Dissociation cross sections of , ,
, and mesons with nucleons
Ruo-Qing Ding1, Xiao-Ming Xu1, and H. J. Weber2
Abstract
We study the dissociation of , , , and
mesons in collisions with nucleons, which takes place in
high-energy proton-nucleus collisions.
Quark interchange between a nucleon and a meson leads to
the dissociation of the meson. We consider the reactions:
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, and ,
where stands for , , , or
.
A reaction of a neutron and a meson corresponds to a reaction
of a proton and the meson by replacing the up quark with the
down quark and vice versa. Transition-amplitude formulas are derived from the
-matrix element. Unpolarized cross sections are calculated with the
transition amplitudes for scattering in the prior form and in the post form.
The cross sections relate to nodes in the radial wave functions of
, , , and mesons.
1Department of Physics, Shanghai University, Baoshan,
Shanghai 200444, China
2Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville,
VA 22904, USA
It is shown in Refs. [1, 2, 3]
that , , , and mesons
are the , , , and states
of a charm quark and a charm antiquark. The four mesons
have been widely studied in annihilation that produce hadrons
[4, 5, 6, 7],
[8, 9, 10],
[9, 10, 11, 12],
[10],
[10, 13],
two charmed mesons [14, 15],
[16],
two charmed strange mesons [18, 17],
[19],
[20],
[21], and
[22].
Electron-positron annihilation produces a virtual photon which splits into a
charm quark and a charm antiquark, and this quark-antiquark pair becomes a
meson nonperturbatively. Production of the
meson in annihilation was studied in the nonrelativistic
quantum chromodynamics (NRQCD) factorization formalism that includes
color-singlet and color-octet contributions [23]. In Refs.
[24, 25] the conversion of the photon to the or
meson is indicated by a constant factor.
Au-Au collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and Pb-Pb
collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) produce quark-gluon plasmas.
At the critical temperature the quark-gluon plasma becomes hadronic
matter. Since
, , and mesons are dissolved in
hadronic matter when the temperature is larger than ,
, and , respectively [26], they
can only be produced in hadronic matter. Therefore,
the production of , , and can be taken
as probes of hadronic matter that results from the quark-gluon plasma created
in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions. In hadronic matter
they are produced in the following reactions:
, , ,
, and so on,
where stands for , , or .
Charmed mesons have been well measured in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC.
It is shown in Ref. [27] that numbers
of , , and produced in a central Pb-Pb
collision at the center-of-mass energy per nucleon-nucleon pair
TeV are 0.25, 0.1, and 0.18, respectively. Therefore, it
is interesting to measure , , and
mesons produced in Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC.
Production of -wave charmonia in nucleon-nucleon collisions was studied
in NRQCD in Ref. [28]. Production cross sections depend on parton
distribution functions, short-distance processes, and nonperturbative matrix
elements of four-fermion operators. In proton-nucleus reactions a charmonium
produced in a proton-nucleon collision further interacts with other nucleons.
The nucleon-charmonium collisions may break the charmonium, and thus reduce
the
charmonium number. Therefore, in the present work we study the dissociation of
, , , and mesons in
collisions with nucleons. Since many experiments on reactions have been
carried out at the RHIC and the LHC, it is interesting to study the
dissociation processes.
, , , and mesons are
of special interest because they are easily produced at electron-positron
colliders. The mechanism of producing them in
proton-nucleus reactions is different from the mechanism of
producing them in electron-positron collisions. The mesons are influenced by
cold nuclear matter due to the dissociation processes and nuclear modification
of parton distribution functions. Therefore, it will be
interesting to compare the production of the mesons in proton-nucleus
reactions with the production in electron-positron collisions in both
experiment and theory in future.
This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. II we derive formulas of
transition amplitudes which are used to calculate unpolarized cross sections
for dissociation of mesons in collisions with nucleons.
In Sect. III we present
numerical cross sections along with relevant discussions. In Sect. IV we
summarize the present work.
II. FORMALISM
We consider the reaction where and represent baryons and
and are mesons.
Denote by and ( and )
the total energy and the total momentum of the initial (final) baryon and the
initial (final) meson,
respectively. If (, , ) stands for the energy of
hadron (, , ), and . Let
be the interaction potential between two constituents of hadrons in the
reaction , where ,
, and represent light quarks. Since the quark flavors inside baryon
differ from the charm flavor inside meson , quark interchange (for
example, and ) between baryon and meson gives rise to the
reaction. The -matrix element for is
(1)
Let () and
() be the total momentum and the
center-of-mass coordinate of , , and (, , and )
in baryon (), respectively. Let
(),
(), and ()
be the total momentum, the center-of-mass coordinate, and the relative
coordinate of and ( and ) of meson (),
respectively. In case that quarks and have the same mass,
we define
(2)
and
(3)
for baryon A, and
(4)
for baryon , where , , , and
are the position vectors of quarks , , , and
, respectively. The wave function of baryon and meson is
(5)
and the wave function of baryon and meson is
(6)
in which is the volume where every hadron wave function is normalized.
()
is the product of the color wave function, the flavor wave function, the spin
wave function, and the space wave function of the three quarks.
()
is the product of the color wave function, the flavor wave function, the spin
wave function, and the quark-antiquark relative-motion wave function.
With the wave functions we have
(7)
where () and
() are
the relative coordinate and the relative momentum of and
( and ), respectively;
is the center-of-mass coordinate of the two initial
hadrons, i.e., of the two final hadrons; is the Hermitean
conjugate of ; is the transition amplitude given
by
(8)
The wave function of baryon and meson is
(9)
and the wave function of baryon and meson is
(10)
where (, ) is the spin of hadron (, ) with its
magnetic projection quantum number (, );
(, ),
(, ), and
(, ) are the color
wave function, the flavor wave function, and the spin wave function of hadron
(, ), respectively; () is
the space wave function of baryon ();
is the quark-antiquark relative-motion wave function of meson ;
, , and
are the color wave function, the flavor wave function,
and the space-spin wave function of meson with the
total angular momentum and its component , respectively.
Denote by and the orbital angular momentum and the spin of meson
, respectively, and by and the magnetic projection
quantum numbers of and . In Eq. (9)
where is the radial wave function
of the relative motion of and ,
are the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients,
are the spherical harmonics, and are the
spin wave functions.
The interaction that governs scattering in the prior form shown in Fig. 1
is
(11)
and the interaction that governs scattering in the post form shown in Fig.
2 is
(12)
where is the potential between constituents and .
Let be the position vector of antiquark . We take
the Fourier transform of the potentials and wave functions:
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
where is the momentum attached to the dot-dashed lines in Figs. 1 and
2, is the relative
momentum of and in meson , and
is the relative momentum of and
in meson .
In momentum space the normalizations are
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
When quarks and have equal masses, their masses are indicated
by . Let , , and stand for the , , and
masses, respectively. From Eqs. (8)-(29) we obtain
the transition amplitude for scattering in the prior form,
(30)
with ,
and the transition amplitude for scattering in the post form,
(31)
with .
The variables and in
,
in ,
and in
, and
in
equal the expressions
enclosed by the parentheses that follow ,
, , and .
With the transition amplitudes the unpolarized cross section for
is
(32)
where is the Mandelstam variable obtained from the four-momenta and
of hadrons and by ; (, , )
and (, , ) of hadron (, , ) are
the total angular momentum and its component, respectively; is
the angle between and which are the three-dimensional
momentum components of baryons and in the center-of-momentum frame of
the initial baryon and the initial meson, respectively.
We calculate the cross section in the center-of-momentum frame.
III. NUMERICAL CROSS SECTIONS AND DISCUSSIONS
We use the notation
,
,
, and
.
We consider the following reactions:
where stands for , , , or
. By replacing the up quark with the down quark and vice versa
in these ten reactions, they give ten reactions of a neutron
and a meson. Since the cross section for
(,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ) equals the one for
(,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ),
it is enough to only discuss reactions of the proton and the
meson in this section.
We calculate unpolarized cross sections for these reactions
with Eq. (32). As seen in Eqs. (30) and (31),
and used in Eq. (32) involve
and . The two wave functions
are obtained from solutions of the Schrödinger equation with the
potential between constituents and in coordinate space,
(33)
where is the relative coordinate of constituents and ;
GeV2 and GeV; , , and
are individually
the mass, the spin, and the Gell-Mann matrices for the
color generators of constituent ; the function is given by
Buchmüller and Tye in Ref. [29]; the quantity is
(34)
where GeV and .
The potential originates from quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [29]. The first
two terms are the Buchmüller-Tye potential, and the other
terms come from one-gluon exchange plus perturbative one- and two-loop
corrections [30].
The function manifests one-gluon exchange plus perturbative one- and
two-loop corrections between constituents and . It
increases from 0 to 1 when increases from 0 to the positive infinity.
Consequently, the second term is not a color Coulomb potential.
One-gluon exchange between two constituents gives rise to the Fermi contact
term . The
function fixes the positions of the two constituents to .
However, the constituent positions fluctuate in the presence of one- and
two-loop
corrections. To allow the position fluctuation, is
replaced with so as to arrive at
the third term on the right-hand side of Eq. (33), which is the smearing
of the Fermi contact term [1].
The Gaussian has a width of , and
indicates the fluctuation size. The larger is , the smaller is
the fluctuation size. depends on constituent masses. When ,
. When ,
. In the two cases the
term gives a constant value to , and the term is proportional to
. The two terms provide different mass dependence. Since
, the parameter reflects the fact that
in a confined system the smearing must be limited.
The masses of the up quark, the
down quark, the strange quark, and the charm quark are 0.32 GeV, 0.32 GeV,
0.5 GeV, and 1.51 GeV, respectively. Solving the Schrödinger equation with
, we obtain meson masses that are close to
the experimental masses of , , , , , ,
, , , , , , ,
, and
mesons listed in Ref. [31]. The experimental data of -wave
elastic phase shifts for scattering [32] are
reproduced in the Born approximation.
and
involve the space wave functions and .
The space wave functions of ground-state baryons are usually assumed to be
harmonic-oscillator wave functions [33, 34]:
(35)
and is obtained from
by replacing
with .
The wave function in
Eq. (5) is
(36)
and in Eq. (6) is given from by
replacing (, ) with
(, ).
Masses of baryons in the baryon octet and the baryon decuplet are given by
(37)
with .
Replacing () with (),
Eq. (37) is used to calculate
masses of ground-state charmed baryons.
Let , , , ,
, and represent the experimental
masses of , , ,
, , and baryons, respectively.
Fits to the experimental masses of the six baryons give
Using the mesonic quark-antiquark relative-motion wave functions and the space
wave functions of baryons, we obtain unpolarized cross sections for
dissociation of , , , and
mesons in collisions with protons. The cross sections are plotted in Figs.
3-12, and are parametrized as
(38)
where is the threshold energy, and , , , ,
, and are parameters. The parameter values are listed in Tables 1-2.
The threshold energy of inelastic (,
, ) scattering is the sum of the proton and
(, , ) masses. At the
threshold energy in Eq. (32) equals zero, but
does not. The cross section is thus infinite at
the threshold energy. The cross sections in Figs. 3-12 are plotted as
functions of which equals or is larger than the threshold energy
plus GeV.
The reactions considered in the present work are all exothermic. When
increases from threshold, the cross sections decrease rapidly, and then change
slowly. In the slowly-changing region the cross sections may be tens of
millibarns. For example, the cross sections for
,
,
, and
can reach 20 mb, 30 mb, 21 mb, and
15 mb, respectively.
According to the quantum numbers of , ,
, and mesons, the numbers of their radial nodes are
0, 2, 1, and 3, respectively. If there is a node in the radial wave function
, cancellation between the wave functions on both sides
of the node occurs in the integration involved in the transition amplitudes,
thus cross sections are reduced. The mass is near the
mass. Since the meson has one node more than the
meson, the integration related to should have more
cancellation than that related to . However, the wave function
of contains the spherical harmonics
(), and the wave function of contains the
constant spherical harmonics . Then, the integration related to
may have more cancellation than that related to .
Therefore, at the threshold energy plus GeV, the cross
sections for reactions are larger in Fig. 3 and Fig. 7
or smaller in Figs. 4-6 and Figs. 8-12 than the ones for
reactions.
The mesonic quark-antiquark relative-motion wave functions are decreasing
functions of the quark-antiquark relative momentum.
()
in the transition amplitudes is an
exponentially decreasing function of and
( and ). The quark-antiquark
relative momenta, , , ,
and , are given by the expressions enclosed by the
parentheses that follow , ,
, and in Eqs. (30) and (31). These
expressions may have and
. In the center-of-momentum frame of
the proton and the charmonium, and
equal and ,
respectively. Therefore,
the quark-antiquark relative momenta, , ,
, and , bear linear relation
to and . At the threshold energy plus
GeV, almost equals zero, and
of any reaction is smaller than
of , , and reactions with the same
final charmed baryon and the same final charmed meson in any of Figs. 3-12.
The transition amplitudes for the reaction are larger than those
for the , , and reactions.
Therefore, at the threshold energy plus
GeV, the cross section for
in Fig. 3 is larger than those for
,
, and
; similar results are displayed in
Figs. 4-12. From the ten figures
we can also understand that the cross sections for
reactions at the threshold energy plus GeV are larger
than the ones for reactions.
The measured proton mass has a very small uncertainty, and the uncertainty
is neglected here. The measured masses of charmed baryons have uncertainties
[31], for example, the mass has an error of 0.14 MeV.
The measured mass of every charmed baryon has a maximum and a minimum, for
example, the mass has the maximum mass 2286.60 MeV and the
minimum mass
2286.32 MeV. Fits to the maximum experimental masses of ,
, , , and baryons
give GeV and
Using these values of and , we obtain
unpolarized cross sections which are denoted as .
The differences between and
shown in Figs. 3-12 are plotted as
the lower solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves in Figs. 13-22.
Fits to the minimum experimental masses of ,
, , , and baryons
give GeV and
Using these values of and , we obtain
unpolarized cross sections which are denoted as .
The differences between and
are plotted as
the upper solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves in Figs. 13-22.
In every figure the orange (green, red, blue) band between the lower and upper
solid (dashed, dotted, dot-dashed) curves show uncertainties of the unpolarized
cross sections, which are labeled as and are caused by
the uncertainties of the value. However,
the cross-section uncertainties are too small to be shown if the bands are
attached to those curves in Figs. 3-12. The cross-section
uncertainties are small because of the small uncertainties of the
values, which correspond to errors of measurement of the baryon masses.
In Refs. [1, 2, 3] , , , and
mesons are identified with the , , ,
and states of a charm quark and a charm antiquark. This
identification is also true with the potential given in Eq. (33), and we then
study inelastic scattering of a nucleon by the four mesons in the
present work. However, we note that the quantum states of and
mesons are open to debate. The state of the
meson is suggested to be
mixed with the state in Ref. [35], and may contain
a four-quark component with the up- and down-quarks and antiquarks in Ref.
[36]. The meson may be a state
given in the screened potential model [37], a state
obtained with a quark potential derivd from a Lagrangian with chiral symmetry
breaking in Ref. [38], or a hybrid recognized in lattice
calculations of meson masses [39], from the
nonrelativistic reduction of the QCD Hamiltonian in the Coulomb gauge
[40], and in the flux-tube model [41].
IV. SUMMARY
Flavor interchange between a nucleon and a meson breaks the meson.
According to the quark interchange mechanism, we have derived formulas of
the transition amplitudes that include wave functions and
constituent-constituent potentials. The
transition amplitudes are used to calculate unpolarized cross sections for the
reactions:
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, and ,
where represents , , , or
. These reactions are exothermic, and the dependence of
their cross sections is so that the cross sections decrease rapidly near
threshold and change slowly when the center-of-mass energy of the nucleon and
the meson is not close to threshold. In the slowly-changing region
the cross sections may be tens of millibarns. The cross sections also depend
on nodes in the radial wave functions of the mesons. Numerical cross
sections are parametrized. Cross sections
for reactions of a neutron and a meson are obtained from those
of a proton and the meson.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the project STRONG-2020 of European Center for
Theoretical Studies in Nuclear Physics and Related Areas.
References
[1] S. Godfrey and N. Isgur, Mesons in a relativized quark model with
chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32, 189 (1985).
[2] T. Barnes, S. Godfrey, and E. S. Swanson, Higher charmonia, Phys.
Rev. D 72, 054026 (2005).
[3] J. Vijande, F. Fernndez, and A. Valcarce,
Constituent quark model study of the meson spectra, J.
Phys. G 31, 481 (2005); P. G. Ortega, J. Segovia, D. R. Entem, and F.
Fernndez, Charmonium resonances in the 3.9
energy region and the puzzle, Phys. Lett. B 778, 1 (2018).
[4] J. Siegrist et al., Observation of a resonance at 4.4 GeV
and additional structure near 4.1 GeV in annihilation, Phys. Rev.
Lett. 36, 700 (1976);
P. A. Rapidis et al., Observation of a resonance in
annihilation just above charm threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 526 (1977).
[5] R. H. Schindler et al., Measurement of the parameters of
the resonance, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2716 (1980).
[6] R. Brandelik et al., Total cross section for hadron
production by annihilation at center of mass energies between 3.6
and 5.2 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 76, 361 (1978);
R. Brandelik et al., Results from DASP on annihilation between
3.1 and 5.2 GeV, Z. Phys. C 1, 233 (1979).
[7] M. Ablikim et al., Determination of the ,
, and resonance parameters, Phys. Lett. B
660, 315 (2008).
[8] J. Z. Bai et al., Evidence of
non- decay to , Phys. Lett. B 605, 63 (2005).
[9] N. E. Adam et al., Observation of and measurement of , Phys. Rev.
Lett. 96, 082004 (2006).
[10] T. E. Coan et al., Charmonium decays of ,
, and , Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162003 (2006).
[11] M. Ablikim et al., Observation of at center-of-mass energy , Phys. Rev. D 86,
071101 (2012).
[12] X. L. Wang et al., Observation of and
decay into , Phys. Rev. D 87, 051101 (2013).
[13] Y. L. Han et al., Measurement of via initial state radiation at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 92, 012011
(2015).
[14] G. Pakhlova et al., Observation of the decay using initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. Lett.
100, 062001 (2008).
[15] B. Aubert et al., Exclusive initial-state-radiation
production of the , , and systems,
Phys. Rev. D 79, 092001 (2009).
[16] G. Pakhlova et al., Measurement of the cross section using initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 80,
091101 (2009).
[17] P. del Amo Sanchez et al., Exclusive production of
, , and via
annihilation with initial-state radiation, Phys. Rev. D 82, 052004 (2010).
[18] G. Pakhlova et al., Measurement of cross sections near threshold using initial-state
radiation, Phys. Rev. D 83, 011101 (2011).
[19] T. K. Pedlar et al., Observation of the
using collisions above the threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107,
041803 (2011).
[20] M. Ablikim et al., Observation of near = 4.42 and 4.6 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 93,
011102 (2016).
[21] M. Ablikim et al., Measurement of cross sections
for at center-of-mass energies from 3.80 to 4.60
GeV, Phys. Rev. D 102, 112009 (2020).
[22] M. Ablikim et al., Measurement of the cross section
for and evidence of the decay , Phys. Rev. D 104, L091104 (2021).
[23] L.-K. Hao, K.-Y. Liu, and K.-T. Chao, -wave charmonium
production in annihilation at = 10.6 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 546,
216 (2002).
[24] M. Piotrowska, F. Giacosa, and P. Kovacs, Can the
explain the peak associated with , Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 98 (2019).
[25] M. Bayar, N. Ikeno, and E. Oset, Analysis of the and
decay into , ,
Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 222 (2020).
[26] W.-X. Li, X.-M. Xu, and H. J. Weber, Cross sections for 2-to-1
meson-meson scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 225 (2021).
[27] L.-Y. Li, X.-M. Xu, and H. J. Weber, Production of
, , and mesons in hadronic matter, Phys.
Rev. D 105, 114025 (2022).
[28] F. Yuan, C.-F. Qiao, and K.-T. Chao, -wave heavy quarkonium
production in fixed target experiments, Phys. Rev. D 59, 014009 (1998).
[29] W. Buchmüller and S.-H. H. Tye, Quarkonia and quantum
chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 24, 132 (1981).
[30] X.-M. Xu, productions in nucleus-nucleus collisions
at RHIC and LHC energies, Nucl. Phys. A 697, 825 (2002).
[31] M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of
particle physics: particle data groups, Phys. Rev. D 98,
030001 (2018) and 2019 update.
[32] E. Colton, E. Malamud, P. E. Schlein, A. D. Johnson, V. J.
Stenger, and P. G. Wohlmut, Measurement of = 2 elastic cross
sections, Phys. Rev. D 3, 2028 (1971);
N. B. Durusoy, M. Baubillier, R. George, M. Goldberg, A. M. Touchard,
N. Armenise, M. T. Fogli-Muciaccia, and A. Silvestri, Study of the = 2 scattering from the reaction at 9.0 GeV/c,
Phys. Lett. 45 B, 517 (1973);
M. J. Losty, V. Chaloupka, A. Ferrando, L. Montanet, E. Paul, D. Yaffe,
A. Zieminski, J. Alitti, B. Gandois, and J. Louie, A study of
scattering from interactions at 3.93 GeV/c, Nucl. Phys. B 69, 185
(1974);
W. Hoogland et al., Measurement and analysis of the system
produced at small momentum transfer in the reaction at 12.5 GeV, Nucl. Phys. B 126, 109 (1977).
[33] S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Baryons in a relativized quark model
with chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 34, 2809 (1986).
[34] J. P. Hilbert, N. Black, T. Barnes, and E. S. Swanson,
Charmonium-nucleon dissociation cross sections in the quark model, Phys.
Rev. C 75, 064907 (2007).
[35] J. L. Rosner, Status of decays to charmless final
states, hep-ph/0405196;
J. L. Rosner, decays to charmless final states, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)
319, 1 (2005).
[36] M. B. Voloshin, purity of and
challenged, Phys. Rev. D 71, 114003 (2005).
[37] B.-Q. Li and K.-T. Chao, Higher charmonia and , , states
with screened potential, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094004 (2009).
[38] J. Segovia, A. M. Yasser, D. R. Entem, and F. Fernández,
hidden charm resonances, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114033 (2008).
[39] C. W. Bernard, J. E. Hetrick, T. A. DeGrand, M. Wingate,
C. DeTar, C. McNeile, S. Gottlieb, U. M. Heller, K. Rummukainen, B. Sugar, and
D. Toussaint, Exotic mesons in quenched lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 56, 7039
(1997);
Z. H. Mei and X. Q. Luo, Exotic mesons from quantum chromodynamics with
improved gluon and quark actions on the anisotropic lattice, Int. J. Mod. Phys.
A 18, 5713 (2003).
[40] P. Guo, A. P. Szczepaniak, G. Galat, A.
Vassallo, and E. Santopinto, Heavy quarkonium hybrids from Coulomb gauge QCD,
Phys. Rev. D 78, 056003 (2008).
[41] N. Isgur, R. Kokoski, and J. Paton, Gluonic excitations of
mesons: why they are missing and where to find them, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 869
(1985).
Figure 1: Scattering in the prior form. Solid lines with triangles right (left)
represent quarks (antiquarks). Dot-dashed lines indicate interactions.
Figure 2: Scattering in the post form. Solid lines with triangles right (left)
represent quarks (antiquarks). Dot-dashed lines indicate interactions.Figure 3: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 4: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 5: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 6: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 7: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 8: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 9: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 10: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 11: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 12: Solid, dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed curves stand for cross sections
for ,
,
, and
, respectively.Figure 13: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 14: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 15: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 16: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 17: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 18: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 19: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 20: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 21: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).Figure 22: The error band between the two solid (dashed, dotted, and dot-dashed)
curves indicates uncertainties of the unpolarized cross sections
for
(,
, and
).
Table 1: Values of the parameters. and are
in units of millibarns; and are in units of GeV; and
are dimensionless.
reaction
0.13
0.01
0.51
0.23
0.09
1.08
0.065
0.068
0.41
0.017
0.18
62.4
0.026
0.032
0.55
0.018
0.18
4.67
0.0164
0.08
0.42
0.005
0.07
11.7
6.4
0.03
0.54
3.18
0.18
4.15
0.14
0.31
1.15
1.12
0.06
0.47
0.58
0.02
0.54
0.66
0.12
2.35
0.034
0.02
0.08
0.3
0.08
0.65
0.017
0.07
0.93
0.021
0.05
0.35
0.0067
0.071
0.51
0.004
0.19
38.6
0.0012
0.01
0.35
0.0042
0.08
0.66
0.0013
0.024
0.58
0.0022
0.168
4.29
0.012
0.04
0.01
5.4
0.058
0.48
0.34
0.03
0.64
0.53
0.19
2.33
0.13
0.017
5.92
0.85
0.058
0.5
0.007
0.0025
0.01
0.27
0.079
0.6
0.005
0.1
0.38
0.014
0.04
0.47
0.0009
0.01
0.29
0.0033
0.12
1.6
0.00112
0.16
2.11
0.002
0.03
0.49
0.0008
0.07
0.437
0.0006
0.162
9.3
Table 2: The same as Table 1, but for twenty other reactions.