This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: Corresponding author: [email protected], †These authors contributed equally to this work.

Cesium nDJnD_{J}+6S1/26S_{1/2} Rydberg molecules and their permanent electric dipole moments

Suying Bai†1,2    Xiaoxuan Han†1,2    Jingxu Bai1,2    Yuechun Jiao1,2    Jianming Zhao1,2    Suotang Jia1,2    Georg Raithel3 1State Key Laboratory of Quantum Optics and Quantum Optics Devices, Institute of Laser Spectroscopy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China 2Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China 3 Department of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1120, USA
Abstract

Cs2 Rydberg-ground molecules consisting of a Rydberg, nDJnD_{J} (33 \leq nn \leq 39), and a ground state atom, 6S1/2(F=S_{1/2}(F=3 or 4)), are investigated by photo-association spectroscopy in a cold atomic gas. We observe vibrational spectra that correspond to triplet ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma and mixed ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma molecular states. We establish scaling laws for the energies of the lowest vibrational states vs principal quantum number and obtain zero-energy singlet and triplet ss-wave scattering lengths from experimental data and a Fermi model. Line broadening in electric fields reveals the permanent molecular electric-dipole moments; measured values agree well with calculations. We discuss the negative polarity of the dipole moments, which differs from previously reported cases.

pacs:
32.80.Ee, 33.20.-t, 34.20.Cf

Recently, molecules formed between a ground-state and a Rydberg atom have attracted considerable attention due to their rich vibrational level structure and permanent electric dipole moments, which are unique for homonuclear molecules. A Rydberg-ground molecule arises from low-energy scattering between the Rydberg electron and ground-state atoms located inside the Rydberg electron’s wavefunction. This interaction, initially investigated in Fermi ; Omont , has been predicted to lead to molecular binding in a novel type of Rydberg molecules, including the so-called trilobite Greene and butterfly molecule Hamilton ; Chibisov . The molecular bond length is on the order of the Rydberg-atom size (a thousand Bohr radii a0). Rydberg-ground molecules were first reported in experiments with Rb nS1/2nS_{1/2} (nn = 35-37) states V. Bendkowsky and later with Rb nP1/2,3/2nP_{1/2,3/2} M. A. Bellos and nD3/2,5/2nD_{3/2,5/2} D. A. Anderson ; A. T. Krupp ; Maclennan states, as well as with Cs nS1/2nS_{1/2} J. Tallant ; Booth , nP3/2nP_{3/2} HS and nD3/2nD_{3/2} Shaffer2019 states. The permanent electric dipole moment of S-type Rydberg-ground molecules has been measured to be \thicksim 1 Debye for Rb Li2011 and a few thousand Debye for Cs Booth . The large size and the permanent electric dipole moments of Rydberg-ground molecules make these molecules good candidates for the realization of certain strongly correlated many-body gases Weimer and for quantum information processing Lukin ; Demille ; Rabl , as well as for dipolar quantum gases and spin systems with long-range interactions Baranov ; Kadau .

Here we report on the measurement of long-range Cs2 (nDJ+6S1/2FnD_{J}+6S_{1/2}F) Rydberg-ground molecules for 33 \leq nn \leq 39, J=3/2J=3/2 or 5/2, and F=3F=3 or 4. These molecules are deeply in the Hund’s case(c)-regime, which differs from Rb nD3/2,5/2nD_{3/2,5/2}-type molecules at lower nn, which are Hund’s case(a) Maclennan or between Hund’s case(a) and (c) D. A. Anderson ; A. T. Krupp . Using a Fermi model, we calculate molecular potential energy curves (PECs), vibrational energies and permanent electric-dipole moments.

The scattering interaction between the Rydberg electron and the ground-state atom is, in the reference frame of the Rydberg ionic core Omont ,

V^(r;R)=\displaystyle\widehat{V}(\textbf{r};R)= 2πas(k)δ3(rRz^)\displaystyle 2\pi a_{s}(k)\delta^{3}(\textbf{r}-R\hat{\textbf{z}}) (1)
+6π[ap(k)]3δ3(rRz^)\displaystyle+6\pi[a_{p}(k)]^{3}\delta^{3}(\textbf{r}-R\hat{\textbf{z}})\overleftarrow{\nabla}\cdot\overrightarrow{\nabla}

where r and Rz^R\hat{\textbf{z}} are the positions of the Rydberg electron and the perturber atom, al(k)a_{l}(k) the scattering lengths, kk is the electron momentum, and ll the scattering partial-wave order (0 or 1 for ss-wave or pp-wave, respectively). The full Hamiltonian of the system is Anderson ,

H^(r;R)=H^0+i=S,TV^(r;R)P^(i)+AHFSS^2I^2\hat{H}(\textbf{r};R)=\hat{H}_{0}+\sum_{\begin{subarray}{c}i=S,T\end{subarray}}\hat{V}(\textbf{r};R)\hat{P}(i)+A_{HFS}\hat{\textbf{S}}_{2}\cdot\hat{\textbf{I}}_{2} (2)

where H^0\hat{H}_{0} is the unperturbed Hamiltonian, which includes the spin-orbit interaction of the Rydberg atom. The second term sums over singlet (ii = SS) and triplet (ii = TT ) scattering channels, using the projection operators P^(T)=S^1S^2+3/4\hat{P}(T)=\hat{\textbf{S}}_{1}\cdot\hat{\textbf{S}}_{2}+3/4, P^(S)=1P^(T)\hat{P}(S)=1-\hat{P}(T) (S^1\hat{\textbf{S}}_{1} and S^2\hat{\textbf{S}}_{2} are the electronic spins of the Rydberg and ground-state atom, respectively). The last term represents the hyperfine coupling of S^2\hat{\textbf{S}}_{2} to the ground-state-atom nuclear spin I^2\hat{\textbf{I}}_{2}, with hyperfine parameter AHFSA_{HFS}. Numerical solutions of the Hamiltonian in Eq. (2) on a grid of RR-values yield sets of PECs. Figure 1(a) shows four PECs that are asymptotically connected with the atomic 36D5/2D_{5/2}-state. The PECs for ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma for 6S1/2F6S_{1/2}F=3 and FF=4 are practically identical, while the PECs for ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma are \sim 10 MHz deeper for FF=3 than for FF=4. A similar behavior was seen in Rb D. A. Anderson ; Maclennan and Cs HS .

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) PECs for 36D5/2+6S1/2(F=4)36D_{5/2}+6S_{1/2}(F=4) (dashed lines) and 36D5/2+6S1/2(F=3)36D_{5/2}+6S_{1/2}(F=3) molecules (gray solid lines), respectively. The deep potentials mostly arise from triplet ss-wave scattering (ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma) and do not depend on FF. The shallow potentials mostly arise from ss-wave scattering of mixed ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma-states and depend on FF; the PEC for ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma F=3F=3 is deeper than that for ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma F=4F=4. The colored lines show the lowest vibrational wavefunctions on the PECs. (b,c) Experimental photo-association spectra for 36D5/2+6S1/2(F=4)36D_{5/2}+6S_{1/2}(F=4) and 36D5/2+6S1/2(F=3)36D_{5/2}+6S_{1/2}(F=3) molecules. Energies are relative to the respective 36D5/2D_{5/2} asymptotes. Filled (open) triangles mark the molecular signals formed by mixed ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma (triplet ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma) potentials. Gray symbols and error bars show data points, black lines display smoothed averages. The error bars are the standard error of ten independent measurements. The thin yellow lines display Gaussian fittings.

The experiment is performed in a crossed optical dipole trap (CODT) loaded from a magneto-optical trap (MOT). The CODT density, measured by absorption imaging, is 1011\thicksim 10^{11} cm-3. This is sufficiently dense to excite Rydberg-ground molecules with bond lengths 0.12μ\sim 0.12~{}\mum (our case). After switching off the trapping lasers, two counter-propagated 852- and 510-nm lasers (pulse duration 3 μ\mus) are applied to photo-associate the atoms into Rydberg-ground molecules. The lasers are both frequency-stabilized to the same high-finesse Fabry-Perot (FP) cavity to less than 500 kHz linewidth. The 852-nm laser is 360 MHz blue-detuned from the intermediate |6P3/2,|6P_{3/2},F’=5=5\rangle level. The 510-nm laser is scanned from the atomic Rydberg line to \sim150 MHz below by scanning the radio-frequency signal (RF) applied to the electro-optic modulator used to lock the laser to the FP cavity. Rydberg molecules are formed when the detuning from the atomic line matches the binding energy of a molecular vibrational state. Rydberg atoms and molecules are detected using electric-field ionization and a microchannel plate (MCP) ion detector. Suitable timing of the MOT repumping laser allows us to prepare the atoms and molecules in either FF=4 or FF=3. The 510-nm laser can be tuned to excite either nD5/2+6S1/2nD_{5/2}+6S_{1/2} or nD3/2+6S1/2nD_{3/2}+6S_{1/2} molecules.

In Fig. 1 we show photo-association spectra of 36D5/2+6S1/236D_{5/2}+6S_{1/2} molecules for F=4F=4 (Fig. 1(b)) and F=3F=3 (Fig. 1(c)), respectively. To reduce uncertainties, the spectra are averaged over ten measurements. Both spectra display a pair of dominant molecular peaks, marked with triangles. They correspond to the vibrational ground (ν=0\nu=0) states in the outermost wells of the shallow (ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma) and deep (ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma) PECs shown in Fig. 1(a), which arise from ss-wave scatting. The deep, ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma PEC corresponds with a triplet state of the Rydberg electron and the 6S1/26S_{1/2} atom. The two ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma PECs correspond with mixed singlet-triplet states and have a reduced depth, which roughly is in proportion with the amount of triplet character in the molecular states. The binding energies of the Σ,ν=0{}^{*}\Sigma,\nu=0 states are extracted from Gaussian fits to the measured molecular peaks, with statistical uncertainties on the order of 1 MHz. Systematic uncertainties in the molecular line positions are negligible because of the high signal-to-noise ratio of the atomic reference lines in the spectra (relative to which the binding energies are measured), and because the FP cavity and the RF used to lock and scan the lasers have no significant drift.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Measured spectra of 36DJ+6S1/236D_{J}+6S_{1/2} molecules for J=3/2J=3/2 (a) and J=5/2J=5/2 (b), for F=3F=3 (top) and F=4F=4 (bottom). The laser detunings are relative to the atomic resonances, and the signal strengths are displayed on identical scales. Vertical solid and dashed lines mark the signals of the ΣT(ν=0){}^{T}\Sigma(\nu=0) and ΣS,T(ν=0){}^{S,T}\Sigma(\nu=0) ground vibrational states, respectively. The signal strengths of the J=5/2J=5/2 spectra are higher than those of the J=3/2J=3/2 ones, due to the higher excitation probability of the nD5/2nD_{5/2} atoms.

We have obtained the photo-association spectra for all combinations of JJ and FF, for n=33n=33 to 39. In Fig. 2 we show the results for the case n=36n=36. The ΣT,ν=0{}^{T}\Sigma,\nu=0 and ΣS,T,ν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma,\nu=0 states are well-resolved and allow for accurate comparison of level energies between experiment and theory. The ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma, ν=0\nu=0 levels, marked by solid vertical lines, do not depend on FF. Since the PECs for the measured states are largely due to ss-wave scattering, the ratio of the binding energies of the ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma, ν=0\nu=0 levels between J=3/2J=3/2 and J=5/2J=5/2 is approximately given by the square of the ratio between the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients J,mj=1/2|m=0,ms=1/2\langle J,m_{j}=1/2|m_{\ell}=0,m_{s}=1/2\rangle, with J=3/2J=3/2 or 5/25/2, and with magnetic quantum numbers mjm_{j}, mm_{\ell} and msm_{s} for the coupled, orbital and electron spins of the Rydberg electron, respectively. For DD-type Rydberg-ground molecules in Hund’s case (c), the binding-energy ratio is /(+1)=2/3\ell/(\ell+1)=2/3, which is close to the binding-energy ratio evident in Fig. 2. The vertical dashed lines of Fig. 2 mark the ΣS,T,ν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma,\nu=0 states, which are mixed singlet-triplet. These are about half as deeply bound as ΣT,ν=0{}^{T}\Sigma,\nu=0, whereby ΣS,T,ν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma,\nu=0 for F=3F=3 is about 5 to 10 MHz more deeply bound than ΣS,T,ν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma,\nu=0 for F=4F=4.

For quantitative modeling of the singlet and triplet ss-wave scattering length functions asT(k)a^{T}_{s}(k) and asS(k)a^{S}_{s}(k), we have measured the binding energies of the states ΣT,ν=0{}^{T}\Sigma,\nu=0 and ΣS,T,ν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma,\nu=0 for nD5/2+6S1/2nD_{5/2}+6S_{1/2} molecules with n=3339n=33-39, for both values of FF. The measured data, listed in detail in the Supplement, are fitted with functions anbExpa\,n^{*b_{Exp}}, with effective quantum number nn^{*} and exponent bExpb_{Exp} (see Table I). The bExp.b_{Exp.} are concentrated around 5.60-5.60, with one exception. Calculated binding energies, listed in the Supplement, yield respective fitted exponents bTheor.b_{Theor.} that are within the uncertainty of the bExp.b_{Exp.} (see Table I), with the exception of the ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma F=4F=4 case, where the binding energies are smallest. The bb-values generally have a magnitude that is significantly less than 6-6. A value of 6-6 would be expected based on Rydberg wavefunction density. The deviation of bb from 6-6 may be attributed to the fact that at lower nn the molecules are less deep in Hund’s case (c) than at higher nn. This may diminish the binding of the J=5/2J=5/2 molecules at lower nn and lead to a reduction of the magnitude of bb. A modification of the scaling may also arise from pp-wave-scattering-induced configuration mixing at lower nn as well as from the zero-point energy of the vibrational states.

The measured binding-energy data are employed to determine ss-wave scattering lengths via comparison with model calculations similar to Maclennan . The calculations yield best-fitting ss-wave scattering-length functions for both singlet and triplet scattering, asS(k)a^{S}_{s}(k) and asT(k)a^{T}_{s}(k), with zero-energy scattering lengths asS(k=0)=1.92a^{S}_{s}(k=0)=-1.92 a0 and asT(k=0)=19.16a^{T}_{s}(k=0)=-19.16 a0; a comparison with previous results is presented in the Supplement. In our calculation we have included pp-wave scattering and found that it has only a small effect on the lowest vibrational resonances in the outermost wells of the PECs suying2020 , within our nn-range of interest. This is because the outermost wells are separated fairly well from further-in wells and are therefore strongly dominated by ss-wave scattering, justifying our use of less accurate non-relativistic pp-wave scattering-length functions apS(k)a^{S}_{p}(k) and apT(k)a^{T}_{p}(k) Khuskivadze2002 .

Table 1: Fitted exponents bb (see text) for the scaling of the binding energies of ΣS,Tν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma\,\nu=0 and ΣTν=0{}^{T}\Sigma\,\nu=0 states of (nD5/2+6S1/2F)(nD_{5/2}+6S_{1/2}\,F) molecules, for F=3F=3 and 4, over the range 33n3933\leqslant n\leqslant 39. The fit function is anba\,n^{*b}, with effective quantum number nn^{*} and exponent bb.
S/T(F=3) T(F=3) S/T(F=4) T(F=4)
bExp.b_{Exp.} -5.65±\pm 0.38 -5.60±\pm 0.16 -6.19±\pm 0.14 -5.62±\pm 0.16
bTheor.b_{Theor.} -5.68±\pm 0.01 -5.62±\pm 0.01 -5.55±\pm 0.01 -5.62±\pm 0.01
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Spectra of 37D5/2+6S1/2(F=4)D_{5/2}+6S_{1/2}(F=4) Rydberg-ground molecules with indicated electric fields, EE. The molecular peaks of ΣT,ν=0{}^{T}\Sigma,\nu=0 and ΣS,T,ν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma,\nu=0 are blue-shifted by EE and substantially broadened in fields E0.27E\geq 0.27 V/cm. The right panel shows zoom-ins on the states ΣT(ν=0){}^{T}\Sigma(\nu=0) (top) and ΣS,T(ν=0){}^{S,T}\Sigma(\nu=0) (bottom). The red solid lines show model spectra based on Eq. 3 for dipole moments of magnitude |d|=5.70|d|=5.70~{}ea0 for ΣT,ν=0{}^{T}\Sigma,\nu=0 and 6.34 ea0 for ΣS,T,ν=0{}^{S,T}\Sigma,\nu=0, respectively.

Homonuclear Rydberg-ground molecules are unusual, in part, because of their permanent electric dipole moment, dd, which are caused by configuration mixing. The values of dd are usually small in molecules with low-\ell character, with the notable exception of Cs SS-type molecules, where the quantum defect allows strong mixing with trilobite states Booth . The values of di,νd_{i,\nu}, with index ii denoting the PEC and ν\nu the vibrational state, can be measured via the broadening of the respective molecular line in an applied weak electric field, EE. For electric-dipole energies, 𝐝i,ν𝐄-{\bf{d}}_{i,\nu}\cdot{\bf{E}}, that are much smaller than the molecular binding energy, the line is inhomogeneously broadened about its center by a square function of full width 2di,νE/h2d_{i,\nu}E/h in frequency. This model applies if the moment of inertia of Rydberg molecules is very large and rotational structure cannot be resolved (our case). The square function is convoluted with a Gaussian profile to account for laser line broadening, electric-field inhomogeneities, magnetic fields etc. The standard deviation σf\sigma_{f} of this Gaussian is experimentally determined by fitting field-free molecular lines. The overall line profile, Si,ν(Δf)S_{i,\nu}(\Delta f), as a function of detuning Δf\Delta f from the line center then is

h2dE[erf(Δf+di,νE/h2σf)erf(Δfdi,νE/h2σf)].\frac{h}{2dE}\left[{\rm{erf}}\left(\frac{\Delta f+d_{i,\nu}E/h}{\sqrt{2}\sigma_{f}}\right)-{\rm{erf}}\left(\frac{\Delta f-d_{i,\nu}E/h}{\sqrt{2}\sigma_{f}}\right)\right]. (3)

Since the field EE is accurately known from Rydberg Stark spectroscopy, the values of |di,ν||d_{i,\nu}| follow from comparing measured line shapes with profile functions calculated using Eq. (3) over a range of test values for |di,ν||d_{i,\nu}|.

In Fig. 3 we show line-broadening measurements for 37D5/237D_{5/2}+6S1/2(F=4)6S_{1/2}(F=4) Rydberg molecules in several electric fields, as well as fit results based on Eq. 3 for the vibrational ground states of ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma (top) and ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma (bottom) PECs for the case E=0.37E=0.37 V/cm. The obtained dipole-moment magnitudes are 5.70 (6.34) ea0ea_{0} for the triplet (mixed) states. Analysis of the spectra for 0.18, 0.27 and 0.37 V/cm yields averaged dipole-moment magnitudes of 4.79 ±\pm 0.78 ea0ea_{0} for ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma and 5.49 ±\pm 1.03 ea0ea_{0} for ΣS,T{}^{S,T}\Sigma.

For a comparison with theory, we first solve Eq. (2) to obtain the PECs and electronic adiabatic dipole moments along the internuclear axis, di,z(R)d_{i,z}(R). We then find the vibrational energies and wavefunctions, Ψi,ν(R)\Psi_{i,\nu}(R), on the PECs Anderson . The dipole moments of the molecules, di,νd_{i,\nu}, are

di,ν=|Ψi,ν(R)|2di,z(R)𝑑R.d_{i,\nu}=\int|\Psi_{i,\nu}(R)|^{2}d_{i,z}(R)dR. (4)

For the ΣT,ν=0{}^{T}\Sigma,\nu=0 states we find di,νd_{i,\nu} values ranging between -4.85 ea0 at n=33n=33 and -4.60 ea0 at n=38n=38. For n=37n=37, the calculated dipole moment is -4.64 ea0, which is in good agreement with the measured result (|d||d| = 4.79 ±\pm 0.78 ea0ea_{0}).

We note that the molecular lines also exhibit a DC Stark shift due to the electric polarizability, α\alpha, of the Rydberg atom. The atomic DC Stark shifts, αmJE2/2-\alpha_{m_{J}}E^{2}/2, depend on the magnetic quantum number mJm_{J} due to the tensor component of the polarizability. If the molecular Stark shift is less than the molecular binding, it can be calculated perturbatively as an average shift with weights P(mJ)P(m_{J}), where mJm_{J} is in the laboratory frame (defined by the direction of the applied electric field). Figure 3 further includes a hint that the molecular lines may split in stronger electric fields (top curve for 0.55 V/cm). The DC Stark shifts and possible splittings can result in an overestimate of the molecular dipole moment; this may explain the deviations between measured and calculated dipole moments.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Densities of adiabatic electronic wavefunctions for Cs 31D5/231D_{5/2} + 6S1/26S_{1/2} (F=4)(F=4) ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma (left) and 32P3/232P_{3/2} + 6S1/26S_{1/2} (F=4)(F=4) ΣT{}^{T}\Sigma (right panels), with the perturber located at \approx 1500a0a_{0} (dot). Top: wavefunction densities. Bottom: difference between electronic wavefunction densities of molecules and atoms on a linear gray-scale, with white and black indicating reductions and increases by amounts shown on the gray-scale bar. The PP-type molecular state (right) carries a trilobite-like component that interferes mostly constructively with the PP-orbital, causing a positive dipole moment of about 7 ea0. In the case of the DD-type molecule (left), the trilobite orbital predominantly shows destructive interference with the DD-orbital, causing a negative dipole moment of about -5 ea0.

While the current measurement method does not give the sign of di,νd_{i,\nu}, the calculations reveal that the di,νd_{i,\nu} of Cs nDJnD_{J}-type Rydberg-ground molecules are negative, which differs from reports on other types of Rydberg-ground molecules J. Tallant ; Booth ; HS ; Markson . Physically, the sign of di,νd_{i,\nu} reflects the direction of the electronic charge shift along the axis of the Rydberg molecule relative to the location of the Cs 6S1/2S_{1/2} atom. The direction of the weak electric field EE applied to measure the dipole moment is not relevant, as long as the field is weak (our case). A negative di,νd_{i,\nu} corresponds with a deficiency of electron charge from the vicinity of the Cs 6S1/2S_{1/2} perturber atom. This situation can generally be described as destructive interference of the Rydberg electron wavefunction near the perturber or, equivalently, as a possible case of electronic configuration mixing near the perturber (LCAO picture).

For further illustration, in Fig. 4 we show electronic wavefunctions of Cs DD-type and PP-type Rydberg-ground molecules in the outer well of the respective PECs (see Fig. 1 for typical PECs). Since the configuration mixing is weak, in the bottom panels in Fig. 4 we plot the difference of the wavefunction density relative to that of the unperturbed atomic state. An analysis of the electronic states by \ell- and mm-quantum numbers shows that the DD-type molecule mostly mixes with PP orbitals and with a combination of high-\ell states similar to the trilobite state Greene , while the PP-type molecule mostly mixes with DD orbitals and the trilobite-like state. Admixtures from SS- and FF-states are smaller. The admixture probabilities 104\sim 10^{-4}, corresponding to a typical wavefunction density variation on the order of a few percent, as seen in Fig. 4, leading to |di,ν||d_{i,\nu}|-values much smaller than the wavefunction diameter. In Fig. 4 it is seen that the PP-state molecule exhibits predominantly constructive interference near the perturber, corresponding to a positive dipole moment. A similar mixing analysis was reported for Rb (35S35S+5S5S) molecules with a small positive dipole moment Li2011 . Interestingly, for the DD-state molecule in Cs the mixing near the perturber is predominantly destructive, corresponding to a negative dipole moment.

In summary, we have observed Cs nDnD Rydberg-ground molecules involving Rydberg-state fine structure and ground-state hyperfine structure. Measurements of the binding energies for ΣT(ν=0){}^{T}\Sigma(\nu=0) and ΣS,T(ν=0){}^{S,T}\Sigma(\nu=0) molecular vibrational states were modeled with calculations. We have measured permanent electric dipole moments with magnitudes of a few  ea0. Calculations show that the dipole moment is negative. Future work may further elucidate this behavior, the exact shifts and splittings due to the tensor atomic polarizability, as well as the transition from weak to large electric-dipole energy shifts relative to the molecular binding.

The work was supported by the National Key R&\&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFA0304203), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants Nos. 11434007, 61835007, 61675123, 61775124 and 11804202), Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. IRT_17R70) and 111 project (Grant No. D18001) and 1331KSC.

References

  • (1) E. Fermi, Il Nuovo Cimento 11, 157 (1934).
  • (2) A. Omont, J. Phys. France 38, 1343 (1977).
  • (3) C. H. Greene, A. S. Dickinson, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2458 (2000).
  • (4) E. L. Hamilton, C. H. Greene and H. R. Sadeghpour, J. phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, L199 (2002).
  • (5) M. I. Chibisov, A. A. Khuskivadze and I. I. Fabrikant, J. phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, L193 (2002).
  • (6) V. Bendkowsky, B. Butscher, J. Nipper, J. P. Shaffer, R. Löw, and T. Pfau, Nature 458, 1005 (2009).
  • (7) M. A. Bellos, R. Carollo, J. Banerjee, E. E. Eyler, P. L. Gould, and W. C. Stwalley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 053001 (2013).
  • (8) D. A. Anderson, S. A. Miller, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 163201 (2014).
  • (9) A. T. Krupp, A. Gaj, J. B. Balewski, P. Ilzhöfer, S. Hofferberth, R. Löw, T. Pfau, M. Kurz, and P. Schmelcher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 143008 (2014).
  • (10) J. L. MacLennan, Y. J.Chen, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. A 99, 033407 (2019).
  • (11) J. Tallant, S. T. Rittenhouse, D. Booth, H. R. Sadeghpour, and J. P. Shaffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 173202 (2012).
  • (12) D. Booth, S. T. Rittenhouse, J. Yang, H. R. Sadeghpour and J. P. Shaffer, Science 348, 6230 (2015).
  • (13) H. Saßmannshausen, F. Merkt, and J. Deiglmayr, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 133201 (2015).
  • (14) C. Fey, J. Yang, S. T. Rittenhouse, F. Munkes, M. Baluktsian, P. Schmelcher, H. R. Sadeghpour and J. P. Shaffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 103001 (2019).
  • (15) W. Li, T. Pohl, J. M. Rost, Seth T. Rittenhouse, H. R. Sadeghpour, J. Nipper, B. Butscher, J. B. Balewski, V. Bendkowsky, R. Löw, T. Pfau, Science, 334, 1110 (2011).
  • (16) H. Weimer, M. Müller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller and H. P. Büchler. Nature Physics, 6, 382-388 (2010).
  • (17) M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 037901 (2001).
  • (18) D. DeMille, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002).
  • (19) P. Rabl, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, , M. D. Lukin, R. J. Schoelkopf and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 033003 (2006).
  • (20) M. A. Baranov, M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, P. Zoller, Chem. Rev. 112, 5012-5061 (2012).
  • (21) H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut and T. Pfau. Nature 530, 194-197 (2016).
  • (22) S. Markson, S. T. Rittenhouse, R. Schmidt, J. P. Shaffer and H. R. Sadeghpour, Chem. Phys. Chem. 17, 3683-3691 (2016).
  • (23) D. A. Anderson, S. A. Miller, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. A 90,062518 (2014).
  • (24) S. Bai, X. Han, J. Bai, Y. Jiao, H. Wang, J. Zhao and S. Jia, J. Chem. Phys. 152, 084302 (2020);
  • (25) A. A. Khuskivadze, M. I. Chibisov, and I. I. Fabrikant, Phys. Rev. A 66, 042709 (2002).