This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Dynamics of charged particles and magnetic dipoles around magnetized quasi-Schwarzschild black holes

Bakhtiyor Narzilloev [email protected] Center for Field Theory and Particle Physics and Department of Physics, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China Akfa University, Kichik Halqa Yuli Street 17, Tashkent 100095, Uzbekistan Ulugh Beg Astronomical Institute, Astronomy Str. 33, Tashkent 100052, Uzbekistan    Javlon Rayimbaev [email protected] Ulugh Beg Astronomical Institute, Astronomy Str. 33, Tashkent 100052, Uzbekistan Akfa University, Kichik Halqa Yuli Street 17, Tashkent 100095, Uzbekistan Institute of Nuclear Physics, Ulugbek 1, Tashkent 100214, Uzbekistan National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan    Ahmadjon Abdujabbarov [email protected] Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, 80 Nandan Road, Shanghai 200030, P. R. China Ulugh Beg Astronomical Institute, Astronomy Str. 33, Tashkent 100052, Uzbekistan Institute of Nuclear Physics, Ulugbek 1, Tashkent 100214, Uzbekistan National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, Kori Niyoziy, 39, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan    Bobomurat Ahmedov [email protected] Ulugh Beg Astronomical Institute, Astronomy Str. 33, Tashkent 100052, Uzbekistan Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, Kori Niyoziy, 39, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100174, Uzbekistan    Cosimo Bambi [email protected] Center for Field Theory and Particle Physics and Department of Physics, Fudan University, 200438 Shanghai, China
Abstract

In the present paper, we have investigated the motion of charged particles together with magnetic dipoles to determine how well the spacetime deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon and external uniform magnetic field can mimic the spin of a rotating Kerr black hole. Investigation of charged particle motion has shown that the deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon in the absence of external magnetic fields can mimic the rotation parameter of Kerr spacetime up to a/M0.5a/M\approx 0.5. The combination of external magnetic field and deviation parameter can do even a better job mimicking the rotation parameter up to a/M0.93a/M\simeq 0.93, which corresponds to the rapidly rotating case. Study of the dynamics of magnetic dipoles around quasi-Schwarzschild black holes in the external magnetic field has shown that there are degeneracy values of ISCO radius of test particles at ϵcr>ϵ0.35\epsilon_{cr}>\epsilon\geq 0.35 which may lead to two different values of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) radius. When the deviation parameter is in the range of ϵ(1, 1)\epsilon\in(-1,\ 1), it can mimic the spin of a rotating Kerr black hole in the range a/M(0.0537, 0.3952)a/M\in(0.0537,\ 0.3952) for magnetic dipoles with values of magnetic coupling parameter β[0.25, 0.25]\beta\in[-0.25,\ 0.25] in corotating orbits.

pacs:
04.50.-h, 04.40.Dg, 97.60.Gb

I Introduction

The first exact analytical solution of the vacuum field equations of Einstein’s general relativity has been obtained just after its discovery in 1916 by Schwarzschild Schwarzschild (1916) and describes exterior spacetime of the non-rotating spherically symmetric black hole. The rotating black hole solution is obtained by Kerr and includes two parameters: the total mass of the black hole and its rotation parameter. Most observational features of the astrophysical black holes can be, in principle, explained by the solution describing the Kerr black hole. On the other hand one may alternatively consider the extension of the Kerr solution with additional parameters, see, for example, Newman et al. (1963); Zimmerman and Shahir (1989); Glampedakis and Babak (2006); Johannsen and Psaltis (2010, 2011); Johannsen (2013); Konoplya et al. (2016); Cardoso et al. (2014); Sen (1992); Rezzolla and Zhidenko (2014). The electric charge may also affect the gravitational field of the charged black hole and the properties of such objects have been studied in Grunau and Kagramanova (2011); Zakharov (1994); Stuchlík and Hledik (2002); Pugliese et al. (2010, 2011a, 2011b); Patil et al. (2012) for different astrophysical scenarios. Black hole may be considered as embedded on the brane of higher dimensional spacetime, see the Refs. Turimov et al. (2017); Whisker (2005); Majumdar and Mukherjee (2005); Liang (2017); Li et al. (2015) where several properties of back holes with brane charge have been studied. Black holes may have gravitomagnetic monopole charge and authors of Refs. Liu et al. (2011); Zimmerman and Shahir (1989); Morozova and Ahmedov (2009); Aliev et al. (2008); Ahmedov et al. (2012); Abdujabbarov et al. (2011a, 2008) have studied the properties of spacetime with nonvanishing gravitmagnetic charge. Authors of Refs. Bambi (2017); Rayimbaev et al. (2015); Bambi and Barausse (2011); Chen and Jing (2012); Narzilloev et al. (2020); Bambi et al. (2012); Bambi (2013); Bambi et al. (2017); Cao et al. (2018) have studied deformed spacetime of black holes and its properties.

One of the interesting extension of the Kerr solution has been proposed in Glampedakis and Babak (2006) where an approximate solution of Einstein vacuum equations has been obtained. It was also introduced the leading order deviation from Kerr solution due to spacetime quadrupole moment. The spacetime properties around so-called quasi-Kerr black hole have been studied in Refs. Psaltis and Johannsen (2012); Liu et al. (2012). In a previous paper, we have studied the weak lensing near the quasi-Kerr black hole Chakrabarty et al. (2018). Recently we have also studied the charged particle motion around quasi-Kerr compact object in the presence of magnetic field Narzilloev et al. (2019).

Testing general relativity and alternative theories of gravity through gravitational lensing and motion of test particles in the various conditions is important to distinguish the central black hole parameters from the ones of alternate gravity theories, since their effects are similar or exactly the same at some range of values of the parameters of theories of gravity. For example in our previous works we have shown how the effects of MOG field parameters Haydarov et al. (2020), conformal parametersHaydarov et al. (2020); Narzilloev et al. (2020a), the coupling parameter of the Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theory Abdujabbarov et al. (2020a), electric charge of a black hole in Einstein-Maxwell theory Turimov et al. (2020), stringy charge Narzilloev et al. (2020a), perfect fluid dark matter Narzilloev et al. (2020b) and quantum gravity Rayimbaev et al. (2020) can mimic the spin of rotating Kerr black hole. On the other hand, by now, in spite of the attempts to detect neutron stars as recycled radio pulsars near the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* in the center of Milky way galaxy by GRAVITY collaboration, we do not have any astrophysical observations of them. One of the reason of the absence of the pulsars around SgrA* is scattering of radio wave in the plasma medium surrounding the SMBH and the other one might be the dominated effects of the magnetic interaction between the neutron star’s dipole moment and the magnetic field around the black hole created by either magnetic charge of the central black hole or electric current of accreting matter . The stable circular and chaotic motions of neutral particles Pánis et al. (2019), dynamics and quasihormonic oscillations of charged particles around static and rotating black holes immersed in external asypmtotically uniform magnetic fields  Kološ et al. (2015); Tursunov et al. (2016); Stuchlík and Kološ (2016); Stuchlík et al. (2020); Tursunov et al. (2020) and plasma magnetosphere surrounding black holes in different gravity models have been analyzed in detail by the authors of Refs.Takahashi and Koyama (2009); Kopáček et al. (2010); Kopáček and Karas (2014); Li and Wu (2019); Yi and Wu (2020) in particular using the method of the Lyapunov to show the difference between regular and chaotic orbits. It is also shown that even a small misalignment and frame dragging effects cause to reduce the chaotic motion.

Recent observation of image of supermassive black hole at the center of elliptical galaxy M87 Akiyama et al. (2019a, b) and detection of the gravitational waves by LIGO-Virgo collaboration The LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration (2016); Abbott et al. (2016) provided the test of general relativity in strong field regime. In fact gravitational wave generated by the binary compact objects and the wave properties strongly depend on their spin and chaos degree in the system. The existence of chaotic motion in such systems in the problems of two spinning black holes in the post-Newtonian approximation has been shown in Refs. Levin (2000, 2003); Cornish and Levin (2002, 2003); Buonanno et al. (2005); Wu and Xie (2007, 2008, 2010); Wu et al. (2015); Wu and Huang (2015); Zhong et al. (2010); Mei et al. (2013).

At the same time these experiments and observations open window for testing the modified and alternative theories of gravity together with analysis of X-ray observations from active galactic nuclei (AGN)  Bambi et al. (2016); Zhou et al. (2018); Tripathi et al. (2019). The second generation Very long baseline interferometer (VLBI) instrument GRAVITY through precise observations of highly relativistic motions of matter and S2 star close to Sgr A* has also provided experimental tests of general relativity in strong field.

Despite the fact that in general relativity the black hole cannot have its own magnetic field due to no-hair theorem Misner et al. (1973), the latter can be considered as immersed in external magnetic field Wald (1974) created by current of electric charges in accretion disk. The spacetime curvature will change the original structure of the external magnetic field. The detailed specifications of these changes and test particle motion around compact object in the presence of magnetic field have been studied in Refs.  Chen et al. (2016); Hashimoto and Tanahashi (2017); Dalui et al. (2019); Han (2008); de Moura and Letelier (2000); Morozova et al. (2014); Jawad et al. (2016); Hussain and Jamil (2015); Jamil et al. (2015); Hussain, S et al. (2014); Babar et al. (2016); Bañados et al. (2009); Majeed and Jamil (2017); Zakria and Jamil (2015); Brevik and Jamil (2019); De Laurentis et al. (2018); Shaymatov et al. (2013); Atamurotov et al. (2013); Narzilloev et al. (2020c, b). The structure of the electromagnetic field around compact objects in alternate and modified theories of gravity have been explored in Refs. Kološ et al. (2017); Kovář et al. (2010, 2014); Aliev and Gal’tsov (1989); Aliev and Özdemir (2002); Aliev et al. (1986); Frolov and Krtouš (2011); Frolov (2012); Stuchlík et al. (2014); Shaymatov et al. (2014); Abdujabbarov and Ahmedov (2010); Abdujabbarov et al. (2011b); Karas et al. (2012); Shaymatov et al. (2015); Stuchlík and Kološ (2016); Rayimbaev et al. (2020); Turimov et al. (2018); Shaymatov et al. (2020a); Shaymatov (2019); Rayimbaev et al. (2019a); Rayimbaev and Tadjimuratov (2020); Rayimbaev et al. (2019b); Shaymatov et al. (2020b); Narzilloev et al. (2020a). Quantum interference effects in conformal Weyl gravity has been studied in Hakimov et al. (2017). Periodic circular orbits, regular orbits and chaotic orbits of neutral and charged particles around various black holes have been investigated in Refs.Karas and Vokrouhlický (1992); Nakamura and Ishizuka (1993); Kopáček et al. (2010); Kopáček and Karas (2014); Li and Wu (2019); Yi and Wu (2020); Takahashi and Koyama (2009). The magnetic dipole motion around black hole in the presence of asymptotically uniform magnetic field has been studied in de Felice and Sorge (2003); de Felice et al. (2004) with further development to the case of modified gravity theories in Rayimbaev (2016); Oteev et al. (2016); Toshmatov et al. (2015); Abdujabbarov et al. (2014); Rahimov et al. (2011); Rahimov (2011); Narzilloev et al. (2020a); Haydarov et al. (2020, 2020); Rayimbaev et al. (2020); Vrba et al. (2020); Abdujabbarov et al. (2020b).

In this work our main purpose is to study the charged particles and magnetic dipoles motion around magnetized quasi-Schwarzschild black hole. The paper is organized as follows: Sect. II is devoted to study the dynamics of charged particles around quasi-Schwarzschild black hole and comparison with one in Kerr spacetime. The magnetic dipoles motion around quasi-Schwarzschild black hole immersed in an external magnetic field is explored in Sect. III. In this section the obtained results have been compared with particles dynamics around Kerr black hole. Then the obtained results have been applied to real astrophysical scenarios in Sect. IV. We conclude our results in Sect. V. Throughout the paper we use the spacelike signature (-,+,+,+) and system of units where G=1=cG=1=c.

II Charged particle motion. Quasi-Schwarzschild versus Kerr black hole

II.1 Magnetic field around compact object

Before going through the investigation of magnetized particles motion around quasi-Schwarzschild compact object immersed in an external asymptotically uniform magnetic field we start with the case when the particle is electrically charged only. The quasi-Schwarzschild spacetime metric can be obtained from rotating quasi-Kerr one Glampedakis and Babak (2006) using the following decomposition

gμν=gμνSchw+ϵhμν,g_{\mu\nu}=g_{\mu\nu}^{Schw}+\epsilon h_{\mu\nu},

where gμνSchwg_{\mu\nu}^{Schw} corresponds to the standard Schwarzschild metric and ϵhμν\epsilon h_{\mu\nu} corresponds to the deviation from the Schwarzschild spacetime. Parameter ϵ\epsilon defines the deviation from the spherically symmetric spacetime due to the additional term in mass quadrupole moment QQ of the gravitating object as

Q=ϵM3,Q=-\epsilon M^{3}\ ,

and it can take both negative and positive signs Glampedakis and Babak (2006). In the linear approximation in ϵ\epsilon the contravariant components of the spacetime metric can be written as

gμν=gSchwμνϵhμν,g^{\mu\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}_{Schw}-\epsilon h^{\mu\nu},

and thus the upper indices of hμνh^{\mu\nu} can be lowered by using Schwarzschild metric tensor. The contravariant components of hμνh^{\mu\nu} are given by the expressions (see Glampedakis and Babak (2006))

htt\displaystyle h^{tt} =\displaystyle= f1(13cos2θ)F1,\displaystyle f^{-1}(1-3\cos^{2}\theta)F_{1},
hrr\displaystyle h^{rr} =\displaystyle= f(13cos2θ)F1,\displaystyle f(1-3\cos^{2}\theta)F_{1},
hθθ\displaystyle h^{\theta\theta} =\displaystyle= 1r2(13cos2θ)F2,\displaystyle-\frac{1}{r^{2}}(1-3\cos^{2}\theta)F_{2},
hϕϕ\displaystyle h^{\phi\phi} =\displaystyle= 1r2sin2θ(13cos2θ)F2,\displaystyle-\frac{1}{r^{2}\sin^{2}\theta}(1-3\cos^{2}\theta)F_{2},
f\displaystyle f =\displaystyle= 12Mr,\displaystyle 1-\frac{2M}{r},

where radial functions F1F_{1} and F2F_{2} read

F1\displaystyle F_{1} =\displaystyle= 5(rM)(2M2+6Mr3r2)8Mr(r2M)\displaystyle-\frac{5(r-M)\left(2M^{2}+6Mr-3r^{2}\right)}{8Mr(r-2M)}
15r(r2M)log(rr2M)16M2,\displaystyle-\frac{15r(r-2M)\log\left(\frac{r}{r-2M}\right)}{16M^{2}}\ ,
F2\displaystyle F_{2} =\displaystyle= 5(2M23Mr3r2)8Mr\displaystyle\frac{5\left(2M^{2}-3Mr-3r^{2}\right)}{8Mr}
+15(r22M2)log(rr2M)16M2.\displaystyle+\frac{15\left(r^{2}-2M^{2}\right)\log\left(\frac{r}{r-2M}\right)}{16M^{2}}\ .

After lowering the indices of hμνh^{\mu\nu} with the use of gμνSchwg_{\mu\nu}^{Schw} the quasi-Schwarzschild spacetime metric takes the following form

ds2=gttdt2+grrdr2+k(r,θ)r2dΩ2,\displaystyle ds^{2}=g_{tt}dt^{2}+g_{rr}dr^{2}+k(r,\theta)r^{2}d\Omega^{2}\ , (3)

where

gtt\displaystyle g_{tt} =\displaystyle= f[1ϵF1(13cos2θ)],\displaystyle-f\left[1-\epsilon F_{1}(1-3\cos^{2}\theta)\right], (4)
grr\displaystyle g_{rr} =\displaystyle= f1[1+ϵF1(13cos2θ)],\displaystyle f^{-1}\left[1+\epsilon F_{1}(1-3\cos^{2}\theta)\right], (5)
k(r,θ)\displaystyle k(r,\theta) =\displaystyle= 1ϵF2(13cos2θ).\displaystyle 1-\epsilon F_{2}(1-3\cos^{2}\theta). (6)

In the spacetime metric the terms being proportional to ϵ\epsilon provide the part being responsible for the quasi-Schwarzschild effects. One can easily check that in the case of ϵ=0\epsilon=0 one recovers Schwarzschild spacetime. It is worth noting here that the condition grr=0g^{rr}=0 gives the location of an event horizon at re=2Mr_{e}=2M being the same as in the case of the Schwarzschild black hole.

Using Wald method Wald (1974) one can find the components of four vector potential of electromagnetic fields as

Aμ=(0,0,0,12B).\displaystyle A^{\mu}=\left(0,0,0,\frac{1}{2}B\right)\ . (7)

Using the metric (3) one can write the covariant components as

Aμ={0,0,0,12Bh(r,θ)r2sin2θ}.\displaystyle A_{\mu}=\left\{0,0,0,\frac{1}{2}Bh(r,\theta)r^{2}\sin^{2}\theta\right\}\ . (8)

Now one can find the expression for the magnetic field around a quasi-Schwarzschild compact object. The four velocity of the proper observer is given by

𝒰α={(f[1+12ϵF1(1+3cos2θ)])12,0,0,0}.\displaystyle\mathcal{U}^{\alpha}=\left\{\left(f\left[1+\frac{1}{2}\epsilon F_{1}(1+3\cos 2\theta)\right]\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}},0,0,0\right\}\ . (9)

Then the orthonormal components of the magnetic field with respect to the chosen frame takes the following form Narzilloev et al. (2019)

Br^\displaystyle B^{\hat{r}} =\displaystyle= Bcosθ1+ϵF2(3cos2θ1)1+ϵ2F2(3cos2θ+1),\displaystyle B\cos\theta\frac{1+\epsilon F_{2}(3\cos 2\theta-1)}{1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}F_{2}(3\cos 2\theta+1)}, (10)
Bθ^\displaystyle B^{\hat{\theta}} =\displaystyle= Bsinθf1+ϵ2F1(1+3cos2θ)1+ϵ2F2(3cos2θ+1)\displaystyle B\sin\theta\sqrt{f}\frac{\sqrt{1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}F_{1}(1+3\cos 2\theta)}}{\sqrt{1+\frac{\epsilon}{2}F_{2}(3\cos 2\theta+1)}} (11)
×\displaystyle\times 1+ϵ4[rF2+2F2](3cos2θ+1)1ϵ24F12(3cos2θ+1)2,\displaystyle\frac{1+\frac{\epsilon}{4}\left[rF_{2}^{\prime}+2F_{2}\right](3\cos 2\theta+1)}{\sqrt{1-\frac{\epsilon^{2}}{4}F_{1}^{2}(3\cos 2\theta+1)^{2}}},
Bϕ^\displaystyle B^{\hat{\phi}} =\displaystyle= 0,\displaystyle 0\ , (12)

where the prime denotes derivative over the radial coordinates. One can easily see that in pure Schwarzschild spacetime it takes

Br^\displaystyle B^{\hat{r}} =\displaystyle= Bcosθ,\displaystyle B\cos\theta\ , (13)
Bθ^\displaystyle B^{\hat{\theta}} =\displaystyle= Bfsinθ,\displaystyle B\sqrt{f}\sin\theta\ , (14)

and in the Newtonian weak field regime M/r0M/r\rightarrow 0 the components of the magnetic field become

Br^=Bcosθ,Bθ^=Bsinθ,\displaystyle B^{\hat{r}}=B\cos\theta\ ,\qquad B^{\hat{\theta}}=B\sin\theta\ , (15)

consistent with the Newtonian limit.

II.2 Circular motion of charged test particle around quasi-Schwarzschild compact object

Now, we study the equation of motion of a charged particle around a quasi-Schwarzschild compact object briefly. It is more convenient to use Hamilton-Jacobi equation of motion for particles orbiting around central objects which is the case here. In the presence of an external electromagnetic field the equation reads

gαβ(Sxα+eAα)(Sxβ+eAβ)=m2,g^{\alpha\beta}\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial x^{\alpha}}+eA_{\alpha}\right)\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial x^{\beta}}+eA_{\beta}\right)=-m^{2}\ , (16)

with ee and mm being the electric charge and mass of the test particle, respectively.

The equation of motion (16) is not separable when the system is non-integrable. In this case, Eq. (16) should be replaced with a Hamiltonian formalism Kološ et al. (2015); Takahashi and Koyama (2009); Kopáček et al. (2010); Kopáček and Karas (2014); Li and Wu (2019); Yi and Wu (2020). However, when one investigates test particle motion on the equatorial plane, Eq. (16) can be expressed in the following separable form

S\displaystyle S =\displaystyle= Et+Lϕ+Sr+Sθ,\displaystyle-Et+L\phi+S_{r}+S_{\theta}\ , (17)

where EE and LL define the energy and angular momentum of a test particle per unit mass, respectively. Thus, the equation of motion of a test particle with unit mass reads as

(+eB2mr2(1ϵF2))2r2(1ϵF2)+f1+ϵF1(Sr)2\displaystyle\frac{\left(\mathcal{L}+\frac{eB}{2m}r^{2}(1-\epsilon F_{2})\right)^{2}}{r^{2}(1-\epsilon F_{2})}+\frac{f}{1+\epsilon F_{1}}\left(\frac{\partial S}{\partial r}\right)^{2}
2f(1ϵF1))=1,\displaystyle-\frac{\mathcal{E}^{2}}{f(1-\epsilon F_{1}))}=-1\ , (18)

where =E/m{\cal E}=E/m and =L/m{\cal L}=L/m are specific energy and angular momentum of a test particle, respectively.

For test particles moving at the equatorial plane (θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2) one can obtain the effective potential from the radial motion

r˙2=2Veff,\displaystyle\dot{r}^{2}=\mathcal{E}^{2}-V_{\rm eff}\ , (19)

that reads as

Veff\displaystyle V_{\rm eff} =\displaystyle= f(1F1ϵ){1+(h(r,π2)r2ωB)2},\displaystyle f\left(1-F_{1}\epsilon\right)\left\{1+\left(\frac{\mathcal{L}}{h(r,\frac{\pi}{2})r^{2}}-\omega_{B}\right)^{2}\right\}, (20)

with ωB=eB/(2mc)\omega_{B}=eB/(2mc) defining the cyclotron frequency of a charged particle which corresponds to the interaction between electrically charged particle and external magnetic field. The radial dependence of such effective potential is shown in Fig. 1. It is clearly seen that the increase in deviation parameter also increases the effective potential while magnetic field has an opposite action as it was shown in Refs.Kološ et al. (2015); Tursunov et al. (2016); Stuchlík and Kološ (2016)

a. Refer to caption b. Refer to caption

Figure 1: Effective potential as a function of radial coordinate rr for the case M=1M=1. Left panel corresponds for variation of deformation parameter. Right panel is for variation of magnetic interaction.

For a circular motion of a particle at equatorial plane one can set following standard conditions

Veff(r)=2,Veff(r)=0,\displaystyle V_{\rm eff}(r)={\cal E}^{2},\,V_{\rm eff}^{\prime}(r)=0, (21)

which results the angular momentum of a charged test particle to have the radial dependence as presented in Fig.  2. We see the usual Schwarzschild shape for the line for which ϵ=0\epsilon=0 in the right panel. However, starting from some value of deviation parameter around ϵ0.32\epsilon\approx 0.32 it changes the shape of lines that causes them to have a maximum point at corresponding radius that vanishes starting from the case when ϵ0.8\epsilon\approx 0.8. We will come back to this point later in the next subsection where it contains an important description on defining ISCO radius.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Radial dependence of the angular momentum of a test particle for the different values of magnetic interaction (left panel) and deformation (right panel).

II.3 Innermost stable circular orbits. Quasi-Schwarzschild versus Kerr black hole

In this subsection we investigate so called innermost stable circular orbits (ISCO) around a quasi-Schwarzschild compact object immersed in an asymptotically uniform magnetic field. Based on the obtained results we will try to answer to the question, how the parameters ϵ\epsilon and BB can mimic the rotation parameter aa of well known Kerr solution. The idea is, if the parameters mentioned can mimic the rotation parameter aa of a Kerr black hole, then for the same ISCO radius one can get a correspondence constraint between rotation parameter and parameters ϵ\epsilon and BB. First, we investigate the relation between ISCO radius and parameters of interest. To do so, one can add additional requirement to the condition (21) that reads

Veff′′(r)=0.\displaystyle V_{\rm eff}^{\prime\prime}(r)=0\ . (22)

Taking into account these three conditions (together with (21)) one might plot the dependence between ISCO radius and parameters ϵ\epsilon and BB as plotted in Fig  3. One can see from the graphs that the increase of the both parameters ϵ\epsilon and BB reduces the ISCO radius of a charged test particle. From the left panel it is clearly seen that if one increases the deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon up to some value then starts to reduce the ISCO radius which becomes smaller and smaller instead of taking its initial values before reducing. To make the situation clear one should take into account the condition on angular momentum of a test particle that says that for particle to move on the last stable circular orbit its angular momentum should have a minimum on that orbit radius. Using this condition one can refer to the graph of dependence between angular momentum of a test particle on circular orbit radius as in the right panel of Fig.  2. We have mentioned this point in the previous subsection saying that the angular momentum for the absence of external magnetic field would have maximum points when the deviation parameter is between 0.320.80.32-0.8. But, when we have plotted the Fig.  3 we just used the case when the angular momentum of a test particle has an extremum. So, we need to exclude such maximums from these extremum points which results that one needs to erase the lower part of ISCO lines starting from the turning points which is shown with shaded region in the left panel of Fig.  3. For the case of magnetic field the situation is typical as expected, i.e. if one increases the magnetic field the Lorentz force becomes stronger which makes the ISCO radius smaller.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: ISCO radius of a test particle orbiting on equatorial plane of a quasi-Schwarzschild compact object for the different values of magnetic interaction (left panel) and deformation parameter (right panel).

Finally, we plan to answer the question stated in the beginning of this subsection, how well the parameters ϵ\epsilon and BB can mimic the rotation parameter aa of Kerr metric? Knowing how the ISCO in the case of Kerr metric behaves under the influence of a rotation parameter one can plot the degeneracy between these parameters as shown in Fig.  4. It was expected from the dependence of ISCO on the parameter ϵ\epsilon that this parameter can not completely mimic the rotation parameter as the ISCO radius did not tend to MM which is the case for extremal rotation a1a\rightarrow 1 in Kerr metric. Now it is one more time clearly seen that this parameter can only mimic the rotation parameter up to approximately 0.5\approx 0.5 when the external magnetic field is absent. One can however see that the magnetic parameter itself can mimic the rotation parameter up to 0.88\approx 0.88. It is also seen from the right panel that in the presence of both, magnetic field and deviation parameter the mimic range exceeds a>0.9a>0.9 being competitive with the rapidly rotating Kerr spacetime.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Degeneracy plot that shows the correspondence between of dimensionless rotation parameter aa of a Kerr metric with ϵ\epsilon and BB parameters.

The degeneracy plot between deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon and magnetic coupling parameter ωB\omega_{B} for a few fixed values of ISCO radius is illustrated in Fig.  5. We see that magnetic interaction has considerably stronger effect than the effect of deformation of a spacetime.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Degeneracy plots for ϵ\epsilon and ωB\omega_{B} for given values of ISCO radii.

III Magnetic dipole motion. Quasi-Schwarzschild versus Kerr black hole

In this section we focus on magnetic dipole motion around a quasi-Schwarzschild compact object immersed in an asymptotically uniform magnetic field. The Hamilton-Jacobi equation of motion of magnetic dipole takes the following form

gμν𝒮xμ𝒮xν=(m12DμνFμν)2.\displaystyle g^{\mu\nu}\frac{\partial{\cal S}}{\partial x^{\mu}}\frac{\partial{\cal S}}{\partial x^{\nu}}=-\Bigg{(}m-\frac{1}{2}D^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}\Bigg{)}^{2}\ . (23)

Here, DμνD^{\mu\nu} is the antisymmetric polarization tensor which defines the electrodynamic properties of the particle. We assume that particle is electrically neutral q=0q=0 and the polarization tensor is only described by magnetic moment μ\mu itself. It is worth to note here that it is also possible to investigate in alternate way the motion of the magnetic dipole with an electric charge where one just needs to take the left hand side of Eq.(16) instead of the one in Eq.(23). However, in this work we are aimed to apply the motion of magnetic dipoles to magnetized neutron stars orbiting around supermassive black holes where neutron star can be treated as electrically neutral test particle with nonvanishing magnetic dipole moment. Since the mass of typical supermassive black hole is much greater than the mass of typical neutron star this allows us to take the neutron star as a test particle moving in the spacetime of the former one. Therefore hereafter we focus on the motion of electrically neutral magnetic dipole only. In this case the components of this tensor can be written as Narzilloev et al. (2020a)

Dμν=ημναβuαμβ,\displaystyle D^{\mu\nu}=\eta^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}u_{\alpha}\mu_{\beta}, (24)

that satisfies the following condition

Dμνuν=0,\displaystyle D^{\mu\nu}u_{\nu}=0, (25)

where μα\mu_{\alpha} describes the four magnetic momentum of a magnetic dipole. Fμν=μAννAμF_{\mu\nu}=\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}\ is the electromagnetic field tensor which can also be written in terms of the components of electromagnetic field as

Fμν=ημναβBαuβ+2u[μEν]\displaystyle F_{\mu\nu}=-\eta_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}B^{\alpha}u^{\beta}+2u_{[\mu}E_{\nu]} (26)

where ηαβσγ\eta_{\alpha\beta\sigma\gamma} is the pseudo-tensorial form of the Levi-Civita symbol ϵαβσγ\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\sigma\gamma} defined as

ηαβσγ=gϵαβσγ,ηαβσγ=1gϵαβσγ,\displaystyle\eta_{\alpha\beta\sigma\gamma}=\sqrt{-g}\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\sigma\gamma}\ ,\qquad\eta^{\alpha\beta\sigma\gamma}=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\epsilon^{\alpha\beta\sigma\gamma}\ , (27)

with g=det|gμν|=r4sin2θg={\rm det|g_{\mu\nu}|}=-r^{4}\sin^{2}\theta for spacetime metric (3) and

ϵαβσγ={+1,forevenpermutations,1,foroddpermutations, 0,fortheothercombinations.\displaystyle\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\sigma\gamma}=\begin{cases}+1\ ,\rm for\ even\ permutations\ ,\\ -1\ ,\rm for\ odd\ permutations\ ,\\ \ \ 0\ ,\rm for\ the\ other\ combinations\ .\end{cases} (28)

Being contracted with (24) and using (25) with (26) one can write

DμνFμν=2μαBα=2μα^Bα^.\displaystyle D^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}=2\mu^{\alpha}B_{\alpha}=2\mu^{\hat{\alpha}}B_{\hat{\alpha}}\ . (29)

For simplicity we consider the magnetic interaction between the magnetic dipole and external magnetic field to be weak enough (due to weakness of the external test magnetic field), so we can use the approximation (𝒟μνμν)20\left({\cal D}^{\mu\nu}{\cal F}_{\mu\nu}\right)^{2}\to 0. It is expected that in a given external magnetic field the magnetic momentum of a particle aligns along this external field. If one assumes a particle moving at equatorial plane (θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2) then since this magnetic field has only normal component Bθ^B^{\hat{\theta}} to this equatorial plane and so does the magnetic moment μθ^\mu^{\hat{\theta}} which is consistent with the lowest energy condition of the magnetic dipole. The scalar product (29) then becomes

DμνFμν=2μB𝒜\displaystyle D^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}=2\mu B\mathcal{A} (30)

here 𝒜(r)\mathcal{A}(r) defines the proportionality function that taking into account expression (10) and for Bθ^B^{\hat{\theta}} reads

𝒜=𝒜(r)=f1ϵF11ϵF21ϵ2[rF2+2F2]1ϵ2F12.\displaystyle\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{A}(r)=\sqrt{f\frac{1-\epsilon F_{1}}{1-\epsilon F_{2}}}\,\frac{1-\frac{\epsilon}{2}\left[rF_{2}^{\prime}+2F_{2}\right]}{\sqrt{1-\epsilon^{2}F_{1}^{2}}}\ . (31)

Plugging the scalar product of DμνD^{\mu\nu} and FμνF^{\mu\nu} into the equation of motion (23) one can find the effective potential at the equatorial plane as

Veff\displaystyle V_{\rm eff} =\displaystyle= (12Mr)[1ϵF1]\displaystyle\left(1-\frac{2M}{r}\right)\Big{[}1-\epsilon F_{1}\Big{]} (32)
×\displaystyle\times {(1β𝒜)2+2r2[1ϵF2]},\displaystyle\left\{\left(1-\beta\mathcal{A}\right)^{2}+\frac{\mathcal{L}^{2}}{r^{2}\left[1-\epsilon F_{2}\right]}\right\}\ ,

here β=2μB/m\beta=2\mu B/m is called magnetic coupling parameter that defines electromagnetic interaction between magnetic dipole and external magnetic field. In real astrophysical scenarios, for example in the case of typical neutron star orbiting around super-massive black hole with magnetic dipole moment μ=(1/2)BNSRNS3\mu=(1/2)B_{\rm NS}R^{3}_{\rm NS} the coupling magnetic parameter is

β11250(BNS1012G)(RNS106cm)3(Bext10G)(mNSM)1,\displaystyle\beta\simeq\frac{11}{250}\left(\frac{B_{\rm NS}}{10^{12}\rm G}\right)\left(\frac{R_{\rm NS}}{10^{6}\rm cm}\right)^{3}\left(\frac{B_{\rm ext}}{10\rm G}\right)\left(\frac{m_{\rm NS}}{M_{\odot}}\right)^{-1}, (33)

where BNSB_{\rm NS} is the magnetic field at the surface of neutron star, RNSR_{\rm NS} and mNSm_{\rm NS} are radius and mass of neutron star, respectively. Radial dependence of the effective potential is plotted in Fig.  6. We see that effective potential for magnetic dipole behaves similarly to the charged particle one.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Effective potential as a function of r/Mr/M for different values of deviation (left panel) and magnetic interaction (right panel) parameters.

From the same conditions (21) for the trajectory of the particle to be circular one can easily find the expressions for the angular momentum and the energy of the test particle that read

2\displaystyle\mathcal{L}^{2} =\displaystyle= r3(1𝒜β)(1ϵF2)2{(1𝒜β)[f(1ϵF1)ϵfF1]2βf𝒜(1ϵF1)}(1ϵF2)[(1ϵF1)(2frf)+frϵF1]frϵ(1ϵF1)F2,\displaystyle\frac{r^{3}(1-{\cal A}\beta)\left(1-\epsilon F_{2}\right)^{2}\left\{(1-{\cal A}\beta)\left[f^{\prime}\left(1-\epsilon F_{1}\right)-\epsilon fF_{1}^{\prime}\right]-2\beta f{\cal A}^{\prime}\left(1-\epsilon F_{1}\right)\right\}}{\left(1-\epsilon F_{2}\right)\left[\left(1-\epsilon F_{1}\right)\left(2f-rf^{\prime}\right)+fr\epsilon F_{1}^{\prime}\right]-fr\epsilon\left(1-\epsilon F_{1}\right)F_{2}^{\prime}}\ , (34)
2\displaystyle\mathcal{E}^{2} =\displaystyle= (1β𝒜)f2(1ϵF1)2{(1β𝒜)rϵF2+2(1ϵF2)[1β(𝒜+r𝒜)]}(1ϵF2)[(1ϵF1)(2frf)+ϵfrF1]frϵ(1ϵF1)F2.\displaystyle\frac{(1-\beta\mathcal{A})f^{2}\left(1-\epsilon F_{1}\right)^{2}\left\{(1-\beta\mathcal{A})r\epsilon F_{2}^{\prime}+2\left(1-\epsilon F_{2}\right)\left[1-\beta\left(\mathcal{A}+r\mathcal{A}^{\prime}\right)\right]\right\}}{\left(1-\epsilon F_{2}\right)\left[\left(1-\epsilon F_{1}\right)\left(2f-rf^{\prime}\right)+\epsilon frF_{1}^{\prime}\right]-fr\epsilon\left(1-\epsilon F_{1}\right)F_{2}^{\prime}}\ . (35)

The orbit of a particle moving at equatorial plane being circular makes the angular momentum of a particle to have the radial dependence as plotted in Fig.  7. From the shift of the minimum of the lines one can state how the ISCO radius changes for the different values of magnetic coupling parameter and also for various values of deviation parameter. From the upper panel it comes out that if one increases the magnetic interaction between magnetic dipole and external magnetic field then it increases the ISCO radius as well.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Radial dependence of the angular momentum of a magnetic dipole for the different values of magnetic parameter β\beta (left panel) and deviation ϵ\epsilon (right panel).

Having obtained the effective potential and the radial dependence for angular momentum one can now investigate ISCO for magnetic dipole moving at the equatorial plane. We can use either the condition given in Eq. (22) or for the angular momentum to have a minimum at ISCO radius. Then the dependence of ISCO radius from parameters ϵ\epsilon and magnetic coupling parameter β\beta becomes as presented in Fig.  8.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Dependence ISCO radius of test particles orbiting at the equatorial plane around quasi-Schwarzschild black hole from the deviation for given β\beta (left panel) and magnetic coupling parameters for given ϵ\epsilon (right panel).

Figure 8 demonstrates the dependence of ISCO radius of magnetic dipole around Quasi-Schwarzschild black hole from the deviation (on the top panel) and magnetic coupling (on the bottom panel) parameters. We see from the plots that increasing the magnetic coupling parameter increases the ISCO radius. Moreover, it appears that it has a value around β=2/3\beta=2/3 at which ISCO radius tends to infinity saying that no stable circular orbits can occur no matter how far the magnetic dipole is orbiting. In the upper panel we have cut the lower part of ISCO radius dependence due to the same reason as in the previous section which says that for chosen value of deviation parameter the angular momentum of a test particle can have both minimum and maximum where we should take only minimum points that are physically relevant.

IV Astrophysical applications of the study

One of the important and actual key issue in relativistic astrophysics is testing theory of gravity by study of test magnetic dipoles motion, in particular, in exploration of motion of neutron stars (pulsars and/or magnetars) treated as test magnetic dipoles around supermassive black holes (hereafter SMBH), that may give a possibility to test both gravitational and electromagnetic fields around a SMBH due to their accurate pulses in observations which may help to measure the distance through Doppler effect. In observations of such models it can be realized when neutron star could be found near the center of a galactic center. However, by now, it is quite difficult to find radio pulsars, due to Compton scattering of radio pulses in dense charged electron gas around the Sgr A*. The first and by now a single neutron star–magnetar called SGR 1745-2900 around Sgr A* has been discovered in 2013 Mori et al. (2013). In our calculations we use the parameters of the magnetar treating it as a magnetic dipole orbiting Sgr A*. On other hand, theoretical problematic issue on the analysis of observational properties such as QPO, ISCO radius around the SMBH when the parameters of different alternate gravity reflect the similar effects on the properties in that cases it is impossible which gravity’s effect plays dominant role. In fact that mostly astrophysical black holes are accepted as rotating black holes. Here we aimed to analyze ISCO radius comparing with the effects of spacetime deformation and spin of Kerr black hole when both provide the same value for ISCO radius of magnetic dipoles. Note that for comparison we consider quasi-Schwarzschild compact object immersed in an external asymptotically uniform magnetic field and Kerr black hole without magnetic field. We assume real astrophysical case of the magnetar orbiting the SMBH Sgr A*. Note also that one can consider a magnetic dipole as a neutral one in the absence of external magnetic field.

The value of the magnetic coupling parameter β\beta for the magnetar SGR (PSR) J1745–2900 with the magnetic dipole moment μ1.6×1032Gcm3\mu\simeq 1.6\times 10^{32}\rm G\cdot cm^{3} orbiting the supermassive BH Sgr A* is Mori et al. (2013)

βPSRJ174529000.716(Bext10G).\displaystyle\beta_{\rm PSR\,J1745-2900}\simeq 0.716\left(\frac{B_{\rm ext}}{10\rm G}\right)\ . (36)

ISCO radius of test particles around a rotating Kerr black hole is defined by the following expression for retrograde (+) and prograde (-) orbits Bardeen et al. (1972)

risco=3+Z2±(3Z1)(3+Z1+2Z2),\displaystyle r_{\rm isco}=3+Z_{2}\pm\sqrt{(3-Z_{1})(3+Z_{1}+2Z_{2})}\ , (37)

where

Z11=(1+a3+1a3)1a23,Z22Z12=3a2.Z_{1}-1=\left(\sqrt[3]{1+a}+\sqrt[3]{1-a}\right)\sqrt[3]{1-a^{2}}\ ,\quad Z_{2}^{2}-Z_{1}^{2}=3a^{2}\ .

Now, in order to compare effects of spin and deviation parameters on ISCO radius we will provide the dependence of ISCO radius from deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon and spin of Kerr black hole for the magnetic dipoles with the negative and positive values of the magnetic coupling parameters as β=±0.25\beta=\pm 0.25 and neutral particles, noting that when the direction of the magnetic dipole moment of the test particle aligns along the magnetic field the magnetic coupling parameter is positive, otherwise it is negative.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Dependence of ISCO radius of magnetic dipoles from deviation parameter of quasi-Shwarzschild black hole and spin of Kerr black hole (left panel). Degeneracy plot is for spin of Kerr BHs aa and the deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon for the different values of the magnetic coupling parameter β=0.25,0,0.25\beta=0.25,0,-0.25.

In Fig.9 we provide the behavior of the ISCO radius of magnetic dipoles around quasi-Schwarzschild black hole in the presence and absence of external magnetic field (blue dashed, red dot-dashed and black solid lines in the top panel of the figure) and around rotating Kerr black hole in the absence of external magnetic field. One may see from the top panel of the figure that an increase of positive deviation parameter causes to decreases the ISCO radius while negative one increases. In some cases it is similar to the effect of spin of Kerr black hole. Moreover, positive (negative) values of magnetic coupling parameter shifts the ISCO radius outwards (towards) the central black hole. In the bottom panel we show (compare) effects of deviation parameter of quasi-Schwarzchild and spin of Kerr black holes for the degeneracy cases of the magnetic dipoles having the same values of ISCO radius. One may see from the degeneracy plot that negative deviation parameter can mimic the spin of Kerr black hole providing the same value of ISCO radius for corotating orbits of magnetized particles with the magnetic coupling parameter β=0.25\beta=0.25 up to a/M0.3952a/M\simeq 0.3952 while for the particles with the parameter β=0\beta=0 and β=0.25\beta=-0.25, it mimics up to the spin value of Kerr black hole a0.1984Ma\simeq 0.1984M and a0.0537Ma\simeq 0.0537M, respectively.

Here, we will focus how the magnetic coupling parameter can mimic the spin of the Kerr black hole providing the same value for ISCO radius of magnetic dipoles around Schwarzschild black hole. One may easily calculate ISCO radius for magnetic dipoles around Schwarzschild black hole keeping the deviation parameter as zero.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Degeneracy plot between dimensionless spin of Kerr BHs aa and the magnetic coupling parameter β\beta and deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon providing the same value for ISCO radius for magnetic dipoles around Schwarzschild black hole immersed in an external asymptotically uniform magnetic field.

One can construct the degeneracy plot between magnetic parameter in quasi-Schwarzschild metric and rotation parameter of Kerr one. From the right panel of Fig. 8 it is clearly seen that for fixed values of deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon the ISCO radius goes up similar to the case when one increases the magnetic coupling parameter. It leads to conclusion that this coupling parameter should only mimic the rotation parameter of a Kerr metric for retrograde orbits. One can ensure this from the degeneracy plot as illustrated in Fig. 10

Refer to caption
Figure 11: Relations between the deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon and magnetic coupling parameter β\beta for the fixed values of ISCO radius of magnetic dipoles.

Degeneracy between values of parameter ϵ\epsilon and magnetic coupling parameter for fixed values of ISCO radius is presented in Fig.  11. One can easily see that there are degeneracy values for the deviation parameter when the magnetic coupling parameter is fixed which provide the same value for ISCO radius. Consequently, with the increase of ISCO radius the range of degeneracy values of the deviation parameter increases.

V Conclusion

In the work the motion of charged particles together with magnetic dipoles has been investigated to determine how well the spacetime deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon and external uniform magnetic field can mimic rotation parameter of Kerr black hole which is the main point of this study.

Investigation of charged particle motion has shown that deviation parameter ϵ\epsilon in the absence of external magnetic field can mimic the rotation parameter of Kerr spacetime up to a0.46a\approx 0.46 which means that black hole assumed to be Kerr one with up to such rotation parameter can be also static quasi-Schwarzschild one with deviation parameter up to ϵ0.8\epsilon\approx 0.8. It has been also shown that the external magnetic field itself (i.e. without deviation parameter of spacetime) can mimic the rotation parameter up to a0.88a\approx 0.88. The combination of these two parameters can do even better but not considerable job mimicking the rotation parameter up to a>0.9a>0.9.

Study of the dynamics of magnetic dipoles around quasi-Schwarzschild black hole in the external magnetic field has shown that the maximum value of the effective potential for the fixed values of the specific angular momentum of the magnetic dipoles and deviation parameter of the spacetime around the BH increases with the increase of the magnetic coupling parameter and the positive deviation parameter increases the effective potential at the fixed values of the angular momentum and the magnetic coupling parameter while the negative ones decrease. It is shown that there are degeneracy values of ISCO radius of test particles at ϵcr>ϵ0.35\epsilon_{cr}>\epsilon\geq 0.35 which may lead to two different values of ISCO radius. Finally, we have studied how the deviation parameter mimics spin of Kerr BH providing the same values for ISCO radius of test particles. Since we consider magnetic dipoles as test ones, we have chosen here two different signs for the magnetic coupling parameter in the range of β[0.25, 0.25]\beta\in[-0.25,\ 0.25] and obtained that when the value of the deviation parameter in the range of ϵ(1, 1)\epsilon\in(-1,\ 1) it can mimic the spin of rotating Kerr BH in the range a/M(0.0537, 0.3952)a/M\in(0.0537,\ 0.3952) for the magnetic dipoles with the values of magnetic coupling parameter β[0.25, 0.25]\beta\in[-0.25,\ 0.25] in corotating orbits. However, the mimic values of the spin parameter in counterrotating orbits lie in the range of a/M(0.0152, 0.7863)a/M\in(0.0152,\ 0.7863). We have pointed out that since the magnetic coupling parameter increases ISCO radius of the magnetic dipoles it can mimic the spin of Kerr BH only in corotating orbits up to its value β=0.5922\beta=0.5922. Moreover, we have shown that the degeneracy relations between magnetic coupling parameter and the deviation parameters for the fixed values of ISCO radius and found out that the ISCO radius can be the same at the two different positive values of the deviation parameter for the fixed values of magnetic coupling parameter. Performed study can be applied to the dynamics of magnetized matter and neutron stars in SMBH close environment.

Acknowledgements.
This research is supported by the Uzbekistan Ministry for Innovative Development, Grants No. VA-FA-F-2-008 and No. MRB-AN-2019-29, the Innovation Program of the Shanghai Municipal Education Commission, Grant No. 2019-01-07-00-07-E00035, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), Grant No. 11973019. B.N. also acknowledges support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC), grant No. 2018DFH009013. This research is partially supported by an Erasmus+ exchange Grant between SU and NUUz. A.A. is supported by a postdoc fund through PIFI of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

References