This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Characterizing 33-dimensional manifolds represented as connected sums of Lens spaces, S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1}, and torus bundles over the circle by certain Morse-Bott functions

Naoki kitazawa Institute of Mathematics for Industry, Kyushu University, 744 Motooka, Nishi-ku Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
TEL (Office): +81-92-802-4402
FAX (Office): +81-92-802-4405
[email protected], [email protected] https://naokikitazawa.github.io/NaokiKitazawa.html
Abstract.

We characterize 33-dimensional manifolds represented as connected sums of Lens spaces, copies of S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1}, and torus bundles over the circle by certain Morse-Bott functions. This adds to our previous result around 2024, classifying Morse functions whose preimages containing no singular points are disjoint unions of spheres and tori on closed manifolds represented as connected sums of Lens spaces and copies of S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1}: we have strengthened and explicitized Saeki’s result, characterizing the manifolds via such functions, in 2006. We apply similar arguments. However we discuss in a self-contained way essentially.

Key words and phrases:
Morse(-Bott) functions. Reeb digraphs. 33-dimensional closed manifolds. Lens spaces. Torus bundles.
2020 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 57R45. Secondary 57R19.

1. Introduction.

Morse(-Bott) functions have been fundamental and important tools in algebraic topology, differential topology and various geometry of manifolds since the birth of the theory, in the 20th century.

[16] explains related theory for example and we refer to this implicitly. Related to this, fundamental notions, terminologies and notation on smooth manifolds, smooth maps and Morse functions will be reviewed later: we also except readers have related fundamental knowledge and have experienced related studies.

One of natural problems is characterizations of certain classes of manifolds by the existence of certain Morse(-Bott) functions.

Reeb’s theorem [17] characterizes spheres topologically except the 44-dimensional case: we use Morse functions with exactly two singular points on closed manifolds. The 44-dimensional unit sphere is characterized by such functions. Morse functions are, in short, functions such that each singular point is represented by a quadratic form for suitable local coordinates. Singular points of Morse functions appear discretely and have information on homology groups and some information on homotopy of the manifolds. Related to this, more geometrically, they also have information on so-called handle decompositions of the manifolds, decompositions into disks, shortly. Morse functions are generalized to Morse-Bott functions and at singular points of them, they are represented as the compositions of projections with Morse functions.

Surprisingly, characterizations of certain classes of manifolds via Morse-Bott functions and classifications of these functions on manifolds of certain classes are of still important and difficult studies. A recent study of Saeki [18], a study on Morse functions such that preimages of single values containing no singular points are disjoint unions of spheres and tori, mainly motivates us.

Hereafter, we use the notation k{\mathbb{R}}^{k} for the kk-dimensional Euclidean space and :=1\mathbb{R}:={\mathbb{R}}^{1}. This is also a Riemannian manifold with the standard Euclidean metric and we define x0||x||\geq 0 as the distance of xx and the origin 0 there. Let Sk:={xk+1x=1}S^{k}:=\{x\in{\mathbb{R}}^{k+1}\mid||x||=1\} and Dk:={xkx1}D^{k}:=\{x\in{\mathbb{R}}^{k}\mid||x||\leq 1\}. They are the kk-dimensional unit sphere and the kk-dimensional unit disk. Lens spaces and torus bundles over the circle S1S^{1} are of important 33-dimensional closed, connected and orientable manifolds. We explain this later again.

Theorem 1 ([18, Theorem 6.5]).

A 33-dimensional closed, connected and orientable manifold MM admits a Morse function f:Mf:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R} such that preimages of single values containing no singular points are disjoint unions of copies of the sphere S2S^{2} and the torus S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1} if and only if MM is diffeomorphic to S3S^{3}, S1×S2S^{1}\times S^{2}, a Lens space, or a manifold represented as a connected sum of these manifolds.

The following is our main result, extending Theorem 1 to a certain class of Morse-Bott functions.

Theorem 2 (Our main result).

A 33-dimensional closed, connected and orientable manifold MM admits a Morse-Bott function f:Mf:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R} such that the following hold if and only if MM is diffeomorphic to S3S^{3}, S1×S2S^{1}\times S^{2}, a lens space, a torus bundle over the circle S1S^{1} or a manifold represented as a connected sum of these manifolds.

  1. (1)

    Preimages of single values of ff containing no singular points are disjoint unions of copies of the sphere S2S^{2} and the torus S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1}.

  2. (2)

    The set of all singular points of the Morse-Bott function ff is a disjoint union of (copies of) the following four manifolds.

    1. (a)

      A one-point set.

    2. (b)

      The circle S1S^{1}.

    3. (c)

      The torus S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1} or the sphere S2S^{2}.

    4. (d)

      The projective plane P2{{\mathbb{R}}P}^{2}.

  3. (3)

    Around each singular point of ff where ff has no local extremum, it is a Morse function.

Note that this gives an answer to [11, Problem 1].

Related to this, Morse-Bott functions on closed surfaces and their Reeb-digraphs, which are digraphs or oriented graphs, are recently studied actively, surprisingly ([1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 13, 14]). The Reeb digraph of a smooth function is the space of all connected components of preimages of single values and defined as a quotient space of the manifold, its vertex is defined as a point (component) containing singular points of the function, and the orientations (of edges) are defined according to the values of the functions naturally. [11] is another related study and studies Morse functions in Theorem 2. We respect [11] here. [15] also contains a related 33-dimensional study.

The next section is for preliminaries. The third section is for the proof and related arguments and remarks. Note also that [11] is closely related and that we respect and refer to this in some scenes. However we do not assume essential arguments of the preprint [11] unless we need related arguments. We believe that our new present result is sufficiently important to be presented in a single form. We also present arguments of certain new types in our paper.

2. Preliminaries.

Topological manifolds are known to be naturally regarded as so-called CW complexes. Smooth manifolds are, more strongly, regarded as polyhedra. Graphs are 11-dimensional polyhedra (if they have edges). For a non-empty space XX of such classes, we can define the dimension dimX0\dim X\geq 0 as an integer uniquely.

For a manifold XX, we can define the interior IntX{\rm Int}\ X, a manifold of dimension dimX\dim X and the boundary X:=XIntX\partial X:=X-{\rm Int}\ X, a empty set or a manifold of dimension dimX10\dim X-1\geq 0.

Let c:XYc:X\rightarrow Y be a smooth map between smooth manifolds XX and YY. A point pXp\in X is a singular point of cc if the rank of the differential is smaller than both the dimensions dimX\dim X and dimY\dim Y there. A Morse function c:Xc:X\rightarrow\mathbb{R} is a smooth function such that its singular point is always in the interior IntX{\rm Int}\ X and that each singular point pp of the function is represented by the form c(x1,xm)=Σj=1mi(p)xj2Σj=1i(p)xmi(p)+j2+c(p)c(x_{1},\cdots x_{m})={\Sigma}_{j=1}^{m-i(p)}{x_{j}}^{2}-{\Sigma}_{j=1}^{i(p)}{x_{m-i(p)+j}}^{2}+c(p) for some local coordinates and some integer 0i(p)m0\leq i(p)\leq m. Here i(p)i(p) is shown to be uniquely defined and we call it the index of pp for cc. We do not need such notions here. Singular points of a Morse function appear discretely. It is a fundamental fact from singularity theory that we can also deform a Morse function via a small homotopy into one such that at distinct singular points of it the values are distinct. We call such a Morse function a simple Morse function. [6] explains singularity theory of differentiable functions and maps systematically from elementary terminologies, notions and arguments, for example.

Hereafter, we call a Morse function such that preimages of single values containing no singular points of it are disjoint unions of copies of S2S^{2} and S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1} as studied in Theorem 1 a sphere-torus-fibered Morse function or an STF Morse function. The name respects [11].

A Morse-Bott function is a smooth function which is at each singular point represented as the composition of a smooth map with no singular points with a Morse function for suitable local coordinates.

Graphs are polyhedra consisting of 1-cells (edges) and 0-cells (vertices). The edge set of a graph is the set of all edges of it. The vertex set of the graph is the set of all vertices of it. We can orient edges in an arbitrary way and the graph is an oriented graph or a digraph. Two graphs are said to be isomorphic if there exists a piecewise smooth homeomorphism between them mapping the vertex set of one graph onto that of another graph. This map is called an isomorphism between these graphs. Two digraphs are said to be isomorphic if they are isomorphic as graphs and admit an isomorphism of the graphs mapping each edge of one graph into an edge of the other graph preserving the orientations. The degree of a vertex vv is defined as the number of edges containing the vertex vv.

The Reeb space WcW_{c} of a map c:XYc:X\rightarrow Y between topological spaces is defined as the quotient space X/cX/{\sim}_{c} by the equivalence relation: x1cx2x_{1}{\sim}_{c}x_{2} if and only if x1x_{1} and x2x_{2} belong to a connected component of a same preimage c1(y)c^{-1}(y). We have the quotient map qc:XWcq_{c}:X\rightarrow W_{c} and in a unique way a map c¯:Wc\bar{c}:W_{c}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} with the relation c=c¯qcc=\bar{c}\circ q_{c}.

Let Y:=Y:=\mathbb{R}. By defining the vertex set of WcW_{c} as the set of all connected components containing some singular points of c:Xc:X\rightarrow\mathbb{R} with the condition that X\partial X is empty, this is a graph in considerable cases. We call the graph the Reeb graph of cc. More rigorously, [19, 20] discuss this rigorously. Our cases are of such cases unless otherwise stated. Reeb graphs are also classical objects and have been fundamental and strong tools in understanding the manifolds compactly ([17]).

The Reeb graph WcW_{c} has the structure of a digraph in a canonical way. We orient an edge connecting v1v_{1} and v2v_{2} as an edge departing from v1v_{1} and entering v2v_{2} if c¯(v1)<c¯(v2)\bar{c}(v_{1})<\bar{c}(v_{2}). We can easily check that the function c¯\bar{c} is regarded as a piecewise smooth function and injective on each edge. We call this digraph WcW_{c} the Reeb digraph of cc. If there exists a piecewise smooth function g:Kg:K\rightarrow\mathbb{R} on a graph KK such that on each edge it is injective, then we can naturally have a digraph KgK_{g}.

The set of all smooth maps from a smooth manifold XX into another smooth manifold YY is topologized with the so-called CC^{\infty} Whitney topology: in short this respects derivatives of the maps. See [6] again. We do not need to understand precise and rigorous definitions and arguments on this here. A diffeomorphism is a smooth map which is a homeomorphism and which has no singular point. A diffeomorphism on a smooth manifold XX is a diffeomorphism from XX onto XX. The diffeomorphism group of XX is the group of all diffeomorphisms on XX.

In our paper, a bundle is a smooth bundle, or a bundle whose fiber is a smooth manifold and whose structure group is a subgroup of the diffeomorphism group of the smooth manifold.

A circle bundle (resp. torus bundle) is a smooth bundle whose fiber is the circle S1S^{1} (resp. torus S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1}). We also assume that the diffeomorphisms do not reverse the orientations.

For 33-dimensional manifold theory, see [7]. The class of lens spaces contains circle bundles over S2S^{2}. These circle bundles are distinguished by the 11-st integral homology groups, isomorphic to finite cyclic groups. Lens spaces may not be circle bundles. However, the 11st integral homology group and the fundamental group of each Len space are isomorphic and of such groups. Torus bundles over the circle are not diffeomorphic to manifolds represented as connected sums of Lens spaces and copies of S1×S2S^{1}\times S^{2}.

3. Our main result, Theorem 2, and related arguments and remarks.

A proof of Theorem 2.

We refer to several figures from [11] where we do not assume essential arguments first presented in [11]. Some arguments here are presented in [11] and several existing studies.
 
STEP 1 The manifold MM of the domain of the Morse-Bott function f:Mf:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R} must be of the presented class of 33-dimensional manifolds.

STEP 1-1 The preimage qf1(N(v)){q_{f}}^{-1}(N(v)) of a small regular neighborhood N(v)N(v) of a vertex vv where ff has a local extremum.
We investigate the preimage qf1(N(v)){q_{f}}^{-1}(N(v)) of a small regular neighborhood N(v)N(v) of a vertex vv where ff has a local extremum. We respect the four cases from (2).
 
CASE 1-1-1
In the first case (2a), the preimage is diffeomorphic to the disk D3D^{3} and we have a Morse function having exactly one singular point in the interior. It is regarded as a so-called height function of the disk D3D^{3}.
 
CASE 1-1-2
In the second case (2b), the preimage is diffeomorphic to the product S1×D2S^{1}\times D^{2} and we have a Morse-Bott function the set of all singular points of which is seen as the set S1×{0}S1×IntD2S^{1}\times\{0\}\subset S^{1}\times{\rm Int}\ D^{2}. This can be deformed into a simple STF Morse function with exactly two singular points by a suitable small homotopy, thanks to fundamental singularity theory and elementary topological arguments.
 
CASE 1-1-3
In the third case (2c), the preimage is diffeomorphic to the product S1×S1×D1S^{1}\times S^{1}\times D^{1} or S2×D1S^{2}\times D^{1} and we have a Morse-Bott function the set of all singular points of which is seen as the set S1×S1×{0}S1×S1×IntD1S^{1}\times S^{1}\times\{0\}\subset S^{1}\times S^{1}\times{\rm Int}\ D^{1} or S2×{0}S2×IntD1S^{2}\times\{0\}\subset S^{2}\times{\rm Int}\ D^{1}. The latter case of these two functions can be deformed into a simple STF Morse function with exactly two singular points by a suitable small homotopy, thanks to fundamental singularity theory and elementary topological arguments.

Note that the former function here is closely related to a key ingredient in STEP 1-2 and our new arguments.
 
CASE 1-1-4
In the fourth case (2d), the preimage is shown to be diffeomorphic to the complementary set of the interior of a smoothly embedded disk D3D^{3} in the 33-dimensional real projective space P3{\mathbb{R}P}^{3} by a fundamental argument on 33-dimensional manifolds. Note that the 33-dimensional real projective space is a circle bundle over S2S^{2}, for example. We have a Morse-Bott function the set of all singular points of which is seen as a copy of the real projective plane P2{\mathbb{R}P}^{2} embedded in a certain canonical way in the 33-dimensional real projective space P3{\mathbb{R}P}^{3}.
 
STEP 1-2 Deforming the Morse-Bott function ff locally around the preimages qf1(N(v)){q_{f}}^{-1}(N(v)) of small regular neighborhoods N(v)N(v) of vertices vv where ff has no local extremum.
 
By a suitable small homotopy, we can deform the Morse-Bott function around the preimages qf1(N(v)){q_{f}}^{-1}(N(v)) of small regular neighborhoods N(v)N(v) of vertices vv where ff has no local extremum preserving the function on the complementary set of the interior of the disjoint union of these local preimages qf1(N(v)){q_{f}}^{-1}(N(v)). The local functions are originally Morse by (3), and by (1), STF Morse functions. By [18, Lemma 6.6], these local functions are changed into simple STF Morse functions. Such an argument is also presented in [11] and we present again.

We also present additional arguments and figures from [11]. FIGURE 1 shows local forms of simple STF Morse functions by Reeb digraphs with information on preimages.

Blue (red) colored edges show edges the preimages of single points in the interior of which are diffeomorphic to S2S^{2} (resp. S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1}). Black dots are for vertices. We adopt this rule for our figures. We can consider the case of c-c for the function cc and we omit the case. We also respect this fundamental rule, hereafter.

Refer to caption
Figure 1. Local information on the Reeb (di)graph and preimages for simple STF Morse functions. Blue (red) colored edges show edges the preimages of single points in the interior of which are diffeomorphic to S2S^{2} (resp. S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1}). Black dots are for vertices. Hereafter we respect this rule for our figures.

FIGURE 2 shows local changes. Each homotopy is realized by a suitable small homotopy. This is from fundamental singularity theory together with the fundamental fact on the 3-dimensional manifold theory: the preimage of the presented local graph (local complex) is diffeomorphic to a manifold obtained by removing the interiors of two disjointly and smoothly embedded copies of the disk D3D^{3} in the interior of S1×D2S^{1}\times D^{2}.

Refer to caption
Figure 2. Local changes of (the Reeb digraphs of) simple STF Morse functions.

We can consider a suitable iteration of local changes of functions presented in FIGURE 2 to have another new Morse-Bott function f0:Mf_{0}:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R} and a new Reeb digraph such that the union of all edges the preimages of single points in the interiors of which are diffeomorphic to S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1} consists of connected components represented as either of the following. If we need, then we change the local functions for CASE 1-1-2 into simple STF Morse functions locally.

Note that for Reeb spaces and Reeb graphs, preimages are considered for the map qc:WcYq_{c}:W_{c}\rightarrow Y for a given map c:XYc:X\rightarrow Y. We also remember the map c¯\bar{c} with the relation c=c¯qcc=\bar{c}\circ q_{c}.

We note that, hereafter, we present some new arguments, which do not appear in [11].

  • A closed arc II satisfying the following: vertices of the boundary points, points of I\partial I, are of degree 22 and ones where the function f0¯:Wf0\bar{f_{0}}:W_{f_{0}}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} does not have a local maximum, and vertices in the interior are of degree 22 and ones where the function f0¯:Wf0\bar{f_{0}}:W_{f_{0}}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} has a local extremum. We can also check that the preimage qf1(N(I)){q_{f}}^{-1}(N(I)) of a small regular neighborhood N(I)N(I) of II is diffeomorphic to a manifold obtained by removing the interiors of two smoothly and disjointly embedded copies of D3D^{3} from a Lens space, S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1}, or S3S^{3}.

  • A connected component CC homeomorphic to the circle S1S^{1} satisfying the following: at each vertex vCv\in C there where the restriction f0¯C{\bar{f_{0}}}{\mid}_{C} to CC of the function f0¯:Wf0\bar{f_{0}}:W_{f_{0}}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} has a local extremum, the original function f0¯\bar{f_{0}} also has a local extremum at the vertex vv and vv is also of degree 22 in the graph Wf0W_{f_{0}}. We can also check that the preimage qf1(N(C)){q_{f}}^{-1}(N(C)) of a small regular neighborhood N(C)N(C) of CC is diffeomorphic to a manifold obtained by removing the interiors of finitely many smoothly and disjointly embedded copies of D3D^{3} from a torus bundle over the circle.

Remembering STEP 1-1 with CASE 1-1-1–CASE 1-1-4 and Theorem 1 for example, we can see that the closed, connected and orientable manifold MM of the domain is diffeomorphic to a manifold obtained in the following way.

  • We prepare a suitable finite family of torus bundles over S1S^{1}, Lens spaces, copies of S2×S1S^{2}\times S^{1}, and copies of S3S^{3}.

  • We remove the interiors of finitely many smoothly and disjointly embedded copies of D3D^{3} from the prepared manifolds suitably.

  • We glue the resulting manifolds suitably to have our desired closed, connected and orientable manifold along the boundaries, each of which is diffeomorphic to S2S^{2}. The resulting manifold is diffeomorphic to MM.

Our manifold MM is also of the class of 33-dimensional closed, connected and orientable manifolds presented in the statement of Theorem 2.

This completes STEP 1.
 
STEP 2 Construct a desired Morse-Bott function on a 33-dimensional manifold MM of the presented class, conversely.

On a sphere S3S^{3}, we have a Morse function with exactly two singular points. It is also a specific case of simple STF Morse functions.

We can reconstruct a desired simple STF Morse function on each lens space MjM_{j}, S1×S2S^{1}\times S^{2} and S3S^{3} from the colored digraph in FIGURE 3. Rules for colors are for preimages as presented: blue (red) colored edges are for preimages of single points diffeomorphic to S2S^{2} (resp. S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1}). Blue colored vertices are for removal of (the interiors of) small regular neighborhoods of the vertices and the preimages: preimages here are diffeomorphic to D3D^{3} (IntD3{\rm Int}\ D^{3}).

In addition, we can also reconstruct a desired Morse-Bott function fj:Mjf_{j}:M_{j}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} on each torus bundle MjM_{j} over the circle S1S^{1} from the colored digraph in FIGURE 4. Rules for colors and blue vertices are same as those in the previous situation.

Refer to caption
Figure 3. We can reconstruct a desired Morse function on each lens space MjM_{j}, S1×S2S^{1}\times S^{2} and S3S^{3}, from the colored digraph. Rules for colors are for preimages as presented. Blue colored vertices are for removal of (the interiors of) small regular neighborhoods of the vertices and the preimages, each of which is diffeomorphic to D3D^{3} (IntD3{\rm Int}\ D^{3}).
Refer to caption
Figure 4. We can reconstruct a desired Morse-Bott function on each torus bundle MjM_{j} over the circle S1S^{1}, from the colored digraph.

On a general MM, represented as a connected sum of the manifolds MjM_{j}, by gluing these local Morse-Bott functions suitably, we have a desired Morse-Bott function f:Mf:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}.

For our reconstruction here, the author has discussed more general cases in [8, 9] for example. However we do not understand these studies of course. Our construction in the present proof is very fundamental, natural and specific.

Note also that we can have a resulting Reeb digraph as a so-called cactus graph: a cactus graph is a graph such that each edge is contained in at most one circle (simple cycle).
 
This completes the proof. ∎

Problem 1.

For a piecewise smooth function g:Kg:K\rightarrow\mathbb{R} on a finite and connected graph KK such that on each edge ee it is injective, consider the digraph KgK_{g} such that at each vertex vv where gg has a local extremum the degree of vv is 11 or 22. For the edge set EKgE_{K_{g}}, a map lKgl_{K_{g}} is defined satisfying the following: the values are 0 or 11 and on edges eve_{v} containing a vertex vv where the function gg has a local extremum, the values l(ev)l(e_{v}) are constant (for each vv). Does there exist a Morse-Bott function f:Mf:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R} on a given 33-dimensional manifold MM satisfying the three conditions in Theorem 2 and the following properties?

  1. (1)

    There exists an isomorphism ϕ:KgWf\phi:K_{g}\rightarrow W_{f} between the digraphs.

  2. (2)

    The preimage qf1(p){q_{f}}^{-1}(p) of a point pp in the interior of the edge ϕ(e)Wf\phi(e)\subset W_{f} is diffeomorphic to S2S^{2} (S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1}) if lKg(e)=0l_{K_{g}}(e)=0 (resp. 11).

This respects a problem mainly discussed in [11] ([11, Problem 1 ]). For closed surfaces, [13] is a complete answer for the Morse function case and [4, 5] give some complete answers for Morse-Bott functions on closed surfaces.

We present a kind of explicit affirmative answers characteristic to our situation. A subgraph KK^{\prime} of a graph KK means a subcomplex of KK. If the graph KK is a digraph, then KK^{\prime} is also a digraph canonically.

Theorem 3.

Given a situation for Problem 1 as follows.

Let there exist ll disjoint simple cycles {Cj}j=1l\{C_{j}\}_{j=1}^{l} in KK satisfying the following. We consider the restriction gCjg{\mid}_{C_{j}} of the function gg. The following are satisfied.

  • For each edge eCje_{C_{j}} of CjC_{j}, lKg(eCJ)=1l_{K_{g}}(e_{C_{J}})=1.

  • At each vertex where gCjg{\mid}_{C_{j}} has a local extremum, it is also a vertex where the original function gg has a local extremum.

  • If KK is homeomorphic to the circle S1S^{1}, then at some vertex vKv\in K, gg does not have a local extremum.

Then for any family {Mj}j=1l\{M_{j}\}_{j=1}^{l} of ll manifolds each of which is a torus bundle over S1S^{1} and ”some 33-dimensional manifold MM from Theorem 1”, denoted by Ml+1M_{l+1}, and a manifold MM represented as a connected sum of these l+1l+1 manifolds, we can have a desired Morse-Bott function f:Mf:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}.

Proof.

Here, we refer to several published articles [8, 9] and arguments. We also refer to some preprints of the author [10, 11].

We can have the following subgraph KK^{\prime} of KK in the unique way.

  • The subgraph KK^{\prime} contains no edge in cycles CjC_{j}.

  • The subgraph KK^{\prime} is maximal among all subgraphs K′′K^{\prime\prime} satisfying the previous condition.

We do the following operation for each vertex vCv_{C} of KK^{\prime} originally contained in some cycle CjC_{j}.

We add two oriented edges evC,K,le_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm l}} and evC,K,he_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm h}}. We also add the first edge evC,K,le_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm l}} as an edge departing from a new vertex vC,K,lv_{C,K^{\prime},{\rm l}} and entering vCv_{C}. We also add the second edge evC,K,he_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm h}} as an edge departing from the vertex vCv_{C} and entering a new vertex vC,K,hv_{C,K^{\prime},{\rm h}}.

Let K0{K_{0}}^{\prime} denote the resulting digraph. We extend the map lKgl_{K_{g}} as a map such that at each new edge the value is 0. Let the map denoted by lKg,0{l_{K_{g},0}}^{\prime}.

We also do the following operation for each vertex vCv_{C} of each cycle CjC_{j}. The notation ”vCv_{C} here” is same as the vertex vCv_{C} before.

We add another two oriented edges evC,le_{v_{C},{\rm l}} and evC,he_{v_{C},{\rm h}}. We also add the first edge evC,le_{v_{C},{\rm l}} as an edge departing from a new vertex vC,lv_{C,{\rm l}} and entering vCv_{C}. We also add the second edge evC,he_{v_{C},{\rm h}} as an edge departing from the vertex vCv_{C} and entering a new vertex vC,hv_{C,{\rm h}}. Let C0,jC_{0,j} denote the resulting digraph, obtained as a result of the change from CjC_{j}.

We further extend the maps lKgl_{K_{g}} and lKg,0{l_{K_{g},0}}^{\prime} as a map such that at each of additional new edges the value is 0. Let the map denoted by lKg,0l_{K_{g},0}.

For K0{K_{0}}^{\prime}, we can have a Morse-Bott function f:Mf^{\prime}:M^{\prime}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} on a suitably chosen manifold MM^{\prime} as in the statement of Theorem 2: for the preimages we respect the map lKg,0{l_{K_{g},0}}^{\prime} (and the map lKg,0l_{K_{g},0}). We can construct the function in such a way that the set of all singular points of the function is a disjoint union of copies of S2S^{2}, S1S^{1}, S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1} and one-point sets: we consider CASE 1-1-1, CASE 1-1-2 and CASE 1-1-3 in the proof of Theorem 2. For the class of manifolds MM^{\prime} belongs to, we need additional consideration on local construction around each vertex vv where for the digraph K0{K_{0}}^{\prime} both an edge entering vv and an edge departing from vv exist. We construct locally as in [11, (3) in STEP 2 in the proof of Theorem 2]. Or we also construct as presented in the articles [8, 9]: for example [8, Proof of Theorem 1.2]. In this construction, it is most important to choose the local function so that we can deform the local function by a suitable homotopy into a simple STF Morse function having the preimage of some single value diffeomorphic to S2S^{2} and containing no singular point of the simple STF Morse function.

Our construction also yields a Morse-Bott function f0:M{f_{0}}^{\prime}:M^{\prime}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} on MM^{\prime} which is, around each point where the function does not have a local extremum, represented as a simple STF Morse function. In addition, the function f0{f_{0}}^{\prime} satisfies the following. The union of all edges the preimages of single points in the interiors of which are diffeomorphic to the torus S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1} is a disjoint union of intervals: as a small remark, we deform the local function around a vertex for CASE 1-2 in the proof of Theorem 2 into a local simple STF Morse function, if we need. For this, note that for any simple cycle CK0{C_{{K_{0}}^{\prime}}}^{\prime} in the graph K0{K_{0}}^{\prime}, at some vertex vCK0v\in{C_{{K_{0}}^{\prime}}}^{\prime}, either gCK0g{\mid}_{{C_{{K_{0}}^{\prime}}}^{\prime}} does not have a local extremum or gg does not have a local extremum on the original graph KK. This is thanks to the assumption that if the graph KK is homeomorphic to the circle S1S^{1}, then at some vertex vKv\in K, gg does not have a local extremum. Each connected component of the manifold MM^{\prime} belongs to the class of ”the 33-dimensional manifolds MM of Theorem 1”. Remember also that such an argument is presented in STEP 1-2 in the proof of Theorem 2. By the structure of the Morse-Bott function and fundamental arguments on Morse functions, we have a copy D3vC{D^{3}}_{v_{C}} of the disk D3D^{3} small and smoothly embedded into MM^{\prime} and mapped onto the union of the two edges evC,K,le_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm l}} and evC,K,he_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm h}} for each vertex vCv_{C} before. We can also choose the disk D3vC{D^{3}}_{v_{C}} as a space containing exactly two singular points of the function f0{f_{0}}^{\prime}. For related arguments, for our previous result, see also [10, A proof of Main Theorem 1] for example.

For each simple cycle CjC_{j}, we remove all vertices vCjv_{C_{j}} where the function does not have local extrema from CjC_{j} and have a new simple cycle Cj{C_{j}}^{\prime}. We can construct a Morse-Bott function on fj:Mjf_{j}:M_{j}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} and the Reeb digraph isomorphic to Cj{C_{j}}^{\prime} and the preimage of a point in CC^{\prime} is diffeomorphic to the torus S1×S1S^{1}\times S^{1}: the point may be a point in the interior of an edge or a vertex. We can also reconstruct a Morse-Bott function f0,j:Mjf_{0,j}:M_{j}\rightarrow\mathbb{R} which is, around each vertex where the function does not have a local extremum, represented as an STF Morse function not being simple, whose Reeb digraph is isomorphic to C0,jC_{0,j} and which respects the map lKg,0l_{K_{g},0} for the preimages. We can reconstruct the functions so that fjf_{j} is deformed into f0,jf_{0,j} by a suitable homotopy, thanks to fundamental arguments on Morse functions, singular points of them and (generating and canceling) handles. We also have a copy D3vCj{D^{3}}_{v_{C_{j}}} of the disk D3D^{3} small and smoothly embedded into MjM_{j} and mapped onto a closed interval embedded in the interior of the union of two adjacent edges evCj,le_{v_{C_{j}},{\rm l}} and evCj,he_{v_{C_{j}},{\rm h}} for each vertex vCjv_{C_{j}} before. Remember that for these edges, the notation of the form ”evC,le_{v_{C},{\rm l}}, evC,he_{v_{C},{\rm h}}, and vCv_{C}” is used before. We have no problem on the usage. We can also choose the disk D3vCj{D^{3}}_{v_{C_{j}}} as a space containing no singular points of the function f0,jf_{0,j}. For related arguments, for our previous result, see also [10, A proof of Main Theorem 1] again, for example.

Respecting these arguments and information, we construct a new 33-dimensional manifold MM. First we remove the interiors of disks D3vC{D^{3}}_{v_{C}} and D3vCj{D^{3}}_{v_{C_{j}}} from MjM_{j} and MM^{\prime}. We glue the resulting manifolds along connected components of the boundaries one after another suitably to have a closed, connected and orientable manifold MM. More explicitly, we glue connected components originally corresponding to a same vertex vC=vCjKv_{C}=v_{C_{j}}\in K where abusing the notation in such a way has no problem. We also glue the functions ff^{\prime} and f0,jf_{0,j} (, restricted to the remaining manifolds).

We can have a new Morse-Bott function f:Mf^{\prime}:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R} on the new manifold MM whose Reeb digraph is isomorphic to a digraph obtained by identifying evC,K,le_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm l}} with evC,le_{v_{C},{\rm l}}, and evC,K,he_{v_{C,K^{\prime}},{\rm h}} with evC,he_{v_{C},{\rm h}} from K0{K_{0}}^{\prime} and C0,jC_{0,j}, canonically. By the structure of the Morse-Bott function and fundamental arguments on Morse functions, especially on singular points of the functions, handles and so-called canceling pairs of singular points of the functions or handles, we have a desired function f:Mf:M\rightarrow\mathbb{R}. Last, we can also see that MM is represented as in the statement.

This completes the proof.

Example 1.

From the two graphs in FIGURE 5, seen naturally as digraphs, we can reconstruct Morse-Bott functions as in Theorems 2 and 3.

Refer to caption
Figure 5. Two similar digraphs for reconstruction in Theorems 2 and 3. For example, rules for colored edges and vertices are as presented before. Long arrows are for orientations of the digraphs. The former (latter) digraph is for l=0l=0 (resp. l=0,1l=0,1) in Theorem 3.

As before, a blue colored edge ee implies lK(e)=0l_{K}(e)=0 and a red colored edge ee implies lK(e)=1l_{K}(e)=1. It is important that from the first case, we must have a manifold MM as the domain as a ”33-dimensional manifold MM in Theorem 1” and that from the second case, we can have a case of l=1l=1 in Theorem 3.

4. Acknowledgement.

The author would like to thank members of the research group hosted by Osamu Saeki. The author would also like to thank people organizing and supporting Saga Souhatsu Mathematical Seminar (http://inasa.ms.saga-u.ac.jp/Japanese/saga-souhatsu.html): the author would like to thank Inasa Nakamura again for inviting the author as a speaker and letting him present [8, 10]. Discussions on several Morse functions and topological properties of the manifolds of their domains with these groups have motivated the author to challenge [11] and further and led the author to the present result.

5. Conflict of interest and Data availability.

Conflict of interest.
The author works at Institute of Mathematics for Industry (https://www.jgmi.kyushu-u.ac.jp/en/about/young-mentors/). This project is closely related to our study. Our study thanks them for their encouragements. The author is also a researcher at Osaka Central Advanced Mathematical Institute (OCAMI researcher): this is supported by MEXT Promotion of Distinctive Joint Research Center Program JPMXP0723833165. He is not employed there. However, our study also thanks them for such an opportunity. Saga Souhatsu Mathematical Seminar (http://inasa.ms.saga-u.ac.jp/Japanese/saga-souhatsu.html), inviting the author as a speaker, is funded and supported by JST Fusion Oriented REsearch for disruptive Science and Technology JPMJFR202U: the author was a speaker on 2024/7/12 supported by this project.
 
Data availability.
Essentially, data supporting our present study are all here. Note that this respects [9] and [9] and the present paper both study similar studies on Morse-Bott functions on similar classes of 33-dimensional closed , connected and orientable manifolds. However, the present paper studies some new problems different from ones in [9] and present several new arguments.

References

  • [1] I. Gelbukh, A finite graph is homeomorphic to the Reeb graph of a Morse-Bott function, Mathematica Slovaca, 71 (3), 757–772, 2021; doi: 10.1515/ms-2021-0018.
  • [2] I. Gelbukh, Morse-Bott functions with two critical values on a surface, Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, 71 (3), 865–880, 2021; doi: 10.21136/CMJ.2021.0125-20.
  • [3] I. Gelbukh, Criterion for a graph to admit a good orientation in terms of leaf blocks, Monatsh. Math., 198, 61–77, 2022.
  • [4] I. Gelbukh, Realization of a digraph as the Reeb graph of a Morse-Bott function on a given surface, Topology and its Applications, 2024.
  • [5] I. Gelbukh, Reeb Graphs of Morse-Bott Functions on a Given Surface, Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society, Volume 50 Article number 84, 2024.
  • [6] M. Golubitsky and V. Guillemin, Stable Mappings and Their Singularities, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (14), Springer-Verlag (1974).
  • [7] J. Hempel, 3- Manifolds, AMS Chelsea Publishing, 2004.
  • [8] N. Kitazawa, On Reeb graphs induced from smooth functions on 33-dimensional closed orientable manifolds with finitely many singular values, Topol. Methods in Nonlinear Anal. Vol. 59 No. 2B, 897–912.
  • [9] N. Kitazawa, On Reeb graphs induced from smooth functions on 33-dimensional closed manifolds which may not be orientable, Methods of Functional Analysis and Topology Vol. 29 No. 1 (2023), 57–72, 2024.
  • [10] N. Kitazawa, Realization problems of graphs as Reeb graphs of Morse functions with prescribed preimages, the 3rd revised version is submitted to a refereed journal based on positive comments, arXiv:2108.06913.
  • [11] N. Kitazawa, On a classification of Morse functions on 33-dimensional manifolds represented as connected sums of manifolds of Heegaard genus one, arXiv:2411.15943, 2024.
  • [12] W. Marzantowicz and L. P. Michalak, Relations between Reeb graphs, systems of hypersurfaces and epimorphisms onto free groups, Fund. Math., 265 (2), 97–140, 2024.
  • [13] L. P. Michalak, Realization of a graph as the Reeb graph of a Morse function on a manifold. Topol. Methods in Nonlinear Anal. 52 (2) (2018), 749–762, arXiv:1805.06727.
  • [14] L. P. Michalak, Combinatorial modifications of Reeb graphs and the realization problem, Discrete Comput. Geom. 65 (2021), 1038–1060, arXiv:1811.08031.
  • [15] L. P. Michalak, Reeb graph invariants of Morse functions and 33-manifold groups, arXiv:2403.02291.
  • [16] J. Milnor, Lectures on the h-cobordism theorem, Math. Notes, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.J. 1965.
  • [17] G. Reeb, Sur les points singuliers d´une forme de Pfaff complétement intègrable ou d´une fonction numérique, Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de I´Académie des Sciences 222 (1946), 847–849.
  • [18] O. Saeki, Morse functions with sphere fibers, Hiroshima Math. J. Volume 36, Number 1 (2006), 141–170.
  • [19] O. Saeki, Reeb spaces of smooth functions on manifolds, International Mathematics Research Notices, maa301, Volume 2022, Issue 11, June 2022, 3740–3768, https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/maa301, arXiv:2006.01689.
  • [20] O. Saeki, Reeb spaces of smooth functions on manifolds II, Res. Math. Sci. 11, article number 24 (2024), https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40687-024-00436-z.