Bose-Einstein Condensation of Europium
Abstract
We report the realization of a Bose-Einstein condensate of europium atoms, which is a strongly dipolar species with unique properties, a highly symmetric electronic ground state and a hyperfine structure. By means of evaporative cooling in a crossed optical dipole trap, we produced a condensate of 151Eu containing up to atoms. The scattering length of 151Eu was estimated to be by comparing the velocities of expansion of condensates with different orientations of the atomic magnetic moments. We observed deformation of the condensate in the vicinity of the Feshbach resonance at 1.32 G with a width of 10 mG.
The realization of Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in highly magnetic atoms has opened new frontiers in quantum simulations [1, 2, 3]. Pioneering work began with chromium (Cr) [4], in which a strong dipole-dipole interaction (DDI) was observed as a d-wave symmetric collapse of the condensate [1] originating from the large dipole moment of . Bose-Einstein condensates of the magnetic lanthanide atoms dysprosium (Dy) and erbium (Er) were also produced [5, 6]. Since these atoms possess large magnetic dipole moments ( (Dy) and (Er)) and large atomic masses (), their dipolar lengths [1] are much larger than that of Cr and comparable to their s-wave scattering lengths. This strong magnetic property enables investigations of unprecedented quantum phases: self-bound droplets and supersolid crystals [2]. Optical lattice systems with these magnetic atoms are also areas of intense research [7].
Dipolar BECs with a spin degree of freedom, namely, spinor dipolar BECs, are the focus of another research direction. Novel spin physics is expected to emerge in the competition of spin-dependent contact interactions and DDIs [8, 9, 10]. In general, the ratio of these two interactions cannot be tuned under the experimental conditions used for spinor dipolar BECs; observable phenomena vary depending on the atomic species. Thus far, spinor dipolar BECs with magnetic atoms have been realized only in Cr [11, 12], whose spin-dependent contact interactions are much larger than DDIs; i.e., its dipolar length of is one order of magnitude smaller than the difference between the scattering lengths [13, 14, 15]. To gain an in-depth understanding of spinor dipolar BECs, it is essential to realize such phenomena in atoms whose spin-dependent contact interactions are smaller than DDI.
Europium (Eu), a magnetic lanthanide with a dipole moment of , features a highly symmetric electronic ground state. This unique property distinguishes Eu from other magnetic atoms in the context of spinor dipolar BECs. Since the half-filled shell is screened by the outer closed shell, the molecular potentials of Eu associated with different spin channels are almost identical [16, 17], in contrast to those of Cr [18], leading to a smaller spin-dependent interaction. In addition, the dipolar length of Eu, , is four times larger than that of Cr due to a larger dipole moment and greater atomic mass. Consequently, the formation of DDI-dominant spinor dipolar BECs is strongly suggested in the case of Eu. We note that the behavior of spinor dipolar BECs of other magnetic lanthanide atoms may differ considerably from those of Cr and Eu due to their orbital anisotropy [19].
Another feature of Eu is its hyperfine structure ( for 151Eu and 153Eu) in the ground state, which is useful for the study of spin physics. The quadratic Zeeman shift induced by hyperfine interactions can be used to prepare specific magnetic sublevels [20, 21]. Quantum simulations of quantum magnetism [22, 21] are expected to be possible with a wide range of spin lengths . The hyperfine interaction, in principle, enables control of contact interactions with microwaves even under dc zero magnetic fields [23], which could greatly expand the scope of research on spinor dipolar BECs. Note that the hyperfine spacings of Eu are relatively small ( MHz [24]), which can mitigate technical difficulties in the above applications.
In this letter, we report the attainment of 151Eu BECs containing atoms. In addition, we measure the s-wave scattering length, observe the low-magnetic-field Feshbach spectrum, and demonstrate control of the scattering length with the Feshbach resonance.
Our experimental procedure to create a BEC of Eu consists of a narrow-line magneto-optical trap (MOT), transfer of atoms from the MOT to a single optical dipole trap (ODT), and subsequent evaporative cooling in a crossed ODT, similar to experiments involving other magnetic lanthanide atoms [6, 25]. We first loaded atoms into the narrow-line red-MOT [26] using the transition at 687 nm with a natural linewidth of 97 kHz, which was operated simultaneously with the yellow-MOT [27] and the Zeeman slowing for the optically pumped metastable atoms [28]. Our red-MOT contains atoms on the electronic ground state at a temperature of , where the atoms were spontaneously polarized to the lowest Zeeman substate with the aid of the gravity [26, 29].
Our atom trap system consisted of horizontal and vertical ODTs, with a light source derived from a single-frequency fiber laser at a wavelength of . The horizontal ODT was formed by a horizontally propagating focused beam with an initial power of . The beam had a waist of 31(25) along the horizontal (vertical) direction and was horizontally linearly polarized. The vertical ODT was formed by a beam tilted at to the vertical with a maximum power of . The beam had a waist of and was polarized orthogonal to the horizontal ODT beam polarization. The power of each beam was controlled independently by an acousto-optic modulator. To avoid the spatial interference between the two beams, their frequencies were shifted by relative to each other.
The atoms trapped in the MOT were then loaded into the horizontal ODT. Loading was performed by overlapping the MOT and horizontal ODT for an optimal loading time of . After loading, we turned off the MOT beams and the quadrupole magnetic field, and we applied a homogeneous magnetic field of 3 G along the vertical direction to preserve the spin polarization of the sample. We obtained atoms at a temperature of in the horizontal ODT. The trap frequency under loading conditions was measured to be , where the , , and axes correspond to the horizontal ODT beam axis, the vertical axis, and the axis perpendicular to them, respectively. Using these values, we estimated the potential depth of the trap, peak density, and peak phase space density to be , , and , respectively. These were our starting conditions for the following evaporative cooling process.
Evaporative cooling was carried out by gradually reducing the power of the horizontal ODT beam. In the middle of the evaporative cooling process, we turned on the vertical ODT, which intersected with the horizontal ODT, and atoms were then concentrated in the crossing region. The overall evaporation sequence took approximately [28]. After that, we turned off the trapping beams, let the atomic cloud expand, and rotated the magnetic field into the imaging axis (-axis) for absorption imaging. The atoms were then illuminated by a polarized probe laser beam along the -axis at a wavelength of , which was resonant with the cyclic transition. The absorption by the atoms cast a shadow on an imaging device.

Figure 1 shows the absorption images taken after 18 ms of expansion and the corresponding linear density profiles at different final temperatures, showing the phase transition to BECs. Before the phase transition (a), the atomic distribution was well fitted by a Gaussian function, indicating that atoms in the trap followed the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. The temperature was estimated to be from the Gaussian width; the number in parentheses indicates standard error. When the atomic sample was cooled, a dense parabolic peak emerged from a Gaussian background (b), signaling the formation of a BEC. With bimodal fitting [25], we estimated a temperature of and a BEC fraction of 7(1) %. The theoretical critical temperature was estimated to be , which is consistent with our observation. Note that the critical temperature was calculated from BEC theory [30], including the finite size effect, the s-wave interaction effect with a scattering length of , which was measured later, and the DDI effect. In this calculation, we used the measured trap frequencies of and an atom number of . Further cooling increased the BEC fraction to 35(1) % (c), and we finally obtained an almost pure BEC (d) containing atoms, where the thermal component was no longer discernible.
The s-wave scattering length for spin-polarized 151Eu was measured via the following method, which was first demonstrated with 52Cr [31]. The values to measure are asymptotic velocities of expansion of the condensate with different orientations of the applied magnetic field . By comparing the ratio of the two asymptotic velocities with numerical simulation, one can estimate . Here, the numerical simulation was based on the Gross-Pitaevskii equation with DDI in the Thomas-Fermi limit [32]. This method has the advantage that the accuracy of the s-wave scattering length is insensitive to that of the atom number or trap frequencies, in contrast to other methods [33, 34, 35, 36].
After creating a BEC, we set a magnetic field in the - or -direction with a magnitude of 0.5 G. Then, we turned off the ODTs, let the BEC expand, and maintained the magnetic field for a duration of , which was long enough to convert the mean-field energy of the BEC into kinetic energy. After that, we rotated the magnetic field to the imaging axis and acquired an absorption image at various times. Figure 2 (a) shows the measured dependence of on the time of flight, where is the rescaled Thomas-Fermi radius by an atom number [31]. Typical absorption images after time of flight are also shown in Fig. 2 (b) and (c), where the magnetic field is parallel to the and axes, respectively. The effect of DDIs can be clearly seen as the elongation of the BEC in the magnetic field direction [37, 31]. Upon linear fitting of the experimental data, we obtained the two asymptotic velocities and and their ratio . By comparing the ratio with the numerical simulation, we obtained and the corresponding relative DDI strength .


We also performed Feshbach spectroscopy for 151Eu BECs in a low magnetic field of up to 4.1 G. After production of the BEC, we changed the magnetic field to a target value, held the BEC for in the trap under the target magnetic field, and measured the residual atom number. One can find Feshbach resonances as resonant atomic losses. Figure 3 (a) shows the loss spectrum. We found one relatively broad resonance () and two narrow resonances ( and 3.56 G). The width of the broader resonance at 1.32 G was estimated by Feshbach spectroscopy for thermal 151Eu atoms. We prepared atoms trapped in the horizontal ODT under a target magnetic field and abruptly reduced the potential depth and spilled out the higher energy atoms. Since the trap depth decreased more along the -direction than along the other axes due to gravity, anisotropy in the resultant kinetic energy was induced, where the energy along the -axis was the lowest. We then let the system evolve for to undergo thermalization and measured the residual atom number and effective temperature . Figure 3 (b) shows the loss spectrum and effective temperature as a function of the magnetic field. The maximal atom loss indicates the Feshbach resonance pole, whereas the minimum in the effective temperature indicates zero crossing of the scattering length, where cross-dimensional thermalization made little progress [6, 39]. From the difference between them, we estimated the width of the resonance . We note that the magnetic field was calibrated by spectroscopy on the narrow-line transition using cold Eu atoms. The calibration yields a relative uncertainty of , and the absolute error is less than for the magnetic field values around the resonance.
Although we observed Feshbach resonances in the low magnetic field, their origin is different from that of Dy, Er, and Tm [40, 41]. The Feshbach resonances for these atomic species are mainly induced by their orbital anisotropy and exhibit chaotic properties [40], whereas Eu has no orbital anisotropy in the ground state. A theoretical investigation [42] predicted that small hyperfine spacings and the coupling between entrance channels (s-wave) and closed channels (d- or g-waves) through DDIs would induce dense Feshbach resonances in a low magnetic field without a chaotic distribution. The typical widths of d-wave resonances were estimated to be between and , whereas the widths of g-wave resonances were estimated to be below . The spectral widths observed in our experiment were consistent with the theoretical prediction.

To demonstrate the control of the scattering length with the Feshbach resonance at , we observed the shape of the BEC at a magnetic field slightly higher than the resonance pole. We first produced pure BECs at a magnetic field of , which is above the Feshbach resonance. We then linearly ramped down the magnetic field to a variable target value within and turned off the trap. The magnetic field was kept constant at its target value during the first of the expansion and then set along the probe axis. After an additional of expansion, we acquired an absorption image of the atomic cloud, which is summarized in Fig. 4. Figure 4 (a) shows the absorption image of the BEC at a magnetic field of , which is much higher than the resonance. Upon decreasing the magnetic field, the BEC showed a more anisotropic shape (b) and (c), showing enhancement of the magnetostriction effect, which indicates reduction of the s-wave scattering length [43]. Upon further decreasing the magnetic field, the BEC collapsed, and the cloud split into two (d)-(f), as observed in 52Cr BEC [44]. Regarding the collapse, a different story was suggested by Jens Hertkorn in the Universität Stuttgart group that these TOF images may be the repulsion of two droplets. A detailed experiment such as in situ observation is required to confirm this possibility.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a BEC of 151Eu atoms with a large dipole moment and a highly symmetric electronic ground state. The scattering length of 151Eu was measured to be . In addition, we observed a low-magnetic-field Feshbach spectrum and demonstrated control of the s-wave scattering length with resonance. Since the Feshbach spectrum of Eu is not expected to exhibit chaotic properties, the s-wave scattering lengths for different spin channels can be determined from the spectrum, as in the case of Cr [13], which is crucial for quantum simulation of spinor dipolar BECs. The production of Eu BECs under ultralow magnetic fields will expand the research field of spinor dipolar BEC, which includes the Einstein–de Haas effect [9] and spontaneous circulation in ground-state [8].
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to K. Aikawa, J. Hertkorn, and T. Pfau for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by JST Grant Numbers JPMJPF2015 and JPMJMI17A3 and JSPS Japan KAKENHI Grant Number JP20J21364.
References
- Lahaye et al. [2008] T. Lahaye, J. Metz, B. Fröhlich, T. Koch, M. Meister, A. Griesmaier, T. Pfau, H. Saito, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080401 (2008).
- Böttcher et al. [2020] F. Böttcher, J.-N. Schmidt, J. Hertkorn, K. S. H. Ng, S. D. Graham, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Reports on Progress in Physics 84, 012403 (2020).
- Norcia and Ferlaino [2021] M. A. Norcia and F. Ferlaino, Nature Physics 17, 1349 (2021).
- Griesmaier et al. [2005] A. Griesmaier, J. Werner, S. Hensler, J. Stuhler, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 160401 (2005).
- Lu et al. [2011] M. Lu, N. Q. Burdick, S. H. Youn, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 190401 (2011).
- Aikawa et al. [2012] K. Aikawa, A. Frisch, M. Mark, S. Baier, A. Rietzler, R. Grimm, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 210401 (2012).
- Baier et al. [2016] S. Baier, M. J. Mark, D. Petter, K. Aikawa, L. Chomaz, Z. Cai, M. Baranov, P. Zoller, and F. Ferlaino, Science 352, 201 (2016).
- Kawaguchi et al. [2006a] Y. Kawaguchi, H. Saito, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 130404 (2006a).
- Kawaguchi et al. [2006b] Y. Kawaguchi, H. Saito, and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 080405 (2006b).
- Takahashi et al. [2007] M. Takahashi, S. Ghosh, T. Mizushima, and K. Machida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 260403 (2007).
- Pasquiou et al. [2011] B. Pasquiou, E. Maréchal, G. Bismut, P. Pedri, L. Vernac, O. Gorceix, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 255303 (2011).
- Lepoutre et al. [2018] S. Lepoutre, K. Kechadi, B. Naylor, B. Zhu, L. Gabardos, L. Isaev, P. Pedri, A. M. Rey, L. Vernac, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Phys. Rev. A 97, 023610 (2018).
- Werner et al. [2005] J. Werner, A. Griesmaier, S. Hensler, J. Stuhler, T. Pfau, A. Simoni, and E. Tiesinga, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 183201 (2005).
- Pasquiou et al. [2010] B. Pasquiou, G. Bismut, Q. Beaufils, A. Crubellier, E. Maréchal, P. Pedri, L. Vernac, O. Gorceix, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Phys. Rev. A 81, 042716 (2010).
- de Paz et al. [2014] A. de Paz, B. Naylor, J. Huckans, A. Carrance, O. Gorceix, E. Maréchal, P. Pedri, B. Laburthe-Tolra, and L. Vernac, Phys. Rev. A 90, 043607 (2014).
- Buchachenko et al. [2009] A. A. Buchachenko, G. Chałasiński, and M. M. Szczęśniak, The Journal of Chemical Physics 131, 241102 (2009).
- Suleimanov [2010] Y. V. Suleimanov, Phys. Rev. A 81, 022701 (2010).
- Pavlović et al. [2004] Z. Pavlović, B. O. Roos, R. Côté, and H. R. Sadeghpour, Phys. Rev. A 69, 030701(R) (2004).
- Li et al. [2018] M. Li, E. Tiesinga, and S. Kotochigova, Phys. Rev. A 97, 053627 (2018).
- Baier et al. [2018] S. Baier, D. Petter, J. H. Becher, A. Patscheider, G. Natale, L. Chomaz, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 093602 (2018).
- Patscheider et al. [2020] A. Patscheider, B. Zhu, L. Chomaz, D. Petter, S. Baier, A.-M. Rey, F. Ferlaino, and M. J. Mark, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023050 (2020).
- Gabardos et al. [2020] L. Gabardos, B. Zhu, S. Lepoutre, A. M. Rey, B. Laburthe-Tolra, and L. Vernac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 143401 (2020).
- Papoular et al. [2010] D. J. Papoular, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. A 81, 041603(R) (2010).
- Jin et al. [2002] W.-G. Jin, T. Endo, T. Wakui, H. Uematsu, T. Minowa, and H. Katsuragawa, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 71, 1905 (2002).
- Davletov et al. [2020] E. T. Davletov, V. V. Tsyganok, V. A. Khlebnikov, D. A. Pershin, D. V. Shaykin, and A. V. Akimov, Phys. Rev. A 102, 011302(R) (2020).
- Miyazawa et al. [2021] Y. Miyazawa, R. Inoue, H. Matsui, K. Takanashi, and M. Kozuma, Phys. Rev. A 103, 053122 (2021).
- Inoue et al. [2018] R. Inoue, Y. Miyazawa, and M. Kozuma, Phys. Rev. A 97, 061607(R) (2018).
- [28] See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for our experimental setup and detailed procedure to produce Eu BEC .
- Dreon et al. [2017] D. Dreon, L. A. Sidorenkov, C. Bouazza, W. Maineult, J. Dalibard, and S. Nascimbene, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 50, 065005 (2017).
- Glaum et al. [2007] K. Glaum, A. Pelster, H. Kleinert, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 080407 (2007).
- Griesmaier et al. [2006] A. Griesmaier, J. Stuhler, T. Koch, M. Fattori, T. Pfau, and S. Giovanazzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 250402 (2006).
- Giovanazzi et al. [2006] S. Giovanazzi, P. Pedri, L. Santos, A. Griesmaier, M. Fattori, T. Koch, J. Stuhler, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. A 74, 013621 (2006).
- Mewes et al. [1996] M.-O. Mewes, M. R. Andrews, N. J. van Druten, D. M. Kurn, D. S. Durfee, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 416 (1996).
- Pereira Dos Santos et al. [2001] F. Pereira Dos Santos, J. Léonard, J. Wang, C. J. Barrelet, F. Perales, E. Rasel, C. S. Unnikrishnan, M. Leduc, and C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3459 (2001).
- Tang et al. [2015] Y. Tang, A. Sykes, N. Q. Burdick, J. L. Bohn, and B. L. Lev, Phys. Rev. A 92, 022703 (2015).
- Patscheider et al. [2022] A. Patscheider, L. Chomaz, G. Natale, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, S. Baier, B. Yang, R. R. W. Wang, J. L. Bohn, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063307 (2022).
- Stuhler et al. [2005] J. Stuhler, A. Griesmaier, T. Koch, M. Fattori, T. Pfau, S. Giovanazzi, P. Pedri, and L. Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 150406 (2005).
- Inouye et al. [1998] S. Inouye, M. R. Andrews, J. Stenger, H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and W. Ketterle, Nature 392, 151 (1998).
- Kadau et al. [2016] H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Nature 530, 194 (2016).
- Maier et al. [2015] T. Maier, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, I. Ferrier-Barbut, T. Pfau, A. Frisch, S. Baier, K. Aikawa, L. Chomaz, M. J. Mark, F. Ferlaino, C. Makrides, E. Tiesinga, A. Petrov, and S. Kotochigova, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041029 (2015).
- Khlebnikov et al. [2019] V. A. Khlebnikov, D. A. Pershin, V. V. Tsyganok, E. T. Davletov, I. S. Cojocaru, E. S. Fedorova, A. A. Buchachenko, and A. V. Akimov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 213402 (2019).
- Zaremba-Kopczyk et al. [2018] K. Zaremba-Kopczyk, P. S. Żuchowski, and M. Tomza, Phys. Rev. A 98, 032704 (2018).
- Lahaye et al. [2007] T. Lahaye, T. Koch, B. Fröhlich, M. Fattori, J. Metz, A. Griesmaier, S. Giovanazzi, and T. Pfau, Nature 448, 672 (2007).
- Metz et al. [2009] J. Metz, T. Lahaye, B. Fröhlich, A. Griesmaier, T. Pfau, H. Saito, Y. Kawaguchi, and M. Ueda, New Journal of Physics 11, 055032 (2009).