This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Considerations on the suppression of charged particles and π0\pi^{0} in
high energy heavy ion collisions

M.Petrovici National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering - IFIN-HH
Hadron Physics Department
Bucharest - Romania
Faculty of Physics, University of Bucharest
   A.Lindner National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering - IFIN-HH
Hadron Physics Department
Bucharest - Romania
Faculty of Physics, University of Bucharest
   A.Pop National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering - IFIN-HH
Hadron Physics Department
Bucharest - Romania
Abstract

Experimental results related to charged particle and π0\pi^{0} suppression obtained at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Brookhaven for Au-Au (Cu-Cu) collisions and at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN for Pb-Pb (Xe-Xe) collisions are compiled in terms of the usual nuclear modification factors, RAAR_{AA} and RCPR_{CP}, and of the newly introduced RAANR^{N}_{AA} and RCPNR^{N}_{CP} as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle and dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle. The RAANR^{N}_{AA} and RCPNR^{N}_{CP} are calculated as the ratios of the pTp_{T} spectra in each centrality bin, to the spectrum in proton-proton minimum bias collisions, or to the spectrum in a peripheral bin, respectively, each of them normalised to the corresponding charged particle density. The studies are focused on a pTp_{T} range in the region of maximum suppression evidenced in the experiments. The RAAR_{AA} scaling as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle and dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle is discussed. The core contribution to RAAR_{AA} is presented. The difference in RAAR_{AA} relative to the difference in particle density per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area (dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}) and the Bjorken energy density times the interaction time (εBjτ\varepsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau) between top RHIC and LHC energies indicate a suppression saturation at LHC energies. Considerations on the missing suppression in high charged particle multiplicity events for pp collisions at 7 TeV are presented. RCPNR^{N}_{CP} for the same systems and energies shows a linear scaling as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle. While (1-RAAR_{AA})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle shows an exponential decrease with (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}, (1-RAANR_{AA}^{N})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle is independent on (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} for (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}\geq2.1 particles/fm2/3/fm^{2/3}. The trends of RCPR_{CP} and RCPNR^{N}_{CP} for charged particles as a function of sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}, measured at RHIC in Au-Au collisions and at LHC in Pb-Pb collisions, show a suppression that becomes larger from sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 39 GeV up to sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, followed by a saturation up to the highest energy of sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} =5.02 TeV in Pb-Pb collisions. The sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} dependences of RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}} and (RAAN)π0(R_{AA}^{N})^{\pi^{0}} in the same pTp_{T} ranges and for the very central collisions show the same trend. A clear change in the dependence of (1RAAπ0)/dN/dy(1-R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}})/\langle dN/dy\rangle for the most central collisions as a function of collision energy is evidenced in the region of sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} =62.4 - 130 GeV.

I Introduction

Detailed studies of different observables in heavy ion collisions at RHIC BRAHMS05 ; PHOBOS05 ; STAR05 ; PHENIX05 ; PHENIXB ; STARB support theoretical predictions pioneered more than 40 years ago Coll ; Cha ; Shu ; Chi that at large densities and temperatures of the fireballs produced at these energies, the matter is deconfined into its basic constituents, quarks and gluons. Obviously, such studies are rather difficult given that the produced fireballs are highly non-homogeneous, have a small size and are highly unstable, since their dynamical evolution plays an important role. One of the powerful tools used to diagnose the properties of such a deconfined object is the study of the energy loss of partons traversing the deconfined matter Bjorken82 . Within QCD based models, the energy loss of a parton traversing deconfined matter is due to collisional or radiative processes. Collisional energy loss due to elastic parton collisions is expected to scale linearly with the path length dentbetz . Radiative energy loss occurs via inelastic processes where a hard parton radiates a gluon. Soft interactions of partons with the deconfined medium can also induce gluon radiation dEnterria10 . Radiative energy loss is expected to grow quadratically with the path length Renk07 . There are quite a few theoretical approaches to describe the parton energy loss in expanding deconfined matter Baier97 ; Gyulassy00 ; Baier01 ; Arleo02 ; Muller05 ; Djordjevic08 ; Casalderrey-Solana15 ; Burke14 ; Betz14 ; Arleo18 . However, a proper description of the parton energy loss in the non-equilibrium expanding deconfined matter for the intermediate pTp_{T} range remains a challenging task. The predicted suppression at LHC energies turned out to be overestimated, once the experimental information became available. A comprehensive analysis within the CUJET/CIBJET framework recently published Shi19 , indicates, similar to the results of the JET Collaboration Burke14 , a maximum in q^/T3\hat{q}/T^{3} as a function of temperature around the critical temperature (TcT_{c}), followed by a decrease towards temperatures reached at LHC energies. Some considerations on the charged particle and π0\pi^{0} suppression at RHIC and LHC energies are presented in this paper. Section II is a short presentation of the quantities estimated in the Glauber Monte Carlo (MC) model used in the next sections. A review of the charged particle suppression dependence on Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle and dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle, the core-corona effect and the dependence on particle density per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area (dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}), a measure of the entropy density and thus of temperature Vogt and the Bjorken energy density times the interaction time (εBjτ\varepsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau) for Cu-Cu and Au-Au at the top RHIC energy and for Xe-Xe and Pb-Pb at LHC energies, are presented in Section III. Section IV is dedicated to similar studies, using dNch/dηAA/dNch/dηpp\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{AA}/\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{pp} instead of Nbin\langle N_{bin}\rangle in a model independent estimation of suppression, namely RAANR_{AA}^{N}, defined later in this section Petrovici17_aip . In Section V, similar considerations for the corresponding relative suppression, RCPR_{CP} and RCPNR_{CP}^{N} are presented. (1-RAAR_{AA})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle and (1-RAANR_{AA}^{N})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle dependences as a function of (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} are presented in Section VI. The collision energy dependence of RCPR_{CP}, RCPNR_{CP}^{N} for charged particles and RAAR_{AA}, RAANR_{AA}^{N} for π0\pi^{0} is discussed in Section VII. Conclusions are presented in Section VIII.

II Glauber Monte Carlo estimates

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The average number of participating nucleons Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle as a function of centrality for Cu-Cu, Au-Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44 TeV and for Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 2.76 and 5.02 TeV.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Ratio of the average number of nucleons undergoing single collisions to the average number of participating nucleons (Nsc/Npart\langle N_{sc}\rangle/\langle N_{part}\rangle), as a function of the average number of participating nucleons (Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle) estimated within the Glauber MC model.

The Glauber MC model Glauber55 ; Franco66 ; Miller07 ; Rybcz2014 was used to estimate in a unitary manner various quantities characteristic to the initial state in A-A collisions: number of participants, number of collisions, number of nucleons undergoing a single collision and the transverse overlapping areas in centrality bins. In a core-corona picture Rybcz2014 , the core quantities were estimated for wounded nucleons suffering more than a single collision. The calculations have been done in the hard sphere wounding prescription Rybcz2014 . For the nuclear density profile of the colliding nuclei, a Woods-Saxon distribution was considered:

ρ(r)=11+exp(rr0a)\rho(r)=\frac{1}{1+exp(\frac{r-r_{0}}{a})} (1)

with a = 0.535 fm, r0r_{0} = 6.5 fm for the Au nucleus STAR_dNchdeta , a = 0.546 fm, r0r_{0} = 6.62 fm for the Pb nucleus Abelev044909 a = 0.57 fm, r0r_{0} = 5.42 fm for the Xe nucleus Loiz and a = 0.596 fm, r0r_{0} = 4.2 fm for the Cu nucleus Loiz . Within the hard sphere approach, the nucleons are considered to collide if the relative transverse distance dσppπd\leq\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_{pp}}{\pi}}. The nucleon - nucleon inelastic cross section, σpp\sigma_{pp}, at a given collision energy, was taken as specified in Refs. STAR_dNchdeta ; Abelev044909 ; XeXecent ; PbPb_502_dNchdeta . The centrality dependence of the overlapping area, SvarS_{\perp}^{var} is considered to be proportional to the quantity Sσx2σy2σxy2S\propto\sqrt{\langle\sigma_{x}^{2}\rangle\langle\sigma_{y}^{2}\rangle-\langle\sigma_{xy}^{2}\rangle}. σx2\sigma_{x}^{2}, σy2\sigma_{y}^{2} are the variances, and σxy\sigma_{xy} is the co-variance of the participant distributions in the transverse plane, per event Alver08 . They were averaged over many events. The centrality dependent values were rescaled in such a way as to equalize the geometrical area (calculated as in Petrovici18 ; PetAIP ) and SvarS_{\perp}^{var} in the case of the complete overlap of the nuclei (b = 0 fm). After generating a large number of events for the minimum bias (MB) collisions, they were sorted in centrality classes according to the impact parameter distribution. Calculations of the quantities of interest have been done in each centrality class. The results of the calculations for various systems and energies were presented in Refs. Petrovici18 ; PetAIP and Table I of this paper. The obtained number of participants and number of collisions are in good agreement, within the error bars, with the same quantities listed in different experimental publications. In Figure 1, the average number of participating nucleons (Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle) Alver06 ; STAR_AuAu_200 ; XeXe_data ; PbPb_502_dNchdeta ; Petrovici18 as a function of centrality obtained within the Glauber MC approach is shown. As can be seen, the difference in Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle at a given centrality, for colliding systems with different sizes and incident energies, is increasing from peripheral towards central collisions. Figure 2 shows the average number of nucleons undergoing single collisions relative to the average number of participating nucleons (Nsc/Npart\langle N_{sc}\rangle/\langle N_{part}\rangle). As expected, Nsc/Npart\langle N_{sc}\rangle/\langle N_{part}\rangle has large values at low Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, the system size and collision energy dependence being rather small. With increasing Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle towards very central collisions, although the percentage of nucleons undergoing single collisions decreases, the difference between the various systems becomes significant.

Table 1: The percentage of nucleons that suffer more than a single collision (fcoref_{core}), the overlapping surface of the colliding nuclei (SvarS_{\perp}^{var}) and the overlapping surface corresponding to the core contribution ((Svar)coreS_{\perp}^{var})^{core}) for Cu-Cu and Xe-Xe colliding systems at the corresponding collision energies and centralities.
System 𝐬𝐍𝐍\bf\sqrt{s_{NN}} Cen. fcoref_{core} 𝐒𝐯𝐚𝐫\bf S_{\perp}^{var} ) (𝐒𝐯𝐚𝐫)𝐜𝐨𝐫𝐞\bf(S_{\perp}^{var})^{core}
(GeV) (%) (fm2fm^{2}) (fm2fm^{2})
Cu-Cu 200 0-10 0.81±\pm0.00 67.9±\pm0.5 51.8±\pm0.4
10-30 0.69±\pm0.00 53.4±\pm0.4 36.1±\pm0.3
30-50 0.55±\pm0.00 38.3±\pm0.3 23.3±\pm0.2
50-70 0.38±\pm0.01 24.7±\pm0.2 13.2±\pm0.1
Xe-Xe 5440 0-5 0.93±\pm0.00 124.1±\pm0.6 105.3±\pm0.5
5-10 0.89±\pm0.00 114.9±\pm0.6 91.3±\pm0.5
10-20 0.84±\pm0.00 100.6±\pm0.5 74.9±\pm0.4
20-30 0.78±\pm0.00 83.7±\pm0.5 57.9±\pm0.3
30-40 0.72±\pm0.00 69.3±\pm0.4 44.7±\pm0.2
40-50 0.65±\pm0.00 57.1±\pm0.3 34.2±\pm0.2
50-60 0.57±\pm0.00 45.9±\pm0.3 25.5±\pm0.1
60-70 0.47±\pm0.01 35.4±\pm0.2 18.2±\pm0.1
70-80 0.36±\pm0.01 24.8±\pm0.2 10.9±\pm0.1
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The overlapping area (SvarS_{\perp}^{var}) as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle corresponding to total (full symbols) and core (open symbols) wounded nucleons.

Figure 3 shows the overlapping area, SvarS_{\perp}^{var}, as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for the total and core contribution. In this paper we decided to use SvarS_{\perp}^{var}, similar to what was used to estimate the Bjorken energy density at LHC energies Adam16 . It will be simply written SS_{\perp} from now on.

III RAAR_{AA} (5<pT<85<p_{T}<8 GeV/cGeV/c) : Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle dependence

Usually, the comparisons among different systems and different collision energies in terms of the nuclear modification factor, RAAR_{AA}, are done as a function of collision centrality. RAAR_{AA} is defined as:

RAA=(d2NdηdpT)cenNbin(d2NdηdpT)pp,MBR_{AA}=\frac{(\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}})^{cen}}{\langle N_{bin}\rangle\cdot(\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}})^{pp,MB}} (2)

where the transverse momentum distribution of a certain particle measured in A-A collisions for a given centrality (cen) is divided by the pp MB pTp_{T} distribution of that particle at the same energy, multiplied by the number of binary collisions calculated based on the Glauber MC model.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: RAAR_{AA} in the 5<pT<85<p_{T}<8 GeV/c region as a function of the average number of nucleons Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for charged particles; a) experimental values, b) core contribution, see the text.

Because of the Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle dependence on centrality in Figure 1, a study of the suppression phenomena in relativistic heavy ion collisions as a function of system size and collision energy is better done in terms of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, instead of centrality. At sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, the same values of charged particle RAAR_{AA} as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for different bins in pTp_{T}, for two very different colliding symmetric systems Au-Au Adler04 and Cu-Cu Alver06 , were evidenced. A similar scaling was also observed for a lower collision energy, i.e. sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=62.4 GeV Back05 . Such a dependence was studied for pions and protons, for 5<pT<<p_{T}<8 GeV/c and 5<pT<<p_{T}<6 GeV/c respectively, in Cu-Cu and Au-Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, by the STAR Collaboration Abelev10 , where a good scaling of RAAπ++πR_{AA}^{\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}} as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for the two systems was seen. The PHENIX Collaboration has shown that in Au-Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=62.4 GeV and 200 GeV, the RAAR_{AA} of π0\pi^{0} for pT>p_{T}> 6 GeV/c has the same value as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle Adare12 . At the LHC energies, the CMS Collaboration presented a similar scaling for Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV and Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV Sirunyan18 with the remark that the RAAR_{AA} for Xe-Xe was obtained using the pTp_{T} spectrum from MB pp collisions at s\sqrt{s}=5.02 TeV. Aside from Cu-Cu at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, where the pTp_{T} spectra were obtained for the 0.2 <η<<\eta< 1.4 pseudorapidity range, all the other results were obtained for a symmetric cut relative to η\eta=0.

Suppression studies at LHC energies up to very large pTp_{T} values Chatrchyan12 ; Abelev13 ; Aad15 , for charged particles, evidence a maximum suppression in the 5-8 GeV/c pTp_{T} range, for a given centrality. While the absolute value of the maximum suppression depends on centrality, its position is in the same region of pTp_{T}. Although at RHIC energies the measured pTp_{T} range is much smaller than the region where the RAAR_{AA} starts to increase, based on the larger range in pTp_{T} for π0\pi^{0} Adare12 , one could conclude that the maximum suppression for different centralities is in the same range of pTp_{T}, i.e. 5-8 GeV/c. This is the main reason to focus the present considerations on the suppression phenomena in this pTp_{T} range.

Using the latest results obtained at RHIC for Cu-Cu and Au-Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV Alver06 ; STAR_AuAu_200 ; Adler04 , at LHC for Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV XeXe_data and Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 and 5.02 TeV PbPb_Raa , we obtained the mean values of RAAR_{AA}, averaged over the 5<pT<85<p_{T}<8 GeV/c region, presented in Figure 4a. RAAR_{AA} scales as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle at RHIC (sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV) and LHC energies, separately, as it was shown in the above mentioned papers. Within the error bars, a small difference, i.e. a slightly larger suppression is observed for central Cu-Cu and Xe-Xe collisions relative to Au-Au and Pb-Pb respectively, at the same Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle. The highlighted areas represent the systematic uncertainties, while the error bars are the statistical uncertainties, for the cases where they have been reported separately (Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 and 5.02 TeV, Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV, Au-Au (PHENIX) and Cu-Cu at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV), while in the case of Au-Au (STAR) the error bars represent the square root of statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. Another aspect worth being considered is the so called core-corona effect Becattini04 ; Bozek05 ; Werner07 ; Steinheimer11 ; Becattini08 ; Becattini09 ; Aichelin09 ; Aichelin10_2 ; Bozek09 ; Schreiber12 ; Gemard14 ; Petrovici17 on the suppression estimate. The contribution to the pTp_{T} spectra in A-A collisions from a nucleon suffering a single collision is similar with the spectra from pp MB collisions at the same energy. Therefore, one should first correct the experimental spectra of A-A collisions with the contribution coming from single binary collisions (corona) in order to obtain the spectra of the core:

(d2NdηdpT)cen,core=(d2NdηdpT)cen,measured(d2NdηdpT)pp,MB,measuredNpartcen2(1fcorecen),\begin{split}&(\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}})^{cen,core}=(\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}})^{cen,measured}-\\ &-(\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}})^{pp,MB,measured}\cdot\frac{\langle N_{part}\rangle^{cen}}{2}\cdot(1-f^{cen}_{core}),\end{split} (3)

where fcorecen=Npartcorecen/Npartcenf^{cen}_{core}=\langle N_{part}^{core}\rangle^{cen}/\langle N_{part}\rangle^{cen}. The suppression due to the core of the fireball, RAAcoreR^{core}_{AA}:

RAAcore=(d2NdηdpT)cen,coreNbincorecen(d2NdηdpT)pp,MB,R_{AA}^{core}=\frac{(\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}})^{cen,core}}{\langle N_{bin}^{core}\rangle^{cen}\cdot(\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}})^{pp,MB}}, (4)

where

Nbincorecen=NbincenNpartcen2(1fcorecen)\langle N_{bin}^{core}\rangle^{cen}=\langle N_{bin}\rangle^{cen}-\frac{\langle N_{part}\rangle^{cen}}{2}\cdot(1-f_{core}^{cen}) (5)

is presented in Figure 4b as a function of Npartcore\langle N_{part}^{core}\rangle. In the simple image of a net core-corona separation, the figure shows the core contribution extracted from the experimental data for the different centrality classes.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: The same as Figure 4a with the shape of the overlapping area SS_{\perp} at different values of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle estimated within the Glauber MC approach.

The suppression is increased in peripheral collisions by \approx10-20% and the values for the most central Cu-Cu and Xe-Xe collisions are the same as for Au-Au and Pb-Pb collisions, respectively, for the same Npartcore\langle N_{part}^{core}\rangle. The suppression for Cu-Cu and Au-Au is the same at the same collision energy (sNN(\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV). At the LHC energies, the suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV is the same as at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV, as well as for Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV, where the latter energies are almost twice as high. The small deviation evidenced in Xe-Xe collisions at low values of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle could be due to the way in which the correlation between centrality and Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle is estimated in the standard Glauber MC approach Loizides17 . For consistency reasons, for Au-Au collisions (sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV) we have used both the data published by STAR and PHENIX Collaborations. As one can observe in Figure 4a, there is very good agreement between these two datasets. In order to avoid overloaded figures as much as possible, from now on only the dataset measured by the STAR Collaboration will be used.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: (1-RAAR_{AA}) (full symbols - left scale) and dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} (open symbols - right scale) as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle. The abscissa is the same as in Figure 5 and consequently, at a given Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, the full and open symbols correspond to the same fireball shape.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: The difference between the suppression in Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV and the suppression in Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV, Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 5.44 TeV, Au-Au and Cu-Cu at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV (full symbols). The corresponding differences in terms of particle density per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} (Figure 7a - open symbols) and of Bjorken energy density times the interaction time ϵBjτ\epsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau (Figure 7b - open symbols) at the corresponding collision energies can be followed using the scales on the right sides.

The Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle dependence of the suppression has the advantage that at a given Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, the fireball transverse area SS_{\perp} is the same for the colliding systems and collision energies in question glauber_b , with small deviations observed at very central collisions in Cu-Cu and Xe-Xe relative to Au-Au and Pb-Pb Petrovici18 , where the fireball shapes are closer to a circular geometry, qualitatively represented in Figure 5. At LHC energies, with a slight change in the offset (\approx10 fm2fm^{2}) the linear dependence of SS_{\perp} on Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle has the same slope as at the RHIC energy (Figure 3). As it is known, all theoretical models predict a greater suppression with increasing path length and energy density or temperature of the deconfined medium traversed by a parton Baier97 ; Gyulassy00 ; Baier01 ; Arleo02 ; Muller05 ; Djordjevic08 ; Casalderrey-Solana15 ; Burke14 ; Betz14 ; Arleo18 . In Figure 6, the suppression in terms of (1-RAAR_{AA}) in the 5<pT<<p_{T}<8 GeV/c region for the colliding systems and energies under consideration, compared with the particle density per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area (dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}), which is a measure of the entropy density and thus of the temperature Vogt , as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, is represented. The dN/dydN/dy values were estimated as in Petrovici18 ; PetAIP .

Refer to caption
Figure 8: RAAR_{AA} as a function of charged particle density per unit of pseudorapidity, dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle, for the same systems and collision energies as in Figure 4; a) experimental values; b) the core contribution to RAAR_{AA} and dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle.

In the case of Cu-Cu and Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, for the same average number of participants and dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}, the suppression has the same value, increasing with dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} and with the size of the overlapping area. Since the suppression in central Cu-Cu collisions is the same as in Au-Au collisions at the corresponding Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, it appears that the fireball shape plays a minor role, for the same size of the overlapping area, on the azimuthally averaged RAAR_{AA} values. For Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=200, the differences in dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} for Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76, 5.02 TeV and for Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV, relative to Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, are 5.25±1\pm 1, 6.77±\pm1 and 7.89±\pm1 (particles/fm2fm^{2}) while the differences in (1-RAAR_{AA}) are 0.10±\pm0.03, 0.11±\pm0.03 and 0.11±\pm0.03. This suggests a suppression saturation at LHC energies. For central Au-Au collisions, i.e. Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=350, the difference in dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} between Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV and Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV is 7±\pm1 (particles/fm2fm^{2}) while the difference in (1-RAAR_{AA}) is 0.08±\pm0.03.

Using the phenomenological ”abc” parton energy loss approach Xu , where the fractional energy loss is:

ΔEETaLb\frac{\Delta E}{E}\propto T^{a}L^{b} (6)

and the approximation from Djordjevic19 , one obtains:

(1RAA)ξTaLb,(1-R_{AA})\propto\xi T^{a}L^{b}, (7)

where L is the average path length and T is the average temperature. With the assumption that L2SL^{2}\propto S_{\perp}, the entropy density sdN/dy/Ss\propto\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} and T3dN/dy/ST^{3}\propto\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} Vogt , one could estimate ξ\xi for three values of the parameters a and b, used by different models in order to reproduce the experimental results related to the suppression: i) a=1, b=2; ii) a=1, b=1 Djordjevic19 ; zig20 ; iii) a=3, b=2 Xu . Using the experimental values of (1-RAAR_{AA}) for Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV and Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV at Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=350, corresponding to the most central collisions for Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, one obtains: i) ξLHC\xi^{LHC} = 0.86(±0.03\pm 0.03)\cdotξRHIC\xi^{RHIC}; ii) ξLHC\xi^{LHC} = 0.88(±0.03\pm 0.03)\cdotξRHIC\xi^{RHIC} and iii) ξLHC\xi^{LHC} = 0.58(±\pm 0.04)\cdotξRHIC\xi^{RHIC}. Although theoretically not compelling, as it was mentioned in Ref. Betz14 , we used ansatz iii) based on their results on relative success and failure of different models (Table 2 and 3 in the same paper). Previous studies Betz13 ; Betz12 ; Betz11 have shown that the running coupling alters the jet-energy dependence of energy loss and ΔEE\frac{\Delta E}{E} is approximatively independent on E. Obviously, the hydrodynamic expansion of the deconfined matter traversed by the parton plays a role in the estimated final suppression. Using the dN/dy/S\sqrt{\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}} scaling of the average transverse flow velocity, βT\langle\beta_{T}\rangle, reported in Ref. Petrovici18 , for the geometrical scaling variable corresponding to the particle densities used before for the ξLHC/ξRHIC\xi^{LHC}/\xi^{RHIC} estimation, a ratio βTLHC/βTRHIC\langle\beta_{T}\rangle^{LHC}/\langle\beta_{T}\rangle^{RHIC}\simeq1.09±\pm0.08 is obtained. This could be one of the reasons leading to lower values of the jet-medium coupling in Pb-Pb central collision at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV energy relative to Au-Au central collision at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV. In Table II (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} \simT, βT\langle\beta_{T}\rangle and (1RAA)π0(1-R_{AA})^{\pi^{0}} for the 0-5% collision centrality for Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=39 GeV and 200 GeV and for Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV are listed. A comparison between 39 GeV and 200 GeV for Au-Au collisions shows an increase of 39.7% relative to sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=39 GeV in the suppression, while the increase in (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} and <βT><\beta_{T}> is 20.3% and 20.4%, respectively. The increase in the suppression from sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV (Au-Au) to sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV is 7.4% relative to sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, while the increase in (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} and <βT><\beta_{T}> is 24.2% and 10.2%, respectively. In this case, a \approx 4 times smaller difference in the suppression, for a larger difference in (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} and a smaller difference in the expansion velocity, can be observed.

Table 2: (dN/dyS)1/3(\frac{\langle dN/dy\rangle}{S_{\perp}})^{1/3}, βT\langle\beta_{T}\rangle Petrovici18 and (1RAA)π0(1-R_{AA})^{\pi^{0}} for the 0-5% collision centrality for Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=39 GeV and 200 GeV Adare12 ; Adare08 and for Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV ALICE14 .
System sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} Cen. (dN/dy/S)1/3(\frac{\langle dN/dy\rangle/}{S_{\perp}})^{1/3} βT\langle\beta_{T}\rangle (1RAA)π0(1-R_{AA})^{\pi^{0}}
(GeV) (%)
Au-Au 39 0-5 1.72±\pm0.03 0.49±\pm0.04 0.58±\pm0.02
Au-Au 200 0-5 2.07±\pm0.03 0.59±\pm0.05 0.81±\pm0.06
Pb-Pb 2760 0-5 2.57±\pm0.04 0.65±\pm0.06 0.87±\pm0.08

This supports the assumption that the main contribution to the observed evolution of (1RAA)(1-R_{AA}) as a function of collision energy, i.e. a strong increase followed by a weakening dependence, is due to the energy density (temperature) dependence of the parton energy loss in the deconfined medium. In Figure 7, the relative differences between the suppression in Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV and the suppression in Au-Au and Cu-Cu collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, Pb-Pb collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV and Xe-Xe collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV are shown. The corresponding differences in particle density per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area, dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} (Figure 7a) and Bjorken energy density times the interaction time, ϵBjτ\epsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau (Figure 7b) are also shown with the corresponding scales on the right side of the figures.

The Bjorken energy density times the interaction time is estimated based on Bjorken82_2 :

ϵBjτ=dETdy1S\epsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau=\frac{dE_{T}}{dy}\cdot\frac{1}{S_{\perp}} (8)

where ETE_{T} is the total transverse energy and SS_{\perp} represents the overlapping area of the colliding nuclei. The total transverse energy per unit of rapidity can be estimated as follows:

  • RHIC sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV:

    dETdy32(mTdNdy)π±+2(mTdNdy)K±,p,p¯\frac{dE_{T}}{dy}\approx\frac{3}{2}\left(\langle m_{T}\rangle\langle\frac{dN}{dy}\rangle\right)_{\pi^{\pm}}+2\left(\langle m_{T}\rangle\langle\frac{dN}{dy}\rangle\right)_{K^{\pm},p,\bar{p}} (9)
  • LHC energies:

    dETdy\displaystyle\frac{dE_{T}}{dy} 32(mTdNdy)π±+2(mTdNdy)K±,p,p¯,Ξ,Ξ¯+\displaystyle\approx\frac{3}{2}\left(\langle m_{T}\rangle\langle\frac{dN}{dy}\rangle\right)_{\pi^{\pm}}+2\left(\langle m_{T}\rangle\langle\frac{dN}{dy}\rangle\right)_{K^{\pm},p,\bar{p},\Xi^{-},\bar{\Xi}^{+}} (10)
    +(mTdNdy)Λ,Λ¯,Ω,Ω¯+\displaystyle+\left(\langle m_{T}\rangle\langle\frac{dN}{dy}\rangle\right)_{\Lambda,\bar{\Lambda},\Omega^{-},\bar{\Omega}^{+}}

The input data used in the estimation of the Bjorken energy density times the interaction time are reported in Petrovici18 ; STAR_dNchdeta ; PbPb_276_dNchdeta ; Jacazio17 ; Adams07 ; Abelev13_2 ; Albuquerque18 ; Brahms16 ; Bellini19 and Table I.

Within the error bars, the suppression in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV is the same with the one corresponding to sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV for all values of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, although the difference in dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} and in ϵBjτ\epsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau increases from 0.88±\pm0.33 particles/fm2fm^{2} to 1.95±\pm0.54 particles/fm2fm^{2} and from 0.71±\pm0.32 GeV/(fm2cfm^{2}c) to 2.44±\pm0.81 GeV/(fm2cfm^{2}c), respectively, from the low (Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=50) to the highest value of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle (Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=350). The difference between the suppression in Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV and Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV decreases from 0.27±\pm0.25 to 0.08±0.02\pm 0.02 with Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, while the differences in dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} and ϵBjτ\epsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau increase from 2.63±\pm0.29 particles/fm2fm^{2} and 2.13±\pm0.28 GeV/(fm2cfm^{2}c) to 8.9±\pm0.43 particles/fm2fm^{2} and 8.2±\pm0.8 GeV/(fm2cfm^{2}c), respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: The same as Figure 8a, with the shapes of the overlapping area SS_{\perp} at different values of dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: a) The Bjorken energy density times the interaction time ϵBjτ\epsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau; b) particle density per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}, both as a function of the average charged particle density per unit of pseudorapidity dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle.
Refer to caption

[h!]

Figure 11: The average charged particle density per unit of pseudorapidity dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle as a function of the average value of participating nucleons Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle.

An alternative representation of RAAR_{AA} could be done as a function of the average charged particle density per unit of pseudorapidity XeXe_data . The dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle experimental data for heavy ion collisions are taken from XeXe_data ; STAR_dNchdeta ; BES_CuCu_dNchdeta ; PbPb_502_dNchdeta ; PbPb_276_dNchdeta . The RAAR_{AA} as a function of dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle is presented in Figure 8a for the same systems and collision energies as in Figure 4. In such a representation, all systems at all energies scale as a function of dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle. The same representation in terms of RAAcoreR_{AA}^{core} and dNch/dηcore\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{core} (Figure 8b) shows a larger deviation between RHIC and LHC energies for dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle\leq 200. Relative to the Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle dependence, the difference in the shapes of the overlapping areas of different systems for a given dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle is larger, as it can be seen in Figure 9. If we look at the dependence of ϵBjτ\epsilon_{Bj}\cdot\tau or dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp} respectively as a function of charged particle density (Figure 10a and Figure 10b), a difference between the collision energies which increases with dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle is seen.

Therefore, with several contributions playing a role in the observed scaling in dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle, it is rather difficult to unravel the importance of each one of them. The difference between the two representations is explained by the correlation between dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle and Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, presented in Figure 11. While the overlapping area depends little on the system size and collision energy for a given Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle Petrovici18 , dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle combines the contribution of both collision energy and system size.

IV Why RAANR_{AA}^{N} ?

RAAR_{AA}, as a measure of the suppression in heavy ion collisions, is based on the estimate of the number of binary collisions Nbin\langle N_{bin}\rangle within the Glauber MC approach using straight trajectories as a hypothesis. The dependence on the collision energy is introduced by the nucleon-nucleon cross section and the oversimplified assumption that every nucleon-nucleon collision takes place at the same energy, s\sqrt{s}, and consequently the same cross section, σpp\sigma_{pp}. In Figure 12, the correlation between the number of binary collisions Nbin\langle N_{bin}\rangle and Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle estimated within the standard Glauber MC approach is represented.

An alternative approach, where the energy and σpp\sigma_{pp} change after each collision Seryakov16 , has shown that in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV, the average number of binary collisions Nbin\langle N_{bin}\rangle is significantly lower than the values estimated by the standard Glauber model with the difference increasing towards central collisions. The difference in Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle is negligible at peripheral and central collisions. For mid-central collisions it is about 18%.

Nbin/[dNch/dηAA/dNch/dηpp,MB]\langle N_{bin}\rangle/[\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{A-A}/\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{pp,MB}] has to be unity if only single collisions take place. A very good correlation between Nbin\langle N_{bin}\rangle estimated within the standard Glauber model and experimental values of dNch/dηAA/dNch/dηpp,MB\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{A-A}/\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{pp,MB} is evidenced in Figure 13. However, their ratio as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle shows an increase from close to 1 for the lowest values of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, up to Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle\approx150, followed by a tendency towards a saturation at \approx3.5 for the largest Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle values (Figure 14). All systems at all investigated energies overlap in this representation. In the case of pp collisions, dNch/dηINEL\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{INEL} corresponding to the selection of inelastic collisions and the parametrisation given in ALICE17 had been used.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Correlation between the average number of binary collisions Nbin\langle N_{bin}\rangle and the average number of participating nucleons Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle estimated using the Glauber MC approach.
Refer to caption
Figure 13: Correlation between the average number of binary collisions Nbin\langle N_{bin}\rangle and experimental dNch/dηAA/dNch/dηpp\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{AA}/\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{pp}.
Refer to caption
Figure 14: Nbin/[dNch/dηAA/dNch/dηpp]\langle N_{bin}\rangle/[\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{A-A}/\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle^{pp}] as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle.
Refer to caption
Figure 15: RAANR_{AA}^{N} as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle.

Based on these, we will also analyse the model independent quantity, namely RAANR_{AA}^{N}, obtained as a ratio of the pTp_{T} spectra in A-A collisions to the one in MB pp collisions at the same energy, with each of them normalised to the corresponding charged particle densities, for all the available centralities in A-A collisions (Eq.(11)). This observable was used in a previous paper for comparing the behaviour of pTp_{T} spectra in pp, p-Pb and Pb-Pb collisions as a function of charged particle multiplicity and centrality, respectively Petrovici17_aip .

RAAN=(d2NdpTdη/dNchdη)cen(d2NdpTdη/dNchdη)pp,MBR_{AA}^{N}=\frac{(\frac{d^{2}N}{dp_{T}d\eta}/\langle\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\rangle)^{cen}}{(\frac{d^{2}N}{dp_{T}d\eta}/\langle\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\rangle)^{pp,MB}} (11)

In Figure 15, RAANR_{AA}^{N} as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for the systems discussed in the previous section is presented. The system size scaling for each energy domain, i.e. the highest energy at RHIC and LHC energies remains. RAANR_{AA}^{N} has a close to linear dependence as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle and at larger values of the average number of participating nucleons, the suppression is reduced compared to RAAR_{AA}. As it is observed in Figure 16, the scaling of RAANR_{AA}^{N} has not the same quality as RAAR_{AA} as a function of dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle (see Figure 8a) for the two collision energy domains. However, the scaling at LHC energies remains, a close to linear dependence being evidenced in this representation as well. The same considerations as in Section III can be used in order to estimate the expected suppression, (1-RppN(HM)R_{pp}^{N(HM)}), for pp collisions at s\sqrt{s}=7 TeV and very high charged particle multiplicity (HM) events. The geometrical scaling Petrovici18 shows that for the highest charged particle multiplicity in pp collisions at s\sqrt{s}=7 TeV, in the case of α\alpha=1, dN/dy/S\sqrt{\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}}=3.3±\pm0.1 particles\cdotfm1fm^{-1}, βT\langle\beta_{T}\rangle in pp and Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV is the same. Therefore, the contribution of the hydrodynamic expansion to the suppression should play a similar role. For this value of dN/dy/S\sqrt{\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}}, SppS_{\perp}^{pp}(α\alpha=1)=7.43±\pm0.48 fm2fm^{2} and SPbPbS_{\perp}^{Pb-Pb}=70±\pm0.4 fm2fm^{2} (corresponding to Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=125). Assuming the same jet-medium coupling, (1-RppN(HM)R_{pp}^{N(HM)})/(1-RAAN(Npart=125)R_{AA}^{N}({\langle N_{part}\rangle=125)}) \approx Spp,HMS_{\perp}^{pp,HM}/SPbPb,Npart=125S_{\perp}^{Pb-Pb,\langle N_{part}\rangle=125}=0.11 ±\pm0.01. This could explain why in pp collisions at LHC, in high charged particle multiplicity events, in the limit of current experimental uncertainties, no suppression was observed, although similarities to Pb-Pb collisions for other observables were evidenced.

Refer to caption
Figure 16: RAANR_{AA}^{N} as a function of dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle.

V Relative suppression in terms of RCPR_{CP}

For energies where the pTp_{T} spectra in pp collisions were not measured, the suppression was studied in terms of RCPR_{CP}, i.e. the ratio of charged particle pTp_{T} spectra at a given centrality to the pTp_{T} spectrum in peripheral collisions, each of them divided by the corresponding average number of the binary collisions:

RCP=(d2NdηdpTNbin)cen/(d2NdηdpTNbin)peripheralR_{CP}=\left(\frac{\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}}}{\langle N_{bin}\rangle}\right)^{cen}/\left(\frac{\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}}}{\langle N_{bin}\rangle}\right)^{peripheral} (12)

for each centrality in A-A collisions.

Refer to caption
Figure 17: RCPR_{CP} for Au-Au and Cu-Cu at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV and Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV, as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle.

For a better comparison of the RCPR_{CP} values as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, the peripheral collision of reference was chosen to be the same for all systems and all energies, i.e Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=30. The RCPR_{CP} estimated in this way is represented in Figure 17 for the same systems and energies. As in the case of RAAR_{AA}, due to the same reasons, using experimental data, we estimated the RCPNR_{CP}^{N}:

RCPN=(d2NdηdpTdNchdη)cen/(d2NdηdpTdNchdη)peripheralR_{CP}^{N}=\left(\frac{\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}}}{\langle\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\rangle}\right)^{cen}/\left(\frac{\frac{d^{2}N}{d\eta dp_{T}}}{\langle\frac{dN_{ch}}{d\eta}\rangle}\right)^{peripheral} (13)
Refer to caption
Figure 18: RCPNR_{CP}^{N} for Au-Au at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, Xe-Xe at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.44 TeV and Pb-Pb at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 TeV and 5.02 TeV as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle.

The RCPNR_{CP}^{N} suppression as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle (Figure 18) is the same at all values of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for all the heavy systems, Au-Au, Xe-Xe and Pb-Pb, although the difference in the collision energies is \approx 14-27 times higher at LHC than at RHIC and between the LHC energies is a factor of \approx 2. The linear dependence as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle follows the linear dependence observed in RAANR_{AA}^{N}.

VI (1-RAAR_{AA})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle and (1-RAANR_{AA}^{N})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle dependence on (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}

Based on Eq. (7) and ansatz (iii) from Section III and taking SL2S_{\perp}\propto L^{2}, ξ\xi, which is a rough estimate of the jet-coupling constant, turns out to be proportional to (1-RAAR_{AA})/ dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle. A qualitative temperature dependence of ξ\xi can be obtained from experimental data, as
T(<dN/dy>/S)1/3T\sim(<dN/dy>/S_{\perp})^{1/3}.

Refer to caption
Figure 19: (1-RAAR_{AA})/ dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle dependence on (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}. The line is the result of the fit with the expression (14).
Refer to caption
Figure 20: (1-RAANR_{AA}^{N})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle dependence on (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}.

As can be seen in Figure 19, (1-RAAR_{AA})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle shows an exponential decrease as a function of (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}. The hatched line is the result of the fit with the following expression:

1RAAdN/dy=eαβ(dN/dy/S)1/3\frac{1-R_{AA}}{\langle dN/dy\rangle}=e^{\alpha-\beta\cdot(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}} (14)

Such a temperature dependence of the jet-medium coupling was considered in Ref.Betz14 in order to reproduce the nuclear modification factors at RHIC and LHC energies. A similar representation for RAANR_{AA}^{N} instead of RAAR_{AA} is presented in Figure 20. In this case, (1-RAANR_{AA}^{N})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle is constant as a function of (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}, for (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}\geq 2.1 particles/fm2/3, independent on the size of the colliding systems and collision energy. An impact parameter independence of the jet quenching parameter was claimed in a series of theoretical estimates Andres ; Andres2 ; Xie .

VII The sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} dependence of RCPR_{CP}, RCPNR_{CP}^{N}, RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}}, (RAAN)π0(R_{AA}^{N})^{\pi^{0}}

As it is well known, within the Beam Energy Scan (BES) program at RHIC, valuable data were obtained relative to the behaviour of different observables in Au-Au collisions, starting from sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}= 7.7 GeV, up to 39 GeV. Since the pTp_{T} spectra for charged particles in pp collisions at these energies were not measured, the STAR Collaboration studied the pTp_{T} dependence of RCPR_{CP} [(0-5%)/(60-80%)] for different collision energies, for Au-Au collisions Sangaline12 . In order to include as much as possible the lower energies, where the published data are in a lower pTp_{T} range, we had to change the pTp_{T} range from 5<pT<<p_{T}<8 GeV/c, used in previous sections, to 4<pT<<p_{T}<6 GeV/c, for the study of the charged particle suppression dependence on the collision energy. These results, together with the values obtained in Pb-Pb collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=2.76 and 5.02 TeV, for the most central collisions, are presented in Figure 21a. Following the arguments from the previous section, RCPNR_{CP}^{N} as a function of the collision energy is presented in Figure 21b. In both plots is evidenced a decrease of RCPR_{CP} or RCPNR_{CP}^{N} from sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}= 19.6 GeV up to sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}= 200 GeV, while the relative ratios of particle densities per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area are constant, within the error bars. Beyond the RHIC energies, RCPR_{CP} and RCPNR_{CP}^{N} remain constant. Since RAAR_{AA} for charged particles at lower RHIC energies are not reported, in order to confirm the above observations, we used the RAAR_{AA} of π0\pi^{0} published by the PHENIX collaboration at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=39, 62.4 and 200 GeV Adare08 ; Adare12 and by the ALICE Collaboration ALICE14 ; Sekihata18 at LHC energies.

Refer to caption
Figure 21: a) RCPR_{CP} and b) RCPNR_{CP}^{N}, for 4<pT<<p_{T}<6 GeV/c, as a function of sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} for 0-5% centrality relative to 60-80%, for charged particles in Au-Au and Pb-Pb collisions. On the right scales, the ratio of particle densities per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area for the same centralities is given.
Refer to caption
Figure 22: a) The same as Figure 21a. b) RAAR_{AA} for π0\pi^{0}, corresponding to the same range in pTp_{T} as a), for experimental values (full symbols) and interpolated/extrapolated results (open symbols) for 0-10% centrality. In both plots the continuous line is the fit with Eq.15.

In order to have an estimate on RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}} corresponding to 0-10% centrality for the collision energies where it was not published, we applied the procedure described bellow. The sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} dependence of RCPR_{CP} (Figure 21a) was fit with the following empirical expression:

RCPa+bsNN+csNNR_{CP}\propto a+\frac{b}{s_{NN}}+c\cdot\sqrt{s_{NN}} (15)

with a, b, and c as free parameters, the result being presented in Figure 22a. A similar expression was used in order to fit the measured experimental data of the RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}} - sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} dependence (Figure 22b - full symbols), leaving the parameters free. The result was used for estimating RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}} at the missing collision energies, i.e. 19.6, 27 and 130 GeV (Figure 22b - open symbols). Measured, interpolated and extrapolated RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}} values as a function of sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} are presented in Figure 23, for both pTp_{T} ranges used in this paper, namely 4-6 GeV/c (open symbols) and 5-8 GeV/c (full symbols).

Refer to caption
Figure 23: π0\pi^{0} RAAR_{AA} for the two pTp_{T} ranges: 4-6 GeV/c (open symbols) and 5-8 GeV/c (full symbols) for 0-10% centrality.

The RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}} dependence as a function of sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} is qualitatively similar with the one evidenced for RCPR_{CP} corresponding to charged particles presented in Figure 21a. The suppression starts around sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=27 GeV, becomes more significant up to the top RHIC energy and remains constant up to the LHC energies. The ratios relative to dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle as a function of collision energy are presented in Figure 24, namely: (1RAAπ0)(1-R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle (Figure 24a) and [1(RAAN)π0][1-(R_{AA}^{N})^{\pi^{0}}]/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle (Figure 24b).

Refer to caption
Figure 24: a) (1RAAπ0)(1-R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle as a function of collision energy; b) (1(RAAN)π0)(1-(R_{AA}^{N})^{\pi^{0}})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle as a function of collision energy (bullets)-left scale and (dN/dy/S\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}) (stars)-right scales for the 0-10% centrality.

These ratios show a maximum around the top RHIC energies (in the region of sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 62.4 - 130 GeV), decreasing towards LHC energies, in qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions Liao09 ; Burke14 ; Shi19 . To what extent such a trend is due to a transition from a magnetic plasma of light monopoles near the critical temperature region Liao09 to a deconfined matter dominated by quarks and gluons Shi19 remains an open question. However, the trends in the experimental data suggest a change in the properties of the deconfined matter from RHIC to LHC energies.

VIII Conclusions

The present paper is mainly based on published experimental data obtained at RHIC and LHC. The motivation of this was to study possible scaling or distinctive features between the two energy regimes. Without claiming precise calculations that are extremely laborious, we tried to rely mainly on experimental considerations. Based on the experimental results obtained at RHIC for Au-Au, Cu-Cu and at LHC for Pb-Pb and Xe-Xe collisions, a detailed analysis of the charged particle suppression in the region of transverse momentum corresponding to the maximum suppression is presented.

In order to draw conclusions independent of estimates of the number of binary collisions used in the definitions of RAAR_{AA} and RCPR_{CP}, we define the quantities RAANR_{AA}^{N} and RCPNR_{CP}^{N} in which the ratios of pTp_{T} spectra are normalised to charged particle density (dNch/dηdN_{ch}/d\eta) before they are then divided by the relevant pp or peripheral pTp_{T} spectra, again normalised by charged particle density in pp or peripheral collision.

While RAAR_{AA} scales as a function of dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle for the top RHIC and all LHC energies, it scales separately as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for RHIC and LHC energies, for all the corresponding measured colliding systems. However, given that dNch/dη\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle depends on the collision energy and on the overlapping area of the colliding systems, their relative contribution to suppression is rather difficult to unravel. This is the main reason why the considerations on the suppression phenomena as a function of collision geometry and collision energy are mainly based on the Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle dependence.

The influence of the corona contribution on the experimental RAAR_{AA} is presented. As expected, the main corona contribution is at low values of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle where the core suppression relative to the experimental value is larger.

Based on (1-RAAR_{AA}) and dN/dy/ST3\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}\sim T^{3} dependences on Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle, one could conclude that a saturation of suppression at LHC energies takes place. At Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle=350, corresponding to the most central Au-Au collisions at sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV, if one considers the parton energy loss proportional with the squared path length and with the particle density per unit of rapidity and unit of overlapping area, the proportionality factor ξ\xi is approximately two times lower at LHC than at RHIC. The difference in the hydrodynamic expansion extracted from the βT\langle\beta_{T}\rangle scaling as a function of dN/dy/S\sqrt{\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp}} cannot explain this difference. Such considerations, applied to the highest charged particle multiplicity measured in pp collisions at 7 TeV could explain why no suppression is evidenced in such events, in the limit of current experimental uncertainties, while there are similarities to Pb-Pb with respect to other observables. RAANR^{N}_{AA} as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle shows similar separate scaling for RHIC and LHC energies, with a linear dependence being evidenced. RCPNR^{N}_{CP} shows a very good scaling as a function of Npart\langle N_{part}\rangle for the heavy systems at all collision energies. The ratio (1-RAAR_{AA})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle shows an exponential decrease with (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} while (1-RAANR_{AA}^{N})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle is independent on (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3} for (dN/dy/S)1/3(\langle dN/dy\rangle/S_{\perp})^{1/3}\geq2.1 particles/fm2/3, the value being the same for all the heavy systems at all the collision energies, showing the possible dependence of the jet-medium coupling as a function of temperature. For the most central collisions, RCPR_{CP}, RCPNR^{N}_{CP} for charged particles and RAAπ0R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}}, (RAAN)π0(R_{AA}^{N})^{\pi^{0}} for 4<pT<<p_{T}<6 GeV/c and 5<pT<<p_{T}<8 GeV/c, measured at RHIC in Au-Au collisions and at LHC in Pb-Pb collisions, evidence, as a function of the collision energy, an increase of the suppression from sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 39 GeV up to 200 GeV, followed by a saturation up to the highest energy, sNN\sqrt{s_{NN}} =5.02 TeV for Pb-Pb collisions. (1RAAπ0)(1-R_{AA}^{\pi^{0}})/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle and [1(RAAN)π0][1-(R_{AA}^{N})^{\pi^{0}}]/dN/dy\langle dN/dy\rangle for the 0-10% centrality evidence a maximum around the largest RHIC energies, in qualitative agreement with models predictions. To what extent this pattern is a signature of a transition in the deconfined matter properties from the top RHIC energy to LHC energies has to be further confirmed by theoretical models.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was carried out under the contracts sponsored by the Ministry of Education and Research: RONIPALICE-04/10.03.2020 (via IFA Coordinating Agency) and PN-19 06 01 03.

References

  • (1) I.C. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration). Nucl.Phys.A, 757:1, 2005.
  • (2) B.B. Back et al. (PHOBOS Collaboration). Nucl.Phys.A, 757:28, 2005.
  • (3) J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration). Nucl.Phys.A, 757:102, 2005.
  • (4) K. Adcox et al. (PHENIX Collaboration). Nucl.Phys.A, 757:184, 2005.
  • (5) J.T. Mitchell et al. (PHENIX Collaboration). Nucl.Phys.A, 904-905:903c, 2013.
  • (6) D. McDonald et al. (STAR Collaboration). Eur.Phys.J.Web of Conferences, 95:01009, 2015.
  • (7) J.C. Collins and M.J. Perry. Phys.Rev.Lett, 34:1353, 1975.
  • (8) G.F. Chapline and A.K. Kerman.  MIT report CTP-695, 1978.
  • (9) E.V. Shuryak. Phys.Lett.B, 78:150, 1978.
  • (10) S.A. Chin. Phys.Lett.B, 78:552, 1978.
  • (11) J.D. Bjorken. FERMILAB-PUB-82-059-THY, 1982.
  • (12) D. d’Enterria and B. Betz. Lecture Notes in Physics, 785:285, 2010.
  • (13) D. d’Enterria. Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics, Landolt-Börnstein - Group I Elementary Particles, Nuclei and Atoms, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, ISBN 978-3-642-01538-0, 23:471, 2010.
  • (14) T. Renk. Phys.Rev.C, 76:064905, 2007.
  • (15) R. Baier et al. Nucl.Phys.B, 483:291, 1997.
  • (16) M. Gyulassy, P. Levai, and I. Vitev. Nucl.Phys.B, 571:197, 2000.
  • (17) R. Baier et al. J. High Energ. Phys., 0109:033, 2001.
  • (18) F. Arleo. J. High Energ. Phys., 11:044, 2002.
  • (19) B. Müller and K. Rajagopal. Eur.Phys.J., C43:15, 2005.
  • (20) M. Djordjevic and U.W. Heinz. Phys.Rev.Lett., 101:022302, 2008.
  • (21) J. Casalderrey-Solana et al. J. High Energ. Phys., 09:175, 2015.
  • (22) K.M. Burke et al. (JET Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 90:014909, 2014.
  • (23) B. Betz and M. Gyulassy. J. High Energ. Phys., 08:090, 2014.
  • (24) F. Arleo and G. Falmagne. PoS(HardProbes2018), page 075, 2018.
  • (25) S. Shi, J. Liao, and M. Gyulassy. Chinese Phys. C, 43:044101, 2019.
  • (26) Ramona Vogt. Ultrarelativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions, Elsevier Science:ISBN 978–0–444–52196–5, 2007.
  • (27) M. Petrovici et al. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1852:050003, 2017.
  • (28) R.J. Glauber. Phys. Rev., 100:242, 1955.
  • (29) V. Franco and R.J. Glauber. Phys. Rev., 142:119, 1966.
  • (30) M.L. Miller et al. Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci., 57:205, 2007.
  • (31) M. Rybczynski et al. Comput. Phys. Commun., 185:1759, 2014.
  • (32) B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 79:034909, 2009.
  • (33) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 88:044910, 2013.
  • (34) C. Loizides et al. arXiv:1408.2549v9[nucl-ex], 2019.
  • (35) S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Lett.B, 788:166, 2019.
  • (36) J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Rev.Lett., 116:222302, 2016.
  • (37) B. Alver et al. Phys.Rev.C, 77:014906, 2008.
  • (38) M. Petrovici et al. Phys.Rev.C, 98:024904, 2018.
  • (39) M. Petrovici et al. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2076:040001, 2019.
  • (40) B. Alver et al. (PHOBOS Collaboration). Phys.Rev.Lett., 96:212301, 2006.
  • (41) J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration). Phys.Rev.Lett., 91:172302, 2003.
  • (42) S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Lett.B, 790:35, 2019.
  • (43) J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 94:034903, 2016.
  • (44) S.S. Adler et al. (PHENIX Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 69:034910, 2004.
  • (45) B.B. Back et al. Phys.Rev.Lett., 94:082304, 2005.
  • (46) B.I. Abelev et al. (STAR Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 81:054907, 2010.
  • (47) A.Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration). Phys.Rev.Lett., 109:152301, 2012.
  • (48) A.M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS Collaboration). J. High Energ. Phys., 10:138, 2018.
  • (49) S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS Collaboration). Eur.Phys.J., C72:1945, 2012.
  • (50) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Lett.B, 720:52, 2013.
  • (51) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS Collaboration). J. High Energ. Phys., 09:050, 2015.
  • (52) S. Acharya et al. (ALICE Collaboration). J. High Energ. Phys., 1811:013, 2018.
  • (53) F. Becattini et al. Phys.Rev.C, 69:024905, 2004.
  • (54) P. Bozek. Acta Phys. Pol., B36:3071, 2005.
  • (55) K. Werner. Phys.Rev.Lett., 98:152301, 2007.
  • (56) J. Steinheimer and M. Bleicher. Phys.Rev.C, 84:024905, 2011.
  • (57) F. Becattini and J. Manninen. J.Phys.G, 35:104013, 2008.
  • (58) F. Becattini and J. Manninen. Phys.Lett.B, 673:19, 2009.
  • (59) J. Aichelin and K. Werner. Phys.Rev.C, 79:064907, 2009.
  • (60) J. Aichelin and K. Werner. Phys.Rev.C, 82:034906, 2010.
  • (61) P. Bozek. Phys.Rev.C, 79:054901, 2009.
  • (62) K. Werner C. Schreiber and J. Aichelin. Phys. Atom. Nucl., 75:640, 2012.
  • (63) M. Gemard and J. Aichelin. Astron. Nachr., 335:660, 2014.
  • (64) M. Petrovici et al. Phys.Rev.C, 96:014908, 2017.
  • (65) C. Loizides and A. Morsch. Phys.Lett.B, 773:408, 2017.
  • (66) C. Loizides et al. Phys.Rev.C, 97:054910, 2018.
  • (67) M. Gyulassy J. Xu, A. Buzzatti. JHEP, 08:063, 2014.
  • (68) M. Djordjevic et al. Phys.Rev.C, 99:061902, 2019.
  • (69) D. Zigic et al. Nucl.Phys.A, 00:1, 2020.
  • (70) B.Betz and M.Gyulassy. arXiv:, 1305.6458[nucl-th], 2013.
  • (71) B.Betz and M.Gyulassy. Phys.Rev.C, 86:024903, 2012.
  • (72) B.Betz and M.Gyulassy. Phys.Rev.C, 84:024913, 2011.
  • (73) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX Collaboration). Phys.Rev.Lett., 101:232301, 2008.
  • (74) B. Abelev et. (ALICE Collaboration). Eur.Phys.J., C74:3108, 2014.
  • (75) J.D. Bjorken. Phys.Rev.D, 27:140, 1982.
  • (76) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 88:044909, 2013.
  • (77) N. Jacazio (ALICE Collaboration). Nucl.Phys.A, 967:421, 2017.
  • (78) J. Adams et al. (STAR Collaboration). Phys.Rev.Lett., 98:062301, 2007.
  • (79) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Phys.Rev.Lett., 111:222301, 2013.
  • (80) D.S. de Albuquerque (ALICE Collaboration). Quark Matter 2018, 13-19 May 2018.
  • (81) I.C. Arsene et al. (BRAHMS Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 94:014907, 2016.
  • (82) F. Bellini (ALICE Collaboration). Nucl.Phys.A, 982:427, 2019.
  • (83) A. Adare et al. (STAR Collaboration). Phys.Rev.C, 93:024901, 2016.
  • (84) A. Seryakov and G. Feofilov. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1701:070001, 2016.
  • (85) J. Adam et al. (ALICE Collaboration). Eur.Phys.J., C77:33, 2017.
  • (86) C. Andres et al. Eur.Phys.J., C76:475, 2016.
  • (87) C. Andres et al. arXiv:1705.01493[nucl-th], 2017.
  • (88) M. Xie et al. Eur.Phys.J., C79:589, 2019.
  • (89) E. Sangaline et al. (STAR Collaboration). Quark Matter 2012 Conference Proceedings, 2012.
  • (90) D. Sekihata (for the ALICE Collaboration). Quark Matter 2018, 13-19 May 2018.
  • (91) J. Liao and E. Shuryak. Phys.Rev.Lett., 102:202302, 2009.