This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Excitation of 87Rb Rydberg atoms to nS and nD states (n\leq68) via an optical nanofiber

Alexey Vylegzhanin these authors contributed equally Light-Matter Interactions for Quantum Technologies Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.    Dylan J. Brown these authors contributed equally Light-Matter Interactions for Quantum Technologies Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.    Aswathy Raj Light-Matter Interactions for Quantum Technologies Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.    Danil F. Kornovan Center for Complex Quantum Systems, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.    Jesse L. Everett Light-Matter Interactions for Quantum Technologies Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.    Etienne Brion Laboratoire Collisions Agrégats Réactivité, UMR5589, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, CNRS, F-31062 Toulouse Cedex 09, France.    Jacques Robert Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique des Gaz et des Plasmas, 91405 Orsay, France.    Síle Nic Chormaic Light-Matter Interactions for Quantum Technologies Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.
Abstract

Cold Rydberg atoms are a promising platform for quantum technologies and combining them with optical waveguides has the potential to create robust quantum information devices. Here, we experimentally observe the excitation of cold rubidium atoms to a large range of Rydberg S and D states through interaction with the evanescent field of an optical nanofiber. We develop a theoretical model to account for experimental phenomena present such as the AC Stark shifts and the Casimir-Polder interaction. This work strengthens the knowledge of Rydberg atom interactions with optical nanofibers and is a critical step toward the implementation of all-fiber quantum networks and waveguide QED systems using highly excited atoms.

I Introduction

Cold Rydberg atoms are a promising platform for quantum information [24, 54, 2, 26, 29, 9] and quantum simulation [67, 7] due to the long lifetimes of the excited states and the strong dipole interaction resulting in Rydberg blockade [64]. The Rydberg blockade allows for the deterministic entanglement of qubits [68], implementation of C-NOT [24] and C-Phase quantum gates [22], and the generation of single-photon emitters [53] and single-photon switches [5]. Typically, Rydberg experiments have been performed in free-space, often with atoms being excited to a Rydberg state in optical tweezers arrays [62], optical lattices [3] or micron-sized vapor cells [32]. However, new platforms of interest include hybrid systems such as atom-waveguide experiments [27, 33, 13], atom chips [11], and cavity QED [61]. Compared to free-space systems, these have advantages such as low power consumption and high scalability [54], which are important features for creating practical quantum devices [1].

Here, we present our work on Rydberg atom excitation using an optical nanofiber (ONF) integrated into a cloud of cold neutral atoms, to develop an ONF - atom hybrid system [51] for the purposes of developing a robust system for waveguide QED experiments [56]. Optical nanofibers are versatile for many different quantum experiments [48, 57] based on their ease of integration into atomic systems [48]. The high intensity of the evanescent field decaying from the fiber’s surface [38, 16] make them ideal for manipulating and probing cold atoms [47, 65, 17, 25], with the steep gradient allowing for the study of quadrupole excitations difficult to access via free-space  [52, 28]. The extension of the evanescent field far from the surface facilitates atom-light interactions many wavelengths from the fiber [14]. In addition, ONFs are relatively easy to install into experimental setups making them a strong candidate for compact quantum devices, all-fiber integrated quantum systems, and waveguide QED [56, 42]. The ability to generate an ordered array of Rydberg atoms near an optical nanofiber will provide a major new direction for waveguide QED and could lead to the realization of self-ordered trains of photons through the nanofiber due to a repulsive photon-photon interaction [25].

We experimentally excite 87Rb atoms from a magneto-optical trap (MOT) to a wide range of Rydberg states, as high as nn = 68 for the nnD5/2 state, using the evanescent field of an optical nanofiber, see Fig. 1(a) for a schematic of the setup. Atoms excited to the Rydberg state are lost from the MOT and we measure the remaining MOT population as an indirect measurement of the Rydberg excitation rate, see Sec. III and Sec. IV for details. We perform numerical calculations of the atom-surface interaction and extend our previous model [51] using experimental parameters to better account for the full dynamics. We present the conclusions and perspectives of the work in Sec. V.

II Experimental details

The experiment is performed using a cold cloud of 87Rb atoms overlapped with an optical nanofiber with diameter dd \approx 350 nm, see Fig. 1(a). The ONF is prepared from standard 125 μ\mum diameter fiber (SM800-5.6-125) using a H:O flame brushing technique [66]. During the tapering process, transmission through the fiber is monitored with a photodetector to ensure it remains above 99% for 780 nm guided light. The ONF is installed in an ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) chamber, maintained at a pressure of 10910^{-9} mbar, with the MOT centered at the waist. During the experiments, we propagate 300 μ\muW of 1064 nm light through the fiber to keep it hot and reduce the adsorption of 87Rb on its surface. Note we assume only HE11 mode propagation for all the wavelengths (480 nm, 780 nm, 1064 nm) used in the experiments. However, the ONF diameter is very close to the cutoff of 352 nm for the TE01 and TM01 guided modes at 480 nm [35].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the experimental setup. 87Rb atoms are trapped around the ONF in a MOT formed from six counterpropagating 780 nm beams. The excitation to the Rydberg state is driven by 480 nm light coupled into the ONF. The polarization of the 480 nm light is set using two λ\lambda/4 waveplates to maximize the excitation rate. The MOT population is measured using a PMT by collecting the fluorescence from the trapped atoms. ONF - optical nanofiber, PD - photodetector, DM - dichroic mirror, PC - polarization compensation, PMT - photomultiplier tube, EMCCD - electron multiplying CCD. (b) Energy level diagram for Rydberg excitation. The 780 nm cooling laser drives a transition between the 5S1/2 and 5P3/2 states, while the 480 nm laser excites atoms to the Rydberg state. The cooling and Rydberg lasers have detunings Δ1\Delta_{1} and Δ2\Delta_{2} from their respective transitions. (c) The timing sequence of the experiment. The MOT initially loads for 7 seconds. Once the 480 nm laser is turned on, the MOT starts losing atoms. After 4 seconds, both the 480 nm and 780 nm lasers are turned off and the experiment cycle recommences. The 1064 nm laser remains at a constant power throughout the experiments.

 

The cold 87Rb atoms, with an average temperature of \sim140 μ\muK, are created in a standard MOT with three pairs of counterpropagating 780 nm cooling beams. The cooling beams are stabilized to the 5S(F=2)1/25P3/2(F=2,3){}_{1/2}(F=2)\rightarrow 5\mathrm{P}_{3/2}(F=2,3) crossover peak and shifted with an AOM to a fixed detuning, Δ1=14{\Delta_{1}=-14} MHz, from the transition to the 5P(F=3)3/2{}_{3/2}(F=3) state. The total power in all cooling beams is 50 mW. A pair of anti-Helmholtz coils provides a magnetic field gradient of 20 G/cm and three pairs of compensation coils allow us to overlap the atom cloud with the ONF. With no defined quantization axis, the atoms are assumed to equally occupy all Zeeman sublevels. Two EMCCD cameras (Thorlabs DCC1545M and Andor Luca R) capture images of the atom cloud. Fluorescence from the atoms is collected by a photomultiplier tube (PMT,Hamamatsu R636-10). This provides a signal that is proportional to the number of atoms trapped in the MOT.

The 480 nm light used to drive the Rydberg transitions, see Fig. 1(b), is from a Toptica SHG Pro, stabilized to the desired wavelength using electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) in an enriched 87Rb vapor cell [50]. The precise wavelength of the 480 nm light is controlled by modifying the wavelength of the 780 nm probe laser using an electro-optical modulator (EOM, NIR-NPX800, Photline Technologies). Shifting the frequency of the 780 nm probe causes a shifting of the EIT condition. The laser locking circuit compensates for this by adjusting the 480 nm frequency by the same amount. The output power of the 480 nm light from the ONF is kept constant at 30 μ\muW. The transmission of the 480 nm light through the ONF is 10%10\% with 300 μ\muW at the input of the fiber. The 125 μ\mum fiber supports multiple modes of 480 nm light, all of which, other than the fundamental HE11, are lost during the downward taper of the ONF, leading to the low transmission. We maximize the transmission through the ONF by ensuring the light coupled into the input fiber is coupled as much as possible into the fundamental HE11 mode. We use a noise eater (NEL01A/M 425 - 650 nm, Thorlabs) in the path of the 480 nm light to stabilize the power, as, without it, power fluctuations on the order of 5% would lead to significant fluctuations in the PMT signal. Polarization control (PC), consisting of two quarter waveplates, is used to set the polarization [63] of the 480 nm field at the ONF, with the optimal condition corresponding to the polarization being quasi-circularly polarized. In this case, the shape of the evanescent field provides the maximum interaction area for atoms, indicated by maximal loss of atoms from the MOT.

III Experimental procedure

First, we tune the 480 nm laser to select a specific Rydberg state by locking it to a particular wavelength via the EIT locking setup [50]. We compare the wavelength of the 480 nm laser using a wavemeter (HighFinesse WS-6) with the list of frequencies from [46]. Unlisted frequencies are calculated using the Alkali-Rydberg Calculator (ARC) package [69].

The experimental sequence (see Fig. 1(c)) consists of two steps. First, atoms are trapped in the MOT for 7 seconds, until saturation is reached, i.e., the number of atoms in the trap is constant, N1N_{1}. We normalize the MOT population in all measurements to this value, i.e., N1=1N_{1}=1, see inset to Fig. 2. Second, the 480 nm Rydberg excitation light is switched on, resulting in atoms in the vicinity of the ONF interacting with both the 780 nm light from the cooling beams and the 480 nm evanescent light field. We keep the 480 nm light on until the normalized atom population in the MOT reaches a new equilibrium, N21N_{2}\leq 1, after approximately 4 seconds [51]. We then determine the dependence of N2N_{2} on the detuning, Δ2\Delta_{2}, of the 480 nm laser from the two-photon transition, see Fig. 1(b), by varying Δ2\Delta_{2} from -22 MHz to +22MHz with a step size of 1 MHz and recording the fluorescence signal from the remaining atoms in the MOT using the PMT. The two-photon resonance condition should occur when Δ2=Δ1\Delta_{2}=-\Delta_{1}, i.e., when the two-photon detuning is zero, ignoring any energy shifts. This gives us an indirect measurement of the rate of Rydberg excitation since any atoms excited to the Rydberg state are lost from the MOT. We repeat this measurement 10 times for each value of Δ2\Delta_{2} in order to get an average MOT population after Rydberg excitation as a function of the detuning, N¯2(Δ2)\overline{N}_{2}(\Delta_{2}). This procedure is then repeated for each specific nnS or nnD Rydberg state that we consider. Figure 2 shows N2¯\overline{N_{2}}, as a function of Δ2\Delta_{2} for the 3030D5/2, 3030D3/2 and 3030S1/2 Rydberg states. It is important to note that the excitation to the Rydberg state does not have a defined quantization axis as it occurs within a few hundred nanometers of the center of the MOT where the magnetic field is close to zero. The ONF is positioned so as to overlap with the MOT center. In this region Zeeman shifts of the ground and intermediate states are small (less than 0.5 MHz typically), and depend on the atom position, while the polarization of the photons performing the excitation are also not well defined due to the geometry of the system and the nature of field polarization in the nanofiber’s evanescent field  [38]. Hence, we can assume that the Zeeman levels are evenly populated. The curves clearly display the two dips resulting from the Autler-Townes splitting of the intermediate level arising from the strong drive of the 780 nm cooling laser, offset from zero due to the non-zero detuning of the cooling laser as the dressed states are asymmetric superpositions of the bare stares. This is the same phenomenon described in the previous work as coherent and incoherent peaks [18, 15].

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Normalized MOT population, N¯2\overline{N}_{2}, after Rydberg excitation as a function of the detuning, Δ2\Delta_{2}, of the 480 nm laser for the 5P3/2 to 30S1/2 (gray squares), 30D3/2 (red triangles) and 30D5/2 (blue circles) transitions. The transitions to nnD5/2 states have higher excitation rates than the nnS1/2 and nnD3/2 states due to the larger dipole matrix element. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the 10 experimental measurements of N2N_{2} and N¯2,min\overline{N}_{2,\mathrm{min}} represents the minimum observed average population of the MOT after Rydberg excitation. The inset is a sample normalized MOT population curve when Δ2=14\Delta_{2}=14 MHz for the 30D5/2 state, indicating how N1N_{1} and N2N_{2} are determined.

 

The measurements are repeated for the states nnS1/2 for n[26,55]n\in\left[26,55\right], nnD3/2 for n[24,65]n\in\left[24,65\right] and nnD5/2 for n[24,68]n\in\left[24,68\right]. Each spectrum (similar to those shown in Fig. 2) is fit by a skewed Gaussian function to account for the asymmetry arising from the red-shift induced by the AC Stark shift of the 1064 nm laser and the atom-fiber surface interaction. The fitting function is

P(Δ2)=1C1Φ(A1(Δ2μ1))Exp[(Δ2μ1)22σ12]C2Φ(A2(Δ2μ2))Exp[(Δ2μ2)22σ22],\begin{split}P(\Delta_{2})=1-C_{1}\Phi(A_{1}(\Delta_{2}-\mu_{1}))\mathrm{Exp}\left[\frac{-(\Delta_{2}-\mu_{1})^{2}}{2\sigma_{1}^{2}}\right]-\\ C_{2}\Phi(A_{2}(\Delta_{2}-\mu_{2}))\mathrm{Exp}\left[\frac{-(\Delta_{2}-\mu_{2})^{2}}{2\sigma_{2}^{2}}\right],\end{split} (1)

where P(Δ2)P(\Delta_{2}) is a fit to N¯2\overline{N}_{2} the normalized final MOT population, Φ(μ)=1+erf(μ)\Phi\left(\mu\right)=1+\mathrm{erf}\left(\mu\right), Δ2\Delta_{2} is the detuning, CiC_{i} are the magnitudes of the dips, σi\sigma_{i} the widths of the dips, μi\mu_{i} the un-skewed Gaussian location, and AiA_{i} are the skew parameters. From the fit we extract the mode of the distribution ν2\nu_{2} which is the position of minimum MOT population.

In Fig. 3(a) we plot the minimum observed average MOT population after Rydberg excitation, N¯2,min\overline{N}_{2,min}, at the two-photon resonance position for the full range of Rydberg S and D states considered. Refer to Fig. 2 to see how N¯2,min\overline{N}_{2,min} is defined for the 30D5/2 state as an example. We see that N¯2,min\overline{N}_{2,min} is almost constant regardless of the principal quantum number, nn, with only the lower and higher nn values deviating from the constant loss value. The constant rate of atom loss over a large range of nn is because the rate of atom excitation is predominantly dictated by the atom density surrounding the fiber and the overlap with the evanescent field. The rate of loss is dictated by a combination of the excitation and collisional losses of atoms with the Rydberg atoms. This sets an effective maximum excitation rate not determined by the dipole matrix element of the particular Rydberg transition. These differences at the upper and lower ends could be due to the drop in power and stability of the 480 nm laser we experience when tuning to longer wavelengths (for lower nn) and the larger energy shifts and possibility of ionization of Rydberg atoms (at higher nn).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Measured quantities of the nnS1/2 (gray squares), nnD3/2 (red triangles) and nnD5/2 (blue circles) states. (a) Dependence of the minimum MOT population N¯2,min\overline{N}_{2,\mathrm{min}} on the principal quantum number nn. (b) The position of the two-photon resonance dip ν2\nu_{2} as a function of the principal quantum number nn. The nnS1/2 states experience a significant red-shift from the initial ν2=14\nu_{2}=14 MHz until the excitation stops at n=55n=55. The excitation to nnD5/2 and nnD3/2 states experience little energy shift over the range of states measured, with variances of 0.5 MHz and 0.61 MHz respectively. Error bars on the data represent fitting errors of (a) the dip magnitude and (b) the dip position.

 

The two-photon resonance dip position, ν2\nu_{2}, (the position of the minimal MOT population N¯2,min\overline{N}_{2,min}) is plotted against the principal quantum number nn in Fig. 3(b) and indicates that transitions to the nnD3/2 and nnD5/2 states are less affected by the presence of the ONF than transitions to nnS1/2 states. Until nn approaches 66 there is very little change in the two-photon resonance condition of the nnD states, indicated by the variances σD3/2=0.61\sigma_{D_{3/2}}=0.61 MHz and σD5/2=0.5\sigma_{D_{5/2}}=0.5 MHz, while the transition to the nnS1/2 states experiences a clear red-shift before ceasing to be excited at n56n\geq 56. We believe the apparent reduction of the surface interaction of the nnD states with the ONF surface results from the asymmetry of the electron probability distribution. The surface interaction with the fiber depends on the orientation of the atomic orbitals with only those aligned parallel with the fiber experiencing a small enough energy shift to be excited, contrasted with the nnS1/2 states which exhibit spherical symmetry. For states n>60n>60 the rate of excitation of the nnD5/2 decreases until n68n\geq 68 at which point the excitation no longer occurs and the final MOT population is unchanged (see Fig. 3(a)). Speculating that the sudden decrease in the excitation probability arose from ionization of the Rydberg atoms, we tuned the 480 nm laser back to the two-photon resonance condition (Δ2=14\Delta_{2}=14 MHz) for the transition to the 3030D5/2 state and repeated the experiment, but observed no excitation signal. Given that the highly excited Rydberg states 70\sim{}70 are known to ionize readily in a MOT [43], we believe that at these high nn excitations close to the dielectric and in a strong electric field the atoms are ionized, and the ions stick to the surface of the fiber which shields the excitation [32]. The impact of DC Stark shifts from stray electric fields or the charging of the ONF are difficult to quantify with no electrodes in the vacuum chamber; however, we assume these remain relatively constant in our experiments, except for the higher nnD5/2 states when ion deposition on the fiber surface causes enormous shifts. The nnD5/2 states are known to be more sensitive to stray electric fields than nnS1/2 states, so we should expect to see a larger impact on these states if DC Stark effects were significant in these measurements.

To test this hypothesis, we first measured the absorption of a probe laser resonant with the 87Rb D2 (F=2F=3F=2\rightarrow F^{\prime}=3) transition, obtaining the usual results [47], indicating there was no issue with the presence of the evanescent field or loss of propagation through the fiber. We then shifted the position of the MOT approximately 0.5 mm along the waist of the ONF using the compensation Helmholtz coils, and performed the Rydberg excitation experiments again. At the new position along the waist the Rydberg experiments worked as expected, supporting our hypothesis that the previous region of fiber had been coated in ions, but was otherwise undamaged.

IV Numerical Modeling

Interactions between atoms and conductive or dielectric surfaces have been investigated thoroughly experimentally [23, 30]. However, experiments exploring the interactions between Rydberg state atoms and dielectric surfaces remain limited [49, 10, 55, 32]. The interactions of Rydberg atoms with dielectric surfaces are expected to be stronger than for a metal surface, since the dielectric surface can be charged, leading to a resonant interaction between surface polaritons, thereby enhancing the interaction [32].

For atoms with principal quantum number n>20n>20 the quadrupole transitions play a significant role in determining the interaction with surfaces, becoming comparable to the dipole contributions for larger nn [58]. Interactions with the surface also have an impact on the lifetime of Rydberg levels, enhancing the spontaneous decay rate in the proximity of a fiber [60, 58].

To investigate the importance of these interactions, we develop a detailed numerical model to compute the rate of Rydberg excitation near an optical nanofiber and quantify the magnitude of the energy shifts.

We calculate the population of the Rydberg state at the end of the experiment by solving the steady-state Maxwell-Bloch equations:

ρ˙gg\displaystyle\dot{\rho}_{gg} =12[Ω1(ρegρge)]+Γ1ρee+Γ2ρrr+γ(1sρgg)\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\left[\Omega_{1}\left(\rho_{eg}-\rho_{ge}\right)\right]+\Gamma_{1}\rho_{ee}+\Gamma_{2}\rho_{rr}+\gamma_{\ell}(1-s-\rho_{gg})
ρ˙ee\displaystyle\dot{\rho}_{ee} =12[Ω1(ρgeρeg)+Ω2(ρreρer)]Γ1ρee+γ(sρee)\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\left[\Omega_{1}\left(\rho_{ge}-\rho_{eg}\right)+\Omega_{2}\left(\rho_{re}-\rho_{er}\right)\right]-\Gamma_{1}\rho_{ee}+\gamma_{\ell}\left(s-\rho_{ee}\right)
ρ˙rr\displaystyle\dot{\rho}_{rr} =12[Ω2(ρerρre)]Γ2ρrrγρrr\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\left[\Omega_{2}\left(\rho_{er}-\rho_{re}\right)\right]-\Gamma_{2}\rho_{rr}-\gamma_{\ell}\rho_{rr}
ρ˙ge\displaystyle\dot{\rho}_{ge} =12[Ω1(ρeeρgg)Ω2ρgr+2Δ1ρge](Γ12+γ)ρge\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\left[\Omega_{1}\left(\rho_{ee}-\rho_{gg}\right)-\Omega_{2}\rho_{gr}+2\Delta_{1}\rho_{ge}\right]-\left(\frac{\Gamma_{1}}{2}+\gamma_{\ell}\right)\rho_{ge}
ρ˙gr\displaystyle\dot{\rho}_{gr} =12[Ω1ρerΩ2ρge+2(Δ1+Δ2)ρgr](Γ22+γ+γr)ρgr\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\left[\Omega_{1}\rho_{er}-\Omega_{2}\rho_{ge}+2(\Delta_{1}+\Delta_{2})\rho_{gr}\right]-\left(\frac{\Gamma_{2}}{2}+\gamma_{\ell}+\gamma_{r}\right)\rho_{gr}
ρ˙er\displaystyle\dot{\rho}_{er} =12[Ω2(ρrrρee)+Ω1ρgr+2Δ2ρer](Γ12Γ22+γ)ρer\displaystyle=\frac{1}{2}\left[\Omega_{2}\left(\rho_{rr}-\rho_{ee}\right)+\Omega_{1}\rho_{gr}+2\Delta_{2}\rho_{er}\right]-\left(\frac{\Gamma_{1}}{2}-\frac{\Gamma_{2}}{2}+\gamma_{\ell}\right)\rho_{er} (2)
Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) Numerical calculation of the excitation probability of the Rydberg state at steady state for the 30S1/2 Rydberg state compared to the experiment. The blue circles show N¯2\overline{N}_{2} from the experiment, the gray line show the numerical results without the Casimir-Polder interaction taken into account, while the red curve includes the Casimir-Polder interaction of the Rydberg atom with the fiber. (b) Numerical calculation of t

he change of the linewidth Γ2\Gamma_{2} of the Rydberg transition (blue) and the Casimir-Polder shift ΔECP\Delta E_{CP} of the Rydberg energy (red) as a function of distance from the surface for the 30S1/2 state. (c) Numerical calculation of the single photon Rabi frequency Ω2\Omega_{2} of the 5P3/2{}_{3/2}\rightarrow30S1/2 transition (blue) and the total detuning Δ2\Delta_{2} of the Rydberg state as a function of distance from the fiber surface.  

Here, Ω1\Omega_{1} and Ω2\Omega_{2} are the Rabi frequencies of the 780 nm and 480 nm lasers, respectively, Γ1,2\Gamma_{1,2} the natural linewidths of the transitions, Δ1,2\Delta_{1,2} are the detunings from the respective transitions, 0s10\leq s\leq 1 is the mixing ratio describing the relative populations of the ground and intermediate states, and γr\gamma_{r} and γ\gamma_{\ell} correspond to additional decoherences and losses of atoms from the MOT that are replaced with a new atom in the cooling cycle. We calculate the Rydberg excitation probability averaging over 10,000 atoms sampled from various positions of the atomic density near the fiber. For each atom, the Rabi frequencies are calculated from the 480 nm evanescent field and the 780 nm cooling laser intensity. The detunings are calculated including all AC Stark shifts, Doppler shifts from atomic motion, linewidths of the lasers, van der Waals interactions between the atom and the fiber, and the Casimir-Polder energy shifts and lifetime changes of the Rydberg state. In the model, DC Stark shifts are not included as we have no experimental mechanism for quantifying them. They are expected to have minimal impact in comparison to the atom-surface interactions, broadening of the Rydberg transitions, and AC Stark shifts. The lasers are circularly polarized resulting in a uniform electric field around the fiber, and no specific quantization axis is chosen, as is the case in the experiment. For the 5S1/2 and 5P3/2 states the van der Waals potential is approximated by UvdW=Aexp[α(ra)]C4/((|r|a)3(|ra|+C4/C3))U_{\mathrm{vdW}}=A\exp\left[-\alpha(r-a)\right]-C_{4}/\left(\left(\left|r\right|-a\right)^{3}\left(\left|r-a\right|+C_{4}/C_{3}\right)\right) following the treatment in [36, 19]. For Rydberg states, the situation is much less trivial [37]. Usually only a few low-frequency transitions toward closely lying states substantially contribute to the Casimir-Polder potential Ref. [12], and a quasi-static (or zero-frequency) approximation can, therefore, be applied leading to the following form of the potential [58]:

Uk=Uk(ED)+Uk(EQ),\displaystyle U_{k}=U_{k}^{(\text{ED})}+U_{k}^{(\text{EQ})},
Uk(ED)=lim𝐫𝐫12ε0α,βkdα(k,k)Tα,β(0)(𝐫,𝐫)dβ(k,k),\displaystyle U^{(\text{ED})}_{k}=\lim_{\mathbf{r}\to\mathbf{r^{\prime}}}-\dfrac{1}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\sum\limits_{\alpha,\beta}\sum\limits_{k^{\prime}}d^{(k,k^{\prime})}_{\alpha}T^{(0)}_{\alpha,\beta}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r^{\prime}})d^{(k^{\prime},k)}_{\beta},
Uk(EQ)=lim𝐫𝐫12ε0α,β,γ,δkQα,β(k,k)2Tβ,δ(0)(𝐫,𝐫)rαrγQγ,δ(k,k),\displaystyle U^{(\text{EQ})}_{k}=\lim_{\mathbf{r}\to\mathbf{r^{\prime}}}-\dfrac{1}{2\varepsilon_{0}}\sum\limits_{\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta}\sum\limits_{k^{\prime}}Q^{(k,k^{\prime})}_{\alpha,\beta}\dfrac{\partial^{2}T^{(0)}_{\beta,\delta}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r^{\prime}})}{\partial r_{\alpha}\partial r^{\prime}_{\gamma}}Q^{(k^{\prime},k)}_{\gamma,\delta}, (3)

where we considered only electric dipole (ED) and quadrupole (EQ) allowed transitions from a given state kk of interest to kk^{\prime} requiring the dipole (dα(k,k)d^{(k,k^{\prime})}_{\alpha}), and quadrupole (Qα,β(k,k)Q^{(k,k^{\prime})}_{\alpha,\beta}) operator matrix elements, Tα,β(0)(𝐫,𝐫)=limω0ω2c2Gα,β(𝐫,𝐫,ω)T^{(0)}_{\alpha,\beta}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r^{\prime}})=\lim_{\omega\to 0}\frac{\omega^{2}}{c^{2}}G_{\alpha,\beta}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}^{\prime},\omega) with Gα,β(𝐫,𝐫,ω)G_{\alpha,\beta}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r}^{\prime},\omega) being the components of a classical electrodynamical Green’s function of the problem. Note that spatial derivatives here are taken in the Cartesian coordinate system. Under the assumption that atoms occupy each Zeeman sublevel with equal probability, we may write k=12F+1F,M,M{\sum\limits_{k^{\prime}}\dots=\dfrac{1}{2F+1}\sum\limits_{F^{\prime},M^{\prime},M}\dots}, where k=(n,F,M),k=(n,F,M)k=(n,F,M),k^{\prime}=(n^{\prime},F^{\prime},M^{\prime}) characterize a complete set of quantum numbers for a hyperfine level. The nanofiber’s electrodynamical Green’s tensor can be calculated by using the expansion in terms of Vector Cylindrical Harmonics [8, 31]. Finally, the lightshifts can be simply found by δωk=Uk/\delta\omega_{k}=U_{k}/\hbar.

When calculating the emission rate modification due to the presence of the nanofiber, instead of a quasi-static approximation, one has to use the resonant approximation as the nonretarded approximation, which is the usual way to find it, is no longer valid:

Γk=Γk(ED)+Γk(EQ),\displaystyle\Gamma_{k}=\Gamma_{k}^{(\text{ED})}+\Gamma_{k}^{(\text{EQ})},
Γk(ED)=lim𝐫𝐫2μ0α,βkωk,k2dα(k,k)Im[Gα,β(𝐫,𝐫,ωk,k)]dβ(k,k),\displaystyle\Gamma^{(\text{ED})}_{k}=\lim_{\mathbf{r}\to\mathbf{r^{\prime}}}\dfrac{2\mu_{0}}{\hbar}\sum\limits_{\alpha,\beta}\sum\limits_{k^{\prime}}\omega^{2}_{k,k^{\prime}}d^{(k,k^{\prime})}_{\alpha}\text{Im}\left[G_{\alpha,\beta}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r^{\prime}},\omega_{k,k^{\prime}})\right]d^{(k^{\prime},k)}_{\beta},
Γk(EQ)=lim𝐫𝐫2μ0α,β,δ,γkωk,k2Qα,β(k,k)2Im[Gβ,δ(𝐫,𝐫,ωk,k)]rαrγQγ,δ(k,k).\displaystyle\Gamma^{(\text{EQ})}_{k}=\lim_{\mathbf{r}\to\mathbf{r^{\prime}}}\dfrac{2\mu_{0}}{\hbar}\sum\limits_{\alpha,\beta,\delta,\gamma}\sum\limits_{k^{\prime}}\omega_{k,k^{\prime}}^{2}Q^{(k,k^{\prime})}_{\alpha,\beta}\dfrac{\partial^{2}\text{Im}\left[G_{\beta,\delta}(\mathbf{r},\mathbf{r^{\prime}},\omega_{k,k^{\prime}})\right]}{\partial r_{\alpha}\partial r^{\prime}_{\gamma}}Q^{(k^{\prime},k)}_{\gamma,\delta}. (4)

We compute the change in the lifetime, and hence the linewidths, of the intermediate and Rydberg states when they are in close proximity to the fiber.

All parameters in the model use the experimentally determined values, aside from the previously discussed Casimir-Polder interaction, van der Waals interaction, and the decoherence terms γ,γr\gamma_{\ell},\gamma_{r} that are left as free parameters essential in matching the relative height of the Autler-Townes dips. These decoherence terms relate to the rate that Rydberg atoms leave the MOT once excited and the rate at which new atoms enter the MOT - they are difficult to determine experimentally due to the complexity of the dynamics of the MOT.

The results of the model, omitting the Casimir-Polder interaction, unsurprisingly show large broadening of the transition due to the very high intensity evanescent field close to the fiber surface, as shown in Fig. 4, overcoming the small detuning of the 480 nm laser. Introducing the Casimir-Polder interaction resolves this problem, immediately narrowing the resonant dip to closer match the experiment. The Casimir-Polder shift essentially restricts the excitation to a small region of the evanescent field approximately 250-300 nm from the surface of the fiber, where the Rabi frequency is on the order of a few MHz. Atoms closer than this distance experience such a large energy shift they are no longer resonant with the Rydberg transition. This is shown in Fig. 4(b), and matches the theory of the previous work [51] where the optimal Rabi frequency was empirically found to be \sim2 MHz. The discrepancy between the model, even with the included Casimir-Polder shift, is most likely due to the fact that it does not include any Rydberg-Rydberg interactions, such as the dipole blockade. Research on the interactions of neighboring Rydberg atoms in the presence of an ONF indicates that it may play a significant role in the excitation dynamics of such a system [59]. The model also ignores any effects of ionization of the Rydberg atoms, of which the dynamics in a MOT are still an ongoing area of research  [44, 45].

V Conclusions

In summary, we have achieved excitation of cold 87Rb Rydberg atoms next to an ONF via two-photon excitation to a range of nnS1/2, nnD3/2 and nnD5/2 Rydberg states with nn ranging from 24 to 68. We have also measured the excitation spectrum, the resonant dip position, and MOT loss rate dependence on the principal quantum number. We observed a strong red shift of the nnS1/2 states that was not detected with the nnD states. This result suggests that, for future work, the nnD states, particularly the nnD5/2 states, are the most suitable for ONF-based Rydberg experiments due to their seemingly limited interaction with the fiber that we assume arises from the asymmetry of the electron probability distribution and the reduction of the interaction through the spatial orientation of the atom with respect to the fiber. We produced a detailed numerical model of the experiment, which includes the Casimir-Polder interaction with the ONF, and confirmed that the Casimir-Polder interaction is of crucial importance in the dynamics of the Rydberg atoms and the dominant energy shift of the Rydberg states in the experiments. This work provides a critical step forward in the understanding of Rydberg-ONF interactions, which are essential for the continuation of experimental studies of Rydberg atoms at the surface of dielectric, the development of Rydberg-based waveguide QED systems, and the generation of a 1D ordered array of Rydberg atoms for quantum simulations mediated by the nanofiber.

Future experiments will investigate the efficacy of using an optical dipole trap [21] to confine atoms at a fixed distance from the fiber surface, where the Casimir-Polder interaction can be accurately compared to calculations and the loss dynamics are significantly easier to determine without having to consider the full MOT system. This could also be experimentally favorable by reducing the ionization of highly excited Rydberg states caused by the atom-surface interactions. Additionally, adapting the conventional two-color dipole trap [34, 65, 6] to allow for the trapping of Rydberg atoms, potentially through the use of magic wavelengths [4] would be a significant step forward in the development of optical nanofiber and Rydberg atom based quantum devices, enabling the investigation of any effect the presence of the ONF has on the Rydberg blockade [59].

Appendix: Technical Details

V.1 Theoretical Model

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Normalized density of the atoms (blue) near the ONF surface due to the van der Waals forces and attractive force of the 1064 nm laser in the fiber. The evanescent fields of the 1064 nm (red) and 480 nm (gray) lasers are also shown, normalized to the highest intensity of the 1064 nm light.

The evanescent fields of both the 1064 nm and 480 nm light at the waist of the ONF are calculated explicitly following [35] with the polarizations set to be quasi-circular due to the non-zero longitudinal component of the electric field in the fiber. The optical power is set to experimental values. The Rabi frequencies, Ω\Omega, and AC stark shifts, UACU_{AC}, are directly calculated from the intensities as

Ω=𝐝|𝐄|\displaystyle\Omega=\frac{-\mathbf{d}\cdot|\mathbf{E}|}{\hbar} (5)
UAC=14|E|2[α(0)(ω)iα(1)(ω)(𝐮×𝐮)𝐅2F\displaystyle U_{\mathrm{AC}}=\frac{1}{4}|E|^{2}\left[\alpha^{(0)}\left(\omega\right)-i\alpha^{(1)}\left(\omega\right)\frac{\left(\mathbf{u}^{*}\times\mathbf{u}\right)\cdot\mathbf{F}}{2F}\right.
α(2)3[(𝐮𝐅)(𝐮𝐅)+(𝐮𝐅)(𝐮𝐅)]2𝐅22F(2F1)]\displaystyle\left.-\alpha^{(2)}\frac{3\left[(\mathbf{u}^{*}\cdot\mathbf{F})(\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{F})+(\mathbf{u}\cdot\mathbf{F})(\mathbf{u}^{*}\cdot\mathbf{F})\right]-2\mathbf{F}^{2}}{2F(2F-1)}\right] (6)

where 𝐝\mathbf{d} is the dipole operator, α(0)(ω),α(1)(ω),α(2)(ω)\alpha^{(0)}\left(\omega\right),\alpha^{(1)}\left(\omega\right),\alpha^{(2)}\left(\omega\right) are the scalar, vector, and tensor polarizabilites of the atom, EE the electric field and 𝐅\mathbf{F} the total angular momentum [40].

The explicit forms of the dipole and quadrupole matrix elements of Eq. IV are given by [41, 39]:

nFM|𝐝|nFM=(1)J+I+F+1(2F+1)(2F+1)\displaystyle\langle n^{\prime}F^{\prime}M^{\prime}|\mathbf{d}|nFM\rangle=(-1)^{J^{\prime}+I^{\prime}+F+1}\sqrt{(2F^{\prime}+1)(2F+1)} (7)
×{F1FJIJ}nJ𝐝nJ,\displaystyle\times\begin{Bmatrix}F^{\prime}&1&F\\ J&I&J^{\prime}\end{Bmatrix}\langle n^{\prime}J^{\prime}||\mathbf{d}||nJ\rangle,
nFM|Qα,β|nFM=3euαβ(MM)(1)FM\displaystyle\langle n^{\prime}F^{\prime}M^{\prime}|Q_{\alpha,\beta}|nFM\rangle=3eu_{\alpha\beta}^{(M^{\prime}-M)}(-1)^{F^{\prime}-M^{\prime}} (8)
×(F2FMMMM)nFT(2)nF,\displaystyle\times\begin{pmatrix}F^{\prime}&2&F\\ -M^{\prime}&M^{\prime}-M&M\end{pmatrix}\langle n^{\prime}F^{\prime}||T^{(2)}||nF\rangle,

where II is the nuclear spin, J=L+SJ=L+S is the total electron momentum, nJ𝐝nJ\langle n^{\prime}J^{\prime}||\mathbf{d}||nJ\rangle, is the reduced dipole matrix element, the quantity in curly brackets is a 6j6j-symbol, while in round ones - 3j3j-symbol, ee is the electron charge, matrices uα,β(q)u^{(q)}_{\alpha,\beta} with q={2,1,0,1,2}q=\{-2,-1,0,1,2\} written in Cartesian coordinates can be found in Ref. [39], and nFT(2)nF\langle n^{\prime}F^{\prime}||T^{(2)}||nF\rangle is the reduced matrix element of a tensor operator Tq(2)=22π15R2Y2,q(θ,ϕ)T^{(2)}_{q}=2\sqrt{\dfrac{2\pi}{15}}R^{2}Y_{2,q}(\theta,\phi). For a quadrupole operator matrix element, one can decouple the angular and radial parts. The latter, as well as the reduced dipole matrix element, can be found, for example, by using the ARC package [69].

The normalized atomic density surrounding the fiber is shown in Fig. 5, and is calculated following [20] from the expression

ρ=Θ(ra)1/[1UvdW+UAC32kBT]\rho=\Theta\left(r-a\right)1/\left[1-\frac{U_{\mathrm{vdW}}+U_{\mathrm{AC}}}{\frac{3}{2}k_{\mathrm{B}}T}\right] (9)

where UvdWU_{\mathrm{vdW}} is the van der Waals potential of the fiber, UACU_{\mathrm{AC}} is the potential formed from the AC Stark shift of the 1064 nm laser, Θ(ra)\Theta\left(r-a\right) is the Heaviside function fixing the potential outside the surface of the fiber of radius, aa, and TT is the average temperature of the atoms in the MOT. The density is assumed to tend towards a constant value away from the surface of the fiber. The competition between the kinetic energy of the atoms and the attractive forces near the fiber causes atoms to accelerate in the vicinity of the ONF, leading to a drop in density close to the fiber surface. This calculation gives a result that closely matches that presented in previous work [36], minus the oscillations present in the full quantum calculation.

Acknowledgements.
The authors would like to thank P Cheinet, F Le Kien, S Lepoutre and K. Mølmer for very insightful discussions, K Karlsson and M Ozer for technical assistance, Y Saleh for contributions to data collection, the Nanofabrication Section for Scanning Electron Microscope access, and Mechanical Engineering Section of the Research Support Division at Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University.
This research is supported by Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) under Grants No. 19K05316 and No. 20K03795 and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Early Career) No. 22K13986. Investments for the Future from LabEx PALM (ANR-10-LABX-0039-PALM). Danish National Research Foundation through the Center of Excellence “CCQ” (Grant agreement no.: DNRF156).

References

  • [1] Antonio Acín, Immanuel Bloch, Harry Buhrman, Tommaso Calarco, Christopher Eichler, Jens Eisert, Daniel Esteve, Nicolas Gisin, Steffen J Glaser, Fedor Jelezko, Stefan Kuhr, Maciej Lewenstein, Max F Riedel, Piet O Schmidt, Rob Thew, Andreas Wallraff, Ian Walmsley, and Frank K Wilhelm. The quantum technologies roadmap: a european community view. New Journal of Physics, 20(8):080201, aug 2018.
  • [2] Charles S Adams, Jonathan D Pritchard, and James P Shaffer. Rydberg atom quantum technologies. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53(1):012002, 2019.
  • [3] Sarah E Anderson, KC Younge, and Georg Raithel. Trapping Rydberg atoms in an optical lattice. Physical Review Letters, 107(26):263001, 2011.
  • [4] Jiandong Bai, Shuo Liu, Jun He, and Junmin Wang. Towards implementation of a magic optical-dipole trap for confining ground-state and Rydberg-state cesium cold atoms. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53(15):155302, jun 2020.
  • [5] Simon Baur, Daniel Tiarks, Gerhard Rempe, and Stephan Dürr. Single-photon switch based on Rydberg blockade. Physical Review Letters, 112(7):073901, 2014.
  • [6] J.-B. Béguin, E. M. Bookjans, S. L. Christensen, H. L. Sørensen, J. H. Müller, E. S. Polzik, and J. Appel. Generation and detection of a sub-poissonian atom number distribution in a one-dimensional optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:263603, Dec 2014.
  • [7] V Bharti, S Sugawa, M Mizoguchi, M Kunimi, Y Zhang, S de Léséleuc, T Tomita, T Franz, M Weidemüller, and K Ohmori. Ultrafast many-body dynamics in an ultracold Rydberg-excited atomic Mott insulator. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.09590, 2022.
  • [8] Weng Cho Chew. Waves and fields in inhomogenous media, volume 16. John Wiley & Sons, 1999.
  • [9] Yeelai Chew, Takafumi Tomita, Tirumalasetty Panduranga Mahesh, Seiji Sugawa, Sylvain de Léséleuc, and Kenji Ohmori. Ultrafast energy exchange between two single Rydberg atoms on a nanosecond timescale. Nature Photonics, 16(10):724–729, 2022.
  • [10] D. Davtyan, S. Machluf, M. L. Soudijn, J. B. Naber, N. J. van Druten, H. B. van Linden van den Heuvell, and R. J. C. Spreeuw. Controlling stray electric fields on an atom chip for experiments on Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. A, 97:023418, Feb 2018.
  • [11] Julius de Hond, Rick van Bijnen, SJJMF Kokkelmans, RJC Spreeuw, HB van Linden van den Heuvell, and NJ van Druten. From coherent collective excitation to Rydberg blockade on an atom chip. Physical Review A, 98(6):062714, 2018.
  • [12] Simen Å. Ellingsen, Stefan Yoshi Buhmann, and Stefan Scheel. Temperature-independent Casimir-Polder forces in arbitrary geometries. Phys. Rev. A, 84:060501, Dec 2011.
  • [13] G Epple, KS Kleinbach, TG Euser, NY Joly, T Pfau, P St J Russell, and R Löw. Rydberg atoms in hollow-core photonic crystal fibres. Nat. commun., 5(1):1–5, 2014.
  • [14] R. Finkelstein, G. Winer, D. Z. Koplovich, O. Arenfrid, T. Hoinkes, G. Guendelman, M. Netser, E. Poem, A. Rauschenbeutel, B. Dayan, and O. Firstenberg. Super-extended nanofiber-guided field for coherent interaction with hot atoms. Optica, 8(2):208–215, Feb 2021.
  • [15] A. Flusberg and S. R. Hartmann. Probing adiabatic states. Phys. Rev. A, 14:813–815, Aug 1976.
  • [16] Vandna Gokhroo, Fam Le Kien, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Rubidium atom spectral lineshapes in high intensity light fields near an optical nanofibre. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 55(12):125301, may 2022.
  • [17] B Gouraud, D Maxein, A Nicolas, O Morin, and J Laurat. Demonstration of a memory for tightly guided light in an optical nanofiber. Physical Review Letters, 114(18):180503, 2015.
  • [18] D Grischkowsky. Coherent excitation, incoherent excitation, and adiabatic states. Physical Review A, 14(2):802, 1976.
  • [19] J. A. Grover, P. Solano, L. A. Orozco, and S. L. Rolston. Photon-correlation measurements of atomic-cloud temperature using an optical nanofiber. Phys. Rev. A, 92:013850, Jul 2015.
  • [20] Jeffrey Aaron Grover. ATOM-TRAPPING AND PHOTON-COUNTING EXPERIMENTS WITH OPTICAL NANOFIBERS. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, 2015.
  • [21] Ratnesh K Gupta, Jesse L Everett, Aaron D Tranter, René Henke, Vandna Gokhroo, Ping Koy Lam, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Machine learner optimization of optical nanofiber-based dipole traps. AVS Quantum Science, 4(2):026801, 2022.
  • [22] Rui Han, Hui Khoon Ng, and Berthold-Georg Englert. Implementing a neutral-atom controlled-phase gate with a single Rydberg pulse. EPL, 113(4):40001, 2016.
  • [23] E. A. Hinds, K. S. Lai, and M. Schnell. Atoms in micron-sized metallic and dielectric waveguides. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 355(1733):2353–2365, 1997.
  • [24] L Isenhower, E Urban, XL Zhang, AT Gill, T Henage, Todd A Johnson, TG Walker, and M Saffman. Demonstration of a neutral atom controlled-not quantum gate. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104(1):010503, 2010.
  • [25] Ole A. Iversen and Thomas Pohl. Self-ordering of individual photons in waveguide QED and Rydberg-atom arrays. Phys. Rev. Res., 4:023002, Apr 2022.
  • [26] Dieter Jaksch, Juan Ignacio Cirac, Peter Zoller, Steve L Rolston, Robin Côté, and Mikhail D Lukin. Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms. Physical Review Letters, 85(10):2208, 2000.
  • [27] Min Ke, Feng Zhou, Xiao Li, Jin Wang, and Mingsheng Zhan. Tailored-waveguide based photonic chip for manipulating an array of single neutral atoms. Opt. Express, 24(9):9157–9167, May 2016.
  • [28] Fam Le Kien, Sile Nic Chormaic, and Thomas Busch. Transfer of angular momentum of guided light to an atom with an electric quadrupole transition near an optical nanofiber. Physical Review A, 106(1):013712, 2022.
  • [29] Adam Kinos and Klaus Mølmer. Optical multiqubit gate operations on an excitation-blockaded atomic quantum register. Phys. Rev. Res., 5:013205, Mar 2023.
  • [30] Mike W. Kohlhoff. Interaction of Rydberg atoms with surfaces. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 225(15-16):3061–3085, 2016.
  • [31] D. F. Kornovan, A. S. Sheremet, and M. I. Petrov. Collective polaritonic modes in an array of two-level quantum emitters coupled to an optical nanofiber. Phys. Rev. B, 94:245416, Dec 2016.
  • [32] Harald Kübler, JP Shaffer, T Baluktsian, R Löw, and T Pfau. Coherent excitation of Rydberg atoms in micrometre-sized atomic vapour cells. Nature Photonics, 4(2):112–116, 2010.
  • [33] Jan Kumlin, Kevin Kleinbeck, Nina Stiesdal, Hannes Busche, Sebastian Hofferberth, and Hans Peter Büchler. Nonexponential decay of a collective excitation in an atomic ensemble coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide. Phys. Rev. A, 102:063703, Dec 2020.
  • [34] Fam Le Kien, V. I. Balykin, and K. Hakuta. Atom trap and waveguide using a two-color evanescent light field around a subwavelength-diameter optical fiber. Phys. Rev. A, 70:063403, Dec 2004.
  • [35] Fam Le Kien, Thomas Busch, Viet Giang Truong, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Higher-order modes of vacuum-clad ultrathin optical fibers. Phys. Rev. A, 96:023835, Aug 2017.
  • [36] Fam Le Kien and K. Hakuta. Position distribution of cold thermal atoms in the vicinity of a dielectric surface. Phys. Rev. A, 77:042903, Apr 2008.
  • [37] Fam Le Kien, D. F. Kornovan, Síle Nic Chormaic, and Thomas Busch. Repulsive Casimir-Polder potentials of low-lying excited states of a multilevel alkali-metal atom near an optical nanofiber. Phys. Rev. A, 105:042817, Apr 2022.
  • [38] Fam Le Kien, JQ Liang, K Hakuta, and VI Balykin. Field intensity distributions and polarization orientations in a vacuum-clad subwavelength-diameter optical fiber. Optics Communications, 242(4-6):445–455, 2004.
  • [39] Fam Le Kien, Tridib Ray, Thomas Nieddu, Thomas Busch, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Enhancement of the quadrupole interaction of an atom with the guided light of an ultrathin optical fiber. Phys. Rev. A, 97:013821, Jan 2018.
  • [40] Fam Le Kien, Philipp Schneeweiss, and Arno Rauschenbeutel. Dynamical polarizability of atoms in arbitrary light fields: general theory and application to cesium. The European Physical Journal D, 67(5):92, May 2013.
  • [41] Fam Le Kien, Philipp Schneeweiss, and Arno Rauschenbeutel. Dynamical polarizability of atoms in arbitrary light fields: general theory and application to cesium. The European Physical Journal D, 67(5):92, May 2013.
  • [42] Daniel Lechner, Riccardo Pennetta, Martin Blaha, Philipp Schneeweiss, Arno Rauschenbeutel, and Jürgen Volz. Light-matter interaction at the transition between cavity and waveguide QED. arXiv:2302.07161, 2023.
  • [43] YF Li, DM Zhao, X Ma, and J Yang. Autoionization in the evolution process of dense Rb Rydberg atoms in nP states. X-Ray Spectrometry, 49(1):125–128, 2020.
  • [44] Yufan Li, Syed Zaheeruddin, Dongmei Zhao, Xinwen Ma, and Jie Yang. Ionization spectroscopic measurement of nP Rydberg levels of 87Rb cold atoms. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 87(5):054301, 2018.
  • [45] M Lyon and S L Rolston. Ultracold neutral plasmas. Reports on Progress in Physics, 80(1):017001, nov 2016.
  • [46] Markus Mack, Florian Karlewski, Helge Hattermann, Simone Höckh, Florian Jessen, Daniel Cano, and József Fortágh. Measurement of absolute transition frequencies of Rb87{}^{87}\mathrm{Rb} to 𝑛𝑆\mathit{nS} and 𝑛𝐷\mathit{nD} rydberg states by means of electromagnetically induced transparency. Phys. Rev. A, 83:052515, May 2011.
  • [47] KP Nayak, PN Melentiev, M Morinaga, Fam Le Kien, VI Balykin, and K Hakuta. Optical nanofiber as an efficient tool for manipulating and probing atomic fluorescence. Optics express, 15(9):5431–5438, 2007.
  • [48] Thomas Nieddu, Vandna Gokhroo, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Optical nanofibres and neutral atoms. Journal of Optics, 18(5):053001, 2016.
  • [49] Paloma L. Ocola, Ivana Dimitrova, Brandon Grinkemeyer, Elmer Guardado-Sanchez, Tamara Dordevic, Polnop Samutpraphoot, Vladan Vuletic, and Mikhail D. Lukin. Control and entanglement of individual Rydberg atoms near a nanoscale device, 2022.
  • [50] Krishnapriya Subramonian Rajasree, Kristoffer Karlsson, Tridib Ray, and Síle Nic Chormaic. 1.6 GHz frequency scanning of a 482 nm laser stabilized using electromagnetically induced transparency. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 33(15):780–783, 2021.
  • [51] Krishnapriya Subramonian Rajasree, Tridib Ray, Kristoffer Karlsson, Jesse L. Everett, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Generation of cold Rydberg atoms at submicron distances from an optical nanofiber. Phys. Rev. Research, 2:012038, Feb 2020.
  • [52] Tridib Ray, Ratnesh K Gupta, Vandna Gokhroo, Jesse L Everett, Thomas Nieddu, Krishnapriya S Rajasree, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Observation of the 87Rb 5S1/2 to 4D3/2 electric quadrupole transition at 516.6 nm mediated via an optical nanofibre. New Journal of Physics, 22(6):062001, 2020.
  • [53] Fabian Ripka, Harald Kübler, Robert Löw, and Tilman Pfau. A room-temperature single-photon source based on strongly interacting Rydberg atoms. Science, 362(6413):446–449, 2018.
  • [54] Mark Saffman, Thad G Walker, and Klaus Mølmer. Quantum information with Rydberg atoms. Rev. Mod. Phys., 82(3):2313, 2010.
  • [55] J. A. Sedlacek, E. Kim, S. T. Rittenhouse, P. F. Weck, H. R. Sadeghpour, and J. P. Shaffer. Electric field cancellation on quartz by Rb adsorbate-induced negative electron affinity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 116:133201, Mar 2016.
  • [56] Alexandra S. Sheremet, Mihail I. Petrov, Ivan V. Iorsh, Alexander V. Poshakinskiy, and Alexander N. Poddubny. Waveguide quantum electrodynamics: Collective radiance and photon-photon correlations. Rev. Mod. Phys., 95:015002, Mar 2023.
  • [57] Pablo Solano, Jeffrey A Grover, Jonathan E Hoffman, Sylvain Ravets, Fredrik K Fatemi, Luis A Orozco, and Steven L Rolston. Optical nanofibers: a new platform for quantum optics. In Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, volume 66, pages 439–505. Elsevier, 2017.
  • [58] E. Stourm, M. Lepers, J. Robert, S. Nic Chormaic, K. Mølmer, and E. Brion. Spontaneous emission and energy shifts of a Rydberg rubidium atom close to an optical nanofiber. Phys. Rev. A, 101:052508, May 2020.
  • [59] E Stourm, M Lepers, J Robert, S Nic Chormaic, K Mølmer, and E Brion. Interaction of two Rydberg atoms in the vicinity of an optical nanofibre. New Journal of Physics, 25(2):023022, feb 2023.
  • [60] E Stourm, Y Zhang, M Lepers, R Guérout, J Robert, S Nic Chormaic, K Mølmer, and E Brion. Spontaneous emission of a sodium Rydberg atom close to an optical nanofibre. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 52(4):045503, jan 2019.
  • [61] Aziza Suleymanzade, Alexander Anferov, Mark Stone, Ravi K Naik, Andrew Oriani, Jonathan Simon, and David Schuster. A tunable high-Q millimeter wave cavity for hybrid circuit and cavity QED experiments. Applied Physics Letters, 116(10):104001, 2020.
  • [62] Nobuyuki Takei, Christian Sommer, Claudiu Genes, Guido Pupillo, Haruka Goto, Kuniaki Koyasu, Hisashi Chiba, Matthias Weidemüller, and Kenji Ohmori. Direct observation of ultrafast many-body electron dynamics in an ultracold Rydberg gas. Nat. commun., 7(1):1–12, 2016.
  • [63] Georgiy Tkachenko, Fuchuan Lei, and Síle Nic Chormaic. Polarisation control for optical nanofibres by imaging through a single lens. Journal of Optics, 21(12):125604, 2019.
  • [64] E. Urban, T. A. Johnson, T. Henage, L. Isenhower, D. D. Yavuz, T. G. Walker, and M. Saffman. Observation of Rydberg blockade between two atoms. Nature Physics, 5(2):110–114, Feb 2009.
  • [65] E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagué, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel. Optical interface created by laser-cooled atoms trapped in the evanescent field surrounding an optical nanofiber. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:203603, May 2010.
  • [66] JM Ward, A Maimaiti, Vu H Le, and Sile Nic Chormaic. Contributed review: Optical micro-and nanofiber pulling rig. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 85(11):111501, 2014.
  • [67] Hendrik Weimer, Markus Müller, Igor Lesanovsky, Peter Zoller, and Hans Peter Büchler. A Rydberg quantum simulator. Nature Physics, 6(5):382–388, 2010.
  • [68] XL Zhang, L Isenhower, AT Gill, TG Walker, and M Saffman. Deterministic entanglement of two neutral atoms via Rydberg blockade. Physical Review A, 82(3):030306, 2010.
  • [69] N. Šibalić, J.D. Pritchard, C.S. Adams, and K.J. Weatherill. ARC: An open-source library for calculating properties of alkali Rydberg atoms. Computer Physics Communications, 220:319–331, 2017.