This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Cherenkov radiation in a strong magnetic field

Cheng-Yang Lee Center for Theoretical Physics, College of Physical Science and Technology,
Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China
[email protected]
Abstract

According to quantum electrodynamics, in a strong magnetic field that is constant and spatially uniform, the vacuum becomes polarized with a refractive index greater than unity. As a result, ultra-relativistic charged particles travelling in such media can emit Cherenkov radiation with a power spectrum directly proportional to the photon frequency ω\omega. Therefore, by extrapolating ω\omega beyond the critical synchrotron frequency ωc\omega_{c}, the Cherenkov radiation will eventually dominate over its synchrotron counterpart. However, such an extrapolation is not possible. We show that in the framework of effective field theory, the maximal attainable photon frequency ωmax\omega_{\tiny{\mbox{max}}} is about four order of magnitude less than ωc\omega_{c}. At ω=ωmax\omega=\omega_{\tiny{\mbox{max}}}, given the γe\gamma_{e}-factor of an electron travelling normal to a constant and spatially uniform magnetic field 𝐁\mathbf{B}, the spectrum of Cherenkov radiation becomes dominant when γe(|𝐁|/Gauss)4.32×1019\gamma_{e}(|\mathbf{B}|/\mbox{Gauss})\gtrsim 4.32\times 10^{19}. Nevertheless, detecting the Cherenkov radiation in astrophysical environments remains challenging since its spectral flux density is about three orders of magnitude less than the synchrotron radiation.

keywords:
Quantum electrodynamics , vacuum polarization , Cherenkov radiation , synchrotron radiation
journal: Nuclear Physics B

In order to discover new physics from astronomical observations, it is important to understand the mechanisms in which electromagnetic radiation are produced by the astrophysical sources. In most cases, synchrotron radiation produced by accelerating charges provide an adequate account of observations from which astronomers are able to obtain information on the electromagnetic fields in the vicinity of sources such as pulsars. However, these are not the only possible mechanisms of radiation production. According to quantum electrodynamics (QED), as the electromagnetic fields approach the critical value |𝐁|c=me2/e=4.42×1013Gauss|\mathbf{B}|_{c}=m^{2}_{e}/e=4.42\times 10^{13}\,\mbox{Gauss} where mem_{e} is the electron mass and ee the electric charge 111We use the SI units with c==1c=\hbar=1 so that 1 Gauss = 1.95×1021.95\times 10^{-2} eV2. The Cherenkov and synchrotron spectrum given in Schwinger (1949); Macleod et al. (2019) are in Gaussian units so we need to introduce a factor of 1/(4π)1/(4\pi) in their respective power spectra., the vacuum becomes polarized with a refractive index greater than unity Bialynicka-Birula and Bialynicki-Birula (1970); Adler (1971); Brezin and Itzykson (1971); Tsai and Erber (1975); Latorre et al. (1995); Dittrich and Gies (1998); Gies and Dittrich (1998); Dittrich and Gies (2000); Marklund and Shukla (2006). As a result, for ultra-relativistic charged particles travelling in such media, the emission of Cherenkov radiation becomes a real possibility. Taking into account the effects of non-linear QED, in the presence of a constant and spatially uniform magnetic field, the Cherenkov power spectrum is given by Macleod et al. (2019)

dPCherdω=02π𝑑ϕ(d2P+dωdϕ+d2Pdωdϕ),\displaystyle\frac{dP_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}}{d\omega}=\int^{2\pi}_{0}d\phi\left(\frac{d^{2}P_{+}}{d\omega d\phi}+\frac{d^{2}P_{-}}{d\omega d\phi}\right), (1)
d2P±dωdϕ=(14π)e2ω±β2π|ϵ0ϵ±|2sin2θ±,\displaystyle\frac{d^{2}P_{\pm}}{d\omega d\phi}=\left(\frac{1}{4\pi}\right)\frac{e^{2}\omega_{\pm}\beta}{2\pi}|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{0}\cdot\boldsymbol{\epsilon_{\pm}}|^{2}\sin^{2}\theta_{\pm}, (2)
cosθ±1n±β\displaystyle\cos\theta_{\pm}\equiv\frac{1}{n_{\pm}\beta} (3)

where β\beta is the velocity of the charged particle which we will take to be electron, n±n_{\pm} the refractive index and ω±\omega_{\pm} the modified photon frequency Bialynicka-Birula and Bialynicki-Birula (1970); Adler (1971)

n±=(1λ±|𝐐|2)1,ω±=|𝐤|(1λ±|𝐐|2),\displaystyle n_{\pm}=(1-\lambda_{\pm}|\mathbf{Q}|^{2})^{-1},\quad\omega_{\pm}=|\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{k}$}|(1-\lambda_{\pm}|\mathbf{Q}|^{2}), (4)
𝐐𝐤^×(𝐤^×𝐁)\displaystyle\mathbf{Q}\equiv\hat{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{k}$}}\times(\hat{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{k}$}}\times\mathbf{B}) (5)

with 𝐤\mathbf{k} being the photon momentum. The coefficients λ±\lambda_{\pm} are derived from the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian in the weak field limit Schwinger (1951)

14λ+=17λ=e4360π2me4.\frac{1}{4}\lambda_{+}=\frac{1}{7}\lambda_{-}=\frac{e^{4}}{360\pi^{2}m^{4}_{e}}. (6)

In eq. (3), ϵ0\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{0} and ϵ±\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{\pm} are the polarization vectors for the Cherenkov radiation and linearly polarized photons in the medium respectively. Their expressions can be found in Bialynicka-Birula and Bialynicki-Birula (1970) but they are not important to us here. Since the refractive index is constant, the spectrum is directly proportional to the photon frequency.

For electrons travelling parallel or anti-parallel to the photon trajectory, the condition for Cherenkov radiation is β>1/n±\beta>1/n_{\pm}. For ultra-relativistic electrons, this condition is equivalent to γe2>1/(2λ±|𝐐|2)\gamma_{e}^{2}>1/(2\lambda_{\pm}|\mathbf{Q}|^{2}). Therefore, in the presence of a strong magnetic field and with the electrons satisfying the stated condition, they will emit both Cherenkov and synchrotron radiation; for convenience, we write the associated γe\gamma_{e} factor as

γe2=X/(2λ|𝐁|2),X>1.\gamma^{2}_{e}=X/(2\lambda|\mathbf{B}|^{2}),\quad X>1. (7)

The power spectrum of the synchrotron radiation is given by Schwinger (1949)

dPsyncdω=(14π)33/24πe2γe4Rω0ωωc2ω/ωc𝑑ηK5/3(η)\frac{dP_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}}{d\omega}=\left(\frac{1}{4\pi}\right)\frac{3^{3/2}}{4\pi}\frac{e^{2}\gamma_{e}^{4}}{R}\frac{\omega_{0}\,\omega}{\omega^{2}_{c}}\int^{\infty}_{\omega/\omega_{c}}d\eta\,K_{5/3}(\eta) (8)

where K5/3(η)K_{5/3}(\eta) is the modified Bessel function, RR the radius of curvature and

ω0=eEe|𝐁|,ωc=32ω0γe3\omega_{0}=\frac{e}{E_{e}}|\mathbf{B}|,\quad\omega_{c}=\frac{3}{2}\omega_{0}\gamma_{e}^{3} (9)

where EeE_{e} is the energy of the electron. For ultra-relativistic electrons, the radius of curvature can be approximated as R1/ω0R\approx 1/\omega_{0} so that

dPsyncdω(14π)13πe2ωcγe2[ωωcω/ωc𝑑ηK5/3(η)].\frac{dP_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}}{d\omega}\approx\left(\frac{1}{4\pi}\right)\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}\pi}\frac{e^{2}\omega_{c}}{\gamma^{2}_{e}}\left[\frac{\omega}{\omega_{c}}\int^{\infty}_{\omega/\omega_{c}}d\eta\,K_{5/3}(\eta)\right]. (10)

Substituting eq. (7) into ωc\omega_{c} and taking λ±λ1032Gauss2\lambda_{\pm}\approx\lambda\sim 10^{-32}\,\mbox{Gauss}^{-2}, we obtain

ωc=8.67X×1023eV(Gauss|𝐁|)\omega_{c}=8.67X\times 10^{23}\,\mbox{eV}\left(\frac{\mbox{Gauss}}{|\mathbf{B}|}\right) (11)

Above the critical frequency ωc\omega_{c}, the synchrotron power spectrum exhibits approximate exponential decay. Therefore, if one extrapolates the photon frequency beyond ωc\omega_{c}, the Cherenkov radiation given in eqs. (1-3) will eventually dominate over its synchrotron counterpart. However, as we will show below, such an extrapolation is problematic because the photon dispersion and refractive index are derived from an effective field theory. Specifically, the extrapolation is constrained by the following inequality Narozhny (1969); Ritus (1985)

χγ=eme3[(Fk)μ(Fkμ)]1/21\chi_{\gamma}=\frac{e}{m^{3}_{e}}[(F\cdot k)^{\mu}(F\cdot k_{\mu})]^{1/2}\lesssim 1 (12)

where FF is the electromagnetic field strength tensor and kμk^{\mu} is the photon momentum. In terms of the critical magnetic field |𝐁c||\mathbf{B}_{c}| and the presence of a spatially constant and uniform magnetic field, we have χγ(|𝐁|/|𝐁c|)(ω/me)\chi_{\gamma}\sim(|\mathbf{B}|/|\mathbf{B}_{c}|)(\omega/m_{e}) thus yielding an upper-bound to the photon frequency

ωωmax=|𝐁c||𝐁|me=2.26×1019eV(Gauss|𝐁|).\omega\lesssim\omega_{\tiny{\mbox{max}}}=\frac{|\mathbf{B}_{c}|}{|\mathbf{B}|}m_{e}=2.26\times 10^{19}\,\mbox{eV}\left(\frac{\mbox{Gauss}}{|\mathbf{B}|}\right). (13)

Going beyond the bound, the effective field theory becomes unreliable and quantum effects become important. For instance, when |𝐁||𝐁c||\mathbf{B}|\sim|\mathbf{B}_{c}| and ω2me\omega\gtrsim 2m_{e}, photo-pair production γe+e\gamma\rightarrow e^{+}e^{-} dominates (Adler, 1971).

Comparing eqs. (11) to (13), we find that ωmaxωc\omega_{\tiny{\mbox{max}}}\ll\omega_{c}. Therefore, we cannot extend the photon frequency associated with Cherenkov radiation beyond ωc\omega_{c} thus verifying our earlier assertion. Therefore, we may use the following approximation for the synchrotron spectrum Rybicki and Lightman (2004)

(dPsyncdω)ωωc(14π)43[e2ωc21/3Γ(1/3)γe2](ωωc)1/3.\left(\frac{dP_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}}{d\omega}\right)_{\omega\ll\omega_{c}}\approx\left(\frac{1}{4\pi}\right)\frac{4}{3}\left[\frac{e^{2}\omega_{c}}{2^{1/3}\Gamma(1/3)\gamma_{e}^{2}}\right]\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_{c}}\right)^{1/3}. (14)

To approximate the maximum Cherenkov power spectrum, we take |ϵ0ϵ±|=1|\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{0}\cdot\boldsymbol{\epsilon}_{\pm}|=1, set β=1\beta=1 and take ω±ω\omega_{\pm}\approx\omega, λ1032Gauss2\lambda\sim 10^{-32}\,\mbox{Gauss}^{-2}. These approximations are possible because we are working under the condition λ|𝐁|21\lambda|\mathbf{B}|^{2}\ll 1. To the leading order in λ|𝐁|2\lambda|\mathbf{B}|^{2}, with electrons and photons travelling normal to the magnetic field and γe2>1/(2λ|𝐁|2)\gamma_{e}^{2}>1/(2\lambda|\mathbf{B}|^{2}), we get

dPCher(max)dω(14π)4e2ωλ|𝐁|2.\frac{dP^{\tiny{\mbox{(max)}}}_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}}{d\omega}\approx\left(\frac{1}{4\pi}\right)4e^{2}\omega\lambda|\mathbf{B}|^{2}. (15)

At ω=ωmax\omega=\omega_{\tiny{\mbox{max}}} and with γe2=X/(2λ|𝐁|2)\gamma^{2}_{e}=X/(2\lambda|\mathbf{B}|^{2}), after some manipulations, we find

(dPCher(max)dω)/(dPsyncdω)ωωc2.99×103X1/3.\left(\frac{dP^{\tiny{\mbox{(max)}}}_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}}{d\omega}\right)\Big{/}\left(\frac{dP_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}}{d\omega}\right)_{\omega\ll\omega_{c}}\approx 2.99\times 10^{-3}X^{1/3}. (16)

Therefore, the Cherenkov radiation becomes dominant when γe4.32×1019(Gauss/|𝐁|)\gamma_{e}\gtrsim 4.32\times 10^{19}\,(\mbox{Gauss}/|\mathbf{B}|).

Even though the Cherenkov radiation dominates for certain ranges of γe\gamma_{e}, actual detections of the Cherenkov radiation from astrophysical sources remains difficult. A common feature of Cherenkov and synchrotron radiation is that both emissions are concentrated in a narrow cone about the path of the electrons. Let θ±θCher\theta_{\pm}\approx\theta_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}} and θsync\theta_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}} be the opening angles for the Cherenkov and synchrotron radiation respectively. For ultra-relativistic electrons, they are given by

θCher22λ|𝐁|2,θsync21γe2.\theta^{2}_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}\approx 2\lambda|\mathbf{B}|^{2},\quad\theta^{2}_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}\approx\frac{1}{\gamma_{e}^{2}}. (17)

Defining their spectral flux densities to be

Cher(ω)1θCher2D2dPCher(max)dω,\displaystyle\mathcal{F}_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}(\omega)\equiv\frac{1}{\theta^{2}_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}D^{2}}\frac{dP^{\tiny{\mbox{(max)}}}_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}}{d\omega}, (18)
sync(ω)1θsync2D2dPsyncdω\displaystyle\mathcal{F}_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}(\omega)\equiv\frac{1}{\theta^{2}_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}D^{2}}\frac{dP_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}}{d\omega} (19)

where DD is the distance between the source and the observer. At ω=ωmax\omega=\omega_{\tiny{\mbox{max}}}, the ratio of the flux density is given by

Chersync2.29×103X2/3\frac{\mathcal{F}_{\tiny{\mbox{Cher}}}}{\mathcal{F}_{\tiny{\mbox{sync}}}}\approx\frac{2.29\times 10^{-3}}{X^{2/3}} (20)

Since X>1X>1, the spectral flux density of Cherenkov radiation is at least three orders of magnitude smaller than its synchrotron counterpart.

In summary, the production of Cherenkov radiation in strong magnetic fields is a real and fascinating possibility. However, because ωmaxωc\omega_{\tiny{\mbox{max}}}\ll\omega_{c}, actual detection of Cherenkov radiation from astrophysical sources remains challenging. It may also be instructive to study photon propagation in strong electric fields or other configurations but it seems to us that the pure magnetic field configuration is the most interesting and physically relevant.

Acknowledgement - I would like to thank Chris Gordon and Lance Labun for discussions and reading the manuscript. I would also like to thank the referee for valuable comments. I am grateful to the generous hospitality offered by the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Canterbury where part of this work was completed.

References

  • Adler (1971) Adler, S. L., 1971. Photon splitting and photon dispersion in a strong magnetic field. Annals Phys. 67, 599–647, [333(1971)].
  • Bialynicka-Birula and Bialynicki-Birula (1970) Bialynicka-Birula, Z., Bialynicki-Birula, I., 1970. Nonlinear effects in quantum electrodynamics. Photon propagation and photon splitting in an external field. Phys. Rev. D2, 2341–2345.
  • Brezin and Itzykson (1971) Brezin, E., Itzykson, C., 1971. Polarization phenomena in vacuum nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 3, 618–621.
  • Dittrich and Gies (1998) Dittrich, W., Gies, H., 1998. Light propagation in nontrivial QED vacua. Phys. Rev. D 58, 025004.
  • Dittrich and Gies (2000) Dittrich, W., Gies, H., 2000. Probing the quantum vacuum. Perturbative effective action approach in quantum electrodynamics and its application. Vol. 166. Springer Tract in Modern Physics.
  • Gies and Dittrich (1998) Gies, H., Dittrich, W., 1998. Light propagation in nontrivial QED vacua. Phys. Lett. B 431, 420–429.
  • Latorre et al. (1995) Latorre, J. I., Pascual, P., Tarrach, R., 1995. Speed of light in nontrivial vacua. Nucl. Phys. B 437, 60–82.
  • Macleod et al. (2019) Macleod, A. J., Noble, A., Jaroszynski, D. A., 2019. Cherenkov radiation from the quantum vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (16), 161601.
  • Marklund and Shukla (2006) Marklund, M., Shukla, P. K., 2006. Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 591–640.
  • Narozhny (1969) Narozhny, N., 1969. Propagation of plane electromagnetic waves in a constant field. Sov. Phys. JETP. 28, 371–374.
  • Ritus (1985) Ritus, V. I., 1985. Quantum effects of the interaction of elementary particles with an intense electromagnetic field. J. Russ. Laser Res. 6, 497–617.
  • Rybicki and Lightman (2004) Rybicki, G. B., Lightman, A. P., 2004. Radiative Processes in Astrophysics. Wiley-VCH, 2004.
  • Schwinger (1949) Schwinger, J. S., 1949. On the classical radiation of accelerated electrons. Phys. Rev. 75, 1912, [332(1949)].
  • Schwinger (1951) Schwinger, J. S., 1951. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization. Phys. Rev. 82, 664–679, [116(1951)].
  • Tsai and Erber (1975) Tsai, W.-Y., Erber, T., 1975. The Propagation of Photons in Homogeneous Magnetic Fields: Index of Refraction. Phys. Rev. D 12, 1132.