This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Eckardt points on a cubic threefold

Gloire Grâce Bockondas Gloire Grâce Bockondas, Département de Mathématiques, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Congo [email protected] https://sites.google.com/view/gloiregbockondas/  and  Basile Guy Richard Bossoto Basile Guy Richard Bossoto, Département de Mathématiques, Université Marien Ngouabi, Brazzaville, Congo [email protected]
Abstract.

In this paper we survey Eckardt points on a smooth complex cubic threefold with an approach aimed at computing all Eckardt points of a cubic threefold. In addition, we construct cubic threefolds with no Eckardt points but containing triple lines.

Key words and phrases:
cubic threefold, Eckardt point, triple line, main component.
1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
14J10; 14J29; 14J30; 14H20.

1. Introduction

Eckardt points originate from a paper of F.E. Eckardt [Eck76]. They have been thoroughly studied in the case of cubic surfaces in 3\mathbb{P}^{3}, defined as points corresponding to the intersection of three of the 27 lines [Seg43]. They have then been generalized to higher-dimensional and higher-degree hypersurfaces [CC10]. They are also called star points or inflection points [Tju71]. On a smooth complex cubic threefold X4X\subset\mathbb{P}^{4}, an Eckardt point pXp\in X is a point for which the intersection XTpXX\cap T_{p}X of the projective tangent space of XX at pp with XX has multiplicity three at pp. This is equivalent to saying that the intersection XTpXTpXX\cap T_{p}X\subset T_{p}X is a cone with vertex pp over an elliptic curve EpE_{p} [CC10]. Each Eckardt point pXp\in X parametrizes thus an elliptic curve EpE_{p} on the Fano surface of lines F(X){\rm{F}}(X) of XX, which is the base of the cone XTpXX\cap T_{p}X (see [Tju71]). A cubic threefold can contain at most finitely many Eckardt points, and in fact at most 30, which is achieved by the Fermat cubic whereas the general one has none [CG72, CCS97]. There are then at most 30 elliptic curves on the Fano surface F(X){\rm{F}}(X) while for the general cubic threefold there are none [Rou09], the Fano surface of the Fermat cubic threefold being the only one that contains exactly 30 elliptic curves. This is the most common characterization of Eckardt points on a cubic threefold in the literature.

Furthermore, Eckardt points on a smooth cubic hypersurface YnY\subset\mathbb{P}^{n} can be studied through polar quadrics. They have been intensively studied in this way in [CCS97] where the authors found the maximal number of Eckardt points of a cubic hypersurface in n\mathbb{P}^{n}. In [CC10], a connection between Eckardt points of a hypersurface of degree dd in n\mathbb{P}^{n} and polar hypersurfaces is used to determine all Eckardt points on the Fermat hypersurface of degree dd in n\mathbb{P}^{n}.

Nevertheless, both equivalent characterizations and a method for finding all Eckardt points, certainly well-known to the experts, are difficult to find in the literature. This paper aims to fill this gap by studying Eckardt points on a cubic threefold using these two characterizations with an approach focusing on finding all Eckardt points of a cubic threefold. Moreover, we construct cubic threefolds with no Eckardt points but containing triple lines, which is as far as we know new. We also study through many examples the configuration of elliptic curves, triple lines, and the residual component of the union of elliptic curves in the curve M(X){\rm{M}}(X) of lines of the second type of XX called the main component. These computations show how elliptic curves, triple lines and the main component can be related in a cubic threefold.

Acknowledgements. We wish to thank warmly Samuel Boissière for many useful discussions. Besides, we would like to thank Søren Gammelgaard and Yilong Zhang for interesting discussions. The first author has been supported by the Program EMS SIMONS for Africa and the “Laboratoire de Mathématiques et Applications de l’Université de Poitiers UMR CNRS 7348”.

2. Notations and Preliminaries

For X4X\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} a smooth complex cubic threefold, the Fano surface F(X){\rm{F}}(X) is a smooth general type surface that parametrizes the lines on XX (see [CG72]). Lines on XX are either of the first type or of the second type [CG72] depending on the decomposition of their normal bundles. A line X\ell\subset X is said to be of the second type if and only if there exists a unique 2-plane PP\supset\ell tangent to XX in all points of \ell. We write PX=2P\cap X=2\ell\cup\ell^{{}^{\prime}}, where \ell^{{}^{\prime}} is the residual line of \ell. Otherwise we say that \ell is a line of the first type. For \ell\neq\ell^{{}^{\prime}} the line \ell is called a double line, and if =\ell=\ell^{{}^{\prime}} we say that \ell is a triple line. The locus M(X){\rm{M}}(X) of lines of the second type on XX is a curve whose the singularities are exactly the points corresponding to triple lines on XX (see [BB23]). However, this curve is smooth for a generic cubic threefold X4X\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} [Huy20].

Denote by pi,jp_{i,j}, 0i<j40\leq i<j\leq 4, the Plücker coordinates of the grassmannian of lines 𝔾(1,4)9\mathbb{G}(1,4)\subset\mathbb{P}^{9}. On the affine chart p0,1=1p_{0,1}=1 of 𝔾(1,4)\mathbb{G}(1,4) with local coordinates (p0,2,p0,3,p0,4,p1,2,p1,3,p1,4)(p_{0,2},p_{0,3},p_{0,4},p_{1,2},p_{1,3},p_{1,4}) we have the decomposition f(p)=i+j=3t0it1jϕi,j()f(p)=\displaystyle\sum_{i+j=3}t_{0}^{i}t_{1}^{j}\phi^{i,j}(\ell) for any point pXp\in\ell\subset X with coordinates t0v0+t1v1t_{0}v_{0}+t_{1}v_{1}, where ϕi,j()\phi^{i,j}(\ell) are functions of the local Plücker coordinates of \ell and f=0f=0 the equation of XX. The Fano surface F(X){\rm{F}}(X) is then defined by the vanishing locus of the terms ϕi,j()\phi^{i,j}(\ell). On the other hand, any 2-plane PP that contains \ell meets the plane π={x0=0,x1=0}\pi=\{x_{0}=0,x_{1}=0\} at a unique point v2=(0:0:α2:α3:α4)v_{2}=(0:0:\alpha_{2}:\alpha_{3}:\alpha_{4}) such that \ell and v2v_{2} span π\pi. The plane cubic PXP\cap X is then defined by f(t0v0+t1v1+t2v2)=0f(t_{0}v_{0}+t_{1}v_{1}+t_{2}v_{2})=0 where (v0:v1:v2)(v_{0}:v_{1}:v_{2}) are the projective coordinates of PP. Expanding in t2t_{2} we write:

0=f(t0v0+t1v1)+t2i=24fxi(t0v0+t1v1)αi+12t222i,j42fxjxi(t0v0+t1v1)αiαj+t23f(v2).0=f(t_{0}v_{0}+t_{1}v_{1})+t_{2}\sum_{i=2}^{4}\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x_{i}}(t_{0}v_{0}+t_{1}v_{1})\alpha_{i}+\dfrac{1}{2}t_{2}^{2}\sum_{2\leq i,j\leq 4}\dfrac{\partial^{2}f}{\partial x_{j}\partial x_{i}}(t_{0}v_{0}+t_{1}v_{1})\alpha_{i}\alpha_{j}+t_{2}^{3}f(v_{2}).

The line P\ell\subset P of equation t2=0t_{2}=0 is a line of the second type on XX if and only if f(t0v0+t1v1)=0f(t_{0}v_{0}+t_{1}v_{1})=0 and the plane cubic equation is a multiple of t22t_{2}^{2}. Furthermore, the second type line X\ell\subset X of equation t2=0t_{2}=0 is a triple line if and only if the plane cubic equation is a multiple of t23t_{2}^{3} (see [BB23]).

3. Characterizations of Eckardt points on a cubic threefold

3.1. Eckardt points and elliptic curves

We recall the definition of an Eckardt point on a smooth complex cubic threefold X4X\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} (see [LPZ18, Definition 1.5] and [Gam18, Proposition 6.3.5]). Denote by TpXT_{p}X the projective tangent space of XX at pXp\in X.

Definition 3.1.

A point pXp\in X is an Eckardt point if it is a point of multiplicity three for the cubic XTpXTpXX\cap T_{p}X\subset T_{p}X.

Choose coordinates (x0::x4)4(x_{0}:\ldots:x_{4})\in\mathbb{P}^{4} such that p=(1:0:0:0:0)p=(1:0:0:0:0) and TpX={x1=0}T_{p}X=\{x_{1}=0\}. The equation of XX may be written

f(x0,,x4)=x02x1+x0Q(x1,,x4)+C(x1,,x4)f(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=x_{0}^{2}x_{1}+x_{0}Q(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})+C(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})

where Q(x1,,x4)Q(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4}) and C(x1,,x4)C(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4}) are homogeneous polynomials of degree two and three respectively. So if pXp\in X is an Eckardt point then Q(x1,,x4)=0Q(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})=0 and the equation of XX may take the form

(3.1) f(x0,,x4)=x02x1+C(x1,,x4).f(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=x_{0}^{2}x_{1}+C(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4}).

Following [Mur72, p.169-170] (see also [Gam18, Proposition 6.3.5]) we have the following proposition.

Proposition 3.2.

A point pXp\in X is an Eckardt point if and only if it is contained in infinitely many lines on XX.

Proof.

Consider a line \ell going through pp. It cuts out the hyperplane x0=0x_{0}=0 in a unique point q4q\in\mathbb{P}^{4}; every point on \ell has coordinates λp+μq\lambda p+\mu q with (λ:μ)1(\lambda:\mu)\in\mathbb{P}^{1}. The line \ell, defined by x0=λ,xi=μqix_{0}=\lambda,x_{i}=\mu q_{i} with i=1,,4i=1,\ldots,4, lies on XX if and only if f(λp+μq)=λ2μq1+λμ2Q(q1,,q4)+μ3C(q1,,q4)=0f(\lambda p+\mu q)=\lambda^{2}\mu q_{1}+\lambda\mu^{2}Q(q_{1},\ldots,q_{4})+\mu^{3}C(q_{1},\ldots,q_{4})=0 for all (λ:μ)1(\lambda:\mu)\in\mathbb{P}^{1}, that is if and only if

q1=0,Q(q1,,q4)=0,C(q1,,q4)=0.q_{1}=0,\quad Q(q_{1},\ldots,q_{4})=0,\quad C(q_{1},\ldots,q_{4})=0.

The lines X\ell\subset X through pp correspond thus to the points (x2:x3:x4)2(x_{2}:x_{3}:x_{4})\in\mathbb{P}^{2} satisfying the equations Q(0,x2,x3,x4)=0Q(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=0 and C(0,x2,x3,x4)=0C(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=0, that is the intersection points of a conic and a cubic in the plane of equation {x0=0,x1=0}\{x_{0}=0,x_{1}=0\}. If pp is an Eckardt point then Q(0,x2,x3,x4)=0Q(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=0. The intersection XTpXX\cap T_{p}X is a cone with vertex pp over the elliptic curve EpE_{p} of equation {x0=0,C(0,x2,x3,x4)=0}\left\{x_{0}=0,C(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=0\right\}; the point pp is then contained in infinitely many lines on XX. Conversely, if Q(0,x2,x3,x4)Q(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}) and C(0,x2,x3,x4)C(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}) have a common factor there are infinitely many lines through pp contained in XX, otherwise there are six lines in XX going through pp. Moreover, if this common factor is linear then XX contains a plane and, if it is quadratic XX contains a quadratic cone, and hence a plane; this is impossible because of the smoothness of XX. Therefore Q(0,x2,x3,x4)=0Q(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=0 and pp is an Eckardt point. ∎

Every Eckardt point pXp\in X parameterizes an elliptic curve EpF(X)E_{p}\subset{\rm{F}}(X) of equation {x0=0,C(0,x2,x3,x4)=0}\left\{x_{0}=0,C(0,x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=0\right\}, the base of the cone XTpXX\cap T_{p}X, and inversely every elliptic curve gives rise to an Eckardt point [Tju71, Rou09]. Moreover, there are at most finitely many Eckardt points on a smooth cubic threefold whereas a general one has no Eckardt points [Zha23, Lemma 2.7]. The following result has been proven in [Gam18].

Proposition 3.3.

[CG72, p.315] A cubic threefold can contain at most 30 Eckardt points.

Proof.

We reproduce the proof and for completeness see [Gam18, Proposition 6.3.8] and [Zha22, Lemma 4.8.4]. Consider P4P\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} a plane and KF:={[]F(X)|P0}K_{{\rm{F}}}:=\{[\ell]\in{\rm{F}}(X)|\ell\cap P\neq 0\} the canonical divisor of F(X){\rm{F}}(X) (see [CG72]). Let CC_{\ell} denote the curve of lines on XX incident to \ell. We have KFEp=3K_{{\rm{F}}}\cdot E_{p}=3, then CEp=1C_{\ell}\cdot E_{p}=1 since KF=3CK_{{\rm{F}}}=3C_{\ell} [CG72, (10.9)]. On the other hand, any component of M(X){\rm{M}}(X) intersects KFK_{{\rm{F}}} non-negatively since KFK_{{\rm{F}}} is effective. Moreover, all elliptic curves EpiE_{p_{i}} are parametrised by Eckardt points pip_{i} and are contained in M(X){\rm{M}}(X). There are thus at most CM(X)C_{\ell}\cdot{\rm{M}}(X) Eckardt points in XX, with CM(X)=2CKF=6C2=30C_{\ell}\cdot{\rm{M}}(X)=2C_{\ell}\cdot K_{{\rm{F}}}=6C_{\ell}^{2}=30 since M(X)=2KF{\rm{M}}(X)=2K_{{\rm{F}}} and C2=5C_{\ell}^{2}=5 by [CG72, Proposition 10.21, (10.8)]. ∎

The Fano surface F(X){\rm{F}}(X) contains therefore at most 30 elliptic curves. Note that the curve M(X){\rm{M}}(X) of lines of the second type may contain components other than elliptic curves. However, if it contains exactly 30 elliptic curves then it has no components besides the elliptic components. Only one cubic hypersurface of 4\mathbb{P}^{4} has 30 Eckardt points: the Fermat cubic F4F_{4}. Its Fano surface F(F4){\rm{F}}(F_{4}) is the only Fano surface that contains 30 elliptic curves [Rou09].

Definition 3.4.

The residual component of the union of elliptic curves in the curve of lines of the second type is called the main component.

Apart from the Fermat cubic, for every smooth cubic threefold X4X\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} containing Eckardt points the main component is not empty.

Proposition 3.5.

[Mur72, Lemma 1.18] If X\ell\subset X is a line of the first type and pp\in\ell then there are six lines on XX through pp.

Every point pXp\in X not contained in a line of the second type is thus contained in six lines and we have the following proposition.

Proposition 3.6.

[Mur72] A line going through an Eckardt point is of the second type.

We give an elementary proof in coordinates of the following theorem.

Theorem 3.7.

[Tju71] Let pXp\in X be an Eckardt point. The triple lines on XX correspond exactly to the inflection points of the elliptic curve EpE_{p} which is the base of the cone XTpXTpXX\cap T_{p}X\subset T_{p}X.

Proof.

Let aEpa\in E_{p} be a point and a\ell_{a} the tangent line of EpE_{p} at aa. Then a\ell_{a} is defined by i=24xiCxi(a)=0.\displaystyle\sum_{i=2}^{4}x_{i}\dfrac{\partial C}{\partial x_{i}}(a)=0. The 2-plane P1P_{1} spanned by pp and a\ell_{a} is tangent to XX along all of \ell. Let bab\in\ell_{a} be a point such that bab\neq a and P2P_{2} the 2-plane in which lies EpE_{p}. Since aP2\ell_{a}\subset P_{2} then bP2b\in P_{2} and one can write

(3.2) i=24biCxi(a)=0.\displaystyle\sum_{i=2}^{4}b_{i}\dfrac{\partial C}{\partial x_{i}}(a)=0.

We have thus P1=span(a,b,p)P_{1}={\rm{span}}(a,b,p) and the plane cubic P1XP_{1}\cap X is defined by f(t0p+t1a+t2b)=0f(t_{0}p+t_{1}a+t_{2}b)=0 with (t0:t1:t2)(t_{0}:t_{1}:t_{2}) the projective coordinates of P1P_{1}. Expanding in t2t_{2} and using Equations (3.1) and (3.2), one can see that the line \ell of equation t2=0t_{2}=0 is a double line on XX. This second type line is a triple line if and only if

(3.3) t1i=242Cxi2(a)bi2+2t12i<j42Cxjxi(a)bibj=0and3Ct23(t1a)0t_{1}\sum_{i=2}^{4}\dfrac{\partial^{2}C}{\partial x_{i}^{2}}\left(a\right)b_{i}^{2}+2t_{1}\displaystyle\sum_{2\leq i<j\leq 4}\dfrac{\partial^{2}C}{\partial x_{j}\partial x_{i}}\left(a\right)b_{i}b_{j}=0\quad\mbox{and}\quad\dfrac{\partial^{3}C}{\partial t_{2}^{3}}(t_{1}a)\neq 0

holds. Now we are going to study inflection points on the elliptic curve EpE_{p}. The point aEpa\in E_{p} is an inflection point if it is a point of multiplicity three for the intersection EpaE_{p}\cap\ell_{a} defined by C(t1a+t2b)=0C(t_{1}a+t_{2}b)=0. Since C(t1a)C(t_{1}a) and Ct2(t1a)\dfrac{\partial C}{\partial t_{2}}(t_{1}a) vanish then aEpa\in E_{p} is an inflection point if and only if (3.3) holds, which are necessary and sufficient conditions for the line \ell of equation t2=0t_{2}=0 to be a triple line on XX. ∎

The planes P1P_{1} and P2P_{2} meet along a\ell_{a}, the tangent line to EpE_{p} at aa. The point aa gives thus rise to the line of the second type X\ell\subset X, and conversely the line of the second type gives rise to the point aa. When aEpa\in E_{p} is not an inflection point, the tangent line a\ell_{a} cuts out the elliptic curve EpE_{p} in a third point aEpa^{{}^{\prime}}\in E_{p} which gives rise to the residual line \ell^{{}^{\prime}} of the double line \ell.

Corollary 3.8.

If a smooth complex cubic threefold contains Eckardt points then it contains triple lines.

Example 3.9.

  1. 1.

    The Fermat cubic defined by x03+x13+x23+x33+x43=0x_{0}^{3}+x_{1}^{3}+x_{2}^{3}+x_{3}^{3}+x_{4}^{3}=0 has 30 Eckardt points with coordinates (0,,1xi,,ξxj,,0)(0,\ldots,\underbrace{1}_{x_{i}},\ldots,\underbrace{\xi}_{x_{j}},\ldots,0) with xk=0x_{k}=0 for ki,jk\neq i,j and ξ\xi\in\mathbb{C} such that ξ3=1\xi^{3}=-1, and contains 135 triple lines.

  2. 2.

    The Klein cubic defined by x02x1+x12x2+x22x3+x32x4+x42x0=0x_{0}^{2}x_{1}+x_{1}^{2}x_{2}+x_{2}^{2}x_{3}+x_{3}^{2}x_{4}+x_{4}^{2}x_{0}=0 contains neither Eckardt points nor triple lines.

  3. 3.

    The cubic threefold defined by x02x2+x22x4+x12x3+x32x0+x43=0x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{2}^{2}x_{4}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{3}^{2}x_{0}+x_{4}^{3}=0 has one Eckardt point with coordinates (0:1:0:0:0)(0:1:0:0:0) and contains 9 triple lines.

Remark 3.10.

Nevertheless, the converse of Corollary 3.8 is not true. There exist smooth complex cubic threefolds with no Eckardt points but containing triple lines (see Section 5).

Corollary 3.11.

There are exactly nine triple lines going through an Eckardt point on a smooth cubic threefold.

Every smooth cubic threefold containing Eckardt points contains therefore at least nine triple lines.

3.2. Eckardt points and polar quadrics

Let X4X\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} be a smooth complex cubic threefold and pXp\in X a point. We recall the following definition (see [CC10, Definition 2.11]).

Definition 3.12.

The polar quadric of a point p=(p0::p4)4p=(p_{0}:\ldots:p_{4})\in\mathbb{P}^{4} with respect to XX is the hypersurface defined by i=04pifxi=0\displaystyle\sum_{i=0}^{4}p_{i}\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x_{i}}=0.

Denote by p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X) the polar quadric of pp with respect to XX. From [CCS97, p.161-162] we have the following proposition.

Proposition 3.13.

A point pXp\in X is an Eckardt point if and only if the polar quadric p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X) splits up as the tangent space TpXT_{p}X and a hyperplane not passing through pp.

Proof.

Let p=(1:0:0:0:0)Xp=(1:0:0:0:0)\in X be an Eckardt point and TpX={x1=0}T_{p}X=\left\{x_{1}=0\right\} be the projective tangent space of XX at pp. Then the equation of XX can take the form

f(x0,,x4)=x02x1+C(x1,,x4)f(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=x_{0}^{2}x_{1}+C(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})

where C(x1,,x4)C(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4}) is a homogeneous polynomial of degree three. The polar quadric p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X) is defined by x0x1=0x_{0}x_{1}=0. It therefore contains the tangent space TpXT_{p}X and a hyperplane not passing through pp. Conversely, choose coordinates on 4\mathbb{P}^{4} such that p=(1:0:0:0:0)p=(1:0:0:0:0) is a point of XX, TpX={x1=0}T_{p}X=\left\{x_{1}=0\right\} and HpX={x0=0}H_{p}X=\left\{x_{0}=0\right\} is a hyperplane not passing through pp. The equation of XX can be written:

f(x0,,x4)=x02x1+x0Q(x1,,x4)+C(x1,,x4)f(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=x_{0}^{2}x_{1}+x_{0}Q(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})+C(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})

where Q(x1,,x4)Q(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4}) and C(x1,,x4)C(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4}) are homogeneous polynomials of degree two and three respectively. The polar quadric p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X) is given by the equation:

2x0x1+Q(x1,,x4)=0.2x_{0}x_{1}+Q(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})=0.

Since it splits up as TpX={x1=0}T_{p}X=\left\{x_{1}=0\right\} and HpX={x0=0}H_{p}X=\left\{x_{0}=0\right\} then Q(x1,,x4)=0Q(x_{1},\ldots,x_{4})=0 and pp is an Eckardt point. ∎

The two characterizations of Eckardt points studied in this paper are thus equivalent. The following lemma shows how polar quadrics can be used to find all Eckardt points on a cubic threefold.

Lemma 3.14.

A point pXp\in X is an Eckardt point if and only if the polar quadric p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X) is of rank at most two.

Proof.

Let pXp\in X be an Eckardt point, TpX={l1(x0,,x4)=0}T_{p}X=\left\{l_{1}(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=0\right\} the projective tangent space of XX at pp and HpX={l2(x0,,x4)=0}H_{p}X=\left\{l_{2}(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=0\right\} a hyperplane not passing through pp, with l1(x0,,x4)l_{1}(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4}) and l2(x0,,x4)l_{2}(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4}) two linear forms. Assume the polar quadric p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X) is defined by the equation q(x0,,x4)=0q(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=0, where q(x0,,x4)q(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4}) is a homogeneous polynomial of degree two. Using Proposition 3.13 we write

q(x0,,x4)=l1(x0,,x4)l2(x0,,x4)q(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=l_{1}(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})l_{2}(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})

and the quadratic form is of rank at most two. Conversely, suppose pXp\in X is not an Eckardt point. Then the quadratic form q(x0,,x4)q(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4}) is not the product of two linear forms (see Proposition 3.13) and p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X) is therefore of rank at least three. ∎

4. Computing Eckardt points on a cubic threefold

We have studied Eckardt points on a cubic threefold through two different approaches: the first one involving elliptic curves and the second one involving polar quadrics. Both approaches can be used to compute Eckardt points on a cubic threefold. However, it is generally challenging to compute Eckardt points on a cubic threefold using the first approach because the expression of the tangent space TpXT_{p}X can make the computation of points of multiplicity three of XTpXTpXX\cap T_{p}X\subset T_{p}X difficult. It is therefore easier to check whether a point of the cubic is an Eckardt point than to find all Eckardt points using the first approach. Nevertheless, this approach has the benefit of revealing the equations of the elliptic curves of the Fano surface.

Unlike the first approach, the second one can be used to compute all Eckardt points of a cubic threefold and check whether a point on the cubic is an Eckardt point. It therefore has the advantage of revealing the number of Eckardt points of a cubic threefold.

Using Lemma 3.14, we propose the following method for computing all Eckardt points on a cubic threefold.

4.1. Method for computing all Eckardt points on a cubic threefold.

Let X4X\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} be a smooth complex cubic threefold, p=(p0::p4)Xp=(p_{0}:\ldots:p_{4})\in X a point and \mathcal{B} the matrix associated with the polar quadric p(X)\bigtriangleup_{p}(X). Eckardt points on XX are given by the vanishing locus of all 3×33\times 3 minors of \mathcal{B}. In order to count each point only once, we use a stratification of 4\mathbb{P}^{4} described as follows: the first stratum is the affine chart p0=1p_{0}=1 and the ii-th one is defined by p0=0,,pi2=0,pi1=1p_{0}=0,\ldots,p_{i-2}=0,p_{i-1}=1 for i=1,,4i=1,\ldots,4.

Example 4.1.

Consider the Fermat cubic F4={x03+x13+x23+x33+x43=0}4F_{4}=\{x_{0}^{3}+x_{1}^{3}+x_{2}^{3}+x_{3}^{3}+x_{4}^{3}=0\}\subset\mathbb{P}^{4}. Denote by 1\mathcal{B}_{1} the matrix associated with the polar quadric pF4\bigtriangleup_{p}F_{4}.

  1. (1)

    On the affine chart p0=1p_{0}=1 the vanishing locus of all 3×33\times 3 minors of 1\mathcal{B}_{1} is defined by the following equations:

    p24+p2=0,p34+p3=0,p44+p4=0,p13+p23+p33+p43+1=0,p1p2=0,p1p3=0,p2p3=0,p1p4=0,p2p4=0,p3p4=0p_{2}^{4}+p_{2}=0,~{}p_{3}^{4}+p_{3}=0,~{}p_{4}^{4}+p_{4}=0,~{}p_{1}^{3}+p_{2}^{3}+p_{3}^{3}+p_{4}^{3}+1=0,~{}p_{1}p_{2}=0,\newline p_{1}p_{3}=0,~{}p_{2}p_{3}=0,~{}p_{1}p_{4}=0,~{}p_{2}p_{4}=0,~{}p_{3}p_{4}=0.

    If pi0p_{i}\neq 0 then pj=0p_{j}=0 for iji\neq j and pi3=1p_{i}^{3}=-1. We get 12 Eckardt points with coordinates (1:0::pi::0)(1:0:\ldots:p_{i}:\ldots:0) with pi3=1p_{i}^{3}=-1.

  2. (2)

    In the stratum p0=0,p1=1p_{0}=0,p_{1}=1 the vanishing locus of all 3×33\times 3 minors of 1\mathcal{B}_{1} is defined by the following equations:

    p34+p3=0,p44+p4=0,p23+p33+p43+1=0,p2p3=0,p2p4=0,p3p4=0p_{3}^{4}+p_{3}=0,~{}p_{4}^{4}+p_{4}=0,~{}p_{2}^{3}+p_{3}^{3}+p_{4}^{3}+1=0,~{}p_{2}p_{3}=0,\newline p_{2}p_{4}=0,~{}p_{3}p_{4}=0.

    If pi0p_{i}\neq 0 then pj=0p_{j}=0 for iji\neq j and pi3=1p_{i}^{3}=-1. We get 9 Eckardt points with coordinates (0:1::pi::0)(0:1:\ldots:p_{i}:\ldots:0) with pi3=1p_{i}^{3}=-1.

  3. (3)

    In the stratum p0=0,p1=0,p2=1p_{0}=0,p_{1}=0,p_{2}=1 the vanishing locus of all 3×33\times 3 minors of 1\mathcal{B}_{1} is defined by the following equations:

    p44+p4=0,p33+p43+1=0,p3p4=0p_{4}^{4}+p_{4}=0,~{}p_{3}^{3}+p_{4}^{3}+1=0,~{}p_{3}p_{4}=0.

    We get three Eckardt points with coordinates (0:0:1:ξ:0)(0:0:1:\xi:0) and three others with coordinates (0:0:1:0:ξ)(0:0:1:0:\xi), with ξ3=1\xi^{3}=-1.

  4. (4)

    In the last stratum we get 33 Eckardt points with coordinates (0:0:0:1:ξ)(0:0:0:1:\xi) with ξ3=1\xi^{3}=-1.

The Klein cubic contains no Eckardt point because the vanishing locus of all 3×33\times 3 minors of the matrix associated with its polar quadric is empty in all strata.

Without giving much details, the authors in [CCS97, Example  4.4] state that the cubic threefold X24X_{2}\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} defined by

x02x4+x12x3+x33+x32x4+x3x42x43+x23=0x_{0}^{2}x_{4}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{3}^{3}+x_{3}^{2}x_{4}+x_{3}x_{4}^{2}-x_{4}^{3}+x_{2}^{3}=0

has exactly two Eckardt points with coordinates (1:0:0:0:0)(1:0:0:0:0) and (0:1:0:0:0)(0:1:0:0:0). It is easy to check that these points are Eckardt points of X2X_{2} using both approaches. However, showing that X2X_{2} has no Eckardt points besides (1:0:0:0:0)(1:0:0:0:0) and (0:1:0:0:0)(0:1:0:0:0) is quite challenging. Therefore the importance of the method we proposed in this paper for computing all Eckardt points of a cubic threefold. Let p=(p0:p1:p2:p3:p4)X2p=(p_{0}:p_{1}:p_{2}:p_{3}:p_{4})\in X_{2} be a point and denote by 2\mathcal{B}_{2} the matrix associated with the polar quadric pX2\bigtriangleup_{p}X_{2}. On the affine chart p0=1p_{0}=1 the vanishing locus of all 3×33\times 3 minors of 2\mathcal{B}_{2} is defined by p1=0,p2=0,p3=0,p4=0p_{1}=0,p_{2}=0,p_{3}=0,p_{4}=0, and in the stratum p0=0,p1=1p_{0}=0,p_{1}=1 it is defined by p2=0,p3=0,p4=0p_{2}=0,p_{3}=0,p_{4}=0 while it is empty in the other strata. This proves that X2X_{2} has no Eckardt points besides (1:0:0:0:0)(1:0:0:0:0) and (0:1:0:0:0)(0:1:0:0:0).

5. Main component, elliptic curves and triple lines configuration of some cubic threefolds

5.1. Strategy for finding some cubic threefolds with no Eckardt points but containing triple lines

Let \ell be a line of the second type on XX given by

x2=0,x3=0,x4=0.x_{2}=0,x_{3}=0,x_{4}=0.

Following [CG72, (6.10)] the equation of XX may take the form:

f(x0,,x4)=x02x2+x12x3+x0q0(x2,x3,x4)+x1q1(x2,x3,x4)+P(x2,x3,x4)=0f(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{0}q_{0}(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})+x_{1}q_{1}(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})+P(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=0

where q0(x2,x3,x4)=2jk4b0jkq_{0}(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=\sum_{2\leq j\leq k\leq 4}b_{0jk} and q1(x2,x3,x4)=2jk4b1jkq_{1}(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})=\sum_{2\leq j\leq k\leq 4}b_{1jk} are homogeneous polynomials of degree two and P(x2,x3,x4)P(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4}) is a homogeneous polynomial of degree three. Assume \ell is a triple line so that the plane given by x2=0,x3=0x_{2}=0,x_{3}=0 is the plane tangent to XX in all points of \ell. Then the equation of XX may be written

(5.1) f(x0,,x4)=x02x2+x12x3+x0q0(x2,x3,x4)+x1q1(x2,x3,x4)+kx43=0f(x_{0},\ldots,x_{4})=x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{0}q_{0}(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})+x_{1}q_{1}(x_{2},x_{3},x_{4})+kx_{4}^{3}=0

with k0k\neq 0 and b044=0,b144=0b_{044}=0,b_{144}=0. Using Equation (5.1)\eqref{(5.1)} we obtain many examples of smooth cubic threefolds with no Eckardt points but containing triple lines.

5.2. Main component, elliptic curves and triple lines configuration

The following table gives the list of smooth complex cubic threefolds Xi4X_{i}\subset\mathbb{P}^{4} we will work with in this section. Cubics X5,X6,X7X_{5},X_{6},X_{7} and X8X_{8} are obtained through the method detailed in Section 5.1.

X1X_{1} x02x2+x22x4+x12x3+x32x0+x43=0x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{2}^{2}x_{4}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{3}^{2}x_{0}+x_{4}^{3}=0
X2X_{2} 2x0x22+2x2x12+x12x3+x3x02+3x33+x43=02x_{0}x_{2}^{2}+2x_{2}x_{1}^{2}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{3}x_{0}^{2}+3x_{3}^{3}+x_{4}^{3}=0
X3X_{3} x02x4+x12x3+x33+x32x4+x3x42x43+x23=0x_{0}^{2}x_{4}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{3}^{3}+x_{3}^{2}x_{4}+x_{3}x_{4}^{2}-x_{4}^{3}+x_{2}^{3}=0
X4X_{4} x03+x13+x23+x33+x43+3x0x1x2=0x_{0}^{3}+x_{1}^{3}+x_{2}^{3}+x_{3}^{3}+x_{4}^{3}+3x_{0}x_{1}x_{2}=0
X5X_{5} x02x2+x12x3+x1x22+x0x32+x1x32+x43=0x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{1}x_{2}^{2}+x_{0}x_{3}^{2}+x_{1}x_{3}^{2}+x_{4}^{3}=0
X6X_{6} x02x2+x12x3+x0x22+x1x22+x0x32+2x1x2x4+2x0x3x4+x43=0x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{0}x_{2}^{2}+x_{1}x_{2}^{2}+x_{0}x_{3}^{2}+2x_{1}x_{2}x_{4}+2x_{0}x_{3}x_{4}+x_{4}^{3}=0
X7X_{7} x02x2+x12x3+x1x22+x0x32+2x0x3x4+x43=0x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{1}x_{2}^{2}+x_{0}x_{3}^{2}+2x_{0}x_{3}x_{4}+x_{4}^{3}=0
X8X_{8} x02x2+x12x3+x1x22+x1x32+x0x32+x0x42+x1x42+x43=0x_{0}^{2}x_{2}+x_{1}^{2}x_{3}+x_{1}x_{2}^{2}+x_{1}x_{3}^{2}+x_{0}x_{3}^{2}+x_{0}x_{4}^{2}+x_{1}x_{4}^{2}+x_{4}^{3}=0
Table 1. Some smooth cubic threefolds

Table 2 gives the information about the number nEn_{E} of Eckardt points and the number nTn_{T} of triple lines of these cubics.

cubic threefold X1X_{1} X2X_{2} X3X_{3} X4X_{4} X5X_{5} X6X_{6} X7X_{7} X8X_{8}
nEn_{E} 1 1 2 12 0 0 0 0
nTn_{T} 9 33 39 81 27 9 2 1
Table 2. Eckardt points and triple lines numbers

The following table gives the configuration of the main component, elliptic curves and triple lines for the above cubics. This table contains the number of triple lines, the number nEpn_{E_{p}} of elliptic curves, and the intersection number of the main component PP and elliptic curves in the affine chart p0,1=1p_{0,1}=1.

cubic threefold X1X_{1} X2X_{2} X3X_{3} X4X_{4}
nTn_{T} 9 33 33 54
nEpn_{E_{p}} 1 1 2 6
Intersection points EpP=9Ep\cdot P=9 EpP=9Ep\cdot P=9 EpiP=8Ep_{i}\cdot P=8 EpiP=12Ep_{i}\cdot P=12 (for
number Ep1Ep2=1E_{p_{1}}\cdot E_{p_{2}}=1 3 elliptic curves)
EpjP=6Ep_{j}\cdot P=6 (for
the other elliptic curves)
EpiEpj=0E_{p_{i}}\cdot E_{p_{j}}=0
Table 3. Main component, elliptic curves and triple lines configuration

The intersection points are computed over the rational field \mathbb{Q}. All the computations have been done using the software MAGMA [BCP97], except the number of triple lines computed with SAGEMATHS [The20]. The main component of X1,X2,X3X_{1},X_{2},X_{3} and X4X_{4} is irreducible over \mathbb{Q}. However, whether it is smooth is still an open question. Inspection of Table 3 reveals that the 9 intersection points of the elliptic curve and the main component of X1X_{1} are exactly the triple lines of X1X_{1}.

References

  • [BB23] G.G. Bockondas and S. Boissière, Triple lines on a cubic threefold, Comptes Rendus. Mathématique 361 (2023), no. G4, 747–755.
  • [BCP97] W. Bosma, J. Cannon, and C. Playoust, The Magma algebra system. I. The user language, J. Symbolic Comput. 24 (1997), no. 3-4, 235–265, Computational algebra and number theory (London, 1993). MR MR1484478
  • [CC10] F. Cools and M. Coppens, Star points on smooth hypersurfaces, Journal of Algebra 323 (2010), no. 1, 261–286.
  • [CCS97] G. Canonero, M.V. Catalisano, and M.E. Serpico, Inflection points of cubic hypersurfaces, Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana-B (1997), no. 1, 161–186.
  • [CG72] H.C. Clemens and P.A. Griffiths, The intermediate Jacobian of the cubic threefold, Annals of Mathematics (1972), 281–356.
  • [Eck76] F.E. Eckardt, Ueber diejenigen Flächen dritten grades, auf denen sich drei gerade Linien in einem Punkte schneiden, Mathematische Annalen 10 (1876), no. 2, 227–272.
  • [Gam18] S. Gammelgaard, Cubic hypersurfaces, their Fano schemes, and special subvarieties, Master’s thesis, University of Oslo, 2018.
  • [Huy20] D. Huybrechts, The geometry of cubic hypersurfaces, Preprint (2020).
  • [LPZ18] R. Laza, G. Pearlstein, and Z. Zhang, On the moduli space of pairs consisting of a cubic threefold and a hyperplane, Advances in Mathematics 340 (2018), 684–722.
  • [Mur72] J.P. Murre, Algebraic equivalence modulo rational equivalence on a cubic threefold, Compositio Mathematica 25 (1972), no. 2, 161–206.
  • [Rou09] X. Roulleau, Elliptic curve configurations on Fano surfaces, manuscripta mathematica 129 (2009), no. 3, 381–399.
  • [Seg43] B. Segre, The non-singular cubic surfaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc 49 (1943), no. 5, 350–352.
  • [The20] The Sage Developers, Sagemath, the Sage Mathematics Software System (Version 3.7.7), 2020, https://www.sagemath.org.
  • [Tju71] A.N. Tjurin, The geometry of the Fano surface of a nonsingular cubic and Torelli theorems for Fano surfaces and cubics, Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya 5 (1971), no. 3, 517.
  • [Zha22] Y. Zhang, Topological Abel-Jacobi map for hypersurfaces in complex projective four-space, PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, 2022.
  • [Zha23] by same author, Extension of the topological Abel-Jacobi map for cubic threefolds, arXiv e-prints (2023), arXiv–2308.