This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Discovery of a Mid-L Dwarf Companion to the L 262-74 System

Léopold Gramaize Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 Adam C. Schneider United States Naval Observatory, Flagstaff Station, 10391 West Naval Observatory Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86005, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, George Mason University, MS3F3, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA Federico Marocco IPAC, Mail Code 100-22, Caltech, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Jacqueline K. Faherty Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10034, USA Aaron M. Meisner NSF’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, 950 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719, USA J. Davy Kirkpatrick IPAC, Mail Code 100-22, Caltech, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Mark Popinchalk Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10034, USA Department of Physics, Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 5th Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA Austin Rothermich Department of Physics, Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 5th Ave., New York, NY 10016, USA Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10034, USA Marc J. Kuchner NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Exoplanets and Stellar Astrophysics Laboratory, Code 667, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA The Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 Collaboration
Abstract

We present the discovery of CWISE J151044.74-524923.5, a wide low-mass companion to the nearby (\sim24.7 pc) system L 262-74, which was identified through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 citizen science project. We detail the properties of the system, and we assess that this companion is a mid-L dwarf, which will need to be verified spectroscopically. With an angular separation of 74.\farcs3, we estimate a projected physical separation of \sim1837 au from the central system.

Brown dwarfs (185), Low mass stars (2050), Multiple stars (1081), Proper motions (1295)

1 Introduction

Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 is a citizen science project dedicated to the search of unknown nearby objects (Kuchner et al. 2017), through the inspection of all-sky WISE images (Wright et al. 2010). Its volunteers contributed to the discovery of several cold substellar companions to stellar systems (Faherty et al. 2020, Faherty et al. 2021, Schneider et al. 2021). In an effort to identify such systems, we cross-matched a list of Gaia EDR3 sources (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2021) with the CatWISE2020 catalog (Marocco et al. 2021), focusing the search on brown dwarf candidates. We found CWISE J151044.74-524923.5, a low-mass comoving source to the L 262-74 system.

2 Properties of the central system

L 262-74 was classified as a M2V(e) spectroscopic triple (SB3) by Torres et al. (2006). Elliott et al. (2015) identified two components at an angular separation of 0.\farcs47. In Gaia DR3, there are two resolved sources with similar proper motions: 5888257093214433920 and 5888257161906604800 (Table 1). For clarity reasons, we designate them as L 262-74A and L 262-74B, because L 262-74A has photometric data and the smallest astrometric error values, while L 262-74B has no available photometry. This designation may have to be reassessed in the future. From the 0.\farcs873 angular separation and the respective parallaxes of these sources (Table 1), we estimate a projected separation of 21.5 to 21.6 au.

The system was part of the TESS sector 12 observation campaign (Ricker et al. 2015). The input catalog refers to Gaia DR2 5888257093214433920 (Stassun et al. 2019), but as the angular resolution of TESS is 21″, the system is unresolved. The light curve reveals two v-shaped \sim14%\% dips with a 17.12 day period. These dips cannot result from the orbital motion of L 262-74A and L 262-74B, because the period for two stellar objects at a separation of 21.5 au would be several years. To rule out the possibility that the eclipse signal comes from a nearby background source, we computed the photocenter of the blended detection in the individual FFIs using the estimate_centroids function within the lightkurve python package. Since L 262-74 is the brightest source, the photocenter will be close to its position. When an eclipse happens, the system becomes fainter, so the photocenter should move slightly towards the west, where most of the background sources are. It is indeed what we observe during each transit, meaning that the signal is associated with L 262-74. Assuming that the light from L 262-74A is the dominant contribution to the light curve, we use the 14%\% transit depth and a 0.44R radius estimate for a M2V star to assess a lower limit of 0.16R for the size of the transiting companion. Finally, the Gaia DR3 re-normalized unit weight error of L 262-74A is 2.482, which could be caused by a close companion (Belokurov et al. 2020), although such a high value could be biased (Maíz Apellániz et al. 2021). These hints suggest that the central system is probably triple, confirming the observation of Torres et al. (2006).

3 Analysis of the companion

Through visual inspection, CWISE J151044.74-524923.5 appears to be comoving with L 262-74. To verify this observation, we assessed the difference between the proper motion vectors (Lépine & Bongiorno 2007) for L 262-74 (from Gaia DR3) and CWISE J151044.74-524923.5 (from CatWISE2020). For L 262-74A and L 262-74B, we calculate a reference value of ΔμAB=30.3±0.3\Delta\mu_{AB}=30.3\pm 0.3 mas yr-1. Then, we find Δμ=20.6±10.8\Delta\mu=20.6\pm 10.8 mas yr-1 for L 262-74A and CWISE J151044.74-524923.5, and Δμ=40.2±12.3\Delta\mu=40.2\pm 12.3 mas yr-1 for L 262-74B and CWISE J151044.74-524923.5. Comparing these values with ΔμAB\Delta\mu_{AB}, we consider that the proper motion match between the companion and L 262-74 is similar to the one between L 262-74A and L 262-74B.

From the 2MASS JKs-K_{s} = 1.759 mag color, we estimate that the spectral type of CWISE J151044.74-524923.5 is L5 to L7 (Best et al. 2018). Alternatively, the W1-W2 = 0.314 mag color suggests a spectral type of L4. However, the presence of a nearby potential contamination source during the NEOWISE survey epochs makes 2MASS data more reliable. Thanks to the J, H and KsK_{s} absolute magnitudes inferred from the spectral type estimate, we determine a photometric distance of 17 to 30 pc, which is compatible with an association with L 262-74, whose distance is 24.6 to 24.7 pc according to the Gaia DR3 parallaxes of L 262-74A and L 262-74B.

From their positions in 2MASS, the angular separation between the companion and L 262-74 is 74.\farcs6, which corresponds to a projected separation of 1844 au, assuming a distance of 24.718 pc. Proceeding similarly with the positions in CatWISE2020, we find a 74.\farcs3 angular separation and a 1837 au projected separation.

Using a 52.5 mas yr-1 matching tolerance, which corresponds to the highest possible Δμ\Delta\mu value calculated earlier, we find 8 591 Gaia DR3 sources whose proper motion match with CWISE J151044.74-524923.5. 173 of them are located between 17 and 30 pc. Using a projected separation of 20 600 au as a reference (Lépine & Bongiorno 2007, Schneider et al. 2021), we calculate a 7.11×1047.11\times 10^{-4} chance alignment probability that one of these 173 sources would randomly fall within the 20 600 au radius. Using the CoMover code (Gagné et al. 2021), we confirm this result by determining association probabilities of 99.8% between L 262-74A and CWISE J151044.74-524923.5, 95.5% between L 262-74B and CWISE J151044.74-524923.5, and 94.0% between L 262-74A and L 262-74B.

4 Conclusions

We confirmed that L 262-74 is composed of two stellar objects, and probably of a third companion whose nature remains to be determined. We also presented the discovery of CWISE J151044.74-524923.5, a wide companion to this system, that we classify as a mid-L dwarf candidate, which will need to be verified spectroscopically. Using two methods, we determined consistent low chance alignment probabilities. We conclude that this companion and L 262-74 are associated, implying that the system might be quadruple. Although similar hierarchical systems like GJ 570 have been previously discovered (Burgasser et al. 2000), only a few of them are currently known.

5 Acknowledgements

This work has made use of data from:

  • the NASA NEOWISE mission, which is a joint project of Caltech/JPL and the University of Arizona.

  • the ESA Gaia mission.

  • the TESS mission. The data is accessible in MAST:http://dx.doi.org/10.17909/qh1f-ww20 (catalog 10.17909/qh1f-ww20).

  • Lightkurve, a Python package for Kepler and TESS data analysis (Lightkurve Collaboration et al. 2018).

  • the cross-match service from CDS, Strasbourg (Boch et al. 2012).

We thank Frank Kiwy for his methodological advice.

Software: AstroToolBox (Kiwy 2022), CoMover (Gagné et al. 2021), Wiseview (Caselden et al. 2018).

References

  • Belokurov et al. (2020) Belokurov, V., Penoyre, Z., Oh, S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 1922. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1522
  • Best et al. (2018) Best, W. M. J., Magnier, E. A., Liu, M. C., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 1. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa9982
  • Boch et al. (2012) Boch, T., Pineau, F., & Derriere, S. 2012, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXI, 461, 291
  • Burgasser et al. (2000) Burgasser, A. J., Kirkpatrick, J. D., Cutri, R. M., et al. 2000, ApJ, 531, L57. doi:10.1086/312522
  • Caselden et al. (2018) Caselden, D., Westin, P., Meisner, A., et al. 2018, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1806.004
  • Elliott et al. (2015) Elliott, P., Huélamo, N., Bouy, H., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A88. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525794
  • Faherty et al. (2020) Faherty, J. K., Goodman, S., Caselden, D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 176. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab5303
  • Faherty et al. (2021) Faherty, J. K., Gagné, J., Popinchalk, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 48. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2499
  • Gagné et al. (2021) Gagné, J., Faherty, J. K., Schneider, A. C., et al. 2021, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:2106.007
  • Gaia Collaboration et al. (2016) Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, A&A, 595, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272
  • Gaia Collaboration et al. (2021) Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657
  • Gaia Collaboration (2022) Gaia Collaboration 2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog, I/355
  • Kirkpatrick et al. (2014) Kirkpatrick, J. D., Schneider, A., Fajardo-Acosta, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 783, 122. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/122
  • Kiwy (2022) Kiwy, F. 2022, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:2201.002
  • Kuchner et al. (2017) Kuchner, M. J., Faherty, J. K., Schneider, A. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 841, L19. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7200
  • Lépine & Bongiorno (2007) Lépine, S. & Bongiorno, B. 2007, AJ, 133, 889. doi:10.1086/510333
  • Lightkurve Collaboration et al. (2018) Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J. V. de M., Hedges, C., et al. 2018, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1812.013
  • Maíz Apellániz et al. (2021) Maíz Apellániz, J., Pantaleoni González, M., & Barbá, R. H. 2021, A&A, 649, A13. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140418
  • Marocco et al. (2021) Marocco, F., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Fowler, J. W., et al. 2021, ApJS, 253, 8. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abd805
  • Ricker et al. (2015) Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003
  • Skrutskie et al. (2006) Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163. doi:10.1086/498708
  • Schneider et al. (2021) Schneider, A. C., Meisner, A. M., Gagné, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 140. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c75
  • Stassun et al. (2019) Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Paegert, M., et al. 2019, AJ, 158, 138. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467
  • Torres et al. (2006) Torres, C. A. O., Quast, G. R., da Silva, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 460, 695. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065602
  • Wright et al. (2010) Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868
Table 1: Properties of the system
Parameter L 262-74AB L 262-74A L 262-74B CWISE J151044.74-524923.5 Unit Ref.
Alternative Designations
2MASS J15104047-5248189 J15104501-5249211 1
Gaia DR3 5888257093214433920 5888257161906604800 2
CWISE J151040.23-524821.5 J151044.74-524923.5 3
TIC 124350360 4
Astrometry
α2MASS\alpha_{2MASS} 227.668633 227.687559 deg 1
δ2MASS\delta_{2MASS} -52.80526 -52.82254 deg 1
αGaiaDR3\alpha_{GaiaDR3} 227.6676445 227.6672734 deg 2
δGaiaDR3\delta_{GaiaDR3} -52.8060496 -52.8059578 deg 2
αCatWISE2020\alpha_{CatWISE2020} 227.6676556 227.6864521 deg 3
δCatWISE2020\delta_{CatWISE2020} -52.8059889 -52.8232175 deg 3
μα\mu_{\alpha} -137.192 ±\pm 0.036 -165.654 ±\pm 0.167 -139.78 ±\pm 7.9 mas yr-1 2,3
μδ\mu_{\delta} -169.999 ±\pm 0.039 -159.644 ±\pm 0.174 -190.46 ±\pm 9.1 mas yr-1 2,3
ω\omega 40.4567 ±\pm 0.0401 40.6222 ±\pm 0.1048 mas 2
dd 24.718 ±\pm 0.024 24.617 ±\pm 0.063 pc 2
RV 19.5 km s-1 5
RVGaiaDR3RV_{GaiaDR3} 12.274 ±\pm 2.48 km s-1 2
RUWE 2.482 1.326 2
Photometry
GBPG_{BP} 11.654 ±\pm 0.004 mag 2
G 10.548 ±\pm 0.003 mag 2
GRPG_{RP} 9.226 ±\pm 0.005 mag 2
J 7.701 ±\pm 0.021 16.071 ±\pm 0.12 mag 1
H 7.098 ±\pm 0.042 14.884 ±\pm 0.073 mag 1
KsK_{s} 6.847 ±\pm 0.023 14.312 ±\pm 0.076 mag 1
W1 6.911 ±\pm 0.021 13.338 ±\pm 0.018 mag 3
W2 6.592 ±\pm 0.009 13.024 ±\pm 0.012 mag 3
W3 6.512 ±\pm 0.017 mag 6
W4 6.404 ±\pm 0.059 mag 6
Spectral type
Sp. Type M2 5
JKs-K_{s} estimate L5, L7 7
W1-W2 estimate L4 7
Fundamentalsaafootnotemark:
Teff 3471 ±\pm 157 K 4
log g 4.63 ±\pm 0.01 dex (with g in cm s-2) 4
Radius 0.63 ±\pm 0.02 R 4
Mass 0.61 ±\pm 0.02 M 4
Luminosity 0.05 ±\pm 0.01 L 4

Note. — Reference codes: (1) Skrutskie et al. (2006), (2) Gaia Collaboration (2022), (3) Marocco et al. (2021), (4) Stassun et al. (2019), (5) Torres et al. (2006), (6) Kirkpatrick et al. (2014), (7) Best et al. (2018)