This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Asymptotic theory of not completely integrable soliton equations

A. M. Kamchatnov Institute of Spectroscopy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Troitsk, Moscow, 108840, Russia [email protected].
Abstract

We develop the theory of transformation of intensive initial nonlinear wave pulses to trains of solitons emerging at asymptotically large time of evolution. Our approach is based on the theory of dispersive shock waves in which the number of nonlinear oscillations in the shock becomes the number of solitons at the asymptotic state. We show that this number of oscillations, which is proportional to the classical action of particles associated with the small-amplitude edges of shocks, is preserved by the dispersionless flow. Then the Poincaré-Cartan integral invariant is also constant and therefore it reduces to the quantization rule similar to the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule for linear spectral problem associated with completely integrable equations. This rule yields a set of ‘eigenvalues’ which are related with the asymptotic solitons’ velocities and other their characteristics. Our analytical results agree very well with the results of numerical solutions of the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation.

pacs:
47.35.Jk, 47.35.Fg, 02.30.Jr

In many typical situations an intensive enough initial wave pulse evolves eventually to some number of solitons, and therefore it is very important to be able to predict velocities of these asymptotic solitons and other their characteristics. If the nonlinear wave equation under consideration is completely integrable, then this problem can be solved by finding the eigenvalues of the linear spectral problem associated with this equation. The theory becomes especially effective when the number of solitons is large, so that the quasiclassical asymptotical method can be applied to the spectral problem. However, in case of not completely integrable equations a similar approach was only known for a special class of initial conditions when they correspond to simple waves of the dispersionless approximation. In this paper, we generalize this theory to arbitrary smooth enough initial pulses described by two wave variables. We obtain the generalized Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule which defines a set of ‘eigenvalues’ corresponding to given initial conditions and show how these eigenvalues are related with physical parameters of asymptotic solitons. The theory agrees very well with numerical simulations and sheds new light on the quasiclassical limit of completely integrable equations.

I Introduction

If a nonlinear wave system supports propagation of solitons, then an intensive enough initial pulse evolves eventually into a certain number NN of solitons and some amount of linear radiation. In view of universality of this phenomenon, it is very important to be able to predict parameters of emerging solitons (e.g., their velocities and amplitudes) from given initial distributions of the wave variables. This problem admits a straightforward solution in case of completely integrable nonlinear wave equations; see, e.g., Refs. nmpz-80 ; as-81 ; newell-85 and references therein. Such equations are associated with some linear spectral problems where the wave distributions play the role of ‘potentials’. Though these ‘potentials’ evolve with time according to the wave equation under consideration, the spectrum of the associated linear problem does not change, i.e. the evolution is isospectral, and each discrete eigenvalue corresponds to a certain soliton at the asymptotic stage of evolution at tt\to\infty. Hence, if we find the spectrum of the linear problem for given initial wave distributions, then the discrete eigenvalues provide all necessary information about solitons’ parameters at asymptotically large time tt.

This theory considerably simplifies if the final number of solitons is large, N1N\gg 1, and the initial distributions are smooth enough, so we can apply the quasiclassical WKB method to the linear spectral problem. For example, in case of Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation associated with the stationary Schrödinger equation ggkm-67 , the well-known Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule readily gives approximate values of the discrete eigenvalues very simply related with solitons’ velocities and amplitudes karpman-67 ; karpman-73 . As usual in the WKB method, the asymptotic formulas give quite accurate results even for small quantum numbers. Similar Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule was derived in Refs. JLML-99 ; kku-02 for the Zakharov-Shabat spectral problem associated with nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation zs-73 . However, when the nonlinear wave equation under consideration is not completely integrable, such a direct approach becomes impossible.

To find a more general method for calculation of parameters of asymptotic solitons, we need to consider in some more detail the process of transformation of an initially smooth pulse to a sequence of solitons. One can distinguish in this process three typical stages. At first, the pulse’s profile gradually steepens due to nonlinear effects, but it keeps a smooth enough form without any oscillations, so its evolution obeys with high accuracy the dispersionless (hydrodynamic) limit of nonlinear wave equations under consideration. When the profile’s slope becomes very large, the dispersion effects start to influence on the evolution of the wave, so oscillations are generated after the so-called wave breaking moment of time. Such regions of nonlinear oscillations are called dispersive shock waves (DSWs) and, according to Gurevich and Pitaevskii gp-73 , they can be approximated by modulated periodic solutions of the nonlinear wave equations. Evolution of the modulation parameters obeys the Whitham modulation equations whitham ; Whitham-74 . In Gurevich-Pitaevskii approximation, a DSW occupies a finite expanding region of space. At one edge of the DSW solitons are gradually formed and the opposite small-amplitude edge propagates with some group velocity along a smooth part of the evolving pulse. Thus, at the second stage of evolution the wave structure consists of one or two DSWs adjoined with smooth parts of the pulse and the DSWs expand gradually over the whole pulse. Numbers of oscillations in DSWs increase with time due to difference between phase and group velocities of linear waves at the small-amplitude edges where oscillations enter into the DSWs regions gp-87 . At the last third stage of evolution of an initially localized pulse with a finite length its smooth parts disappear and the number of oscillations in DSWs is stabilized, so the solitons acquire their asymptotic values of parameters as tt\to\infty, when distances between solitons become much greater than their widths. Thus, asymptotic solitons form gradually from small-amplitude oscillations which enter into the DSW region at its small-amplitude edge, so we have to consider propagation of this edge in some more detail.

Let the nonlinear wave dynamics under consideration be described by two variables which for definiteness we shall call “density” ρ\rho and “flow velocity” uu. The periodic solutions ρ=ρ(x,t),u=u(x,t)\rho=\rho(x,t),u=u(x,t) are periodic functions of the phase θ\theta which in non-modulated case has the form θ=kxωt=k(xVt)\theta=kx-\omega t=k(x-Vt), where VV is the phase velocity of the traveling wave. In a slightly modulated wave, the wave number kk and the frequency ω\omega become slow functions of xx and tt. Since locally the wave can still be considered in the leading approximation as uniform, they can be defined as

k=θx,ω=θtk=\theta_{x},\qquad\omega=-\theta_{t} (1)

for some phase θ(x,t)\theta(x,t), and then one of the modulation equations can be written in the form of ‘the number of waves’ conservation law whitham ; Whitham-74

kt+ωx=0,k_{t}+\omega_{x}=0, (2)

where kk plays the role of density of waves and ω\omega is their flux.

At the small-amplitude edge we can distinguish the short wavelength oscillation at the length scale 2π/k\sim 2\pi/k and the slowly changing “background distributions” ρb(x,t),ub(x,t)\rho_{b}(x,t),u_{b}(x,t) which change at the length scale of the initial pulse length l\sim l. Hence we can write ρ(x,t)=ρb(x,t)+ρ(x,t),u(x,t)=ub(x,t)+u(x,t)\rho(x,t)=\rho_{b}(x,t)+\rho^{\prime}(x,t),u(x,t)=u_{b}(x,t)+u^{\prime}(x,t) where the smooth functions ρb(x,t),ub(x,t)\rho_{b}(x,t),u_{b}(x,t) obey the motion equation in the dispersionless (hydrodynamic) limit obtained by neglecting term with higher order space and/or time derivatives, and the small-amplitude oscillations ρ(x,t),u(x,t)\rho^{\prime}(x,t),u^{\prime}(x,t) obey the equations linearized with respect to deviations from the background flow. Since at the length scale 2π/k\sim 2\pi/k the background flow can be considered as constant, we obtain in the main approximation from the linearized equations with constant coefficients the harmonic wave solutions ρ,uexp[i(kxωt)]\rho^{\prime},u^{\prime}\propto\exp[i(kx-\omega t)] with the dispersion relation ω=ω(k,ρb,ub)\omega=\omega(k,\rho_{b},u_{b}). A slightly modulated linear wave packet propagating along a slowly changing background still consists of harmonics with the same dispersion law which satisfies the number of waves conservation law (2), but ρb,ub\rho_{b},u_{b} become in this case the slowly changing solutions ρ=ρ(x,t),u=u(x,t)\rho=\rho(x,t),u=u(x,t) of the dispersionless equations (see Ref. Whitham-74 ). In Gurevich-Pitaevskii theory gp-73 of DSWs, the small-amplitude edge is represented by such a linear wave packet and according to the conservation law (2) oscillations enter into the DSW region where their amplitudes grow from zero at the small-amplitude edge to soliton-like propagation at the opposite soliton edge. Since the small-amplitude edge propagates with the group velocity vg=ω(k,ρ,u)/kv_{g}=\partial\omega(k,\rho,u)/\partial k, along its path the flux is Doppler-shifted, so the number of oscillations inside the DSW region changes with time as (see Refs. gp-87 ; kamch-21a )

dNdt=12π|kωkω|.\frac{dN}{dt}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\left|k\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}-\omega\right|. (3)

The expression in the right-hand side coincides, up to a constant factor, with Lagrangian of a point particle associated with the small-amplitude edge of the DSW, if in accordance with the well-known optics-mechanical analogy (see, e.g., Ref. lanczos ) we identify kk and ω\omega with the particle’s momentum and Hamiltonian, correspondingly. Then the number NN of solitons formed from an intensive initial pulse is equal to the mechanical action produced by an associated with the packet point-like particle,

N=S2π=12π(kdxωdt),N=\frac{S}{2\pi}=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int(kdx-\omega dt), (4)

where dx=vgdtdx=v_{g}dt and integration is taken over the packet’s path. If the initial distributions ρ0(x),u0(x)\rho_{0}(x),u_{0}(x) correspond to unidirectional simple wave propagation of the background pulse, that is there exists a functional dependence between ρ\rho and uu corresponding to a constant value of one of the Riemann invariants of the dispersionless equations LL-6 , then the wave number kk can be expressed as a function of the value of ρ\rho at the point where the small-amplitude edge is located at this moment of time, k=k(ρ)k=k(\rho). Then we have also ω=ω(k,ρ)\omega=\omega(k,\rho), where ρ=ρ(x,t)\rho=\rho(x,t) is a solution of the Hopf equation

ρt+V0(ρ)ρx=0\rho_{t}+V_{0}(\rho)\rho_{x}=0 (5)

to which the dispersionless equations can be reduced, k=k(ρ)k=k(\rho) is the solution of the equation

dkdρ=ω/ρV0ω/k\frac{dk}{d\rho}=\frac{\partial\omega/\partial\rho}{V_{0}-\partial\omega/\partial k} (6)

with the initial condition

k(0)=0,k(0)=0, (7)

where it is assumed that wave breaking occurs at the point with ρ=0\rho=0. Equation (6) was first obtained in Ref. el-05 by means of analysis of Whitham equations for DSWs at their small-amplitude edge and then it was derived from the Hamilton equations for propagation of linear wave packets along simple wave pulses in Refs. kamch-20a ; ks-21 . When the function k=k(ρ)k=k(\rho) is found, then, as was shown in Ref. kamch-19 , one can find the path x=x(t)x=x(t) of the small-amplitude edge of a DSW and, consequently, calculate the integral in Eq. (4) for some particular nonlinear wave equations (see Refs. kamch-20a ; kamch-21 ; cbk-21 ). In this case the final result can be written in the form

N=1πk(ρ0(x))𝑑x,N=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}k(\rho_{0}(x))dx, (8)

where ρ0(x)\rho_{0}(x) is the initial distribution of ρ\rho. Such a formula was suggested earlier in Refs. egkkk-07 ; egs-08 under supposition that one can extend solution of the Whitham equations to the unmodulated yet part of the pulse in such a way, that the total number of oscillations in DSW and unmodulated part remains constant during evolution of the pulse. Generalization of this rule to more general solutions k=k(ρ,q¯)k=k(\rho,\overline{q}), q¯\overline{q} is an integration constant in a solution of Eq. (6), yields also parameters of solitons at the asymptotic stage of evolution egs-08 . This theory agrees with numerical solutions of nonlinear wave equations and with experimental results obtained in Ref. mfweh-20 for a viscous fluid conduit.

So far this theory was limited to an important but particular case of an initial simple-wave pulse evolving eventually to a number of solitons and the aim of this paper is to generalize this approach to the general case of nonlinear wave evolutions describes by two variables ρ(x,t),u(x,t)\rho(x,t),u(x,t) and admitting solitonic propagation of waves. To this end, we notice that equality of two expressions (4) and (8) can be interpreted as a special case of preservation of a constant value of the Poincaré-Cartan integral invariants poincare ; cartan for a mechanical system with the phase space (x,k)(x,k) and Hamiltonian ω(k,x,t)\omega(k,x,t). However, in this special case the tube of trajectories preserving the invariant is defined by solutions of Eq. (5) rather than by solutions of the Hamilton equations under consideration. In this paper, we extend this definition of Poincaré-Cartan integral invariants to general hydrodynamic flows for two variables ρ,u\rho,u not restricted by the condition that one of the Riemann invariants is constant and arrive at generalization of formula (8)

N=1πk(ρ0(x),u0(x),qN)𝑑x,N=\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}k(\rho_{0}(x),u_{0}(x),q_{N})dx, (9)

where ρ0(x),u0(x)\rho_{0}(x),u_{0}(x) are the initial distributions of these two variables and qNq_{N} is an integration constant in the solution of equations which define the function k=k(ρ,u)k=k(\rho,u) of two variables. One can say that qNq_{N} corresponds to the NN-th soliton in the asymptotic distribution of solitons. Then if we decrease NN by one, then we get the value qN1q_{N-1} corresponding to the (N1)(N-1)-th soliton, and in this way we relate each nn-th soliton with the corresponding value qnq_{n} of the generalized ‘Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization’ rule (9), which extends the above mentioned method karpman-67 ; karpman-73 ; JLML-99 ; kku-02 of finding solitons parameters for completely integrable wave equations to not completely integrable equations. Relationship of the parameters qnq_{n} with such physical parameters of solitons as, for example, their velocities is established by means of the Stokes remark lamb ; stokes (see also ai-77 ; dkn-03 ; kamch-20a ) that linear waves and exponentially small soliton tails obey the same linearized equations, so the expressions for their phase or soliton velocities are transformed to each other by the replacement kik~k\leftrightarrow-i\widetilde{k}, where k~\widetilde{k} is the inverse half-width of a soliton.

We illustrate the formulated here approach by its application to the generalized NLS (gNLS) equation and confirm its accuracy by comparison with numerical solutions.

II Poincaré-Cartan integral invariant and Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule

Let the hydrodynamic (dispersionless) equations for the background flow evolution can be written in the form of equations of the compressible fluid dynamics,

ρt+(ρu)x=0,ut+uux+c2ρρx=0,\rho_{t}+(\rho u)_{x}=0,\qquad u_{t}+uu_{x}+\frac{c^{2}}{\rho}\rho_{x}=0, (10)

where c=c(ρ)c=c(\rho) is the ‘sound velocity’ related with the density ρ\rho by means of equation of state p=p(ρ)p=p(\rho), c2=dp/dρc^{2}=dp/d\rho, pp is the pressure. The characteristic velocities of this system,

v+=u+c,v=uc,v_{+}=u+c,\qquad v_{-}=u-c, (11)

correspond to the sound waves propagating upstream and downstream the background flow with velocity uu. Equations (10) can be transformed to the Riemann diagonal form

r+t+v+r+x=0,rt+vrx=0,\frac{\partial r_{+}}{\partial t}+v_{+}\frac{\partial r_{+}}{\partial x}=0,\quad\frac{\partial r_{-}}{\partial t}+v_{-}\frac{\partial r_{-}}{\partial x}=0, (12)

for the variables

r±=u2±120ρcdρρr_{\pm}=\frac{u}{2}\pm\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{\rho}\frac{cd\rho}{\rho} (13)

called Riemann invariants. If we substitute here the function ρ=ρ(c)\rho=\rho(c), then we get the Riemann invariants in the form

r±=u2±σ(c),σ(c)=120ccρ(c)dρdc𝑑c,r_{\pm}=\frac{u}{2}\pm\sigma(c),\qquad\sigma(c)=\frac{1}{2}\int_{0}^{c}\frac{c}{\rho(c)}\frac{d\rho}{dc}dc, (14)

so that cc can be used as a wave variable instead of ρ\rho. If Eqs. (12) are solved, then the physical variables u,ρ,cu,\rho,c can be expressed in terms of the Riemann invariants,

u=r++r,ρ=ρ(r+,r),c=c(r+,r).u=r_{+}+r_{-},\quad\rho=\rho(r_{+},r_{-}),\quad c=c(r_{+},r_{-}). (15)

In case of unidirectional propagation of a background pulse we get a simple wave solution with one of the Riemann invariants constant. Let such a pulse propagate to the right through the uniform quiescent medium with constant values of ρ=ρR\rho=\rho_{R}, c=cRc=c_{R}, u=uR=0u=u_{R}=0. Then along this pulse the variables uu and cc are related by the formula u/2σ(c)=σ(cR)u/2-\sigma(c)=-\sigma(c_{R}), so that c=c(u)c=c(u) and r+=u+σ(cR)r_{+}=u+\sigma(c_{R}), v+=u+c(u)V0(u)v_{+}=u+c(u)\equiv V_{0}(u). Consequently, the second equation (12) is fulfilled identically and the first one reduces to the Hopf equation

ut+V0(u)ux=0.\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}+V_{0}(u)\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}=0. (16)

We are interested in propagation of the small-amplitude edge of a DSW and we identify this propagation with motion of a point particle with coordinate x(t)x(t) and momentum k(t)k(t) which satisfy the Hamilton equations

dxdt=ωk,dkdt=ωx.\frac{dx}{dt}=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k},\qquad\frac{dk}{dt}=-\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial x}. (17)

In usual situations the Hamiltonian (dispersion relation) ω\omega is a function of k,x,tk,x,t, ω=ω(k,x,t)\omega=\omega(k,x,t). Following the excellent textbook gant-66 , let us define in the three-dimensional extended phase space (x,k,t)(x,k,t) an arbitrary closed curve

C0={x=x0(η),k=k0(η),t=t0(η)|  0η1},C_{0}=\left\{x=x_{0}(\eta),\,\,k=k_{0}(\eta),\,\,t=t_{0}(\eta)\,\,|\,\,0\leq\eta\leq 1\right\}, (18)

where the points corresponding to η=0\eta=0 and η=1\eta=1 coincide with each other. Then we can calculate along this curve the integral

I0=C0(kδxωδt),I_{0}=\oint_{C_{0}}(k\delta x-\omega\delta t), (19)

where δx\delta x and δt\delta t denote differentials of the functions x=x0(η)x=x_{0}(\eta), t=t0(η)t=t_{0}(\eta) at the points of the contour C0C_{0}. Now, we define the flow in the phase space by the equations

dxdt=Q(k,x,t),dkdt=P(k,x,t)\frac{dx}{dt}=Q(k,x,t),\qquad\frac{dk}{dt}=P(k,x,t) (20)

and, when solutions of these equations cross the contour C0C_{0}, we obtain a tube of trajectories

x=x(t,η),k=k(t,η),x=x(t,\eta),\qquad k=k(t,\eta), (21)

where x(t0(η),η)=x0(η)x(t_{0}(\eta),\eta)=x_{0}(\eta), k(t0(η),η)=k0(η)k(t_{0}(\eta),\eta)=k_{0}(\eta). If we take now another function t=t1(η)t=t_{1}(\eta), then we get a new contour

C1={x=x1(η)=x(t1(η),η),k=k1(η)=k(t1(η),η),t=t1(η)|  0η1}\begin{split}&C_{1}=\{x=x_{1}(\eta)=x(t_{1}(\eta),\eta),\\ &k=k_{1}(\eta)=k(t_{1}(\eta),\eta),\,\,t=t_{1}(\eta)\,\,|\,\,0\leq\eta\leq 1\}\end{split} (22)

and a new value of the integral similar to Eq. (19),

I1=C1(kδxωδt),I_{1}=\oint_{C_{1}}(k\delta x-\omega\delta t), (23)

which is taken over the contour C1C_{1} around the tube of trajectories generated by the flow (21). Now one can ask, for which Eqs. (20) and corresponding flows (21) the integrals (19) and (23) are equal to each other independently of the choice of the contour C1C_{1} (that is the choice of the function t=t1(μ)t=t_{1}(\mu)). As was shown in Refs. poincare ; cartan ; gant-66 , this is true for

Q=ωk,P=ωx,Q=\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k},\qquad P=-\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial x}, (24)

that is when the flow obeys the Hamilton equations (17). Thus, the invariance of the Poincaré-Cartan integral

I=C(kδxωδt)I=\oint_{C}(k\delta x-\omega\delta t) (25)

means that the flow (20) is Hamiltonian.

Now we change the perspective and look at invariance of the integral (25) from a different point of view. As was indicated in Introduction, we are interested in invariance of this integral with respect to flows generated by the hydrodynamic equations (10) or (16). In this case the Hamiltonian ω\omega depends on xx and tt only via solutions ρ=ρ(x,t)\rho=\rho(x,t), u=u(x,t)u=u(x,t) of these equations, i.e.,

ω=ω(k,ρ,u)\omega=\omega(k,\rho,u) (26)

and the flow is generated by the equation

dxdt=u(x,t).\frac{dx}{dt}=u(x,t). (27)

Then invariance of the integral (25) imposes certain conditions on the dependence of the momentum (wave number) kk on the background variables,

k=k(ρ,u).k=k(\rho,u). (28)

If the condition of invariance is fulfilled, then the action (4) can be reduced to the generalized Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule (9) which provides important information about parameters of asymptotic solitons. We shall consider the condition of invariance of the integral (25) separately for the simple wave flow (16) and for the general solutions of Eqs. (10),

II.1 Simple wave background pulse

In simple wave case, the small-amplitude edge propagates along the background pulse described by a single variable u=u(x,t)u=u(x,t) which evolution obeys the Hopf equation (16). Then we have ω=ω(k,u)\omega=\omega(k,u) and we look for such a function k=k(u)k=k(u), that the Poincaré-Cartan integral (25) remains the same for any contour CC around the tube generated by the flow dx/dt=V0(u)dx/dt=V_{0}(u). Following Ref. gant-66 , we introduce a coordinate μ\mu along the paths that form the tube and assume that this coordinate is related with the flow by the relations

dxV0(u)=dt=χdμ,\frac{dx}{V_{0}(u)}=dt=\chi d\mu, (29)

where χ=χ(t,x,k)\chi=\chi(t,x,k) is an arbitrary function: its choice fixes the choice of the coordinate μ\mu along the flow trajectories. Thus, for any fixed value of μ=const\mu=\mathrm{const} we get a point on every trajectory, so these points define the closed contour around the tube. As a result, the integral (25), generally speaking, becomes a function of μ\mu, but we want to find such a function k=k(u)k=k(u), that this integral does not depend on μ\mu for any choice of χ\chi. Differentiation of Eq. (25) with respect to μ\mu gives

dI={[dkduδx(ωkdkdu+ωu)δt]×(utdt+uxdx)δxdx+δωdt}=0,\begin{split}dI=&\oint\Bigg{\{}\left[\frac{dk}{du}\delta x-\left(\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}\frac{dk}{du}+\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial u}\right)\delta t\right]\\ &\times\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}dt+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}dx\right)-\delta x\cdot dx+\delta\omega\cdot dt\Bigg{\}}=0,\end{split}

where we have integrated the terms kdδxωdδtkd\delta x-\omega d\delta t by parts over the closed contour. Now we substitute dx=V0χdμdx=V_{0}\chi d\mu, dt=χdμdt=\chi d\mu and obtain after simple transformations with account of Eq. (16) the expression

{[(ωkV0)dkdu+ωu](utδt+uxδx)χ}dμ=0.\Bigg{\{}\oint\left[\left(\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}-V_{0}\right)\frac{dk}{du}+\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial u}\right]\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial t}\delta t+\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\delta x\right)\chi\Bigg{\}}\cdot d\mu=0.

This integral must vanish for any choice of χ\chi, so we get the equation

dkdu=ω/uV0(u)ω/k.\frac{dk}{du}=\frac{\partial\omega/\partial u}{V_{0}(u)-\partial\omega/\partial k}. (30)

This equation was obtained earlier from analysis of Whitham equations at the small-amplitude edge of DSWs el-05 and from Hamilton equations for propagation of wave packets along a simple wave background pulse kamch-20a ; ks-21 . Presented here derivation gives important new information that the background evolution preserves the value of the Poincaré-Cartan integral (25).

Let us assume now that we have found such a solution

k=k(u,q¯),k=k(u,\overline{q}), (31)

(q¯\overline{q} being an integration constant) of Eq. (30) that the closed contour CC corresponds to the path of the small-amplitude edge gone first in one direction with negative kk and then in the opposite direction with positive kk according to the Hamilton equations (17). Then we can define “number of oscillations”

N(q¯)=14πC(q¯)(kδxωδt)N(\overline{q})=\frac{1}{4\pi}\oint_{C(\overline{q})}(k\delta x-\omega\delta t) (32)

in the DSW corresponding to this value q¯\overline{q} (additional factor 1/21/2 compared with Eq. (4) is introduced for taking into account that in the case of a closed contour the edge goes its path twice). This number N(q¯)N(\overline{q}) remains the same, when we transform the contour to the initial state at t=0t=0 (δt=0\delta t=0):

N(q¯)=14πC0(q¯)kδx=12πx1(q¯)x2(q¯)k(u0(x),q¯)𝑑x,N(\overline{q})=\frac{1}{4\pi}\oint_{C_{0}(\overline{q})}k\delta x=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{x_{1}(\overline{q})}^{x_{2}(\overline{q})}k(u_{0}(x),\overline{q})dx, (33)

where x1,2(q¯)x_{1,2}(\overline{q}) are two ‘turning point’ at which

k(u0(x1,2(q¯)),q¯)=0k(u_{0}(x_{1,2}(\overline{q})),\overline{q})=0 (34)

and u0(x)u_{0}(x) is the initial distribution of the background pulse. The asymptotic expression (8) for the number of solitons assumes that these turning point go to infinities, but less formal consideration makes it clear at once that there exists the maximal integer value of NN for which the expression (33) with a given distribution u0(x)u_{0}(x) still has the corresponding ‘eigenvalue’ q¯N\overline{q}_{N} but for N+1N+1 such an eigenvalue does not exist anymore. In this case the integration interval (x1(q¯N),x2(q¯N))(x_{1}(\overline{q}_{N}),x_{2}(\overline{q}_{N})) is so wide for intensive initial pulses with u0(x)0u_{0}(x)\to 0 as |x||x|\to\infty, that it can be replaced with good enough accuracy by the interval (,)(-\infty,\infty). We can say that q¯N\overline{q}_{N} corresponds to the NN-th soliton in the asymptotic state. If we decrease NN by one, then we get N(q¯N1)=N1N(\overline{q}_{N-1})=N-1, that is q¯N1\overline{q}_{N-1} corresponds to (N1)(N-1)-th soliton, and so on. As a result, we arrange correspondence between the nn-th soliton and the parameter q¯n\overline{q}_{n} which is to be determined from the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule

x1(q¯n)x2(q¯n)k(u0(x),q¯n)𝑑x=2πn,n=1,2,,N,\int_{x_{1}(\overline{q}_{n})}^{x_{2}(\overline{q}_{n})}k(u_{0}(x),\overline{q}_{n})dx=2\pi n,\qquad n=1,2,\ldots,N, (35)

where k=k(u,q¯)k=k(u,\overline{q}) is the solution (31) of Eq. (30). At last, we notice that Eq. (35) can be interpreted as a quasiclassical quantization rule for eigenvalues of a linear wave equation for waves propagating along the “potential” u0(x)u_{0}(x). As is well known from quantum mechanics (see, e.g., LL-3 ), a more accurate description of wave solutions in vicinities of the turning points leads to the replacement nn1/2n\mapsto n-1/2, and this is very general phenomenon of the short wavelength asymptotic behavior at kk\to\infty (see, e.g., Appendix 11 in Ref. arnold-89 ). We will make such a replacement in practical applications of this theory without derivation just as a heuristic approximation confirmed by comparison with numerical results.

We will relate the parameters q¯n\overline{q}_{n} obtained from the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule (35) with the physical parameters of the asymptotic solitons in the next Section and now we turn to generalization of this quantization rule to not simple-wave background flows.

II.2 General flow of background pulse

Now we suppose that the dispersionless flow is described by the solution ρ=ρ(x,t)\rho=\rho(x,t), u=u(x,t)u=u(x,t) of Eqs. (10) with some initial distributions ρ=ρ0(x),u=u0(x)\rho=\rho_{0}(x),u=u_{0}(x). The dispersion relation in the Hamilton equations (17) for the packet’s propagation depends on the values ρ\rho and uu at the point xx of the packet’s instant location at the moment tt, so the function

ω=ω(k,ρ,u)\omega=\omega(k,\rho,u) (36)

is known from the linearized equations. We look again for such a function k=k(ρ,u)k=k(\rho,u) that the Poincaré-Cartan integral (25) is preserved by the flow in the extended phase space (x,k,t)(x,k,t) provided the contour CC is taken around a tube of streamlines defined by the equation dx/dt=u(x,t)dx/dt=u(x,t). As in the simple wave case of the background flow, we define a coordinate μ\mu along streamlines by the equations

dxu=dt=χdμ,\frac{dx}{u}=dt=\chi d\mu, (37)

where χ=χ(x,t,k)\chi=\chi(x,t,k) is an arbitrary function, and we demand the integral does not depend neither on χ\chi (that is the choice of the contour’s form), no on μ\mu (that is on position of this contour on the tube). Differentiation of Eq. (25) with respect to μ\mu gives with account of Eqs. (10) and (17) the expression

dI={[kρ(ωku)c2ρku+ωρ]ρx+[ku(ωku)ρkρ+ωu]ux}×(δxuδt)χdμ=0.\begin{split}dI=\oint&\Bigg{\{}\left[\frac{\partial k}{\partial\rho}\left(\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}-u\right)-\frac{c^{2}}{\rho}\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}+\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial\rho}\right]\rho_{x}\\ &+\left[\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}\left(\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial k}-u\right)-{\rho}\frac{\partial k}{\partial\rho}+\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial u}\right]u_{x}\Bigg{\}}\\ &\times(\delta x-u\delta t)\chi\cdot d\mu=0.\end{split}

Since χ\chi is an arbitrary function, the expression in curly brackets must vanish. Moreover, the expressions in square brackets are only functions of ρ\rho and uu, whereas the local values of ρx\rho_{x} and uxu_{x} depend on the choice of the initial distributions, so they can be considered as arbitrary functions, too. Hence, the expressions in square brackets vanish separately and we arrive at the equations

kρ=(vgu)ωρ+c2ρωuc2(vgu)2,ku=(vgu)ωu+ρωρc2(vgu)2,\begin{split}&\frac{\partial k}{\partial\rho}=\frac{(v_{g}-u)\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial\rho}+\frac{c^{2}}{\rho}\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial u}}{c^{2}-(v_{g}-u)^{2}},\\ &\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}=\frac{(v_{g}-u)\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial u}+\rho\frac{\partial\omega}{\partial\rho}}{c^{2}-(v_{g}-u)^{2}},\end{split} (38)

which should determine the function k=k(ρ,u)k=k(\rho,u) for given dispersion relation (36) and equation of state c=c(ρ)c=c(\rho). Eqs. (38) have recently been derived in Ref. sk-23 from the Hamilton equations (17) under the same supposition that kk is only a function of ρ\rho and uu.

For existence of the function k=k(ρ,u)k=k(\rho,u), its derivatives defined by Eqs. (38) must satisfy the compatibility condition

ρ(ku)=u(kρ).\frac{\partial}{\partial\rho}\left(\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}\right)=\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left(\frac{\partial k}{\partial\rho}\right). (39)

If this condition is not fulfilled identically, we can confine ourselves to the limit of large values of kk since just this limit corresponds to the high quantum numbers in the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule. To this end, we expand the right-hand sides of Eqs. (38) with respect to a small parameter c/k\sim c/k and obtain

kρ=R1(k,ρ,u),ku=R2(k,ρ,u),\begin{split}\frac{\partial k}{\partial\rho}=R_{1}(k,\rho,u),\qquad\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}=R_{2}(k,\rho,u),\end{split} (40)

where in R1,2R_{1,2} only the terms are held that satisfy the condition (39). Then these equations allow one to restore the function

k=k(ρ,u,q),k=k(\rho,u,q), (41)

where qq is an integration constant determined by the initial value k=k0ck=k_{0}\gg c. It is convenient to define qq in such a way that the condition kk0ck\sim k_{0}\gg c corresponds to qcq\gg c.

The solution (41) (exact of approximate) allows one to define the Poincaré-Cartan integral

N(q)=14πC(kδxωδt)N(q)=\frac{1}{4\pi}\oint_{C}(k\delta x-\omega\delta t) (42)

for contours CC around a tube of streamlines of the dispersionless flow. If we transform such a contour to the initial state at t=0t=0, we obtain

N(q)=14πC0(q)kδx=12πx1(q)x2(q)k[ρ0(x),u0(x),q]𝑑x,N(q)=\frac{1}{4\pi}\oint_{C_{0}(q)}k\delta x=\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{x_{1}(q)}^{x_{2}(q)}k[\rho_{0}(x),u_{0}(x),q]dx, (43)

where x1,2(q)x_{1,2}(q) are the turning points defined by the equation

k[ρ0(x1,2(q),u0(x1,2(q)),q]=0.k[\rho_{0}(x_{1,2}(q),u_{0}(x_{1,2}(q)),q]=0. (44)

If we only know the asymptotic solution kck\gg c of Eq. (40), then Eq. (44) give only approximate solution for the turning points. Nevertheless, Eq. (43) gives accurate enough value of the integral, since along the most part of the integration interval we have kck\gg c and vicinities of the turning points give negligibly small contribution to the integral. As in the simple-wave background pulse case, we arrange correspondence between the soliton’s number nn and the value qnq_{n} determined by the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule

x1(qn)x2(qn)k[ρ0(x),u0(x),qn)𝑑x=2πn,n=1,2,,N.\int_{x_{1}(q_{n})}^{x_{2}(q_{n})}k[\rho_{0}(x),u_{0}(x),q_{n})dx=2\pi n,\quad n=1,2,\ldots,N. (45)

In practical applications of this formula we will make a replacement nn+1/2n\mapsto n+1/2, as it was explained below Eq. (35).

Now we have to relate the constants q¯n\overline{q}_{n} (simple-wave case) or qnq_{n} (general case) with parameters of asymptotic solitons emerging eventually from a given initial pulse.

III Parameters of asymptotic solitons

Now, when each soliton is labeled by a specific value of the parameter q¯n\overline{q}_{n} or qnq_{n}, we need to relate it with soliton’s physical parameters, as, for example, its velocity VnV_{n}. This can be done with the use of Stokes remark lamb ; stokes (see also ai-77 ; dkn-03 ) that the small amplitude tails exp[±k~(xVt)]\propto\exp[\pm\widetilde{k}(x-Vt)] of a soliton obey the same linearized equations as a small-amplitude harmonic wave exp[i(kxωt)]\propto\exp[i(kx-\omega t)]. Consequently, the soliton’s velocity VnV_{n} can be expressed in the form

Vn=ω~(k~n)/k~n,whereω~(k~)=iω(ik~),V_{n}=\widetilde{\omega}(\widetilde{k}_{n})/\widetilde{k}_{n},\quad\text{where}\quad\widetilde{\omega}(\widetilde{k})=i\omega(-i\widetilde{k}), (46)

and k~\widetilde{k} denotes the soliton’s inverse half-width (see Refs. el-05 ; kamch-20a ; kamch-21 ). This means analytical continuation of the function ω=F(k2)\omega=F(k^{2}) from the interval of positive values of its argument k2k^{2} to the interval of its negative values of the argument k2=k~2<0k^{2}=-\widetilde{k}^{2}<0. In practice it means that we consider the same function FF at different intervals of its argument k2k^{2}.

We generalize this Stokes observation to other functions of k2k^{2} that can also be continued to the region k2<0k^{2}<0 where they express some assertions about the inverse half-widths k~\widetilde{k} of solitons. For example, suppose we have found the exact solution (31) of Eq. (30) and it can be expressed in the form

k2=K¯(u,q¯).k^{2}=\overline{K}(u,\overline{q}). (47)

This formula can be continued to the solitonic region to give

k~2=K¯(u,q¯).\widetilde{k}^{2}=-\overline{K}(u,\overline{q}). (48)

Suppose we have found from the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule the value q¯n\overline{q}_{n} for the nn-th soliton and at asymptotically large time this soliton propagates along zero background u=0u=0. Then its inverse half-width is given by the formula

k~n2=K¯(0,q¯n)\widetilde{k}_{n}^{2}=-\overline{K}(0,\overline{q}_{n}) (49)

and, consequently, its velocity is readily obtained from Eq. (46). This approach reproduces in a different form the theory developed for simple wave pulses in Refs. egs-08 ; mfweh-20 .

We can extend the above approach to the case of exact solutions of Eqs. (38), so we imply that the condition (39) is fulfilled. Again we express the exact solution in the form

k2=K(ρ,u,q)k^{2}=K(\rho,u,q) (50)

and analytically continue it to the soliton region to obtain

k~2=K(ρ,u,q).\widetilde{k}^{2}=-K(\rho,u,q). (51)

If we found for the nn-th soliton the eigenvalue qnq_{n} from the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule (45) and if the asymptotic soliton propagates along the uniform background with ρ=ρR,u=0\rho=\rho_{R},u=0, then its inverse half-width is given by the formula

k~n2=K(ρR,0,qn)\widetilde{k}_{n}^{2}=-K(\rho_{R},0,q_{n}) (52)

and its velocity is to be found from the Stokes rule (46).

However such an analytical continuation becomes impossible in case of asymptotic solutions (41) which are only correct for kcuk\gg c\sim u. Nevertheless, we can overcome this difficulty in the following way. Suppose we have found the asymptotic solution in the form (50). Naturally, this general solution remains correct in case of simple-wave pulses when there is the functional relationship between ρ\rho and uu, say, ρ=ρsw(u)\rho=\rho_{\mathrm{sw}}(u), so we get the asymptotic formula

k2=K(ρsw(u),u,q),ku.k^{2}=K(\rho_{\mathrm{sw}}(u),u,q),\qquad k\gg u. (53)

Now, the asymptotic soliton trains propagate along simple-wave solutions, so their inverse half-widths are asymptotic specifications of the formula (48) obtained by analytic continuation of Eq. (47). If we take its series expansion with respect to small parameter uu, then the resulting formula

k2=K¯asymp(u,q¯)k^{2}=\overline{K}_{\text{asymp}}(u,\overline{q}) (54)

must coincide with Eq. (53). This matching condition allows one to find the relationship between the parameters qq and q¯\overline{q}:

q¯=q¯(q).\overline{q}=\overline{q}(q). (55)

Consequently, the inverse half-widths of asymptotic solitons are given by Eq. (49),

k~n2=K¯(0,q¯(qn)),\widetilde{k}_{n}^{2}=-\overline{K}(0,\overline{q}(q_{n})), (56)

where the parameters qnq_{n} are to be obtained from the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule (45) and we assumed that the asymptotic solitons propagate along the background with u=0u=0. At last, the soliton’s velocities are to be found according to the Stokes rule (46).

Let us illustrate this theory by examples.

IV Solitons evolved from a large deep in the generalized NLS equation theory

Here we shall consider evolution of a pulse according to the defocusing generalized NLS equation (generalized Gross-Pitaevskii equation for a Bose-Einstein condensate of atoms with repulsive interaction)

iψt+12ψxxf(|ψ|2)ψ=0,i\psi_{t}+\frac{1}{2}\psi_{xx}-f(|\psi|^{2})\psi=0, (57)

where the nonlinearity function is positive: f(ρ)>0f(\rho)>0, f(0)=0f(0)=0. It is well known that by means of the substitution

ψ=ρexp(ixu(x,t)𝑑x)\psi=\sqrt{\rho}\exp\left(i\int^{x}u(x^{\prime},t)dx^{\prime}\right) (58)

this equation can be transformed to the hydrodynamic-like system

ρt+(ρu)x=0,ut+uux+c2ρρx+(ρx28ρ2ρxx4ρ)x=0,\begin{split}&\rho_{t}+(\rho u)_{x}=0,\\ &u_{t}+uu_{x}+\frac{c^{2}}{\rho}\rho_{x}+\bigg{(}\frac{\rho_{x}^{2}}{8\rho^{2}}-\frac{\rho_{xx}}{4\rho}\bigg{)}_{x}=0,\end{split} (59)

where

c2=ρf(ρ).c^{2}=\rho f^{\prime}(\rho). (60)

Linearization of this system with respect to small deviations from a uniform flow yields the Bogoliubov dispersion relation

ω=k(u±c2+k24),\omega=k\left(u\pm\sqrt{c^{2}+\frac{k^{2}}{4}}\right), (61)

that is cc has the meaning of the sound velocity in the dispersionless limit k0k\to 0. Equations (59) reduce in the same limit to the standard Euler equations (10).

Now we can check whether the derivatives (38) commute. In this case it is convenient to replace ρ\rho by the variable cc where the function ρ=ρ(c)\rho=\rho(c) is obtained by inversion of the function c=c(ρ)c=c(\rho) (see Eq. (60)) so Eqs. (38) are cast to the form

kc=c[(2+cρ/ρ)k2+4(1+cρ/ρ)c2]k(k2+3c2),ku=k2+4c2[k2+2(1+ρ/(cρ))c2]k(k2+3c2).\begin{split}&\frac{\partial k}{\partial c}=-\frac{c[(2+c\rho^{\prime}/\rho)k^{2}+4(1+c\rho^{\prime}/\rho)c^{2}]}{k(k^{2}+3c^{2})},\\ &\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}=-\frac{\sqrt{k^{2}+4c^{2}}[k^{2}+2(1+\rho/(c\rho^{\prime}))c^{2}]}{k(k^{2}+3c^{2})}.\end{split} (62)

The straightforward calculation yields (see also sk-23 )

c(ku)u(kc)=k2+4c2kρρ(k2+3c2)2×[(k2+6c2)ρ2(ρ2c)+2(k2+3c2)ρ2(cρ′′ρ)],\begin{split}&\frac{\partial}{\partial c}\left(\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}\right)-\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left(\frac{\partial k}{\partial c}\right)=\frac{\sqrt{k^{2}+4c^{2}}}{k\rho\rho^{\prime}(k^{2}+3c^{2})^{2}}\\ &\times\left[(k^{2}+6c^{2})\rho^{\prime 2}(\rho^{\prime}-2c)+2(k^{2}+3c^{2})\rho^{2}(c\rho^{\prime\prime}-\rho^{\prime})\right],\end{split} (63)

and we see that the compatibility condition is only fulfilled for the case of the Kerr-like nonlinearity with f(ρ)=ρf(\rho)=\rho and ρ=c2\rho=c^{2}. Otherwise, it is fulfilled only in the limit kk\to\infty, so it is natural to consider these two situations separately.

IV.1 Kerr-like nonlinearity f(ρ)=ρf(\rho)=\rho

NLS equation with Kerr-like nonlinearity is completely integrable zs-73 , so the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule for solitons parameters can be derived from the Zakharov-Shabat linear spectral problem JLML-99 ; kku-02 . It is instructive to see, how these known results follow from our general approach not based on the complete integrability property. We assume here that the initial pulse is represented by a deep in the density or sound velocity distribution c=c0(x)c=c_{0}(x) and there is also some distribution of the initial flow velocity u=u0(x)u=u_{0}(x). Far enough from the initial pulse we have c0(x)cRc_{0}(x)\to c_{R}, u0(x)0u_{0}(x)\to 0 as |x||x|\to\infty. Naturally, these two distributions are equivalent to some initial distributions r±(0)(x)r_{\pm}^{(0)}(x) of the dispersionless Riemann invariants (see (14))

r±=u2±c.r_{\pm}=\frac{u}{2}\pm c. (64)

In this case with ρ=c2\rho=c^{2} Eqs. (62) can be written in the form

kc=4ck,ku=k2+4c2k,\begin{split}\frac{\partial k}{\partial c}=-4\frac{c}{k},\qquad\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}=-\frac{\sqrt{k^{2}+4c^{2}}}{k},\end{split} (65)

and they have the exact solution

k2=(qu)24c2,k^{2}=(q-u)^{2}-4c^{2}, (66)

where qq is an integration constant. If we write it in the form

k2=4(q2u2c)(q2u2+c)=4(λr+)(λr),k^{2}=4\left(\frac{q}{2}-\frac{u}{2}-c\right)\left(\frac{q}{2}-\frac{u}{2}+c\right)=4(\lambda-r_{+})(\lambda-r_{-}), (67)

where we have defined λ=q/2\lambda=q/2, then the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule (45) reads

x1(λn)x2(λn)(λnr+(0)(x))(λnr(0)(x))𝑑x=nπ,n=1,2,,N.\begin{split}\int_{x_{1}(\lambda_{n})}^{x_{2}(\lambda_{n})}\sqrt{(\lambda_{n}-r_{+}^{(0)}(x))(\lambda_{n}-r_{-}^{(0)}(x))}\,dx=n\pi,\\ n=1,2,\dots,N.\end{split} (68)

It coincides in the main approximation in the limit nn\to\infty with the asymptotic formula for the linear spectral problem eigenvalues (see JLML-99 ; kku-02 ). It is worth, however, notice that in better approximation developed in Ref. JLML-99 the integer nn should be replaced by n+1/2n+1/2 with n=1,2,,Nn=1,2,\ldots,N in agreement with the replacement nn+1/2n\mapsto n+1/2 mentioned below Eq. (35).

Since Eq. (66) represents the exact solution of Eqs. (65), it is correct for any values of kk and can be continued to the soliton region, so we obtain

k~2=4(λr+)(λr).\widetilde{k}^{2}=-4(\lambda-r_{+})(\lambda-r_{-}). (69)

In the asymptotic region, when solitons propagate along background with r±=±cRr_{\pm}=\pm c_{R}, we get for the half-width of the nn-th soliton the expression k~n2=4(cR2λn2)\widetilde{k}_{n}^{2}=4(c_{R}^{2}-\lambda_{n}^{2}). Consequently, according to the Stokes rule (46), its velocity is equal to

Vn=ω~(k~n)k~n=cR2k~24=λnV_{n}=\frac{\widetilde{\omega}(\widetilde{k}_{n})}{\widetilde{k}_{n}}=\sqrt{c_{R}^{2}-\frac{\widetilde{k}^{2}}{4}}=\lambda_{n} (70)

in agreement with the known results (see, e.g., Ref. kku-02 ).

The possibility to find the exact solution of Eqs. (62) in this case is related, apparently, with complete integrability of the NLS equation (57) with Kerr nonlinearity f(ρ)=ρf(\rho)=\rho. We will clarify this point in Section V.

IV.2 Non-Kerr nonlinearity

In the limit of large kck\gg c the right-hand side of Eq. (63) tends to zero as k2\propto k^{-2}, that is the condition (39) is fulfilled in this limit and we can find the asymptotic expression for the function k=k(c,u)k=k(c,u). Eqs. (62) in the limit of large kk can be written as

k2c2=2(1+c2ρdρdc2),ku=1.\frac{\partial k^{2}}{\partial c^{2}}=-2\left(1+\frac{c^{2}}{\rho}\frac{d\rho}{dc^{2}}\right),\qquad\frac{\partial k}{\partial u}=-1. (71)

The second equation gives k=qu+F(c2)k=q-u+F(c^{2}), where in the main approximation kqk0|u|,ck\approx q\sim k_{0}\gg|u|,c. We suppose that F(c2)c2F(c^{2})\sim c^{2}, so k2(qu)2+2qF(c2)k^{2}\approx(q-u)^{2}+2qF(c^{2}), where we have neglected small terms uFc3uF\sim c^{3} and F2c4F^{2}\sim c^{4}. Then the first equation (71) gives

F(c2)=1q(c2+0ρ(c)c2ρ𝑑ρ)c2qF(c^{2})=-\frac{1}{q}\left(c^{2}+\int_{0}^{\rho(c)}\frac{c^{2}}{\rho}d\rho\right)\sim\frac{c^{2}}{q}

in agreement with our supposition about the order of magnitude of FF. Thus, we obtain the asymptotic solution

k2=(qu)22(c2+0ρ(c)c2ρ𝑑ρ).k^{2}=(q-u)^{2}-2\left(c^{2}+\int_{0}^{\rho(c)}\frac{c^{2}}{\rho}d\rho\right). (72)

For a particular case of the nonlinearity function

f(ρ)=1γ1ργ1,whenc2=ργ1,ρ=c2/(γ1),f(\rho)=\frac{1}{\gamma-1}\rho^{\gamma-1},\quad\text{when}\quad c^{2}=\rho^{\gamma-1},\quad\rho=c^{2/(\gamma-1)}, (73)

we get

k2=(qu)22γγ1c2.k^{2}=(q-u)^{2}-\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma-1}c^{2}. (74)

If γ=2\gamma=2, that is f(ρ)=ρf(\rho)=\rho, this asymptotic formula reproduces the exact solution (66). The function k=k(c,u)k=k(c,u) defined by Eq. (74) can be used in the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule (45), so we get

x1(qn)x2(qn)(qnu0(x))22γγ1c02(x)𝑑x=2π(n+12),n=1,2,,N,\begin{split}&\int_{x_{1}(q_{n})}^{x_{2}(q_{n})}\sqrt{(q_{n}-u_{0}(x))^{2}-\frac{2\gamma}{\gamma-1}c_{0}^{2}(x)}\,\,dx\\ &=2\pi\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right),\qquad n=1,2,\ldots,N,\end{split} (75)

where we have made the replacement nn+1/2n\mapsto n+1/2. As a result, we obtain a set of parameters qnq_{n} for solitons emerging from the pulse with given initial distributions c=c0(x),u=u0(x)c=c_{0}(x),u=u_{0}(x). To relate qnq_{n} with velocities of these solitons, we should turn to the simple-wave solution of the corresponding equation (30).

The problem of evolution of a step-like discontinuity of the simple-wave type was studied in much detail in Ref. hoefer-14 by the method of Ref. el-05 . The solution of Eq. (30) found there can be written in the form

k2=4c2(α2(c,q¯)1),k^{2}=4c^{2}(\alpha^{2}(c,\overline{q})-1), (76)

where the function α=α(c,q¯)\alpha=\alpha(c,\overline{q}) is defined in implicit form in our notation by the formula

cq¯=(21+α)γ13γ5(γ+13γ+2(γ1)α)2(γ2)3γ5.\frac{c}{\overline{q}}=\left(\frac{2}{1+\alpha}\right)^{\frac{\gamma-1}{3\gamma-5}}\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{3-\gamma+2(\gamma-1)\alpha}\right)^{\frac{2(\gamma-2)}{3\gamma-5}}. (77)

In the limit cq¯c\ll\overline{q} we have α1\alpha\gg 1, so we obtain the series expansion

cq¯=β(γ)(1α1γ11α2+γ23γ+64(γ1)21α3+),\frac{c}{\overline{q}}=\beta(\gamma)\left(\frac{1}{\alpha}-\frac{1}{\gamma-1}\cdot\frac{1}{\alpha^{2}}+\frac{\gamma^{2}-3\gamma+6}{4(\gamma-1)^{2}}\cdot\frac{1}{\alpha^{3}}+\ldots\right), (78)

where

β(γ)=23γ3γ5(γ+1γ1)2(γ2)3γ5.\beta(\gamma)=2^{\frac{3-\gamma}{3\gamma-5}}\left(\frac{\gamma+1}{\gamma-1}\right)^{\frac{2(\gamma-2)}{3\gamma-5}}. (79)

Inversion of this series and substitution of the result into Eq. (76) yield with necessary accuracy

k2(2q¯β)24γ1(2q¯β)c+(4(γ1)22γ12)c2,cq¯.\begin{split}k^{2}\approx&(2\overline{q}\beta)^{2}-\frac{4}{\gamma-1}(2\overline{q}\beta)c\\ &+\left(\frac{4}{(\gamma-1)^{2}}-\frac{2}{\gamma-1}-2\right)c^{2},\qquad c\ll\overline{q}.\end{split} (80)

This asymptotic expression should be matched with Eq. (74) for the simple wave pulses.

The dispersionless Riemann invariants (14) in our case (73) are equal to

r±=u2±cγ1.r_{\pm}=\frac{u}{2}\pm\frac{c}{\gamma-1}. (81)

We consider the asymptotic train of right-propagating solitons along the background with

r=u2cγ1=cRγ1=const,r_{-}=\frac{u}{2}-\frac{c}{\gamma-1}=-\frac{c_{R}}{\gamma-1}=\mathrm{const},

where ccRc\to c_{R}, u0u\to 0 as |x||x|\to\infty. Hence, we have to substitute

u=2γ1(ccR)u=\frac{2}{\gamma-1}(c-c_{R}) (82)

into Eq. (74) to obtain

k2=(q+2cRγ1)24γ1(q+2cRγ1)c+(4(γ1)22γ12)c2,cq.\begin{split}k^{2}=&\left(q+\frac{2c_{R}}{\gamma-1}\right)^{2}-\frac{4}{\gamma-1}\left(q+\frac{2c_{R}}{\gamma-1}\right)c\\ &+\left(\frac{4}{(\gamma-1)^{2}}-\frac{2}{\gamma-1}-2\right)c^{2},\qquad c\ll q.\end{split} (83)

This expression coincides with Eq. (80) for

q¯=12β(q+2cRγ1).\overline{q}=\frac{1}{2\beta}\left(q+\frac{2c_{R}}{\gamma-1}\right). (84)

In the solitonic region Eq. (76) gives

k~2=4c2(1α2(c,q¯)),\widetilde{k}^{2}=4c^{2}(1-\alpha^{2}(c,\overline{q})), (85)

so the asymptotic velocities of solitons propagating along a uniform background with c=cRc=c_{R}, u=0u=0 are equal to

Vn=ω~(k~n)k~n=cR2k~n24=cRα(cR,12β(qn+2cRγ1)),\begin{split}V_{n}&=\frac{\widetilde{\omega}(\widetilde{k}_{n})}{\widetilde{k}_{n}}=\sqrt{c_{R}^{2}-\frac{\widetilde{k}_{n}^{2}}{4}}\\ &=c_{R}\alpha\left(c_{R},\frac{1}{2\beta}\left(q_{n}+\frac{2c_{R}}{\gamma-1}\right)\right),\end{split} (86)

where qnq_{n} are to be obtained from the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule (75).

Soliton’s velocity VV is related with minimal value ρm\rho_{m} of the density at its center by the formula (see Ref. ks-09 )

V2=2ρm(ρRρm)2ρmρR[f(ρR)f(ρ)]𝑑ρ,V^{2}=\frac{2\rho_{m}}{(\rho_{R}-\rho_{m})^{2}}\int_{\rho_{m}}^{\rho_{R}}\left[f(\rho_{R})-f(\rho)\right]d\rho, (87)

so when the soliton’s velocity is known, we can easily find the amplitude of this soliton.

Let us illustrate the theory by a concrete example γ=3\gamma=3, when β=2\beta=\sqrt{2} and the function α=α(c)\alpha=\alpha(c) can be found in the explicit form (see Ref. hoefer-14 ),

α(c,q¯)=12(1+8(q¯c)21).\alpha(c,\overline{q})=\frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{1+8\left(\frac{\overline{q}}{c}\right)^{2}}-1\right). (88)

As a result, we obtain a simple formula

Vn=12(cR2+(cR+qn)2cR).V_{n}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\sqrt{c_{R}^{2}+(c_{R}+q_{n})^{2}}-c_{R}\right). (89)
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Distribution of c(x)c(x) in the right-propagating soliton train evolved from the pulse with the initial distributions (90) at t=1000t=1000.

We compared these analytical predictions with results of the exact numerical solution of the gNLS equation (57) with f(ρ)=ρ2/2f(\rho)=\rho^{2}/2 (γ=3\gamma=3) for the initial distributions

c0(x)=10.9cosh2(x/20),u0(x)=0.c_{0}(x)=1-\frac{0.9}{\cosh^{2}(x/20)},\qquad u_{0}(x)=0. (90)

In this case the initial pulse evolves into two symmetrical right- and left-propagating dark soliton trains and a typical distribution of c(x)c(x) at t=1000t=1000 is shown in Fig. 1 for the right-propagating solitons. If we assume that all the solitons started their motion at x=0x=0 at the moment t=0t=0 with asymptotic velocities VnV_{n}, then their coordinates at the moment tt are equal to xn(t)=t(1+(1+qn)21)/2x_{n}(t)=t(\sqrt{1+(1+q_{n})^{2}}-1)/2. This formula allows one to find qnq_{n} from numerical values of the coordinates,

qnnum=(2xn(t)/t+1)211.q_{n}^{\text{num}}=\sqrt{\left(2x_{n}(t)/t+1\right)^{2}-1}-1. (91)

These values can be compared with the values qnB.-S.q_{n}^{\text{B.-S.}} found from the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule (75) in a particular case of the initial distributions (90), and the results are shown in Fig. 2, where crosses correspond to qnB.-S.q_{n}^{\text{B.-S.}} and dots to qnnumq_{n}^{\text{num}}. As one can see, the agreement is quite good even for small values of nn.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Parameters qnB.-S.q_{n}^{\text{B.-S.}} obtained from the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule (crosses) and qnnumq_{n}^{\text{num}} obtained from the numerical solution (red dots).

In case of f(ρ)=ρ2/2f(\rho)=\rho^{2}/2 Eq. (87) gives the expression for the minimal density at the nn-th soliton

ρm(n)=[ρR2+34(ρR2+(qn+ρR)2ρR)2]1/2ρR.\rho_{m}^{(n)}=\left[\rho_{R}^{2}+\frac{3}{4}\left(\sqrt{\rho_{R}^{2}+(q_{n}+\rho_{R})^{2}}-\rho_{R}\right)^{2}\right]^{1/2}-\rho_{R}. (92)

This formula also agrees very well with the minimal values of density at centers of solitons shown in Fig. 1.

V Connection with the theory of completely integrable equations

As we saw in the preceding Section, there is sharp difference between the cases with γ=2\gamma=2 and γ2\gamma\neq 2: if γ=2\gamma=2 the derivatives (62) commute and we get the exact solution (66) of these equations, whereas if γ2\gamma\neq 2 we can only obtain the asymptotic solution (74) correct in the limit q|u|,cq\gg|u|,c. It seems very plausible that such a difference between two situations is related with the complete integrability of the NLS equation (57) with f(ρ)=ρf(\rho)=\rho, (γ=2\gamma=2). Here we shall consider this relationship for the class of completely integrable equations which belong to the Ablowitz-Kaup-Newell-Segur (AKNS) scheme akns-74 .

Usually the AKNS scheme is formulated in 2×22\times 2-matrix form, but for discussion of its quasiclassical limit it is convenient to use its scalar form (see Ref. ak-02 ). So we assume that an integrable equation under consideration can be written as a compatibility condition of two linear equations

ϕxx=𝒜ϕ,ϕt=12xϕ+ϕx\phi_{xx}=\mathcal{A}\phi,\qquad\phi_{t}=-\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{B}_{x}\phi+\mathcal{B}\phi_{x} (93)

for the function ϕ\phi, where 𝒜\mathcal{A} and \mathcal{B} depend on the wave variables (let them be ρ\rho and uu) and the spectral parameter λ\lambda. Then the compatibility condition (ϕxx)t=(ϕt)xx(\phi_{xx})_{t}=(\phi_{t})_{xx} leads to the equation

𝒜t2x𝒜𝒜x+12xxx=0,\mathcal{A}_{t}-2\mathcal{B}_{x}\mathcal{A}-\mathcal{B}\mathcal{A}_{x}+\frac{1}{2}\mathcal{B}_{xxx}=0, (94)

which must be fulfilled for any values of λ\lambda, so we get the nonlinear equations under consideration. This provides a number of useful relations for solutions without actual finding them. In particular, the first Eq. (93) has two basis solutions ϕ+,ϕ\phi_{+},\phi_{-}, so we define the function

g=ϕ+ϕ,g=\phi_{+}\phi_{-}, (95)

which satisfies the equations

gxxx2𝒜xg4𝒜gx=0,gt=gxxg.g_{xxx}-2\mathcal{A}_{x}{g}-4\mathcal{A}{g}_{x}=0,\qquad{g}_{t}=\mathcal{B}{g}_{x}-\mathcal{B}_{x}{g}. (96)

The first one is readily integrated to give

12ggxx14gx2𝒜g2=P,\frac{1}{2}{g}{g}_{xx}-\frac{1}{4}{g}_{x}^{2}-\mathcal{A}{g}^{2}={P}, (97)

where PP is an integration constant. Then the second Eq. (96) yields

(Pg)t=(Pg)x,\left(\frac{\sqrt{P}}{{g}}\right)_{t}=\left(\frac{\sqrt{P}}{{g}}\mathcal{B}\right)_{x}, (98)

where we have introduced the constant factor P\sqrt{P} under the differentiation signs to fix the asymptotic behavior of gg in the limit λ\lambda\to\infty. Eq. (98) can serve as a generating function of conservation laws of our nonlinear wave equations and averaging of this generating function provides a convenient method of derivation of the Whitham modulation equations kamch-94 ; kamch-04 . Solutions of the linear equations (93) can also be expressed in terms of the function gg (see, e.g., kku-02 ; ak-01 )

ϕ±=gexp(±ixPg𝑑x).\phi_{\pm}=\sqrt{g}\exp\left(\pm i\int^{x}\frac{\sqrt{P}}{g}\,dx\right). (99)

Now we can turn to the discussion of the quasiclassical limit of these equations.

Let us study transformation of a large-scale pulse to soliton trains. This transformation can be represented as formation and evolution of dispersive shock waves (see, e.g., kamch-21a ). According to Gurevich and Pitaevskii gp-73 , such an evolution can be represented as a slow change of modulation parameters in the periodic solution of equations under consideration what leads to the slow variation of PP as well as parameters in gg. Nevertheless, following to the Whitham method whitham ; Whitham-74 in Krichever’s formulation krichever-88 (see also Ref. dn-93 ), we assume that expressions (98) and (99) remain correct during evolution of ρ\rho and uu from the initial smooth distributions to the asymptotic soliton trains. When ρ\rho and uu are still smooth functions, the function gg is also smooth, so the terms with derivatives in Eq. (97) can be neglected and we obtain

Pg𝒜¯k¯(ρ,u,λ),\frac{\sqrt{P}}{g}\approx\sqrt{-\overline{\mathcal{A}}}\equiv\overline{k}(\rho,u,\lambda), (100)

where 𝒜¯=𝒜¯(ρ,u)\overline{\mathcal{A}}=\overline{\mathcal{A}}(\rho,u) is to be obtained from 𝒜\mathcal{A} in the same approximation with omitted derivatives of ρ\rho and uu. Then we arrive at a quasiclassical limit of Eq. (99),

ϕ±gexp(±ixk¯(ρ,u,λ)𝑑x).\phi_{\pm}\approx\sqrt{g}\exp\left(\pm i\int^{x}\overline{k}(\rho,u,\lambda)\,dx\right). (101)

The condition that ϕ±\phi_{\pm} are single-valued functions of xx gives the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule (see, e.g., karpman-73 ; JLML-99 ; kku-02 )

x1(λn)x2(λn)k¯(ρ0(x),u0(x),λn)𝑑x=π(n+12),n=1,2,,\begin{split}\int_{x_{1}(\lambda_{n})}^{x_{2}(\lambda_{n})}\overline{k}(\rho_{0}(x),u_{0}(x),\lambda_{n})\,dx=\pi\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right),\\ n=1,2,\dots,\end{split} (102)

where x1(λn),x2(λn){x_{1}(\lambda_{n})},{x_{2}(\lambda_{n})} are the turning points. Comparison with Eq. (45) gives the expression for the wave number kk in our approach,

k(ρ,u)=2k¯(ρ,u)=2𝒜¯(ρ,u),k(\rho,u)=2\overline{k}(\rho,u)=2\sqrt{-\overline{\mathcal{A}}(\rho,u)}, (103)

as well as some relationship between the integration constant qq in our theory and the spectral parameter λ\lambda in the AKNS scheme. Consequently, in case of nonlinear wave equations, which are completely integrable in the AKNS scheme, we obtain the expression for the function k=k(ρ,u)k=k(\rho,u) without solving Eqs. (38).

Substitution of P/g=k/2\sqrt{P}/g=k/2 into Eq. (98) gives the equation

kt(k¯)x=0,k_{t}-(k\overline{\mathcal{B}})_{x}=0, (104)

where ¯(ρ,u)\overline{\mathcal{B}}(\rho,u) is obtained from \mathcal{B} in the same quasiclassical approximation. This equation must coincide with the number of waves conservation law (2), so we get

ωk=¯.\frac{\omega}{k}=-\overline{\mathcal{B}}. (105)

As we see, the quasiclassical limits of the functions 𝒜\mathcal{A} and \mathcal{B} are related with the dispersion relation ω=ω(k,ρ,u)\omega=\omega(k,\rho,u) of linear waves and the function k=k(ρ,u,q)k=k(\rho,u,q) which can be obtained by solving Eqs. (38) if these derivatives commute. From this point of view, the condition of commutativity of derivatives in Eqs. (38) can be considered as an “integrability test” of nonlinear equations in framework of the AKNS scheme. If this test is fulfilled, then equations

𝒜¯(ρ,u,q)=14k2(ρ,u,q),¯(ρ,u,q)=ω(k(ρ,u,q),ρ,u)k(ρ,u,q)\begin{split}\overline{\mathcal{A}}(\rho,u,q)&=-\frac{1}{4}k^{2}(\rho,u,q),\\ \overline{\mathcal{B}}(\rho,u,q)&=-\frac{\omega(k(\rho,u,q),\rho,u)}{k(\rho,u,q)}\end{split} (106)

give us the quasiclassical limit of the functions 𝒜\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B} in the Lax pair (93) and qq plays the role of the spectral parameter.

Let us apply the above consideration to the NLS equation (57) with f(ρ)=ρf(\rho)=\rho. In this case we have (see Ref. alber-93 )

𝒜=(λ+iψx2ψ)2+ψψ(ψx2ψ)x,=λ+i2ψxψ.\begin{split}\mathcal{A}&=-\left(\lambda+\frac{i\psi_{x}}{2\psi}\right)^{2}+\psi^{*}\psi-\left(\frac{\psi_{x}}{2\psi}\right)_{x},\\ \mathcal{B}&=-\lambda+\frac{i}{2}\frac{\psi_{x}}{\psi}.\end{split} (107)

The substitution of Eq. (58) and neglecting derivatives of ρ\rho and uu yield

𝒜¯=(λu2)2+ρ,¯=λu2.\overline{\mathcal{A}}=-\left(\lambda-\frac{u}{2}\right)^{2}+\rho,\qquad\overline{\mathcal{B}}=-\lambda-\frac{u}{2}. (108)

Then Eq. (103) gives k2=4[(λu/2)2ρ]k^{2}=4\left[(\lambda-u/2)^{2}-\rho\right] in agreement with Eq. (66) for q=2λq=2\lambda. Exclusion of λ\lambda from this equation and from Eq. (105), that is from ω=k(λ+u/2)\omega=k(\lambda+u/2), reproduces the dispersion relation (61).

VI Conclusion

The asymptotic method developed in this paper provides a simple way to finding parameters of solitons evolved from given initial distributions of wave variables for a wide class of nonintegrable nonlinear equations. Besides that, it presents a simple method of derivation of the asymptotic Bohr-Sommerfeld generalized rule for a linear spectral problem in framework of the AKNS scheme. Condition of commutativity of derivatives defined in Eqs. (38) or their generalizations (see Ref. sk-23 ) can be used as an ‘integrability test’: if they commute, then it is quite plausible that the nonlinear wave equations under consideration are completely integrable and Eqs. (106) give useful information about quasiclassical limit of functions defining the Lax pair in the scalar representation of the AKNS scheme. At last, the results of the paper can be used in discussions of problems about propagation of high-frequency wave packets along non-uniform and evolving with time background, as it was demonstrated in Ref. sk-23 .

Acknowledgements.
I thank L. F. Calazans de Brito and D. V. Shaykin for useful discussions. This research is funded by the research project FFUU-2021-0003 of the Institute of Spectroscopy of the Russian Academy of Sciences and by the Foundation for the Advancement of Theoretical Physics and Mathematics “BASIS”.

References

  • (1) V. E. Zakharov, S. V. Manakov, S. P. Novikov, and L. P. Pitaevskii, The Theory of Solitons: The Inverse Scattering Method, (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) (translation: Consultants Bureau, 1984).
  • (2) M. J. Ablowitz, H. Segure, Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform, (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1981).
  • (3) A. C. Newell, Solitons in Mathematics and Physics, (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1985).
  • (4) S. C. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, R. M. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett., 19, 1095 (1967).
  • (5) V. I. Karpman, Phys. Lett. A, 25, 708 (1967).
  • (6) V. I. Karpman, Non-Linear Waves in Dispersive Media, (Nauka, Moscow, 1973) (English translation: Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975).
  • (7) S. Jin, C. D. Levermore, D. W. McLaughlin, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 52, 613 (1999).
  • (8) A. M. Kamchatnov, R. A. Kraenkel, B. A. Umarov, Phys. Rev. E 66, 036609 (2002).
  • (9) V. E. Zakharov, A. B. Shabat, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 64, 1627 (1973) [Sov. Phys. JETP, 37, 823 (1973)].
  • (10) A. V. Gurevich and L. P. Pitaevskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 65, 590 (1973) [Sov. Phys.-JETP, 38, 291 (1974)].
  • (11) G. B. Whitham, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, A 283, 238 (1965).
  • (12) G. B. Whitham, Linear and Nonlinear Waves, (Wiley Interscience, New York, 1974).
  • (13) A. V. Gurevich and L. P. Pitaevskii, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 93, 871 (1987) [Sov. Phys.-JETP, 93, 871 (1987)].
  • (14) A. M. Kamchatnov, Usp. Fiz. Nauk., 191, 52-87 (2021) [Phys.–Uspekhi, 64, 48-82 (2021)].
  • (15) C. Lanczos, The Variational Principles of Mechanics, (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1962).
  • (16) L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Fluid Mechanics, (Pergamon, Oxford, 1987).
  • (17) G. A. El, Chaos, 15, 037103 (2005).
  • (18) A. M. Kamchatnov, Chaos 30, 123148 (2020).
  • (19) A. M. Kamchatnov, D. V. Shaykin, Phys. Fluids, 33, 052120 (2021).
  • (20) A. M. Kamchatnov, Phys. Rev. E 99, 012203 (2019).
  • (21) A. M. Kamchatnov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 159, 76 (2021) [JETP, 132, 63 (2021)].
  • (22) L. F. Calazans de Brito, A. M. Kamchatnov, Phys. Rev. E 104, 054203 (2021).
  • (23) G. A. El, A. Gammal, E. G. Khamis, R. A. Kraenkel, A. M. Kamchatnov, Phys. Rev. A 76, 053813 (2007).
  • (24) G. A. El, R. H. J. Grimshaw, N. F. Smyth, Physica D, 237, 2423 (2008).
  • (25) M. D. Maiden, N. A. Franco, E. G. Webb, G. A. El, and M. A. Hoefer, J. Fluid Mech. 883, A10 (2020).
  • (26) H. Poincaré, Les méthodes nouvelles de la Mécanique céleste, t. III, (Paris, Gauthier-Villar, 1899).
  • (27) É. Cartan, Leçons sur les invariants intégraux, (Hermann, Paris, 1922).
  • (28) H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994).
  • (29) G. G. Stokes, Mathematical and Physical Papers, Vol. V, p. 163 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1905).
  • (30) O. Akimoto and K. Ikeda, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 10, 425 (1977).
  • (31) S. A. Darmanyan, A. M. Kamchatnov, M. Neviére, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 123, 997 (2003) [JETP, 96, 876 (2003)].
  • (32) F. R. Gantmacher, Lectures in Analytical Mechanics, (Moscow, Nauka, 1966) (English translation: Mir, Moscow, 1975).
  • (33) L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, Pergamon, Oxford (1981).
  • (34) V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, (N. Y., Springer,1989).
  • (35) D. V. Shaykin, A. M. Kamchatnov, Phys. Fluids (accepted, 2023), preprint arXiv:2303.16592 (2023).
  • (36) M. A. Hoefer, J. Nonlinear Sci., 24, 525 (2014).
  • (37) A. M. Kamchatnov and M. Salerno, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 42, 185303 (2009).
  • (38) M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, H. Segur, Stud. Appl. Math. 53, 249 (1974).
  • (39) A. M. Kamchatnov and R. A. Kraenkel, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 35, L13 (2002).
  • (40) A. M. Kamchatnov, Phys. Lett. A, 186, 387 (1994).
  • (41) A. M. Kamchatnov, Physica D, 188, 247 (2004).
  • (42) A. M. Kamchatnov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen., 34, L441 (2001).
  • (43) I. M. Krichever, Funk. Analiz. Prilozh. 22, 37 (1988) [Funct. Anal. Appl., 22, 200 (1988)].
  • (44) B. A. Dubrovin, S. P. Novikov, Sov. Sci. Rev. C. Math. Phys. 9, 1 (1993).
  • (45) S. J. Alber, Complex deformations of integrable Hamiltonians over generalized Jacobi varieties, in Nonlinear Processes in Physics, eds A. S. Fokas, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, and V. E. Zakharov, p.6 (Berlin, Springer, 1993).