This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Estimates on the Kodaira dimension for fibrations over abelian varieties

Fanjun Meng Department of Mathematics, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA [email protected]
Abstract.

We give estimates on the Kodaira dimension for fibrations over abelian varieties, and give some applications. One of the results strengthens the subadditivity of Kodaira dimension of fibrations over abelian varieties.

2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: 14D06, 14K05.
Keywords: Kodaira dimension, fibrations, abelian varieties.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we give estimates on the Kodaira dimension for fibrations over abelian varieties over {\mathbb{C}}, and give some applications.

Theorem 1.1.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a fibration from a smooth projective variety XX to an abelian variety AA where ff is smooth over an open set VAV\subseteq A, and mm a positive integer. Then

κ(V)κ(A,det^fωXm)dimV0(A,fωXm).\kappa(V)\geq\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})\geq\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}).

If m>1m>1, then κ(A,det^fωXm)=dimV0(A,fωXm)\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})=\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}).

The line bundle det^fωXm\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m} is the reflexive hull of detfωXm\det f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}. Given a smooth quasi-projective variety VV, κ(V)\kappa(V) denotes the log Kodaira dimension, defined as follows: for any smooth projective compactification YY of VV such that D=YVD=Y\setminus V is a divisor with simple normal crossing support, we have κ(V)=κ(Y,KY+D)\kappa(V)=\kappa(Y,K_{Y}+D). Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on an abelian variety AA. The cohomological support locus V0(A,)V^{0}(A,\mathcal{F}) is defined by

V0(A,)={αPic0(A)dimH0(A,α)>0},V^{0}(A,\mathcal{F})=\{\alpha\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A)\mid\dim H^{0}(A,\mathcal{F}\otimes\alpha)>0\},

see also Definition 2.2. If \mathcal{F} admits a finite direct sum decomposition

iI(αipii),\mathcal{F}\cong\bigoplus_{i\in I}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p_{i}^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}),

where each AiA_{i} is an abelian variety, each pi:AAip_{i}\colon A\to A_{i} is a fibration, each i\mathcal{F}_{i} is a nonzero M-regular coherent sheaf on AiA_{i}, and each αiPic0(A)\alpha_{i}\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A) is a torsion line bundle, then we can characterize V0(A,)V^{0}(A,\mathcal{F}) using this decomposition, and we have

dimV0(A,)=maxiIdimAi.\dim V^{0}(A,\mathcal{F})=\max_{i\in I}\dim A_{i}.

See Definition 2.3 for the definition of M-regular coherent sheaves. We will use this observation in the proofs of our main theorems. The decomposition above is called the Chen–Jiang decomposition of \mathcal{F}. It is known that pushforwards of pluricanonical bundles under morphisms to abelian varieties have the Chen–Jiang decomposition by [CJ18, PPS17, LPS20] in increasing generality, and pushforwards of klt pairs under morphisms to abelian varieties have the Chen–Jiang decomposition, as proved independently in [Jia21] and [Men21].

If there exists a positive integer mm such that κ(A,det^fωXm)=dimA\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})=\dim A, it is known that κ(V)=dimA\kappa(V)=\dim A by [MP21, Theorem 2.4] (see Theorem 2.7) which is a consequence of [PS17, Theorems 4.1 and 3.5]. The first part of the inequality in Theorem 1.1 is a generalization of this fact when det^fωXm\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m} is not necessarily big. In a different direction, by letting κ(V)=0\kappa(V)=0 in Theorem 1.1, we can recover [MP21, Theorem B] which gives the structures of pushforwards of pluricanonical bundles of smooth projective varieties under surjective morphisms to abelian varieties when the morphisms are smooth away from a closed set of codimension at least 22 in the abelian varieties.

By estimating the dimension of V0(A,fωXm)V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}), we have the following corollary of Theorem 1.1.

Corollary 1.2.

Let g:XYg\colon X\to Y be a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration of a smooth projective variety XX with general fiber GG where YY is a smooth projective variety, and f:XAf\colon X\to A a fibration to an abelian variety AA where ff is smooth over an open set VAV\subseteq A. Then

κ(V)dimAq(G).\kappa(V)\geq\dim A-q(G).

Given a projective variety GG, q(G)q(G) denotes the irregularity of GG, see Definition 2.1. A projective variety GG is said to be regular if q(G)=0q(G)=0. If the Iitaka fibration gg has regular general fiber, then κ(V)=dimA\kappa(V)=\dim A by Corollary 1.2 and thus ff is not smooth unless AA is a point. Thus we have the following corollary.

Corollary 1.3.

Let g:XYg\colon X\to Y be a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration of a smooth projective variety XX with general fiber GG where YY is a smooth projective variety. If GG is regular, then XX has no nontrivial smooth morphisms to an abelian variety.

Corollary 1.3 implies that there are no nontrivial smooth morphisms from a projective variety of general type to an abelian variety which was proved in [VZ01] when the base is an elliptic curve and in [HK05] and [PS14] in general, see also [MP21] for related results.

We also have a quick corollary of Theorem 1.1 if the Albanese morphism of XX is a fibration. In Corollary 1.2, we let ff be the Albanese morphism of XX. Then we deduce that

κ(V)q(Y)\kappa(V)\geq q(Y)

by Theorem 1.1 and [LPS20, Theorem D].

By [Kaw85, Theorem 1.1], Theorem 1.1 implies a special case of the Kebekus–Kovács conjecture when the base VV compactifies to an abelian variety. This conjecture bounds Var(f)\operatorname{Var}(f) from above by the log Kodaira dimension κ(V)\kappa(V) assuming that the general fiber of ff has a good minimal model and has recently been proved in [Taj20]. For the definition of the variation Var(f)\operatorname{Var}(f), see [Kaw85, Section 1]. In private communication from Mihnea Popa, he proposed the following conjecture.

Conjecture 1.4 ([Pop22]).

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a fibration from a smooth projective variety XX to an abelian variety AA. Then

dimV0(A,fωXm)Var(f)\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})\geq\operatorname{Var}(f)

for every integer m>1m>1 such that fωXm0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}\neq 0.

In the case when κ(X)=0\kappa(X)=0 and ff is the Albanese morphism of XX, this conjecture is essentially equivalent to Ueno’s Conjecture K, predicting that up to birational equivalence ff becomes a projection onto a factor after an étale base change. This is due to the fact that fωXmf_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m} is a torsion line bundle on AA for every positive integer mm such that fωXm0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}\neq 0 by [HPS18, Theorem 5.2]. In the following corollary, we give an answer to his conjecture assuming that the general fiber of ff has a good minimal model.

Corollary 1.5.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a fibration from a smooth projective variety XX to an abelian variety AA. Assume that the general fiber of ff has a good minimal model. Then

dimV0(A,fωXm)Var(f)\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})\geq\operatorname{Var}(f)

for every integer m>1m>1 such that fωXm0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}\neq 0. Moreover, if g:XYg\colon X\to Y is a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration of XX where YY is a smooth projective variety, then

q(Y)dimV0(A,fωXm)Var(f)q(Y)\geq\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})\geq\operatorname{Var}(f)

for every integer m>1m>1 such that fωXm0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}\neq 0.

In a different but related direction, the next theorem strengthens the result on the subadditivity of Kodaira dimension of fibrations over abelian varieties by [CP17] (see also [HPS18]).

Theorem 1.6.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a fibration from a klt pair (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) to an abelian variety AA, FF the general fiber of ff, m1m\geq 1 a rational number, and DD a Cartier divisor on XX such that Dm(KX+Δ)D\sim_{{\mathbb{Q}}}m(K_{X}+\Delta). Then

κ(X,KX+Δ)κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D)).\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta)\geq\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)).

If m>1m>1, then

κ(X,KX+Δ)κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D)).\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta)\geq\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)).

If f𝒪X(D)0f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\neq 0, V0(A,f𝒪X(D))V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)) is not empty since f𝒪X(D)f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) is a GV-sheaf by [Men21, Corollary 4.1]. We have the following corollary of Theorem 1.6. If κ(X,KX+Δ)=0\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta)=0 and f𝒪X(D)0f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\neq 0, then dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D))=0\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=0 by Theorem 1.6 and we deduce that f𝒪X(D)f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) is a torsion line bundle on AA by employing its Chen–Jiang decomposition, see [HPS18, Theorem 5.2] for the case of pushforwards of pluricanonical bundles of smooth projective varieties under fibrations to abelian varieties.

By estimating the dimension of V0(A,f𝒪X(D))V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)), we have the following corollary of Theorem 1.6.

Corollary 1.7.

Let g:XYg\colon X\to Y be a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration associated to KX+ΔK_{X}+\Delta with general fiber GG where (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is a klt pair and YY is a smooth projective variety, and f:XAf\colon X\to A a fibration to an abelian variety AA with general fiber FF. Then

κ(X,KX+Δ)κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+dimAq(G).\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta)\geq\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+\dim A-q(G).

We can rewrite the inequality in Corollary 1.7 as

dimFκ(F,KF+Δ|F)dimGq(G)\dim F-\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})\geq\dim G-q(G)

where dimGq(G)\dim G-q(G) is nonnegative since the Albanese morphism of GG is a fibration by κ(G,KG+Δ|G)=0\kappa(G,K_{G}+\Delta|_{G})=0 and [Wan16, Theorem B]. We immediately have the following corollary.

Corollary 1.8.

Let g:XYg\colon X\to Y be a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration associated to KX+ΔK_{X}+\Delta with general fiber GG where (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is a klt pair and YY is a smooth projective variety, and f:XAf\colon X\to A a fibration to an abelian variety AA with general fiber FF. If (F,Δ|F)(F,\Delta|_{F}) is of log general type, then GG is birational to its Albanese variety.

Under the hypotheses of Corollary 1.8, the klt pair (G,Δ|G)(G,\Delta|_{G}) has a good minimal model by [Fuj13, Theorem 1.1] since GG is birational to its Albanese variety. Thus the klt pair (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) has a good minimal model over YY by [HX13, Theorem 2.12]. Since g:XYg\colon X\to Y is a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration associated to KX+ΔK_{X}+\Delta, we can deduce that (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) has a good minimal model by running a (KX+Δ)(K_{X}+\Delta)-MMP over YY and applying the canonical bundle formula. The main result of [BC15] says that klt pairs fibered over normal projective varieties of maximal Albanese dimension with general fibers of log general type have good minimal models. By the discussion above, we give an intuitive explanation of why their result should be true.

We also have a quick corollary of Theorem 1.6 if the Albanese morphism of XX is a fibration. In Corollary 1.7, we let ff be the Albanese morphism of XX. Then we deduce that

κ(X,KX+Δ)κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+q(Y)\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta)\geq\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+q(Y)

by Theorem 1.6 and [Men21, Theorem 1.5].

For the proofs of the main theorems, we employ results from [Men21], techniques from [MP21], a hyperbolicity-type result from [PS17], and arguments on positivity properties of coherent sheaves.

Acknowledgements.

I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Mihnea Popa for helpful discussions and constant support. I would also like to thank Jungkai Alfred Chen for helpful discussions.

2. Preliminaries

We work over {\mathbb{C}}. A fibration is a projective surjective morphism with connected fibers. Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on a projective variety XX, we denote om𝒪X(,𝒪X)\mathcal{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_{X}}(\mathcal{F},\mathcal{O}_{X}) by \mathcal{F}^{\vee}.

We recall several definitions first.

Definition 2.1.

Let XX be a smooth projective variety. The irregularity q(X)q(X) is defined as h1(X,𝒪X)h^{1}(X,\mathcal{O}_{X}). If XX is a projective variety, the irregularity q(X)q(X) is defined as the irregularity of any resolution of XX.

If XX is a normal projective variety of rational singularities, then the irregularity q(X)q(X) is equal to the dimension of its Albanese variety Alb(X)\operatorname{Alb}(X) since its Albanese variety coincides with the Albanese variety of any of its resolution by [Rei83, Proposition 2.3] and [Kaw85, Lemma 8.1].

Definition 2.2.

Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on an abelian variety AA. The cohomological support loci Vli(A,)V_{l}^{i}(A,\mathcal{F}) for ii\in{\mathbb{N}} and ll\in{\mathbb{N}} are defined by

Vli(A,)={αPic0(A)dimHi(A,α)l}.V_{l}^{i}(A,\mathcal{F})=\{\alpha\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A)\mid\dim H^{i}(A,\mathcal{F}\otimes\alpha)\geq l\}.

We use Vi(A,)V^{i}(A,\mathcal{F}) to denote V1i(A,)V_{1}^{i}(A,\mathcal{F}).

Definition 2.3.

A coherent sheaf \mathcal{F} on an abelian variety AA

  1. (i)\mathrm{(i)}

    is a GV-sheaf if codimPic0(A)Vi(A,)i\operatorname{codim}_{\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A)}V^{i}(A,\mathcal{F})\geq i for every i>0i>0.

  2. (ii)\mathrm{(ii)}

    is M-regular if codimPic0(A)Vi(A,)>i\operatorname{codim}_{\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A)}V^{i}(A,\mathcal{F})>i for every i>0i>0.

  3. (iii)\mathrm{(iii)}

    satisfies IT0\operatorname{IT_{0}} if Vi(A,)=V^{i}(A,\mathcal{F})=\emptyset for every i>0i>0.

It is known that M-regular sheaves are ample by [Deb06, Corollary 3.2], and GV-sheaves are nef by [PP11, Theorem 4.1]. We prove a useful lemma here by a similar method as in the proof of [PP11, Theorem 4.1].

Lemma 2.4.

Let \mathcal{F} be a torsion-free GV\operatorname{GV}-sheaf on an abelian variety AA. Then det^\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F} is nef.

Proof.

We denote by mA:AAm_{A}\colon A\to A the multiplication by mm where mm is an integer. We can take an ample line bundle \mathcal{H} on AA such that (1A)(-1_{A})^{*}\mathcal{H}\cong\mathcal{H} and thus we have mAm2m_{A}^{*}\mathcal{H}\cong\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m^{2}}. Since \mathcal{F} is a GV\operatorname{GV}-sheaf and mAm_{A} is an isogeny, mAm_{A}^{*}\mathcal{F} is a torsion-free GV\operatorname{GV}-sheaf. We choose mm to be positive now. We deduce that mAmm_{A}^{*}\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m} satisfies IT0\operatorname{IT_{0}} by [PP11, Proposition 3.1], and it is ample by [Deb06, Corollary 3.2]. Since an ample sheaf is big and mAm_{A} is an isogeny, we deduce that

det^(mAm)det^mAmrankmAdet^mrank\widehat{\det}(m_{A}^{*}\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m})\cong\widehat{\det}m_{A}^{*}\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m\cdot\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}}\cong m_{A}^{*}\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m\cdot\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}}

is big by [Vie83, Lemma 3.2(iii)] (see also [Mor87, Properties 5.1.1]). We deduce that

mA((det^)mrank)(mAdet^mrank)mm_{A}^{*}((\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F})^{\otimes m}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{\otimes\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}})\cong(m_{A}^{*}\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{\otimes m\cdot\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}})^{\otimes m}

is big and thus ample since AA is an abelian variety. Thus (det^)mrank(\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F})^{\otimes m}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{\otimes\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}} is ample for every m>0m>0 and we deduce that det^\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F} is nef. ∎

We now give the definition of the Chen–Jiang decomposition.

Definition 2.5.

Let \mathcal{F} be a coherent sheaf on an abelian variety AA. The sheaf \mathcal{F} is said to have the Chen–Jiang decomposition if \mathcal{F} admits a finite direct sum decomposition

iI(αipii),\mathcal{F}\cong\bigoplus_{i\in I}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p_{i}^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}),

where each AiA_{i} is an abelian variety, each pi:AAip_{i}\colon A\to A_{i} is a fibration, each i\mathcal{F}_{i} is a nonzero M-regular coherent sheaf on AiA_{i}, and each αiPic0(A)\alpha_{i}\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A) is a torsion line bundle.

We state the following theorem which is a direct corollary of [Men21, Theorems 1.3 and 1.4] and omit the proof, see also [Jia21, Theorem 1.3] for the case when m>1m>1 is an integer.

Theorem 2.6.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a morphism from a klt pair (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) to an abelian variety AA, m>1m>1 a rational number, and DD a Cartier divisor on XX such that Dm(KX+Δ)D\sim_{{\mathbb{Q}}}m(K_{X}+\Delta). Then there exists a fibration p:ABp\colon A\to B to an abelian variety BB such that f𝒪X(lD)f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(lD) admits, for every positive integer ll, a finite direct sum decomposition

f𝒪X(lD)iI(αipi),f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(lD)\cong\bigoplus_{i\in I}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}),

where each i\mathcal{F}_{i} is a nonzero coherent sheaf on BB satisfying IT0\operatorname{IT_{0}}, and each αiPic0(A)\alpha_{i}\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A) is a torsion line bundle whose order can be bounded independently of ll. If g:XYg\colon X\to Y is a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration associated to the Cartier divisor DD with general fiber GG where YY is a smooth projective variety, then

dimBdimAq(G).\dim B\geq\dim A-q(G).

Moreover, if ff is surjective, then

q(Y)dimB.q(Y)\geq\dim B.

We will need the following hyperbolicity-type result proved in [PS17]. It relies on important ideas and results of Viehweg–Zuo and Campana–Păun, and on the theory of Hodge modules.

Theorem 2.7 ([PS17, Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 3.5]).

Let f:XYf\colon X\to Y be a fibration between smooth projective varieties where YY is not uniruled. Assume that ff is smooth over the complement of a closed subset ZYZ\subseteq Y, and there exists a positive integer mm such that det^fωX/Ym\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X/Y}^{\otimes m} is big. Denote by DD the union of the divisorial components of ZZ. Then the line bundle ωY(D)\omega_{Y}(D) is big.

The theorem above is stated in [PS17] only when Z=DZ=D, but the proof shows more generally the statement above, since all the objects it involves can be constructed from YY with any closed subset of codimension at least 22 removed.

We include a useful lemma about the log Kodaira dimension on ambient varieties of nonnegative Kodaira dimension which is [MP21, Lemma 2.6].

Lemma 2.8.

Let XX be a smooth projective variety with κ(X)0\kappa(X)\geq 0, ZXZ\subseteq X a closed reduced subscheme, and V=XZV=X\setminus Z. Assume that Z=WDZ=W\cup D where codimXW2\operatorname{codim}_{X}W\geq 2 and DD is a divisor. Then

κ(V)=κ(X,KX+D).\kappa(V)=\kappa(X,K_{X}+D).

3. Main results

We prove several useful lemmas first.

Lemma 3.1.

Let f:XYf\colon X\to Y be a surjective morphism between normal projective varieties, and φ:YY\varphi\colon Y^{\prime}\to Y an étale morphism from a normal projective variety YY^{\prime}. Consider the following base change diagram.

X{X^{\prime}}X{X}Y{Y^{\prime}}Y{Y}f\scriptstyle{f^{\prime}}φ\scriptstyle{\varphi^{\prime}}f\scriptstyle{f}φ\scriptstyle{\varphi}

Let \mathcal{F} be a torsion-free coherent sheaf on XX, then

φdet^fdet^φfdet^fφ.\varphi^{*}\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{F}\cong\widehat{\det}\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{F}\cong\widehat{\det}f^{\prime}_{*}\varphi^{\prime*}\mathcal{F}.
Proof.

The coherent sheaves ff_{*}\mathcal{F} and fφf^{\prime}_{*}\varphi^{\prime*}\mathcal{F} are torsion-free since φ\varphi^{\prime} is étale. Since φ\varphi is flat, we deduce that

φdet^fφom𝒪Y(om𝒪Y(detf,𝒪Y),𝒪Y)\varphi^{*}\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{F}\cong\varphi^{*}\mathcal{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_{Y}}(\mathcal{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_{Y}}(\det f_{*}\mathcal{F},\mathcal{O}_{Y}),\mathcal{O}_{Y})
om𝒪Y(om𝒪Y(φdetf,φ𝒪Y),φ𝒪Y)\cong\mathcal{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_{Y^{\prime}}}(\mathcal{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_{Y^{\prime}}}(\varphi^{*}\det f_{*}\mathcal{F},\varphi^{*}\mathcal{O}_{Y}),\varphi^{*}\mathcal{O}_{Y})
om𝒪Y(om𝒪Y(detφf,𝒪Y),𝒪Y)det^φfdet^fφ.\cong\mathcal{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_{Y^{\prime}}}(\mathcal{H}om_{\mathcal{O}_{Y^{\prime}}}(\det\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{F},\mathcal{O}_{Y^{\prime}}),\mathcal{O}_{Y^{\prime}})\cong\widehat{\det}\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{F}\cong\widehat{\det}f^{\prime}_{*}\varphi^{\prime*}\mathcal{F}.

Lemma 3.2.

Let f:XYf\colon X\to Y and g:YZg\colon Y\to Z be surjective morphisms where YY is a smooth projective variety, and XX and ZZ are normal projective varieties. Consider the following base change diagram.

Xz{X_{z}}X{X}Yz{Y_{z}}Y{Y}{z}{\{z\}}Z{Z}fz\scriptstyle{f_{z}}f\scriptstyle{f}gz\scriptstyle{g_{z}}g\scriptstyle{g}

Let \mathcal{F} be a locally free sheaf of finite rank on XX. If zz is a general point of ZZ, then

(det^f)|Yzdet^fz(|Xz).(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}}\cong\widehat{\det}{f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}}).
Proof.

Choose an open set VYV\subseteq Y such that (f)|V(f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{V} is locally free and codimYYV2\operatorname{codim}_{Y}Y\setminus V\geq 2. Consider the following base change diagram.

Vz{V_{z}}V{V}Yz{Y_{z}}Y{Y}iz\scriptstyle{i_{z}}i\scriptstyle{i}

We can choose zz sufficiently general such that XzX_{z} is normal, YzY_{z} is smooth, codimYzYzVz2\operatorname{codim}_{Y_{z}}Y_{z}\setminus V_{z}\geq 2, and

(f)|Yzfz(|Xz)(f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}}\cong{f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}})

by [LPS20, Proposition 4.1]. Thus (fz(|Xz))|Vz({f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}}))|_{V_{z}} is locally free. By the property of reflexive sheaves, we have

(det^f)|Yz(idetif)|Yzanddet^fz(|Xz)izdetizfz(|Xz).(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}}\cong(i_{*}\det i^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}}\quad\text{and}\quad\widehat{\det}{f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}})\cong{i_{z}}_{*}\det i_{z}^{*}{f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}}).

We have the natural morphism

(det^f)|Yz(idetif)|Yziz((detif)|Vz)(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}}\cong(i_{*}\det i^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}}\to{i_{z}}_{*}((\det i^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{V_{z}})
iziz(det(f)|Yz)izizdetfz(|Xz)det^fz(|Xz).\cong{i_{z}}_{*}i_{z}^{*}(\det(f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}})\cong{i_{z}}_{*}i_{z}^{*}\det{f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}})\cong\widehat{\det}{f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}}).

The morphism above is an isomorphism over the open set VzV_{z}. Thus it is an isomorphism over YzY_{z} since (det^f)|Yz(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{F})|_{Y_{z}} and det^fz(|Xz)\widehat{\det}{f_{z}}_{*}(\mathcal{F}|_{X_{z}}) are line bundles, and codimYzYzVz2\operatorname{codim}_{Y_{z}}Y_{z}\setminus V_{z}\geq 2. ∎

Lemma 3.3.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a surjective morphism from a klt pair (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) to an abelian variety AA, m1m\geq 1 a rational number, and DD a Cartier divisor on XX such that Dm(KX+Δ)D\sim_{{\mathbb{Q}}}m(K_{X}+\Delta). If f𝒪X(D)0f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\neq 0, then

κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))0.\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))\geq 0.
Proof.

By [Men21, Theorem 1.1], there exists an isogeny φ:AA\varphi\colon A^{\prime}\to A such that φf𝒪X(D)\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) is globally generated. We deduce that detφf𝒪X(D)\det\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) is globally generated and thus det^φf𝒪X(D)\widehat{\det}\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) is generically globally generated. In particular, the line bundle det^φf𝒪X(D)\widehat{\det}\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) has nonzero sections. By Lemma 3.1, we deduce

κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))=κ(A,φdet^f𝒪X(D))=κ(A,det^φf𝒪X(D))0.\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=\kappa(A^{\prime},\varphi^{*}\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=\kappa(A^{\prime},\widehat{\det}\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))\geq 0.

Lemma 3.4.

Let f:XYf\colon X\to Y be a fibration between normal projective varieties, FF the very general fiber of ff, and \mathcal{L} a line bundle on XX. If f𝒯f_{*}\mathcal{L}\cong\mathcal{B}\oplus\mathcal{T} where \mathcal{B} is an ample sheaf on YY, then

κ(X,)=κ(F,|F)+dimY.\kappa(X,\mathcal{L})=\kappa(F,\mathcal{L}|_{F})+\dim Y.
Proof.

Let \mathcal{H} be an ample line bundle on YY. Since \mathcal{B} is ample, there exists a positive integer kk such that Sk1S^{k}\mathcal{B}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{-1} is globally generated where SkS^{k}\mathcal{B} is the kk-th symmetric product of \mathcal{B} (see e.g. [Deb06, Section 2]). We have the following morphism

SkSkffkS^{k}\mathcal{B}\hookrightarrow S^{k}f_{*}\mathcal{L}\to f_{*}\mathcal{L}^{\otimes k}

which is the following nonzero multiplication homomorphism between k(y)k(y)-linear spaces when restricted at the general point yy of YY

Sk(y𝒪Y,yk(y))SkH0(Xy,|Xy)H0(Xy,k|Xy)S^{k}(\mathcal{B}_{y}\otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{Y,y}}k(y))\hookrightarrow S^{k}H^{0}(X_{y},\mathcal{L}|_{X_{y}})\to H^{0}(X_{y},\mathcal{L}^{\otimes k}|_{X_{y}})

by the base change theorem and generic flatness. Thus we deduce that the following homomorphism

H0(Y,Sk1)H0(Y,fk1)H^{0}(Y,S^{k}\mathcal{B}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{-1})\to H^{0}(Y,f_{*}\mathcal{L}^{\otimes k}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{-1})

is nonzero since Sk1S^{k}\mathcal{B}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{-1} is globally generated. We deduce that fk1f_{*}\mathcal{L}^{\otimes k}\otimes\mathcal{H}^{-1} has a nonzero global section and thus k(f)1\mathcal{L}^{\otimes k}\otimes(f^{*}\mathcal{H})^{-1} has a nonzero global section. Thus we have an injective morphism

fk.f^{*}\mathcal{H}\to\mathcal{L}^{\otimes k}.

By [Mor87, Proposition 1.14], we deduce that

κ(X,)=κ(F,|F)+dimY.\kappa(X,\mathcal{L})=\kappa(F,\mathcal{L}|_{F})+\dim Y.

We are ready to prove our main theorems now. We prove the first part of the inequality in Theorem 1.1 first.

Theorem 3.5.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a fibration from a smooth projective variety XX to an abelian variety AA where ff is smooth over an open set VAV\subseteq A, and mm a positive integer. Then

κ(V)κ(A,det^fωXm).\kappa(V)\geq\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}).
Proof.

If fωXm=0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}=0, then the statement is trivial. Thus we can assume fωXm0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}\neq 0. By Lemma 3.3, we have that

κ(A,det^fωXm)0.\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})\geq 0.

If κ(A,det^fωXm)=0\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})=0, then the statement is trivial since κ(V)0\kappa(V)\geq 0. Thus we can assume κ(A,det^fωXm)>0\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})>0. Denote Z=AVZ=A\setminus V and assume that Z=WDZ=W\cup D where codimAW2\operatorname{codim}_{A}W\geq 2 and DD is an effective divisor. If det^fωXm\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m} is big, we deduce that

κ(V)=κ(A,KA+D)=dimA=κ(A,det^fωXm)\kappa(V)=\kappa(A,K_{A}+D)=\dim A=\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})

by Theorem 2.7 and Lemma 2.8. Assume now det^fωXm\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m} is not big. We can choose a positive integer NN which is sufficiently big and divisible such that

(det^fωXm)N𝒪A(E)(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})^{\otimes N}\cong\mathcal{O}_{A}(E)

where EE is an effective divisor. By a well-known structural theorem, there exist a fibration p:ABp\colon A\to B between abelian varieties and an ample effective divisor HH on BB such that dimA>dimB>0\dim A>\dim B>0 and E=pHE=p^{*}H. Denote the kernel of pp by KK which is an abelian subvariety of AA. By Poincaré’s complete reducibility theorem, there exists an abelian variety CAC\subseteq A such that C+K=AC+K=A and CKC\cap K is finite, so that the natural morphism φ:C×KA\varphi\colon C\times K\to A is an isogeny. We consider the following commutative diagram, qq is the projection onto KK, kKk\in K is a general point, and ff^{\prime} and fkf^{\prime}_{k} are obtained by base change from ff via φ\varphi and the inclusion iki_{k} of the fiber CkC_{k} of qq over kk respectively.

Xk{X^{\prime}_{k}}X{X^{\prime}}X{X}Ck{C_{k}}C×K{C\times K}A{A}{k}{\{k\}}K{K}B{B}fk\scriptstyle{f^{\prime}_{k}}φ\scriptstyle{\varphi^{\prime}}f\scriptstyle{f^{\prime}}f\scriptstyle{f}ik\scriptstyle{i_{k}}q\scriptstyle{q}φ\scriptstyle{\varphi}p\scriptstyle{p}

By construction, the composition

ψk=pφik:CkB\psi_{k}=p\circ\varphi\circ i_{k}\colon C_{k}\to B

is an isogeny. Since φ\varphi is étale, XX^{\prime} is smooth. If W:=φ1(W)W^{\prime}:=\varphi^{-1}(W), then codimC×KW2\operatorname{codim}_{C\times K}W^{\prime}\geq 2, and ff^{\prime} is smooth over V:=φ1(V)V^{\prime}:=\varphi^{-1}(V). We can choose kk sufficiently general such that XkX^{\prime}_{k} is smooth, codimCkik1(W)2\operatorname{codim}_{C_{k}}i_{k}^{-1}(W^{\prime})\geq 2, and

ikdet^fωXmdet^fk(ωXm|Xk)det^fkωXkmi_{k}^{*}\widehat{\det}f^{\prime}_{*}\omega_{X^{\prime}}^{\otimes m}\cong\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}(\omega_{X^{\prime}}^{\otimes m}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})\cong\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\omega_{X^{\prime}_{k}}^{\otimes m}

by Lemma 3.2. By Lemma 3.1, we deduce that

ψk𝒪B(H)ikφ𝒪A(E)ikφ(det^fωXm)N\psi_{k}^{*}\mathcal{O}_{B}(H)\cong i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\mathcal{O}_{A}(E)\cong i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})^{\otimes N}
ik(det^fωXm)N(det^fkωXkm)N.\cong i_{k}^{*}(\widehat{\det}f^{\prime}_{*}\omega_{X^{\prime}}^{\otimes m})^{\otimes N}\cong(\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\omega_{X^{\prime}_{k}}^{\otimes m})^{\otimes N}.

Since ψk\psi_{k} is an isogeny, ψk𝒪B(H)\psi_{k}^{*}\mathcal{O}_{B}(H) is ample and thus det^fkωXkm\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\omega_{X^{\prime}_{k}}^{\otimes m} is ample. Since codimCkik1(W)2\operatorname{codim}_{C_{k}}i_{k}^{-1}(W^{\prime})\geq 2 and fkf^{\prime}_{k} is smooth over ik1(V)i_{k}^{-1}(V^{\prime}), we deduce that

κ(Ck,KCk+(ikφD)red)=dimCk=dimB=κ(A,E)=κ(A,det^fωXm)\kappa(C_{k},K_{C_{k}}+(i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}D)_{\operatorname{red}})=\dim C_{k}=\dim B=\kappa(A,E)=\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})

by Theorem 2.7. We can choose a rational number ε>0\varepsilon>0 small enough such that (C×K,εφD)(C\times K,\varepsilon\varphi^{*}D) is a klt pair. By [CP17, Theorem 1.1] and choosing kk sufficiently general, we deduce that

κ(V)=κ(A,D)=κ(A,εD)=κ(C×K,εφD)\kappa(V)=\kappa(A,D)=\kappa(A,\varepsilon D)=\kappa(C\times K,\varepsilon\varphi^{*}D)
κ(Ck,εikφD)=κ(Ck,(ikφD)red)=κ(A,det^fωXm).\geq\kappa(C_{k},\varepsilon i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}D)=\kappa(C_{k},(i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}D)_{\operatorname{red}})=\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}).

Next, we prove the second part of the inequality in Theorem 1.1 in a more general setting which allows klt singularities. We also prove the first inequality in Theorem 1.6 along the way.

Theorem 3.6.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a fibration from a klt pair (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) to an abelian variety AA, FF the general fiber of ff, m1m\geq 1 a rational number, and DD a Cartier divisor on XX such that Dm(KX+Δ)D\sim_{{\mathbb{Q}}}m(K_{X}+\Delta). Then

κ(X,KX+Δ)κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D)),\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta)\geq\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)),

and

κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D)).\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))\geq\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)).
Proof.

If f𝒪X(D)=0f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)=0, then the statement is trivial. Thus we can assume f𝒪X(D)0f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\neq 0. By [Men21, Theorem 1.3], f𝒪X(D)f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) has the Chen–Jiang decomposition

f𝒪X(D)iI(αipii),f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\cong\bigoplus_{i\in I}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p_{i}^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}),

where each AiA_{i} is an abelian variety, each pi:AAip_{i}\colon A\to A_{i} is a fibration, each i\mathcal{F}_{i} is a nonzero M-regular coherent sheaf on AiA_{i}, and each αiPic0(A)\alpha_{i}\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A) is a torsion line bundle. By [LPS20, Lemma 3.3], we deduce that

dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D))=maxiIdimAi.\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=\max_{i\in I}\dim A_{i}.

We consider the fibration pj:AAjp_{j}\colon A\to A_{j} for a fixed jIj\in I. Denote the kernel of pjp_{j} by KK which is an abelian subvariety of AA. By Poincaré’s complete reducibility theorem, there exists an abelian variety CAC\subseteq A such that C+K=AC+K=A and CKC\cap K is finite, so that the natural morphism φ:C×KA\varphi\colon C\times K\to A is an isogeny. We consider the following commutative diagram, qq is the projection onto KK, kKk\in K is a general point, and ff^{\prime} and fkf^{\prime}_{k} are obtained by base change from ff via φ\varphi and the inclusion iki_{k} of the fiber CkC_{k} of qq over kk respectively. We define a {\mathbb{Q}}-divisor Δ\Delta^{\prime} by KX+Δ=φ(KX+Δ)K_{X^{\prime}}+\Delta^{\prime}=\varphi^{\prime*}(K_{X}+\Delta). Since φ\varphi^{\prime} is an étale morphism, the new pair (X,Δ)(X^{\prime},\Delta^{\prime}) is klt and Δ\Delta^{\prime} is effective. Define DD^{\prime} by φD\varphi^{\prime*}D then we have Dm(KX+Δ)D^{\prime}\sim_{{\mathbb{Q}}}m(K_{X^{\prime}}+\Delta^{\prime}). By the flat base change theorem, we have that f𝒪X(D)φf𝒪X(D)f^{\prime}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}}(D^{\prime})\cong\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D).

(Xk,Δ|Xk){(X^{\prime}_{k},\Delta^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})}(X,Δ){(X^{\prime},\Delta^{\prime})}(X,Δ){(X,\Delta)}Ck{C_{k}}C×K{C\times K}A{A}{k}{\{k\}}K{K}Aj{A_{j}}fk\scriptstyle{f^{\prime}_{k}}φ\scriptstyle{\varphi^{\prime}}f\scriptstyle{f^{\prime}}f\scriptstyle{f}ik\scriptstyle{i_{k}}q\scriptstyle{q}φ\scriptstyle{\varphi}pj\scriptstyle{p_{j}}

By construction, the composition

ψk=pjφik:CkAj\psi_{k}=p_{j}\circ\varphi\circ i_{k}\colon C_{k}\to A_{j}

is an isogeny. If we denote 𝒯:=ij(αipii)\mathcal{T}:=\bigoplus_{i\neq j}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p_{i}^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}), then we have

f𝒪X(D)(αjpjj)𝒯.f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\cong(\alpha_{j}\otimes p_{j}^{*}\mathcal{F}_{j})\oplus\mathcal{T}.

We can choose kk sufficiently general such that (Xk,Δ|Xk)(X^{\prime}_{k},\Delta^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}}) is klt and

fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk)ikf𝒪X(D)ikφf𝒪X(D){f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})\cong i_{k}^{*}f^{\prime}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}}(D^{\prime})\cong i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)

by [LPS20, Proposition 4.1]. We deduce that

fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk)ikφf𝒪X(D)(ikφαjψkj)ikφ𝒯.{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})\cong i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\cong(i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\alpha_{j}\otimes\psi_{k}^{*}\mathcal{F}_{j})\oplus i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\mathcal{T}.

Since j\mathcal{F}_{j} is an M-regular sheaf on AjA_{j}, it is ample by [PP03, Proposition 2.13] and [Deb06, Corollary 3.2]. Since ψk\psi_{k} is an isogeny and ikφαji_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\alpha_{j} is a torsion line bundle, we deduce that ikφαjψkji_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\alpha_{j}\otimes\psi_{k}^{*}\mathcal{F}_{j} is also ample. We deduce that ikφ𝒯i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\mathcal{T} is a GV-sheaf since it is a direct summand of fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk){f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}}) which is a GV-sheaf by [Men21, Corollary 4.1]. Thus we have that

fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk)12,{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})\cong\mathcal{H}_{1}\oplus\mathcal{H}_{2},

with 1\mathcal{H}_{1} ample and 2\mathcal{H}_{2} a GV-sheaf. The very general fiber of fkf^{\prime}_{k} is FF. We deduce that

κ(Xk,D|Xk)=κ(F,D|F)+dimCk=κ(F,D|F)+dimAj\kappa(X^{\prime}_{k},D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})=\kappa(F,D|_{F})+\dim C_{k}=\kappa(F,D|_{F})+\dim A_{j}

by Lemma 3.4. By [HMX18, Theorem 4.2], κ(F,KF+Δ|F)\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F}) is constant for general fiber FF of ff. By [CP17, Theorem 1.1] and choosing kk sufficiently general, we deduce that

κ(X,KX+Δ)=κ(X,KX+Δ)κ(Xk,KXk+Δ|Xk)\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta)=\kappa(X^{\prime},K_{X^{\prime}}+\Delta^{\prime})\geq\kappa(X^{\prime}_{k},K_{X^{\prime}_{k}}+\Delta^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})
=κ(Xk,D|Xk)=κ(F,D|F)+dimAj=κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+dimAj.=\kappa(X^{\prime}_{k},D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})=\kappa(F,D|_{F})+\dim A_{j}=\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+\dim A_{j}.

Thus we deduce that

κ(X,KX+Δ)\displaystyle\kappa(X,K_{X}+\Delta) κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+maxiIdimAi\displaystyle\geq\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+\max_{i\in I}\dim A_{i}
=κ(F,KF+Δ|F)+dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D)).\displaystyle=\kappa(F,K_{F}+\Delta|_{F})+\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)).

We next prove the second inequality in the theorem. Since 1\mathcal{H}_{1} is big, det^1\widehat{\det}\mathcal{H}_{1} is a big line bundle by [Vie83, Lemma 3.2(iii)] (see also [Mor87, Properties 5.1.1]). We deduce that det^2\widehat{\det}\mathcal{H}_{2} is a nef line bundle by Lemma 2.4. Thus their tensor product det^fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk)\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}}) is big. We can choose kk sufficiently general such that

ikdet^f𝒪X(D)det^fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk)i_{k}^{*}\widehat{\det}f^{\prime}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}}(D^{\prime})\cong\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}})

by Lemma 3.2. By Lemma 3.3, we can choose a positive integer NN which is sufficiently big and divisible such that

(det^f𝒪X(D))N𝒪A(E)(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))^{\otimes N}\cong\mathcal{O}_{A}(E)

where EE is an effective divisor. By Lemma 3.1, we deduce that

ikφ𝒪A(E)ikφ(det^f𝒪X(D))Ni_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\mathcal{O}_{A}(E)\cong i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}(\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))^{\otimes N}
ik(det^f𝒪X(D))N(det^fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk))N.\cong i_{k}^{*}(\widehat{\det}f^{\prime}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}}(D^{\prime}))^{\otimes N}\cong(\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}}))^{\otimes N}.

By the same argument used at the end of the proof of Theorem 3.5 and choosing kk sufficiently general, we deduce that

κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))=κ(A,𝒪A(E))κ(Ck,ikφ𝒪A(E))\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=\kappa(A,\mathcal{O}_{A}(E))\geq\kappa(C_{k},i_{k}^{*}\varphi^{*}\mathcal{O}_{A}(E))
=κ(Ck,det^fk𝒪Xk(D|Xk))=dimCk=dimAj.=\kappa(C_{k},\widehat{\det}{f^{\prime}_{k}}_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X^{\prime}_{k}}(D^{\prime}|_{X^{\prime}_{k}}))=\dim C_{k}=\dim A_{j}.

Thus we deduce that

κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))maxiIdimAi=dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D)).\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))\geq\max_{i\in I}\dim A_{i}=\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)).

Remark 3.7.

We still have κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D))\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))\geq\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)) if ff is only assumed to be surjective by the same proof as above.

Lemma 3.8.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a surjective morphism from a klt pair (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) to an abelian variety AA, m>1m>1 a rational number, and DD a Cartier divisor on XX such that Dm(KX+Δ)D\sim_{{\mathbb{Q}}}m(K_{X}+\Delta). Then

κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))=dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D)).\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)).
Proof.

If f𝒪X(D)=0f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)=0, then the statement is trivial. Thus we can assume f𝒪X(D)0f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\neq 0. By Theorem 2.6, there exists a fibration p:ABp\colon A\to B to an abelian variety BB such that f𝒪X(D)f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D) admits a finite direct sum decomposition

f𝒪X(D)iI(αipi),f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\cong\bigoplus_{i\in I}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}),

where each i\mathcal{F}_{i} is a nonzero coherent sheaf on BB satisfying IT0\operatorname{IT_{0}}, and each αiPic0(A)\alpha_{i}\in\operatorname{Pic}^{0}(A) is a torsion line bundle. Each i\mathcal{F}_{i} is torsion-free. By [LPS20, Lemma 3.3], we deduce that

dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D))=dimB.\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=\dim B.

Since pp is flat and det^(αipi)\widehat{\det}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}) is a line bundle, we deduce that

det^f𝒪X(D)iIdet^(αipi)iI(det^piαiranki)\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)\cong\bigotimes_{i\in I}\widehat{\det}(\alpha_{i}\otimes p^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i})\cong\bigotimes_{i\in I}(\widehat{\det}p^{*}\mathcal{F}_{i}\otimes\alpha_{i}^{\otimes\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}_{i}})
iI(pdet^iαiranki)p(iIdet^i)iIαiranki.\cong\bigotimes_{i\in I}(p^{*}\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}_{i}\otimes\alpha_{i}^{\otimes\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}_{i}})\cong p^{*}(\bigotimes_{i\in I}\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}_{i})\otimes\bigotimes_{i\in I}\alpha_{i}^{\otimes\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}_{i}}.

Since i\mathcal{F}_{i} satisfies IT0\operatorname{IT_{0}}, it is ample by [PP03, Proposition 2.13] and [Deb06, Corollary 3.2]. The sheaf i\mathcal{F}_{i} is big since an ample sheaf is big (see e.g. [Deb06, Section 2] and [Mor87, Section 5]). Thus det^i\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}_{i} is a big line bundle by [Vie83, Lemma 3.2(iii)] (see also [Mor87, Properties 5.1.1]). We deduce that

κ(A,det^f𝒪X(D))=κ(A,p(iIdet^i)iIαiranki)\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D))=\kappa(A,p^{*}(\bigotimes_{i\in I}\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}_{i})\otimes\bigotimes_{i\in I}\alpha_{i}^{\otimes\operatorname{rank}\mathcal{F}_{i}})
=κ(A,p(iIdet^i))=κ(B,iIdet^i)=dimB=dimV0(A,f𝒪X(D)).=\kappa(A,p^{*}(\bigotimes_{i\in I}\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}_{i}))=\kappa(B,\bigotimes_{i\in I}\widehat{\det}\mathcal{F}_{i})=\dim B=\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\mathcal{O}_{X}(D)).

Proof of Theorem 1.1.

It is a direct corollary of Theorem 3.5, Theorem 3.6 and Lemma 3.8. ∎

Proof of Corollary 1.2.

It is a direct corollary of Theorems 1.1 and 2.6. ∎

Proof of Corollary 1.3.

Let f:XAf\colon X\to A be a smooth morphism to an abelian variety AA. Then ff is surjective. We consider its Stein factorization f=φhf=\varphi\circ h where BB is a normal projective variety, h:XBh\colon X\to B is a fibration, and φ:BA\varphi\colon B\to A is a finite surjective morphism. Since ff is smooth, we deduce that hh is smooth and φ\varphi is étale. Thus BB is also an abelian variety. Since q(G)=0q(G)=0 and hh is a smooth fibration, we deduce that dimA=dimB=0\dim A=\dim B=0 by Corollary 1.2. ∎

Proof of Corollary 1.5.

By Theorem 2.6 and [LPS20, Lemma 3.3], there exists an abelian variety BB such that

dimV0(A,fωXm)=dimB\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})=\dim B

for every integer m>1m>1 such that fωXm0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}\neq 0. By Theorem 1.1, we have

κ(A,det^fωXm)=dimV0(A,fωXm)\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})=\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})

for every integer m>1m>1. By [Kaw85, Theorem 1.1], there exists an integer k>1k>1 such that

κ(A,det^fωXk)Var(f)\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes k})\geq\operatorname{Var}(f)

since the general fiber of ff has a good minimal model. In particular, fωXk0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes k}\neq 0. Thus we deduce that

dimV0(A,fωXm)=dimV0(A,fωXk)=κ(A,det^fωXk)Var(f)\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m})=\dim V^{0}(A,f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes k})=\kappa(A,\widehat{\det}f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes k})\geq\operatorname{Var}(f)

for every integer m>1m>1 such that fωXm0f_{*}\omega_{X}^{\otimes m}\neq 0. If g:XYg\colon X\to Y is a smooth model of the Iitaka fibration of XX where YY is a smooth projective variety, then

q(Y)dimBVar(f)q(Y)\geq\dim B\geq\operatorname{Var}(f)

by Theorem 2.6. ∎

Proof of Theorem 1.6.

It is a direct corollary of Theorem 3.6 and Lemma 3.8. ∎

Proof of Corollary 1.7.

It is a direct corollary of Theorems 1.6 and 2.6. ∎

Proof of Corollary 1.8.

It is a direct corollary of Corollary 1.7 and [Wan16, Theorem B]. ∎

References

  • [BC15] C. Birkar and J. A. Chen, Varieties fibred over abelian varieties with fibres of log general type, Adv. Math. 270 (2015), 206–222.
  • [CJ18] J. A. Chen and Z. Jiang, Positivity in varieties of maximal Albanese dimension, J. Reine Angew. Math. 736 (2018), 225–253.
  • [CP17] J. Cao and M. Păun, Kodaira dimension of algebraic fiber spaces over abelian varieties, Invent. Math. 207 (2017), no. 1, 345–387.
  • [Deb06] O. Debarre, On coverings of simple abelian varieties, Bull. Soc. Math. France 134 (2006), no. 2, 253–260.
  • [Fuj13] O. Fujino, On maximal Albanese dimensional varieties, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 89 (2013), no. 8, 92–95.
  • [HK05] C. D. Hacon and S. J. Kovács, Holomorphic one-forms on varieties of general type, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 38 (2005), no. 4, 599–607.
  • [HMX18] C. D. Hacon, J. McKernan, and C. Xu, Boundedness of moduli of varieties of general type, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 20 (2018), no. 4, 865–901.
  • [HPS18] C. D. Hacon, M. Popa, and C. Schnell, Algebraic fiber spaces over abelian varieties: around a recent theorem by Cao and Păun, Local and global methods in Algebraic Geometry: volume in honor of L. Ein’s 60th birthday, Contemp. Math. 712 (2018), 143–195.
  • [HX13] C. D. Hacon and C. Xu, Existence of log canonical closures, Invent. Math. 192 (2013), 161–195.
  • [Jia21] Z. Jiang, M-regular decompositions for pushforwards of pluricanonical bundles of pairs to abelian varieties, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2021).
  • [Kaw85] Y. Kawamata, Minimal models and the Kodaira dimension of algebraic fiber spaces, J. Reine Angew. Math. 363 (1985), 1–46.
  • [LPS20] L. Lombardi, M. Popa, and C. Schnell, Pushforwards of pluricanonical bundles under morphisms to abelian varieties, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 22 (2020), no. 8, 2511–2536.
  • [Men21] F. Meng, Pushforwards of klt pairs under morphisms to abelian varieties, Math. Ann. 380 (2021), no. 3, 1655–1685.
  • [Mor87] S. Mori, Classification of higher-dimensional varieties, Algebraic geometry, Bowdoin, 1985 (Brunswick, Maine, 1985), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 46, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1987, pp. 269–331.
  • [MP21] F. Meng and M. Popa, Kodaira dimension of fibrations over abelian varieties, preprint, arXiv:2111.14165.
  • [Pop22] M. Popa, private communication, 2022.
  • [PP03] G. Pareschi and M. Popa, Regularity on abelian varieties I, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), no. 2, 285–302.
  • [PP11] by same author, Regularity on abelian varieties III: relationship with generic vanishing and applications, Grassmannians, moduli spaces and vector bundles, Clay Math. Proc., vol. 14, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2011, pp. 141–167.
  • [PPS17] G. Pareschi, M. Popa, and C. Schnell, Hodge modules on complex tori and generic vanishing for compact Kähler manifolds, Geometry and Topology 21 (2017), no. 4, 2419–2460.
  • [PS14] M. Popa and C. Schnell, Kodaira dimension and zeros of holomorphic one-forms, Ann. of Math. 179 (2014), no. 3, 1109–1120.
  • [PS17] by same author, Viehweg’s hyperbolicity conjecture for families with maximal variation, Invent. Math. 208 (2017), no. 3, 677–713.
  • [Rei83] M. Reid, Projective morphisms according to Kawamata, preprint, 1983.
  • [Taj20] B. Taji, Birational geometry of smooth families of varieties admitting good minimal models, preprint, arXiv:2005.01025.
  • [Vie83] E. Viehweg, Weak positivity and the additivity of the Kodaira dimension. II. The local Torelli map, Classification of algebraic and analytic manifolds (Katata, 1982), Progr. Math., Birkhäuser Boston, 39 (1983), 567–589.
  • [VZ01] E. Viehweg and K. Zuo, On the isotriviality of families of projective manifolds over curves, J. Algebraic Geom. 10 (2001), 781–799.
  • [Wan16] Y. Wang, On the characterization of abelian varieties for log pairs in zero and positive characteristic, preprint, arXiv:1610.05630.