This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Chirped periodic and localized waves in a weakly nonlocal media with cubic-quintic nonlinearity

Houria Triki Radiation Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Badji Mokhtar University, P. O. Box 12, 23000 Annaba, Algeria    Vladimir I. Kruglov Centre for Engineering Quantum Systems, School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia 1Radiation Physics Laboratory, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, Badji Mokhtar University, P. O. Box 12, 23000 Annaba, Algeria
2Centre for Engineering Quantum Systems, School of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
Abstract

We study the propagation of one-dimentional optical beams in a weakly nonlocal medium exhibiting cubic-quintic nonlinearity. A nonlinear equation governing the evolution of the beam intensity in the nonlocal medium is derived thereby which allows us to examine whether the traveling-waves exist in such optical material. An efficient transformation is applied to obtain explicit solutions of the envelope model equation in the presence of all material parameters. We find that a variety of periodic waves accompanied with a nonlinear chirp do exist in the system in the presence of the weak nonlocality. Chirped localized intensity dips on a continuous-wave background as well as solitary waves of the bright and dark types are obtained in a long wave limit. A class of propagating chirped self-similar solitary beams is also identified in the material with the consideration of the inhomogeneities of media. The applications of the obtained self-similar structures are discussed by considering a periodic distributed amplification system.

pacs:
05.45.Yv, 42.65.Tg

I Introduction

Propagations of spatial optical solitons through nonlocal nonlinear media have drawn considerable attention because of their experimental observations in liquid crystals Conti and lead glasses R1 in addition to several important theoretical predictions K1 ; G1 ; G2 . Nonlocal nonlinearity represents the fact that the refractive index change of a material at a particular location, is determined by the light intensity in a certain vicinity of this location K1 . Compared with the local nonlinear medium for which the response at a given point is only dependent on the light intensity at that point Kro , the response of the nonlocal nonlinear medium at a given point depends not only on the optical intensity at that point, but also on the intensity in its vicinity Kro ; Jia ; W1 . It is noteworthy that the nonlocality plays a vital role for the very narrow beam propagation in the system and thus the nonlocal contribution to the refractive index change has to be taken into account in this case Kro . It is worth mentioning that nonlinear media that feature the nonlocal nonlinearity also include nonlinear ion gas Sut , thermal nonlinear liquid Dreis , quadratic nonlinear media Nikolov , dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate Gries , and photorefractive crystal Segev ; Saffman .

It has been demonstrated that the propagation dynamics of beams and their localization is significantly influenced by nonlocality Bang . In this respect, important results have revealed that the nonlocal nonlinearity can suppress the modulational instability of plane waves W1 ; W2 and support novel soliton states such as ring vortex solitons Bri ; Kart , gap solitons Ras , multipole solitons Rot , spiraling solitons Sku ; Buc , soliton clusters Buc1 , and incoherent solitons Kro2 . Although soliton structures have been extensively studied in nonlocal Kerr-type media Kro ; Dre ; Kart1 ; Ge ; Kong1 ; Kong2 , their investigation in nonlocal non-Kerr systems has not been widespread. Some significant results have, however, been obtained, with previous theoretical studies considering nonlocality of nonlinear response and saturation Tsoy . Specifically, Tsoy studied the soliton solutions in an implicit form which propagate through a weakly nonlocal medium with cubic-quintic nonlinearity, and derived explicit solutions in bright and dark solitons in particular case Tsoy .

To the best of our knowledge, investigations discussing the formation and properties of periodic waves with nonlinear chirp in weakly nonlocal media exhibiting cubic-quintic nonlinearity are not available to date. Moreover, the control of chirped self-similar beams in a nonlocal nonlinear system with distributed diffraction, cubic-quintic nonlinearity, weak nonlocality, and gain or loss has been absent. The objective of the present work is to study the existence and propagation properties of periodic and localized waves with a nonlinear chirp in a weakly nonlocal cubic-quintic medium. Such chirping property is of practical interest in achieving effective beam compression or amplification. Additionally, the problem of self-similar light beam propagation through a weakly nonlocal medium in the presence of distributed cubic-quintic nonlinearity, diffraction, and gain (or loss) are investigated too.

The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we present the cubic-quintic nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) with weak nonlocality describing optical beam propagation in a nonlocal medium with a saturation of the nonlinear response. We also present here the nonlinear equation that governs the evolution of the light beam intensity in the system and the general traveling-wave solutions of the mentioned equation. In Sec. III, we present results of novel chirped periodic wave solutions of the model equation and the nonlinear chirp accompanying these nonlinear waveforms. Considering the long-wave limit of the analytically determined periodic solutions, we find chirped solitary beam solutions which include gray, bright and dark solitons in Sec. IV. In Sec. V, the similarity transformation method is employed to construct exact self-similar periodic and localized wave solutions of the generalized NLS model with varied coefficients governing the beam evolution in presence of the inhomogeneities of nonlocal media. We also determine here the self-similar variables and constraints satisfied by the distributed coefficients in the inhomogeneous NLS model. We further investigate the propagation dynamics of the obtained self-similar localized waves (or “similaritons”) in a specified soliton control system. Finally, we give some conclusions in Sec. VI.

II Model of NLSE and chirped traveling waves

The paraxial wave equation governing one-dimensional beam propagation in a nonlinear medium is given by Kro :

iψz+122ψx2+Δn(I)ψ=0,i\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+\Delta n\left(I\right)\psi=0, (1)

where ψ(x,z)\psi\left(x,z\right) is the envelope of the electromagnetic field, xx is transverse variable, and zz is the longitudinal variable representing propagation distance. Here Δn\Delta n and I(x,z)=|ψ(x,z)|2I\left(x,z\right)=\left|\psi\left(x,z\right)\right|^{2} are the refractive index change and light intensity, respectively. In the case of nonlocal nonlinear media, Δn(I)\Delta n\left(I\right) can be written in general form as K1 ; Kro ; Tsoy

Δn(I)=+R(xx)F(I(x,z))𝑑x,\Delta n\left(I\right)=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}R(x^{\prime}-x)F(I(x^{\prime},z))dx^{\prime}, (2)

where R(x)R(x) is the response function of the nonlocal medium, which is a real symmetric function while F(I)F\left(I\right) is the intensity-dependent function.

For weakly nonlocal media with cubic-quintic nonlinearity, one finds Tsoy Δn(I)=γI+σI2+μx2I\Delta n\left(I\right)=\gamma I+\sigma I^{2}+\mu\partial_{x}^{2}I with μ\mu being the nonlocality parameter which is defined through μ=12+x2R(x)𝑑x\mu=\frac{1}{2}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}x^{2}R(x)dx. The accordingly equation governing the beam propagation in such nonlinear media is given by the NLS equation with weak nonlocality presented in Tsoy . For our studies, this NLS equation model is expressed as

iψz+β22ψx2+γ|ψ|2ψ+σ|ψ|4ψ+μψ2|ψ|2x2=0,i\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial z}+\frac{\beta}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}\psi}{\partial x^{2}}+\gamma\left|\psi\right|^{2}\psi+\sigma\left|\psi\right|^{4}\psi+\mu\psi\frac{\partial^{2}\left|\psi\right|^{2}}{\partial x^{2}}=0, (3)

where γ,\gamma, σ\sigma and μ\mu  are real parameters related to the cubic nonlinearity, quintic nonlinearity, and weak nonlocality, respectively, while the coefficient β\beta accounts for the diffraction in the transverse plane.

In the absence of quintic nonlinearity (i.e., σ=0\sigma=0), Eq. (3) becomes the modified NLS equation which applies to the description of optical beam propagation in nonlocal nonlinear Kerr-type media Kro . Moreover, in the limit of vanishing weak nonlocality (i.e., μ=0\mu=0), Eq. (3) is reduced to the cubic-quintic NLS equation which governs the evolution of the optical beam in a local medium exhibiting third- and fifth-order nonlinearities. As previously mentioned, the soliton solutions in an implicit form of the model (3) with β=1,\beta=1, which are expressed in terms of the elliptic integrals have been presented in Ref. Tsoy . But here we are concerned with explicit periodic wave and soliton solutions which are characterized by a nonlinear chirp. Our results introduce for the first time an efficient transformation which allows the derivation of periodic and localized solutions of Eq. (3) in an explicit form.

To obtain exact traveling wave solutions to the cubic-quintic NLS equation with weak nonlocality (3), we assume a solution given by the expression,

ψ(x,z)=u(ξ)exp[i(κzδx)+iϕ(ξ)],\psi\left(x,z\right)=u(\xi)\exp[i\left(\kappa z-\delta x\right)+i\phi(\xi)], (4)

where both u(ξ)u(\xi) and ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) are real functions of the traveling coordinate ξ=xvz\xi=x-vz, with vv being the transverse velocity of the wave. Also κ\kappa and δ\delta represent the propagation constant and frequency shift, respectively. Substitution of Eq. (4) into Eq. (3) and separation of the real and imaginary parts of the equation yields the following two coupled ordinary differential equations,

β2(ud2ϕdξ2+2dϕdξdudξ)(v+βδ)dudξ=0,\frac{\beta}{2}\left(u\frac{d^{2}\phi}{d\xi^{2}}+2\frac{d\phi}{d\xi}\frac{du}{d\xi}\right)-\left(v+\beta\delta\right)\frac{du}{d\xi}=0, (5)
β2d2udξ2(κvdϕdξ)uβ2(dϕdξδ)2u+γu3+σu5+2μ[u(dudξ)2+u2d2udξ2]=0.\frac{\beta}{2}\frac{d^{2}u}{d\xi^{2}}-\left(\kappa-v\frac{d\phi}{d\xi}\right)u-\frac{\beta}{2}\left(\frac{d\phi}{d\xi}-\delta\right)^{2}u+\gamma u^{3}+\sigma u^{5}+2\mu\left[u\left(\frac{du}{d\xi}\right)^{2}+u^{2}\frac{d^{2}u}{d\xi^{2}}\right]=0. (6)

The multiplication of Eq. (5) by the function u(ξ)u(\xi) and integration of the resulting equation leads to the following equation,

βu2dϕdξ(v+βδ)u2=J,\beta u^{2}\frac{d\phi}{d\xi}-(v+\beta\delta)u^{2}=J, (7)

where JJ is the integration constant. Then Eq. (7) yields the following expression,

dϕdξ=δ+vβ+Jβu2(ξ).\frac{d\phi}{d\xi}=\delta+\frac{v}{\beta}+\frac{J}{\beta u^{2}(\xi)}. (8)

The accompanying chirp Δω\Delta\omega defined as Δω=[κzδx+ϕ(x)]/x\Delta\omega=-\partial\left[\kappa z-\delta x+\phi(x)\right]/\partial x is given by

Δω=vβJβu2(ξ).\Delta\omega=-\frac{v}{\beta}-\frac{J}{\beta u^{2}(\xi)}. (9)

Further insertion of the result (8) into (6) gives to the following nonlinear ordinary differential equation,

d2udξ2+a[u(dudξ)2+u2d2udξ2]+bu+cu3+du5J2β2u3=0,\frac{d^{2}u}{d\xi^{2}}+a\left[u\left(\frac{du}{d\xi}\right)^{2}+u^{2}\frac{d^{2}u}{d\xi^{2}}\right]+bu+cu^{3}+du^{5}-\frac{J^{2}}{\beta^{2}u^{3}}=0, (10)

where the parameters a,a, b,b, cc and dd are defined by

a=4μβ,b=v2+2β(δvκ)β2,c=2γβ,d=2σβ.a=\frac{4\mu}{\beta},~{}~{}~{}~{}b=\frac{v^{2}+2\beta\left(\delta v-\kappa\right)}{\beta^{2}},~{}~{}~{}~{}c=\frac{2\gamma}{\beta},~{}~{}~{}~{}d=\frac{2\sigma}{\beta}. (11)

Multiplying Eq. (10) by du/dξdu/d\xi and integrating the resultant equation, we obtain

(1+au2)(dudξ)2+bu2+12cu4+13du6+J2β2u2+C=0,\left(1+au^{2}\right)\left(\frac{du}{d\xi}\right)^{2}+bu^{2}+\frac{1}{2}cu^{4}+\frac{1}{3}du^{6}+\frac{J^{2}}{\beta^{2}u^{2}}+C=0, (12)

where CC is another integration constant. We define new function f(ξ)=u2(ξ)f(\xi)=u^{2}(\xi) which transforms Eq. (12) to the following ordinary differential equation,

(1+af)(dfdξ)2=ν0+ν1f+ν2f2+ν3f3+ν4f4,\left(1+af\right)\left(\frac{df}{d\xi}\right)^{2}=\nu_{0}+\nu_{1}f+\nu_{2}f^{2}+\nu_{3}f^{3}+\nu_{4}f^{4}, (13)

where

ν0=4J2β2,ν1=4C,ν2=4b,ν3=2c,ν4=4d3.\nu_{0}=-\frac{4J^{2}}{\beta^{2}},\quad\nu_{1}=-4C,\quad\nu_{2}=-4b,\quad\nu_{3}=-2c,\quad\nu_{4}=-\frac{4d}{3}. (14)

Equation (13) presents one of the main results of our analysis, describing the evolution of beam intensity in a weakly nonlocal medium with cubic-quintic nonlinearity. This equation allow us to know whether the traveling-wave solutions exist in the nonlocal medium and in what parametric conditions they are formed. In general, this nonlinear differential equation with coexisting f(df/dξ)2f\left(df/d\xi\right)^{2} and f4f^{4} terms is difficult to handle analytically. However, by introducing a special transformation in this paper, Eq. (13) is solved analytically to obtain a rich variety of nonlinear waveforms for the model (3). Such a transformation, to our knowledge not used before testifies about the novelty of the solutions obtained.

Incorporating these results back into Eq. (4), we find that general form of traveling wave solutions to the cubic-quintic NLS equation with weak nonlocality (3) is

ψ(x,z)=±f(ξ)exp[i(κzδx)+iϕ(ξ)],\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\sqrt{f(\xi)}\exp[i\left(\kappa z-\delta x\right)+i\phi(\xi)], (15)

where f(ξ)f(\xi) satisfies Eq. (13) while ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) can be evaluated explicitly using Eq. (8) as

ϕ(ξ)=(δ+vβ)(ξη)+Jβηξ1u2(ξ)𝑑ξ+ϕ0,\phi\left(\xi\right)=\left(\delta+\frac{v}{\beta}\right)(\xi-\eta)+\frac{J}{\beta}\int_{\eta}^{\xi}\frac{1}{u^{2}(\xi)}d\xi+\phi_{0}, (16)

with ϕ0\phi_{0} being the initial phase and η\eta is an arbitrary constant.

This result shows that the phase modification ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) involves a nonlinear contribution that is inversely proportional to light beam intensity |ψ(x,z)|2=|u(ξ)|2\left|\psi\left(x,z\right)\right|^{2}=\left|u(\xi)\right|^{2}. Interestingly, the nontrivial nature of the phase leads to the formation of chirped beams in the system. In particular, when J=0J=0, the phase ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) in (16) can be reduced to a simple linear form as ϕ(ξ)=(δ+vβ1)(ξη)+ϕ0.\phi\left(\xi\right)=\left(\delta+v\beta^{-1}\right)(\xi-\eta)+\phi_{0}.\ In what follows, we are interested in periodic and solitary pulse solutions to Eq. (13) in the most general case when J0,J\neq 0, which describe nonlinearly chirped structures to the model (3).

III Periodic wave solutions

As previously noted, the general solutions to Eq. (3) which are implicit and are expressed in terms of the elliptic integrals have been found in Tsoy . In this section, we introduce an efficient transformation that enables one to obtain explicit solutions of the full underlying cubic-quintic NLS equation with weak nonlocality (3). Interestingly, exact chirped periodic solutions are found in the presence of all material parameters for the first time.

Applying the transformation (85) to Eq. (13), one obtains a modified nonlinear differential equation of the form [see Appendix A]:

(dfdξ)2=α0+α1f+α2f2+α3f3,\left(\frac{df}{d\xi}\right)^{2}=\alpha_{0}+\alpha_{1}f+\alpha_{2}f^{2}+\alpha_{3}f^{3}, (17)

with the new coefficients αi\alpha_{i} (i=1,2,3)(i=1,2,3) that are found in the Appendix A as

α0=4J2β2,α1=4ba+2ca24d3a3,\alpha_{0}=-\frac{4J^{2}}{\beta^{2}},\quad\alpha_{1}=-\frac{4b}{a}+\frac{2c}{a^{2}}-\frac{4d}{3a^{3}}, (18)
α2=2ca+4d3a2,α3=4d3a.\alpha_{2}=-\frac{2c}{a}+\frac{4d}{3a^{2}},\quad\alpha_{3}=-\frac{4d}{3a}. (19)

Thus the coefficient α0\alpha_{0} in Eq. (17) is a free parameter because JJ is the integration constant. Note that in Eq. (13) there are two free coefficients as ν0\nu_{0} and ν1\nu_{1} because JJ and CC are two independent integration constants. However, Eq. (17) has only one free parameter α0\alpha_{0}. Thus one can use different parameter α0\alpha_{0} for different solutions of Eq. (17).

We now introduce a new function y(ξ)y(\xi) as

y(ξ)=α3f(ξ),f(ξ)=u2(ξ).y(\xi)=-\alpha_{3}f(\xi),\quad f(\xi)=u^{2}(\xi). (20)

Thus the equation for function y(ξ)y(\xi) is

(dydξ)2=c0+c1y+c2y2y3,\left(\frac{dy}{d\xi}\right)^{2}=c_{0}+c_{1}y+c_{2}y^{2}-y^{3}, (21)

where the coefficients cnc_{n} are given by

c0=α0α32,c1=α1α3,c2=α2.c_{0}=\alpha_{0}\alpha_{3}^{2},\quad c_{1}=-\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3},\quad c_{2}=\alpha_{2}. (22)

We also introduce the polynomial P(y)=c0+c1y+c2y2y3P(y)=c_{0}+c_{1}y+c_{2}y^{2}-y^{3} which is given by the right side of Eq. (21). The roots of polynomial P(y)P(y) are given by equation,

y3α2y2+α1α3yc0=0,y^{3}-\alpha_{2}y^{2}+\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}y-c_{0}=0, (23)

where the coefficient c0=α0α32c_{0}=\alpha_{0}\alpha_{3}^{2} is a free parameter because α0=4J2/β2\alpha_{0}=-4J^{2}/\beta^{2} and JJ is integration constant.

The periodic bounded solution of Eq. (21) defined in the interval y2y(ξ)y3y_{2}\leq y(\xi)\leq y_{3} is

y(ξ)=y2+(y3y2)cn2(w(ξη),k),y(\xi)=y_{2}+(y_{3}-y_{2})\mathrm{cn}^{2}(w(\xi-\eta),k), (24)

where the roots are real and ordered (y1<y2<y3y_{1}<y_{2}<y_{3}), and cn(z,k)\mathrm{cn}(z,k) is elliptic Jacobi function. The parameters ww and kk in this solution are

w=12y3y1,k=y3y2y3y1,w=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{y_{3}-y_{1}},\quad k=\sqrt{\frac{y_{3}-y_{2}}{y_{3}-y_{1}}}, (25)

where 0<k<10<k<1. It is shown in the Appendix B that ordered real roots are

y1=α23+4(k22)w23,y2=α23+4(12k2)w23,y_{1}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}+\frac{4(k^{2}-2)w^{2}}{3},\quad y_{2}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}+\frac{4(1-2k^{2})w^{2}}{3}, (26)
y3=α23+4(1+k2)w23.y_{3}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}+\frac{4(1+k^{2})w^{2}}{3}. (27)

The parameter ww in these equations is given by

w=12(α223α1α3k4k2+1)1/4,w=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{k^{4}-k^{2}+1}\right)^{1/4}, (28)

where it is assumed that α223α1α3>0\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}>0. It is shown in the Appendix B that the integration constant JJ is fixed by relation,

J2=β2y1y2y34α32.J^{2}=-\frac{\beta^{2}y_{1}y_{2}y_{3}}{4\alpha_{3}^{2}}. (29)

Hence, in general case the roots yny_{n} must satisfy the condition y1y2y30y_{1}y_{2}y_{3}\leq 0.

1. Family of chirped periodic bounded waves with J0J\neq 0.

The amplitude in Eq. (4) is u(ξ)=±y(ξ)/α3u(\xi)=\pm\sqrt{-y(\xi)/\alpha_{3}} which lead to a family of periodic bounded solutions of Eq. (3) (with 0<k<10<k<1) as

ψ(x,z)=±[A+Bcn2(w(ξη),k)]1/2exp[i(κzδx)+iϕ(ξ)],\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\left[A+B\mathrm{cn}^{2}(w(\xi-\eta),k)\right]^{1/2}\exp[i\left(\kappa z-\delta x\right)+i\phi(\xi)], (30)

where the parameters A=y2/α3A=-y_{2}/\alpha_{3} and B=(y3y2/α3B=-(y_{3}-y_{2}/\alpha_{3} are

A=13α3[α2+4(2k21)w2],B=4k2w2α3.A=\frac{1}{3\alpha_{3}}[-\alpha_{2}+4(2k^{2}-1)w^{2}],\quad B=-\frac{4k^{2}w^{2}}{\alpha_{3}}. (31)

The parameter ww in this solution is given in Eq. (28). It follows from this solution that the parameters AA and BB should satisfy the conditions A>0A>0 and A+B0A+B\geq 0. Moreover, the conditions α223α1α3>0\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}>0 and y1y2y3<0y_{1}y_{2}y_{3}<0 are also necessary for this family of periodic solutions with integration constant J0J\neq 0.

We note that parameter ww is given by Eq. (28), however one can consider ww as independent variable parameter in Eqs. (30) and (31) because the parameter α1\alpha_{1} depends on bb which is variable parameter (see Eqs. (11) and (18)). In this case using Eq. (28) and relation α1=4b/aα2/a\alpha_{1}=-4b/a-\alpha_{2}/a we obtain the equation for the wave number κ\kappa as

κ=vδ+v22β+βα28+aβα2224α32aβw43α3(k4k2+1).\kappa=v\delta+\frac{v^{2}}{2\beta}+\frac{\beta\alpha_{2}}{8}+\frac{a\beta\alpha_{2}^{2}}{24\alpha_{3}}-\frac{2a\beta w^{4}}{3\alpha_{3}}(k^{4}-k^{2}+1). (32)

This equation means that the variable parameters ww, vv, δ\delta and κ\kappa are connected by this relation for fixed parameter kk of Jacoby elliptic function cn(ζ,k)\mathrm{cn}(\zeta,k). We present below three particular cases of periodic solutions with the integration constant J=0J=0.

2. Bounded periodic dn-waves for the condition y1=0y_{1}=0.

The solution in Eq. (30) for y1=0y_{1}=0 (J=0J=0) and 0<k<10<k<1 reduces to the periodic waves,

ψ(x,z)=±Λdn(w(ξη),k)exp(iθ(x,z)),\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\Lambda\mathrm{dn}(w(\xi-\eta),k)\exp(i\theta(x,z)), (33)

where the parameters Λ\Lambda and ww are

Λ=α2α3(2k2),w=12α22k2.\Lambda=\sqrt{\frac{-\alpha_{2}}{\alpha_{3}(2-k^{2})}},\quad w=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\alpha_{2}}{2-k^{2}}}. (34)

The necessary conditions for this solution are α2>0\alpha_{2}>0 and α3<0\alpha_{3}<0. The phase θ(x,z)\theta(x,z) in this periodic solution is

θ(x,z)=(κvδv2β)z+vβx+θ0,\theta(x,z)=\left(\kappa-v\delta-\frac{v^{2}}{\beta}\right)z+\frac{v}{\beta}x+\theta_{0}, (35)

where θ0=ϕ0η(δ+v/β)\theta_{0}=\phi_{0}-\eta(\delta+v/\beta). In this case ( y1=0y_{1}=0) the parameter ww is fixed by Eq. (34) and hence Eq. (32) has the form,

κ=vδ+v22β+βα28+aβα22(1k2)8α3(2k2)2.\kappa=v\delta+\frac{v^{2}}{2\beta}+\frac{\beta\alpha_{2}}{8}+\frac{a\beta\alpha_{2}^{2}(1-k^{2})}{8\alpha_{3}(2-k^{2})^{2}}. (36)

3. Bounded periodic cn-waves for the condition y2=0y_{2}=0.

The solution in Eq. (30) for y2=0y_{2}=0 (J=0J=0) and 0<k<10<k<1 reduces to the periodic waves,

ψ(x,z)=±Λcn(w(ξη),k)exp(iθ(x,z)),\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\Lambda\mathrm{cn}(w(\xi-\eta),k)\exp(i\theta(x,z)), (37)

where the parameters Λ\Lambda and ww are

Λ=α2k2α3(2k21),w=12α22k21.\Lambda=\sqrt{\frac{-\alpha_{2}k^{2}}{\alpha_{3}(2k^{2}-1)}},\quad w=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{\alpha_{2}}{2k^{2}-1}}. (38)

The necessary conditions for this solution are α2>0\alpha_{2}>0 and α3<0\alpha_{3}<0 for 1/2<k<11/\sqrt{2}<k<1; and α2<0\alpha_{2}<0 and α3<0\alpha_{3}<0 for 0<k<1/20<k<1/\sqrt{2}. The phase θ(x,z)\theta(x,z) in this solution is given by Eq. (35). In this case ( y2=0y_{2}=0) the parameter ww is fixed by Eq. (38) and hence Eq. (32) has the form,

κ=vδ+v22β+βα28aβα22k2(1k2)8α3(2k21)2.\kappa=v\delta+\frac{v^{2}}{2\beta}+\frac{\beta\alpha_{2}}{8}-\frac{a\beta\alpha_{2}^{2}k^{2}(1-k^{2})}{8\alpha_{3}(2k^{2}-1)^{2}}. (39)

4. Bounded periodic sn-waves for the condition y3=0y_{3}=0.

The solution in Eq. (30) for y3=0y_{3}=0 (J=0J=0) and 0<k<10<k<1 reduces to the periodic waves,

ψ(x,z)=±Λsn(w(ξη),k)exp(iθ(x,z)),\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\Lambda\mathrm{sn}(w(\xi-\eta),k)\exp(i\theta(x,z)), (40)

where the parameters Λ\Lambda and ww are

Λ=α2k2α3(1+k2),w=12α21+k2.\Lambda=\sqrt{\frac{-\alpha_{2}k^{2}}{\alpha_{3}(1+k^{2})}},\quad w=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{\frac{-\alpha_{2}}{1+k^{2}}}. (41)

The necessary conditions for this solution are α2<0\alpha_{2}<0 and α3>0\alpha_{3}>0. The phase θ(x,z)\theta(x,z) in this solution is given by Eq. (35). In this case (y3=0y_{3}=0) the parameter ww is fixed by Eq. (41) and hence Eq. (32) has the form,

κ=vδ+v22β+βα28+aβα22k28α3(1+k2)2.\kappa=v\delta+\frac{v^{2}}{2\beta}+\frac{\beta\alpha_{2}}{8}+\frac{a\beta\alpha_{2}^{2}k^{2}}{8\alpha_{3}(1+k^{2})^{2}}. (42)

We emphases that in Eqs. (36), (39) and (42) there are three variable parameters: δ\delta, vv and κ\kappa for fixed parameter kk. This means that one can fix any two of these variable parameters and then the third variable parameter follows from Eqs. (36), (39) and (42) respectively. For an example, if the variable parameters δ\delta and κ\kappa are fixed then the above equations yield the parameter vv.

IV Solitary wave solutions

In this section, we present various nonlinearly chirped solitary wave solutions of the cubic-quintic NLS equation with weak nonlocality (3). At first we consider the solution in Eq. (30) in the limiting case k=1k=1 for integration constant J0J\neq 0. In this case the periodic bounded solution in Eq. (30) reduces to solitary wave as

ψ(x,z)=±[A+Bsech2(w0(ξη))]1/2exp[i(κzδx)+iϕ(ξ)],\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\left[A+B\mathrm{sech}^{2}(w_{0}(\xi-\eta))\right]^{1/2}\exp[i\left(\kappa z-\delta x\right)+i\phi(\xi)], (43)

where the inverse width is w0=12(α223α1α3)1/4w_{0}=\frac{1}{2}(\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3})^{1/4}. It is assumed here that the condition α223α1α3>0\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}>0 is satisfied. The parameters AA and BB are

A=13α3(4w02α2),B=4w02α3.A=\frac{1}{3\alpha_{3}}(4w_{0}^{2}-\alpha_{2}),\quad B=-\frac{4w_{0}^{2}}{\alpha_{3}}. (44)

Note that in the case with k=1k=1 the roots are

y1=α234w023,y2=α234w023,y3=α23+8w023,y_{1}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}-\frac{4w_{0}^{2}}{3},\quad y_{2}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}-\frac{4w_{0}^{2}}{3},\quad y_{3}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}+\frac{8w_{0}^{2}}{3}, (45)

where y1=y2y_{1}=y_{2}. The equation for variable parameters w0w_{0}, vv, δ\delta and κ\kappa for this case (k=1k=1) are connected by relation,

κ=vδ+v22β+βα28+aβα2224α32aβw043α3.\kappa=v\delta+\frac{v^{2}}{2\beta}+\frac{\beta\alpha_{2}}{8}+\frac{a\beta\alpha_{2}^{2}}{24\alpha_{3}}-\frac{2a\beta w_{0}^{4}}{3\alpha_{3}}. (46)

We consider here the case with integration constant J0J\neq 0, and hence Eq. (29) yields the condition y3<0y_{3}<0 because y1=y2y_{1}=y_{2} for k=1k=1. It follows from Eq. (45) that the condition y3<0y_{3}<0 is satisfied for α2<8w02\alpha_{2}<-8w_{0}^{2}, and hence we have α2<0\alpha_{2}<0. Moreover, in this case (J0J\neq 0) we have yn0y_{n}\neq 0, and hence 4w02α204w_{0}^{2}-\alpha_{2}\neq 0 and A0A\neq 0. The parameter AA in solution (43) should be positive which is possible only in the case with α3>0\alpha_{3}>0 because we have α2<0\alpha_{2}<0 (see Eq. (44)). It also follows from Eq. (44) that A+B=(8w02+α2)/3α3>0A+B=-(8w_{0}^{2}+\alpha_{2})/3\alpha_{3}>0 because y3<0y_{3}<0 and α3>0\alpha_{3}>0. Thus we have found that the conditions A>0A>0, B<0B<0 and A+B>0A+B>0 are satisfied for the solution given in Eq. (43). These conditions lead to gray soliton solution which is a dark soliton with nonzero minimum intensity.

5. Chirped gray soliton solution.

The solution given in Eq. (43) with J0J\neq 0 can also be written in the equivalent form as

ψ(x,z)=±[Λ+Dtanh2(w0(ξη))]1/2exp[i(κzδx)+iϕ(ξ)],\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\left[\Lambda+D\mathrm{tanh}^{2}(w_{0}(\xi-\eta))\right]^{1/2}\exp[i\left(\kappa z-\delta x\right)+i\phi(\xi)], (47)
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Intensity profiles of the chirped gray solitary wave solution (47)) for different values of the nonlocality parameter μ:\mu: μ=0.25,\mu=0.25, μ=0.27,\mu=0.27, μ=0.30\mu=0.30. Other parameters are β=1,\beta=1, σ=1,\sigma=-1, γ=1,\gamma=1, v=0.1,v=0.1, δ=2.81,\delta=2.81, κ=0.12,\kappa=0.12, η=0\eta=0.

where the inverse width of the gray soliton is w0=12(α223α1α3)1/4w_{0}=\frac{1}{2}(\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3})^{1/4} with the condition α22>3α1α3\alpha_{2}^{2}>3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}. The parameters Λ=A+B\Lambda=A+B and D=BD=-B are given by

Λ=13α3(α2+8w02),D=4w02α3.\Lambda=-\frac{1}{3\alpha_{3}}(\alpha_{2}+8w_{0}^{2}),\quad D=\frac{4w_{0}^{2}}{\alpha_{3}}. (48)

We have shown that this solution occur only in the case when α2<8w02\alpha_{2}<-8w_{0}^{2} and α3>0\alpha_{3}>0. These conditions also lead to inequalities Λ>0\Lambda>0 and D>0D>0. Hence, the minimum intensity of the pulse is I=Λ0I=\Lambda\neq 0 which typically for gray solitons. The equation for variable parameters w0w_{0}, vv, δ\delta and κ\kappa for this case (k=1k=1) are connected by Eq. (46).

We note that the condition ΛD>0\Lambda D>0 is satisfied for gray soliton solution. In this case the phase ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) in Eq. (47) follows by Eq. (16) as

ϕ(ξ)\displaystyle\phi\left(\xi\right) =\displaystyle= JD2βRw0arcsin((Λ+D)+(ΛD)cosh(2w0(ξη))(ΛD)+(Λ+D)cosh(2w0(ξη)))\displaystyle-\frac{JD}{2\beta Rw_{0}}\arcsin\left(\frac{(\Lambda+D)+(\Lambda-D)\cosh(2w_{0}(\xi-\eta))}{(\Lambda-D)+(\Lambda+D)\cosh(2w_{0}(\xi-\eta))}\right) (49)
+(δ+vβ+Jβ(Λ+D))(ξη)+ϕ0,\displaystyle+\left(\delta+\frac{v}{\beta}+\frac{J}{\beta(\Lambda+D)}\right)(\xi-\eta)+\phi_{0},~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}

where R=ΛD(Λ+D)R=\sqrt{\Lambda D}(\Lambda+D).

Typical intensity profiles of the chirped solitary wave (47) at z=0z=0 are shown in Fig. 1 for different degrees of nonlocality μ\mu as: μ=0.25,\mu=0.25, μ=0.27,\mu=0.27, μ=0.30\mu=0.30. The parameter values used are β=1,\beta=1, σ=1,\sigma=-1, γ=1,\gamma=1, v=0.1,v=0.1, δ=2.81,\delta=2.81, κ=0.12,\kappa=0.12, η=0.\eta=0. An interesting observation in this figure is that the minimum intensity of chirped gray solitary wave decreases continuously with the increasing of the degree of nonlocality. We also find that the background intensity of the chirped gray solitary waves remains the same for different values of the nonlocality parameter μ\mu.

6. Bright soliton solution.

The solutions in Eqs. (33) and (37) for limiting case k=1k=1 and J=0J=0 reduce to chirped bright soliton solution,

ψ(x,z)=±α2α3sech(α22(ξη))exp(iθ(x,z)),\psi\left(x,z\right)=\pm\sqrt{-\frac{\alpha_{2}}{\alpha_{3}}}\mathrm{sech}(\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_{2}}}{2}(\xi-\eta))\exp(i\theta(x,z)), (50)
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Intensity profiles of the chirped bright solitary wave solution (50) for different values of the nonlocality parameter μ:\mu: μ=0.10,\mu=0.10, μ=0.15,\mu=0.15, μ=0.20\mu=0.20. Other parameters are β=1,\beta=1, γ=1,\gamma=-1, σ=0.3,\sigma=0.3, v=0.1,v=0.1, δ=2.81,\delta=2.81, κ=0.12,\kappa=0.12, η=0\eta=0.

where the necessary conditions for this solution are α2>0\alpha_{2}>0 and α3<0\alpha_{3}<0. In this bright soliton solution the phase θ(x,z)\theta(x,z) is given by Eq. (35). Note that we have c0=y22y3c_{0}=y_{2}^{2}y_{3} which leads to relation c0=α0α32=0c_{0}=\alpha_{0}\alpha_{3}^{2}=0 because y2=0y_{2}=0. This yields α0=0\alpha_{0}=0 and integration constant J=0J=0. Moreover, Eqs. (36) and (39) lead to equation for variable parameters δ\delta and κ\kappa and vv as

κ=vδ+v22β+βα28.\kappa=v\delta+\frac{v^{2}}{2\beta}+\frac{\beta\alpha_{2}}{8}. (51)

Note that in this case the inverse width is fixed as w0=α2/2w_{0}=\sqrt{\alpha_{2}}/2.

Figure 2 depicts the intensity profiles of the chirped bright solitary wave (50) for different values of the nonlocality parameter μ.\mu. It can be observed that with the increasing of nonlocality, the intensity of the solitary wave gradually decreases, while the width increases leading to broadening of the light beam if the parameter μ\mu is further increased.

7. Dark soliton solution.

The solution in Eq. (40) for limiting case k=1k=1 and J=0J=0 reduces to chirped dark soliton solution,

ψ(x,z)=±α22α3tanh(α28(ξη))exp(iθ(x,z)),\psi(x,z)=\pm\sqrt{-\frac{\alpha_{2}}{2\alpha_{3}}}\mathrm{tanh}(\sqrt{-\frac{\alpha_{2}}{8}}(\xi-\eta))\exp(i\theta(x,z)), (52)
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Intensity profiles of of the chirped dark solitary wave solution (52) for different values of the nonlocality parameter μ:\mu: μ=0.10,\mu=0.10, μ=0.15,\mu=0.15, μ=0.20\mu=0.20. Other parameters are β=1,\beta=-1, γ=1,\gamma=1, σ=0.3,\sigma=-0.3, v=0.1,v=0.1, δ=2.81,\delta=2.81, κ=0.12,\kappa=0.12, η=0\eta=0.

where the necessary conditions for this solution are α2<0\alpha_{2}<0 and α3>0\alpha_{3}>0. In this dark soliton solution the phase θ(x,z)\theta(x,z) is given by Eq. (35). Note that in this case we have c0=y22y3c_{0}=y_{2}^{2}y_{3} where y3=0y_{3}=0, and hence c0=α0α32=0c_{0}=\alpha_{0}\alpha_{3}^{2}=0 which yields α0=0\alpha_{0}=0 and integration constant J=0J=0. Moreover, Eq. (42) leads to equation for variable parameters δ\delta and κ\kappa and vv as

κ=vδ+v22β+βα28+aβα2232α3.\kappa=v\delta+\frac{v^{2}}{2\beta}+\frac{\beta\alpha_{2}}{8}+\frac{a\beta\alpha_{2}^{2}}{32\alpha_{3}}. (53)

In this case the inverse width is fixed as w0=α2/8w_{0}=\sqrt{-\alpha_{2}/8}. We note that in Eqs. (51) and (53) there are three variable parameters: δ\delta, vv and κ\kappa. This means that one can fix any two of these variable parameters and then the third parameter follows from above equations respectively.

The intensity profile of the chirped dark solitary wave (52) for different values of μ\mu is displayed in Fig. 3. One can see that unlike chirped gray solitary waves, the background intensity of the chirped dark solitary waves increase as the degree of nonlocality grows.

V Similarity transformation of generalized CQNLS equation

In a real optical material including nonlocal nonlinear media, the physical parameters vary along with the propagation of light beams due to the presence of the inhomogeneities of media. The inclusion of the distributed coefficients into the NLS equations is currently an effective way to reflect the inhomogeneous effects of the optical beams LWang . In what follows, we analyze the beam propagation phenomena in a realistic weakly nonlocal cubic-quintic medium exhibiting varied physical parameters. An accurate description of the beam evolution in such inhomogeneous system can be achieved by means of variation with respect to the propagation distance of all the material parameters in Eq. (3), resulting in the generalized NLS model with distributed coefficients:

iΦs+D(s)22Φχ2+R1(s)|Φ|2Φ+R2(s)|Φ|4Φ+N(s)Φ2(|Φ|2)χ2=iG(s)Φ,i\frac{\partial\Phi}{\partial s}+\frac{D(s)}{2}\frac{\partial^{2}\Phi}{\partial\chi^{2}}+R_{1}(s)\left|\Phi\right|^{2}\Phi+R_{2}(s)\left|\Phi\right|^{4}\Phi+N(s)\Phi\frac{\partial^{2}(\left|\Phi\right|^{2})}{\partial\chi^{2}}=iG(s)\Phi, (54)

where D(s),D(s), R1(s)R_{1}(s) and R2(s)R_{2}(s) represent the variable diffraction, cubic and quintic nonlinearity coefficients, respectively. Parameter N(s)N(s) denotes the weak nonlocality coefficient, while G(s)G(s) represents the loss (G(s)<0G(s)<0) or gain (G(s)>0G(s)>0) coefficient.

In order to connect solutions of Eq. (54) with those of Eq. (3), we will use the transformation Dai1 ; Dai4 ; Dai3 as

Φ(s,χ)=ρ(s)ψ[x(s,χ),z(s)]exp[iφ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\rho(s)\psi\left[x(s,\chi),z(s)\right]\exp\left[i\varphi(s,\chi)\right], (55)

where ρ(s),\rho(s), z(s),z(s), x(s,χ),x(s,\chi), and φ(s,χ)\varphi(s,\chi) are real functions to be determined. Substituting Eq. (55) into Eq. (54) leads to Eq. (3), but we must have the following set of parametric equations:

2ρs+Dρφχχ2Gρ=0,xs+Dxχφχ=0,2\rho_{s}+D\rho\varphi_{\chi\chi}-2G\rho=0,~{}~{}~{}~{}x_{s}+Dx_{\chi}\varphi_{\chi}=0, (56)
2ϕs+D(φχ)2=0,D(xχ)2βzs=0,2\phi_{s}+D\left(\varphi_{\chi}\right)^{2}=0,\quad D\left(x_{\chi}\right)^{2}-\beta z_{s}=0, (57)
Nρ2(xχ)2μzs=0,xχχ=0,N\rho^{2}\left(x_{\chi}\right)^{2}-\mu z_{s}=0,~{}~{}~{}~{}x_{\chi\chi}=0, (58)
R1ρ2γzs=0,R2ρ4σzs=0,R_{1}\rho^{2}-\gamma z_{s}=0,~{}~{}~{}~{}R_{2}\rho^{4}-\sigma z_{s}=0, (59)

where subscripts denote partial differentiation. These equations can be solved self-consistently to obtain the self-similar wave amplitude ρ(s)\rho(s) and phase φ(s,χ)\varphi(s,\chi):

ρ(s)=γD(s)βR1(s)W(s),\displaystyle\left.\rho(s)=\frac{\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)},\right. (60)
φ(s,χ)=c0Γ(s)2χ2b0Γ(s)χb022Γ(s)d(s),\displaystyle\left.\varphi(s,\chi)=-\frac{c_{0}\Gamma(s)}{2}\chi^{2}-b_{0}\Gamma(s)\chi-\frac{b_{0}^{2}}{2}\Gamma(s)d(s),\right. (61)

together with the similarity variable x(s,χ)x(s,\chi) and effective propagation distance z(s)z(s):

x(s,χ)=χχc(s)W(s),\displaystyle\left.x(s,\chi)=\frac{\chi-\chi_{c}(s)}{W(s)},\right. (62)
z(s)=d(s)Γ(s)βW02,\displaystyle\left.z(s)=\frac{d(s)\Gamma(s)}{\beta W_{0}^{2}},\right. (63)

where the beam width W(s)W(s) and center position χc(s)\chi_{c}(s) are given by

W(s)=W0/Γ(s),χc(s)=χ0(b0+c0χ0)d(s).W(s)=W_{0}/\Gamma(s),\quad\chi_{c}(s)=\chi_{0}-\left(b_{0}+c_{0}\chi_{0}\right)d(s). (64)

Meanwhile, the accumulted diffraction d(s)d(s) and the parameter related to the phase-front curvature wave Γ(s)\Gamma(s) are given by

d(s)=0sD(s)𝑑s,Γ(s)=[1c0d(s)]1.d(s)=\int_{0}^{s}D(s^{\prime})ds^{\prime},\quad\Gamma(s)=\left[1-c_{0}d(s)\right]^{-1}. (65)

Here the parameters χ0\chi_{0}, W0W_{0}, c0c_{0} and b0b_{0} are constants representing the initial values of central position of beam, width, chirp, and position of the wavefront, respectively. Further, the constraint conditions on the management parameters depicting weak nonlocality, quintic nonlinearity, and gain (or loss) are given by

N(s)=μR1(s)W2(s)γ,\displaystyle\left.N(s)=\frac{\mu R_{1}(s)W^{2}(s)}{\gamma},\right. (66)
R2(s)=βσR12(s)W2(s)γ2D(s),\displaystyle\left.R_{2}(s)=\frac{\beta\sigma R_{1}^{2}(s)W^{2}(s)}{\gamma^{2}D(s)},\right. (67)
G(s)=12{𝒲[R1(s),D(s)]R1(s)D(s)c0W0D(s)W(s)},\displaystyle\left.G(s)=\frac{1}{2}\left\{\frac{\mathcal{W}\left[R_{1}(s),D(s)\right]}{R_{1}(s)D(s)}-\frac{c_{0}W_{0}D(s)}{W(s)}\right\},\right. (68)

with the notation for the Wronskian 𝒲[R1(s),D(s)]=R1DsDR1s.\mathcal{W}\left[R_{1}(s),D(s)\right]=R_{1}D_{s}-DR_{1s}.

We notice that the accumulated diffraction d(s)d(s) influences not only the characteristics of the self-similar pulse such as the amplitude, width, center position, and phase but also the effective propagation distance.

Hence, a similarity transformation between Eq. (54) and Eq. (3) can be obtained as

Φ(s,χ)=γD(s)βR1(s)W(s)ψ[x(s,χ),z(s)]eiφ(s,χ),\Phi(s,\chi)=\frac{\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\psi\left[x(s,\chi),z(s)\right]e^{i\varphi(s,\chi)}, (69)

where the phase φ(s,χ)\varphi(s,\chi) is given by Eq. (61) and ψ(x,z)\psi\left(x,z\right) satisfies Eq. (3).

With this transformation [Eq. (69)], one can construct exact self-similar solutions of the generalized NLS equation model (54) by using the above analytic solutions of the constant-coefficient NLS model (3). Let us first construct exact self-similar periodic wave solutions of Eq. (54). Using the transformation (69) with Eqs. (66)-(68) and periodic bounded solution (30) of Eq. (3), we obtain a self-similar cnoidal wave solution of the generalized NLS equation (54) in the form

Φ(s,χ)=±γD(s)βR1(s)W(s)[A+Bcn2(wζ,k)]1/2exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\left[A+B\mathrm{cn}^{2}(w\zeta,k)\right]^{1/2}\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (70)

where the traveling coordinate ζ\zeta is given by

ζ(s,χ)=Γ(s){χ+(b0+c0χ0)d(s)χ0}W0vβW02d(s)Γ(s)η,\zeta(s,\chi)=\frac{\Gamma(s)\left\{\chi+\left(b_{0}+c_{0}\chi_{0}\right)d(s)-\chi_{0}\right\}}{W_{0}}-\frac{v}{\beta W_{0}^{2}}d(s)\Gamma(s)-\eta, (71)

and the phase of field has the form,

Θ(s,χ)=c0Γ(s)2χ2(b0+δW0)Γ(s)χ{b022+δ(b0+c0χ0)W0κβW02}Γ(s)d(s)+δχ0W0Γ(s)+ϕ(ξ).\Theta(s,\chi)=-\frac{c_{0}\Gamma(s)}{2}\chi^{2}-\left(b_{0}+\frac{\delta}{W_{0}}\right)\Gamma(s)\chi-\left\{\frac{b_{0}^{2}}{2}+\frac{\delta\left(b_{0}+c_{0}\chi_{0}\right)}{W_{0}}-\frac{\kappa}{\beta W_{0}^{2}}\right\}\Gamma(s)d(s)+\frac{\delta\chi_{0}}{W_{0}}\Gamma(s)+\phi(\xi). (72)

Note that the parameters A,A, BB and κ\kappa in the family of self-similar cnoidal wave solutions (70) are defined by Eqs. (31) and (32). While the phase structure for self-similar waves propagating in cubic-quintic nonlinear media seem to be quadratic [see Refs. Sent ; Dai2 ], the phase of self-similar light beams in the presence of weak nonlocality takes a more complicated form [Eq. (72)], which involves an extra intensity-dependent phase term ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) [Eq. (16)]. This implies that the derived self-similar solutions are chirped nonlinearly which would find potential applications in light compression or amplification.

A second family of exact self-similar periodic wave solution of the generalized NLS equation (54) can be obtained by inserting the solution (33) into the transformation (69) as

Φ(s,χ)=±ΛγD(s)βR1(s)W(s)dn(wζ,k)exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\Lambda\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\mathrm{dn}(w\zeta,k)\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (73)

where ζ\zeta is same as the one given by Eq. (71) while the phase Θ(s,χ)\Theta(s,\chi) takes the form,

Θ(s,χ)=c0Γ(s)2χ2(b0vβW0)Γ(s)χ{b022v(b0+c0χ0)βW0β(κvδ)v2β2W02}Γ(s)d(s)vχ0βW0Γ(s)+θ0.\Theta(s,\chi)=-\frac{c_{0}\Gamma(s)}{2}\chi^{2}-\left(b_{0}-\frac{v}{\beta W_{0}}\right)\Gamma(s)\chi-\left\{\frac{b_{0}^{2}}{2}-\frac{v\left(b_{0}+c_{0}\chi_{0}\right)}{\beta W_{0}}-\frac{\beta(\kappa-v\delta)-v^{2}}{\beta^{2}W_{0}^{2}}\right\}\Gamma(s)d(s)-\frac{v\chi_{0}}{\beta W_{0}}\Gamma(s)+\theta_{0}. (74)

Also Λ\Lambda and ww satisfy Eq. (34) and κ\kappa is given by Eq. (36).

A third family of exact self-similar periodic wave solution of the model (54) can be found by inserting Eq. (37) into the transformation (69) as

Φ(s,χ)=±ΛγD(s)βR1(s)W(s)cn(wζ,k)exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\Lambda\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\mathrm{cn}(w\zeta,k)\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (75)

where the parameters Λ\Lambda and ww are given by Eq. (38) and κ\kappa is shown in Eq. (39). Meanwhile, the variable ζ\zeta and phase Θ(s,χ)\Theta(s,\chi) take the same form as Eqs. (71) and (74), respectively.

Another class of exact self-similar periodic wave solution of Eq. (54) can be determined by substituting Eq. (40) into the transformation (69) as

Φ(s,χ)=±ΛγD(s)βR1(s)W(s)sn(wζ,k)exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\Lambda\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\mathrm{sn}(w\zeta,k)\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (76)

where ζ\zeta and Θ(s,χ)\Theta(s,\chi) are same as the ones given by Eqs. (71) and (74), respectively. Moreover, Λ\Lambda and ww are given by Eq. (41) while κ\kappa is determined by Eq. (42).

Next we construct the exact self-similar localized solutions of the generalized NLS equation with distributed coefficients (54). Substitution of the solution (43) into the transformation (69) yields an exact self-similar solitary wave solution of Eq. (54) of the form,

Φ(s,χ)=±γD(s)βR1(s)W(s)[A+Bsech2(w0ζ)]1/2exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\left[A+B\mathrm{sech}^{2}(w_{0}\zeta)\right]^{1/2}\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (77)

where AA\ and BB are defined by Eq. (44), ζ\zeta and Θ(s,χ)\Theta(s,\chi) are shown in Eqs. (71) and (72) respectively, with κ\kappa given by Eq. (46).

Moreover, substitution of the solution (47) into the transformation (69) leads to an exact chirped self-similar gray soliton solution of Eq. (54) of the form,

Φ(s,χ)=±γD(s)βR1(s)W(s)[Λ+Dtanh2(w0ζ)]1/2exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\left[\Lambda+D\mathrm{tanh}^{2}(w_{0}\zeta)\right]^{1/2}\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (78)

where Λ\Lambda and DD are shown in Eq. (48) and ζ\zeta and Θ(s,χ)\Theta(s,\chi) are given by Eqs. (71) and (72) respectively, with the phase shift ϕ(ξ)\phi(\xi) given by the relation (49).

It is interesting that we can construct a chirped self-similar bright-type soliton solution for the generalized NLS equation (54) by combining Eqs. (50) and (69) as

Φ(s,χ)=±γD(s)βR1(s)W(s)α2α3sech(α22ζ)exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\sqrt{-\frac{\alpha_{2}}{\alpha_{3}}}\mathrm{sech}(\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_{2}}}{2}\zeta)\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (79)

in the case where α3<0\alpha_{3}<0 and α2>0.\alpha_{2}>0. It should be noted here that ζ\zeta and Θ(s,χ)\Theta(s,\chi) take the same expressions stated in (71) and (74) respectively and κ\kappa is given by Eq. (51).

A chirped self-similar dark-type soliton solution can be also obtained for Eq. (54) by using Eqs. (52) and (69) as

Φ(s,χ)=±γD(s)βR1(s)W(s)α22α3tanh(α28ζ)exp[iΘ(s,χ)],\Phi(s,\chi)=\pm\frac{\sqrt{\gamma D(s)}}{\sqrt{\beta R_{1}(s)}W(s)}\sqrt{-\frac{\alpha_{2}}{2\alpha_{3}}}\mathrm{tanh}(\sqrt{-\frac{\alpha_{2}}{8}}\zeta)\exp\left[i\Theta(s,\chi)\right], (80)

when α2<0\alpha_{2}<0 and α3>0.\alpha_{3}>0. Here the variable ζ\zeta and phase Θ(s,χ)\Theta(s,\chi) are same as the ones given by Eqs. (71) and (74) while the wave number κ\kappa satisfies Eq. (53).

Now we discuss how to realize the control for chirped self-similar beams presented above. To demonstrate the controllable self-similar structures, here we take the chirped self-similar localized solutions (78) and (79) as examples to discuss the dynamical behaviors of the self-similar gray and bright solitary waves in the weakly nonlocal medium. In this situation, we take a periodic distributed amplification system with varying diffraction and nonlinear parameters of the form Dai2 ; RH ; Tang :

D(s)=D0cos(gs),R1(s)=R0exp(rs)cos(gs),D(s)=D_{0}\cos\left(gs\right),\quad R_{1}(s)=R_{0}\exp\left(-rs\right)\cos\left(gs\right), (81)

where D0D_{0} and gg are the parameters used to describe the diffraction, while R0R_{0} and rr are related to the nonlinearity. The corresponding weak nonlocality, quintic nonlinearity, and gain (or loss) of the optical medium defined by Eqs. (66), (67) and (68) read

N(s)=μR0W02cos(gs)exp(rs)γ[1ϵsin(gs)]2,\displaystyle\left.N(s)=\frac{\mu R_{0}W_{0}^{2}\cos\left(gs\right)\exp\left(-rs\right)}{\gamma}\left[1-\epsilon\sin\left(gs\right)\right]^{2},\right. (82)
R2(s)=σβR02W02cos(gs)exp(2rs)γ2D0[1ϵsin(gs)]2,\displaystyle\left.R_{2}(s)=\frac{\sigma\beta R_{0}^{2}W_{0}^{2}\cos\left(gs\right)\exp\left(-2rs\right)}{\gamma^{2}D_{0}}\left[1-\epsilon\sin\left(gs\right)\right]^{2},\right. (83)
G(s)=r2c0D0cos(gs)2[1ϵsin(gs)],\displaystyle\left.G(s)=\frac{r}{2}-\frac{c_{0}D_{0}\cos\left(gs\right)}{2\left[1-\epsilon\sin\left(gs\right)\right]},\right. (84)

where we introduced for brevity the parameter ϵ=c0D0/g.\epsilon=c_{0}D_{0}/g.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Evolution of self-similar solitary wave solutions with parameters μ=0.125,\mu=0.125, g=1g=1, D0=R0=1,D_{0}=R_{0}=1, r=0,r=0, c0=0,c_{0}=0, b0=1,b_{0}=1, v=0.9,v=0.9, W0=1,W_{0}=1, δ=1.2,\delta=1.2, κ=1.807,\kappa=1.807, χ0=η=0\chi_{0}=\eta=0; (a)-(b) gray self-similar wave when β=0.5,\beta=0.5, γ=0.5,\gamma=0.5, σ=0.5\sigma=-0.5; (c)-(d) bright self-similar wave when β=0.5,\beta=-0.5, γ=0.5,\gamma=-0.5, σ=0.5\sigma=0.5.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Evolution of chirped self-similar wave solutions with parameters c0=0.2,c_{0}=0.2, b0=1,b_{0}=1, v=0.9v=0.9; (a)-(b) gray self-similar wave; (c)-(d) bright self-similar wave. Other parameters are same as given in Fig.4.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Evolution of chirped self-similar wave solutions with parameters c0=0.2,c_{0}=0.2, b0=0,b_{0}=0, v=0v=0; (a)-(b) gray self-similar wave; (c)-(d) bright self-similar wave. Other parameters are same as given in Fig.4.

First, we analyze the evolutional behavior of self-similar solitary beams in the case when the initial chirp c0=0c_{0}=0. In this situation, the gain (loss) function (84) takes a constant form G(s)=r/2G(s)=r/2, which corresponds to the diffraction decreasing nonlocal medium for r<0r<0. Here, without loss of generality, we use the parameters D0=1D_{0}=1, g=1g=1, and R0=1R_{0}=1 and choose the value of the nonlocality parameter as μ=0.125\mu=0.125. Figure 4 shows the evolution and contour plots of the chirped self-similar solitary wave solutions (78) and (79) with D(s)D(s) and R1(s)R_{1}(s) given by Eq. (81) for the parameters b0=1,b_{0}=1, r=0,r=0, v=0.9,v=0.9, δ=1.2,\delta=1.2, κ=1.807\kappa=1.807, W0=1,W_{0}=1, and χ0=η=0.\chi_{0}=\eta=0. From it, one observes a snake-like behavior of the gray and bright solitary beams as they propagate through the weakly nonlocal medium. For such snaking-like trajectory, the profile of the self-similar solitary waves maintains its structural integrity in propagating along the system although its position varies periodically. Notice that for this case, the central position as given by Eq. (64) reads χc(s)=χ0[(b0+c0χ0)D0/g]sin(gs),\chi_{c}(s)=\chi_{0}-\left[\left(b_{0}+c_{0}\chi_{0}\right)D_{0}/g\right]\sin\left(gs\right), thus indicating that it oscillates periodically along distance even if the value of initial chirp is zero (i.e., c0=0c_{0}=0). However, for the same case, the width given by Eq. (64) which obeys the relation W(s)=W0[1ϵsin(gs)]W(s)=W_{0}\left[1-\epsilon\sin\left(gs\right)\right], becomes a constant W(s)=W0W(s)=W_{0} when c0=0.c_{0}=0. One should note here that the snakelike evolutional behavior of the gray and bright structures takes place due to the presence of the parameters b0b_{0} and vv in the traveling coordinate ζ\zeta [Eq. (71)].

Next, we discuss the dynamical behavior of self-similar waves in the case of practical interest c00.c_{0}\neq 0. Considering the initial chirp parameter c0=0.2c_{0}=0.2 and using the same values of b0b_{0} and vv as in Fig. 4, one can see that the chirped self-similar gray and bright solitary beams show a periodical change in their intensity but their profile remain unchanged in propagation along the nonlocal medium [Figs. 5(a)-(b) and 5(c)-(d)]. We can conclude that the oscillation of the self-similar beam intensity here results from the term c0d(s)c_{0}d(s) in the expression for the amplitude given by Eq. (60). Taking the same value of the initial chirp c0=0.2c_{0}=0.2 and for b0=0b_{0}=0\ and v=0v=0, we see that that the chirping leads to localization and yields the periodic emergence of solitary waves [Figs. 6(a)-(b) and 6(c)-(d)]. We note in passing that similar behaviors can also be obtained in the case of the chirped self-similar dark-type soliton solutions (80). Hence, we can conclude that rich and significant self-similar solitary beam dynamics can be obtained in the soliton control system (81) by choosing the parameters c0,c_{0}, b0b_{0} and vv appropriately.

VI Conclusion

To conclude, we studied the formation and properties of spatial nonlinear waves in a weakly nonlocal media with cubic-quintic nonlinearity. A wide variety of periodic waves which are characterized by a nonlinear chirp have been found in the system for the first time. The chirping property of such nonlinear period waves makes them of practical importance for achieving effective beam compression or amplification. It is remarked that these chirped periodic structures do exist in nonlocal media in the presence of all material parameters. The explicit chirped gray optical dip solutions as well as chirped bright and dark soliton solutions are obtained in the long-wave limit of the derived periodic waveforms. In addition, we have investigated the self-similar propagation of optical beams in an inhomogeneous weakly nonlocal media wherein the light propagation is described by the generalized NLS equation with distributed weak nonlocality, diffraction, cubic-quintic nonlinearities and gain or loss. Interestingly, the wider class of periodic and localized solutions presented here possess attractive features such as nonlinearity in beam chirp and self-similarity in beam shape. We also discussed the applications of the obtained chirped self-similar localized beams by considering a periodic distributed amplification system. The results showed that the dynamical behaviors of those nonlinearly chirped self-similar beams could be controlled by choosing appropriate diffraction and quintic nonlinearity parameters. Future research includes a systematic study of the stability of such nonlinearly chirped solitary waves with respect to finite perturbations such as amplitude perturbation, the slight violation of the parametric conditions, and random noises.

Appendix A Modified nonlinear differential equation

In this Appendix we consider the transformation of Eq. (13) to modified Eq. (17). Note that such transformation is possible because the coefficients ν0\nu_{0} and ν1\nu_{1} in Eq. (13) are free parameters. These coefficients are free because ν0\nu_{0} and ν1\nu_{1} depend on integration constants JJ and CC. We define the coefficients αn\alpha_{n} by equation,

n=04νnfn(ξ)=(1+af(ξ))n=03αnfn(ξ).\sum_{n=0}^{4}\nu_{n}f^{n}(\xi)=(1+af(\xi))\sum_{n=0}^{3}\alpha_{n}f^{n}(\xi). (85)

Equation (85) yields the system of algebraic equations as

α0=ν0,α1+aα0=ν1,α2+aα1=ν2,α3+aα2=ν3,\alpha_{0}=\nu_{0},\quad\alpha_{1}+a\alpha_{0}=\nu_{1},\quad\alpha_{2}+a\alpha_{1}=\nu_{2},\quad\alpha_{3}+a\alpha_{2}=\nu_{3}, (86)

where the last equation is

aα3=ν4.a\alpha_{3}=\nu_{4}. (87)

Relations (86) lead to the coefficients as

α0=ν0,α1=ν1aν0,α2=ν2aν1+a2ν0,\alpha_{0}=\nu_{0},\quad\alpha_{1}=\nu_{1}-a\nu_{0},\quad\alpha_{2}=\nu_{2}-a\nu_{1}+a^{2}\nu_{0}, (88)
α3=ν3aν2+a2ν1a3ν0.\alpha_{3}=\nu_{3}-a\nu_{2}+a^{2}\nu_{1}-a^{3}\nu_{0}. (89)

We emphases that Eqs. (87) and (89) yield the constraint for coefficients νn\nu_{n} as

ν4=aν3a2ν2+a3ν1a4ν0.\nu_{4}=a\nu_{3}-a^{2}\nu_{2}+a^{3}\nu_{1}-a^{4}\nu_{0}. (90)

Equations (88), (89) and the constraint (90) lead to the following coefficients,

α0=ν0,α1=ν2aν3a2+ν4a3,α2=ν3aν4a2,α3=ν4a.\alpha_{0}=\nu_{0},\quad\alpha_{1}=\frac{\nu_{2}}{a}-\frac{\nu_{3}}{a^{2}}+\frac{\nu_{4}}{a^{3}},\quad\alpha_{2}=\frac{\nu_{3}}{a}-\frac{\nu_{4}}{a^{2}},\quad\alpha_{3}=\frac{\nu_{4}}{a}. (91)

Note that one can assume that the constraint (90) is satisfied because the coefficients ν0\nu_{0} and ν1\nu_{1} are free parameters. These coefficients are free because they depend on integration constants JJ and CC (see Eq. (14)). Moreover, one can consider the coefficient ν0\nu_{0} as a free parameter and ν1\nu_{1} is fixed by (90) for an arbitrary given ν0\nu_{0}. The substitution of Eq. (85) to Eq. (13) leads to modified nonlinear differential equation,

(dfdξ)2=α0+α1f+α2f2+α3f3,\left(\frac{df}{d\xi}\right)^{2}=\alpha_{0}+\alpha_{1}f+\alpha_{2}f^{2}+\alpha_{3}f^{3}, (92)

where the coefficients αn\alpha_{n} are given by Eq. (91). In this equation the coefficient α0\alpha_{0} is a free parameter because α0=ν0\alpha_{0}=\nu_{0}. We emphases that in Eq. (13) there are two free coefficients as ν0\nu_{0} and ν1\nu_{1}. However, the modified Eq. (92) has one free coefficient α0\alpha_{0}.

Appendix B Ordered real roots of polynomial

In this Appendix we present three ordered real and different roots y1<y2<y3y_{1}<y_{2}<y_{3} in Eq. (23). The polynomial P(y)=c0+c1y+c2y2y3P(y)=c_{0}+c_{1}y+c_{2}y^{2}-y^{3} can be written as

c0+c1y+c2y2y3=n=13(yyn),c_{0}+c_{1}y+c_{2}y^{2}-y^{3}=-\prod_{n=1}^{3}(y-y_{n}), (93)

where yny_{n} are the roots in Eq. (23). Eq. (93) yields the relations,

c1=y2y3y1y2y1y3,c2=y1+y2+y3,c_{1}=-y_{2}y_{3}-y_{1}y_{2}-y_{1}y_{3},\quad c_{2}=y_{1}+y_{2}+y_{3}, (94)
c0=y1y2y3,c0=α0α32,c_{0}=y_{1}y_{2}y_{3},\quad c_{0}=\alpha_{0}\alpha_{3}^{2}, (95)

where c1=α1α3c_{1}=-\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3} and c2=α2c_{2}=\alpha_{2}. Moreover, Eq. (25) yields the relation,

y2=k2y1+(1k2)y3.y_{2}=k^{2}y_{1}+(1-k^{2})y_{3}. (96)

Eqs. (94) and (96) lead to the following ordered real and different roots yny_{n} of the polynomial P(y)P(y),

y1=α23+(k22)3α223α1α3k4k2+1,y_{1}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}+\frac{(k^{2}-2)}{3}\sqrt{\frac{\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{k^{4}-k^{2}+1}}, (97)
y2=α23+(12k2)3α223α1α3k4k2+1,y_{2}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}+\frac{(1-2k^{2})}{3}\sqrt{\frac{\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{k^{4}-k^{2}+1}}, (98)
y3=α23+(1+k2)3α223α1α3k4k2+1.y_{3}=\frac{\alpha_{2}}{3}+\frac{(1+k^{2})}{3}\sqrt{\frac{\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{k^{4}-k^{2}+1}}. (99)

Note that k4k2+1>0k^{4}-k^{2}+1>0 for the arbitrary values of parameter kk. One can show that under conditions α223α1α30\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}\geq 0 and 0<k<10<k<1 these three roots are real, different and ordered as y1<y2<y3y_{1}<y_{2}<y_{3}.

It follows from Eq. (25) that the parameter ww is

w=12y3y1=12(α223α1α3k4k2+1)1/4.w=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{y_{3}-y_{1}}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\alpha_{2}^{2}-3\alpha_{1}\alpha_{3}}{k^{4}-k^{2}+1}\right)^{1/4}. (100)

Thus the parameters AA and BB in Eq. (29) are

A=13α3[α2+4(2k21)w2],B=4k2w2α3.A=\frac{1}{3\alpha_{3}}[-\alpha_{2}+4(2k^{2}-1)w^{2}],\quad B=-\frac{4k^{2}w^{2}}{\alpha_{3}}. (101)

We emphasis that the constraint in Eq. (95) has the form,

J2=β2y1y2y34α32,J^{2}=-\frac{\beta^{2}y_{1}y_{2}y_{3}}{4\alpha_{3}^{2}}, (102)

where JJ is integration constant. Hence, this constraint is satisfied for the integration constant JJ given in Eq. (102). However, in this case the roots yny_{n} must satisfy to the inequality y1y2y30y_{1}y_{2}y_{3}\leq 0.

References

  • (1) C. Conti, M. Peccianti, and G. Assanto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 113902 (2004).
  • (2) C. Rotschild, O. Cohen, O. Manela, M. Segev, and T. Carmon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213904 (2005).
  • (3) W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, J. Wyller, J. J. Rasmussen and D. Edmundson, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 6, S288 (2004).
  • (4) Q. Guo, Proc. SPIE 5281, 581 (2004).
  • (5) Q. Guo, B. Luo, F. Yi, S. Chi, and Y. Xie, Phys. Rev. E 69, 016602 (2004).
  • (6) W. Królikowski and O. Bang, Phys. Rev. E 63, 016610 (2000).
  • (7) J. Jia, J. Lin, Optics Express 20, 7469 (2012).
  • (8) W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, J. Rasmussen, and J. Wyller, Phys. Rev. E 64, 16612 (2001).
  • (9) D. Suter and T. Blasberg, Phys. Rev. A 48, 4583 (1993)
  • (10) A. Dreischuh, D. Neshev, D. E. Petersen, O. Bang, and W. Królikowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 043901 (2006).
  • (11) N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, O. Bang, and W. Z. Królikowski, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036614 (2003).
  • (12) A. Griesmaier, J. Werner, S. Hensler, J. Stuhler, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 160401 (2005).
  • (13) M. Segev, B. Crosignani, A. Yariv, and B. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 923 (1992)
  • (14) W. Królikowski, M. Saffman, B. Luther-Davies, and C. Denz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3240 (1998).
  • (15) W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, N. I. Nikolov, D. Neshev, J. Wyller, J. J. Rasmussen, and D. Edmundson, J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 6, S288 (2004).
  • (16) J. Wyller, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and J. Rasmussen, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066615 (2002).
  • (17) D. Briedis, D. Petersen, D. Edmundson, W. Krolikowski, and O. Bang, Opt. Express 13, 435 (2005).
  • (18) . Y. Kartashov, V. Vysloukh, and L. Torner, Opt. Express15, 9378 (2007).
  • (19) P. Rasmussen, F. Bennet, D. Neshev, A. Sukhorukov, C. Rosberg, W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and Y. Kivshar, Opt. Lett. 34, 295 (2009).
  • (20) C. Rotschild, M. Segev, Z. Xu, Y. Kartashov, L. Torner, and O. Cohen, Opt. Lett. 31, 3312 (2006).
  • (21) S. Skupin, O. Bang, D. Edmundson, and W. Krolikowski, Phys. Rev. E 73, 66603 (2006).
  • (22) D. Buccoliero, A. Desyatnikov, W. Krolikowski, and Y. Kivshar, Opt. Lett. 33, 198 (2008).
  • (23) D. Buccoliero, A. Desyatnikov, W. Krolikowski, and Y. Kivshar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 53901 (2007).
  • (24) W. Krolikowski, O. Bang, and J. Wyller, Phys. Rev. E 70, 036617 (2004).
  • (25) A. Dreischuh, D. Neshev, D. Petersen, O. Bang, and W. Krolikowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 43901 (2006).
  • (26) Y. Kartashov and L. Torner, Opt. Lett. 32, 946 (2007).
  • (27) L. Ge, Q. Wang, M. Shen, J. Shi, Q. Kong, and P. Hou, J. Opt. A 11, 065207 (2009).
  • (28) Q. Kong, Q. Wang, O. Bang, and W. Krolikowski, Opt. Lett. 35, 2152 (2010).
  • (29) Q. Kong, Q. Wang, O. Bang, and W. Krolikowski, Phys. Rev. A 82, 013826 (2010).
  • (30) E. N. Tsoy, Phys. Rev. A 82, 063829 (2010).
  • (31) L. Wang, J. H. Zhang, Ch. Liu, M. Li, and F. H. Qi, Phys. Rev. E 93, 062217 (2016).
  • (32) C. Q. Dai, J. F. Ye, X. F. Chen, Opt. Commun. 285, 3988 (2012).
  • (33) C. Q. Dai, G. Q. Zhou, and J. F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 85, 016603 (2012).
  • (34) C. Q. Dai, Y. Y. Wang, C. Yan, Opt. Commun. 283, 1489 (2010).
  • (35) K. Senthilnathan, Q. Li, K. Nakkeeran, and P. K. A. Wai, Phys. Rev. A 78, 033835 (2008).
  • (36) J. d. He, J. F. Zhang, M. Y. Zhang, C. Q. Dai, Opt. Commun. 285, 755 (2012).
  • (37) R. Y. Hao, L. Li, Z. H. Li, R. C. Yang, G. S. Zhou, Opt. Commun. 245 (2005) 383.
  • (38) X. Y. Tang, P. K. Shukla, Phys. Rev. A 7 (6), 013612 (2007).