Band width and the Rosenberg index
Abstract.
A Riemannian manifold is said to have infinite -width if it admits an isometric immersion of an arbitrarily wide Riemannian band whose inward boundary has non-trivial higher index. In this paper we prove that if a closed spin manifold has inifinite -width, then its Rosenberg index does not vanish. This gives a positive answer to a conjecture by R.Β Zeidler. We also prove its βmulti-dimensionalβ generalization; if a closed spin manifold admit an isometric immersion of an arbitrarily wide cube-like domain whose lowest dimensional corner has non-trivial higher index, then the Rosenberg index of does not vanish.
1. Introduction
The existence of a positive scalar curvature (psc) metric on a given manifold has been a fundamental problem in high-dimensional differential topology. An effective approach is the Dirac operator method, in which the SchrΓΆdingerβLichnerowicz theorem reduces the problem to the invertibility of the Dirac operator. When the manifold is not compact, the invertibility of the Dirac operator is obstructed by the higher index, a generalization of the Fredholm index defined by using C*-algebra K-theory and coarse geometry [roeLecturesCoarseGeometry2003, willett_yu_2020]. When one consider the universal covering of a closed manifold, the higher index of the Dirac operator is called the Rosenberg index [rosenbergAstAlgebrasPositive1983, rosenbergAstAlgebrasPositive1986, rosenbergAstAlgebrasPositive1986a] and is known to be a powerful obstruction to a psc metric. Indeed, the RosenbergβStolz theorem [rosenbergStableVersionGromovLawson1995, stolzManifoldsPositiveScalar2002] states that the Rosenberg index is a complete obstruction to positive scalar curvature in a stable sense, under the assumption of the BaumβConnes injectivity. More precisely, the vanishing of the Rosenberg index is equivalent to the existence of a psc metric after taking the direct product with sufficiently many copies of the Bott manifold (an -dimensional closed spin manifold with and ). On the other hand, Schick [schickCounterexampleUnstableGromovLawsonRosenberg1998] constructed a closed spin manifold in dimensions , , which does not admit any psc metric but its Rosenberg index vanishes, by using the SchoenβYau minimal surface method [schoenStructureManifoldsPositive1979]. This leads us to explore a psc obstruction beyond the Rosenberg index. A guideline is Schickβs meta-conjectureΒ [schickTopologyPositiveScalar2014]*Conjecture 1.5, stating that any topological obstruction to positive scalar curvature coming from the Dirac operator is dominated by the Rosenberg index. For example, the psc obstructions given by the Rosenberg index of certain submanifolds of codimension 1 [zeidlerIndexObstructionPositive2017, kubotaRelativeMishchenkoFomenkoHigher2020] and codimension [hankeCodimensionTwoIndex2015, kubotaRelativeMishchenkoFomenkoHigher2019, kubotaGromovLawsonCodimensionObstruction2020, kubotaCodimensionTransferHigher2021] provide evidences to this conjecture.
Recently, a series of papers by Gromov [gromovDozenProblemsQuestions2018, gromovMetricInequalitiesScalar2018, gromovFourLecturesScalar2019] shed new lights on this problem. One of the remarkable ideas proposed in these papers is the notion of a band and its width. A (proper) compact Riemannian band is a compact Riemannian manifold with inward and outward boundaries . The distance of and is called its width. Gromov proved that, if a compact Riemannian band is endowed with a psc metric but does not admit any psc metric due to the minimal surface method, then the width of is bounded by a constant depending on the infimum of the scalar curvature and the dimension. Following this line, in [zeidlerBandWidthEstimates2020, zeidlerWidthLargenessIndex2020, cecchiniLongNeckPrinciple2020], Zeidler and Cecchini proved the same band width inequality when the inward boundary of the universal covering has non-trivial higher index. Furthermore, another approach to this inequality based on the quantitative K-theory is developed by GuoβXieβYuΒ [guoQuantitativeKtheoryPositive2020].
This band width inequality has a qualitative application to the existence of a psc. It is considered by Gromov [gromovMetricInequalitiesScalar2018]*Section 3,4 and Zeidler [zeidlerBandWidthEstimates2020]*Section 4, the latter of which is the main subject of this paper. The following definition of the notion of -width looks a little different, but equivalent, to the original definition by Zeidler.
Definition 1.1 ([zeidlerBandWidthEstimates2020]*Definition 4.3).
A compact Riemannian band is said to be in the class if it is equipped with a spin structure and the index of the higher index does not vanish, where denotes the inward boundary of the universal covering of . For a closed manifold , its -width is the supremum of the width of bands in the class which is isometrically immersed to .
Note that the infiniteness of the -width depends only on the diffeomorphism class of , i.e., is independent of the metric on it. The band width inequality implies that a closed manifold with infinite -width does not admit a psc metric. Since the infiniteness of the -width is stable under the direct product with the Bott manifold, the RosenbergβStolz theorem shows the non-vanishiing of the Rosenberg index of , if we assume that satisfies the BaumβConnes injectivity. Zeidler conjectured that this non-vanishing still holds without assuming the BaumβConnes injectivity [zeidlerBandWidthEstimates2020]*Conjecture 4.12, following the line of Schickβs meta-conjecture. The aim of this paper is to give a positive answer to this conjecture.
In this paper we work in a little more general setting. We need not assume that the target manifold is closed. Instead, we assume that the universal covering of has a well-behaved βuniformβ topology. For and , let denote the ball with the center and the radius .
Definition 1.2.
A metric space is said to be uniformly -connected if there is an increasing function with as such that any loop in is trivial in .
Here we extend the notion of -width to complete Riemannian manifolds. Then its infiniteness depends only on the diffeomorphism class of and the coarse equivalence class of the metric. Now we state the first main theorem of this paper.
Theorem 1.3.
Let be a complete Riemannian spin manifold whose universal covering is uniformly -connected. If has infinite -width, then the maximal equivariant coarse index of the Dirac operator on does not vanish.
Corollary 1.4.
Let be a closed spin manifold. If has infinite -width, then the Rosenberg index does not vanish.
We remark that this corollary reproves [kubotaGromovLawsonCodimensionObstruction2020]*Theorem 1.1 as a special case, as is pointed out by Zeidler in [zeidlerBandWidthEstimates2020]*Example 4.9.
There are two ingredients of the proof. One is the asymptotic method in C*-algebra K-theory. The asymptotic C*-algebras, typically the quotient of the direct product of a sequence of C*-algebras by the direct sum, has been exploited in many researches of higher index theory such as HankeβSchickΒ [hankeEnlargeabilityIndexTheory2006, hankeEnlargeabilityIndexTheory2007], GongβWangβYuΒ [gongGeometrizationStrongNovikov2008], and so on. In this paper, the C*-algebra of this kind leads us to a qualitative treatment of the higher index of a sequence of Riemannian bands getting wider as , which suits our purpose (although the quantitative estimate is the highlight of this new research direction after Gromov).
Another ingredient is an estimate of the (relative) systole of Riemannian bands immersed to . What makes the problem seem difficult is that the immersion does not induce the injection of fundamental groups in general. However, we show in LemmaΒ 2.1 that the length of a non-trivial loop in , which is apart from the boundary and trivial in , is bounded below by a constant depending on the width of . This enables us to lift an operator on to the universal covering of βmodulo the boundaryβ, which is a variant of the lifting lemma developed in [kubotaCodimensionTransferHigher2021].
We also discuss a generalization of TheoremΒ 1.3, in which we consider the multiwidth of cube-like domains immersed to instead of the width of bands. We say that a -domain is a Riemannian manifold with corner equipped with a well-behaved corner-preserving smooth map (more precisely, see DefinitionΒ 3.1). We write for the inverse image . The multiwidth of is defined by the minimum of the distances of and . In recent researches, a generalization of the band width inequality to such domains has been considered; if is a -domain equipped with a psc metric but its lowest dimensional corner (more precisely, a transverse intersection of hypersurfaces each of which separates with ) does not admit a psc metric due to the Dirac operator or minimal surface methods, then its multiwidth is bounded by a constant depending on the infimum of the scalar curvature and the dimension. This inequality, called the -theorem or the -inequality, is proposed and proved for by Gromov [gromovFourLecturesScalar2019]*p.260, and generalized to manifolds with all dimensions by WangβXieβYu and Xie [wangProofGromovCube2021, xieQuantitativeRelativeIndex2021] in the case that the psc metric on is obstructed by its Rosenberg index. A qualitative consequence of this inequality is that if a closed spin manifold has infinite -multiwidth (DefinitionΒ 3.3), then does not admit any psc metric. The second main theorem of this paper is to dominate this obstruction to positive scalar curvature by the Rosenberg index.
Theorem 1.5.
Let be a complete Riemannian spin manifold whose universal covering is uniformly -connected. If has infinite -multiwidth (DefinitionΒ 3.3), then the maximal coarse index of the Dirac operator on does not vanish.
Corollary 1.6.
Let be a closed Riemannian spin manifold. If has infinite -width, then the Rosenberg index does not vanish.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank Shinichiroh Matsuo for a helpful comment. This work was supported by RIKEN iTHEMS and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers 19K14544, JPMJCR19T2, 17H06461.
2. Proof of TheoremΒ 1.3
2.1. Systole of Riemannian bands immersed to a uniformly -connected manifold
The first step for the proof is an observation on the systole, the minimum of the length of homotopically non-trivial loop, of a subspace of a uniformly -connected manifold.
Let be a -dimensional complete Riemannian spin manifold with infinite -width. For each , pick a compact Riemannian band in the class whose width is greater than , and an isometric immersion . Let and let denote the image of under the inclusion . Then the map lifts to a codimension immersion , where is the universal covering of . In short, we write and for the disjoint union and respectively. For , let denote the open subset of consisting of points such that .
Let and denote the interior of and respectively, which are non-empty open subsets of . For an inclusion of length spaces, we call the infimum of the length of closed loops in representing non-trivial homotopy class in the relative systole of and write . This corresponds to the systole of relative to in the standard terminology of systolic geometry (cf.Β [katzSystolicGeometryTopology2007]*Definition 8.2.1).
Lemma 2.1.
Assume that is uniformly -connected with respect to a function and let . Then we have , where the relative systole is defined with respect to the Riemannian distance of .
Proof.
Let be a closed loop with . Let . Note that is contained in the open ball . By the assumption of uniform -connectedness of , this is null-homotopic in . Since , we have . Hence we obtain that is trivial. This shows that . β
The following lemma is standard in coarse geometry, rather known as the uniform contractibility of the universal covering of an aspherical manifold (see e.g.Β [roeLecturesCoarseGeometry2003]*Example 5.26).
Lemma 2.2.
Let be a closed Riemannian manifold. Then the universal covering is uniformly -connected.
Proof.
For and , let denote the infimum of the real numbers such that the inclusion induces the trivial map in -groups. We show that for any and . Let be less than the injectivity radius of . Then is covered by a finite number of open balls for . The open subspace is homotopy equivalent to its nerve, and hence has the homotopy type of a finite simplicial complex. In particular, its fundamental group is finitely generated, and hence there is such that and the induced map is trivial. This shows , as desired.
The assignment is -invariant and locally bounded (indeed, for any ). Therefore, together with compactness of , we get . This is the desired function since it is by definition increasing. β
2.2. Lifting finite propagation operators
Next, we construct a lift of an operator on to the non-compact Riemannian bands , which forms a -homomorphism βmodulo boundaryβ. This technique is inherited from [kubotaCodimensionTransferHigher2021].
Let which is locally HilbertβSchmidt, i.e., , is in the HilbertβSchmidt class for any . Such is represented by a kernel function as
The support of is defined as the support of its kernel function in , and is called the propagation of , where denotes the metric on . We define as the Real -algebra of -invariant locally HilbertβSchmidt operators with finite propagation. Let denote the completion of with respect to the maximal norm satisfying the C*-condition (which is well-defined by [gongGeometrizationStrongNovikov2008]*3.5). In the same way, we also define and its completion .
We define the Real -algebra consisting of sequences of locally compact operators with a uniform bound of propagation, i.e.,
and let denote its closure in the direct product C*-algebra . We also define the Real C*-ideal as the closure of
where stands for the Hausdorff distance.
Let denote the closure of the set of bounded operators on which is of finite propagation and is pseudo-local, i.e., for any , with respect to the norm
This is a Real C*-algebra [oyono-oyonoTheoryMaximalRoe2009]*Lemma 2.16, including as a Real C*-ideal. We write the quotient as . A standard fact in coarse index theory is that the K-group of is isomorphic to the equivariant K-homology . In the same way, we also define the Real C*-algebras , , , and . We only note that is the closure of the set of pseudo-local, finite propagation operators which is supported near and for any .
2.3.
There is a -homomorphism
constructed in the following way. For with , we define its lift in terms of its kernel function as
(2.4) |
A consequence of LemmaΒ 2.1 is that, for each and with , there is a unique such that . In particular, we have . Moreover, the -invariance of implies the -invariance of .
The assignment is linear and -preserving. Moreover, for with , the lifts , and satisfies that
if . This implies that is supported on the -neighborhood of , i.e., the lifting is multiplicative modulo boundary.
Recall that the assignment is increasing and as . Also, for and with , the difference is supported on the -neighborhood of . This shows that
is well-defined independent of the choice of with . By the above argument, this forms a -homomorphism from . This extends to the -homomorphism from by the maximality of the norm on .
2.5.
The -homomorphism defined in 2.3 extends to
and hence induces
Indeed, without loss of generality, we may assume that there are Riemannian bands such that , extends to an isometric immersion of , and . Let us decompose an operator into , where and . Set
where denotes the lift (2.4) with respect to and , and denotes the projection onto . This is well-defined independent of the choice of a decomposition , and forms a -homomorphism. We omit the detail of the proof, because it is proved completely in the same way as [kubotaCodimensionTransferHigher2021]*Proposition 4.3.
2.3. K-theory and the coarse index of Dirac operators
In the last step, we relate the equivariant coarse index of with that of through the lifting homomorphism constructed above.
We define the ideal of consisting of operators such that as , and set
We also define the Real C*-algebras and in the same way.
Lemma 2.6.
There are isomorphisms
We write for the first and the second component of respectively.
Proof.
Let denote the -neighborhood of and let . Then the inclusion
induces a -isomorphism
Now the six-term exact sequence for the extension
proves the first isomorphism. The second and the third isomorphisms are also proved in the same way. β
Let
(2.7) |
denote the K-theory boundary map associated to the exact sequence
We also use the same letter for the -theory boundary map of the same kind defined for and coarse C*-algebras.
Let , , denote the -linear Dirac operator on and , and the -linear Dirac operator on respectively (for the definition of -linear Dirac operator on a -dimensional spin manifold, see e.g.Β [lawsonjr.SpinGeometry1989]*Chapter II, Β§7). We also consider the Clifford-linear Dirac operators and , each of which is the same thing as the family and respectively. Let is a continuous function such that as and the support of is in . Then is an odd self-adjoint operator in by [roePartitioningNoncompactManifolds1988]*Proposition 2.3, whose image in is unitary. Hence it determines an element of (cf.Β [kubotaCodimensionTransferHigher2021]*Remark A.1), which is denoted by in short. Similarly, we define , and . We also define the relative KO-class of the Dirac operators on manifolds with boundary and .
The K-theory boundary map of the extensions are denoted by , where is , , , and so on. Note that is Morita equivalent to the maximal group C*-algebra and the Rosenberg index is the same thing with .
Hereafter, for a sequence of abelian groups and an element , we write for its image by the quotient map .
Lemma 2.8.
The composition
sends to .
Proof.
Firstly, we have . This is because the operators and are both -th order pseudo-differential operators and their principal symbols are the same. Next, follows from the βboundary of Dirac is Diracβ principle (see e.g.Β [higsonAnalyticHomology2000]*Proposition 11.2.15). Finally, is obvious from the definition. β
Proof of TheoremΒ 1.3.
By definition, the diagram
commutes. Therefore, we get
The right hand side is non-zero by assumption. This shows the non-vanishing of as desired. β
3. Multiwidth of cube-like domains and the Rosenberg index
In this section we study a βmulti-dimensionalβ generalization of TheoremΒ 1.3.
Definition 3.1.
A -dimensional Riemannian -domain is a compact Riemannian manifold with corners equipped with a face-preserving smooth map which is corner proper, i.e., -faces of are pull-backs of -faces of (cf.Β [gromovFourLecturesScalar2019]*3.18).
In this terminology, -domain is the same thing as Riemannian band.
We write the codimension faces of as . Note that the codimension corner
is a closed manifold.
Definition 3.2.
We define the multiwidth of a -domain as
For a class of Riemannian -domains, we define the -multiwidth of a complete spin manifold , denoted by , as the supremum of the width of a Riemannian -domains immersed to .
Definition 3.3.
We say that a -domain is in the class if the equivariant coarse index
does not vanish.
Remark 3.4.
We compare our assumption on cube-like domains with the previous works [gromovFourLecturesScalar2019, wangProofGromovCube2021, xieQuantitativeRelativeIndex2021]. First, the above papers deal with a manifold with boundary , instead of a manifold with corner, equipped with a map sending to the boundary of the cube. For such , the inverse image is a -domain in the sense of DefinitionΒ 3.1 if is chosen to be a regular value of for (where denotes the -th projection). We may choose such in the way that the distance of and is arbitrarily small.
Next, the submanifold playing the role of in the band width theory in the previous papers is not the lowest dimensional corner , but the transverse intersection of hypersurfaces which separates and . In particular, the assumption of [wangProofGromovCube2021, xieQuantitativeRelativeIndex2021] is the non-vanishing of the Rosenberg index of under the condition that is injective. Indeed, this assumption is reduced to the non-vanishing of the -equivariant coarse index of the -Galois covering (instead of -equivariant coarse index of the universal covering of ). This reduction is discussed in [xieQuantitativeRelativeIndex2021], in the second paragraph of the proof of Theorem 4.3. Since and are cobordant, their equivariant coarse index coincides.
Let be a closed spin manifold. Assume that has infinite -multiwidth. For , pick a Riemannian -domain in the class which has the multiwidth and is isometrically immersed to . We use the letters , , , and in the same way as SectionΒ 2. Moreover, we define the maximal Roe algebras and in the same way. Note that, the same proof as LemmaΒ 2.1 shows that, the image of in has systole not less than . This means that the same construction as 2.3 and 2.5 works, and hence we get the -homomorphisms
Let and let denote the -Galois covering of (note that it is not necessarily the universal covering of ). Set and . We remark that is a Riemannian -domain.
Let and denote the Dirac operator on and respectively. In the same way as the previous section, these operators determine the -classes and respectively.
Lemma 3.5.
There is a homomorphism
sending to .
Proof.
Let denote the closure of . Note that , and hence
The Real C*-algebra extension
induces the boundary map
as desired. Moreover, the boundary of the same kind are also defined for and coarse C*-algebras in the same way. Now, the commutativity of the diagram
and the boundary of Dirac is Dirac principle, , shows that as desired. β
Proof of TheoremΒ 1.5.
For , let denote the face , which is a -domain. Let us consider the iterated composition of the map defined in LemmaΒ 3.5 as
We further compose the boundary map (2.7) and . Finally we get
By LemmaΒ 3.5 and the proof of TheoremΒ 1.3, this map sends the equivariant coarse index to , which does not vanish by assumption. This finishes the proof. β