Equation-of-motion and Lorentz-invariance relations
for tensor-polarized parton distribution functions of spin-1 hadrons
Abstract
Structure functions of polarized spin-1 hadrons will be measured at various accelerator facilities in the near future. Recently, transverse-momentum-dependent and collinear parton distribution functions were theoretically proposed at twist 3 and twist 4 in addition to the twist-2 ones, so that full investigations became possible for structure functions of spin-1 hadrons in the same level with those of the spin-1/2 nucleons. Furthermore, twist-3 tensor-polarized multiparton distribution functions were also recently found for spin-1 hadrons. In this work, we show relations among the collinear parton- and multiparton-distribution functions for spin-1 hadrons by using equation of motion for quarks. These relations are valuable in constraining the distribution functions and learning about multiparton correlations in spin-1 hadrons.
keywords:
QCD, Polarized structure function, Spin-1 hadron, Equation of motion, Lorentz-invariance relation1 Introduction
High-energy spin physics has been an exciting field in physics since late 1980’s for finding the origin of nucleon spin. Now, the longitudinally polarized parton distribution functions (PDFs) are relatively well determined except for the gluon distribution. Partonic angular-momentum contributions are not still determined experimentally, and their studies are in progress with measurements of generalized parton distributions (GPDs) [1]. In addition, the field of finding the origin of hadron masses is also rapidly progressing because similar theoretical formalisms are used and the same GPDs or generalized distribution amplitudes (timelike GPDs) can be used for probing quark and gluon composition of hadron masses [2].
On the other hand, structure functions of spin-1 hadrons are quite interesting in providing different aspects of hadron polarizations because of the existence of new tensor-polarization observables, which do not exist in the spin-1/2 nucleons. As for the tensor-polarized structure functions, there exist four functions in charged-lepton deep inelastic scattering from a spin-1 target such as the deuteron [3], and there was a measurement on [4]. There were theoretical studies on the spin-1 physics on the sum rule [5], its second moment [6], fragmentation functions [7], tensor-polarized PDFs in the proton-deuteron Drell-Yan process [8, 9], GPDs [10], projection operators on [11], optimum tensor-polarized PDFs [12], standard-deuteron model prediction for [13, 14], effects of pions and hidden-color state in [15], and gluon transversity [16, 17, 18]. In addition to twist 2 [19], transverse-momentum-dependent parton distribution functions (TMDs), PDFs, and their sum rules were investigated at twist 3 and twist 4 [20], recently. Furthermore, a twist-2 relation and a sum rule were obtained for the twist-3 function with investigations on possible twist-3 multiparton distributions [21].
In future, there are experimental projects [22] to investigate structure functions of the spin-1 deuteron at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility (JLab), Fermilab (Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory), Nuclotron-based Ion Collider fAcility (NICA), LHC (Large Hadron Collider)-spin, and electron-ion colliders (EIC, EicC). Therefore, the field of spin-1 hadrons could become an exciting topic in hadron physics for investigating exotic aspects of hadrons and nuclei, possibly beyond the simple bound systems of nucleons for the deuteron.
In this work, we show useful relations among the tensor-polarized PDFs and the multiparton distribution functions by using equation of motion for quarks. Then, a so-called Lorentz-invariance relation is derived for the tensor-polarized PDFs and the multiparton distribution functions. This kind of studies have been done for structure functions of spin-1/2 nucleons [23]. Here, we investigate such relations for tensor-polarized spin-1 hadrons. In Sec.,2, we introduce correlation functions necessary for explaining possible tensor-polarized PDFs and multiparton distribution functions. Then, their relations are obtained by using the equation of motion, and a Lorentz-invariance relation is derived in Sec. 3. Our results are summarized in Sec. 4.
2 Correlation functions of spin-1 hadrons
The PDFs and the multiparton distribution functions are defined through correlation functions for spin-1 hadrons, so that we introduce them in this section. The correlation function is related to the amplitude to extract a parton from a hadron and then to insert it into the hadron at a different spacetime point as given by
(1) |
where is the quark field, is the quark momentum, and indicate hadron momentum and tensor polarization, is the gauge link necessary for the color gauge invariance, and indicates the integral path. In this work, we discuss only the tensor polarization, so that the spin vector is not explicitly denoted in Eq. (1). The TMD correlation function is given by integrating Eq. (1) over the lightcone momentum as
(2) |
where is the momentum fraction carried by a parton as defined by , and is the transverse momentum. The lightcone vectors and defined as
(3) |
are used in this paper.
Furthermore, if the function is integrated over the transverse momentum, we obtain the collinear correlation function as
(4) |
In investigating various polarized collinear distribution functions, it is useful to define the -weighted collinear correlation function by [24, 25]
(5) |
Although some collinear distribution functions vanish due to the time-reversal invariance, the -weighted distributions could exist. The superscript index indicates the direction of the integral path, namely the plus or minus direction of the coordinate () as shown in Fig. 4 of Ref. [20]. For example, the sign and are associated with the correlation functions in the simi-inclusive deep inelatic scattering (SIDIS) and the Drell-Yan process, respectively [20]. For discussing twist-3 PDFs, multiparton (three-parton in this work) correlation functions are defined with the gluon field tensor , the gluon field , or the covariant derivative as
(6) |
where the gauge link is not explicitly written and is the QCD coupling constant. The field tensor is given by the gluon field as , where the color factor is included in the field as with the Gell-Mann matrix . In this paper, the lightcone gauge () is used, so that the field tensor is expressed by the gluon field as . The covariant derivative is given by . These are the correlation functions used in this work for discussing the tensor-polarized PDFs and the multiparton distributions functions.
3 Relations among PDFs and multiparton distribution
functions for spin-1 hadrons by equation of motion
Using the correlation functions defined in the previous section, we derive relations among the PDFs and the multiparton distribution functions. Since the correlation functions appear repeatedly in this section, we abbreviate the momentum and tensor polarization hereafter in denoting the correlation functions . The transverse gluon field is the only relevant degree of freedom in the lightcone quantization [21, 26], so that the transverse index is used in the following equations (, ).
In the -weighted correlation function of Eq. (5), is expressed by the derivative . Applying this derivative to the gauge link and integrating over , we express the function by the covariant derivative and the gluon field tensor as [24]
(7) |
The second equation is obtained by using . The field-tensor relation is inverted as [27]
(8) |
where is the sign function [21], by noting the boundary conditions at . Using this relation for Eq. (7), we obtain
(9) |
Here, the first and second lines are T-even terms which are expressed by T-even -weighted PDFs, whereas the third line is a T-odd term expressed by T-odd distributions [27]. The -weighted PDFs are defined in Eq. (12). The T-odd -weighted PDFs exist although ordinary T-odd PDFs should vanish due to the time-reversal invariance. The T-odd distributions are actually gluonic-pole effects which are reflected as the difference between and [24]. If one considers , the T-odd distributions vanish, which is related to the TMD relation between the TMDs of the SIDIS and the Drell-Yan process. If the boundary condition were imposed as , the T-odd term vanishes in Eq. (9) [24].
Next, we try to obtain the -weighted correlation function of Eq. (5) in terms of transverse-momentum moments of TMDs. First, the twist-2 TMD correlation function is given as [19, 20]
(10) |
where is the mass of a spin-1 hadron. The path dependence of the TMDs is often abbreviated, for example, as instead of . However, we keep it here to show path-dependent relations in Eq. (13). By the -weighted integral, the vanishes because of . From Eq. (10), the -weighted correlation function is expressed by transverse-momentum moments of the remaining four TMDs as [19, 20]
(11) |
Here, only the leading-twist -weighted PDFs are included by neglecting higher-twist PDFs, and the transverse-momentum moments of the TMDs are given by
(12) |
The only T-even distribution is and the others are T-odd ones [20] to satisfy
(13) |
By using the gluon-field expression in Eq. (8) and the sign function in Eq. (3.36) of Ref. [21], the multiparton correlation function in Eq. (6) is related to another one as [27]
(14) |
where indicates the principal integral. Then, from Eqs. (6), (9), and (14), the multiparton correlation function defined with the covariant derivative is given by
(15) |
where is defined by the average of and as
(16) |
This correlation function is the T-even part of Eq. (9). Using the -weighted correlation function in Eq. (11), we find that it is given by the T-even function as
(17) |
where .
The multiparton correlation function is expressed by the multiparton distribution functions in the same way with of Ref. [21] as
(18) |
Substituting Eqs. (17), (18), and in Eq. (3.32) of Ref. [21] into Eq. (15), we obtain the relations between the multiparton distribution functions as
(19) |
Similar relations are given for the multiparton distribution functions of the nucleons in Refs. [28] and [29]. From these relations, Eq. (13), and Eq. (3.33) of Ref. [21], we find that the function is even under the exchange of and and the other functions [, , ] are odd as
(20) |
The equation of motion for quarks is , which is then multiplied by and written by the lightcone coordinates as
(21) |
where is a quark mass. The constraint from this equation of motion is given by traces of collinear correlation functions as
(22) |
Here, the collinear correlation function is defined by integrating the correlation function over the variable as
(23) |
It should be noted that only the transverse () correlation functions are associated with the multiparton distribution functions by Eq. (18). In expressing integrals of multiparton distribution functions over in the following [Eqs. (26), (27), (28), (32)], the variables and are interchanged by using Eq. (20). From the definition of Eq. (6), the correlation function is expressed by the collinear correlation function as
(24) |
where is given by [21]
(25) |
Calculating Eq. (22) with Eqs. (18), (23), (24), and (25), we obtain the relations among the tensor-polarized PDFs and the multiparton distribution functions as
(26) |
A similar relation to this equation was obtained in Ref. [17] by using a different parametrization for the tensor polarization. Namely, the collinear twist-3 function is given by integrating the twist-3 multiparton distribution functions and over one of the momentum-fraction variables. Then, this relation is written in terms of the multiparton distribution functions defined with the field tensor by using Eq. (19) as
(27) |
Therefore, the function is also expressed by the -weighted function and other multiparton distribution functions and . Using the relation between the twist-3 structure function and the twist-2 one in Eqs. (3.41) and (3.42) of Ref. [21], and taking the derivative of Eq. (27) with respect to , we obtain
(28) |
This is a Lorentz-invariance relation for the tensor-polarized structure functions of spin-1 hadrons in the similar way to the ones for the spin-1/2 nucleons [23]. An equation like Eq. (28) is conventionally called a Lorentz-invariance relation. Here, the Lorentz invariance means the frame independence of twist-3 observables [23]. Therefore, Lorentz-invariant relations play an important role in twist-3 studies. Although it is abbreviated in Eq. (1), there is dependence on the lightcone vector due to the gauge link in the correlation function [20]. The Lorentz-invariance relation is affected by -dependent terms in the correlation function as noticed in the papers of Goeke et al. (2003) and Metz et al. (2009) in Ref. [23] for the spin-1/2 nucleons. Such effects are included in our formalism.
Multiplying on the left-hand side of the Dirac equation and using the identity , we obtain . Then, taking the lightcone component , we have another equation of motion as
(29) |
The constraint from this equation of motion is written, in the same way with Eq. (22), as
(30) |
Then, calculating the traces with Eqs. (18), (23), (24), and (25), we obtain the integral relation among the twist-3 PDF , the twist-2 PDF , and the twist-3 multiparton distribution function as
(31) |
This equation is expressed by another multiparton distribution function by using Eq. (19) as
(32) |
Because of , the third terms of Eqs. (31) and (32) could be practically neglected. Then, the twist-3 functions is described only by the multiparton distribution function or . We notice that the distribution has the corresponding twist-3 PDF by Eq. (31). The distributions and are related to twist-3 PDF as shown in Eq. (26). In the nucleon case, all the twist-3 PDFs are expressed by twist-3 multiparton distribution functions. One finds this correspondence in Eqs. (11), (16), (19), and (20) of Ref. [30] in the spin-1/2 case. However, we find that the corresponding twist-3 PDF does not exist for the distribution of a spin-1 hadron in Eq. (18). This is because the distribution is associated with the tensor-polarization parameter , and there is no twist-3 PDF which is associated with the parameter [18, 20, 21]. In this case, no twist-3 PDF is related to by the equation of motion.
4 Summary
From the equation of motion for quarks, we derived relations among the tensor-polarized distribution functions and twist-3 multiparton distribution functions defined by the field tensor. We found the relations from the equation of motion for quarks as
for the twist-3 PDF , the trasverse-momentum moment PDF , and the multiparton distribution functions and ; for the twist-3 PDF , the twist-2 PDF , and the multiparton distribution function . Then, the Lorentz-invariance relation was obtained as
These relation are valuable in constraining the tensor-polarized PDFs and the multiparton distribution functions.
In deriving these relations, we also obtained new relations among the multiparton distribution functions defined by the field tensor and the covariant derivatives. First, the function is expressed by and as
Next, the functions , , and are expressed only by the corresponding functions defined with the field tensor as
These studies will be useful for investigating the tensor-polarized structure functions of spin-1 hadrons.
Acknowledgments
S. Kumano was partially supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI) Grant Number 19K03830. Qin-Tao Song was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Number 12005191, the Academic Improvement Project of Zhengzhou University, and the China Scholarship Council for visiting Ecole Polytechnique.
References
- [1] For introductory review, see M. Diehl, Phys. Rep. 388, 41 (2003); X. Ji, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 54, 413 (2004). For recent works, see H. Moutarde, P. Sznajder, and J. Wagner, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 890; PARTONS project at http://partons.cea.fr/partons/doc/html/index.html. See also S. Kumano, M. Strikman, and K. Sudoh, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 074003; H. Kawamura and S. Kumano, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 054007; T. Sawada et al., Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 11.
- [2] S. Kumano, Qin-Tao Song, and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 014020; K. Tanaka, Phys.Rev.D 98 (2018) 034009, Y. Hatta, A, Rajan, and K. Tanaka, JHEP 12 (2018) 008; K. Tanaka, JHEP 01 (2019) 120. For reviews and recent works, see, for example, M. V. Polyakov and P. Schweitzer, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) 1830025; X. Ji, Front. Phys. 16 (2021) 64601 and references therein; C. Lorcé, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 120; C. Lorcé, A. Metz, B. Pasquini, and S. Rodini, JHEP 11 (2021) 121.
- [3] L. L. Frankfurt and M. I. Strikman, Nucl. Phys. A405 (1983) 557; P. Hoodbhoy, R. L. Jaffe, and A. Manohar, Nucl. Phys. B 312 (1989) 571.
- [4] A. Airapetian et al. (HERMES Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 242001.
- [5] F. E. Close and S. Kumano, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 2377; S. Kumano, J. Phys.: Conf. Series 543 (2014) 012001.
- [6] A. Efremov and O. Teryaev, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 36 (1982) 557.
- [7] X. Ji, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 114.
- [8] S. Hino and S. Kumano, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 094026; D 60 (1999) 054018.
- [9] S. Kumano and Qin-Tao Song, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 054022.
- [10] E. R. Berger, F. Cano, M. Diehl and B. Pire, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 142302; W. Cosyn and B. Pire, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 074020; Bao-Dong Sun and Yu-Bing Dong, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 036019; 101 (2020) 096008.
- [11] T.-Y. Kimura and S. Kumano, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 117505.
- [12] S. Kumano, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 017501.
- [13] H. Khan and P. Hoodbhoy, Phys. Rev. C 44 (1991) 1219; W. Cosyn, Yu-Bing Dong, S. Kumano, and M. Sargsian, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 074036.
- [14] W. Cosyn and C. Weiss, Phys. Rev. C 102 (2020) 065204.
- [15] G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 045203.
- [16] R. L. Jaffe and A. Manohar, Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989) 218; M. Nzar and P. Hoodbhoy, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2264; W. Detmold and P. E. Shanahan, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 014507; Erratum, 95 (2017) 079902.
- [17] J. P. Ma, C. Wang, and G. P. Zhang, arXiv:1306.6693 (unpublished).
- [18] S. Kumano, Qin-Tao Song, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 054011; D 101 (2020) 094013.
- [19] A. Bacchetta and P. Mulders, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 114004.
- [20] S. Kumano and Qin-Tao Song, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 014025.
- [21] S. Kumano and Qin-Tao Song, JHEP 09 (2021) 141.
- [22] (JLab) J.-P. Chen et al., Proposal to Jefferson Lab PAC-38, PR12-11-110 (2011); M. Jones et al., A Letter of Intent to Jefferson Lab PAC 44, LOI12-16-006 (2016); (Fermilab) D. Geesaman et al., Proposal to Fermilab PAC, P-1039 (2013); D. Keller et al., proposal to be submitted to Fermilab in 2022; (NICA) A. Arbuzov et al., Prog. Nucl. Part. Phys. 119 (2021) 103858; (LHCspin) C. A. Aidala et al., arXiv:1901.08002; (EIC) R. Abdul Khalek et al., arXiv:2103.05419; (EicC) D. P. Anderle et al., Front. Phys. 16 (2021) 64701.
- [23] For explanations on the Lorentz-invariance and equation-of-motion relations, see A. Accardi, A. Bacchetta, W. Melnitchouk, and M. Schlegel, JHEP 11 (2009) 093; K. Kanazawa, Y. Koike, A. Metz, D. Pitonyak, and M. Schlegel, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 054024. Original and related works are R. D. Tangerman, Ph.D. thesis, Free University Amsterdam (1996); P. J. Mulders and R. D. Tangerman, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 197; Erratum, B 484 (1997) 538; D. Boer and P. J. Mulders, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 5780; D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, and F. Pijlman, Nucl. Phys. B 667 (2003) 201; K. Goeke, A. Metz, P. V. Pobylitsa, and M. V. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. B 567 (2003) 27; A. V. Belitsky and D. Müller, Nucl. Phys. B 503 (1997) 279; A. V. Belitsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 (2017) 1730018; A. Metz, P. Schweitzer, and T. Teckentrup, Phys. Lett. B 680 (2009) 141; A. Rajan, M. Engelhardt, and S. Liuti, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 074022.
- [24] D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, and F. Pijlman, Nucl. Phys. B 667 (2003) 201.
- [25] V. Barone and R. G. Ratcliffe, Transverse Spin Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 2003).
- [26] S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli, and S. S. Pinsky, Phys. Rept. 301 (1998) 299.
- [27] D. Boer, P. J. Mulders, and O. V. Teryaev, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 3057.
- [28] H. Eguchi, Y. Koike, and K. Tanaka, Nucl. Phys. B 752 (2006) 1.
- [29] J. Zhou, F. Yuan, and Z. T. Liang, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 054008.
- [30] R. L. Jaffe and X. D. Ji, Nucl. Phys. B 375 (1992) 527.