This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

In this paper, we consider a Carroll magnetic limit of a one-loop scalar effective action. We work on general static backgrounds and compute both divergent and finite parts of the effective action in this limit. We show, that the divergent part can be removed by adding local counterterms. The finite part is related to an effective action in a lower dimensional theory which however does not coincide in general with the one obtained by a Carroll limit in the classical counterpart.

Carroll limit of one-loop effective action

Dmitri Vassilevich [email protected] Centro de Matemática, Computação e Cognição - Universidade Federal do ABC, Avenida do Estados 5001, CEP 09210-580, Santo André, SP, Brazil

I Introduction

Carroll symmetries were introduced long ago [1, 2] but they received due attention much later after the discovery of corresponding conformal symmetries [3, 4, 5]. Over the past few years considerable progress in understanding of various aspects of Carroll theories has been achieved. To give just a few examples, we mention the works [6, 7, 8] on the Carroll structure at null infinity, and on propagating Carroll fields (Carroll swiftons) [9].

Several works were dedicated to quantum Carroll theories [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19] mostly studying quantization, Carrollian conformal field theories, and correlation functions, but also quantum Hall effect [20], representation structure and thermodynamics [21], renormalisation group flow as an origin of Carrollian symmetries [22], and Hawking radiation [23]. It was shown, at some simple examples, that in Carroll limit the scalar partition function is divergent [24].

The purpose of present work is to perform a detailed analysis of divergent and finite terms in the Carroll (magnetic) magnetic limit of the one-loop effective action in scalar theories in various dimensions. We will consider static but otherwise quite general backgrounds.

Carroll limit is basically an ultrarelativistic limit c0c\to 0, where cc is the speed of light. Carroll geometry is defined through a vector vμv^{\mu} which, roughly speaking, fixes the time direction, and a spatial metric hμνh_{\mu\nu}. Together with the fields τμ\tau_{\mu} and hμνh^{\mu\nu}, they satisfy the relations

vμhμν=0,τμhμν=0,vμτμ=1,hμνhμρhρν=δμν+vντμ.v^{\mu}h_{\mu\nu}=0,\quad\tau_{\mu}h^{\mu\nu}=0,\quad v^{\mu}\tau_{\mu}=-1,\quad h_{\mu}^{\nu}\equiv h_{\mu\rho}h^{\rho\nu}=\delta_{\mu}^{\nu}+v^{\nu}\tau_{\mu}. (1)

Local Carroll boosts with the parameter Λμ\Lambda_{\mu} act as follows

δΛvμ=0,δΛτμ=Λμ,δΛhμν=(hμρvν+hνρvμ)Λρ,δΛhμν=0.\delta_{\Lambda}v^{\mu}=0,\quad\delta_{\Lambda}\tau_{\mu}=\Lambda_{\mu},\quad\delta_{\Lambda}h^{\mu\nu}=\bigl{(}h^{\mu\rho}v^{\nu}+h^{\nu\rho}v^{\mu}\bigr{)}\Lambda_{\rho},\quad\delta_{\Lambda}h_{\mu\nu}=0. (2)

The parameter Λ\Lambda satisfies the restriction Λμvμ=0\Lambda_{\mu}v^{\mu}=0. It is easy to check that the volume element

e=(det(τμτν+hμν))1/2e=\bigl{(}\det(\tau_{\mu}\tau_{\nu}+h_{\mu\nu})\bigr{)}^{1/2} (3)

is invariant under Carroll boosts.

In this work, we will be interested in scalar field theories. The so called electric and magnetic Carroll scalar theories were defined as contractions from Lorentz-invariant theories in [25] (see also an earlier work [26]) while conformal Carroll scalar theories were constructed in [27, 28]. We will consider magnetic theories only. The action for magnetic scalar on an n+1n+1 dimensional manifold \mathcal{M} reads

I[Π,ϕ]=dxn+1e(Πvμμϕ+hμνμϕνϕ+V(ϕ)).\displaystyle I[\Pi,\phi]=\int_{\mathcal{M}}\mathrm{d}x^{n+1}e\,\left(\Pi v^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\phi+h^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\,\partial_{\nu}\phi+V(\phi)\right). (4)

We work in the Euclidean signature. This action is invariant under local Carroll boosts if the rules (2) are supplemented by a suitable transformation rule for Π\Pi. VV is a potential. The field Π\Pi generates a constraint

vμμϕ=0.v^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\phi=0. (5)

With this constraint, the action becomes

I[ϕ]=dxn+1e(hμνμϕνϕ+V(ϕ)).\displaystyle I[\phi]=\int_{\mathcal{M}}\mathrm{d}x^{n+1}e\,\left(h^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\,\partial_{\nu}\phi+V(\phi)\right). (6)

This action is Carroll boost invariant provide ϕ\phi satisfies (5).

Consider an “electromagnetic” scalar action [29]

Iem[ϕ]=dxn+1e(κ(vμμϕ)2+hμνμϕνϕ+V(ϕ)),\displaystyle I_{\mathrm{em}}[\phi]=\int_{\mathcal{M}}\mathrm{d}x^{n+1}e\,\left(\kappa(v^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\phi)^{2}+h^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\,\partial_{\nu}\phi+V(\phi)\right), (7)

where κ\kappa is a positive coupling constant having the meaning of 1/c21/c^{2}. In the limit κ\kappa\to\infty the time variation of ϕ\phi are suppressed so that one gets the dynamics described by (7) with the constraint(5). The purpose of present work is to see what happens in quantum theory in this limit.

Since the κ\kappa\to\infty limit means imposing the constraint (5), one may expect that in this limit also the quantum effective action will be defined through an nn dimensional theory living on a hypersurface of constant yy, where yy is defined through y=vμμ\partial_{y}=v^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}. However, in this singular limit the determinant of n+1n+1 dimensional operator may keep the memory on the way the constant yy hypersurfaces are embedded in \mathcal{M} and on the function vμv^{\mu}. (This happens, e.g., with Faddeev–Popov determinants in noncovariant gauges, see [30].) Moreover, even though the contribution of each yy-dependent mode is suppresses at the κ\kappa\to\infty limit, there are infinitely many such modes. Their collective contribution may be non-vanishing and even divergent.

For a generic scalar field theory the one-loop effective action is given by

W(L)=12lndetLW(L)=\tfrac{1}{2}\ln\det L (8)

where LL is an operator of Laplace type appearing in the quadratic form of classical action. We use the ζ\zeta function regularization and write the regularized determinant as

(lndetL)s=Γ(s)ζ(s,L),(\ln\det L)_{s}=-\Gamma(s)\zeta(s,L), (9)

where ss is a complex regularization parameter and

ζ(s,L)=Tr(Ls)\zeta(s,L)=\mathrm{Tr}\,(L^{-s}) (10)

is the spectral ζ\zeta function of LL. The regularized effective is Ws=12(lndetL)sW_{s}=\tfrac{1}{2}(\ln\det L)_{s}. The physical limit corresponds to an analytic continuation to the point s=0s=0. Near this point,

Γ(s)ζ(s,L)(1sγE)ζ(0,L)+ζ(0,L)+𝒪(s)\Gamma(s)\zeta(s,L)\simeq\left(\tfrac{1}{s}-\gamma_{\mathrm{E}}\right)\zeta(0,L)+\zeta^{\prime}(0,L)+\mathcal{O}(s) (11)

where γE\gamma_{\mathrm{E}} is the Euler constant.

The heat kernel expansion [31] will be a useful tool. If ff is a smooth function, there is an asymptotic expansion of the smeared heat kernel at t+0t\to+0,

K(t,L)=Tr(fetL)k=0tkm2ak(f,L)K(t,L)=\mathrm{Tr}\,\left(f\,e^{-tL}\right)\simeq\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}t^{\frac{k-m}{2}}a_{k}(f,L) (12)

Here mm is dimension of the base manifold. For f=1f=1 we will use a shorthand notation ak(L)ak(1,L)a_{k}(L)\equiv a_{k}(1,L). Because of the relation

ζ(0,L)=am(L)\zeta(0,L)=a_{m}(L) (13)

the pole term in (11) is given by am(L)a_{m}(L).

This work is organized as follows. We consider a scalar theory on a product manifold =~×S1\mathcal{M}=\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}\times S^{1} with static background fields. We define an operator L¯\bar{L} acting on quantum fluctuations and apply a local scale transformation to transform this operator to another operator L~\widetilde{L}. This latter operator is a sum of two commuting operators, one being independent of κ\kappa and the other having an exactly known spectrum. The difference between effective actions for L¯\bar{L} and L~\widetilde{L} is given by scale anomaly. These steps are done in Section II.1. The κ\kappa expansion of the effective action for L~\widetilde{L} is constructed in Section II.3 where the divergences in this expansion are analysed. Our most important observation is that all divergences in the κ\kappa\to\infty expansion may be removed by local counterterms. A simple example in two dimensions is considered in Section II.3. The last Section III contains concluding remarks.

II The Carroll limit

II.1 Local scale transformation

We take \mathcal{M} being a product manifold, =~×S1\mathcal{M}=\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}\times S^{1}, and coordinates xμ=(zj,y)x^{\mu}=(z^{j},y) such that yy is a coordinate on unit S1S^{1} and zjz^{j} parametrize ~\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}. The “temporal” direction is taken along S1S^{1}, vμ=vyv^{\mu}=v^{y}. The components hμνh_{\mu\nu} with μ\mu or ν\nu in the S1S^{1} direction vanish while the components hijh_{ij} are identified with a Riemannian metric on ~\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}. hijh^{ij} is taken to be an inverse of hijh_{ij}, hijhjk=δikh_{ij}h^{jk}=\delta_{i}^{k}. This choice breaks Carroll boost symmetry. We will discuss the consequences below. The metric hijh^{ij} and vyv^{y} are assumed to be static, i.e. these fields depend on zz only. For technical reasons we also assume that vyv^{y} is non-vanishing while hijh^{ij} is non-degenerate. This excludes configurations with (Euclidean) horizons, like Carrollian Rindler spacetimes [32], for example.

We represent ϕ=Φ+φ\phi=\Phi+\varphi with Φ\Phi being a static background field and φ\varphi being a quantum fluctuation. By expanding (7) in powers of φ\varphi and keeping quadratic terms only, we obtain

Iem(2)=dxn+1eφL¯φI_{\mathrm{em}}^{(2)}=\int_{\mathcal{M}}\mathrm{d}x^{n+1}e\,\varphi\,\bar{L}\varphi (14)

where

L¯=g¯μν¯μ¯ν+ξR¯+U¯\bar{L}=-\bar{g}^{\mu\nu}\bar{\nabla}_{\mu}\bar{\nabla}_{\nu}+\xi\bar{R}+\bar{U} (15)

Here g¯μν=(hij,κ(vy)2)\bar{g}^{\mu\nu}=(h^{ij},\kappa(v^{y})^{2}) is an effective metric. ¯\bar{\nabla} and R¯\bar{R} are the covariant derivative and the Riemannian curvature for this metric, respectively. One can check that R¯\bar{R} does not depend on κ\kappa. For convenience, we separated a term with conformal coupling in n+1n+1 dimensions, ξ=n14n\xi=\tfrac{n-1}{4n}, so that U¯=ξR¯+12V′′(Φ)\bar{U}=-\xi\bar{R}+\tfrac{1}{2}V^{\prime\prime}(\Phi).

A diffeomorphism and Carroll boost invariant path integral measure reads111Form the operator theory point of view, it is more natural to have in both (14) and (16) the volume element g¯=κ1/2e\sqrt{\bar{g}}=\kappa^{-1/2}e instead of ee since g¯\bar{g} is the metric appearing in the leading symbol of L¯\bar{L}. However, removing the multiplier κ1/2\kappa^{-1/2} at both places does not change the effective action.

𝒟φexp(dn+1xeφ2)=1\int\mathcal{D}\varphi\,\exp\left(-\int\mathrm{d}^{n+1}x\,e\,\varphi^{2}\right)=1 (16)

Taking the path integral in the Gaussian approximation one arrives at a one-loop effective action W(L¯)W(\bar{L}), see (8).

We have fixed hμνh^{\mu\nu} to be a metric over ~\widetilde{\mathcal{M}} to facilitate taking the κ\kappa\to\infty limit, see below. Let us lift this restriction for a moment, perform an infinitesimal Carroll boost (2) and check invariance of the effective action W(L¯)W(\bar{L}). Let us suppose that the couplings contained in V(ϕ)V(\phi) are invariant under these transformations. Such couplings may be ϕk\phi^{k} and R¯ϕ2\bar{R}\phi^{2}, for example. The volume element ee and hence the path integral measure are invariant. The variation of L¯\bar{L} reads

δΛL¯=2Λμhμνvσ¯ν¯σ.\delta_{\Lambda}\bar{L}=-2\Lambda_{\mu}h^{\mu\nu}v^{\sigma}\bar{\nabla}_{\nu}\bar{\nabla}_{\sigma}. (17)

The change of sign ΛμΛμ\Lambda_{\mu}\to-\Lambda_{\mu} in (17) can be be compensated by a reflection vμvμv^{\mu}\to-v^{\mu} leaving L¯\bar{L} unchanged. This means that

δΛW(L¯)=12Tr(δΛL¯L¯1)\delta_{\Lambda}W(\bar{L})=\tfrac{1}{2}\mathrm{Tr}\,\bigl{(}\delta_{\Lambda}\bar{L}\cdot\bar{L}^{-1}\bigr{)} (18)

is invariant under ΛμΛμ\Lambda_{\mu}\to-\Lambda_{\mu}. Thus, the infinitesimal Carroll boost of effective action (18) vanishes.

Let us denote denote vyexp(ρ)v^{y}\equiv\exp(\rho) and make a local scale transformation of the operator L¯\bar{L}.

L¯=en+32ρL~en12ρ,\bar{L}=e^{\frac{n+3}{2}\rho}\,\widetilde{L}\,e^{-\frac{n-1}{2}\rho}, (19)

where

L~=κy2+Ln\widetilde{L}=-\kappa\partial^{2}_{y}+L_{n} (20)

and

Ln=jj+ξR+e2ρU¯\displaystyle L_{n}=-\nabla_{j}\nabla^{j}+\xi R+e^{-2\rho}\bar{U}
=jj14(n1)(22ρ+(1n)(ρ)2)+12e2ρV′′(Φ).\displaystyle\quad=-\nabla_{j}\nabla^{j}-\tfrac{1}{4}(n-1)\left(2\nabla^{2}\rho+(1-n)(\nabla\rho)^{2}\right)+\tfrac{1}{2}e^{-2\rho}V^{\prime\prime}(\Phi). (21)

We stress, that the transformation (19) does not coincide with local conformal (Weyl) transformations of the metric since L¯\bar{L} is not necessarily Weyl covariant. Thus, usual Weyl transformation of the metric g¯μν=e2ρgμν\bar{g}^{\mu\nu}=e^{2\rho}g^{\mu\nu} is accompanied by a local rescaling of the potential. In Eq. (21) all covariant derivatives j\nabla_{j} are the Riemannian derivatives with the metric hijh_{ij} on ~\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}. RR is the curvature of hijh_{ij}.

Let us consider a family of operators

Lu=en+22uρL~en22uρL_{u}=e^{\frac{n+2}{2}u\rho}\,\widetilde{L}\,e^{-\frac{n-2}{2}u\rho} (22)

with u[0,1]u\in[0,1], so that L1=L¯L_{1}=\bar{L} and L0=L~L_{0}=\widetilde{L}. The derivative of ζ\zeta function with respect to uu reads

dduζ(s,Lu)=2sTr(ρLus)\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}u}\,\zeta(s,L_{u})=-2s\mathrm{Tr}\left(\rho L_{u}^{-s}\right) (23)

Due to a factor of ss in (23) the variation of regularized effective action is finite at s=0s=0. By applying an analog of Eq. (13), see [33, 31], we obtain

dduWs|s=0=an+1(ρ,Lu)\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}u}\,W_{s}|_{s=0}=a_{n+1}(\rho,L_{u}) (24)

The heat kernel coefficients are integrals of local invariants constructed from the symbol of operator LuL_{u}, see [31]. By changing the coordinate yy=κ1/2yy\to y^{\prime}=\kappa^{-1/2}y one removes the dependence of integrand on κ\kappa. The whole dependence of an+1(ρ,Lu)a_{n+1}(\rho,L_{u}) on κ\kappa resides in the size of integration interval of yy^{\prime}. Thus, an+1(ρ,Lu)κ1/2a_{n+1}(\rho,L_{u})\propto\kappa^{-1/2} and

limκan+1(ρ,Lu)=0.\lim_{\kappa\to\infty}a_{n+1}(\rho,L_{u})=0. (25)

Thus we conclude that in the Carroll limit κ\kappa\to\infty the effective action for operator L¯\bar{L} equals to the effective action for L~\widetilde{L}.

II.2 Calculation of the κ\kappa-expansion

The operator L~\widetilde{L} is a sum of two commuting operators, κy2\kappa\partial_{y}^{2} and LnL_{n}. The spectrum of the former is known exactly, while the second one does not depend on κ\kappa. This facilitates calculation of the large κ\kappa expansion of the effective action. We will evaluate this expansion by doing small adjustments and modification in the method proposed in [34, 35] to calculate the high temperature expansion of free energy. We write

ζ(s,L~)=1Γ(s)0dtts1K(t,L~)=\displaystyle\zeta(s,\widetilde{L})=\frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}t\,t^{s-1}K(t,\widetilde{L})=
=1Γ(s)0dtts1l=etκl2K(t,Ln)\displaystyle\qquad=\frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}t\,t^{s-1}\sum_{l=-\infty}^{\infty}e^{-t\kappa l^{2}}K(t,L_{n})
=1Γ(s)0dtts1ϑ(0,itκπ1)K(t,Ln)\displaystyle\qquad=\frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}t\,t^{s-1}\vartheta\left(0,\mathrm{i}t\kappa\pi^{-1}\right)K(t,L_{n})
=ζ(s,Ln)+1Γ(s)0dtts1[ϑ(0,itκπ1)1]K(t,Ln).\displaystyle\qquad=\zeta(s,L_{n})+\frac{1}{\Gamma(s)}\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}t\,t^{s-1}\left[\vartheta\left(0,\mathrm{i}t\kappa\pi^{-1}\right)-1\right]K(t,L_{n}). (26)

Here we used the Mellin transform to represent ζ\zeta function through the heat kernel. Then, we separated κy2\kappa\partial_{y}^{2} from that of LnL_{n} and substituted exact spectrum of the former operator. The Jacobi ϑ\vartheta function

ϑ(z,τ)=l=exp(iπl2τ+2iπlz)\vartheta(z,\tau)=\sum_{l=-\infty}^{\infty}\exp(\mathrm{i}\pi l^{2}\tau+2\mathrm{i}\pi lz) (27)

is used to calculate the sum over ll.

Let us substitute in (26) the heat kernel expansion (12) for K(t,Ln)K(t,L_{n}). The integration over tt is performed with the help of Riemann formula for the Mellin transform

120dttσ1[ϑ(0,it)1]=Γ(σ)πσζR(2σ).\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}t\,t^{\sigma-1}\left[\vartheta(0,\mathrm{i}t)-1\right]=\Gamma(\sigma)\pi^{-\sigma}\zeta_{\mathrm{R}}(2\sigma). (28)

Here ζR\zeta_{\mathrm{R}} is the Riemann ζ\zeta function.

ζ(s,L~)=ζ(s,Ln)+2Γ(s)k=0ak(Ln)Γ(kn2+s)ζR(kn+2s)κs+nk2.\zeta(s,\widetilde{L})=\zeta(s,L_{n})+\frac{2}{\Gamma(s)}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}(L_{n})\,\Gamma\left(\frac{k-n}{2}+s\right)\,\zeta_{\mathrm{R}}\left(k-n+2s\right)\,\kappa^{-s+\frac{n-k}{2}}. (29)

Let us substitute this expansion in the formulas (9) and (8) to obtain an expansion for regularized effective action WsW_{s}. Non-negative powers of κ\kappa in this expansion contain two pole terms, one coming from ζ(s,Ln)\zeta(s,L_{n}) and the other – from the term with an(Ln)a_{n}(L_{n}) in the sum. Due to the identity (13), these two poles cancel each other, so that we can immediately take the limit s0s\to 0.

W=p=1n/2π2p(2p1)!!2pζR(2p+1)an2p(Ln)κp\displaystyle W=-\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor n/2\rfloor}\pi^{-2p}\frac{(2p-1)!!}{2^{p}}\,\zeta_{\mathrm{R}}(2p+1)\,a_{n-2p}(L_{n})\kappa^{p}
+p=1(n+1)/2(1)pB2p2p1(2p1)!!pan2p+1(Ln)κp12\displaystyle\quad+\sum_{p=1}^{\lfloor(n+1)/2\rfloor}\frac{(-1)^{p}B_{2p}2^{p-1}}{(2p-1)!!\,p}\,a_{n-2p+1}(L_{n})\,\kappa^{p-\frac{1}{2}}
12ζ(0,Ln)+12ln(2πκ)an(Ln)+𝒪(κ1/2).\displaystyle\quad-\frac{1}{2}\zeta^{\prime}(0,L_{n})+\frac{1}{2}\ln(2\pi\kappa)\,a_{n}(L_{n})+\mathcal{O}(\kappa^{-1/2}). (30)

Here BpB_{p} are the Bernoulli numbers. The only surviving pole term in (29) is proportional to κ1/2\kappa^{-1/2} and reads

Ws,pole=12sπκan+1(Ln)W_{s,\mathrm{pole}}=-\frac{1}{2s}\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\kappa}}\,a_{n+1}(L_{n}) (31)

Due to the product structure of operator L~\widetilde{L} there is a simple relation between the heat kernel coefficients

ak(L~)=πκak(Ln)a_{k}(\widetilde{L})=\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{\kappa}}\,a_{k}(L_{n}) (32)

valid for any kk. Thus, the pole term (31) is nothing else than the standard ultraviolet divergence in the effective action for L~\widetilde{L}, see (11) and (13).

On manifolds without boundaries all odd-numbered heat kernel coefficients vanish. Thus, for even (respectively, odd) nn only the first (respectively, the second) sum survives in the expansion (30). For the same reason, the pole term (31) vanishes identically already for finite values of κ\kappa if n+1n+1 is odd. This reflects the fact that there are no divergences in the ζ\zeta function regularization in odd dimensions. In the the κ\kappa\to\infty limit, this term vanishes for all nn. Instead, also for all nn the terms which are divergent in the Carroll limit appear. Since all these terms are given by heat kernel coefficients, they are local. Thus, the one loop effective action can be made finite in the Carroll limit by subtracting local counterterms. This is the main result of this work.

The partition function magnetic scalar was constructed in [18] basing on an interpretation through an nn dimensional statistical system. No regularization was applied in [18]. In the ζ\zeta function regularization the finite part of corresponding effective action coincides with finite terms in (30).

II.3 An example

To be more explicit, let us consider an example of Carroll limit in a two-dimensional theory, n=1n=1. Take =S1×~\mathcal{M}=S^{1}\times\widetilde{\mathcal{M}} where ~\widetilde{\mathcal{M}} is one-dimensional. Let us denote hzz:=e2ψ(z)h^{zz}:=e^{2\psi(z)}. With V=m2ϕ2V=m^{2}\phi^{2} the action (7) takes the form

Iem=d2xeρψ(κe2ρ(yϕ)2+e2ψ(zϕ)2+m2ϕ2).I_{\mathrm{em}}=\int_{\mathcal{M}}\mathrm{d}^{2}x\,e^{-\rho-\psi}\bigl{(}\kappa e^{2\rho}(\partial_{y}\phi)^{2}+e^{2\psi}(\partial_{z}\phi)^{2}+m^{2}\phi^{2}\bigr{)}. (33)

After integrating by parts in this expression we arrive at

L¯=e2ρ(κy2e2(ψρ)(z+(zψzρ))z+e2ρm2).\bar{L}=e^{2\rho}\left(-\kappa\partial_{y}^{2}-e^{2(\psi-\rho)}(\partial_{z}+(\partial_{z}\psi-\partial_{z}\rho))\partial_{z}+e^{-2\rho}m^{2}\right). (34)

Through a local scale transformation, L¯=e2ρL~\bar{L}=e^{2\rho}\widetilde{L}, cf. (19) and (21), this operator defines

L1=e2(ψρ)(z+(zψzρ))z+e2ρm2.L_{1}=-e^{2(\psi-\rho)}(\partial_{z}+(\partial_{z}\psi-\partial_{z}\rho))\partial_{z}+e^{-2\rho}m^{2}. (35)

Just few terms remain in the expansion (30),

W=16a0(L1)κ1/212ζ(0,L1)+𝒪(κ1/2).W=-\tfrac{1}{6}a_{0}(L_{1})\kappa^{1/2}-\tfrac{1}{2}\zeta^{\prime}(0,L_{1})+\mathcal{O}(\kappa^{-1/2}). (36)

The heat kernel coefficient a0(L1)a_{0}(L_{1}) can be easily computed (see [31], e.g.),

a0(L1)=(4π)1/2~dzeρψa_{0}(L_{1})=(4\pi)^{-1/2}\int_{\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}}\mathrm{d}z\,e^{\rho-\psi} (37)

which is local, as expected. The finite term, 12ζ(0,L1)\tfrac{1}{2}\zeta^{\prime}(0,L_{1}) is a one-loop effective action in a one-dimensional theory. This term is nonlocal, though its structure is considerably simpler than that in higher dimensional theories [36]. If ~\widetilde{\mathcal{M}} is a unit S1S^{1} and ρ=ψ=0\rho=\psi=0, the eigenvalues of L1L_{1} are k2+m2k^{2}+m^{2}. At a very formal level, one may write 12ζ(0,L1)-\tfrac{1}{2}\zeta^{\prime}(0,L_{1}) as 12kln(k2+m2)\tfrac{1}{2}\sum_{k\in\mathbb{Z}}\ln(k^{2}+m^{2}). The latter expression is, of course, divergent. It is also consistent with an expression for magnetic limit of the scalar partition function in [24] where no regularization was used.

For m=0m=0, the operator (35) depends on ρ\rho and ψ\psi through the combination ρψ\rho-\psi only. Thus, L1L_{1} is invariant under local conformal transformations of the metric g¯μν\bar{g}^{\mu\nu}.

III Discussion and conclusions

In this paper, we considered a Carroll magnetic limit κ\kappa\to\infty of the one-loop effective action in an n+1n+1 dimensional scalar theory. The coefficients in κ\kappa expansion are expressed through spectral characteristics (heat kernel coefficients and ζ(0)\zeta^{\prime}(0)) of an nn dimensional operator LnL_{n}. The operator LnL_{n} is not the kinetic operator L¯\bar{L} of the original theory with the term (vμμ)2(v^{\mu}\partial_{\mu})^{2} neglected, as one might have expected naively, but rather an operator obtained through a local scale transformation thereof. We observed, that the usual 1/s1/s divergence of ζ\zeta regularization vanishes in the κ\kappa\to\infty limit. Instead, several divergent terms with positive powers of κ\kappa or with ln(κ)\ln(\kappa) appear. All of them are local. Thus, the effective action can be made finite in Carroll limit by adding a finite number of local counterterms.

Our starting point, the action (7), is not Carroll boost invariant for finite κ\kappa. Besides, we fixed hμνh^{\mu\nu} to be an (inverse) metric over ~\widetilde{\mathcal{M}} thus breaking the Carroll boost invariance. Somewhat surprisingly, the effective action appeared to be invariant under infinitesimal Carroll boosts, see discussion around Eq. (18). It may be, that this invariance is accidental following from a rather specific choice of the background. A more thorough study of Carroll boost invariance requires lifting the assumption made above and considering generic hμνh^{\mu\nu}. Such analysis will be considerably more difficult than the one presented in this work. Technical tools like the ones which have been developed for high temperature limits on stationary (rather than static) backgrounds [37] will be useful.

A word of warning is in order. The κ\kappa expansion of effective action has to be used with care. Since the effective metric gg depends on κ\kappa, the integrated quantities (like the effective action) can be of a different order in κ\kappa than corresponding local quantities (like the stress energy tensor). Besides, the components of tensors with upper and lower indices can contain different powers of κ\kappa. An example of such situation can be found in the paper [23] where the Hawking effect on for a 2D Carroll–Schwarzschild black hole [38] was studied. As usual for massless two-dimensional theories [39], the whole information on Hawking effect is contained in the scale anomaly, which gives a contribution to the effective action suppressed by κ1/2\kappa^{-1/2}. However, the Carroll limit of stress energy tensor contained both finite and divergent contributions. In other words, to analyse local quantities produced by taking variation derivatives of the effective action one may need to use more terms in the κ\kappa expansion. Such terms are easily obtained by extending the summation ranges in the sums (30).

An extension of our results to more general and even κ\kappa-dependent interaction V(ϕ)V(\phi) is straightforward. It is sufficient to re-expand all terms in (30) in powers of κ\kappa. This is easy to do with the heat kernel coefficients, but may be more tedious in the case of ζ(0,Ln)\zeta^{\prime}(0,L_{n}). An expansion of the effective action for the fields of other spins can be obtained along similar lines. It seems promising to apply our methods to the c0c\to 0 limit in Conformal Field Theories [40] and to quantum theories where only external lines of Feynman diagrams are Carrollian [41].

Acknowledgements.
I am grateful to Ankit Aggarwal, Florian Ecker, and Daniel Grumiller for discussions and collaboration on related topics. I also thank the Erwin-Schrödinger Institute (ESI) for the hospitality in April 2024 during the program “Carrollian physics and holography” and I am grateful to the participants of this program for numerous insightful discussions. This work was supported in parts by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) through the grant 2021/10128-0, and by the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), grant 304758/2022-1.

References