This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Dwarfs in nearby voids: results of SALT spectroscopy

S.A. Pustilnik,1 A.Y. Kniazev,2,3,4 A.L. Tepliakova,1 Y.A. Perepelitsyna,1 E.S. Egorova4,5
1 Special Astrophysical Observatory of RAS, Nizhnij Arkhyz,Karachai-Circassia 369167, Russia
2 South African Astronomical Observatory, PO Box 9, 7935 Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
3 Southern African Large Telescope Foundation, PO Box 9, 7935 Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
4 Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Universitetskij Pr. 13, Moscow 119992, Russia
5 Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Mönchhofstraße 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
E-mail: [email protected] (SAP)
(Accepted December ??, 2023, Received August 20, 2023)
Abstract

In the framework of the ongoing project, aimed at the systematical studying galaxies in nearby voids, we conducted spectroscopy with the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT) of 62 objects from the Nearby Void Galaxy (NVG) sample. They include 8 remaining objects of the 60 preselected candidates to eXtremely Metal-Poor (XMP) dwarfs, two known void XMP dwarfs and 52 void dwarfs residing within the Local Volume. For 47 galaxies residing in the nearby voids, we obtained spectra of the diverse quality. For 42 of them, we detected the Hydrogen and Oxygen lines that allowed us to get estimates of O/H in the observed Hii regions. For 12 of the 42 objects, we detected the faint line [Oiii]λ\lambda4363, that allowed us to directly derive the electron temperature Te and obtain their gas O/H by the direct method. 14 objects with the undetected [Oiii]λ\lambda4363 line fall to the lowest metallicities range (12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.5 dex). For them, we use a carefully checked new empirical ’Strong line’ method of Izotov et al. For 14 other objects with only strong lines detected and with 12+log(O/H) of \sim7.5–8.0 dex, we used the modified version of ’semi-empirical’ method of Izotov and Thuan. It accounts for effect of the excitation parameter O32 on Te. 16 new galaxies are found with parameter 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.39 dex. Of them, four have 12+log(O/H) = 7.07 – 7.20 dex. Of the 60 observed NVG objects, 15 have mistaken radial velocities in HyperLEDA. They do not reside in the nearby voids.

keywords:
galaxies: dwarf – galaxies: evolution – galaxies: redshifts – galaxies: abundances – cosmology: large-scale structure of Universe
pagerange: Dwarfs in nearby voids: results of SALT spectroscopyReferencespubyear: 2023

1 Introduction

Voids represent the most rarefied and the largest volume elements of the Large-Scale Structure of the Universe. Despite galaxies residing in voids comprise a relatively small fraction of the whole realm of galaxies (van de Weygaert, 2016), they are the important ’bricks’ of our picture of the general galaxy evolution. Thus, Aragon-Calvo & Szalay (2013) predict the unusual properties of void structures and their galaxies due to the ’time machine and cosmic microscope’ effects of the void environment.

A more detailed modelling of the void galaxy evolution is necessary to compare their predicted properties with the observed ones. In particular, one needs the high resolution simulations in order to address the small dwarfs with the baryonic mass of 106 – some 108 M. Namely for this mass range, the observations (see below) demonstrate significant differences with the properties of galaxies in denser environments.

The effect of environment on evolution is expected to be stronger for the lower mass objects. Since all known wide-area spectral sky surveys have the similar limiting apparent magnitude of B (or rr) of \sim18.5, to have a representative galaxy sample to, e.g., MB = –10 to –12, one should explore the volume with the distances of R \lesssim 20–25 Mpc. This choice differs substantially from many studies of void galaxy samples in more distant voids (\sim80–200 Mpc), which probe properties of only the upper part of the galaxy luminosity function (e.g., Rojas et al., 2005; Patiri et al., 2006; Kreckel et al., 2012, and references therein).

An alternative approach related to the study of galaxies in the nearby voids, was suggested and partly realised by our group. The first step in this direction was the formation and studying of the galaxy sample in the nearby void Lynx-Cancer (Pustilnik & Tepliakova, 2011; Pustilnik et al., 2016, and references therein). In particular, it was found that void galaxies as a whole are less evolved in average as compared to the reference sample of the Local Volume (LV) late-type galaxies of Berg et al. (2012). They have elevated, in average, ratio of gas mass to luminosity (M(Hi)/LB) (Pustilnik, Martin, 2016) and the reduced gas metallicity (Pustilnik et al., 2016, 2021).

A surprising result of the above unbiased study of the whole Lynx-Cancer void sample was the discovery of several low-luminosity dwarfs with the eXtremely Metal-Poor (XMP) Hii regions and the extremely-high gas mass fraction, fg = Mgas/Mbaryon, up to 0.97–0.99 (Pustilnik et al., 2010, 2011; Chengalur & Pustilnik, 2013; Chengalur et al., 2017). Besides, an independently discovered XMP dwarf AGC198691 (Hirschauer et al., 2016; Aver et al., 2022) appeared to reside in the same void. We adopt here the definition of XMP galaxies as objects with 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.21 dex, or with Z(gas) \lesssim Z/30111 The solar value of 12+log(O/H) is adopted to be 8.69 dex after Asplund et al. (2009).. This metallicity is close to that of the prototype of such unusual galaxies, the famous blue compact dwarf IZw18 (Searle & Sargent, 1972).

In addition, these unusual dwarfs reveal blue colours of the outer parts of a galaxy (e.g. Perepelitsyna et al., 2014; Chengalur et al., 2017), where, in the framework of the common paradigm, the most aged stellar population resides. The colours, being compared to the evolutionary tracks from PEGASE2 package (Fioc & Volmerange, 1999), correspond to the ages of the related stellar population of about one to several Gyr. That hints, along with the extremely high gas mass fraction, to the early stages of galaxy evolution.

These properties, in turn, may connect the unusual void dwarfs with the predicted so-called Very Young Galaxies (VYG) (Tweed et al., 2018), defined as objects, formed more than a half of stellar mass within the last 1 Gyr. While the other their properties are not specified in simulations, the first attempts to find such a rare population are presented by Mamon et al. (2020). Meanwhile, the comprehensive study of a void XMP dwarf IZw18 and its companion IZw18C gives a clear indication on their VYG nature (Papaderos & Östlin, 2012).

The seach for and the study of XMP dwarf galaxies was in focus of many groups since the discovery of the record low metallicity of IZw18. We already discussed recently the continuing efforts and findings of such unusual galaxies in the previous papers of this series. Therefore we refer a reader to these texts. The only remarks we would add to this issue, are the recent results of the search for new XMP dwarfs within the nearby voids (Pustilnik et al., 2020b, 2021). They appeared very promising, since the number of known such objects was doubled thanks to our conducted program during several last years.

However, one should note that the prominent XMP dwarfs in the local Universe are occasionally found also in a less rarefied environments. The known examples include ’Little Cub’ galaxy (Hsyu et al., 2017) and ’Peekaboo’ galaxy (Karachentsev et al., 2023) with 12+log(O/H) = 7.11 and 6.98 dex, respectively. This is not clear yet, whether their evolutionary paths differ from those for the similar objects in voids.

Table 1: Journal of SALT spectral observations. Main sample
No Name Date Expos. PA θ\theta Air
time, s mass
1 J0015+0104 2019.10.01 2×\times1200 346.0 1.6 1.22
2 ESO294-010+ 2020.12.18 2×\times1200 64.0 1.4 1.21
3 PGC004055+ 2022.06.27 2×\times1200 66.0 1.7 1.27
4 UGC01085+ 2022.11.22 2×\times1100 169.0 1.6 1.32
5 AGC124137 2018.11.10 2×\times1200 238.0 1.6 1.34
-#- 2019.09.02 2×\times1200 238.0 1.5 1.35
-#- 2019.10.25 2×\times1200 238.0 1.7 1.34
6 ESO199-007+ 2021.02.03 2×\times1200 13.0 1.5 1.33
7 PGC1166738+{}^{*}+ 2019.09.06 2×\times1150 41.5 1.6 1.22
-#- 2019.12.25 2×\times1100 41.5 1.6 1.29
-#- 2019.12.29 2×\times1100 41.5 1.7 1.29
8 PGC013294+{}^{*}+ 2019.09.01 2×\times1200 –24.0 1.1 1.27
9 PGC712531+ 2021.07.31 2×\times1200 101.5 2.0 1.22
10 PGC681755+ 2022.12.26 2×\times1300 51.0 1.2 1.27
11 ESO359-024+ 2023.01.24 2×\times1200 255.5 1.7 1.28
12 PGC016389+ 2023.02.22 2×\times1200 92.0 1.0 1.19
13 HIJ0517-32\dagger+ 2022.01.06 2×\times1200 345.0 2.3 1.31
14 ESO553-046+ 2023.01.25 2×\times1250 101.0 2.0 1.27
15 PGC138836+ 2021.02.04 2×\times1150 161.0 2.0 1.31
-#- 2021.02.07 2×\times1150 161.0 2.0 1.30
16 PGC018431+ 2023.04.11 2×\times1200 87.0 1.8 1.23
17 ESO308-022+ 2023.02.21 2×\times1200 331.0 1.9 1.28
18 PGC020125+ 2022.12.18 2×\times1200 70.0 1.1 1.18
-#- 2022.12.26 2×\times1200 70.0 1.2 1.21
19 J0935-1348 2013.12.28 3×\times800 0.0 1.7 1.25
20 PGC029033+ 2023.01.21 2×\times1100 33.0 1.8 1.23
21 PGC041667+ 2022.04.27 2×\times1100 293.5 1.5 1.27
22 PGC091215+ 2022.03.05 2×\times1300 5.0 1.3 1.23
23 AGC227970+ 2022.05.03 2×\times1200 40.0 1.9 1.30
24 AGC225197+ 2022.03.05 2×\times1200 352.0 1.3 1.27
25 UGC07983+ 2022.04.27 2×\times1100 5.0 1.1 1.33
26 PGC1289726+ 2022.04.25 2×\times1100 38.0 1.3 1.27
27 AGC227972+ 2022.04.26 2×\times1100 134.5 1.9 1.29
28 AGC227973+ 2021.04.07 2×\times1100 326.0 1.4 1.28
-#- 2021.06.13 2×\times1100 326.0 1.6 1.26
-#- 2022.03.09 2×\times1100 326.0 1.3 1.28
29 AGC226122+ 2023.01.31 2×\times1100 46.5 1.6 1.29
30 PGC1264260+ 2021.02.06 2×\times1100 23.0 1.6 1.24
31 UGC08055+ 2022.04.30 2×\times1100 97.0 1.3 1.33
32 PGC044681+{}^{*}+ 2023.02.23 2×\times1100 30.5 1.8 1.30
33 KKH86+ 2022.05.31 2×\times1100 324.5 1.3 1.26
34 AGC716018 2020.03.16 2×\times1150 41.0 1.6 1.30
35 AGC249197 2019.05.29 2×\times1150 190.0 1.0 1.36
36 HIJ1738-57\dagger+{}^{*}+ 2019.05.03 2×\times1150 84.5 1.2 1.23
37 PGC408791+ 2021.07.29 2×\times1150 279.5 1.4 1.27
-#- 2021.11.06 2×\times1150 279.5 2.0 1.27
38 PGC129680+ 2022.04.28 2×\times1100 45.5 1.0 1.29
39 PGC1016598 2019.07.11 2×\times1300 103.0 1.8 1.30
40 ESO289-020+ 2022.04.28 2×\times1100 331.5 1.4 1.23
41 ESO238-005+{}^{*}+ 2019.05.11 2×\times1100 47.0 1.6 1.22
42 PGC1028063+ 2022.05.26 2×\times1100 300.0 1.2 1.20
43 ESO347-017+ 2022.05.27 2×\times1100 90.0 1.2 1.21
44 PGC3192333+ 2020.12.17 2×\times1100 265.5 1.4 1.22
45 PGC680341+ 2020.12.15 2×\times1100 51.5 1.2 1.24
46 ESO348-009+ 2022.05.31 2×\times1200 90.0 1.3 1.31
47 ESO149-003+ 2022.06.06 2×\times1200 146.5 1.6 1.30
+ LV void galaxies; XMP candidates from PEPK20;
\dagger ’HIJ’ means ’HIPASSJ’

The voids themselves are not simple and homogeneous. They have the fine sub-structure resembling the Large-Scale Structure of the Universe (e.g. Gottlöber et al., 2003; Aragon-Calvo & Szalay, 2013). This sub-structure contains nodes, filaments and sub-voids. Therefore, one expects that properties of void galaxies can vary, in particular due to the different effects of their in-void local environments.

The first results, briefly summarised above, appeal to a much more massive studying of void dwarf galaxies. To address the diversity of void galaxies and to have an opportunity to compare cosmological simulations with the real void objects, one needs properties for a sample of many hundreds to thousands galaxies within the limited volume, unbiased as much as possible.

The natural questions related to such studies are the following: a) how much properties of void galaxies can differ from those in a more typical environment? b) how often properties of void galaxies significantly differ from those of a more common population? c) what empirical relations exist between the properties of void galaxies and other factors. The answers to these questions can help us to understand possible differences in formation and evolution scenarios of void galaxies from those in a more common environment.

As a development of the observational study of dwarf void galaxies, in order to increase substantially the statistics of such objects with known evolutionary parameters, Z(gas) and gas mass fraction, we formed a sample of 25 voids in the volume with R << 25 Mpc from the Local Group. We separate 1354 galaxies within this volume (\sim20 percent of the total number known in this volume) which fall within these nearby voids. We refer to this sample as the ’Nearby Void Galaxy’ (NVG) sample (Pustilnik, Tepliakova & Makarov, 2019, hereafter PTM19). The sample galaxies were collected mostly from the HyperLEDA data base (Makarov et al., 2014).

The main parameters of the parent NVG sample are as follows. The range of the absolute blue magnitudes is of MB = –7.5 to –20.5 mag, with the median value of about –15.2 mag. The great majority of the NVG sample are the late-type galaxies (late spirals and dwarf irregulars), with the major fraction of the low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies. Similar to the wide range of luminosities, the distribution on the hydrogen mass in void galaxies is also very broad, with the full range of M(Hi) of 105.5 – 109.7 M, with the median M(Hi) \sim108.5 M. The parameter of gas richness, the ratio M(Hi)/LB of about a thousand NVG sample galaxies with known Hi data, spreads from 0.03 to 26, with the median of \sim1.

In the procedure of separation of void galaxies, all objects, appeared in the preselected empty spheres, were assigned to the void sample. They were further divided to the ’inner’ void subsample (\sim80 %), and the ’outer’ subsample. The ’inner’ 1088 galaxies reside in the ’inner’ parts of voids. Their distances to the nearest luminous neighbours, delineating voids, DNN{}_{\rm NN}\geq 2.0 Mpc, with the median value of \sim3.4 Mpc.

The ’outer’ 242 galaxies have D<NN{}_{\rm NN}< 2.0 Mpc, with the median of 1.65 Mpc. The separation of the void subsamples at D=NN{}_{\rm NN}= 2.0 Mpc was chosen to be consistent with the definition of galaxies residing in the nearby Lynx-Cancer void from our previous study (Pustilnik & Tepliakova, 2011; Pustilnik et al., 2016). In that work, the border of D>NN{}_{\rm NN}> 2.0 Mpc was intentively chosen so that to study the well defined void objects and to exclude possible interlopers. The study of both, the ’inner’ and the ’outer’ subsamples, will allow one to understand how many of the ’outer’ void galaxies represent on their properties an ’intermediate’ kind of the galaxy population in the context of transition between the lowest density regions and the walls, with a roughly mean matter density.

We then began two projects based on this sample. One of them is the search for new XMP void dwarfs. We selected 60 candidate XMP dwarfs from the whole NVG sample based on their known properties in the open data bases and in the literature (Pustilnik et al., 2020a). The results of spectroscopy of \sim3/4 of them are presented in papers Pustilnik et al. (2020b, 2021).

Another project is devoted to the study of the subsample of the NVG objects which fall within the LV. This consists of \sim260 objects from the NVG at the distances closer than 11 Mpc. First results on this part were presented in Pustilnik et al. (2022a, b). This is an analogue of our unbiased study of the galaxy sample in the nearby void Lynx-Cancer. The northern part of void galaxies in this project is studied at the SAO 6-m telescope BTA. The detailed description of the LV void sample, with some intermediate results, will appear in a paper in preparation.

Here we present the results of the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT; Buckley, Swart & Meiring, 2006; O’Donoghue et al., 2006) spectroscopy from the both projects. The first part includes eight of the remaining 14 dwarfs selected in Pustilnik et al. (2020a) as the void XMP candidates. The second part includes 49 galaxies selected as residing in voids within the LV, mainly the least luminous dwarfs. Also, a known XMP dwarf J0015+0104 from the Eridanus void (Guseva et al., 2009; Pustilnik et al., 2013) was observed to improve the accuracy of its O/H.

The content of the paper is arranged as follows: the description of the SALT spectral observations and data processing is presented in Sec. 2. In Sec. 3 we give the description of emission line measurements and methods used for O/H determination. The estimates of O/H for the observed galaxies are shown in Sec. 4. In Sec. 5 we discuss the obtained results along with other available information. In Sec. 6 we summarise and conclude. In the on-line supplementary materials we present the following data. In Appendix A we provide finding charts of all observed galaxies with the spectrograph long slit position superimposed. In Appendix B, plots of 1D spectra for the observed galaxies are presented. Appendix C presents the tables with line intensities, derived physical parameters and the values of 12+log(O/H).

2 SALT observations and data processing

For our spectral observations we used the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT; Buckley, Swart & Meiring, 2006; O’Donoghue et al., 2006) in service mode in the period from May 2019 to April 2023. Several of the 64 target galaxies were observed from two to three times in order to increase the S-to-N ratio of the ’strong’ lines in the potentially very low-metallicity objects. The obtained spectra were averaged for the subsequent analysis. See Tables 1, 2. The SALT Robert Stobie Spectrograph (RSS; Burgh et al., 2003; Kobulnicky et al., 2003) was used with VPH grating PG0900 with the long slit of 1.5″ by 8′. This option provides the range from 3600 Å to 6700 Å and the spectral resolution of FWHM\sim6.0 Å. For the obtained 2D spectra, we used a binning factor of four for the spatial scale and factor of two for the spectral coordinate. This gives us a final spatial sampling of 0.\aas@@fstack{\prime\prime}51 pixel-1 and spectral sampling of 0.97 Å pixel-1 .

Spectral observations with the sufficiently small entrance hole or with the narrow slit are the subject of the differential atmospheric refraction (e.g., Filippenko, 1982). To minimise its effect on the wavelength-dependent light loss, the long slit position angle (PA) is recommended to keep close to the direction of the atmospheric refraction (parallactic angle). In many cases, this can substantially limit the efficiency of observations. The RSS is equipped with an Atmospheric Dispersion Compensator (ADC), what allowed us not to worry about the effect of atmospheric refraction at arbitrary long-slit PAs. Spectrophotometric standards were observed during every night as a part of the SALT standard calibrations program.

In order not to repeat literally the description of specifics of SALT observations and flux calibration, we refer a reader to Section 2 of our recent paper (Pustilnik et al., 2020b).

The majority of Hii-regions in the observed galaxies are faint and low-contrast. For the pointing, we used nearby offset stars. In most cases, we selected position angles (PAs, in degrees) of the slit so that to include a nearby offset star and to cover a faint Hii-knot in a program galaxy. See the journals of observation in Tables 1, 2. They present the main information on each observation: the dates of observations, exposure times, seeing θ\theta (in arc seconds) and air mass.

Since many of the observed dwarfs are faint and of low surface brightness, an attempt to obtain their independent spectra can be a problem. To ease independent checks of our data, we present in Tables 1, 2 the used long slit position angles (PA). In Figures A1 – A4 of the on-line materials, we show their images with superimposed long slit positions. All but a few images are taken from the Legacy surveys database (Dey et al., 2019) The remaining several images which are unavailable in the Legacy database, are taken from the ESO Online archive (https://archive.eso.org/dss/dss).

Similar to our previous paper (Pustilnik et al., 2020b), the SALT science pipelines (Crawford et al., 2010) were used for the primary data reduction. For each CCD amplifier, they include bias and overscan subtraction, gain and cross-talk corrections and finally, mosaicing. The following long-slit reduction was conducted as described in the paper by Kniazev (2022).

Table 2: Journal of SALT spectral observations. Objects with wrong velocities
No. Name Date Expos. PA θ\theta Air
time, s mass
1 PGC3197756+ 2021.09.10 2×\times1200 295.0 1.8 1.27
2 PGC901638+ 2021.08.03 2×\times1200 314.5 1.3 1.23
3 PGC3207684+ 2021.10.08 2×\times1150 259.0 1.3 1.22
4 PGC3210819+ 2021.08.04 2×\times1200 317.0 1.8 1.22
5 PGC504827+ 2021.08.01 2×\times1200 282.5 1.3 1.25
6 PGC645417+ 2022.01.23 2×\times1150 48.0 2.2 1.28
7 PGC016383 2023.02.22 2×\times1200 92.0 1.0 1.19
8 AGC208329+ 2019.01.06 2×\times1200 94.5 1.5 1.29
9 J1355+04B\dagger 2022.05.31 2×\times1100 73.0 1.0 1.31
10 PGC1069207+ 2021.04.14 2×\times1100 137.0 1.2 1.21
11 PGC264615+ 2021.04.04 2×\times1200 21.0 1.3 1.32
-#- 2022.04.12 2×\times1200 21.0 1.5 1.35
12 PGC064718+ 2023.04.02 2×\times1200 52.0 1.4 1.31
13 PGC162688+ 2021.08.02 2×\times1200 107.0 1.6 1.26
14 PGC163318+ 2021.07.17 2×\times1200 43.0 2.0 1.23
15 6dFJ2226-2916+ 2020.11.13 2×\times1200 23.0 1.8 1.21
16 ABELL3888.14+ 2021.07.30 2×\times1200 337.5 1.3 1.24
17 ABELL3888.12+ 2021.08.03 2×\times1200 134.0 1.5 1.23
+ selected as the LV void galaxies
\dagger Makarov & Uklein (2012) adopt it as a companion of KKH86

3 Line measurements and O/H determination

The emission line fluxes obtained from 1D spectra were measured as described in detail in Kniazev et al. (2004) and briefly summarised in Pustilnik et al. (2020b). In order not to repeat this description, we refer a reader to these papers. Very briefly, the procedures include the robust drawing of continuum with the subsequent use of MIDAS222MIDAS is an acronym for the European Southern Observatory package – Munich Image Data Analysis System.-based programs for determination of parameters of emission lines.

Giving the line fluxes measured, we utilise an iterative procedure from Izotov et al. (1994), which accounts for the total sight-line dust extinction and the underlying Balmer line absorptions originating in the related young stellar clusters. As a result, it provides the simultaneous estimate of the equivalent width of absorption Balmer lines EW(abs)EW(abs) and the extinction coefficient C(Hβ)C(H\beta). The relevant equation (1) from Izotov et al. (1994) was used:

I(λ)/I(Hβ)=[EWe(λ)+EWa(λ)]/EWe(λ)×I(\lambda)/I(H\beta)=[EW_{e}(\lambda)+EW_{a}(\lambda)]/EW_{e}(\lambda)\times
EWe(Hβ)/[EWe(Hβ)+EWa(Hβ)]×EW_{e}(H\beta)/[EW_{e}(H\beta)+EW_{a}(H\beta)]\times
F(λ)/F(Hβ)exp[C(Hβ)f(λ)](1)F(\lambda)/F(H\beta)~{}exp[C(H\beta)f(\lambda)]~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}(1)

Here I(λ)I(\lambda) is the intrinsic line flux corrected for the overall extinction (both in the Milky Way and internal to a particular galaxy or Hii region) and the underlying Balmer absorption, while F(λ)F(\lambda) is the measured line flux. Here, as in Izotov et al. (1994), EWe(λ)EW_{e}(\lambda) are equivalent widths of used emission lines. EWa(λ)EW_{a}(\lambda) is the adopted value of the underlying Balmer absorptions. The theoretical Balmer line ratios I(λ\lambda)/I(Hβ\beta) for Case B from Brocklehurst (1971) were used for iterative procedure with equation (1).

Following to Izotov et al. (1994), this term is used to estimate intrinsic fluxes only for Balmer emission lines. Similar to this paper, we adopt the reddening function f(λ)f(\lambda) from Whitford (1958). It is normalised so that f(Hβ)f(H\beta) = 0. For this f(λ)f(\lambda), there is a relation between the excess E(BVB-V) and C(Hβ)C(H\beta): E(BVB-V) = 0.68 ×\times C(Hβ)C(H\beta).

In the classic (Te) method of the oxygen abundance determination, they use the standard two-zone model and method of Aller (1984). Since the electron temperature Te is different in high and low-ionisation Hii regions (e.g. Stasińska, 1990), to calculate abundances of ions O++ and O+, one needs to know temperature Te in both parts of an Hii region. The estimate of Te(O++) uses the flux ratio of [Oiii] lines: I(λ\lambda4363)/I([λ\lambda4959 + λ\lambda5007) and the five-level atom model (Aller, 1984), with the electron density Ne derived from the line ratio of the [Sii] doublet: I(λ\lambda6717)/I(λ\lambda6731). Since in our spectra this doublet was outside the range, we adopted for further calculations N=e{}_{\rm e}= 10 cm-3, a typical electron density in Hii regions of dIrr galaxies. To derive Te(O+), we used the fit for the relation between Te(O+) and Te(O++) from Izotov et al. (1994), based on the models of photoionised Hii regions by Stasińska (1990). This fit is read as follows:

te(Oii) = 0.243 + te(Oiii)[1.031 - 0.184 te(Oiii])] (2)

Here te = 10-4 Te. The resulting rms uncertainty of te(Oii) is transferred from the corresponding rms error of te(Oiii) as derived with use of the above relation. The ionic abundances of O+/H+ and O++/H+ are calculated with formulae (3) and (5) from Izotov et al. (2006).

The major part of Hii regions in the studied galaxies are rather faint. Accordingly, the fluxes of their emission lines are low. The weak auroral line, [Oiii]λ\lambda4363 Å, which is used in the ’direct’ (Te) method for the determination of the electron temperature Te, was detected only in the minority of our targets. Therefore, for the estimate of O/H in the remaining galaxies, we applied the semi-empirical method of Izotov & Thuan (2007). However, as was shown in Pustilnik et al. (2021), this method provides the reliable estimates of Te in rather limited range of parameters of Hii regions. We modified their method, as described in Pustilnik et al. (2021), in order to expand its applicability to the wider range of physical conditions.

The basement of method of Izotov & Thuan (2007) is the fitted empirical dependence between the values of the electron temperature Te and parameter R23R_{\mathrm{2}3}. It was derived from the analysis of the grid of models of Hii-regions in Stasińska & Izotov (2003). As the authors find, for the large representative sample of extragalactic Hii-regions, which cover the whole range of observed O/H, the models approximate well the apparent relations of the strong line intensities versus EW(Hβ\beta). The parameter R23R_{\mathrm{2}3} is the ratio of the sum of fluxes of strong oxygen lines [Oii]λ\lambda3727 Å, [Oiii]λ\lambda4959 Å, [Oiii]λ\lambda5007 Å to that of Hβ\beta. When Te is estimated via R23R_{\mathrm{2}3}, the rest of the calculations of the ionic abundances of O+/H+ and O++/H+ uses the standard equations of the classic Te method, that is the same formulae (3) and (5) from Izotov et al. (2006).

As it became clear later, the good approximation of O/H, derived by this method, to O/H values, obtained by the direct method, has the limited application. This is because it was fitted from a sample of Hii-regions with a rather limited range of the excitation parameter O32O_{\mathrm{3}2} (the ratio of line fluxes of [Oiii]λ\lambda5007 and [Oii]λ\lambda3727). This parameter is a proxy of the physical parameter UU - so-called the ionisation parameter, characterising the flux of ionising photons per unit area of the illuminated gas cloud surrounding the central source. While the original method of Izotov & Thuan (2007) works well for the intermediate values of O32O_{\mathrm{3}2} (\sim 2–6), it leads to the significant systematical bias in the Te and O/H estimates at both, small and large values of O32O_{\mathrm{3}2}. The whole range of O32O_{\mathrm{3}2} in known Hii regions spreads from \lesssim0.3 to \sim50.

This effect was examined in Pustilnik et al. (2021) on the large sample of Hii-regions with O/H derived via the direct method. The sample covers the broad range of parameter O32O_{\mathrm{3}2} and O/H. The modified formula was suggested to estimate Te, which includes the dependence of Te on the both parameters, R23R_{\mathrm{2}3} and O32O_{\mathrm{3}2}. The respective method is called the modified semi-empirical (mse). The mse method has the moderate internal scatter in log(O/H) of 0.09 dex, while allows one to eliminate the systematic bias of the original method of Izotov & Thuan (2007) for the extreme values of parameter O32O_{\mathrm{3}2}.

This is crucial for our project, since the typical Hii-regions in our void galaxy sample, in which the auroral line [Oiii]λ\lambda4363 was too noisy or undetected, have rather low excitation parameter, of O32O_{\mathrm{3}2}\lesssim 1.0. The O/H estimates derived by this method are marked as (mse) in Column 9 of Table 3.

Recently Izotov et al. (2019) suggested a new empirical method, the best suited for Hii-regions with ’metallicity’ 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.4 dex. This uses only the relative fluxes of strong Oxygen lines with respect of Hβ\beta. Namely, their Equation (1) reads as:

12+log(O/H)=0.950×log(R230.08×O32)+6.80512+\log({\rm O/H})=0.950\times\log(R_{\mathrm{2}3}-0.08\times O_{\mathrm{3}2})+6.805

This relation, calibrated on the large number of Hii-regions with O/H derived via the direct (Te) method, empirically accounts for the large scatter in the ionisation parameter log(U) (from about –4 to –1) in various Hii-regions and, thus, reduces the relatively large internal rms scatter of the other empirical methods based on the strong oxygen lines, down to only \sim0.04 dex. The latter value of the rms scatter was obtained in Pustilnik et al. (2021) on the sample of \sim70 Hii-regions with the range of 7.0 \lesssim 12+log\log(O/H) \lesssim 7.5 dex. However, its applicability is limited only to the range of 12+log\log(O/H) \lesssim 7.5. The above relation was slightly modified by Izotov et al. (2021) to account Hii regions with the highest observed values of O32.

Among our galaxies there are 16 objects falling to this category. For them, we use this method. For derived this way value of O/H, we attach index (s) in Column 9 of Table 3, and denote them hereafter as O/H(s).

As shown in Pustilnik et al. (2021), there is a tiny offset in the zero-point of 12+log(O/H)(s) relative to that of 12+log(O/H)(Te), of \sim0.01 dex. In Table 3, we present therefore the values of 12+log(O/H)(s) with the subtraction of 0.01 dex from the values obtained with the formula from Izotov et al. (2019). This allows us to compare them directly with the estimates of 12+log(O/H)(Te) for other galaxies.

The contribution of errors in the strong line fluxes to the related uncertainty of 12+log(O/H)(s), σlog(O/H)\sigma_{\rm log(O/H)}, is rather modest. For the high S-to-N spectra with σR23\sigma_{\rm R23}/R23<R_{\mathrm{2}3}<0.02, the total σlog(O/H)\sigma_{\rm log(O/H)} is close to the internal error of the method, namely, σlog(O/H)\sigma_{\rm log(O/H)}\sim0.04 dex. For the lowest S-to-N our spectra of σR23\sigma_{\rm R23}/R23R_{\mathrm{2}3}\sim0.14, the error of log\log(O/H)(s) increases to 0.12 dex. Intermediate S-to-N of R23R_{\mathrm{2}3} results in the typical σlog(O/H)\sigma_{\rm log(O/H)} = 0.05 – 0.06 dex.

Table 3: Observed nearby void dwarfs and new O/H data
No. Name J2000 Coord Vorig VSALT D\dagger Bt MBM_{\rm B} 12+log\log(O/H) Notes
km s-1 km s-1 Mpc mag mag ±\pmerr.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 J0015+0104 J001520.7+010437 2055±\pm02 2141±\pm15 28.8 18.31 –14.32 7.14±\pm0.04 d+s prototype XMP
2 ESO294-010 J002633.4–415120 113±\pm04 84±\pm20 \dagger2.0 15.56 –10.90 7.79±\pm0.12 mse
3 PGC004055 J010822.0–381233 654±\pm60 633±\pm10 6.8 16.09 –13.09 7.60±\pm0.10 mse+d
4 UGC01085 J013118.9+074716 652±\pm02 680±\pm07 10.0 16.75 –13.44 7.87±\pm0.11 mse
5 AGC124137 J023137.0+093144 897±\pm06 900±\pm10 14.0 17.98 –12.10 7.20±\pm0.12 s+mse low S-to-N
6 ESO199-007 J025804.1–492256 630±\pm05 623±\pm15 \dagger6.0 16.50 –12.49 7.33±\pm0.06 s aver. on 2 knots
7 PGC1166738 J030646.9+002811 710±\pm04 728±\pm20 11.0 18.41 –12.27 7.19±\pm0.04 s aver. on 2 knots
8 PGC013294 J033556.8–451129 737±\pm42 750±\pm10 \dagger7.3 16.07 –13.29 7.90±\pm0.06 d
9 PGC712531 J033903.0–304921 839±\pm123 692±\pm10 9.5 18.29 –11.96 only faint Hα\alpha
10 PGC681755 J033955.0–330309 747±\pm26 705±\pm15 9.5 16.55 –13.39 7.71±\pm0.11: mse low O32 \sim0.25
11 ESO359-024 J041057.5–354951 847±\pm05 815±\pm30 10.9 15.43 –14.80 7.44±\pm0.13 d
12 PGC016389 J045658.7–424802 662±\pm06 710±\pm12 \dagger7.0 14.46 –14.80 7.20±\pm0.05 s \sim7.0 in O32\sim0.2
13 HIPASSJ0517-32 J051721.6–324535 798±\pm06 811±\pm06 10.7 15.96 –14.81 7.93±\pm0.05 d aver. 2 knots
14 ESO553-046 J052705.8–204040 542±\pm06 538±\pm05 \dagger6.7 14.72 –14.71 8.03±\pm0.03 d
15 PGC138836 J055735.2+072913 428±\pm04 407±\pm15 \dagger5.5 18.40 –11.28 7.56±\pm0.10 mse
16 PGC018431 J060719.7–341216 774±\pm13 816±\pm07 \dagger9.6 15.66 –14.34 7.65±\pm0.06 d aver. 2 knots
17 ESO308-022 J063932.9–404317 822±\pm04 888±\pm11 \dagger9.4 16.22 –14.03 7.34±\pm0.05 s
18 PGC020125 J070517.7–583108 564±\pm04 489±\pm05 \dagger5.3 14.95 –14.16 7.37±\pm0.05 s aver. 2 knots
19 6dFJ0935-1348 J093521.6–134852 800±\pm44 877±\pm22 11.7 16.43 –14.10 7.28±\pm0.07 s
20 PGC029033 J100138.2–081455 446±\pm03 258±\pm28 7.0 15.41 –14.07 8.01±\pm0.15 mse V(HI)-V(opt)\sim190
21 PGC041667 J123307.9–003158 740±\pm09 737±\pm37 10.2 16.50 –13.63 7.84±\pm0.14 mse
22 PGC091215 J123655.0+013654 590±\pm01 623±\pm12 6.1 16.35 –12.65 7.37±\pm0.05 s aver. on 3 knots
23 AGC227970 J124601.4+042252 643±\pm04 625±\pm10 9.2 16.00 –13.93 7.71±\pm0.08 d
24 AGC225197 J124942.1+052922 739±\pm18 820±\pm30 10.1 18.38 –11.77 abs. spectrum
25 UGC07983 J124947.0+035033 694±\pm02 743±\pm20 10.1 16.11 –14.08 8.03±\pm0.14 mse
26 PGC1289726 J124959.2+054916 618±\pm01 600±\pm10 9.1 16.76 –13.17 7.68±\pm0.11 mse
27 AGC227972 J125024.0+045422 650±\pm04 647±\pm20 9.1 19.50 –10.46 only Hα\alpha in 2 knots
28 AGC227973 J125039.9+052052 675±\pm04 695±\pm15 9.1 19.50 –10.42 7.07±\pm0.04 s aver. on 2 measur.
29 AGC226122 J125215.4+042727 700±\pm04 756±\pm15 10.0 18.33 –11.86 only Hα\alpha
30 PGC1264260 J125343.3+040914 761±\pm01 810±\pm12 10.0 17.45 –12.69 7.58±\pm0.08 d
31 UGC08055 J125604.4+034846 616±\pm02 622±\pm18 6.7 15.94 –13.34 7.79±\pm0.11 mse
32 PGC044681 J125956.6–192441 827±\pm02 796±\pm15 \dagger7.3 17.00 –12.73 7.34±\pm0.08 s check earlier data
33 KKH86 J135433.4+041440 286±\pm02 298±\pm30 \dagger2.6 17.08 –10.14 only Bal. absorb.
34 AGC716018 J143048.7+070926 1365±\pm04 1415±\pm12 18.1 18.18 –13.22 7.93±\pm0.14 mse
35 AGC249197 J144950.7+095630 1809±\pm05 1822±\pm10 24.2 18.69 –13.35 7.39±\pm0.06 s
36 HIPASSJ1738-57 J173842.9–571525 858±\pm08 815±\pm13 7.3 16.62 –13.12 7.72±\pm0.11 mse 7.77±\pm0.18 (d)
37 PGC408791 J202608.8–552950 893±\pm67 812±\pm10 6.8 16.88 –12.71 7.39±\pm0.05 s
38 PGC129680 J210804.8–471942 860±\pm33 858±\pm12 7.7 15.69 –13.90 8.00±\pm0.10 mse aver. 2 knots
39 PGC1016598 J213902.9–073443 1283±\pm02 1305±\pm12 15.4 18.63 –12.43 7.23±\pm0.04 s aver. 2 knots
40 ESO289-020 J222111.7–454035 912±\pm67 892±\pm06 8.8 15.62 –14.17 7.59±\pm0.05 mse aver. 3 knots
41 ESO238-005 J222230.5–482414 706±\pm03 714±\pm04 \dagger8.0 15.30 –14.28 7.35±\pm0.04 s
42 PGC1028063 J224223.4–065010 899±\pm06 861±\pm06 10.7 16.02 –14.28 7.79±\pm0.09 d
43 ESO347-017 J232656.2–372049 691±\pm03 698±\pm06 6.5 14.93 –14.20 7.82±\pm0.03 d aver. 3 knots
44 PGC3192333 J234133.8–353023 630±\pm89 524±\pm18 6.6 18.86 –10.31 7.26±\pm0.08 d 7.18±\pm0.05 (s)
45 PGC680341 J234147.5–330841 510±\pm89 446±\pm10 4.4 16.59 –11.69 7.34±\pm0.04 d 7.29±\pm0.04 (s)
46 ESO348-009 J234923.4–374622 647±\pm02 587±\pm15 6.1 14.81 –14.18 7.42±\pm0.05 s
47 ESO149-003 J235202.8–523438 574±\pm04 526±\pm09 \dagger7.0 15.09 –14.20 7.66±\pm0.03 d
Table 3 content is described in detail in Sect. 4.1. Here we give the brief information. Col. 2: target name from NVG.
Col. 3: galaxy coordinates adopted from NVG. Col. 4: original radial velocity with its error, in km s-1. Col. 5: SALT radial velocity
with its error; Columns 6, 7 and 8: the adopted distance, total blue magnitude and absolute blue magnitude. Col. 9: derived O/H
as 12+log\log(O/H) and its error, in dex, with indication of the method used: (d) – the direct (Te) method; (mse) – the modified
semi-empirical method of Izotov & Thuan (2007), accounting for the large range of excitation (Pustilnik et al., 2021);
(s) – the new empirical strong line O/H estimator of Izotov et al. (2019), with subtracted 0.01 dex to account for a small offset
relative to O/H(Te). In Col. 10 we show brief notes with more detailed information, when necessary, presented in Sec. 4.1.1, 4.1.2.
- from list of 60 XMP candidate in PEPK20; \dagger marks velocity-independent distances obtained with the TRGB method at HST.
Table 4: SALT results for objects with wrong velocities
No. Name J2000 coord. Vorig VSALT B-mag MB Notes
km s-1 km s-1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 PGC3197756\dagger J001736.3–312618 749±\pm123 2703±\pm10 19.28 –13.64 doubtful, too narrow Hα\alpha
2 PGC901638 J002951.4–160954 724±\pm59 z = 0.092 17.74 –20.30 abs. spectrum
3 PGC3207684 J020140.1–291749 660±\pm123 z = 0.109 19.45 –18.90
4 PGC3210819 J022308.8–295233 779±\pm89 z = 0.16274 18.85 –20.30
5 PGC504827\dagger J024024.4–471257 812±\pm29 1828±\pm15 19.24 –12.68 only faint Hα\alpha
6 PGC645417\dagger J032733.9–354303 723±\pm79 9942±\pm20 16.84 –18.86 only Hα\alpha
7 PGC016383 J045701.2–424803 3443±\pm61 2953±\pm10 15.48 –17.30 on slit with PGC016389
8 AGC208329 J101531.9+033508 1018±\pm04 1370±\pm10 19.42 –12.1: 12+log(O/H)(mse)=7.82. see text
9 [MU2012]J1355+04B J135429.5+041237 4831±\pm9 19.5: –14.6: 12+log(O/H)(mse)=7.56. see text
10 PGC1069207\dagger J143011.3–033552 690±\pm123 988±\pm9 18.34 –12.50 New D = 12.2 Mpc
11 PGC264615 J161354.9–721446 383±\pm11 z = 0.0695 17.94 –19.3 LINER?
12 PGC064718 J202733.8–550525 831±\pm52 10710±\pm35 15.24 –21.2 ……
13 PGC162688 J204847.3–121654 843±\pm45 5860±\pm12 17.12 –17.6: ……
14 PGC163318\dagger J213935.2–401653 1034±\pm59 z = 0.0645 17.25 –19.95 with close E-gal at z = 0.0630
15 6dFJ2226336-291728 J222633.6–291728 1025±\pm45 z = 0.315 19.57 –21.0: AGN Sy1.5
16 ABELL3888_\_14:[PSE2006]1816 J223329.3–372731 1008±\pm19 –166±\pm10 18.49 star-like
17 ABELL3888_\_12:[PSE2006]2246 J223633.3–373005 760±\pm13 z = 0.388 18.80 –22.3: star-like
\dagger grism PG2300, range \sim6060–6880 Å

4 Results of spectral observations and O/H estimates

4.1 Void galaxies

The 1D SALT spectra of the observed void dwarfs are presented in the on-line supplementary materials in Appendix B, Figs. B1–B4. The measured fluxes of emission lines and their derivatives: EW(abs) – the adopted equivalent width of Balmer absorption in the underlying stellar continuum, the extinction coefficient C(Hβ\beta), and the equivalent width of the Hβ\beta emission line EW(Hβ\beta) are presented in Tables C1-C14 of the on-line supplementary materials in Appendix C. Some of the obtained spectra, show rather strong Balmer absorptions in the UV. In these cases the underlying continuum and Balmer absorptions were fitted by a model with the ULySS package (http://ulyss.univ-lyon1.fr, Koleva et al., 2009). This model model spectrum corrected the flux of Hβ\beta emission to a first approximation. In these cases, the EW(abs) derived with the procedure from Izotov et al. (1994) at the next step, appears the residual EW(abs), since this is mainly accounted for by the ULySS fitting. As mentioned in Section 2, the absolute flux calibration at SALT is rather uncertain. Therefore, we do not provide the absolute flux in the emission Hβ\beta.

The derived physical parameters — Te in the zones of emission of [Oiii] and [Oii], the relative numbers of ions O+, O++ and the total abundance of Oxygen relative to Hydrogen, O/H — are shown in the bottom of these tables. As described in Section 3, Te(O++) is calculated with the direct method when the faint auroral line [Oiii]λ\lambda4363 is detected. In the remaining cases it is estimated with the modified semi-empirical method from Pustilnik et al. (2021), based on the semi-empirical method of Izotov & Thuan (2007). As explained in that section, Te(O+) was calculated via the relation (2), adopted from Izotov et al. (1994).

Since the [Sii]λλ\lambda\lambda6717,6731 was outside the range of SALT spectra, the estimate of electron density Ne in the observed Hii regions was impossible. We adopted for further calculations of O/H in the direct and mse methods Ne = 10 cm-3 as a typical value for Hii regions in the low-mass late-type galaxies.

For each galaxy, we present the derived parameter 12+log\log(O/H). For majority of the obtained spectra, this is derived either with the direct method (for the twelve objects, where it is applicable), or with the empirical strong-line method of Izotov et al. (2019) (for 15 the lowest O/H objects). For the remaining 12 objects, with the higher values of O/H, we apply a modified semi-empirical (mse) method, in which we account for the dependence of the empirically derived Te on the excitation parameter O32O_{\mathrm{3}2} (see details in Pustilnik et al., 2021).

We note that 12+log\log(O/H), derived with the mse method, needs a small correction (up to 0.03 dex, depending on the value of O/H) in order to make its zero-points consistent with that for the direct Te method. See Appendix in Pustilnik et al. (2021) for details. This correction is already applied in Tables C1–C15 and the respective value of O/H is indicated as (mse,c). It is reasonable to add a caution on the applicability of mse method for the lowest excitation Hii regions. As discussed in the Appendix of Pustilnik et al. (2021), the fitting formulae for deriving Te via this method, are limited by the lower values of parameter O32O_{\mathrm{3}2}. For the range of 12+log\log(O/H) >> 7.5 dex, this lower limit of O32O_{\mathrm{3}2} is \sim0.4, while for the range of 12+log\log(O/H) << 7.5 dex, this limit is \sim0.5. For several our galaxies with the lowest excitation, the used formulae are slightly extrapolated outside these limits. For these objects, the uncertainty of the derived value of 12+log(O/H) can be somewhat underestimated.

Finally, where it is suitable, just to demonstrate the consistency of our estimates with other popular methods, we provide the value of O/H, derived with the empirical estimator of Pilyugin & Thuan (2005) (lower branch), which is based only on the flux ratios of the strong Oxygen lines. Their formulae also account for parameter of excitation O32O_{\mathrm{3}2}, which enters to their parameter ’P’. Their formulae are obtained via the fitting of the observational data for Hii regions with the direct value of 12+log\log(O/H). However, the applicability of their formulae is limited by the range of parameter ’P’ of 0.55 and 0.97. This translates to the range of O32O_{\mathrm{3}2} of 0.92 to 24.2. Therefore, for our galaxies with the lowest values of O32O_{\mathrm{3}2}, we do not show values of O/H (PT05) due to their systematic shifts.

In Table 3 we summarise the adopted parameter 12+log(O/H) and provide some other parameters of the studied galaxies. The content of the column is as follows: Col. 1 – the number of galaxy, as it appears in Table 1; Col. 2 – the galaxy name as adopted in the NVG catalog, which, in turn, is mainly from the HyperLEDA database333http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr; Col. 3 – J2000 epoch coordinates; Col. 4 – the original heliocentric velocity with the cited error, in km s-1; Col. 5 – the heliocentric velocity with its error obtained from our SALT spectra; Col. 6 – Distance in Mpc. For 13 galaxies this is measured with the Tip of RGB (TRGB) method. For the remaining objects, the peculiar velocity correction is used according to the velocity field from Tully et al. (2008) as also adopted in the Nearby Void Galaxies catalog (PTM19); Col. 7 – an estimate of the total BB-band magnitude; Col. 8 – the absolute magnitude MBM_{\rm B}, with the adopted MW extinction correction from Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011); Col. 9 – the value of 12+log(O/H), its 1-σ\sigma uncertainty and the method used; Col. 10 – notes for some of the program objects.

In total, we observed on both programs 47 objects belonging to the NVG (Nearby Void Galaxy) sample. Also, we observed 15 more galaxies, adopted in the NVG catalog to reside in the nearby voids. This was done based on their HyperLEDA radial velocities. On results of our spectroscopy, they appeared to be not the NVG objects. Two more galaxies were observed in order to check their radial velocities. One was a potential companion of the void galaxy KKH86, while another galaxy was in a visual contact with the void galaxy PGC16389. We devote to these 17 objects Sect. 4.3.

Nine galaxies (of them, eight – new) were observed as a continuation of the two previous papers to search for XMP dwarfs (Pustilnik et al., 2020b, 2021) among the 60 preselected void XMP candidates (Pustilnik et al., 2020a). Accounting for results on 46 already published objects from this program and several remaining galaxies in the Northern hemisphere, observed at BTA, the program is very close to its completion.

4.1.1 Comments on the most metal-poor galaxies

SDSS J0015+0104 = AGC103435. This galaxy, residing in the Eridanus void (Pustilnik et al., 2013; Kniazev et al., 2018), appeared as an XMP object in two papers, with the values of 12+log(O/H) from 7.07±\pm0.06 to 7.03 dex (Guseva et al., 2009; Izotov et al., 2019). This galaxy is one of the prototype objects for the search for void XMP dwarfs. Therefore, it was important to improve its O/H accuracy. The line [Oii]λ\lambda3727 was either outside the available spectral range (Izotov et al., 2019), or the original semi-empirical method was used (Izotov & Thuan, 2007) for too low excitation parameter O32 of \sim0.5 (Guseva et al., 2009). Our spectrum is quite similar to that of Guseva et al. (2009), with a higher S-to-N ratio, since we have even marginally detected a faint [Oiii]λ\lambda4363. The main difference with their spectrum is our factor \sim1.2 larger relative fluxes of [Oii]λ\lambda3727 and [Oiii]λ\lambda5007.

AGC124137 = J023137.0+093144. This new XMP dwarf was originally selected as a candidate XMP object in Pustilnik et al. (2020a). The emission lines of the only compact knot are faint and overlay on the underlying blue continuum with the Balmer-line absorptions. In Figure B1 we show both, the original spectrum (black) and the result of the subtraction of the SSP model spectrum (blue) after the ULySS package application. While the S-to-N in the used lines for the strong-line and mse methods is quite low, both methods give the consistent O/H estimates. Since the uncertainty of the measured flux of Hγ\gamma is large, we varied it in order to check its effect on the derived C(Hβ\beta) and EW(abs) and on the value of O/H. While the C(Hβ\beta) varied from 0.32 up to 0.66–0.69, the respective estimates of 12+log(O/H) (s) varied from 7.08 to 7.30–7.32 dex. The value of C(Hβ\beta) related to the Milky Way extinction is 0.13. Therefore, we believe that C(Hβ\beta) = 0.32, adopted in Table C2, is a more reliable since is a more typical for this type of dwarfs. However, taking into account the low S-to-N of the data, we adopt for this object in Table 3, the value of O/H, which is an average between the two current extreme estimates. The better quality data will be necessary to qualify confidently this dwarf as an XMP void galaxy.

PGC1166738 = J030646.9+002811. This new XMP dwarf was originally selected as a candidate XMP object in Pustilnik et al. (2020a). We show in Table 3 the value of O/H as an average for two knots. For the knot with the extremely low value of 12+log(O/H)(s) = 7.16±\pm0.05 dex, we provide all data in Table C3. For the second knot, we obtain the value of 12+log(O/H)(s) = 7.22±\pm0.05 dex.

In the spectrum of this XMP knot, obtained on 2019.09.06, we detected unusual transient emission lines (Hβ\beta, Hα\alpha, and [Oiiiλ\lambda5007]), which differed in velocity and strength from those observed in the two later dates, in December 2019. Since the available data are too limited, the nature of this transient remains puzzling. Probably, new observations of this knot will uncover a puzzle of this phenomenon.

PGC016389 = J045658.7–424802 = HIPASSJ0457–42. In this blue patchy elongated oval we have on the slit three different Hii regions with varying S-to-N emission lines and with substantial contribution of the underlying Balmer absorptions. To correctly subtract this continuum, we modelled it with the ULySS package as explained in Section 4.1. In Figure B1 (Appendix B, supplementary material) we present the 1d spectrum of the most metal-poor region (a). The respective line fluxes and derived physical parameters for this region are presented in Table C4 (Appendix C, supplementary material). The very low value of 12+log(O/H) (s) = 6.98±\pm0.05 dex derived with the method of Izotov et al. (2019) is practically insensitive to the adopted value Te (with the range of 18.2 KK to 26.2 kK, estimated either via semi-empirical method of Izotov & Thuan (2007), or with the modified method (mse) from Pustilnik et al. (2021).

The main problem with this (as well as with 12+log(O/H) (mse)) estimate, is the very low excitation of this region. The parameter O32{}_{\mathrm{3}2}\sim0.2 is 2.5 times smaller than its lower boundary for the sample of Hii regions with the direct O/H, which is used to derive the empirical relation in Izotov et al. (2019). Therefore, we should treat the derived very low value of O/H with a caution and rather as an indicative one. In two other regions, ’b’ and ’c’, we derived 12+log(O/H) (s) of 7.20±\pm0.05 dex and 7.31±\pm0.09 dex, respectively. While for region ’c’, O32 is very small, of \sim0.1, for region ’b’, O32{}_{\mathrm{3}2}\sim0.46. Having all this information in hands, we currently adopt its 12+log(O/H) (s) = 7.20±\pm0.05 dex. Since the galaxy shows multiple SF regions, we hope that the follow-up high S-to-N spectroscopy will allow one to better determine the range of metallicities in this dwarf.

AGC227973 = J125039.9+052052. This new faint XMP dwarf, with the value of 12+log(O/H) = 7.07 dex, appears to be one of the lowest metallicity LV dwarfs. It is similar on many parameters to the other void XMP galaxy, the Leoncino dwarf (AGC198691 = J0943+3326) (Hirschauer et al., 2016). They have similar distances and atomic gas masses, very close absolute magnitudes and metallicities and amplitude of Hi gas motions. The main difference is the a much higher excitation of Hii region in AGC198691 that allows to determine its metallicity via the direct method and to address the issue of the primordial Helium (Aver et al., 2022).

PGC044681 = J125956.6–192441. For this dwarf, we already obtained the SALT spectrum presented in Pustilnik et al. (2020b). For those rather noisy data for the used emission lines, we found its 12+log(O/H)(s) = 7.22±\pm0.09 dex, with the upward correction by 0.02 dex relative to that paper, due to the updated zero-point correction for Izotov et al. (2019) method, as described in Sect. 3. Since that time, a much better quality images of this dwarf appeared in the Legacy surveys and the Hubble Legacy Archive. We use them to select the different slit position for the repeat observation. The new value of 12+log(O/H)(s) = 7.34±\pm0.08 dex, is, from the one hand, marginally consistent with the first measurement. On the other hand, since it probes the other Hii region, it does not exclude the lower value for that region.

4.1.2 Comments on the other individual void galaxies

ESO308-022 = J063932.9–404317. The slit was positioned far from the main dwarf galaxy body, on the outer SF region well seen at the HST image. Its radial velocity differs by \sim60 km s-1 from that of the main galaxy derived from its Hi emission (Huchtmeier et al., 2000). Since the width of Hi profile, W20{}_{\mathrm{2}0}\sim 70 km s-1, one can think that the studied here SF region can belong to ESO308-022, or alternatively, is a smaller gas-rich companion in which the current SF episode was triggered by the tidal interaction with a more massive neighbour. Probably Hi mapping of this galaxy will clear up the nature of this star-forming gas blob.

PGC029033 = J100138.2–081455. For this galaxy, we detected unusually large difference between the Hi-line velocity of V(Hi) = 446±\pm1.5 km s-1 (Huchtmeier et al., 2003) and our emission line velocity V(opt) = 258±\pm28 km s-1 for the slit position crossing the W edge of galaxy body. The rotation velocity of the galaxy is rather small as follows from the width of Hi profile W0.5 = 49 km s-1 (Huchtmeier et al., 2003). While the optical morphology of this dwarf does not look disturbed, this very large difference in radial velocities of the atomic and ionised gas hints on its non-equilibrium state, probably caused by a recent interaction or a minor merger. The gas metallicity of this dwarf, despite bearing rather large uncertainties, also looks rather enhanced in comparison to the similar luminosity void dwarfs. Also, it is not clear which of the two velocities reflect the systemic velocity of the galaxy, which is used for the distance determination. For the moment, we use the Hi-based velocity. So, the more detailed study of Hi gas kinematics can shed light on the recent processes in this object.

PGC1016598 = J213902.9–073443. In this galaxy the emission on the slit is splitted onto two close (\sim7 pixels, or \sim3.5 arcsec, in between) knots (W and E) with quite different flux ratios of [Oiii]λλ\lambda\lambda4959,5007 lines to Hβ\beta. The half-widths of their extent along the slit are close to the distance between the knots, so that there is a substantial overlapping of their light if we simply extract spectrum of each knot. To obtain the more reliable line strengths in the E and W knots, we undertook a two-gaussian fitting along the slit for all lines of interest. Despite the knots show quite different excitation parameter O32 (1.9 versus 0.44), their parameter 12+log(O/H) (s) is close within rather small uncertainties (7.26±\pm0.05 dex and 7.19±\pm0.06 dex, respectively). Therefore, we adopt their average value, 7.23±\pm0.04 dex.

4.2 Improved velocities and distances for void galaxies

For several void objects from Table 3, the HyperLEDA radial velocities have moderate to low accuracies (60 –120 km s-1, or for related distances, \sim0.9–1.8 Mpc). For objects in the LV and its environs, this results in the substantial uncertainties in both the relative positions to the nearby neighbours and to their distance-dependent parameters. In Table 3 we give for all objects the distances and related MB based on NVG (HyperLEDA) data. Here we briefly summarise galaxies, for which we obtained a better accuracy radial velocities.

PGC712531 = J033903.0–304921. Vhel changed from 839 to 692 km s-1 and the related D – from 10.95 to 9.3 Mpc.

6dFJ0935216–134852. Vhel changed from 800 to 877 km s-1 and the related D – from 11.7 to 12.7 Mpc.

PGC408791 = J202608.8–552950. Vhel changed from 893 to 812 km s-1 and the related D – from 7.5 to 6.4 Mpc.

PGC3192333 = J234133.8–353023. Vhel changed from 630 to 524 km s-1 and the related D – from 6.6 to 5.2 Mpc.

PGC680341 = J234147.5–330841. Vhel changed from 510 to 446 km s-1 and the related D – from 4.4 to 3.5 Mpc.

4.3 Mistaken objects

In Table 4 we summarise the results of observations for 15 objects, which appeared to have wrong radial velocities in HyperLEDA and/or in the original papers. Due to these errors, they reside far from the distances adopted in the PTM19, and, hence, should be excluded from the NVG sample. The two exceptions in this Table are the galaxies [MU2012]J1355+04B and PGC016383. For the former, the information on its radial velocity was absent. Makarov & Uklein (2012) suggested that this is a fainter companion of the known LV dwarf KKH86. For the latter, its known radial velocity placed the galaxy far outside the distance of 25 Mpc, in which the NVG sample is picked-up. We obtained its independent value just because positioned the long slit at the void galaxy PGC016389 so that it also crossed PGC016383. See Sect. 4.3.1.

We show 1D spectra of all these objects in the on-line supplementary materials in Appendix B, Fig. B5–B6 and present the related data in Table 4. The Table includes the following information. Column 2 - the name of the object adopted from HyperLEDA. Column 3 - its J2000 coordinates. Column 4 - the original heliocentric velocity from HyperLEDA used to assign the object to the NVG sample. Column 5 - the heliocentric velocity on the results of the SALT spectroscopy. For seven very distant objects we give their redshifts instead of radial velocity. Column 6 - B-band magnitude adopted from HyperLEDA. Column 7 - estimated absolute B-band magnitude based on parameters in Columns 5 and 6. Column 8 - brief notes. For several objects, we present below more detailed comments.

4.3.1 Comments on individual mistaken objects

PGC016383=J045701.2–424803. This known background galaxy looks to be in contact with the unrelated void galaxy PGC016389 from Table 3. The SALT slit was positioned to cross both galaxies. We did not expect to find something new. However, the E+A spectrum of PGC016383 shows the radial velocity of Vhel = 2953 km s-1, about 500 km s-1 smaller than the adopted value in HyperLEDA.

AGC208329 and SDSSJ101531.9+033508. This blue irregular galaxy is identified in ALFALFA (Haynes et al., 2018) with Hi-source at position J101528.4+033544 with the catalog velocity Vhel,HI = 1018±\pm2 km s-1. The velocity determined on two Hii-regions, Vhel,opt{}_{\rm hel,opt}\sim 1370 km s-1, drastically differs from that Vhel,HI. Due to this inconsistency, we have checked the original data of this Hi-source as presented in the ALFALFA database. Indeed, there is a rather strong source at Vhel,HI = 1018 km s-1 (Fig. 1). In addition, there is a faint, marginally-detected source with F(Hi)\sim0.2 Jy km s-1 at Vhel,HI{}_{\rm hel,HI}\sim 1370 km s-1. We identify this Hi source with the star-forming dwarf, for which we obtained the same radial velocity of the ionised gas.

The optical galaxy has no alternative names in HyperLEDA. However, it is identified with two SDSS objects: J101531.88+033508.4 – for its ’centre’, and J101531.32+033508.9 – for the blue compact knot at the W edge. Both objects were on the SALT slit. They have rather similar spectra and the close radial velocities. This SDSS dwarf is seemingly associated with several dwarf galaxies in the group of the Sa galaxy NGC3169 (J101414.8+032759) with MB = -20.6 mag, at Vhel = 1232 km s-1. Therefore, this optical SDSS object should be excluded from the NVG sample.

As for the nature of AGC208329 itself and an associated with it ’galaxy’, it remains puzzling, since no other potential optical counterparts are visible in the Legacy surveys colour images within the five-arcmin radius. One can suggest that the optical counterpart of AGC208329 is a very low SB void dwarf which falls close to light sight of a much brighter dwarf SDSSJ101531.88+033508.4, for which we obtained optical spectrum. For the typical ratio of M(Hi)/LB{}_{\rm B}\sim 1, for AGC208329 with F(Hi)= 1.15 Jy km s-1, one expects for its counterpart a galaxy with Btot = 16.9 mag, 2.5 mag brighter than that of SDSSJ101531.88+033508.4. To be invisible, this counterpart should be comparable on the total magnitude with this SDSS dwarf (and hence, to be very gas-rich, with M(Hi)/LB \sim10) and to have a much larger angular extent. Probably, the future very deep images of this region will detect such an unusual LSB void dwarf.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: ALFALFA Hi profile of AGC208329 at Vhel = 1018 km s-1 and a fainter object at Vhel{}_{\rm hel}\sim 1370 km s-1. The latter is close to that of the optical velocity of SDSSJ101531.88+033508.4 measured in this work.

[MU2012]J1355+04B = J135429.5+041237. This blue irregular galaxy was suggested by Makarov & Uklein (2012) as a counterpart for a nearby void dwarf KKH86 with Vhel = 220 km s-1 (see Table 3). Our SALT spectrum shows this is a dwarf (MB{}_{\rm B}\sim –14 mag) emission-line galaxy at the D \sim 66 Mpc. The strong Oxygen lines in its Hii region allow one to estimate its Oxygen abundance via the ’mse’ method described above. This gives the value of 12+log(O/H) = 7.56±\pm11 dex.

PGC264615 = J161354.9–721446, not HIPASS J1614-72. This blue galaxy was suggested as an optical counterpart for the faint Hi-source HIPASS J1614-72 by Kilborn et al. (2002). It is separated from the Parks radio position (J161422.45-721554.9, with an accuracy of \sim1.9 arcmin) by 2.4 arcmin. For the Hi radial velocity of Vhel(Hi) = 383 km s-1, the distance to this object, derived via the kinematical model of Tully et al. (2008), is only \sim2.5 Mpc. Hence, this Hi-source belongs to a few per cent of the nearest NVG sample galaxies. Due to the poor coverage of this sky region by the imaging surveys, its real optical counterpart is still waiting for identification. PGC264615 itself appears a distant SF galaxy with the redshift of \sim0.07. NED (NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database) gives a half-dozen galaxies with close redshifts within the radius of 1 degree.

PGC163318=J212935.2–401653. The target galaxy looks like as a small disc with a brighter central core. An off-set red ’star’ is situated at \sim5 arcsec to NE. Both objects on the slit display rather similar spectra, with the prominent absorption features slightly shifted one relative to the other. The non-shifted strong absorption at the edge of the spectrum is the telluric O2 band at \approxλ\lambda6870 Å. The other prominent absorption doublet at \simλ\lambda6270 Å shows the shift and thus should be intrinsic for both objects. The most probable identification of this doublet is NaI D1,D2 (5889.95 and 5895.92 Å) at the redshift of z = 0.0645. Then ’red’ star appears to be an E-galaxy with the radial velocity \sim450 km s-1 lower than that of the target object. The fainter absorption features in the spectra of the both galaxies are well consistent on the wavelengths with the absorption lines visible in spectra of K7-M0 dwarfs from templates in paper by Kesseli et al. (2017). Probably these two galaxies comprise a group with a brighter E galaxy at \sim30 arcsec to SW.

5 Discussion

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Positions of 48 void dwarfs from NVG galaxies selected in PEPK20 as candidate XMP galaxies. The solid red line is the reference relation derived for a sample of the LV late-type galaxies by Berg et al. (2012). Two blue dash-dotted lines at ±\pm0.15 dex show the rms scatter of the reference sample. Magenta dash-dotted line runs at –0.30 dex (–2 rms) from the reference relation. Nine prototype objects (red triangles) are known from the earlier studies of XMP void dwarfs summarised in PEPK20. Five of them have O/H determined with the direct method, while the rest four – with the strong-line method of Izotov et al. (2019). The vertical dashed line at MB14.0{}_{\rm B}\sim-14.0 shows the range of O/H for DDO68 from Annibali et al. (2019).

As described in the Introduction, this work includes the observational results on the ionised gas metallicity from two different projects: a) the search for new XMP dwarfs among galaxies in the NVG sample, and b) the unbiased study of all void galaxies in the LV, that is about 260 the nearest galaxies of the whole NVG sample of 1354 objects. We summarise the respective results below.

5.1 Search for XMP dwarfs in the NVG sample

Altogether, it was selected 60 NVG sample galaxies with M>B14.3{}_{\rm B}>-14.3, which on the other properties were similar to the prototype XMP void dwarfs (Pustilnik et al., 2020a). For 46 of them, the spectral data were obtained either with SALT, or with BTA. The related results were published in Pustilnik et al. (2020b, 2021). In this paper, we present the results of observations for 8 new objects and for one already published dwarf and briefly summarise the preliminary statistics of such unusual dwarfs relative to the more common void galaxy population.

Of the preselected 60 NVG XMP candidates, to date, total 54 are observed and presented in Pustilnik et al. (2020b, 2021) and in this paper. Six more objects remain in the BTA part (paper in preparation). Two of these 60 candidates appeared galaxies with wrong velocities (Pustilnik et al., 2020b). One preselected galaxy appeared too Southern, so that it can not be observed with SALT. Of the remaining 57 NVG objects, for 50 we were able to derive the parameter 12+log(O/H). For 11 of these 50, the parameter 12+log(O/H) appears extremely low, in the range of 6.98 to 7.21 dex. 23 more dwarfs of this candidate XMP dwarf sample, have 12+log(O/H) in the range 7.23 – 7.39 dex, that corresponds to the range of Z/30 \lesssim Z(gas) << Z/20. That is \sim20 percent of that preselected candidates appear XMP galaxies with Z(gas) << Z/30. The additional \sim40 percent of the preselected objects appear very-metal poor, with Z/30 << Z(gas) << Z/20.

The total number of the nearby void XMP dwarfs comprises about 20, including the prototype XMP BCG IZw18 and discovered several decades later, well-known galaxies DDO68, with 12+log(O/H) in the range 6.98 – 7.3 dex (Pustilnik et al., 2005; Izotov & Thuan, 2007; Annibali et al., 2019), J0926+3343 with 12+log(O/H) = 7.12 dex (Pustilnik et al., 2010), and Leoncino dwarf (J0943+3326), with 12+log(O/H) = 7.07 dex (Aver et al., 2022).

In Figure 2, we show how the NVG galaxies, observed as the preselected XMP candidates, sit on the diagram 12+log(O/H) versus MB. The relation between these parameters was derived by Berg et al. (2012) for the reference sample of the LV late-type galaxies with the well-known O/H and distances. We draw this linear relation and two parallel lines showing the value of the rms scatter of this sample (±\pm0.15 dex) around the linear regression. The pink dot-dashed line is drawn at the 2 rms distance (that is –0.3 dex) below the reference linear relation. The galaxies with O/H below this line, deviate systematically downwards from the reference relation.

We use O/H estimates derived with the three different methods, discussed above, depending on the situation. When the auroral line [Oiii]λ\lambda4363 is detectable, we use the direct method (black symbols). Otherwise, we use the strong-line method of Izotov et al. (2019) for the range of 12+log(O/H) \lesssim7.5 dex (green symbols) and the mse (modified semi-empirical) method for the higher O/H (blue symbols). Some systematics between the data, obtained with the different methods of the O/H estimate, are basically due to the selection effects.

The appearance of the faint auroral line [Oiii]λ\lambda4363 correlates with the value of ionisation parameter log(U) or its proxy, the excitation parameter O32, and metallicity. The former, in turn, are related with the strength of SF ’burst’ and its age. Since in the unbiased sample of void galaxies, the probability to catch a young and strong burst is rather small, this translates to the low incidence of [Oiii]λ\lambda4363-line-detected objects. Similarly, since we apply either the ’strong-line’ or ’mse’ methods in the ranges of 12+log(O/H) <<7.5 or >>7.5 dex, the average values of O/H for these two methods show, by definition, the substantial difference.

5.2 Intermediate results on metallicities of the LV void galaxies

The next steps on the spectroscopy of the NVG dwarfs are conducted in the framework of the on-going project of the unbiased study of all void galaxies in the LV. It also finds new very metal-poor objects albeit less frequently. The smaller incidence of the newly-found XMP dwarfs in this project is a natural consequence of the unbiased character of the study of the whole NVG sample in the LV. This is also a reflection of the relative rarity of XMP objects. In this paper, we add two more LV XMP dwarfs, with 12+log(O/H) = 7.07 and 7.20 dex, and 7 new dwarfs with 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.39 dex. A couple of new XMP dwarfs within the LV, which were not preselected as the mentioned above XMP candidates, were also found at the Northern hemisphere with BTA (paper in preparation).

The unbiased approach in the study of void objects allows one to address their diversity, including the scatter of gas metallicity for the similar global parameters, such as luminosity or stellar mass. To date, we collected data on the gas metallicity in the LV void galaxies for about a hundred objects. They include both, our own results from this paper, some of the LV objects appeared in the other our published samples, as well as about two dozen objects with known O/H, found in the literature. Despite this number comprises less than a half of the whole LV void sample (the updated number of 243 objects), it is useful to have a first look on the available data.

For discussion of the intermediate results on the LV sample, we take at the moment only the data with the direct and strong-line O/H estimates. The mse estimates of O/H from this and the previous papers will be included in the next publication, along with the earlier data. The latter need a more careful reanalysis, including those where we used the semi-empirical method of Izotov & Thuan (2007).

The plot with the intermediate results for the LV void sample is presented in Figure 3. The lines for the reference sample are the same as in Figure 2.

One of the features, which distinguishes this void galaxies sample from, e.g., the sample of Lynx-Cancer void, is its heterogeneity in the context of their distances to the nearest massive galaxies. As described in PTM19, the NVG galaxy sample was selected of objects falling within the empty spheres comprising the voids themselves. About 20 per cent of this way selected galaxies appeared to reside closer than two Mpc to the bordering massive galaxies. They were conditionally named outer void galaxies, while the great majority of galaxies (\sim80 per cent) with the DNN (nearby luminous neighbour) distances larger than 2 Mpc were assigned to the inner void galaxies.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Distribution in the diagram ’12+log(O/H) vs MB’ of the 90 LV void galaxies with known O/H, derived either by the direct (Te), or by the ’strong-line’ (Izotov et al., 2019) methods. The lines on the plot are the same as in Figure 2. The data include results from this paper (25 objects) and from our published papers Pustilnik et al. (2016, 2020b, 2021) (31 objects), as well as 12 unpublished BTA objects and 22 objects from the literature (Izotov et al., 1994, 1997; Izotov & Thuan, 2007; Izotov et al., 2012; van Zee, 1997; van Zee & Haynes, 2006; van Zee et al., 2006; Pustilnik et al., 2003; Kniazev et al., 2005; Berg et al., 2012; Skillman et al., 2013).

As one can see in Figure 3, the scatter of the LV void galaxies (filled and empty octagons with error bars) on log(O/H) at a fixed MB, appears significantly larger than for the reference sample of Berg et al. (2012). For the latter sample, the scatter is mostly limited by the blue dot-dashed parallel lines (±\pm1 rms scatter). While the sizeable part of void galaxies falls within the log(O/H) range of the reference sample, about one third of the void objects have a substantially reduced metallicity. In particular, in Figure 4 one can see that 28 of 90 LV void galaxies have the log(O/H), reduced by more than 0.30 dex (two rms) relative to their values expected from the reference relation of Berg et al. (2012).

The majority of void objects with the substantially reduced metallicity in Figure 3 belong to galaxies with very low O/H, namely with 12+log(O/H) \lesssim7.4. Of them, the great majority have values of O/H derived with the strong-line method of Izotov et al. (2019). In Figure 4 we show histograms of the difference 12+log(O/H)(observed) – 12+log(O/H)(reference, MB), separately for O/H obtained by the direct method (black) and O/H, derived with the strong-line method of Izotov et al. (2019) (green). The mean difference for O/H(Te) is –0.049 dex, with rms=0.175 dex. For O/H(s), the mean is –0.346 dex, with rms=0.116 dex.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: The same data as in Figure 3. The histograms show the differences of measured 12+log(O/H) for the LV void galaxies and those expected from the reference relation from Berg et al. (2012). Black hatched histogram is for O/H(Te), while the green histogram is for O/H derived with the strong-line method of Izotov et al. (2019).
Refer to caption
Figure 5: The same data as in the previous figure, but divided according to their distribution within voids. 19 ’outer’ void galaxies are shown in black. 71 ’inner’ void galaxies are coloured with magenta. See a more detailed discussion in the text.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The same data as in Figure 5. The histograms show the differences of measured 12+log(O/H) for the LV void galaxies and those expected from the reference relation from Berg et al. (2012). left-hand panel: separate histograms for ’inner’ (71 galaxies, black) and ’outer’ (19 galaxies, green) subsamples for the case of the threshold DNN = 2.0 Mpc. right-hand panel: same as the left-hand panel, but for the case of the threshold DNN = 1.7 Mpc. Black histogram is for 78 ’inner’, while the green one – for 12 ’outer’ galaxies. See text for more detail.

The effect of the reduced metallicity in void galaxies, already mentioned in several our papers, and its elevated scatter for a given galaxy luminosity/mass, can be due to the interplay between various factors. In particular, the chemical evolution of void galaxies and their current metallicity can depend on their local environment and clustering, and on the faster or slower accretion of the unprocessed intergalactic gas. Since void substructure resembles that of a mini-Universe (Gottlöber et al., 2003; Aragon-Calvo & Szalay, 2013), void galaxies can be associated with more massive hosts or to be well isolated. In general, the local environment is expected to affect the secular evolution, especially of the smaller-mass companions. To uncover these factors, it takes a more careful analysis of the studied sample.

On the other hand, since we study the LV void galaxy sample without any additional bias, we can, in particular, examine, whether the outer and inner void galaxies show differences in their properties. For this, we show outer and inner galaxies in the similar plot in Figure 5. While the statistics is still rather limited, there is a hint that the ’outer’ void objects show a smaller scatter in log(O/H) and follow closer the reference relation of Berg et al. (2012). While the criterion of separation of outer void subsample by the inequality of D<NN{}_{\rm NN}< 2 Mpc, is somewhat arbitrary, it seems to catch a transition of galaxy properties from the most rarefied regions to a denser environment. Therefore, one can think that the large scatter of void galaxies on log(O/H) in Figure 3 can be partly explained by the contribution of the outer objects.

In Figure 6, we show the distribution of differences in log(O/H) for 90 LV void galaxies, separately for the ’inner’ (black) and ’outer’ (green) subsamples. The left-hand panel shows the histograms for the threshold DNN = 2.0 Mpc, as adopted in the original paper on the NVG sample. The mean for the 71 ’inner’ galaxies is –0.193 dex with rms=0.202 dex. For the 19 ’outer’ galaxies, the mean is –0.098 dex, with the rms=0.222 dex. While the scatter for both groups is similar, the ’inner’ group has a substantially more reduced O/H.

To check, how this effect depends on the adopted threshold for DNN, we divided these 90 LV void galaxies into the ’inner’ and ’outer’ subsamples, taking the threshold DNN = 1.7 Mpc. This means that the selected ’outer’ void galaxies are in average somewhat closer to the bordering large galaxies. The histograms in the right-hand panel show the difference of log(O/H) for this case. For the 78 ’inner’ galaxies, the mean is –0.191 dex with rms=0.204 dex, practically the same as for the previous histogram. For the 12 ’outer’ galaxies, the mean is –0.055 dex, with rms=0.208 dex. That is, void galaxies with the smaller DNN show the tendency to have the smaller difference of O/H with the reference relation, albeit the scatter is larger than 0.15 dex characteristic of the reference sample of Berg et al. (2012). We notice that the statistics is still limited, so the future data, incorporating the majority of the LV void galaxies, hopefully will result in more firm conclusions.

5.3 New dTr galaxies in void environment

Several studied void galaxies appear on their properties similar to the handful known voids dwarfs of transitional type (dTr) (Karachentsev et al., 2014; Pustilnik et al., 2022a, and references therein). They show very little current SF as evidenced either by non-detected Hα\alpha emission, or a single region with the faint Hα\alpha. At the same time, their Hi content does not differ much from dIr galaxies of the same luminosity. The unbiased study of the LV void dwarfs allows one to extend the sample of these rare objects and to address the issue of their origin on the larger statistical data.

Below we enumerate the void galaxies, according to the new data, falling into this category with the higher or lower confidence. Several of them are found as Hi-sources in the blind ALFALFA survey (Haynes et al., 2018). A few similar ALFALFA galaxies are found in the SHIELD project described by Cannon et al. (2011); Hauberg et al. (2015); McQuinn et al. (2014).

PGC712531 = J033903.0-304921. This bluish dwarf shows only a faint Hα\alpha in emission.

AGC225197 = EVCC1184 = J124942.11+052922. A blue low-surface brightness (LSB) dwarf with the non-central blue compact object. The long slit was positioned to this blue object. Spectrum of this galaxy in SDSS DR12 (Alam et al., 2015) looks similar to our.

AGC227972 - J125024.0+045422. A bluish oval galaxy without prominent SF regions.

PGC2807150 = KKH86 = AGC231980. This LSB dwarf is rather bright Hi source, with F(Hi) (ALFALFA) = 0.8 Jy km s-1 and the ratio of M(Hi)/LB{}_{\rm B}\sim0.75. At the same time, the on-line database of Karachentsev et al. (2013) provides its Hα\alpha-net image with no tracers of emission. Our value of its Vhel = 298±\pm40 km s-1 comes from the wavelengths of the Balmer absorption lines in the body.

5.4 Issue of mistaken redshifts in the NVG sample

As noticed in the Introduction, the great majority of the NVG sample galaxies in PTM19 are taken from the HyperLEDA data base. On results of our spectral observations of a hundred NVG galaxies (that is residing in the nearby voids), presented in Pustilnik et al. (2020b, 2021) and in this work, we found that \sim15 per cent of them have velocities different from the catalog (HyperLEDA) values much larger than one expects from the cited uncertainties. The great majority of them comes from objects in the Southern hemisphere. Of these, the majority of objects with wrong velocities appear in the HyperLEDA from the 2dFGRS galaxies with redshifts derived via absorption lines.

This allows us to formulate a caution for the use of the 2dFGRS redshift data for statistical studies of galaxies, at least in the nearby Universe, where we have checked many of their radial velocities.

6 Summary and Conclusions

In the previous papers (Pustilnik et al., 2020b, 2021) we presented results of spectroscopy for 46 objects from the sample of 60 preselected candidate XMP void objects from the fainter part (MB14.3M_{\rm B}\gtrsim-14.3) of the Nearby Void Galaxies (NVG) sample. Ten of them were found to be the XMP objects, that is having 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.21 dex. 13 more new void galaxies were found somewhat less metal-poor, with 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.35 dex.

In this work we observed 8 galaxies of the remaining 13 XMP candidates and reobserved one XMP dwarf from Pustilnik et al. (2020b). Two new XMP dwarfs are found of these eight objects. Two additional dwarf galaxies with the Oxygen abundance of 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.35 dex are found as well. Two known XMP void dwarfs were reobserved to improve the accuracy of their metallicity.

The rest 52 observed galaxies are selected to reside in the LV. They represent mostly a fainter part of the total subsample of the LV void galaxies. The currently updated list comprises of 243 LV void objects. Of 39 objects with the well detected strong lines, nine new void galaxies appeared to be very metal-poor, with 12+log(O/H) \lesssim 7.39 dex. Of them, two more XMP dwarfs are found, with 12+log(O/H) = 7.07 and 7.20 dex.

Summarising the results, presented here and the related discussion, we draw the following conclusions:

  1. 1.

    The spectroscopy of 8 remaining ’candidate’ XMP dwarfs from the sample of 60 objects residing in the nearby voids, results in the discovery of two additional XMP dwarfs, with 12+log\log(O/H) \sim7.19 – 7.20 dex (\simZ/30).

  2. 2.

    The almost completed program of search for void XMP dwarfs results in 11 new objects with Zgas = Z/50 – Z/30, that comprises \sim20 per cent of the selected candidates. In addition, 23 very low-metallicity dwarfs (Zgas = Z/30 – Z/20) are found, that is \sim40 per cent of the initial list. This finding increases substantially the number of the known nearby very metal-poor dwarfs and allows us to conduct a deeper study of their individual and group properties and of their possible relation to Very Young Galaxies.

  3. 3.

    The first results are presented for the on-going project of the studying a subsample of 243 NVG galaxies residing in the Local Volume. Of 52 observed objects only 37 appeared in real to reside in the nearby voids, while the rest 15 had the wrong radial velocities in HyperLEDA.

  4. 4.

    The strong lines of Oxygen are detected and its abundance is estimated in 32 of these 37 NVG objects, with the total range of 12+log(O/H) of 7.07 dex to \sim8.0 dex.

  5. 5.

    The addition of the other available data on the LV void dwarfs allows us to probe the relation between 12+log(O/H) and MB on a sample of \sim90 objects. The general trend of the reduced metallicity for a given luminosity, already known from our earlier studies of the nearby void galaxies, is also well seen on the LV void galaxies. Besides, on this compilation of the LV void galaxies, we find a large scatter in O/H for a fixed MB. Partly, the reason of this effect can be the presence in the LV void sample of galaxies in the ’bordering’ regions of voids.

  6. 6.

    The studied void galaxies show a wide range of the star-forming activity. While the most typical dwarfs, dIrrs and late Spirals, show several SF regions, we find four new dTr galaxies with the substantial neutral gas reservoir and the absent or very subtle signs of the current/recent SF.

  7. 7.

    Two Local Volume Hi objects, HIPASS J1614–72 and AGC208329 appear to have a mistaken optical identification. The search for their alternative optical counterparts did not reveal potential candidates. Since the full census of the LV population has the important implications for comparison of the LV with cosmological simulations, the understanding of the nature of these Hi objects will take special efforts, including their Hi-mapping and the improvement of their position accuracy.

Acknowledgements

This work is based on observations obtained with the Southern African Large Telescope (SALT), programs 2017-2-MLT-001, 2020-2-MLT-005, 2022-1-MLT-003 (PI: Kniazev). The reported study was funded by Russian Science Foundation according to the research project 22-22-00654. AYK acknowledges support from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa. We thank the anonymous reviewer for the useful comments and suggestions, which allowed us to improve the content and clarity of the paper. The use of the HyperLEDA database is greatly acknowledged. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED) which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We also acknowledge the great effort of the ALFALFA team which opened access to the nearby Universe gas-rich dwarfs with low or moderate SFR and thus helped us to identify the majority of very low metallicity galaxies of this study.

We also acknowledge the use of the SDSS and Legacy surveys databases. Funding for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS Web site is http://www.sdss.org/. The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) for the Participating Institutions.

The DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys consist of three individual and complementary projects: the Dark Energy Camera Legacy Survey (DECaLS), the Beijing-Arizona Sky Survey (BASS), and the Mayall z-band Legacy Survey (MzLS). DECaLS, BASS and MzLS together include data obtained, respectively, at the Blanco telescope, Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, NSF’s NOIRLab; the Bok telescope, Steward Observatory, University of Arizona; and the Mayall telescope, Kitt Peak National Observatory, NOIRLab. NOIRLab is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation. Pipeline processing and analyses of the data were supported by NOIRLab and the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL). Legacy Surveys also uses data products from the Near-Earth Object Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (NEOWISE), a project of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Legacy Surveys was supported by: the Director, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics of the U.S. Department of Energy; the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, a DOE Office of Science User Facility; the U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of Astronomical Sciences; the National Astronomical Observatories of China, the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation. LBNL is managed by the Regents of the University of California under contract to the U.S. Department of Energy.

Data Availability

The data underlying this article are available in Appendices A, B and C, which are available only in the on-line supplementary materials of the paper.

References

  • Alam et al. (2015) Alam S., Albareti F.D., Allende Prieto C., et al. 2015, ApJS, 219, 12
  • Aller (1984) Aller H.L., 1984, Physics of Thermal Gaseous Nebulae (Dordrecht, Reidel)
  • Annibali et al. (2019) Annibali F., La Torre V., Tosi M., et al., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 3892
  • Aragon-Calvo & Szalay (2013) Aragon-Calvo M.A., & Szalay A.S., 2013, MNRAS, 428, 3409
  • Asplund et al. (2009) Asplund M., Grevesse N., Sauval A. J., Scott P., 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481
  • Aver et al. (2022) Aver E., Berg D.A., Hirschauer A.S., Olive K.A., Pogge R.W., Rogers N.S.J., Salzer J.J., Skillman E.D., 2022, MNRAS, 510, 373
  • Berg et al. (2012) Berg D.A., Skillman E.D., Marble A., et al. 2012, ApJ, 754, 98
  • Brocklehurst (1971) Brocklehurst M., 1971, MNRAS, 153, 471
  • Buckley, Swart & Meiring (2006) Buckley, D.A.H., Swart, G.P., Meiring, J.G., 2006, SPIE, 6267
  • Burgh et al. (2003) Burgh, E.B., Nordsieck, K.H., Kobulnicky, H.A., Williams, T.B., O’Donoghue, D., Smith, M.P., Percival, J.W., 2003, SPIE, 4841, 1463
  • Cannon et al. (2011) Cannon J., Giovanelli R., Haynes M., et al., 2011, ApJL, 739, 22
  • Chengalur & Pustilnik (2013) Chengalur J.N., Pustilnik S.A., 2013, MNRAS, 428, 1579
  • Chengalur et al. (2017) Chengalur J.N., Pustilnik S.A., Egorova E.S., 2017, MNRAS, 465, 2342
  • Crawford et al. (2010) Crawford S. M. et al., 2010, in Silva D. R., Peck A. B., Soifer B. T., Proc. SPIE Conf. Ser. Vol. 7737, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems III. SPIE, Bellingham, p. 773725
  • Dey et al. (2019) Dey A., Schlegel D., Lang D., et al. 2019, AJ, 57, id. 168
  • Filippenko (1982) Filippenko A.V., 1982, PASP, 94, 715
  • Fioc & Volmerange (1999) Fioc M., Rocca-Volmerange B., 1999, astro-ph/9912179
  • Gottlöber et al. (2003) Gottlöber S., Lokas E.L., Klypin A., Hoffman Y., 2003, MNRAS, 344, 715
  • Guseva et al. (2009) Guseva N.G., Papaderos P., Meyer H.T., Izotov Y.I., Fricke K.J., 2009, A&A, 505, 63
  • Hauberg et al. (2015) Hauberg N.C., Salzer J.J., Cannon J.M., Marshall M.V., 2015, ApJ, 800, 121
  • Haynes et al. (2018) Haynes M.P., Giovanelli R., Kent B.R., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 49
  • Hirschauer et al. (2016) Hirschauer A.S., Salzer J.J., Skillman E.D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 822, 108
  • Hsyu et al. (2017) Hsyu T., Cooke R.J., Prochaska J.X., Bolte M., 2017, ApJ Lett., 845, L22
  • Huchtmeier et al. (2000) Huchtmeier W., Karachentsev I.D., Karachentseva V.E., Ehle M., 2000, A&A Suppl. 141, 469
  • Huchtmeier et al. (2003) Huchtmeier W.K., Karachentsev I.D., Karachentseva V.E., 2003, A&A, 401, 483
  • Izotov & Thuan (2007) Izotov Y.I., Thuan T.X., 2007, ApJ, 665, 1115
  • Izotov et al. (1994) Izotov Y.I., Thuan T.X., Lipovetsky V.A., 1994, ApJ, 435, 647
  • Izotov et al. (1997) Izotov Y.I., Thuan T.X., Lipovetsky V.A., 1997, ApJS, 108, 1
  • Izotov et al. (2006) Izotov Y.I., Stasińska G., Meynet G., Guseva N.G., Thuan T.X., 2006, A&A, 448, 955
  • Izotov et al. (2012) Izotov Y.I., Thuan T.X., Guseva N.G., 2012, A&A, 546, A122
  • Izotov et al. (2019) Izotov Y.I., Guseva N.G., Frieke K.J., Henkel C., 2019, A&A, 523, A40
  • Izotov et al. (2021) Izotov Y.I., Thuan T.X., Guseva N.G., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 3996
  • Karachentsev et al. (2013) Karachentsev I.D., Makarov D.I., Kaisina E.I., 2013, AJ, 145, 101
  • Karachentsev et al. (2014) Karachentsev I.D., Makarova L.N., Tully R.B., Wu P.-F., Kniazev A.Y., 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1281
  • Karachentsev et al. (2023) Karachentsev I.D., Makarova L.N., Koribalski B.S., Anand G.S., Tully R.B., Kniazev A.Y., 2023, MNRAS, 518, 5893
  • Kesseli et al. (2017) Kesseli A.Y., West A.A., Veyette M., Harrison B., Feldman D., Bochanski J.J., 2017, ApJS, 230, a.i. 16, 21 pp.
  • Kilborn et al. (2002) Kilborn V.A., Webster R.L., Staveley-Smith L., et al. 2002, AJ, 124, 690
  • Kniazev (2022) Kniazev A.Y., 2022, Astrophysical Bulletin, 77, 334-346
  • Kniazev et al. (2004) Kniazev A.Y., Pustilnik S.A., Grebel E.K., Lee H., Pramskij A.G., 2004, ApJS, 153, 429
  • Kniazev et al. (2005) Kniazev A.Y., Grebel E.K., Pustilnik S.A., Pramskij A.G., Zucker D., 2005, AJ, 130, 1558
  • Kniazev et al. (2018) Kniazev A.Y., Egorova E.S., Pustilnik S.A., 2018, MNRAS, 479, 3842
  • Kobulnicky et al. (2003) Kobulnicky, H.A., Nordsieck, K.H., Burgh, E.B., Smith, M.P., Percival, J.W., Williams, T.B., O’Donoghue, D., 2003, SPIE, 4841, 1634
  • Koleva et al. (2009) Koleva M., Prugniel P., Bouchard A., Wu Y., 2009, A&A, 501, 1269
  • Kreckel et al. (2012) Kreckel K., Platen E., Aragon-Calvo M.A., van Gorkom J.H., van de Weygaert R., van der Hulst J.M., Beygu B., 2012, AJ, 144, 16
  • Makarov & Uklein (2012) Makarov D.I., Uklein R.I., 2012, Astrophys.Bull., 67, 135
  • Makarov et al. (2014) Makarov D.I., Prugniel P., Terekhova N., Courtois H., Vauglin I., 2014, A&A, 570, A13
  • Mamon et al. (2020) Mamon G.A., Trevisan M., Thuan T.X., Galazzi A., 2020, MNRAS, 492, 1791
  • McQuinn et al. (2014) McQuinn K., Cannon J.M., Dolphin A.E., et al., 2014, ApJ, 785, 3
  • O’Donoghue et al. (2006) O’Donoghue D., et al.  2006, MNRAS, 372, 151
  • Papaderos & Östlin (2012) Papaderos P., Östlin G., 2012, A&A, 537, A126
  • Patiri et al. (2006) Patiri S.G., Prada F., Holtzman J., Klypin A., Betancort-Rijo J., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1710
  • Perepelitsyna et al. (2014) Perepelitsyna Y.A., Pustilnik S.A., Kniazev A.Y. 2014, Astrophys.Bull., 69, 247 (arXiv:1408.0613)
  • Pilyugin & Thuan (2005) Pilyugin L.S., Thuan T.X., 2005, ApJ, 631, 231
  • Pustilnik & Tepliakova (2011) Pustilnik S.A., Tepliakova A.L., 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1188
  • Pustilnik, Martin (2016) Pustilnik S.A., Martin J.-M., 2016, A&A, 596,A86
  • Pustilnik et al. (2003) Pustilnik S.A., Zasov A.V., Kniazev A.Y., Pramsky A.G., Ugryumov A.V., Burenkov A.N., 2003, A&A, 400, 841-858
  • Pustilnik et al. (2005) Pustilnik S.A., Kniazev A.Y., Pramskij A.G., 2005, A&A, 443, 91
  • Pustilnik et al. (2010) Pustilnik S.A., Tepliakova A.L., Kniazev A.Y., Martin J.-M., Burenkov A.N., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 333
  • Pustilnik et al. (2011) Pustilnik S.A., Martin J.-M., Tepliakova A.L., Kniazev A.Y., 2011, MNRAS, 417, 1335
  • Pustilnik et al. (2013) Pustilnik S.A., Martin J.-M., Lyamina Y.A., Kniazev A.Y., 2013, MNRAS, 432, 2224
  • Pustilnik et al. (2016) Pustilnik S.A., Perepelitsyna Y.A., Kniazev A.Y., 2016, MNRAS, 463, 670
  • Pustilnik, Tepliakova & Makarov (2019) Pustilnik S.A., Tepliakova A.L., Makarov D.I., 2019, MNRAS, 482, 4329 (PTM19)
  • Pustilnik et al. (2020a) Pustilnik S.A., Egorova E., Perepelitsyna Y.A., Kniazev A.Y., 2020a, MNRAS, 492, 1078
  • Pustilnik et al. (2020b) Pustilnik S.A., Kniazev A.Y., Perepelitsyna Y.A., Egorova E.S., 2020b, MNRAS, 493, 830 (PKPE20)
  • Pustilnik et al. (2021) Pustilnik S.A., Egorova E.S., Kniazev A.Y., Perepelitsyna Y.A., Tepliakova A.L., Burenkov A.N., Oparin D.V., 2021, MNRAS, 507, 494
  • Pustilnik et al. (2022a) Pustilnik S.A., Tepliakova A.L., Perepelitsyna Y.A., Kniazev A.Y., Makarova L.N., Burenkov A.N., Kotov S.S., Malygin E.A., 2022a, MNRAS, 516, 6180
  • Pustilnik et al. (2022b) Pustilnik S., Perepelitsyna Y., Tepliakova A., Kniazev A., Egorova E., Chengalur J., Kurapati S., 2022b, in Proc. of conf. ”The Multifaceted Universe: Theory and Observations - 2022” (MUTO2022), PoS, id.26 (arXiv:2212.0564)
  • Rojas et al. (2005) Rojas R.R., Vogeley M.S., Hoyle F., Brinkmann J., 2005, ApJ, 624, 571
  • Schlafly & Finkbeiner (2011) Schlafly E.F., Finkbeiner D.P., 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, 13pp.
  • Searle & Sargent (1972) Searle L., Sargent W.L.W., 1972, ApJ, 173, 25
  • Skillman et al. (2013) Skillman E., Salzer J.J., Berg D.A., et al., 2013, AJ, 146, 3
  • Stasińska (1990) Stasińska G., 1990, A&AS, 83, 501
  • Stasińska & Izotov (2003) Stasińska G., Izotov Y.I., 2003, A&A, 397, 71
  • Tully et al. (2008) Tully B., Shaya E.J., Karachentsev I.D., Courtois H.M., Kocevski D.D., Rizzi L., Peel A., 2008, ApJ, 676, 184
  • Tweed et al. (2018) Tweed D.P., Mamon G.A., Thuan T.X., Cattaneo A., Dekel A., Menci N., Calura F., Silk J., 2018, MNRAS, 477, 1427
  • van de Weygaert (2016) van de Weygart R., 2016, in The Zel’dovich Universe: Genesis and Growth of the Cosmic Web, Proc. IAU Symposium, V.308, pp. 493-523,
  • van Zee (1997) van Zee L., 1997, AJ, 119, 2757
  • van Zee & Haynes (2006) van Zee L., Haynes M.P., 2006, ApJ, 636, 214
  • van Zee et al. (2006) van Zee L., Haynes M.P., Skillman E., 2006, 637, 269
  • Whitford (1958) Whitford A.E., 1968, AJ, 63, 201