Evidence for
produced in single-tag two-photon interactions
Y. Teramoto
Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585
S. Uehara
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
M. Masuda
Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0032
Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University, Osaka 567-0047
I. Adachi
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
H. Aihara
Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033
S. Al Said
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71451
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589
D. M. Asner
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973
H. Atmacan
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
T. Aushev
Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow 101000
R. Ayad
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71451
V. Babu
Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg
P. Behera
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036
C. Beleño
II. Physikalisches Institut, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen
J. Bennett
University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677
V. Bhardwaj
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, SAS Nagar, 140306
B. Bhuyan
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Assam 781039
T. Bilka
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague
J. Biswal
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
G. Bonvicini
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202
A. Bozek
H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow 31-342
M. Bračko
University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
T. E. Browder
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
M. Campajola
INFN - Sezione di Napoli, 80126 Napoli
Università di Napoli Federico II, 80126 Napoli
D. Červenkov
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague
M.-C. Chang
Department of Physics, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei 24205
P. Chang
Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617
V. Chekelian
Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München
A. Chen
National Central University, Chung-li 32054
B. G. Cheon
Department of Physics and Institute of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763
K. Chilikin
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
K. Cho
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, Daejeon 34141
S.-J. Cho
Yonsei University, Seoul 03722
S.-K. Choi
Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828
Y. Choi
Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419
S. Choudhury
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Telangana 502285
D. Cinabro
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202
S. Cunliffe
Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg
G. De Nardo
INFN - Sezione di Napoli, 80126 Napoli
Università di Napoli Federico II, 80126 Napoli
F. Di Capua
INFN - Sezione di Napoli, 80126 Napoli
Università di Napoli Federico II, 80126 Napoli
Z. Doležal
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague
T. V. Dong
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) and Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200443
S. Eidelman
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
T. Ferber
Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg
B. G. Fulsom
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352
R. Garg
Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014
V. Gaur
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
N. Gabyshev
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
A. Garmash
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
A. Giri
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Telangana 502285
P. Goldenzweig
Institut für Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, 76131 Karlsruhe
D. Greenwald
Department of Physics, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching
C. Hadjivasiliou
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352
T. Hara
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
O. Hartbrich
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
K. Hayasaka
Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181
H. Hayashii
Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506
M. T. Hedges
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
M. Hernandez Villanueva
University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677
W.-S. Hou
Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617
C.-L. Hsu
School of Physics, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006
T. Iijima
Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602
Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602
K. Inami
Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602
G. Inguglia
Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna 1050
A. Ishikawa
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
R. Itoh
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
M. Iwasaki
Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585
Y. Iwasaki
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
W. W. Jacobs
Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47408
E.-J. Jang
Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828
S. Jia
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) and Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200443
Y. Jin
Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033
C. W. Joo
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8583
K. K. Joo
Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186
J. Kahn
Institut für Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, 76131 Karlsruhe
A. B. Kaliyar
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005
K. H. Kang
Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566
G. Karyan
Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg
Y. Kato
Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602
T. Kawasaki
Kitasato University, Sagamihara 252-0373
H. Kichimi
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
C. Kiesling
Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München
B. H. Kim
Seoul National University, Seoul 08826
D. Y. Kim
Soongsil University, Seoul 06978
S. H. Kim
Seoul National University, Seoul 08826
Y.-K. Kim
Yonsei University, Seoul 03722
T. D. Kimmel
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
K. Kinoshita
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
P. Kodyš
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 121 16 Prague
S. Korpar
University of Maribor, 2000 Maribor
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
D. Kotchetkov
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
P. Križan
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
R. Kroeger
University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi 38677
P. Krokovny
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
T. Kuhr
Ludwig Maximilians University, 80539 Munich
R. Kulasiri
Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia 30144
R. Kumar
Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004
K. Kumara
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202
A. Kuzmin
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
Y.-J. Kwon
Yonsei University, Seoul 03722
K. Lalwani
Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur 302017
J. S. Lange
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, 35392 Gießen
I. S. Lee
Department of Physics and Institute of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763
S. C. Lee
Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566
P. Lewis
University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn
L. K. Li
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
Y. B. Li
Peking University, Beijing 100871
L. Li Gioi
Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München
J. Libby
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036
K. Lieret
Ludwig Maximilians University, 80539 Munich
Z. Liptak
Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8511
D. Liventsev
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
T. Luo
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) and Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200443
C. MacQueen
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010
T. Matsuda
University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki 889-2192
D. Matvienko
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
M. Merola
INFN - Sezione di Napoli, 80126 Napoli
Università di Napoli Federico II, 80126 Napoli
K. Miyabayashi
Nara Women’s University, Nara 630-8506
H. Miyata
Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181
G. B. Mohanty
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005
S. Mohanty
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005
Utkal University, Bhubaneswar 751004
T. J. Moon
Seoul National University, Seoul 08826
T. Mori
Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8602
M. Mrvar
Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna 1050
R. Mussa
INFN - Sezione di Torino, 10125 Torino
E. Nakano
Osaka City University, Osaka 558-8585
M. Nakao
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
H. Nakazawa
Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617
Z. Natkaniec
H. Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow 31-342
A. Natochii
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
M. Nayak
School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978
N. K. Nisar
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973
S. Nishida
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
K. Ogawa
Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181
S. Ogawa
Toho University, Funabashi 274-8510
H. Ono
Nippon Dental University, Niigata 951-8580
Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181
Y. Onuki
Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033
P. Pakhlov
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
Moscow Physical Engineering Institute, Moscow 115409
G. Pakhlova
Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow 101000
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
S. Pardi
INFN - Sezione di Napoli, 80126 Napoli
H. Park
Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41566
S.-H. Park
Yonsei University, Seoul 03722
S. Patra
Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Mohali, SAS Nagar, 140306
S. Paul
Department of Physics, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching
Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, 80805 München
T. K. Pedlar
Luther College, Decorah, Iowa 52101
R. Pestotnik
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
L. E. Piilonen
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
T. Podobnik
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
V. Popov
Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow 101000
E. Prencipe
Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich
M. T. Prim
Institut für Experimentelle Teilchenphysik, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie, 76131 Karlsruhe
M. Ritter
Ludwig Maximilians University, 80539 Munich
A. Rostomyan
Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg
N. Rout
Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600036
G. Russo
Università di Napoli Federico II, 80126 Napoli
D. Sahoo
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai 400005
Y. Sakai
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
S. Sandilya
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
A. Sangal
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
L. Santelj
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
T. Sanuki
Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578
V. Savinov
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
G. Schnell
University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, 48080 Bilbao
IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48013 Bilbao
J. Schueler
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
C. Schwanda
Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna 1050
Y. Seino
Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181
K. Senyo
Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-8560
M. E. Sevior
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010
M. Shapkin
Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino 142281
V. Shebalin
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
J.-G. Shiu
Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617
J. B. Singh
Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014
E. Solovieva
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
M. Starič
J. Stefan Institute, 1000 Ljubljana
Z. S. Stottler
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061
M. Sumihama
Gifu University, Gifu 501-1193
K. Sumisawa
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
T. Sumiyoshi
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo 192-0397
W. Sutcliffe
University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn
M. Takizawa
Showa Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 194-8543
J-PARC Branch, KEK Theory Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
U. Tamponi
INFN - Sezione di Torino, 10125 Torino
F. Tenchini
Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg
M. Uchida
Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550
T. Uglov
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
Higher School of Economics (HSE), Moscow 101000
Y. Unno
Department of Physics and Institute of Natural Sciences, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763
S. Uno
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Hayama 240-0193
P. Urquijo
School of Physics, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010
Y. Usov
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
R. Van Tonder
University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn
G. Varner
University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822
A. Vinokurova
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
V. Vorobyev
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
E. Waheed
High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), Tsukuba 305-0801
C. H. Wang
National United University, Miao Li 36003
E. Wang
University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260
M.-Z. Wang
Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617
P. Wang
Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049
X. L. Wang
Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-beam Application (MOE) and Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200443
M. Watanabe
Niigata University, Niigata 950-2181
E. Won
Korea University, Seoul 02841
X. Xu
Soochow University, Suzhou 215006
B. D. Yabsley
School of Physics, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006
S. B. Yang
Korea University, Seoul 02841
H. Ye
Deutsches Elektronen–Synchrotron, 22607 Hamburg
J. Yelton
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
J. H. Yin
Korea University, Seoul 02841
Z. P. Zhang
Department of Modern Physics and State Key Laboratory of Particle Detection and Electronics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026
V. Zhilich
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
V. Zhukova
P.N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991
V. Zhulanov
Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090
Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090
Abstract
We report the first evidence for production
in two-photon interactions by tagging either the electron or the positron in
the final state, exploring the highly virtual photon region.
The search is performed in
,
using 825 fb-1 of data collected by the Belle detector operated
at the KEKB collider.
We observe three candidates, where the expected background
is events, with a significance of 3.2.
We obtain an estimated value for
assuming the dependence predicted by
a meson model,
where is the invariant mass-squared of the virtual photon.
No candidates are found.
pacs:
14.40.Gx, 13.25.Gv, 13.66.Bc
The charmonium-like state (3872) has been observed
in various interactions since its first
observation in decays [1].
Its spin, parity, and charge conjugation are determined to be
[2], but its internal structure is
still a puzzle [3, 4].
Subsequent to the spin-parity determination, the has
not been searched for in two-photon interactions because
axial-vector particles are forbidden to decay to
two real photons 111
The was searched for in two-photon interactions
before its spin-parity
determination: S. Dobbs et al. (CLEO Collaboration),
Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 032004 (2005)..
However, mesons with can
be produced if one or both photons
are highly virtual [6]—denoted as .
We perform the first search for a charmonium state in two-photon
interactions
using ,
where one of the final-state electrons, referred to as a
tagging electron,
is observed, and the other scatters at an extremely
forward (backward) angle and is not detected 222We use “electron” to
denote both electron and positron..
Such events are called single-tag events.
The (3872) is reconstructed via its decay to
().
By measuring the momentum of the tagging electron,
we measure the dependence of production,
where is the invariant mass-squared of the virtual photon.
If the has a molecular component in its structure, it must
have a steeper dependence than the regular state.
Hence, the single-tag two-photon interactions provide information
on the structure of this state.
The value of the two-photon decay width,
obtained from this
measurement, is sensitive to the internal structure of the .
Early attempts to calculate such decay widths for
charmonium-like exotic states have been reported
in Ref. [8].
We also search for the in the same final
state through the
-parity-violating ()
channel, as well as ()
decay[9].
We use 825 fb-1 of data collected by the
Belle detector operated at the KEKB asymmetric
collider [10, 11].
The data were taken at the
resonances () and nearby energies,
9.43 GeV 11.03 GeV.
The Belle detector is a general-purpose magnetic
spectrometer [12, 13].
Charged-particle momenta
are measured by a silicon vertex detector and a cylindrical drift
chamber. Electron and charged-pion identification
relies on a combination of the drift chamber, time-of-flight
scintillation counters, aerogel Cherenkov counters,
and an electromagnetic calorimeter made of CsI(Tl) crystals.
Muon identification relies on
resistive plate chambers
in the iron return yoke.
For Monte Carlo (MC) simulations,
used to set selection criteria and
derive the reconstruction efficiency, we use
TREPSBSS [14, 15] to generate single-tag
events in which the
decays to and decays leptonically.
For simulating radiative decays,
we use PHOTOS [16, 17].
A GEANT3-based program simulates the detector response [18].
Since one final-state electron is
undetected, we select events with exactly five charged tracks,
each coming from the interaction point (IP)
and having GeV/,
with two or more having
GeV/, where
is the transverse momentum with respect
to the direction.
candidates are reconstructed by their decays
to or .
A charged track is identified as an electron
if its electron likelihood ratio, , is greater than 0.66 and as a muon if it is not
selected as an electron and if its muon likelihood ratio,
, is greater
than 0.66; is the likelihood for a particle to
be of species [19, 20].
We require the mass of the lepton pair to be in the
range 3.047–3.147 GeV/.
In the calculation of the invariant mass of
an pair, we include
the four-momenta of radiated photons, having energy less
than 0.2 GeV and angle relative to
an electron direction of less than 0.04 rad.
The tagging electron must have an electron likelihood ratio
greater than 0.95 or greater than 0.87, where is the energy
measured by the electromagnetic calorimeter
and is the momentum of the particle.
We require that the tagging electron have momentum
above 1 GeV/ and GeV/.
The electron momentum includes the momenta of radiated photons,
using the same requirements as for the electrons from decays.
We identify a charged track as a pion if it satisfies the likelihood
ratio criteria of ,
,
, and its is
less than 0.8 [21].
Events should have no photons with energy above
0.4 GeV or candidates with from the
mass-constrained fit less than 4.0.
As the should be back-to-back
with the tagging electron projected in the plane
perpendicular to the beam axis, we require
the difference between their azimuthal angles be
in the range () rad.
The total visible transverse momentum of the event,
333
The center-of-mass quantities are indicated by asterisks.,
should be less than 0.2 GeV/.
We also require that the measured energy of
the system, ,
be consistent with the expectation, ,
calculated from the momentum of the tagging
electron and the direction and invariant mass of the
system, imposing energy-momentum conservation.
Since the energy and total transverse
momentum are correlated, we impose a two-dimensional
criterion
(1)
Figure 1 shows the distribution of events
and these selection criteria in the
vs. plane.
Figure 1:
vs.
distribution from data.
The (red) line shows the selection criteria applied
to and
;
events below the line are accepted.
Finally, we place a requirement on the missing
momentum of the event, equal to the momentum of
the unmeasured electron that goes down the beam pipe.
We require the missing-momentum projection
in the beam direction in the
center-of-mass frame be less than GeV/ for
-tagging events and greater than 0.4 GeV/ for
-tagging events.
We search for and
by looking for events in the
mass distribution, .
The reconstructed mass resolution is
expected to be 2.5 MeV/ from the MC simulation.
We define two signal regions: 3.867–3.877 GeV/
for the and 3.895–3.935 GeV/ for the .
The former accommodates the with a known mass of
MeV/ and a
decay width less than MeV 444
Recent measurements of the decay width show
MeV [3] and MeV [4].;
the latter accommodates the with a known mass of
MeV/ and a decay width of MeV.
We constrain the mass to 3.09690 GeV/
when we calculate
[24].
Figure 2: distribution
shown with the veto (shaded gray region).
The dominant background, centered at 3.686 GeV/,
arises from radiatively produced ,
,
with .
Figure 2 shows the
distribution in data in the vicinity
of . Although the width of the peak
is 2.7 MeV/, it has a tail on the higher mass side.
This feature was also seen in previous
studies of produced by
initial-state radiation (ISR) [25].
To remove events, we veto events within 0.03 GeV/
of the mass, 3.686 GeV/.
Figure 3 shows the distribution
after removing those events, where
and and are the
four-momenta of the incoming (beam) and outgoing (tagging)
electrons and is the electron mass.
In Fig. 3, data are dominated by background
events while MC is pure .
Since two-photon processes are strongly suppressed at high
, we require GeV2/ to
reduce non-two-photon
background.
Our measurement is insensitive for
GeV2/ due to low reconstruction efficiency.
Figure 3: distribution for data
(blue dots) and MC (red histogram).
The area of MC distribution is normalized to that of data.
The vertical (magenta) line indicates the
selection requirement.
Figure 4 shows the observed events in the
vs. plane. Three events are in
the signal
region; no events are in the region.
The masses of the events in the signal region are
3.8726, 3.8701 and 3.8742 GeV/,
averaging to
3.87230.0012 GeV/, where the uncertainty is statistical.
At masses below the region, 3.716-3.867 GeV/,
there are six events,
presumably from events; at masses above the , there are
no events below 4.266 GeV/, in region
of the mass.
A similar distribution was seen in the Belle ISR study [25].
The
events can also originate from
-channel photon exchange with the emission of a virtual photon,
which we call internal bremsstrahlung (IB) [26].
Both processes produce -odd , like , while
the -even peak can only be produced
from the two-photon process.
The absence of a prominent enhancement in our data
argues against non-negligible contribution from the -odd
process through the decay
[27].
To estimate the background from IB, which has the same final-state
particle configuration as our process and is hence difficult to separate,
we use the ISR data [25].
By fitting the ISR data
to our data in the region 3.5 GeV/ 4.5 GeV/, corrected
for the differences in the diagrams of - and -channels, we
estimate the number of background events to be
(3-5)/(10 MeV/) in the region between 3.8 GeV/
and 4.2 GeV/.
This explains the absence of events between the and 4.26 GeV/.
Figure 4: Observed events (red dots) in the
vs. plane.
Three events are seen in the signal region
(red lines with shade).
The blue lines with shade show the signal region.
The vetoed regions are shaded gray with dash lines.
To estimate the background level in the signal region,
we fit a linear function
(2)
to the data in the region GeV/ centered
at the mass, excluding the signal region;
and are free in the fit.
The width of GeV/ is determined by the distance between
the and the upper boundary, GeV/,
of the vetoed region.
Using an unbinned extended maximum-likelihood fit, we obtain
/(GeV/)2 and
/(GeV/).
This yields background events in the
signal window, where the uncertainty is statistical only.
To derive the systematic uncertainty due to
background modeling, we test
two modified fitting functions.
One is a power function,
with set to
2.4 GeV/; the fit is insensitive to the value of .
This gives .
The other is a linear function with a break at 3.800 GeV/,
for
3.800 GeV/ and for
3.800 GeV/,
based on the shapes of the distributions
in the ISR [25, 28] and the
annihilation studies [29, 30].
This gives .
From the variations of in the three forms,
we derive for the systematic uncertainty.
This is negligible compared to the statistical uncertainty.
The estimated number of background events
is , including statistical and systematic uncertainties.
With this background, the significance of three events is 3.2.
For the signal, with three observed and 0.11
expected background events, we calculate the number of signal events,
,
at 68% confidence level (C.L.).
For the signal, with zero observed and 0.3 expected
background events, we obtain
at 90% C.L. The Feldman-Cousins method is used in
both cases [31].
The differential cross section for the production of a resonance ()
in a single-tag two-photon interaction is expressed as [32]
(3)
where is the single-tag luminosity function,
is the resonance mass,
is the invariant mass squared of the virtual photon,
is the
decay width,
is the invariant mass
of the system, and is the resonance spin.
The factor of two comes from the existence of two production modes:
and scattering.
For a resonance, spin-parity conservation forbids
production at .
To remove the
-dependence from ,
we use the reduced decay width
defined as [6, 33]
(4)
using its dependence near zero;
is
the decay width corresponding to
a formation of the resonance from a longitudinal (virtual) photon
and a transverse (real) photon.
Substituting this expression into Eq. (3), we obtain
(5)
for , where an extra factor of two comes from the difference
in the number of spin degrees of freedom: the longitudinal
component has one degree of freedom and the transverse component
has two with unpolarized incident photons.
In Eq. (5), is the ratio
, where
is the luminosity function for the production of one longitudinally
polarized photon and one transversely polarized photon and
is that for two transversely polarized photons.
Using the Schuler-Berends-Gulik (SBG) model [6]555
As a validation of the SBG model at higher ,
Ref. [32] provides measurements of single-tag to no-tag ratios
for the decay widths for and ,
which agree with the predictions of this model.
for -type axial-vector mesons, this can be extended to
higher [33]:
(6)
where
(7)
accounting for contributions from helicity 0 and 1.
The SBG model, based on , is the only model available at present
that can reliably extend Eq. (5) to the higher region:
Eq. (7).
To relate
the number of signal
events and the decay width, ,
we use Eqs. (6) and (7)
assuming the
is a pure state [6],
(8)
where is the -dependent
reconstruction
efficiency, is the integrated luminosity,
is the branching fraction
of the to , and
is the branching fraction of to lepton pairs [24].
We estimate the reconstruction efficiency from MC,
in which we model the
decay as with
and
and with all daughter particles isotropically distributed
in the rest frames of their parents.
The decay model via is motivated
by the measured mass distributions [1, 35, 36].
It has a reconstruction efficiency 12% higher
than that for non-resonant ; we include a 6% systematic
uncertainty to account for this.
The angular distribution of the decay products of the
negligibly
affects the reconstruction, as confirmed by simulating with
an alternative model with decay angles of
daughters from a resonance with helicities 0 and 1.
Detection efficiencies range from 4% to 8%
for between 3 GeV and 25 GeV and have smaller values for
GeV.
They are estimated for our three center-of-mass energies
on the ,
, and resonances and average the
values weighted by their corresponding integrated luminosities.
We also average over the four detection modes given the two
tagging charges ( and ) and the two decay modes
( and ).
The luminosity functions for our beam energies are
calculated as functions of using TREPSBSS.
We set as a convention for the present
application of Eq. (7)[6].
After performing the integration in Eq. (8),
from GeV2/
to GeV2/,
we obtain
(9)
including the total systematic uncertainty from the integration.
The dominant systematic uncertainty on
is from the reconstruction efficiency,
primarily due to differences between MC and data.
The largest uncertainty, 7%, is in the selection
from the uncertainty of the background level.
We estimate the total systematic uncertainty to be 13%.
From , we determine
(10)
To set
a limit on ,
we need .
We derive an upper limit, using the measured products
of -meson decay branching fractions and the
decay branching fractions,
666
From and
the sum over the measured products of the branching
fractions,
,
where we exclude ,
we obtain that
using the Bayesian method at 90% C.L. This limit
is consistent with C. Li and C.-Z. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D 100,
094003 (2019)..
With the measured lower limit [35, 38, 24], this gives
at
90% C.L.
Using the Feldman-Cousins method for three observed events and 0.11
background, we obtain at 90% C.L.
This, with Eq. (9), divided by
, gives
the range: 20-500 eV.
This is consistent with values predicted for
the model [6, 8].
For a comparison of experimental results with
non- models, we must wait for improved
calculations in the future.
No events consistent with
are observed.
This, combined with past measurements [9, 39],
indicates no excess of -parity-violating decays
of .
In summary, we find the first evidence
for production in
two-photon, , interactions.
We observe three
candidates with a significance of 3.2 and an estimated
yield of .
From this, we obtain eV,
assuming the dependence
of a meson model.
With future advances in calculations
of
for non- states and higher luminosities accumulated by Belle II,
we expect this method will clarify our
understanding of the .
Acknowledgements.
We are grateful to M. Karliner for useful discussions.
We thank the KEKB group for excellent operation of the
accelerator; the KEK cryogenics group for efficient solenoid
operations; and the KEK computer group, the NII, and
PNNL/EMSL for valuable computing and SINET5 network support.
We acknowledge support from MEXT, JSPS and Nagoya’s TLPRC (Japan);
ARC (Australia); FWF (Austria); NSFC and CCEPP (China);
MSMT (Czechia); CZF, DFG, EXC153, and VS (Germany);
DST (India); INFN (Italy);
MOE, MSIP, NRF, RSRI, FLRFAS project, GSDC of KISTI and KREONET/GLORIAD (Korea);
MNiSW and NCN (Poland); MSHE, Agreement 14.W03.31.0026 (Russia); University of Tabuk (Saudi Arabia); ARRS (Slovenia);
IKERBASQUE (Spain);
SNSF (Switzerland); MOE and MOST (Taiwan); and DOE and NSF (USA).
References
S.-K. Choi et al. [2003]S.-K. Choi et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 262001 (2003).
R. Aaij et al. [2013]R. Aaij et
al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 222001 (2013).
R. Aaij et
al. [2020a]R. Aaij et
al. (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 102, 092005 (2020a).
R. Aaij et
al. [2020b]R. Aaij et
al. (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP 08, 123 (2020).
Note [1]The was searched for in two-photon interactions
before its spin-parity determination: S. Dobbs et al. (CLEO
Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 032004
(2005).
G. A. Schuler, F. A. Berends, and R. van
Gulik [1998]G. A. Schuler, F. A.
Berends, and R. van Gulik, Nucl. Phys. B 523, 423 (1998).
Note [2]We use “electron” to denote both electron and
positron.
T. Branz, R. Molina and E. Oset [2011]T. Branz, R. Molina
and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 83, 114015 (2011).
S. Uehara et al. [2010]S. Uehara et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 092001 (2010).
S. Kurokawa and E. Kikutani [2003]S. Kurokawa and E.
Kikutani, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 499, 1 (2003).
T. Abe et al. [2013]T. Abe et al.
(KEKB), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2013, 03A001 (2013).
A. Abashian et
al. [2002a]A. Abashian et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Nucl. Instrum. and Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 479, 117 (2002a).
J. Brodzicka et al. [2012]J. Brodzicka et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2012, 04D001 (2012).
M. Masuda et al. [2016]M. Masuda et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 93, 032003 (2016).
E. Barberio, B. van Eijk and Z.
Was [1991]E. Barberio, B. van
Eijk and Z. Was, Compt. Phys. Commun. 66, 115 (1991).
E. Barberio and Z. Was [1994]E. Barberio and Z.
Was, Compt. Phys. Commun. 79, 291
(1994).
R. Brun et al. [1987]R. Brun et
al., CERN DD/EE/ 84-1 (1987).
K. Hanagaki et al. [2002]K. Hanagaki et
al., Nucl. Instrum. and Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A
485, 490 (2002).
A. Abashian et
al. [2002b]A. Abashian et
al., Nucl. Instrum. and Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A
491, 69 (2002b).
E. Nakano [2002]E. Nakano, Nucl. Instrum. and Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 494, 402 (2002).
Note [3]The center-of-mass quantities are indicated by
asterisks.
Note [4]Recent measurements of the decay width show MeV [3] and MeV [4].
N. Tanabashi et al. [2018]N. Tanabashi et
al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018), and 2019 update.
C. Z. Yuan et al. [2007]C. Z. Yuan et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 182004 (2007), Figure 1 shows
.
V. Bytev, E. Kuraev, E. Tomasi-Gustafsson and Ping
Wang [2010]V. Bytev, E. Kuraev,
E. Tomasi-Gustafsson and Ping Wang, Phys. Rev. D 81, 117501 (2010).
M. Ablikim et al. [2014]M. Ablikim et
al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 092001 (2014).
Z. Q. Liu et al. [2013]Z. Q. Liu et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 252002 (2013), Figure 1(a) inset shows
.
M. Ablikim et al. [2017]M. Ablikim et
al. (BESIII Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 092001 (2017), Figure 1 shows
.
N. E. Adam et al. [2006]N. E. Adam et
al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 082004 (2006), Figure 1 shows
.
G. J. Feldman and R. D. Cousins [1998]G. J. Feldman and R.
D. Cousins, Phys. Rev. D 57, 3873
(1998).
M. Masuda et al. [2018]M. Masuda et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 97, 052003 (2018).
H. Aihara et al. [1988]H. Aihara et
al. (TPC/ Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 38, 1 (1988).
Note [5]As a validation of the SBG model at higher , Ref. [32] provides measurements of single-tag to no-tag ratios for the decay widths for and , which agree with the
predictions of this model.
S.-K. Choi et al. [2011]S.-K. Choi et
al. (Belle Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 84, 052004 (2011).
A. Abulencia et al. [2006]A. Abulencia et
al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 102002 (2006).
Note [6]From and the
sum over the measured products of the branching fractions, ,
where we exclude , we obtain that using the Bayesian method at
90% C.L. This limit is consistent with C. Li and C.-Z. Yuan,
Phys. Rev. D 100, 094003 (2019).
B. Aubert et al. [2008]B. Aubert et
al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 77, 111101 (2008).
J. P. Lees et al. [2012]J. P. Lees et
al. (BaBar Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 86, 072002 (2012).