Arbitrary cylindrical vector beam generation enabled by polarization-selective Gouy phase shifter
Abstract
Cylindrical vector beams (CVBs), which possesses polarization distribution of rotational symmetry on the transverse plane, can be developed in many optical technologies. Conventional methods to generate CVBs contain redundant interferometers or need to switch among diverse elements, thus being inconvenient in applications containing multiple CVBs. Here we provide a passive polarization-selective device to substitute interferometers and simplify generation setup. It is accomplished by reversing topological charges of orbital angular momentum based on polarization-selective Gouy phase. In the process, tunable input light is the only condition to generate CVB with arbitrary topological charges. To cover both azimuthal and radial parameters of CVBs, we express the mapping between scalar Laguerre-Gaussian light on basic Poincaré sphere and CVB on high-order Poincaré sphere. The proposed device simplifies the generation of CVBs enormously, and thus has potentials in integrated devices for both quantum and classic optical experiments.
1 Introduction
It is known that angular momentum of light has a spin part associated with polarization[1] and an orbital part associated with spatial distribution[2]. Cylindrical vector beam (CVB)[3, 4, 5], acting as a solution of vectorial Helmholtz equation[6, 7], combines the two parts of angular momentum. Radial polarization and azimuthal polarization are the most conspicuous CVBs. Under tight focusing[8, 9, 10], radial polarization possesses a sharper focal spot than a homogeneously polarized beam[11, 12], while azimuthal polarization can be focused into a hollow spot[13]. These peculiar properties are useful for many applications such as particle manipulation [14, 15, 16, 17, 18], microscopy[19, 20, 21], material processing [22, 23, 24], near-field optics [25], and nonlinear optics[26]. Recently, the degrees of freedom of CVB are extended by ray-like trajectories[27], so that CVB also presents growing potentials in the area of optical encoding[28] and optical communications[29, 30, 31, 32].
There are many methods to generate CVBs. Special intracavity resonator could directly generate CVB from a laser when the cavity geometry is precisely controlled into a frequency-degenerate state[33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. Meanwhile, single-element CVB generators have been introduced to tailor Pancharatnam-Berry phases [38, 39, 40, 41], supporting to modulate a couple of orthogonal polarization bases with conjugate phase distributions, to generate CVBs from a given basic laser mode. All these methods need to switch in different elements to generate CVBs with different topological charges, so that inconvenient in experiments that involve multiple CVBs. Otherwise, implementations usually contain interferometers, where two orthogonal polarizations are modulated by spatially programmable devices individually and are then combined together[42]. Though ingenious devices with high robustness[43, 44, 45] are developed, their complexity of modulating two individual parts still set them bulky and redundant. Therefore, it is significant to create a compact passive device to generate CVBs with arbitrary topological charges.
In this letter, we provide and demonstrate a passive device to generate CVBs with arbitrary azimuthal and radial topological charges. It realizes a polarization-selective Gouy phase mode converter[46, 47] via a couple of specially fabricated polarization-selective cylindrical lenses. The device could remain unchanged no matter the topological charges of CVBs. It even adapts to generate superimposed CVBs by employing the corresponding wavefront modulation of homogeneous polarization. The device creates a robust connection between homogeneous polarizations with transverse modes and CVBs, where homogeneous polarization can be marked on basic Poincaré sphere (PS) and CVBs can be marked on high-order Poincaré sphere (HOPS)[48]. Mapping between states on the basic PS and the first-order HOPS is experimentally proved by comparing Stokes parameters of five representative states with theoretical values. Its extension to generate states set on other HOPSs is verified by collecting petals-like intensities.
2 Theory

Here Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) modes, a complete set for presenting transverse modes, is expressed with complex amplitude
(1) |
where , , and are spatial polar coordinates, and are indices of azimuthal and radial coordinates respectively. is an integer and is a natural number. marks a real coefficient related to and , while denotes spiral phase of wavefront which represents orbital angular momentum (OAM) of light with topological charge . Employing Dirac notations, OAM state is expressed with , and polarization is characterized with circular bases . They construct direct product state
(2) |
which can be set on the surface of basic PS shown in Figure (1a), where is polar angle ranging in the region , is equator angle ranging in , and three spatial axes represent Stokes parameters , and . CVB is defined with
(3) |
which can be unified in an analytic model referring to HOPS[48], where the simplest is first-order HOPS (), as shown in Figure (1b). The definition of spherical surface is similar with the circumstance of basic PS, except the bases change from to .
Both radial polarization and azimuthal polarization are located on the equator of first-order HOPS. Denoting , , Eq. (3) indicates radial vector beam is marked with , and azimuthal vector beam is notated with [49]. For convenience, they are abbreviated with spherical coordinates and . The corresponding states with the same coordinates and for basic PS are and polarizations respectively. Figure (1) elucidates the connection between basic PS and first-order HOPS via several representative points on the sphere. Points a a selected on the surface of basic PS shown in Figure (1a) include polarization states evolving from horizontal polarization to diagonal polarization along with equator then turning to a general elliptic polarization along with longitude line. Each points of a a correspond to points of b b on the same positions of first-order HOPS, which represents CVBs as shown in Figure (1b).
3 Implementation

Comparing Eq. (2) with Eq. (3), it is found that is converted to and remains unchanged. Thus, the device needs to have two functions: response of polarization and inversion of index .
Inspired by the design of Q-plate [38], we employ liquid crystal films coated on a pair of cylindrical lenses to realize the conversion of polarization-selective response. As shown in Figure (2a), polarization-selective cylindrical lens is constructed with isotropic glass lens and inhomogeneous liquid crystal film. Isotropic glass lens provides a common dynamic phase with thickness regardless of polarization, where is chosen as the converging direction of cylindrical lens, is the refractive index of the glass material, is the refractive index of air and is the designed focal length. The operator of common glass lens is expressed with , where according to Fresnel paraxial approximation. Liquid crystal film provides extra geometric phase[50, 51, 52, 53, 54] by metallic distribution of fast axis’ angle related to the direction of axis, written with operator , in which . The compound operator, expressed with
(4) |
means a polarization-selective cylindrical lens[55] with directional focal length operating on is fabricated.
The inversion of index derives from the coefficients conversion of Hermite-Gaussian (HG) modes. For complex amplitude of HG mode, , and are two indices corresponding to and coordinates in the transverse plane. It is shown that a LG mode, , can be decomposed into a set of HG modes with the same order (), written as . Real coefficient is given by
(5) |
where is a continuous parameter around zero point. Exchanging and in Eq. (5), it is deduced that . By definition in LG mode, extra factor fits the conversion coefficients from to . Because polarization-selective cylindrical lenses are set in direction, astigmatic Gouy phase [46] is used to supply such an extra factor associated with mode index , or written as .
As shown in Figure (2b), two polarization-selective cylindrical lenses are set on the symmetrical positions relative to original point . The condition for first piece of lens is , causing left-handed circular polarization (LCP) becomes right-handed circular polarization (RCP) accompanied with converging effect while RCP becomes LCP without any side effect. Correspondingly, the second piece of lens, which is set in symmetrical position (flipped), turns RCP back to LCP with converging effect. Such that, only LCP of incident light accumulates [56] between the two polarization-selective cylindrical lenses. The amount of is decided by the distance between two lenses, , and designed focal length of them, , under proper coupling conditions. Exactly, , where . Phase of wavefront performs a period, so the mode-dependent phase takes effects along the instruction of . Figure (2c) shows amounts of for in sequence. When , special points marked with red angles performs like a phase switch between and along with axis, showing factor is attained and index becomes successfully. means , so the device is called phase polarizing Gouy phase shifter (PGPS).

Figure (2d) shows the experimental scheme. He-Ne laser derives a nm Gaussian beam whose polarization is projected to horizontal by a half wave plate (HWP) and a polarizing beam splitter (PBS). Two lenses constitute an expander to provide an almost plane wave for the spatial light modulator (SLM, Holoeye, Pluto-VIS-016). Fork-like holograms[57] are loaded on the screen of SLM to produce LG modes. Beam splitter (BS) ensures light beam propagates in correct path. Two lenses and Iris select first order of diffracted light after SLM with reducing them into an appropriate scale. The characteristics of SLM determine that the original polarization of the selected beam is horizontal. If a pre-production of polarization is necessary, a quarter wave plate (QWP) and a HWP will be included in the optical circuit. Then the PGPS takes effects to generate CVBs. Following QWP, HWP, PBS and a charge coupled device (CCD) constitute an examination framework of Stokes parameters. By changing angles of the fast axes of QWP and HWP relative to coordinate, polarizations can be reconstructed with intensities recorded by CCD. Exactly, Stokes parameters can be computed via[58, 59]
(6a) | ||||
(6b) | ||||
(6c) | ||||
(6d) |
where represents collected intensities, the first angle in the bracket is of QWP, the second angle is of HWP. Results for S0 S3 are revealed in Figure (3). The quality can be evaluated by comparing the outcomes computed from collected intensities with corresponding values (lower-left conner) computed from simulated intensities. Radial polarization and azimuthal polarization are shown in the first two lines of Figure (3). For common instances, states marked with , and on the first-order HOPS are presented in the last three lines. All the experimental results agree well with the simulated values, so that the device is effective in generating CVBs on the surface of the first-order HOPS. Obviously, all elements in the installation take effects in the reverse propagation, thus proving the device constructs a credible and reversible connection between basic PS and first-order HOPS successfully.

As for , higher-order HOPSs are constructed. Representatively, a state on the equator of HOPS can be examined by casting it into horizontal polarization via transmitted port of PBS. The transmitted intensity performs special distribution which satisfies the petals-like shape, denoted by , where subscript is the same with the index of LG mode. Combined with Eqs. (1) and (3), it is calculated that there are pieces of intensity petals, so the number of petals can be exploited to characterize the azimuthal index of CVB, or called the order of HOPS. Eq. (1) shows that radial index is separated from the operation of , meaning subscript is an individual parameter in the construction of HOPS. Real coefficient remains unchanged, and azimuthal phase is reversed to under the conversion of the proposed device, so that each LG mode corresponds to a unique (non-degenerated) CVB. Naturally, complete LG modes and CVB modes are both defined with two topological charges and as their indices mapping with the same order of each other. Expression of CVB containing is written as
(7) |
where . The general function of the device is illustrated by
(8) |
containing the generation of CVB with both and indices. marks the operator of our device. In experiment, LG modes with and are generated by SLM. As shown in Figure (2d), removing the two HWPs and two QWPs around PGPS from the circuit, petals-like intensities are collected directly after PGPS and a PBS. In Figure (4), the first row is set for results of , the second row is for . These pictures represent that the fabricated device is effective for CVB with both and indices. States on other ultra-high order HOPS are tested by lunching (), , and modes with results shown in the third line of Figure (4). In the collected intensities, outline of petals is always clear, showing the device works well with these higher-order CVBs.
4 conclusion
We propose and demonstrate a passive device based on PGPS to generate arbitrary CVBs with both and indices even in ultra-high order. The device simplifies existed schemes for generation and builds a solid connection between simple scalar field on basic PS and sophisticated CVBs on HOPS. Extensively, states on hybrid order Poincaré sphere (HyOPS)[60, 61] can be implemented with the help of Q-plate which provides a shift of index of CVB[32]. The device supplements a convenient operation for quantum information and communications experiment[62, 63, 64], taking effects on the polarization-selective mode index inversion. Generally, it can be extended to arbitrary phase converter besides and support more splendid mode-dependent conversion of polarizations. The method is flexible to other techniques such as metamaterials [65, 66, 67] and metalens[68, 69] which may help to miniaturize the optical device on chips[70, 71, 72].
Funding
This work was in part supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 91736104, 11534008, 11974345 and 11804271).
References
- [1] R. A. Beth, “Mechanical detection and measurement of the angular momentum of light,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review 50, 115 (1936).
- [2] L. Allen, M. W. Beijersbergen, R. Spreeuw, and J. Woerdman, “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of laguerre-gaussian laser modes,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review A 45, 8185 (1992).
- [3] I. Freund, “Polarization flowers,” \JournalTitleOptics Communications 199, 47–63 (2001).
- [4] Q. Zhan, “Cylindrical vector beams: from mathematical concepts to applications,” \JournalTitleAdvances in Optics and Photonics 1, 1–57 (2009).
- [5] X.-L. Wang, Y. Li, J. Chen, C.-S. Guo, J. Ding, and H.-T. Wang, “A new type of vector fields with hybrid states of polarization,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 18, 10786–10795 (2010).
- [6] D. G. Hall, “Vector-beam solutions of maxwell’s wave equation,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 21, 9–11 (1996).
- [7] X.-L. Wang, J. Ding, W.-J. Ni, C.-S. Guo, and H.-T. Wang, “Generation of arbitrary vector beams with a spatial light modulator and a common path interferometric arrangement,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 32, 3549–3551 (2007).
- [8] J. Pu and Z. Zhang, “Tight focusing of spirally polarized vortex beams,” \JournalTitleOptics & Laser Technology 42, 186–191 (2010).
- [9] A. P. Porfirev, A. V. Ustinov, and S. N. Khonina, “Polarization conversion when focusing cylindrically polarized vortex beams,” \JournalTitleScientific Reports 6, 1–9 (2016).
- [10] E. Otte, K. Tekce, and C. Denz, “Tailored intensity landscapes by tight focusing of singular vector beams,” \JournalTitleOptics express 25, 20194–20201 (2017).
- [11] K. S. Youngworth and T. G. Brown, “Focusing of high numerical aperture cylindrical-vector beams,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 7, 77–87 (2000).
- [12] R. Dorn, S. Quabis, and G. Leuchs, “Sharper focus for a radially polarized light beam,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 91, 233901 (2003).
- [13] Q. Zhan and J. R. Leger, “Focus shaping using cylindrical vector beams,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 10, 324–331 (2002).
- [14] D. G. Grier, “A revolution in optical manipulation,” \JournalTitleNature 424, 810–816 (2003).
- [15] Q. Zhan, “Trapping metallic rayleigh particles with radial polarization,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 12, 3377–3382 (2004).
- [16] Z. Man, Z. Bai, J. Li, S. Zhang, X. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Ge, and S. Fu, “Optical cage generated by azimuthal-and radial-variant vector beams,” \JournalTitleApplied Optics 57, 3592–3597 (2018).
- [17] A. Turpin, V. Shvedov, C. Hnatovsky, Y. V. Loiko, J. Mompart, and W. Krolikowski, “Optical vault: A reconfigurable bottle beam based on conical refraction of light,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 21, 26335–26340 (2013).
- [18] X. Weng, X. Gao, H. Guo, and S. Zhuang, “Creation of tunable multiple 3d dark spots with cylindrical vector beam,” \JournalTitleApplied Optics 53, 2470–2476 (2014).
- [19] S. W. Hell and J. Wichmann, “Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 19, 780–782 (1994).
- [20] D. P. Biss, K. S. Youngworth, and T. G. Brown, “Dark-field imaging with cylindrical-vector beams,” \JournalTitleApplied Optics 45, 470–479 (2006).
- [21] L. Novotny, M. Beversluis, K. Youngworth, and T. Brown, “Longitudinal field modes probed by single molecules,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 86, 5251 (2001).
- [22] M. Kraus, M. A. Ahmed, A. Michalowski, A. Voss, R. Weber, and T. Graf, “Microdrilling in steel using ultrashort pulsed laser beams with radial and azimuthal polarization,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 18, 22305–22313 (2010).
- [23] J. Hamazaki, R. Morita, K. Chujo, Y. Kobayashi, S. Tanda, and T. Omatsu, “Optical-vortex laser ablation,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 18, 2144–2151 (2010).
- [24] C. Hnatovsky, V. G. Shvedov, and W. Krolikowski, “The role of light-induced nanostructures in femtosecond laser micromachining with vector and scalar pulses,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 21, 12651–12656 (2013).
- [25] A. Ciattoni, B. Crosignani, P. Di Porto, and A. Yariv, “Azimuthally polarized spatial dark solitons: exact solutions of maxwell’s equations in a kerr medium,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 94, 073902 (2005).
- [26] A. Bouhelier, M. Beversluis, A. Hartschuh, and L. Novotny, “Near-field second-harmonic generation induced by local field enhancement,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 90, 013903 (2003).
- [27] Y. Shen, X. Yang, D. Naidoo, X. Fu, and A. Forbes, “Structured ray-wave vector vortex beams in multiple degrees of freedom from a laser,” \JournalTitleOptica 7, 820–831 (2020).
- [28] G. Milione, T. A. Nguyen, J. Leach, D. A. Nolan, and R. R. Alfano, “Using the nonseparability of vector beams to encode information for optical communication,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 40, 4887–4890 (2015).
- [29] G. Gibson, J. Courtial, M. J. Padgett, M. Vasnetsov, V. Pas’ko, S. M. Barnett, and S. Franke-Arnold, “Free-space information transfer using light beams carrying orbital angular momentum,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 12, 5448–5456 (2004).
- [30] N. Bozinovic, Y. Yue, Y. Ren, M. Tur, P. Kristensen, H. Huang, A. E. Willner, and S. Ramachandran, “Terabit-scale orbital angular momentum mode division multiplexing in fibers,” \JournalTitleScience 340, 1545–1548 (2013).
- [31] G. Milione, M. P. Lavery, H. Huang, Y. Ren, G. Xie, T. A. Nguyen, E. Karimi, L. Marrucci, D. A. Nolan, R. R. Alfano et al., “4 20 gbit/s mode division multiplexing over free space using vector modes and a q-plate mode (de) multiplexer,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 40, 1980–1983 (2015).
- [32] J. Jia, Z. Chang, H. Yang, Q. Liu, F. Wang, H. Gao, F. Li, and P. Zhang, “Mode sorter designed for (de) multiplexing vector vortex modes,” \JournalTitleApplied Optics 58, 7094–7099 (2019).
- [33] Y. Kozawa and S. Sato, “Generation of a radially polarized laser beam by use of a conical brewster prism,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 30, 3063–3065 (2005).
- [34] M. A. Ahmed, A. Voss, M. M. Vogel, and T. Graf, “Multilayer polarizing grating mirror used for the generation of radial polarization in yb: Yag thin-disk lasers,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 32, 3272–3274 (2007).
- [35] D. Naidoo, F. S. Roux, A. Dudley, I. Litvin, B. Piccirillo, L. Marrucci, and A. Forbes, “Controlled generation of higher-order poincaré sphere beams from a laser,” \JournalTitleNature Photonics 10, 327–332 (2016).
- [36] D. Wei, Y. Cheng, R. Ni, Y. Zhang, X. Hu, S. Zhu, and M. Xiao, “Generating controllable laguerre-gaussian laser modes through intracavity spin-orbital angular momentum conversion of light,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Applied 11, 014038 (2019).
- [37] Z. Wang, Y. Shen, D. Naidoo, X. Fu, and A. Forbes, “Astigmatic hybrid su(2) vector vortex beams: towards versatile structures in longitudinally variant polarized optics,” \JournalTitleOpt. Express 29, 315–329 (2021).
- [38] L. Marrucci, C. Manzo, and D. Paparo, “Optical spin-to-orbital angular momentum conversion in inhomogeneous anisotropic media,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 96, 163905 (2006).
- [39] F. Cardano, E. Karimi, S. Slussarenko, L. Marrucci, C. de Lisio, and E. Santamato, “Polarization pattern of vector vortex beams generated by q-plates with different topological charges,” \JournalTitleApplied Optics 51, C1–C6 (2012).
- [40] J. B. Mueller, N. A. Rubin, R. C. Devlin, B. Groever, and F. Capasso, “Metasurface polarization optics: independent phase control of arbitrary orthogonal states of polarization,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 118, 113901 (2017).
- [41] R. C. Devlin, A. Ambrosio, N. A. Rubin, J. B. Mueller, and F. Capasso, “Arbitrary spin-to–orbital angular momentum conversion of light,” \JournalTitleScience 358, 896–901 (2017).
- [42] C. Rosales-Guzmán, N. Bhebhe, and A. Forbes, “Simultaneous generation of multiple vector beams on a single slm,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 25, 25697–25706 (2017).
- [43] H. Chen, J. Hao, B.-F. Zhang, J. Xu, J. Ding, and H.-T. Wang, “Generation of vector beam with space-variant distribution of both polarization and phase,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 36, 3179–3181 (2011).
- [44] S. Chen, X. Zhou, Y. Liu, X. Ling, H. Luo, and S. Wen, “Generation of arbitrary cylindrical vector beams on the higher order poincaré sphere,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 39, 5274–5276 (2014).
- [45] R. Liu, L.-J. Kong, W.-R. Qi, S.-Y. Huang, Z.-X. Wang, C. Tu, Y. Li, and H.-T. Wang, “Compact, robust, and high-efficiency generator of vector optical fields,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 44, 2382–2385 (2019).
- [46] M. W. Beijersbergen, L. Allen, H. Van der Veen, and J. Woerdman, “Astigmatic laser mode converters and transfer of orbital angular momentum,” \JournalTitleOptics Communications 96, 123–132 (1993).
- [47] J. Jia, Q. Li, K. Zhang, D. Chen, C. Wang, H. Gao, F. Li, and P. Zhang, “Integrated design of pi/2 converter and its experimental performance,” \JournalTitleApplied Optics 57, 6076–6082 (2018).
- [48] G. Milione, H. Sztul, D. Nolan, and R. Alfano, “Higher-order poincaré sphere, stokes parameters, and the angular momentum of light,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 107, 053601 (2011).
- [49] A. A. Tovar, “Production and propagation of cylindrically polarized laguerre–gaussian laser beams,” \JournalTitleJ. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15, 2705–2711 (1998).
- [50] R. Simon, H. Kimble, and E. Sudarshan, “Evolving geometric phase and its dynamical manifestation as a frequency shift: an optical experiment,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 61, 19 (1988).
- [51] P. G. Kwiat and R. Y. Chiao, “Observation of a nonclassical berry’s phase for the photon,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review Letters 66, 588 (1991).
- [52] Z. Bomzon, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Pancharatnam–berry phase in space-variant polarization-state manipulations with subwavelength gratings,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 26, 1424–1426 (2001).
- [53] Z. Bomzon, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Space-variant pancharatnam–berry phase optical elements with computer-generated subwavelength gratings,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 27, 1141–1143 (2002).
- [54] C. Oh and M. J. Escuti, “Achromatic diffraction from polarization gratings with high efficiency,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 33, 2287–2289 (2008).
- [55] E. Hasman, V. Kleiner, G. Biener, and A. Niv, “Polarization dependent focusing lens by use of quantized pancharatnam–berry phase diffractive optics,” \JournalTitleApplied Physics Letters 82, 328–330 (2003).
- [56] S. Feng and H. G. Winful, “Physical origin of the gouy phase shift,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 26, 485–487 (2001).
- [57] E. Bolduc, N. Bent, E. Santamato, E. Karimi, and R. W. Boyd, “Exact solution to simultaneous intensity and phase encryption with a single phase-only hologram,” \JournalTitleOptics Letters 38, 3546–3549 (2013).
- [58] B. Schaefer, E. Collett, R. Smyth, D. Barrett, and B. Fraher, “Measuring the stokes polarization parameters,” \JournalTitleAmerican Journal of Physics 75, 163–168 (2007).
- [59] J. Wang, X. Yang, Y. Li, Y. Chen, M. Cao, D. Wei, H. Gao, and F. Li, “Optically spatial information selection with hybridly polarized beam in atomic vapor,” \JournalTitlePhotonics Research 6, 451–456 (2018).
- [60] X. Yi, Y. Liu, X. Ling, X. Zhou, Y. Ke, H. Luo, S. Wen, and D. Fan, “Hybrid-order poincaré sphere,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review A 91, 023801 (2015).
- [61] Z. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Ke, Y. Liu, W. Shu, H. Luo, and S. Wen, “Generation of arbitrary vector vortex beams on hybrid-order poincaré sphere,” \JournalTitlePhotonics Research 5, 15–21 (2017).
- [62] J. Wang, J.-Y. Yang, I. M. Fazal, N. Ahmed, Y. Yan, H. Huang, Y. Ren, Y. Yue, S. Dolinar, M. Tur et al., “Terabit free-space data transmission employing orbital angular momentum multiplexing,” \JournalTitleNature Photonics 6, 488–496 (2012).
- [63] Y. Zhou, M. Mirhosseini, S. Oliver, J. Zhao, S. M. H. Rafsanjani, M. P. Lavery, A. E. Willner, and R. W. Boyd, “Using all transverse degrees of freedom in quantum communications based on a generic mode sorter,” \JournalTitleOptics Express 27, 10383–10394 (2019).
- [64] F. Wang, P. Zeng, J. Zhao, B. Braverman, Y. Zhou, M. Mirhosseini, X. Wang, H. Gao, F. Li, R. W. Boyd et al., “High-dimensional quantum key distribution based on mutually partially unbiased bases,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review A 101, 032340 (2020).
- [65] D. Lin, P. Fan, E. Hasman, and M. L. Brongersma, “Dielectric gradient metasurface optical elements,” \JournalTitleScience 345, 298–302 (2014).
- [66] L. Deng, J. Deng, Z. Guan, J. Tao, Y. Chen, Y. Yang, D. Zhang, J. Tang, Z. Li, Z. Li et al., “Malus-metasurface-assisted polarization multiplexing,” \JournalTitleLight: Science & Applications 9, 1–9 (2020).
- [67] G. Hu, X. Hong, K. Wang, J. Wu, H.-X. Xu, W. Zhao, W. Liu, S. Zhang, F. Garcia-Vidal, B. Wang et al., “Coherent steering of nonlinear chiral valley photons with a synthetic au–ws 2 metasurface,” \JournalTitleNature Photonics 13, 467–472 (2019).
- [68] F. Aieta, P. Genevet, M. A. Kats, N. Yu, R. Blanchard, Z. Gaburro, and F. Capasso, “Aberration-free ultrathin flat lenses and axicons at telecom wavelengths based on plasmonic metasurfaces,” \JournalTitleNano Letters 12, 4932–4936 (2012).
- [69] M. Khorasaninejad, W. T. Chen, R. C. Devlin, J. Oh, A. Y. Zhu, and F. Capasso, “Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging,” \JournalTitleScience 352, 1190–1194 (2016).
- [70] A. Y. Piggott, J. Lu, K. G. Lagoudakis, J. Petykiewicz, T. M. Babinec, and J. Vučković, “Inverse design and demonstration of a compact and broadband on-chip wavelength demultiplexer,” \JournalTitleNature Photonics 9, 374–377 (2015).
- [71] J. Chen, X. Chen, T. Li, and S. Zhu, “On-chip detection of orbital angular momentum beam by plasmonic nanogratings,” \JournalTitleLaser & Photonics Reviews 12, 1700331 (2018).
- [72] K. Wei, W. Li, H. Tan, Y. Li, H. Min, W.-J. Zhang, H. Li, L. You, Z. Wang, X. Jiang et al., “High-speed measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution with integrated silicon photonics,” \JournalTitlePhysical Review X 10, 031030 (2020).