This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Emitter-Optomechanical Interaction in Ultra-High-Q hBN Nanocavities

Chenjiang Qian [email protected]    Viviana Villafañe    Martin Schalk Walter Schottky Institut and Physik Department, Technische Universität München, Am Coulombwall 4, 85748 Garching, Germany    Georgy V. Astakhov    Ulrich Kentsch    Manfred Helm Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Ion Beam Physics and Materials Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany    Pedro Soubelet    Andreas V. Stier Walter Schottky Institut and Physik Department, Technische Universität München, Am Coulombwall 4, 85748 Garching, Germany    Jonathan J. Finley [email protected] Walter Schottky Institut and Physik Department, Technische Universität München, Am Coulombwall 4, 85748 Garching, Germany
Abstract

Integrating quantum emitters into nanocavities which simultaneously couple to the photonic and mechanical modes is critical for interfacing electron spins, photons and phonons in the cavity QED system. Here, we investigate the interaction between the charged boron vacancy VBV_{B}^{-}, ultra-high-Q (105\sim 10^{5}) cavity photonic modes and local phonon modes. A pronounced asymmetry is observed in the emission spectrum for cavities with Q-factor above a threshold of 104. Similar asymmetries are not observed for cavities without VBV_{B}^{-} centers. To explain our findings, we model the system with phonon-induced light-matter coupling based on VBV_{B}^{-} centers, and compare to the Jaynes-Cummings model for usual emitters. Our results reveal that the multipartite interplay arises during the light-matter coupling of VBV_{B}^{-} centers, illustrating that it is phonon-induced, rather than being caused by thermal population of phonon modes. Such emitter-optomechanical interaction between different photon (VBV_{B}^{-} emission, cavity photonic) and phonon (VBV_{B}^{-} phonon, cavity mechanical) modes provides a novel system to interface spin defects, photons and phonons in condensed matters.

Light-matter coupling between one or more quantum emitters and the photonic mode in a nanocavity is the central pillar of cavity QED experiments. This coupling provides the spin-photon interface as the basic building block from which nanophotonic quantum devices and circuits are built [1, 2, 3, 4]. Recently, cavity optomechanics has emerged in which the coupling between photonic and mechanical (phononic) modes allows coherent phonons to be controlled via photons, or vice versa [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Such cavity optomechanics opens up entirely new perspectives for applications in ultra-precise sensing and meteorology, as well as building nano-opto-electro-mechanical devices with novel functionalities [10, 11, 12].

In particular, quantum emitters simultaneously coupled to cavity photonic and mechanical modes realize an interface between spin, photons and phonons as a hybrid quantum node. However, the experimental exploration of such multi-modal systems remains a challenge. For traditional emitters such as quantum dot and transition metal dichalcogenides, the coupling of electronic and mechanical degrees of freedom is weak, and thereby, typically studied in acoustic cavities [13, 14, 15]. In such system, the mechanical vibration is controlled by extrinsic driving, rather than the intrinsic light-matter coupling. This limits the exploration of coupled mode physics and transduction between different degrees of freedom.

The light-matter coupling for traditional emitters can be described by the Jaynes-Cummings model [16] where the electronic transition couples directly to the optical field without the participation of phonons. In contrast, the charged boron vacancy VBV_{B}^{-} in hexagonal boron nitride hBN is a recently explored quantum emitter [17, 18, 19, 20, 21] that has a weak zero-phonon line, emission instead being dominated by phonon-induced processes [22, 23, 24, 25]. This is indicative of robust electron-phonon polarons that couple to the optical field, thereby intertwining electronic, phononic and photonic degrees of freedom. By creating VBV_{B}^{-} centers in an hBN nanobeam cavity [26, 27], we realize a novel emitter-optomechanical system for which VBV_{B}^{-} related phonon polaritons couple electronic transitions, cavity photonic modes and cavity mechanical modes.

We investigate the emitter-optomechanical system using spatially resolved photoluminescence (PL) and Raman spectroscopy. A pronounced spectral asymmetry is observed in the PL from the cavity photonic mode, only when the Q-factor is above a threshold of \sim104. To explain this asymmetry, we construct a numerical model based on VBV_{B}^{-} [22, 23, 24, 25] for which the light-matter coupling is induced by the phonons. Our model accounts well for the experiment, in contrast to expectations based on the Jaynes-Cummings model. Furthermore, we demonstrate the strong interaction between phonon-induced VBV_{B}^{-} emission and optomechanical cavity modes by spatially correlating luminescence in freely suspended structures [28] and resonantly exciting the cavity photonic mode [7]. In position-dependent measurements, we observe anticrossings and phonon polaritons induced by the nanomechanical vibrations. When subject to resonant excitation, the Raman signals arising from VBV_{B}^{-} phonons exhibit an asymmetric enhancement for red and blue detunings, corresponding to cooling and heating of the cavity mechanical modes, respectively [7]. This reveals that the cavity mechanical modes induce the coupling between cavity photons and VBV_{B}^{-} phonons.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematic of cavity structure for Sample-A. No asymmetry is observed in the lineshape of cavity peak when the hBN is not irradiated. In contrast, the irradiated cavities exhibit pronounced asymmetric lineshape arising from the emitter-optomechanical interaction depicted in the inset. (b) Calculated spectra of the cavity mode, in the cases of Jaynes-Cummings or phonon-induced light-matter coupling. White lines are the spectra at ωa=ωX\omega_{a}=\omega_{X} for examples. The phonon-induced coupling clearly arises the asymmetry of cavity emission lineshape. (c) The asymmetry has a threshold cavity Q-factor of 10000.

The structure of our hBN/Si3N4 nanobeam cavity is schematically depicted in Fig. 1(a). Fabrication procedures are presented in supplement Sec. I A. The confinement for nanophotonic modes is achieved by locally chirping the photonic crystal periodicity around the cavity center. Besides the photonic modes, the cavity also supports nanomechanical modes, since the hBN/Si3N4 nanobeam is freely suspended but clamped at both ends [27]. Representative photonic and mechanical modes are depicted in Fig. 1(a) in blue and orange, respectively. We investigate two samples in this work that differ with respect to the area over which VBV_{B}^{-} centers are created. In Sample-A, a 30 keV N+ ion beam of 101310^{13} ions/cm2\mathrm{ions/cm^{2}} fluence (dose) creates VBV_{B}^{-} centers only within the volume of photonic mode (Fig. 1(a) bottom). The phonon-induced emission of VBV_{B}^{-} [22, 23, 24, 25] gives rise to a spectrally broad emission, even at low temperature [17], and coupling of local phonon modes to the optical transitions of VBV_{B}^{-} center. Thereby, phonons of the cavity mechanical modes may reasonably be expected to impact on the VBV_{B}^{-} emission. This cavity-VBV_{B}^{-} system involves couplings between electronic transitions, VBV_{B}^{-} phonons, cavity photons and cavity nanomechanical vibrations, as a multi-modal emitter-optomechanical system depicted schematically in Fig. 1(a).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) Schematic of VBV_{B}^{-}-related phonon processes. Due to spatial overlap between electron wavefunction (brown shade) and atoms involved in the local phonon modes (blue and red rings), the extended phonon from the defect complex (blue rings) is expected to dominate the trapping process, and the highly localized phonons (red rings) dominate the polarons. (b) SEM image of Sample-B, including the large suspended membrane (upper left) and an array of nanobeam cavities (middle). The sample structure and corresponding mechanical modes are schematically shown at right. (c) Typical Raman spectra recorded from positions aa-cc shown on (b). Phonon modes 1-14 are observed. Peak 10 is the extended phonon [29]. Broad peaks 6, 12 and 13 are highly localized phonons [29] and are the only ones exhibiting distinguishable position-dependent energy shift.

We continue by comparing the emission spectral form observed from the cavities with and without irradiation. All cavities are excited using a 532nm cw-laser having a spot size 1μm\sim 1\ \mathrm{\mu m} and a power 120μW\sim 120\ \mathrm{\mu W}. The cavity photonic mode is hence excited by the emission of VBV_{B}^{-} centers in hBN (irradiated) and/or filtered light arising from other native luminescent defects in the hBN and underlying Si3N4 (non-irradiated). The cavity mode exhibits high Q-factor 105\sim 10^{5} limited only by the spectral resolution of our detection system [26]. Remarkably, for the N+ irradiated cavities we observe a strongly asymmetric lineshape of cavity emission that is broadened on the short wavelength (high energy) side. Typical spectra recorded from four representative cavities without and with irradiation are presented in the upper and lower panels of Fig. 1(a), respectively. We identify this asymmetry as arising from strong photon-phonon coupling [7, 30, 8]. To quantitatively account for this spectral asymmetry, we construct a model in which a 2-level emitter simultaneously couples to cavity photons and local phonons. The Hamiltonian of the multi-modal cavity QED system can then be written as

H =\displaystyle= ωXσX,X+ωaa+a+ωqq+q\displaystyle\hbar\omega_{X}\sigma_{X,X}+\hbar\omega_{a}a^{+}a+\hbar\omega_{q}q^{+}q
+λe-qσX,X(q+q+)+λp-qa+a(q+q+)\displaystyle+\hbar\lambda_{e\text{-}q}\sigma_{X,X}\left(q+q^{+}\right)+\hbar\lambda_{p\text{-}q}a^{+}a\left(q+q^{+}\right)
+He-p\displaystyle+\textit{H}_{e\text{-}p}

including the 6 terms corresponding to the emitter, photon, phonon, emitter-phonon coupling with a strength λe-q\lambda_{e\text{-}q}, photon-phonon coupling with a strength λp-q\lambda_{p\text{-}q}, and emitter-photon coupling, respectively [16]. σA,B\sigma_{A,B} (A,B{X,G}A,B\in\{X,G\}) is the Dirac operator for the emitter with the ground (GG) and excited (XX) state, a+a^{+}/aa are the ladder operators for cavity photons, and q+q^{+}/qq are the ladder operators for phonons. Since the VBV_{B}^{-} emission is dominated by phonon-induced processes [22, 23, 24, 25], we introduce an effective phonon-induced emitter-photon coupling

He-p\displaystyle\textit{H}_{e\text{-}p} =\displaystyle= g(σG,X(q+)ka++σX,Gqka)\displaystyle\hbar g\left(\sigma_{G,X}\left(q^{+}\right)^{k}a^{+}+\sigma_{X,G}q^{k}a\right)

where gg is the coupling strength and kk is the number of phonons involved the coupling. k=0k=0 corresponds to the conventional Jaynes-Cummings model applied for usual emitters dominated by zero-phonon line emission, where the phonons only introduce vibronic sublevels to mediate the emitter-photon coupling, but do not directly participate. In contrast, He-p\textit{H}_{e\text{-}p} with k1k\geq 1 represents an entirely different but coherent interface of emitter, photon and phonon, in which the phonon is necessary to induce the emitter-photon coupling.

We calculated the spectral form of the emission from the cavity photonic mode by solving the master equation (for details see supplement Sec. I D). Typical spectra in the case of k=0k=0 and k=4k=4 are presented in Fig. 1(b), as the energy detuning between 2-level emitter and cavity photonic mode is varied. The white curves show the spectral form at resonance ωa=ωX\omega_{a}=\omega_{X}. The asymmetry in the emission lineshape is suppressed for the Jaynes-Cummings coupling (k=0k=0) but becomes pronounced in the emitter-optomechanical interaction (k=4k=4). Despite the model being rather simple, it captures the essential physics underpinning our experimental observations. As presented in Fig. 1(a), we do not observe any asymmetry in any of our control experiments where the hBN was not irradiated with N+. This is the central result of this work, showing that the phonons involved in the photon-phonon coupling are not thermally excited, but rather arise during the light-matter coupling of VBV_{B}^{-} centers. As such, they give rise to a novel emitter-induced optomechanical coupling.

We note that the asymmetric cavity lineshape is only observed for high-Q irradiated cavities. We use bi-peak fitting to quantify the asymmetry via the ratio between the intensity of two peaks (for details see supplement Sec. I C) and present the results in Fig. 1(c). A threshold Q-factor of 104\sim 10^{4} is clearly observed, meaning that the VBV_{B}^{-}-induced photon-phonon coupling rate needs to exceed the system decay rate to observe the asymmetric lineshape. This threshold behavior is well reproduced in the theoretical calculation, as presented by the solid line in Fig. 1(c) for the case k=4k=4.

Generally, as schematically depicted in Fig. 2(a), two different phonon processes are involved in the VBV_{B}^{-} emission process: Firstly, the negatively charged electronic state VBV_{B}^{-} is generated by trapping an excited electron that relaxes via phonon-assisted processes [31, 32]. Secondly, the excited electron decays again as the polaron with localized phonons to produce a broad phonon sideband in the PL spectrum. The electron-phonon spatial overlap [33, 34] depicted schematically in Fig. 2(a) indicates that, extended phonons involving the vibration of multiple atoms around VBV_{B}^{-} (blue rings) govern the trapping photo-physics, whilst more localized phonons primarily involving neighboring atoms (red rings) dominate the polarons. J. Li et al. [29] recently reported Raman studies of VBV_{B}^{-} and unveiled these extended and highly localized phonons via boron isotope characterization.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Spatially resolved Raman (a) and PL (b) spectra recorded from positions along ABA\rightarrow B in the inset. (c) Map of normalized PL spectra extracted from a loop trace shown in the inset. Anticrossing is clearly demonstrated, otherwise, the PL peak cannot shift back after the loop.

To confirm this picture for VBV_{B}^{-} emission in Fig. 2(a) and the interaction with mechanical modes in nanocavities, we recorded spatially resolved PL and Raman spectroscopy from another sample (Sample-B) that is homogeneously irradiated by 30 keV N+ ions with a fluence (dose) of 1014ions/cm210^{14}\ \mathrm{ions/cm^{2}} [25, 35, 36] as depicted in Fig. 2(b). Sample-B contains three different regions of interest: (i) the non-underetched region with hBN on a planar Si3N4/Si substrate corresponding to the dark surrounding region in the SEM image, (ii) the large suspended membrane with hBN/Si3N4 layers suspended on underetched Si corresponding to the large bright region at left top, and (iii) suspended nanobeam cavities. Typical Raman spectra recorded from three different positions labelled aa-cc in Fig. 2(b) are presented in Fig. 2(c). The observed Raman features are labelled 1-14. Peaks 7 and 9 at 524 and 975 cm1\mathrm{cm^{-1}} are the bulk Si3N4 phonons [37]. Peak 11 at 1377 cm1\mathrm{cm^{-1}} is the bulk hBN phonon E2gE_{2g} [29]. The other peaks are not observed in Si3N4 nor non-irradiated hBN (see supplement Sec. II B). Hence, they are indentified as being related to the VBV_{B}^{-} centers. Peak 6 around 450 cm1\mathrm{cm^{-1}} (red curve) is the highly localized phonon, and peak 10 at 1306 cm1\mathrm{cm^{-1}} (blue) is the extended phonon depicted in the context of Fig. 2(a), which have been previously identified [29]. We observe two other broad Raman features at higher energies: peak 12 around 1800 cm1\mathrm{cm^{-1}} (quadruple of peak 6) and peak 13 around 3600 cm1\mathrm{cm^{-1}} (double of peak 12). Broader Raman linewidth typically implies stronger spatial confinement of the phonon mode [38, 39, 40]. In addition, peaks 6, 12 and 13 are the only VBV_{B}^{-} phonons exhibiting distinguishable energy shifts when moving the laser spot e.g., between the three positions in Fig. 2(c). These common features indicate that peaks 12 and 13 stem from multi-phonon states of peak 6, and are also highly localized at the VBV_{B}^{-} center. Peaks 1-5, 8 and 14 are discussed in supplement Sec. III B, due to they exhibit little correlation to the VBV_{B}^{-} emission.

In Fig. 3(a)(b), we present Raman and PL spectra of VBV_{B}^{-} recorded from positions along the line ABA\rightarrow B illustrated in the inset. This line includes the three regions (i)-(iii) depicted in Fig. 2(b). Position-dependent energy shifts of the Raman and PL peaks in the three regions are marked with the arrows. Their generic shifts exhibit remarkable correlations i.e., the shifts of Raman peak 12 and 13 in Fig. 3(a) track the shifts of PL peak p1 and p2 in 3(b). This observation strongly suggests that PL peak p1 and p2 are phonon sidebands arising from the highly localized phonons Raman peak 12 and 13. Moreover, we observe that the position-dependent shifts of PL peaks and VBV_{B}^{-} phonons exhibit pronounced anticrossings. Fig. 3(c) shows PL spectra recorded from various positions along a closed clockwise loop on the sample illustrated in the inset. As depicted by the dashed lines in Fig. 3(c), two anticrossings are observed at which one spectral feature disappears and is replaced by another. This combined with the identity of spectra at the beginning and end of loop provide strong evidence for the phonon polaritons induced by the position-dependent mechanical modes. Similar feature and anticrossings between highly localized phonons are also observed from the spatially resolved Raman spectra (see supplement Sec. II E), further supporting this conclusion.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a) Resonant excitation of a cavity photonic mode that is denoted in the top spectrum excited by 532nm laser. (b) The enhancement of VBV_{B}^{-} phonon peak 6 is asymmetric: strong at blue (heating) and weak at red (cooling) detunings for cavity mechanical modes. In contrast, the enhancement of Si3N4 phonon peak 7 is nearly symmetric.

Finally, we explore the emitter-optomechanical interaction by controlling the optomechanical cavity modes via resonant excitation of the cavity itself. Hereby, the spectrum is detected as a narrowband (1\leq 1MHz) cw-laser is tuned from 730.998 and 731.012 nm encompassing an ultra-high-Q cavity photonic mode at \sim 731 nm. Typical results obtained from such resonant excitation are presented in Fig. 4(b) which shows the intensity of Raman peak 6 and 7 as a function of laser-cavity detuning. The population of photons in the cavity is enhanced for both red and blue detunings. The enhanced cavity photons couple to the phonons of Si3N4 and VBV_{B}^{-} thus enhance the corresponding Raman signals [41]. In contrast, the population of cavity mechanical phonons is reduced at red detunings (cooling) but enhanced at blue detunings (heating) [7]. As presented in Fig. 4(b) upper panel, the enhancement of peak 6 arising from VBV_{B}^{-} phonon is pronounced, varying by >10×>10\times as the laser is tuned through the cavity photonic mode. Moreover, this enhancement is asymmetric with respect to detuning, being weaker with the cooling of cavity vibrations (red detuning) but stronger with the heating (blue detuning). This observation reveals that the cavity mechanical modes induce the coupling between cavity photons and VBV_{B}^{-} phonons [27]. In contrast, the enhancement of Si3N4 phonon peak 7 is much weaker (10%10\%) and nearly symmetric, indicating that the cavity photons couple to Si3N4 phonon directly without the participation of cavity vibrations.

In summary, we report on the interaction between VBV_{B}^{-} centers and optomechanical modes in a hBN nanocavity. PL and Raman data demonstrate the VBV_{B}^{-}-induced cavity optomechanical coupling and the control of VBV_{B}^{-} transitions and polarons through cavity optomechanics. This emitter-optomechanical interaction stems from the ultra-high Q-factor of our nanocavity and the phonon-induced light-matter coupling. These results reveal that the coupling between multiple degrees of freedom arise from the intrinsic phonon processes in the system. The phononic features are strong since hBN is an atomically thin layered material that is highly sensitive to local deformation [42, 43, 44, 45]. Our work extends cavity QED to the regime where electronic systems are simultaneously coupled to both phononic and photonic degrees of freedom. We believe that such hybrid interface in nanosystem will open up interesting perspectives for quantum sensing and meteorology, as well as quantum transduction.

Acknowledgements.
All authors gratefully acknowledge the German Science Foundation (DFG) for financial support via grants FI 947/8-1, DI 2013/5-1, AS 310/9-1 and SPP-2244, as well as the clusters of excellence MCQST (EXS-2111) and e-conversion (EXS-2089). J. J. F. gratefully acknowledges the state of Bavaria via the One Munich Strategy and Munich Quantum Valley. C. Q. and V. V. gratefully acknowledge the Alexander v. Humboldt foundation for financial support in the framework of their fellowship programme. Support by the Ion Beam Center (IBC) at HZDR is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  • Kimble [2008] H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008).
  • Lodahl et al. [2015] P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 347 (2015).
  • Reiserer and Rempe [2015] A. Reiserer and G. Rempe, Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1379 (2015).
  • Haroche et al. [2020] S. Haroche, M. Brune, and J. M. Raimond, From cavity to circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys. 16, 243 (2020).
  • Eichenfield et al. [2009a] M. Eichenfield, R. Camacho, J. Chan, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, A picogram- and nanometre-scale photonic-crystal optomechanical cavity, Nature 459, 550 (2009a).
  • Eichenfield et al. [2009b] M. Eichenfield, J. Chan, R. M. Camacho, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, Optomechanical crystals, Nature 462, 78 (2009b).
  • Aspelmeyer et al. [2014] M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014).
  • Guo and Gröblacher [2022] J. Guo and S. Gröblacher, Integrated optical-readout of a high-q mechanical out-of-plane mode, Light: Sci. Appl. 11, 282 (2022).
  • Yu and Vollmer [2022] D. Yu and F. Vollmer, Active optomechanics, Commun. Phys. 5, 61 (2022).
  • Metcalfe [2014] M. Metcalfe, Applications of cavity optomechanics, Applied Physics Reviews 1, 031105 (2014).
  • Midolo et al. [2018] L. Midolo, A. Schliesser, and A. Fiore, Nano-opto-electro-mechanical systems, Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 11 (2018).
  • Li et al. [2021a] B.-B. Li, L. Ou, Y. Lei, and Y.-C. Liu, Cavity optomechanical sensing, Nanophotonics 10, 2799 (2021a).
  • Czerniuk et al. [2014] T. Czerniuk, C. Brüggemann, J. Tepper, S. Brodbeck, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, B. A. Glavin, D. R. Yakovlev, A. V. Akimov, and M. Bayer, Lasing from active optomechanical resonators, Nat. Commun. 5, 4038 (2014).
  • Montinaro et al. [2014] M. Montinaro, G. Wüst, M. Munsch, Y. Fontana, E. Russo-Averchi, M. Heiss, A. Fontcuberta i Morral, R. J. Warburton, and M. Poggio, Quantum dot opto-mechanics in a fully self-assembled nanowire, Nano Lett. 14, 4454 (2014).
  • Xie et al. [2021] H. Xie, S. Jiang, D. A. Rhodes, J. C. Hone, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Tunable exciton-optomechanical coupling in suspended monolayer mose2, Nano Lett. 21, 2538 (2021).
  • Wilson-Rae and Imamoğlu [2002] I. Wilson-Rae and A. Imamoğlu, Quantum dot cavity-qed in the presence of strong electron-phonon interactions, Phys. Rev. B 65, 235311 (2002).
  • Kianinia et al. [2020a] M. Kianinia, S. White, J. E. Fröch, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Engineering spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride (2020a), arXiv:2004.07968 .
  • Gottscholl et al. [2020] A. Gottscholl, M. Kianinia, V. Soltamov, S. Orlinskii, G. Mamin, C. Bradac, C. Kasper, K. Krambrock, A. Sperlich, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Initialization and read-out of intrinsic spin defects in a van der waals crystal at room temperature, Nat. Mater. 19, 540 (2020).
  • Stern et al. [2022] H. L. Stern, Q. Gu, J. Jarman, S. Eizagirre Barker, N. Mendelson, D. Chugh, S. Schott, H. H. Tan, H. Sirringhaus, I. Aharonovich, and M. Atatüre, Room-temperature optically detected magnetic resonance of single defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun. 13, 618 (2022).
  • Gottscholl et al. [2021] A. Gottscholl, M. Diez, V. Soltamov, C. Kasper, D. Krauße, A. Sperlich, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, and V. Dyakonov, Spin defects in hbn as promising temperature, pressure and magnetic field quantum sensors, Nat. Commun. 12, 4480 (2021).
  • Liu et al. [2021] W. Liu, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, Z.-C. Li, N.-J. Guo, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.-S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Temperature-dependent energy-level shifts of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics 8, 1889 (2021).
  • Ivády et al. [2020] V. Ivády, G. Barcza, G. Thiering, S. Li, H. Hamdi, J.-P. Chou, Ö. Legeza, and A. Gali, Ab initio theory of the negatively charged boron vacancy qubit in hexagonal boron nitride, npj Comput. Mater 6, 41 (2020).
  • Reimers et al. [2020] J. R. Reimers, J. Shen, M. Kianinia, C. Bradac, I. Aharonovich, M. J. Ford, and P. Piecuch, Photoluminescence, photophysics, and photochemistry of the VB{{\mathrm{V}}_{\mathrm{B}}}^{-} defect in hexagonal boron nitride, Phys. Rev. B 102, 144105 (2020).
  • Libbi et al. [2022] F. Libbi, P. M. M. C. de Melo, Z. Zanolli, M. J. Verstraete, and N. Marzari, Phonon-assisted luminescence in defect centers from many-body perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 167401 (2022).
  • Qian et al. [2022a] C. Qian, V. Villafañe, M. Schalk, G. V. Astakhov, U. Kentsch, M. Helm, P. Soubelet, N. P. Wilson, R. Rizzato, S. Mohr, A. W. Holleitner, D. B. Bucher, A. V. Stier, and J. J. Finley, Unveiling the zero-phonon line of the boron vacancy center by cavity-enhanced emission, Nano Lett. 22, 5137 (2022a).
  • Qian et al. [2022b] C. Qian, V. Villafañe, P. Soubelet, A. Hötger, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, N. P. Wilson, A. V. Stier, A. W. Holleitner, and J. J. Finley, Nonlocal exciton-photon interactions in hybrid high-qq beam nanocavities with encapsulated mos2{\mathrm{mos}}_{2} monolayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 237403 (2022b).
  • Qian et al. [2022c] C. Qian, V. Villafañe, P. Soubelet, A. V. Stier, and J. J. Finley, Exciton coupling with cavity vibrational phonons and mos2 lattice phonons in hybrid nanobeam cavities (2022c), arXiv:2204.04304 .
  • Yang et al. [2022] T. Yang, N. Mendelson, C. Li, A. Gottscholl, J. Scott, M. Kianinia, V. Dyakonov, M. Toth, and I. Aharonovich, Spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride for strain sensing on nanopillar arrays, Nanoscale 14, 5239 (2022).
  • Li et al. [2021b] J. Li, E. R. Glaser, C. Elias, G. Ye, D. Evans, L. Xue, S. Liu, G. Cassabois, B. Gil, P. Valvin, T. Pelini, A. L. Yeats, R. He, B. Liu, and J. H. Edgar, Defect engineering of monoisotopic hexagonal boron nitride crystals via neutron transmutation doping, Chem. Mater. 33, 9231 (2021b).
  • Zhou et al. [2019] J. Zhou, J. Zheng, Z. Fang, P. Xu, and A. Majumdar, Ultra-low mode volume on-substrate silicon nanobeam cavity, Opt. Express 27, 30692 (2019).
  • Shan et al. [2014] G.-C. Shan, Z.-Q. Yin, C. H. Shek, and W. Huang, Single photon sources with single semiconductor quantum dots, Front. of Phys. 9, 170 (2014).
  • Heitz et al. [1997] R. Heitz, M. Veit, N. N. Ledentsov, A. Hoffmann, D. Bimberg, V. M. Ustinov, P. S. Kop’ev, and Z. I. Alferov, Energy relaxation by multiphonon processes in inas/gaas quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 56, 10435 (1997).
  • Achtstein et al. [2018] A. W. Achtstein, O. Marquardt, R. Scott, M. Ibrahim, T. Riedl, A. V. Prudnikau, A. Antanovich, N. Owschimikow, J. K. N. Lindner, M. Artemyev, and U. Woggon, Impact of shell growth on recombination dynamics and exciton–phonon interaction in cdse–cds core–shell nanoplatelets, ACS Nano 12, 9476 (2018).
  • Merkl et al. [2021] P. Merkl, C.-K. Yong, M. Liebich, I. Hofmeister, G. Berghäuser, E. Malic, and R. Huber, Proximity control of interlayer exciton-phonon hybridization in van der waals heterostructures, Nat. Commun. 12, 1719 (2021).
  • Kianinia et al. [2020b] M. Kianinia, S. White, J. E. Fröch, C. Bradac, and I. Aharonovich, Generation of spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Photonics 7, 2147 (2020b).
  • Guo et al. [2022] N.-J. Guo, W. Liu, Z.-P. Li, Y.-Z. Yang, S. Yu, Y. Meng, Z.-A. Wang, X.-D. Zeng, F.-F. Yan, Q. Li, J.-F. Wang, J.-S. Xu, Y.-T. Wang, J.-S. Tang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, Generation of spin defects by ion implantation in hexagonal boron nitride, ACS Omega 7, 1733 (2022).
  • Iatsunskyi et al. [2015] I. Iatsunskyi, G. Nowaczyk, S. Jurga, V. Fedorenko, M. Pavlenko, and V. Smyntyna, One and two-phonon raman scattering from nanostructured silicon, Optik 126, 1650 (2015).
  • Howie et al. [2014] R. T. Howie, I. B. Magdău, A. F. Goncharov, G. J. Ackland, and E. Gregoryanz, Phonon localization by mass disorder in dense hydrogen-deuterium binary alloy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 175501 (2014).
  • Arora et al. [2007] A. K. Arora, M. Rajalakshmi, T. R. Ravindran, and V. Sivasubramanian, Raman spectroscopy of optical phonon confinement in nanostructured materials, J. Raman Spectrosc. 38, 604 (2007).
  • Korepanov [2020] V. I. Korepanov, Localized phonons in raman spectra of nanoparticles and disordered media, J. Raman Spectrosc. 51, 881 (2020).
  • Wang et al. [2020] P. Wang, W. Chen, F. Wan, J. Wang, and J. Hu, A review of cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy as a gas sensing method, Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 55, 393 (2020).
  • Mendelson et al. [2019] N. Mendelson, M. Doherty, M. Toth, I. Aharonovich, and T. T. Tran, Strain engineering of quantum emitters in hexagonal boron nitride (2019), arXiv:1911.08072 .
  • Autore et al. [2018] M. Autore, P. Li, I. Dolado, F. J. Alfaro-Mozaz, R. Esteban, A. Atxabal, F. Casanova, L. E. Hueso, P. Alonso-González, J. Aizpurua, A. Y. Nikitin, S. Vélez, and R. Hillenbrand, Boron nitride nanoresonators for phonon-enhanced molecular vibrational spectroscopy at the strong coupling limit, Light: Sci. Appl. 7, 17172 (2018).
  • Wang et al. [2019] Y. Wang, J. Lee, X.-Q. Zheng, Y. Xie, and P. X.-L. Feng, Hexagonal boron nitride phononic crystal waveguides, ACS Photonics 6, 3225 (2019).
  • Latini et al. [2021] S. Latini, U. De Giovannini, E. J. Sie, N. Gedik, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, Phonoritons as Hybridized Exciton-Photon-Phonon Excitations in a Monolayer hh-BN Optical Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 227401 (2021).