This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

\UseRawInputEncoding

Correlation-enhanced spin-orbit coupling and quantum anomalous Hall insulator with large band gap and stable ferromagnetism in monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}

San-Dong Guo1, Yu-Tong Zhu1 and Bang-Gui Liu2,3 1School of Electronic Engineering, Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications, Xi’an 710121, China 2 Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China 3School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China
Abstract

Nontrivial band topology combined with magnetic ordering can produce quantum anomalous Hall insulator (QAHI), which may lead to advances in device concepts. Here, through first-principles calculations, stable monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is predicted as a room-temperature large-gap high-Chern-number QAHI by using generalized gradient approximation plus UU (GGA+UU) approach. The large gap is due to correlation-enhanced spin-orbit coupling (SOC) effect of Fe atoms, which equates with artificially increasing the strength of SOC without electronic correlation. Out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy is very key to produce quantum anomalous Hall (QAH) state because in-plane magneitization will destroy nontrivial band topology. In the absence of SOC, Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is a half Dirac semimetal state protected by mirror symmetry, and the electronic correlation along with SOC effect creates QAH state with a sizable gap and two chiral edge modes. It is found that the QAH state is robust against biaxial strain (a/a0a/a_{0}: 0.96 to 1.04) in monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} with stable ferromagnetic (FM) ordering and out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy. Calculated results show that Curie temperature is sensitive to correlation strength and strain. The reduced correlation and compressive strain are in favour of high Curie temperature. These analysis and results can be readily extended to other monolayer Fe2XY\mathrm{Fe_{2}XY} (X/Y=Cl, Br and I), which possesses the same Fe-dominated low-energy states with a Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} monolayer. These findings open new opportunities to design new high-temperature topological quantum devices.

Correlation, Spin-orbit coupling, Magnetic ordering, Band topology

I Introduction

The quantum anomalous Hall effect (QAHE) is characterized by the nonzero Chern numbers with the quantized Hall conductanceh0 , which can be used to design low-power-consumption spintronic devices due to the existence of dissipationless chiral edge states under zero magnetic field. The QAH state also provides a fertile playground to explore topological magnetoelectric effects, Majorana fermions and quantum computationh1 ; h2 ; h3 . However, the experimental observation of QAHE is rare, and its ultralow working temperature limits exploring these emergent quantum physics and promising applications. The QAHE is firstly observed in Cr-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3\mathrm{(Bi,Sb)_{2}Te_{3}} thin films at a very low temperature of 30 mKh4 . In quick succession, the QAHE is realized in V-doped and Cr-and-V co-doped (Bi,Sb)2Te3\mathrm{(Bi,Sb)_{2}Te_{3}} thin film at about 25 and 300 mKh5 ; h6 . Recently, the intrinsic QAHE has been observed in the van der Waals (vdW) layered material MnBi2Te4\mathrm{MnBi_{2}Te_{4}}h7 ; h8 , and a high-Chern-number QAHE has also been obtained in a 10-layer MnBi2Te4\mathrm{MnBi_{2}Te_{4}} device at about 13 Kh9 . So, seeking high-temperature QAHI with large gap is a compelling problem of condensed matter physics and materials science.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) The crystal structure of monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}: (a) top view and (b) side view. The primitive cell is marked by black frame.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) For monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the energy difference between AFM and FM (Top), lattice constants (Middle) and MAE (Bottom) as a function of UU.

However, searching for high-temperature QAHI with large nontrivial band gap is challenged. The ferromagnetism prefers metallic systems composed of light 3dd elements, while topological insulator (TI) favors heavy elements for achieving strong SOC effects. Recently, a robust QAHI Fe2I2\mathrm{Fe_{2}I_{2}} monolayer with centrosymmetry is predicted with a large nontrivial band gap of 301 meV and a high Curie temperature of about 400 Kfe . In Li2Fe2X2\mathrm{Li_{2}Fe_{2}X_{2}} (X=S, Se and Te) monolayers (Lithium-decorated iron-based superconductor monolayer materials), the high-temperature large-gap QAHIs are also achievedfe1 . To realize the combination of piezoelectricity with topological properties, monolayer Fe2IX\mathrm{Fe_{2}IX} (X=Cl and Br), FeI1xBrx\mathrm{FeI_{1-x}Br_{x}} (x=0.25 and 0.75) and Li2Fe2SSe\mathrm{Li_{2}Fe_{2}SSe} are predictedfe2 ; fe3 ; fe4 , namely two-dimensional (2D) piezoelectric quantum anomalous Hall insulator (PQAHI), which provides possibility to use piezotronic effect to control QAHE. All these 2D materials share the same Fe layer structure and Fe-dominated low-energy states, and they all are room-temperature large-gap high-Chern-number QAHIs. The SOC is generally considered to be appreciable only in heavy elements, and the SOC effect should be very small in light Fe element. However, these 2D materials are predicted to large-gap QAHIs. In ref.fe1 , a large QAH gap is attributed to the enlarged effective SOC strength of dd orbitals by bonding with heavy elements, and then the SOC effects are significantly enhanced near Dirac cones.

To clarify this question, we take monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} as a concrete example to study the correlation effects on effective SOC strength. Why do we choose monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}? Firstly, monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} has not been studied in detail, including its stability and electronic structures. Secondly, for Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the Fe elements bond with relatively light elements Br compared to I elements in Fe2I2\mathrm{Fe_{2}I_{2}}, and it has a simpler structure than Li2Fe2S2\mathrm{Li_{2}Fe_{2}S_{2}}. In this work, it is found that the correlation-enhanced SOC effect of Fe atoms induces large nontrivial band gap in monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, and the effective enlarged SOC strength of Fe-3dd orbitals is not due to bonding with heavy elements Br. Calculated results show out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy is necessary to produce QAH state. So, the magnetic anisotropy direction must be determined to achieve QAHE in these 2D materials. Taking classic UU=2.5 eVfe ; fe5 as an example, Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is proved to be dynamically, mechanically and thermally stable. The high Chern number (C=2) is firmly confirmed by Berry curvatures and chiral edge states. In Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the QAH state, FM ordering and out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy are robust against biaxial strain. It is found that reduced correlation and compressive strain make for high Curie temperature. Our works provide basis for understanding large nontrivial band gap in monolayer Fe2XY\mathrm{Fe_{2}XY} (X/Y=Cl, Br and I) and Li2Fe2XY\mathrm{Li_{2}Fe_{2}XY} (X/Y=S, Se and Te).

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, we shall give our computational details and methods. In the next few sections, we shall present electronic correlation effects on electronic structures along with the case at UU=2.5 eV, strain influence on topological properties, and Curie temperatures of monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. Finally, we shall give our discussion and conclusion.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) For monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the gaps as a function of UU using GGA+SOC.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color online)For monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the energy band structures without SOC (Top) and with SOC (Bottom) as a function of UU. The red (blue) lines represent the band structure in the spin-up (spin-down) direction without SOC.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: (Color online) The energy band structures of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} with enhanced SOC strength to 400% and 800% at UU=0.00 eV.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: (Color online) Topological edge states of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} calculated along the (100) direction at UU=0.50 eV and UU=3.50 eV.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: (Color online) For monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the energy band structures: (a) full SOC with out-of-plane magnetization; (b)full SOC with in-plane magnetization; (c) only considering SOC of Fe with out-of-plane magnetization; (d) only considering SOC of Br with out-of-plane magnetization.

II Computational detail

Within density functional theory (DFT)1 , the first-principles calculations are performed by using the Vienna ab initio simulation package (VASP)pv1 ; pv2 ; pv3 with plane-wave basis set. The projector augmented wave (PAW) method is adopted in conjugation with a GGA of Perdew, Burke and Ernzerhof (PBE-GGA) as exchange-correlation functionalpbe . A plane-wave cutoff of 500 eV is used to perform geometric optimization and electronic properties calculations of monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. The energy convergence criterion is set for 10810^{-8} eV, and the residual force is less than 0.0001 eV.Å1\mathrm{eV.{\AA}^{-1}}. The Brillouin zone (BZ) integration is carried out with 18×\times18×\times1 k-point sampling. To avoid interactions between two neighboring images, the vacuum region along the zz direction is set to be larger than 16 Å\mathrm{{\AA}}. The electronic correlation of Fe atoms is considered within the GGA+UU scheme by the rotationally invariant approach proposed by Dudarev et alu . The SOC is included self-consistently in the calculations to investigate magnetic anisotropy and topological properties.

The elastic stiffness tensor CijC_{ij} is calculated by using strain-stress relationship (SSR) with GGA, and the 2D elastic coefficients Cij2DC^{2D}_{ij} have been renormalized by Cij2DC^{2D}_{ij}=LzL_{z}Cij3DC^{3D}_{ij} with LzL_{z} being the length of unit cell along zz direction. For phonon spectrum calculation, the Phonopy codepv5 is used within finite displacement method. The interatomic force constants (IFCs) with a 5×\times5×\times1 supercell are calculated to attain phonon dispersions. For ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulation, the calculation is carried out with a 4×\times4×\times1 supercell for more than 8000 fs with a time step of 1 fs by using canonical ensemble. WannierTools code is used to perform surface state and Berry curvature calculations, based on the tight-binding Hamiltonians constructed from maximally localized Wannier functions by Wannier90 codew1 ; w2 . The Curie temperature is estimated by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation with a 40×\times40 supercell and 10710^{7} loops, as implemented in Mcsolver codemc .

III Electronic correlation effects

As shown in Figure 1, the unit cell of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} contains four atoms with two co-planar Fe atoms being sandwiched between two layers of Br atoms. The Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} possesses P4/nmmP4/nmm space group (No. 129) with centrosymmetry. The key space-group symmetry operations of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} include space inversion PP, C4C_{4} rotation, MxM_{x} (MyM_{y}) mirror and glide mirror Gz={Mz|12,12,0}G_{z}=\{M_{z}|\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2},0\}, which is different from monolayer Fe2IBr\mathrm{Fe_{2}IBr} with missing PP and glide mirror GzG_{z}fe2 . So, monolayer Fe2IBr\mathrm{Fe_{2}IBr} possesses piezoelectricity, but Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is not piezoelectric. it is noteworthy that magnetic orientation can influence these symmetries within SOC.

In the presence of the electron correlation, the SOC effect of 3dd systems with special orbital symmetry and electron occupation is found to be more prominenth10 ; h11 ; h12 ; h13 . Here, we optimize lattice constants aa with varied UU (0-4 eV), and then determine magnetic ground state. The energy differences between antiferromagnetic (AFM) and FM ordering vs UU are plotted in Figure 2. With increasing UU, the ground state of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} changes from FM ordering to AFM one, and the critical UU value is about 3.75 eV. It is found that increasing UU weakens FM interaction, giving rise to important influence on Curie temperature of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. The aa as a function of UU with FM ground state is shown in Figure 2, and aa increases with increasing UU. Similar result can be found in FeClF monolayerh12 . The different magnetic orientation can affect the symmetry of 2D systems, and then produce important influence on their valley and topological propertiesh10 ; h12 . The magnetic anisotropy can be described by magnetic anisotropy energy (MAE), which plays a very important role to determine thermal stability of magnetic ordering. The MAE can be calculated by EMAEE_{MAE} = ExE_{x}-EzE_{z}, where Ex/zE_{x/z} is the energy per Fe atom when the magnetization is along the x/zx/z direction. In Figure 2, we plot MAE as a function of UU, which favors an out-of-plane FM state in considered UU range. The out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy plays a crucial role to produce QAH state, as we shall see in a while. It is found that increasing UU makes for out-of-plane one. This is different from one of FeClF monolayerh12 , where increasing UU changes its magnetic anisotropy from out-of-plane to in-plane.

Next, we prove that electron correlation can dramatically enhance the SOC effect in Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} monolayer. The energy band structures with varied UU are calculated by using GGA and GGA+SOC. The GGA+SOC gaps as a function of UU are shown in Figure 3, and both GGA and GGA+SOC energy bands at representative UU values are plotted in Figure 4. Ignoring electron correlation by setting UU=0.00 eV, the SOC induce a very small splitting along Γ\Gamma-X line near the Fermi level. However, a metallic state is produced, because both conduction and valence bands slightly cross the Fermi level. Once the correlation effect is included self-consistently, the SOC-induced gap is enhanced dramatically, reaching 305 meV (UU=3.5 eV). To further confirm correlation-enhanced SOC, we artificially increase the strength of SOC, and realize a large energy gap in Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} without electron correlation (UU=0.00 eV). The SOC strength is improved to 400%/800% of the normal one, and the corresponding energy bands are plotted in Figure 5. It is clearly seen that a gap of 47/146 meV is induced with enhanced SOC strength to 400%/800%. The gap with enhanced SOC strength to 800% at UU=0.00 eV is close to one (166 meV) with the normal SOC strength at UU=2.5 eV. These show that correlation indeed can trigger enhanced SOC effect, and then produce large-gap QAHI.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: (Color online)For monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, topological edge states (a,c) and distribution of Berry curvature (b,d) at UU=2.50 eV with out-of-plane (a.b) and in-plane (c,d) magnetization.

Within GGA, in small UU range, distorted Dirac cones can be observed with the valence and conduction energy bands of the minority-spin touching the Fermi level. With increasing UU, there are Dirac cones with linear band dispersion, for example UU=2.50 eV. For Dirac states, the presence of SOC triggers gap opening at the touching points, which means that Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} should be a QAHI. By checking the chiral edge modes (see Figure 6), we therefore confirm that monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is a potential QAHI in considered UU range. It is clearly seen that two chiral edge states does exist, which connect the conduction bands and valence bands. This means that the Chern number of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is equal to two (CC=2). The UU dependence of electronic structures in Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is different from those in monolayer VSi2P4\mathrm{VSi_{2}P_{4}}, FeCl2\mathrm{FeCl_{2}} and FeClFh10 ; h11 ; h12 , and they undergo a rich topological phase transition with QAH phase only existing in certain UU range.

IV The case at UU=2.5 eV

We adopt typical UU=2.5 eVfe ; fe5 as a concrete example to detailedly investigate the physical properties of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. To confirm the stability of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, phonon dispersion, AIMD simulation and elastic constants CijC_{ij} are calculated by using GGA. As shown in FIG.1 of electronic supplementary information (ESI), the phonon spectra of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} shows no imaginary frequency, indicating its dynamical stability. By AIMD simulation, the temperature and total energy fluctuations of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} as a function of simulation time along with final structures after 8 ps are plotted in FIG.2 of ESI at 300 K. Neither structure reconstruction nor bond breaking with small temperature and total energy fluctuations confirm its thermodynamical stability at room temperature. We use elastic constants to prove mechanical stability of monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. Using Voigt notation, the 2D elastic tensor with space group P4/nmmP4/nmm can be expressed as:

C=(C11C120C12C11000C66)C=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}C_{11}&C_{12}&0\\ C_{12}&C_{11}&0\\ 0&0&C_{66}\\ \end{array}\right) (1)

The three independent elastic constants C11C_{11}, C12C_{12} and C66C_{66} are 48.69 Nm1\mathrm{Nm^{-1}}, 22.78 Nm1\mathrm{Nm^{-1}} and 29.01 Nm1\mathrm{Nm^{-1}}, which satisfy the Born criteria of mechanical stability: C11>0C_{11}>0, C66>0C_{66}>0, C11C12>0C_{11}-C_{12}>0, confirming its mechanical stability.

Due to P4/nmmP4/nmm symmetry, Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is mechanically anisotropic. The direction-dependent in-plane Young’s moduli C2D(θ)C_{2D}(\theta) and Poisson’s ratios ν2D(θ)\nu_{2D}(\theta) can be attained from the calculated CijC_{ij} by using these expressionsela ; ela1 :

C2D(θ)=C11C22C122C11m4+C22n4+(B2C12)m2n2C_{2D}(\theta)=\frac{C_{11}C_{22}-C_{12}^{2}}{C_{11}m^{4}+C_{22}n^{4}+(B-2C_{12})m^{2}n^{2}} (2)
ν2D(θ)=(C11+C22B)m2n2C12(m4+n4)C11m4+C22n4+(B2C12)m2n2\nu_{2D}(\theta)=\frac{(C_{11}+C_{22}-B)m^{2}n^{2}-C_{12}(m^{4}+n^{4})}{C_{11}m^{4}+C_{22}n^{4}+(B-2C_{12})m^{2}n^{2}} (3)

in which m=sin(θ)m=sin(\theta), n=cos(θ)n=cos(\theta) and B=(C11C22C122)/C66B=(C_{11}C_{22}-C_{12}^{2})/C_{66}. The θ\theta is the angle of the direction with the xx direction as 00^{\circ} and yy direction as 9090^{\circ}. The direction-dependent Young’s moduli C2D(θ)C_{2D}(\theta) and Poisson’s ratios ν2D(θ)\nu_{2D}(\theta) are plotted in FIG.3 of ESI. Due to cubic symmetry, we only consider the angle range from 00^{\circ} to 4545^{\circ}. For Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the softest/hardest direction is along the (100)/(110) direction with Young s moduli of 38.03 Nm1\mathrm{Nm^{-1}}/64.04 Nm1\mathrm{Nm^{-1}}. The maximum value of C2DC_{2D} is less than that of graphene (340 Nm1\mathrm{Nm^{-1}})gra , indicating its extraordinary flexibilities. This provides possibility to use strain to tune physical properties of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. The minima/maxima of ν2D(θ)\nu_{2D}(\theta) is 0.104/0.468 along the (110)/(100) direction.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: (Color online)For monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the energy difference between AFM and FM (Top) and MAE (Bottom) as a function of a/a0a/a_{0} at UU=2.50 eV.

Without SOC, Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is a 2D half Dirac semimetal state with a large-gap insulator for spin up and a gapless Dirac semimetal for spin down. The band crossings are protected by MyM_{y} (MxM_{x}), forbidding dz2d_{z^{2}} and dxyd_{xy} to hybridize (see FIG.4 of ESI). In contrast to typical Dirac cones in graphene, there are four Dirac cones in 2D BZ due to C4C_{4} symmetry. Within SOC, the Dirac gap of of 166 meV can be produced. These similar results can be found in Fe2I2\mathrm{Fe_{2}I_{2}}, Fe2IX\mathrm{Fe_{2}IX} (X=Cl and Br), FeI1xBrx\mathrm{FeI_{1-x}Br_{x}} (x=0.25 and 0.75), Li2Fe2X2\mathrm{Li_{2}Fe_{2}X_{2}} (X=S, Se and Te) and Li2Fe2SSe\mathrm{Li_{2}Fe_{2}SSe}fe ; fe1 ; fe2 ; fe3 ; fe4 . The magnetic anisotropy direction is very important to determine the topological properties of some 2D systems. For example, for monolayer VSi2P4\mathrm{VSi_{2}P_{4}}, FeCl2\mathrm{FeCl_{2}} and FeClFh10 ; h11 ; h12 , the QAH states can exist at proper UU range with out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy, and no special QAH states appear with in-plane case. The energy band structures with out-of-plane and in-plane magnetizations by using GGA+SOC are plotted in Figure 7. By varying the magnetization orientation from zz to xx, the band gap decreases down to very small value (Strictly, the gap should be zero.). The topological edge states with out-of-plane and in-plane magnetizations are calculated, as shown in Figure 8. For in-plane case, no non-trivial chiral edge modes appear within the bulk gap of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, meaning its Chern number CC=0.

To corroborate this finding, the Chern number is recalculated by integrating the Berry curvature (Ωz(k)\Omega_{z}(k)) of the occupied bands:

C=12πBZd2kΩz(k)C=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{BZ}d^{2}k\Omega_{z}(k) (4)
Ωz(k)=k×iμn,k|kμn,k\Omega_{z}(k)=\nabla_{k}\times i\langle\mu_{n,k}|\nabla_{k}\mu_{n,k}\rangle (5)

in which μn,k\mu_{n,k} is the lattice periodic part of the Bloch wave functions. The distributions of Berry curvature in 2D BZ with out-of-plane and in-plane magnetization are plotted in Figure 8. For out-of-plane magnetization, the hot spots in the Berry curvature are around four gapped Dirac cone, which have the same signs. A quantized Berry phase of π\pi for each gapped Dirac cone can be attained, and the total Berry phase of 4π\pi due to four Dirac cones means a high Chern number CC=2. For in-plane magnetization, there are four main hot spots in the Berry curvature along four Γ\Gamma-M lines, and two of then have the opposite signs with the other two, giving rise to disappeared Chern number.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: (Color online)For monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, the gaps as a function of a/a0a/a_{0} at UU=2.50 eV.
Refer to caption
Figure 11: (Color online)For Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} monolayer, the normalized magnetic moment (S) and auto-correlation as a function of temperature with UU==1.50 eV (a), 2.50 eV (b) and a/a0a/a_{0}=0.96 (c), 1.04 (d) at UU==2.50 eV.

For Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, a large QAH gap is not because the effective SOC strength of dd orbitals is enlarged by bonding with heavy elements Br, and is because the electron correlation improves the SOC effect. To illustrate this, the energy band structures with only considering SOC of Fe/Br with out-of-plane magnetization are plotted in Figure 7. For only considering SOC of Fe, the gap is 140 meV, which is very close to 166 meV with full SOC. However, the gap of 35 meV is attained with only considering SOC of Br, which is about one-fifth of one with full SOC. So, the large gap is mainly from the SOC effects of Fe combined with electronic correlation.

To explain the key role of SOC of Fe, the atom- and Fe-3dd-orbital-resolved band structures of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} are plotted in FIG.4 of ESI by using GGA+SOC. It is found that the Fe-dd derived states contribute mainly to the gapped Dirac states near the Fermi level, which leads to importance of SOC of Fe to induce QAH gap. Without SOC, the two crossed spin-down bands (see Figure 4) near the Fermi level are mainly contributed by dz2d_{z^{2}} and dxyd_{xy} orbitals of Fe, and their band order is inverted between Γ\Gamma and X. When considering SOC, a Dirac gap is produced. Topological edge states of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} monolayer with only considering SOC of Fe/Br are plotted in FIG.5 of ESI. Two chiral gapless edge modes appear within the bulk gap for only considering SOC of both Fe and Br, indicating QAH properties.

V Strain effects

Strain can modify the distance between atoms, and then can tune kinetic and interaction energies of electrons, which can induce topological transitionv6 ; v7 ; v8 . The biaxial strain effects on QAH robustness of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} are investigated, and a/a0a/a_{0} (0.96-1.04) is used to simulate the biaxial strain with aa/a0a_{0} being the strained/unstrained lattice constants. The a/a0a/a_{0}<<1/>>1 means compressive/tensile strain. Based on energy difference between AFM and FM (see Figure 9), the ground state of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is FM ordering in considered strain range. It is found that compressive strain can enhance FM interaction, and tensile strain can weaken one, which will produce important effects on Curie temperature of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. Based on previous research results, the magnetic orientation is very key to induce QAH state, and the MAE as a function of a/a0a/a_{0} is plotted in Figure 9. In considered strain range, the out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy is robust against strain, which confirms possible existence of QAH state.

The GGA+SOC energy band structures of Fe2IBr\mathrm{Fe_{2}IBr} vs a/a0a/a_{0} are plotted in FIG.6 of ESI, which show that they are all FM semiconductors. The gaps as a function of strain are shown in Figure 10, which shows a nonmonotonic behavior with a/a0a/a_{0} from 0.96 to 1.04. With increasing a/a0a/a_{0}, the gap firstly increases, and then decreases, which is due to the change of conduction band bottom from one point along Γ\Gamma-X to Γ\Gamma point. The topological edge states of strained monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} are calculated, and two chiral topologically protected gapless edge states emerge at representative 0.94 and 1.06 strains (see FIG.7 of ESI), giving Chern number C=2. These prove that the QAH state of monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is robust against strain. Unlike Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, strain can induce a series of phase transitions from ferrovalley (FV) insulator to half-valley metal (HVM) to QAHI in these 2D materialsv6 ; v7 ; v8 , for example VSi2N4\mathrm{VSi_{2}N_{4}}.

VI Curie temperature

Based on the previous discussion, both electronic correlation and strain can effectively tune FM interaction of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, which means that they can affect observably its Curie temperature (TCT_{C}). The MC simulations are performed to estimate TCT_{C} of monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} based on spin Heisenberg model, whose Hamiltonian can be expressed as:

H=Ji,jSiSjAi(Siz)2H=-J\sum_{i,j}S_{i}\cdot S_{j}-A\sum_{i}(S_{i}^{z})^{2} (6)

where SiS_{i}/SjS_{j}, SizS_{i}^{z}, JJ and AA are the spin vector of each Fe atom, spin component parallel to the zz direction, nearest neighbor exchange parameter and MAE.

Based on the energy difference between AFM and FM, the normalized magnetic coupling parameters (|S||S| = 1) can be attained as JJ=(EAFME_{AFM}-EFME_{FM})/8. At representative correlation strength (UU=1.5 eV and 2.5 eV) and strain (a/a0a/a_{0}=0.96 and 1.04), the calculated JJ values are 110.2 meV, 62.8 meV, 87.7 meV and 37.8 meV, respectively. We plot the normalized magnetic moment and auto-correlation as a function of temperature in Figure 11. The estimated TCT_{C} is about 830/471 K for UU==1.5/2.5 eV, and 663/287 K for a/a0a/a_{0}==0.96/1.04. So, both electronic correlation and strain have important influence on TCT_{C} of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}. It is found that the reduced correlation strength and compressive strain can improve TCT_{C}. At typical UU=2.5 eV, the predicted TCT_{C} is significantly higher than that of previously reported many 2D FM semiconductors (20-160 K)m7-6 ; tc1 ; tc2 . These indicate that Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} should be a room-temperature QAHI.

VII Discussion and Conclusion

Electronic correlations have significant effects on physical properties of materials with localized dd electrons, especially for low-dimensional systems. For example monolayer VSi2P4\mathrm{VSi_{2}P_{4}}, FeCl2\mathrm{FeCl_{2}} and FeClFh10 ; h11 ; h12 , different correlation strengths can drive these systems into various types of interesting ground states, such as FV, HVM and QAH states. The correlation strength can also tune magnetic anisotropy of these 2D materials. For monolayer VSi2P4\mathrm{VSi_{2}P_{4}}, several transitions in the magnetic anisotropy can be observed with varied UUh10 . The out-of-plane FM ordering allows a nonvanishing Chern number of these 2D systemsh10 ; h12 , which is different from in-plane FM situation. Here, the correlation can be used to induce enhanced SOC effect of Fe atoms in Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, which can produce large-gap QAHI with out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy. In fact, amplifying the SOC effect in light elements can be achieved by the interplay between particular crystal symmetry and electron correlation, which contains certain partially occupied orbital multipletsh13 . In a word, our works emphasize the importance of electronic correlation and magnetic anisotropy to determine the electronic state of Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}.

In summary, the intriguing large-gap of QAHI Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is explained by the reliable first-principle calculations, which is due to correlation-enhanced SOC effects of Fe element. The Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} exhibits excellent dynamic, mechanical and thermal stabilities, and can realize room-temperature high-Chern-number (CC=2) QAHE. At representative UU=2.5 eVfe ; fe5 , the band gap of 166 meV and TCT_{C} of about 471 K are obtained, respectively. The emergence of QAH states in monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}} is robust against strain. The TCT_{C} can be enhanced to 663 K at 0.96 compressive strain, and the band gap remains at about 92 meV. At 1.04 tensile strain, the TCT_{C} of 287 is still close to room temperature, and the gap is about 152 meV. Our works provide a comprehensive understanding of correlation effects on large nontrivial band gap in monolayer Fe2Br2\mathrm{Fe_{2}Br_{2}}, which can be readily extended to other monolayer Fe2XY\mathrm{Fe_{2}XY} (X/Y=Cl, Br and I). These results are also helpful to deepen our understanding of large-gap QAHI in light-element materials.

Acknowledgements.
This work is supported by Natural Science Basis Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2021JM-456), the Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No.11974393) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB33020100). We are grateful to the Advanced Analysis and Computation Center of China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT) for the award of CPU hours and WIEN2k/VASP software to accomplish this work.

References

  • (1) F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988).
  • (2) F. D. M. Haldane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 040502 (2017).
  • (3) M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
  • (4) X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
  • (5) C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y. Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y. Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y. Wang et al., Science 340, 167 (2013).
  • (6) C.-Z. Chang, W. Zhao, D. Y. Kim, H. Zhang, B. A. Assaf, D. Heiman, S.-C. Zhang, C. Liu, M. H. W. Chan, and J. S. Moodera, Nat. Mater. 14, 473 (2015).
  • (7) Y. Ou, C. Liu, G. Jiang, Y. Feng, D. Zhao, W. Wu, X.-X. Wang, W. Li, C. Song, L.-L. Wang, W. Wang, W. Wu, Y. Wang, K. He, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Adv. Mater. 30, 1703062 (2017).
  • (8) Y. Deng, Y. Yu, M. Z. Shi, Z. Guo, Z. Xu, J. Wang, X. H. Chen, and Y. Zhang, Science 367, 895 (2020).
  • (9) C. Liu, Y. Wang, H. Li, Y. Wu, Y. Li, J. Li, K. He, Y. Xu, J. Zhang, and Y. Wang, Nat. Mater. 19, 522 (2020).
  • (10) J. Ge, Y. Liu, J. Li, H. Li, T. Luo, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, and J. Wang, Natl. Sci. Rev. 7, 1280 (2020).
  • (11) Q. L. Sun, Y. D. Ma and N. Kioussis, Mater. Horiz. 7, 2071 (2020).
  • (12) Y. Li, J. H. Li, Y. Li, M. Ye, F. W. Zheng, Z. T. Zhang, J. H. Fu, W. H. Duan and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 086401 (2020).
  • (13) S. D. Guo, W. Q. Mu, X. B. Xiao and B. G. Liu, Nanoscale 13, 12956 (2021).
  • (14) S. D. Guo, W. Q. Mu, X. B. Xiao and B. G. Liu, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 25994 (2021).
  • (15) S. D. Guo, W. Q. Mu, M. Y. Yin, Y. C. Li and W. C. Ren, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 54, 505006 (2021).
  • (16) J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003).
  • (17) P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964); W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
  • (18) G. Kresse, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 193, 222 (1995).
  • (19) G. Kresse and J. Furthmu¨\ddot{u}ller, Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
  • (20) G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).
  • (21) J. P. Perdew, K. Burke and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
  • (22) S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys and A. P. Sutton, Phys. Rev. B 57, 1505 (1998).
  • (23) A. Togo, F. Oba, and I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134106 (2008).
  • (24) Q. Wu, S. Zhang, H. F. Song, M. Troyer and A. A. Soluyanov, Comput. Phys. Commun. 224, 405 (2018).
  • (25) A. A. Mostofia, J. R. Yatesb, G. Pizzif, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souzad, D. Vanderbilte and N. Marzarif, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2309 (2014).
  • (26) L. Liu, X. Ren, J. H. Xie, B. Cheng, W. K. Liu, T. Y. An, H. W. Qin and J. F. Hu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 480, 300 (2019).
  • (27) S. Li, Q. Q. Wang, C. M. Zhang, P. Guo and S. A. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085149 (2021).
  • (28) H. Hu, W. Y. Tong, Y. H. Shen, X. Wan, and C. G. Duan, npj Comput. Mater. 6, 129 (2020).
  • (29) S. D. Guo, J. X. Zhu, M. Y. Yin and B. G. Liu, arXiv:2111.07110 (2021).
  • (30) J. Y. Li, Q. S. Yao, L. Wu, Z. X. Hu, B. Y. Gao, X. G. Wan and Q. H. Liu, arXiv:2107.06691 (2021).
  • (31) E. Cadelano and L. Colombo, Phys. Rev. B 85, 245434 (2012).
  • (32) E. Cadelano, P. L. Palla, S. Giordano, and L. Colombo, Phys. Rev. B 82, 235414 (2010).
  • (33) C. Lee, X. Wei, J. W. Kysar, and J. Hone, Science 321, 385 (2008).
  • (34) X. Zhou, R. Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Feng, Y. Mokrousov and Y. Yao, npj Comput. Mater. 7, 160 (2021).
  • (35) Y. L. Wang and Y. Ding, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 193101 (2021).
  • (36) H. Huan, Y. Xue, B. Zhao, G. Y. Gao, H. R. Bao and Z. Q. Yang, Phys. Rev. B 104, 165427 (2021).
  • (37) B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero and X. Xu, Nature 546, 270 (2017).
  • (38) N. Miao, B. Xu, L. Zhu, J. Zhou and Z. Sun, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 2417 (2018).
  • (39) C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia and X. Zhang, Nature 546, 265 (2017).