Averages of determinants of Laplacians over moduli spaces for large genus
Abstract.
Let be the moduli space of hyperbolic surfaces of genus endowed with the Weil-Petersson metric. We view the regularized determinant of Laplacian as a function on and show that there exists a universal constant such that as ,
-
(1)
the expected value of over has rate of decay for some uniform constant ;
-
(2)
the expected value of over approaches to whenever .
1. Introduction
Let be a closed hyperbolic surface of genus . The spectrum of the Laplacian of on is a discrete closed subset in and consists of eigenvalues. We enumerate them, counted with multiplicity, in the following increasing order:
For , the spectral zeta function of is given as
From Weyl’s Law, the function is well-defined and holomorphic when . The regularized determinant is usually defined by
provided that has an analytic extension to . It is known from e.g. Hoker-Phong [5] and Sarnak [25] that
(1) |
where
and is the Selberg zeta function
where runs over all primitive closed geodesics on and is the length of on . It is known by Wolpert [29] that the magnitudes and are proper functions on moduli space of Riemann surfaces of genus , that is, they will be divergent when the surface goes to the boundary of .
In this work, we view and as random variables with respect to the probability measure on given by the Weil-Petersson metric. Naud is the first one to study their asymptotic behaviors for large genus and shows in [21] that
Theorem (Naud).
For any ,
(2) |
Actually it is shown in [21] that the property in (2) also holds for the other two models of random hyperbolic surfaces: random cover [14, 15] and Brooks-Makover [3]. In the proof, Naud essentially only requires uniform spectral gaps and suitable countings of closed geodesics for large genus. In this paper, we focus on the Weil-Petersson model and use the techniques developed in [22, 32] to show that
Theorem 1.
There exists a uniform constant such that as ,
where the implied constant is universal and is the Weil-Petersson volume of .
It would be interesting to study the optimal choice of in Theorem 1. By using Markov’s inequality, Theorem 1 clearly implies the result of Naud above. Moreover, combining with (1) it also implies that
Indeed, our second result is as follows.
Theorem 2.
For any ,
For any ,
For any , this is due to Naud [21].
Notations.
We say two positive functions
if there exists a universal constant , independent of , such that ; and we say
if and .
Plan of the paper.
In Section 2 we will provide a review of relevant background materials and show that for , if and only if which will be applied in the proof of Theorem 2. Then by assuming (2) and closely following [21], in Section 3 we will complete the proof of Theorem 2. In the last Section, we will use the techniques developed in [22, 32] to finish the proof of Theorem 1.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank all the participants in our seminar on Teichmüller theory for helpful discussions and comments on this project. We also would like to thank Frédéric Naud for his interests on this work. The second named author is partially supported by the NSFC grant No. , and .
2. Preliminary
In this section, we set up notations and basic propositions on the regularized determinant of the Laplacian and the Weil-Petersson model of random surfaces.
2.1. Determinants of Laplacians
Let with be a complete hyperbolic surface of genus with geodesic boundaries. By the Gauss-Bonnet formula, its hyperbolic area satisfies . For a closed geodesic on , we use or to denote its length.
Now let be a closed hyperbolic surface of genus and be its Laplacian. Recall that as in the introduction, the regularized determinant . Indeed, it is known from e.g. [5, 25, 21] that it also satisfies the following identity
(3) |
where is the Euler constant, is the constant given in (1), and
Here is the set of oriented primitive closed geodesics on . One may see [21] and references therein for more details. Selberg’s trace formula gives the following identity:
(4) |
See [4, Theorem 9.5.3] or [2, Theorem 5.6] for a general form of Selberg’s trace formula. One may also see e.g. [26] and [8].
2.2. Counting geodesics
We will apply the following two countings on closed geodesics. The first one is for general closed geodesics. One may see e.g. [4, Lemma 6.6.4].
Lemma 3.
Let be a hyperbolic surface of genus and let . There are at most oriented closed geodesics on of length which are not iterates of closed geodesics of length .
Recall that a closed geodesic is called filling in a hyperbolic surface with geodesic boundaries if each component of is homotopic to a single point or some boundary component of . The second counting is the following bound for filling closed geodesics that is essential in the proof of Theorem 1. One may see [32, Theorem 4] or [31, Theorem 18] for more details.
Theorem 4 (Wu-Xue).
For any and , there exists a constant only depending on and such that for all and any compact hyperbolic surface of genus with boundary simple closed geodesics, the following inequality holds:
where is the number of filling closed geodesics in of length , and is the total length of the boundary closed geodesics of .
2.3. The Weil-Petersson model of random surfaces
For , let be the Teichmüller space of Riemann surfaces with genus and punctures. The mapping class group acts on keeping the Weil-Petersson symplectic form invariant. The quotient space is the moduli space of Riemann surfaces. Set and . For , let be the Teichmüller space of bordered hyperbolic surfaces with geodesic boundaries of length , and . In particularly,