Criteria of the existence of global solutions to semilinear wave equations with first-order derivatives on exterior domains
Abstract.
We study the existence of global solutions to semilinear wave equations on exterior domains , , with small initial data and nonlinear terms where and . If and , criteria of the existence of a global solution for general initial data are provided, except for non-empty obstacles when . For and , we verify the criteria for radial solutions provided obstacles are closed balls centered at origin. These criteria are established by local energy estimates and the weighted Sobolev embedding including trace estimates. Meanwhile, for the sample choice of the nonlinear term and initial data, sharp estimates of lifespan are obtained.
Key words and phrases:
Glassey conjecture, Semilinear wave equation, Blow-up, Lifespan, Exterior domain1991 Mathematics Subject Classification:
35L05, 35L71, 35B30, 35B33, 35B441. Introduction
Let and be a smooth, compact and nontrapping obstacle. We denote , hence when , and consider the following semilinear wave equation
(1) |
Here, , the real-valued function
and real-valued initial data satisfy some compatibility conditions when is non-empty. By translation and scaling, when is non-empty, we can assume that the origin is in the interior of and . Here, is the unit open ball center at the origin. Denote , . When there is no danger of misunderstanding, we will omit in hereby.
The purpose of this paper is to show how the combination of local energy estimates and the control of the leads to the criterion of global existence theorems for small amplitude initial data and nonlinear terms only involving first-order derivatives. The problem (1) is a generalized version of Glassey conjecture in the exterior domain; see Hidano-Wang-Yokoyama [5] and the references therein. For spatial dimension , we prove the global existence of any small amplitude solutions to (1), if for and for . Also, for sample choices of the initial data and nonlinear terms, the solutions will blow up at finite time, when , , and . When , for spatial dimension , the current technology can only be applied for the radial cases and non-empty obstacles , that is, as long as is a closed ball centered at origin, we can obtain the global existence of any small amplitude radial solution for any nonlinear term satisfying and , or . Again, for sample choices of initial data and nonlinear terms, the solutions cannot extend to infinity, when and . For spatial dimension , due to the lack of local energy estimates, similar results are only established for and . Given any small amplitude initial data, global solutions exist when . For sample choices of initial data and nonlinear terms, the solutions will blow up in finite time, when . On the whole, the existence of a global solution to (1) with small initial data basically depends on whether the integral , , converges or not. Meanwhile, the sharp estimates of the lifespan, the maximal existence time of the solution to (1), are also provided for the blow-up solutions for sample choices of the initial data and nonlinear terms.
Let us recall the history of the Glassey conjecture. For Cauchy problem
(2) |
with and , it is conjectured that the critical power for the global existence v.s. blow-up is in Glassey’s mathematical review [3]; see also Schaeffer [13] and Rammaha [10]. For , , the global existence part of the conjecture is verified for general initial data in dimension by Hidano-Tsutaya [4] and Tzvetkov [18], independently. For , the conjecture is only demonstrated for radial initial data and ; see Hidano-Wang-Yokoyama [5]. For and sample choices of the initial data, the blow-up result is verified by Rammaha [10] for all spatial dimension expect for critical cases, , in the even dimension. Later, Zhou [21] shows the blow-up for all dimension with where , together with upper bound estimate on the lifespan for , which is
(3) |
On the other hand, deduced from the well-posed theory for , the lower bound on the lifespan is also obtained for all spatial dimensions, that is,
(4) |
see Hidano-Wang-Yokoyama [5] for (see also Fang-Wang [2] for the critical case in dimension two) and Kitamura-Morisawa-Takamura [8] for dimension one. Hence, for nonlinear terms , the estimates of the lifespan (3) and (4) are sharp.
As for , the results for the global existence are the same as above, as well as the lower bound estimates for . Hence, when , one may expect the powers for blow-up results are also and the lifespan estimates (3) and (4) are sharp. For dimension one, the sharp lifespan estimates are verified in Sasaki-Takamatsu-Takamura [12]. For dimension , the blow-up result is first established in Sideris [16] for , as well as the upper bound estimate , which does not match the well-known lower bound verified in John-Klainerman [7], . For , Schaeffer [13] obtains the blow-up result for . For , Rammaha shows the blow-up result in [10] for all of the critical and subcritical powers excluding the critical cases for even dimensions and studies the upper bound for and in [11]. In Takamura, Wang and the author’s recent work [14], we provide a uniform way to deduce the sharp upper bound estimates of the lifespan for all dimension and , that is,
There are also similar results when the problem (2) is considered on the asymptotically flat Lorentzian manifolds or the exterior domain; see Wang [20, 19].
Since the critical power is the borderline of the existence of the global solution with power-type nonlinearities. To determine the threshold nature of the nonlinear term, one may study the problem
(5) |
where the function is a non-decreasing sufficiently smooth function with . The blow-up is established by Chen-Palmieri [1, Theorem 2.1] for all classical solutions to (5) under the assumptions that the function is convex, that , and that initial data with . Also, they provide the upper bound estimates for the lifespan, that is, for all sufficiently small , there exist constants , , and such that the lifespan of the solution to (5) satisfies
where the function and is the inverse function of . They also obtain results for the existence part when and initial data are radial. If , there exists a unique radial global classical solution to (5) for all sufficiently small , provided that satisfying , . When , the lifespan of the radial classical solution to (5) has the lower bound
where , , and are some positive constants; see [1, Theorem 2.2 and Propsition 2.2].
With these results in hand, it is natural to ask what is the criterion for general non-linear terms . Since , it follows that in some neighborhood of the origin . Heuristically, if the obstacle is empty, the solutions to (1) could behave like free waves with energy of size and decay rate , for the time interval , when
(6) |
Here, is some positive constant from the weighted Sobolev embedding and . With simple calculation, the main term of the left hand side of (6) is
which gives rise to the following expected sharp estimate for the lifespan, provided ,
where is some positive constant and is
and is the inverse function of .
Now, we can state our results.
Theorem 1.1.
Let , , and be smooth, compact and nontrapping obstacles. Provided , there exists a small positive constant , such that, the problem (1) has a unique global solution satisfying
whenever the initial data satisfying the compatibility of order , and
Otherwise, if , when is small enough, there exist some positive constants , , and such that we have a unique solution satisfying
with
Theorem 1.1 is mainly established by local energy estimates and Sobolev embedding. Here, we give the definition of the compatibility of order .
Definition 1.2 (The compatibility of order ).
For equation (1), note that there exist, formally, functions such that
A priori, the initial data should fulfill
Since the estimate of th-order energy needs , and , , by the compatibility of order , we mean that
Similarly, for Dirichlet-wave equations
(7) |
there exist, formally, functions such that
Then, the compatibility condition of order for the equation (7) is
Using the argument in the proof of Theorem 1.1, we can obtain the following result for and .
Remark 1.3.
Let , , and be smooth, compact and nontrapping obstacles. There is a unique global solution to (1) satisfying
whenever the initial data satisfying the compatibility of order , and
Due to the lack of local energy estimates in dimension 2, the problem (1) for non-empty obstacles is still unsettled. However, for , we will have the following theorem by standard energy estimates, Klainerman-Sobolev inequalities, and trace estimates.
Theorem 1.4.
Let , , and . If , there exists a small positive constant , such that, the problem has a unique global solution to (1) satisfying
whenever the initial data satisfying
Otherwise, if , there exist some positive , , and such that we have a unique solution satisfying
with
(8) |
According to Theorem 1.1, Remark 1.3, and Theorem 1.4, as long as , the convergence of the integral
(9) |
foreshadows the existence of the global solution. And the divergence of the integral of (9) implies a lower bound of the lifespan. For , , and , this criterion is still available for the radial solution and we should consider the following nonlinear problem
(10) |
Here, .
Theorem 1.5.
Let , , and be radial functions. If , there exists a small positive constant such that the problem (10) has a unique radial global solution satisfying
whenever the initial data satisfying the compatibility of order , and
Otherwise, if , there exist positive constants , , and such that we have a unique radial solution satisfying
with
(11) |
Remark 1.6.
Let , , and . There is a unique radial global solution to (10) satisfying
whenever the radial initial data satisfying the compatibility of order , and
Following the argument in [1], we can show that the lower bound estimates of the lifespan are sharp for sample choices of the nonlinear terms and initial data. Before the statement, we give a rigorous definition of the lifespan.
Definition 1.7 (Lifespan).
The lifespan of the equation (1) is the supremum of the set consisting of such that there exists a unique solution
Assume is sufficiently small. For fixed , let denote the lifespan of the equations (1) with initial data .
Theorem 1.8 (Sharpness of the lifespan estimates).
Let , , and . Consider the following equation,
(12) |
Here, the initial datum is non-negative and radial with . The function such that
(13) |
and is a convex function on . There exist positive constants , , and such that, when is sufficiently small, the lifespan of the solution to (12) has the upper bound,
(14) |
Furthermore, estimates (14) with replaced by is still hold when , , and satisfying
(15) |
To conclude this section, we give some typical examples of .
-
•
Example 1: , for and for . We can choose
Then, the criterion is whether is infinity or not, which coincides with the classical results. For , , hence, for ,
where are positive constants given in the lifespan estimates above; for ,
and then, for
- •
-
•
Example 3: with and . By Theorem 1.5, given radial initial data, we can obtain a unique radial solution locally and provide the lower bound estimate of the lifespan. However, the sharp upper bound estimate is still open.
2. Preliminary
2.1. Notations
In this subsection, we list the notations used in this paper.
-
•
Besides , we will use polar coordinates .
-
•
Denote , , with the abbreviation . We will also need and
We denote
Hereby in this notation list, will be one of the collections of vector fields, , , , , , and .
-
•
For multi-indices, , and . For any , and mean the collection of the vector fields and .
-
•
With the Dirichlet boundary condition, we define as the closure of , with respect to the norm
If , is the closure of with respect to the norm. Also, we denote for and . Space is the closure of with respect to the norm. Space is the dual space of equipped with weak* topology .
-
•
A function belonging to means that for any , . We denote the -times continuous differentiable -valued function space.
-
•
For a Banach space , .
-
•
The space means
for a partition of unity subordinate to the (inhomogeneous) dyadic (spatial) annuli, . A typical choice could be a radial, non-negative with value 1 for and 0 for , and for . Take and then , .
-
•
We will use the norm in polar coordinates ,
with trivial modification for the case , where is the standard Lebesgue space on the sphere .
-
•
The energy norm is
For a collection of vector fields , the energy norm of order is
Also, we use to denote the local energy norm
and the dual norm . Similarly, for a collection of vector fields , the local energy norm of order is
-
•
, .
-
•
For a subset , is the characteristic function of and . For , denote the open ball centered at the origin with a radius , the characteristic function of the set and .
-
•
We will use to stand for where the constant may change line to line. Then, stands for . In addition, when denoting by for , we mean the relevant estimate holds for for sufficiently small .
2.2. Estimates
In this subsection, we give some estimates.
Proposition 2.1 (Klainerman-Sobolev Inequality).
If and , then the inequality
holds. If and , then
We will need the variant of the Sobolev embedding.
Lemma 2.2 (Sobolev embedding).
Let . For with , we have
Moreover, we have
See [19, Lemma 2.2] for the proof.
We need the following trace estimates.
Proposition 2.3.
If and , we have
See [6, Proposition 2.4] for the proof.
Proposition 2.4.
Let , then
See [5, Lemma 2.2] for the proof.
Proposition 2.5 (Local energy estimates).
Consider the Dirichlet-wave equations (7). Let . For , we have , , and
In addition, we have higher order (th-order) local energy estimates. Provided that , that with and , and that fulfill the compatibility condition of order , there exists some such that we have a solution and
with the estimates
(16) | ||||
See [19, Proposition 1.4] for the proof of estimate and Appendix 7 for the explanation of regularity.
Lemma 2.6.
Let and . For any non-decreasing function defined on with , we have the following inequality
Proof.
Note that
Thus,
2.3. Solution spaces
The solution will be obtain by iteration in some suitable function space.
Let be or . For initial data satisfying the compatibility of order , denote the space consisting of functions
and equipped with the norm . Also, we define as the space consisting of functions and
and equipped with the norm . Denote
We choose to be in the proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Remark 1.3 and to be in the proofs of Theorem 1.5 and Remark 1.6.
For Theorem 1.4, we will use the space consisting of function
and equipped with the norm . Also, we define as the space consisting of functions and
and equipped with the norm . Again, denote
3. Proof of Theorem 1.1
In this section, , , and stand for , , and . Theorem 1.1 will be established by iteration argument in some suitable function space .
Proposition 3.1.
Proof of Proposition 3.1.
According to Lemma 2.2, we have
Because , it follows that, by the chain rule, , , and
Also, the compatibility condition of the problem (17) coincides with that of the problem (1). Thus, by Proposition 2.5, as long as , it follows
(20) | ||||
According to the definition of , we have
(21) |
Noting that , , we obtain that
By Lemma 2.2 and 2.6, we deduce that
and
Therefore, it follows
(22) | ||||
and, if ,
(23) |
If is finite, due to , we have
(24) | ||||
Combining (21), (22), (23), and (24), we deduce that
(25) |
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
The uniqueness is obvious. We just focus on the existence and the lower bound of the lifespan.
Consider the following Dirichlet-wave equation
(31) |
where
and is a cut-off function such that in some neighborhood of . By a direct calculation, we find that the equation (31) has the same compatibility condition as that of the equation (1). By Proposition 2.5, there exists a constant such that the solution to the equation (31) satisfying
As long as we choose and such that
(32) |
we can take , , and deduce that, by (18) and (19), for all ,
Thus, we find a unique solution
with . Strictly speaking, to complete the proof, we need also to prove the regularity of the solution, that is, , . As this is standard, we omit details here and refer the reader to the end of Section 4 in [20] or [5, P533].
To conclude this subsection, we discuss the global existence and the lower bound estimate of the lifespan. Obviously, if , we can choose in (32), that is,
Due to , there exists an such that for all , the problem (1) has a unique global solution. Otherwise, we choose satisfying
Denote
and, to fulfill the requirement (32), take such that
that is,
4. Proofs of Remark 1.3 and Theorem 1.4
The proofs of Remark 1.3 and Theorem 1.4 are established by (local) energy estimates and the control of the norm of . In this section, we give sketches of the proofs.
4.1. Proof of Remark 1.3
In this subsection, and stand for and . This time the solution will be obtained by iteration in space .
To obtain the th-order version estimates of (18) and (19), that is, there exists constants and such that, for all ,
where , we only need to verify
(33) |
By the chain rule, for ,
(34) | ||||
Noticing that
(35) |
we can focus on the terms in the last line of (34) where and , . Because
it is always possible for us to choose such that
Then, it follows that, by Lemma 2.2,
(36) | ||||
Hence, combining (34), (35), and (36), we establish the desired inequality (33).
Let be the solution to the following Dirichlet-wave equation
(37) |
where
and is a cut-off function such that in some neighborhood of . By a direct calculation, we find that the equation (37) has the same compatibility condition as that of the equation (1). As long as is small enough, the iteration sequence, , , will converge to the unique global solution to the problem (1).
4.2. Proof of Theorem 1.4
In this subsection, and stand for and .
When , due to the lack of local energy estimate, the problem (1) is suspended for non-empty obstacles. For and , standard energy estimates and Klainerman-Sobolev inequalities are enough to bring out the expected results.
By energy estimates, for all , it follows
(38) | ||||
Just as in the poof of Remark 1.3, we only need to focus on terms where and , . Then, we have . Due to , we only need to investigate terms with , that is,
(39) | ||||
where we used the Proposition 2.1, Proposition 2.3, and Sobolev embedding on . Combining (38) and (39), one deduces that
Also, for all , one has
where . Thus, if , there exists a unique global solution to the problem (1). When , due to
there exist positive constants , such that we have a unique solution on with satisfying
that is,
5. Proofs of Theorem 1.5 and Remark 1.6
In this section, , , and stand for , , and .
5.1. Proof of Theorem 1.5
Recall Proposition 2.4 and . For a radial function , there exists a constant such that
Thus, following the proof of Proposition 3.1, we have, for ,
where
and . Once again, let be the solution to the following Dirichlet-wave equation
where
and is a cut-off function such that in some neighborhood of . Then, there exists a constant such that
As long as is small enough, the iteration sequence, , , will converge to the unique radial solution to the problem (10).
We should select and such that
(40) |
If , there exists a unique radial global solution to the problem (10), as long as fulfills
When , we choose satisfying
Recall that
This time, we have
and
Denote
Notice that is decreasing and , we can take such that
Further require that
and then . Thus, it follows that
Then, to fulfill the requirement (40), we choose to be
and then there exists a unique radial solution on .
5.2. Proof of Remark 1.6
6. Proof of Theorem 1.8
Due to the finite speed of propagation, the semilinear wave equation (1) can be localized. Since, for the problem posed on , blow-up can be showed by constructing an integral near the wave front and derive an ordinary differential inequality, we can use this argument to deduce the blow-up result and provide the upper bound estimates of the lifespan. This argument appears in many former works, e.g., [10, 21, 1].
Proof of Theorem 1.8.
According Theorem 1.5 and Theorem 1.4, for sufficiently small , the lifespan of the problem (12) has the lower bound (11) or (8) with replacing the in . For each , the solution is radial, hence is radial and continuous, and on . By finite speed of propagation, we deduce that for all , ; see the argument in [15, Lemma 2.11].
Let a linear operator be
The operator is defined for all admissible functions. Therefore, is the weak solution to
Noticing that is continuous, we can use d’Alembert’s formula and obtain that, for
which implies ; see the argument and details in [14, Section 4]. Let . Recall that . It follows that, for ,
(42) |
where . Noting that on , we obtain that
and, by Jensen’s inequality and the convexity of ,
(43) | ||||
Combining (42) and (43), we have
where . Following the argument in [1, Subsection 3.2], we deduce that
(44) |
with
Since (44) is valid for any , we obtain the sharp upper bound estimates for the lifespan . ∎
7. Appendix: Regularity in Proposition 2.5
When , the result is standard by dense argument for . Hereby, the obstacle will be non-empty.
Once we obtain the solution to (7), the derivatives of exist in the distributional sense, belonging to . In this appendix, we give the proof for the regularity result of first-order local energy estimates. For higher order estimates, one can use induction to verify the results.
Proposition 7.1.
Let , with , and fulfill the compatibility condition of order . Then, , , and , .
Proof.
Let and , . Recall that , . Then, we have
(45) | ||||
Fix a function with on and on . We denote , and denote
Due to the continuity, it follows that
(46) | ||||
where . Hence,
(47) | ||||
By and , , we have
(48) |
Noticing that and the continuity of and , we obtain that
(49) | ||||
Since , the measure of the support of is of the size and
Hence, by for ,
(50) |
uniformly in . Combining (45), (46), (47), (48), (49), and (50), we obtain that
(51) | ||||
Next, we replace in (51) by and find that
Using the limitation argument above, by and , one has
According to the compatibility condition, and , there exists a solution , to the equation
which implies
Therefore, for all ,
(52) |
As long as for any we can find a such that , it can be deduce by (52) that . Because has compact support, we can choose and such that and . Consider the backward Dirichlet-wave equation on
(53) |
Since we have assumed that the obstacle is smooth, the problem (53) has a solution . By finite speed of propagation, we deduce that near time and , . Hence, let
which satisfies the requirement .
Having , , we can estimate . For any smooth cut-off function of , . As , , and , it follows that by Poincaré inequalities and Sobolev embedding
and, then
Since and with and , one has and any bounded part of belongs to . On the other hand, implies
and on the set
Thus, we deduce that and . Further, by elliptic estimates, . Meanwhile, modifying by and by Newton-Leibniz formula, one obtain that , hence .
Once again, using the above argument, we have
Thus, the inhomogeneous term satisfies
which demonstrates that and . In conclusion, we have and
Acknowledgments
The author was supported by China Scholarship Council (No. 202406320284). The author thanks Professor Chengbo Wang (School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University) and Doctor Xiaoran Zhang (Beijing Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Applications) for some discussions in the preparation of the paper.
References
- [1] Wenhui Chen and Alessandro Palmieri. On the threshold nature of the dini continuity for a glassey derivative-type nonlinearity in a critical semilinear wave equation. arXiv:2306.11478v4 [math.AP].
- [2] Daoyuan Fang and Chengbo Wang. Almost global existence for some semilinear wave equations with almost critical regularity. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 38(9):1467–1491, 2013.
- [3] Robert T. Glassey. Mathreview to “global behavior of solutions to nonlinear wave equations in three dimensions” of sideris. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 1983.
- [4] Kunio Hidano and Kimitoshi Tsutaya. Global existence and asymptotic behavior of solutions for nonlinear wave equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 44(4):1273–1305, 1995.
- [5] Kunio Hidano, Chengbo Wang, and Kazuyoshi Yokoyama. The Glassey conjecture with radially symmetric data. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 98(5):518–541, 2012.
- [6] Kunio Hidano, Chengbo Wang, and Kazuyoshi Yokoyama. Combined effects of two nonlinearities in lifespan of small solutions to semi-linear wave equations. Math. Ann., 366(1-2):667–694, 2016.
- [7] F. John and S. Klainerman. Almost global existence to nonlinear wave equations in three space dimensions. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 37(4):443–455, 1984.
- [8] Shunsuke Kitamura, Katsuaki Morisawa, and Hiroyuki Takamura. Semilinear wave equations of derivative type with spatial weights in one space dimension. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 72:Paper No. 103764, 12, 2023.
- [9] Tatsien Li and Yi Zhou. Nonlinear wave equations. Vol. 2, volume 2 of Series in Contemporary Mathematics. Shanghai Science and Technical Publishers, Shanghai; Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2017. Translated from the Chinese by Yachun Li.
- [10] M. A. Rammaha. Finite-time blow-up for nonlinear wave equations in high dimensions. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 12(6):677–700, 1987.
- [11] M. A. Rammaha. Upper bounds for the life span of solutions to systems of nonlinear wave equations in two and three space dimensions. Nonlinear Anal., 25(6):639–654, 1995.
- [12] Takiko Sasaki, Shu Takamatsu, and Hiroyuki Takamura. The lifespan of classical solutions of one dimensional wave equations with semilinear terms of the spatial derivative. AIMS Math., 8(11):25477–25486, 2023.
- [13] Jack Schaeffer. Finite-time blow-up for in two dimensions. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 11(5):513–543, 1986.
- [14] Kerun Shao, Hiroyuki Takamura, and Chengbo Wang. Blow-up of solutions to semilinear wave equations with spatial derivatives. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 45(2):410–424, 2025.
- [15] Kerun Shao and Chengbo Wang. Global solutions with small initial data to semilinear wave equations with energy supercritical powers. Preprint, 2023, arXiv:2211.01594v2 [math.AP].
- [16] Thomas C. Sideris. Global behavior of solutions to nonlinear wave equations in three dimensions. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, (12):1291–1323, 1983.
- [17] Christopher D. Sogge. Lectures on non-linear wave equations. International Press, Boston, MA, second edition, 2008.
- [18] Nickolay Tzvetkov. Existence of global solutions to nonlinear massless Dirac system and wave equation with small data. Tsukuba J. Math., 22(1):193–211, 1998.
- [19] Chengbo Wang. The Glassey conjecture for nontrapping obstacles. J. Differential Equations, 259(2):510–530, 2015.
- [20] Chengbo Wang. The Glassey conjecture on asymptotically flat manifolds. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 367(10):7429–7451, 2015.
- [21] Yi Zhou. Blow up of solutions to the Cauchy problem for nonlinear wave equations. Chinese Ann. Math. Ser. B, 22(3):275–280, 2001.