Asymmetric Fuglede - Putnam theorem for Unbounded -Hyponormal operators
Abstract.
A closed densely defined operator on a Hilbert space is callled -hyponormal if and there exists for which for all and for all . In this paper, we prove that if bounded linear operator is such that , where is a closed subnormal (resp. a closed -hyponormal) on , is a closed -hyponormal (resp. a closed subnormal) on , then (i) (ii) reduces to the normal operator and (iii) reduces to the normal operator
Key words and phrases:
Closed densely defined -hyponormal operator, Fuglede-Putnam Theorem, Riesz projection.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
47A05, 47A10, 47B201. Introduction and Preliminaries
Let be infinite dimensional complex Hilbert space. Let denotes the space of all bounded linear operators on . The famous Fuglede - Putnam theorem asserts that if are normal operators and for some , then ([7, 11, 17, 21]). Several authors tried to relax the normality condition ([5, 1, 13, 14, 22]). But for subnormal operators, it does not hold. Asymmetric version of Fuglede - Putnam theorem for bounded subnormal operators, -hyponormal operators and dominant operators are studied by Furuta ([8, 9]) Moore ([14]) and Stampfli ([23]) respectively. The study of unbounded operators is one of the major research area in the field of operator theory. In most of the cases operators involved in quantum mechanics, differential equations are unbounded.
Let and denotes the domain, nullspace, range and graph of respectively. Let be the polar decomposition of , where . Let and denotes the space of all linear and closed linear operators on respectively. Let denotes the restriction of in to the closed subspace of . A closed subspace is said to be a core for if ([25]).
An operator is said to be densely defined if For example, be defined by
with . Since , and is dense in , we have is dense in .
An operator is said to be subnormal if there is a Hilbert space and a normal operator in such that . An operator is said to be hyponormal if and is said to be M-hyponormal if for all and for all . It is evident that the following inclusion hold:
A densely defined operator is said to be -hyponormal if
and there exists for which for all
and for all
Now we give an example for closed densely defined - hyponormal opearator, which is not hyponormal.
Example 1.1.
Let be defined by
where =
Let
. Since , and is dense in , is dense in . Since is eventually increasing, is -hyponormal ([12]). The adjoint of is given by
Let , where 1 occurs in the place. Then
Since and it follows that is not hyponormal.
Stochel ([25]) studied asymmetric Fuglede - Putnam theorem for closed hyponormal (resp. closed subnormal) and closed subnormal (resp. closed hyponormal) operators. Recently, Bensaid, Dehimi, Fuglede and Mortad([3]), studied new and classic version of Fuglede theorem in an unbounded setting. Assymmetric Fuglede - Putnam theorem for some class unbounded operators has been studied by Mortad ([15, 16]) and Paliogiannis ([18]). In this paper we study asymmetric Fuglede - Putnam theorem for closed -hyponormal (resp. closed subnormal) and subnormal (resp. closed -hyponormal) operators by the method of ([25]).
2. Fuglede-Putnam Theorem
A closed subspace of is said to be invariant under if for any , then . ie., if is a closed subspace of , we define is an operator on with domain
If reduce to an operator then . Throughout the paper we present known result as proposition. In the following result we show that part of closed densely defined - hyponormal operator is again -hyponormal.
Lemma 2.1.
Let be a densely defined -hyponormal operator and let be a closed subspace of which is invariant under T. Then is a closed -hyponormal operator.
Proof.
We have . Let and be an orthogonal projection on to . Then
Hence is a closed -hyponormal operator. ∎
The next result for closed hyponormal operators has been studied in ([25]) by Stochel.
Lemma 2.2.
Let be a densely defined -hyponormal operator. Then there exist a contraction such that for every .
Proof.
Define by
Since is -hyponormal, is a contraction with Now we extend to such that
. Then the contraction defined by for all is an extension of . Hence
Therefore, we get
If we put then ∎
A closed subspace of reduces if and are invariant under . Stochel ([25]) proved if is hyponormal and is a closed subspace of which is invariant under with is normal, then reduces Now we prove the result for closed densely defined -hyponormal operators.
Theorem 2.3.
Suppose is a densely defined -hyponormal operator. If is a closed subspace of which is invariant under with is normal, then reduces
Proof.
Let where and Then has the block matrix representation
where is defined by for Here, denotes the orthogonal projection onto Since is invariant under , we have
Let By Lemma 2.2, we have
for every . Thus, for every Then there exist a densely defined operator such that ( see [6]). Hence, for some We can choose such that Therefore, for every Hence,
Thus, ([20]) and so . ∎
Proposition 2.4.
([25]) Let be a core for and be a selfadjoint operator with If , then is a core for .
Now we extend the Theorem 2.3 of ([25]) from closed hyponormal to closed -hyponormal operator by the similar argument as in the proof of ([25, Theorem 2.3]).
Theorem 2.5.
Let be normal. Let be -hyponormal. If be such that . Then
(i)
(ii) If and , then .
Proof.
(i) Suppose is -hyponormal. Then by Lemma 2.2, we have
(2.1) |
Let be the spectral measure of and let be a compact subset of Since is regular, it is sufficient to prove that for every compact set of
Since is normal, we have reduces and for every .
For define the function
Then
Since we have
Hence by equation (2.1),
Since for
and hence where Then ([25, Theorem 2.2]). Therefore, Since is arbitrary,
Since is selfadjoint, This completes the proof.
(ii) Since from (i) we have for Thus, Since is a core for is a core for from Proposition 2.4. Hence,
Therefore, . Since , we have Hence,
∎
Let we denotes and Let be the polar decomposition of where , is partial isometry with initial space and final space . Also and are in . Also is a bounded unique unitary isomorphism from into with
Proposition 2.6.
([25],Theorem 3.2)
Let and be a closed densely defined operators in and respectively, and let be such that
(i) If reduces then is closed densely defined operator in and
(ii) If and reduces and to normal operators respectively, then
Now we prove the asymmetric Fuglede-Putnam theorem for closed densely defined -hyponormal and normal operators. The following result is the motivated by ([25],Proposition 4.1).
Theorem 2.7.
Suppose is a normal operator and is -hyponormal. If is such that Then reduces and are unitarily equivalent normal operators.
Proof.
Let be a Borel subset of and let be the spectral measure of . We have is an orthogonal projection. To prove reduces it is sufficient to prove that is invariant under .
Let . Then there exist a sequence such that converges to . Since is bounded, converges to . Since , there exist such that Therefore, converges to From Theorem 2.5 (i), Hence, converges to Thus, reduces .
Since and reduces we have is a closed densely defined operator in and
(2.2) |
by Proposition 2.6 (i). Since is -hyponormal, is a closed -hyponormal operator in by Lemma 2.1. From ([25, Lemma 3.1(v)]), we have
Let , and
Also we have is unitary isomorphism and is -hyponormal. Then for
Hence is a closed -hyponormal operator.
From Theorem 2.5 (ii), we get because . Thus, are unitarily equivalent normal operators.
∎
Stochel ([25]) proved the following result for closed hyponormal and closed subnormal operators. Now we extend the result to closed -hyponormal and closed subnormal operators using the method of ([25, Theorem 4.2])
Theorem 2.8.
Let be subnormal (resp. a closed -hyponormal operator in ), be -hyponormal (resp. a closed subnormal operator in ) and is such that Then
(i)
(ii) reduces to the normal operator
(iii) reduces to the normal operator
Proof.
First assume that is subnormal and is -hyponormal. Since is subnormal, there exist a normal extension on the Hilbert space Define by From ([25, Theorem 3.8]), we have
Since we have
(2.3) |
Since from equation (2.3) and we have
Thus Hence Since , we have and are unitarily equivalent normal operators by Theorem 2.7. Thus, reduces to the normal operator .
Since reduces , we have
is closed densely defined in and
(2.4) |
by Proposition 2.6 (i) and ([25, Lemma 3.1(iii)]). Since is subnormal. Then is -hyponormal. Thus, reduces to the normal operator from equation (2.4) and Theorem 2.7. Hence by Theorem 2.3, reduces to the normal operator The result (i) follows from Proposition 2.6 (ii).
Next we assume that is -hyponormal and is subnormal. Since and are reducing subspace for and respectively. Also the part and are normal. By Proposition 2.6 (ii), we have
∎
Corollary 2.9.
Let be subnormal (resp. a closed -hyponormal operator in ), be -hyponormal (resp. a closed subnormal operator in ) and is such that Then
(i) If then is normal.
(ii) If then is normal.
References
- [1] A. Bachir and F. Lombarkia, Fuglede-Putanam theorem for w-hyponormal operators, Math. Inequal. Appl. 15, (2012), 777-786.
- [2] N. Bala and G.Ramesh, Weyl’s theorm for paranormal closed operators , Ann. Funct. Anal. 11, (2020), 567-582. 2020.
- [3] I. F. Z. Bensaid, S. Dehimi, B. Fuglede and M. H. Mortad, The Fuglede theorem and some intertwining relations, Advan. Oper. Theory. 6, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43036-020-00110-5.
- [4] M. Cho and Y. M. Han, Riesz idempotent and algebraically M-hyponormal operators, Integr. Eqn. Oper. Theory. 53, (2005), 311-320.
- [5] M. Cho, T. Prasad, M. H. M. Rashid, K. Tanahashi and A. Uchiyama, Fuglede-Putnam theorem and quasisimilarity of class p-wA(s,t) operators, Oper. and Matrices. 13, (2019), 293-299.
- [6] R. G. Douglas, On majorization, factorization, and range inclusion of operators on Hilbert space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 17, (1966), 413-415.
- [7] B. Fuglede, A commutativity theorm for Normal operators, Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. 36, (1950), 35-40.
- [8] T. Furuta, Relaxation of normality in the Fuglede-Putnam theorem, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 77, (1979), 324-328.
- [9] T. Furuta, An extension of the Fuglede-Putnam theorem to subnormal operators using a Hilbert-Schmidt norm inequality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81, (1981), 240-242.
- [10] I. Gohberg, S. Goldberg and M. A. Kaashoek, Classes of linear operator, Vol I Operator Theorey: Advances and Applications, 49, Birkhauser Verlag Basel 1990.
- [11] P.R. Halmos, A Hilbert Space Problem Book, Second Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982.
- [12] J. S. Ham, S. H. Lee and W. Y. Lee On M-hyponormal weighted shifts, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 286, (2003), 116-124.
- [13] S. Mecheri, Fuglede-Putnam theorem for class A operators, Colloq. Mathematicum. 138, (2015), 183-191.
- [14] R. L. Moore, D. D. Rogers and T. T. Trent, A note on intertwining - hyponormal operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 83, (1981), 514-516.
- [15] M. H. Mortad, An application of the Putnam-Fuglede theorm to normal products of selfadjoint operators , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 131, (2003), 3135-3141.
- [16] M. H. Mortad, An all-unbounded-operator version of Fuglede-Putnam theorem, complex Anal. Oper. Theory. 6, (2012), 1269-1273.
- [17] M. H. Mortad, An operator theory problem book, World scientific publishing Co., 2018.
- [18] F. C. Paliogiannis, A generalization of the Fuglede-Putnam theorem to unbounded operators, J. Oper. 2015 , art.ID 804353.
- [19] T. Prasad, Spectral properties for some extensions of isometric operators, Ann. Funct. Anal. 11,(2020), 626-633.
- [20] C. R. Putnam, Ranges of normal and subnormal operators, Michigan Math. J. 18, (1971), 33-36.
- [21] C. R. Putnam, On the normal operators on Hilbert space, Am. Math. J. 73, (1951), 357-362.
- [22] M. Radjabalipour, An extension of Putnam–Fuglede theorem for hyponormal operators, Math. Zeit. 194, (1987), 117–120.
- [23] J. G. Stampfli and B. L. Wadhwa, On dominant operators, Mh. Math. 84, (1977),143-153.
- [24] J. G.Stampfli, hyponormal operators and spectral density, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 117, (1965), 469-476.
- [25] J. Stochel, An asymmetric Putnam-Fuglede theorem for unbounded operators, Proc. Amer Math. Soc. 8, (2001), 2261-2271.
- [26] A. E Taylor and D. C Lay Introduction to Functional Analysis, reprint of second Edition, Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co, Inc. Melbourne, Fl, 1986.