This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Asymmetric jet shapes with 2D jet tomography

Yu-Xin Xiao Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China    Yayun He School of Physics and Optoelectronics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China    Long-Gang Pang Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China    Hanzhong Zhang [email protected] Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Nuclear Science, Institute of Quantum Matter, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory of Quantum Matter, Southern Nuclear Science Computing Center, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China    Xin-Nian Wang [email protected] Key Laboratory of Quark & Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle Physics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China Nuclear Science Division, MS 70R0319, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) jet tomography is a promising tool to study jet medium modification in high-energy heavy-ion collisions. It combines gradient (transverse) and longitudinal jet tomography for selection of events with localized initial jet production positions. It exploits the transverse asymmetry and energy loss that depend, respectively, on the transverse gradient and jet path length inside the quark-gluon plasma (QGP). In this study, we employ the 2D jet tomography to study medium modification of the jet shape of γ\gamma-triggered jets within the linear Boltzmann transport (LBT) model for jet propagation in heavy-ion collisions. Our results show that jets with small transverse asymmetry (ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}}) or small γ\gamma-jet asymmetry (xJγ=pTjet/pTγx_{J\gamma}=p_{T}^{\rm jet}/p_{T}^{\gamma}) exhibit a broader jet shape than those with larger ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}} or xJγx_{J\gamma}, since the former are produced at the center and go through longer path lengths while the later are off-center and close to the surface of the QGP fireball. In events with finite values of ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}}, jet shapes are asymmetric with respect to the event plane. Hard partons at the core of the jet are deflected away from the denser region while soft partons from the medium response at large angles flow toward the denser part of QGP. Future experimental measurements of these asymmetric features of the jet shape can be used to study the transport properties of jets and medium responses.

I INTRODUCTION

A few microseconds after the Big Bang, the Universe was filled with a novel state of matter called quark-gluon plasma (QGP) that consists of deconfined quarks and gluons. In the past two decades, relativistic heavy-ion collision experiments have been carried out at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at BNL and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN to produce such hot and dense QGP matter and study its properties.

Together with the formation of QGP, large transverse momentum partons (pTp_{T}) are also produced in the early stage of relativistic heavy-ion collisions that will traverse the QGP and encounter multiple scattering with quarks and gluons inside the medium. These scatterings will also induce gluon bremsstrahlung and cause a significant amount of energy loss to the propagating parton, leading to a phenomenon called jet quenching Gyulassy and Plumer (1990); Wang and Gyulassy (1992); Qin and Wang (2015). Large transverse momentum (pTp_{T}) hadrons and jets are significantly suppressed due to jet quenching in heavy-ion collisions, as compared to large pTp_{T} hadrons and jets in proton-proton collisions. Jet quenching has been observed in experiments by PHENIX Adare et al. (2010) and STAR Adler et al. (2002) Collaboration at RHIC, ALICE Abelev et al. (2013), ATLAS Aad et al. (2012) and CMS Chatrchyan et al. (2012); Sirunyan et al. (2018) Collaboration at LHC. In addition, large pTp_{T} dihadrons, γ\gamma-hadrons and dijets are also suppressed and exhibit azimuthal decorrelation Wang and Wang (2002); Vitev (2004); Zhang et al. (2007, 2009); Vitev and Zhang (2010). Full jet structure is also modified Qin and Muller (2011); He et al. (2012); Young et al. (2011); Barata et al. (2023a) by the QGP medium as observed at both RHIC and LHC Adams et al. (2006); Casalderrey-Solana et al. (2011); Aamodt et al. (2010); Aad et al. (2010); Sirunyan et al. (2019).

Theoretical studies have revealed that the strength of jet quenching is proportional to jet transport coefficient q^\hat{q}, which is defined as the transverse momentum squared per unit length along the parton trajectory Baier et al. (1997a, b, 1998); Guo and Wang (2000); Wang and Guo (2001); Casalderrey-Solana and Wang (2008); Majumder (2012). This coefficient is directly related to the medium gluon density. In high-energy heavy-ion collisions, the spatial distribution of gluon density and the jet transport coefficient are not uniform inside the QGP fireball. They reach their highest values in the central region of the QGP where the temperature is also the highest. The initial spatial distributions are given by the nuclear geometry of two colliding nuclei and the time evolution can be determined from hydrodynamic model of heavy-ion collisions. Jet tomographic techniques have been developed that exploit these non-uniform distributions of the medium and jet quenching strength to reveal information about the locations of the initial jet production.

The longitudinal tomography was first proposed in Refs. Zhang et al. (2007, 2009) to localize the initial jet production positions along the direction of jet propagation in the study of dihadron and γ\gamma-hadron spectra in heavy-ion collisions. In the case of γ\gamma-jet processes, low pTp_{T} γ\gamma-associated hadrons are produced primarily through the fragmentation of γ\gamma-jets created in the central region of the medium (volume emission) after losing some amount of energy. The high pTp_{T} γ\gamma-associated hadrons, however, mainly come from γ\gamma-jets initially produced in the outer corona region (surface emission) that suffer little or no energy loss. Furthermore, a significant fraction of the surface emission is tangential to the medium surface. In a more recent study He et al. (2020), a transverse or gradient jet tomography was developed. In this case, an asymmetry observable ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}} caused by the transverse gradient of the medium for high pTp_{T} hadrons inside a jet is introduced to localize the initial position of jet production perpendicular to the jet propagation direction. Two-dimensional (2D) jet tomography combines longitudinal and transverse tomography to localize the initial jet production positions in the transverse plane. Such 2D jet tomography has been applied to select special classes of events with localized region of initial jet production so that signals of jet-induced medium response are enhanced Yang et al. (2021, 2023a).

In this work, we study medium-modified γ\gamma-jet shape in events of jet production selected with transverse and longitudinal jet tomography in heavy-ion collisions, using the linear Boltzmann transport (LBT) model Li et al. (2011); He et al. (2015); Cao et al. (2016); Wang and Zhu (2013); Cao and Wang (2021); Luo et al. (2023) for jet transport simulations in the QGP medium. We consider in particular the asymmetric jet shape caused by flow and gradient of the hot QGP medium along the path of jet propagation in events selected with the 2D jet tomography.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Sec. II introduces the LBT model and the γ\gamma-jet shape in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions. Sec. III describes the technique of transverse and longitudinal tomography for γ\gamma-jet events. The numerical results for the medium-modified jet shape via transverse and longitudinal tomography are presented in Sec. IV. In Sec. V, we investigate the asymmetric jet shape in events with special class of jet propagation path relative to the geometry of the dense QGP medium as selected by 2D jet tomography. A summary is given in Sec. VI.

II Jet shape in the LBT model

The linear Boltzmann transport (LBT) model Li et al. (2011); He et al. (2015); Cao et al. (2016); Wang and Zhu (2013); Cao and Wang (2021) was developed to study jet propagation in quark-gluon plasma in heavy-ion collisions, and to describe not only parton energy loss but also jet-induced medium excitation. It has been used to describe experimental data on suppression of single hadrons Cao et al. (2016), single jets He et al. (2019), and γ\gamma-hadron Chen et al. (2018) and γ\gamma-jet correlations Luo et al. (2018) in heavy-ion collisions at both RHIC and LHC energies.

The transport of jet shower and recoil partons is described by the linear Boltzmann equations,

pafa=i=b,c,dd3pi2Ei(2π)3γb2(fcfdfafb)|abcd|2×S2(s^,t^,u^)2π4δ4(pa+pbpcpd)+inelastic,\displaystyle\begin{split}p_{a}&\cdot\partial f_{a}=\int\prod_{i=b,c,d}\frac{d^{3}p_{i}}{2E_{i}(2\pi)^{3}}\frac{\gamma_{b}}{2}(f_{c}f_{d}-f_{a}f_{b})|\mathcal{M}_{ab\rightarrow cd}|^{2}\\ &\times S_{2}(\hat{s},\hat{t},\hat{u}){2\pi}^{4}\delta^{4}(p_{a}+p_{b}-p_{c}-p_{d})+{\rm inelastic},\end{split} (1)

where |abcd||\mathcal{M}_{ab\rightarrow cd}| is the leading-order elastic scattering amplitude that depends on the Mandelstam variables s^,t^\hat{s},\hat{t}, and u^\hat{u}. fi=(2π)3δ3(ppi)δ3(xxivit)(i=a,c)f_{i}=(2\pi)^{3}\delta^{3}(\vec{p}-\vec{p}_{i})\delta^{3}(\vec{x}-\vec{x_{i}}-\vec{v_{i}}t)(i=a,c) is the phase space density for jet shower partons before and after scattering. fi=1/(epiu/T±1)(i=b,d)f_{i}=1/(e^{p_{i}\cdot u/T}\pm 1)(i=b,d) is the phase space distribution of thermal partons in the QGP medium with local temperature TT and fluid 4-velocity uu. The regularization factor,

S2(s^,t^,u^)=θ(s^2μD2)θ(s^+μD2t^μD2),S_{2}(\hat{s},\hat{t},\hat{u})=\theta(\hat{s}\geq 2\mu_{D}^{2})\theta(-\hat{s}+\mu_{D}^{2}\leq\hat{t}\leq-\mu_{D}^{2}), (2)

is used to regulate the collinear divergence in |abcd||\mathcal{M}_{ab\rightarrow cd}|, and μD2=3g2T2/2\mu_{D}^{2}=3g^{2}T^{2}/2 is the Debye screening mass.

The description of inelastic processes of induced gluon radiation in the LBT model is based on the high-twist approach Guo and Wang (2000); Zhang et al. (2004) with the radiative gluon spectrum,

dNgadzdk2dτ=6αsPa(z)k4π(k2+z2m2)4pup0q^a(x)sin2ττi2τf,\frac{dN^{a}_{g}}{dzdk^{2}_{\perp}d\tau}=\frac{6\alpha_{s}P_{a}(z)k^{4}_{\perp}}{\pi(k^{2}_{\perp}+z^{2}m^{2})^{4}}\frac{p\cdot u}{p_{0}}\hat{q}_{a}(x)\sin^{2}\frac{\tau-\tau_{i}}{2\tau_{f}}, (3)

where mm is the mass of the propagating parton aa, zz and kk_{\perp} are the energy fraction and transverse momentum of radiated gluon, respectively. αs\alpha_{s} is the strong coupling constant, and q^a\hat{q}_{a} is the jet transport coefficient, defined as the transverse momentum transfer squared per unit path for the parton aa traveling in the medium. Pa(z)P_{a}(z) is the splitting function for aa+ga\rightarrow a+g, and τf=2Ez(1z)/(k2+z2M2)\tau_{f}=2Ez(1-z)/(k^{2}_{\perp}+z^{2}M^{2}) is the formation time of the radiated gluon Luo et al. (2018). In LBT model, recoiled medium partons are also transported according to the Boltzmann equation, the same as jet shower partons, going through further elastic and inelastic scattering once they are produced. The depletion of the medium due to back-reaction is also taken into account through “negative” partons whose energy and momentum must be subtracted from the final observables. Recoil and “negative” partons are generally referred to as medium-response.

In this study, we employ the multi-phase transport (AMPT) model Lin et al. (2005) to generate the initial energy density distribution and collision geometry. These include the distribution of binary collisions NcollN_{\rm coll}, which is used to determine the initial positions of γ\gamma-jet production, as well as the initial energy density distribution that serves as the initial condition for CLVisc 3+1D viscous hydrodynamic evolution Pang et al. (2012, 2018) of the bulk QGP medium. PYTHIA 8 Sjostrand et al. (2006, 2008) is utilized to generate the momenta of the initial jet shower partons in γ\gamma-jet events. The LBT model is then employed to describe the propagation and transport of the jet shower partons inside the QGP medium whose evolution is provided by the CLVisc hydrodynamics with the initial condition given by the AMPT model. The information on local temperature and fluid four-velocity from the CLVisc hydrodynamics is used in LBT to determine the elastic and inelastic scattering rates. The initial time and freeze-out temperature in CLVisc hydrodynamics are set to τ0=0.2\tau_{0}=0.2 fm/c and Tf=137T_{f}=137 MeV, respectively, which also determine the beginning and end of the parton-medium interaction. We use the FastJet package (Cacciari et al., 2012; Cacciari and Salam, 2006) with the anti-ktk_{t} jet algorithm to reconstruct full jets using the partonic information of the final jets.

The jet shape is defined as the probability density of transverse momentum distribution inside a jet cone Sirunyan et al. (2019); Luo et al. (2018),

ρ(r)=1ΔriNjetpTi(r12Δr,r+12Δr)iNjetpTi(0,R),\rho(r)=\frac{1}{\Delta r}\frac{\sum_{i}^{N_{\rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(r-\frac{1}{2}\Delta r,r+\frac{1}{2}\Delta r)}{\sum_{i}^{N_{\rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(0,R)}, (4)

calculated from the parton distribution inside the reconstructed jets, where the distance rr between the track partons and the jet axis is defined as r=(ηηjet)2+(ϕϕjet)2r=\sqrt{\left(\eta-\eta_{\rm jet}\right)^{2}+\left(\phi-\phi_{\rm jet}\right)^{2}} in the plane of pseudo-rapidity η\eta and azimuthal angle ϕ\phi. The total energy from the ii-th jet in the circular annulus with inner radius r1=rΔr/2r_{1}=r-\Delta r/2 and outer radius r2=r+Δr/2r_{2}=r+\Delta r/2 is defined as pTi(r1,r2)=assocΔrpTassocp_{T}^{i}(r_{1},r_{2})=\sum_{{\rm assoc}\in\Delta r}p_{T}^{\rm assoc} where Δr=r2r1\Delta r=r_{2}-r_{1} is the width of the annulus. Additionally, the total energy inside the jet cone with a radius RR for the ii-th jet is given by pTi(0,R)p_{T}^{i}(0,R). The summation is over the total number of jet NjetN_{\rm jet} analyzed.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) The ratio of the γ\gamma-jet shape between 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions as a function of rr at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV, from LBT calculations (red-solid) as compared with the CMS data (black-squares) Sirunyan et al. (2019).

In the following calculations, we select the trigger photon with pTγ>p_{T}^{\gamma}> 60 GeV/cc in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. The cone size of the γ\gamma-triggered jets is set as R=0.3R=0.3, and the lower threshold of transverse momentum for the jets is set at pTjet>30p_{T}^{\rm jet}>30 GeV/c, with associated partons selected with pTassoc>1p_{T}^{\rm assoc}>1 GeV/cc. The pseudorapidities for the γ\gamma and jets are constrained within |ηγ|<1.44|\eta_{\gamma}|<1.44 and |ηjet|<1.6|\eta_{\rm jet}|<1.6, and their azimuthal angle differences |Δϕjγ||\Delta\phi_{j\gamma}| are restricted to be larger than (7/8)π(7/8)\pi.

Shown in Fig. 1 is the ratio of γ\gamma-jet shape in 0-10% Pb+Pb over that in p+p collisions as a function of rr from the LBT model simulations as compared with the CMS data Sirunyan et al. (2019). The LBT result is in good agreement with experimental data. The numerical ratio indicates an enhancement at large r region, suggesting that a significant fraction of the transverse momentum is transported to larger angles with respect to the jet axis in Pb+Pb relative to p+p collisions. This is partially due to radiated gluons, but most of the enhancement is caused by jet-induced medium response at large angles Luo et al. (2018). This medium modification of the jet shape can also be described by the coupled LBT hydro model Chen et al. (2018); Yang et al. (2021, 2023b) where the soft mode of jet-induced medium-response is modeled through hydrodynamics that couples to the Boltzmann transport of hard partons.

III Transverse and longitudinal jet tomography of heavy-ion collisions

The path-length dependence of the parton energy loss during the jet propagation within the QGP medium can be utilized to localize the initial jet production positions along the longitudinal direction, a technique known as longitudinal jet tomography Zhang et al. (2009). Additionally, non-zero spatial gradients of the parton transport coefficient q^\hat{q} perpendicular to their propagation directions arise due to temperature gradients in the QGP fireball. Parton propagation in such a non-uniform medium leads to an asymmetrical transverse momentum distribution He et al. (2020); Fu et al. (2023); Barata et al. (2023b, c) of final state hadrons. In a class of events with a given transverse asymmetry, a jet observable defined to characterize the asymmetric transverse momentum distribution of hadrons or partons inside a jet, the distribution of the initial jet transverse positions is found localized in a region with a corresponding transverse gradient of the jet transport coefficient. The average transverse position of the initial jet production has a monotonic dependence on the transverse asymmetry, therefore, enabling transverse jet tomography. By considering both longitudinal and transverse jet tomography, one is able to localize the jet production positions in the transverse plane, resulting in a 2D jet tomography Yang et al. (2021, 2023a).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) Illustration of the γ\gamma-jet configuration relative to the event plane and the azimuthal angle distribution of the jet shape inside the jet cone.

In our study here, we consider the event plane along the xx-axis and select the direction of the trigger photon to be along the negative xx-axis, while the correlated jets propagate approximately along the positive xx-axis as illustrated in Fig. 2. The asymmetry ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}} used for transverse jet tomography is defined as He et al. (2020),

ANn=ad3rd3kfa(k,r)Sign(kn)ad3rd3kfa(k,r),A_{N}^{\vec{n}}=\frac{\sum_{a}\int d^{3}rd^{3}kf_{a}\left(\vec{k},\vec{r}\right){\rm Sign}\left(\vec{k}\cdot\vec{n}\right)}{\sum_{a}\int d^{3}rd^{3}kf_{a}\left(\vec{k},\vec{r}\right)}, (5)

where faf_{a} represents the phase-space distribution of partons (hadrons), n\vec{n} denotes the normal direction of plane defined by the beam direction and the direction of the trigger particle, which is the same as the positive yy-axis in our set-up in Fig. 2. The summation is over all partons (hadrons) inside a jet.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online). The γ\gamma-jet production rates 1/Nd2N/dxdy1/Nd^{2}N/dxdy as a function of initial jet production positions (xx, yy) in the transverse plane in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, selected with 6 different ranges of transverse asymmetry, ANyA_{N}^{y} = [-0.05, 0.05], [0.05, 0.15], [0.15, 0.25], [0.25, 0.35], [0.35, 0.45] and [0.45, 0.55] in the 6 panels, respectively. The trigger γ\gamma is selected along the negative xx-axis direction with pTγ>p_{T}^{\gamma}> 60 GeV/c and pTjet>p_{T}^{\rm jet}> 30 GeV/c. Other kinetic cuts are the same as in Fig. 1.

Shown in Fig. 3 are the final γ\gamma-jet production rates (1/N)d2N/dxdy(1/N)d^{2}N/dxdy as a function of the initial locations (xx, yy) in the transverse plane in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV with different values of the jet transverse asymmetry ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}}. The six panels, (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f), correspond to 6 different bins of the transverse asymmetry, ANyA_{N}^{y} = [-0.05, 0.05], [0.05, 0.15], [0.15, 0.25], [0.25, 0.35], [0.35, 0.45] and [0.45, 0.55], respectively. As we can see from the numerical results, the typical initial jet production transverse position (yy) shifts from the center to the outer region of the medium when ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}} (or ANyA_{N}^{y}) is increased from [-0.05, 0.05] to [0.45, 0.55]. For small values of ANyA_{N}^{y}, γ\gamma-jets originate from the center region and jets have to traverse the whole volume of the QGP as depicted in panel (a). Conversely, for large values of ANyA_{N}^{y}, γ\gamma-jets emerge from surface areas of the QGP and jets propagate tangentially to the medium surface, as shown in panel (f).

It is worth noting that the selected jet production positions also exhibit an asymmetric distribution along the x-axis. This is attributed to the path length dependence of ANyA_{N}^{y}, the parton energy loss and the azimuthal angle restriction. The path-length dependence of the parton energy loss biases the initial production position of the selected jets closer to the surface (positive xx values). The probability to have a smaller value of ANyA_{N}^{y} with a longer path length is also rare as compared to a shorter path length. Additionally, longer path lengths may result in a larger drift of the jet direction, outside the azimuthal cut-off |Δϕjγ|<(7/8)π|\Delta\phi_{j\gamma}|<(7/8)\pi.

The integration of the initial γ\gamma-jet production rates along the xx-axis for different selected transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y} projects the 2-dimensional γ\gamma-jet rate onto the yy-axis, as shown in Fig. 4. It is clear from this figure that the peak of the transverse distribution of the initial jet production position shifts towards large values of yy with increased value of the transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y}. The variance appears to be similar across different ANyA_{N}^{y} ranges. The shape of the approximately asymmetric distribution (1/N)dN/dy(1/N)dN/dy does not change significantly when ANyA_{N}^{y} varies between 0 and 0.35, corresponding to the central regions of QGP. However, the transverse distribution becomes more asymmetric for large ANyA_{N}^{y} because of the surface bias by the path-length dependence of ANyA_{N}^{y}.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color online) The γ\gamma-jet production rates 1/NdN/dy1/NdN/dy as a function of the initial jet production position yy, selected with different asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y}. The kinematic cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.

For the purpose of an illustration, one can also select the initial transverse jet production positions of γ\gamma-jets and calculate the corresponding distribution of the transverse asymmetry. Fig. 5 shows the γ\gamma-jet production rates (1/N)dN/dANy(1/N)dN/dA_{N}^{y} as a function of ANyA_{N}^{y} with given bins of yy coordinate of the initial jet production. With given initial bins of yy ranging from yy = [-0.5, 0.5] fm to [4.5, 5.5] fm, the peak of the distribution shifts from small to large ANyA_{N}^{y} values. In summary, according to Figs. 4 and 5, the transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y} of the final state particles inside a jet does localize the initial transverse positions of γ\gamma-jet production.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: (Color online) The γ\gamma-jet production rates 1/NdN/dANy1/NdN/dA_{N}^{y} as a function of ANyA_{N}^{y}, with given initial jet production position yy. The corresponding cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.
Refer to caption
Figure 6: (Color online). (Upper) The γ\gamma-jet production rates 1/Nd2N/dxdy1/Nd^{2}N/dxdy as a function of initial jet production locations (xx, yy) in the transverse plane in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV, selected with 3 different jet transverse momentum, pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} = [15, 30] GeV/c, [30, 60] GeV/c and pTjet>p_{T}^{\rm jet}> 60 GeV/c, respectively. These jets are triggered by photons with transverse momentum pTγ>p_{T}^{\gamma}> 60 GeV/c. Other cuts are the same as in Fig. 3. (Lower) The corresponding projections onto the xx-axis.

To illustrate the power of longitudinal jet tomography in localizing the initial jet production positions, we show in the upper panels of Fig. 6 the contour distributions of the initial γ\gamma-jet production rates (1/N)d2N/dxdy(1/N)d^{2}N/dxdy in the transverse plane (xx, yy) for different jet transverse momentum (a) pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} = [15, 30] GeV/cc, (b) pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} = [30, 60] GeV/cc and (c) pTjet>p_{T}^{\rm jet}> 60 GeV/cc, respectively, for direct photons with the transverse momentum pTγ>60p_{T}^{\gamma}>60 GeV/cc. The lower panels give the corresponding projections onto the xx-axis, (1/N)dN/dx=(1/N)𝑑y(d2N/dxdy)(1/N)dN/dx=(1/N)\int dy(d^{2}N/dxdy). For fixed photon transverse momentum pTγp_{T}^{\gamma}, a higher value of pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} indicates less jet energy loss due to a shorter path-length of jet propagation. Conversely, smaller pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} corresponds to larger jet energy loss and longer path-length. This is indeed seen in Fig. 6: γ\gamma-jets with smaller pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} are primarily produced through volume emissions that undergo long path lengths and have significant energy loss, while γ\gamma-jets with larger pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} are mainly produced through surface emissions with shorter path lengths and less energy loss. Varying pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} while keeping pTγp_{T}^{\gamma} fixed thus provides a method to approximately localize the initial γ\gamma-jet production locations in the longitudinal direction along the jet path.

IV Jet shape modification with jet tomography

In this section, we investigate the modification of jet shape for γ\gamma-jets produced in different regions of the QGP fireball as selected by jet tomography. During the jet propagation, hard partons tend to penetrate the dilute region of the medium with low gluon density, while soft recoil partons are more likely to be created in the dense region with high gluon density. By localizing γ\gamma-jets to different regions, we can study the modification of jet shape for jets with different path lengths and temperature gradients. In particular, temperature gradients along the direction perpendicular to the jet propagation may lead to an asymmetric jet shape. We will employ transverse tomography, longitudinal tomography, and a combination of these two methods, namely 2D-tomography, to localize γ\gamma-jets in the transverse plane. The kinetic cuts used in this section remain the same as before.

IV.1 Jet shapes selected with transverse tomography

We first consider jet events selected with the transverse jet tomography and examine the corresponding modification of the jet shape. Shown in Fig. 7 are (a) the jet shape as a function of the radius rr in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions (solid curves), for γ\gamma-jets selected with different ranges of the transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y} from [-0.05, 0.05] to [0.65, 0.75], as compared to the jet shape in p+p collisions (dashed line) at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV, and (b) the ratios of jet shapes in Pb+Pb and p+p collisions. In both Pb+Pb and p+p collisions, the jet shape decreases monotonically with the radius rr, indicating that most of the jet energy is concentrated in the core region close to the jet axis. However, the jet shape in Pb+Pb is in general broader than that in p+p collisions. This suggests that some fraction of the transverse momentum lost by hard partons at the core of the jet is transported to large angles by soft partons (radiated gluons and medium response) with respect to the jet axis in Pb+Pb relative to p+p collisions. Furthermore, γ\gamma-jets selected with smaller transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y} exhibit a broader jet shape, indicating that the path length is longer and quenching effect is stronger for jets produced in the central region of QGP as localized by smaller values of ANyA_{N}^{y}. According to the picture we have illustrated in the last section, increasing ANyA_{N}^{y} will shift the γ\gamma-jet production positions toward the outer region of QGP. This will reduce the jet energy loss and jet quenching effect with smaller broadening of the jet shape. Therefore, the width of the jet shape in Pb+Pb collisions decreases monotonically as the values of ANyA_{N}^{y} increase.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: (Color online) (a) Jet shape of γ\gamma-jets as a function of rr in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid curves) selected with different ranges of ANyA_{N}^{y} and p+p (dashing curve) collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. (b) Ratios of jet shapes in Pb+Pb over p+p collisions as a function of rr.

For theoretical illustrations, we also show in Fig. 8 the jet shape modification of γ\gamma-jets selected according to their transverse coordinates yy which shows similar trends for the corresponding ANyA_{N}^{y} dependence of the modification in Fig. 7.

The broadening of jet shape is caused by interaction between the jet and the medium, in which hard partons at the core of a jet lose energy leading to a slight suppression of the jet shape at the core r<0.05r<0.05. This lost energy will be carried by radiated gluons and medium-response to large angles, therefore transporting the energy towards the outer layer of the jet cone and leading to the enhancement of the jet shape in large rr regions. Selection of jet events with different values of the transverse asymmetry localizes the transverse positions of the initial jet production with different average path lengths and therefore different degree of jet quenching. This naturally leads to different levels of broadening of the jet shape, decreasing with increasing values of the transverse asymmetry or the average values of the transverse coordinate (yy). This observation is also consistent with previous studies Luo et al. (2018, 2022).

Show in Fig. 9 is the γ\gamma-jet production rate as a function of xJγx_{J\gamma} (=pTjet/pTγ=p_{T}^{\rm jet}/p_{T}^{\gamma}), selected with different ranges of the transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y}, in 0-10% Pb+Pb at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. The dashed curve is the result from p+p collisions for comparison. One can see that the rate in Pb+Pb shifts toward smaller xJγx_{J\gamma} relative to p+p collisions due to jet quenching. The shift is smaller for γ\gamma-jets selected with a larger ANyA_{N}^{y} range, indicating more bias toward surface emission. For theoretical illustrations, we also show in Fig. 10 the γ\gamma-jet production rate as a function of xJγx_{J\gamma} with different initial jet production positions in the yy axis. The trend is similar to the corresponding dependence of ANyA_{N}^{y} as shown in Fig. 9.

Although the xJγx_{J\gamma} distributions in Fig. 9 for different ANyA_{N}^{y} selections exhibit the similar trends as in Fig. 10 for the results with different selection of the initial production position in the yy axis, the xJγx_{J\gamma} distribution in Pb+Pb is observed to move back to the distribution in p+p collisions only when ANyA_{N}^{y} is sufficiently large. To understand these trends, we also show in Fig. 11 the average path length of the leading partons L\left\langle L\right\rangle which is defined as,

L(ANy)=𝑑x𝑑yP(x,y,ANy)l(x,y,ANy)𝑑x𝑑yP(x,y,ANy),\left\langle L(A_{N}^{y})\right\rangle=\frac{\int dxdyP(x,y,A_{N}^{y})l(x,y,A_{N}^{y})}{\int dxdyP(x,y,A_{N}^{y})}, (6)

where l(x,y,ANy)l(x,y,A_{N}^{y}) is the distance between the longitudinal position of the initial jet production and the boundary of QGP, and P(x,y,ANy)P(x,y,A_{N}^{y}) is the initial jet production rates at (x,y)(x,y) for jet events with ANyA_{N}^{y}. In the results shown in Fig. 11, we assume that the path is parallel to the xx-axis and we take the critical temperature (Tc=165T_{c}=165 MeV) at the boundary of the QGP. The panel (a) in Fig. 11 indicates that with increasing ANyA_{N}^{y}, L(ANy)\left\langle L(A_{N}^{y})\right\rangle remains nearly unchanged, but rapidly decreases as ANA_{N} approaches to 1. Meanwhile, panel (b) shows that L(y)\left\langle L(y)\right\rangle decreases smoothly with the initial jet production position yy. Since the modification of the γ\gamma-jet xJγx_{J\gamma} distributions is controlled mainly by jet energy loss which in turn is controlled by the jet path length, Fig. 11 explains why modification of xJγx_{J\gamma} distribution is similar across most of the ANyA_{N}^{y} range where the average path length is insensitive to ANyA_{N}^{y}. It reverts back to the distribution in p+p collisions only when ANyA_{N}^{y} is sufficiently large.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: (Color online) (a) Jet shape of γ\gamma-jets as a function of rr in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid curves) selected with different initial production position yy and p+p (dashing curve) collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. (b) Ratios of jet shapes in Pb+Pb over p+p collisions as a function of rr.
Refer to caption
Figure 9: (Color online) xJγx_{J\gamma} distribution, with γ\gamma-jets selected with different ranges of the transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y}, in in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid line) and p+p (dashing line) collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV.
Refer to caption
Figure 10: (Color online) xJγx_{J\gamma} distribution, with γ\gamma-jets selected with different ranges of the transverse coordinates y, in 0-10% Pb+Pb (solid line) and p+p (dashing line) collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV.
Refer to caption
Figure 11: (Color online) Average propagating path length of the leading jet partons as a function of ANyA_{N}^{y} (left) and as a function of initial production transverse position yy (right).

IV.2 Jet shapes selected with longitudinal tomography

In the previous subsection, we have seen how selecting different values of the transverse asymmetry ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}} localizes the initial transverse position (yy) and leads to different jet propagation path length and jet shape broadening. Alternatively, one can directly vary the jet propagation path length using longitudinal jet tomography, as illustrated in Fig. 6.

Shown in Fig. 12 are (a) the jet shapes as a function of rr for γ\gamma-jets in 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV, with different pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} and (b) the ratio of jet shapes between Pb+Pb and p+p collisions. Because of QCD branching in vacuum, the jet shape in p+p becomes broader with larger jet transverse momentum pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} as we see in the figure. This energy-dependence of the vacuum jet shape can lead to jet shape broadening due to jet energy loss in Pb+Pb collisions. In addition, jet-medium interaction will also broaden the jet shape because of radiated gluons and medium-response at large angles. This medium-induced jet shape broadening will also depend on pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} because of the path-length bias imposed by the longitudinal jet tomography.

As we have seen in Fig. 6, for given values of the photon transverse momentum pTγp_{T}^{\gamma}, γ\gamma-jets with small final pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} normally comes from jets initially produced at the center of QGP that have gone through a along path length and lost significant amount of energy. One should also see large broadening of the jet shapes. On the other hand, γ\gamma-jets with large pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} are more likely produced initially close to the surface of QGP, travel a shorter path length and lose less energy. The corresponding jet shape broadening is also smaller as we see in Fig. 12.

It is worth noting again that γ\gamma-jets with the same final pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} in Pb+Pb collisions usually come from initial jets with higher transverse momentum than in p+p collisions due to jet energy loss. This energy loss alone can lead to jet shape broadening due to energy-dependence of the jet shape in vacuum. Such jet shape broadening due to jet energy-loss is approximately independent of the final jet energy pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} as we see in the LBT results for r<0.2r<0.2. At large radius r>0.22r>0.22, the jet shape broadening due to radiated gluons and medium-response strongly depends on pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} due to path-length bias imposed by the longitudinal jet tomography.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: (Color online) Upper panel: the jet shape as a function of rr, selected with different jet transverse momentum, pTjet<30p_{T}^{\rm jet}<30 GeV/c, 30<pTjet<6030<p_{T}^{\rm jet}<60 GeV/c and pTjet>60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60 GeV/c in in 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV, respectively. The transverse momentum of the trigger photon is pTγ>60p_{T}^{\gamma}>60 GeV/c. Lower panel: the ratio of jet shapes between Pb+Pb and p+p collisions. Other kinematic cuts are the same as in Fig. 7.

IV.3 Jet shapes selected with 2D tomography

One can combine transverse and longitudinal jet tomography, or 2D jet tomography to study the jet shape modification in Pb+Pb collisions by simultaneously selecting both final jet pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} and transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y}. We select trigger photons with pTγ>60p_{T}^{\gamma}>60 GeV/cc along the negative xx-axis direction. We calculate the jet shape of the correlated jets with two intervals of transverse momentum: small pTjet=[15,30]p_{T}^{\rm jet}=[15,30] GeV and large pTjet>60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60 GeV. In addition, we require the γ\gamma-jets have small ANyA_{N}^{y} = [-0.05, 0.05] and large transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y} = [0.55, 0.65].

Refer to caption
Figure 13: (Color online) Similar to Fig. 12, but simultaneously selected with the two final observables, pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} = [15, 30] GeV/c and ANyA_{N}^{y} = [-0.05, 0.05], pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} = [15, 30] GeV/c and ANyA_{N}^{y} = [0.55, 0.65], pTjet>60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60 GeV/c and ANyA_{N}^{y} = [-0.05, 0.05], pTjet>60p_{T}^{\rm jet}>60 GeV/c and ANyA_{N}^{y} = [0.55, 0.65], respectively.

The jet shapes of these γ\gamma-jets and their corresponding ratios between 0-10% Pb+Pb and p+p collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV are shown Fig. 13 for four different combinations of transverse and longitudinal tomographic selections. Among these four sets of tomographic selected configurations, γ\gamma-jets with small pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} in conjunction with small ANyA_{N}^{y} have the most broadened jet shapes, since these jets are produced at the central region of QGP and traverse the longest path length on the average. Conversely, the configurations that have the least jet shape broadening are those γ\gamma-jets with large values of both pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} and ANyA_{N}^{y}, that are initially produced in the outer region of QGP and travel a smaller path-length. If the γ\gamma-jets are selected with small pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} and large ANyA_{N}^{y}, or large pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet} and small ANyA_{N}^{y}, the medium modification of the jet shape falls between the above two extreme cases as seen in Figure 13.

V Asymmetric jet shapes

Refer to caption
Figure 14: (Color online) Comparisons of ρupper\rho_{upper} (red dash-dotted) and ρlower\rho_{lower} (blue dashed ) as a function of rr in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV, with different given yy positions of the initial jet production. Other cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.

The dependence of the jet shape modification on variables defined in different types of tomography methods in the last section is essentially the manifestation of the path-length dependence of jet-medium interaction and the associated medium response. We will study in this section the jet shape modification specifically caused by the gradient of the parton density or the jet transport coefficient q^\hat{q} and the radial flow. We will look at the azimuthal angle distribution of energy density inside the jet cone relative to the direction of the transverse gradient of the QGP medium. We consider the same γ\gamma-jet configurations relative to the event plane of heavy-ion collisions as illustrated in Fig 2. Because of the gradient of the medium density and the radial flow, both final jet partons and medium-response distribution will be asymmetric relative to the direction of the gradient.

For a purely theoretical illustration, we first divide the jet cone into two equal halves using a plane defined by the beam direction and the direction of the jet axis as shown in Fig 2. We then calculate the jet shapes as a function of the radius rr for each half cone - one for the upper half and another for the lower half,

ρ(r)upper/lower=1ΔriNjetpTi(rΔr2,r+Δr2)Θ(±kn)iNjetpTi(0,R),\displaystyle\rho(r)_{\rm upper/lower}=\frac{1}{\Delta r}\frac{\sum_{i}^{N_{\rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(r-\frac{\Delta r}{2},r+\frac{\Delta r}{2})\Theta(\pm\vec{k}\cdot\vec{n})}{\sum_{i}^{N_{\rm jet}}p_{T}^{i}(0,R)}, (7)

where ±\pm in the Θ\Theta function selects associated particles in the upper half and lower half of the jet cone, respectively, k\vec{k} is the momentum of the associated particle and n\vec{n} is the norm of the plane defined by the beam direction and the momentum of this jet, which coincides with the event plane in our setup.

Shown in Fig. 14 are the upper (red dash-dotted), lower half (blue dashed), and the total jet shape (black solid line) for γ\gamma-jets initially produced in 6 different regions of the transverse coordinate yy in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. For jets produced in the central region of the QGP with yy = [-0.5, 0.5] fm, the upper and lower jet shapes are almost identical, while jets produced near the system edge with yy = [4.5, 5.5] fm have a broader lower-half jet shape as compared to the upper-half due to the asymmetric parton transport of jet partons and medium response in the non-uniform QGP medium.

We also plot the ratio between ρlower\rho_{\rm lower} and ρupper\rho_{\rm upper} in Fig. 15 as a function of the radius rr for jets initially produced in different regions of the QGP. It is clear that the lower-half jet shape is suppressed at the core of the jet cone but enhanced toward the edge of the jet cone as compared to the upper-half jet shape. Since the jet core is made up of the energetic jet partons, their diffusion in the transverse direction is enhanced toward the dilute region of the QGP medium (opposite direction of the transverse gradient dq^/dyd\hat{q}/dy) leading to the positive value of the transverse asymmetry AN(y)A_{N}(y) and the suppression of ρlower\rho_{\rm lower} relative to ρupper\rho_{\rm upper} at the core of the jet cone. Jet-induced medium response in the same jet event will compensate such transport of momentum in the transverse direction and flow in the opposite direction of the transverse diffusion of hard jet partons (along the direction of the transverse gradient dq^/dyd\hat{q}/dy). This therefore contributes to the enhancement of the lower-half jet shape ρlower\rho_{\rm lower} relative the upper-half ρupper\rho_{\rm upper} in the large radius region where medium response dominate. The difference between ρlower\rho_{\rm lower} and ρupper\rho_{\rm upper} is more pronounced for jets produced in the outer region of the QGP where the gradient of q^\hat{q} increases toward edge due to the initial energy density distribution of the hot matter.

Refer to caption
Figure 15: (Color online) The ratio of ρlower\rho_{\rm lower} over ρupper\rho_{\rm upper} as a function of rr. Kinematic selections and cuts are the same as in Fig. 14.
Refer to caption
Figure 16: (Color online) The in-cone transverse momentum distribution as a function of Δϕ\Delta\phi and Δη\Delta\eta in 0-10% Pb+PbPb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV with ANy=[0.55,0.65]A_{N}^{y}=[0.55,0.65]. Kinematic selections and cuts are the same as in Fig. 3.

Note that in experiments one can only statistically localize the transverse region of the initial jet production according to the value of the jet transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y}. However, fluctuations of ANyA_{N}^{y} make it difficult to determine the transverse location precisely in each event, especially for small values of ANyA_{N}^{y} as seen in Fig. 5. In order to observe the asymmetric jet shape as we have illustrated in the about theoretical study, we introduce a two-dimensional rr-weighted jet shape ρ~2D(Δη,Δϕ)\tilde{\rho}_{2D}(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi) for the transverse momentum distributions inside the jet cone in the ΔηΔϕ\Delta\eta-\Delta\phi plane,

ρ~2D(Δη,Δϕ)\displaystyle\tilde{\rho}_{2D}(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi) =1δηδϕ\displaystyle=\frac{1}{\delta\eta\delta\phi}
jet(Δη,Δϕ)(Δη+δη,Δϕ+δϕ)ripTi/pTjetjetri<RripTi/pTjet,\displaystyle\frac{\sum_{\rm jet}\sum_{(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi)}^{(\Delta\eta+\delta\eta,\Delta\phi+\delta\phi)}r_{i}p_{T}^{\rm i}/p_{T}^{\rm jet}}{\sum_{\rm jet}\sum_{r_{i}<R}r_{i}p_{T}^{\rm i}/p_{T}^{\rm jet}}, (8)

where ri=Δη2+Δϕ2r_{i}=\sqrt{\Delta\eta^{2}+\Delta\phi^{2}} is the distance between the ii-th associated parton and the jet axis, pTip_{T}^{\rm i} is the transverse momentum of the ii-th associated parton, Δη=ηiηjet\Delta\eta=\eta_{i}-\eta_{jet} and Δϕ=ϕiϕjet\Delta\phi=\phi_{i}-\phi_{jet}, the δη\delta\eta and δϕ\delta\phi are the bin sizes in the Δη\Delta\eta and Δϕ\Delta\phi directions, respectively. The 2-D jet profile is weighted with the distance rr to enhance the contribution of soft partons in the large rr region from medium response.

The 2D jet shape ρ~2D(Δη,Δϕ)\tilde{\rho}_{2D}(\Delta\eta,\Delta\phi) inside the jet cone is shown in Fig. 16, for γ\gamma-jets in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at 5.025.02 TeV, with ANyA_{N}^{y} in the range [0.55,0.65][0.55,0.65]. The contribution from the leading hard jet parton to the 2-D jet profile at the core is shown in the inset, while the remaining contribution (with the leading parton subtracted) primarily from soft particles to the 2D jet profile inside the jet cone is displayed in the main figure. This 2D jet shape with given transverse asymmetry indeed shows the same asymmetrical structure as we have discussed in the above study with specified region of transverse position of the initial jet production. The hard jet partons are diffused toward the dilute region of the QGP medium while soft partons from the medium response tend to move to the direction of the dense region of the QGP. In other words, the asymmetric jet shape suggests that hard partons inside the jet are deflected away from dense regions, while soft partons from medium response are more likely to be created in dense regions. This asymmetrical behavior is particularly more pronounced for γ\gamma-jet events with large ANyA_{N}^{y}, where the jet is produced mostly in the outer layer of the medium, and is tangential to the surface.

Refer to caption
Figure 17: (Color online) The in-cone transverse momentum distribution as a function of ϕr\phi_{r} in three different circular regions inside γ\gamma-jets in 0-10% Pb+PbPb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. Three kinds of jet events are selected with different ANyA_{N}^{y} values in panels (a), (b), and (c), respectively.
Refer to caption
Figure 18: (Color online) The in-cone transverse momentum distribution as a function of ϕr\phi_{r} in three different pTassocp_{T}^{\rm assoc} ranges in 0-10% Pb+PbPb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV. Three kinds of jet events are selected with different ANyA_{N}^{y} values in panels (a), (b), and (c), respectively.

To further illustrate the asymmetrical jet shape and the underlying contributions from hard and soft particles, we project the 2D jet shape to the azimuthal angle distribution inside the jet cone,

d𝒫Tdϕr=1Njetjetϕrϕr+ΔϕrripTiΔϕr,\displaystyle\frac{d{\cal P}_{T}}{d\phi_{r}}=\frac{1}{N_{\rm jet}}\frac{\sum_{\rm jet}\sum_{\phi_{r}}^{\phi_{r}+\Delta\phi_{r}}r_{i}\cdot p_{T}^{\rm i}}{\Delta\phi_{r}}, (9)

where NjetN_{\rm jet} is the total number of jet events, and ϕr\phi_{r} is the azimuthal angle in the ΔηΔϕ\Delta\eta-\Delta\phi plane,

{ϕr=arcsin(Δηr),(Δϕ0)ϕr=πarcsin(Δηr),(Δϕ<0,Δη0)ϕr=πarcsin(Δηr),(Δϕ<0,Δη<0).\displaystyle\begin{cases}\begin{aligned} \phi_{r}&=\arcsin{\left(\frac{\Delta\eta}{r}\right)},&(\Delta\phi\geqslant 0)\\[5.0pt] \phi_{r}&=\pi-\arcsin{\left(\frac{\Delta\eta}{r}\right)},&(\Delta\phi<0,\Delta\eta\geqslant 0)\\[5.0pt] \phi_{r}&=-\pi-\arcsin{\left(\frac{\Delta\eta}{r}\right)},&(\Delta\phi<0,\Delta\eta<0).\end{aligned}\end{cases} (10)

with ϕr=0\phi_{r}=0 defined as the direction of yy or along the positive direction of ANyA_{N}^{y}.

Shown in Fig. 17 are the azimuthal angle ϕr\phi_{r} distribution of transverse energy inside γ\gamma-jets in 0-10% Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=5.02\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV with three different jet transverse asymmetry (a) ANy=[0.05,0.05]A_{N}^{y}=[-0.05,0.05], (b) [0.25,0.35][0.25,0.35] (c) and [0.55,0.65][0.55,0.65] for three different circular annulus at radius rr = [0, 0.1] (solid), [0.1, 0.2] (dashed) and [0.2, 0.3] (dotted), respectively. We also show in Fig. 18 the angular ϕr\phi_{r} distribution of transverse energy inside γ\gamma-jets with three different jet transverse asymmetry (a) ANy=[0.05,0.05]A_{N}^{y}=[-0.05,0.05], (b) [0.25,0.35][0.25,0.35] (c) and [0.55,0.65][0.55,0.65], for three different regions of parton transverse momentum, pTassoc>3p_{T}^{\rm assoc}>3 GeV/c (solid), 2<pTassoc32<p_{T}^{\rm assoc}\leq 3 GeV/c (dashed) and pTassoc2p_{T}^{\rm assoc}\leq 2 GeV/c (dotted), respectively. Soft partons originating from the medium response have smaller pTassocp_{T}^{\rm assoc}, while large pTassocp_{T}^{\rm assoc} is associated with hard partons. We observe different trends in the ϕr\phi_{r} distributions for hard and soft partons, particularly for jet events with a large value of ANyA_{N}^{y}. This conclusion is consistent with the results presented in Fig. 17, except that different circular annuli are used to separate hard from soft partons: hard jet partons are concentrated around the core of the jet cone (r=0r=0) whereas soft partons tend to dominate the region toward the edge of the jet cone.

With small jet transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y} ranging from -0.05 to 0.05, the jet shape is mostly symmetric with an approximately uniform distribution in ϕr\phi_{r} at both small and large radius rr or for both small and large transverse momentum partons as seen in Figs. 17(a) and 18(a). For jets with sizable or large transverse asymmetry ANyA_{N}^{y} in ranges [0.25, 0.35] or [0.55, 0.65], they propagate through regions of QGP with large transverse gradient. These jets have asymmetric jet shapes with non-uniform azimuthal ϕr\phi_{r} distributions as seen in Figs. 17(b-c) and 18(b-c). Hard jet partons at the core of the jet have a peak in the opposite direction of the gradient (ϕr=0\phi_{r}=0 toward the dilute region) while soft partons at large radius have a peak in the direction of the gradient (ϕr=π\phi_{r}=\pi toward the dense region). This is consistent with the findings as illustrated in Fig. 16.

Note that in experimental measurements, one can only know the absolute value of the transverse asymmetry |ANy||A_{N}^{y}| with equal probability of positive and negative values. If one averages events with both positive and negative values of ANyA_{N}^{y}, the final azimuthal distribution will be uniform. To circumvent this, one should align the orientation of the hard jet (or soft) partons in each event before averaging over events. The anti-correlation of hard and soft partons in asymmetric jets serves to determine the direction of the gradient of the QGP through which the jets propagate. This is an especially useful technique to measure the asymmetric jet shape caused by the transverse gradient of the QGP medium in central heavy-ion collisions where one cannot determine the event plane from the bulk hadron distributions.

VI summary

We have investigated the medium-modified jet shapes of γ\gamma-jets in high-energy heavy-ion collisions using a two-dimensional jet tomography that combines gradient (transverse) and longitudinal jet tomography using event-by-event linear Boltzmann Transport simulations which can reproduce CMS experimental data. Transverse and longitudinal jet tomography are demonstrated to be able to localize the initial γ\gamma-jet production locations as proposed in Zhang et al. (2009) and He et al. (2020). By employing the 2D jet tomography in which γ\gamma-jets are selected with different jet transverse asymmetry ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}} or the longitudinal asymmetry pTjet/pTγp_{T}^{\rm jet}/p_{T}^{\gamma}, we computed the medium modification for the transverse momentum distribution inside the jet cone, namely the jet shape. Jet shapes are in general broadened in Pb+Pb collisions relative to p+p collisions because of the energy transfer carried by soft partons in medium response at large angles relative to the jet axis. Our results indicate that jet shape broadening are enhanced in events with small values of ANnA_{N}^{\vec{n}} and pTjetp_{T}^{\rm jet}, corresponding to jets initially produced at the center of the QGP or with long path lengths. We further illustrated the asymmetrical jet shapes of these jets that propagate through regions of the QGP with finite transverse gradient. Hard jet partons at the core of the jet are defected away from the dense region of QGP while soft partons from the medium response are produced more in the dense region of QGP. This anti-correlation of hard and soft partons within the asymmetric jets can be used to determine the direction of the transverse gradient of the QGP in each jet event. These distinctive behaviors of hard and soft partons inside the jet cone may pave the way for new avenues to investigate the properties of the QGP and strong interactions. Future experimental measurements can validate these distinctive features in the jet shape, thereby testing the theory of QCD and parton transport.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Guang-You Qin, Enke Wang and Zhong Yang for stimulating discussions. This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants Nos. 11935007, 11435004, 12075098, 12305140, 12147134, by Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No. 2021A1515110817, by Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research No. 2020B0301030008, Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou No. 2019050001, and the Director, Office of Energy Research, Office of High Energy and Nuclear Physics, Division of Nuclear Physics, of the U.S. Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-AC02-05CH11231 and within the framework of the SURGE Collaboration, the US National Science Foundation under Grant No. OAC-2004571 within the X-SCAPE Collaboration.

References

  • Gyulassy and Plumer (1990) M. Gyulassy and M. Plumer, Phys. Lett. B 243, 432 (1990).
  • Wang and Gyulassy (1992) X.-N. Wang and M. Gyulassy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1480 (1992).
  • Qin and Wang (2015) G.-Y. Qin and X.-N. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1530014 (2015), eprint 1511.00790.
  • Adare et al. (2010) A. Adare et al. (PHENIX), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 142301 (2010), eprint 1006.3740.
  • Adler et al. (2002) C. Adler et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 202301 (2002), eprint nucl-ex/0206011.
  • Abelev et al. (2013) B. Abelev et al. (ALICE), Phys. Lett. B 719, 18 (2013), eprint 1205.5761.
  • Aad et al. (2012) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Lett. B 707, 330 (2012), eprint 1108.6018.
  • Chatrchyan et al. (2012) S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 022301 (2012), eprint 1204.1850.
  • Sirunyan et al. (2018) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 776, 195 (2018), eprint 1702.00630.
  • Wang and Wang (2002) E. Wang and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 162301 (2002), eprint hep-ph/0202105.
  • Vitev (2004) I. Vitev, J. Phys. G 30, S791 (2004), eprint hep-ph/0403089.
  • Zhang et al. (2007) H. Zhang, J. F. Owens, E. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 212301 (2007), eprint nucl-th/0701045.
  • Zhang et al. (2009) H. Zhang, J. F. Owens, E. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 032302 (2009), eprint 0902.4000.
  • Vitev and Zhang (2010) I. Vitev and B.-W. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 132001 (2010).
  • Qin and Muller (2011) G.-Y. Qin and B. Muller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 162302 (2011), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 108, 189904 (2012)], eprint 1012.5280.
  • He et al. (2012) Y. He, I. Vitev, and B.-W. Zhang, Phys. Lett. B 713, 224 (2012), eprint 1105.2566.
  • Young et al. (2011) C. Young, B. Schenke, S. Jeon, and C. Gale, Phys. Rev. C 84, 024907 (2011), eprint 1103.5769.
  • Barata et al. (2023a) J. a. Barata, J. G. Milhano, and A. V. Sadofyev (2023a), eprint 2308.01294.
  • Adams et al. (2006) J. Adams et al. (STAR), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 162301 (2006), eprint nucl-ex/0604018.
  • Casalderrey-Solana et al. (2011) J. Casalderrey-Solana, J. G. Milhano, and U. A. Wiedemann, J. Phys. G 38, 035006 (2011), eprint 1012.0745.
  • Aamodt et al. (2010) K. Aamodt et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252301 (2010), eprint 1011.3916.
  • Aad et al. (2010) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303 (2010), eprint 1011.6182.
  • Sirunyan et al. (2019) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 152001 (2019), eprint 1809.08602.
  • Baier et al. (1997a) R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B 484, 265 (1997a), eprint hep-ph/9608322.
  • Baier et al. (1997b) R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, S. Peigne, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B 483, 291 (1997b), eprint hep-ph/9607355.
  • Baier et al. (1998) R. Baier, Y. L. Dokshitzer, A. H. Mueller, and D. Schiff, Nucl. Phys. B 531, 403 (1998), eprint hep-ph/9804212.
  • Guo and Wang (2000) X.-f. Guo and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3591 (2000), eprint hep-ph/0005044.
  • Wang and Guo (2001) X.-N. Wang and X.-f. Guo, Nucl. Phys. A 696, 788 (2001), eprint hep-ph/0102230.
  • Casalderrey-Solana and Wang (2008) J. Casalderrey-Solana and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024902 (2008), eprint 0705.1352.
  • Majumder (2012) A. Majumder, Phys. Rev. D 85, 014023 (2012), eprint 0912.2987.
  • He et al. (2020) Y. He, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 122301 (2020), eprint 2001.08273.
  • Yang et al. (2021) Z. Yang, W. Chen, Y. He, W. Ke, L. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 082301 (2021), eprint 2101.05422.
  • Yang et al. (2023a) Z. Yang, Y. He, W. Chen, W.-Y. Ke, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 652 (2023a), eprint 2206.02393.
  • Li et al. (2011) H. Li, F. Liu, G.-l. Ma, X.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 012301 (2011), eprint 1006.2893.
  • He et al. (2015) Y. He, T. Luo, X.-N. Wang, and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. C 91, 054908 (2015), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 97, 019902 (2018)], eprint 1503.03313.
  • Cao et al. (2016) S. Cao, T. Luo, G.-Y. Qin, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 94, 014909 (2016), eprint 1605.06447.
  • Wang and Zhu (2013) X.-N. Wang and Y. Zhu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 062301 (2013), eprint 1302.5874.
  • Cao and Wang (2021) S. Cao and X.-N. Wang, Rept. Prog. Phys. 84, 024301 (2021), eprint 2002.04028.
  • Luo et al. (2023) T. Luo, Y. He, S. Cao, and X.-N. Wang (2023), eprint 2306.13742.
  • He et al. (2019) Y. He, S. Cao, W. Chen, T. Luo, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 99, 054911 (2019), eprint 1809.02525.
  • Chen et al. (2018) W. Chen, S. Cao, T. Luo, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 777, 86 (2018), eprint 1704.03648.
  • Luo et al. (2018) T. Luo, S. Cao, Y. He, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Lett. B 782, 707 (2018), eprint 1803.06785.
  • Zhang et al. (2004) B.-W. Zhang, E. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 072301 (2004), eprint nucl-th/0309040.
  • Lin et al. (2005) Z.-W. Lin, C. M. Ko, B.-A. Li, B. Zhang, and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 72, 064901 (2005), eprint nucl-th/0411110.
  • Pang et al. (2012) L. Pang, Q. Wang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 86, 024911 (2012), eprint 1205.5019.
  • Pang et al. (2018) L.-G. Pang, H. Petersen, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 97, 064918 (2018), eprint 1802.04449.
  • Sjostrand et al. (2006) T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, JHEP 05, 026 (2006), eprint hep-ph/0603175.
  • Sjostrand et al. (2008) T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, and P. Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008), eprint 0710.3820.
  • Cacciari et al. (2012) M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam, and G. Soyez, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1896 (2012), eprint 1111.6097.
  • Cacciari and Salam (2006) M. Cacciari and G. P. Salam, Phys. Lett. B 641, 57 (2006), eprint hep-ph/0512210.
  • Yang et al. (2023b) Z. Yang, T. Luo, W. Chen, L.-G. Pang, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 052301 (2023b), eprint 2203.03683.
  • Fu et al. (2023) Y. Fu, J. Casalderrey-Solana, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 107, 054038 (2023), eprint 2204.05323.
  • Barata et al. (2023b) J. a. Barata, A. V. Sadofyev, and X.-N. Wang, Phys. Rev. D 107, L051503 (2023b), eprint 2210.06519.
  • Barata et al. (2023c) J. a. Barata, X. Mayo López, A. V. Sadofyev, and C. A. Salgado, Phys. Rev. D 108, 034018 (2023c), eprint 2304.03712.
  • Luo et al. (2022) A. Luo, Y.-X. Mao, G.-Y. Qin, E.-K. Wang, and H.-Z. Zhang, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 156 (2022), eprint 2107.11751.