This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Coherent photoproduction of heavy quarkonia on nuclei

B. Z. Kopeliovich1 [email protected]    M. Krelina2,3 [email protected]    J. Nemchik2,4 [email protected]    I. K. Potashnikova1 [email protected] 1 Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avenida España 1680, Valparaíso, Chile 2 Czech Technical University in Prague, FNSPE, Břehová 7, 11519 Prague, Czech Republic 3 Physikalisches Institut, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 4 Institute of Experimental Physics SAS, Watsonova 47, 04001 Košice, Slovakia
Abstract

The differential cross section of coherent photo-production of heavy quarkonia on nuclear targets is calculated within the QCD color dipole formalism. The higher-twist nuclear shadowing corresponding to the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q Fock component of the photon, is calculated including the correlation between dipole orientation r\vec{r} and impact parameter of a collision b\vec{b}, which is related to the transverse momentum transfer via Fourier transform. We also included the leading twist gluon shadowing corresponding to higher Fock components of the photon containing gluons, which have specifically short coherence time, especially for multi-gluon components, even at very high energies. The contribution of such fluctuating gluonic dipole is calculated employing the path-integral technique. Our results are in good agreement with recent ALICE data on charmonium production in ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions.

pacs:
14.40.Pq,13.60.Le,13.60.-r

I Introduction

Exclusive photo-production of vector mesons on protons and nuclei has been an important playground for strong interaction models since early years of vector dominance model Stodolsky:1966am ; Ross:1965qa based on the pole dominated dispersion relation for the production amplitude (see the comprehensive review Bauer:1977iq ). While for light mesons that assumption was reasonably justified by closeness of the meson pole to the physical region, photo-production of heavy quarkonia, J/ψJ/\psi, Υ\Upsilon, etc. (or high Q2Q^{2} electro-production), cannot be dominated by the pole, which is far away from physical region, and other singularities, poles and cuts, become essential Hufner:1995qe ; Hufner:1997jg . Besides, photo-production on nuclei provide unique information about the space-time pattern of interaction Hufner:1996dr .

With advent of the quantum-chromodynamics (QCD) era, an alternative description in terms of color dipoles was proposed in Kopeliovich:1981pz , and applied to exclusive photo-production of heavy quarkonia on protons and nuclei Kopeliovich:1991pu ; Hufner:2000jb ; Ivanov:2002kc .

Experiments with ultra-peripheral collisions (UPC) at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) and Large Hadron Collider (LHC) (see e.g. Bertulani:2005ru ) offer new opportunities for measurements of exclusive photo-production of vector mesons on protons and nuclei. Corresponding calculations, performed within the color-dipole approach Ivanov:2007ms ; Kopeliovich:2020has , as well as other theoretical descriptions of coherent production of heavy quarkonia in UPC, require improvements. In the present paper, we aim to minimize theoretical uncertainties of the QCD dipole formalism for coherent production on nuclear targets.

The effect, missed in many calculations, is the correlation between the dipole transverse orientation r\vec{r} and the impact parameter of the collision b\vec{b}. Since a colorless Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q dipole interacts only due to the difference between the QQ and Q¯\bar{Q} scattering amplitudes, the dipole-proton interaction vanishes when dipole separation vector r\vec{r} is perpendicular to b\vec{b}, while reaches maximal strength when they are parallel Kopeliovich:2007fv . The influence of the r\vec{r}-b\vec{b} correlation on the differential cross section of exclusive photo-production of heavy quarkonia on protons was studied recently in Kopeliovich:2021dgx . A significant difference was found with the description based on the conventional bb-dependent dipole models, lacking the b\vec{b}-r\vec{r} correlation, like b-IPsat Rezaeian:2012ji , b-Sat Kowalski:2003hm , b-CGC Kowalski:2006hc ; Rezaeian:2013tka and b-BK Cepila:2018faq models, for example. We found that the correlation is especially important for photo-production of radially excited charmonium states due to the nodal structure of the wave function. This provides a stringent test of various models for bb-dependent dipole amplitude. The importance of color dipole orientation in other processes has been discussed in Ref. Kopeliovich:2021dgx (see references therein).

However, on nuclear targets the effect of b\vec{b}-r\vec{r} correlation is diluted, except the nuclear periphery, where the nuclear density steeply varies with b\vec{b}. Therefore the impact of b\vec{b}-r\vec{r} correlation on the azimuthal asymmetry of photons and pions turns out to be rather small Kopeliovich:2008dy ; Kopeliovich:2007sd ; Kopeliovich:2007fv ; Kopeliovich:2008nx . Nevertheless, in the present paper, we implement the dipole orientation effect to minimize the theoretical uncertainties. The calculations rely on the realistic model for the r\vec{r} and b\vec{b} dependent partial Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q-proton and Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q-nucleus amplitudes proposed in Kopeliovich:2021dgx , with parameters corresponding to GBW GolecBiernat:1998js ; GolecBiernat:1999qd and BGBK Bartels:2002cj saturation models for the dipole cross section.

The present paper is organized as follows. The basics of the dipole formalism for photoproduction on a proton target, γpVp\gamma^{*}p\to Vp, is described in Sec. II. In particular, the effect of b\vec{b}-r\vec{r} correlation, including explicit expression for the partial dipole amplitude is presented in Sec. II.1.

The important part of the calculations, the VQ¯QV\to\bar{Q}Q distribution function in the light-front (LF) frame, is discussed in Sec. II.2, where the procedure of Lorentz boost from the rest frame of the quarkonium is described. It is confronted with the unjustified, but popular photon-like structure for the VQ¯QV\to\bar{Q}Q transition. Its Lorentz-invariant form leads to a huge weight of the DD-wave component in the quarkonium rest frame, contradicting the solutions of the Schrödinger equation with realistic potentials.

The dipole formalism for coherent photoproduction on nuclei is formulated in Sec. III.

Since the higher-twist nuclear effects for photoproduction of heavy quarkonia are very small, the main nuclear effects are related to gluon shadowing, considered in Sec. IV. In terms of the Fock state expansion, that is related to the higher Fock components of the projectile photon, which contain besides the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q, additional gluons. The lifetime (coherence time) of such components turn out to be rather short, even for the very first state |Q¯Qg|\bar{Q}Qg\rangle, which we calculate in Sec. IV.1 relying on the path-integral formalism. In Sec. IV.2 we evaluate the coherence length for multi-gluon Fock states and demonstrate that it is dramatically reduced with addition of every extra gluon. We conclude that the single-gluon approximation is rather accurate in the available energy range.

Eventually, in Sec. V we present predictions for differential cross sections dσ/dtd\sigma/dt of coherent charmonium photoproduction, which are in a good accord with available results of the ALICE experiment, extracted from data on UPC. Here we present also predictions for other quarkonium states, like ψ,Υ\psi^{\,\prime},\Upsilon and Υ\Upsilon^{\,\prime}.

II Dipole formalism for photo-production of heavy quarkonia

The color dipole formalism leads to the following factorized form of the dipole-nucleon photo-production amplitude Kopeliovich:1991pu ,

𝒜γpVp(x,q)=V|𝒜~|γ=2d2beiqbd2r01𝑑αΨV(r,α)𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)Ψγ(r,α,Q2).\mathcal{A}^{\gamma^{\ast}p\to Vp}(x,\vec{q}\,)=\bigl{\langle}V|\tilde{\mathcal{A}}|\gamma^{*}\bigr{\rangle}=2\,\int d^{2}b\,e^{i\vec{q}\cdot\vec{b}}\int d^{2}r\int_{0}^{1}d\alpha\,\Psi_{V}^{*}(\vec{r},\alpha)\,\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)\,\Psi_{\gamma^{\ast}}(\vec{r},\alpha,Q^{2})\,. (1)

Here q\vec{q} is transverse component of momentum transfer; α\alpha is the fractional light-front momentum carried by a heavy quark or antiquark of the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q Fock component of the photon, with the transverse separation r\vec{r}. That is the lowest Fock state, while the higher Fock components contribute by default to the dipole-proton amplitude. However, on a nuclear target these higher Fock components will be taken into account separately, due to coherence effect in gluon radiation.

The dipole-proton amplitude 𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,) in Eq. (1) depends on the transverse dipole size r\vec{r} and impact parameter of collision b\vec{b}. The essential feature of this amplitude is the r\vec{r}-b\vec{b} correlation, explicitly presented below in Sec. II.1. The LF distribution functions Ψγ(r,α,Q2)\Psi_{\gamma^{\ast}}(r,\alpha,Q^{2}) and ΨV(r,α)\Psi_{V}(r,\alpha) correspond to the transitions γQ¯Q\gamma^{\ast}\to\bar{Q}Q and Q¯QV\bar{Q}Q\to V, respectively. They are specified below in Sect. II.2.

The amplitude (1) depends on Bjorken xx evaluated in ryskin in the leading log(1/x)\log(1/x) approximation. Each radiated gluon provides a factor x1𝑑x/x=ln(1/x)\int_{x}^{1}dx^{\prime}/x^{\prime}=\ln(1/x), where xx is the minimal value of the fractional LF gluon momentum related to the longitudinal momentum transfer qL=(MV2+Q2)/2Eγq_{L}=(M_{V}^{2}+Q^{2})/2E_{\gamma}. So,

x=MV2+Q2s=MV2+Q2W2+Q2mN2.x=\frac{M_{V}^{2}+Q^{2}}{s}=\frac{M_{V}^{2}+Q^{2}}{W^{2}+Q^{2}-m_{N}^{2}}\,. (2)

As far as the production amplitude (1) is known, we are in a position to calculate the differential cross section,

dσγpVpdq2=116π|𝒜γpVp(x,q)|2.\frac{d\sigma^{\gamma^{\ast}p\to Vp}}{dq^{2}}=\frac{1}{16\,\pi}\,\Bigl{|}\mathcal{A}^{\gamma^{\ast}p\to Vp}(x,\vec{q}\,)\Bigr{|}^{2}\,. (3)

II.1 Dipole-proton partial amplitude with 𝒓\vec{r}-𝒃\vec{b} correlation

As was explained in Introduction, interaction of a color neutral dipole with impact parameter b\vec{b} exhibits a strong r\vec{r}-b\vec{b} correlation. Namely, interaction vanishes if rb\vec{r}\perp\vec{b}, but reaches maximal strength if rb\vec{r}\parallel\vec{b}. An explicit form of the dipole-proton partial amplitude, possessing such a correlation, was proposed in Kopeliovich:2008dy ; Kopeliovich:2007sd ; Kopeliovich:2007fv ; Kopeliovich:2008nx ; Kopeliovich:2021dgx and reads,

Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)=σ08π(x){exp[[b+r(1α)]22(x)]+exp[(brα)22(x)]\displaystyle\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)=\frac{\sigma_{0}}{8\pi\mathcal{B}(x)}\,\Biggl{\{}\exp\left[-\,\frac{\bigl{[}\vec{b}+\vec{r}(1-\alpha)\bigr{]}^{2}}{2\mathcal{B}(x)}\right]+\exp\left[-\,\frac{(\vec{b}-\vec{r}\alpha)^{2}}{2\mathcal{B}(x)}\right]
 2exp[r2R02(x)[b+(1/2α)r]22(x)]},\displaystyle-\,2\,\exp\Biggl{[}-\,\frac{r^{2}}{R_{0}^{2}(x)}-\,\frac{\bigl{[}\,\vec{b}+(1/2-\alpha)\vec{r}\,\bigr{]}^{2}}{2\mathcal{B}(x)}\Biggr{]}\Biggr{\}}\,, (4)

where the function (x)\mathcal{B}(x) was defined in Ref. Kopeliovich:2008nx ,

(x)=Belq¯q(x,r0)18R02(x).\mathcal{B}(x)=B^{\bar{q}q}_{el}(x,r\to 0)-\frac{1}{8}R_{0}^{2}(x)\,. (5)

Here R02(x)R_{0}^{2}(x) controls xx dependence of the saturation cross section, introduced in GolecBiernat:1998js ; GolecBiernat:1999qd , σQ¯Q(r,x)=σ0(1exp[r2/R02(x)])\sigma_{\bar{Q}Q}(r,x)=\sigma_{0}\,\bigl{(}1-\exp\bigl{[}-{r^{2}}/{R_{0}^{2}(x)}\bigr{]}\bigr{)}, with σ0=23.03mb\sigma_{0}=23.03\,\,\mbox{mb}, R0(x)=0.4fm×(x/x0)0.144R_{0}(x)=0.4\,\,\mbox{fm}\times(x/x_{0})^{0.144} with x0=3.04×104x_{0}=3.04\times 10^{-4}. The dipole-proton slope in the limit of vanishingly small dipoles Belq¯q(x,r0)B^{\bar{q}q}_{el}(x,r\to 0) can be measured in electro-production of vector mesons with highly virtual photons Q21GeV2Q^{2}\gg 1\,\mbox{GeV}^{2}. The measured slope Bγpρp(x,Q21GeV2)5GeV2B_{\gamma^{*}p\to\rho p}(x,Q^{2}\gg 1\,\mbox{GeV}^{2})\approx 5\,\mbox{GeV}^{-2} ZEUS:2007iet , as expected is defined by the proton charge radius.

The GBW model, lacking DGLAP evolution, was improved in the BGBK dipole model Bartels:2002cj , where the saturation scale is related to the gluon density, which is subject to DGLAP evolution, R02(x,μ2)=4/Qs2(x,μ2)=σ0Nc/(π2αs(μ2)xg(x,μ2))R_{0}^{2}(x,\mu^{2})={4}/{Q_{s}^{2}(x,\mu^{2})}={\sigma_{0}\,N_{c}}/\bigl{(}{\pi^{2}\,\alpha_{s}(\mu^{2})\,x\,g(x,\mu^{2})}\bigr{)}, where μ2=𝐶/r2+μ02\mu^{2}={\mathrel{C}}/{r^{2}}+\mu_{0}^{2}, Qs2Q_{s}^{2} is the saturation scale and the gluon distribution function xg(x,μ2)x\,g(x,\mu^{2}) is obtained as a solution of the DGLAP evolution equation with the shape at the initial scale Q02=1GeV2Q_{0}^{2}=1\,\,\mbox{GeV}^{2}, xg(x,Q02)=Agxλg(1x)5.6x\,g(x,Q_{0}^{2})=A_{g}\,x^{-\lambda_{g}}(1-x)^{5.6}. Here Ag=1.2A_{g}=1.2, λg=0.28\lambda_{g}=0.28, μ02=0.52GeV2\mu_{0}^{2}=0.52\,\,\mbox{GeV}^{2}, 𝐶=0.26\mathrel{C}=0.26 and σ0=23mb\sigma_{0}=23\,\,\mbox{mb}. In what follows, we denote GBW and BGBK dipole model containing the color dipole orientation as br-GBW and br-BGBK, respectively.

II.2 The 𝑸¯𝑸\bar{Q}Q distribution functions

Now we should specify the form of the γQ¯Q\gamma^{*}\to\bar{Q}Q and VQ¯QV\to\bar{Q}Q distribution functions in Eq. (1) resp. (6). The former is well known Kogut:1969xa ; Bjorken:1970ah , here we skip the details, which can be found e.g. in Hufner:2000jb ).

The LF distribution function for heavy quarkonium VQ¯QV\to\bar{Q}Q requires special care. It is known in the rest frame of the quarkonium treating it as a non-relativistic system and solving Schrödinger equation. However, challenging is the Lorentz boost to the LF frame. A popular prescription was proposed by Terent’ev Terentev:1976jk . The 3-dimensional quarkonium wave function in the rest frame can be expressed in terms of LF variables, fractional LF momentum α\alpha and 2-dimensional transverse momentum of the quarks. Although the variables are invariant relative Lorentz boost, the function itself is not. The crucial but unjustified assumption of the prescription is Lorentz invariance of the whole function of α\alpha and pTp_{T}, so it is boosted unchanged from the rest to the LF frame.

The Lorentz boosted Schrödinger equation was derived in Kopeliovich:2015qna for heavy Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q system, basing on the Lorentz-invariant Bethe-Salpeter equation and smallness of Δα=α1/2\Delta\alpha=\alpha-1/2. Comparison with the Terent’ev prescription (see fig. 2 in Kopeliovich:2015qna ) shows that the latter is amazingly accurate at medium values of α1/2\alpha\sim 1/2. Thus, the Lorentz boosting Terent’ev prescription is proven to be well justified.

The quarkonium wave function in the rest frame was found solving the Schrödinger equation with several realistic potentials, such as the harmonic oscillatory potential (HAR) (see e.g. Kopeliovich:1991pu ; Cepila:2019skb ), Cornell potential (COR) Eichten:1978tg ; Eichten:1979ms , logarithmic potential (LOG) Quigg:1977dd , power-like potential (POW) Barik:1980ai , as well as Buchmüller-Tye potential (BT) Buchmuller:1980su . All of them well reproduce the charmonium mass spectrum and leptonic decay widths. The results for the photoproduction cross sections obtained with these potentials were found in Hufner:2000jb to be rather close. The observed diversity can be treated as a measure of theoretical uncertainty related to the LF quarkonium distribution function.

Nevertheless, a significant correction to this boosting prescription was found in Hufner:2000jb . Because of transverse motion of the quarks, their momenta are not parallel to the boost axis, what leads to a quark spin rotation along with the boost, named after Melosh Melosh:1974cu (see also Krelina:2018hmt ; Lappi:2020ufv ). The corresponding correction to the photo-production cross section turns out to be large Hufner:2000jb especially for ψ(2S)\psi(2S), what solves the ψ\psi^{\prime} to J/ψJ/\psi puzzle Hoyer:1999xe .

On the contrary, the frequently used alternative assumption is that the VQ¯QV\to\bar{Q}Q vertex has the vector current structure Ψμu¯γμu\Psi_{\mu}\bar{u}\gamma_{\mu}u, like for γQ¯Q\gamma^{*}\to\bar{Q}Q (see e.g. Ryskin:1992ui ; Brodsky:1994kf ; Frankfurt:1995jw ; Nemchik:1996cw ). This vertex is Lorentz invariant and can be treated in any reference frame, in particular in the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q rest frame, where the three-dimensional Schrödinger equation discriminates between the state with different orbital momenta, in particular between the SS- and DD-waves Hufner:2000jb . The above photon-like vertex contains a DD-wave component with abnormally large weight, 5-6% for charmonium and 1.6-1.8% for bottomonium (uncertainty is related to the choice of renormalization-scheme dependent quark masses). In contrast, the solution of Schrödinger equation with above mentioned realistic potentials, contains an order of magnitude smaller contamination of the DD-wave component (for a review on quarkonium physics see e.g. Brambilla:2004wf ; Brambilla:2010cs ).

The calculations in Haysak:2003yf , employing the COR potential and hyperfine splitting, exhibit DD-wave contributions to the J/ψJ/\psi wave function squared with magnitudes 0.05%0.05\%, and 0.004%0.004\% for Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S).

Similar magnitude of the DD-wave component for charmonium was found in Ref. Fu:2018yxq , and in Ref. Chang:2010kj in the framework of the Bethe-Salpeter equation, as well as in Ref. Cao:2012du within the QCD-inspired quark potential model.

These solid arguments completely rule out the possibility of photon-like vertex for transition of a heavy quarkonium to a Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q pair. For this reason we treat this unjustified model as incorrect and ignore it in what follows.

III Coherent photo-production off nuclei: higher twist shadowing

The lowest Fock component of the projectile photon, which contributes to this process, is Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q. The transverse dipole size is small, 1/mQ1/m_{Q}. Therefore shadowing corrections are as small as 1/mQ21/m_{Q}^{2}, so should be treated as a higher twist effect.

For the amplitude of quarkonium photo-production on a nuclear target, γAVA\gamma^{*}A\to VA, one can employ expression Eq. (1), but replacing the dipole-nucleon by dipole-nucleus amplitude,

𝒜γAVA(x,Q2,q)=2d2bAeiqbAd2r01𝑑αΨV(r,α)𝒜Q¯QA(r,x,α,bA)Ψγ(r,α,Q2).\mathcal{A}^{\gamma^{\ast}A\to VA}(x,Q^{2},\vec{q}\,)=2\,\int d^{2}b_{A}\,e^{i\vec{q}\cdot\vec{b}_{A}}\int d^{2}r\int_{0}^{1}d\alpha\,\Psi_{V}^{*}(\vec{r},\alpha)\,\mathcal{A}^{A}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}_{A})\,\Psi_{\gamma^{\ast}}(\vec{r},\alpha,Q^{2})\,. (6)

In ultra-peripheral collisions at the LHC, the photon virtuality Q20Q^{2}\sim 0 and the photon energy in the nuclear rest frame is sufficiently high to make the coherence length lcl_{c} for Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q photo-production much longer than the nuclear radius, lc=1/qL=(W2+Q2mN2)/(mN(MV2+Q2)W2/(mNMV2))RAl_{c}=1/q_{L}=(W^{2}+Q^{2}-m_{N}^{2})/\bigl{(}m_{N}\,(M_{V}^{2}+Q^{2})\approx W^{2}/(m_{N}M_{V}^{2})\bigr{)}\gg R_{A}. Then Lorentz time delation freezes the fluctuations of the dipole size, and one can rely on the eikonal form for the dipole-nucleus partial amplitude at impact parameter bA\vec{b}_{A},

Im𝒜Q¯QA(r,x,α,bA)|lcRA=1[11Ad2bIm𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)TA(bA+b)]A,\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{A}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}_{A})\Biggl{|}_{l_{c}\gg R_{A}}=1-\Biggl{[}1-\frac{1}{A}\,\int d^{2}b\,\,\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)\,T_{A}(\vec{b}_{A}+\vec{b}\,)\Biggr{]}^{A}\,, (7)

where TA(bA)=𝑑zρA(bA,z)T_{A}(\vec{b}_{A})=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dz\,\rho_{A}(\vec{b}_{A},z) is the nuclear thickness function normalized as d2bATA(bA)=A\int d^{2}b_{A}\,T_{A}(\vec{b}_{A})=A, and ρA(bA,z)\rho_{A}(\vec{b}_{A},z) is the nuclear density. For ρA(bA,z)\rho_{A}(\vec{b}_{A},z) we employ the realistic Wood-Saxon form DeJager:1987qc .

Expression for the differential cross sections is analogous to Eq. (3) provided that the coherence length lcRAl_{c}\gg R_{A},

dσγAVA(x,Q2,t=q2)dt|lcRA=116π|𝒜γAVA(x,Q2,q)|2.\frac{d\sigma^{\gamma^{\ast}A\to VA}(x,Q^{2},t=-q^{2}\,)}{dt}\Biggl{|}_{l_{c}\gg R_{A}}=\frac{1}{16\,\pi}\,\Bigl{|}\mathcal{A}^{\gamma^{\ast}A\to VA}(x,Q^{2},\vec{q}\,)\Bigr{|}^{2}\,. (8)

We also incorporate the real part Bronzan:1974jh ; Nemchik:1996cw ; forshaw-03 of the nuclear γAVA\gamma^{\ast}A\to VA amplitude via a substitution in Eq. (7)

Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)(1iπΛ2)\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}_{\bar{Q}Q}^{N}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)\Rightarrow\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}_{\bar{Q}Q}^{N}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)\,\cdot\left(1-i\,\frac{\pi\,\Lambda}{2}\right)\, (9)

with Λ=ln(Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b))/ln(1/x)\Lambda=\partial\ln(\,{\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)}\,)\huge/\partial\ln(1/x).

In order to include the skewness correction Shuvaev:1999ce one should perform the following modification of the partial Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q-nucleon amplitude in the eikonal formula (7),

Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)RS(Λ),\displaystyle\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)\Rightarrow\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}\,)\cdot R_{S}(\Lambda)\,, (10)

where the skewness factor RS(Λ)=(22Λ+3/π)Γ(Λ+5/2)/Γ(Λ+4)R_{S}(\Lambda)=\bigl{(}{2^{2\Lambda+3}}/{\sqrt{\pi}}\,\bigr{)}\,\cdot{\Gamma(\Lambda+5/2)}/{\Gamma(\Lambda+4)}.

IV Higher Fock states and gluon shadowing

Higher Fock components of the photon contain besides the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q pair additional gluons, |Q¯Qg|\bar{Q}Q\,g\rangle, |Q¯Q 2g|\bar{Q}Q\,2g\rangle, etc. In γp\gamma^{*}p collision they correspond to gluon radiation processes, which should be treated as higher-order corrections to the gluonic exchange, which take part in the building of the Pomeron exchange in the diffractive γp\gamma^{*}p interaction. Therefore the higher Fock components are included in the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q-dipole interaction with the proton. In the case of photo-production on a nucleus, the higher Fock components contribute to the amplitude 𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b}) in Eq. (7). This would correspond to the Bethe-Heitler regime of radiation, when each of multiple interactions produce independent gluon radiation without interferences.

However, the pattern of multiple interactions changes in the regime of long coherence length of gluon radiation lcgdl_{c}^{g}\gg d, where d2fmd\approx 2\,\mbox{fm} is the mean separation between bound nucleons. The gluon radiation length has the form,

lcg=2Eγαg(1αg)kT2+(1αg)mg2+αgMQ¯Q2,l_{c}^{g}=\frac{2E_{\gamma}\alpha_{g}(1-\alpha_{g})}{k_{T}^{2}+(1-\alpha_{g})m_{g}^{2}+\alpha_{g}M_{\bar{Q}Q}^{2}}, (11)

where αg\alpha_{g} is the LF fraction of the photon momentum carried by the gluon, MQ¯QM_{\bar{Q}Q} is the effective mass of the Q¯Q{\bar{Q}Q} pair and the effective gluon mass mg0.7GeVm_{g}\approx 0.7\,\mbox{GeV} is fixed by data on gluon radiation Kopeliovich:1999am ; Kopeliovich:2007pq . Such a rather large effective gluon mass makes the gluonic coherence length (see Eq. (15) in Sec. IV.2) nearly order of magnitude shorter than for Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q fluctuations Kopeliovich:2000ra . This is why onset of shadowing in DIS, which occur at x<0.1x<0.1 for higher twist Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q shadowing, requires much smaller x<0.01x<0.01 for onset of gluon shadowing Kopeliovich:1999am . That was confirmed by the global analysis of DIS data on nuclei florian .

IV.1 Single gluon approximation

At long lcgdl_{c}^{g}\gg d the Landau-Pomeranchuk effect is at work, namely, radiation does not resolve multiple interactions, which act as one accumulated kick, which shakes off gluons. So gluon radiation intensity is reduced in comparison with the Bethe-Heitler regime. This is why it is called gluon shadowing (GS) Kopeliovich:1999am .

Such a reduction of the cross section is a well known feature of Gribov inelastic shadowing Gribov:1968jf ; Kopeliovich:2012kw ; Kopeliovich:2016jjx , and gluon shadowing is a part of Gribov corrections. It correspond to inclusion of higher Fock components of the projection photon, |Q¯Qg|\bar{Q}Qg\rangle, |Q¯Q2g|\bar{Q}Q2g\rangle, etc. Then, eikonalization of these components is required. However, differently from Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q fluctuations, a Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Qg component does not reach the ”frozen” size regime even at very small xx, because of divergent dαg/αgd\alpha_{g}/\alpha_{g} behavior. Therefore, variation of the Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Q-g dipole size should be taken into account. This was done for DIS in Kopeliovich:1999am applying the Green function technique. It was also used for calculation of gluon shadowing in electroproduction of heavy vector mesons on nuclei in Refs. Ivanov:2002kc ; Nemchik:2002ug .

The Gribov correction, related to the Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Qg component of the photon, to the partial nuclear cross section at impact parameter bAb_{A}, reads

ΔσtotγA(bA)\displaystyle\Delta\sigma^{\gamma^{*}A}_{tot}(b_{A}) =\displaystyle= 12Re𝑑z2ρA(bA,z2)z2𝑑z1ρA(bA,z1)d2ρ1d2ρ2dαgαg\displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\,{\rm Re}\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}dz_{2}\,\rho_{A}(b_{A},z_{2})\int\limits_{-\infty}^{z_{2}}dz_{1}\,\rho_{A}(b_{A},z_{1})\int d^{2}\rho_{1}\int d^{2}\rho_{2}\int\frac{d\alpha_{g}}{\alpha_{g}} (12)
×\displaystyle\times AγQ¯Qg(αg,ρ2)Ggg(z2,ρ2;z1,ρ1)AγQ¯Qg(αg,ρ1).\displaystyle A^{\dagger}_{\gamma^{*}\to\bar{Q}Qg}(\alpha_{g},\vec{\rho}_{2})G_{gg}(z_{2},\vec{\rho}_{2};z_{1},\vec{\rho}_{1})A_{\gamma^{*}\to\bar{Q}Qg}(\alpha_{g},\vec{\rho}_{1})\,.

This is the usual Gribov correction containing product of conjugated amplitudes of diffractive transitions, γ+NQ¯Qg+N\gamma^{*}+N\to\bar{Q}Qg+N, on bound nucleons with longitudinal coordinates z1,2z_{1,2}. On the contrary to kk we have no uncertainty with inclusion of higher order multiple interactions. The propagation of the Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Qg system in the nuclear medium is described by the Green function Ggg(z2,ρ2;z1,ρ1)G_{gg}(z_{2},\vec{\rho}_{2};z_{1},\vec{\rho}_{1}), which takes care of attenuation and phase shift.

The Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Qg Fock state is characterized by two scales. One scale is set by the heavy quark mass, and determines the small Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q separation 1/mQ\approx 1/m_{Q}. This is a higher twist effect, i.e. the quark Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q pair size drops linearly with mQm_{Q} (or with Q2Q^{2} in Kopeliovich:1999am ), so it can be treated as point-like color-octet system. However, the transverse distance between the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q and gluon is much larger and independent of mQm_{Q} (up to Log corrections). This distance depends on the previously mentioned scale, the effective gluon mass, mg0.7GeVm_{g}\approx 0.7\,\mbox{GeV}. Thus, the Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Q-g system is strongly asymmetric, a nearly point-like color-octet Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q pair and the gluon is separated by relatively long, 1/mg1/m_{g} distance. Since the latter controls gluon shadowing, it is the leading twist effect, because it is hardly dependent (only Log) on the hard scale mQm_{Q}. Expression (12) is integrated over Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q separation, assuming a weak dependence of the Green function on this scale. Thus, the whole 3-body system can be treated with high precision as glue-glue dipole Kopeliovich:1999am . We skip further details of calculation, which are well described in Kopeliovich:1999am ; Ivanov:2002kc .

The fractional Gribov correction to the partial nuclear cross section

RG(bA)=1ΔσtotγA(bA)TA(bA)σtotγN,R_{G}(b_{A})=1-\frac{\Delta\sigma^{\gamma^{*}A}_{tot}(b_{A})}{T_{A}(b_{A})\sigma^{\gamma^{*}N}_{tot}}, (13)

is interpreted in the parton model as ratio of gluon densities. As far as the gluon density in the bound nucleons is reduced by factor RGR_{G} one can take this into account renormalizing the nucleon amplitude in Eq. (7),

Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)Im𝒜Q¯QN(r,x,α,b)RG(x,|bA+b|).\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b})\Rightarrow\mathrm{Im}\mathcal{A}^{N}_{\bar{Q}Q}(\vec{r},x,\alpha,\vec{b})\cdot R_{G}(x,|\vec{b}_{A}+\vec{b}|)\,. (14)

As an example, the magnitudes of RGR_{G} at c.m. collision energies sN=5.02TeV\sqrt{s_{N}}=5.02\,\mbox{TeV} and 13TeV13\,\mbox{TeV} are presented in Fig. 1 at y=0y=0 as function of nuclear impact parameter bAb_{A} in left panel, and vs rapidity for the bAb_{A}-integrated cross section in the right panel.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Gluon shadowing factor RG(bA)R_{G}(b_{A}) for photo-production of J/ψJ/\psi on lead as function of impact parameter bAb_{A} (left), and rapidity yy (right). Solid and dashed curves correspond to c.m. collision energies sN=5.02TeV\sqrt{s_{N}}=5.02\,\mbox{TeV} and 13TeV13\,\mbox{TeV}, respectively.

IV.2 Suppression of multi-gluon Fock states

The lifetime of the Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Qg fluctuation, usually called coherence time (or length), in the nuclear rest frame is given by,

lcg=2EγMQ¯Qg2,l^{g}_{c}=\frac{2E_{\gamma}}{M_{\bar{Q}Qg}^{2}}\,, (15)

where replacing kT2\langle k_{T}^{2}\rangle by mg2m_{g}^{2}, the invariant mass of the fluctuation gets the form,

MQ¯Qg2=MQ¯Q2+kT21αg+mg2+kT2αgMQ¯Q2(1+γ/αg).M_{\bar{Q}Qg}^{2}=\frac{M_{\bar{Q}Q}^{2}+k_{T}^{2}}{1-\alpha_{g}}+\frac{m_{g}^{2}+k_{T}^{2}}{\alpha_{g}}\approx M_{\bar{Q}Q}^{2}\left(1+\gamma/\alpha_{g}\right)\,. (16)

Here αg\alpha_{g} is the fractional LF momentum carried by the gluon, which is small (see below), and

γ=2mg2MQ¯Q2.\gamma=\frac{2m_{g}^{2}}{M_{\bar{Q}Q}^{2}}\,. (17)

Thus, Eq. (15) acquires the form,

lcg=PgxmN,l^{g}_{c}=\frac{P_{g}}{x\,m_{N}}\,, (18)

where according to Kopeliovich:2000ra the quantity 1/xmN1/x\,m_{N} is the maximal possible coherence length, and the factor

Pg=αgαg+γ,P_{g}=\frac{\alpha_{g}}{\alpha_{g}+\gamma}\,, (19)

considerably reduces the magnitude of lcgl_{c}^{g}. We simplify the calculations done in Kopeliovich:2000ra , because we need to evaluate only the coherence lengths, including more complicated multi-gluon Fock components. We avoid the integration over the gluon-Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q transverse separation, fixing it at the mean value 1/mg1/m_{g}. Averaging PgP_{g} over the radiation spectrum dαg/αgd\alpha_{g}/\alpha_{g} we get its mean value,

Pg=ln[(αgmax+γ)/(αgmin+γ)]ln(αgmax/αgmin).\langle P_{g}\rangle=\frac{\ln\left[(\alpha_{g}^{max}+\gamma)/(\alpha_{g}^{min}+\gamma)\right]}{\ln(\alpha_{g}^{max}/\alpha_{g}^{min})}\,. (20)

The minimal value αgmin\alpha_{g}^{min} is defined by the trasnverse mass of the radiated gluon 2mg\approx 2m_{g} and the available energy range for radiation. The latter is not well defined, it depends on the chosen invariant mass of the diffractive excitation γX\gamma^{*}\to X, corresponding to the triple-Pomeron term in Gribov corrections. Fortunately, the result of (20) has a weak sensitivity (only Log) to this choice. Following Kopeliovich:2000ra and previous studies of diffraction kklp we fix

αgmin=2mg20.2W2=5γx.\alpha_{g}^{min}=\frac{2m_{g}^{2}}{0.2\,W^{2}}=5\,\gamma\,x\,. (21)

Here the chosen factor 0.20.2 corresponds to the cut xF>0.8x_{F}>0.8 for Feynman xx in diffraction hNhXhN\to hX (see e.g. in kklp ).

The choice of the upper bound αgmax\alpha_{g}^{max} for the photon LF momentum is rather uncertain. Large values αgmax1\alpha_{g}^{max}\to 1 are dangerous, because according to Eq. (16) the mass of the fluctuation rises to infinity. That means a vanishingly small probability of such fluctuations. Therefore, following Kopeliovich:2000ra we fix αgmax=γ\alpha_{g}^{max}=\gamma. Then, the numerator of (20) equals to ln2\ln 2, and e.g. at x=103x=10^{-3} the mean value of the coherence length lg\langle l_{g}\rangle is reduced by the factor Pg=0.13\langle P_{g}\rangle=0.13, pretty close to the more accurate estimate in Kopeliovich:2000ra .

Notice that at αminαmax\alpha_{min}\ll\alpha_{max} the invariant mass Eq. (16) is dominated by the second term. Including more gluons to a Fock component (16) makes it heavier adding a new term γ/αgi\gamma/\alpha_{gi}. Assuming the mean values of this terms equal each other, we get the coherence length for the nn-gluon Fock component nn times shorter than the single-gluon lcgl^{g}_{c}, which we already found very short.

This is why the Balitsky-Kovchegov (BK) equation balitsky ; kovchegov , which assumes that the dipole sizes are ”frozen”, cannot be applied to nuclear targets at available energies poetic . Therefore the single-gluon approximation described in Sect. IV.1, is sufficiently accurate, and we employ it in what follows.

V Predictions and comparison with data

The dipole model calculations of diffractive photo-production of J/ψJ/\psi on protons, dσγpJ/ψp(t)/dtd\sigma^{\gamma^{\ast}p\to J\!/\!\psi p}(t)/dt, were verified in Ref. Kopeliovich:2021dgx by comparing with data from the ZEUS Breitweg:1997rg ; Chekanov:2002xi and H1 Aktas:2005xu ; Alexa:2013xxa experiments at HERA. Predictions for charmonium photo-production on nuclei at high energies were provided in Ivanov:2002kc .

Calculations, performed in the present paper, rely on the quarkonium wave functions generated by the Buchmüller-Tye (BT) Buchmuller:1980su QQ-Q¯\bar{Q} interaction potential. Following Hufner:2000jb we performed a Lorentz boost to the LF frame, including corrections for the effect of Melosh spin rotation. The Lorentz boost procedure was originally proposed in Terentev:1976jk as an educated guess, but proven later in Kopeliovich:2015qna for a heavy Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q system.

Considering the LHC kinematic region, we included gluon shadowing calculated in the single gluon approximation, while multi-gluon Fock states were found to have too short coherence length and neglected. The corresponding suppression factor RgR_{g} in Eq. (14) provides the main nuclear effect. The results of calculations of the differential cross section for heavy vector meson production relying on the b\vec{b}-dependent dipole models are presented and compared with available data in Fig. 2.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) Predictions for the differential cross section of coherent photo-production of heavy quarkonia dσγPbVPb/dtd\sigma^{\gamma Pb\to VPb}/dt in comparison with data from the experiment ALICE Acharya:2021bnz . Predictions are depicted for the 1S (thick lines) and 2S (thin lines) charmonium (left panel) and bottomonium states (right panel). For the partial dipole-nucleus amplitude we employ the parametrizations br-GBW (solid lines) and br-BGBK (dashed lines).

The photo-production differential cross section γPbJ/ψPb\gamma Pb\to J\!/\!\psi Pb was extracted in Acharya:2021bnz from UPC data at c.m. collision energy sN=5.02TeV\sqrt{s_{N}}=5.02\,\mbox{TeV} and at the mid rapidity, which corresponds to the c.m. γ\gamma-NN energy W=MV(sN)1/4125GeVW=\sqrt{M_{V}}\cdot(s_{N})^{1/4}\approx 125\,\,\mbox{GeV}. They are depicted in the left panel of Fig. 2 together with our predictions, which used two different b\vec{b}-dependent dipole models. Our calculations are in a good accord with data.

In a wider interval of transverse momentum one should anticipate a specific diffractive behavior of the cross section with intermittent maxima and minima, as was predicted in Ivanov:2002kc , and confirmed by the current calculations depicted in Fig. 2, which are based on more advanced models for the dipole amplitude.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) The same as in Fig. 2, but for a wider |t||t|-range, at c.m. energy WMV(sN)1/4W\approx\sqrt{M_{V}}(s_{N})^{1/4} corresponding to the kinematic regions of UPC at the LHC at y=0y=0. Our predictions are based on the br-GBW (solid lines) and br-BGBK (dashed lines) parametrizations of the dipole cross section.

The curves show our predictions, still awaiting for data, for dσ/dtd\sigma/dt of coherent photo-production of other quarkonium states, charmonium ψ(2S)\psi^{\,\prime}(2S) (left panel) and bottomonia Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S), Υ(2S)\Upsilon^{\,\prime}(2S) (right panel). One can see that the production of the 1S and 2S bottomonium states is more sensitive to the choice of the model for partial dipole-proton amplitude in comparison with charmonium production. The differences in predictions adopting br-BGW and br-BGBK models can be treated as a measure of theoretical uncertainty.

VI Summary

We studied the momentum transfer dependence of differential cross sections for coherent photo-production of heavy quarkonia on nuclei, in the framework of the dipole description.

The LF wave function of a high-energy photon was expanded over Fock states, independently contributing to heavy quarkonium production, |Q¯Q|\bar{Q}Q\rangle, |Q¯Qg|\bar{Q}Qg\rangle, |Q¯Q2g|\bar{Q}Q2g\rangle, etc. The cross section γAVA\gamma A\to VA was calculated for every Fock component separately in accordance with the corresponding coherence lengths. At the energies of UPC the photon energy in the nuclear rest frame is so high, that the coherence length, associated with the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q component is much longer than the nuclear size, so one can eikonalize the dipole Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q-N amplitude, as is done in Eq. (7), including the correlation between b\vec{b} and dipole orientation r\vec{r}. Such a dipole amplitude contains Gribov corrections in all orders. The corresponding quark shadowing is a higher twist effect, so it is small at the scale imposed by the heavy quarkonium mass.

For the dipole amplitude γQ¯QV\gamma\to\bar{Q}Q\to V we rely on a LF wave function of the vector meson, determined by a solution of the Lorentz boosted Schrödinger equation with realistic potentials. On the other hand, we found that the frequently used unjustified model of photon-like structure VQ¯QV\to\bar{Q}Q leads to an exaggerated weight of the DD-wave in the rest frame wave function, inconsistent with the solutions of the Schrödinger equation.

The QCD dipole formalism also includes the leading twist gluon shadowing, which is related to the higher Fock components of the photon, Q¯Qg\bar{Q}Qg, Q¯Q2g\bar{Q}Q2g, etc. The corresponding shadowing effect is a leading twist due to large, nearly scale independent size of the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q-gg dipoles. The related nuclear effect is much stronger that the higher twist shadowing, controlled by the small-size of Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q dipoles. However, calculations of the effect of gluon shadowing is more involved, because the dipoles Q¯Qg,\bar{Q}Q-g,... cannot be treated as ”frozen” even at very high energies, their size fluctuates during propagation through the nucleus, and we took that into account by applying the path-integral technique.

The coherence length of the higher Fock components is much shorter than for the Q¯Q\bar{Q}Q fluctuation of the photon. We demonstrated that radiation of every additional gluon significantly reduces the coherence length. Therefore, at available energies the single gluon approximation was found to be rather accurate, while higher components containing two and more gluons have too short coherence length to produce a sizeable shadowing effect. In particular, the BK equation cannot be applied to nuclear targets, because it treats all dipoles as ”frozen”.

On the contrary to the global data analyses, which provide only bAb_{A} integrated gluon shadowing, we calculated the bAb_{A} dependence of shadowing, which is crucial for the differential cross section dσγAVA/dtd\sigma^{\gamma A\to VA}/dt.

Our calculations of dσ/dtd\sigma/dt for the coherent process γPbJ/ψPb\gamma Pb\to J\!/\!\psi Pb are in a good accord with recent ALICE data at the LHC (see Fig. 2). We also provided predictions for other quarkonium states, ψ(2S)\psi^{\,\prime}(2S), Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) and Υ(2S)\Upsilon^{\,\prime}(2S) (see Figs. 2 and 3), that can be verified in the current experiments at the LHC.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported in part by ANID-Chile PIA/APOYO AFB180002. The work of J.N. was partially supported by Grant No. LTT18002 of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, by the project of the European Regional Development Fund No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000778 and by the Slovak Funding Agency, Grant No. 2/0020/22. The work of M.K. was supported by the project of the International Mobility of Researchers - MSCA IF IV at CTU in Prague CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/20_079/0017983, Czech Republic.

References

  • (1) L. Stodolsky, “Hadron-like behavior of gamma, neutrino nuclear cross-sections,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 135 (1967).
  • (2) M. H. Ross and L. Stodolsky, “Photon dissociation model for vector meson photoproduction,” Phys. Rev. 149, 1172 (1966).
  • (3) T. H. Bauer, R. D. Spital, D. R. Yennie and F. M. Pipkin, “The Hadronic Properties of the Photon in High-Energy Interactions,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 261 (1978) [erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 407 (1979)].
  • (4) J. Hüfner and B. Kopeliovich, “The Relative J / psi to psi-prime suppression in proton - nucleus and nucleus-nucleus collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 192 (1996).
  • (5) J. Hüfner and B. Z. Kopeliovich, “J / Psi N and Psi-prime N total cross-sections from photoproduction data: Failure of vector dominance,” Phys. Lett. B 426, 154 (1998).
  • (6) J. Hüfner, B. Kopeliovich and J. Nemchik, “Glauber multiple scattering theory for the photoproduction of vector mesons off nuclei and the role of the coherence length,” Phys. Lett. B 383, 362 (1996).
  • (7) B.Z. Kopeliovich, L.I. Lapidus and A.B. Zamolodchikov; “Dynamics of Color in Hadron Diffraction on Nuclei,” JETP Lett. 33, 595 (1981) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 612 (1981)].
  • (8) B.Z. Kopeliovich and B.G. Zakharov; “Quantum effects and color transparency in charmonium photoproduction on nuclei,” Phys. Rev. D 44, 3466 (1991).
  • (9) J. Hüfner, Y.P. Ivanov, B.Z. Kopeliovich and A.V. Tarasov; “Photoproduction of charmonia and total charmonium proton cross-sections,” Phys. Rev. D 62, 094022 (2000).
  • (10) Y. Ivanov, B. Kopeliovich, A. Tarasov and J. Hüfner, “Electroproduction of charmonia off nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 66, 024903 (2002).
  • (11) C. A. Bertulani, S. R. Klein and J. Nystrand, “Physics of ultra-peripheral nuclear collisions,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 55, 271 (2005).
  • (12) Y. Ivanov, B. Kopeliovich and I. Schmidt, “Vector meson production in ultra-peripheral collisions at LHC,” arXiv:0706.1532 [hep-ph].
  • (13) B. Z. Kopeliovich, M. Krelina, J. Nemchik and I. K. Potashnikova, “Heavy quarkonium production in ultraperipheral nuclear collisions,” arXiv:2008.05116 [hep-ph].
  • (14) B. Z. Kopeliovich, H. J. Pirner, A. H. Rezaeian and I. Schmidt, “Azimuthal anisotropy of direct photons,” Phys. Rev. D 77, 034011 (2008).
  • (15) B. Z. Kopeliovich, M. Krelina and J. Nemchik, “Electroproduction of heavy quarkonia: significance of dipole orientation,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 094027 (2021).
  • (16) A.H. Rezaeian, M. Siddikov, M. Van de Klundert and R. Venugopalan, “Analysis of combined HERA data in the Impact-Parameter dependent Saturation model,” Phys. Rev. D 87 034002 (2013).
  • (17) H. Kowalski and D. Teaney, “An Impact parameter dipole saturation model,” Phys. Rev. D 68, 114005 (2003).
  • (18) H. Kowalski, L. Motyka and G. Watt, “Exclusive diffractive processes at HERA within the dipole picture,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 074016 (2006).
  • (19) A. H. Rezaeian and I. Schmidt, “Impact-parameter dependent Color Glass Condensate dipole model and new combined HERA data,” Phys. Rev. D 88, 074016 (2013).
  • (20) J. Cepila, J. G. Contreras and M. Matas, “Collinearly improved kernel suppresses Coulomb tails in the impact-parameter dependent Balitsky-Kovchegov evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 051502 (2019).
  • (21) B. Z. Kopeliovich, A. H. Rezaeian and I. Schmidt, “Handedness of direct photons,” Braz. J. Phys. 38, 443 (2008).
  • (22) B. Z. Kopeliovich, A. H. Rezaeian and I. Schmidt, “Azimuthal Asymmetry of Prompt Photons in Nuclear Collisions,” Nucl. Phys. A 807, 61 (2008).
  • (23) B. Z. Kopeliovich, A. H. Rezaeian and I. Schmidt, “Azimuthal Asymmetry of pions in pp and pA collisions,” Phys. Rev. D 78, 114009 (2008).
  • (24) K.J. Golec-Biernat and M. Wusthoff, “Saturation effects in deep inelastic scattering at low Q**2 and its implications on diffraction,” Phys. Rev. D59, 014017 (1998).
  • (25) K.J. Golec-Biernat and M. Wusthoff, “Saturation in diffractive deep inelastic scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 114023 (1999).
  • (26) J. Bartels, K. J. Golec-Biernat and H. Kowalski, “A modification of the saturation model: DGLAP evolution,” Phys. Rev. D 66, 014001 (2002).
  • (27) M. G. Ryskin, R. G. Roberts, A. D. Martin and E. M. Levin, “Diffractive J/psi photoproduction as a probe of the gluon density,” Z. Phys. C 76, 231 (1997).
  • (28) S. Chekanov et al. [ZEUS], “Exclusive rho0 production in deep inelastic scattering at HERA,” PMC Phys. A 1, 6 (2007).
  • (29) J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper, “Quantum Electrodynamics in the Infinite Momentum Frame,” Phys. Rev. D 1, 2901 (1970).
  • (30) J. D. Bjorken, J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper, “Quantum Electrodynamics at Infinite Momentum: Scattering from an External Field,” Phys. Rev. D 3, 1382 (1971).
  • (31) M. V. Terentev, “On the Structure of Wave Functions of Mesons as Bound States of Relativistic Quarks,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 106 (1976) [Yad. Fiz. 24, 207 (1976)].
  • (32) B. Z. Kopeliovich, E. Levin, I. Schmidt and M. Siddikov, “Lorentz-boosted description of a heavy quarkonium,” Phys. Rev. D 92, 034023 (2015).
  • (33) J. Cepila, J. Nemchik, M. Krelina and R. Pasechnik, “Theoretical uncertainties in exclusive electroproduction of S-wave heavy quarkonia,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 495 (2019).
  • (34) E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K.D. Lane and T.M. Yan; “Charmonium: Comparison with Experiment,” Phys. Rev. D21, 203 (1980).
  • (35) E. Eichten, K. Gottfried, T. Kinoshita, K.D. Lane and T.M. Yan; “Charmonium: The Model,” Phys. Rev. D17, 3090 (1978); Erratum: [Phys. Rev. D21, 313 (1980)].
  • (36) C. Quigg and J.L. Rosner; “Quarkonium Level Spacings,” Phys. Lett. B 71, 153 (1977).
  • (37) N. Barik and S.N. Jena, “Fine - Hyperfine Splittings Of Quarkonium Levels In An Effective Power Law Potential,” Phys. Lett. B 97, 265 (1980).
  • (38) W. Buchmuller and S.H.H. Tye, “Quarkonia and Quantum Chromodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 24, 132 (1981).
  • (39) H.J. Melosh, “Quarks: Currents and constituents,” Phys. Rev. D 9, 1095 (1974).
  • (40) M. Krelina, J. Nemchik, R. Pasechnik and J. Cepila, “Spin rotation effects in diffractive electroproduction of heavy quarkonia,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 154 (2019).
  • (41) T. Lappi, H. Mäntysaari and J. Penttala, “Relativistic corrections to the vector meson light FRONT wave function,” Phys. Rev. D 102, 054020 (2020).
  • (42) P. Hoyer and S. Peigne, “ψ\psi^{\prime} to J/ψJ/\psi ratio in diffractive photoproduction,” Phys. Rev. D 61, 031501 (2000).
  • (43) M. G. Ryskin, “Diffractive J / psi electroproduction in LLA QCD,” Z. Phys. C 57, 89 (1993).
  • (44) S. J. Brodsky, L. Frankfurt, J. F. Gunion, A. H. Mueller and M. Strikman, “Diffractive leptoproduction of vector mesons in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 50, 3134 (1994).
  • (45) L. Frankfurt, W. Koepf and M. Strikman, “Hard diffractive electroproduction of vector mesons in QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 54, 3194 (1996).
  • (46) J. Nemchik, N. N. Nikolaev, E. Predazzi and B. G. Zakharov, “Color dipole phenomenology of diffractive electroproduction of light vector mesons at HERA,” Z. Phys. C 75, 71 (1997).
  • (47) N. Brambilla et al. [Quarkonium Working Group], “Heavy quarkonium physics,” arXiv:hep-ph/0412158 [hep-ph].
  • (48) N. Brambilla, S. Eidelman, B. K. Heltsley, R. Vogt, G. T. Bodwin, E. Eichten, A. D. Frawley, A. B. Meyer, R. E. Mitchell and V. Papadimitriou, et al. “Heavy Quarkonium: Progress, Puzzles, and Opportunities,” Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1534 (2011).
  • (49) I. Haysak, Y. Fekete, V. Morokhovych, S. Chalupka and M. Salak, “Spin effects in two quark system and mixed states,” Czech. J. Phys. 55, 541 (2005).
  • (50) H. F. Fu and L. Jiang, “Coupled-channel-induced SDS{-}D mixing of Charmonia and testing possible assignments for YY(4260) and YY(4360),” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 460 (2019).
  • (51) C. Chang and G. Wang, “Spectrum for Heavy Quankonia and Mixture of the Relevant Wave Functions within the Framework of Bethe-Salpeter Equation,” Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 53, 2005 (2010).
  • (52) L. Cao, Y. C. Yang and H. Chen, “Charmonium states in QCD-inspired quark potential model using Gaussian expansion method,” Few Body Syst. 53, 327 (2012).
  • (53) H.De Vries, C.W.De Jager and C.De Vries, “Nuclear charge and magnetization density distribution parameters from elastic electron scattering,” Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 36, 495 (1987).
  • (54) J. B. Bronzan, G. L. Kane and U. P. Sukhatme, “Obtaining Real Parts of Scattering Amplitudes Directly from Cross-Section Data Using Derivative Analyticity Relations,” Phys. Lett. B 49, 272 (1974).
  • (55) J.R. Forshaw, R. Sandapen and G. Shaw; “Color dipoles and rho, phi electroproduction,” Phys. Rev. D 69, 094013 (2004).
  • (56) A. G. Shuvaev, K. J. Golec-Biernat, A. D. Martin and M. G. Ryskin, “Off diagonal distributions fixed by diagonal partons at small x and xi,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 014015 (1999).
  • (57) B. Z. Kopeliovich, A. Schäfer and A. V. Tarasov; “Nonperturbative effects in gluon radiation and photoproduction of quark pairs,” Phys. Rev. D62, 054022 (2000).
  • (58) B. Z. Kopeliovich, I. K. Potashnikova, B. Povh and I. Schmidt, “Evidences for two scales in hadrons,” Phys. Rev. D 76, 094020 (2007).
  • (59) B. Z. Kopeliovich, J. Raufeisen and A. V. Tarasov, “Nuclear shadowing and coherence length for longitudinal and transverse photons,” Phys. Rev. C 62, 035204 (2000).
  • (60) D. de Florian, R. Sassot, P. Zurita and M. Stratmann, “Global Analysis of Nuclear Parton Distributions,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 074028 (2012).
  • (61) V. N. Gribov, “Glauber corrections and the interaction between high-energy hadrons and nuclei,” Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 483 (1969).
  • (62) B. Z. Kopeliovich, J. G. Morfin and I. Schmidt, “Nuclear Shadowing in Electro-Weak Interactions,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 68, 314 (2013).
  • (63) B. Z. Kopeliovich, “Gribov inelastic shadowing in the dipole representation,” Contribution to: Gribov-85 Memorial Workshop on Theoretical Physics of XXI Century; Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 31, no.28n29, 1645021 (2016).
  • (64) J. Nemchik, “Incoherent production of charmonia off nuclei as a good tool for study of color transparency,” Phys. Rev. C 66, 045204 (2002).
  • (65) V. Karmanov and L.A. Kondratyuk, “Inelastic screening for high energy nucleon scattering on complex nuclei,” JETP Lett. 18, 266 (1973) [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 18, 451 (1973)].
  • (66) Y. .M. Kazarinov, B. Z. Kopeliovich, L. I. Lapidus, I. K. Potashnikova, “Triple Regge Phenomenology in the Reaction p + p –¿ p + x,” JETP 43, 598 (1976).
  • (67) I. Balitsky, “Operator expansion for high-energy scattering,” Nucl. Phys. B 463, 99 (1996).
  • (68) Y. V. Kovchegov, “Small-x F2F_{2} structure function of a nucleus including multiple pomeron exchanges,” Phys. Rev. D 60, 034008 (1999).
  • (69) B.Z. Kopeliovich, talk at POETIC IV, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France, Sept. 7-11, 2015.
  • (70) J. Breitweg et al. [ZEUS], “Measurement of elastic J/ψJ/\psi photoproduction at HERA,” Z. Phys. C 75, 215 (1997).
  • (71) S. Chekanov et al. [ZEUS], “Exclusive photoproduction of J / psi mesons at HERA,” Eur. Phys. J. C 24, 345 (2002).
  • (72) A. Aktas et al. [H1], “Elastic J/psi production at HERA,” Eur. Phys. J. C 46, 585 (2006).
  • (73) C. Alexa et al. [H1], “Elastic and Proton-Dissociative Photoproduction of J/psi Mesons at HERA,” Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2466 (2013).
  • (74) S. Acharya et al. [ALICE], “First measurement of the tt-dependence of coherent J/ψJ/\psi photonuclear production,” Phys. Lett. B 817, 136280 (2021).