This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Disturbances in the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal and in telluric current caused by the atmospheric waves from an explosive eruption of Hunga Tonga volcano on January 15, 2022

N. Salikhov A. Shepetov [email protected] G. Pak V. Saveliev S. Nurakynov V. Ryabov V. Zhukov Institute of Ionosphere, Kamenskoye plato, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan, 050020 P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (LPI), Leninsky pr., 53, Moscow, Russia, 119991 V. G. Fesenkov Astrophysical Institute, Almaty, 050020, Kazakhstan
(March 7, 2023)
Abstract

After an explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano on January 15, 2022, disturbances were observed at a distance of about 12000 km in Northern Tien Shan among the variations of the atmosphere pressure, of telluric current, and of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal. At 16:00:55 UTC a pulse of atmospheric pressure was detected there with a peak amplitude of 1.3 hPa and propagation speed of 0.3056 km/s, equal to the velocity of Lamb wave. In the variations of the Doppler frequency shift, the disturbances of two types were registered on the 3212 km and 2969 km long inclined radio-paths, one of which arose as a response to the passage of a Lamb wave (0.3059 km/s) through the reflection point of radio wave, and another as reaction to the acoustic-gravity wave (0.2602 km/s). Two successive perturbations were also detected in the records of telluric current at the arrival times of the Lamb and acoustic-gravity waves into the registration point. According to the parameters of the Lamb wave, an energy transfer into the atmosphere at the explosion of the Hunga Tonga volcano was roughly estimated as 2000 Mt of TNT equivalent.

keywords:
Hunga Tonga volcano eruption; Doppler frequency shift; ionosphere; telluric current; atmosphere pressure; Lamb wave; acoustic-gravity wave

1 Introduction

An explosive eruption of the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha´apai volcano in South-West Pacific, which happened on January 15, 2022, was the first event of current century with the volcanic explosivity index 5. Unique for this event are the powerful disturbances which were observed in the entire thickness of the atmosphere. Everywhere over the globe it was detected an appearance of intensive infrasonic, acoustic-gravity, and Lamb waves. On-ground barometers in different parts of the world registered the atmosphere signatures of the volcano explosion [1, 2, 3], and the atmospheric Lamb wave bypassed the Earth several times, propagating with the mean velocity of \sim0.3 km\cdots-1[4, 5, 6]. Disturbances in the ionosphere caused by the Hunga Tonga explosive eruption were studied by the means of the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers net which is commonly used for measuring the total electron concentration in the ionosphere [3, 6, 7, 8]. Together with the ground-based GNSS measurements, the prominent ionospheric effects induced by the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion were also observed from the satellites of the ICE and GOLD missions situated, correspondingly, both at the low-Earth and geostationary orbits [9].

Generally, it is known that large volcano eruptions cause ionospheric disturbances of various kinds [10, 11] which are believed to arise from the upward leakage of the energy of Lamb waves. The energy can be transmitted into the ionosphere through an atmospheric resonance at the frequency of acoustic-gravity oscillations, which stipulates large amplitude of the waves at high altitude [8]. In the case of Hunga-Tonga event the GNSS receivers identified two types of the traveling ionospheric disturbances (TID) which propagated from the epicenter of the explosion: there were two large-scale, and several medium-scale TIDs. The most dominant medium-scale TID was moving with the velocity of about (200–400) m\cdots-1 and coincided with the disturbance of the near-surface atmosphere pressure [7]. In a multi-sensor study of the propagation of ionospheric disturbances from the Hunga-Tonga volcano explosion, which was based on more than 5000 GNSS receivers distributed over the whole globe, it was demonstrated that the ionosphere is a sensitive detector of atmospheric waves and geophysical perturbations [8].

During decades continuous multi-parametric observations of geophysical environment were going on in Northern Tien Shan, at the Radio polygon ”Orbita” of the Institute of Ionosphere, and at the Tien Shan mountain scientific station of P. N. Lebedev Physical Institute [12, 13]. The experimental base is situated in a mountainous, seismically active locality and encompasses a complex of measuring equipment for simultaneous investigation of the processes which take place in the lithosphere, atmosphere, and ionosphere. The eruption of the Hunga Tonga volcano was one of the most powerful explosive volcanic events of modern era, the disturbances of which were distributed from the lithosphere to the heights of the ionosphere and spread even into the near space. This event occurred a unique natural experiment of such a strong impact on the environment, which was a motif to search for its geophysical consequences at the detectors of the Tien Shan scientific complex.

In the present study the response of the ionosphere to the Hunga-Tonga explosive eruption event was investigated at the distances of (1112)103(11-12)\cdot 10^{3} km from the volcano using the method of continuous variation monitoring of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal on inclined radio path [14, 15]. The method of Doppler sounding, primarily applied in this work, has demonstrated its efficiency and high sensitivity in a number of studies of ionospheric disturbances which accompany the powerful explosions, earthquakes, solar flares, and geomagnetic storms [16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Together with the Doppler signal, the most convincing effects of the Hunga Tonga volcanic explosion were found among the measurements of the atmosphere pressure and telluric current, which data are also discussed in the article.

2 Experimental technique

Investigation of the response of geophysical fields on the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha´apai volcano eruption was carried out at the two high altitude experimental sites: the Radio polygon “Orbita” of the Institute of Ionosphere (N43.05831, E76.97361; 2750 m above the sea level), and the Tien Shan mountain scientific station of the Lebedev Physical Institute (N43.03519, E76.94139; 3340 m a.s.l.). Both sites are located at the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan in Tien Shan mountains, 2.9 km apart from each other, and at a distance of 12948 km from the Hunga Tonga volcano island.

Barometric pressure

Continuous monitoring of the atmosphere pressure proceeds at the Tien Shan mountain station using a MSB181 type digital barometer (LLC “MicroStep-MIS”, Russia) which permits to measure the pressure in the range of (600–1100) hPa with precision of ±\pm0.3 hPa. The barometric data with one-minute time resolution are accessible in real time at an Internet site of the Tien Shan mountain station [22].

The Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal on inclined radio path

For detection of the ionosphere response to the volcano eruption it was used a hard- and software complex of Doppler measurements which is based on the phase-locked loop (PLL) operation principle and permits to measure the Doppler shift of a larger amplitude radio-signal under conditions of a multipath signal propagation [14]. Within a 15 Hz wide holdoff band of the PLL loop the non-linearity of the frequency conversion characteristic equals to 0.46

In the present experiment, monitoring of the Doppler frequency shift was made over the two inclined radio paths, Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” (the length d=3200d=3200 km and basic frequency f=7275f=7275 kHz), and Kuwait—Radio polygon “Orbita” (d=3950d=3950 km, f=5860f=5860 kHz). Left graph in Figure 1 illustrates the mutual disposition of the both mentioned radio paths and of the Hunga Tonga volcano. The distance from the volcano to the projection on the Earth of the point of radio wave reflection equals to 11393 km for the radio path Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita”, and to 14367 km for the Kuwait—Radio polygon “Orbita” path. Both distances were estimated using the Garmin MapSource program.

Measurements of telluric current

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Left: the disposition scheme of the radio paths used in the Doppler sounding experiment relative to the Hunga Tonga volcano; (TX)—the radio-transmitters, (RX)—the receiver at the Radio Polygon ”Orbita”. Two hatched ellipses indicate the projection of the radio wave reflection points onto the Earth. Right: the scheme of the equipment for the measurement of telluric current at the Tien Shan mountain station: (1),(2),(3)—three buried electrodes, (4)—a \sim20 m long pair of twisted wires, (5)—a differential amplifier, (6)—an active filtering scheme.

The point of the telluric current measurement is situated at the Tien Shan mountain station, in a locality far away from any industrial sources of electromagnetic interference [24]. The measuring equipment consists of three lead electrodes of rectangular shape, 410×\times80×\times10 mm3, buried in vertical position at a depth of 1 m under the surface of the ground, such that the distance between the two outer electrodes equals to 120 m. As it is shown in the right plot of Figure 1, the signal of the current is gathered from the two side electrodes, while the middle one is used as a zero point of the electric measurement scheme. For suppression of in-phase interferences the signal from the electrodes is connected to the measurement equipment through a twisted pair of wires and a differential amplifier. Registration of the weak electric oscillations induced on the electrodes by telluric current proceeds in the range of extremely low frequencies, (0–20) Hz.

For selection of the weak electric signals with typical amplitude of a few tens—hundred of microvolts it is necessary to eliminate the stray of the industrial power main from the useful signal of telluric current. In the considered experiment, a notch filter was applied for a \sim40 dB rejection of the industrial 50 Hz interference. Main filtration of the input signal was made by a 12-order Chebyshev low-pass filter with a cutoff frequency at 32 Hz and a \geqslant80 dB suppression of high-frequency oscillations above the cutoff. The active filtering scheme was built on the basis of precision low-noise operational amplifiers OPA-27GP of Texas Instruments production. The final registration of the purified signal was made by a 12-bit ADC continuously operating with the digitization speed of 80 sps [24].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Anomaly of atmospheric pressure

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The pulse of the atmosphere pressure registered at the Tien Shan mountain station on January 15, 2022.

On January 15, 2022, in the day of the Hunga Tonga volcano explosive eruption, the barometer located at the territory of the Tien Shan mountain station registered a short time anomalous pulse of the atmosphere pressure, as illustrated by Figure 2. As it follows from this plot, the peak amplitude of pressure growth above the preceding level of undisturbed slow variation was about (1.3-1.4) hPa, and the whole effect lasted about (25-30) min. The start of the atmosphere pressure pulse was detected at the moment of 16:00:55 UTC, nearly 12 h after the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Top: anomalous pulses of the atmosphere pressure detected at various distances from the Hunga Tonga volcano on January 15, 2022. Bottom: the dependence of the observation time of the atmosphere pressure pulse on the distance from the volcano.
Table 1: Propagation of the pulse of atmosphere pressure as detected on January 15, 2022 at various distances from the Hunga Tongo volcano.
observation point geographical coordinates distance, km arrival of pressure pulse, UTC propagation time, s propagation speed, km\cdots-1
Auckland S36.83970 E174.82843 2040 05:56:44 6119 0.3334
Brisbane S27.46778 E153.02806 3291 07:03:24 10119 0.3252
Tokyo N36.23000 E140.18000 7850 11:10:47 24962 0.3145
Seattle N47.64236 W122.33348 9226 12:11:57 28632 0.3222
Santiago S33.31831 W70.68514 10056 12:57:55 31390 0.3241
Irkutsk N52.27000 E104.45000 11152 14:22:37 36472 0.3058
Tien Shan Station N43.04361 E76.94139 12948 16:00:55 42370 0.3056
Yekaterinburg N56.85400 E60.64400 13943 16:54:00 45555 0.3061
Moscow N55.76660 E37.57324 15235 18:04:09 49755 0.3061
Barcelona N41.65060 E2.44564 17658 20:12:08 57443 0.3074
Table 2: Parameters of the ionospheric disturbance propagation on the radio paths Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” and Kuwait—Radio polygon “Orbita”.
radio path geographical coordinates of the radio wave reflection point distance to the reflection point, km time moment of the ionospheric anomaly, UTC propagation time, s propagation speed, km\cdots-1
Beijing— “Orbita” N43.66260 E96.75869 11393 14:35:21 37236 0.3059
Kuwait— “Orbita” N36.89300 E60.39300 14367 19:35:21 55241 0.2602

Similarly, anomalous short-time pulses of the atmosphere pressure were detected in the same day of the Hunga Tonga volcanic event by the barometric equipment installed in the various points of the globe. A number of the atmospheric pressure time series registered at that time, including the record of the Tien Shan station, are presented in the upper panel of Figure 3. Except the Tien Shan station data, the information for these plots was obtained from an open access database [25]. It is seen, that everywhere the detected pulses of the atmosphere pressure had similar shape and duration, which varied only slightly between the observation points.

In the bottom panel of Figure 3 the moments of the atmosphere pressure pulses are plotted in dependence on the distance between the observation point and the Hunga Tonga volcano. The distances for the latter plot were defined on the basis of the geographical coordinates of corresponding points by the Garmin MapSource program. With account to these distances and the time delays of the pressure pulses it was calculated the average propagation velocity of the atmosphere disturbance, which values are listed in Table 1. As it follows from the data presented in Figure 3 and Table 1, the maximum velocity was observed in the nearest registration points, i. e. in Auckland and Brisbane, and only starting since the distances above \sim10410^{4} km the atmosphere pressure pulse was propagating in the SE–NW direction with a practically constant speed of 0.306 km\cdots-1.

Positive anomalies of the atmosphere pressure which were moving with the velocity of \sim0.3 km\cdots-1 from SE to NW over the territory of Japan and lasted in total about 20 min were also reported in [6]. According to [26], generally such pulses of atmospheric pressure are brought by a Lamb wave which propagates with the speed of sound (\sim0.3 km\cdots-1) along the surface of the Earth.

It should be noted that Barcelona is situated only at a \sim2100 km distance from the antipode point relative to the Hunga Tonga volcano. This may be the reason why the atmosphere pressure pulse plotted for this station in Figure 3 has a maximally complicated shape with two peaks and double duration, which features can be explained by successive registration of the direct and antipodal Lamb waves moving from the volcano explosion point.

The moment of the atmosphere pressure peak observation at the Tien Shan station, 16:00:55 UTC, agrees well with the general trend of the world data, and corresponds to the propagation speed of a surface Lamb wave from the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion. This agreement permits to identify the observed anomaly of atmospheric pressure as an effect also connected with the Hunga Tonga volcanic event.

3.2 The Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Upper panel: sample time series of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal registered on the radio path Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” in the days January 13, 14, 16, and 17, 2022. The middle and bottom panels: the Doppler shift data measured on the paths Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” and Kuwait—Radio polygon “Orbita” on January 15, 2022. Thin lines correspond to the original measurement data of the Doppler frequency, bold lines—to the same data after their smoothing with a 10 points running average filter.

The Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal at the Radio polygon “Orbita” is registered on the two radio paths, Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” and Kuwait—Radio polygon “Orbita”. The optimal radio frequencies for the day- and night time are chosen in accordance with the Short Wave Radio Frequencies BBC Catalog [23]. The geometric disposition of both paths relative to location of the Hunga Tonga volcano is illustrated by a chart in Figure 1.

Continuous monitoring of Doppler frequency in the day of the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion, January 15, 2022, made it possible to reveal two disturbances in the ionosphere, which are illustrated by the plots in Figure 4.

The upper plot of Figure 4 demonstrates a set of superimposed time series of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal which were obtained at the radio path Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” on the dates of 13, 14, 16, and 17 January, i. e. both immediately on the eve, and a few days after the considered volcanic event. It is seen in this plot, that the undisturbed daily records of Doppler data do not differ considerably between the days, and generally overlap within the limits ±\pm1 Hz.

In contrast to the regular background oscillations observed in the preceding days, on January 15, 2022 it was detected a considerable negative disturbance of Doppler frequency with an amplitude of about 2 Hz and duration of 1073 s, which is shown in the middle plot of Figure 4. This disturbance appears at the time of 14:35:21 UTC, i. e. 37236 s (10.3 h) after the explosion moment of the Hunga Tonga volcano. With account of the distance between the volcano and the reflection point of radio waves at the Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” radio path, 11393 km, the propagation velocity of the atmospheric disturbance in the ionosphere can be calculated as 0.3059 km\cdots-1. As it was discussed above, practically same value, 0.3056 km\cdots-1, was obtained at the Tien Shan mountain station for the speed of the pulse of atmosphere pressure which corresponded to the propagation of the Lamb wave from the volcano explosion (see Table 1).

The observed time correlation is an evidence, that the Lamb wave propagating over the whole thickness of the atmosphere had initiated disturbances in the ionosphere as well, which revealed themselves in the record of the Doppler frequency shift. As additional argument in favour of this conclusion the ICON-MIGHTI and Swarm satellite observations [27] can be mentioned of the penetration of Lamb waves at the heights of (90–300) km into the ionosphere.

The second anomaly in the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal found on January 15, 2022 was registered at the time of 19:35:21 UTC, i. e. 55241 s (15.3 h) after the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion, when the Doppler sounding equipment had just switched into operation with the Kuwait—Radio polygon “Orbita” radio path. The corresponding time series of Doppler data is presented in the bottom plot of Figure 4. It is seen there a disturbance with a maximum frequency shift of 1.84 Hz and a 1270 s duration, followed by a sequence of undulating perturbations with much lesser amplitudes and the quasi-periods of 1223 s, 1146 s, and 1053 s. As known, similar periodicity of 1000 s order can be observed by propagation of acoustic-gravity waves in the ionosphere [28].

In supposition that the reason of the ionospheric effect detected at 19:35:21 UTC is also connected with the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion, and with account to the 14367 km distance from the volcano to the radio waves reflection point at the radio path used, a calculation analogous to above gives the distribution speed of the disturbance 0.2602 km\cdots-1. This estimate corresponds well to the velocity of acoustic-gravity waves [5].

The characteristics of the two anomalous effects found during the day January 15, 2022 in the records of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal are summed up in Table 2.

Thus, the data obtained at the Radio polygon “Orbita” permit to connect the revealed ionosphere disturbances with successive propagation of the Lamb and acoustic-gravity waves generated by the explosion of the Hunga Tonga volcano. At the same time, the detected effects demonstrate the effectiveness of the applied method of Doppler sounding on inclined radio path for revealing ionospheric disturbances of volcanic origin at a distance of more than 10410^{4} km.

3.3 The measurements of telluric current

As it follows from the previous section, powerful atmosphere disturbances, distributing after the explosion of the Hunga Tonga volcano as Lamb waves over the entire atmosphere thickness, initiated perturbations in the ionosphere as well. Resulting modulation of the electric currents in the ionosphere causes geomagnetic effects which may be registered at the ground level in variation of the telluric current. This consideration was the reason for searching for anomalies in the monitoring data of telluric current after the Hunga Tonga explosion event.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Disturbances of the atmosphere pressure and telluric current detected at the Tien Shan station at passage of the acoustic waves from the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion. The dotted line above represents the atmospheric pressure. The thin line in the lower distribution corresponds to the original measurement data of telluric current, while the bold one to the same data smoothed by a running average filter with a 10 points long kernel.

In Figure 5 the time series of the atmosphere pressure and of the intensity of telluric current recorded at the Tien Shan station on January 15, 2022 are matched against each other. As it follows from this figure, at the moment of 16:00:55 UTC an appreciable (6-10) μ\muV decrease appears in the record of telluric current, almost simultaneously with arrival of the atmosphere pressure pulse, which propagated with the 0.3056 km\cdots-1 speed from the Hunga Tonga volcano point. After the bay-like dip feature in the record it was observed an increase of the telluric current amplitude.

It is worth to note that the decrease of the current lasted about 1800 s, which is quite comparable with the length of the barometric pressure pulse. The total duration of the whole period of telluric current variations, both of the negative dip and of the subsequent rise, was \sim4900 s.

Another noticeable disturbance in the record of telluric current starts at 18:04:05 UTC, as it is also seen in Figure 5. This moment corresponds to the arrival time of the acoustic-gravitation wave from the Hunga Tonga volcano which was moving with the speed of 0.260 km\cdots-1 (see Table 2). The second period of the telluric current disturbances lasted about 6800 s.

The described time correlations may be a reason to suppose an electromagnetic nature of the detected disturbances, at which the modulation of the electric currents in the ionosphere by atmospheric waves may result in the variation of the telluric current measured at the ground level.

3.4 Evaluation of the energy released into the atmosphere at the Hunga Tonga volcano explosion

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Comparison of the data on the Doppler frequency shift at the Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” radio path registered on January 15, 2022 with the time history of the atmosphere pressure, as it was measured at the Tien Shan station (dotted line). The thin solid line corresponds to the original measurement data of Doppler signal, bold line to the same data after smoothing by a 10 points running average filter. The record of barometric pressure is displaced to -1.50 h along the time axis (see text).

In Figure 6 the time history considered above of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal at the Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” radio path is superimposed with the record of the atmosphere pressure, as it was written in the date of Hunga Tonga explosion at the Tien Shan mountain station. The barometric data series in this plot is shifted along the horizontal axis to the time of -1.50 h, in correspondence with the propagation speed of the Lamb acoustic wave from the Hunga Tonga explosion, 0.3056 km\cdots-1 (see Table 1), and the distance difference of 1560 km between the Hunga Tonga volcano and the Tien Shan station, from the one side, and between the volcano and the reflection point of radio waves on the Beijing—Radio polygon “Orbita” radio path, from another.

As it follows from Figure 6, the duration of the period of anomalous Doppler frequency shift is reasonably close to that of the atmosphere pressure pulse, and the start moments of both effects practically coincide with each other. The distribution speed of the two anomalous effects also seems to be practically identical, about 0.306 km\cdots-1, as it was discussed in the previous paragraphs. These experimental facts mean that both anomalies originate from the same acoustic disturbance which had arose at a height of about 100 km and was propagating with the velocity of the surface Lamb wave. In turn, the specific features of these phenomena permit to estimate the order of energy which was transferred into the atmosphere at the considered explosion event.

Since the average energy of an air molecule is 32kT\frac{3}{2}kT, the energy density of the atmosphere equals to 32nkT\frac{3}{2}nkT, where nn is the concentration of molecules, TT—temperature, and kk—the Boltzmann’s constant. The barometric pressure pp is connected with the molecules concentration by an equation of state p=nkTp=nkT. As a result, the energy density can be expressed through the atmosphere pressure as

ε=32p.\varepsilon=\frac{3}{2}p. (1)

The total energy ΔE\Delta E transmitted to the mass of atmosphere by the Hunga Tonga eruption can be found as a product of the disturbed energy density, Δε=32Δp\Delta\varepsilon=\frac{3}{2}\Delta p, to the effective spatial volume of the disturbance region VeffV_{eff}:

Veff=2πrsin(rr)Hτcs.V_{eff}=2\pi r_{\oplus}\sin\left(\frac{r}{r_{\oplus}}\right)H\tau c_{s}. (2)

Here, rr_{\oplus} is the radius of the Earth; rr—the distance to the eruption point; 2πrsin(rr)2\pi r_{\oplus}\sin(\frac{r}{r_{\oplus}}) is the length of the circumference of the disturbance front on the spherical Earth’s surface, τ\tau and csc_{s} are, correspondingly, the time duration of the disturbance and the sound speed; and HH is the height of the homogeneous atmosphere, in which the surface Lamb wave concentrates. Finally, a simple expression for the transferred energy ΔE\Delta E looks as

ΔE=3πΔprsin(rr)Hτcs.\Delta E=3\pi\Delta pr_{\oplus}\sin\left(\frac{r}{r_{\oplus}}\right)H\tau c_{s}. (3)

According to the measurements data presented above, at the Tien Shan mountain station (r=12948103r=12948\cdot 10^{3} m) the average amplitude of the pulse of atmospheric pressure was Δp0.65\Delta p\approx 0.65 hPa, the pressure disturbance lasted τ1000\tau\approx 1000 s and had the propagation speed cs=306c_{s}=306 m\cdots-1. Putting these values together into Equation (3), and taking into account that 11 hPa =100=100 Pa [ J\cdotm-3 ], r=6371103r_{\oplus}=6371\cdot 10^{3} m, H=8103H=8\cdot 10^{3} m, and 4.18410154.184\cdot 10^{15} J =1=1 MtTNT{}_{\text{TNT}}, the next rough estimate follows for the energy released into the atmosphere by the Hunga Tonga explosive eruption, as expressed in the megatons of TNT equivalent:

ΔE2103 MtTNT.\Delta E\approx 2\cdot 10^{3}\text{\,Mt}_{\text{TNT}}. (4)

4 Conclusion

The measurement equipment installed at the Radio polygon “Orbita” and at the Tien Shan mountain scientific station has registered disturbances in the near-surface atmosphere, in the ionosphere, and among the variations of telluric current, which took place after explosion of the Hunga Tonga volcano on January 15, 2022. In this experiment, the monitoring of the atmosphere pressure, of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal, and of the telluric current in the near-surface layers of the ground was made at a considerable distance, of about 1210312\cdot 10^{3} km from the volcano. The observations may be summarized as the following.

1. On January 15, 2022, 11 h, 46 min, and 10 s after the volcano explosion, it was detected an anomalous short time pulse of the atmosphere pressure which had an amplitude of 1.3 hPa and duration of about (25-30) min, and was propagating in the atmosphere with the velocity of Lamb waves, 0.3056 km\cdots-1, as it was registered by the barometer of the Tien Shan mountain station.

2. Continuous monitoring of the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal on the inclined radio paths with the length of 3212 km (7245 kHz) and 2969 km (5860 kHz) permitted to reveal two different ionosphere disturbances in the day of the Hunga Tonga explosive eruption. The disturbances onset time corresponded to arrival of the atmospheric waves moving with the velocities of 0.3059 km\cdots-1 and 0.2602 km\cdots-1 into the reflection point of radio waves in the ionosphere. Judging by the velocity values, the observed disturbances in the Doppler frequency shift of ionospheric signal arose as a result of successive passage of the Lamb- and acoustic-gravity waves generated by the volcano explosion, and their influence to the ionosphere.

3. In the day of volcano explosion it was found two consecutive disturbances in the variations of telluric current, their appearance being consistent with the passage of the atmospheric waves with velocities of 0.3056 km\cdots-1 and 0.2600 km\cdots-1. Both velocity estimates permit to connect the observed effects with the passage of the Lamb- and acoustic-gravity waves from the volcano explosion across the point of the telluric current registration. Thus, the atmospheric waves, propagating over the whole thickness of the atmosphere, cause modulation of the electric currents in the ionosphere, which induces an electromagnetic response in the telluric current registered at the ground level.

4. The energy transferred into the atmosphere at the explosion of the Hunga Tonga volcano is roughly estimated by the parameters of the Lamb wave as 2000 Mt of TNT equivalent.

References

  • Kulichkov et al. [2022] Kulichkov, S. N.; Chunchuzov, I. P.; Popov, O. E.; et al. Acoustic-gravity Lamb waves from the eruption of the Hunga-Tonga–Hunga-Hapai volcano, its energy release and impact on aerosol concentrations and tsunami. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2022, 179, 1533–1548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-022-03046-4.
  • Matoza et al. [2022] Matoza, R. S.; Fee, D.; Assink, J. D.; et al. Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga. Science 2022, 377, 95. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo7063.
  • Chen et al. [2022] Chen, C.H.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.Y.; et al. Individual wave propagations in ionosphere and troposphere triggered by the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha´apai underwater volcano eruption on 15 January 2022. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 2179. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14092179.
  • Kubota et al. [2022] Kubota, T.; Saito, T.; Nishida, K. Global fast-traveling tsunamis driven by atmospheric Lamb waves on the 2022 Tonga eruption. Science 2022, 377, 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo4364.
  • Wright et al. [2022] Wright, C. J.; Hindley, N. P.; Alexander, M. J.; et al. Surface-to-space atmospheric waves from Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha´apai eruption. Nature 2022, 609, 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05012-5.
  • Heki [2022] Heki, K. Ionospheric signatures of repeated passages of atmospheric waves by the 2022 Jan. 15 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha´apai eruption detected by QZSS–TEC observations in Japan. Earth Planets Space 2022, 74, 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01674-7.
  • Themens et al. [2022] Themens, D. R.; Watson, C.; Žagar, N.; et al. Global propagation of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49, e2022GL0981582. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098158.
  • Zhang et al. [2022] Zhang, S.R.; Vierinen, J.; Aa, E.; et al. 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption induced global propagation of ionospheric disturbances via Lamb waves. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 2022, 9, 871275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2022.871275.
  • Aa et al. [2022] Aa, E.; Zhang, S.R.; Wang, W.; et al. Pronounced suppression and X-pattern merging of equatorial ionization anomalies after the 2022 Tonga volcano eruption. J. Geophys. Res.: Space Phys. 2022, 127, e2022JA030527. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030527.
  • Cahyadi et al. [2021] Cahyadi, M. N.; Handoko, E. Y.; Rahayu, R. W.; Heki, K. Comparison of volcanic explosions in Japan using impulsive ionospheric disturbances. Earth Planets Space 2021, 73, 228. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-021001539-5.
  • Heki and Fujimoto [2022] Heki, K.; Fujimoto, T. Atmospheric modes excited by the 2021 August eruption of the Fukutoku–Okanoba volcano, Izu–Bonin Arc, observed as harmonic TEC oscillations by QZSS. Earth Planets Space 2022, 74, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01587-5.
  • Shepetov et al. [2021] Shepetov, A.; Kryakunova, O.; Mamina, S.; et al. Geophysical Aspect of Cosmic Ray Studies at the Tien Shan Mountain Station: Monitoring of Radiation Background, Investigation of Atmospheric Electricity Phenomena in Thunderclouds, and the Search for the Earthquake Precursor Effects. Physics of Atomic Nuclei 2021, 84, 1128–1136. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778821130330.
  • Salikhov et al. [2022] Salikhov, N.; Argynova, K.; Vildanova, L.; et al. Multichannel monitoring of the radiation background and a search for precursor signals of the seismic activity at the Tien Shan Mountain Station. Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute 2022, 49, 317–321. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068335622100086.
  • Salikhov and Somsikov [2014] Salikhov, N. M.; Somsikov, V. M. The program- and hardware complex for registration of the Doppler frequency shift of ionosphere radio-signal over earthquake epicenters (in Russian). Bull. Nat. Acad. Sci. of Kazakhstan Republic 2014, 296, 115–121.
  • Salikhov [2016] Salikhov, N. M. New registration method of the dynamic of ionosphere ionization bursts by the program- and hardware complex of Doppler measurements on a slanted radio-track (in Russian). Bull. Nat. Acad. Sci. of Kazakhstan Republic 2016, 308, 27–33.
  • Drobzhev et al. [1978] Drobzhev, V. I.; Krasnov, V. M.; Salikhov, N. M. Ionospheric disturbances accompanying earthquakes and explosions. Radiophys. Quant. Electr. 1978, 21, 1295–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02121915.
  • Drobzhev et al. [1987] Drobzhev, V. I.; Zheleznyakov, E. V.; Idrisov, I. K.; et al. Ionospheric effects of the acoustic wave above the epicenter of an industrial explosion. Radiophys. Quant. Electr. 1987, 30, 1047–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01035385.
  • Laštovička and Chum [2017] Laštovička, J.; Chum, J. A review of results of the international ionospheric Doppler sounder network. Advances in Space Research 2017, 60, 1629–1643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.032.
  • Krasnov et al. [2015] Krasnov, V. M.; Drobzheva, Y. V.; Chum, J. Far-field coseismic ionospheric disturbances of Tohoku earthquake. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 2015, 135, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.09.017.
  • Salikhov et al. [2022] Salikhov, N.; Shepetov, A.; Pak, G.; et al. Monitoring of gamma radiation prior to earthquakes in a study of lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling in Northern Tien Shan. Atmosphere 2022, 13, 1667, [2211.03409]. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13101667.
  • Salikhov and Pak [2020] Salikhov, N. M.; Pak, G. D. Ionospheric effects of solar flares and earthquake according to Doppler frequency shift on an inclined radio path. Bull. Nat. Acad. Sci. of Kazakhstan Republic 2020, 331, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.32014/2020.2518-1726.43.
  • tie [2006–2022] The Tien-Shan mountain station’s database. {http://www.tien-shan.org}, accessed on 2022-12-01.
  • [23] SHORT-WAVE.INFO. https://www.short-wave.info, accessed on 2022-12-01.
  • Salikhov et al. [2021] Salikhov, N. M.; Pak, G. D.; Shepetov, A. L.; et al. Hardware-Software Complex for the telluric current investigation in a seismically hazardous region of Zailiysky Alatau. News Nat. Acad. Sci. of Kazakhstan Republic. Ser. Geology and Techin. Sci. 2021, 5, 94–102. https://doi.org/10.32014/2021.2518-170X.103.
  • [25] SENSOR.COMMUNITY. https://archive.sensor.community, accessed on 2022-12-01.
  • Kanamori et al. [1994] Kanamori, H.; Mori, J.; Harkrider, D.G. Excitation of atmospheric oscillations by volcanic eruptions. J Geophys Res 1994, 99, 21947–21961. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB01475.
  • Harding et al. [2022] Harding, B. J.; Wu, Y. J.J.; Alken, P.; et al. Impacts of the January 2022 Tonga volcanic eruption on the ionospheric dynamo: ICON-MIGHTI and Swarm observations of extreme neutral winds and currents. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2022, 49, e2022GL098577. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL098577.
  • Drobzhev et al. [1979] Drobzhev, V. I.; Krasnov, V. M.; Salikhov, N. M. Simultaneous spectral analysis of wave perturbations in the ionospheric D-layer and F-layer. Radiophys. Quant. Electr. 1979, 22, 168–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01782929.