Bouncing Scenario in the Modified Gravity Model with Dynamical System Analysis
Abstract
In gravity, the theory modifies the gravitational action by
introducing a function of the torsion scalar . This approach
allows for a different treatment of gravity than general relativity,
particularly in cosmological contexts. Dynamical system analysis is
a powerful tool for exploring the stability and behavior of
cosmological solutions within this framework. The dynamical system
analysis involves examining the phase space of the cosmological
equations derived from the model. This analysis helps
identify fixed points, stability, and the evolution of the
universe’s scale factor. Therefore, in the following, we first
review the main equations of the gravity model.
Then we study the dynamic analysis of the gravity model and obtain stability points. Finally, we consider the bouncing scenario in this model.
PACS: 98.80.Cq
Key Words: Bouncing Scenario, Modified Gravity, Dynamical
System Analysis.
I Introduction
The modified gravity model is a theoretical framework that
extends the standard theory of gravity by modifying the
gravitational action based on the torsion scalar instead of the
Ricci scalar used in General
Relativity [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. This approach is part of
a broader category of modified gravity theories that aim to address
various cosmological and astrophysical phenomena, including the
accelerated expansion of the universe and the nature of dark
energy [6, 7, 8]. In the framework, the gravitational
dynamics are described using the torsion scalar, which arises in the
context of teleparallel gravity. This scalar is related to the
torsion of spacetime, providing an alternative geometric description
of gravity [1]. The model is expressed as , where is
a function that can take various forms depending on the physical
scenario being modeled [2, 3, 4]. This flexibility allows for
a wide range of behaviors and predictions. The models have
been explored for their implications in cosmology, particularly in
explaining the late-time acceleration of the universe [7, 8].
They can potentially provide a unified description of cosmic
evolution without invoking dark energy. The model has been
applied to various astrophysical scenarios, including the study of
compact objects like gravastars and wormholes, as well as in the
context of inflationary cosmology [9]. The modified
gravity model introduces several key features that distinguish it
from traditional theories of gravity, particularly General
Relativity. The field equations derived from the action are
second-order differential equations, which helps avoid issues
related to ghost instabilities that can arise in higher-order
theories [9]. The model provides a framework to
understand dark energy phenomena by modifying the gravitational
interaction at large scales, which can lead to effects similar to
those attributed to dark energy in standard cosmological
models [3, 4]. Ongoing research aims to compare the
predictions of models with observational data from cosmic
microwave background radiation, galaxy distributions, and other
cosmological measurements to assess their viability [7, 8]. In
summary, the modified gravity model represents a significant
area of research in theoretical physics, offering new insights into
the nature of gravity and its
role in the universe’s evolution [10].
The bouncing scenario in cosmology presents an alternative to the
traditional Big Bang model, suggesting that the universe undergoes a
”bounce” rather than originating from a singularity [11, 12].
This concept has gained traction as researchers explore the
implications of a universe that can contract and then expand,
potentially resolving several fundamental cosmological issues. The
bouncing model posits that the universe can transition from a
contracting phase to an expanding phase without encountering a
singularity. This non-singular bounce avoids the infinite densities
and temperatures associated with the Big Bang, providing a smoother
transition between phases [12]. Some bouncing models propose a
cyclic universe, where the universe undergoes repeated cycles of
contraction and expansion. Each bounce represents a new cycle,
allowing for a universe that has no definitive beginning or
end [13]. This idea contrasts with the traditional view of a
singular beginning at the Big Bang. The bouncing scenario addresses
several longstanding issues in cosmology, such as the horizon
problem, flatness problem, and inhomogeneity problem. By providing a
mechanism for a non-singular transition, it can potentially explain
the uniformity observed in the cosmic microwave background
radiation [14]. Theoretical frameworks that incorporate
quantum gravity suggest that quantum effects could play a
significant role during the bounce. These effects might prevent the
universe from collapsing into a singularity, allowing for a bounce
instead. Various mathematical models have been developed to describe
bouncing cosmologies. These models often utilize tools from
numerical relativity to simulate the dynamics of the universe during
the bounce, helping to predict observable consequences and test the
viability of the scenario [15, 16]. Some bouncing models can
be made compatible with current observational data, such as the
cosmic microwave background and large-scale structure. For instance,
after the bounce, the universe can enter a slow-roll inflationary
phase, which aligns with observations of cosmic
expansion [17]. While promising, bouncing cosmologies face
challenges in terms of theoretical development and empirical
validation. Critics argue that these models need to be as robust and
well-developed as inflationary
models to gain wider acceptance in the cosmological community.
On the other hand, Dynamical system analysis is a powerful
mathematical tool used in cosmology to study the behavior of various
cosmological models [18]. This approach allows researchers to
understand the qualitative dynamics of the universe without
necessarily solving the complex differential equations that govern
these models. In dynamic system analysis, cosmological models are
represented in a phase space, where each point corresponds to a
state of the system. The evolution of the universe can be visualized
as trajectories in this space, providing insights into the stability
and behavior of different cosmological scenarios [18]. A
central concept in dynamic systems is the identification of fixed
points, which represent equilibrium states of the cosmological
model. By analyzing the stability of these fixed points, researchers
can determine whether small perturbations will lead to a return to
equilibrium or diverge away, indicating the model’s behavior under
various conditions [19]. The dynamical systems approach
enables the study of the qualitative behavior of cosmological
models, such as the existence of attractors, repellers, and limit
cycles [19]. This qualitative analysis is crucial for
understanding the long-term evolution of the universe, including
scenarios like inflation, dark energy domination, and bouncing
cosmologies. Dynamic system analysis has been applied to a wide
range of cosmological models, including those involving scalar
fields, perfect fluids, and modified gravity theories. For instance,
it has been used to explore the dynamics of models with exponential
potentials and to investigate the implications of dark energy on
cosmic expansion [20, 21, 22]. Researchers employ both
numerical simulations and analytical techniques to study the
dynamics of cosmological models. This dual approach allows for a
comprehensive understanding of the models, including their global
behavior and local stability properties. The analysis can reveal how
different models respond to initial conditions and how they align
with observational data. Dynamic system analysis is particularly
useful in studying bouncing and cyclic cosmological models. By
examining the phase space of these models, researchers can identify
conditions under which a non-singular bounce occurs and explore the
implications for the universe’s evolution.
However, according to the above discussions, we organize the
structures of the paper as follows: in Section 2, a review of the
original model present. In Section 3, we discuss dynamic
analysis of gravity model, and stability analysis of model, in
Section 4, we check the bouncing scenario in the model. Finally, in
Section 5, the conclusion and summary offer.
II Gravity Model
In this model, we consider the action as a function of the space-time torsion, which is minimally coupled with the scalar field, with kinetic and potential terms as [7, 23]
(1) |
where, is torsion scalar, and is scalar field. For the scalar field, pressure and density are defined as follows
(2) |
(3) |
We assume that the space-time torsion is in the form of a perfect fluid. Therefore, we have the following relations for the torsion density and pressure:
(4) |
(5) |
where are arbitrary constants. With this assumption, we write the Friedman equations for action (1) as follows
(6) |
(7) |
Also, the evolution equation of the scalar field is as follows
(8) |
In this relation, the prime represents the derivative of with
respect to the scalar field.
III Dynamic Analysis of Gravity Model
By analyzing the dynamics of cosmological models, researchers can
identify stable states and trajectories that the universe might
follow. For example, they can determine whether the universe is
likely to continue expanding, enter a phase of contraction, or
undergo a bounce. This understanding helps in predicting the general
fate of the universe over long timescales. Also, dynamic system
analysis allows for the identification of fixed points in the phase
space, which correspond to equilibrium states of the universe. By
studying the stability of these points, cosmologists can infer
whether the universe will settle into a particular state or if it
will evolve towards a different scenario, such as dark energy
domination or a bouncing model. While dynamic system analysis can
outline possible future scenarios based on current models, it does
not provide precise predictions of specific events (like supernovae
or galaxy collisions). Instead, it helps in understanding the
conditions under which certain events might occur, such as the onset
of inflation or the transition to a dark energy-dominated phase.
Therefore, by applying dynamic system analysis to various
cosmological models, researchers can compare their predictions and
assess which models are more consistent with observational data.
This comparative analysis can guide future research and
observational efforts to test the viability of different
cosmological theories. On the other hand, while dynamic system
analysis can indicate trends and potential outcomes, it cannot
predict specific cosmic events with high precision. The universe is
influenced by numerous factors, including quantum fluctuations and
chaotic dynamics, which can complicate predictions. Therefore, while
it can provide a framework for understanding possible futures, it
does not yield exact forecasts of future cosmic phenomena.
However, because the cosmic field equations are non-linear and
complex, we can analyze the qualitative behavior of cosmic models,
including the bouncing scenario, by using dynamic systems analysis.
Therefore, to consider the cosmic equations by analyzing dynamic
systems, we first determine the variables of the dynamic system as
follows [23]
(9) |
(10) |
(11) |
By using these variables, the field equations (6,7,8) are transformed into the equations of the independent system in the following form
(12) |
(13) |
(14) |
with . If we define the exponential potential function as
(15) |
where is an arbitrary parameter. The above relations are rewritten in the following form
(16) |
(17) |
(18) |
It is also possible to obtain the equation of state in terms of deceleration parameter
(19) |
III.1 Stability Analysis
To check the stability of the independent dynamic system, we first find the fixed points (equilibrium) of the system. After determining the fixed points, we obtain the Jacobian matrix of the system for each of the fixed points. Then we obtain the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix at each of the fixed points. At the end, we analyze the stability of fixed points through the special sign or zeroness of the eigenvalues using the Hartman and Grobman theory and the central manifold theory. In this regard, the independent system expressed by equations (16,17,18) has fixed points. After determining these points, we obtain the Jacobian matrix of the system by using the dynamic equations of the system (16,17,18). Then, for each of the fixed points to , we obtain the eigenvalues corresponding to each fixed point, which are shown in Table 1.
Critical point | eigenvalues | z | y | x | Stability type | ||
P1 | 0 | -2 | -3 | 0 | 0 | Stable | |
P2 | 0 | -4 | -8 | 0 | 0 | Unstable | |
P3 | 0 | -4 | -8 | 0 | 0 | - | Unstable |
P4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | Saddle | |||
P5 | 0 | 0 | - | 2 | Saddle |
After determining the eigenvalues, we obtain the type of fixed
points using the Hartman-Grobman theory. We assume the values of the
parameters .
-
1.
At point , due to the fact that one of the eigenvalues is zero, we determine the type of fixed point using the central manifold theory. For this point, the central manifold is Y=0 [24, 25]. And, due to the negativity of the eigenvalues for point and the decreasing changes of in the two-dimensional phase space, the direction of the phase space paths in the plane is towards the origin, so the origin is a stable fixed point.
-
2.
For points similar to point , we use the central manifold theory. First, with changes , , , we reach to new coordinates where the origin is fixed at that point. The central manifold is [24]. Although the two eigenvalues are negative at this point, The paths move away from the origin along Y=0 and x=0, so these fixed points are unstable.
-
3.
For the point , using the central manifold theory, first we go to the new coordinates with the changes , , , where the origin is at that point is fixed. The central manifold is expressed by the equation . The paths on the central manifold in the two-dimensional phase space along the x-axis approach the fixed point (P5) P4 and then move away. Therefore, these fixed points are saddle type [24].
IV The Bouncing Scenario in the Model
According to the equilibrium points in the phase space and the paths that enter or leave these points, we can draw the display of changes in the two-dimensional phase space (Figure 1). Considering the selected initial conditions and its closeness to the fixed points and the analysis of the paths in the vicinity of the fixed points of the phase space, we examine the bouncing scenario.


Bouncing according to the Hubble parameter occurs when with
or . According to pressure and density
equations, if , Hubble parameter will be positive, and if
, Hubble parameter will be negative [23]. Also,
according to phase space variables, and the previous conditions for
pressure and density, if Hubble parameter will be
increasing. On the other hand, if the relation is
established, Hubble parameter will be decreasing. If the selected
initial conditions are close to the fixed point , considering
that this point is stable, the paths in the phase space enter to
this point and the system reaches a stable equilibrium.
If we choose the initial conditions in the vicinity of fixed points
, because the relation is established in
these areas, therefore Hubble parameter are decreasing and the scale
factor are negative. Starting from the vicinity of these points, if
Hubble parameter is positive () (expanding universe) then the
paths reach to infinity in the compressed phase space [23](In
the Minkowski limit ). These paths at infinity leave
the saddle points and go to the point stable equilibrium ends at the
origin. Due to the negative values of the Hubble parameter,
reaches negative values and the universe enters the contraction
phase. Therefore, by establishing the necessary conditions, the
bouncing will happen. Upon the onset of the universe, the quantum effects lead to a contraction phase and bouncing,
resulting in the creation of fermions.
This fermion creation induces a space-time torsion,
aligning with our gravitational model as described in the reference [26].
V Summary and Conclusion
This study explores how modifications to gravitational action can
lead to unique cosmological behaviors, particularly focusing on
stability and the evolution of the universe’s scale factor. We delve
into the main equations of the model, analyze its dynamics,
and investigate the intriguing bouncing scenario. In this regard,
the modified gravity model extends traditional gravitational
theories by incorporating a function of the torsion scalar ,
allowing for a different treatment of gravity, particularly in
cosmological contexts. This model provides a framework to explore
various cosmological phenomena, including the accelerated expansion
of the universe and the nature of dark energy. Also, after applying
dynamical system analysis, the analysis reveals the bouncing
scenario in this model. In summary, this study concludes that the
modified gravity model, through its unique approach to
gravitational dynamics, presents significant insights into the
nature of cosmic evolution. The bouncing scenario, in particular,
highlights the potential for a cyclic universe that avoids
singularities, offering a compelling alternative to traditional
cosmological models. This work underscores the importance of
dynamical system analysis in exploring the stability and future
trajectories of the universe,
paving the way for deeper insights into the fundamental nature of gravity and cosmic evolution.
Data availability No new data were generated or analysed in
support of this research.
Declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that
they have no conflict of interest.
References
- [1] S. Pradhan, S. Mandal, P. K. Sahoo, Chinese Physics C. 47 (5), 055103 (2023).
- [2] A. Das, S. Ghosh, D. Deb, F. Rahaman, S. Ray, Nuclear Physics B., 954, 114986 (2020).
- [3] P. Bhar, P. Rej, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics. 18(07), 2150112 (2021).
- [4] A. Samaddar, S. Singh, Phys. Scr. 99 035219 (2024).
- [5] B. Mirza, F. Oboudiat, JCAP 11, 011 (2017).
- [6] P. Wu, H. Yu, Phy. Rev. D, 692, 176 (2010).
- [7] S. D. Sadatian, EPL 126, 30004 (2019).
- [8] M. R. Setare, N. Mohammadipour, JCAP, 11, 030 (2012).
- [9] M. Sinha, S. S. Singh, arXiv:2407.09579, (2024).
- [10] X. Zhang, C. Y. Chen, Y. Reyimuaji, Phys. Rev. D, 105, 043514 (2022).
- [11] M. Novello, M. Bergliaffa, S. E. Perez, Physics Reports. 463(4), 127 (2008).
- [12] R. Brandenberger, P. Patrick, Foundations of Physics., 47(6), 797 (2017).
- [13] P. J. Steinhardt, N. Turok, Science 312, 1180 (2006).
- [14] A. Ijjas, P. J. Steinhardt, Class. Quantum Grav., 35, 135004 (2018).
- [15] A. Ijjas, P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Lett. B, 795, 666 (2019).
- [16] A. Ijjas, D. Garfinkle, P. J. Steinhardt, W. G. Cook, JCAP, 07, 077 (2024).
- [17] H. Matsui, F. Takahashi, T. Terada, Physics Letters B, 795, 152 (2019).
- [18] J. L. Rosa, T. Zlosnik, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 024018 (2024).
- [19] C. G. Boehmer, N. Chan, LTCC Advanced Mathematics Series: Volume 5 Dynamical and Complex Systems, 121 (2017).
- [20] S. Bahamonde, C. G. Boehmer, S. Carloni, E. J. Copeland, W. Fang, N. Tamanini, Physics Reports, 775-777, 1 (2018).
- [21] S. Rathore, S. S. Singh, Scientific Reports, 13, 13980 (2023).
- [22] S. A. Kadam, N. P. Thakkar, B. Mishra, Theoretical Physics, 83, 809 (2023).
- [23] S. Chakraborty, S. Mishra and S. Chakraborty, Gen Relativ Gravit, 56, 83 (2024).
- [24] S. Mishra, S. Chakraborty, Eur.Phys. J. C, 79(4), 328 (2019).
- [25] L. Perko, ” Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, (1991).
- [26] A. Scardua, L. F. Guimarae, N. Pinto-Neto, and G. S. Vicente, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 083505 (2018).