This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Doping-induced superconductivity in the topological semimetal Mo5Si3

Jifeng Wu1,2,3111These authors contributed equally to this work.    Chenqiang Hua4∗    Bin Liu1,2,3    Yanwei Cui1,2,4    Qinqing Zhu1,2,3    Guorui Xiao1,2,4    Siqi Wu4    Guanghan Cao4    Yunhao Lu4,5    Zhi Ren1,2222[email protected] 1School of Science, Westlake University, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou 310064, P. R. China 2Institute of Natural Sciences, Westlake Institute for Advanced Study, 18 Shilongshan Road, Hangzhou 310064, P. R. China 3Department of Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, P. R. China 4Zhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Quantum Technology and Device, Department of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China 5State Key Lab of Silicon Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China
Abstract

Chemical doping of topological materials may provide a possible route for realizing topological superconductivity. However, all such cases known so far are based on chalcogenides. Here we report the discovery of superconductivity induced by Re doping in the topological semimetal Mo5Si3 with a tetragonal structure. Partial substitution of Re for Mo in Mo5-xRexSi3 results in an anisotropic shrinkage of the unit cell up to the solubility limit of approximately xx = 2. Over a wide doping range (0.5 \leq xx \leq 2), these silicides are found to be weakly coupled superconductors with a fully isotropic gap. TcT_{\rm c} increases monotonically with xx from 1.67 K to 5.78 K, the latter of which is the highest among superconductors of the same structural type. This trend in TcT_{\rm c} correlates well with the variation of the number of valence electrons, and is mainly ascribed to the enhancement of electron-phonon coupling. In addition, band structure calculations reveal that superconducting Mo5-xRexSi3 exhibits nontrivial band topology characterized by Z2Z_{2} invariants (1;000) or (1;111) depending on the Re doping level. Our results suggest that transition metal silicides are a fertile ground for the exploration of candidate topological superconductors.

I I. Introduction

In the past decade, topological superconductors (TSC) have received widespread attention as a new quantum state of matter TSCreview1 ; TSCreview2 ; TSCreview3 . The most prominent character of TSC is the existence of Majorana fermions TSCreview1 ; TSCreview2 . These fermions are their own antiparticles and obey non-Abelian statistics, which makes TSC useful in fault-tolerant quantum computing. In theory, in addition to topological materials that are intrinsically superconducting superconductingTM1 ; superconductingTM2 ; superconductingTM3 ; superconductingTM4 , doped topological materials that exhibit superconductivity are also natural candidates for TSC TSCreview3 . In reality, examples in the latter category include AxA_{x}Bi2Se3 (AA = Cu, Sr, Nb) CuxBi2Se3 ; SrxBi2Se3 ; NbxBi2Se3 , Tl0.6Bi2Te3 TlxBi2Te3 , Sn1-xInxTe Sn1-xInxTe , K- and [C6H11N2]-intercalated WTe2 KxWTe2 ; organicintercalated . These materials are all based on transition metal or main-group chalcogenides, and most of their parent compounds are either topological insulators or topological crystalline insulators. In comparison, doping-induced superconductivity has been rarely observed in topological semimetals. Very recently, CoSi was shown to have a topologically nontrivial band structure CoSi1 ; CoSi2 , suggesting that TSC may also be found in transition metal silicides. However, no such example has been reported to date. Note that, compared with chalcogenides, the transition metal silicides generally have higher hardness and thermal stability highhardness , and thus are better suited for practical applications.

Several theoretical calculations consistently show that Mo5Si3 is a high symmetry line topological semimetal Mo5Si3prediction1 ; Mo5Si3prediction2 ; Mo5Si3prediction3 . This material belongs to the tetragonal DD8m category of the A5A_{5}B3B_{3} family, and its structure is sketched in Figs. 1(a) and (b). In the tetragonal unit cell, there are two distinct Mo sites Mo(1) and Mo(2), the nearest-neighbours of which form zigzag and linear chains running along the cc-axis, respectively Mo5Si3structure . Since the density of states at the Fermi level [NN(EFE_{\rm F})] of Mo5Si3 is dominated by the Mo 4dd states, this one-dimensional arrangement of the Mo atoms results in significant anisotropy in physical properties including thermal expansion and resistivity Mo5Si3anisotropy . However, Mo5Si3 has long been studied as a high-temperature structural alloy HTalloy1 ; HTalloy2 ; HTalloy3 , while little attention has been paid to its low temperature properties. In this respect, it is worth noting that a number of compounds isostructural to Mo5Si3 are found superconducting and their TcT_{\rm c} correlates with the average number of valence electrons per atom ratio (ee/aa) Nb5Sn2Al . The ee/aa value falls in the range between 4.25 and 4.625 for most of these superconductors, but is significant higher (5.25) for W5Si3 that is isoelectronic to Mo5Si3. This suggests the presence of another superconducting region at higher ee/aa values, which is also expected by the Matthias rule MTrule . It is thus speculated that superconductivity may be induced in Mo5Si3 by increasing the number of valence electrons.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematic structure of Mo5Si3 projected perpendicular to the cc-axis. (b) A three-dimensional view of the Mo5Si3 unit cells. (c) Powder x-ray diffraction patterns for the series of Mo5-xRexSi3 samples. (d)-(f) Structural refinement results for xx = 0, 1 and 2, respectively. The inset in panel (f) shows a zoom of the data for xx = 2 in the 2θ\theta range between 41 and 44, and the impurity peak near 2θ\theta \approx 43 is marked by the asterisk. (g-i) Re content xx dependence of the lattice constants and unit-cell volume for the Mo5-xRexSi3 samples, respectively. The inset in (g) shows the (400) peak for these samples.

With this in mind, we employ Re as a dopant since it has one more valence electron than Mo. Structural analysis indicates that Mo5-xRexSi3 retains a single tetragonal structure up to xx \approx 2, and the increase of Re content xx results in a reduction of the aa-axis but has little affect on the cc-axis. For xx \geq 0.5, bulk superconductivity is observed with a maximal TcT_{\rm c} of 5.78 K observed at the Re solubility limit. The dependencies of TcT_{\rm c} on NN(EFE_{\rm F}), electron-phonon coupling constant as well as ee/aa are examined, and various superconducting parameters are obtained. Moreover, the evolution of band topology with Re doping is investigated by theoretical calculations. The implication of these results on the possibility of topological superconductivity in Re-doped Mo5Si3 is discussed.

II II. Materials and Methods

Table 1: Atomic coordinates for Mo5-xRexSi3.
Atoms site xx yy zz Occupancy
Mo(1)/Re(1) 16kk 0.074 0.223 0 (1-0.2xx)/0.2xx
Mo(2)/Re(2) 4bb 0 0.5 0.25 (1-0.2xx)/0.2xx
Si(1) 8hh 0.17 0.67 0 1
Si(2) 4aa 0 0 0.25 1

Polycrystalline Mo5-xRexSi3 samples with xx = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 were prepared by the arc melting method. High purity powders of Mo (99.9%), Re (99.9%) and Si (99.99%) were weighed according to the stoichiometric ratio, mixed thoroughly using a mortar and pestle, and pressed into pellets in an argon-filled glovebox. The pellets were melted several times in an arc furnace under argon atmosphere, followed by rapid cooling on a water-chilled copper plate. The resulting ingots were grounded, pressed gain into pellets, and annealed at 1600 C in a vacuum furnace for 24 hours, followed by furnace cooling to room temperature. We have examined carefully ingots and pellets of all samples but no single crystals could be obtained.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) Temperature dependence of resistivity for the series of Mo5-xRexSi3 samples. (b) A zoom of the same set of data in the low temperature region. (c) Magnetic susceptibility data in the same temperature range as in (b) for these samples. (d) Low temperature CpC_{\rm p} data for the series of Mo5-xRexSi3 samples. The solid lines are entropy conserving constructions to estimate the specific heat jump as well as TcT_{\rm c} and dashed lines are fits by the Debye model. (e) Normalized electronic specific heat for the samples with xx = 1, 1.5 and 2. The dashed and solid lines are fits by the α\alpha model.

The phase purity was checked by powder x-ray diffraction (XRD) at room temperature using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα\alpha radiation. The chemical composition was measured with an energy-dispersive x-ray (EDX) spectrometer affiliated to a Hitachi field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM). Electrical resistivity and specific heat measurements were carried out in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS-9 Dynacool). The resistivity was measured using a standard four-probe method down to 1.8 K, and, if necessary, then from 1.8 to 150 mK with an adiabatic dilution refrigerator option. The applied current is 1 mA. The specific heat was measured down to 1.8 K using a relaxation method. Magnetic susceptibility measurements down to 1.8 K were performed in a Quantum Design Magnetic Property Measurement System (MPMS3) with an applied magnetic field of 0.5 mT in both zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) modes. For consistency, all the results were collected on the same sample for each xx value.

First-principles band structure calculations were performed using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE)PBE exchange-correlation functional in the Vienna ab-initio simulation package VASP . Our convergence threshold of Hellmann-Feynman force is 0.01 eV/Å and the energy convergence criteria was set to 10-6 eV. In both optimization and self-consistent calculations, the energy cutoff was fixed to 450 eV. Besides, we adopted 9×\times9×\times9 kk points to mesh the Brillouin zone. The effect of spin-orbital coupling (SOC) SOC is included for Wannier-function-based calculations of Z2Z_{2} invariants SOC ; wanier .

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (a-c) Temperature dependence of resistivity under various fields for the Mo5-xRexSi3 samples with xx = 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively. In each panel, the field increment is 0.5 T. (d) Temperature dependence of upper critical field for these samples. The solid and dashed lines are fits by the WHH and Ginzburg-Landau models, respectively.

III III. Results and Discussion

Fig. 1(c) shows the results of XRD measurements for the series of Mo5-xRexSi3 samples. It is obvious that all the patterns are very similar, indicating that the structure remains unchanged upon Re doping. For the refinement, the II4/mcmmcm space group is employed and the Re atoms are assumed to occupy disorderly the Mo(1) and Mo(2) sites (see Table I) orderedmodel . As exemplified in Figs. 1(d)-(f), a good agreement is obtained between the calculated and observed patterns (the CIF files are available through the ICSD database, CSD 2027050-2027052) and the refinement results are listed in Table II. For xx = 2, a small impurity peak is discernible at 2θ\theta \approx 43 [see the inset of Fig. 1(f)], suggesting that this xx value is very close to the solubility limit of Re in Mo5Si3. Figures 2(d)-(f) show the refined lattice parameters and unit-cell volume (VV) plotted as a function of Re content xx. The lattice parameters for Mo5Si3 (xx = 0) are aa = 9.648(1) Å and cc = 4.903(1) Å, in good agreement with the previous report Mo5Si3structure . With increasing xx, the aa-axis decreases by \sim1.1 % to 9.545(1) Å, which is clearly evidenced by the shift of (400) peak position toward higher 2θ\theta values [see the inset of Fig. 1(g)]. In comparison, the variation of cc-axis is within \sim0.2 %. As a result, VV shrinks by nearly 2% at xx = 2 compared with xx = 0, which is as expected since Re has a smaller atomic radius than Mo radius .

The morphology of these Mo5-xRexSi3 samples was also investigated by SEM. At low xx values, the samples contains disconnected grains with a size of several tenth μ\mum. As the Re content increases, the grains become interconnected with the voids getting fewer and smaller. This signifies a growth in the grain size, probably due to a reduction in the energy barrier caused by Re doping. The EDX spectra were collected from several locations for each sample (see Fig. S1 of the Supporting Information). Averaging the data yields the measured chemical compositions of Mo5.06(8)Si2.93(8), Mo4.54(11)Re0.47(9)Si2.99(9), Mo4.01(11)Re1.09(3)Si2.90(12), Mo3.65(6)Re1.43(3)Si2.91(7), and Mo3.17(13)Re1.83(6)Si2.99(11) for xx = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively, which agree with the nominal ones within the experimental error.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (a-b) TcT_{\rm c} of the Mo5-xRexSi3 samples plotted as a function of γ\gamma and λep\lambda_{\rm ep}, respectively. (c) TcT_{\rm c} of superconductors isostructural to Mo5-xRexSi3 plotted as a function of the average number of valence electrons per atom ratio. The two dashed lines are a guide to the eyes, showing that TcT_{\rm c} of these superconductors follows the empirical Matthias rule.

Figure 2(a) shows the temperature dependence of resistivity (ρ\rho) for the series of Mo5-xRexSi3 samples. In all cases, ρ\rho decreases smoothly with decreasing temperature, indicative of a metallic behavior without any phase transition. For undoped Mo5Si3 (xx = 0), ρ\rho remains finite down to 150 mK and the residual resistivity ratio (RRR) is about 3. When increasing xx to 0.5, while the ρ300K\rho_{\rm 300K} value remains nearly unchanged, the RRR ratio is reduced to 1.5. With further increasing xx, the ρ\rho(TT) curve shifts up almost rigidly, and the low temperature ρ\rho value for xx = 2 is nearly one order of magnitude larger than that for xx = 0. This suggests that the incorporation of Re atoms leads to enhanced electron scattering. Despite this enhancement, a clear drop to zero resistivity is observed for all Re-doped samples, and the resistive transition moves to higher temperatures as the increase of Re content. From midpoints of the resistive transitions, the values of TcT_{\rm c} are determined to be 1.67 K, 4.45 K, 5.29 K, and 5.78 K for xx = 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively. One may note that, in these samples, a higher TcT_{\rm c} is correlated with a larger normal-state ρ\rho. However, it should be pointed that the resistivity of polycrystalline samples as used in the present study largely depends on the contribution of grain boundaries GB . Thus this correlation needs to be verified when single crystals become available.

The occurrence of superconductivity is corroborated by the magnetic susceptibility (χ\chi) and specific heat (CpC_{\rm p}) results shown in Figs. 2(c) and (d). Large shielding fractions exceeding 100% at 1.8 K (without correction for demagnetization effect due to the irregular sample shapes) and strong CpC_{\rm p} anomalies are observed for the Mo5-xRexSi3 samples with xx \geq 1, indicating bulk superconductivity. As for xx = 0.5, such anomaly is absent since it is expected below the lowest measurement temperature of 1.8 K. The TcT_{\rm c} values determined from the onset of diamagnetic χ\chi are 4.63 K, 5.27 K and 5.78 K for xx = 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively. On the other hand, entropy conserving constructions of the CpC_{\rm p} anomalies yield TcT_{\rm c} = 4.15 K, 5.11 K, 5.66 K, and Δ\DeltaCpC_{\rm p}/γ\gammaTcT_{\rm c} = 1.42, 1.48, 1.64 for the same series of samples. Note that the TcT_{\rm c} values determined from transport and magnetic measurements are close to each other and higher than that determined from the thermodynamic measurements. The difference is less than 0.2 K for xx = 1.5 and 2 but attains a significantly larger value of \sim0.5 K for xx = 1, presumably due to lower sample homogeneity.

For all xx values, the normal-state CpC_{\rm p} data are analyzed by the Debye model

Cp/T=γ+βT2,C_{\rm p}/T=\gamma+\beta T^{2}, (1)

where γ\gamma and β\beta are the Sommerfield and phonon specific heat coefficients, respectively. Then the Debye temperature can be calculated as

ΘD=(12π4nR5β)1/3,\Theta_{\rm D}=(\frac{12\pi^{4}nR}{5\beta})^{1/3}, (2)

where nn = 8 and RR = 8.314 J mol-1 K-1 is the molar gas constant. Thus we obtain γ\gamma = 24.2 mJ mol-1 K-2, 24.1 mJ mol-1 K-2, 25.5 mJ mol-1 K-2, 28.7 mJ mol-1 K-2, 29.8 mJ mol-1 K-2, and ΘD\Theta_{\rm D} = 407 K, 406 K, 403 K, 397 K, 386 K for xx = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively. From ΘD\Theta_{\rm D}, the electron phonon coupling strength λep\lambda_{\rm ep} can be estimated using the inverted McMillan formula McMillam ,

λep=1.04+μln(ΘD/1.45Tc)(10.62μ)ln(ΘD/1.45Tc)1.04,\lambda_{\rm ep}=\frac{1.04+\mu^{\ast}\rm ln(\Theta_{\rm D}/1.45\emph{T}_{\rm c})}{(1-0.62\mu^{\ast})\rm ln(\Theta_{\rm D}/1.45\emph{T}_{\rm c})-1.04}, (3)

where μ\mu^{\ast} is the Coulomb repulsion pseudopotential. According to Ref. McMillam , μ\mu^{\ast} is usually between 0.1 and 0.13, the latter of which is taken for all transition metal elements. Since the NN(EFE_{\rm F}) of Mo5-xRexSi3 are dominated by the contributions from Mo and Re atoms, μ\mu^{\ast} value of 0.13 is reasonable. Actually, we have checked the possible influence of the variation μ\mu^{\ast} on the calculated results of λep\lambda_{\rm ep} and found that it is insignificant. Hence, for convenience, μ\mu^{\ast} is assumed to be the same for all samples. This gives λep\lambda_{\rm ep} = 0.46, 0.57, 0.60, and 0.62 for xx = 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively.

By subtracting the phonon contribution, we obtain the the normalized electronic specific heat CelC_{\rm el}/γ\gammaTT for xx \geq 1 as shown in Fig. 2(e). In order to fit the data, we employ a modified BCS model, or the so-called α\alpha model alphamodel . This model still assumes a fully gapped isotropic ss-wave pairing while allows a variation of the coupling constant α\alpha \equiv Δ0\Delta_{\rm 0}/TcT_{\rm c}, where Δ0\Delta_{\rm 0} is the superconducting gap at 0 K. Note that αBCS\alpha_{\rm BCS} = 1.768 in the standard BCS theory BCSthoery . The CelC_{\rm el}/γ\gammaTT data for xx = 1.5 and 2 can be well reproduced by the model with α\alpha = αBCS\alpha_{\rm BCS} and 1.88, respectively. In comparison, the agreement with the data and the model with α\alpha = αBCS\alpha_{\rm BCS} is slightly worse for xx = 1. This is probably due to the sample inhomogeneity as noted above. Nevertheless, it is emphasized that the overall quality of the fitting is well comparable to that reported in the literature HCfit . In addition, the α\alpha value for xx = 2 is larger than that for xx = 1 and 1.5, which is consistent with the trend of increasing λep\lambda_{\rm ep} with Re content. Taken together, these results suggest that the Mo5-xRexSi3 are weak coupling superconductors with a fully isotropic gap.

Table 2: Measured chemical compositions, lattice and physical parameters of Mo5-xRexSi3.
Parameter xx = 0 xx = 0.5 xx = 1 xx = 1.5 xx = 2
Measured Mo content 5.06(8) 4.54(11) 4.01(11) 3.65(6) 3.17(13)
Measured Re content 0 0.47(9) 1.09(3) 1.43(3) 1.83(6)
Measured Si content 2.93(8) 2.99(9) 2.90(12) 2.91(7) 2.99(11)
aa (Å) 9.648(1) 9.623(1) 9.590(1) 9.569(1) 9.545(1)
cc (Å) 4.903(1) 4.897(1) 4.911(1) 4.914(1) 4.911(1)
RwpR_{\rm wp} 5.7% 6.5% 6.4% 7.1% 8.6%
RpR_{\rm p} 4.5% 5.0% 4.8% 5.4% 5.9%
GOF 1.33 1.51 1.43 1.58 1.77
TcT_{\rm c}(ρ\rho) (K) - 1.67 4.45 5.29 5.78
TcT_{\rm c}(χ\chi) (K) - - 4.63 5.27 5.78
TcT_{\rm c}(CpC_{\rm p}) (K) - - 4.15 5.11 5.66
Δ\DeltaCpC_{\rm p}/γ\gammaTcT_{\rm c} - - 1.42 1.48 1.64
γ\gamma (mJ molatom-1 K-2) 23.9 24.1 25.5 28.7 29.8
ΘD\Theta_{\rm D} (K) 407 406 403 397 386
λep\lambda_{\rm ep} - 0.46 0.57 0.60 0.62
Bc2B_{\rm c2}(0) (T) - - 4.2 6.5 8.5
ξGL\xi_{\rm GL} (nm) - - 8.7 7.1 6.2
Refer to caption
Figure 5: (a) Brillouin zone of Mo5-xRexSi3 with high symmetry points and lines. (b) Bulk band structure of Mo5Si3 (xx = 0) with SOC included. Gapped and protected Dirac points are highlighted. Colorful regions indicate where gap opens due to SOC, which allows us to calculate the Z2Z_{2} invariants. Taking the green one as an example, if the top band is unoccupied while the bottom band is occupied, we find a weak TI phase with Z2Z_{2} invariants being (0;111). (c, d) Band structures of xx = 0 and 0.5, respectively, without SOC included. A comparison of the bands in the energy regions indicated by the red frames shows that they look very similar to each other.

Figures 3(a)-(c) show the temperature dependence of resistivity under various magnetic fields for the Mo5-xRexSi3 samples with xx = 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively. Increasing the field leads to a gradual suppression of the resistive transition, and the same 50%ρN\rho_{\rm N} criterion is used to determine TcT_{\rm c} under field. The resulting upper critical field (Bc2B_{\rm c2})-temperature phase diagrams are summarized in Fig. 3(d). As can be seen, the Bc2B_{\rm c2}(TT) data for xx = 1 are well fitted by the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg (WHH) model WHH , yielding a zero-temperature upper critical field Bc2B_{\rm c2}(0) = 4.4 T. In contrast, the data for the other two samples show upward deviation from the WHH behavior especially at low temperature. As such, the Bc2B_{\rm c2}(0) values are estimated by extrapolating with the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) model

Bc2(T)=Bc2(0)1t21+t2,B_{\rm c2}(T)=B_{\rm c2}(0)\frac{1-t^{2}}{1+t^{2}}, (4)

where tt = TT/TcT_{\rm c}. This gives Bc2B_{\rm c2}(0) = 6.5 T and 8.5 T for xx = 1.5 and 2, respectively. With these Bc2B_{\rm c2}(0) values, the GL coherence length ξGL\xi_{\rm GL} can be calculated by the equation

ξGL=Φ02πBc2(0),\xi_{\rm GL}=\sqrt{\frac{\Phi_{0}}{2\pi B_{\rm c2}(0)}}, (5)

where Φ0\Phi_{0} = 2.07 ×\times 10-15 Wb is the flux quantum. Hence ξGL\xi_{\rm GL} values of 8.7 nm, 7.1 nm and 6.2 nm are obtained for xx = 1, 1.5 and 2, respectively.

Now we examine the correlation between TcT_{\rm c} and the physical parameters γ\gamma and λep\lambda_{\rm ep} to gain some insight into the pairing mechanism of Mo5-xRexSi3. As can be seen from Figs. 4(a) and (b), TcT_{\rm c} tends to increase with the increases of both γ\gamma and λep\lambda_{\rm ep}, which is consistent with the BCS theory BCSthoery . However, the γ\gamma value is nearly the same for xx = 0 and 0.5, and hence the emergence of superconductivity is unlikely due to a change in NN(EFE_{\rm F}). Indeed, when increasing xx from 0.5 to 2, TcT_{\rm c} is enhanced by more than a factor of 3, while γ\gamma is increased by only \sim24 %. Remarkably, TcT_{\rm c} of Mo5-xRexSi3 exhibits a linear dependence on λep\lambda_{\rm ep}, suggests that it is primarily governed by the electron-phonon coupling strength. Previous study shows that superconductivity emerges in the isostructural compound Mo5Ge3 after neutron irradiation, which dose not modify its γ\gamma but results in phonon softening Mo5Ge3 . According to McMillan McMillam ,

λepN(0)I2Mω2,\lambda_{\rm ep}\equiv\frac{N(0)\langle I^{2}\rangle}{M\langle\omega^{2}\rangle}, (6)

where NN(0) is the bare density of states at the Fermi level, MM is the atomic mass, \langleI2I^{2}\rangle and \langleω2\omega^{2}\rangle are the averaged electron-phonon matrix elements and phonon frequencies, respectively. For irradiated Mo5Ge3, λep\lambda_{\rm ep} is enhanced mainly due to the decrease of \langleω2\omega^{2}\rangle since ΘD\Theta_{\rm D} reduces significantly from 377 K to 320 K after irradiation Mo5Ge3 . In contrast, the values of NN(0), MM and \langleω2\omega^{2}\rangle are nearly the same for the Mo5-xRexSi3 samples with xx = 0 and 0.5. Thus the increase in λep\lambda_{\rm ep} in this case can only be due to the enhancement of electron-phonon matrix elements. It is thus clear that the effect of Re doping is different from that of irradiation in inducing superconductivity. In this respect, the phonon spectrum as well as its evolution with Re doping in Mo5-xRexSi3 is definitely of interest for further investigations.

Figure 4(c) shows the TcT_{\rm c} dependence on ee/aa for Mo5-xRexSi3 together with previously known isostructural superconductors Nb5Sn2Al . According to the Matthias rule, TcT_{\rm c} of intermetallic superconductors is expected to exhibit two maxima at ee/aa close to 4.7 and 6.5 MTrule . Indeed, the ee/aa values for most of the superconductors isostructural to Mo5-xRexSi3 are in the range of 4.25-4.625 with a maximum TcT_{\rm c} of 5 K observed at ee/aa = 4.6. As for Mo5-xRexSi3, the ee/aa values of 5.312-5.5 fall significantly above this range and TcT_{c} shows a rapid increase with increasing ee/aa, which is consistent with the presence of another TcT_{\rm c} maximum at higher ee/aa. In this regard, a higher TcT_{\rm c} might be expected by substituting Mo in Mo5Si3 with elements that can supply more valence electrons than Re, such as Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, and Pt. On the other hand, this can serve as a useful guide for the search of superconductivity in related A5A_{5}B3B_{3} compounds, such as Mo5Ge3 Mo5Ge3 , Cr5Si3 Cr5Si3 , Cr5Ge3 Cr5Ge3 , which may significantly enlarge this family of superconductors.

Since Mo5Si3 is predicted to be a topological semimetal, it is of natural interest to investigate the evolution of band topology with Re doping. Fig. 5(a) shows the Brillouin zone of Mo5-xRexSi3, and, as can be seen, there are five high symmetry points, Γ\Gamma, Z, M, X and P. The calculated band structure with SOC included for Mo5Si3 (xx = 0) is depicted in Fig. 5(b). The result indicates that several bands are crossing the Fermi level (EFE_{\rm F}), consistent with the metallic nature. Without considering SOC, there are two nodal lines: one is surrounding M point at Z-M-Γ\Gamma plane and another one is the X-P high symmetry line. When turning on SOC, two gapped Dirac points are located at \sim0.45 eV below the EFE_{\rm F} and the two protected Dirac points are located exactly a the X and P points. This opens a gap between the valence and conduction bands (see the green region). Therefore, we can still calculate the four Z2Z_{2} invariants (ν0\nu_{0};ν1\nu_{1}, ν2\nu_{2}, ν3\nu_{3}) to be (0;111), indicating that the undoped system is in the weak topological insulator (TI) phase. Note that the fourfold degeneracy of bands at X/P point is protected by various symmetries (mirror MzM_{z}, inversion and time-reversal symmetries) even under SOC. This, together with the nontrivial topological index, demonstrates that Mo5Si3 is a Dirac nodal line semimetal, confirming the previous studies Mo5Si3prediction1 ; Mo5Si3prediction2 ; Mo5Si3prediction3 .

As indicated by above XRD results, the Re dopants are distributed homogeneously in the lattice and hence the point group symmetries remain unchanged. In view of this, virtual crystal approximation have been adopted to elucidate the band structure variation induced by Re doping. Figs. 5(c) and (d) show the band structures without considering SOC for xx = 0 and 0.5, respectively. A comparison of these two plots uncovers that the bands near EFE_{\rm F} for xx = 0.5 look very similar to those near EE - EFE_{\rm F} = -0.6 eV for xx = 0. This indicates that the band character and band ordering of Mo5-xRexSi3 with xx >> 0 resemble closely the valence bands of undoped Mo5Si3 so that Z2Z_{2} invariants of the former can be facilely checked. As also seen in Fig. 5(b), the Z2Z_{2} invariants are (1;000) when EE - EFE_{\rm F} ranges from -0.25 eV to -1.5 eV and (1;111) when EE - EFE_{\rm F} ranges from -1.5 eV to -2.0 eV. Clearly, this indicates that the Re-doped Mo5Si3 are mostly in the strong TI phase, though the band topology changes with the Re doping level. In passing, we have also calculated the density of states as a function of energy for Mo5-xRexSi3 (see Fig. S2 of the Supporting Information). The evolution of calculated NN(EFE_{\rm F}) with Re content is consistent with that from the CpC_{\rm p} results.

From above results, one can see that doped silicides Mo5-xRexSi3 with 0.5 \leq xx \leq 2 not only exhibit fully gapped superconductivity, but also possess non-trivial band topology characterized by strong Z2Z_{2} invariants. These together render them promising candidates for TSC TSCreview1 ; TSCreview2 ; TSCreview3 . In this regard, future angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy studies are called for to probe the band structure and superconducting gap directly. In particular, it is of significant interest to see whether zero-bias conductance peaks can be found within the magnetic vortex cores for certain xx values, which is a hallmark of the existence of Majorana bound states ZBCP1 ; ZBCP2 ; ZBCP3 . Also, thin film growth of these silicides is worth pursuing. On one hand, by choosing proper substrates, a compressive or tensile strain could be generated, which may increase λep\lambda_{\rm ep} and hence enhance TcT_{\rm c}. On the other hand, electrostatic gating of these films can be used to tune the EFE_{\rm F} continuously. This would allow us to control both TcT_{\rm c} and band topology, and may find applications in Si-based superconducting devices.

IV IV. Conclusions

In summary, we have discovered Re-doping induced superconductivity in the topological semimetal Mo5Si3. The substitution of Re for Mo results in a shrinkage of the Mo5-xRexSi3 unit cell along the aa-axis up to the solubility limit of xx \approx 2. Meanwhile, fully gapped superconductivity is observed for 0.5 \leq xx \leq 2 and TcT_{\rm c} increases monotonically with the Re content. At xx = 2, TcT_{\rm c} reaches a maximum of 5.87 K, which is the highest among superconductors of this structural type. Our analysis shows that the emergence of superconductivity as well as the trend in TcT_{\rm c} is mainly attributed to the enhancement of electron-phonon coupling. In addition, TcT_{\rm c} is found to increase as the increase of ee/aa, implying that a higher TcT_{\rm c} may be achieved by adding more valence electrons. First-principles calculations show that Re doping turns the system into strong TI phase, which is characterized by Z2Z_{2} invariants (1;000) or (1;111) depending on the doping level. The combination of a fully gapped superconducting state and nontrivial band topology makes Mo5-xRexSi3 a promising candidate for TSC. Our study suggests that transition metal silicides may offer a new playground to explore topological superconductivity, which might facilitate the creation and control of Majorana fermions in silicon-based devices.

ACKNOWLEGEMENT

We acknowledge financial support by the foundation of Westlake University. The work at Zhejiang University is supported by National Key Research Development Program of China (No.2017YFA0303002), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11974307, No.61574123), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (D19A040001), Research Funds for the Central Universities and the 2DMOST, Shenzhen Univeristy (Grant No.2018028).

References

  • (1) X. L. Qi and S. C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  • (2) J. Alicea, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012).
  • (3) M. Sato and Y. Ando, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 076501 (2017).
  • (4) Z. Guguchia, F. von Rohr, Z. Shermadini, A. T. Lee, S. Banerjee, A. R. Wieteska, C. A. Marianetti, B. A. Frandsen, H. Luetkens, Z. Gong, S. C. Cheung, C. Baines, A. Shengelaya, G. Taniashvili, A. N. Pasupathy, E. Morenzoni, S. J. L. Bilinge, A. Amato, R. J. Cava, R. Khasanov, and Y. J. Uemura, Nat. Commnu. 8, 1082 (2017).
  • (5) Y. N. Li, Q. Q. Gu, C. Chen, J. Zhang, Q. Liu, X. Y. Hu, J. Liu, Y. Liu, L. S. Ling, M. L. Tian, Y. Wang, N. Samarth, S. Y. Li, T. Zhang, J. Feng, and J. Wang, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 18, 9305 (2018).
  • (6) L. Muechler, Z. Guguchia, J. C. Orain, H. Nuss, L. M. Schoop, R. Thomale, and F. von Rohr, APL Mater. 7, 121103 (2019).
  • (7) L. Jin, X. M. Zhang, T. L. He, W. Z. Meng, X. F. Dai, and G. D. Liu, J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 10694 (2019).
  • (8) Y. S. Hor, A. J. Williams, J. G. Checkelsky, P. Roushan, J. Seo, Q. Xu, H. W. Zandbergen, A. Yazdani, N. P. Ong, and R. J. Cava, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 057001 (2010).
  • (9) Z. H. Liu, X. Yao, J. F. Shao, M. Zuo, L. Pi, S. Tan, J. C. Zhang, and Y. H. Zhang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10512 (2015).
  • (10) T. Asaba, B. J. Lawson, C. Tinsman, L. Chen, P. Corbae, G. Li, Y. Qiu, Y. S. Hor, L. Fu, and L. Li, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011009 (2017).
  • (11) Z. W. Wang, A. A. Taskin, T. Frolich, M. Braden, and Y. Ando, Chem. Mater. 28, 779 (2016).
  • (12) S. Sasaki, Z. Ren, A. A. Taskin, K. Segawa, L. Fu, and Y. Ando, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 217004 (2012).
  • (13) L. Zhu, Q. Y. Li, Y. Y. Lv, S. C. Li, X. Y. Zhu, Z. Y. Jia, Y. B. Chen, J. S. Wen, and S. C. Li, Nano Lett. 18, 6585 (2018).
  • (14) H. X. Zhang, W. Rousuli, S. C. Shen, K. N. Zhang, C. Wang, L. P. Luo, J. Z. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, W. H. Duan, H. Yao, P. Yu, and S. Y. Zhou, Sci. Bull. 65, 188 (2020).
  • (15) Z. C. Rao, H. Li, T. T. Zhang, S. J. Tian, C. H. Li, B. B. Fu, C. Y. Tang, L. Wang, Z. L. Li, W. H. Fan, J. J. Li, Y. B. Huang, Z. H. Liu, Y. W. Long, C. Fang, H. M. Weng, Y. G. Shi, H. C. Lei, Y. J. Sun, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Nature 567, 496 (2019).
  • (16) D. Takane, Z. W. Wang, S. Souma, K. Nakayama, T. Nakamura, H. Oinuma, Y. Nakata, H. Iwasawa, C. Cacho, T. Kim, K. Horiba, H. Kumigashira, T. Takahashi, Y. Ando, and T. Sato, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 076402 (2019).
  • (17) S. P. Murarka, Aunu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 13, 117 (1983).
  • (18) T. T. Zhang, Y. Jiang, Z. D. Song, H. Huang, Y. Q. He, Z. Fang, H. M. Weng, and C. Fang, Nature 566, 475 (2019).
  • (19) M. G. Vergniory, L, Elcoro, C. Felser, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, and Z. J. Wang, Nature 566, 480 (2019).
  • (20) F. Tang, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and X. G. Wan, Nature 566, 486 (2019).
  • (21) F. Chu, D. J. Thoma, K. McClellna, P. Peralta, and Y. He, Intermetallics 7, 611 (1999).
  • (22) F. Chu, D. J. Thoma, K. J. McClellan, and P. Peralta, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 261, 44 (1999).
  • (23) C. C. Dharmawardhana, R. Sakidja, S. Aryal, and W. Y. Ching, J. Alloys Compd. 620, 427 (2015).
  • (24) Y. Pan, P. Wang, and C. M. Zhang, Ceram. Int. 4, 12357 (2018).
  • (25) C. Q. Zhu, Y. Koizumi, A. Chiba, K. Yuge, K. Kishida, and H. Inui, Intermetallics 116, 106590 (2020).
  • (26) J. F. Wu, B. Liu, Y. W. Cui, H. D. Wang, Z. C. Wang, Z. Ren, and G. H. Cao, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 32, 045010 (2019).
  • (27) B. T. Matthias, Phys. Rev. 97, 74 (1955).
  • (28) J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  • (29) G. Kresse and J. Furthmu¨\ddot{u}ller, Comp. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
  • (30) D. D. Koelling and B. N. Harmon, J. Phys. C 10, 3107 (1977).
  • (31) G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Blugel, F. Freimuth, G. Getanton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. Johnson, T. Korestune, J. Lbanez-Azpiroz, H. J. Lee, J. M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponce, Y. Ponweiser, J. F. Qiao, F. Thole, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Wierzbowska, N. Marzari, D. Vanderbilt, I. Souza, A. A. Mostofi, and J. R. Yates, J. Phys.:Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020).
  • (32) Note that we have also tried structural refinement based on an ordered structural model. For example in Mo4ReSi3 (xx = 1), the Re atoms are set to occupy the Mo(2) position. Nevertheless, the resulting RwpR_{\rm wp} and RpR_{\rm p} factors are larger than those for the model with a disordered distribution of the Re atoms.
  • (33) Y. Tarutani and M. Kudo, J. Less Common Met. 55, 221 (1977).
  • (34) B. Lv, M. Gooch, B. Lorenz, F. Chen, A. M. Guloy, and C. W. Chu, New J. Phys. 11, 025013 (2009).
  • (35) W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968).
  • (36) D. C. Johnston, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 115011 (2013).
  • (37) J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schreiffer, Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).
  • (38) M. Novak, S. Sasaki, M. Kriener, K. Segawa, and Y. Ando, Phys. Rev. B 88, 140502(R) (2013).
  • (39) N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand, and P. C. Hohenberg,
  • (40) A. K. Ghosh and R. Caton, Solid State Commun. 44, 1083 (1982). Phys. Rev. 147, 295 (1966).
  • (41) C. H. Dauben, D. H. Templeton, and C. Myers, J. Phys. Chem. 60, 443 (1956).
  • (42) E. Parthe and J. T. Norton, Acta Cryst. 11, 14 (1958).
  • (43) J. X. Yin, Z. Wu, J. H. Wang, Z. Y. Ye, J. Gong, X. Y. Hou, L. Shan, A. Li, X. J. Liang, X. X. Wu, J. Li, C. S. Ting, Z. Q. Wang, J. P. Hu, P. H. Hor, H. Ding, and S. H. Pan, Nat. Phys. 11, 543 (2015).
  • (44) D. F. Wang, L. Y. Kong, P. Fan, H. Chen, S. Y. Zhu, W. Y. Liu, L. Cao, Y. J. Sun, S. X. Du, J. Schneeloch, R. D. Zhong, G. D. Gu, L. Fu, H. Ding, and H. J. Gao, Science 362, 333 (2018).
  • (45) C. F. Liu, C. Chen, X. Q. Liu, Z. Q. Wang, Y. Liu, S. S. Ye, Z. Q. Wang, J. P. Hu, and J. Wang, Sci. Adv. 6, 10.1126/sciadv.aax7547 (2020).