+1\hat{A}_{+}\ket{n}=\ket{n+1} and A^|n+1=|n\hat{A}_{-}\ket{n+1}=\ket{n} for all 0n<2N10\leq n<2^{N}-1. The above definitions allow us to construct truncated creation and annihilation operators conveniently. Based on these properties, we have

A^Σ^z|n\displaystyle\hat{A}_{-}\sqrt{\hat{\Sigma}_{z}}\ket{n} =n|n1,\displaystyle=\sqrt{n}\ket{n-1}, (8)
A^+Σ^z+𝟙N|n\displaystyle\hat{A}_{+}\sqrt{\hat{\Sigma}_{z}+\mathds{1}^{\otimes N}}\ket{n} =n+1|n+1.\displaystyle=\sqrt{n+1}\ket{n+1}.

Thus we get the final mapping representations

a^\displaystyle\hat{a} =A^Σ^z,\displaystyle=\hat{A}_{-}\sqrt{\hat{\Sigma}_{z}}, (9)
a^\displaystyle\hat{a}^{\dagger} =A^+Σ^z+𝟙N,\displaystyle=\hat{A}_{+}\sqrt{\hat{\Sigma}_{z}+\mathds{1}^{\otimes N}},

which together with Eq. (5) form the mapping scheme of our quantum simulation process.

Here we should claim that the form like Eq. (9) is not an easy Hamiltonian to simulate, as there is multi-body interactions. However, by a combination of the natural Hamiltonian of two-body NMR sample and Radio frequency control pulses, multi-body interactions could be simulated in NMR systems [1, 2].

Order parameter measurement. Since ^s=S^(r~)^S^(r~)\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}=\hat{S}^{\dagger}(\tilde{r})\hat{\mathds{H}}\hat{S}(\tilde{r}), the ground states of ^\hat{\mathds{H}} and ^s\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s} are linked by a squeezing transformation

|G=S^(r~)|Gs,\ket{G}=\hat{S}\left(\tilde{r}\right)\ket{G}_{s}, (10)

where |G\ket{G} and |Gs\ket{G}_{s} are the ground states of ^\hat{\mathds{H}} and ^s\hat{\mathds{H}}_{s}, respectively. Then the order parameter of SPT can be expressed as

Φ\displaystyle\Phi =(ω/Ω)G|a^a^|G\displaystyle=(\omega/\Omega)\langle G|\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}|G\rangle (11)
=(ω/Ω)G|S^(r~)a^a^S^(r~)|Gss.\displaystyle=(\omega/\Omega)\,{{}_{s}}\langle G|\hat{S}^{\dagger}(\tilde{r})\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\hat{S}(\tilde{r})|G\rangle_{s}.

Together with the following derivation

S^(r~)\displaystyle\hat{S}^{\dagger}(\tilde{r}) a^a^S^(r~)S^(r~)a^S^(r~)S^(r~)a^S^(r~)\displaystyle\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\hat{S}(\tilde{r})\equiv\hat{S}^{\dagger}(\tilde{r})\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{S}(\tilde{r})\hat{S}^{\dagger}(\tilde{r})\hat{a}\hat{S}(\tilde{r}) (12)
=cosh(2r~)a^a^12sinh(2r~)(a^2+a^2)+sinh2r~,\displaystyle=\cosh(2\tilde{r})\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}-\frac{1}{2}\sinh(2\tilde{r})\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}+\hat{a}^{2}\right)+\sinh^{2}\tilde{r},

we obtain

Φ=\displaystyle\Phi= (ω/Ω)cosh(2r~)a^a^s\displaystyle(\omega/\Omega)\cosh(2\tilde{r})\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}\rangle_{s}
(1/2)sinh(2r~)(a^2s+a^2s)+sinh2r~.\displaystyle-(1/2)\sinh(2\tilde{r})\left(\langle\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}\rangle_{s}+\langle\hat{a}^{2}\rangle_{s}\right)+\sinh^{2}\tilde{r}. (13)

This means the order parameters of SPT can be obtained by measuring the corresponding expectations in the ground state |Gs|G\rangle_{s} with the NMR spectra [37].

In short, based on the spin-to-oscillator mapping scheme, i.e., Eq. (5) with N=3N=3, the value of aas\langle a^{\dagger}a\rangle_{s}, corresponding to σ^z(i)s\langle\hat{\sigma}_{z}^{(i)}\rangle_{s}, can be obtained by applying three π/2\pi/2 readout pulses along yy axis on the three 19F spins and reading out the corresponding NMR spectra. Similarly, the boson operators a^2+a^2\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}+\hat{a}^{2} can be expressed as

a^2+a^2=\displaystyle\hat{a}^{\dagger 2}+\hat{a}^{2}= l,m{0,1}clm(clm1)|ll|σ^x|mm|\displaystyle\sum_{l,m\in\{0,1\}}\sqrt{c_{lm}\left(c_{lm}-1\right)}\outerproduct{l}{l}\otimes\hat{\sigma}_{x}\otimes\outerproduct{m}{m} (14)
+3×4(|100010|+|010100|)\displaystyle+\sqrt{3\times 4}\left(\outerproduct{100}{010}+\outerproduct{010}{100}\right)
+4×5(|101011|+|011101|).\displaystyle+\sqrt{4\times 5}\left(\outerproduct{101}{011}+\outerproduct{011}{101}\right).

The expectations of the first term are read out directly from the multiplet structure of F2 spectra. The expectations of the last two terms can be firstly transferred as the single quantum coherence terms of F2 spin by employing operation U^2\hat{U}_{2} to the system. Subsequently, the corresponding expectations are obtained by measuring the NMR spectra of F2 spin again. Here the operation U^2\hat{U}_{2} can be implemented by the quantum circuits shown in FIG. S4 of Supplementary [37] or the equivalent GRAPE pulse sequences.

References

References

  • [1] Tseng, C. H. et al. Quantum simulation of a three-body-interaction hamiltonian on an nmr quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A 61, 012302 (1999).
  • [2] Peng, X. H. et al. Experimental implementation of adiabatic passage between different topological orders. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 080404 (2014).

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (Grant no. 2016YFA0301203 and No. 2018YFA0306600), the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11822502, No. 11974125, No. 11661161018, and No. 11927811), Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies (Grant No. AHY050000).

Author contributions

X. P. and X. L. conceived the project. X. L. conceived the relevant theoretical constructs. X. P., X. C. and Z. W. designed the experiment. X. C. and Z. W. performed the measurements and analyzed the data. M. J. assisted with the experiment. X. P. and J. D. supervised the experiment. All authors contributed to analyzing the data, discussing the results and writing the manuscript.

Competing financial interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.