This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: These authors contributed equally to this work.thanks: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Dynamics of ferromagnetic bimerons driven by spin currents and magnetic fields

Laichuan Shen School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China    Xiaoguang Li School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China    Jing Xia School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China    Lei Qiu School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China   
Xichao Zhang
School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China
   Oleg A. Tretiakov School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia    Motohiko Ezawa Department of Applied Physics, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan    Yan Zhou [email protected] School of Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518172, China
Abstract

Magnetic bimeron composed of two merons is a topological counterpart of magnetic skyrmion in in-plane magnets, which can be used as the nonvolatile information carrier in spintronic devices. Here we analytically and numerically study the dynamics of ferromagnetic bimerons driven by spin currents and magnetic fields. Numerical simulations demonstrate that two bimerons with opposite signs of topological numbers can be created simultaneously in a ferromagnetic thin film via current-induced spin torques. The current-induced spin torques can also drive the bimeron and its speed is analytically derived, which agrees with the numerical results. Since the bimerons with opposite topological numbers can coexist and have opposite drift directions, two-lane racetracks can be built in order to accurately encode the data bits. In addition, the dynamics of bimerons induced by magnetic field gradients and alternating magnetic fields are investigated. It is found that the bimeron driven by alternating magnetic fields can propagate along a certain direction. Moreover, combining a suitable magnetic field gradient, the Magnus-force-induced transverse motion can be completely suppressed, which implies that there is no skyrmion Hall effect. Our results are useful for understanding of the bimeron dynamics and may provide guidelines for building future bimeron-based spintronic devices.

bimerons, skyrmions, spintronics, micromagnetics
pacs:
75.10.Hk, 75.70.Kw, 75.78.-n, 12.39.Dc

I Introduction

Topologically nontrivial magnetic skyrmions have received a lot of attention, because they have small size and low depinning current, and can be used as information carriers for information storage and computing applications Roszler_NATURE2006 ; Nagaosa_NNANO2013 ; Finocchio_JPD2016 ; Kang_PIEEE2016 ; Fert_NATREVMAT2017 ; ES_JAP2018 ; Zhou_NSR2018 ; Zhang_SciRep2015 ; Prychynenko_PRApplied2018 ; Nozaki_APL2019 ; Zhang_JPCM2020 ; Bogdanov_1989 . Magnetic skyrmions have been experimentally observed in systems with bulk or interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) Nagaosa_NNANO2013 ; Finocchio_JPD2016 ; Fert_NATREVMAT2017 ; ES_JAP2018 , and can be manipulated by various methods, such as electric currents Sampaio_NatNano2013 ; Iwasaki_NatNano2013 ; Zhang_PRB2016 , spin waves Zhang_Nanotech2015 , magnetic field gradients Komineas_PRB2015 ; Wang_NJP2017 ; Liang_NJP2018 , magnetic anisotropy gradients Wang_Nanoscale2018 ; Xia_JMMM2018 ; Tomasello_PRB2018 ; Shen_PRB2018 ; Ma_NanoLett2019 and temperature gradients Kong_PRL2013 ; Khoshlahni_PRB2019 . In addition, various topologically nontrivial spin textures, such as antiferromagnetic skyrmions Zhang_SREP2016A ; Barker_PRL2016 ; Yang_PRL2018 ; Shen_APL2019 ; Liang_PRB2019 , ferrimagnetic skyrmions Woo_NATCOM2018 , antiskyrmions Nayak_Nature2017 , and bimerons Ezawa_PRB2011 ; Zhang_SciRep2015 ; Lin_PRB2015 ; Heo_SciRep2016 ; Leonov_PRB2017 ; Kharkov_PRL2017 ; Kolesnikov_SciRep2018 ; Chmiel_NatMater2018 ; Yu_Nat2018 ; Woo_Nat2018 ; Gobel_PRB2019 ; Fernandes_SSC2019 ; Murooka2019 ; Kim2019 ; Moon_arX2018 ; Shen_PRL2020 ; Lu_arXiv2020 ; Zarzuela_PRB2020 ; Zhang_Bimeron2020 ; Li_arXiv2020 , are also currently hot topics.

Particularly, a bimeron composed of two merons can be regarded as a counterpart of the skyrmion in in-plane magnets, which can be attained by rotating the spin texture of a skyrmion by 9090^{\circ}Gobel_PRB2019 Therefore, the ferromagnetic (FM) bimerons share the characteristics of skyrmions, such as small size and topologically nontrivial spin structure, and they also show the transverse drift during force-driven motion, i.e., the skyrmion Hall effect Jiang_NatPhys2017 ; Litzius_NatPhys2017 . The skyrmion Hall effect may cause the skyrmion (or bimeron) to annihilate at the sample edge, which is detrimental for practical applications. To overcome or suppress the skyrmion Hall effect, various ways have been proposed, such as adopting synthetic antiferromagnetic skyrmions Zhang_NATCOM2016 ; Xia_PRApplied2019 ; Legrand_NatMat2019 ; Dohi_NATCOM2019 or applying high magnetic anisotropy in the racetrack edge Lai_SciRep2017 . Magnetic bimerons, which can be found in various magnets Kharkov_PRL2017 ; Zhang_Bimeron2020 ; Zhang_SciRep2015 ; Lin_PRB2015 ; Leonov_PRB2017 ; Murooka2019 ; Zarzuela_PRB2020 ; Shen_PRL2020 ; Li_arXiv2020 ; Gobel_PRB2019 , also has the potential to be used as information carriers for spintronic devices made of in-plane magnetized thin films Zhang_SciRep2015 ; Gobel_PRB2019 ; Murooka2019 . Recent studies on bimerons Gobel_PRB2019 ; Murooka2019 ; Shen_PRL2020 ; Moon_arX2018 ; Zarzuela_PRB2020 ; Zhang_Bimeron2020 ; Li_arXiv2020 focus on its dynamics induced by electric currents. However, an electric current faces the issue of Joule heating and is not applicable for insulating materials. Therefore, it is necessary to explore alternative methods for manipulating FM bimerons effectively.

In this work, we report the dynamics of FM bimerons induced by spin currents and magnetic fields. We numerically realize the simultaneous creation of two bimerons with opposite topological numbers via current-induced spin torques, and we theoretically prove that such two bimerons can coexist in a FM film with interfacial DMI. Our results show that in addition to the spin current, a magnetic field gradient can drive a FM bimeron to motion. Furthermore, excited by alternating magnetic field, the bimeron propagates along a certain direction, which does not show the skyrmion Hall effect when a suitable magnetic field gradient is further adopted.

II Model and simulation

Refer to caption

Figure 1: (a)-(c) The geometry of the magnetic atom (orange), the DMI vector (green) and the magnetic anisotropy (red). When the perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and isotropic DMI (a) are adopted, the skyrmion (d) can be a stable solution. Taking in-plane easy-axis anisotropy and isotropic DMI (b), the asymmetrical bimeron (e) is formed. If we further rotate the DMI vectors by 9090^{\circ} (anisotropic DMI) (c), the bimeron has symmetrical shape (f).

Considering a FM film with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy [Fig. 1(a)], the skyrmion [Fig. 1(d)] can be stabilized by introducing the isotropic interfacial DMI Tomasello_SciRep2014 ; Rohart_PRB2013 , where the DMI can be induced at the ferromagnet/heavy metal (such as Ta and Pt) interface. Here we focus on the study of a FM film with in-plane easy-axis anisotropy [Fig. 1(b)]. In such a FM system, the asymmetrical bimeron [Fig. 1(e)] is formed when the isotropic interfacial DMI is adopted. We employ the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation Gilbert_IEEE2004 with the damping-like spin torque to simulate the dynamics of FM systems, which is described as

𝒎˙=γ𝒎×𝑯eff+α𝒎×𝒎˙+γHj𝒎×𝒑×𝒎.\boldsymbol{\dot{m}}=-\gamma\boldsymbol{m}\times\boldsymbol{H_{\text{eff}}}+\alpha\boldsymbol{m}\times\boldsymbol{\dot{m}}+\gamma H_{j}\boldsymbol{m}\times\boldsymbol{p}\times\boldsymbol{m}. (1)

𝒎\boldsymbol{m} (=𝑴/MS=\boldsymbol{M}/M_{\text{S}} with saturation magnetization MSM_{\text{S}}) is the reduced magnetization and 𝒎˙\boldsymbol{\dot{m}} denotes the partial derivative of the magnetization with respect to time. The damping-like spin torque γHj𝒎×𝒑×𝒎\gamma H_{j}\boldsymbol{m}\times\boldsymbol{p}\times\boldsymbol{m} can be produced by injecting a current into a magnetic tunnel junction or using the spin Hall effect. 𝒑\boldsymbol{p} is the polarization vector and HjH_{j} relates to the applied current density jj, defined as Hj=jθSH/(2μ0eMStz)H_{j}=j\hbar\theta_{\text{SH}}/(2\mu_{0}eM_{\text{S}}t_{z}) with the reduced Planck constant \hbar, the spin Hall angle θSH\theta_{\text{SH}}, the vacuum permeability constant μ0\mu_{0}, the elementary charge ee, and the layer thickness tzt_{z}. γ\gamma and α\alpha denote the gyromagnetic ratio and the damping constant respectively. 𝑯eff\boldsymbol{H_{\text{eff}}} stands for the effective field obtained from the variation of the FM energy EE,

E=\displaystyle E= dV{A(𝒎)2K(𝒎𝒏)2μ0MS𝑯𝒎\displaystyle\int{dV}\left\{{A(\nabla\boldsymbol{m})^{\text{2}}-K(\boldsymbol{m}\cdot\boldsymbol{n})^{2}-\mu_{0}M_{\text{S}}\boldsymbol{H}\cdot\boldsymbol{m}}\right. (2)
+D[mz𝒎(𝒎)mz]},\displaystyle\left.{+D[m_{z}\nabla\cdot\boldsymbol{m}-(\boldsymbol{m}\cdot\nabla)m_{z}]}\right\},

where the first, second, third and fourth terms represent the exchange energy, magnetic anisotropy energy, Zeeman energy and DMI energy respectively. In Eq. (2), AA, KK and DD are the exchange constant, magnetic anisotropy constant and DMI constant respectively. 𝒏=𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{n}=\boldsymbol{e_{x}} stands for the direction of the anisotropy axis, and 𝑯\boldsymbol{H} is the applied magnetic field. Note that the thermal fluctuation and dipole-dipole interaction are not taken into account.

To obtain the bimeron mentioned above, the presence of in-plane magnetic anisotropy in materials (such as CoFeB Kipgen_JMMM2012 ) is essential. On the other hand, the out-of-plane spin configurations exist in the bimeron, and they will increase the system energy if the in-plane anisotropy is considered. By introducing other energies, such as the DMI energy, which lends to spin canting, the energy increase due to the anisotropy can be compensated, so that the bimeron can be formed in a FM film with DMI and in-plane easy-axis anisotropy (the stability diagram of the bimeron is shown in Fig. S1 of Ref. Shen_SI ). Similar to DMI, the frustrated exchange interaction can also bring the spin canting Gobel_PRB2019 , so that the bimeron can be stabilized in frustrated FM systems Zhang_Bimeron2020 . In addition to ferromagnets, the bimeron is a stable solution in antiferromagnets in the presence of DMI and in-plane anisotropy Shen_PRL2020 ; Li_arXiv2020 . Note that the shape of bimerons depends on the DMI. Taking isotropic DMI (see Fig. 1), i.e., the DMI vectors are in-plane and DMI energy constant Dx=DyD_{x}=D_{y}, the formed bimeron has asymmetrical shape Li_arXiv2020 . If we rotate the DMI vectors by 9090^{\circ} [see Fig. 1(c)] Gobel_PRB2019 , the bimeron shape will be symmetrical [see Fig. 1(f)] Shen_PRL2020 . The dynamics of symmetrical and asymmetrical FM bimerons induced by alternating magnetic fields will be discussed later, while for the bimeron in antiferromagnet, it is difficult to excite its dynamics by a magnetic field.

III Spin current-induced creation of bimerons

Refer to caption

Figure 2: (a)-(h) The time evolution of the magnetization mzm_{z} induced by a spin-polarized current with the polarization vector 𝒑=𝒆𝒛\boldsymbol{p}=\boldsymbol{e_{z}}, where the damping-like spin torque is taken into account and the color represents the value of mzm_{z}. (i) The evolution of the topological number QQ and the injected current density jj. In our simulations, the current of j=1500j=1500 MA/cm2 is injected in the central circular region with diameter of 3030 nm [see green lines in Figs. (a)-(c)] and we adopt the following parameters, A=15A=15 pJ/m, K=0.8K=0.8 MJ/m3, D=4D=4 mJ/m2, MS=580M_{\text{S}}=580 kA/m, γ=2.211×105\gamma=2.211\times 10^{5} m/(A s) and θSH=0.2\theta_{\text{SH}}=0.2. Here we take the damping α=0.5\alpha=0.5, which is a realistic value in the ultra-thin FM layer grown on a heavy metal Litzius_NatPhys2017 . The mesh size of 0.3×0.3×0.50.3\times 0.3\times 0.5 nm3 is used to discretize the FM film with the size 120×120×0.5120\times 120\times 0.5 nm3. Figs. (a)-(h) only show the mzm_{z} in the 96×9696\times 96 nm2 plane.

Creating bimerons is the foundation for their practical applications. Here we use a spin current to create the bimerons via damping-like spin torques. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the initial state is the FM ground state. When the current pulse of j=1500j=1500 MA/cm2 and 𝒑=𝒆𝒛\boldsymbol{p}=\boldsymbol{e_{z}} is injected into the central circular region with diameter of 30 nm, the magnetization in the circular region will be flipped towards the direction of the polarization vector 𝒑\boldsymbol{p}, as shown in Fig. 2(b). At t=0.2t=0.2 ns [Fig. 2(d)], the current is switched off, and then the magnetic texture is relaxed [see Figs. 2(e)-(h)]. Figure 2(h) shows that after the relaxation, two bimerons are simultaneously generated. In addition, we calculate the time evolution of the topological number Q=1/(4π)𝑑x𝑑y[𝒎(x𝒎×y𝒎)]Q=-1/(4\pi)\int{dxdy}[\boldsymbol{m}\cdot(\partial_{x}\boldsymbol{m}\times\partial_{y}\boldsymbol{m})] Barker_PRL2016 ; Lin_PRB2015 ; Tretiakov_PRB2007 , showing that for the two bimerons created here, the sum of their topological numbers equals to zero [see Fig. 2(i)]. This indicates their opposite topological numbers, which is also confirmed in Fig. 2(h). A pair of bimerons with opposite QQ shown in Fig. 2(h) can be separated into two independent bimerons when a suitable spin current is applied, as they have opposite drift directions (see Fig. 4). Note that an isolated bimeron with positive QQ will be created when j=+1000j=+1000 MA/cm2, as shown in Fig. S2 of Ref. Shen_SI . If the sign of current is changed, i.e., j=1000j=-1000 MA/cm2, the created bimeron has negative QQ.

Refer to caption

Figure 3: The components mxm_{x} (a) and mym_{y} (b) of the magnetization for this case of Fig. 2(h).

In order to analyze such a phenomenon, i.e., two bimerons with opposite signs of QQ are stabilized in a FM film with the same background (see Supplementary Movie 1), Moon_arX2018 ; Murooka2019 we present the components mxm_{x} and mym_{y} of the magnetization for the case of Fig. 2(h), as shown in Fig. 3. Figures 2(h) and 3 suggest that by using the operation [mx(x,y),my(x,y),mz(x,y)][m_{x}(x,y),m_{y}(x,y),m_{z}(x,y)] \to [mx(x,y),my(x,y),mz(x,y)][m_{x}(-x,y),-m_{y}(-x,y),-m_{z}(-x,y)], two bimerons created here can convert to each other. On the other hand, the operation mentioned above will affect the spatial derivative of the magnetization, (x,y)(x,y)(\partial_{x},\partial_{y})\to(-\partial_{x},\partial_{y}). Thus, we obtain the operation for the spatial derivative of the magnetization, (xmx,xmy,xmz)(\partial_{x}m_{x},\partial_{x}m_{y},\partial_{x}m_{z}) \to (xmx,xmy,xmz)(-\partial_{x}m_{x},\partial_{x}m_{y},\partial_{x}m_{z}) and (ymx,ymy,ymz)(\partial_{y}m_{x},\partial_{y}m_{y},\partial_{y}m_{z}) \to (ymx,ymy,ymz)(\partial_{y}m_{x},-\partial_{y}m_{y},-\partial_{y}m_{z}). Taking the above operation and combining Eq. (2), it is found that the system energy EE is not changed, however giving rise to a change in the sign of the topological number QQ. As a result, the bimerons with opposite signs of QQ can coexist in the FM film with in-plane anisotropy and isotropic DMI (see Fig. 1), while in a FM system with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and isotropic DMI, the coexistence of different skyrmions with opposite topological numbers is not allowed. We note that taking the same values of parameters, the asymmetrical bimerons have a smaller size compared to the skyrmions.

IV spin current-driven motion of bimerons

In addition to creating the bimerons, manipulating them is also indispensable for the application of information storage and logic devices. We now use the spin current (instead of electric current) to manipulate the bimerons. Taking the current density j=5j=5 MA/cm2 and the damping α=0.5\alpha=0.5, the time evolution of the velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) for bimerons with opposite signs of QQ is shown in Figs. 4(a)-(f), where the velocity vi=r˙iv_{i}=\dot{r}_{i} and the guiding center (rxr_{x}, ryr_{y}) of the bimeron is defined as Komineas_PRB2015

ri=𝑑x𝑑y[i𝒎(x𝒎×y𝒎)]𝑑x𝑑y[𝒎(x𝒎×y𝒎)],i=x,y.r_{i}=\frac{\int{dxdy}[i\boldsymbol{m}\cdot(\partial_{x}\boldsymbol{m}\times\partial_{y}\boldsymbol{m})]}{\int{dxdy}[\boldsymbol{m}\cdot(\partial_{x}\boldsymbol{m}\times\partial_{y}\boldsymbol{m})]},i=x,y. (3)

Refer to caption

Figure 4: (a)-(f) The time evolution of the velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) for bimerons with opposite signs of the topological number QQ, where j=5j=5 MA/cm2, θSH=0.2\theta_{\text{SH}}=0.2 and α=0.5\alpha=0.5. In addition, different polarization vectors 𝒑=𝒆𝒙,𝒆𝒚\boldsymbol{p}=\boldsymbol{e_{x}},\boldsymbol{e_{y}} and 𝒆𝒛\boldsymbol{e_{z}} are adopted. The velocities vxv_{x} (g) and vyv_{y} (h) as functions of the damping α\alpha for the bimerons with positive sign of QQ, where the numerical (symbols) and analytical (lines) results are obtained from our micromagnetic simulations and Eq. (5) respectively. In addition to dxx15.44d_{xx}\sim 15.44 and dyy12.93d_{yy}\sim 12.93, the numerical value of (ux,uyu_{x},u_{y}) has been used in our calculations [Fig. S3 of Ref. Shen_SI shows that it is equal to (0, -13.18 nm), (33.03 nm, 0) and (0, 25.91 nm) for the cases of 𝒑=𝒆𝒙,𝒆𝒚\boldsymbol{p}=\boldsymbol{e_{x}},\boldsymbol{e_{y}} and 𝒆𝒛\boldsymbol{e_{z}}, respectively.].

From Fig. 4, we can see that for the cases where the polarization vector 𝒑=𝒆𝒙,𝒆𝒚\boldsymbol{p}=\boldsymbol{e_{x}},\boldsymbol{e_{y}} and 𝒆𝒛\boldsymbol{e_{z}}, the bimerons can be driven to motion and the velocity reaches a constant value at t=0.2t=0.2 ns. For the bimerons with opposite signs of QQ, a spin current drives them to drift in the opposite directions. Namely, their skyrmion Hall angles [=arctan(vy/vx)=\text{arctan}(v_{y}/v_{x})] have opposite signs. The above result means that two-lane racetracks (or double-bit racetracks) can be built in order to accurately encode the data bits, where the presence of a bimeron in the top and bottom lanes is used to encode the data bits “1” and “0” respectively. Moon_arX2018 ; Muller_NJP2017 ; Kang_IEDL2016 ; Lai_Spin2017 Compared to the single-lane racetrack based on skyrmions, such a two-lane racetrack based on bimerons is robust for the data representation, as we always detect a bimeron for the data bits “1” and “0”. In the single-lane racetrack, the data bits “1” and “0” are encoded by the presence and absence of a skyrmion respectively. However, the distance between two skyrmions may be affected by many factors, so that the number of the data bit “0” cannot be accurately encoded by the absence of a skyrmion.

By changing the damping constant α\alpha, the different values of the velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) are obtained from the numerical simulations, as shown in Figs. 4(g) and (h). In order to test the reliability of the simulated speeds, from Eq. (1), we derive the steady motion equation for the FM bimeron using Thiele’s (or collective coordinate) approach Thiele_PRL1973 ; Tveten_PRL2013 ; Tretiakov_PRL2008 ; Clarke_PRB2008 , written as

𝑮×𝒗+𝑭α+𝑭driv=𝟎,\boldsymbol{G}\times\boldsymbol{v}+\boldsymbol{F}_{\alpha}+\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{driv}}=\boldsymbol{0}, (4)

where 𝑮=(4πQμ0MStz/γ)𝒆𝒛\boldsymbol{G}=(4\pi Q\mu_{0}M_{\text{S}}t_{z}/\gamma)\boldsymbol{e_{z}} is the gyrovector. 𝑭α=αμ0MStz𝒅𝒗/γ\boldsymbol{F}_{\alpha}=-\alpha\mu_{\text{0}}M_{\text{S}}t_{z}\boldsymbol{d}\cdot\boldsymbol{v}/\gamma represents the dissipative force with the dissipative tensor 𝒅\boldsymbol{d}, where the component dijd_{ij} of the dissipative tensor is dij=𝑑x𝑑y(i𝒎j𝒎)d_{ij}=\int{dxdy}(\partial_{i}\boldsymbol{m}\cdot\partial_{j}\boldsymbol{m}). 𝑭driv\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{driv}} denotes the driving force, which is described as 𝑭driv=μ0HjMStz𝒖\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{driv}}=-\mu_{0}H_{j}M_{\text{S}}t_{z}\boldsymbol{u} with ui=𝑑x𝑑y[(𝒎×𝒑)i𝒎]u_{i}=\int{dxdy}[(\boldsymbol{m}\times\boldsymbol{p})\cdot\partial_{i}\boldsymbol{m}] when the damping-like spin torque is considered. From Eq. (4), we obtain the steady motion speed,

(vxvy)=γ𝑳𝑭drivμ0MStz[(4πQ)2+α2dxxdyy],\begin{pmatrix}v_{x}\\ v_{y}\end{pmatrix}=\frac{\gamma\boldsymbol{L}\cdot\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{driv}}}{\mu_{0}M_{\text{S}}t_{z}[(4\pi Q)^{2}+\alpha^{2}d_{xx}d_{yy}]}, (5)

where 𝑳=(αdyy4πQ4πQαdxx)\boldsymbol{L}=\begin{pmatrix}\alpha d_{yy}&-4\pi Q\\ 4\pi Q&\alpha d_{xx}\end{pmatrix}, and dxy0d_{xy}\sim 0 has been used Shen_SI . Figures 4(g) and (h) show that the analytical results given by Eq. (5) are in good agreement with the numerical simulations. Note that for the case of 𝒑=𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{p}=\boldsymbol{e_{x}} (along the anisotropy axis), asymmetrical bimerons can be driven, while for a symmetrical bimeron, 𝑭driv=𝟎\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{driv}}=\boldsymbol{0} is derived so that its motion speed is equal to zero.

V Motion of bimerons driven by magnetic field gradients

Refer to caption

Figure 5: (a) The time evolution of the velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) for the bimeron with positive QQ, where the magnetic field gradient (𝑯=dH/dxx𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{H}=-dH/dx\cdot x\boldsymbol{e_{x}} with μ0dH/dx=1\mu_{0}dH/dx=1 mT/nm) is adopted as the driving source, and the damping α=0.5\alpha=0.5. (b) The velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) at t=0.2t=0.2 ns as functions of the magnetic field gradient μ0dH/dx\mu_{0}dH/dx for α=0.5\alpha=0.5, where the symbols are the results of numerical simulations and the lines are given by Eqs. (5) and (6).

Using the magnetic field as a driving source is applicable in both metals and insulating materials, so it is an important manipulation method, and it is necessary to discuss the dynamics of bimeron induced by magnetic fields. In the next sections, we focus on the study of the bimeron dynamics induced by magnetic field gradients and alternating magnetic fields. Figure 5(a) shows the time evolution of the velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) for the bimeron with positive QQ, where a magnetic field gradient (𝑯=dH/dxx𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{H}=-dH/dx\cdot x\boldsymbol{e_{x}} with μ0dH/dx=1\mu_{0}dH/dx=1 mT/nm, where the gradient value could be feasible in experiments Jakobi_NatNano2017 ) is applied and the damping α=0.5\alpha=0.5. For the case shown in Fig. 5(a), the change of bimeron size induced by the magnetic field can be ignored, and the velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) at t=0.2t=0.2 ns almost reach a constant value of (0.518 m/s, 1.002 m/s). Figure 5(b) shows that the velocities of the bimeron are proportional to the magnetic field gradient. Due to the presence of the magnetic field gradient, the potential energy of the system changes spatially, so that a nonzero driving force will act on the FM bimeron. We now derive the formula of the driving force induced by the magnetic field with a constant gradient. Applying a partial integration, Komineas_PRB2015 the induced force is derived from μ0MStz𝑯x𝒎dxdy-\mu_{0}M_{\text{S}}t_{z}\int{\boldsymbol{H}\cdot\partial_{x}\boldsymbol{m}dxdy}, which is described as

𝑭grad=μ0MStzuHdHdx𝒆𝒙,\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{grad}}=\mu_{0}M_{\text{S}}t_{z}u_{\text{H}}\frac{dH}{dx}\boldsymbol{e_{x}}, (6)

where uH=(1mx)𝑑x𝑑yu_{\text{H}}=\int{(1-m_{x})dxdy} is 94.4 nm2 for the parameters used here Shen_SI . Substituting the above Eq. (6) into Eq. (5), we obtain the steady motion speed, and find that the bimeron moves towards the area of lower magnetic field, similar to the case of the skyrmion Wang_NJP2017 . As shown in Fig. 5(b), the results given by Eqs. (5) and (6) are consistent with the numerical simulations.

VI Motion of bimerons driven by alternating magnetic fields

Refer to caption

Figure 6: (a)-(c) The trajectories of bimerons induced by an alternating magnetic field 𝑯=H0\boldsymbol{H}=H_{0}sin(2πft2\pi ft)𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{e_{x}} [(a) the asymmetrical bimeron with positive QQ; (b) the asymmetrical bimeron with negative QQ; (c) the symmetrical bimeron with positive QQ.], where μ0H0=50\mu_{0}H_{0}=50 mT, f=10f=10 GHz and α=0.5\alpha=0.5. In order to form the symmetrical bimeron, the anisotropic DMI is used in our simulation. (d)-(f) show the time evolution of the guiding center (rxr_{x}, ryr_{y}) for the cases of Figs. (a)-(c) respectively.

Recently, an interesting method for manipulating magnetic skyrmions, was proposed, i.e., by using an oscillating electric field and combining a static magnetic field, where the electric field can modify the magnetic anisotropy. Yuan_PRB2019 ; Song_JPD2019 Such a method is applicable in both metals and insulators. With the oscillating electric field alone, the skyrmion will exhibit the breathing motion (rather than propagation along a certain direction) and the spin wave excitation is symmetric. When an in-plane static magnetic field is applied, the symmetry of the skyrmion is broken and then the spin wave excitation becomes asymmetric, resulting in nonzero net driving force. Yuan_PRB2019 ; Song_JPD2019 Thus, an oscillating electric field can drive the asymmetrical skyrmion to move along a certain direction. In addition, the skyrmion speed reaches its maximum value when the frequency of the oscillating electric field matches the eigenfrequency of the system. Yuan_PRB2019

The bimerons studied here have intrinsic asymmetrical structure, so that they can be driven by the alternating field. Figures 6(a) and (b) show the trajectories of asymmetrical bimerons driven by an alternating magnetic field 𝑯=H0\boldsymbol{H}=H_{0}sin(2πft2\pi ft)𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{e_{x}}, where the applied magnetic field is uniform in space. Indeed, the propagation of asymmetrical bimerons is induced, and for the bimerons with opposite signs of QQ, their trajectories are essentially the same, except for their motion directions. For the purpose of comparison, we also calculate the motion of the symmetrical bimeron under the same magnetic field, as shown in Fig. 6(c), from which we can see that an alternating magnetic field cannot induce the symmetrical bimeron to propagation. Note that in addition to the alternating magnetic field, the alternating magnetic anisotropy can also excite the asymmetrical bimeron to move along a certain direction, as shown in Fig. S5 of Ref. Shen_SI .

On the other hand, based on the time evolution of the guiding center (rxr_{x}, ryr_{y}), the propagation velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) of the bimeron can be obtained [see Fig. 6(d)]. Figures 7(a) and (b) show the velocities as functions of the frequency ff, where we take the alternating magnetic field 𝑯=H0\boldsymbol{H}=H_{0}sin(2πft2\pi ft)𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{e_{x}} with amplitude μ0H0\mu_{0}H_{0} of 10 mT and frequency ff of 8328\sim 32 GHz. Similar to the case of the skyrmion, Yuan_PRB2019 the bimeron reaches its maximum speed when the frequency of alternating magnetic fields coincides with the system eigenfrequency of 20.6\sim 20.6 GHz [see the inset in Fig. 7(a)]. In addition, the velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) are calculated as functions of the damping α\alpha, as shown in Figs. 7(c) and (d), where the alternating magnetic field has the amplitude of 10 mT and frequency of 20 GHz. To understand the results of the numerical simulations, we try to find the net driving force induced by the alternating magnetic field. As shown in the inset of Fig. 7(d), the ratio vy/vxv_{y}/v_{x} obtained from numerical simulations can be described by αdxx/(4πQ)\alpha d_{xx}/(-4\pi Q). Thus, Eq. (5) suggests that the net driving force 𝑭net\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{net}} is almost along the yy direction. Assuming that Fnet=c1/α+c2+c3α+c4α2F_{\text{net}}=c_{1}/\alpha+c_{2}+c_{3}\alpha+c_{4}\alpha^{2} with c1=0.865×1016c_{1}=0.865\times 10^{-16} N, c2=1.398×1016c_{2}=1.398\times 10^{-16} N, c3=5.081×1016c_{3}=-5.081\times 10^{-16} N and c4=4.975×1016c_{4}=4.975\times 10^{-16} N, the results given by Eq. (5) agree with the numerical simulations, as shown in Figs. 7(c) and (d). It is worth mentioning that the bimeron will annihilate, when a strong alternating magnetic field (its amplitude and frequency are 100 mT and 20 GHz respectively) is applied (see Supplementary Movie 2).

Refer to caption

Figure 7: (a) and (b) The bimeron velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) as functions of the frequency ff of the alternating magnetic field 𝑯=H0\boldsymbol{H}=H_{0}sin(2πft2\pi ft)𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{e_{x}}, where μ0H0=10\mu_{0}H_{0}=10 mT, and α=\alpha= 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5. The inset in Fig. 7(a) is the absorption spectrum. Applying a magnetic field 𝑩𝒔=0.5\boldsymbol{B_{s}}=0.5 mT\cdotsin(2πft2\pi ft)/(2πft2\pi ft)𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{e_{x}} with f=100f=100 GHz yields the average magnetization mx(t)\left\langle m_{x}(t)\right\rangle of the system, and then the Fourier transform of mx(t)\left\langle m_{x}(t)\right\rangle gives the absorption spectrum, where the damping α=\alpha= 0.008 is used in our calculation. (c) and (d) The bimeron velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) as functions of the damping α\alpha, where the alternating magnetic field has the amplitude of 10 mT and frequency of 20 GHz. The inset in Fig. 7(d) shows the ratio of vy/vxv_{y}/v_{x} with different damping constants.

VII Magnetic bimerons showing no skyrmion Hall effect

Refer to caption

Figure 8: (a) The schematic diagram of the forces acting on the bimerons, where 𝑭net\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{net}} and 𝑭grad\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{grad}} are the forces induced by the alternating magnetic field and magnetic field gradient respectively, and 𝑭α\boldsymbol{F}_{\alpha} and 𝑮×𝒗\boldsymbol{G}\times\boldsymbol{v} denote the dissipative force and Magnus force. The color of the background represents the value of the space-dependent magnetic field. (b) The trajectories of bimerons induced by an alternating magnetic field 𝑯=H0\boldsymbol{H}=H_{0}sin(2πft2\pi ft)𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{e_{x}} with μ0H0=10\mu_{0}H_{0}=10 mT and f=20f=20 GHz, where we set the damping α=\alpha= 0.1 and the total time t=t= 1 ns in our simulations. In addition, the magnetic field gradient (𝑯=dH/dxx𝒆𝒙\boldsymbol{H}=-dH/dx\cdot x\boldsymbol{e_{x}} with μ0dH/dx=\mu_{0}dH/dx= 0, 0.2, 0.28 and 0.6 mT/nm) is applied. (c) and (d) The bimeron velocities (vxv_{x}, vyv_{y}) as functions of the magnetic field gradient μ0dH/dx\mu_{0}dH/dx, where α=0.1\alpha=0.1, the frequency ff of alternating magnetic fields is 20 GHz, and the amplitudes μ0H0\mu_{0}H_{0} of 10 and 20 mT are adopted. The symbols and lines denote the results of numerical simulations and Eq. (5) respectively.

As shown in Figs. 6 and 7, under the action of the alternating magnetic field, the FM bimerons show the skyrmion Hall effect due to the presence of the Magnus force (𝑮×𝒗\boldsymbol{G}\times\boldsymbol{v}), and the motion speed is small (<0.1<0.1 m/s). Here we introduce a force induced by magnetic field gradients to compensate the Magnus force, and then achieve this purpose of overcoming or suppressing the skyrmion Hall effect, as shown in Fig. 8(a), where the direction of the net driving force 𝑭net\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{net}} (the yy direction) is parallel to the racetrack. Figure 8(b) shows that as the magnetic field gradient μ0dH/dx\mu_{0}dH/dx increases, the bimeron moves faster and the skyrmion Hall effect is effectively suppressed. When μ0dH/dx\mu_{0}dH/dx increases to 0.28 mT/nm, the bimeron propagates parallel to the racetrack with the speed of 0.374\sim 0.374 m/s, so that the bimeron will not be destroyed by touching the racetrack edge. On the other hand, for the case of μ0dH/dx=\mu_{0}dH/dx= 0.28 mT/nm, the propagation of the bimeron is perpendicular to the gradient direction, so that the bimeron size is not affected by the space-dependent magnetic field. If μ0dH/dx>\mu_{0}dH/dx> 0.28 mT/nm, the force 𝑭grad\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{grad}} induced by the magnetic field gradient is larger than the Magnus force (𝑮×𝒗\boldsymbol{G}\times\boldsymbol{v}), causing that the bimeron moves towards the area of lower magnetic field [see Fig. 8(b)].

By changing the magnetic field gradient μ0dH/dx\mu_{0}dH/dx, the different velocities are obtained by numerical simulations, as shown in Figs. 8(c) and (d). In our simulations, the damping α=\alpha= 0.1, the frequency ff of alternating magnetic fields is 20 GHz, and the amplitudes μ0H0\mu_{0}H_{0} of 10 and 20 mT are adopted. Combining the Eq. (6) and substituting 𝑭driv=(FgradFnet)\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{driv}}=\begin{pmatrix}F_{\text{grad}}\\ F_{\text{net}}\end{pmatrix} into Eq. (5), the analytical velocities are given. As shown in Figs. 8(c) and (d), the results given by Eq. (5) are consistent with numerical simulations, where the values of Fnet9.58×1016F_{\text{net}}\sim 9.58\times 10^{-16} and 32.59×101632.59\times 10^{-16} N have been used for the cases of μ0H0=\mu_{0}H_{0}= 10 and 20 mT respectively. We now derive the critical magnetic field gradient, at which the bimeron moves without showing the skyrmion Hall effect, i.e., vx=0v_{x}=0. Based on 𝑮×vy𝒆𝒚+𝑭grad=𝟎\boldsymbol{G}\times v_{y}\boldsymbol{e_{y}}+\boldsymbol{F}_{\text{grad}}=\boldsymbol{0}, the critical magnetic field gradient is derived, which satisfies the following formula,

dHdx=4πQγuHvy,\frac{dH}{dx}=\frac{4\pi Q}{\gamma u_{\text{H}}}v_{y}, (7)

where vy=γFnet/(αdyyμ0MStz)v_{y}=\gamma F_{\text{net}}/(\alpha d_{yy}\mu_{0}M_{\text{S}}t_{z}). As mentioned earlier, for the case of μ0H0=\mu_{0}H_{0}= 10 mT, our numerical simulation shows that the critical magnetic field gradient is \sim 0.28 mT/nm and the corresponding speed vyv_{y} is \sim 0.374 m/s. If the amplitude μ0H0\mu_{0}H_{0} of the alternating magnetic field is increased to 20 mT, the critical magnetic field gradient and corresponding speed vyv_{y} are \sim 1.11 mT/nm and 1.486 m/s, respectively, as shown in Figs. 8(c) and (d). The above values obtained from numerical simulations obey Eq. (7).

VIII Conclusions

In conclusion, we analytically and numerically study the dynamics of FM bimerons induced by spin currents and magnetic fields. Numerical simulations show that two bimerons with opposite signs of the topological numbers can be simultaneously created in a FM film via current-induced spin torques, and we prove their energy equivalence. However, the coexistence of two skyrmions with opposite topological numbers is not allowed in a FM film with the same background. Compared to the skyrmions, the bimerons studied here have a smaller size for the same values of parameters. The motion of bimerons induced by spin currents is also discussed, and the bimeron speed is analytically derived, which agrees well with the numerical simulations. We point out that two-lane racetracks based on bimerons can be built in order to accurately encode the data bits, as the bimerons with opposite topological numbers can coexist and have opposite drift directions. In addition, a magnetic field gradient can drive a bimeron towards the area of lower magnetic field. More importantly, when only an alternating magnetic field is applied to the entire film system, the asymmetrical bimeron propagates along a certain direction. Besides, if a suitable magnetic field gradient is further introduced, the alternating magnetic field can drive the bimeron to move at a speed of \sim 1.5 m/s and the bimeron does not show the skyrmion Hall effect. Our results are useful for understanding of the bimeron dynamics and may provide effective ways for building bimeron-based spintronic devices.

Acknowledgements.
X.L. acknowledges the support by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2019A1515111110). X.Z. acknowledges the support by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Grant No. 2019A1515110713), and the Presidential Postdoctoral Fellowship of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CUHKSZ). O.A.T. acknowledges the support by the Australian Research Council (Grant No. DP200101027) and the Cooperative Research Project Program at the Research Institute of Electrical Communication, Tohoku University. M.E. acknowledges the support by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Nos. JP18H03676 and JP17K05490) and the support by CREST, JST (Grant Nos. JPMJCR16F1 and JPMJCR1874). Y.Z. acknowledges the support by the President’s Fund of CUHKSZ, Longgang Key Laboratory of Applied Spintronics, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11974298 and 61961136006), Shenzhen Fundamental Research Fund (Grant No. JCYJ20170410171958839), Shenzhen Key Laboratory Project (Grant No. ZDSYS201603311644527), and Shenzhen Peacock Group Plan (Grant No. KQTD20180413181702403).

References

  • (1) A. N. Bogdanov and D. A. Yablonskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 68, 101 (1989).
  • (2) U. K. Rößler, A. N. Bogdanov, and C. Pfleiderer, Nature 442, 797 (2006).
  • (3) N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899 (2013).
  • (4) G. Finocchio, F Büttner, R. Tomasello, M. Carpentieri and M. Kläui, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 49, 423001 (2016).
  • (5) A. Fert, N. Reyren and V. Cros, Nat. Rev. Mat. 2, 17031 (2017).
  • (6) K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Kläui, J. Appl. Phys. 124, 240901 (2018).
  • (7) W. Kang, Y. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and W. Zhao, Proc. IEEE 104, 2040 (2016).
  • (8) Y. Zhou, Natl. Sci. Rev. 6, 210 (2019).
  • (9) X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, K. M. Song, T.-E. Park, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, W. Zhao, G. Zhao, and S. Woo, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 143001 (2020).
  • (10) X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, and Y. Zhou, Sci. Rep. 5, 9400 (2015).
  • (11) D. Prychynenko, M. Sitte, K. Litzius, B. Krüger, G. Bourianoff, M. Kläui, J. Sinova, and K. Everschor-Sitte, Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 014034 (2018).
  • (12) T. Nozaki, Y. Jibiki, M. Goto, E. Tamura, T. Nozaki, H. Kubota, A. Fukushima, S. Yuasa, and Y. Suzuki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 012402 (2019).
  • (13) J. Sampaio, V. Cros, S. Rohart, A. Thiaville, and A. Fert, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 839 (2013).
  • (14) J. Iwasaki, M. Mochizuki, and N. Nagaosa, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 742 (2013).
  • (15) X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and M. Ezawa, Phys. Rev. B 93, 024415 (2016).
  • (16) X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, D. Xiao, G. P. Zhao, Y. Liu, and Y. Zhou, Nanotechnology 26, 225701 (2015).
  • (17) S. Komineas and N. Papanicolaou, Phys. Rev. B 92, 064412 (2015).
  • (18) C. Wang, D. Xiao, X. Chen, Y. Zhou, and Y. Liu, New J. Phys. 19, 083008 (2017).
  • (19) J. J. Liang, J. H. Yu, J. Chen, M. H. Qin, M. Zeng, X. B. Lu, X. S. Gao, and J.-M. Liu, New J. Phys. 20, 053037 (2018).
  • (20) X. Wang, W. L. Gan, J. C. Martinez, F. N. Tan, M. B. A. Jalil, and W. S. Lew, Nanoscale 10, 733 (2018).
  • (21) H. Xia, C. Song, C. Jin, J. Wang, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 458, 57 (2018).
  • (22) R. Tomasello, S. Komineas, G. Siracusano, M. Carpentieri, and G. Finocchio, Phys. Rev. B 98, 024421 (2018).
  • (23) L. Shen, J. Xia, G. Zhao, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, X. Liu, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134448 (2018).
  • (24) C. Ma, X. Zhang, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, W. Jiang, T. Ono, S. N. Piramanayagam, A. Morisako, Y. Zhou, and X. Liu, Nano Lett. 19, 353 (2019).
  • (25) L. Kong and J. Zang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 067203 (2013).
  • (26) R. Khoshlahni, A. Qaiumzadeh, A. Bergman, and A. Brataas, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054423 (2019).
  • (27) X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and M. Ezawa, Sci. Rep. 6, 24795 (2016).
  • (28) J. Barker and O. A. Tretiakov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 147203 (2016).
  • (29) H. Yang, C. Wang, T. Yu, Y. Cao, and P. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 197201 (2018).
  • (30) L. Shen, J. Xia, G. Zhao, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, X. Liu, and Y. Zhou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 114, 042402 (2019).
  • (31) X. Liang, G. Zhao, L. Shen, J. Xia, L. Zhao, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. B 100, 144439 (2019).
  • (32) S. Woo, K. M. Song, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, M. Ezawa, X. Liu, S. Finizio, J. Raabe, N. J. Lee, S. I. Kim, S. Y. Park, Y. Kim, J. Y. Kim, D. Lee, O. Lee, J. W. Choi, B. C. Min, H. C. Koo, and J. Chang, Nat. Commun. 9, 959 (2018).
  • (33) A. K. Nayak, V. Kumar, T. Ma, P. Werner, E. Pippel, R. Sahoo, F. Damay, U. K. Rößler, C. Felser, and S. S. P. Parkin, Nature 548, 561 (2017).
  • (34) M. Ezawa, Phys. Rev. B 83, 100408(R) (2011).
  • (35) S. Z. Lin, A. Saxena, and C. D. Batista, Phys. Rev. B 91, 224407 (2015).
  • (36) C. Heo, N. S. Kiselev, A. K. Nandy, S. Blügel, and T. Rasing, Sci. Rep. 6, 27146 (2016).
  • (37) A. O. Leonov and I. Kézsmárki, Phys. Rev. B 96, 014423 (2017).
  • (38) Y. A. Kharkov, O. P. Sushkov, and M. Mostovoy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 207201 (2017).
  • (39) A. G. Kolesnikov, V. S. Plotnikov, E. V. Pustovalov, A. S. Samardak, L. A. Chebotkevich, A. V. Ognev, and O. A. Tretiakov, Sci. Rep. 8, 15794 (2018).
  • (40) F. P. Chmiel, N. Waterfield Price, R. D. Johnson, A. D. Lamirand, J. Schad, G. van der Laan, D. T. Harris, J. Irwin, M. S. Rzchowski, C. B. Eom, and P. G. Radaelli, Nat. Mater. 17, 581 (2018).
  • (41) X. Z. Yu, W. Koshibae, Y. Tokunaga, K. Shibata, Y. Taguchi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Nature 564, 95 (2018).
  • (42) S. Woo, Nature 564, 43 (2018).
  • (43) B. Göbel, A. Mook, J. Henk, I. Mertig, and O. A. Tretiakov, Phys. Rev. B 99, 060407(R) (2019).
  • (44) R. L. Fernandes, R. J. C. Lopes, and A. R. Pereira, Solid State Commun. 290, 55 (2019).
  • (45) R. Murooka, A. O. Leonov, K. Inoue and J. Ohe, Sci. Rep. 10, 396 (2020).
  • (46) S. K. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224406 (2019).
  • (47) K.-W. Moon, J. Yoon, C. Kim, and C. Hwang, Phys. Rev. Appl. 12, 064054 (2019).
  • (48) L. Shen, J. Xia, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, X. Liu, G. Zhao, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 037202 (2020).
  • (49) X. Zhang, J. Xia, L. Shen, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, G. Zhao, X. Liu, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. B 101, 144435 (2020).
  • (50) R. Zarzuela, V. K. Bharadwaj, K.-W. Kim, J. Sinova, and K. Everschor-Sitte, Phys. Rev. B 101, 054405 (2020).
  • (51) X. Lu, R. Fei, and L. Yang, arXiv:2002.05208 (2020).
  • (52) X. Li, L. Shen, Y. Bai, X. Zhang, J. Xia, M. Ezawa, O. A. Tretiakov, X. Xu, M. Mruczkiewicz, M. Krawczyk, and Y. Zhou, arXiv:2002.04387 (2020).
  • (53) W. Jiang, X. Zhang, G. Yu, W. Zhang, X. Wang, M. Benjamin Jungfleisch, John E. Pearson, X. Cheng, O. Heinonen, K. L. Wang, Y. Zhou, A. Hoffmann, and Suzanne G. E. te Velthuis, Nat. Phys. 13, 162 (2017).
  • (54) K. Litzius, I. Lemesh, B. Krüger, P. Bassirian, L. Caretta, K. Richter, F. Büttner, K. Sato, O. A. Tretiakov, J. Förster, R. M. Reeve, M. Weigand, I. Bykova, H. Stoll, G. Schütz, G. S. D. Beach, and M. Kläui, Nat. Phys. 13, 170 (2017).
  • (55) X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and M. Ezawa, Nat. Commun. 7, 10293 (2016).
  • (56) J. Xia, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, Z. Hou, W. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Zhou, Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 044046 (2019).
  • (57) W. Legrand, D. Maccariello, F. Ajejas, S. Collin, A. Vecchiola, K. Bouzehouane, N. Reyren, V. Cros, and A. Fert, Nat. Mater. 19, 34 (2019).
  • (58) T. Dohi, S. DuttaGupta, S. Fukami, and H. Ohno, Nat. Commun. 10, 5153 (2019).
  • (59) P. Lai, G. P. Zhao, H. Tang, N. Ran, S. Q. Wu, J. Xia, X. Zhang, and Y. Zhou, Sci. Rep. 7, 45330 (2017).
  • (60) R. Tomasello, E. Martinez, R. Zivieri, L. Torres, M. Carpentieri, and G. Finocchio, Sci. Rep. 4, 6784 (2014).
  • (61) S. Rohart and A. Thiaville, Phys. Rev. B 88, 184422 (2013).
  • (62) L. Kipgen, H. Fulara, M. Raju, and S. Chaudhary, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324, 3118, (2012).
  • (63) See Supplemental Material at http:// for the detailed results on the FM bimerons.
  • (64) T. L. Gilbert, IEEE Trans. Magn. 40, 3443 (2004).
  • (65) O. A. Tretiakov and O. Tchernyshyov, Phys. Rev. B 75, 012408 (2007).
  • (66) J. Müller, New J. Phys. 19, 025002 (2017).
  • (67) W. Kang, C. Zheng, Y. Huang, X. Zhang, Y. Zhou, W. Lv and W. Zhao, IEEE Electron Devices Lett. 37, 924 (2016).
  • (68) P. Lai, G. P. Zhao, F. J. Morvan, S. Q. Wu and N. Ran, Spin 7, 1740006 (2017).
  • (69) A. A. Thiele, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 230 (1973).
  • (70) E. G. Tveten, A. Qaiumzadeh, O. A. Tretiakov, and A. Brataas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 127208 (2013).
  • (71) O. A. Tretiakov, D. Clarke, G. W. Chern, Y. B. Bazaliy, and O. Tchernyshyov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 127204 (2008).
  • (72) D. J. Clarke, O. A. Tretiakov, G. W. Chern, Y. B. Bazaliy, and O. Tchernyshyov, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134412 (2008).
  • (73) I. Jakobi, P. Neumann, Y. Wang, D. B. R. Dasari, F. E. Hallak, M. A. Bashir, M. Markham, A. Edmonds, D. Twitchen, and J. Wrachtrup, Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 67 (2017).
  • (74) H. Y. Yuan, X. S. Wang, M.-H. Yung, and X. R. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 99, 014428 (2019).
  • (75) C. Song, C. Jin, Y. Ma, J. Wang, H. Xia, J. Wang, and Q. Liu, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 52, 435001 (2019).