This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

\UseRawInputEncoding

Enhanced quantum sensing with amplification and deamplification

Min Jiang These authors contributed equally to this work CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China    Yushu Qin These authors contributed equally to this work CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China    Yuanhong Wang CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China    Ying Huang CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China    Xinhua Peng [email protected] CAS Key Laboratory of Microscale Magnetic Resonance and School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China CAS Center for Excellence in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China Hefei National Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230088, China    Dmitry Budker Helmholtz-Institut, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Mainz 55128, Germany Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz 55128, Germany Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA
Abstract

Quantum sensing is a fundamental building block of modern technology that employs quantum resources and creates new opportunities for precision measurements. However, previous methods usually have a common assumption that detection noise levels should be below the intrinsic sensitivity provided by quantum resources. Here we report the first demonstration of Fano resonance between coupled alkali-metal and noble gases through rapid spin-exchange collisions. The Fano resonance gives rise to two intriguing phenomena: spin amplification and deamplification, which serve as crucial resources for enhanced sensing. Further we develop a novel scheme of quantum sensing enhanced by amplification and deamplification, with relaxed requirements on the detection noise. The coupled systems of alkali-metal and noble gases act as amplifiers or de-amplifiers, enabling to extract small signals above the detection noise before final detection. We demonstrate magnetic-field measurement about 54 decibels below the photon-shot noise, which outperforms the state-of-the-art squeezed-light technology and realizes femtotesla-level sensitivity. Our work opens new avenues to applications in searches for ultralight dark matter with sensitivity well beyond the supernova-observation constraints.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Principle of enhanced sensing using Fano resonance. a, Experimental setup. The key element is a 0.5 cm3 vapor cell containing 20 torr Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe, 250 torr N2\rm N_{2}, and a droplet of isotopically enriched Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb. Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe spins are polarized and coupled with Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb by Fermi-contact collisions. Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb atoms are polarized with a circularly-polarized pump laser light tuned to the D1 line and probed with a linearly-polarized probe laser light detuned to higher frequencies by 110 GHz from the D2 line. b, Coupled oscillator model. The coupled alkali-metal-noble-gas spins can be seen as two coupled harmonic oscillators. c, Schematic of Fano resonance. Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb provides a “continuum” response profile with a broad resonance linewidth (Γa30\Gamma_{a}\approx 30 kHz) and Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe provides a “discrete-system” resonance with narrow linewidth (Γb7\Gamma_{b}\approx 7 mHz). The response profile for individual Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb or 129Xe is symmetric (top and middle). Interference between their response signals leads to the asymmetric Fano profile in the spectral vicinity of the Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe resonance frequency (bottom).

Quantum sensing uses quantum resources to enable or enhance sensing, and has created new opportunities for a broad range of metrological tasks [1, 2, 3]. Examples include numerous quantum technologies, ranging from electromagnetic field sensing [4, 5, 6, 7], frequency standards [8], and gravity-wave detection [9] to searches for new physics beyond the standard model [10, 11, 12, 13]. However, previous works usually required detection noise added during precision measurements below the limits set by the intrinsic sensitivity provided by these quantum resources. In fact, numerous susceptibilities to detection noise, such as environmental noise, sensor losses, and shot noise, tend to hamper quantum advantage and prevent the realization of practical quantum-enhanced sensors. In addition, there are numerous applications of quantum sensors in challenging environments [14], for example, in cities with high electromagnetic noise or in space with high radiation level, where low-noise detection is difficult. To address this, there has been dedicated work on enhancing detection sensitivity with cavity-aided measurements [15, 16], quantum lock-in detection [17], phase-transition enhancement [18], and filtering techniques [19, 20].

Here, we describe the concept and the realization of enhanced quantum sensing with amplification and deamplification that relaxes the stringent low-noise detection requirements. We observe a previously unexplored Fano resonance in alkali metal and noble gas coupled by rapid spin-exchange collisions. The Fano resonance is the key ingredient of our enhanced metrology due to the emerging phenomena of both resonant amplification and deamplification. As a first application, we demonstrate enhanced magnetic-field sensing assisted with amplification of the input signal that is 54 dB below the photon-shot noise and with a suppression (deamplification) of the magnetic background noise by about 24 dB. In contrast to the previous work that exploited squeezed light, our method that does not involve squeezing is easier to implement, while it achieves substantial sensitivity improvement for quantum sensing. In addition, our findings unveil a new self-compensating mechanism so that magnetic-field noise does not contribute to the final signal. In particular, the present mechanism is perfectly suited to understanding previously-established self-compensated comagnetometry [21, 22, 23] operating in the near-zero frequency, whereas our work can operate in a broader frequency range for self-compensating. We further discuss prospects for quantum-enhanced sensing using coupled atomic gases and its potential utility in applications, for example, non-Hermitian metrology [24, 25, 26] and searches for new physics [10, 11, 12, 13].

Our quantum sensing experiments are carried out in a warm vapor cell that contains 87Rb and 129Xe gases. These two atomic gases interact with each other through spin-exchange collisions that are divided into incoherent and coherent processes [27, 28]. Figure 1(a) schematically illustrates the main steps of the measurement. The Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe spins are polarized along zz via incoherent collisions with optically-polarized Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb atoms [29]. The coherent process leads to mutual precession between the two spins, where alkali-metal spins experience an additional effective magnetic field λMb(t)\lambda\textbf{M}^{b}(t) and noble-gas nuclear spins experience λMa(t)\lambda\textbf{M}^{a}(t) as well. Here λ=8πκ0/3\lambda=8\pi\kappa_{0}/3 and κ0540\kappa_{0}\approx 540 is the Fermi-contact enhancement factor for Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb and Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe[29]. To make the coherent dynamics of the hybrid system more intuitive, we use Holstein-Primakoff transformation, i.e., a^=(Mxa+iMya)/2γaMza\hat{a}=(M^{a}_{x}+iM^{a}_{y})/\sqrt{2\gamma_{a}M^{a}_{z}} and b^=(Mxb+iMyb)/2γbMzb\hat{b}=(M^{b}_{x}+iM^{b}_{y})/\sqrt{2\gamma_{b}M^{b}_{z}}[30]. The measured field is assumed to be so weak that the excited transverse field MxaM^{a}_{x} and MyaM^{a}_{y} satisfies Mxa,MxaMzaM^{a}_{x},M^{a}_{x}\ll M^{a}_{z}. The dynamics of spin excitations a^,b^\hat{a},\hat{b} can be modeled by (Supplementary Section I)

t(a^b^)=i(ωa+iΓaJJωb+iΓb)(a^b^)+(hahb),\partial_{t}\begin{pmatrix}\hat{a}\\ \hat{b}\end{pmatrix}=i\begin{pmatrix}\omega_{a}+i\Gamma_{a}&-J\\ -J&\omega_{b}+i\Gamma_{b}\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}\hat{a}\\ \hat{b}\end{pmatrix}+\begin{pmatrix}h_{a}\\ h_{b}\end{pmatrix}, (1)

where ωa=γa(Bz+λMzb)\omega_{a}=\gamma_{a}(B_{z}+\lambda M^{b}_{z}) and ωb=γb(Bz+λMza)\omega_{b}=\gamma_{b}(B_{z}+\lambda M^{a}_{z}) denotes the Larmor frequency of the alkali-metal spin and noble-gas spin, respectively. Here γa,b\gamma_{a,b} is gyromagnetic ratio and Γa,b\Gamma_{a,b} is decoherence rate. The bidirectional coupling between a^\hat{a} and b^\hat{b} excitations is described with J=λγaγbMzaMzbJ=\lambda\sqrt{\gamma_{a}\gamma_{b}M^{a}_{z}M^{b}_{z}} (in our experiment, J30J\approx 30 Hz), which emerges from the mutual precession between 87Rb and 129Xe gases. The last term with ha,bh_{a,b} represents the excitations induced by the measured field (Supplementary Section I,VI), such as ordinary magnetic field and pseudo-magnetic field from inertial rotation or new physics. The Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe spin excitation is read out by optical probing the real part of Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb excitation [29].

At the core of our method lies the Fano resonance in coupled alkali-metal-noble-gas spins. The coupled spin excitations described in Eq. (1) can be seen as two coupled oscillators that can exchange energy with each other via bidirectional Fermi-contact collisions [Fig. 1(b)]. In general, Fano resonance is an intriguing phenomenon in coupled oscillators that has been widely investigated in photonics and nuclear scattering [31, 32, 33]. To appear as Fano resonance, a discrete-level system and a continuum-level system should exist [32]. Accordingly, Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe nuclear spins have a sharp magnetic resonance line (Γb7\Gamma_{b}\approx 7 mHz) and can be seen as a discrete system, whereas Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb spins have a broad resonance line (Γa30\Gamma_{a}\approx 30 kHz) and can be approximated as a continuum system. As a consequence of their distinct resonance lines, the Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe response phase exhibits a π\pi jump at its resonance and, by contrast, the Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb response phase varies slowly. The interference between 87Rb and 129Xe spin excitations induced by the measured field results in the asymmetric Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb response profile [Fig. 1©] in the spectral vicinity of Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe resonance frequency. We show that the Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb power spectral response can be well described as a Fano profile (Supplementary Section III)

F(ϵ)=𝒜(ϵ)(q+ϵ)21+ϵ2+(ϵ),F(\epsilon)=\mathscr{A}(\epsilon)\dfrac{(q+\epsilon)^{2}}{1+\epsilon^{2}}+\mathscr{B}(\epsilon), (2)

where ϵ=(ωω~b)/Γ~b=2π(νν~b)/Γ~b\epsilon=(\omega-\widetilde{\omega}_{b})/{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}}=2\pi(\nu-\widetilde{\nu}_{b})/{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}}, ω~b\widetilde{\omega}_{b} and Γ~b\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b} is the dressed Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe Larmor frequency and decoherence rate via the bidirectional Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb-Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe coupling (see below). In the first term, qq denotes the Fano parameter, which affects the symmetry of the profile. The first term in Eq. (2) is asymmetric when the Fano parameter qq is non-zero, where the profile shape reverses when the sign of qq changes. When qq is close to zero, the profile becomes symmetric. 𝒜(ϵ)\mathscr{A}(\epsilon) and (ϵ)\mathscr{B}(\epsilon) depending on the coupled gases are symmetric and their details are provided in Supplementary Section III.

As a first illustration of Fano resonance, the external magnetic field is set as Bz8.59B_{z}\approx-8.59 mG, corresponding to νb10.11{\nu}_{b}\approx 10.11 Hz. We apply an oscillating test field along yy and scan its oscillation frequency around νb{\nu}_{b}, and record the frequency-response signal. The measurement duration of each point in our experiment is 180 s. Figure 2(a) shows the experimental data. For example, the dark-blue profile is indeed asymmetric and well fit with a Fano profile with Fano parameter q524q\approx 524. In order to observe the change of the Fano profile with the Fano parameter qq, we change the Fano parameters by applying a periodic magnetic field on the 87Rb-129Xe vapor cell [34, 35], where the periodic magnetic field is along zz direction and has a frequency of 3 Hz. The corresponding profiles also show good agreement with the predicted Fano profile. As qq decreases, the maximum value becomes smaller and the frequency of the minimum value moves toward the resonance frequency.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Demonstration of Fano resonance, amplification, and deamplification. a, Fano response profile as a function of the frequency of yy-directed measured field. BzB_{z} is set to about -8.59 mG as an example. The data are well fit with theoretical Fano profile with Fano parameter qq, which is modified by applying a periodic magnetic field (Supplementary Section VIII). For each Fano profile, there exists an amplification regime with large response above one and a deamplification regime with response below one. b and c, Demonstration of amplification and deamplification with respect to Fano parameter. The data show that the amplification η\eta at Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe Larmor frequency is nearly equal to the Fano parameter qq and the deamplificaton point is linearly dependent on the Fano parameter with the slopes are 1.06 ±\pm 0.08 and 0.04 ±\pm 0.0001 (95% confidence interval), respectively (see text).

We observe magnetic-field amplification and deamplification, which are critical resources to bypass the low-noise detection requirements for quantum sensing. There are two distinct parts of the Fano profile. In one part, there is constructive interference corresponding to signal enhancement and in the other, there is destructive interference corresponding to signal suppression. These are referred to as “amplification” and “deamplification” regimes, respectively. When the measured frequency ν\nu is near ν~b\widetilde{\nu}_{b} (corresponding to ϵ0\epsilon\approx 0), the response amplitude in the Fano profile is greatly enhanced and reaches a maximum. In this case, the effective field λ𝐌b\lambda\mathbf{M}^{b} produced by 129Xe spins is significantly larger than the measured field, with an amplification factor of η=γbλMzb/(2Γ~b\eta=\gamma_{b}\lambda M^{b}_{z}/(2\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}) (Supplementary Section IV). For example, the dark-blue response profile in Fig. 2(a) gives η524\eta\approx 524, where the measured field is effectively pre-amplified by at least two orders of magnitude before detection. As a result, the present amplification offers the capability of extracting small signal below the detection noise level. We further demonstrate (Supplementary Section IV) that the amplification factor η\eta is equal to the Fano parameter qq. This is confirmed by the measurement [Fig. 2(b)]. Importantly, this reveals a connection between Fano resonance and amplification that have previously been considered as two distinct phenomena. On the other hand, the deamplification with a minimum response occurs at ϵq\epsilon\approx-q, according to Eq. (2). Figure2(c) shows that the deamplification frequency shifts from the 129Xe resonance is Δv(2π)1qΓ~b\Delta v\approx(2\pi)^{-1}q\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b} (Supplementary Section III). The fit to our data gives Γ~b140\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}^{-1}\approx 40 s, which is in good agreement with the independent measurements of the decoherence rate. Although the magnetic responsivity deteriorates in the deamplification regime, it is well suited for suppressing environmental magnetic noise by at least one order of magnitude.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Control of Fano resonance with an external magnetic field. a, Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe decoherence time as a function of external magnetic field. The Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe decoherence time reaches a minimum Γ~b128\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}^{-1}\approx 28 s at Bz3B_{z}\approx-3 mG and reaches a maximum Γ~b1130\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}^{-1}\approx 130 s at Bz±70B_{z}\approx\pm 70 mG. After increasing external field, the decoherence time decreases due to magnetic field gradient. The solid line is the theoretical fit with our built noble-gas decoherence model, and the dashed line represents the Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe decoherence after numerically correcting the magnetic field gradient. b and c, Fano profiles for x,yx,y-direction oscillating fields under different bias fields.

Fano resonance can be controlled with an external magnetic field, enabling tuning the sensing performance. Diagonalizing the matrix in Eq. (1), we find the complex energy eigenstates of the the hybrid spin system: ω~a,b+iΓ~a,b=ω0+iχ±J2+Γ2\widetilde{\omega}_{a,b}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{a,b}=\omega_{0}+i\chi\pm\sqrt{J^{2}+\Gamma^{2}}, where ω0=(ωa+ωb)/2\omega_{0}=(\omega_{a}+\omega_{b})/2, χ=(Γa+Γb)/2\chi=(\Gamma_{a}+\Gamma_{b})/2 and Γ=δ+iβ\Gamma=\delta+i\beta with δ=(ωaωb)/2\delta=(\omega_{a}-\omega_{b})/2, β=(ΓaΓb)/2\beta=(\Gamma_{a}-\Gamma_{b})/2 (Supplementary Section I). We show that the joint action of magnetic Zeeman interaction and the alkali-metal-noble-gas bidirectional coupling dresses their Larmor frequencies and decoherence rates, in particular Γ~b1\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}^{-1} of Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe spins. In experiment, the decoherence time reaches a minimum Γ~b128\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}^{-1}\approx 28 s when the bias field is Bz3B_{z}\approx-3 mG. Such a minimum can be theoretically estimated by calculating the extreme value of Γ~b1\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}^{-1} and satisfies δ=0\delta=0, where the external field is Bz=λ(γbMzaγaMzb)/(γaγb)λMzbB_{z}=\lambda(\gamma_{b}M^{a}_{z}-\gamma_{a}M^{b}_{z})/(\gamma_{a}-\gamma_{b})\approx-\lambda M^{b}_{z}. In this case, the electron and nuclear spin precession frequencies are nearly matched, leading to the strong damping of Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe precession. The Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe decoherence time increases rapidly when BzB_{z} is increased. When the bias field is Bz±70B_{z}\approx\pm 70 mG, the decoherence time reaches a maximum Γ~b1130\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}^{-1}\approx 130 s. We found that with a further increase of BzB_{z}, the 129Xe decoherence time decreases, in contradiction with the expectation [Fig. 3(a)]. This is caused by the inhomogeneity of the applied magnetic field. In order to verify this, we built a comprehensive model of noble-gas spin decoherence caused by bidirectional coupling and magnetic field gradient (Supplementary Section II). With this decoherence model, the data are well fit [solid curve in Fig. 3(a)]. Based on our analysis, the magnetic field inhomogeneity is estimated to be about 0.04%. We numerically correct the magnetic gradient effect and obtain the corrected decoherence with the dashed curve in Fig. 3(a). The width of the dashed curve is proportional to the Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb decoherence rate Γa\Gamma_{a} and we notice that the decoherence rate could be recovered to that of uncoupled Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe spins, i.e., Γ~bΓb\widetilde{\Gamma}_{b}\approx\Gamma_{b} at the bias field larger than about 70 mG (Supplementary Section I).

When increasing external magnetic field, a different regime emerges where Fano resonance of the oscillating field along xx becomes significant. The Fano profile for the measured field along yy gradually becomes symmetric as BzB_{z} increases [Fig. 3(b)]. By contrast, using the same method described above, we observe significantly asymmetric Fano profile [Fig. 3(c)] when a xx-direction oscillating is applied at large BzB_{z}, for example, Bz±150B_{z}\approx\pm 150 mG in our experiment. The magnetic responsivity is enhanced over 200 at the amplification regime and suppressed over 10 at the deamplification regime. It is worth noting that the Fano profile is reversed in Fig. 3(c) due to the sign change of the Fano parameter qq depending on the direction of BzB_{z}.

We further investigate sensing with optimized operation parameters, including sensing direction and external magnetic field. We numerically simulate the Fano profile of oscillating field with various directions described with the azimuth angle θ\theta ranging from 0 to π\pi (rotating along zz in the xyxy plane), and then scan the external field frequency (Supplementary Section V). As one can see, there are two distinct curves (I, II) in Fig. 4(a), where we focus on the minimum value for each Fano profile. Our results show that the curve I is thicker than curve II, yielding broader direction range for implementing deamplification. We find that the curve I can be approximated with θcot1γa(Bz+λMza+λMzb)/Γa\theta\approx\cot^{-1}\gamma_{a}(B_{z}+\lambda M^{a}_{z}+\lambda M^{b}_{z})/\Gamma_{a}, which is the optimal direction for performing deamplification-assisted metrology. In this case, the detection noise could be suppressed by a factor of more than 100. The curve I is disconnected at a small field range [Fig. 4(b)] because the deamplifiction point is moved to negative frequencies that can not be observed. The curve II is extremely sharp as a function of external magnetic field, which is close to a specific value Bz=λMzbλMzaB_{z}=-\lambda M^{b}_{z}-\lambda M^{a}_{z}. At this field, the deamplification works well for arbitrary measured-field directions from 0 to π\pi in the xyxy plane. We note that such BzB_{z} is the operation field of self-compensated comagnetometers [21, 22, 23].

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Sensing with optimized amplification and deamplification. a and b, Deamplification at various external magnetic fields and sensing directions. For each magnetic field BzB_{z}, we scan the direction of measured field from 0 to π\pi and record the minimum of Fano profile that is normalized comparing with the response far away from 129Xe Larmor frequency (in our experiment, we choose 300 Hz response as a reference). There are two distinct curves, which present optimal sensing directions for realizing significant deamplification. The curve I corresponds to the Fano resonance near the Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe Larmor frequency and is broken near the strong-damping point BzλMzbB_{z}\approx-\lambda M^{b}_{z} without deamplification. The curve II is sharp at BzλMzbB_{z}\approx-\lambda M^{b}_{z}. c, Amplification and deamplification along the optimal sensing direction.

Figure 4(c) shows the performance of optimal sensing with optimized sensing direction. Here we focus on the curve I that corresponds to the high-frequency part of the Fano profile. The amplification and deamplification points are linearly dependent on the bias field when the bias field is far away from the self-compensating point [Fig. 4(c)]. We further show that the frequency distance between such two points remain a constant ΔνγbλMzb/(4π)\Delta\nu\approx\gamma_{b}\lambda M^{b}_{z}/(4\pi) (Supplementary Section IV). In such optimal conditions, the deamplification factor can be higher than 100, which is about one order of magnitude better than when the field is along the non-optimal xx or yy directions. By contrast, the amplification is independent of azimuth angle θ\theta. Inspired by the above finding, we could adjust the relative direction between the sensor and measured field to optimize the metrological performance before sensing.

The present amplification and deamplification provide two flexible methods to bypass the low-noise requirement for detection of small signals. The type of detection noise is the key criterion to select amplification or deamplification. On the one hand, when the dominant noise does not directly interact with noble-gas spins, for example, probe photon-shot noise and alkali-metal spin-projection noise [5, 4, 6], such detection noise is not amplified with noble gas. In this case, the amplification provides an efficient way to enhance the sensitivity by the amplification factor compared with the sole alkali-metal magnetometer. In our experiment, the magnetic sensitivity is enhanced to about 3.5 fT/Hz1/2 assisted with the amplification of more than 500, which is about 54 dB below the dominant photon-shot noise in 87Rb magnetometer. Additionally, the achieved sensitivity is equivalent to the energy resolution of 2.7×10232.7\times 10^{-23} eV/Hz1/2. Our method does not use squeezed light, relaxing the implementation complexity. On the other hand, when the detection noise simultaneously interact with noble gas and alkali metal with the scale of their magnetic moment (for example, magnetic noise), it is better to choose the deamplification operation. The deamplification-assisted sensitivity is equal to the alkali-metal sensitivity. Such a metrology sensitivity is about 1 pT/Hz1/2 with Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb-129Xe system in our experiment (Supplementary Section VI). However, the use of K-He3\rm{}^{3}He system could improve such a sensitivity, where K magnetometer has already demonstrated fT/Hz1/2-level sensitivity that is typically limited by magnetic noise from magnetic shields [4, 5]. The deamplification offers the capability to beat the magnetic noise limit. In actual, previous self-compensated comagnetometer is one type of deamplification-assisted sensors and has demonstrated 0.75 fT/Hz1/2 at about 0.1 Hz [22]. Our work opens new opportunities to extend the sub-femtotesla and even higher sensitivity to higher frequency range, for example, 1-100 Hz.

We would like to emphasize the difference between this work and body of existing work. In Ref. [11], we reported on using noble gas as a spin amplifier to enhance magnetic sensing. This work further gains the deep understanding of spin amplification with Fano resonance. Moreover, beneficial from the new connection between Fano resonance and coupled atomic gases, we find unexplored deamplification phenomena in a broad frequency range. Although there have been works on self-compensated comagnetometers [21, 22, 23], they only show the deamplification of magnetic noise in near-zero frequency range. By contrast, our work builds a unified framework of self-compensating mechanism based on Fano resonance that can explain previous near-zero-frequency self-compensating mechanism and moreover extends its operation to high-frequency range for the first time, for example, above 100 Hz. Our advances would open new opportunities for enhanced quantum metrology in a wide range of precision measurements [36, 11, 10, 37, 38].

Our work may advance enhanced quantum sensing by bridging non-Hermitian physics and coupled atomic gases. According to Eq. (1), the dynamics of alkali-metal and noble-gas excitations is governed by a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, where there is an exceptional point (EP) corresponding to δ=0\delta=0 and J/β=1J/\beta=1 (Supplementary Section I). In the vicinity of the EP where a small perturbation from external field causes non-zero δ\delta, the frequency splitting between alkali-metal and noble gas resonance lines becomes Δω~a,b=2β1/2|δ|1/2\Delta\widetilde{\omega}_{a,b}=2\beta^{1/2}|\delta|^{1/2}. This sublinear response leads to a sizable enhanced sensing compared with the linear response relying on Hermitian degeneracies, with an amplification factor of (β/δ)1/21(\beta/\delta)^{1/2}\gg 1. Yet, the key realization of J/β=1J/\beta=1 is still out of reach in Rb87\rm{}^{87}Rb-Xe129\rm{}^{129}Xe system, where J/β103J/\beta\approx 10^{-3} in our experiment. By contrast, the proposed EP-enhanced sensing should be realized in K\rm K-He3\rm{}^{3}He coupled gases, where J/βJ/\beta has been recently demonstrated from 1-20 [28, 21].

Our work suggests a novel quantum-sensing technique to search for hypothetical particles beyond the standard model [39, 40, 41, 42] such as ultralight axions or dark photons that are also well-motivated dark matter candidates. Such particles couple with standard-model particles (for example, to nuclei interacting with their spins) or act as force mediators to induce exotic interactions between two standard-model particles. Here the hypothetical particles are assumed to couple with only one of the alkali-metal and noble-gas spins. As a consequence, hypothetical particles produce an oscillating pseudo-magnetic field on spins. The sensors presented in this work are, in effect, transducers converting the pseudo-magnetic field into an effective magnetic field that is measured. For example, the pseudo-magnetic field on noble-gas spins can be effectively magnified by almost three orders of magnitude. On the other hand, deamplification-assisted sensor can extend the previous applications of self-compensated comagnetometers to, for example, exotic spin-dependent interactions with high-modulation frequencies. With our current experimental parameters, the search sensitivity of axions and dark photons is well beyond the most stringent supernova constraints by about two orders of magnitude [43]. Our method can also be used to measure weak magnetization of samples, for example, ancient rocks for archaeometry, where rocks are rotated within the amplification frequency range. In contrast to superconducting quantum interference devices that are dominant tools in archaeometry, our method does not require cryogenic cooling.

In summary, we report the first demonstration of Fano resonance in coupled alkali-metal-noble-gas spin system and implement enhanced metrology with relaxed requirements on the detection noise (as the signal is selectively amplified). Our work simultaneously provides amplification and deamplification as two critical resources for enhanced sensing, which does not require quantum entanglement. Our sensing concept is generic and can be extended to other well-established Fano resonance in, for example, metamaterials, plasmonic-atomic system, and nuclear scattering [31, 32, 33], enabling exciting applications in sensing electromagnetic fields from microwave, optics to X ray.

References

  • [1] Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Reviews of modern physics 89, 035002 (2017).
  • [2] Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Advances in quantum metrology. Nature photonics 5, 222–229 (2011).
  • [3] Clerk, A. A., Devoret, M. H., Girvin, S. M., Marquardt, F. & Schoelkopf, R. J. Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155 (2010).
  • [4] Kominis, I., Kornack, T., Allred, J. & Romalis, M. V. A subfemtotesla multichannel atomic magnetometer. Nature 422, 596–599 (2003).
  • [5] Budker, D. & Romalis, M. Optical magnetometry. Nat. Phys. 3, 227–234 (2007).
  • [6] Bao, H. et al. Spin squeezing of 1011 atoms by prediction and retrodiction measurements. Nature 581, 159–163 (2020).
  • [7] Jing, M. et al. Atomic superheterodyne receiver based on microwave-dressed rydberg spectroscopy. Nature Physics 16, 911–915 (2020).
  • [8] Gill, P. Optical frequency standards. Metrologia 42, S125 (2005).
  • [9] Schnabel, R., Mavalvala, N., McClelland, D. E. & Lam, P. K. Quantum metrology for gravitational wave astronomy. Nature communications 1, 1–10 (2010).
  • [10] Afach, S. et al. Search for topological defect dark matter with a global network of optical magnetometers. Nature Physics 17, 1396–1401 (2021).
  • [11] Jiang, M., Su, H., Garcon, A., Peng, X. & Budker, D. Search for axion-like dark matter with spin-based amplifiers. Nat. Phys. 17, 1402–1407 (2021).
  • [12] Safronova, M. et al. Search for new physics with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 025008 (2018).
  • [13] Backes, K. M. et al. A quantum enhanced search for dark matter axions. Nature 590, 238–242 (2021).
  • [14] Fu, K.-M. C., Iwata, G. Z., Wickenbrock, A. & Budker, D. Sensitive magnetometry in challenging environments. AVS Quantum Science 2, 044702 (2020).
  • [15] Hosten, O., Krishnakumar, R., Engelsen, N. J. & Kasevich, M. A. Quantum phase magnification. Science 352, 1552–1555 (2016).
  • [16] Wu, H. et al. Enhanced quantum sensing with room-temperature solid-state masers. Science Advances 8, eade1613 (2022).
  • [17] Boss, J. M., Cujia, K., Zopes, J. & Degen, C. L. Quantum sensing with arbitrary frequency resolution. Science 356, 837–840 (2017).
  • [18] Ding, D.-S. et al. Enhanced metrology at the critical point of a many-body rydberg atomic system. Nature Physics 18, 1447–1452 (2022).
  • [19] Kong, J. et al. Measurement-induced, spatially-extended entanglement in a hot, strongly-interacting atomic system. Nature communications 11, 1–9 (2020).
  • [20] Abbott, B. et al. Analysis of first ligo science data for stochastic gravitational waves. Physical Review D 69, 122004 (2004).
  • [21] Kornack, T. & Romalis, M. Dynamics of two overlapping spin ensembles interacting by spin exchange. Physical review letters 89, 253002 (2002).
  • [22] Vasilakis, G., Brown, J., Kornack, T. & Romalis, M. Limits on new long range nuclear spin-dependent forces set with a k- he 3 comagnetometer. Physical review letters 103, 261801 (2009).
  • [23] Liu, J. et al. Dynamics of a spin-exchange relaxation-free comagnetometer for rotation sensing. Physical Review Applied 17, 014030 (2022).
  • [24] Kononchuk, R., Cai, J., Ellis, F., Thevamaran, R. & Kottos, T. Exceptional-point-based accelerometers with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio. Nature 607, 697–702 (2022).
  • [25] Chu, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, H. & Cai, J. Quantum sensing with a single-qubit pseudo-hermitian system. Physical Review Letters 124, 020501 (2020).
  • [26] Cao, W. et al. Reservoir-mediated quantum correlations in non-hermitian optical system. Physical Review Letters 124, 030401 (2020).
  • [27] Katz, O., Shaham, R. & Firstenberg, O. Quantum interface for noble-gas spins based on spin-exchange collisions. PRX quantum 3, 010305 (2022).
  • [28] Shaham, R., Katz, O. & Firstenberg, O. Strong coupling of alkali-metal spins to noble-gas spins with an hour-long coherence time. Nature Physics 18, 506–510 (2022).
  • [29] Walker, T. G. & Happer, W. Spin-exchange optical pumping of noble-gas nuclei. Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 629 (1997).
  • [30] Ressayre, E. & Tallet, A. Holstein-primakoff transformation for the study of cooperative emission of radiation. Physical Review A 11, 981 (1975).
  • [31] Limonov, M. F., Rybin, M. V., Poddubny, A. N. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in photonics. Nat. Photon. 11, 543–554 (2017).
  • [32] Miroshnichenko, A. E., Flach, S. & Kivshar, Y. S. Fano resonances in nanoscale structures. Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2257 (2010).
  • [33] Luk’yanchuk, B. et al. The Fano resonance in plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Nat. Mater. 9, 707–715 (2010).
  • [34] Jiang, M. et al. Floquet spin amplification. Physical Review Letters 128, 233201 (2022).
  • [35] Jiang, M., Su, H., Wu, Z., Peng, X. & Budker, D. Floquet maser. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe0719 (2021).
  • [36] Balser, M. & Wagner, C. A. Observations of earth–ionosphere cavity resonances. Nature 188, 638–641 (1960).
  • [37] Arvanitaki, A. & Geraci, A. A. Resonantly detecting axion-mediated forces with nuclear magnetic resonance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 161801 (2014).
  • [38] Bloch, I. M. et al. New constraints on axion-like dark matter using a floquet quantum detector. Science advances 8, eabl8919 (2022).
  • [39] Preskill, J., Wise, M. B. & Wilczek, F. Cosmology of the invisible axion. Physics Letters B 120, 127–132 (1983).
  • [40] Abbott, L. F. & Sikivie, P. A cosmological bound on the invisible axion. Phys. Lett. B 120, 133–136 (1983).
  • [41] Dine, M. & Fischler, W. The not-so-harmless axion. Phys. Lett. B 120, 137–141 (1983).
  • [42] Dobrescu, B. A. & Mocioiu, I. Spin-dependent macroscopic forces from new particle exchange. J. High Energy Phys. 2006, 005 (2006).
  • [43] Raffelt, G. G. Astrophysical axion bounds. In Axions, 51–71 (Springer, 2008).

Code availability. The code that supports the plots in this paper is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgements. This work was supported by the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (Grant No. 2021ZD0303205), National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants nos. 11661161018, 11927811, 12004371, 12150014, 12205296, 12274395), Youth Innovation Promotion Association (Grant No. 2023474). This work was also supported by the Cluster of Excellence “Precision Physics, Fundamental Interactions, and Structure of Matter” (PRISMA+ EXC 2118/1) funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the German Excellence Strategy (Project ID 39083149).

Author contributions. M.J., Y.S.Q. designed experimental protocols, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. Y.H.W., Y.H. analyzed the data and edited the manuscript. X.H.P., D.B. proposed the experimental concept, devised the experimental protocols, and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed with discussions and checking the manuscript.

Competing interests. The authors declare no competing interests.